HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-03-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
March 5, 1970
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'rY
SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
AND 11 -------------------------
Gentlemen:
A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County
Sani ta tj.on Dist1:icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of'
Orange County, California, will be held:
Wednesday evening, March 11, 1970
at 7:30 p.m.
10844 Ellls Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Buil.c~~.!lg Comm5_! t9e ...;-Mce .. ~:Ln.?12. -7: 00 p. m. , Mar·c h 11
TELEPHONES:
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
962-2411
Chairman Miller
Item No. 14
Presentation of Plant Operator Certificates from the California
Water Pollution Control Association. to the following employees:
Wilton Huntley Grade IV
John Silva Grade IV
Thomas Rood Grade III
This certification program is a voluntary self-improvement program
for plant operators which requires considerable time and effort to
prepare for the examination. The extra effort devoted to earning
these certificates is evidence that these operators are interested
in improving their efficiency.
Call meeting of the Executive Committee for Tuesday, March 31st, at
""'-"'
5:30 p.m. Invite Directors McWhinney and Clark.
•I
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, March 11, 1970
7:30 p.m.
P. 0. Box 51 75
10844 E:ll is Aven ue
Founta in Va ll ey, Ca lif., 9 2708
Telephones :
March 6, 1970
Aree Code 714
540-29 10
962-2 411
The following is a brief explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the
agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but
will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
* * * * * * * * *
Joint Boar.de
Nos. 11 through 13 -PROPOSED UNIFORM CONNECTION AND USE ORDINANCE:
These three agenda items relate to the proposed ordinance which has
been under consideration by the Boards since e arly last fall. In the
interim, the staff has attended numerous meetings on this matter with
the committees of the Orange County Chamber of Commerce and other
interested parties. It became apparent from these meetings that a
different type of formula than originally proposed for establishing
charges for excess use of the District's facilities would (1) be
more acceptable to Orange County industries , and (2) conform more
closely with proposed formulas under considera tion by the Los Angeles
County Sanitation Districts.
Accordingly, the ordinance now proposed is quite different in
many respects from that originally submitted to the Boards and which
has been the subject for the continued public hearings. For this
reason, it is believed appropriate to close the hearing on the
original ordinance (Item No. 11), to reject it (Item No. 12) and to
declare intent to consider adoption of a revised ordinance at the
April 8 Board meeting and to call an April 8 pub lic hearing on the
revised ordina nce (Item No. 13).
In order to review and discuss the ordinance in its rev ised
form, the staff is meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee of the County
Chamber of Commerce on Monday afternoon, March 9, and we are advised
that the Chamb er has invited over 700 industrie s in the County to
attend. At this meeting the Stee ring Committee of the Ch amb e r will
present to the group a sununary of the ordinance , particu larly with
r egard to its effect on existing and future industry, and will
recanmend that the larger group act favorably on it.
As agreed at the February meeting, an adjourned meeting of all
Boards will be held on the evening of March 25 to discuss the revised
ordinance, prior to the April public hearing. It will be noted on
the agenda , therefore, that it is proposed that each Board adjourn to
this date. A copy of the revised ordinance is included with the
agenda material.
Another development of note in connection with the proposed
ordinance is the fact that the President's recent message to Congress
on water pollution control stated that administrative action would
be taken to require all agencies, as a condition to receiving Federal
construction grants, to demonstrate that industry is paying its
proportionate share of industrial waste treatment costs.
Nos. 17 and 18 -SPECIAL BUILDING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ON NEW
LABORATORY BUILDING : The Committee will meet immediately before the
Board meeting to consider the practically completed plans for this
building and the architect's revised estimate of cost. At the Board
meeting the Committee will verbally present its recommendation for
Bo ard action.
No. 19 -MODIFICATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PLANT EXPANSION: The
Directors will recall that at the February meeting, a report by John
Carollo Engineers proposed a major change in our plant expansion
program for the next three years. The plan proposed was approved and
t he firm directed to prepare a formal modification report as required
by State law for Board consideration. This modification report has
been submitted and the staff has reviewed it and finds that it
conforms to the revised expa..~sion program approved in February by
t he Boards. Since adoption of the modification report is now only a
required formality, a copy is not included with this mailing but will
be available for inspection at, or prior, to the Board meeting by
any interested Director or person.
No. 20 -AUTHORIZATION FOR DESIGN OF PLANT FACILITIES: As pointed
out in the enclosed letter dated March 2 from John Carollo Engineers,
it is important that design of one of the facilities set forth in
the modification report, described under the preceding item, proceed
at the earliest moment. The high priority assigned to this facility
is based on the fact that its construction and operation will give
us the necessary experience with which to modify existing plant units
to obtain an improvement in treatment. The facility referred to is
an experimental sedimentation basin included in an over-all larger
project. It is contemplated that the basin will eventually function
as a normal plant component but its design will provide for its being
used initially to conduct experimental procedures on various methods
of increasing removal of settleable and floatable solids prior to
discharge to the ocean.
The staff recommends that the engineers be authorized to
p roceed with the design of this facility which will be included in
our recommendations for the Joint Construction Budget for 1970-71.
-2-
No. 21 -ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR REPAIR
OF PLANT FACILITIES: At the staff's request, Jolm Carollo Engineers
have submitted a proposal to do the necessary design work involved
in the repair and reconditioning of several older plant units. This
work will result in restoring or increasing the original efficiency
of the units and is described in some detail in the Carollo proposal
included with the agenda material. We recommend that the per diem
proposal be accepted as submitted, with a maximum fee of $12,500.
No. 22 -ADDENDUivI TO PLA~fT JOB NO. Pl-15, P2-15: This job, bids for
which will be opened on March 20, has been previously d e scribed but
consists basically of construction of sludge dewatering facilities at
Plant No. 2 and additions to the existing facilities at Plant No. 1.
Because of the nature of the job several teclmical questions have been
raised by bidders which require clarification by means of an addendum
to the plans and specifications. The actual addendum has not yet been
completed by the engineers but will be included with the agenda
material at the Board meeting.
No. 23 -PURCHASE OF TWO 4 1 X 8 1 VIBRATORY SCREENS: At the present
time the Districts have in operation three of these units for screen-
ing waste digester streams at Plant No. 1 for the removal of floatable
material prior to discharge to the ocean. The units, purchased from
the Link Belt Company in 1968, have proven very satisfactory and will
be continued in use as part of the new plant facilities described in
t he preceding item. Since similar screening facilities at Plant No. 2
1i:i ll immediately improve the quality of our effluent, the staff is
r8commending that two more units be purchased at this time for tempo-
~ary installation there and for eventual incorporation in the sludge
dewatering facility to be constructed there this year. Accordingly,
we have solicited the manufacturer of the orig inal three screens for
a quotation on two more units and have been assured that they can be
fUrnished at no increase in price over the figure bid in 1968. I am
therefore recommending that I be authorized to purchase these units
immediately at a total cost not to exceed $4,ooo , plus tax and
f reight.
No. 24 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, PLANT JOB NO. I-4-2B: This change order
relates to an extension of time for the delivery of a 750 cfm dig ester
gas compressor and an extension of the faithful performance bond
coverage. The proposed change order, included with the agenda
material, is self-explanatory and we recommend its adoption.
~ro. 25 -REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: As
~xplained in previous agenda reports, a procedure has been esta -
b lished to receive and file and act upon requests for extensions of
t ime, received from the contractor and approved by the eng inee r, for
the p:r·eceding month. It is recommended that the r e quest for f'our
days extension of' time , as shown on the agenda, be granted.
-3-
No. 26 -DETERMINATION R3GARDING DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS ACT: We be-
lieve the Directors are t~oroughly familiar with this ma tter. Since
the act also applies to the staff of the Districts , it wi ll be
necessary for the Board to determine which employees are required to
file the prescribed statement. We have asked our Legal Counsel to
advise the Boards on this matter.
No. 27 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT ON PLANT CONSTRUCTION: The
Directors have undoubtedly noted press reports on the Administration's
proposal for increased appropriations for Federal grants for sewerage
works construction. We have just received advice from the State Water
Resources Control Board, which allocates the California share of
these appropriations, that this share will be in the neighborhood of
$65 million for the present fiscal year and for the next four years.
We are therefore recommending that the Districts apply for grants in
the future for every project of any magnitude which appears to have
any degree of eligibility (see also Items Nos. 35 and 48).
As a preliminary step, the resolutions appearing with the
agenda material, authorizing grant applications for all presently
planned plant expansion work for the next fiscal year, are recom-
mended for adoption. I plan to have recommendations on additional
applications at either the March 25 or April 8 meetings.
No. 28 -ATTENDANCE AT CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION
CONFERENCE IN SACRAMENTO FROM APRIL 29 THROUGH MAY 2: For many years
it has been customary to authorize a number of employees to attend
these conferences and we feel that such attendance has been bene-
ficial to the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices
and procedures of other agencies as well as new developments in· the
sewerage field. Many of our employees are active in the Santa Ana
River Basin Section of this organization and have a genuine interest
in these meetings.
It is recommended that authorization be given to designate ten
Districts' employees to attend this meeting with fees and expenses
paid.
No. 29 -AUTHORIZATION FOR STAFF MEMBER TO ATTEND MEETING OF EXECUTIVE
COMMITTEE OF CALIFORNIA SANITARY AND SANITATION DISTRICT ASSOCIATION
IN SACRA..1\ffiNTO, APRIL 18 : I plan to have our Director of Finance
accompany me to this meeting (for which I already have general
authority to attend) since there are several matters to be discussed
in which Mr. Sylvester can participate with benefit to the committee
and ourselves. The meeting date is a Saturday so no loss of staff
time is involved.
No. 30 -SEMI-ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: Our ind~pendent auditors,
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants,
have advised that they are mailing to the Directors , under separate
cover, their required report for the period ending December 31, 1969.
The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may
have on the material presented in this report.
-4-
Districts Nos. 1 and 7
No. 35 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GR~NT, SUNFLOWER INTER-
CEPTOR TRUNK SEWER: As described under Item No. 27, we believe there
is a possibility of obtaining Federal grants on major construction
such as this .which may qualify as an eligible project. Accordingly,
the staff is preparing formal resolutions authorizing a grant appli-
cation for the Sunflower Trunk Sewer as set forth in the recently
approved engineer's reports for both Districts. These resolutions
are not included in this mailing because of time limitations but will
be available at the Board meeting.
District No. 1
No. 36 -INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT WITH HOLLY SUGAR COMPANY:
As the Directors are aware, we have had an agreement for several
years with this Company to provide industrial waste disposal service
at certain specified charges. Included with the agenda is a proposal
from the company to renew for 1970 the agreement on the same terms
and conditions. We recommend the proposal be accepted. It should be
noted that the company is qualifying its proposal to the effect that
if a uniform connection and use ordinance becomes effective during
1970, the company will have the option of continuing with the present
agreement for 1970 or conforming to the terms of the ordinance. This
is not a problem since it is proposed that the uniform ordinance will
become effective on January 1, 1971.
No. 37 -ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR EASEMENT: Leavitt and Sons of
California, Inc., has offered the District a fee title grant, at no
cost, to a portion of the easement in which the District's present
trunk sewer lies along the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks between
Bristol and Main Streets. The property is of no value to the company,
which is developing adjoining land, and we recommend acceptance of
the deed.
No. 38 -AWARD OF PLANT JOB NO. P2-16: Bids for construction of this
plant expansion job, which c.onsists of a new sedimentation basin and
digester at Plant No. 2, will be opened on the day of this mailing.
If the bids are satisfactory, we plan to have a recommendation for
award available at the time of the Board meeting. The engineer~s
estimate is $650,000.
District No. 2
No. 42 -ANNEXATION NO. 5: The resolution, included under this
agenda item, is a formality to conclude Board action on this annexa-
tion which has been previously approved by the Board.
District No. 3
No. 48 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANT, WESTSIDE INTER-
CEPTOR FACILITIES: The District has budgeted and is ready t o ask for
bids, pending final agreement with the U. s. Navy regarding acqui-
-5-
sition of the site for the proposed Los Alamitos Pumping Station,
for four urgently needed construction projects. In view of the :
possible availability of Federal funds for grants for construction of
this type of facilities (see Item No. 27), we are recommending that
the Board authorize the staff to proceed with the application.
Because of the shortness of time, the staff will not be able to
prepare the enabling resolution in time for this mailing but it will
be included with the final agenda material.
District No. 5
SEWERAGE OF COASTAL AREA ADJACENT TO THE DISTRICT: Although no
formal action appears on the agenda regarding this matter , we believe
it appropriate to report that the Irvine Ranch Water District, with
which the District has been holding discussions for some time on this
subject , has indicated that a definite proposal , departing to some
extent from the plans presented in the November, 1969 Interim Master
Plan Report, will be soon sub~itted. At the regular February Board
meeting it was agreed that, prior to any formal Board consideration
of any such proposals, the Chairman, staff and engineer review them
and therafter recommend appropriate Board action.
Yesterday, the IRWD manager advised by telephone that the matter
was still under study and a proposal would not be submitted this
month.
District No. 11
No. 56 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 11-11: Bids for this project, the
Slater-Springdale and Edinger Relief Trunk Sewer, will be opened on
the day of this mailing. If the bids are s a tisfa ctory, a recom-
mendation for award will be made at the time of the Board meeting.
District No. 7
Nos. 60 and 61 -REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC INVESTMENTS ..
COMPANY: This ma tter was deferred from the February 25 adjourned
mee ting and will be t a ken up again with appropriate e xplanations
which were not possible at the February 25 meeting b e cause of my
absence.
No. 62 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS:
This resolution, finalizing a routine matt e r, is recommended for
adoption.
No. 63 -CONDEMNATION OF RIGHT OF WAY, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 :
This resolution authorizes acquisition of easements required for the
above assessment district proj e ct, a contra ct for which was awarded
at the February 25 adjourned Board meeting.
No . 6L~ -RATIFYING STATEMENTS MAILED FOR MARCH 24 BOND ELECTION:
State l a w r e quire s that these statements carry Board appro v a l.
Becaus e of the time ele ment, these stateme nts had to be prepared and
made ready for mailing prior to this Board meeting .
-6-
Fre d A. Ha r pe r
Ge nera l Manage r
3-1;!-7 ()
JOINT BOARDS
v' Mi 11 er·, -C ·'-""
Mcwhinney V ~Bousman -p<
Brooks,~on ______ _
Cul v~er--~ . . v ·
-F\Irman ,vi"au1 . V
C~1ez ~ · '2L: /
Green v v
Q.szl 6 k"./
An4-~rs0n'.·_ ·
Harvey.-~
Herr.in··\;/'
Kroesen -~
Mcinni.s· ~
Marshall
MarsQ..o.t-tv
Nevj.l · l~:.,.r
Parsqns~"~
Porter·"-"".
~
Reinha;zdt'v
Roge.r-s· v'
Schutte"~..-·
{" Just"-~ Shlpl~y-"'v
Smith'~
Clark, Robert
· WorkmanC/
Allen'-""'"""
Hirstein
Harper
Brown
Car~lson
Clarke
Dunn
1'1inster
Galloway
Hohener
Keith
Low.ry
Naddox
Martinson
Nisson
Piersall
Sigler
Stevens
Sylvester
Tremblay
~
Mitch'ell
V~dacr
Allen
l(
v
1<(_
k'·. v
.v
~ ..
Coco
Davis
-Warren
Westra
Langer
Coen
Matney
Herrin .
·Fuhrman, Conway
Kanode ·
PA tter_so-n
Otte
Ma:r·shall
Rogers
Weishaupt
Sims
Root
Mar.shall
Clark, Ralph ·
Harper
Hi.leman
Hami~ton, Wm.
Knudsen
Phillips
·Allen
0 1 Su1l:i.van
Pti:U.l:Lps
DISTRIC'11
/ 2-3 ;-((-? It
REGULAR V
~~~---~~~~~-
ADJOURNED
--~~-~~~~~
·€HI ,t.
.Miller, C.
Porter
Allen
DISTRICT 1
DISTRIC'l1 2
Clark, Robert-
.Brooks, Burton
Culver
·Gomez
Herrin
Nevil
,,Reinhardt
Schutte
Just
Smith
Workman
Allen
DISf1RICT 3
Culver
McWhinney
Bousman
Furman~ Paul
Green
;Herrin
Anderson
Harvey
.Kroesen
Marshott
Nevil
Reinhardt
Schutte
.... Just
Clark, Robert
·Allen
Parsons
Marshall
Allen
Por·ter-
Mclnnj_s
Allen
Miller, CO·
('!.. • _... 1iJ I f.rv
Porter
Hoe:crs
Srn:l th
Hirn tt':~ j n
8h:ipley
G·r·c:cn
·Ar~cm
DISTRICT 5_
~-
~
~
DISTRrcrr 6
DISrrRIC'l1 7
-----=~ __ V-_
=-~~ __ z:
HeJ'rin
Coco
Phillips
Hamilton, Wm.
Warren
Langer
: Patterson
-Sims· --
Root
, Clar!<,. BaJ-p_h
Harper
Hileman
Knudsen
Phillips
Davi.s
Westra
Coen
Patterson
Fuhrma.ri _, Con we:·
K·anOde · ~
Otte
Weishaupt
Sims
Root
Clark
Harper
Hamllton
Phillips
Rogers
Phillips
Marshall
Phillips
Coco
Hci-r:tn
MHrshr::ll
H:i.lem~,n
Allen
M:-itncy
PLJ.llip::~
II ,.
II
II
BOAnD5 OF DE~~CTOtlS
Cou nty Sanl tu ti on Dist rict s P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, Ca lifo rn ia 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Va l ley, C ali f.., 92/08
JOIJ\J T 8())\f~DS
Ma r ch 11 , 1 970 -7 :30 p .m. AG ENDA
(1) Ple dge of Allegiance
(2) Ro ll Ca l l
(3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern , i f necessa r y .dJ-/ ~
(h)
(5 )
(6 )
(7 )
DI STRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving mi nute s of the regular
meeting h e l d February 11 , 1 970 , as mailed
DISTRIC T 2
~onsideration of mot i on appr oving mi nutes of the regular
meeting held February 1 1 , 1970 , as mailed
DISTRICT 3
Co ns i deration of mo t ion approving mi nut es of the r egular
meeting held February 1 1 , 1 970 , as mai l ed
DI STRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving minut es of the regular
meeting held Februa r y 11 , 1 970 , as m~i l ed
(8) DISTRICT 6
Considera t i on of motion approving mi nutes of the r egular
meet i ng held February 1 1, 1 970 , as mail ed
(9) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving minut es of the r egular
meetin g held Feb ruary 11, 1 970, and the adjourned regular
meeting t h e r e of held February 25 , 1970 , as mai l ed
(1 0) DISTRICT 11
Consid erat i on of motion approving minut es of the regular
me e ting h e ld Feb r uary 11 , 1 970 , as mailed
(11 ) AL L DISTRICTS
Considera t ion of motio n opening public h earing
ordinance relating to conn ect j on to and use of
on proposed J1l-
Dis trict 5
sew erage facilities :
Read ing of written communicat:Lons ~1&11i' •&e~f /t_ttl h;irf-0 cC& A.
B. Oral co mm ents or protests
C . Motion t o close h ear ing
(12 ) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideratj.on of motJon rej e cting the propos e d ordinance
submj_tte d to lhe Boarc.Js on Aug:ust 13, 1969, r elating to
connection to and u s e of District sew e rage facilities
,(1?.3)) !\!:I!._ DIS T_~!-C '11 ~ <.!/ Con:::;1dera t ion of Res o1 a ti.o n No. 70-29 , t o receiv e and
file the revis e d ord:l.n a nc:e da te d MA.rch 1 0 , 1970 , r e lat.·i.ng
·to c o n n e ction to and u se of Dj s lric t s e we rage f a cili t i e s ;
d ec l ar.i ng j nl e nt to c o rn;.i.cl e 1· the rcvls e d ordina ncr) on
Apr :il 8th ; and f:i e tt ·i n g th e pub lj c hcar·:1.ng f or 7 :30 p.in .,
Apr :U 8th . See pR;~e ·-·~~,~---(Ord :l.nan cc on p :=i.g0 __ 1~0_'1
_ _)
(19 )
(20 )
(21 )
(22 )
~µ'\·, (23 )
ALL DIS'l1RICTS
Rep ort of the Joint Cha irman
ALL DI STRICTS
Report of the Gene ral Manager
ALL DIS1I'RICTS
Rep ort of the General Coun.se 1
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report of the Bu:Llding Committee
ALL DI STRICTS r ,t,,;t ! ,t ---i.
-consideration of actions on the Buil ding Co mmitt ee 1 s -" /.' .-, ">t
r ecommendations ;,
r1' $ I J D,c,t.
ALL DISTRICTS /\Q_.J-o ~
Consideratio of ~ adopting Modification Report
.prepared by John Carollo Engineers , r elative t o the i;-
1 968 Eng:Lneers 1 Report on Wastewater Treatment
Facilities
AL L DISTR I CTS
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of John Carollo
En gineers , and directing the engineers to proc eed with the
de s:Um of an expe rimental sedimentation basin . See p age
"HYr
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of John Carollo
Engineers, for design servic es relative to r econditioning
of the Pflanz Headwo r ks and Sedi mentation Basins A,B, and C
at Plant No . 2 , and Sedimentation Basins 3 and L ~ at Plant
No . 1, for a maximwn fee not to exceed $12 ,500 . See page
"I"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Add endum No . 1 to the
p lans and specj.fications for Job s Nos . Pl-15 and P2 -15
(S edimentation Basins at Plants 1 and 2).
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing purchase of two, 4 x 8
Vi bratory Scr eens from Link Belt Company, for a total
price not to exceed $4 ,ooo plus t ax and freight
(24 ) ALL DISTRICTS ._ci_
(25 )
-Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1
to Job No . I -4 -2B , granting an extension of time for
S 11311 d elivery of digester gas compr esso r . ee page
ALL DIS'I'RICTS
Co nsideration of motion to recej_ve and file l etters fran
Peter Kiewj_t Sons ' Company and John Carollo Engineers ,
and granting a time extens ion of four days for comp l etion
of Ocean Outfall No . 2, Marine Sec tion, Job No . J -10 .
See pages ----~-and 11 r._,11
~ 6 ) ALL DIS'l'RIC'l1 S
Determinat:lon of which employees will be r equb:·ed to file
a statemen t under the J.969 State Disclosure of Assets Act
-2-
(27) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing
and directing execution and filing of docwnents necessary
for a Federal Grant under 33 USC L~66 et seq., for 1970-71
Improvements and Additions to Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2
and Interplant Influent Interceptor. See page "M"
District
1
2
3
5
6
7
Resolution No.
70-28-1
70-22-2
70-23-3
70-2l~-5
~
~
~
-~
ll .---s
Ji}-
,;.>
11
(28) ALL DISTRICTS
70-25-6
70-26-7
70-2r{-ll
(29)
(30)
(32)
(33)
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager ~ , .. j
to designate ten staff members to attend CWPCA Conference-~·:..,;;.
c·: _ _. in Sacramento, April 29 -May 2; and authorizing payment
for registration fees, meals, transportation, lodging
and incidental expenses
ALL DisrrRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to designate one staff member to attend meeting of the
Executive Committee of the California Sanitary and
Sanitation Districts Association in Sacramento, April
18th; and authorizing payrnent for meals, transportation,
lodgine, and incidental expenses
r!J---
---5
ALL DrsrrRIC~CS
---Considerafion of motion to receive and file Financial
Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and
Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the
period ended December 31, 1969
ALL DIS'l1RICTS
Staff report on negotiations with the City of Huntington
Beach relative to possible acceptance of domestic and
industrial wastes from outside the Districts
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideratfon of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recommends authorization for payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approvinr; J-oint Operating Fund, ~
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, and Construction Inspection
Revolvinr; Fw1d warrant books for signature of the Chairman
of District No. 1, and authorizing fJayment of claims listed
on pages "A" , ~-'~--' and 11 c 11
. .,,.,
ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
•(35) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
,~
(36)
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing
the filing of applications for a Federal Grant for the
I Sunflower Interceptor Trlll1k Sewer:
District No. 1 -
__ __.~ \ p}) vC-' ~ Resolution No. 70-30-1 Page "N" y
District No. 7 Resolution No. 70-31-7 Page ----
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept V\/\ -
letter-proposal from Holly Sugar Corporation; and authoriz~
ing the General Manager to execute an agreement on behalf ~
of the District, for the 1970 calendar year. See page
II p II
(37) DISTRICT 1
(38)
( 42)
Consideration· of Resolution No. 70-32-1, authorizing
acceptance of a Grant Deed from Levitt and Sons of
California, Inc., at no cost to the District, relative
to the Dyer Road Trunk Sewer. See page "Q" ·
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 70-33-1 awarding contract ~
for Job No. P2-16 (Sedimentation Basin "'J 11 and Digester "J"
at Plant No. 2), to J.E. & W.W. HOAGLAND, Contractor, ~-
in the amount of $ 587, 700. See page ~ (Bid tabulation
on page ~_J_
Seek
DISTRICT 1 ~ ~/,,?0VUf·t#7 a_(,lfi~'V)UJ-1
Consideratiori of motion to adjo~n to 7:30 p.m., March 25th
DISTRICT 2 AA
Consideration of Resolution No. 70-31.J.-2, ordering annexation ·_,-L!+---
of territory to the District (Beverly Glenwood -Annexation c:;_
No. 5). See page "T" ,,,,,.,,--
(43) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving war~ants, if any. See
page _'_'D_11_
( h4) DISTRI_p:.--:§: ~
~r business and commun~1....,c-a-t;i-1.;..,· O""'l~is~,~J~_f"'"· -ia~1~1y~---·
( 45) DISTRrcrr 2
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25th
~) DISTRICT 3
-(fonsidcration of Resolution No. 70-35-3, authorizing the
filing of an application for a Federal Grant for Westside
Interceptor Facili tj_cs o See pae:e ~~-
( h7) DISTRICrJ' 3
Consideration of motion app:rov:i.ng warrrn.1ts,, if any.
"D" · page
_1, __
See _f!J_.
S··
-
( 48) DISTRIQ'.I_-_t_:__.;:jlo---..-------·-
. ~ busines~communicat:i.Qfl--s-,---1'"!!1!±~' ~a~n~y=---~-_
1
(
49
) n2~;~i~~r~ tion of motion to adjourn to 7: 30 p :!·.,L~ :arch 25th~
(50)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(61)
(62)
DISTRICT 5
76ens idet a'eion of mo+iion a:l:'tH o v in~ 'loa:! l'. ant~, if e:I1ji • See
f)B:gc "D 11
:.i
~ l q ~ Al\~ D2~~~f~~r~tion of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., M~rch 25t~
DISTRICT 6
-(JoH01acFatim~ of motioH appFo¥iHg waFFarFf5s, if a.Hy. Sec
II Ji1 II ~ago :!!!
DISTRICT 6
Q.ther busine§_~-~nd conununications, if any ~
--.....
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25t~
DISTRICT 11 ~-
Consideration of Resolution No. 70-36-11, awarding contra~t
for Slater-Springdale and Edinger Relief Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 11-11, to SALATA, INC., Contractor s;;
in the amount of $710,000.00. See pag~ "V" (Bid
tabulation on page "W" )
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "E 11
...... ...........__.
and -connnw1icati0Ho, if BiHY
DISTRICT 11 !'t ;--0
See
... ,, \ --------=-5
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25th
DISTRICT 7
Report of the General Counsel on right-of-way acquisition
for South Coast Plaza Subtrunk Sewer
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 70-37-·7, approving Sewerage \/\A
Facility Reimbursement Agreement with Pacific Investments ~__:j....
Company (deferred from February 25th meeting). See page c;;
"X"
DIS'J.1RICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 70-38-7, authorizing .~
acceptance of an easement from the State Division of
Highways relative to Contracts Nos. 7-1 and 7-2, at no r:-
cost to the Dj_ strict. See page "Y"
D~~~:f~~rition of Resolutia1 No. 70-39-7, authorizing the ~, ~~
filing of a condemnation action relative to Assessment ~-
District No. 8. See page _'_'ZL... ""
-5-
.(64) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion ratifying statements mailed for
the March 24th bond election. See pages "AA" , "BB" c:=,
and "CC;'
W1
(65) DISTRICT 7 ~
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See .c::::?
page "E" ~
. £6)\ DISTRICT 7 /~ Other business and communications, if any
(67) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March
-6-
t .. tit'
RESOLU~IONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
March 11, 1970-
" ~-- -
~~ Lf ~ z:-..e..._ ~l.!-t
)
WARRANT· NO.
12698
.12699
12700
12701 ~12702
12703
12704
12705
12706
12707
12708
12709
12710
12711
12712
12713
12714
12715
12716
12717
12718
12719
12720
12721
12722
12723
12724
12725
1_2726
~2727
12728
12729
12730
12731
12732
12733
12731+
12735
12736
12737
12738
12739
12740
12741
12742
12743
127li4
12745
12746
12747
12748
12749
12750
,.2751
~2752
12753
127511.
12755
12756.
12757
\
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ace Truck Lines, Freight $
Advance Electric, Motor Rewind
All Bearing Service, Inc .. , Bearings
City of Anaheim, Power
E. K. Anderson, Ecology Study Equipment
The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing
Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment
Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections
Ralph W. Atkinson Co., Inc., Replacement Pump
Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies
Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, Truck Parts
Barksdale, Valves
Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Small Hardware
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Engine Parts
Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Repair
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Chlorinator Parts
Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair
Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies
Duke Blowers Equipment Rentals, Jack Rental
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair
Brenner Fiedler & Assoc., Compressor
Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-Employment Physicals
Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies
Buckeye Brass Foundry, Inc., Pump Parts (MO 1-14-70)
Certified Building Materials, Cement
Certified Labs, Inc., Janitorial Supplies
College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Continental-Emsco Co., Truck Parts
Control Specialists, Inc., Valves
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts
Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water
De Guelle & Son's Glass Co., Equipment Repair
Davey's Locker, Inc., Ecology Study Boat Charter
John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware
Diesel Control Corp., Engine Repair
W. C. Dillon & Co., Inc., Governor Repair
Dunton Ford, Truck Parts
Eimco Corp., Diffusers & Clarifier Parts
Electric Supplies Dist., Electrical Supplies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring
Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts
Ensign Products Co., Maintenance Supplies
Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies
Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts
Fischer & Porter Co., Chlorinator Parts
Fountain Valley Glass & Mirror, Framing
Fowler Equipment, Inc., Crane Rental
Fredson Co., Small Hardware
Garvin's Paint & Body Shop, Truck Repair
General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine
Golden State Paper Co., Drafting Supplies
Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Disposal
Goodall Rubber Co., Rain Suits
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Maintenance Chemicals
George T. Hall Co., Inc., Valves
Harbor Electronic, Communication Equip.
-A-
AMOUNT
37.00
1,161.90
82.33
12.50
400.00
124.97
48.oo
59.69
117.60
114.46
15.75
384.20
44.10
15.83
252.00
132.30
18.oo
37.70
5.00
310.08
81.68
75.00
659.85
4, 131.48
32.13
165.80
373.38
14.4. 22
116.55
383.95
294.21
6.oo
10.00
450.00
5.67
.133. 98
5.61
58.76
190.65
993.42
3,390.00
605.64
161.15
173-99
111.11
2,048.25
24 .. 99
136.00
10.04
30.25
292.53
l,lt23.79
17,858.24
80.06
720.00
154.35
88.48
124 .. o4.
69.88
25l~. 70
..
W.ARRANT NO.
12758·
12759
12760
12761
. 12762
12763
~12764
12765
12766
12767
12768
12769
12770
12771
12772
12773
12774
12775
12776
12777
12778
12779
12780
12781
12782
12783
12784
12785
12786
12787
12788
~2789
12790
12791
12792
12793
12794
12795
12796
12797
12798
12799
12800
12801
12802
12803
12804
12805
12806
12807
12808
12809
12810
12811
12812
1.2813
....-.i.2814
12815
12816
12817
12818
12~19·
IN F.AVOR OF
Fred .A. Harper, Various Mtg. & C.O.D. Expense $
Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment
Hertz Equipment Rental, Tool Rer.tal
Hines Wholesale Nurseries, Landscaping Supplies
Hollisters Nursery Flori.st, Landscaping Supplies
Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies
Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Ingersoll-Rand, Tool Repair
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves
King Bearing, Inc., Small Hardware
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Kleen-Line Corp., Maintenance· supplies & Equipment
Knipper's Rentals, Equipment Rental
Anthony J. Lauricha, Reimb. OJT Mileage
LBWS, Inc., Small Hardware
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service
Charles Lowe Co., Replacement Pump
.A. J. Lynch Co., Ecology Study Supplies
Mahaffey Machine Co., Machining
Main Photo Service, Photo Processing
Marine Biological Consultants, Ecological Surveys
Moore Business Forms, Inc., Forms
E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Ring & Cover
Herbert .A. Moss, Labor Counsel Retainer
National Chemsearch Corp., Small Hardware
City of Newport Beach, Water
C . .Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer
o. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware
OD.A Nursery, Landscaping Supplies
oranco Supply Co., Pipe & Supplies
ORCO Block Co., Inc., Building Supplies
Co. of Or . .Auditor-Cont., Juvenile Court Program
Orange County Chemical Co., Cleaning Chemicals
Orange Coun{y Radiotelephone
Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamp ·
Orange County Water Works
Pacific Telephone Co ..
Paints & Tapes Unlimited, Paint
L. B. Penhall Co., Inc., Drilling
Postmaster, Postage
The Pryor-Giggey Co., Thermal Concrete
Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Hauling
The Register, Subscription
Reynolds .Aluminum Supply Co., Steel
Santa .Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair
Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals
The Scam Instrument Corp., Compressor Parts
Scientific Products, Lab Chemicals
Shell Oil Co., Gasoline
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies
· John Sigler, Employee Mileage
So-Cal Sign, Federal Project Signs
Southern California Edison Co ..
Southern California Water Co.
Southern Counties Gas Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., New Winch
-B-
.AMOUNT
123.75
171. 61
11.75
193.20
6.83
688.40
471.03
7.30
120.29
132.32
97.84
856.97
258.98
459.01
771.42
8.54
122.20
510.46
11.90
894.68
546.oo
66.15
326.81
191. 21
1,397.10
257.04
234.15
250.00
306.60
254.78
700.00
143.31
140.18
226.74
9.45
350.00
10.87
307.05
6.43
2.85
284.45
91.35
90.00
200.00
176.40
150.00
16.50
147.28
1,006.05
158.96
238.00
156.45
974.19
156.08
19.80
308. l~4
6,730.98
3.15
981. 60
99.25
106.11
708.75
WARRANT NO.
12820"
12821
12822
. 12823
1282!~
~12825
12826
12827
12828
12829
12830
12831
12832
12833
12834
12835
12836
12837
12838
12839
12840
12841
12842
12843
12844
12845
12846
12847
128L~8
12849
12850
12851
12852
12853
IN FAVOR OF
Standard Oil Co., Engine Oil & Grease
Surveyors Service Co., Small Tools
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts
C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene
Tiernan's Office Equipment, Office Equipment
Tustin Cement Bldg Block Co., Building Supplies
Tustin Cycle & Lawnmower, Equipment Parts
Edward D. Testa Co., Mill Machine
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
The University Club, Lodging FWPCA Seminar
Vaniman Camera Shop, Photo Processing
Earl Vinson Automotive, Small Tool Repair
Walker-Holmes Insurance, Notary Bond
Wall Colmonoy Corp., Re-surfacing
Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorination Equipment
John R. Waples R. S., Odor Consultant
Guy L. Warden & Sons, Aftercooler
Warren 'Bailey Co., Inc., Piping
Wilson Engine & Equipment, Truck Parts
World Travel Bureau, Inc., WPCF Seminar
Don Wright, Employee Mileage
George Yardley Co., Pipe Fittings
Pomona Machinery Co., Lathe
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
AMOillJT
$-7 .. 1,678.96
5.01
62.43
59.78
396.75
39.22
30.81
1,050.00
7.43
18.38
98.53
7.50
10.00
284.58
132.42
214.90
566. 62
67.48
253.34
461.80
28.00
190.85
1,575.00
$ 71,132.02
John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv.-Plant Const. $ 29,667.76
Co. of Or. Auditor-Contr., Testing P2-14 50.35
Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice Pl & 2-15, P2-16 125.58
Griffith Company, Release of Retained Percentage P2-8-4 896.10
J. E. & W. W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-14 64,521.00
Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 88,585.20
Lemar Corp., Contractor Pl-14 32,940.00
Orange Coast Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 6.53
Osborne Labs, Inc., Pipe Inspection p2~11~ 85.50
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Plans & Specs. Pl& 2-15, P2-16 439.43
T~ining Labs, Testing Pl-14, P2-14 103.00
TO'rAL CAPI'I1AL OUTLAY REVOLVING
OCEl\N OlYrFALL #2
CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND
IN FAVOR OF
Osborne Labs, Inc., Testing J-10
Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10
TOTAL INSPECTION REVOINING
TOTAL JOINT WARHAN1rS
-c-
$ 217,L~20.45
$
$
869.50
4,523.99
5,393.L19
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
12856 City of Santa Ana, Contract 1-11
12857 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs 1-11
12858
12859
12860
12861
12862
12863
12864
12865
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Steve Cappello & Sons Construction Co., Contractor
2-13 .
City of Garden Grove, Road Base Cont. 2-13
County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Compaction
Tests Cont. 2-13
Lowry Eng:i.neering-Science, Inspection Cont. 2-13
Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc.,
Testing Cont. 2-13
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services
Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Title Insurance & Trust Co., Right of Way Report
3-11 & 3-14
-D-
AMOUNT
$150,000.00
35.44
$150,035.44
$ 20,709.00
300.00
51.25
980.00
5.00
$ 22,045.25
53.50
263.25
$ 316.75
$ 75.00
$ 391. 75
WARRANT NO.
12866
12867
12868
12869
12870
12871
12872
12873
12874
12875
12876
128r77
12878
12879
,0 880
~881
12882
12883
12884
12885
12886
12887
12888
12889
12890
12891
1.2892
12893
DISTRicrr NO. 7
OPEI{ATING FUND WARRAN':I1S
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv., AD #8 & Misc.
Freedom Ne\·rspapers, Inc., Bond Notice
AMOUNT
$ 6.676.27
7.87
C. Arthur Nissan and Jack J. Rimel, AD #8 Legal Serv.
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Precinct Maps
1,295.22
61.53
ACClJMUL..t\':f.1ED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRA1rrrs
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-2R and
7-2AP-2, Inspectl.on 7-2R
County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Compaction
Test 7-2R
Kisling Construction Company, Contractor 7-2AP-2
Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 7-2AP-l
Scott Bros. Construction, Inc., Contractor·7-2AP-l
Zarubica Company, Contractor r7-2R
FIXED OBIAGATION FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOH OF
City of Anaheim, JOS~Payment
City of Buena Park, JOS Payment
City of Fullerton, J·os Payment
Garden Grove Sanitary District, JOS P~yment
City of LaHabra., JOS Payment
City of Orange, JOS Payment
City of Placentia, JOS Payment
City of Santa Ana, JOS Payment
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRAN'rs
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle Engineering, Engr. 7-4·-2R & 7-lF·-B
Byron I,. Crume, Inc., Contractor 7-4-2R
Keith and Associates, Engr. 7-2D-P
Bob Lench Company, Inc., Refund Fee Overpayment
Harry G. Liljeb1ad, Rei.rnb. Agrm. Payment
C. Arthur Nissan, Assignee of Gordon Maybee, Reimb.
Agrm. Payment
Pacific Investment Company, Reimb. Agrm. Payment
Standard-Paclfic Corporation, Reimb. Agrm. Payment
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMtff.A'rmJ CAPITAL OU'I'Ll\Y FUND WARHANTS
IN FAVOH OF
Enterprise Prj_nt:i.ne: Company, PlDx1s & SpccG o 11-11
Huntington Beach News, Ri.d Not:Lce Cont. 11~~11
-E-
$ 8,040.89
$ 2,602.62
111. 71
3,343.95
76.00
1, 67l+. 00
49,621. 24
$ 57,429.52
$
$
$
1, 561. 80
96.70
1, 561. 80
2141.80
386.90
l/+74. 70
2lu_. 80
4,43lt. 50
---
10,000.00
702.00
~-' 069. l~8
1, 161. 00
100.00
326.15
326.15
38' 141. 50
1,114.76
$ 45,941.04
$ J. 21, 1~ J. J . l~ 5
58.05
h1.3?
$ 10).1!2
.. ·-··----·--
·-----···-·~----~-·-····-·-
RESOLUTION NOo 70-29
DECLARATION OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER
PROPOSED ORDINANCE RELATING TO CON-
NECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE
FACILITIES
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING
INTENT TO CONSIDER PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING
RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION TO
AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY
CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR
CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT'S SEWERAGE
FACILITIES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION
The Boards of Directors of County Saqitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the revised ordinance dated March 10, 1970
relating to connection to and use of District sewerage facilities,
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That these Boards of Directors hereby declare
their intent to consider the certain proposed ordinance at the
April 8, 1970 Joint Boards of Directors meeting; and,
Section 3. That April 8, 1970, at 7:30 p.m. at 10844
Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, is hereby fixed as
the date and hour and place when and where any and all persons
having any objection to the aforesaid proposed ordinance may
appear before said Boards of Directors and show cause why said
ordinance should not be adopted; and,
Section 4. That the staff be instructed to forward copies
of the full ordinance to each city, sewering entity, and Chamber
of Commerce within the Districts, prior to public hearing date.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970.
Agenda Item #13 All Districts
ORDINANCE NOo
DRAFT
2-2-70
Revo 2-9-70
Revo 3-3-70
Rev. 3-10-70
AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS
RELATING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT
SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE
USE CRITERIA, CHARGES "FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE
OF DISTRICTYS SEWERAGE FACILITIES, PROVIDING
PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE
NOo
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo
----, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows:
ARTICLE 1 -PURPOSE
The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the maximum
public benefit from the use of the District's facilities by regulating
the quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharged
thereto and to provide for charges for the use thereof when such use
is disproportionate to District costs imposed on other property within
the District.
The revenues to be derived from the application of this ordinance
shall be used to defray the costs of, including the repayment of
· principal and interest on bonds issued for the acquisition, construction
or reconstruction and the maintenance of an adequate sewerage system
to serve the territory of the District excepting that no revenues
derived from this ordinance shall be used for the acquisition or con-
struction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished
from main trunk interceptor and outfall sewers.
ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONR
(a) Assessed Valuation -Shall mean that portion of the total
assessed valuation of the property producing and discharging sewage
or industrial waste upon which District taxes are levied in the fiscal
year beginning in the calendar year in which the discharge takes
place. Property producing and discharging sewage or industrial
waste shall include all the real property and improvements in the
District used, owned, leased, occupied or maintained by or for the
user whether or.not sewage or industrial waste is generated by a
Agenda Item //13 -G-All Dlstrlcts
particular improvement and shall include, but not be limited to,
offices, landscaped areas, parking lots, warehouses and incidental
improvements. It shall also include unimproved land located in
the District when such land is used, owned, leased, occupied or
maintained by the user. For property upon which no District tax is
levied, the assessed valuation will be considered to be zero.
----
(b) District -Shall mean County Sanitation District Noa
, of Orange Countyo
(c) General Manager -Shall mean the individual duly
designated by the Board of Directors of the District to administer
this ordinance.
(d) Industrial Waste -Shall mean the waterborne waste and
wastewater from any producing, manufacturing, or processing operation
·of whatever nature, including institutional and commercial operations
where water is used for laundering, vehicle cleaning, or the removal
of significant quantities of wastes of non-human origin.
(e) Local Sewering Agency -Shall mean any public corporation
duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct
and/or maintain public sewerso
(f) Excess Capacity -Shall mean the hydraulic use of a
District facility for peak flow rate greater than reasonable use.
(g) Peak Flow Rate -Shall mean the annually determined
highest flow rate of sewage or industrial waste discha~ged to a public
sewer over a period of at least 15 minutes at any time during the
preceding 12-month period. In the absence of actual peak flow rate
data, peak flow rate may be considered at 1.6 times the greatest
metered eight-hour water use during the preceding 12-month period,
provided that where peak flow rate is established for permittees on
the effective date of this ordinance, the permi~tee certifies that
said eight-hour water use ·was for normal operations and not the result
of extraordinary circumstancesu
-2-
(h) Pre-Treatment Facility -Shall mean any works or device
for the treatment or flow limitation of sewage or industrial waste,
prior to discharge into a public sewer.
(i) Public Corporation -Shall mean any City, District, or
other public agency duly organized under the laws of the State of
California.
(j) Reasonable Use -Shall mean the rate of discharge of
sewage or industrial waste and the suspended solids contained therein
to which a user connected to a public sewer shall be entitled to
discharge to said sewer without payment of excess capacity connection
charges or use charges by virtue of the assessed valuation of said
property and other criteriao For the purpose of computing excess
capacity connection charges, reasonable use is hereby established at
25,000 gallons per day peak flow rate per $100,000 of assessed valuation.
For purposes of computing use charges, reasonable use is hereby
established at 10 million gallons per year and 15 dry tons of suspended
solids per year per $100,000 of assessed valuationo In the event a
person producing sewage or industrial waste maintains more than one
operation in the District, peak flow rate, annual flow, annual
suspended solids and assessed valuation shall be combined for all such
operations for the purpose of determining reasonable use and computing
excess capacity connection charges and use chargeso
(k) Sewage -Shall mean the wastewater derived from human
use of buildings for ordinary residential, institutional or commercial
purposes.
(1) Standard Methods -Shall mean procedures described in
the Twelfth edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water
and Wastewater" as published by the American Public Health Association,
the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control
"-"' Federation.
(m) Suspended Solids -Shall mean any insoluble solid matter
contained as a component of sewage or industrial waste and capable of
' separation from the liquid portion of said waste by laboratory filtra-
-3-
tion, provided, however, no insoluble solid matter shall be included
if permittee can demonstrate that it is non-putrescible and results
from planned water conservation or reuse within the premises of
permittee.
(n) User -Shall mean any person or public corporation
discharging sewage or industrial waste to a sewerage facility of the
District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which
facility discharges to a District facilityo
ARTICLE 3 -PERMITS
{a) When Required -No person or public corporation shall be
permitted to connect to, use, or maintain a connection to the sewerage
facilities of the District without the permits required and issued
as hereinafter provided. No person or public corporation shall be
permitted to use or maintain a connection for the discharge of
industrial waste to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency,
which facility discharges to a District sewerage facility, without
a valid permit issued as hereinafter providedo
{b) Condition Precedent -No permit shall be valid unless the
real property to be served by use of the permit is included within
the boundaries of th~ District and within the boundaries of a local
sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewerage works; provided,
however, a permit may be issued for property to b~ served outside the
boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes
application for the issuance of such permit.
{c) Information to be Furnished -The District may require, in
connection with any application for a permit, that the applicant
furnish data regarding present and anticipated future flows, quality
of discharge and information concerning present and anticipated
assessed valuation.
(d) Permit for Connection To and Use of District Facility -·
Application for such permit shall be made to the Distrlct and permits
shall be issued by the District in two parts~ First, a connection
-4-
permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District's
sewerage facility under conditions set forth in said permit; and
secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial waste
to the District's sewerage facility.
(1) A new connection ·permit is not required for existing
connections to District's sewerage facilitieso
(2) The connection permit may prescribe requirements as
to the type of connection and the use permit may require the provision
of pre-treatment facilities necessary to insure compliance with
Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirements shall be set forth in
the permit.
{e) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit -Application for a
permit to use District services and facilities for the treatment and
disposal of industrial waste shall be made to the Districto The
permit shall be issued by the District and shall be in accordance
with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof. The permit may require
the permittee to provide necessary pre-treatment facilities to insure
compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirement shall
be set forth in the industrial waste discharge permito
(f) Amendment of Permits -Any permit issued under the
provisions of this Article 3 may be amended by the District after giving
to the permittee a thirty (30) day notice of intention to amend where
the permit given was based on incorrect information and the proposed
amendment is for the purpose of making the permit conform to the
actual factors involved as determined by the General Manager.
ARTICLE 4 -QUALITY REQUIREMENTS
(a) Substances Prohibited -No person or public corporation
shall discharge sewage or industrial waste into a District sewerage
facility or into a local sewering agency facility, which facility
discharges to a District facility, when the components of such effluent
cause the effluent to exceed the limits set forth herein or are in
violation of the rules and regulations of the District established
' as hereinafter provided.
-5-
(1) An eight-hour temperature average higher than 140°F
(2) More than 100 milligrams per liter of hexane soluble
material (fats and oils) or 25 milligrams per liter
of floatable oil both based on an average concentration
over an eight-hou~ period
(3) A pH of less than 6.0 provided that at least 8o% of
the time in any eight-hour period, the pH shall be
not less than 605
(4) Suspended solids or other substances of such a
character or in such concentrations which result in
improper functioning of any public sewer through which
said solids are conveyed or in the improper operation
of the Districts' treatment facilities
(5) Any liquid or gas or other substance which, singly or
in combination with other substances, could cause an
explosive, dangerously radioactive, or toxic condition
in the sewerage system of the Districto
(b) Rain Water Prohibited -No person or public corporation
shall discharge or cause to be discharged to a District sewerage
facility or to a local sewering agency facility, which facility dis-
charges to a Distric~ facility, water from roof drains or other runoff
water from rain storms or uncontaminated water.not classified as
sewage or industrial waste.
(c) Additional Rules and Regulations -The General Manager of
the District shall, from time to time as he deems necessary, prepare
additional regulations as to the quality of sewage or industrial
waste discharged to the sewerage facilities of the District or to the
sewerage facilities of a local sewering agency, which facility dis-
charges into a District facilityo Said regulations shall be for the
purpose ·of insuring that sewage or industrial waste so discharged will
not cause undue maintenance in the District's facilities, interfere
with proper operation of the treatment plants, produce a noxious or
malodorous gas, create a public nuisance, create hazards to structures,
' equipment and personnel, or create a violation of the requirements
-6-
imposed upon the District by Federal, State or local regulatory agencies.
Said regulations shall not be effective until after public hearing
and approval by resolution of the Board of Directors. The General
Manager shall, thirty days before formal consideration of such
resolution, mail a notice of such consideration to each person holding
a valid industrial waste discharge permito Such notice shall also
be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request
for such notice.
ARTICLE 5 -QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS
In order to provide for reasonable use of the District's sewerage
facilities and in recognition of the fact that the transmission, treat-
ment and disposal of domestic sewage is the highest and best use of
the District's sewerage facilities, the General Manager may set forth,
in any industrial waste discharge permit issued, requirements to limit
the quantity of industrial waste discharged to a sewerage facility of
the District or a local sewering agency whe~, in the opinion of the
General Manager, the existing hydraulic capacity of the District's
sewerage facilities would be unreasonably used. Such requirements
may limit the quantity of industrial wastes to be discharged with
respect to any given unit of time and shall be subject to appeal as
provided in Article 12 hereof.
ARTICLE 6 -PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES
FOR CONNECTION AND USE
{a) Connection Permit Fees -No application for a permit
for a connection to a District sewerage facility shall be considered
until a permlt fee is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that
such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the reconnection
or alteration of an existing connection made by the District or at the
request of the District. Said permit fee shall be an amount set
forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors.
(b) Industrial Waste Discharge ~ermit Fees and Excess Capaclty
Connection Charges for Use Greater than Reasonable Use -Except as
, hereinafter provided, no permit to use a connection to a facility of
the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency,
which facility discharges into a District facility, shall, after the
effective date of this ordinance, be issued until an industrial waste
discharge permit fee is paid by the applicanto An industrial waste
discharge permit fee shall be payable in an amount set forth in a
resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and shall be based
on the volwne and characteristics of the industrial waste but in no
event shall exceed $250 per year. Industrial waste permit fees shall
be payable annually within thirty days after expiration date and upon
invoicing by the District.
Prior to commencement of use and upon invoicing by the District,
an excess capacity connection charge shall be payable by a user when,
du~ing the 12-month period after commencement of use, the peak flow
rate may be reasonably expected to exceed 25,000 gallons per day unless
such peak flow rate is a reasonable use as defined in Article 2 of
this ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no excess
capacity connection charge shall be made for connections in use on
~ the effective date of this ordinance unless there is an increase in
peak flow rates of sewage and j_ndustrial waste which exceeds, by more
than 5,000 gallons per day, the highest peak flow rate previously
determined for such user.
Subject to the provisions hereinabove> excess capacity
connection charges payable shall be computed at the rate of $350 per
1,000 gallons per day of peak flow rate and, in the case of connections
in use on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be payable on
the lesser of the following amounts:
(1) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate
exceeds that determined for the 12-month period preceding the effective
date of this ordinance or
(2) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds
the reasonable peak flow rate determined at the time bf the increasev
-8-
(c) Use Charges -Any person using a connection to a facility
of the District or a facility of a local sewering agency, which facility
discharges to a District facility, shall be subject to the payment of
an annual use charge for the preceding calendar yearo Such use
charge shall be payable only on the annual flow of sewage or industrial
waste discharged or suspended solids discharged greater than reasonable
use as hereinbefore defined. The use charge shall be the actual
treatment costs of the District for the fiscal year ending in said
calendar year expressed per 1,000 gallons in excess of reasonable
use and $10 per ton of suspended solids in excess of reasonable use.
(d) Computation and Invoicing of Use Charges -After January 1
of each calendar year, the General Manager shall determine which users
are subject to the payment of use charges and shall invoice the user
in accordance with the mit charges established as hereinabove provided.
At the option of the General Manager, use charges may be invoiced more
frequently than annually when, in his judgment, the use charges are of
such a magnitude to warrant more frequent payment. Upon application
by any person to the Board of Directors, which application demonstrates
a financial hardship, the Board of Directors may allow the payment of
excess capacity connection charges to be made over a period of not
more than five years with interest at six percent per annum on the
unpaid balance .
. ARTICLE 7 -REFUND OF EXCESS CAPACITY CONNECTION CHARGES
Upon application to the Board of Directors by any permittee who
has paid excess capacity connection charges to the District of more
than $5,000, which application certifies that the peak flow rate has
permanently decreased by 25 percent or more, and which application is
not disputed by the General Manager, the Board of Directors will autho-
rize a refund to the applicant. The refund will be computed to maintain
"-". the total remaining excess capacj_ty connection charge paid to an amount
corresponding to the excess capacity connection charge payable at the
~ime of the decrease.
-9-
ARTICLE 8 -LOCAL AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES
No excess capacity connection charges or use charges, as speci-
fied in Article 6 hereof, shall be payable for the discharge of sewage
or industrial waste from property in the District owned by elementary,
high school, and junior college school districts, special districts,
the County of Orange, and cities.
ARTICLE 9 -MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITY AND
QUALITY OF FLOWS
(a) Annual Flow -The measurement of annual flow of sewage or
industrial waste shall be made by the District by means of a metering
device, approved by the General Manager, and installed and maintained
at the expense of the permittee, or by estimate arrived at from total
water used in the area occupied, or by other means acceptable to the
General Manager and to the permittee. The permittee shall have the
option of selecting whether the measurement shall be made by meter, or
by estimate, or other means, provided that the method of estimate or
other means is approved by the General Manager.
(b) Peak Flow Rate -The determination of peak flow rate
shall be made by means of an effluent meter approved by the General
Manager or by field measurements made by the District or by the method
provided in Article 2 hereof. The permittee shall have the option of
selecting the method of determination to be used, provided, however,
that in the event the field measurement is selected, an additional charge
of $600 per year will be made to defray the costs thereof and will be
invoiced each February 1 for the preceding calendar year.
(c) Determination of Components The determination or
estimation of suspended solids or other components contained in sewage
or industrial waste discharges shall be by one of the following methods:
(1) Sampling and analysis by District's personnelo
(2) Sampline and analysis by personnel of permittee or
laboratory acceptable to the District· and employed
by the perrnittee.
(3) Estimates arrived at by study of operations leading
to the discharge.
-10-
The permittee shall have the option of selecting which of
the foregoing methods will be used, provided, however, that such
method must be proposed by permittee and approved by the General
Manager before January 1 of any calendar year and continued through-
out the year. In the event no method is so selected and approved,
Method (1) will be used. Also in the event that either Method (2)
or (3) is so selected and approved, the District may, by appropriate
sampling and analysis, determine the accuracy of the results obtained.
If Method (2) is so selected and approved, the permittee shall pre-
pare and submit on, or before, January 15 of any year, a certified
statement of the results obtained for the preceding year. All
laboratory procedures shall strictly conform to Standard Methodso
ARTICLE 10 -INSPECTION
The General MaDager shall institute a regular industrial
waste inspection program in order to determine the quality and quantity
of industrial waste discharged to the District's facilities and the
effect thereof on the maintenance and operation of said facilitieso
Said inspection program shall be carried out by employees of the
District and, insofar as possible, shall be funded from industrial
waste permit feeso
ARTICLE 11 -AGREEMENTS WITH PERMITTEES
(a) New Installations -At the option of the General Manager
or the permittee, the District will enter into an agreement with any
permittee whose assessed valuation and peak flow rate cannot be deter-
mined at the time of the issuance of the permit. Such an agreement
will provide for an estimate of the assessed valuation for the ensuing
fiscal year and the peak flow rate for the ensuing 12-month period,
and require payment of excess capacity connecti~n charges on the basis
of such estimates and will. provide for a method of additional payment
or refund, as the case may be, of such charges when actual data as to
assessed valuation and peak flow rate can be obtainedu
-11-
(b) Special Situations -If any perrnittee feels that the circum-
stances involved in his discharge are of a nature which requires
special consideration, he may apply to the Board of Directors for a
special agreement. Such application shall state the facts to warrant
such special agreement which may, upon resolution of the Board of
Directors, provide terms other than contained in this ordinanceo
(c) Existing Agreements -It is recognized that the District
may have special agreements for the discharge of sewage or industrial
waste to its facilities in effect on the effective date of this ordinance.
In such cases, the user shall have the option of maintaining the
existing agreement or to terminate it. In the event of termination,
the provisions of this ordinance will apply to permittee's dischargeo
ARTICLE 12 -INTERPRETATION AND APPEAL
(a) Request for Ruling -If any permittee or applicant for a
permit disputes the interpretation or application of this ordinance,
he shall set forth his contentions in writing to the General Managero
The General Manager shall, within thirty days, respond in writing to
the contentions so made and set forth his determinations thereof.
(b) Appeal -If the permittee or applicant for a permit is
dissatisfied with the determinations so made by the General Manager,
he may within thirty days after mailing of said ruling by the General
Manager to said permittee or applicant for a permit, appeal said
ruling by giving written notice of the basis of his appeal to the
Board of Directors of the Districto Said written notice shall be
accompanied by a non-refundable fee of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100).
The Board of Directors of the District shall, within forty~five days
after receipt of said written notice of appeal, make a final determination
of the issues presented.
ARTICLE 13 -PAYMENT OF CHARGES AND DELINQUENCIES
All charges made pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance
are due and payable upon receipt of not:i.ce thereof. All such charges
' shall be and become delinquent forty~five days after mailing or
-12-
delivering notice thereof to the mailing address of the property
subject to such charges.
All delinquent charges shall be deemed a violation of this
ordinance and each day any such charge remains delinquent shall be
"-. deemed a separate violation.
ARTICLE 14 -PENALTIES
Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a
penalty charge equal to ten percent of the charge that became delinquent
and thereafter an additional penalty shall accrue on the total charge
due, including the ten percent basic penalty at the rate of one-half
of one percent per month until paid.
ARTICLE 15 -COLLECTION
Upon motion by the Board of Directors of the District, any
charge and all penalties thereon shall be collected by lawsuit in the
name of the District. Any such action for collection may include an
application for an injunction to prevent repeated and reoccurring
violations of this ordinance.
ARTICLE 16 -VIOLATIONS
No person or public corporation shall violate any provisions or
fail to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any
person or public corporation violating any of the provisions or failing
to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance shall be
guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person or corporation convicted of a
misdemeanor under the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished
by a fine of not more than $100.,00 or by imprisonment in the County Jail
for a period not exceeding thirty days, or by both such fine and
imprisonment. Each person or public corporation shall be guilty of a
separate offense for each and every day during any pcrtion of which
any violation of any provision of this ordinance is committed, continued
or permitted by such person or public corporatj?n and shall be
punishable accordingly.
-13-
ARTICLE 17 -SEVERABILITY
If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to
any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional, the remainder of
the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons
and circumstances shall not be affected thereby. If a provision of
this ordinance is held invalid, all valid provisions that are
severable from the invalid provision shall remain in effect.
ARTICLE 18 -PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENT
Thirty days before any formal consideration of an amendment to
this ordinance by the Board of Directors, the General M~nager will so
notify in writing each city and local sewering agency in the District
and each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permit or
who has paid an excess capacity connection chargeo Such notice shall
also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request
for such notice. Such notice shall contain a brief description of
·the nature of the amendment to be considered.
ARTICLE 19 -REPEAL
Ordinances Nos. are hereby repealed and all
~~~--~--~~-
ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance
are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the
provisions of this ordinance.
ARTICLE 20 -EFFECTIVE DATE
The effective date of this ordinance is January 1, 1971.
-14-
. .
~· ~ . -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS---------·---
Phooriix, Arizona Lafoyofte, California El Paso, Texas
'-"oHN A. C,l.ROLLO, P.£.
ltOBEr.T M. ElRE:R~TC>N, P.E.
H. HArtVEY HUNT, P.F.
HOWAno M. WA.Y, P.E.
ROBERT c;;. V.'ILLIAMS, P.E.
DON~LD R. Pi,E:ISL~R, P.E.
March 2, 1970
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Rcpfy to:
3668 MT. DIABLO BOULEVAno
LAFAYEITE, CALIFOC?NIA 94549
AREA COOC .Cl5
To accomplish an improved degree of treatment at the
Sanitation Districts' Joint Treatment Works, the Modification Report
sets forth several objectives under Section 2 entitled 11 A GENERAL
DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK I?ROPOSED TO BE DONE TO CARRY
OUT THE OBJECTS OF THE-DISTRICTS".
We believe that based on test work to date, Objective No. 1
(increasing quantity of flow receiving secondary treatment at Plant
No. 1) set forth therein, can be accomplished at an early date with an
expenditure of less than $50, 000. We recommend that you proceed on
this.
We recommend that Objective No. 2 (constructing facilities
to test and evaluate methods of improving sedim.entation and/ or re -
moval of grease and other floatables) be accomplished at the earliest
pos siblc date. This objective should be given a high priority in our
estimation, 2s the answer obtained from this test work will influence
the de sign of future treatment facilit.ie s.
This facility {Objective No. 2) is set forth under Section 5
of the Modification Report as:
"Sedirncntation Basin "K'' (Experin~cntal)
and Djgcstcr "K 11 at Plant No. 2, expansion
of heating and steam system at Plants No. 1
and No. 2. Basin "K" will be constructed
with special modifications so various
schemes can be investigated for :lmproving
sedimentation and grease and floatablcs
ren1oval ·
Project Cost
Agenda Item #20 H-1
$1, 265, 000.11
All Districts
Mr. Fred A. Har pc r 1 General Manager
March 2 1 1970
Page 2 .·
We suggest you authorize the engineering on this project prior
to the next fiscal year so as to obtain completion and operation at the
earliest possible date.
We will be pleased to proceed with de sign of this project upon
your authorization to do so. We propose to do this work in accordance
with our basic contract dated February 11, 1959, and amendment dated
October 14, 1964. (Design fee 5. 2o/o of the cost of construction.}
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
H. Harvey Hunt
HHH: vaw
Agenda Item .f/20 H-2 All D1stricts
',
..
-----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS-----------
~OHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.
RODERT r.t. E:'RERETOU, P,E.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P,E.
HOWARD V., WAY, P.E.
RODERT G, Wll.LIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PRElsU:R, P.E.
Phoenix, Ari.zona Lafaycflo, Ca!ifornia
March 2, 1970
El Paso, T oxas
Repfy to:
3688 MT. OJAEILO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA S/.t;49
AREA COD:? .Ct!!
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services
Reconditioning of Structures
In accordance with your.request, we are submitting a proposal
to provide the engineering services for preparation of plans and specifi-
cations for the reconditioning of the Pflanz Headworks and Sedimentation
Basins A, B, and C at Plant 2, and Sedimentation Basins 3 and 4 at
Pl ant 1.
.As we now understand the scope of the project, the recon-
ditioning will. include the following:
I. Pflanz Headworks Plant No. 2
I. Repair of concrete influent chambers and wet well
2. Rep3.ir of concrete in pmnp discharge channels
3. Repair of cone rctc in grit chamber and outlet box
4. Repair of pump discharge pipe outlets in discharge
chan1ber
5. Paint submerged steel
6. Paint dry well concrete and steel
7. Incidental items related to the above
II. Sedimentation Basins A, B, and C Plant No. 2
I. Installation of new skim.ming sy stern
2. Installation of ·new scum pumping systen1
3. Installation of new weirs, baffles, etc.
4. Installation of new accesses· to sludge pump area
5. Installation of new influent baff] e
6. Installation of new shtdge pumps
7. Installation of existing sludge meters
· 8. Incidental items related to the above
Agenda Item //'21 I-1 All Di.strlcts
I'
'"-!""
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
March 2, 1970
Page 2
III. Sedimentation Basins 3 and 4 Plant No. 1
1. Installation of new drives
2. Installaqon of new weirs and baffles
3. Repair of concrete in launders
4. Repaint iron works as required
5. Incidental items related to the above
The engineering services will include, but not necessarily be
limited to, the following:
a~ Investigation of materials and methods of reconditioning
b. De sign of new facilities
c. Preparation of plans and speCifications
d. Provide consultation and advice as requc sted by the
Districts during the construction stage
Our fee for performing this work will be in accordance with
the terms of our proposal dated November 22, 1968, and accepted by the
Districts December 1.8, 1968, for special engineering services.
Since the exact scope of the job is not definite, it is difficult to
estimate the total engineering fee. Based on the scope as defined herein,
we estimate the engineering fee to be between $9, 700 and $12, 500. The
maximum fee would be suLject to negotiation if the scope of the project is
materially revised from that outlined in this letter.
HMW:vaw
Agenda Item //21 I-2
Very truly yours,
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
Howard M. Way
Partner
All Districts
COUNTY SANITA'I1 ION DIS 1rRIC 1rS OF OHANGE COUNTY
P. 0 .. Box 8127 -108'1-J+ Ellis ./\venue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
page 1 of 2
C. 0. NO. 1
CON'l1RACTOR: Gas Processors, Inc.
--~--------~--~"""---~----~~~~~--
DATE: March.5, 1970
JOB: Digester Gas Compressor, Job No. I-4-2B
Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ _
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCES: Contractor's letters dated July 29, 1969, September 9, 1969,
January 13, 1970, and February 2, 1970; and Districts' letters
dated January 29, 1970 and February 11, 1970.
Item I Revision: Section B-9, PAYMENT
The final payment clause of this section shall be
revised as follows:
A second and final payment for the balance remain-
ing due under the contract shall be paid within 30
calendar days after the special stainless steel con-
necting rod has been installed and the unit is found
to be functioning correctly and acceptable to the
Districts, or approximately 90 calendar days after
delivery of the equipment, whichever is the later.
The contractor shall furnish the Districts with a
certification from the bonding company that the term
of the Faithful Performance Bond has been extended
to one year from the date that said final payment
is authorized.
Item II Extension of Time
The contract time shall be extended as follows:
(a)
(b)
Labor strike at the Ingersoll-Rand Company
New York factory, commencing on July 15, 1969
and ending on September 7, 1969 o o • • • • • • • 40 calendar days
Difficulties at the U.S. Electric Motors
factory in testing the 100 horsepower motor
due to abnormal failure of the stator o • • • • 14 calendar days
TOTAL TIME • • . o • 54 calendar days
(continued next page)
Agenda Item #24 All Districts
page 2 of' 2
JOB: Digester Gas Compressor, Job No. I-4-2B C.O. NO.
------=~~~~--~-------~--~--------------------~--1 continued
Summ?-ry:
Original Contract Date
Original Contract Time
Original Contract Completion Date
Contract Time Extension (this C.O.)
Revised Contract Completion Date
Actual Completion Date
July 24·, 1969
140 calendar days
December 12, 1969
54 calendar days
February 3, 1970
January 30, 1970
Original Contract Price $,
Prev. Au th. Changes $
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $
2Q;882.~Q
None
None
Amended Contract Price $ 20;882.40
Board Authorization Date: Approved:
March 11, 1970
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
GAS PROCESSORS, INC.
Agenda Item //24 J-? All Diotr:i.cts
1 ,.
PETER KIEVVIT SONS' CO.
CONTRACTOHS
ESTABLISH ED 1884
~IN OFFICE: OMAHA 31, NEER.
1000 KIEWIT PLAZA
ADDRESS REPLY TO: P.O. Box 552
Huntington Beach, Ca ·926L8
February 19, 1970
John Carollo Engineers
P.O. Box 528
Huntington Beach, Ca 926118
Attn: Nr. Walter A. Bishc1p, ReE;ident Engineer
Re: Request for e:x:tensfon of time
Gentlemen:
In accordance 1,1ith the genernl provisions of the specifications
Section 6; p[lragrc~ph 3, ue rospcctful1y rccuost an extcns:ton of the
contr2ct. tj_me for the fo11owin£; listed dates and c<mse0 of dcl2y:
Febr-..:i.ary 9, 1970 heavy strrf &nd rain
February 10, 1970 rain c:nd heavy surf
February 12, 1970 heavy oceDn floor currents in pipe laying area
February 13, 1970 II u t1 11 II II II II & moderate
to rou~h surf
February 18, 1970 her~vy surf
February 19, 1970 heavy st1_rf & stron~ 1r1nds I
S:inccrc ly,
cc: Filo
P tor KicHit Sons'. CoQ c ·?~-;"~·( .. ~ t~ /1/ \.... . •' ~ t-/, ....._ f-:-~-j • 1/J,)
/ t.1o ,n Fon1 Jr. ··
(
Project Supori{1i:.cnclent
'/ . {.
Agenda Ttcm //2S -K-All D:i stPtcts
-----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS-----------
Phoenix, Arizona Laf ayctfe, California El Paso, Texas
~.JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.
Reply to: ROBERT M. BREHETON, P,E.
H, HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY, P.E.
ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PnEISLEH, P.E.
March 3 1 1970
3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manae;e·r
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
P .~. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marino Section
Re ply to: AREA coD~ 4t!;
}' .o. Box 528
Huntington Beach
California 92648
Attachdd is a letter from Feter Kiewit Sons' Company
requesting six (6) _days extension of time. Reasons for the delays
arc listed in their letter.
We recommend r.pprova.l of four (4) days extension of
tiwe in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General Provisio!ls of
the Specifications. 1'hc recommended days a.re February 9 and 10 ...
hcf!vy surf and ruin; F'ebruary 18 -heavy surf; February 19 -heavy
surf nnd strong winds.
'!'he contractor has requested a total of fifty nine
(59) days extension of time of which TIC have recommended approval
of fifty seven (57) days extension through February 25, 1970.
Very truly yours,
Y.IAB: rw
Enclonurc
Agenda· It~.~ //'?.5 -L-All Distr:Lct.B
283·3695
..
'
RESOLUTION NO. '(0-28-1
FEDERAL GRANT -1970-71 IMPROVEMENTS AND
ADDITIONS TO PLAN'l1 NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2
AND INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANI'l1ATION DIS'I.1RICT NO·. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT
UNDER 33 U.S.C. h66 ET SEQ., IN BEHALF OF COUNTY
SANI'l1A'I.1ION DIS'I1RICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollv,tion' Control Act, as amended ( 33 U.S. C. lJ-66 et seq. ) provides for ·
Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the
~ purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer
system for the collection of' sewacse from the cities and other local
collection sev:ering ar;encies, and has joined ·with other County Sani-
tation Districts, namely County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7,
and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint se1·mge treatment
plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1959,
knovm as the Joint 01.-mersh:ip, Opera ti on and Construction Agreement.
Sectio~_J_. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership,
Operation and ConstructJon Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Oranie County, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation
Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Oranc;e County, Californj_a,
each organized for similar purposes and servine; dj_fferent terri to:rie~~,
all in Orange County, Califotnia, for the purpose of constructing and
~
opera tine sa:td jo:i.nt scvmge treatment plants and disposal facil:i t:tes.
Agenda Item //2'/ M-1 All Dlstr:iets
--~----~~ . ....-.-
Section lL By means of this res·olution and of the resolutions
set forth below by number, the following Colll1ty Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications
, for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts set
forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as
"Central Ag~ncy" for said applications as set forth in Title 23,
Chapter 3, Section 2101 (e) of the California Administrative Code:
District No. Resolution No. Application Amount
1 70-28-1 $ 352,900
2 70-22-2 1,027,600
3 70-23-3 1,093,800
5 70-2h-5 185,600
6 70-25-6 196,100
7 70-26-7 210,700
11 70-27-11 240,,800
Total $3,307,500
Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare,
sign and subm:Lt for County Sanitation District No. 1,, ·for itself and as
agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2,, 3, 5, q, 7, and 11, al1
documents necessary to apply for and acecpt construction grants under
~
said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth in Section l~ he;~eof for a
joint project generally described as:
1970-71 IMPROVEME~ns AND ADDITIONS TO
PLANT NO. 1 AND PIANT NO. 2 AND
INTERPLAN'I1 INFLUEN'l1 IWl1.ERCEPTOR
Acceptance of said grants may be for arnounts more or less tha..n set
forth in Section 4 hereof.
AEenda Item .f/27 Al 1 DJs tr:tc ts -----··-----
RESOLUTION NO. 70-30-1
FEDERAL GRANT -SUNF1LOWER IN':L1ERCEPTOR TRUNK
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DIS11HICT NO •. lJ OF ORANGE COUN11Y,
CALIFORNIAJ AUTHORIZING AND DIHECTING EXECU'rION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U. S • C. , 466 ET SE'Q,.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE A~ID ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Con[Sress k.ncn·m as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c.~ 466 et seq.) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. Com:ity Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the
purpose of constructing; operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer
system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local
collection sewerihg agencies.
Section 3. By means of this resolution, the Board of Directors
hereby declares its intention to enter into an agreement with Cou..Dty
Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, a.D identically
organized agency, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost
of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities, as said
facilities and cost shares are set forth in the duly approved and
adopted Engineer'.s Report, dated November, 1969, which agreement will
provide also that said District No. 7 will construct and operate said
facilities and thereby will be deemed as "Central Agency" for said
grant application, as set forth in Title 23, .chapter 3, Section 2100 (e)
of the California Administrative .Code.
Section 4. By means of this resolution and· Resolution No.
,_.,. 70-31-7 of County Sani ta ti on Di.strict· No. 7, the following County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County authorize the filing of appli-
Agenda Item #35 N-1 District 1
cations for grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth
below:
District No.
1
7
Application Amount
$ 407 ,Iwo
1,039,200
Section 5. The General Manager is hereby e,,uthorized and
instructed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
No. 7 all documents necessary to apply for and accep~ a construction
grant under said Act of Congress, in the amount of ·$1,039,200 for a
joint project generally described as:
SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR TRUNK
Acceptance of said grants may be for arnounts more or less than herein-
above set forth.
Agenda Item #35 N-2· District 1
t"
RESOLUTION NO. 70-31-7
FEDERAL GRANT -SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR TRUNK
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. · 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING-AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 4~6 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as ~ended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides for
Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County,
is a ·separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the
purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sew·er
·system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local
collection sewering agencies.
Section 3. By means of this· resolution, the Board of Directors
hereby declares its intention to enter into an agreement with County
Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, an identically
organized agency, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost
of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities, as said
facilities and cost shares are set forth in the duly approved and
adopted Engineer's Report, dated November, 1969, which agreement will
provide also that this District will construct and operate said facili-
ties and thereby will be deemed as "central Agency" for said grant
application, as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2100 (e) of
the California Administrative Code.
Section lL By means of this resolution and Resolution No.
,.,,,.,, 70-30-1 of County Sanitation District No. 1, the follO\·dng County
Sanitation Districts of Orange County authorized the filj_.ng of applj_ ..
Agenda I~em //35 -0-
cations for grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth
below:
District No.
1
7
Application Amount
$ 407,400
1,039,200
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby designated
as "Central Agency" for said construction project as defined by the
said provisions of the California Administrative Cod~ an·d is directed
to act as agent for County Sanitation Di~trict No. 1 in all ways necessary
to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 1
as hereinabove expressed.
Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized and
instructed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
No. 1 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction
grant under said Act of Congress, in the amount of $407,400 for a joint
project generally described as:
SUNFLOWER INTERCEPI'OR TRUNK
Acceptance of said grants may be for amounts more or less than herein-
above set forth .
...
Agenda Item #35 0 -2·
,·
P.O. BOX 1052
AREA CODE 303
471-0123
.,....
COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO
February 16, 1970
Orange County Sanitation District :/fl
P. 0. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Gentlemen:
During the past year Holly Sugar Corporation
("Holly") utilized the service and facilities of Orange
County Sanitation District :/fl (the "District") to dispose
of wast~ material generated at or by its sugarbeet factory
located on Dyer Road (the "Dyer Plant") under an accepted
proposal dated April 10, 1969 (the "1969 Agreement").
Holly wishes to continue to make use of the
facilities of the District during calendar year 1970.
However, Ilolly understands that the Orange County Chamber
of Commerce has suggested an alternate ordinance which
would, if adopted, modify existing and govern future charges
by the District for services. A copy of such proposal is
attached, marked Exhibit "A."
This letter, therefore, in duplicate orj_ginal,
when accepted will evidence and establish the agreement
between Holly and the District with respe.ct to services rn1d
charges therefore to be furnished Holly by the District
for a term (the "1970 term") commencing as of January 1,
1970 and terminating December 31, 19/0.
The District shall furnish Holly with services
for the 1970 term and charge Holly for services of the
same kind and at the same rate as described and designated
in the 196 9 Agreement; provided> hm·1ever, that should
Orange County> during the course of calendar year 1970,
adopt nn orclinnncc j_ncorporat:i.ng substantially the
Agenda Ttem //36 P-1 District 1
·r-·
· Orange County Sanitation
District ill -2-February 16, 1970
provisions summarized in .Exhibit "A" (the "new ordinance"),
then Holly shall have the· option (but· not the requirement)
of adopting provisions of the new ordinance to this .
Agreement with the effect that all rates provided by
the new ordinance would govern the charges to Holly under
this Agreement on and after the effective date of the
new ordinance.
If the above and foregoing is acceptable to
the District, please so indicate by causing an authorized
District official to execute both duplicate originals in
the space provided belo·w, returning Holly's copy, so
marked, to the attention of the undersigned.
Very truly yours,
HOLLY SUGAR CORPORATION
ACCEPTED: -------{date)
ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 111
By
Agenda Item #36 P-2 Dlstrict 1
RESOLUTION NO. 70-32-1
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED
A RESOLUTICN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO .. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED
FROM LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant Deed dated January 8,
1970, wherein Levitt and Sons of California, Inc.,grants to
County Sanitation District No. 1, all its interests in the real
property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and
more particularly described as follows:
The Northerly 20.00 feet of Lots 79 through 82 jn
Tract No. 7000, per Map recorded in Book 264, Pages
42 through 45 inclusive, Records of Orange County,
California.
Section 2. That said Grant Deed is accepted at no cost
to the District, in connection with the Dyer Trunk Sewer; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official
Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970.
Ar:enda Item #37 . -Q-Dlstrict 1
RESOLUTION NO. 70-33-1
AWARDING CONTRACT NOo P2-16, SEDI-
MEN'l1NL1ION BASIN "J" AND DIGESTER 11 J 11
AT PLANT NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEDIMENTATION
BASIN "J'' AND DIGESTER "J", CONTRACT NO. P2-16
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted
to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, District's
engineers, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be made to J. E. & W. W. HOAGLAND
---------~--~~~----------~~~---
Contractor for SEDIMENTATION BASIN "J" AND DIGESTER "J" AT PLANT
NO. 2, CONTRACT NO. P2-16, and the proposal submitted for said work
are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. P2-16 be
awarded to J. E • & W • W ~ HOAGLAND , Contractor,
------~~--~~~~~~~~~-------·------
in the total amount of $587,700.00 , in accordance with the
terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the
specifications and contract.documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970.
-R-Dlstr:tct 1
Eng. Estimate: $650,000.
B I D TAB U·L AT I 0 N
S H E E T
Date: March 6, 1970 __ __,.1~1-:~0~0~a~.-m-.---~~---
Contract For:
SEDIMENTATION BASIN "J11 AND DIGESTER "J11 A'r PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-16
BIDDER
1. J.E. & W.W. Hoagland
Long Beach
2 · J. Putnam Henck
San Bernardino
3. J. D. Deffenbaugh, Inc.
Riverside
4 · Lomar Corporatjon
Huntington Beach
5. Hood Corporation
Whittier
~ · 6 · U.T.E.C.
Gardena
7. Thomas Construction Company
Fresno
8. J. R. Youngdale Construction
San Diego
9.
10.
Agenda Item .f/38 -S-
TOTAL BID
$ 587,700.00
601,430.00
603,603.00
608,500.00
618,800.00
634,990.00
734,000.00
76L~, 000. 00
District l
RESOLUTION NO. 70-34-2
APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (Annexation No .. 5)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ·OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO
THE DISTRICT "PROPOSED BEVERLY-GLENWOOD ANNEXATION
TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 -(ANNEXATION
NO. 5)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the
Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to
County Sanitation District No. 2, by means of a petition filed with
said Commission by the property owners; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Beverly-Glenwood
Annexation No. 5 to County Sanitation District No. 2 11
, the exterior
boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit
"B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
~fininhabited; and,
Section 4. That the reason for annexing ·said territory is to
provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $6,586.06
($260 per acre) have been received by County Sanitation District No. 2;
and,
Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section
56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove,
be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County S~nitation District No. 2.
PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular meetirgon March 11, 1970.
Agenda Item #42 T-1 Dist:rlct 2
... '
ANNEXATION NO. 5 (Beverly-Glenwood)
Conn ty S:lni. t:l tion Dis td.c t No 2
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
All that certain land situated partly within the City of Yorba
Linda, County of Orange, State of California, to-wit:
... ~
That. portion of the northeast quarter of Fractional Section 23,
. Township 3 South, Range 9 West, San Bernardino Meridian, ANll that portion
of the land of Samuel Kraemer, in the nortl~1est quarter of Fractional
Section 24 of said Townsl1ip and Range as per map filed in Book 2 Page 21
of Records of Surveys, in the Office of the County Recorder of said
County. Described as follows:
Rcginnine at a poi.nt on the northerly boundary line of Connty
Sanl.ta t:1 on DJ~; tric l No. 2 of Orange County, per f ornw tJ on u n tcc.1 6-9-118
being also the northerly lJnc of the Rancho Canon. de Santa Ana, distant
thereon N 89° 23' 16" East 386.73 feet from a monument marking the north-
east corner of Felipe Yorba Allotment of Second Class Land in tlic partltion
of said Rancho Canon de Santa Ana, and also distant thereon South 89° 23'
16" West, 271.25 feet from the quarter·corner of Sections 23 and 24 to the
point of beginning, said point being a point on a curve concave westerly
having 0 rnc.Hus of 1200 feet, a radial 11.ne of s.:tid curve to s.'.1id point
bears South 50° 57' 49" East; thence leaving the boundary line of said
County Sanitation District No. 2, northerly along said curve through a
central angle of 39° 17' 20" a distance of $22.87 feet to the point of
tangency thereof with the easterly line of said northeast quarter of
Sec ti on 23, said line being also the westerly 1 ine of said nor tln·:cs t
quarter of Section 24; thence along said line, North 0° 15' 09'' West
15 '• • 3 8 f c e t to a poi n t in th c south c r 1 y 1 inc of the r i g h t o f way ( 5 0 feet
wide) of the Metropol:i.t:rn Water District of Southern Californ:ia; tltr_•nce
along s;dd southerly right of way line, South 76° 06' 28" East 1537 .60
feet; thence South 13° 53' 32" West 54/i.80 feet, more or less to a point
in said northerly line of the boundary of Orange County Sanitation Dis-
trict N;. 2; thence along said northerly boundary line, South 89° 23' 16"
.West 1629.13 feet to the point of beginning.
Containing 25.331 Acres, more or less .
. .
.•
Agenda Item #LI 2 ·District ·2
1.
~.
I
-L --. -
E. L. f?carson & Assoc.
1551 W. REDONDO BEACH BLVD.
GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247
A1LiP 51-!otlJ!,\.'G .Dr,opo·SED
~1A.JIJ[x,_\no.v 7o O:;:~l-.'5!:. Cou1--n-y
SAIJI/!., TIC.V D/5;-k.' /CT. .'./£. "2
Vl.0. ;3~~ .=i P. I
(213} 321-1515 (213J 329-4125
Oa te: .': -7-:, <;,
) ''JI I -v } _.,..,~ 'J , /": -~;:;.., .... I/;: ,-JI \/ Gl _, / 1,1 //"'/'tf,•) J.1 r. ,, C:: /., l-i I 1'-111 -i~J._.,. ~ "_ ...... -::_v.._r .... .._, - -CN ;1., --~v,J
Designed b;': :>.J.=.
Checked b :
r4 I 13 ----71·----
f)') I I/) "~. .. ..... 'J
I I IH If'' =-~ ')I N.11. ~ • rac . ..,,ec. ,..,.
T. s s. ,2. 9 w. ,ss.M.
,..... I JA.V/U~ ~
LEGEAID
r·~ 300·
rx; ... -7·1 1v~ 1:_::.-I/ UD°'/\ r)',./ c:... \ ~ '.> /\ ..:; _,Jo,._, 11 ,--., ...... .,~:~~ .. ~-J..·:. .. .;,..ca.. .r~~t:i:;:.;_ ~:..! ......
p;(oPo5ED 8cu1:JDAA.At-~--........--··-·----·-
----------------
Agenda Item f/lt2 T-3 District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 70-35-3
FEDERAL GRANT -WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DIS'l.1 RICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER
33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ. ·
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section.·.l. An Act of Congress knm·m as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County,
California, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3,
Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California,
for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major
trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and
other local collection sewering agencies.
Sectj_on 3. The General Manager is hereby authorized and
instructed to prepare, sign and submit, for Cou.nty Sanitation District
No. 3, all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction
grant under said Act of Congress, in the amou.nt of $7h0,500 for a
project generally described as:
WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILrrIES
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than herein-
above set forth.
Agenda It~~~ #~§_ -U-
RESOLUTION NO. 70-36-11
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLATER-SPRINGDALE
AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 11-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE SLATER-SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER
RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-11
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by Keith and Associates, District's
engineers and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be .made to SALATA, INC.
------~~--~~--~~~~--~~--~~
Contractor, for SLATER-SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER,
CONTRACT NO. 11-11, and the proposal submitted for said work, are
hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said ·contract for Contract No. 11-11 be
awarded to SALATA, INC. , Contractor, in the
~~--~-----~~~~----~~~----
total amount of $710,700.00 in accordance with the terms of
its bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract
with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications
and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970.
Agenda Item #56 -V-District 11
Eng. Estimate: $735,896.
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
S H E E T
Contract For:
Date: March 6, 1970
11:00 a.m.
SLATER-SPEINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 11-11
BIDDER
1. Salata, Inc.
Stanton
2. Mike Prlich & Sons
S. El Monte
3. R. G. Atckinson
Signal Hill
4 · Drummond & Bronneck, Inc.
Santa Monica
5. Henson Construction Co.
Bell Gardens
6 • Mercury Company
El Monte
7 · Steve Bubalo Construction Co.
Reseda
8 · Steve Kral Corporation
Baldwin Park
9. Merco Construction Engineers
Redondo Beach
lO. A & P Pipeline
Upland
11. Scott Bros. Construction
Santa Ana
12. Dorfman Construction Co.
Los Angeles
Agenda Item #56 -W-
TOTAL BID
$ 710,700.00
738,719.36
770,000.00
823,309.00
823,946.oo
849,090.00
850,864.oo
861,889.50
892,541.10
908,659.00
913,128.00
990, 129-. 00
District 11
RESOLUTION NO. 70-37-7
APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ·AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
WITH PACIFIC INVESTMENT COMPANY
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement
Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange
County, California, and Pacific Investment Company, providing for
reimbursement by the District for South Coast Plaza Subtrunk
Extension, Contract No. 7-lF-B, which said sewerage facility is more
particularly described as:
A 15" VCP Sanitary Sewer extending northerly from
Sunflower Avenue generally along the alignment of
the F-2 Flood Control Channel northerly to the
vicinity of MacArthur Boulevard,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District
are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf
of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel; and,
Section 3. That reimbursement in the total amount of
$38.J41.50 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the
terms and conditions of said agreement and Schedule "A" attached hereto,
from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. ·
Agencla Item f/61 -X-Distrlct 7.
RESOLUTION NOo 70-38-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORPER:
Section 1. That the certain Director's Deed (easement agreement)
dated February 2, 1970, wherein the State Division of Highways grants to
County Sanitation District No. 7, a permanent easement for sewer
purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of California, in
connection with the Gisler Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, and the
Redhill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is
granted is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That said Director's Deed is accepted at no
cost to the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be
authorized and directed to record said deed in the Official Records
of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970.
Agenda Item #62 -Y-District 7
RESOLUTION NO. 70-39-7
.. •• • --• p
AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION
WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8
(CONDEMNATION #1 )
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOO 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and
determined, and hereby does find and determine, that the public
interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition,
construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said
County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to
wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances
necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring
devices, pumping stations, and other structures for the trans-
porting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the
purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage
and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said
County Sanitation District and such other territories as said
District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that
certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State
of California, is necessary· therefor.
Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of
which is required by the public interest and n~cessity for the
uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in
the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly
·.described on Schedule 11 A11 and shown on maps marked Exhibit 11 A11
attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full
herein.
Agenda Item f/63 Z-1 District 7
...
Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way
above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired
subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns,
to use the surface of the land w~thin the boundary lines of such
easements and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full
and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided,
however, that:
(a) No building or structure of any kind shall be
placed, erected or maintained thereon;
(b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be
constructed upon, over, or along said ease-
ments and rights of way to a grade less
than four feet above the top of any pipe
or pipes located within the lines of said
easements or rights of wayj
(c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over
the surface of the ground as it shall exist
within the lines of said easements and rights
of way upon the completion of the improvements
to be cons~ructed therein greater than six feet
in depth.
Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way
to be acquired shall include:
(a) The right to construct manholes, air valves,
blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations,
metering stations, standpipe and service
connection structures appurtenant to said
line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which
structures shall not extend above the surface
~-of the ground;
(b) The right during construction to use all
existing private roads within the properties
of the owners for ingress to and egress from
j\penda Item #63 Z-2 District 7
the work, together with the right, upon
completion of the construction of the pipe-
line or pipelines or other works, to con-
struct and maintain an access road upon, over,
and along such permanent easements and rights
of way as may be in the public interest from
time to timeo
Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares its
intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof
by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller,
Nissan and Kogler, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California,
be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners
and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of
condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County
Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be
prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable
thereto. That said attorneys are authroized and instructed to make
application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of sec~rity
by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order
permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County,
California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property
for the uses and purposes herein described.
Section 6. That the Auditor· of the District is authorized
upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nisson, General
Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County
of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be
required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court
granting immediate possessi.on of easements and.rights of way to the
District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin~ held March 11, 1970.
Agenda Item fl9..'i Distr1 lct 7
Z-3
..,,.
... ';·.
·/.
. •' .·
· .... ·.
~·:
.....
("{lf:.Ef?.'T C fl,0.V.llS
fj:s:ll
E14 s-4 7'1 (IJ?~ . ::.
_,,.--. T,I. 4 7 :~ ';' l': (, • ~-____ .._ __ _
.JESSc /?."J?f)!;s
.·· . ._.( hM61
·";8fOG/094 O.P..
. ffii] Dill
( 7-8·4 )
Q£!]
A01-U~0J{"r
~"---~~~--~~---
•• 'I • • • ·.r • ·. ·.· ... ... , .. ·. -': .. . .
·:·. . ,
. ·.· ... ,
. : \ ::
. I.: ..... ~ .
. . .
. :
.· .....
· . .'.L
l'1 • ..
; . ·.' .. : ..... ,: ........ "
Agenda Item //63
0.1/EL l ESTE/JJ
I 1-e-1s I
·· 87.Jo/122 o.~
1·.s-11 I
8G81 /7Z4 O,P.
[ 7·0·/9 J
8/C!>/N1 o.-n.
CC/Y ,4. C'OA TS
· lJ7StJ/7.?I O.tl,
!J,1-./.0t..SON
( N·/4 f
4701 4~2 o.P..
G.£.OOO$oN
I 7•8·/G I ~ ~ ~
C2G7/G08 O./t .
';:'\
1·.s·1s j J
~ ~795/ ;91 o.r. .
[ Nh?4J B
. ~
l>-"'~o eCt-#\,W.61, ~
T.1.4739C/!.
ALLAN so'
11.4/?/?lf! ...
1Jc1e/11g o.r..
. ~.~/Jll' Et>"~<~r -.. -.. -...
_...,..,....-...--
........... ~ .
.:. '· · .. '.• ..... ' ,, .. -.....
Dlstrlct 7__
I
\
t
ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST BOND PROPOSITION
The following ·arguments for :me! against the Bond Proposition to be submitteJ at ·a Spccbl District
Election to b~ held in County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California. on March ~4. I 970,
have bt•en filed with the Sccrt.'tary pursuant to Article 3, Chapter 2, Division 4 (Sections 3780 to 3786,
inclush·e) of the Ekctions Code_:
ARGUMENT FOR BOND PROPOSAL
Since 1962 County Sanitation District No. Ts population has tripled and its assessed \"Jlu~:tinn has in-
creased from $68,948,530 to S2n,S92,760. This development. has increased the voluml' of sewage so
that tl.w existing sewerage facilities are at near 100% capacity and are at timt'S ovcrload~d. ·
In order to provide sewerage facilities to prevent overflows, the District Bo~ud has ajopkcl :i two-ph~1SC'
construction program.
Between 1971 and 1973. 50.000 fret of trunks would be constructed south of the Sant~ Ana frct?w~y at a
cost of SG.000,000. In second-pk1se construction. between 1974 and 1979. 39,000 fed of trunks would
·be built north of the Freeway, costing $3,816,000. Phase One should be financed through is·rn~1rn:e of the
propOSL"'d general obligation bonds, \Vhik Phase Two would be funded by ch:1rgcs fo:-new connections.
Your "'YES" vote on the bond measure on March 24 is urgently requested and rccomrncndccl bcL'~lllsc:
( 1) The District is oblig~ted tllldt.~r law to provide SC\Vl'ragL' facilities for its territory.
(2) Other methods of financing this obligation arc considerably more cxpen.siVL' and tend to place the
burden on present users rathC'r than future users. Some of these altcrn~1tc methods arL':
(a) Direct tax al ion increase;
(b) r..fonthly sewer service charges for each user;
(c) Revenut' bonds to be voted on and paid by sewer service ch~uges;
(d) Lcasl?-purchasc financing hy means of a nonprofit corporation.
(J) Failure to construct additional srwL•rage facilities could result in. restrictions on further rcsidcnti~l,
commercial and ind ustria I dcvelopmcn t imposed by heal th and water pollution L'Ontrol :rn thori ties.
Under the proposed bond financinr. prog1'am, the present District sewer tax rJtc> of 50 cents per S 100
assessed valuation is prcdict'-·d to pay the costs of th(' proposl'd bond issUL' 3S well as all other District
cxprnses. No increase in property tncs is anticipatrd.
Agenda Item /J6h
BOARD or DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
Clifton C. I\1ilkr (C'hairm~111)
Lorin Grisct
Ellis N. Porter
Don E. Smith
William Hirstein
ARGUMENT 1-\GAlr\!ST BOND PROPOSAL
(Nonr Filed)
-AA-District 7
..
STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ELECTIONS CODE SECTIONS 5300 TO 5304
s shown on the enclosed sample ballot, an election will be held in the County S:rnitation District Nu. 7, of
"""()range County on l\farch ~4. 1970, for the purpose of submitting to the ekctors of said distrid the
question of incurring J bonded indebtedness of said district in the principal ::nnount of S6,000.000. As
such bonds an.~ authorized and sold, the principal thereof and interest thl'rcon will he pay;:ibh· from the
proceeds of tax levies made upon all the taxable real property in sJid district. The following in ft 1r:n~1 ti on
regarding tax rates is given to comply with St'ctions 5300 to 5304 of the Elections Code. Such infPrmation
is based upon the best estimaks and projections presently avaihbk from official sources and tipOn ex-
perience within s:lid district or other demonstrable factors. ·
If said bonds arc authorized, thl' present projection is that said ~6,000.000 of bonds wil1 bL· sold in a
single saJc during the fiscal year 1970---1971.
The district Board of Directors h:.is established a policy of maintaining a stable tax rak and hasc.'cl upon the
best estimates and projections presently available, the current total tax rak of appro:--.imatcly S.50 pa
' $100 of assessed valuation required to fund all fiscal activities will not inL·reasc during thl· period of th1..•
bond retirement. -
Based upon such projL·ctions and estimates. the following statement is made in compliance with par~1graphs
(1 ), {2) and (3) of subdi·,·isior~ (a) of Section 5301 of the Elections Code:
The first· fiscal year after the sale of the bonds will be the fiscal year t 971--· I 972. It is presently e~;tim:itcd
that the assessed vJ]uati0n of all t~1xab!c property in the district, as shown on the asses~mcnt roll fm such
fiscal year, will be S268, 102.000. Base-d upon the foregoing estimates ~rnd projections, th1..· tax ratl' which
would be required to fund said bond issue during such fiscal year ·l 97 l -;-197?., including rt.•savc require-
ments for tlw following fis1..·al yc:ir, would he S.2658 per S l 00 of ~1ssrsscd valuation.
The tax rate for fisc:il year t 97'2-1973, the second fiscal year after the sale of°the bonds, b~1scd upon an
estimated assessed valtwtion of $:.88.210,000 will decrease to S. l MO per SI 00 or assess~d rnluation.
~fhc fis('a] year in which the highrst tax rate required to fund s:1id bond issue to be levied is also cstimakd
to be the fiscal year 1971--1972, as abO\'C stated.
The attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is b~ISl'd upon projrctions
and estimates only, which arc not binding upon the district. The actual tinws of sail's of s~id bond-.. and
the.> amount so1cl 3t any given timL' will be governed by the nct~cls of the distril'l. thL~ thl'n appli1.·abk do..'ht
limit, the state of the bond market a·nd other fal'tors. The actual interest r~lll' whkh bond~ sold will ~i:ar
will depend upon the bond m:nket 3t the time of the sale. The ·actu:il as~essccl v~t!m's durin~. thL' Sl'"\?ral
future years will depend upon the then amount of taxable prop8rty wit!tin s~1id distrii.:t. and thL· ·.:tluc
thereof as determined in tht' ~1ssL'SSllll'llt and cqualiz~1tion process. lknl·1..·. th-.· actu~d tax r~1tcs ~1111.I thl'
years in which the same ~re applicabk m~ry vary from those prL'SC'ntly csti111,1kd» ~!-.. abmT stakJ.
The foregoing statement has bcrn a pprovcd by th~ governing hoard () f S;t id s~tll i t:1 {ion Di-;trict.
. .,,,,.,
Agenda Item #61+
FRI~D A. HARPER. Sl~net;11y
COUNTY SANITATION DIS'1 RICT ~O. 7
OF ORANGE COUNTY
10844 Ellis A n·rrnc
P. (). Box 81 27 I
Fountain Valky, Calif. 92708
-BI3-Distrlct 7
,.
ANALYSIS OF BOND PROPOSAL
The proposal to be submitted to the voters of County .Sanitation District No. 7 on l\l<lrch 24, 1970. seeks
authority to issue and sell ~6,000,000 in general obligation bonds to be used to construct additional trunk
sewer lines. An engineering report was adopted, after public hearing, which sho\vl·d the lines to be con-
structed as necessary for transporting sewage and industrial wastes originating within the District to its
treatment plant bt:c:rnsc the rapid devcloim1ent of the District from farm land to rl'Sickn tial, commercial
and industrial uses has used all exi~ting major and interceptor trunk line hydraulic c~1pacity.
The proposed gcnt'rul obligation bond issue is one of several possible methods of fin~mcing this District
obligation. It was rccomm;:.ndcd as the least expensive and the best-suited to District purpo_scs by Bartle
Wells Associates, indtpcndent municipal financing consultants employed by the District.
The proposed construction would provide a second main. interceptor se\wr line from the District into the
treatment pbnt jointly owned and operated by the District and the other County Sanitation Districts.
That portion of the new interceptor sewer line running easterly from the treatment plant in the direction
of Sunnower Avenue to l\fain Street would be financed and owned in p:nt by County Sanitation District
No. 1. This joint participation would substanti~11y reduce the costs to County Sanit:1tion District No. 7 of
this Ii ne. ·
The otlwr s~·wer trunks to be constructed arc to provide an adequate trunk system to nll areas of the
District in order to relieve O\'crloaded existing trunk lines ancl to permit the continued orderly growth and
development of the District by local agencies and property owners.
If approved, the District will sell the bonds and repay them by kvying taxes on the taxable real property
within the District over a period of years not to exceed forty. /predicts
The financing consultants' report based on p~1st growth rate cxpL'ricnce projccted,th:.it the total tax rate to
be levied by this District for all purposes, including the repayment of these bonds, will not exceed 50
cents pl.~r S l 00 of assessed valuation. The total tax rate for the J?istrid is now $00.4970. Th~ rapidly
increasing assessed valuation of thr District is predicted to provide a revenue b~1sis for repayment of these
proposed bonds. · ·
Agenda Item //6'-t
C. ARTIIUR NISSON
Gcncr:il Counsel
County Sanitation District No. 7
-cc.:. District 7