Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1970-03-11COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 March 5, 1970 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUN'rY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 ------------------------- Gentlemen: A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sani ta tj.on Dist1:icts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of' Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, March 11, 1970 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellls Avenue Fountain Valley, California Buil.c~~.!lg Comm5_! t9e ...;-Mce .. ~:Ln.?12. -7: 00 p. m. , Mar·c h 11 TELEPHONES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 Chairman Miller Item No. 14 Presentation of Plant Operator Certificates from the California Water Pollution Control Association. to the following employees: Wilton Huntley Grade IV John Silva Grade IV Thomas Rood Grade III This certification program is a voluntary self-improvement program for plant operators which requires considerable time and effort to prepare for the examination. The extra effort devoted to earning these certificates is evidence that these operators are interested in improving their efficiency. Call meeting of the Executive Committee for Tuesday, March 31st, at ""'-"' 5:30 p.m. Invite Directors McWhinney and Clark. •I II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 11, 1970 7:30 p.m. P. 0. Box 51 75 10844 E:ll is Aven ue Founta in Va ll ey, Ca lif., 9 2708 Telephones : March 6, 1970 Aree Code 714 540-29 10 962-2 411 The following is a brief explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. * * * * * * * * * Joint Boar.de Nos. 11 through 13 -PROPOSED UNIFORM CONNECTION AND USE ORDINANCE: These three agenda items relate to the proposed ordinance which has been under consideration by the Boards since e arly last fall. In the interim, the staff has attended numerous meetings on this matter with the committees of the Orange County Chamber of Commerce and other interested parties. It became apparent from these meetings that a different type of formula than originally proposed for establishing charges for excess use of the District's facilities would (1) be more acceptable to Orange County industries , and (2) conform more closely with proposed formulas under considera tion by the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts. Accordingly, the ordinance now proposed is quite different in many respects from that originally submitted to the Boards and which has been the subject for the continued public hearings. For this reason, it is believed appropriate to close the hearing on the original ordinance (Item No. 11), to reject it (Item No. 12) and to declare intent to consider adoption of a revised ordinance at the April 8 Board meeting and to call an April 8 pub lic hearing on the revised ordina nce (Item No. 13). In order to review and discuss the ordinance in its rev ised form, the staff is meeting with the Ad Hoc Committee of the County Chamber of Commerce on Monday afternoon, March 9, and we are advised that the Chamb er has invited over 700 industrie s in the County to attend. At this meeting the Stee ring Committee of the Ch amb e r will present to the group a sununary of the ordinance , particu larly with r egard to its effect on existing and future industry, and will recanmend that the larger group act favorably on it. As agreed at the February meeting, an adjourned meeting of all Boards will be held on the evening of March 25 to discuss the revised ordinance, prior to the April public hearing. It will be noted on the agenda , therefore, that it is proposed that each Board adjourn to this date. A copy of the revised ordinance is included with the agenda material. Another development of note in connection with the proposed ordinance is the fact that the President's recent message to Congress on water pollution control stated that administrative action would be taken to require all agencies, as a condition to receiving Federal construction grants, to demonstrate that industry is paying its proportionate share of industrial waste treatment costs. Nos. 17 and 18 -SPECIAL BUILDING COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATION ON NEW LABORATORY BUILDING : The Committee will meet immediately before the Board meeting to consider the practically completed plans for this building and the architect's revised estimate of cost. At the Board meeting the Committee will verbally present its recommendation for Bo ard action. No. 19 -MODIFICATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR PLANT EXPANSION: The Directors will recall that at the February meeting, a report by John Carollo Engineers proposed a major change in our plant expansion program for the next three years. The plan proposed was approved and t he firm directed to prepare a formal modification report as required by State law for Board consideration. This modification report has been submitted and the staff has reviewed it and finds that it conforms to the revised expa..~sion program approved in February by t he Boards. Since adoption of the modification report is now only a required formality, a copy is not included with this mailing but will be available for inspection at, or prior, to the Board meeting by any interested Director or person. No. 20 -AUTHORIZATION FOR DESIGN OF PLANT FACILITIES: As pointed out in the enclosed letter dated March 2 from John Carollo Engineers, it is important that design of one of the facilities set forth in the modification report, described under the preceding item, proceed at the earliest moment. The high priority assigned to this facility is based on the fact that its construction and operation will give us the necessary experience with which to modify existing plant units to obtain an improvement in treatment. The facility referred to is an experimental sedimentation basin included in an over-all larger project. It is contemplated that the basin will eventually function as a normal plant component but its design will provide for its being used initially to conduct experimental procedures on various methods of increasing removal of settleable and floatable solids prior to discharge to the ocean. The staff recommends that the engineers be authorized to p roceed with the design of this facility which will be included in our recommendations for the Joint Construction Budget for 1970-71. -2- No. 21 -ACCEPTANCE OF PROPOSAL FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR REPAIR OF PLANT FACILITIES: At the staff's request, Jolm Carollo Engineers have submitted a proposal to do the necessary design work involved in the repair and reconditioning of several older plant units. This work will result in restoring or increasing the original efficiency of the units and is described in some detail in the Carollo proposal included with the agenda material. We recommend that the per diem proposal be accepted as submitted, with a maximum fee of $12,500. No. 22 -ADDENDUivI TO PLA~fT JOB NO. Pl-15, P2-15: This job, bids for which will be opened on March 20, has been previously d e scribed but consists basically of construction of sludge dewatering facilities at Plant No. 2 and additions to the existing facilities at Plant No. 1. Because of the nature of the job several teclmical questions have been raised by bidders which require clarification by means of an addendum to the plans and specifications. The actual addendum has not yet been completed by the engineers but will be included with the agenda material at the Board meeting. No. 23 -PURCHASE OF TWO 4 1 X 8 1 VIBRATORY SCREENS: At the present time the Districts have in operation three of these units for screen- ing waste digester streams at Plant No. 1 for the removal of floatable material prior to discharge to the ocean. The units, purchased from the Link Belt Company in 1968, have proven very satisfactory and will be continued in use as part of the new plant facilities described in t he preceding item. Since similar screening facilities at Plant No. 2 1i:i ll immediately improve the quality of our effluent, the staff is r8commending that two more units be purchased at this time for tempo- ~ary installation there and for eventual incorporation in the sludge dewatering facility to be constructed there this year. Accordingly, we have solicited the manufacturer of the orig inal three screens for a quotation on two more units and have been assured that they can be fUrnished at no increase in price over the figure bid in 1968. I am therefore recommending that I be authorized to purchase these units immediately at a total cost not to exceed $4,ooo , plus tax and f reight. No. 24 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, PLANT JOB NO. I-4-2B: This change order relates to an extension of time for the delivery of a 750 cfm dig ester gas compressor and an extension of the faithful performance bond coverage. The proposed change order, included with the agenda material, is self-explanatory and we recommend its adoption. ~ro. 25 -REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: As ~xplained in previous agenda reports, a procedure has been esta - b lished to receive and file and act upon requests for extensions of t ime, received from the contractor and approved by the eng inee r, for the p:r·eceding month. It is recommended that the r e quest for f'our days extension of' time , as shown on the agenda, be granted. -3- No. 26 -DETERMINATION R3GARDING DISCLOSURE OF ASSETS ACT: We be- lieve the Directors are t~oroughly familiar with this ma tter. Since the act also applies to the staff of the Districts , it wi ll be necessary for the Board to determine which employees are required to file the prescribed statement. We have asked our Legal Counsel to advise the Boards on this matter. No. 27 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL GRANT ON PLANT CONSTRUCTION: The Directors have undoubtedly noted press reports on the Administration's proposal for increased appropriations for Federal grants for sewerage works construction. We have just received advice from the State Water Resources Control Board, which allocates the California share of these appropriations, that this share will be in the neighborhood of $65 million for the present fiscal year and for the next four years. We are therefore recommending that the Districts apply for grants in the future for every project of any magnitude which appears to have any degree of eligibility (see also Items Nos. 35 and 48). As a preliminary step, the resolutions appearing with the agenda material, authorizing grant applications for all presently planned plant expansion work for the next fiscal year, are recom- mended for adoption. I plan to have recommendations on additional applications at either the March 25 or April 8 meetings. No. 28 -ATTENDANCE AT CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE IN SACRAMENTO FROM APRIL 29 THROUGH MAY 2: For many years it has been customary to authorize a number of employees to attend these conferences and we feel that such attendance has been bene- ficial to the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices and procedures of other agencies as well as new developments in· the sewerage field. Many of our employees are active in the Santa Ana River Basin Section of this organization and have a genuine interest in these meetings. It is recommended that authorization be given to designate ten Districts' employees to attend this meeting with fees and expenses paid. No. 29 -AUTHORIZATION FOR STAFF MEMBER TO ATTEND MEETING OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF CALIFORNIA SANITARY AND SANITATION DISTRICT ASSOCIATION IN SACRA..1\ffiNTO, APRIL 18 : I plan to have our Director of Finance accompany me to this meeting (for which I already have general authority to attend) since there are several matters to be discussed in which Mr. Sylvester can participate with benefit to the committee and ourselves. The meeting date is a Saturday so no loss of staff time is involved. No. 30 -SEMI-ANNUAL FINANCIAL REPORT: Our ind~pendent auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, have advised that they are mailing to the Directors , under separate cover, their required report for the period ending December 31, 1969. The staff will be prepared to answer any questions the Directors may have on the material presented in this report. -4- Districts Nos. 1 and 7 No. 35 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GR~NT, SUNFLOWER INTER- CEPTOR TRUNK SEWER: As described under Item No. 27, we believe there is a possibility of obtaining Federal grants on major construction such as this .which may qualify as an eligible project. Accordingly, the staff is preparing formal resolutions authorizing a grant appli- cation for the Sunflower Trunk Sewer as set forth in the recently approved engineer's reports for both Districts. These resolutions are not included in this mailing because of time limitations but will be available at the Board meeting. District No. 1 No. 36 -INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL AGREEMENT WITH HOLLY SUGAR COMPANY: As the Directors are aware, we have had an agreement for several years with this Company to provide industrial waste disposal service at certain specified charges. Included with the agenda is a proposal from the company to renew for 1970 the agreement on the same terms and conditions. We recommend the proposal be accepted. It should be noted that the company is qualifying its proposal to the effect that if a uniform connection and use ordinance becomes effective during 1970, the company will have the option of continuing with the present agreement for 1970 or conforming to the terms of the ordinance. This is not a problem since it is proposed that the uniform ordinance will become effective on January 1, 1971. No. 37 -ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FOR EASEMENT: Leavitt and Sons of California, Inc., has offered the District a fee title grant, at no cost, to a portion of the easement in which the District's present trunk sewer lies along the Pacific Electric Railroad tracks between Bristol and Main Streets. The property is of no value to the company, which is developing adjoining land, and we recommend acceptance of the deed. No. 38 -AWARD OF PLANT JOB NO. P2-16: Bids for construction of this plant expansion job, which c.onsists of a new sedimentation basin and digester at Plant No. 2, will be opened on the day of this mailing. If the bids are satisfactory, we plan to have a recommendation for award available at the time of the Board meeting. The engineer~s estimate is $650,000. District No. 2 No. 42 -ANNEXATION NO. 5: The resolution, included under this agenda item, is a formality to conclude Board action on this annexa- tion which has been previously approved by the Board. District No. 3 No. 48 -APPLICATION FOR FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANT, WESTSIDE INTER- CEPTOR FACILITIES: The District has budgeted and is ready t o ask for bids, pending final agreement with the U. s. Navy regarding acqui- -5- sition of the site for the proposed Los Alamitos Pumping Station, for four urgently needed construction projects. In view of the : possible availability of Federal funds for grants for construction of this type of facilities (see Item No. 27), we are recommending that the Board authorize the staff to proceed with the application. Because of the shortness of time, the staff will not be able to prepare the enabling resolution in time for this mailing but it will be included with the final agenda material. District No. 5 SEWERAGE OF COASTAL AREA ADJACENT TO THE DISTRICT: Although no formal action appears on the agenda regarding this matter , we believe it appropriate to report that the Irvine Ranch Water District, with which the District has been holding discussions for some time on this subject , has indicated that a definite proposal , departing to some extent from the plans presented in the November, 1969 Interim Master Plan Report, will be soon sub~itted. At the regular February Board meeting it was agreed that, prior to any formal Board consideration of any such proposals, the Chairman, staff and engineer review them and therafter recommend appropriate Board action. Yesterday, the IRWD manager advised by telephone that the matter was still under study and a proposal would not be submitted this month. District No. 11 No. 56 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 11-11: Bids for this project, the Slater-Springdale and Edinger Relief Trunk Sewer, will be opened on the day of this mailing. If the bids are s a tisfa ctory, a recom- mendation for award will be made at the time of the Board meeting. District No. 7 Nos. 60 and 61 -REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC INVESTMENTS .. COMPANY: This ma tter was deferred from the February 25 adjourned mee ting and will be t a ken up again with appropriate e xplanations which were not possible at the February 25 meeting b e cause of my absence. No. 62 -ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS: This resolution, finalizing a routine matt e r, is recommended for adoption. No. 63 -CONDEMNATION OF RIGHT OF WAY, ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 : This resolution authorizes acquisition of easements required for the above assessment district proj e ct, a contra ct for which was awarded at the February 25 adjourned Board meeting. No . 6L~ -RATIFYING STATEMENTS MAILED FOR MARCH 24 BOND ELECTION: State l a w r e quire s that these statements carry Board appro v a l. Becaus e of the time ele ment, these stateme nts had to be prepared and made ready for mailing prior to this Board meeting . -6- Fre d A. Ha r pe r Ge nera l Manage r 3-1;!-7 () JOINT BOARDS v' Mi 11 er·, -C ·'-"" Mcwhinney V ~­Bousman -p< Brooks,~on ______ _ Cul v~er--~ . . v · -F\Irman ,vi"au1 . V C~1ez ~ · '2L: / Green v v Q.szl 6 k"./ An4-~rs0n'.·_ · Harvey.-~ Herr.in··\;/' Kroesen -~ Mcinni.s· ~ Marshall MarsQ..o.t-tv Nevj.l · l~:.,.r Parsqns~"~ Porter·"-"". ~ Reinha;zdt'v Roge.r-s· v' Schutte"~..-· {" Just"-~ Shlpl~y-"'v Smith'~ Clark, Robert · WorkmanC/ Allen'-""'""" Hirstein Harper Brown Car~lson Clarke Dunn 1'1inster Galloway Hohener Keith Low.ry Naddox Martinson Nisson Piersall Sigler Stevens Sylvester Tremblay ~ Mitch'ell V~dacr Allen l( v 1<(_ k'·. v .v ~ .. Coco Davis -Warren Westra Langer Coen Matney Herrin . ·Fuhrman, Conway Kanode · PA tter_so-n Otte Ma:r·shall Rogers Weishaupt Sims Root Mar.shall Clark, Ralph · Harper Hi.leman Hami~ton, Wm. Knudsen Phillips ·Allen 0 1 Su1l:i.van Pti:U.l:Lps DISTRIC'11 / 2-3 ;-((-? It REGULAR V ~~~---~~~~~- ADJOURNED --~~-~~~~~ ·€HI ,t. .Miller, C. Porter Allen DISTRICT 1 DISTRIC'l1 2 Clark, Robert- .Brooks, Burton Culver ·Gomez Herrin Nevil ,,Reinhardt Schutte Just Smith Workman Allen DISf1RICT 3 Culver McWhinney Bousman Furman~ Paul Green ;Herrin Anderson Harvey .Kroesen Marshott Nevil Reinhardt Schutte .... Just Clark, Robert ·Allen Parsons Marshall Allen Por·ter- Mclnnj_s Allen Miller, CO· ('!.. • _... 1iJ I f.rv Porter Hoe:crs Srn:l th Hirn tt':~ j n 8h:ipley G·r·c:cn ·Ar~cm DISTRICT 5_ ~-­ ~­ ~ DISTRrcrr 6 DISrrRIC'l1 7 -----=~ __ V-_ =-~~ __ z: HeJ'rin Coco Phillips Hamilton, Wm. Warren Langer : Patterson -Sims· -- Root , Clar!<,. BaJ-p_h Harper Hileman Knudsen Phillips Davi.s Westra Coen Patterson Fuhrma.ri _, Con we:· K·anOde · ~ Otte Weishaupt Sims Root Clark Harper Hamllton Phillips Rogers Phillips Marshall Phillips Coco Hci-r:tn MHrshr::ll H:i.lem~,n Allen M:-itncy PLJ.llip::~ II ,. II II BOAnD5 OF DE~~CTOtlS Cou nty Sanl tu ti on Dist rict s P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, Ca lifo rn ia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Va l ley, C ali f.., 92/08 JOIJ\J T 8())\f~DS Ma r ch 11 , 1 970 -7 :30 p .m. AG ENDA (1) Ple dge of Allegiance (2) Ro ll Ca l l (3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern , i f necessa r y .dJ-/ ~ (h) (5 ) (6 ) (7 ) DI STRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving mi nute s of the regular meeting h e l d February 11 , 1 970 , as mailed DISTRIC T 2 ~onsideration of mot i on appr oving mi nutes of the regular meeting held February 1 1 , 1970 , as mailed DISTRICT 3 Co ns i deration of mo t ion approving mi nut es of the r egular meeting held February 1 1 , 1 970 , as mai l ed DI STRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minut es of the regular meeting held Februa r y 11 , 1 970 , as m~i l ed (8) DISTRICT 6 Considera t i on of motion approving mi nutes of the r egular meet i ng held February 1 1, 1 970 , as mail ed (9) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving minut es of the r egular meetin g held Feb ruary 11, 1 970, and the adjourned regular meeting t h e r e of held February 25 , 1970 , as mai l ed (1 0) DISTRICT 11 Consid erat i on of motion approving minut es of the regular me e ting h e ld Feb r uary 11 , 1 970 , as mailed (11 ) AL L DISTRICTS Considera t ion of motio n opening public h earing ordinance relating to conn ect j on to and use of on proposed J1l- Dis trict 5 sew erage facilities : Read ing of written communicat:Lons ~1&11i' •&e~f /t_ttl h;irf-0 cC& A. B. Oral co mm ents or protests C . Motion t o close h ear ing (12 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideratj.on of motJon rej e cting the propos e d ordinance submj_tte d to lhe Boarc.Js on Aug:ust 13, 1969, r elating to connection to and u s e of District sew e rage facilities ,(1?.3)) !\!:I!._ DIS T_~!-C '11 ~ <.!/ Con:::;1dera t ion of Res o1 a ti.o n No. 70-29 , t o receiv e and file the revis e d ord:l.n a nc:e da te d MA.rch 1 0 , 1970 , r e lat.·i.ng ·to c o n n e ction to and u se of Dj s lric t s e we rage f a cili t i e s ; d ec l ar.i ng j nl e nt to c o rn;.i.cl e 1· the rcvls e d ordina ncr) on Apr :il 8th ; and f:i e tt ·i n g th e pub lj c hcar·:1.ng f or 7 :30 p.in ., Apr :U 8th . See pR;~e ·-·~~,~---(Ord :l.nan cc on p :=i.g0 __ 1~0_'1 _ _) (19 ) (20 ) (21 ) (22 ) ~µ'\·, (23 ) ALL DIS'l1RICTS Rep ort of the Joint Cha irman ALL DI STRICTS Report of the Gene ral Manager ALL DIS1I'RICTS Rep ort of the General Coun.se 1 ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report of the Bu:Llding Committee ALL DI STRICTS r ,t,,;t ! ,t ---i. -consideration of actions on the Buil ding Co mmitt ee 1 s -" /.' .-, ">t r ecommendations ;, r1' $ I J D,c,t. ALL DISTRICTS /\Q_.J-o ~ Consideratio of ~ adopting Modification Report .prepared by John Carollo Engineers , r elative t o the i;- 1 968 Eng:Lneers 1 Report on Wastewater Treatment Facilities AL L DISTR I CTS Consideration of motion accepting proposal of John Carollo En gineers , and directing the engineers to proc eed with the de s:Um of an expe rimental sedimentation basin . See p age "HYr ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion accepting proposal of John Carollo Engineers, for design servic es relative to r econditioning of the Pflanz Headwo r ks and Sedi mentation Basins A,B, and C at Plant No . 2 , and Sedimentation Basins 3 and L ~ at Plant No . 1, for a maximwn fee not to exceed $12 ,500 . See page "I" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Add endum No . 1 to the p lans and specj.fications for Job s Nos . Pl-15 and P2 -15 (S edimentation Basins at Plants 1 and 2). ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing purchase of two, 4 x 8 Vi bratory Scr eens from Link Belt Company, for a total price not to exceed $4 ,ooo plus t ax and freight (24 ) ALL DISTRICTS ._ci_ (25 ) -Consideration of motion approving Change Order No . 1 to Job No . I -4 -2B , granting an extension of time for S 11311 d elivery of digester gas compr esso r . ee page ALL DIS'I'RICTS Co nsideration of motion to recej_ve and file l etters fran Peter Kiewj_t Sons ' Company and John Carollo Engineers , and granting a time extens ion of four days for comp l etion of Ocean Outfall No . 2, Marine Sec tion, Job No . J -10 . See pages ----~-and 11 r._,11 ~ 6 ) ALL DIS'l'RIC'l1 S Determinat:lon of which employees will be r equb:·ed to file a statemen t under the J.969 State Disclosure of Assets Act -2- (27) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of docwnents necessary for a Federal Grant under 33 USC L~66 et seq., for 1970-71 Improvements and Additions to Plant No. 1 and Plant No. 2 and Interplant Influent Interceptor. See page "M" District 1 2 3 5 6 7 Resolution No. 70-28-1 70-22-2 70-23-3 70-2l~-5 ~ ~ ~ -~ ll .---s Ji}- ,;.> 11 (28) ALL DISTRICTS 70-25-6 70-26-7 70-2r{-ll (29) (30) (32) (33) Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager ~ , .. j to designate ten staff members to attend CWPCA Conference-~·:..,;;. c·: _ _. in Sacramento, April 29 -May 2; and authorizing payment for registration fees, meals, transportation, lodging and incidental expenses ALL DisrrRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend meeting of the Executive Committee of the California Sanitary and Sanitation Districts Association in Sacramento, April 18th; and authorizing payrnent for meals, transportation, lodgine, and incidental expenses r!J--- ---5 ALL DrsrrRIC~CS ---Considerafion of motion to receive and file Financial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ended December 31, 1969 ALL DIS'l1RICTS Staff report on negotiations with the City of Huntington Beach relative to possible acceptance of domestic and industrial wastes from outside the Districts ALL DISTRICTS Consideratfon of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approvinr; J-oint Operating Fund, ~ Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, and Construction Inspection Revolvinr; Fw1d warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing fJayment of claims listed on pages "A" , ~-'~--' and 11 c 11 . .,,., ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any •(35) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 ,~ (36) Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing the filing of applications for a Federal Grant for the I Sunflower Interceptor Trlll1k Sewer: District No. 1 - __ __.~ \ p}) vC-' ~ Resolution No. 70-30-1 Page "N" y District No. 7 Resolution No. 70-31-7 Page ---- DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept V\/\ - letter-proposal from Holly Sugar Corporation; and authoriz~ ing the General Manager to execute an agreement on behalf ~ of the District, for the 1970 calendar year. See page II p II (37) DISTRICT 1 (38) ( 42) Consideration· of Resolution No. 70-32-1, authorizing acceptance of a Grant Deed from Levitt and Sons of California, Inc., at no cost to the District, relative to the Dyer Road Trunk Sewer. See page "Q" · DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 70-33-1 awarding contract ~ for Job No. P2-16 (Sedimentation Basin "'J 11 and Digester "J" at Plant No. 2), to J.E. & W.W. HOAGLAND, Contractor, ~- in the amount of $ 587, 700. See page ~ (Bid tabulation on page ~_J_ Seek DISTRICT 1 ~ ~/,,?0VUf·t#7 a_(,lfi~'V)UJ-1 Consideratiori of motion to adjo~n to 7:30 p.m., March 25th DISTRICT 2 AA Consideration of Resolution No. 70-31.J.-2, ordering annexation ·_,-L!+--- of territory to the District (Beverly Glenwood -Annexation c:;_ No. 5). See page "T" ,,,,,.,,-- (43) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving war~ants, if any. See page _'_'D_11_ ( h4) DISTRI_p:.--:§: ~ ~r business and commun~1....,c-a-t;i-1.;..,· O""'l~is~,~J~_f"'"· -ia~1~1y~---· ( 45) DISTRrcrr 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25th ~) DISTRICT 3 -(fonsidcration of Resolution No. 70-35-3, authorizing the filing of an application for a Federal Grant for Westside Interceptor Facili tj_cs o See pae:e ~~- ( h7) DISTRICrJ' 3 Consideration of motion app:rov:i.ng warrrn.1ts,, if any. "D" · page _1, __ See _f!J_. S·· - ( 48) DISTRIQ'.I_-_t_:__.;:jlo---..-------·- . ~ busines~communicat:i.Qfl--s-,---1'"!!1!±~' ~a~n~y=---~-_ 1 ( 49 ) n2~;~i~~r~ tion of motion to adjourn to 7: 30 p :!·.,L~ :arch 25th~ (50) (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) (61) (62) DISTRICT 5 76ens idet a'eion of mo+iion a:l:'tH o v in~ 'loa:! l'. ant~, if e:I1ji • See f)B:gc "D 11 :.i ~ l q ~ Al\~ D2~~~f~~r~tion of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., M~rch 25t~ DISTRICT 6 -(JoH01acFatim~ of motioH appFo¥iHg waFFarFf5s, if a.Hy. Sec II Ji1 II ~ago :!!! DISTRICT 6 Q.ther busine§_~-~nd conununications, if any ~ --..... DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25t~ DISTRICT 11 ~- Consideration of Resolution No. 70-36-11, awarding contra~t for Slater-Springdale and Edinger Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-11, to SALATA, INC., Contractor s;; in the amount of $710,000.00. See pag~ "V" (Bid tabulation on page "W" ) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E 11 ...... ...........__. and -connnw1icati0Ho, if BiHY DISTRICT 11 !'t ;--0 See ... ,, \ --------=-5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March 25th DISTRICT 7 Report of the General Counsel on right-of-way acquisition for South Coast Plaza Subtrunk Sewer DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 70-37-·7, approving Sewerage \/\A Facility Reimbursement Agreement with Pacific Investments ~__:j.... Company (deferred from February 25th meeting). See page c;; "X" DIS'J.1RICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 70-38-7, authorizing .~ acceptance of an easement from the State Division of Highways relative to Contracts Nos. 7-1 and 7-2, at no r:- cost to the Dj_ strict. See page "Y" D~~~:f~~rition of Resolutia1 No. 70-39-7, authorizing the ~, ~~ filing of a condemnation action relative to Assessment ~- District No. 8. See page _'_'ZL... "" -5- .(64) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion ratifying statements mailed for the March 24th bond election. See pages "AA" , "BB" c:=, and "CC;' W1 (65) DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See .c::::? page "E" ~ . £6)\ DISTRICT 7 /~ Other business and communications, if any (67) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p.m., March -6- t .. tit' RESOLU~IONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 11, 1970- " ~-- - ~~ Lf ~ z:-..e..._ ~l.!-t ) WARRANT· NO. 12698 .12699 12700 12701 ~12702 12703 12704 12705 12706 12707 12708 12709 12710 12711 12712 12713 12714 12715 12716 12717 12718 12719 12720 12721 12722 12723 12724 12725 1_2726 ~2727 12728 12729 12730 12731 12732 12733 12731+ 12735 12736 12737 12738 12739 12740 12741 12742 12743 127li4 12745 12746 12747 12748 12749 12750 ,.2751 ~2752 12753 127511. 12755 12756. 12757 \ JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ace Truck Lines, Freight $ Advance Electric, Motor Rewind All Bearing Service, Inc .. , Bearings City of Anaheim, Power E. K. Anderson, Ecology Study Equipment The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Appliance Refinishing Co., Refinish Equipment Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Ralph W. Atkinson Co., Inc., Replacement Pump Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, Truck Parts Barksdale, Valves Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Small Hardware Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Engine Parts Becker Pump & Engr. Co., Pump Repair Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Chlorinator Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies Duke Blowers Equipment Rentals, Jack Rental Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Brenner Fiedler & Assoc., Compressor Bristol Park Medical Group, Pre-Employment Physicals Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies Buckeye Brass Foundry, Inc., Pump Parts (MO 1-14-70) Certified Building Materials, Cement Certified Labs, Inc., Janitorial Supplies College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental-Emsco Co., Truck Parts Control Specialists, Inc., Valves Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water Dist., Water De Guelle & Son's Glass Co., Equipment Repair Davey's Locker, Inc., Ecology Study Boat Charter John M. Deck Co., Small Hardware Diesel Control Corp., Engine Repair W. C. Dillon & Co., Inc., Governor Repair Dunton Ford, Truck Parts Eimco Corp., Diffusers & Clarifier Parts Electric Supplies Dist., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts Ensign Products Co., Maintenance Supplies Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies Fisher Controls Co., Compressor Parts Fischer & Porter Co., Chlorinator Parts Fountain Valley Glass & Mirror, Framing Fowler Equipment, Inc., Crane Rental Fredson Co., Small Hardware Garvin's Paint & Body Shop, Truck Repair General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Golden State Paper Co., Drafting Supplies Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Disposal Goodall Rubber Co., Rain Suits Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Hach Chemical Co., Inc., Maintenance Chemicals George T. Hall Co., Inc., Valves Harbor Electronic, Communication Equip. -A- AMOUNT 37.00 1,161.90 82.33 12.50 400.00 124.97 48.oo 59.69 117.60 114.46 15.75 384.20 44.10 15.83 252.00 132.30 18.oo 37.70 5.00 310.08 81.68 75.00 659.85 4, 131.48 32.13 165.80 373.38 14.4. 22 116.55 383.95 294.21 6.oo 10.00 450.00 5.67 .133. 98 5.61 58.76 190.65 993.42 3,390.00 605.64 161.15 173-99 111.11 2,048.25 24 .. 99 136.00 10.04 30.25 292.53 l,lt23.79 17,858.24 80.06 720.00 154.35 88.48 124 .. o4. 69.88 25l~. 70 .. W.ARRANT NO. 12758· 12759 12760 12761 . 12762 12763 ~12764 12765 12766 12767 12768 12769 12770 12771 12772 12773 12774 12775 12776 12777 12778 12779 12780 12781 12782 12783 12784 12785 12786 12787 12788 ~2789 12790 12791 12792 12793 12794 12795 12796 12797 12798 12799 12800 12801 12802 12803 12804 12805 12806 12807 12808 12809 12810 12811 12812 1.2813 ....-.i.2814 12815 12816 12817 12818 12~19· IN F.AVOR OF Fred .A. Harper, Various Mtg. & C.O.D. Expense $ Heathkit Electronic Center, Communication Equipment Hertz Equipment Rental, Tool Rer.tal Hines Wholesale Nurseries, Landscaping Supplies Hollisters Nursery Flori.st, Landscaping Supplies Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies Howard Supply Co., Pipe Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water Ingersoll-Rand, Tool Repair International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves King Bearing, Inc., Small Hardware Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Kleen-Line Corp., Maintenance· supplies & Equipment Knipper's Rentals, Equipment Rental Anthony J. Lauricha, Reimb. OJT Mileage LBWS, Inc., Small Hardware Judy Lee, Employee Mileage L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Charles Lowe Co., Replacement Pump .A. J. Lynch Co., Ecology Study Supplies Mahaffey Machine Co., Machining Main Photo Service, Photo Processing Marine Biological Consultants, Ecological Surveys Moore Business Forms, Inc., Forms E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Ring & Cover Herbert .A. Moss, Labor Counsel Retainer National Chemsearch Corp., Small Hardware City of Newport Beach, Water C . .Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer o. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware OD.A Nursery, Landscaping Supplies oranco Supply Co., Pipe & Supplies ORCO Block Co., Inc., Building Supplies Co. of Or . .Auditor-Cont., Juvenile Court Program Orange County Chemical Co., Cleaning Chemicals Orange Coun{y Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamp · Orange County Water Works Pacific Telephone Co .. Paints & Tapes Unlimited, Paint L. B. Penhall Co., Inc., Drilling Postmaster, Postage The Pryor-Giggey Co., Thermal Concrete Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Hauling The Register, Subscription Reynolds .Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Santa .Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Chemicals The Scam Instrument Corp., Compressor Parts Scientific Products, Lab Chemicals Shell Oil Co., Gasoline The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies · John Sigler, Employee Mileage So-Cal Sign, Federal Project Signs Southern California Edison Co .. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts Stanco Mfg. & Sales, Inc., New Winch -B- .AMOUNT 123.75 171. 61 11.75 193.20 6.83 688.40 471.03 7.30 120.29 132.32 97.84 856.97 258.98 459.01 771.42 8.54 122.20 510.46 11.90 894.68 546.oo 66.15 326.81 191. 21 1,397.10 257.04 234.15 250.00 306.60 254.78 700.00 143.31 140.18 226.74 9.45 350.00 10.87 307.05 6.43 2.85 284.45 91.35 90.00 200.00 176.40 150.00 16.50 147.28 1,006.05 158.96 238.00 156.45 974.19 156.08 19.80 308. l~4 6,730.98 3.15 981. 60 99.25 106.11 708.75 WARRANT NO. 12820" 12821 12822 . 12823 1282!~ ~12825 12826 12827 12828 12829 12830 12831 12832 12833 12834 12835 12836 12837 12838 12839 12840 12841 12842 12843 12844 12845 12846 12847 128L~8 12849 12850 12851 12852 12853 IN FAVOR OF Standard Oil Co., Engine Oil & Grease Surveyors Service Co., Small Tools T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene Tiernan's Office Equipment, Office Equipment Tustin Cement Bldg Block Co., Building Supplies Tustin Cycle & Lawnmower, Equipment Parts Edward D. Testa Co., Mill Machine Union Oil Co., Gasoline The University Club, Lodging FWPCA Seminar Vaniman Camera Shop, Photo Processing Earl Vinson Automotive, Small Tool Repair Walker-Holmes Insurance, Notary Bond Wall Colmonoy Corp., Re-surfacing Wallace & Tiernan, Chlorination Equipment John R. Waples R. S., Odor Consultant Guy L. Warden & Sons, Aftercooler Warren 'Bailey Co., Inc., Piping Wilson Engine & Equipment, Truck Parts World Travel Bureau, Inc., WPCF Seminar Don Wright, Employee Mileage George Yardley Co., Pipe Fittings Pomona Machinery Co., Lathe TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOillJT $-7 .. 1,678.96 5.01 62.43 59.78 396.75 39.22 30.81 1,050.00 7.43 18.38 98.53 7.50 10.00 284.58 132.42 214.90 566. 62 67.48 253.34 461.80 28.00 190.85 1,575.00 $ 71,132.02 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv.-Plant Const. $ 29,667.76 Co. of Or. Auditor-Contr., Testing P2-14 50.35 Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Bid Notice Pl & 2-15, P2-16 125.58 Griffith Company, Release of Retained Percentage P2-8-4 896.10 J. E. & W. W. Hoagland, Contractor P2-14 64,521.00 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 88,585.20 Lemar Corp., Contractor Pl-14 32,940.00 Orange Coast Daily Pilot, Bid Notice 6.53 Osborne Labs, Inc., Pipe Inspection p2~11~ 85.50 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Plans & Specs. Pl& 2-15, P2-16 439.43 T~ining Labs, Testing Pl-14, P2-14 103.00 TO'rAL CAPI'I1AL OUTLAY REVOLVING OCEl\N OlYrFALL #2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Osborne Labs, Inc., Testing J-10 Parker Diving Service, Inspection J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOINING TOTAL JOINT WARHAN1rS -c- $ 217,L~20.45 $ $ 869.50 4,523.99 5,393.L19 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 12856 City of Santa Ana, Contract 1-11 12857 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs 1-11 12858 12859 12860 12861 12862 12863 12864 12865 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Steve Cappello & Sons Construction Co., Contractor 2-13 . City of Garden Grove, Road Base Cont. 2-13 County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Compaction Tests Cont. 2-13 Lowry Eng:i.neering-Science, Inspection Cont. 2-13 Twining Laboratories of Southern California, Inc., Testing Cont. 2-13 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services Cook & Barletta, Inc., Contractor 3-15 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Title Insurance & Trust Co., Right of Way Report 3-11 & 3-14 -D- AMOUNT $150,000.00 35.44 $150,035.44 $ 20,709.00 300.00 51.25 980.00 5.00 $ 22,045.25 53.50 263.25 $ 316.75 $ 75.00 $ 391. 75 WARRANT NO. 12866 12867 12868 12869 12870 12871 12872 12873 12874 12875 12876 128r77 12878 12879 ,0 880 ~881 12882 12883 12884 12885 12886 12887 12888 12889 12890 12891 1.2892 12893 DISTRicrr NO. 7 OPEI{ATING FUND WARRAN':I1S IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv., AD #8 & Misc. Freedom Ne\·rspapers, Inc., Bond Notice AMOUNT $ 6.676.27 7.87 C. Arthur Nissan and Jack J. Rimel, AD #8 Legal Serv. Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Precinct Maps 1,295.22 61.53 ACClJMUL..t\':f.1ED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRA1rrrs IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 7-2R and 7-2AP-2, Inspectl.on 7-2R County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Compaction Test 7-2R Kisling Construction Company, Contractor 7-2AP-2 Osborne Laboratories, Inc., Testing 7-2AP-l Scott Bros. Construction, Inc., Contractor·7-2AP-l Zarubica Company, Contractor r7-2R FIXED OBIAGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOH OF City of Anaheim, JOS~Payment City of Buena Park, JOS Payment City of Fullerton, J·os Payment Garden Grove Sanitary District, JOS P~yment City of LaHabra., JOS Payment City of Orange, JOS Payment City of Placentia, JOS Payment City of Santa Ana, JOS Payment FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRAN'rs IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. 7-4·-2R & 7-lF·-B Byron I,. Crume, Inc., Contractor 7-4-2R Keith and Associates, Engr. 7-2D-P Bob Lench Company, Inc., Refund Fee Overpayment Harry G. Liljeb1ad, Rei.rnb. Agrm. Payment C. Arthur Nissan, Assignee of Gordon Maybee, Reimb. Agrm. Payment Pacific Investment Company, Reimb. Agrm. Payment Standard-Paclfic Corporation, Reimb. Agrm. Payment DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMtff.A'rmJ CAPITAL OU'I'Ll\Y FUND WARHANTS IN FAVOH OF Enterprise Prj_nt:i.ne: Company, PlDx1s & SpccG o 11-11 Huntington Beach News, Ri.d Not:Lce Cont. 11~~11 -E- $ 8,040.89 $ 2,602.62 111. 71 3,343.95 76.00 1, 67l+. 00 49,621. 24 $ 57,429.52 $ $ $ 1, 561. 80 96.70 1, 561. 80 2141.80 386.90 l/+74. 70 2lu_. 80 4,43lt. 50 --- 10,000.00 702.00 ~-' 069. l~8 1, 161. 00 100.00 326.15 326.15 38' 141. 50 1,114.76 $ 45,941.04 $ J. 21, 1~ J. J . l~ 5 58.05 h1.3? $ 10).1!2 .. ·-··----·-- ·-----···-·~----~-·-····-·- RESOLUTION NOo 70-29 DECLARATION OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER PROPOSED ORDINANCE RELATING TO CON- NECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO CONSIDER PROPOSED ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT'S SEWERAGE FACILITIES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION The Boards of Directors of County Saqitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the revised ordinance dated March 10, 1970 relating to connection to and use of District sewerage facilities, is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That these Boards of Directors hereby declare their intent to consider the certain proposed ordinance at the April 8, 1970 Joint Boards of Directors meeting; and, Section 3. That April 8, 1970, at 7:30 p.m. at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, is hereby fixed as the date and hour and place when and where any and all persons having any objection to the aforesaid proposed ordinance may appear before said Boards of Directors and show cause why said ordinance should not be adopted; and, Section 4. That the staff be instructed to forward copies of the full ordinance to each city, sewering entity, and Chamber of Commerce within the Districts, prior to public hearing date. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. Agenda Item #13 All Districts ORDINANCE NOo DRAFT 2-2-70 Revo 2-9-70 Revo 3-3-70 Rev. 3-10-70 AN ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, QUALITY CRITERIA, REASONABLE USE CRITERIA, CHARGES "FOR CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICTYS SEWERAGE FACILITIES, PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NOo The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo ----, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 -PURPOSE The purpose of this ordinance is to provide for the maximum public benefit from the use of the District's facilities by regulating the quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharged thereto and to provide for charges for the use thereof when such use is disproportionate to District costs imposed on other property within the District. The revenues to be derived from the application of this ordinance shall be used to defray the costs of, including the repayment of · principal and interest on bonds issued for the acquisition, construction or reconstruction and the maintenance of an adequate sewerage system to serve the territory of the District excepting that no revenues derived from this ordinance shall be used for the acquisition or con- struction of new local street sewers or laterals as distinguished from main trunk interceptor and outfall sewers. ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONR (a) Assessed Valuation -Shall mean that portion of the total assessed valuation of the property producing and discharging sewage or industrial waste upon which District taxes are levied in the fiscal year beginning in the calendar year in which the discharge takes place. Property producing and discharging sewage or industrial waste shall include all the real property and improvements in the District used, owned, leased, occupied or maintained by or for the user whether or.not sewage or industrial waste is generated by a Agenda Item //13 -G-All Dlstrlcts particular improvement and shall include, but not be limited to, offices, landscaped areas, parking lots, warehouses and incidental improvements. It shall also include unimproved land located in the District when such land is used, owned, leased, occupied or maintained by the user. For property upon which no District tax is levied, the assessed valuation will be considered to be zero. ---- (b) District -Shall mean County Sanitation District Noa , of Orange Countyo (c) General Manager -Shall mean the individual duly designated by the Board of Directors of the District to administer this ordinance. (d) Industrial Waste -Shall mean the waterborne waste and wastewater from any producing, manufacturing, or processing operation ·of whatever nature, including institutional and commercial operations where water is used for laundering, vehicle cleaning, or the removal of significant quantities of wastes of non-human origin. (e) Local Sewering Agency -Shall mean any public corporation duly authorized under the laws of the State of California to construct and/or maintain public sewerso (f) Excess Capacity -Shall mean the hydraulic use of a District facility for peak flow rate greater than reasonable use. (g) Peak Flow Rate -Shall mean the annually determined highest flow rate of sewage or industrial waste discha~ged to a public sewer over a period of at least 15 minutes at any time during the preceding 12-month period. In the absence of actual peak flow rate data, peak flow rate may be considered at 1.6 times the greatest metered eight-hour water use during the preceding 12-month period, provided that where peak flow rate is established for permittees on the effective date of this ordinance, the permi~tee certifies that said eight-hour water use ·was for normal operations and not the result of extraordinary circumstancesu -2- (h) Pre-Treatment Facility -Shall mean any works or device for the treatment or flow limitation of sewage or industrial waste, prior to discharge into a public sewer. (i) Public Corporation -Shall mean any City, District, or other public agency duly organized under the laws of the State of California. (j) Reasonable Use -Shall mean the rate of discharge of sewage or industrial waste and the suspended solids contained therein to which a user connected to a public sewer shall be entitled to discharge to said sewer without payment of excess capacity connection charges or use charges by virtue of the assessed valuation of said property and other criteriao For the purpose of computing excess capacity connection charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 25,000 gallons per day peak flow rate per $100,000 of assessed valuation. For purposes of computing use charges, reasonable use is hereby established at 10 million gallons per year and 15 dry tons of suspended solids per year per $100,000 of assessed valuationo In the event a person producing sewage or industrial waste maintains more than one operation in the District, peak flow rate, annual flow, annual suspended solids and assessed valuation shall be combined for all such operations for the purpose of determining reasonable use and computing excess capacity connection charges and use chargeso (k) Sewage -Shall mean the wastewater derived from human use of buildings for ordinary residential, institutional or commercial purposes. (1) Standard Methods -Shall mean procedures described in the Twelfth edition of "Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater" as published by the American Public Health Association, the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control "-"' Federation. (m) Suspended Solids -Shall mean any insoluble solid matter contained as a component of sewage or industrial waste and capable of ' separation from the liquid portion of said waste by laboratory filtra- -3- tion, provided, however, no insoluble solid matter shall be included if permittee can demonstrate that it is non-putrescible and results from planned water conservation or reuse within the premises of permittee. (n) User -Shall mean any person or public corporation discharging sewage or industrial waste to a sewerage facility of the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facilityo ARTICLE 3 -PERMITS {a) When Required -No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use, or maintain a connection to the sewerage facilities of the District without the permits required and issued as hereinafter provided. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to use or maintain a connection for the discharge of industrial waste to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District sewerage facility, without a valid permit issued as hereinafter providedo {b) Condition Precedent -No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be served by use of the permit is included within the boundaries of th~ District and within the boundaries of a local sewering agency authorized to maintain public sewerage works; provided, however, a permit may be issued for property to b~ served outside the boundaries of a local sewering agency if a local sewering agency makes application for the issuance of such permit. {c) Information to be Furnished -The District may require, in connection with any application for a permit, that the applicant furnish data regarding present and anticipated future flows, quality of discharge and information concerning present and anticipated assessed valuation. (d) Permit for Connection To and Use of District Facility -· Application for such permit shall be made to the Distrlct and permits shall be issued by the District in two parts~ First, a connection -4- permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District's sewerage facility under conditions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial waste to the District's sewerage facility. (1) A new connection ·permit is not required for existing connections to District's sewerage facilitieso (2) The connection permit may prescribe requirements as to the type of connection and the use permit may require the provision of pre-treatment facilities necessary to insure compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit. {e) Industrial Waste Discharge Permit -Application for a permit to use District services and facilities for the treatment and disposal of industrial waste shall be made to the Districto The permit shall be issued by the District and shall be in accordance with the provisions of Articles 4 and 5 hereof. The permit may require the permittee to provide necessary pre-treatment facilities to insure compliance with Articles 4 and 5 hereof. Any such requirement shall be set forth in the industrial waste discharge permito (f) Amendment of Permits -Any permit issued under the provisions of this Article 3 may be amended by the District after giving to the permittee a thirty (30) day notice of intention to amend where the permit given was based on incorrect information and the proposed amendment is for the purpose of making the permit conform to the actual factors involved as determined by the General Manager. ARTICLE 4 -QUALITY REQUIREMENTS (a) Substances Prohibited -No person or public corporation shall discharge sewage or industrial waste into a District sewerage facility or into a local sewering agency facility, which facility discharges to a District facility, when the components of such effluent cause the effluent to exceed the limits set forth herein or are in violation of the rules and regulations of the District established ' as hereinafter provided. -5- (1) An eight-hour temperature average higher than 140°F (2) More than 100 milligrams per liter of hexane soluble material (fats and oils) or 25 milligrams per liter of floatable oil both based on an average concentration over an eight-hou~ period (3) A pH of less than 6.0 provided that at least 8o% of the time in any eight-hour period, the pH shall be not less than 605 (4) Suspended solids or other substances of such a character or in such concentrations which result in improper functioning of any public sewer through which said solids are conveyed or in the improper operation of the Districts' treatment facilities (5) Any liquid or gas or other substance which, singly or in combination with other substances, could cause an explosive, dangerously radioactive, or toxic condition in the sewerage system of the Districto (b) Rain Water Prohibited -No person or public corporation shall discharge or cause to be discharged to a District sewerage facility or to a local sewering agency facility, which facility dis- charges to a Distric~ facility, water from roof drains or other runoff water from rain storms or uncontaminated water.not classified as sewage or industrial waste. (c) Additional Rules and Regulations -The General Manager of the District shall, from time to time as he deems necessary, prepare additional regulations as to the quality of sewage or industrial waste discharged to the sewerage facilities of the District or to the sewerage facilities of a local sewering agency, which facility dis- charges into a District facilityo Said regulations shall be for the purpose ·of insuring that sewage or industrial waste so discharged will not cause undue maintenance in the District's facilities, interfere with proper operation of the treatment plants, produce a noxious or malodorous gas, create a public nuisance, create hazards to structures, ' equipment and personnel, or create a violation of the requirements -6- imposed upon the District by Federal, State or local regulatory agencies. Said regulations shall not be effective until after public hearing and approval by resolution of the Board of Directors. The General Manager shall, thirty days before formal consideration of such resolution, mail a notice of such consideration to each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permito Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such notice. ARTICLE 5 -QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS In order to provide for reasonable use of the District's sewerage facilities and in recognition of the fact that the transmission, treat- ment and disposal of domestic sewage is the highest and best use of the District's sewerage facilities, the General Manager may set forth, in any industrial waste discharge permit issued, requirements to limit the quantity of industrial waste discharged to a sewerage facility of the District or a local sewering agency whe~, in the opinion of the General Manager, the existing hydraulic capacity of the District's sewerage facilities would be unreasonably used. Such requirements may limit the quantity of industrial wastes to be discharged with respect to any given unit of time and shall be subject to appeal as provided in Article 12 hereof. ARTICLE 6 -PERMIT FEES AND CHARGES FOR CONNECTION AND USE {a) Connection Permit Fees -No application for a permit for a connection to a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a permlt fee is paid by the applicant, provided, however, that such fee shall not be payable when a permit is issued for the reconnection or alteration of an existing connection made by the District or at the request of the District. Said permit fee shall be an amount set forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors. (b) Industrial Waste Discharge ~ermit Fees and Excess Capaclty Connection Charges for Use Greater than Reasonable Use -Except as , hereinafter provided, no permit to use a connection to a facility of the District or to a sewerage facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges into a District facility, shall, after the effective date of this ordinance, be issued until an industrial waste discharge permit fee is paid by the applicanto An industrial waste discharge permit fee shall be payable in an amount set forth in a resolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors and shall be based on the volwne and characteristics of the industrial waste but in no event shall exceed $250 per year. Industrial waste permit fees shall be payable annually within thirty days after expiration date and upon invoicing by the District. Prior to commencement of use and upon invoicing by the District, an excess capacity connection charge shall be payable by a user when, du~ing the 12-month period after commencement of use, the peak flow rate may be reasonably expected to exceed 25,000 gallons per day unless such peak flow rate is a reasonable use as defined in Article 2 of this ordinance. Notwithstanding the foregoing sentence, no excess capacity connection charge shall be made for connections in use on ~ the effective date of this ordinance unless there is an increase in peak flow rates of sewage and j_ndustrial waste which exceeds, by more than 5,000 gallons per day, the highest peak flow rate previously determined for such user. Subject to the provisions hereinabove> excess capacity connection charges payable shall be computed at the rate of $350 per 1,000 gallons per day of peak flow rate and, in the case of connections in use on the effective date of this ordinance, shall be payable on the lesser of the following amounts: (1) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds that determined for the 12-month period preceding the effective date of this ordinance or (2) The amount the latest determined peak flow rate exceeds the reasonable peak flow rate determined at the time bf the increasev -8- (c) Use Charges -Any person using a connection to a facility of the District or a facility of a local sewering agency, which facility discharges to a District facility, shall be subject to the payment of an annual use charge for the preceding calendar yearo Such use charge shall be payable only on the annual flow of sewage or industrial waste discharged or suspended solids discharged greater than reasonable use as hereinbefore defined. The use charge shall be the actual treatment costs of the District for the fiscal year ending in said calendar year expressed per 1,000 gallons in excess of reasonable use and $10 per ton of suspended solids in excess of reasonable use. (d) Computation and Invoicing of Use Charges -After January 1 of each calendar year, the General Manager shall determine which users are subject to the payment of use charges and shall invoice the user in accordance with the mit charges established as hereinabove provided. At the option of the General Manager, use charges may be invoiced more frequently than annually when, in his judgment, the use charges are of such a magnitude to warrant more frequent payment. Upon application by any person to the Board of Directors, which application demonstrates a financial hardship, the Board of Directors may allow the payment of excess capacity connection charges to be made over a period of not more than five years with interest at six percent per annum on the unpaid balance . . ARTICLE 7 -REFUND OF EXCESS CAPACITY CONNECTION CHARGES Upon application to the Board of Directors by any permittee who has paid excess capacity connection charges to the District of more than $5,000, which application certifies that the peak flow rate has permanently decreased by 25 percent or more, and which application is not disputed by the General Manager, the Board of Directors will autho- rize a refund to the applicant. The refund will be computed to maintain "-". the total remaining excess capacj_ty connection charge paid to an amount corresponding to the excess capacity connection charge payable at the ~ime of the decrease. -9- ARTICLE 8 -LOCAL AGENCY EXEMPTION FROM CHARGES No excess capacity connection charges or use charges, as speci- fied in Article 6 hereof, shall be payable for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste from property in the District owned by elementary, high school, and junior college school districts, special districts, the County of Orange, and cities. ARTICLE 9 -MEASUREMENT OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF FLOWS (a) Annual Flow -The measurement of annual flow of sewage or industrial waste shall be made by the District by means of a metering device, approved by the General Manager, and installed and maintained at the expense of the permittee, or by estimate arrived at from total water used in the area occupied, or by other means acceptable to the General Manager and to the permittee. The permittee shall have the option of selecting whether the measurement shall be made by meter, or by estimate, or other means, provided that the method of estimate or other means is approved by the General Manager. (b) Peak Flow Rate -The determination of peak flow rate shall be made by means of an effluent meter approved by the General Manager or by field measurements made by the District or by the method provided in Article 2 hereof. The permittee shall have the option of selecting the method of determination to be used, provided, however, that in the event the field measurement is selected, an additional charge of $600 per year will be made to defray the costs thereof and will be invoiced each February 1 for the preceding calendar year. (c) Determination of Components The determination or estimation of suspended solids or other components contained in sewage or industrial waste discharges shall be by one of the following methods: (1) Sampling and analysis by District's personnelo (2) Sampline and analysis by personnel of permittee or laboratory acceptable to the District· and employed by the perrnittee. (3) Estimates arrived at by study of operations leading to the discharge. -10- The permittee shall have the option of selecting which of the foregoing methods will be used, provided, however, that such method must be proposed by permittee and approved by the General Manager before January 1 of any calendar year and continued through- out the year. In the event no method is so selected and approved, Method (1) will be used. Also in the event that either Method (2) or (3) is so selected and approved, the District may, by appropriate sampling and analysis, determine the accuracy of the results obtained. If Method (2) is so selected and approved, the permittee shall pre- pare and submit on, or before, January 15 of any year, a certified statement of the results obtained for the preceding year. All laboratory procedures shall strictly conform to Standard Methodso ARTICLE 10 -INSPECTION The General MaDager shall institute a regular industrial waste inspection program in order to determine the quality and quantity of industrial waste discharged to the District's facilities and the effect thereof on the maintenance and operation of said facilitieso Said inspection program shall be carried out by employees of the District and, insofar as possible, shall be funded from industrial waste permit feeso ARTICLE 11 -AGREEMENTS WITH PERMITTEES (a) New Installations -At the option of the General Manager or the permittee, the District will enter into an agreement with any permittee whose assessed valuation and peak flow rate cannot be deter- mined at the time of the issuance of the permit. Such an agreement will provide for an estimate of the assessed valuation for the ensuing fiscal year and the peak flow rate for the ensuing 12-month period, and require payment of excess capacity connecti~n charges on the basis of such estimates and will. provide for a method of additional payment or refund, as the case may be, of such charges when actual data as to assessed valuation and peak flow rate can be obtainedu -11- (b) Special Situations -If any perrnittee feels that the circum- stances involved in his discharge are of a nature which requires special consideration, he may apply to the Board of Directors for a special agreement. Such application shall state the facts to warrant such special agreement which may, upon resolution of the Board of Directors, provide terms other than contained in this ordinanceo (c) Existing Agreements -It is recognized that the District may have special agreements for the discharge of sewage or industrial waste to its facilities in effect on the effective date of this ordinance. In such cases, the user shall have the option of maintaining the existing agreement or to terminate it. In the event of termination, the provisions of this ordinance will apply to permittee's dischargeo ARTICLE 12 -INTERPRETATION AND APPEAL (a) Request for Ruling -If any permittee or applicant for a permit disputes the interpretation or application of this ordinance, he shall set forth his contentions in writing to the General Managero The General Manager shall, within thirty days, respond in writing to the contentions so made and set forth his determinations thereof. (b) Appeal -If the permittee or applicant for a permit is dissatisfied with the determinations so made by the General Manager, he may within thirty days after mailing of said ruling by the General Manager to said permittee or applicant for a permit, appeal said ruling by giving written notice of the basis of his appeal to the Board of Directors of the Districto Said written notice shall be accompanied by a non-refundable fee of ONE HUNDRED DOLLARS ($100). The Board of Directors of the District shall, within forty~five days after receipt of said written notice of appeal, make a final determination of the issues presented. ARTICLE 13 -PAYMENT OF CHARGES AND DELINQUENCIES All charges made pursuant to the provisions of this ordinance are due and payable upon receipt of not:i.ce thereof. All such charges ' shall be and become delinquent forty~five days after mailing or -12- delivering notice thereof to the mailing address of the property subject to such charges. All delinquent charges shall be deemed a violation of this ordinance and each day any such charge remains delinquent shall be "-. deemed a separate violation. ARTICLE 14 -PENALTIES Any charge that becomes delinquent shall have added to it a penalty charge equal to ten percent of the charge that became delinquent and thereafter an additional penalty shall accrue on the total charge due, including the ten percent basic penalty at the rate of one-half of one percent per month until paid. ARTICLE 15 -COLLECTION Upon motion by the Board of Directors of the District, any charge and all penalties thereon shall be collected by lawsuit in the name of the District. Any such action for collection may include an application for an injunction to prevent repeated and reoccurring violations of this ordinance. ARTICLE 16 -VIOLATIONS No person or public corporation shall violate any provisions or fail to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any person or public corporation violating any of the provisions or failing to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any person or corporation convicted of a misdemeanor under the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100.,00 or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not exceeding thirty days, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each person or public corporation shall be guilty of a separate offense for each and every day during any pcrtion of which any violation of any provision of this ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person or public corporatj?n and shall be punishable accordingly. -13- ARTICLE 17 -SEVERABILITY If any provision of this ordinance or the application thereof to any person or circumstance is held unconstitutional, the remainder of the ordinance and the application of such provision to other persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby. If a provision of this ordinance is held invalid, all valid provisions that are severable from the invalid provision shall remain in effect. ARTICLE 18 -PROCEDURES FOR AMENDMENT Thirty days before any formal consideration of an amendment to this ordinance by the Board of Directors, the General M~nager will so notify in writing each city and local sewering agency in the District and each person holding a valid industrial waste discharge permit or who has paid an excess capacity connection chargeo Such notice shall also be mailed to any person who has filed with the District a request for such notice. Such notice shall contain a brief description of ·the nature of the amendment to be considered. ARTICLE 19 -REPEAL Ordinances Nos. are hereby repealed and all ~~~--~--~~- ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent with this ordinance are hereby repealed to the extent that they are inconsistent with the provisions of this ordinance. ARTICLE 20 -EFFECTIVE DATE The effective date of this ordinance is January 1, 1971. -14- . . ~· ~ . -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS---------·--- Phooriix, Arizona Lafoyofte, California El Paso, Texas '-"oHN A. C,l.ROLLO, P.£. ltOBEr.T M. ElRE:R~TC>N, P.E. H. HArtVEY HUNT, P.F. HOWAno M. WA.Y, P.E. ROBERT c;;. V.'ILLIAMS, P.E. DON~LD R. Pi,E:ISL~R, P.E. March 2, 1970 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Rcpfy to: 3668 MT. DIABLO BOULEVAno LAFAYEITE, CALIFOC?NIA 94549 AREA COOC .Cl5 To accomplish an improved degree of treatment at the Sanitation Districts' Joint Treatment Works, the Modification Report sets forth several objectives under Section 2 entitled 11 A GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE WORK I?ROPOSED TO BE DONE TO CARRY OUT THE OBJECTS OF THE-DISTRICTS". We believe that based on test work to date, Objective No. 1 (increasing quantity of flow receiving secondary treatment at Plant No. 1) set forth therein, can be accomplished at an early date with an expenditure of less than $50, 000. We recommend that you proceed on this. We recommend that Objective No. 2 (constructing facilities to test and evaluate methods of improving sedim.entation and/ or re - moval of grease and other floatables) be accomplished at the earliest pos siblc date. This objective should be given a high priority in our estimation, 2s the answer obtained from this test work will influence the de sign of future treatment facilit.ie s. This facility {Objective No. 2) is set forth under Section 5 of the Modification Report as: "Sedirncntation Basin "K'' (Experin~cntal) and Djgcstcr "K 11 at Plant No. 2, expansion of heating and steam system at Plants No. 1 and No. 2. Basin "K" will be constructed with special modifications so various schemes can be investigated for :lmproving sedimentation and grease and floatablcs ren1oval · Project Cost Agenda Item #20 H-1 $1, 265, 000.11 All Districts Mr. Fred A. Har pc r 1 General Manager March 2 1 1970 Page 2 .· We suggest you authorize the engineering on this project prior to the next fiscal year so as to obtain completion and operation at the earliest possible date. We will be pleased to proceed with de sign of this project upon your authorization to do so. We propose to do this work in accordance with our basic contract dated February 11, 1959, and amendment dated October 14, 1964. (Design fee 5. 2o/o of the cost of construction.} JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS H. Harvey Hunt HHH: vaw Agenda Item .f/20 H-2 All D1stricts ', .. -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS----------- ~OHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. RODERT r.t. E:'RERETOU, P,E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P,E. HOWARD V., WAY, P.E. RODERT G, Wll.LIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PRElsU:R, P.E. Phoenix, Ari.zona Lafaycflo, Ca!ifornia March 2, 1970 El Paso, T oxas Repfy to: 3688 MT. OJAEILO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA S/.t;49 AREA COD:? .Ct!! Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Proposal for Engineering Services Reconditioning of Structures In accordance with your.request, we are submitting a proposal to provide the engineering services for preparation of plans and specifi- cations for the reconditioning of the Pflanz Headworks and Sedimentation Basins A, B, and C at Plant 2, and Sedimentation Basins 3 and 4 at Pl ant 1. .As we now understand the scope of the project, the recon- ditioning will. include the following: I. Pflanz Headworks Plant No. 2 I. Repair of concrete influent chambers and wet well 2. Rep3.ir of concrete in pmnp discharge channels 3. Repair of cone rctc in grit chamber and outlet box 4. Repair of pump discharge pipe outlets in discharge chan1ber 5. Paint submerged steel 6. Paint dry well concrete and steel 7. Incidental items related to the above II. Sedimentation Basins A, B, and C Plant No. 2 I. Installation of new skim.ming sy stern 2. Installation of ·new scum pumping systen1 3. Installation of new weirs, baffles, etc. 4. Installation of new accesses· to sludge pump area 5. Installation of new influent baff] e 6. Installation of new shtdge pumps 7. Installation of existing sludge meters · 8. Incidental items related to the above Agenda Item //'21 I-1 All Di.strlcts I' '"-!"" Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager March 2, 1970 Page 2 III. Sedimentation Basins 3 and 4 Plant No. 1 1. Installation of new drives 2. Installaqon of new weirs and baffles 3. Repair of concrete in launders 4. Repaint iron works as required 5. Incidental items related to the above The engineering services will include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: a~ Investigation of materials and methods of reconditioning b. De sign of new facilities c. Preparation of plans and speCifications d. Provide consultation and advice as requc sted by the Districts during the construction stage Our fee for performing this work will be in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated November 22, 1968, and accepted by the Districts December 1.8, 1968, for special engineering services. Since the exact scope of the job is not definite, it is difficult to estimate the total engineering fee. Based on the scope as defined herein, we estimate the engineering fee to be between $9, 700 and $12, 500. The maximum fee would be suLject to negotiation if the scope of the project is materially revised from that outlined in this letter. HMW:vaw Agenda Item //21 I-2 Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS Howard M. Way Partner All Districts COUNTY SANITA'I1 ION DIS 1rRIC 1rS OF OHANGE COUNTY P. 0 .. Box 8127 -108'1-J+ Ellis ./\venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER page 1 of 2 C. 0. NO. 1 CON'l1RACTOR: Gas Processors, Inc. --~--------~--~"""---~----~~~~~-- DATE: March.5, 1970 JOB: Digester Gas Compressor, Job No. I-4-2B Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ ___ _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCES: Contractor's letters dated July 29, 1969, September 9, 1969, January 13, 1970, and February 2, 1970; and Districts' letters dated January 29, 1970 and February 11, 1970. Item I Revision: Section B-9, PAYMENT The final payment clause of this section shall be revised as follows: A second and final payment for the balance remain- ing due under the contract shall be paid within 30 calendar days after the special stainless steel con- necting rod has been installed and the unit is found to be functioning correctly and acceptable to the Districts, or approximately 90 calendar days after delivery of the equipment, whichever is the later. The contractor shall furnish the Districts with a certification from the bonding company that the term of the Faithful Performance Bond has been extended to one year from the date that said final payment is authorized. Item II Extension of Time The contract time shall be extended as follows: (a) (b) Labor strike at the Ingersoll-Rand Company New York factory, commencing on July 15, 1969 and ending on September 7, 1969 o o • • • • • • • 40 calendar days Difficulties at the U.S. Electric Motors factory in testing the 100 horsepower motor due to abnormal failure of the stator o • • • • 14 calendar days TOTAL TIME • • . o • 54 calendar days (continued next page) Agenda Item #24 All Districts page 2 of' 2 JOB: Digester Gas Compressor, Job No. I-4-2B C.O. NO. ------=~~~~--~-------~--~--------------------~--1 continued Summ?-ry: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Contract Completion Date Contract Time Extension (this C.O.) Revised Contract Completion Date Actual Completion Date July 24·, 1969 140 calendar days December 12, 1969 54 calendar days February 3, 1970 January 30, 1970 Original Contract Price $, Prev. Au th. Changes $ This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ 2Q;882.~Q None None Amended Contract Price $ 20;882.40 Board Authorization Date: Approved: March 11, 1970 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer GAS PROCESSORS, INC. Agenda Item //24 J-? All Diotr:i.cts 1 ,. PETER KIEVVIT SONS' CO. CONTRACTOHS ESTABLISH ED 1884 ~IN OFFICE: OMAHA 31, NEER. 1000 KIEWIT PLAZA ADDRESS REPLY TO: P.O. Box 552 Huntington Beach, Ca ·926L8 February 19, 1970 John Carollo Engineers P.O. Box 528 Huntington Beach, Ca 926118 Attn: Nr. Walter A. Bishc1p, ReE;ident Engineer Re: Request for e:x:tensfon of time Gentlemen: In accordance 1,1ith the genernl provisions of the specifications Section 6; p[lragrc~ph 3, ue rospcctful1y rccuost an extcns:ton of the contr2ct. tj_me for the fo11owin£; listed dates and c<mse0 of dcl2y: Febr-..:i.ary 9, 1970 heavy strrf &nd rain February 10, 1970 rain c:nd heavy surf February 12, 1970 heavy oceDn floor currents in pipe laying area February 13, 1970 II u t1 11 II II II II & moderate to rou~h surf February 18, 1970 her~vy surf February 19, 1970 heavy st1_rf & stron~ 1r1nds I S:inccrc ly, cc: Filo P tor KicHit Sons'. CoQ c ·?~-;"~·( .. ~ t~ /1/ \.... . •' ~ t-/, ....._ f-:-~-j • 1/J,) / t.1o ,n Fon1 Jr. ·· ( Project Supori{1i:.cnclent '/ . {. Agenda Ttcm //2S -K-All D:i stPtcts -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS----------- Phoenix, Arizona Laf ayctfe, California El Paso, Texas ~.JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. Reply to: ROBERT M. BREHETON, P,E. H, HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT C. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PnEISLEH, P.E. March 3 1 1970 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manae;e·r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P .~. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marino Section Re ply to: AREA coD~ 4t!; }' .o. Box 528 Huntington Beach California 92648 Attachdd is a letter from Feter Kiewit Sons' Company requesting six (6) _days extension of time. Reasons for the delays arc listed in their letter. We recommend r.pprova.l of four (4) days extension of tiwe in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General Provisio!ls of the Specifications. 1'hc recommended days a.re February 9 and 10 ... hcf!vy surf and ruin; F'ebruary 18 -heavy surf; February 19 -heavy surf nnd strong winds. '!'he contractor has requested a total of fifty nine (59) days extension of time of which TIC have recommended approval of fifty seven (57) days extension through February 25, 1970. Very truly yours, Y.IAB: rw Enclonurc Agenda· It~.~ //'?.5 -L-All Distr:Lct.B 283·3695 .. ' RESOLUTION NO. '(0-28-1 FEDERAL GRANT -1970-71 IMPROVEMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO PLAN'l1 NO. 1 AND PLANT NO. 2 AND INTERPLANT INFLUENT INTERCEPTOR A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI'l1ATION DIS'I.1RICT NO·. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. h66 ET SEQ., IN BEHALF OF COUNTY SANI'l1A'I.1ION DIS'I1RICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollv,tion' Control Act, as amended ( 33 U.S. C. lJ-66 et seq. ) provides for · Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the ~ purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of' sewacse from the cities and other local collection sev:ering ar;encies, and has joined ·with other County Sani- tation Districts, namely County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint se1·mge treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1959, knovm as the Joint 01.-mersh:ip, Opera ti on and Construction Agreement. Sectio~_J_. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Ownership, Operation and ConstructJon Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Oranie County, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Oranc;e County, Californj_a, each organized for similar purposes and servine; dj_fferent terri to:rie~~, all in Orange County, Califotnia, for the purpose of constructing and ~ opera tine sa:td jo:i.nt scvmge treatment plants and disposal facil:i t:tes. Agenda Item //2'/ M-1 All Dlstr:iets --~----~~ . ....-.- Section lL By means of this res·olution and of the resolutions set forth below by number, the following Colll1ty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, have authorized the filing of applications , for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as "Central Ag~ncy" for said applications as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (e) of the California Administrative Code: District No. Resolution No. Application Amount 1 70-28-1 $ 352,900 2 70-22-2 1,027,600 3 70-23-3 1,093,800 5 70-2h-5 185,600 6 70-25-6 196,100 7 70-26-7 210,700 11 70-27-11 240,,800 Total $3,307,500 Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and subm:Lt for County Sanitation District No. 1,, ·for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2,, 3, 5, q, 7, and 11, al1 documents necessary to apply for and acecpt construction grants under ~ said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth in Section l~ he;~eof for a joint project generally described as: 1970-71 IMPROVEME~ns AND ADDITIONS TO PLANT NO. 1 AND PIANT NO. 2 AND INTERPLAN'I1 INFLUEN'l1 IWl1.ERCEPTOR Acceptance of said grants may be for arnounts more or less tha..n set forth in Section 4 hereof. AEenda Item .f/27 Al 1 DJs tr:tc ts -----··----- RESOLUTION NO. 70-30-1 FEDERAL GRANT -SUNF1LOWER IN':L1ERCEPTOR TRUNK A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS11HICT NO •. lJ OF ORANGE COUN11Y, CALIFORNIAJ AUTHORIZING AND DIHECTING EXECU'rION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U. S • C. , 466 ET SE'Q,. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE A~ID ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Con[Sress k.ncn·m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c.~ 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. Com:ity Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing; operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewerihg agencies. Section 3. By means of this resolution, the Board of Directors hereby declares its intention to enter into an agreement with Cou..Dty Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, a.D identically organized agency, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities, as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in the duly approved and adopted Engineer'.s Report, dated November, 1969, which agreement will provide also that said District No. 7 will construct and operate said facilities and thereby will be deemed as "Central Agency" for said grant application, as set forth in Title 23, .chapter 3, Section 2100 (e) of the California Administrative .Code. Section 4. By means of this resolution and· Resolution No. ,_.,. 70-31-7 of County Sani ta ti on Di.strict· No. 7, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County authorize the filing of appli- Agenda Item #35 N-1 District 1 cations for grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth below: District No. 1 7 Application Amount $ 407 ,Iwo 1,039,200 Section 5. The General Manager is hereby e,,uthorized and instructed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 7 all documents necessary to apply for and accep~ a construction grant under said Act of Congress, in the amount of ·$1,039,200 for a joint project generally described as: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR TRUNK Acceptance of said grants may be for arnounts more or less than herein- above set forth. Agenda Item #35 N-2· District 1 t" RESOLUTION NO. 70-31-7 FEDERAL GRANT -SUNFLOWER INTERCEPTOR TRUNK A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. · 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING-AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 4~6 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as ~ended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, is a ·separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sew·er ·system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies. Section 3. By means of this· resolution, the Board of Directors hereby declares its intention to enter into an agreement with County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, an identically organized agency, whereby the two said Districts will share in the cost of the construction of certain joint interceptor facilities, as said facilities and cost shares are set forth in the duly approved and adopted Engineer's Report, dated November, 1969, which agreement will provide also that this District will construct and operate said facili- ties and thereby will be deemed as "central Agency" for said grant application, as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2100 (e) of the California Administrative Code. Section lL By means of this resolution and Resolution No. ,.,,,.,, 70-30-1 of County Sanitation District No. 1, the follO\·dng County Sanitation Districts of Orange County authorized the filj_.ng of applj_ .. Agenda I~em //35 -0- cations for grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth below: District No. 1 7 Application Amount $ 407,400 1,039,200 Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby designated as "Central Agency" for said construction project as defined by the said provisions of the California Administrative Cod~ an·d is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation Di~trict No. 1 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 1 as hereinabove expressed. Section 6. The General Manager is hereby authorized and instructed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress, in the amount of $407,400 for a joint project generally described as: SUNFLOWER INTERCEPI'OR TRUNK Acceptance of said grants may be for amounts more or less than herein- above set forth . ... Agenda Item #35 0 -2· ,· P.O. BOX 1052 AREA CODE 303 471-0123 .,.... COLORADO SPRINGS, COLORADO February 16, 1970 Orange County Sanitation District :/fl P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: During the past year Holly Sugar Corporation ("Holly") utilized the service and facilities of Orange County Sanitation District :/fl (the "District") to dispose of wast~ material generated at or by its sugarbeet factory located on Dyer Road (the "Dyer Plant") under an accepted proposal dated April 10, 1969 (the "1969 Agreement"). Holly wishes to continue to make use of the facilities of the District during calendar year 1970. However, Ilolly understands that the Orange County Chamber of Commerce has suggested an alternate ordinance which would, if adopted, modify existing and govern future charges by the District for services. A copy of such proposal is attached, marked Exhibit "A." This letter, therefore, in duplicate orj_ginal, when accepted will evidence and establish the agreement between Holly and the District with respe.ct to services rn1d charges therefore to be furnished Holly by the District for a term (the "1970 term") commencing as of January 1, 1970 and terminating December 31, 19/0. The District shall furnish Holly with services for the 1970 term and charge Holly for services of the same kind and at the same rate as described and designated in the 196 9 Agreement; provided> hm·1ever, that should Orange County> during the course of calendar year 1970, adopt nn orclinnncc j_ncorporat:i.ng substantially the Agenda Ttem //36 P-1 District 1 ·r-· · Orange County Sanitation District ill -2-February 16, 1970 provisions summarized in .Exhibit "A" (the "new ordinance"), then Holly shall have the· option (but· not the requirement) of adopting provisions of the new ordinance to this . Agreement with the effect that all rates provided by the new ordinance would govern the charges to Holly under this Agreement on and after the effective date of the new ordinance. If the above and foregoing is acceptable to the District, please so indicate by causing an authorized District official to execute both duplicate originals in the space provided belo·w, returning Holly's copy, so marked, to the attention of the undersigned. Very truly yours, HOLLY SUGAR CORPORATION ACCEPTED: -------{date) ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 111 By Agenda Item #36 P-2 Dlstrict 1 RESOLUTION NO. 70-32-1 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED A RESOLUTICN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO .. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT DEED FROM LEVITT AND SONS OF CALIFORNIA, INC. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant Deed dated January 8, 1970, wherein Levitt and Sons of California, Inc.,grants to County Sanitation District No. 1, all its interests in the real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and more particularly described as follows: The Northerly 20.00 feet of Lots 79 through 82 jn Tract No. 7000, per Map recorded in Book 264, Pages 42 through 45 inclusive, Records of Orange County, California. Section 2. That said Grant Deed is accepted at no cost to the District, in connection with the Dyer Trunk Sewer; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. Ar:enda Item #37 . -Q-Dlstrict 1 RESOLUTION NO. 70-33-1 AWARDING CONTRACT NOo P2-16, SEDI- MEN'l1NL1ION BASIN "J" AND DIGESTER 11 J 11 AT PLANT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEDIMENTATION BASIN "J'' AND DIGESTER "J", CONTRACT NO. P2-16 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, District's engineers, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to J. E. & W. W. HOAGLAND ---------~--~~~----------~~~--- Contractor for SEDIMENTATION BASIN "J" AND DIGESTER "J" AT PLANT NO. 2, CONTRACT NO. P2-16, and the proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. P2-16 be awarded to J. E • & W • W ~ HOAGLAND , Contractor, ------~~--~~~~~~~~~-------·------ in the total amount of $587,700.00 , in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract.documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. -R-Dlstr:tct 1 Eng. Estimate: $650,000. B I D TAB U·L AT I 0 N S H E E T Date: March 6, 1970 __ __,.1~1-:~0~0~a~.-m-.---~~--- Contract For: SEDIMENTATION BASIN "J11 AND DIGESTER "J11 A'r PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-16 BIDDER 1. J.E. & W.W. Hoagland Long Beach 2 · J. Putnam Henck San Bernardino 3. J. D. Deffenbaugh, Inc. Riverside 4 · Lomar Corporatjon Huntington Beach 5. Hood Corporation Whittier ~ · 6 · U.T.E.C. Gardena 7. Thomas Construction Company Fresno 8. J. R. Youngdale Construction San Diego 9. 10. Agenda Item .f/38 -S- TOTAL BID $ 587,700.00 601,430.00 603,603.00 608,500.00 618,800.00 634,990.00 734,000.00 76L~, 000. 00 District l RESOLUTION NO. 70-34-2 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Annexation No .. 5) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ·OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "PROPOSED BEVERLY-GLENWOOD ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 -(ANNEXATION NO. 5) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 2, by means of a petition filed with said Commission by the property owners; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Beverly-Glenwood Annexation No. 5 to County Sanitation District No. 2 11 , the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is ~fininhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing ·said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $6,586.06 ($260 per acre) have been received by County Sanitation District No. 2; and, Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County S~nitation District No. 2. PASSED AND ADOPTED.at a regular meetirgon March 11, 1970. Agenda Item #42 T-1 Dist:rlct 2 ... ' ANNEXATION NO. 5 (Beverly-Glenwood) Conn ty S:lni. t:l tion Dis td.c t No 2 LEGAL DESCRIPTION All that certain land situated partly within the City of Yorba Linda, County of Orange, State of California, to-wit: ... ~ That. portion of the northeast quarter of Fractional Section 23, . Township 3 South, Range 9 West, San Bernardino Meridian, ANll that portion of the land of Samuel Kraemer, in the nortl~1est quarter of Fractional Section 24 of said Townsl1ip and Range as per map filed in Book 2 Page 21 of Records of Surveys, in the Office of the County Recorder of said County. Described as follows: Rcginnine at a poi.nt on the northerly boundary line of Connty Sanl.ta t:1 on DJ~; tric l No. 2 of Orange County, per f ornw tJ on u n tcc.1 6-9-118 being also the northerly lJnc of the Rancho Canon. de Santa Ana, distant thereon N 89° 23' 16" East 386.73 feet from a monument marking the north- east corner of Felipe Yorba Allotment of Second Class Land in tlic partltion of said Rancho Canon de Santa Ana, and also distant thereon South 89° 23' 16" West, 271.25 feet from the quarter·corner of Sections 23 and 24 to the point of beginning, said point being a point on a curve concave westerly having 0 rnc.Hus of 1200 feet, a radial 11.ne of s.:tid curve to s.'.1id point bears South 50° 57' 49" East; thence leaving the boundary line of said County Sanitation District No. 2, northerly along said curve through a central angle of 39° 17' 20" a distance of $22.87 feet to the point of tangency thereof with the easterly line of said northeast quarter of Sec ti on 23, said line being also the westerly 1 ine of said nor tln·:cs t quarter of Section 24; thence along said line, North 0° 15' 09'' West 15 '• • 3 8 f c e t to a poi n t in th c south c r 1 y 1 inc of the r i g h t o f way ( 5 0 feet wide) of the Metropol:i.t:rn Water District of Southern Californ:ia; tltr_•nce along s;dd southerly right of way line, South 76° 06' 28" East 1537 .60 feet; thence South 13° 53' 32" West 54/i.80 feet, more or less to a point in said northerly line of the boundary of Orange County Sanitation Dis- trict N;. 2; thence along said northerly boundary line, South 89° 23' 16" .West 1629.13 feet to the point of beginning. Containing 25.331 Acres, more or less . . . .• Agenda Item #LI 2 ·District ·2 1. ~. I -L --. - E. L. f?carson & Assoc. 1551 W. REDONDO BEACH BLVD. GARDENA, CALIFORNIA 90247 A1LiP 51-!otlJ!,\.'G .Dr,opo·SED ~1A.JIJ[x,_\no.v 7o O:;:~l-.'5!:. Cou1--n-y SAIJI/!., TIC.V D/5;-k.' /CT. .'./£. "2 Vl.0. ;3~~ .=i P. I (213} 321-1515 (213J 329-4125 Oa te: .': -7-:, <;, ) ''JI I -v } _.,..,~ 'J , /": -~;:;.., .... I/;: ,-JI \/ Gl _, / 1,1 //"'/'tf,•) J.1 r. ,, C:: /., l-i I 1'-111 -i~J._.,. ~ "_ ...... -::_v.._r .... .._, - -CN ;1., --~v,J Designed b;': :>.J.=. Checked b : r4 I 13 ----71·---- f)') I I/) "~. .. ..... 'J I I IH If'' =-~ ')I N.11. ~ • rac . ..,,ec. ,..,. T. s s. ,2. 9 w. ,ss.M. ,..... I JA.V/U~ ~ LEGEAID r·~ 300· rx; ... -7·1 1v~ 1:_::.-I/ UD°'/\ r)',./ c:... \ ~ '.> /\ ..:; _,Jo,._, 11 ,--., ...... .,~:~~ .. ~-J..·:. .. .;,..ca.. .r~~t:i:;:.;_ ~:..! ...... p;(oPo5ED 8cu1:JDAA.At-~--........--··-·----·- ---------------- Agenda Item f/lt2 T-3 District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 70-35-3 FEDERAL GRANT -WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILITIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DIS'l.1 RICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C., 466 ET SEQ. · The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section.·.l. An Act of Congress knm·m as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.s.c., 466 et seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies. Sectj_on 3. The General Manager is hereby authorized and instructed to prepare, sign and submit, for Cou.nty Sanitation District No. 3, all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress, in the amou.nt of $7h0,500 for a project generally described as: WESTSIDE INTERCEPTOR FACILrrIES Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than herein- above set forth. Agenda It~~~ #~§_ -U- RESOLUTION NO. 70-36-11 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SLATER-SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE SLATER-SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Keith and Associates, District's engineers and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be .made to SALATA, INC. ------~~--~~--~~~~--~~--~~ Contractor, for SLATER-SPRINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-11, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said ·contract for Contract No. 11-11 be awarded to SALATA, INC. , Contractor, in the ~~--~-----~~~~----~~~---- total amount of $710,700.00 in accordance with the terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. Agenda Item #56 -V-District 11 Eng. Estimate: $735,896. B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N S H E E T Contract For: Date: March 6, 1970 11:00 a.m. SLATER-SPEINGDALE AND EDINGER RELIEF TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 11-11 BIDDER 1. Salata, Inc. Stanton 2. Mike Prlich & Sons S. El Monte 3. R. G. Atckinson Signal Hill 4 · Drummond & Bronneck, Inc. Santa Monica 5. Henson Construction Co. Bell Gardens 6 • Mercury Company El Monte 7 · Steve Bubalo Construction Co. Reseda 8 · Steve Kral Corporation Baldwin Park 9. Merco Construction Engineers Redondo Beach lO. A & P Pipeline Upland 11. Scott Bros. Construction Santa Ana 12. Dorfman Construction Co. Los Angeles Agenda Item #56 -W- TOTAL BID $ 710,700.00 738,719.36 770,000.00 823,309.00 823,946.oo 849,090.00 850,864.oo 861,889.50 892,541.10 908,659.00 913,128.00 990, 129-. 00 District 11 RESOLUTION NO. 70-37-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING ·AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC INVESTMENT COMPANY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, and Pacific Investment Company, providing for reimbursement by the District for South Coast Plaza Subtrunk Extension, Contract No. 7-lF-B, which said sewerage facility is more particularly described as: A 15" VCP Sanitary Sewer extending northerly from Sunflower Avenue generally along the alignment of the F-2 Flood Control Channel northerly to the vicinity of MacArthur Boulevard, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form approved by the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement in the total amount of $38.J41.50 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions of said agreement and Schedule "A" attached hereto, from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. · Agencla Item f/61 -X-Distrlct 7. RESOLUTION NOo 70-38-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORPER: Section 1. That the certain Director's Deed (easement agreement) dated February 2, 1970, wherein the State Division of Highways grants to County Sanitation District No. 7, a permanent easement for sewer purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of California, in connection with the Gisler Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-1, and the Redhill Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Director's Deed is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held March 11, 1970. Agenda Item #62 -Y-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 70-39-7 .. •• • --• p AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 (CONDEMNATION #1 ) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOO 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and determined, and hereby does find and determine, that the public interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations, and other structures for the trans- porting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary· therefor. Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and n~cessity for the uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly ·.described on Schedule 11 A11 and shown on maps marked Exhibit 11 A11 attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein. Agenda Item f/63 Z-1 District 7 ... Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land w~thin the boundary lines of such easements and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however, that: (a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; (b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be constructed upon, over, or along said ease- ments and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located within the lines of said easements or rights of wayj (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines of said easements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be cons~ructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include: (a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service connection structures appurtenant to said line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend above the surface ~-of the ground; (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from j\penda Item #63 Z-2 District 7 the work, together with the right, upon completion of the construction of the pipe- line or pipelines or other works, to con- struct and maintain an access road upon, over, and along such permanent easements and rights of way as may be in the public interest from time to timeo Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller, Nissan and Kogler, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorneys are authroized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of sec~rity by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 6. That the Auditor· of the District is authorized upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possessi.on of easements and.rights of way to the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meetin~ held March 11, 1970. Agenda Item fl9..'i Distr1 lct 7 Z-3 ..,,. ... ';·. ·/. . •' .· · .... ·. ~·: ..... ("{lf:.Ef?.'T C fl,0.V.llS fj:s:ll E14 s-4 7'1 (IJ?~ . ::. _,,.--. T,I. 4 7 :~ ';' l': (, • ~-____ .._ __ _ .JESSc /?."J?f)!;s .·· . ._.( hM61 ·";8fOG/094 O.P.. . ffii] Dill ( 7-8·4 ) Q£!] A01-U~0J{"r ~"---~~~--~~--- •• 'I • • • ·.r • ·. ·.· ... ... , .. ·. -': .. . . ·:·. . , . ·.· ... , . : \ :: . I.: ..... ~ . . . . . : .· ..... · . .'.L l'1 • .. ; . ·.' .. : ..... ,: ........ " Agenda Item //63 0.1/EL l ESTE/JJ I 1-e-1s I ·· 87.Jo/122 o.~ 1·.s-11 I 8G81 /7Z4 O,P. [ 7·0·/9 J 8/C!>/N1 o.-n. CC/Y ,4. C'OA TS · lJ7StJ/7.?I O.tl, !J,1-./.0t..SON ( N·/4 f 4701 4~2 o.P.. G.£.OOO$oN I 7•8·/G I ~ ~ ~ C2G7/G08 O./t . ';:'\ 1·.s·1s j J ~ ~795/ ;91 o.r. . [ Nh?4J B . ~ l>-"'~o eCt-#\,W.61, ~ T.1.4739C/!. ALLAN so' 11.4/?/?lf! ... 1Jc1e/11g o.r.. . ~.~/Jll' Et>"~<~r -.. -.. -... _...,..,....-...-- ........... ~ . .:. '· · .. '.• ..... ' ,, .. -..... Dlstrlct 7__ I \ t ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST BOND PROPOSITION The following ·arguments for :me! against the Bond Proposition to be submitteJ at ·a Spccbl District Election to b~ held in County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California. on March ~4. I 970, have bt•en filed with the Sccrt.'tary pursuant to Article 3, Chapter 2, Division 4 (Sections 3780 to 3786, inclush·e) of the Ekctions Code_: ARGUMENT FOR BOND PROPOSAL Since 1962 County Sanitation District No. Ts population has tripled and its assessed \"Jlu~:tinn has in- creased from $68,948,530 to S2n,S92,760. This development. has increased the voluml' of sewage so that tl.w existing sewerage facilities are at near 100% capacity and are at timt'S ovcrload~d. · In order to provide sewerage facilities to prevent overflows, the District Bo~ud has ajopkcl :i two-ph~1SC' construction program. Between 1971 and 1973. 50.000 fret of trunks would be constructed south of the Sant~ Ana frct?w~y at a cost of SG.000,000. In second-pk1se construction. between 1974 and 1979. 39,000 fed of trunks would ·be built north of the Freeway, costing $3,816,000. Phase One should be financed through is·rn~1rn:e of the propOSL"'d general obligation bonds, \Vhik Phase Two would be funded by ch:1rgcs fo:-new connections. Your "'YES" vote on the bond measure on March 24 is urgently requested and rccomrncndccl bcL'~lllsc: ( 1) The District is oblig~ted tllldt.~r law to provide SC\Vl'ragL' facilities for its territory. (2) Other methods of financing this obligation arc considerably more cxpen.siVL' and tend to place the burden on present users rathC'r than future users. Some of these altcrn~1tc methods arL': (a) Direct tax al ion increase; (b) r..fonthly sewer service charges for each user; (c) Revenut' bonds to be voted on and paid by sewer service ch~uges; (d) Lcasl?-purchasc financing hy means of a nonprofit corporation. (J) Failure to construct additional srwL•rage facilities could result in. restrictions on further rcsidcnti~l, commercial and ind ustria I dcvelopmcn t imposed by heal th and water pollution L'Ontrol :rn thori ties. Under the proposed bond financinr. prog1'am, the present District sewer tax rJtc> of 50 cents per S 100 assessed valuation is prcdict'-·d to pay the costs of th(' proposl'd bond issUL' 3S well as all other District cxprnses. No increase in property tncs is anticipatrd. Agenda Item /J6h BOARD or DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Clifton C. I\1ilkr (C'hairm~111) Lorin Grisct Ellis N. Porter Don E. Smith William Hirstein ARGUMENT 1-\GAlr\!ST BOND PROPOSAL (Nonr Filed) -AA-District 7 .. STATEMENT IN COMPLIANCE WITH ELECTIONS CODE SECTIONS 5300 TO 5304 s shown on the enclosed sample ballot, an election will be held in the County S:rnitation District Nu. 7, of """()range County on l\farch ~4. 1970, for the purpose of submitting to the ekctors of said distrid the question of incurring J bonded indebtedness of said district in the principal ::nnount of S6,000.000. As such bonds an.~ authorized and sold, the principal thereof and interest thl'rcon will he pay;:ibh· from the proceeds of tax levies made upon all the taxable real property in sJid district. The following in ft 1r:n~1 ti on regarding tax rates is given to comply with St'ctions 5300 to 5304 of the Elections Code. Such infPrmation is based upon the best estimaks and projections presently avaihbk from official sources and tipOn ex- perience within s:lid district or other demonstrable factors. · If said bonds arc authorized, thl' present projection is that said ~6,000.000 of bonds wil1 bL· sold in a single saJc during the fiscal year 1970---1971. The district Board of Directors h:.is established a policy of maintaining a stable tax rak and hasc.'cl upon the best estimates and projections presently available, the current total tax rak of appro:--.imatcly S.50 pa ' $100 of assessed valuation required to fund all fiscal activities will not inL·reasc during thl· period of th1..• bond retirement. - Based upon such projL·ctions and estimates. the following statement is made in compliance with par~1graphs (1 ), {2) and (3) of subdi·,·isior~ (a) of Section 5301 of the Elections Code: The first· fiscal year after the sale of the bonds will be the fiscal year t 971--· I 972. It is presently e~;tim:itcd that the assessed vJ]uati0n of all t~1xab!c property in the district, as shown on the asses~mcnt roll fm such fiscal year, will be S268, 102.000. Base-d upon the foregoing estimates ~rnd projections, th1..· tax ratl' which would be required to fund said bond issue during such fiscal year ·l 97 l -;-197?., including rt.•savc require- ments for tlw following fis1..·al yc:ir, would he S.2658 per S l 00 of ~1ssrsscd valuation. The tax rate for fisc:il year t 97'2-1973, the second fiscal year after the sale of°the bonds, b~1scd upon an estimated assessed valtwtion of $:.88.210,000 will decrease to S. l MO per SI 00 or assess~d rnluation. ~fhc fis('a] year in which the highrst tax rate required to fund s:1id bond issue to be levied is also cstimakd to be the fiscal year 1971--1972, as abO\'C stated. The attention of all voters is directed to the fact that the foregoing information is b~ISl'd upon projrctions and estimates only, which arc not binding upon the district. The actual tinws of sail's of s~id bond-.. and the.> amount so1cl 3t any given timL' will be governed by the nct~cls of the distril'l. thL~ thl'n appli1.·abk do..'ht limit, the state of the bond market a·nd other fal'tors. The actual interest r~lll' whkh bond~ sold will ~i:ar will depend upon the bond m:nket 3t the time of the sale. The ·actu:il as~essccl v~t!m's durin~. thL' Sl'"\?ral future years will depend upon the then amount of taxable prop8rty wit!tin s~1id distrii.:t. and thL· ·.:tluc thereof as determined in tht' ~1ssL'SSllll'llt and cqualiz~1tion process. lknl·1..·. th-.· actu~d tax r~1tcs ~1111.I thl' years in which the same ~re applicabk m~ry vary from those prL'SC'ntly csti111,1kd» ~!-.. abmT stakJ. The foregoing statement has bcrn a pprovcd by th~ governing hoard () f S;t id s~tll i t:1 {ion Di-;trict. . .,,,,., Agenda Item #61+ FRI~D A. HARPER. Sl~net;11y COUNTY SANITATION DIS'1 RICT ~O. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis A n·rrnc P. (). Box 81 27 I Fountain Valky, Calif. 92708 -BI3-Distrlct 7 ,. ANALYSIS OF BOND PROPOSAL The proposal to be submitted to the voters of County .Sanitation District No. 7 on l\l<lrch 24, 1970. seeks authority to issue and sell ~6,000,000 in general obligation bonds to be used to construct additional trunk sewer lines. An engineering report was adopted, after public hearing, which sho\vl·d the lines to be con- structed as necessary for transporting sewage and industrial wastes originating within the District to its treatment plant bt:c:rnsc the rapid devcloim1ent of the District from farm land to rl'Sickn tial, commercial and industrial uses has used all exi~ting major and interceptor trunk line hydraulic c~1pacity. The proposed gcnt'rul obligation bond issue is one of several possible methods of fin~mcing this District obligation. It was rccomm;:.ndcd as the least expensive and the best-suited to District purpo_scs by Bartle Wells Associates, indtpcndent municipal financing consultants employed by the District. The proposed construction would provide a second main. interceptor se\wr line from the District into the treatment pbnt jointly owned and operated by the District and the other County Sanitation Districts. That portion of the new interceptor sewer line running easterly from the treatment plant in the direction of Sunnower Avenue to l\fain Street would be financed and owned in p:nt by County Sanitation District No. 1. This joint participation would substanti~11y reduce the costs to County Sanit:1tion District No. 7 of this Ii ne. · The otlwr s~·wer trunks to be constructed arc to provide an adequate trunk system to nll areas of the District in order to relieve O\'crloaded existing trunk lines ancl to permit the continued orderly growth and development of the District by local agencies and property owners. If approved, the District will sell the bonds and repay them by kvying taxes on the taxable real property within the District over a period of years not to exceed forty. /predicts The financing consultants' report based on p~1st growth rate cxpL'ricnce projccted,th:.it the total tax rate to be levied by this District for all purposes, including the repayment of these bonds, will not exceed 50 cents pl.~r S l 00 of assessed valuation. The total tax rate for the J?istrid is now $00.4970. Th~ rapidly increasing assessed valuation of thr District is predicted to provide a revenue b~1sis for repayment of these proposed bonds. · · Agenda Item //6'-t C. ARTIIUR NISSON Gcncr:il Counsel County Sanitation District No. 7 -cc.:. District 7