The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1969-08II coAgDs OF om~crons Ccunty SanH ati.o n Disirlcts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange Co:m~y, Ca lifo rn ia 1084L~ Elli s Avcr1uc Fountai n Vall ey, Cal if.., 92708 JOll\JT BOARDS AG EM DA Au gust 13 , 1969 -7 :30 p .m. (1 ) Pledge of Alleg i anc e ( 2 ) Roll Call ( 3 ) DISTRIC T 3 Con sideration of motion to r eceive and fil e excerpt f rom the City of Seal Beach show ing appo in tment of Conway J . Fuhrman as alternate Director on District No . 3 (4 ) ALL DISTRICTS App ointments of Chairmen pro tern , if n e ces sary (5 ) DISTRICT 1 Consid eration of moti on approving minut e s of the r egular meeting h eld July 9 , 1969, as mail ed (6 ) DI STRICT 2 (7 ) (8 ) (9 ) (10 ) (1 1 ) (1 2 ) (13 ) (14 ) Consid eration of motio n approving minut e s of the r egu l ar mee ting h el d Jul y 9, 1969 , an d the ad j ourned meet ing thereof held J uly 23 , 1969 , as mailed DI STR I CT 3 -Consid eration of motio n approving minute s of the r egular meet ing heid J uly 9 , 19 69 , as mailed DISTRICT 5 Considerat ion of mot i on approving minu tes of the r egular meeting he l d July 9 , 1969 , aB ma il e d DISTRICT 6 Consi deration of motion approving miuutec: o f the r egu l ar mee ting held July 9, 1969 , as maile:d DI STRICT 7 Con s:lderatj_on of motion approving minutes uf the regular meeting held July 9, 1969 , as mailed DISTRICT 11 --coDsidera tio n of motion approving minutes of the regular meet ing hel d July 9 , 19 69 , as mail ed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the J oint Ch a irrr.an ALL DI STRIC TS -Repo r t of' the General M;i.nager ALL DISTRICTS -J{eport of the General Counse J (15) . (16) (17) ·(18) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Conunittee and Building Committee, and consideration of motion·to receive and file the .written report (copy in folders)o ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action on items recommended by the Executive and Building Committees, as follows: A. Consideration of motion accepting proposal of William P. Ficker, A.I.A., to expand the scope of the Master Plan for Support Facili- ties at Treatment Plant No. 1. See page "F rr B. Consideration of motion accepting proposal of William P. Ficker, A.I.A., to develop a Master Plan for Support Facilities at Treatment Plant No. 2. See page 11 G11 C. Consideration of Resolution of Intention No. 69-65 to formally consider a uniform industrial waste charge ordinance on September 10th. See page "H" D. Consideration of motion to receive and file specifications for Jobs Nos. Pl-15A and P2-15A, and directing the staff to negotiate with Bird Machine Company for purchase of centrifuge equipment for Plants 1 and 2; and, authorizing issuance of a purchase order for said equipment, upon completion of satisfactory negotiations, in an amount not to exceed $350,000 plus freight charges and sales tax. E. Consideratj_on of moti'on authorizing the General Manager to designate staff members to attend meetings shown on page. "I" ; and authoriz- ing reimbursement for expenses incurred. F. Consideration of Resolution No. 69-64, approving Joint Powers Agreement creating Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority; and authorizing District No. 1 to execute said agreement. See page rr J" ALL DISTRIC'I'S Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate members.of the Board and/or staff to attend meet- ings, conferences, facility inspections and other functions which are not of an overnight duration and which, in his opinion, will be of value to the Districts; and authorizing reimbursement for travel, meals, re~istration fees and incidental expenses. See page "K for meetings authorized by the General Manager during the past fiscal year. ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Director of Fina.nee on individual District budgets for 1969-70 -2- {19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file Master Plan Report-Electrical Energy, 1969-1980, sub- mitted by John Carollo Engineers (20) ALL DIS'l'RICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to Contract No. Pl-14 (Digester No. 8 at Plant" No. 1), granting a one-day time extension and authorizing an . addition of $584.43 to the contract with Lamar Corporation, Contractor. See page "L~' · {21) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one employee to attend Woodward Governor Company's Prime Mover Control Conference at Ft. Collins, Colorado, September 9th through 12th; and authorizing reimbursement for expenses incurred (22) ALL DISTRICTS (23) (24) Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda~ found them in order, and that re recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1 and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "Arr "B" , and "C" ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications A. Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to sign a negotiated contract with William P. Ficker, A.I.A., in accordance with terms of proposal dated June 6, 1969, relative to the Districts' new laboratory building. See page "GG" ' {25) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving the Districts budget for the 1969-70 fiscal year. See page "M" (26) DISTRICT 1 Report of the General Counsel on easement matter re: Monarch Investment Company (27) DISTRICT 1 (28) (29) (30) . (31) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D rr DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving the District's budget for the 1969-70 fiscal year. See page "N" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Lowry Engineering-Science, for engineering design services in connection with Contract No. 2-12 (Trask Avenue In.terceptor Sewer); and authorizing the General Manager to direct the . t d . tl . d . s "0" engineers o procee wi l sai services. ee page --3- '-..,.! I (34) DISTRICT 2 (33) (34) Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to Contract No. 2-10-9 (Euclid Trunk Sewer), authorizing an addition of $1,137 to the contract with Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc., Contractor. See page "P" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving· Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 2-10-9, authorizing a 49-day time extension to the contract with Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. See page "Q" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-61-2, accepting Contract No. 2-10-9 as complete, and authori.zing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work thereforo· See page "R" (35) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (36) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (37) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn (38) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving the District's budget for the 1969-70 fiscal year. See page "s" (39) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (40) DISTRICT 3 Other business and connnunications, if any (41) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn (42) DISTRICT 5 ( 43) ( 44) ( 45) Consideration of motion approving the District's budget for the 1969-70 fiscal year. See page "T" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract'No. 5-16 (Reconstruction of the Lido Pump Station), authorizing a total addition of $3,497.24 to the contract with B & M Excavating, Inc., Con- tractor. See page "u" . · DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 5-16, authorizing a deduction of $1,300 from the contract with B & M Excavating, Inc. See page "V" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-63-5, accepting Contract No. 5-16 as complete; approving Final Closeout Agreement; and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page 11 w11 \.._I . . (46) DISTRICT 5 . Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (47) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (48). DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn (49) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving the District's 1969-70 · fiscal year budget. See page "X" (50) DISTRICT 6 (51) (52) (53) . (54) (55) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page· "E" DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approvin?, the District's 1969-70 fiscal year budget. See page 'Y" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of .Keith and Associates for preparation of plans and specifications for the Slater-Springdale Relief Trunk Sewer and Edinger Avenue Relief Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 11-11; and authorizing the General Manager to direct the engineers to proceed. See page "z" DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Counsel to file a claim for damages with the City of Huntington Beach, based on costs incurred by the District for damages caused to the District's Coast Highway Trunk Sewer during 1968 and 1969. See page "AA" (56) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (57) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if .'any (58) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to ~djourn (59) DISTRICT 7 .· Consideration of motion approving the District's 1969-70 fiscal year budget. See page "BB " ( 60) (61) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-59-7, approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 7-l~-2R (Tustin-Newport Relief' Subtrunk Sewer), and authorizing advertislng for bids to be opened at 11.: 00 p .m., September 3rd. See page ucc 11 ·- DISTHICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-62-·-r, approving Reimburse- ment Agreement (Met.st.er Plan) \·rlth Irvlne Industrial Complex ~elat1vc to Contracts No. 7-2D and No. 7-·2D-l_, and sewerage improvements to 'l're.ct No. 611J.O. 8~e page _ rrnD_1_' -5-___ ____, (62) (63) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-60-7, authorizing acceptance of a Grant of Easement, at no cost to the District, from Tustin Walnut, a limited partnership. See page "EE" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-66-7, establishing the method of collecting annexa'tion fees re: Annexation No. 14.> pursuant to the provisi.ons ·of Resolution No. 68-57-7. See page "FF" (64) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (65) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any. (66) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn ,... -o- II Mi\NAGER'S AG:.iNOA nEPOnT Co unty San i fot ion Distdd.s P. 0. Box 5175 of O range County, Ca lifo1 r:i<1 10844 E:lis Avenue Founta in Va ll ey, Ca lif., 92708 T ol ophone~: JOINT BOARDS Arec Code 714 5 1:0-2910 962 -24 11 Augu st 8 , 1969 Supplement to Regular Agenda Report f or August 13 Meet ing At the request of Director Speer , Chairman of the Buildin~ Co mmii:;tee , the following i tem will be placed on the agenda for cons :i.d era t i on at this meeting . This matter was inadv ertedly omitted from the agenda for the Building Committ ee at its August 5 th meeting , but appear~ to be of sufficient importance and u rgency to be consid ered without formal committee considerat i on : No . 2L~ -OT HER B USINESS -DESIGN OF NEW L ABORATORY BUILDING : I t will be recalled that at the J oint Board mee tj.ng in Jun9 , a proposal of Willjam F . Ficker , A.I .A., for certain arclti tectu ral services , in cluding the design of a n e\'J laboratory bu ild ing was submit tea·. At that time, the J o int BoB.rc'l aut i1or:Lzed the acceptance cf that portion of the proposal relating to the preparation of a ma8ter plan of non -treatment units and buildings at Plant No . 1 . At the August 5th mectir.g of the Ex ecutive a1:d Bu :ildlng Com mittees , the architect's wor·x to date on the mastc>r pla n was reviewe d and the location of the new laboratory buiiding, i mmediately west of the administrative offices , was approved. Accordingly , and in order to proceed as expedltiously as possible with the design and constructjon of this b adly needed facility, we are re commending that the J oint Boards c;,uthQrize the architect lo proceed with that portion of his over-all services. An excerpt of Mr . Ficker 1 s proposal relating to Lhe design o f the new l aQoratory building is attached hereto . Fred A. Harper General f1'.anac;er ·---- EXCERPT FROM PROPOSAL OF WILLIAM Po FICKER, AoI.A. DATED JUNE 6, 1969 NEW LABORATORY BUILDING This would be an entirely new structure planned specifically . for laboratory use. Strong consideration will be given to the laboratory aspects of the planning and design. Mechanical systems, gas and electric as well as interior laboratory furnishings, etc., will be designed by this ·office. Fee This fee must be determined upon evaluation of. the project scope. However, it will essentially be based on the following sched~le 1 a. Building only. Approximately ~ to 10%. This would include basic systems of plumbing and air handling. b. Complete responsibility for specify.ing all interior furnishings, special hoods,· ovens, etc., and providing systems for their support. . .. 12% of the cost of this equipment and related items. These fees are based on a total cost of approximately $150,000.00. Should the project scope increase, the percentage of fee would .probably average out at a~proximately 10/o; however, a smaller · project of approximately ~100,000.00 would deserve re-evaluation due to the extraordinarily hlgh proportion of specialized engineering. It might also be possible that the Orange County Sanitation Districts would desire to assume responsibility for the coordination of special furnishings, in which c&se only a small proportion of th: f~e of section "b" of the proposal, relating to the new laborator·y building, would be necessary for coordination of the systems by the architect. COU NTY S AN ITAT IO N DI ST RICTS o f O RA NG E C OU NTY, CALIFORN IA P. 0. BOX 8 127 10844 ELLIS AVENU E l=OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 Au gu st 7 , 1969 (714) 540-2910 (7 14) 962-2411 RE PORT OF THE EXEC UTI VE AND BUI LDI NG CO MMITTEES Meeting Date : Aug u st 5 , 1969 -5 :30 p .m. EXEC UTIVE COMMITTEE BUILDI NG COMMITTEE Directors present : Di rectors present : Cl ifton C. Miller (Chairman ) Lo rin Griset Thomas 0 . Speer (Chairman ) Clifton C. Miller Thomas O. Speer Lindsley Parsons Di r ectors absent : Su pervisor Wm . Hirstein Directors a b sent : No r man E. Cu lver Ellis N. Porter Donal d D. Shipley Norman E . Culver Robert Schwerdtfeger Other Directors present : Burton Brooks S taff Members present: Fred . A. Harper Pa ul B. Brown Norman Tremblay J . Wayne Sylvester Ot h e r s present : Wil l iam Ficker H. Harvey Hunt Walter Howard Convened: Ad jou rned : 5 :30 p .m. 1 0 :00 p .m. ******************** 1. Preliminary Review of Master Plan for Plant No . 1 . At the Joint Board meeting in June , William Ficker, A .I .A., of Newport Beach, was employed to develop a Master Plan for Plant No . 1 , encompassing the anticipated future requirements for facilities such as warehousing , shop, laboratory, additional office space, and other special requirements which will be n e eded at this location . Following a discussion with Mr . Ficke r concerning his recom- mendations and his work to date, it became apparent that additional consideration should be given to the l ong-range plans of the Distri cts with regard to the support facilities which will be necessary to maintain and operate the ever-increasing treatment works at both p l ants . Mr . Ficker 's preliminary work placed considerable emphasis on the continued use and expansion of ex isting support facilities which may or may not be desirable ul t imately . It is the Executive Committee 's recommendation that the scope of the Master Plan for Plant No . 1 be expanded to include the Districts' ultimate requirements for maintenance and operation support facilities . The Executive Committee directed the staff to obtain from William Fic k er , A. I. A., a proposal for additional services in connection with the Master Plan for Plant No . 1 , and a proposal to develop a Master P1an for Support Facilities at Tre atment Plant No . 2 , for t he Boards ' consideration . 2 . Proposed Uniform Industrial Waste Gharge Ordinance . Pursuant to the inst ructions of the Committee on June 24th, a completed ordinance was submitted for review at this meeting . Several changes and additions have been incorporated into the en - c l osed ordinance . It is the Committee 's recomm endat ion that the Board members study the proposed ordinance in preparation for discussion at the August Joint Board meeting . It is further recommended that if the ordinance is acceptable to · the Directors, the Boards adopt a resolution of intention to formally consider this ordinance at the September Joint Board meeting . The resolution of intention will instruct the staff to forward to each city, sewering entity, Chamber of Commerce , and others, copies of the full ordinance . The resolution will also establish a public hearing date at which time all int erested parties will be given the opportunity of expressing their views . 3 . Di ester Solids Dewaterin Facilities -Centrifu e Equip - ment Purchase Projects 2091 -C and 20 2 -B . Subs equent to the adoption of the Joint Works Construction Budget for the 1969 -70 fiscal year, the Districts ' treatment plant engineers were directed to proceed with the design of additional -2 - digester solids dewatering facilities for Plants Nos. 1 and 2 . Aft er several design conferences it was concluded that equipment d elivery would delay the projects , as an installing contractor would be required to supp ly the centrifuges . It was then de cided that the projects could be expedited if the Districts purchas e d the required centrifuge equipment under a separate contract . Following a review of the letter submitted by J ohn Carollo Engineers re l ative to the merits of negotiating for purchase of the centrifug e equipment (letter enclosed ), it is the Committee 's r ecommendation that the staff be authorized and directed to n egotiate for the purchase of four centrifuges in accordance with the specifications submitted by the engineers . (The General Couns e l has advised that , bas ed on the information submitted by the engineers , this approach is acceptable ). 4 . General Manager 's Request for Authority to Attend the foll owing Meetings : (A) Me eting in Washington , D. C., of manage - ment official s of the twenty -five largest sewering agencies in the United States With r eference to the attached l etter from Charles V. Gibbs , Executive Direc tor of the Municipality of Metropolitan Seattle, the purpose of the suggested meeting has been expanded to permit discussions toward developing, a uniform plan through which the largest sewering agencies in the United States can approach the Administration and legislative representatives to formulate an equitable po llution abateme nt financing pro- gram at the Federal level . I would like authorization to attend the meeting when it i s called . I have been in contact with Mr . Gibbs, and he has advised that he has had very favorable response to his sugg estions concerning a meeting , from the larger ent ities . (B ) Annual Workshop of the California Sanitary and Sanitation Di stricts Association , in San Francisco , September 24th through 28th Th e Districts ' General Manager and Director of Finance attend ed l ast year 's annual meeting in San Diego . As a result of our attendanc e at that meeting , the Districts became members of the Association . It is recommended that two staff membe rs ·be a u thorized to attend this meeting which is sche dul e d f~r the latter part of Septembe r, in San Francisco . \. -3 - ...... ....... (C ) Annual meeting of the Water Po llut ion Control Fed eration> and Workshop > in Dallas > Texas > October 4th through 8th I have b een asked by the Water Pollution Control Federation to pa.rticipa te in a panel on current training c ourses and fac i lities at a Workshop on Operator Training . This workshop i s scheduled for Sat u rday> October 4th > i mlaediately p rece din g the Water Po llution Control Federation annual meeting which wi ll be held i n Da llas > Texas . (D) National Workshop on Operator Training sponsored by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration > in Atlanta> Georgia> Nov ember 3rd through 5th The Federal Water Pollution Control Administration, i n coop eration with Clemson University , will conduct a National Workshop on Educational Systems for opera.tors of wat e r pollution control facilities, in Atlanta, Georgia> No vember 3rd through 5th . I have been asked to participate in a panel entitled "Training Problems and Needs at the Local Level 11 • This workshop is being organized to permit representa- t ives of the 50 states~ as weJl as ma j or cities and i ndustries > to exchange ideas on wnat is being done and what remains to be d one to improve the e ffi c i ency of treatment plant operations . (This request is made subject to the air transportation be ing provided by the Conference sponsors). The Committee recommends approval of Items (A) through (D) as outlined . • 5 , Consideration of a Subcontract with the State Water Resources Control Board to Establish an On -The -Job Training Course . We have received an offer from the Executive Officer of the State Water Resources Control Board to contract with the State Boa rd to establish a forty -four week , on -the-job traini ng program . The enclosed letter from Mr . Gilbert outlines the program . Se v eral months ago the staff met with the Federal and State representatives to discuss this matter , and we have had s e v era l conversations with Mr . Gi lbert , representing the state , and Mr . DeFalco , representing the Federal Water Polluti on Control Administration . It is their personal opinion that the Orange County Sanitation Districts are the best qual i fied in the state to establish one of these programs . The Districts ' staff advised the Committee that sufficient time was not available to allow complete evaluation of the program submitted by the State in time to i nitiate the program by September . The Committee instructed the General Manager to continue discussions with the State repre sentatives regarding this p roject , or possibly a r evised program more acceptable to the Distr:Lcts . -4- 6 . Southern California Coastal Wate r Research Project Autho rity -Joint Powers Agreement . Fo r t he past two years , the staffs o f the Los Angeles County Sani tation Districts , Los Angeles City Bureau o f Sani tation , County of Ventura , City of San Diego , and our Di stricts have been meeting to d evelop a Joint Powers Agreement whereby the five agencies could d eve l op a j oint ocean -research p rogram . The p r inci pal o bj ective of thi s program i s to in c rease the scientific lmow l edge of t h e ecol ogic a l sys t ems of the near -shore coastal waters and to establi sh t he i nte r - r e l ationships between these systems and the Southern Cali f ornia treated waste water discharges to the ocean . The attached Jo i nt Powers Agreement has been reviewed by the l egal counsel s of each of the entit i es and is now i n final draft f orm . All five entities have budgeted funds for the 1 969 -70 f i scal y ea r , and each entity will contribute toward the f inancing of the pro j ect i n proportion to its annual ocean discharge . As t he Directors wi l l recall, the anticipated project is f or thre e years , with a provi sion for a two -year extension, if necessary . The staff r eports that this pro j ect has been discussed with both the state a nd federal authorities and it appears that the program will be e lig i ble for a Federal Grant . I t i s the Committee 's recommendation that the Joint Boards a pprove the agreement . 7 . Poss i ble Conflict between the Ali gnment of the Proposed Orange Freeway, and the Districts ' Facilities at Tr eatment Plants No . 1 and No . 2 . The State Division of Highways has been conducting some in- f ormal hearings relative to the alignment of the proposed Orange Fr eeway between the San Diego Freeway and the Coast Highway . At the p resent time , the Highway engineers are investigating p ossible r o ~tes paralleling the Santa Ana River . The Committee instructed the staff to advise the State Divis i on of Highways of the location of the treatment fac ilities a nd the future requirements of the Di stricts for additiona l treat - ment facilities at Plants No . 1 and No . 2 . The staff was further instr ucted to advise the Committee of any correspondence from the Divi sion of Highways relative to the proposed location of the f r eeway in relation to the Districts ' t r eatment works . -5- DRAFT 7-29-69 8-6-69 (Rev.) • ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDI NANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATI NG TO CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES , ESTABLISHING CHARGES THER EFOR AND CHARGES FOR DISPOSAL OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE, PROVIDING PENA LTI ES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING ORDINANCES NOS . • The Board of Directors of Co unty Sanitation District No . of Orange Coun ty, California, does ordain as f o llows: ••• -.. .. -• .. . • • • 1 ARTICLE 1 -PURPOSE •"" I The purpose of· this ordinance is to provide for the maximum lt- public benefit from the use of the Districts' faci l ities by r egulat ing the qua lity and quantity of sewage and industrial waste dis charged thereto and to provide for charge s for the us e thereof when such use is disproportionate to Dist rict cost s imposed by other property within the District. • • lo • The revenues t o be derived from the application of this ordinance • shall be u sed to defray the costs of, including the r epayment of principa l and inte r est on bonds issued for the acquisition, construction or reconstruction and the maintenance of an adequate sewerage system to serve the territory of the District excepting that no r evenues derived from this ordinance sha ll be us ed for the acquisition or construction • of new loca l street sewe rs or late r a l s as distinguished from main trunk interceptor and outfal l sewers . .. "*" • •• • ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONS (a) Area Occupied -Sh a ll mean the l and area in ac r es upon whic·h i mprovements and facilities have been constructed and the use thereof produces industrial waste. It shall include the area occupied by all improvements us ed , o~med or maintained by or for the firm or establishment whether or not industri a l waste is generated by a particular improvement and shall include landsc aped areas, parking l ots, warehouses and incidental improvements . It shall also include unimproved land adjacent to i mproved prop e rty when such l and is own e d, l eased, occupied or maintained by the firm or estabLtshment . In the c ase of l a nd -• , • occupied for oil or mineral production, it shall include the entire area r eserved for oil or mineral production. I (b) District -Shal l mean County Sanita tion Di strict No . of Orange County . ( c) Sewa g e -Shall mean the ·waste wat e r d e rive d from human use of buildings for ordina ry residential , institutional or commercial • -purposes. " (d) General Ma nag er -Shall mean the individua l duly designa ted by the Board of Di r ectors of the District to administer this ordina nce . (e) Industria l Wast e -Shall mean the wate r borne waste and waste water from any producing, manufacturing , or processing opera tion of whatever nature , including institutional and comm ercial opera tions where water is used for l aundering , vehic l e cleaning, or the removal of sig nifi- cant qua ntities of wastes of non-huma n ori g in . (f) Loc a l Sew e ring Ag ency -Sha ll me an any public corp oration duly authoriz e d unde r the l a ws of the Sta t e o f Ca lifor n ia to c onst ruct a nd /or ma intain public s ewe rs . ' (g) Pe a k Flow Ra t e -Shall mean the highe st fl ow r a te of industrial was t e discha r ged to a public s e wer ove r a p e riod of at l e ast 15 minut e s be twe en the hou r s of 6 :00 a .m. and 1 2 :00 midn i g ht at any time during a c a lenda r qua rt e r . (h) Pre -Tre atme nt Pl a nt or Fa cility -Sha ll mean any wo r k s or device for the trea t me nt o f industrial wast e , prior t o discha r ge into a public s e we r . (i) Public Corp ora tion -Sha ll mean any City, District or o t h er public agen c y d u ly o rga n ized und e r the l aw s of t he St ate o f Ca lif o1·nia . (j) St a ndar d Me thods -Sha ll me a n proc edu res d e scribed in the Twe l fth edition o f 11 Standar d Me thods fo r the Exam ination of Water and Wastewa t e r 11 as publi s h e d by the Am eric an Publi c Health Ass oc i a tion , the Ame rica n Wa t e r Works As soc iati on and t h e Wa ter Poll ution Control Fede r a t ion . • ~ (k) Su sp e nd e d So l ids -Sha ll me a n any ins olub l e solid ma tter cont ~i n e d as a c ompon e nt of sewage or industria l wa ste and c a pable of separation f r om the liquj_d p ortion of s a id wa st e by l a b o r a tory filtra tion . • ·-2 -• ARTICLE 3 -PERMITS (a ) When Required -No p e rson or public corporation shall be p ermitted to connect to, use, or maintain a connection to the sewerage f aciliti es of the Distr ict without a valid permit, issued as her e in- after provided . No person or public corporation s hall be permitted to u se or maintain a connection for the discharg e of industrial waste to a sewerage facility of a l ocal sewering age ncy, which facility discharges to a District sewerage faci lity, without a valid permit issued as h ereinafter provided . • (b) Co ndition Precedent -No p ermi t shall be valid unl ess the re al property t o b e served by us e of the permit i s included within the boundaries of the District and within the boundaries of a local ~ewering agency authorized to maintain public sewe r age works ; provided, however, a permit may be issued for property t o be served outside the boundaries of a loc a l sewering agency if a l ocal sewering agency makes application fo r the issuance of such permit . • • (c) Permit for Conne ction To and Use of District Facility (1) Application for such permit shall be made to the District on forms provided by the District and shall be i n two parts : fir st , a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District 1 s sewerage facility under conditions set forth in said permit ; and secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial waste t o District 1 s sewerage facility in accordance with the rule s and regu- l ations of the District established as hereinafter provided . (2 ) The use permit may prescri be requireme nts as to the t ype of conne ction and r equire the provision of industrial ~aste pre- treatment plants or facilities necessary to insure comp liance with the District 's rules and reg ula tions as to the characteristics , quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste dischare;ed . Such rules and r egulations shall be established as provided hereinafter and such ""I re quirements shall be set forth in the permit by the General .Manager of the District . (d) Permit for Use of District Services and Facilities for Treatment and Disposal of Indust ria l Waste ( 1) Applj_c a t ion for such permit shall be made to the -3- Di s trict on forms provide d by the Dis trict . The permi t sha ll be i ssued by the Dist ri ct and shall be in accordance with the rul es and r egul ations of the District as to the components_, quality and quantity of sewage and industri a l wastes discharged . The permit may also prescribe r equire - ments as to necessary p re-treatment of industrial waste to insure .. .. comp liance with the District 's r egulations as to the components, quality and quantity of sewage and industrial waste discharged . Any such ·- r equir ements shall be set forth in the permit . • .. Iii -.L lllfi' ART I CLE 4 -QUALITY REQUIREMENTS (a ) Substances Prohibited -No person or public c orporation sha l l discharge sewage or industrial waste i nto a Dist r ict sewerage facility or into a loc al sewering agency facility_, which facility d i scharges to a District f a cility_, when the cor11ponents of such effluent caus e the effluent to exce e d the limit s set forth h erein or are in violation of the rules and r egul ations of the District establi shed as h ereinafter provided . ·11 (1) .. (2 ) A t emperature highe r than 120°F More than 1 00 milligrams per lite r of hexane soluble mat erial (fats and oils) or 25 millig rams p e r lite r o f floatab l e oil ..... .• I "'. 11£ • .. (3) a pH of l ess than 6 .5 or more tha n 12 .0 (4) Mor e t h an 1 250 milli grams per l iter of suspended sol ids .. • I . ( 5 ) Any amount of substances which_, singly or in combination 't [l ~ -~--~ , .. -I&. • • with othe r substances_, c ause an explos i ve_, r adioactive _, or toxic condition in the s ewe rag e system_, treatment plants or disposal area . .. (b ) Additiona l Rules and Regul a tions -The Gene ral Ma n ager of the District sha ll_, from time to time_, esta blish and diss em ina t e additiona l rules and regulations as to qua lity of indus tria l waste dis- cha r ged to the sewerage f acilities of the District or to the s ewe r age facilitie s of a local sewering agency _, which f ac ility discha r ges into a Distri ct f a cility. Said r egula tions will be for the purpose o f insuring tha t industrial waste discharged will not cause undue maintenance in the District 1 s f a cilities _, inte rfere '·T ith prope r operation of :the treatment pla nts_, produc e a n oxious or malod orous gas , create a pub lic nuis anc e _, l .. -4-.. crea te h azards to structures) equipment and personnel) or create a violation of the r equi r ements imposed upon the District by Federal) State or local regul atory agencies . <- • I AR TIC LE 5 -QUANTITY REQUIREMENTS • " • In order to provide for reasonable us e of the District 's sewe rage faci l ities and in recognition of the f act that t h e transmission ) treat - ment and disposal of domestic s ewage is the highest and best us e of the District 's sewerage f ac ilities ) the General Manager of the Di strict may set forth requir ements in a ny permit to l imit the quantity of industri a l waste discha r ged t o a sewerage facility of t he Di strict or to a l ocal sewering agency . Such r equireme nts may limit the volume of indus t r i a l waste to be discharged with r espect to any given unit of time . • • ARTIC LE 6 -CHARGES FOR CO NNECTION AND USE (a ) Connection Charge -No application for a permit for a conn e c t ion to a District sewerage facility shall be considered until a c onnection charge is paid by the appli cant ) provided however ) that such charge sha ll not be payable when a permit i s issued for the reconnection or a lteration of an existing c onnection made by the District or at the request of the Distri ct . Said connection cha r ge sha ll be an amount set forth in a r esolution duly adopted by the Board of Directors . (b) Permit Charge for I n dustrial Waste -No application for a p e r mit to use a conne ction to a facility of the District or to a sewerage f acility of a l ocal sewering agency ) which discharges into a District f aci~ityJ for the discharge of industrial waste sha ll, afte r the effective date of this ordina nce) be consider ed unti l an I ndustrial Waste Permit charge is paid by the applicant . As used in this section ) "discha r g e of industrial waste " shall includ e any significa nt change in the qua lity or qua ntity of an existing industrial waste discha r ge . No cha r ge will b e mad e for the i ssuance of s uch permit for discha rges of industrial was t e existing at the effective date of this ordinance ) providing applica t ion the refor is made within 180 d ays a fter said effective d a t e . Said Industrial Waste Ch a r ge shall b e a n amount set forth in a r esolution duly adop t ed by the Bo a rd of Directors. (c ) Use Ch a r ges for Industrial Waste -In order to e ffe ct a n equita ble di stribution of costs b e tween the users of the Distri ct 's _i:;_ sewerage fac i lities, a cha r g e sha ll b e ma de for us e of such f a cilities for disposal of industri a l waste when the volume and qual ity of such was t e i mposes District co s ts disproportionat e to the District costs i mposeq by othe r prop e rty within the Distri ct . I t is here by e s t abl ishe d tha t an average dai l y rat e of f l ow of i n dustr i a l waste exceeding 5 ,000 gal lons (668 .5 cubi c f ee t) per acre of area occupi e d p e r day or a peak f l ow rate of industrial wa ste exceeding the rate of 7 ,500 gallons (1003 c ub i c feet) p e r a cre of area occupied p e r d a y or the discha r ge of i ndustrial wa s te c onta i ning mor e than 250 mi lli g r am s pe r lit e r of sus- p ended sol ids impose s an unreasonab l e burd e n of cost on other property within the District. In the event of a discha r g e of indu strial waste, whose c omponents, eithe r b y them selves or in conjunction with those of othe r wastes , cre ate an additi onal ma intenanc e and/or treatment expense to t h e District , the Board of Dire ctors, upon the recommen dation of the General Man a ger of t he District, ma y i mp ose a dditional cha r ges commensura te with t he additi ona l ma inte n a nc e a nd/or treat me nt e xpen se s incurred . -, (d) Co mput a tion and Invoicing of Us e Charg es for Ind ustri a l Wast $ -At the b eginning o f e a ch c a l enda r qua rter , the Ge n e r a l Manage r o f the Di s trict sha ll d e t e r mine ·which discha r ge rs of industria l wa ste h ave , during the pre c e ding c a l e n d ar q uarte r, exc eeded the flow r a t e s and/or suspen ded solids cont e nt limita tions s e t forth h e r e ina bove and sha ll c ompu t e the use charg e payab le . Said u se cha r g e i s t he · s um of a Vo l um e Cha r ge , a Pe a k Flm1 Cha r g e a n d a Su s p e nd e d So lids Ch a r g e and shall be c ompu te d a s foll ow s : . • (1) Volume Ch a r g e -Th e volume charge per cale nda r qua rt e r, wh en more tha n 50 pe rc ent o f the tota l flow during the c a l e.n dar quarter is discha r g e d d uring the h our s of 6 :00 a .m. and midnight, i s $0.05 p e r 1,000 gallons (133.7 cubi c fe e t ) of t h e exc ess of t h e a ctua l volume discha r ged during the c a l end a r quart e r ove r the vo l urne to b e a c cept e d wi thout c harge . The vo l ume to be ac c epted 11i thout cha r ge is 5, 000 gallons p e r day for each a cre o f area o c c upied . • Or, when mor e tha n ·50 p ercent of the tot a l f low e ac h d a y during t h e c a l end a r qua r t er i s d is c h a r ged ~1r i n g t h e hour s of 12 :60 midni ~ht .. -6 - I and 6 :00 a .m., the volume cha r g e i s $0 .04 per 1,000 gallon s , c a l cula ted on t he s ame basis . • (2) Pe a k Flow Ch a r g e -The pea k fl ow cha r ge p e r c a l enda r qu a rter is $0 .50 p e r 1,000 gal l ons p e r d a y of t he e xces s of t he a c t u a l p eak f l ow r ate discha r g ed du ring the c a l end a r quarter o ve r the peak fl ow r ate to be acc ept e d without charge . Th e p e a k flow rate to be • • ac c epted without cha r ge is 7,500 g a llons pe r d a y for e a ch acr e of a rea occupied . • (3) Susp e n ded S oli ds Cha r ge -The s uspende d solids cha rge p er c a l endar qua rt e r is $15 .00 per ton of suspen ded s o lid s in the i n dustria l wa ste discha r ged duri n g the c a lendar qu a rt e r in exce s s of the tons of suspend e d solids t o b e a cc e p ted withou t cha r ge . The t ons of • s usp e nde d s o lids t o b e acc e pte d without charge is that am ount represent ed by a conc e ntra tion of 250 mi lligrams per lit e r . Beginning Octob er 30 , 1970 and t he r eafter n ot l a te r t h a n 30 d ays foll owi ng the e nd of e ac h c a l e n dar quar te r, the Ge ne r a l Manager of t h e Di s trict s hall invoic e eac h p e r mittee f o r the discha r g e of industrial was t e as f ol lows : For e ac h calendar quarte r f rom J u l y 1, 1970 throug h J une 30 , 1971 , 33 -1/3% of the amount e qu al to the s um of t h e vol ume char ge , peak flow cha r g e and sus p ende d solids c harge ; f o r each c a l en dar quart e r fr om July 1, 1971 through J une 30, 1972 , 66 -2/3 % o f s a id amo unt; and a ft er June 30 , 1972 , for each c a l endar q uarte r, 100% of s ai d amoun t . I • ... . ... ARTICL E 7 -MEA SUR EMENT OF QUANTITY AND QUALITY OF FLOWS • (a) Ave r a g e Fl ow -The meas ureme n t o f averag e flow o f i ndust 1~i al wa ste sha l l be ma d e b y the Di s trict by means o f a met ering devi c e , a ppr ove d by the Gen e r a l Ma nag er of t he Di s trict and i nstalled and ma inta ine d at t he expense o f the d isch a r ger of indust r ial waste , o r b y es t ima t e a rri ved at f r om t ota l wate r u s e d in t he area o ccupied , o r by o-Cher means ac c eptable t o t h e Gen e r a l Manager of the Di strict and to the discha rge r of industri a l was t e . Th e di sc h arger o f indu strial waste s h a ll h a ve the op ti on o f se lect ing wh e the r the me a s urement sha ll b e ma d e by me t e r , or by estima t e , or other means , p rovided tha t t he met h od o f e s timat e or -7 - other means i s approved by the General Manager of the District . (b) Peak Fl ow Rate -The measurement of peak f low rate during the calendar qua r te r shall be made by means of a meter approved by the Ge n e r a.l Manager of the Distric t or by field measurements made by the District . Th e discharger of industrial waste shall have the option of s e l ecting the method of measurement to be used, provided however that in t he event the field measur ement is se l e cted, an additional charge of $1 50 .00 per calendar quarter wi l l be made to defray the costs the reof and wi ll be invoiced with the regula r us e charge invoice for that c a l endar quarter . • (c) Deterwination of Comp onents -The measurement of suspended solids and othe r components ~n the s ewage and i ndustrial waste d i scharged shall b e made from appropriate samp l es of the discharge taken and ana -· lyzed by the District as part of the regular insp e ction program herein- after authorized . All quality measurements and d eterminations shall be mad e in accordance ·with Standard Methods. --i). I!' • .. -ARTICLE 8 -I NSPECTION ·- •• Th e General Manager of the District shal l institut e a r egular industrial waste inspe ction program in order to determine the quality and quantity of industrial waste discharged to the District s ' facilities and the effect thereof on the mai n tenance and operation of said facili - ties . Said inspection shall be carried out by employees of the District . . • • • • ARTIC LE 9 -INTERPRETATION AND APPEA L (a ) Request for Ruli~ -If any p ermittee or app licant for a p erwi t disputes the interpretation or appli cati on of this ordina nce, h e shall set forth his contentions in writing to the Genera l Manager of the District . The General .Manager shall within thirty days res pond in writing to the cont entions so made and s e t forth his determinations thereof . (b) App eal -If the permittee or app licant for a p e rmit i s di ssatisfied wi t h the determinations so made by the General Manager , h e may within .thirty days after mailing of IL -~. . . __ ,, ~ ..... _ ~ .. ~ • \-.. .. ~ "'II .... . -.. II -8- said ruling by the General Manager to said p ermittee or applicant for a permit, appeal said ruling by giving written notice of the basis of his appeal to the Board of Directors of the District . Said written notice sha ll ~e accompanied by a non-r efundab l e fee of ONE HUNDRED DOLLA RS • ($100 .00). The Boa rd of Directors o f the District sha ll within forty - five days after r eceipt of said written notice of app eal make a fina l det ermination o f the is sues presented . ARTICLE 1 0 -PAYMENT OF CHARGES AND DELINQUENCI ES . . •• cha r ges made pursuant to the provisions of this ordina nce are due and payab l e upon receipt of notice the r eof . All such charges sha ll be and become delinquent thirty days after mailing or delivering notic e thereof to the mailing addres s of the property sub j ect to such charges . • All delinquent cha r ges sha ll b e deemed a violation o f this - ordina nc e and each day any such charge r emains delinquent shall be •• de emed a separate violation . - • ARTICLE 11 -PENALTIES • • An y charge that becomes d e linquent shall have added to it a penalty charge equal to ten perc ent of the charge that be c ame delinquent and thereafter an additional pena lty shall accrue on the tota l c harge due, including the t en percent basic penalty at the rate of one-half ill of on e p e rc ent per month until p a id . • • " • • .-. -.. .. • • ARTICL E 1 2 -COLLECTION • • Upon motion by the Board of Directors -of the Distric t , any charge and all p enalties thereon sha ll be col lected by lawsuit in the name of the District . Any such action for collection may include an application for an inj unct ion to prevent repeated and r e -occuxr:Lng violati ons of this ordinance . .... AffrICLE 13 -VIOL!\.TIONS No person or public corporation shall vj.olate any provisions or f a il ·to comply with any of the r equirements of this ordinance . Any person or public corporation viola.ting any of the provisions or failing -9- . to comply with any of the requirements of thi s ordinance shall be guilty of a misdemeanor. Any p e r son or corporation convicted of a misdemeanor under the provisions of this ordinance shall be punished by a fine of not more than $100 .00 or by imprisonment in the County Jail for a period not exc eeding thirty days, or by both such fine and imprisorunent. Each person or public corporation sha l l be guilty of a separate offens e for each and every day during any portion of which any violation of any provision of this ordinance i _s commi tted, continued or permitted by such person or public corporation and shall be puni s hab le accordingly. ARTICLE 14 -SEVERABILITY If any provision of this ordinance or the app lication thereof to any person or circums t ance is held unconstitutional, the r emainde r of the ordinance and the application of such provision to othe r persons and circumstances shall not be affected thereby . If a provision of this ord inance is held inval id , all valid provisions that are se verab le from the invalid provision shall remain in effec t . • ARTICLE 15 -REPEAL Ordinances Nos. are hereby r epeal ed and all ordinances or parts of ordinances incons i stent i·1i th this ordinance are hereby r epeal ed to the extent that they are inc onsistent with the provisions of this ordinance . . . . ., •• • .. ..... . -••• . • . •• .. ARTICLE 16 -EFFECTIVE DATE Th e effective date of this ordinance is J anuary 1, 1970 . I ' • L -I -... .. Ii • j .. • • .. .. • • I • • I~ I • ii '3 ... . ... ... • • • '!I I '!I • ~ '· 'I .. -· -10- • Melrop~:i:<?n CoL1 11cil Chainn:rn C . Carey D onworth Si:ATT LE Mayor F loyd C . Miller C ouncilmen T ed Best C harles l\!. Carroll Mrs. Harlan H. Edwards T im Hill Mrs. Arthur V. Lamphere M. B Mitchell Sam Smith Liem F.ng Tuai Don D. Wright eHtoVUE Mayor Kenneth A. Cole KIRl<L\ND Councilm:in Albert A. King C ouncilman C levcland Anschcll R:: 01.1 ci rm M ayor Selwyn L. "Bud" Young Mayor Donald W. Custer s1.1:-.u c~ ro wu:; J ames \\'. Barton l\fayor, Hunt ~ P oin t 1:111 .:; ccu:nY C ountr Exccuti,·c J ohn D. Spcllm:rn Countr Council Di;trict Rcprc·sc ntativcs T hnnias '.\I. Fors) the Willi:un IL Rca11·1s A. Dl·an \\'orthinr,tnn • • > Executive Director Charles \'. C ihlo s 41 0 WES T HARRISON STREET • SEATTLE, WASH ING TON 98 11 9 • ATwaler 4-5 1 00 Mr . Fred A. Harper Genera l Manager County Sanitation District of Orange County Fountain Valley , Ca l ifornia Dear Mr. Harper: Federa l Legislation Ju ly 3 0, 1 969 The early responses to my most recent l etter indicate t hat nearly everyone is i nt e rest ed in meeting in Washington , D.C. to discuss the details of our l egis- l at i ve proposal . As you know , we propose to submit legislat ion to Congress which will enable the F edera l Water Pollution Control Ad ministra tion to adequately f und the massive c onstruction program necessary to cope with the n a tio11 's wa t er pollution problem , Also, we hope to provj_de a means wh ereb y the discrimination against the large c ities in the early years of the grant program can be partially compensa ted through bonus gran ts on future p rojects , The dates of Sept ember 15 and 16 have been selected for t he meeting and we hope that your scheduJ.e will permit you to be t here. I assume that we will reach a consen- sus on a legislative propo sa l so you might want to plan t o stay an extra day and contact your Con gressiona l delegatio n . As soon as the arran-gements are completed , I will let you know where the meeting is to be h eld , I t will be n e cess ary to co mpi l e cert a:l .n statistics to support our contention that the existing Federal le g - islation has been discriminatory tow a rd the l arge c om mun ities . Als o , we should be prepared to show the ext en t to which we h ave already pledged our tax ~nd r evenue s~urce~; in support of clean wa ters. Acc ·of"d "'"-·- i n~ly, it v10uld be v eJ'Y helpful if you wou ld complete the e n cJ.osed questionn a ire 2nc1 send it to me as soon as you can . 1..,.,1 . -2- As soon as we receive a copy of the Administration's fin- . ancing plan which was submitted to Congress last week 1 we will prepare a draft of the amendments necessary to accomplish our proposal and send them to you for review.· I feel that it will be very desirable for you to discuss the new proposal with your local political leaders and secure .their approval of the concept before our meeting in Washington. In this manner, we can approve and begin implementing an action program as soon as we reach a con- sensus on the legislation itself. As I indicated earlier, I assume we will reach such agreement before our September meeting is completed. CVG:jj ·Enclosure v1lt:£~ fhtfref?/v. Gibbs Executive Director ~ ·' STAT:; OF CALIFORNIA-THE RESOURCES AGENCY STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD 1001.\ U401 RESOUP.CES BUILDING 1416 NINTH STREET • SACRAMENTO 95814 • IEAAY W. MULLIGAN, Cholrman V. A. ALEXANDER, Vice Chairman ~. B. HUME, Member I. P. DIBBLE, Mombor RONALD 8. ROBIE, Membor JEROME I. GILBERT, Executive Omce' ·.;!UL 2 5 f969 ·. Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue P •· o. Box 8127 F~untain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: . ··.:.: .~- RONALD REAGAN, Governor Ph~ne 445-3993 ·This letter summarizes our recent staff level discussions concerning the establishme.nt of an on-the-job training program for waste water treatment plant operators in the Orange County area. Th~ State Water Resources Control Board is to receive $85,000 from the Federal Water· Pollution Control Administr&tion and the Depart- . ment of Labor for the training of ,100 waste water treatment plant operators. We plan to locate five separate• sites across the State for the training of approximately 20 operators at each site. The State Board will contract with a local sewerage agency in each area to carry out the actual training. The entire $85,000 will be passed on to the local agencies for the training activity. Addi- tional State monies may also be available to supplement these funds. The course is scheduled for 44 weeks. During this time the trainee should receive approximately 336 hours of classroom-type training, much of it coming in the first two months. The remaining time will be for on-the-job training. The actual hours of on-the-job training will depend on how much is done at the central facility and how much is done at the trainees' home plant. '!'his will be determined by the instructor in his setup of the course. Each group of 20 trainees will qualify for one full-time instructor. At present $10,000 is available for the instructors' salary, $1,000 for fringe benefits and $1,000 for additional educational specialists. W~ are attempting to supplement these items. Additional monies are available for the instructors' travel and training. Text books, manuals, training aids and other classroom instructional material will be supplied by J:1·7PCA. The trainees will continue to receive . wages from their m·m agencies. . .. Mr. Fred A. Harper -2- . Each subcontracting agency may include as many of their personnel '..,I in the training program as they desire. In each case, however, the local agencies have indicated that they would probably have less than ten of their employees attending. In this case additional operators presently employed in the area would be invited to attend in order to form a class of 20 trainees. · Each local .agency should establish the level of training most needed in their plant and the surrounding area. It is s~ggested that the course span no more than two levels of the California Water Pollution Contra~ Association operator certification grades. The instructor in any vocational training course should be an in~ividual with practical experience. This is even ·more important in.an on-the-job training class. For this reason we ~eel that the instructor should have, if possible, practical plant experience as·well as teaching experience. It is proposed to allow the local agency and their instructor a great deal of latitude in developing the course they will present. The FWPCA has requested that actual training activities begin in September. We hope to meet this chedule and therefore must move rapidly. We feel the follo-wing steps are necessary: 1. 2. . Please indicate if your agency wishes to subcontract with ·the State Board for establishment of an on-the-job course. I Do you have an instructor for this program? (Salary should not be a limiting factor at this time in chos~ng the individual.) · 3. How many employees may be expected to receive ~raining from your agency? We greatly appreciate your time and effort in this matter. Initiation of this program by the Sanitation Districts of Orange County will not only benefit your employees but those of the Orange County-Los Angeles County area. Sincere~y yours, Gilbert Officer cc: Irving Terzich Santa Ana Regional l·TQC Board Los Angeles Regional 'NQC Board ------------J 0 H N CAR 0 L L.O ENGINEER 5---------- Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, California El Paso, Texas .IOHN A.. CAROLLO, P.E. \wJ ltOBERT M. BRERETON. P.E: Reply to: H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WA.Yo P,E, RODERT G, WILLIAMS. P,E, OONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. 3688 MT. DfABt.O BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 July 251 1969 Executive Committee County Sanitation District.s of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: AREA CODE 415 We are proceeding with the design of additional digester solids dewatering facilities for Plant Nos. I and 2 which were budgeted for 1969 -1970. In order to meet the projected schedule for construction and in determining that equipment delivery would be a minimum of eight (8) months, it was decided to purchase the required centrifuge equipment under a separate contract. This would allow the Districts to receive bids and contract .for the required equipment immediately, with delivery scheduled to suit ·the timing of the subsequent contract for installation. In order to meet the projected schedule, the Districts ,should advertise for bids on furnishing the centrifuge equipment in August, 1969, which would require Board approval and authorization to advertise at the regular meeting in August. We have investigated the potential suppliers of the required centrifuge equipment and have reported our findings to the Districts' Staff. Our investigation revealed that there are three (3) manu- facturers who produce a solid bowl centrifuge for dewatering waste- water sludges. Of these, two (2) manufacturers {Bird Machine Company and Sharples Equipment Company) produce units of a size which will be required by the Districts. Of these two manufacturers, only one, Bird Machine Company, has operating experience in de- watering wastewater sludges. Preliminary cost information indicates that the Bird centrifuges will cost from $10, 000 to $15, 000 per unit more than the Sharples centrifuge. (The Districts anticipate pur- chasing four (4) centrifuges at this time). Further investigation revealed that the Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts are in the process of expanding their digester solids dewatering facilities. They purchased one Bird centrifuge o! the size we arc considering in early 1968, and have just recently 283·3895 Page 2 Executive Committee July 25, 1969 purchased three more identical units. The contract for the three (3) centrifuges, most recently purchased, was awarded to Bird Machine Company even though the Sharples Equipment Company submitted a bid whic;h was $30, 000 lower ($101 000 per centrifuge). Reasons given by Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts for awarding to Bird we·re as follows: 1. Sharples did not meet specifications which required four (4) years experience in the field of dewatering wastewater sludges. (At this time they have no operating experien~e). 2. The rotational speed of the Sharples centrifuge exceeded the limit set forth in the specifications. Specifications required the rotational speed not to exceed 1400 revolutions per minute while the Sharples proposal was based on a centrifuge oper- ating at 2300 revolutions per minute. A tentative decision has been made by the Districts' Staff that experience should be a requirement, and that a liinit should be placed on rotational speed for the centrifuges purchased by the Districts. If this is done, it is apparent to us that the Districts will receive only one bid to furnish the r.equired centrifuges. ' We are proceeding with preparation of the specifications and intend to require experience and liinit the centrifuge rotational speed in accordance with the above mentioned tentative decision, unless directed otherwise. Mr. Harper has requested that we be present at your August 5, 1969 1 Executive Committee meeting to briefly present our findings and to request directio~ relative to how the Districts should proceed with the equipment purchase. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS WRH/ls 'J)-"~ jJ-()-UX~~ Walter R. Howard CLARK MILLER C.AATHUR NtSSON \,,,.;) NELSON !\OGLE~ MILLER, NISSON l1 KOGLER ATTORN E:YS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 July 22, 1969 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Proposed Joint Powers Agreement, Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority Dear Fred: I have reviewed the latest draft sent to me under your letter of July 16, 1969, and find it acceptable as to form. I checked it against the draft we went over in LosAngeles a month or so ago'and find that it is in line with the comments which were made at the meeting. If you have any other and further questions, please advise. CAN m Yo~truly, C. Arthur Nissen TELEPHONE: !542-6771 . :.·· .... ...... i. ; I .. ·. .· ' .. .. .. JOINT POWERS AGREs: .. snT C.REATit:rG AH . . . ' AGENCY TO BE !a';owr.r 'J\13. THE sou~!IBRH CA;LIFORNLA. C"OASTAL WA?ER ~SEA~CH PROJECT -~UTEORITY THIS AqREEMEI'rr, made and· entered i..Tlto this day of ---- •' 8-8-69 , . ·, 1969, by and between THE CITY OF LOS ANGEIES, --------------~~---- a. :111 u n~cipa~ corporation, (hereinafter called "IDS ANGELES"), THE .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT MO •. 1 OF OMMGE COUNTY ~rganized and • I existing by virtue of the laws of the State of CaliforniaJ to-·wit: · ··Division 5, Part 3, Chapter 3, Article 1 (commencing ·with Section 470~). of the He.a.1th and Safety Code·, (hereinafter called "ORANGE COUNTY DISTRICI'"), THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, a mur.ic5-pal co:r·porat:!.onJ· .(hereinaf'ter co.:!.lP.d 11 SAN DIEGO") , COUNTY SANITATION DIST.RIC'l' NO •. 2 . OF LOS,ANGEIES COui-!TY organized and existing by virtue or the !aws \.._) of. the St.ate of California, to-wit: ·Division 5, Part 3, C!1a.9ter 3.; 4' /, Article l (comi~encirtg with Section 4700) of the Health and Safety . . ' . Code, (hereinafter called "LOS ANGEIB~ COUNTY DISTRICT!:) and VEN·rURA COUNTY, a body corporate and politic of the Ste ... te or."" California, (hereinafter called ~'v~r~UR.A.. n): WITNESSETH: lr.dERE.AS; each of the roregoing pu.blic agencies is er.:powerad ~ ' ' to survey, study and report concerning s2.n.!ta.t"ion and. matters· re- ·1ating t.o· set·:age treatment a."'1d disposal; . lIHEHEAS, e~ch of the foregoing public agencies ls desi~cus j'ointly orGanizin[;, fu.r1.dir..5 and concuctj_ng such a study; each of the forer;c5_ng ~l!blic agencies is deoirous -1- ' i . I l l .1 ·l . hereby to exercise jo;ntly a power cor.unon to all. NOW, THEREFORE, IN CONSIDERA.TION of the mutual promises, covenants and conditions hereinafter contained, the parties agree as :follo·ws: l. PURPOSE ~he purpose of this Agreement is to create an agency as a public entity separate and apart from the parties to this Agreement to acbninister and exercise such Agreement, the purl'.>ose of which is to increase the scientific knowledge of the ecological systems to insure protection and conservation of the marine resources and to study the interrelationships of treated waste water discharges with tne ecology, all leading to the enhancer:1ent of the marine environ- n1ent. 2. CREATION' OF AUTHORITY Pu.rsuant to Chapter 5, Division 7 of Title 1 (commencing with Government Code Section 6500 et seq.,) ther·e is hereby created an agency as a public entity, separate and apart from .the signa- tories in this Agreement to be kno,·m as "THE SOUTHERN CALIFOHNIA COASTAL HATER_ RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITYr:, herein called Autho:ci.ty. Such·agency shall adn:inj_ster and execute this Aereement. 3. PfrfS ICAL BOUHDlL'qJ:ES The physical bounda!'ies of t!'le study cont~rJple..ted by this Agreer.1ent shall include coastal \·mters fros the Ventura-Santa Barbara County l5_ne to the :.:exican horde~, excludin2; the tidt1l prism.3 of estua~ies. The off-shore boundary shall extend to, but shall not necess9.rily be lir.i.i ted to, the outer edge ·of the co.~sta.l shelf·. -2- . \ " Within th:ls contemplated study area, waters presently , exist l·1hich are either un~ff'ect~d by treated waste d~scharges or l'rhere varying a..."Ilounts of treated waste waters are be~ng discharged •. 4. ORGANIZATION Such Author~ty shall be a Commission composed of five (5) ·members servin~ in their individual capacities as members of such · Com.~ission. The govern~ng body of each such entity which is-a party ·to this Agreement.shall appoiht one person as a com.missioner ~nd one.~e!son.as an alternate to act. as a member of the Comniission in the absence of the commissioner.appointed.. The Corr~ssion at its first· _1!1eeting and therea~ter at. its first meeting in july of each· ... succeeding year shall elect a President and a.Vice-President from its members. Vacancies in the membership of th~ Commission shall be :rilled promptly by the governing body of the signatory parties. to ·· ~ this Agreement for the unexpired term of the vac~cy. All Cor1- missiore rs shall be appointed for ?-term ·or three ( 3) years or ' until this Agreement is terminatedJ. whicheve;c first occurs to serve a~ the pleasure of the appointing Authority. . . The Commission shall adopt rules for. CX)nductine its meetings and other business and any action take~ by the Co!!'.nrl.ssion · shall be taken by at least three (3) members entitled to act. Three (3) members shal~ constitute a quoru...~. The members of the Corr .... ~j.ssion and' ea.ch alternate attending :c. ·shall receive as expens.es $50 per meeting not to excend $100 per month where permitted by la·w. The Com.mission shall meet at l~ast twice in each calendar ye~r and at such a.ppropriate intervals as is necessary· to con~u.ct ·the business of the Authority; and all meetings shall be subject to the Ralph M. Brc\·m Act co~.menclng with Section 5I~950 of the --:3- .• .. ~. . ~. Government Code of the State of Calif.ornia. 5. CONSULTING BOARD a. The Commission shall appoint an Adv~scry·Board to be .knm,m as the Consu~ting Board co~sisting o~ five (5) members all of whom shall h~ve specialized education and t·raining in the disci- plines esse~tial to the study contemplated hereby. Without limit- ing_ its power. to appoint any individu~l deemed que .. lified to dis- char~e the duties or a member.of the Consulting BoardJ the Commission, whenever-possibleJ shall make a reasonable ef:fort to . provide a Consulting Board cont~ining members educated ~nd e~perienced in the follm·ring fields· of study: . Marine Biology Oceanography . Envirorunental Engineering Organic Cher.listry Public Health . ' b. The Cowiaission shall fix the amount of compenGation ·per day to be paid each ·member of the Consulting Board for his services provided that such compensation shall not exceed.$250 per day. In addition, each r:iember of the 9onsulting Board shall be entitled to reimbursement for actual expenses reasonably and neces- sarily incurred by him and as approved by the Comm.issiono .' "· c. It shall be the duty of the Consulting Board to confer with the P!'ojcct r.re .. ne .. ger ancL to present to him and to the Cor.l- mi~sion at their request procedures for tee prosecution of the \ ) t d .t. 1 L ., ~~ ,. -d , • .L • t'" c , ' • ~ d • 11 ......,. s u y con'"'e:-;:p a"ec. ne~eDy. . J..n a ai..,ioz:_, ne onsu.-'tin~ .coar sna I . -render to the Project !.Iar!~.;er and the. CoGlmission such tecl" .. J1ical assistance as r.1e..y be ag~eed upon and direct"~d by the Corr .. 11ission:. .... " ~~· .. The Commission may from· time to tin1e reques~t of· the Consul tine; Board reports r~lating· to any aspect of· the. s·tudy being conducted in accordance with this Agreement at a cost to be agreed upon in. writing by· the Commission and the ~onsulting Board prio~--. to commencement of any such report. ~. The me~bers of the Consultin~ Board shall serve during the term of this Agreement subject to the right of the Comm;ssion to remove.any such member with or without ca.use. • 6. PROJECT.VANAGER . The Conrnission shall appoint a Project Manager under whose gene·ral supervision and cont·:rol the research project shall be conducte~. Such appointment shall only be made after the Com1.d.ssion has received the recow~-:.endation of the Consulting Board, although such recorrm1endation will not limit the Cor.-.. mission in its powers of . . '..,,I . • t t · a.ppoin men • ~ ' Such Project Manager shall be appointed subject to the right of. the Cormnission to l'.emove him .. at any tir~e with or without cause.· The Col1'.mission shall fix his.compensation; providedJ however, that said compensation shall not exceed $30,000 per year. 7. STAFF _, Upon :recommendation by the Project Manager, the Corr.mission ~ may emp~oy or contract for such sanitation experts, marine experts ' . and other staff as may reasonably be nec~ssary to carry into e~fect the purposes of this Agreement. ·.~ ..... ::~ -5- ·. • .. I 8. RESPONSIBILITIES.) SIGNATORY PARTIES Los Angeles, Orange Co':lrlty District, San Diego, Los . . Angeles CoW1.ty District_ and Ventura each recognize that the benefits to be derived from. the researC:h project cont~mplated hereby·will not be realized for an indeterminate period; and that it is presently impossible to determine the extent to which each of the roregoing public agencies shall be.benerited thereby •. It is therefore agreed . . that the costs of the research project· shall be borne, except as herein~fter provided, by Los P.ngeles, Orange County District, San . . Diego, Los Angeles Co~ty District, and Ventura in direct pro- portion to the fl~:n"j from the se1·1age treatment plants under the · authority ~f eech signatory to this Agreement ~ctually discharged . to the Pacific Ocean during the previous fiscal year. Flows, fiscal year 1967-68: Los Angeles Cotmty District Los Angeles Orange County District San Diego Ventura •. ·124,107 M.G. '118,305 11I.G. 42,757 M.G. 29,106 M.G. 6",213 M.G. ~t is anticipated that a part of the costs or the research project shall be defrayed by a grant or grants from the Federal Water·Pollution Control Administration. The receipt or non-:. receipt of any such g:rant or grants, however, shall not affect the validit3 o~ this Agreeraent nor any of the obligations i~posed hereby. The Commission shall yearly on or. before the first Monday · of March, adopt and issue a fin~~cial report. projecting the fu..n.ds necessary to maintain and operate the research project for.the ~orth- coming fiscal. year being from July 1 to and including Jtme 30· of the ~ollowing calendar year. Said report shall be made and presented to -6- .\. the governing bodies of Los Angeles, Oranse County District, San Diego, Los Angeles County District; and .Ventura. The report· shall, among other things~ contain a state1~~nt of anticipated revenue from outside· grants for the for·chcoming :fiscal year • . Los Angeles, Orange County District, San. Diego, Los Angeles County District, and Ventura shall on or before the first day of July of the then current fiscal year use its best efforts .to pay to the Authority the net fu..~ds requested, the ccntrioution o:f . each agency being determined on the basis of flow as prescribed in paragraph 8 hereof. . . None of the public agencies signatory to this Agreement shall be required or requested to expend in any one fiscal year more then its prorated share basad on a total annual Conmrl.ssion budget of not to exceed $500 ~000, In the event that any of the signatories is unable· to ·pay its pro rata share of the budget expense of the CoIT~d.ssion, then this Agreement shall .·termLviate upon notification of such in:.. '-1 1 ability to the Commission and to the other signatory· parties by the disabled signatory; and this provision shall be a limitation upon the Corr.P-l.ission 's right .to contract beyond any ope fisca.l year. 9·. SCOPE AfID CONDUCT OF STUDY It is contemplated that the research program provided hereby shall be accomplished over a period of three (3) fiscal years and ·shall be prosecuted in three (3) phases as follO'ws: .... Phase I -Review of Existing Data; Phase II -co·11ection of New Data; . Phase III -Report and Recoi:utendations The Corr~ssion shall from tiTie to time but not less than once each year submit progress reports to the governing bodies of each ot the signatories of this A~reement and provide ten .(10) copies -7- ·. . , to each signatory to this Agreement. Upon completion of the research project, the Conk"'lission shall submit a fin~l report to each signatory to this Agree~ent a...nd '../ provide ten (10) copies to each s:i.gnatory. to this .Agreement; and all right, title and interest i...~ said report and all ~aterials pre- ~ared reletive thereto shall pass and belong to the signatories as property in common and may be produced, reproduced and distributed by each signatory without limitation. • ; 10. AGENCIES OF AUTHORITY . Los Angeles County District is appointed the contractfng and purchasing agent for the· project; Said District· shall set up a special account against which will be charged all costs to s3.id District incurred for materials, services, rentals~ or other expenses of the project. '.,;) . Said .District shall bill the Authority for its expenses 4 -quarterly and all such billing shall· be paid· 1·1i thin ten ( 10) days of receipt. ·. Los Angeles CoU?tY District ·shall furnish all accounting~ secretarial, purchasing and acL"ninistrat.ive services. The administrative procedures a..~d policies of Los Angeles County District are hereby adopted as the actninistre..tive policies and·procedures or the Authority. -.~ The.Secretary of Los Angeles CoUJ.~ty Distric~ is appointed ex~offic~o Secretary, the County Auditor as ex-officio Auditor, ~he Cotu~ty Treasurer as ex-officio Treasurer. .. . - legal assistance shall be provided by the attorney for the .Los Angeles County District. ~ . . I . . Se .. id Los Angeles Co~--i.ty District along with the Authori~t.Y shall be strictly account?-ble for all funds' received, held a.nd disbursed by each and shall render an annue.1 report as to the sa.tne -8- not later than August l of each year during the term of this Agreement. 11. .TERM . , The term of this Agreer1ent end of the research project. contemplated hereby shall be three (3) calendar years from the date hereof. 12 • ACCOUI-!'TING The Auditor of the Authority shall establish and maintain such funds and accounts as may be required by.good accounting practice •. Tna Treasurer or .the Authority shall have custody of the fun~~ of the Authority, and disbursement shal~ .b.e made by t_he · Auditor in accordance with procedures therefor prescribed, Funds . . l.._,i of the Authority in the custody of the Treasu2:·er thereof shall be I deposited in the County treasury anq shall be kept separate and apart from the funds of Co.unty ·and the District. P..ny earnings on the funds o~ the Authority shall be credited to and be a part of the funds of the Authority. ~he fiscal year of the Authority shall begin on the first day of July of each year and shall end on the thirtieth day of June of the follm·ring year. 13. P01'1ERS AND DUTI."ES OF TriE AUTHORITY The Authority shall and is hereby authorized in its m·m name. to do all things necessary and ~esi~able (subject to the limi- • '-'1. tations provided in this Agreer~ent) to car~y out the . pu!'poses of this Agreer:-~ent including but not limited to the f oll~ming: a. To.make and enter contracts; bo To e~ploy agents and e~ployees; ~9- ..• -c. ~o acqui.re, construct, manage, maintain or . operate any buildings, works or improvements; d. To acquire, hold or dispose of property; e. To incur debts, liabilities and obligations which shall not constitute the debts, liabilities or obligations or a:ny of the signato~ies to this Agreement; and . f. To sue a..nd be sued in its m·m name. The Authority is limited from· issuing r~venue bonds or otherrrise incurrin!; indebtedness as provided in Article 2, Chapter 2,· Division 7, Title 1 (commencing with Section 6540 of the Government Code)~ 14. DISPOSITION OF PROPERTY AHD SURPLUS FUI.fDS ·. At the termination of this Agreement, any and all property, funds, ass.ets and interes'ts there:i!n of the Authority shall become the property of and be distributed to the signatories to this Agreement in the same proportion as the ·signatories have .. contributed to the total cost of the project except as otherwise. herein provided. 15. P~IVIIEGES AND IMt:fUNITIES ·' 'I. All of the privileges and immunities from liability, exemptions from laus, ordinances and rules, all pension,, relief, disability, workmen's comp_e:n.sa.tion, . a.rid o.ther benefits which apply· to the activities of officers,, agents or employees of any cf the b 1 . • ' · h • 1 t · · +: o t' · s ,.. c nt ~ rh en pu ic agencies wnic. are signa. ories ,., ni l'-Greer.:.:: •. L. : per- forming their respective functions ~·rithin t.he territorial limits of their respectj_ve publtc agencies, shall e.pply to them to tha -10- . . .. .. same degree and ·extent while en5aged in the performance of any of their :functions and duties extra-territorially tL~der the provisions 0£ this Agreement. · 16. MISCELL.l\NEOUS The sectj_on headings herein are for convenience only and are not to be· construed as modifying or governing the language in the sectfon referred to. 17°. PARTIAL INVALIDI'IY I:f any one or more of the· terms, prov~sions, prorrisesJ covenants or conditions of this Agreement shall to ar1y extent be . ~djudged invalid, unenforceable, void or voidable for any ree~son whatsoever by a court of competent jurisdict~on each and all. of i;;he remaining terms, provisions, promises, covenants and oonditions . o:f this Agreement shall not be affected therebyJ and shall be valid a...Tld en£orceable to the fullest extent permitted by law. 18. SUCCESSORS This Agreement shall be binding upon and shall inure to the benefit of the successors of the parties. -· 19. INDEMNIFICATION LIABILITY AND INSURANCE a. Third Party liability insura..~ce naming each signat~ry as an additional lnsured party, shall be carried dur:tng the entire term .or this Agreeme~t in kind and in such ~--:1ou..11ts as is pre~ently ~· being carried by the Ios Angeles: County Dis"!;rict; the prer;1iu-~~s shall be paid by the Con.11.ission. . ... -11- ·~ ... ; • -!. ~. ~ I '...,,_; I I b. .·Each signatory agrees to indernnify and hold harm.less every other signatory to this Agreement and each of their officers,, . . . agents and employees free from any cost o.r. liability imposed upon· .• any other· signatory, their officers, agents or employees arising out or any acts or .omissions of its o~·m officers, agents or e!lployees J or ~mposed upon any other signatory or.Authority by virtue of Goverru~ent Code Section 895.2. APPROVED ·AS TO FORM ·AND L~GALITY: ROGER ARNEBERGH CITY AT'i'ORNEY By - ·. ATTEST: . t!.L~'Y Clli"rtl\. . APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ATTEST: THE CITY OF LOS AHGEIES By ________________ _ Pre~ioen~ Ci~y Cow1cil I ... • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.l OF ORANGE COilllTY -, -:::>_ .... '~ :~. \._/ \.,.I -...,,,; '. ' ~PPROVED AS TO FORM . AND LEGALITY: · ATTEST: APPROVED' AS TO FORi'1 AND IEGALITY: ATTEST: APPROVED AS TO FORM AND LEGALITY: ·. ATTEST: •. THE CITY OF SP.N DIEGO By" COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY • By ________________ _ ·' .... \7ENTURA COillITY ._ ,3_ -... ·- I-'• .- I ' • •. S~c •.. ? .................................. The City C!erk shall certify. to the passage of tl1i.«'i ordinunce end coose the same to be published in some daily newspaper printed o~d published in the C!iy of Los Angele~. · -~ I hereby certify that the foregoing ordinance was passed by the Council of the City of Los Angeles, I at its n1ceting of .......... ····-·-·-······· ····-·-·····-···-····· .••...• ·. REX E. LAYTON t:II;.~;>.~;:;y~Jf:.t~, City Clerk, .. By .............. ····-·-·· ... ····-··········· ... _ •. :: ........... : .... :. ..•. 'Deputy. Approved ........................................................................ .. •••• ••• ••• ._. ·--•• ·-. ·-· •• ·--. ·--~ •• ·-......... ·--............ •4• ••••••••••••••• \._) . Approved us lo Form and Legality By ........................................ -........................ .. BRI.AN CR.Al-1' •. AN Deputy. Fil~ N 11+ 3778 o. ·····-· .................... ·-- rorm 23. --·' 696t '£t q.snllnv SJ.N:!IWfiOOO DNIXHOd:c.ffiS aNV S.NOLLfi'IOs:trH -~ -,-,, WARRANT NO. 11547 11548 11549 ~11550 11551 11552 11553 11554 11555 11556 11557 11558 11559 11560 11561 11562 11563 11564 11565 11566 11567 11568 11569 11570 11571 11572 11573 11574 "-"11575 :11576 11577 11578 11579 11580 11581 11582 11583 11584 11585 11586 11587 11588 11589 11590 11591 11592 11593 11594 11595 11596 11597 11598 11599 ~1600 11601 11602 11603 11604 11605 11606 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Advance Electric, Motor Rewind $ All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings City of Anaheim, Power Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts The Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets· Associated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Atlas Stationers~ Office Supplies Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, New Vehicles (MO 7-9-69) Barney's Hole Digging Service, Dewatering Well Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Maintenance Supplies Blower Paper Company, Janitorial Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Certified Building Materials, Bldg. Supplies C-L Chemical Products, Maintenance Chemicals City Wide Air Conditioning, Air Cond. Repair Clarke Dye Hardware, Small Hardware Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Premiums College Lumber Co., Hardware Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa County Water District, Water Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental-Emsco Co., Small Tools Daily Pilot, Bid Notice De Guelle & Son's Glass Co., Truck Repair Diesel Control Corp., Filters, Seals Dodge Trucks, Inc., Truck Parts Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electrical Supplies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Sampling, Current Monitoring Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies Filter Supply Co., Filter Supplies Fischer & Porter Co., Controls & Instrumentation Flair Drafting Service • Fowler Equipment, Inc., Crane Rental Larry Fricker Co., Weed Killer Friden, Inc., Maintenance Agreement City of Fullerton, Water Garden Grove Lumber & Cement, Small Hardware General Electric Supply Co., Elect. Supp. (MO 5-14-69) General Telephone Co. (2 Mos.) George T. Hall Co., Inc., Engine Parts Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Gesto Business Machines, Reproduction Supplies Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Disposal Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg. & C.O.D. Expenses Hertz Equipment Rental, Chipper Rental James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Honeywell, Inc., Controls Howard Supply Co., Small ijardware, Pump City of Huntington Beach, Water International Harvester Co., New Truck (MO 5-14-69) Keenan· Pipe & Supply Co., Small Hardware, Pipe King Bearing, Inc., Seals & Bearings Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools LBJ Crane Rental Service, Crane Rental LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Small Hardware Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Truck Parts L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Rental Lithographic Arts, Inc., Printing Los Angeles Times, Employment Ad -/\- AMOUNT 3,122.32 258.46 71.68 153.77 382.77 358.69 188.76 4,108.46 159.96 58.80 368.59 228.18 36.75 52.27 110°. 90 20.74 12,247.75 103.41 535.54 6.oo 1,764.76 202.78 . 5. 31 59.78 167.89 6.43 51.18 3,787.50 67.91 26.11 585.64 307.08 117.25 81.90 47.50 5.16 56.45 2,074.42 1,908.40 80.38 23,395.09 100.80 912.00 149.30 48.12 13.20 288.32 705.04 7.30 2,400.00 76.65 79.61 53.54 90.00 ino.45 13.30 180.23 681.09 59.33 157.59 i WARRANT NO. 11607 11608 11609 11610 11611 '-i/11612 11613 11614 11615 11616 11617 11618 11619 11620 11621 11622 11623 11624 11625 11626 11627 11628 11629 11630 11631 11632 11633 11634 11635 11636 ~1637 ;11638 11639 11640 11641 11642 11643 11644 11645 11646 11647 11648 11649 11650 11651 11652 11653 11654 11655 11656 11657 11658 11659 11660 11661 '-11662 -i1663 11664 11665 11666 11667 11668 IN FAVOR OF R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Rock & Gravel $ McCoy Motor Co., Tractor Parts Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Work Main Photo Service, Photo Processing Marinovich Trawl Co., Inc., Ecology Trawl Milam's Electric Motor Service, Motor Rewind E. B. Mortiz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals · National Cash Register Co., Forms Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts, Seals City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Co.,. Inc., Mimeo Paper O. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware County of Orange Auditor Controller, Juv. Work Pgm. Orange ·county Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Oranco Supply Co., Pipe & Supplies Pacific Diesel Parts Co., Engine Parts Pacific Telephone Co. L. B. Penhall Co., Inc., Cored Drilling Postmaster, Postage The Register, Employment Ads The Republic Supply Co., Chlor. Parts Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Small Hardware, Steel Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Forms Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Saunders & Co., Groundskeeping Equipment Shell Oil Co., Gasoline The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint & Supplies Signal-Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental Smith Bros. Co., Storage Cabinets Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses Snow Gates & Valves, Inc., Valves Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies John W. Stang Corp., Euclid Dewatering (Dist. #2) Standard Oil Co., Engine Oil Star-Lite Electronic Co., Barricade Rental State Comp. Insurance Fund, 68-69 Policy Premium Surveyors Service Co., Survey Equipment T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Small Hardware Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Small Hardware Tustin Water Works, Water Union Oil Co., Gas & Service Regents of the University of Calif., Law Journal Valvate Associates, Valve Plugs John R. Waples, R.S., Odor Consultant Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Engine Parts Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete Bartle Wells Associates, Industrial Waste Consultant Western Salt Co., Salt Michael J. Wilson, Employee Mileage Wilson Engine & Equipment Co., Engine Parts Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service -B- AMOUNT 262.50 40.01 142.57 42.30 386.58 112.87 190.05 637.14 199.78 391.52 9.22 790.00 75.92 19.40 400.00 298.50 10.61 194.84 71.52 194.70 155.00 150.00 81.18 83.79 71.92 44.88 107.96 81.61 84.70 1,136.83 452.11 34.20 65.50 53.33 63.42 18,692 .. 50 3.37 353.49 91.88 324.91 31.91 732.31 687.45 90.00 10,571.09 16.94 15.80 151.64 20.83 51.99 22.28 51.06 8.50 544.04 110.40 1,577.04 162.83 400.00 71.99 52.80 1,892.35 352.58 WARRANT NO. 11669 11670 11671 11672 11673 11674 11675 11676 11677 11678 'wzl.1679 • IN FAVOR OF Everett H. York Co., Filters TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Advance Foundation Engr., Inc., P2-14 Testing W. J. Burke Const. Co., P2-8-3 Contractor John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. Plant Const. Wiliiam P. Ficker, Plt. 1 Bldg. Master Plan J. E. Hoagland & w. W. Hoagland, P2-14 Contractor w. W. Hoagland, I-7-2 Contractor Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., J-10 Contractor Lamar Corp., Pl-14 Contractor Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-13 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Pipe Testing J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS -c- $ AMOUNT 91.64 $ 108,018.67 $ 73.04 42,432.46 13,596.19 745.50 45,164.70 31,672.35 507,351.60 17,787.60 4.50 $ 658,827.94 1,962.00 $ 1,962.00 $ 768,808.61 WARRANT NO. 11669 11670 11671 11672 11673 11674 11675 11676 11677 11678 'wJ-1679 IN FAVOR OF Everett H. York Co., Filters TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Advance Foundation Engr., Inc., P2-14 Testing W. J. Burke Const. Co., P2-8-3 Contractor Joh~ Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. Plant Const. William P. Ficker, Plt. 1 Bldg. Master Plan J. E. Hoagland & W. W. Hoagland, P2-14 Contractor W. W. Hoagland, I-7-2 Contractor Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., J-10 Contractor I.omar Corp., Pl-14 Contractor Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-13 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Pipe Testing J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS -c- $ AMOUNT 91.64 $ 108,018.67 $ 73.04 42,432.46 13,596.19 745.50 45,164.70 31,672.35 507,351.60 17,787.60 4.50 $ 658,827.94 1,962.00 $ 1,962.00 $ 768,808.61 WARRANT NO. 11680 11681 11682 11683 11684 11685 \..,I 11686 11687 11688 11689 11690 11691 11692 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUl-ID WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Lowry ~ngineering Science, Study & Report RCFCD ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARP.ANTS IN FAVOR OF· Boyle Engineering, Engineering & Irispection 2-10-9 Lowry Engineering Sclence, Study & Report RCFCD Meriwether Investment Co., Inc. Assignee of Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc., Contractor 2-10-9 County of Orange Auditor Controller, Compaction Tests 2-10-9 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineer:lng, Engineering-Manhole Repairs ACCUMULATED CAPITi\L OUTLAY FUND WARRAJ\TTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. 3-11, 3-12, 3-13 & 3-14 General Telephone Company, Contract 3-11 Facl. Ck. LeRoy Crandall & Associates, Soil & Foundation $ $ $ $ $ AMOUNT 295.35 3,498.40 641.89 6,417.90 29.86 10,588.05 10,883.40 492.50 8,687.30 250.00 5,700.00 Investigation, 3-11, 3-12, 3-13 & 3-14 Title Insurance & Trust Co., Right-of-Way 3-11 & 3-13 92.50 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRAl'l1l1S IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Conn. Chg. Adm. ACCUMULA 1:I1ED CAPrrAL OT}I'LAY FUND WARRA.NTS IN FAVOR OF Allied Pump Industries, Contractor 5-~7 B & M Excavating Inc., Contractor 5-16 .. -D··· $ 1!~' 729. 80 $ 15,222.30 $ -288.00 $ 10,431.80 4,703.70 $ 15,135.50 .. $ J.5'.lli23.50 ------ WARRA.NT NO • 11693 11694 ~695 11696 11697 11698 11699 ·.700 ~701 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art, Printing Joint Use Report Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv f. Maude Annexation Plan Check & Inspection Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund Inspection Fee. Overpayment ' ·ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRAl\TTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineerj_ng, Engineering & Inspection 7-2R Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Pipe Testing 7-2R Zarubica Company, Contractor 7-2R FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. & Survey 7-4-2A, 7-lF-B Enterprise Printing Co., Plans & Specs 7-4-2A John Moyer, Refund Permit Fee .. R- AMOUNT $ 185.85 1,467.00 124.50 $ 1,777.35 $ 2,677.50 152.00 70,055.10 $ 72,884.60 $ 1,872.50 55.49 216.00 . $ 2,143,99 $ 76,805.94 '..I v \_,) .. WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A. Architecture and Planning Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 • Area Code 714 • 644-1581 A~gust 8, 1969 Mr. Norman R. Tremblay County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Master Plan Plant #1 Dear Norm: Per our meeting of Tuesday', August 25 and our subsequent conversations, you have requested that·we submit a propo~al to further study the master planning of the subject facility. The following outlines my evaluation of what work should be accomplished and the work that has been accomplished: 1. Adequate meetings have been held with the staff so that we now possess substantial knowledge of the n~eds and functions of the Orange County Sanitation Districts. · 2. Based on the above knowledge and the planning that has been accomplished to date, we would suggest that we accomplish the following work. · · 2.1 Review the future development of the entire site rather than the limited area to which the first phase of the master planning was limited. This work will be coordinated with your consulting engineers as well as your staff. 2.2 Siting plan of existing and future buildings as well as sewage treatment facilities. · 2.3 Expansion of existing~buildings, location and size as well as schematic plans of new buildings. Agenda Item #16A F-1 All Districts Mr. Norman R. Tremblay -2-August 8, 1969 2.4 Traffic patterns. 2.5 Parking organization and storage yards. 2.6 General recommendations for the type of buildings. 2.7 General organization of paved areas, etc. 3. The· above will be presented with adequate drawings and written material to provide for a comprehensive evaluation and future reference. 4. Fee. 4.1 Since we have accomplished much of the preliminary work of meetings and research of activities, I would recommend that this work could be ·accomplished for $1,000.00. You would be billed on the same hourly basis as previously and the above fee would be the maximum amount. Our previous maximum fee was in line with what we had estimated our time might reflect; therefore, I would anticipate this m~ght also be very close. I Thank you for the opportunity of submitti~g this proposal. Very truly yours, William P. Ficker, A.I.A. WPF:etm Agenda Item //J.6A F-2 All Districts WILLIAM P. FICKER, A.I.A. A?·chitecture and Planning Suite 875 • 550 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, California 92660 " Arca Code 714 • 644-1581 August 8, 1969 Mr. Norman R. Tremblay County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Reference: Master Plan Plant #2 Dear No rm: Thank you for the opportunity of submitting this proposal for a Master Plan for Plant #2. · I would s~ggest proceedi~g in the followi~g manner: 1. Meet with you and your staff to determine the needs and functions of Plant #2. 2. Coordinate with your consultant e~gineers. 3. Prepare a master plan for the s~bject plant as follows: a. Site plan of all existing buildings, sewage treatment facilities and underground. · b. Traffic pattern. c. Parking organization and storage yards. d. Areas for future expansion of all facilities illustrating limits of buildi~g construction. 4. The above will be presented with adequate drawi~gs and written material to provide for a comprehensive evaluation and future reference. Sgenda Item #16B G-1 All Distr:I.cts \._.,,) '...,_) I 'W Mr. Norman R. Tremblay -2-August a·, 1969 5. Fee. 5.1 Our fee for the above .would be $1,000.00. You would be billed on the same hourly basis as previously and the above fee would be the maximum amount. Very truly yours, tJ. p~-..:L_ William P. Ficker, A.I.A. WPF:etm _, .. i Agenda Iten~ #16B. G-2 All D:tstrlcts \._,/ '..._,) L '.._/ RESOLUTION NO. 69-65 DECLARATION OF INTENTION TO CONSIDER PROPOSED UNIFORM INDUSTRIAL WASTE CHARGE ORDINANCE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DECLARING INTENT TO CONSIDER PROPOSED ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTION TO AND USE OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND CHARGES FOR DISPOSAL OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE, PRO- VIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATION, AND REPEALING CERTAIN ORDINANCES The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the report prepared by Bartle Wells Associates, Municipal Financing Consultants, dated August, 1969, entitled "Industrial Waste Disposal Charges" is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That these Boards of Directbrs hereby declare their intent to consider the certain proposed Uniform Industrial Waste Charge Ordinance at the September 10, 1969 Joint Boards of Directors meeting; and, Section 3. That September 10, 1969, at 7:30 p.m. at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, is hereby fixed as the date and hour and place when and where any and all persons having any objection to the aforesaid proposed ordinance may appear before l • said Boards of Directors and show cause why said ordinance should not be adopted; and, Section 4. That the staff be instructed to forward copies of the full ordinance to each city, sewering entity, and Chamber of Commerce within the Districts, prior to public hearing dateo PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1969. Agenda Item #16 -H-All Districts ALL PISTRICTS: Request is made for authorization to attend the following meetings: Meeting in Washington, D.C., of management officials of the twenty- fi ve largest sewering agencies in the United States (September, 1969) Annual Workshop of the California Sanitary and Sanitation Districts Association, in San Francisco (September 24th through 28th, 1969) Annual meeting of Water Pollution Control Federation, and Workshop, in Dallas Texas (October 4th through 8th," 1969) National Workshop on Operato~ Training, sponsored by the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration in Atlanta, Georgia (November 3rd through 5th, 1969) 1 staff member 2 staff members 1 staff member 1 staff member* *(Subject to the-air transportation being provided by the Conference sponsors) Agenda Item #16E -I-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 69-64 AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE.KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF LOS ANGELES, THE CITY OF SAN DIEGO, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF LOS ANGELES, AND VENTURA COUNTY CREATING AN AGENCY TO BE KNOWN AS THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA COASTAL WATER RESEARCH PROJECT AUTHORITY The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Noso 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Joint Powers Agreement between the City of Los Angeles, the City of San Diego, County Sanitation District No. 2 of Los Angeles, Ventura County, and County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, creating an agency to be known as the Southern California Coastal Water Research Project Authority, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement in form acceptable to the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on August 13, 1969. Agenda Item #16F . -J-All Dj_strtcts August 6, 1969 7-1-68 7-18-68 7-19-68 8-1-68 8-1-68 8-12-68 8-28-68 9-4-68 9-13-68 9-16-68 9-27-68 10-3-68 10-24-68 11-1-68 11-8-68 ATTENDANCE AT MEETINGS AUTHORIZED BY THE GENERAL MANAGER DURING THE 1968-69 FISCAL YEAR Meeting with Los Angeles City Director,Bureau of Sanitation and meeting re: Coastal Water Research Project; attended by General Manager Meeting with Assistant Director Sanitation, Los Angeles (Jack Betz); attended by General Manager and Construction Engineer Sanitary and Sanitation Districts Association meeting; attended by General Manager and Dlrector of Finance State Water Resources Control Board meeting; attended by General Manager Meeting honoring Howard Cooke, General Manager, Orange County Water District; attended by General Manager Safety Council Meeting; attended by two Plant staff members Meeting with Los Angeles City Director of Sanitation and Executive Officer of the Regional Water Quality Control Board re: Districts' supernatant facilities; attended by General Manager and ten staff members Meeting re: Discussion of flotation.and grease removal experiments on supernatant; attended by General Manager and Operations Engineer Meeting to plan inspection visit of FWPCA Officials; attended by General Manager Board of Governor's Conference, CWPCA; attended by General Manager Meeting re: Possibility of participation with District No. 4 concerning waste discharge; attended 'by General Manager Desert Section Meeting, CWPCA; attended by four operating staff members American Water Works Association Meeting; attended by General Manager 7th Annual Orange County Economic Development Conference; attended by General Manager Meeting with Officials of FWPCA re: Districts' Apprentice Program; attended by seven Administrative staff members Agenda Item #17 K-1 All Districts 11-20-68 11-29-68 12-11-68 12-15-68 12-16-68 12-19-68 1-11-69 1-21-69 2-25.-69 3-11-69 3-14-69 4-8-69 4-14-69 4-18-69 4-29-69 5-20-69 Agenda Item #17 Meeting of Conference Committee -CWPCA; attended by ten staff members Meeting attended by General Manager and Joint Chairman Management Training Meeting attended by Wmo Clarke Meeting honoring George Weimer, Manager, City of Orange; attended by General Manager Section Meeting of the California Water Pollution Control Association; attended by five Operating personnel Meeting with Manager of Orange County Water District (Langdon Owen), re: Upstream Water Quality and the Santa Ana Watershed Planning Agency; attended by General Manager and Assistant General Manager Sanitary & Sanitation Districts Association Meeting; attended by General Manager Meeting with Manager of Irvine Ranch Water District (Wm. Eppinger) re: possible participation of Water District with Districts 1 and 7; attended by General Manager and Assistant General Manager Meeting with staff of Los Angeles County Sani- tation Districts re: Fiscal Matters; attended by Director of Finance Meeting re: Contract between District No. 3, and District No. 4 for sewer servi9es; attended by General Manager and Assistant General Manager Meeting re: Ocean Outfall Monitoring Program; attended by General Manager and Assistant General Manager Meeting re: Ecological and bacteriological monitoring requirements for new ocean out- fall; attended by General Manager, Assistant General Manager and Purchasing Administrative Officer Southern California Meter Association Short School; attended by five Operating staff members Municipal Finance Officers• Association Meeting; attended by Director of Finance and Accountant Meeting re: Southern California Coastal Water Research Project; attended by General Manager Meeting with General Counsel re: Joint Powers Agreement -Meeting in Los Angeles; attended by General Manager ·K-2 All Districts 5-22-69 5-28-69 6-12-69 6-25-69 Agenda Item #17 Meeting with Director, Bureau of Sanitation, City of Los Angeles re: Coastal Waters Research Project; attended by General Manager Meeting re: FWPCA State Water Resources Training Committee; attended by six staff members Meeting re: Ecological Survey, and obtaining related data from Orange County School Districts; attended by Purchasing Administrative Officer Meeting of Water Coordinating Committee; attended by General Manager and Assistant General Manager -·: K-3 All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CH.L\NGE ORDJ~R C.O. NO·~~~~=l~--~- CONTRACTOR: Lomar Corporation DATE: _____ A~ug~u~s~t--..._i.7_,-=19~6~9::---_ JOB: Digester No. 8 at Plant No. 1, Job No. P 1-14 Amount of this change order {ADD) (IDBrnIDmQ $ 584 .43 ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following ·additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated July 15, 1969 ADD As directed by the Districts' Engineer, Contractor shall remove from within the limits of the excavation for Digester No. 8, concrete slabs which is a removal of an abandone9 sedimentatio~ basin system. (ADD) TIME EXTENSION The contract time is extended a total of one calendar day due to the above. described work. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) {llXll]C}f') Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: Approved: 584.43 1 Calendar Day $ 329 ,400. 00 $ None --- $ ___ _?84.43 $.J.g2-~_984 ~.-4w--3 - August 13, 1969 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County~ California By /s/ Paul G. Brown·------ Chief Engineer JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS LOMAR CORPORATION By __ ~--~~--~------~--~·-----By _______ ~--~~------------~-- Agenda Item //20 .-L-All Distr·icts MOTION DISTRICT NO. 1 -(Roll Call Vote} MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT NO. 1 Operating Fund Budget 1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget Total Amount of said 1969-1970 Budget 441,0480 189,613. $ 3,419,0410 FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are 'hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. Agenda Item //25 -M-Distr·ict 1 MOTION DISTRICT NO. 2 -(Roll Call Vote) MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT NO. 2 Operating Fund Budget 1958 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budgets Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget DISTRICT NO. 2 AND 2A 1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budget ,. 1,015,250. 120,206. $ 10,221,433. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgetso Agenda Item 1}30 -N-District 2 LO\VRY ENGINEERING-SCIENCE 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE • SANTA ANA-CALIFORNIA 92701 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 TELEPHONE 714 I 541-5301 August 1, 1969 Re: Trask Avenue Interceptor· Sewer -Contract 2-12 Gentlemen: In accordance with your staff's request, we are pleased to submit this proposal for providing engineering services for the preparation of plans and specifications for the Trask Avenue Interceptor Sewer. This sewer is one of the projects proposed in our recent study, "Feasibility Report for Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside ~ounty Flood Control and Water Conservation District," and will pro- vide substantial relief to the lower.reach of the Newhope-Placentia I Trunk. Total estimated cost of the project, including engineering and contingencies is $87,000. We will accomplish the following: (1) Review of capacity requirements of the Euclid Trunk system to provide proper capacity in the Trask Avenue Interceptor Sewer. (2) Hold conferences with the staff and other appropriate agencies and individuals concerned with the project. (3) Make arrangements for field surveys, soils investigations, and pavement coring, if necessary. (4) Prepare preliminary engineering designs for review and approval. (5) Prepare data for permit applications. (6) Prepare plans and specifications. (7) Prepare estimates of quantities and costs. , (8) Deliver the original plans and specifications to·the District for reproduction by the District (9) Assist the District in securing bids, tabulation and analysis of bids, and in awarding contract. 'Agenda Item 1131 0-1 District 2 LOWRY ENGINEERING-SCIENCE August 1, 1969 Board of .Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 Page -2- (10) Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the con- tractor. (11) Review laboratory reports on materials tests and inspections to insure compliance with the plans and specifications. (12) Aid the District during construction by periodic observations of the work in progress and provide appropriate reports to the District. (13) . Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the District. (14) Prepare "As Built" drawings of the completed project and deliver originals to "the District for their permanent record. We propose to provide the above services for a basic. fee of $4,800. It is suggested that payment be made monthly based on th~· percentage of the work completed, up to 90 percent at the time of delivery of the plans and specifications, and 100 percent payment when the work on the project ' has been completed by the District. It is proposed that the field surveys needed for the preparation of the plans and specifications and the construction staking be accomplished at the current per diem surveying rate of $38.00 per hour. Construction inspection services, if required, will be provided on an hourly basis of $10.00 per hour, with inspection personnel to be approved by the District. Payment to be made monthly as invoiced. We prepose that the outside services required and approved by the ·District for soils investigations and related work be paid directly by the District with the engineer's certification. We estimate that the plans and specifications could be completed within two months after authorization to proceed. Very truly yours, Lowry Engineering-Science . SLL/jh Agenda Item #31 0-2 District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR:'\NGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -ioe44 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .,O. NO. ,2 -~------ CONTRACTOR: ___ C~h~a~r~l~e_s-=L~·~B~u~.r~c~h~&----.S~on~s~,~I~n~c~·----DATE : __ A_u ...... g_u_s t_1_3 ____ ;_1 __ 96_9"'-- 'JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-9 l..,..J Amount of this change .order (ADD) (~) $ 1,137.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the :following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES ADD - Item Change Est'd. Quant. No. Unit From To 1. L.F. 2. L.F. 3. L.F. 4. · V.F. 6. . V.F. 10,135 10,156 21 L.F. @ $42.00/L.F. $ 882.00 10· 13 3 L.F. @ 25.00/L.F. 75.00 87 110 23 L.F. @ 15.00/L.F. 345.00 98 155.3 57.3 V.F·. @ 44.00/V.F. . 2,521.20 16 17 1 V.F • @ 65.00/V.F. 65.00 7. V.F. 8. V.F. 11. Each 13 13.3 .3 V.F. @ 60.00/V.F. 18.oo . 20 21.9 1.9 V.F. @ 42.00/V.F. .79.80 11 12 1 Fach @ 75.00/Each 75.00 TOTAL ADD $4,061.00 DEDUCT \.,I 5. V.F. 191 10 160.8 3 30.2 V.F. @ $45.00/V.F. 7 C.Y. @ 35.00/C.Y. . 4 Each @ Bo. 00/Each 10 Each @ 100.00/Each $1,359.00 21~5. 00 320.00 1,000.00 ; 10. 17. i8. C.Y. Each Each 5 10 1 0 TOTAL.DEDUCT §2,924 .• oo TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,137.00 Original Contract Price Prev. Au th. Changes ADD This Change (ADD) (%£Xt~tCX') Amended Contract Price $ 459 J 892. QQ__ $ 20Q_,OQ__ . $ 1 , 13_7 • 00 $ 4612 229. QO __ _ ===----------------~-----=~..,.._...,,,, Board authorization date: \.,I ·August 13, 1969 Agenda Item //32 Approved: COUN'rY SANI'fA'I'ION DIS'rRICTS of Orange County, California CHARLES L. BUHCH & SONS, INC. By __ ·----------·---------- -P-District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: __ ~Ch_a_r_l_e_s~L_.~B_u_r_c_h~&~S_o_n_s~, __ I_n_c_•~-- C .O. NO. _ __.___.._ ...... 3 __ ....__.._ __ DATE: August. 13, 1969 JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-9 Amourit of this change ~rder (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ none ·~ . · In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation . therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Eng~neer's letter dated August 1, 1969 EXTENSION OF TIME Inclement Weather Days November, 1968 December, 1968 January, 1969 February, 1969 March, 1969 2 2· 8 7 5 24 Acts of Other Agencies 2500 feet of installed sewer required to be cleaned of sand du$ to rupture of 8-inch City of Anaheim water main TOTAL DAYS 25 49 ************************* Original completion° date: Completion date with this extension of time (49 calendar days) Actual completion date: June 21, 1969 August 9, 1969 July-30, 1969 Original Contract Price $ 459 '892. QQ_ __ - $ 1,33~.Q_~-Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change (ADD){DEDUCT) . $ __ n_o_n_e_ Amended Contract Price $361, 22~._oo __ ~oard authorization date: Approved: '--' August 13, 1969 Agenda Item 1133 -Q- COUNTY SANITA'J.1ION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By __ /s/ Pa_ul ~r_~------- Chlcf EngJnecr CHARLES L. BURCH & SONS, INC. Uy_. ____ _ Dlstrict 2 RESOLUTION NO. 69-61-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-10-9 AS COMPLETE .A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE EUCLID 'TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-9, AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, Contract No. 2-10-9, on the 30th day of July, 1969; and, Section 2. That by letter, the District's Engineers, Boyle Engineering, has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation,,which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That construction of the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, Contract No. 2-10-9, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of October, 1968; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby author- ized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on August 13, 1969. Agenda Item #3l~ -R-District 2 MOTION DISTRICT NO. 3 -(Roll Call Vote) MOVED.: That the District 1 s 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT NO. 3 Operating Fund Budget Bond, Interest and Sinking Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budgets . $ 1,435 '868. 1,413' 2700 9,144,070. $ 11,993,208. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. Agenda Item #38 -S-District 3 MOTION DISTRICT NO. 5 -(Roll Call Vote) MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT NO. 5 Operating Fund Budget 1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget Facilities Revolving Fund Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budgets 1,275,o13 0 241,2530 $ 1, 889 ,9 3 7. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are ·hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. • I Agenda Item #l-t-2 -T-District 5 I COUNTY SANI'fA'f ION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE courrrY P. 0. BOX 5175 -10841~ Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. --~~----~---- CONTRACTOR: B & M Excavating, Ipc. DATE: Aug;us t 7~ 1969 JOB: Reconstruction of the Lidb Pump Stati.on, Contract No. 5-16 Amourit of this change order (ADD) (~~) $ 3,497.24 .. -In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the .. ·. c9ntract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved •. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated March 10, 1969 and July 22,. 1969. Sa~itation Districts' letter dated April 17, 1969. ADD Item I . · Extra work performed by the Contractor to replace the 2~' Vitrified Clay Pipe between existing man- hole in Short Street and the pump station and the extension of excavation, bypass sys.tern, etc., due to serious condition of the existing 21" VCP •·. · Item II Labor Material Equipment Sub-contractor Oyer he.ad . $ 991.16 425.53 486.66 1237.15 4,.(1. orr Additional labor, mate.rial and rental of equipment caus·ea by the break in ·the 15n VCP Newport Bea.ch City trunk and subsequent delays. Labor Material Equipment Overhead $ 21.00 124.50 568.13. 107.04 $3,611.57 $ . 820.61 TOTAL ADD "'$4,432.24 Continued on Second ~P~agg~e~==============:=========~========--======;;;~~~ "'ioard authorizatib~ date: _!\genda Item #43 Original Contract Price $ __ , __ Prev. Auth. Changes "*-----. This Change (ADD)(DEDUCT) _$ ______ _ Amended Contract Price $ ____ _ Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DIS'fRICTS of Orang~ County, California· By _ _Ls/ Paul G. Bro_w_n ___ _ Ch-ief Engineer U-1 District 5 , COlJNTY S1'\NITATION DISTRICTS OF OPu-'\NGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 5175 -l08l~li Ellis A venue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGg ORDER c.o. NO. 2. -· contlnued CONTRACTOR: B & M Excavating, Inc. DATE : __ A_u__,g ...... u_s_t ___ 7_, ___ 1 ___ 9_6..._9_ JOB: Reconstruction of the Lido Pumry Station, Contract No. 5-16 Amount of this change order (ADD) (EXENE~) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. DEDUCT Item I· Substitution for experimental Furane concrete man- hole in lieu of the specified pre-cast concrete !' Amerplate" lined manhole. Item II Deletion of the asphaltic concrete pavement for the alley westerly of the'. pump station.· · · ... 400 square feet@ $.25.per fdot TOTAL DEDUCT Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes (ADD) This Change (ADD)(m;mrC{'X) Amended Contract Price Approved: ($835.00) ( 100.00) ($935.00) $ 20 ~-4 ~· o_o __ $ 950.83 $ 3,497.24 $ 21~ '64 2 0 9_._7 __ "-"?ard authorizatlon date: · August 13, 1969 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown.~-~-- Chief Engineer .. B & M EXCAVATING, INC. By_ Agenna Item #ln U-~2 District ~ ....,.,, COUNrry SANITATIO~r DISTRIC11 S OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley~ California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. -------- CONTRACTOR: ___ B __ & __ M_._E_x_c~a~v~a~t_i~n~g~,~---I~n~c~·~~--~--~ DATE: Aognst. 7J 1969 JOB: Reconstruction of the Lido. Pump Station, Contract No. 5-16 Amount of this change order (~~ (DEDUCT) $ 1300 .oo In accordance with contract provisions," the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following addition~ to or de~uctions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Sanitation Districts' Memorandum, dated August 1, 1969. Con·.tractor' s letters dated Aprii 16, 1969 and May 9, 1969. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME Item I Rain Item II February 12,16,18,19,20, 22,23,24,25 & 28 March 10,12 & 21 April 5,6 & 10 May 3 & 4 Delay in construction due to the discovery of damaged 21 11 VCP and due to the breakage of the New- port Beach City Sewer. March 19 through April 30, 1969 Item III Delay due to leakaf2e at the manhole May 18,19 & 20 Item IV Extra work for re;eair of 21'' VCP During the month of May through July TOTAL TIME Continued on Second Page - 10 Days 3 Days 3" Days 2 Days 42 Days 3 Days 6 Days 69 D~ \ Original Contract Price $-------~~~ Prev. Auth. Changes *--~~~-~~- This Change (A.Pn) (DEDUCT) . $ _____ _ Amended Contract Price $----~~------- ----~-====================================================-::: -.._..Poard authorizatj;on date: Approved: COUNTY SANI'rATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California. By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer Agenda Item /flt L~ V-1 District 5 ,. . . COUNTY SAN!'fATION DISTRIC'l'S OF ORl\UGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 51?5 -l08lil~ Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C • 0 • NO • __ 3_._-_9 ..... 0 ....... 0-...t .,..; D..ut.:.;.1 e~d.i.- CONTRACTOR: B & M Excavating, Inc. ~ATE: August 7, 1969 JOB: Reconstruction of the Lido Pumo Station, Contract Noo 5-16 · · · Amount of this change order ~ {DEDUCT) $ 1300.00 ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation · therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · SUMMARY: Original Contract Date Original Contract Time Original Contract Completion Date Contract Time Extension, this Cpange Order · Revised Contract Completion Date Actual Completion Date Delay in Construction Period February 7, 1969 90 Calendar Days May 8, 1969 · 69 Calendar Days July 16, 1969 July 29, 1969 13 Calendar Days LIQUIDATED DAMAGES (Contract Specifications, Secti.on ·13· Cale~dar Days X $100.00 per day 5-10) 1:: -,ard authorization date: ..... ,,.,,J August 13, 1969 Age~!_d.3. Item _ _#4l1. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes (ADD) This Change ~~(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: . ( $ 1300 .00) $ 20 ~ 194 ._fill __ $ 4 ,448."07 $ (1, 300. 00). $.B,342.07 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown --Chie._f_· -E-ngineer- .. B & M EXCAVATING, INC. By_ V-2 Distrlc:t 5 RESOLUTION NO. 69-63-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-16 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-16 AS COMPLETE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSE- OUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, B & M EXCAVATING, INC., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the Reconstruction of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-16, on the 29th day of July, 1969; and, Section 2. That by letter, Shuirman-Simpson, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation,. which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Reconstrµction of Lido Pump Station, Contract No. 5-16, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 7 th day of February, 1969; and, · Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with B & M EXCAVATING, INC., providing for payment to the contractor in the amount of $23,342.07, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on August 13, 1969. Agenda Item //h5 -W-District 5 M 0 T I 0 N MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts; DISTRICT NO. 6 Operating Fund Budget 1951 Bond, Interest and Sinking Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budgets 266,992. 72,809. 1,073,483. $ 1 '413 ' 28l~. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ~ ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. _, Agenda Item #46 -X-District 6 MOTION DISTRICT NO. 11 -.{Roll Call Vote) MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets,. as recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee, be and they. are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts: DISTRICT NO. 11 Operating Fund Budget 1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget 1958 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budgets $ 348,531. 33,060. 159,050. 2,248,055. $ 2,788,696. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. Agenda. Item //53 -Y-District 11 " I I;. ~ KEITH AND ASSOCIATES CONSUL TING CIVIL ENGINEERS Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attn: Mr. Paul Brown Chief Engineer Re: County Sanitation District No. 11, Slater Avenue Trunk Sewer and Edi!lger Avenue Trunk Sewer Gentlemen: 1525 SOUTH GRAND AVENUE SANTA ANA. CAL.IFORNIA Sl2705 C714J 541•5300 July 31, 1969 In response to your verbal request, we are pleased to submit herewith our proposal for furnishing de~~gn e~gineer- \..,.1 i!lg services for the subject project. · · HYDRAULICS We propose to furnish ~he followi!lg: ' I. Des~gn Plans and Specifications A. Preliminary Phase 1. Review requirements of the District, together with available material and records assembled. 2. Prepare a supplemental Master Plan to be used as an updating of the 1962 Master Plan. (Suitable . .for a Public Heari!lg report if r~quired.) I 3. Prepare a preliminary cost estimate. B. Design Phase 1. Prepare final design contract drawings in ink on linen. · · 2. Prepare contract special provisions, bid proposals, and other documents to be included with the District's standard general provisions and specifications. MUNICIPAL SERVICE:"'.S Agenda Item f/54 Z-1 1District 11 •, . I • -.. ~---·· ~ Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts 7-31-69 P~ge 2. 3. Prepare a final cost estimate. C. Construction Phase 1. Assist the District in the securing and tabulation of bids, analyze bid results and furnish recommendations on award. 2. General supervision and advice to the District duri~g construction. 3. Prepare supplementary sketches on.design, if required, to resolve field conditions encountered. 4. Check detailed construction drawings and shop and erection drawings for compliance" with des~gn concept~ · 5. Conduct final field tests and prepare final report on the completed project. II. Special Services It is anticipated that the project will require special supporting services. We will furnish or retain the services of qualified personnel or companies to furnish the followi~g: l. Soils investigation report, if necessary and approved. by the District in writi~g. 2. Survey services for the necessary design surveys, and final construction staki~g • . 3. Furnish full time daily inspection services if requested by the District in writing. --; 4. Prepare legal descriptions for the acquisi- tion of rights of way if requir~do Fees for furnishing the above services are as follows, and are based on the fee curves, as listed in Manual 45 of the American Society of Civil Engineers, April 1964: Agenda Item 1/54 Z-2 District 11 c, .• Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts ·7-31-69 P~ge 3. I. Design Plans and Specifications, a lump sum fee of $21,450.00. . .II. Special Services: 1. Soils Engineering, at invoice cost as submitted. · 2. Survey services, at hourly rates as follows: a. Three-man survey party -$42.00 per hour. b. Two-man survey party -$35.00 per hour. 3. Daily Inspection services· at the hourly rate of $8.00. 4. Prepare legal descriptions at the office hourly rate of $12.QO, with a maximum fee not to exceed $100.00 per parcel. Payment of fees is requested as follows: I. Des~gn Plans and Specifications: ' A. Monthly progress payments amounting to 90% of the percentage of project completed. B. Construction contract awarded and construction started, 90% of the fee. C. Project completed and accepted for operation and maintenance by the District, 100% of the fee. II. Special Services: Agenda Item #5!1· 1. Soils engineering within 30 days after sub- mittal of soils' report to this company with copies to the District. 2. Survey services at monthly invoice costs as submitted. 3. Daily inspection services at monthly invoice costs as submitted. Z-3 District 11 "'-·-·· • .. I Fred Harper, General Manager Coun~y Sanitation Districts 7-31-69 P~ge 4. 4. Legal descriptions, within 30 days after submittal of the descriptions. If this m~ets with your .approval, we will agree to complete the work within the following time schedule: MKK:m Preliminary Phase within 45 days. Design Phase within 90 days after approval of the· preliminary plans. Respectfully submitted, KEITH AND ASSOCIATES -. '"I·/) . ~ (_// //-_/ //> £lt.i. /) /) .-eAA4z.:i Milo K. Keith Agenda Item /154 Z-4 District 11 •. CLAIM OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a public corporation, , . . , vs CLAIM FOR DAMAGES THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation. TO THE CITY OF HUNTINGTON BEACH, a municipal corporation: YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, a public corporation, whose 8127 address is 10844 Ellis Avenue, P. O. Box -51.-75, Fountain Valley, California, 92708, claims damages from the City of Huntington Beach in the amount, computed as of the date of presentation of this Claim, of $2,665.14. The claim is based on damages caused to the claimant's sanitary sewer located on the south side of Coast Highway west of Beach Boulevard in the City of Huntington Beach, which damage is believed to have been caused by Co-Ordinated Developers, Inc., of Huntington Beach who were sub-contractors to Strecker Con- struction Company of Santa Fe Springs who, in turn, were general . • contractors for the development of the area southerly of Coast Highway between Beach Boulevard and the Huntington Beach pier in the City of Huntington Beach. The damages sustained by claimant, as far as known, as of the date of presentation, consist of the following items and the amounts indicated: Emergency repair, December, 1-968 T.V. inspection, January, 1969 Replacement inspection, February,1969 i 15·% Overhead Total amount due $ 533.70 1,043.10 7l1.0. 71 ~2,317.51 347.63 $2,665.14 All notices or other communications with regard to ..... r Arr,en_da Item_ #~5 AA-1 DJ.str:l.ct 11. ~ ~ ,: ~/ 8127 this claim should be sent to claimant at P. O. Box §115,,,Fountain Valley, California, 92708. DATED: , 1969. -; COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,a public corporation By~__,,,._..~--~~~~~~--~~~~ Fred A. Harper, General Manager , -.~ Agenda Item //55 AA-2 D:l.fit:rlct. 11 ----------- 1~ MOTION . -· ........ . DISTRICT NO. 7 -(Roll Call Vote) MOVED: That the District's 1969-1970 fiscal year budgets, as recommended by the Chairman of the 'District, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total amounts; DISTRICT NO. 7 Operating Fund Budget Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget 1962 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Construction Fund Budget Facilities Revolving Fund Budget DISTRICT NO. 7, 7A, AND 7B 1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget Fixed Obligation Fund Budget. Total amount of said 1969-1970 Budgets 422,080. 1,690,190. 299,3390 20,027. 312,865. 35,846~ 15,500. FURTHER MOVED: That said budgets are hereby received and ordered filed; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the Chairman of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets. Agenda Item 1159 -BB-District 7 ""-' ~ \._,I RESOLUTION NO. 69-59-7 .. APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NOo 7-4-2R A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NOo 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE TUSTIN-NEWPORT RELIEF SUBTRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-4-2R , The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. · That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, for construction of the Tustin-Newport Relief Subtrunk Sewer, c·ontraqt No •. 7-4-2R, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State oP California; and, Section 3o That said bids will be received until 4:00 Pomo, September 3, 1969, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4o That the Secretary of the Board and the District's Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directorso PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 19690 :Bgenda Item #.6 o -CC-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 69-62-7 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) WITH IRVINE INDusrrRIAL COMPLEX The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section· 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse- ment Agreement {Master Plan), between County Sanitation District No. 7 and IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, providing for reimbursement b¥ the District for the McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D, the Armstrong Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D-l, and sewerage improvements to Tract No. 6410, which said sewerage facility is more particularly described as: A Sanitary Sewer Line, and appurtenances, generally referred to as McGaw Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D, and ArmstrongAvenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D-l, and Sewer Line and appurtenances constructed with Tract 6410 Improvements, consisting of the following: 251.5 1,287.2 1,755.2 1,853 LF of 27'' · VCP Sewer Line LF of 18" VCP Sewer Line LF of 15" VCP Sewer Line LF of 24" VCP Sewer Line is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2.· That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree- ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement for the McGaw ~venue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D, the Armstrong Avenue Subtrunk, Contract No. 7-2D-l, .. and sewerage improvements to Tract No. 6410 in the total amount of $115,115.77 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the '-"' terms and conditions outlined in said agreement, from the Facilities ·Revolving Fund of the District. · PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting held August 13, 19690 Agenda Item # 61 -DD-D:lstrict 7 RESOLUTION NOo 69-60-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTAJ:il'CE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEIVIENT FROM TUSTIN WALNUT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated June 3, 1969, wherein TUSTIN WALNUT, a limited partnership, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7, a permanent easement for sewer purposes situated in the County of Orange, State of California, in connection with an apartment development generally known as Tustin-Walnut, is hereby approv~d and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property .over which said easement is granted is more particularly described as follows: That part of the Northwesterly half of the Southerly quarter of Lot 48, in Block 11, of Irvine's Subdivision, as per map recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, Official Records of Orange County, California, described as follows: Parcel 1: The Northwesterly 27.00 feet of the Southwesterly 222.00 feet, except therefrom the Northwesterly 12000 feeto Parcel 2: The Northwesterly 35.00 feet of the Northeasterly 155.50 feet of the Southwesterly 377.50 feet, except therefrom the Northwesterly 20.00 feet of the Southwesterly 140050 feet. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #62 -EE-District 7 a. RESOLUTION NO. 69-66-7 ESTABLISHING METHOD OF COLLECTING ANNEXATION FEES RE: ANNEXATION NO. 14 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING THE METHOD OF COLLECTING ANNEXATION FEES RE: ANNEXATION NO. 14 AREA (NEWPORT AVENUE ANNEXATION) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That pursuant to the provisions of Section 56470, Subsections (a) and (b) of the Government Code of the State of California, and pursuant to the provisions of Resolution No. 68-57-7 adopted by this Board of Directors on June 19, 1968, annexation fees in the amount of $8,766.60, due the District in connection with "Newport Avenue Annexation No. ll~ to County Sanitation District No. 7", are to be paid ·by the collection of a special and additional tax collected in the same manner as the general taxes of said District, on each parcel of real property within the annexed territory, in equal annual installments over a period of five taxable years; and, Section 2. That the County Auditor of the County of Orange and ex officio Auditor of County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to add said fees, commencing with the 1969-70 taxable year and continuing each year thereafter for a total of five years, to the secured tax roll for each parcel of real property involved. PASSED AND ADOPrED at a regular meeting held August 13, 1969. Agenda Item 1163 -FF-Distr:Lct 7 .. EXCERPT FROM PROPOSAL OF WILLIAM Po FICKER, AoI.A. ,' DATED JUNE 6, 1969 NEW LABORATORY BUILDING This would be an entirely new structure planned specifically for laboratory use. Strong consideration will be given to the laboratory aspects of the planning and design. Mechanical systems, gas and electric as well as interior laboratory furnishings, etc., will be designed by this office. Fee This fee must be determined upon evaluation of the project scope. However, it will essentially be based on the following sched"ll;le, a. Building only. Approximately 9% to 10%. b. This would include basic systems of plumbing and aj.r handling. Complete responsibility for specify.ing all interior furnishings, special hoods,· ovens, etc.~ and providing systems for their support. . . 12]6 of the cost of this equipment and related items. These fees are based on a total cost of approximately $150,000.00. Should the project scope increase, the percentage of fee would . probably average out a·t a~prox:lrnately lq'&; however, a smaller project of approximately ~100,000.00 would deserve re-evaluation due to the ~xtraordinarily hjgh proportion of specialized . engineering. It might also be possible that the OraAge County Sanitation Distrlcts would desire to assume responsibility for the coordinatton of special furnishings, in which c&se only a small proportion of th: f~e of section "b" of thq proposal, relating to the new J.aboratcn"ly buildl.ng, would be neccs8ary for coordlna tion of the sy8tems by tlie ar·chltect. Agenda Item #2L~A -GG-All Districts