Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-07II ~ .. MAN A GER'S AG~NDA REPORT Co unty San it a ti on Di s!rlct s ,.., . of Ora n ge County, Ca liforni<J • DISTRICT NO. _?_: .. __,____ July 1 8 ,, 1969 Adjourned ReguJ .ar Meeting July 23 , 1969 -7 :30 p .m . P. 0. Box 5175 10844 t:llis Avenue Fou ntain Valley, Calif., 9 2708 T elcphone s: Are o Code 7 14 5 40-2910 962.2411 Th e following is an exp l anat i on of the items of business t o a ppear on the agenda for this meeting . • "Feasibility Report f or Joint Outfall Sew er Proj ect with Riverside Co unty F'lood Control and Water Conservation District 1 ~ dated June 1 969 • Th e engineers submitted this report to the Board on J uly 9th , at wh j.ch time .it was taken under submission for study . We have asked that a r epresentative of Lowry Engineering -Selene~ review the report verbally for the pirectors at the adjourned meeting . Revi ew o f Irvin e-Riverside Joint Use of Treatme nt Plant Facilities S tudy Th e Directors will recall that the Executive Co!Tlffiittee reported the.t the Districts 1 treatme nt pla nt engineers, John Carollo Engineers , met with the Committee on June 24th t o discuss their prel:i..minary findings concerning additional treatme nt plant co sts and the f eas ibility of acc epting wast es from Riverside Co unty and the Irvine Ranch ar e a . ~~he staff h as inv j_ted Mr. Harvey Hunt of J"ohn Carollo Engineers to b e pres ent at the We dn esday meeting for the purpose of r e vi ewing briefly their rec ommendations . Financia l Ma.tters Related to Prouosed Joint Construc tion of Trunk Sewers and Es tirnated Expenchtures 'Through 1973-~(L~ Fis_s:aTY8ar· Th e staff is prepa ring a report showin g the District 's pre sent financing capability for n e c essa ry futur e const:i:uction work based on the Engin ce r 1 s report . ~: • •• 'I • ., Ir .,. 'I ':: I . - . . I Fred A . Harpr:r Ge n c:ca.l Mn.trn.t;cr • • II BOAtlDS Of DIRECTORS Co unt y San itation Distr icts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange Co un ty, Ca l ifo rn ia 10844 ~llis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DIS1-RICT No . 2 (1) Ro l l Call Adjou rned Meeting J uly 23 , 1969 -7 :30 p .m. A GENDA (2 ) Appointment of Cha i rman pro tern , if necessary (3 ) Report of the Gene r al Manager ( L~) Report of the General Counsel (5 ) Review of "Feasibili ty Report for Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Con servation District ", da ted June 1969 , by representative of Lowry Engineering-Science . (6 ) Review of Irvine -Riverside J oint Use of Treatment Plant Facilities Study by Mr. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers (7 ) Report of the staff showing the District 's present financing capability for necessary future construction work , re : Proposed Joint Construction of Trunk Sewers and Estimated Expenditures Through 1973 -74 Fiscal Year. (8 ) Other business and communications , if any (9 ) Consideration of motion to adjourn .~~ -~:~~5~· ,.-.:... _,,.._. Aaenda Item No ...... _s-=-=~rt EXCERPTS FROM; FEASIBILITY REPORT FOR JOINT OUTFALL SEWER PROJECT WITH RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD·CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT Prepared For County Sanitation District No. 2 Orange County, California By Lowry Engineering-Science 121 East Washington Avenue Santa Ana, California 92701 June 1969 .. I LO\VRY ENGINEERING·_SCIENCE 121 EAST WASHINGION AVENUE • SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA 92701 Board of Directors of County Sa~itation District No. 2 Orange County, California · Gentlemen: TELEPHONE: 714 / 541-5301 Transmitt.ed herewith is our report, "Feasibility Report for Joint Outfall Sewer Project with Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District", which investigates the possibility of meeting the long term outfall trunk sewer needs of the District by co~structing a joint project with Riverside County. The report shows that the District's Newhope-Placentia trunk will reach lts design capacity in early 1971 (see Figure II-2), and tha~ addi- tional outfall capacity will be needed for the District by that time. In addition, the District will need additional local sewers to provide for developing areas within the District and potential annexations to the District. 0 Two sets of cost evaluations are made in the report.; one. is based on the needs of the present District, and the other takes into consideration probable future annexations. The total potential expenditures to the District for these two conditions are $12.5 milli~n and $13.4 million, respectively, if the District proceeds with its own independent construc- tion program. Considerable savings could be realized in a joint project with Riverside County, in that the total program expenditutes would be reduced to $8.0 million and $10.7 million for the two cases, for savings of $4.5 million or $2.7 million. Similarly, Riverside County would save about $2.5 nlillion in trunk sewer costs in a joint project. A summary of the cost information is shown on pages IV-5 and IV-7 of the report'. The potentials for water reclamation in the District are explored in the report, and it is concluded that water could be reclaimed at costs ranging from $25 to $35 per acre-foot. It is concluded that the concept of a joint project is feasible and should be actively pursued with Riverside County. Also the possibilities of constructing a water reclamation plant in the District should be ex- plored with the Orange County Water District. A complete list of recommendations from. the study is presented on Page 5 of the report. Respectfully submitted, l> .. JM: l m T ~ \wl \,,.J '-"" ... SUMMARY, CONCLUSIONS, AND RECOMMENDATIONS SUMMARY Chapter I ~ Introduction 1. The purpose of this constructing a joint project report is to investigate the feasibility.of with the Riverside County Flood Control District to provide outfall capacity for non-reclaimable wastes from the Upper Basin Counties and also for domestic sewage from County Sanitation District No. 2. 2. The proposed outfall sewer would originate in Riverside County, or possibly San Bernardino County, extend through Orange County along the northe~ly and westerly side of the Santa Ana River, and discharge into the hcadworks at Plant 1. The flows would be treated 8~ Plant 1, or by-passed to Plant 2 for treatment and ocean disposal. 3. The specific objectives of this study are to (1) re-evaluate ~he outfall trunk sewer capacity needs of County Sanitation Distric·t No. 2, (2)_ ·detcrtl).nc the feasibility of meeting the long term trunk sewer t1eeds of the District by the construction of a jqint project with Riverside County, (3) estimate the costs of constructing a joi~t trunk sewer project with Riverside County, (4) determine if there are interimwtype improvements that can be constructed to relieve existing overloaded trunk sewers, and (5) re- cv~luate the potentials for water reclamation in the District. Cl~~~~r II -Need for Additional District Sewerage Facilities l. l\.to plans have been studied in the past to provide relief to the cxf sting Ncwhopc-Placentia trunk sewer, the 01ajor outfall trunk sewer in th('" District. O.~.c plan involves the construction of a new trunk sewer along the S'1nta An:t River, and the other plan includes the construction of a water rccla~ation plant in the northeasterly section of the county adjacent to the S.1nta Ana River. 2. lhc 1966 County Sewerage Survey Report (Reference 2) recommended llic co:ir.truction of dual facilities; the trunk sewer by the Sanitation t•Sr.trfct • and the water reclamation plant by others, principally the Orange Ccunty \:atcr District with possible assistance from other agencies, including 1 1' ,,,. ~- I..,_) '..J '.._/ ~ • the Sanitation District. 3. With dual facilities,·. the reclamation plant would be operated only when it was desi.rable to recharge the groundwater basin, and the financing arrangements would be based upon the value of the water. At times when it is not practical to recharge the groundwater basin with reclaimed water, the waste water would be conveyed to the existing treat- ment plants for c·onventiona1 treatment and disposal. 4. Recent flow measurements in the District confirm earlier pre- dictions that additional trunk sewer capacity will be needed in the early 1970 period. -If the flow in Newhope-Placentia trunk continues to increase at the present rate, additional facilities will have to be in service by J~nuary, 1971 (See Figure II-2). Sufficient lead time will be needed to design and construct the relief facilities. S. The scope of this study does not include a re-analysis of the sub-trunk sewer system proposed in the 1965 Preliminary Engineer's Report (Reference 1). The estimated cost of the sub-trunks as presented in· that report is $5,985,000. Chapter 0 'III -Proposed Non-Reclaimable Waste Line 1. The original concept of the proposed outfall sewer was to con- struct a pipeline originating in one of the Upper Basin Counties, con- tinue downstream along the Santa Ana River, construct a tunnel around Prado Dam, construct a treatment plant near Prado Dam, continue the sewer along the Santa Ana River through Orange County, and construct an ocean outfall near the mouth of the Santa Ana River for the ocean disposal of the wastes. 2. Additional studies investigated various concepts for joint partid.pation i·>°y CSDOC, including use of the outfali and greatly expanded treatment facilities to receive large waste water flows from the Upper Basin Counties, but it was concluded that the most practical plan worthy. of more detailed study is to consider !eceiving 50 mgd of non-reclaimable waste from the Upper Basin Counties. Reclaimable flows would be treated in the Upper Basin (Riverside and San Bernardino County). Chapter IV -Proposed Joint Sc~er Project for Trunk Seuer Capacity 1. Several alternatlvcs have been studied for a proposed outfall 2 .• sewer through Orange County that would carry a flow of 50 mgd of non- reclaimable wastes from the Upper Basin.~ounties. Pipe sizes and cost estimates have been determined for a sewer that would extend from the County line along the northerly and westerly bank of the Santa Ana R~ver to Plant 1 at .Ellis Avenue. Consideration has been given to including the future capacity requirements for domestic sewage for Sanitation District No. 2; both for the area within the present District boundaries, and also for the total potential area. 2. An outfall se~er for just the non-reclaimable waste flow of 50 mgd from the Upper Basin Counties would vary in size in Orange County from 48-inch to 63-inch, and a sewer that would carry the total potential flow from the study area would vary in size from 48-inch to 72-inch • • 3. Cost estimates have been prepared for the various alternatives and have been proportioned to each agency in accordance with the capacities allotted to the Sanita~ion District and the Upper Basin Counties in each . . reach. The total cost and cost breakdowns are shown in Table IV-2 o~ Page IV-5. Total potential expenditures to the District a~e shown.in Tables IV-3 and IV-4. 4. ··No allowance has been made in the cost estimates for right of way expense in that the sewer is located in public right of way or in private lands where the necessary right of way should be available at a minimal cost. However, 20 percent contingency item has been included iQ the CO$t estimate. Chapter V -Possible Interim Improvements 1. The lower reach of the Newhope.-Placentia trunk downstream of Trask Avenue is the first reach that will apparently require relief (See Figure II-2). An interceptor trunk sewer could be constructed in Trask Avenue from Newhope Street to the Euclid Avenue trunk on Euclid Avenue. A 24-inch sewer would carry a flow of 5.7 mgd for an estimated cost of $87,000, and would provide substantial relief, but only to the lower reach. 2. Additional relief to the ~ewhope-Placentia trunk could be made by the construction of a portiop of the Santa Ana River trunk from Plant 1 to the Olive sub-trunk at Katella Avenue. Estimated cost for a trunk sewer that would be adequate to serve the needs of only the area within the present District boundaries is $5,0GS,OO~. Estimated cost for a sewer for .· 3 the total potential area is $5,993,000. Chapter VI -Proposed Water Reclamation Project .. 1. A report was prepared by the Review Committee for the County Sewerage Survey Report (Reference 7) that pr~sented cost data for the con- struction of the proposed.reclamation plant _and ~ecommended. that studies for the means of financing of the facilities continue. 2. Water quality will be a major concern in the proposed reclamation project and will require further study, including a sampling program of the flows in the existing sewers. 3. The Orange County Water District has expressed an interest in financing the facilities in cooperation with the Sanitation District · based on the value of the water. 4. Based upon the estimated cost of the reclamation plant, the cost of producing reclaimed water at the plant, including the amortization of the capital costs and the operating costs, are ·~~own in Tables VI-1 and VI-2. The total cost varies between $25 and $35 per acre foot of re- claimed water. 5. ·~he estimated.cost of the sewerage faciJities needed to divert the initial flows to the reclamation plant is $1;455,000. These facilities ~·ould also provide sewer service for newly developing areas. co::cI..USIONS --- Based on the data developed in this report, it is concluded that a joint project between the Sanitation District and the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for the construction of a trunk se~er that would carry non-reclaimable wastes from the Upper Basin Counties and domestic sewage from Sanitation District No. 2 is feasible. Considerable sa~ings to both parties could be realized in a joint proje2t, rather than each agency constructing its own facilities. 1£ the Sanitation District proceeded on its own for the ultimate out~ fall trunk sever requirements of the District, an expenditure of about SlO ~illion would be required ($7.8 million for the Santa Ana River trunk ~nd $2.2 ~illion for the north Santa Ana River trunk). In a joint project \d th f~ivcrsidc this cost would be reduced to $7. 3 million, for a saving of .. 4 ,. $2.7 million. If the.Upper Basin Counties constructed a separate project, their cost would be $11.8 million. In a joint project with the District, their cost would be reduced to $9. 3 million, for· a savj.ng of $2. 5 million. The above figures assume that the costs' will be divided on the basis of capacity rights. The timing of the constructing of the proposed facilities will be critical, in that the Sanitation District must have in service additional trunk sewer capacity to relieve the Newhope-Placentia trun~ sewer in the early 1970's in accordance with the timing shoWn in Figure II-2. RECOMMENDATIONS It is recommended that: •. (1) The District actively pursue the concept of a joint project with the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District (the results of an additional study, currently under way, on the co_st and feasibility of treatment of the non-reclaima~le wastes by the CSDOC will b~ needed. to finalize the total concept); (2) The District authorize the preparation of plans and specifications for a by-pass sewer in Trask Avenue from the Newhope-Placentia Trunk to the Euclid Trunk as proposed in this report; (3) The District proceed with the fiscal planning for the expen- ditures outlined in this report; (4) 'l'he District con.sider authorization for an Engineer's Report for the scheduling of work and an updating of the requirements for sub-trunk sewers, based upon the final decision of whether or not a joint outfall trunk sewer project will be constructed with Riverside County; (5) A copy of this report be transmitted to the Orange County Water District for their review and com.ments on the water reclamation aspects. 5 ( ,..., < I " Item Local Trunk Sewers and Pump Stations (1) Trask Avenue Interceptor Santa Ana River Trunk Sewer TOTALS Water Reclamation Plant 50 mgd (Ultimate Flow) 10 mgd (Initial Flow) (2) ( TABLE IV-4 POTENTIAL FUTURE DISTRICT EXPENDITURES Independent Program by District For Area Within For Total Potential Present Distri~t Future Area of Boundaries District 5' 520, 000 <3 > 87,000 6,900,000 12,507,000 (12.5 million) 5,520,000 87,000 7,800,000 13,407,000 (13.4 million) 9,100,000 2,900,000 ( In Coooeration with Riverside County For Area Within For Total Potential Present District Future Area of Boundaries District 3,320,000 87,000 4,616,000 8,023,000 (8.0 million) 3,320,000 87,000 1,26q,ooo 10,667,000 (10. t million) (1) Will require re-evaluation after adoption of final plan. Local trunk sewer system includes capacity for areas outside of present Distr~ct boundaries. (2) See Table V-2, Page V-2 (3) Includes facilities outside of present District Roundaries. "'-·" . ','. ~-. ~-~ Item Mo..-.ill!6w--:.- -----------------.J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5----------- .IOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, California · El Paso, Texas Preliminary Findings Presented to the Executive Committee.June 24, 1969 Reply to: 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE. CALIFORNIA 94!549 AREA CODE 4115 283-3895 Irvine-Riverside Joint Use of Facilities St.udy June 1 7, 1969 ·PER TON -EXCESS SOLIDS (On Tonnage Basis /day of use) Interest on Construction Cost $85, 000 X • 05 = $ 4, 250 /ton/yr. Capital Depreciation 85, 000 X • 01505*** 1 1 280/ton/yr. Interest on Land Cost 2, 500 X .. 05 =. 125/ton/yr. $5.bSSTton/yr. $5, 655 i 365 = $15. 50/ton/day plt1s operation _and maintenance cost. (Purchase of Capacity Rights) But if Riverside or Irvine would decide to discharge solids from domestic wastewater (settled sludge) and/or industrial solids the dischargex would purchase capacity rights in additional solids handling facilities at the plant.· Construction Cost Land $ 85, 000/ton processed/day 2,500 $ U7, 500/ton proceseed/day In a·.schedule such as that set forth above the recovery of money required to replace the original fa.:ility could be by obta:i:l.ing 1/30 of the con3truction cost each year ($2, 850. 00 per.ton processed/day updated to the current E. N. R. cost index.) *** S :.nking fund depreciation factor. ~. -.-~-- BASIS OF CHARGE IRVINE -RIVERSIDE JOINT USE OF FACILITIES STUDY June 17, 1969 PER MGD AVERAGE FLOW -WASTEWATER (Purchase of Capacity Rights) Construction Cost (Primary Treatment) $313, 740 Land 10,000 Charge for Unused Capacity* 62,500 $386,240 SAY $385, 000/MGD Average Flow 232, 000/MGD Peak Flow ** 149, 000/CFS Peak Flow ** Operation and maintenance of the facilities would be a charge in addition to the above. In a schedule such as that set forth abov~ the recovery of money required to replace the original facility could be by obtaining l /30 of the construction cost each year ($10, 458/yr. I MGD updated to the current E. N. R. cost index.) * Determination from accompanying plate and based on "fair share" of cost for facilities which are constructed but not yet operating at their design capacity. **Based on peak to average flow of 1. 66 to 1. ~(-22-b9 ( COUNTY SANITAT~{~ DISTRICT NO. 2 ( Preliminary PROJECTED AD VALOREM TAX FUNDS AIL.ABLE FOR CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS :i> FISCAL YEARS 1969/70 through 1973/74 q I CD Total 5-Year ::s 1973-74 0.. 1969-70 1970-71 1971-72 1972-73 Period Pl H Projected Assessed Valuation & + 8.0% + 8.0% . + 8.b% + 8.0% + 8.0% c+ (I) Estimated Annual Increase, allowing 3 for a 5% Delinquency Factor $758,416,000. $819,089,000. $884,616,000. $955,386,ooo. $1,031,816,000. ~ Tax Rate per $100 of AoVo $ .4263 $ .4263 $ .4263 $ .4263 $ .4263 Projected Amount Available from Ad Valorem Taxes* $ 3,233,000. $ 3,492,000. $ 3,771,000. $ 4,073,000. $ 4,399,000. $18,968,000. Preliminary Estimate of Unencumbered Carry-Over & Facilities Extension Reserve Funds from 1968-69 ~ 2.z4012000. ~ 2.24012000. Total Funds Available $ 5.z634 2 000. $ 3.z422.z000. ~ 3.z771.zOOO. ~ 4.z07~.zOOO. ~ 4.!322.zOOO. ~21.2369.2000. Less: Operating Tax Levy $ 552,000. $ 597,000. $ 657,000. $ 723,000. $ 795,000. $ 3,324,ooo. Bond Retirement Tax Levy 626,000. 606,000. 584,ooo. 562,000. 540,000. 2,918,000. District Facilities Construction 1969-70 Tax Levy 150,000. 150,000. Joint Treatment & Disposal Facilities Expansion & Equity 1,280,000. 1,280,000. 1,280,000. 1,280,000. . 6, 712, 000. Purchase or Sale (Net) Tax Levy 1,592,000. Sub-Total $ 2,920,000. $ 2.2483 2 000. $ 2,521.zOOO. $ 2,565.zOOO. $ 2.z 615·, 000. $13,104,ooo. Unencumbered Funds Available for District Construction .. Program $ 2 2 714.zOOO.: $ l.z002.z000. ~ l.z250.z000. ~ l.z508 2 000. ~ l.z784.zOOO. ~ 8.z265.zOOO. 1$1 Projected Construction Program m Expenditures Excerpted from Joint c+ $13.z407.2000"tf'* 1~. Use Feasibility Report I~ Additional Financing Required $ 5.2142.zOOO"tE'* lf\) * One cent added to the tax rate woutd raise an additional: 75,842. $ 81,910. $ . 88,462. $ 95,539. $ 103,182 • ** Does not consider participation by Riverside County COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE. P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 July 3, 1969 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 Gentlemen: A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, July 9, 1969 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjournments prior to the next regular meeting: District No. 2 -7: 30 p .m., July 23rd Executive Committee -5:30 p.m., July 29th TELEPHONES: AREA CDDE ?14 540-2910 962-2411 7 .·-... llOARDS OF DIRECTORS \~ · &Je-:.t County San itation Districts /,, .A~ : /"2-A., •. : u P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fountain Valley, Ca li f., 92708 of Oran ge Co unt y, Ca liforni a r v"« ,,. ~~ !'J v-Q,;""'" JOIN1-BOARDS II AGENDA July 9, 19 69 -7 :30 p .m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (A) Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpt from the Ci ty of Santa Ana showing appointment of Wade Herrin as Director on Districts 2 and 3 , and Lorin Griset on Districts 1 and 7 , and alternates for each (3) ALL DISTRICTS Appointme nts of Chairmen pro tern (4) DIS TRICT 1 Con siderat i on of mo tion approving minutes o f the adjourned regular meeting held June 2 4 , 19 69 , and the regular meet i ng held June 11, 1969 , as mai l ed. (5) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion app r oving minutes of the regular meeting held June 11, 1969 , as mailed . (6 ) DISTRICT 3 Consid e ration of motion approving mi nutes of the regular meeting held J une 11, 1969 , as mailed. (7 ) DIS TRICT 5 --COnsidera tion of motion approving mi nutes of the regular me eting held June 11, 1969 , as mail ed . (8 ) DISTRICT 6 (9) (1 0 ) (1 1 ) (12) (13) (15) Consideration of motion approving minutes o f the regular meeting h e ld June 11, 1969, as mailed . DIS TRICT 7 Con s ide r at ion of motion approving minute s o f t he adjourne d regular me eting he l d June 24, 1969, and the reg ular meeting held June 11, 19 69 , as ma iled. DIST RICT 8 Cons ide ra tio n of motj.on a ppro ving mi nu tes o f t he reg ul a r meeting held April 9 , 196 9 , as ma ile d . DI STRICT 11 Conslde rati cn o f mo tj.on approving mi n u tes o f t he reg ular mee t i ng h e l d June 11, 1969 , ~s ma iled . ALL DIS'rR I CTS Rep 01:-t o f the J o :i..nt Cha irma n ALL DI S'l1FUC TS Rep o r t 0 1" the Ge;ne ral ~Ta n a g e r ALL DISTRICTS Re p ort or the Gcne~a l Co u nse l ALL DISTRIC'l"S --"ReCC:ifi1i tJ on -of' !\pprar t-:i. r;es who ha ·1c con1p1cter1 the presc.cibed two yenr· c::urse rif slud.v . I ··~ (16) (17) ·ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee, and conside ratio n of mo tio n to receive and file the written report (c op y in me et i n g folder) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of mo t i on to recei v e and file bid tab ula tion and recommenda tions, and awarding purcha se of the following equipment : Two, 4 -D oor Passenge r Sedans Specification No . A-0 40 $ 4,108.46 See page 11F 11 ------ (18) ALL DISTRI CTS ~ ·-" f' Consid e r ation o f Reso l u tion No . 69-54, t o receive and file bid r 0 f> . tabulation and r e comm e n d ation, and a warding contract for J '' Job No . I-4 -2 B (Diges t e r Ga s Compress or) t o Ga s Pr oce sso r s , I n c . 1" n,..{lf°' in the tota l a mo unt of $20 ,882 .40 See page s ·11 a" L.P and 11H " · ff ) ti fl (20) (21) (22) ALL DISTR I CT S Consid e ration of motion accepting propo s a l of Cha r l es T. Mi tchell to acc om pl i s h eco l ogica l s u r veys o f oc ean outfall di s c ha r ge are a as r e qu i red by the Re g i onar-wat e r Q.ual i t v Cont r o l Board . See page "I" ----- ALL DISTR I CTS Cons ider ation o f motion approvi ng Change Ord e r No . 1, J ob No . I-7-2 (Pl ant No . 1 Bypass Facil iti es at Plant No . 1 ), g r anti ng an e x tension of time of 1 20 days due to high g r ound water . See p age "S" ALL DI S'l1RICTS Cons ideration of motion approvi ng Change Orde r No . 3, Jo b No . P-2-8-3 (En c losure s _ -Phase I I and Operator 's Bu i lding), granti ng an additi on o f $581.4 0 to the c ontrac t with W. J . Burke Constru ct i on Comp a ny. See p age ----~ ALL DI STRICTS Cons i d eration o f motio n app r ovi ng Change Order No . 4 , J o b No . P2-8 -3 , (Enc l osures -Phase II and Operator 's Bu ilding ), gran ting an extens i on o f t i me o f 39 days to W. J . Bu r ke Construction Com pany , due t o f a ct that bui l ding sites were not avai l able to contractor on contract date . See page "L" (23) ALL DISTRICTS Co n s id eration of mot i o n to r ece ive a nd file letter f rom Lomar Corporation , da te d J une 16 , 1 969 , re l ative to an error made in the bid on Digester No , 8 at Pl ant No . 1, J ob No . Pl-14 , na~ing Ra ndall EJ.ectric as the e l ectrica l subcontractor ins tead of Irvi n e El ectric , Inc .; and , Con sideration of motion to appro v e chan8c in ori ginal bid of Lc5mar Corporation to record e l ect ric a l subcontractor as : Irvine Electric , I nc ., 605-F Alton St ., Santa An a , Ca lif . 92705 (714) 546-8880 . S ee p age 11 M11 (2 4) AL L DI STRICTS Consideration of mot i o n to r eceiv e and fil e General Manager 's c e r tification tha t h e h as checked all b ills appea r ing on the a genda, found the m to b~ in order , a nd that he recommends a u t h - orization for paym e nt -2- . ? ··~5) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrants for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A" , "B" , and "c" (26) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any {27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (28) DISTRICT l Other business and communications {A) Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Monarch Investment Company, dated July 1, 1969, relative to a 20-foot easement over the northerly portion of Tract No. 5451; and referring said letter to the General Counsel for study and recommendation. See page "U" (29) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (30) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1, Contract No. 5-16, {Reconstruction of the Lido Pump Station), autporizing an addition of $950.83 to the contract with B & M Excavating due to increase in the size of the temporary bypass piping from 8" to 12". See page "N" (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E" See DISTRICT 6 Other business and communicatio~s, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion approving 1969-70 fiscal year budget. See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated June 26, 1969, from Wright, Finley and Behrens, attorneys for Barnett & Thomas Contractors, Inc., claiming damages on b~half of their . client in the amount of $23,043.92, as a result of costs incurred on repairs of 24" sewer line in the City of Huntington Beach; and denying said claim and ordering the matter referred to the Districts' General Counsel to take appropriate action to collect expenses incurred by the District as a result of damage to the District's 24" trllllk sewer. See page "P" -3- (41) DISTRICT 11 Cons i deration of motion approving warrants , if any . See page "E" (42) DISTRICT 11 Cther business and coITLmunications, if any (43) DISTRICT 11 Co nsideration of motion to adjourn (44) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Reso l ution No. 69 -53 -2, authorizing acceptance of easement from BUTLER -HARBOUR CONSTRUCTION CO ., relative to the Olive Sub -Trunk , Taft Branch, Contract No . 2 -6 , at no cost to the District. See page "Q 11 (45) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approvi ng Change Order No . 1 to Contract No. 2 -10-9, (Euclid Trunk Sewer ), authorizing an addition of $200 .00 to the contract with Charl es L. Burch & Sons , Inc ., Cont r actor . See page "R" (46) DISTRICT 2 Considerat i on of motion to receive and file "Feasibility Report for a Joint Outfall Sewer Project with the Riverside Flood Control and Water Conservat ion Di strict" dated July, 1 969, and take the report under submission for study . (Copy in meeting folder) (47) DISTRICT 2 Consi derat ion of motion approving warrants , if any . See p age 11 D" (48) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (49) DISTRICT 2 (50) Considera tion of motion to adjourn to 7:30 p .m., J uly 23rd DISTRICT 3 Review by engineers of proposed facilities in the Seal Beach , Los Alamitos , Westminster area (51) DI STRICT 3 (52) (53) (54) Consideration of mot ion approving wa r rant s, if any . See page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other bus iness and communic a tions, i f any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of moti on t o ad j ourn DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to direct Pacific Investments · to proceed with design and construction of the Master Plan Subtrunk Se1·rer, rlLnning northerly l'rom Sunflower Avenue generally along the alignment of the F -2 Flood Control Chann e l, northerly to the vicinity of Ma cArthur Blvd ., in con - junction with Pacific Investment's development which is requiring this facility; and , FURTHER MOVED.: That the Gene ral Man age r be directed to advi se Pacific Investments that upon completion of the construction of the aforementi·oned Master Plan Subtrunk Sewer, the District wilJ. re imburse the deve~oper from fun ds r eceived fr om the city of Santa An a as per the city 's lette r dated May 7 , 1969 . • J • ' • (55) (58 ) ( 5 9) ( 60 ) DISTRICT 7 Considerat ion of Resolution No . 69 -56 -7, authorizing execution o f appl i cation to the Department of Health, Education, and We l fare for a permanent easement for sewer trunk lines and f orce mains from Navy Way Pump Station to Red Hill Avenue . DISTRICT 7 Con sideration of Reso l ution No . 69 -55 -7 , ordering annexation of territory to the District (Daniger Annexat i on No . 21 - 6 .27 ac r es).· See page "S" DI STRICT 7 Consideration of Resolut i on No . 69-57-7, authorizing acceptance o f an easement, at no cost to the District, from Frank M. Ho lliday and Doris W. Ho lliday . See page "T" DISTRICT 7 Con sideration of motion approvi ng wa r rants , i f any . See p age "E " DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications , if any DI STRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -5 - ~l d z: e ~ «I "'C c: ~ VIEST:Sl&>c Ret.IC-F TRt.llJI~ COJJTl?4CI .3·11 (51 11 R..:.P.) ...__ ... _ ) _," .. , •. ,..,, P.'l""'G- COUNIY SAA.JI 14 //OA./ DIS'TRIC7 AIO. 3 M4S'TC:I.? Pt.4AI Tl?Ul\J/.1' St!itt't/~R F4Cll..171€S /9G9-70 CONSrt?ucr10N Pl?OGl?A/c/J a:j ........... L' • hE1>w...::ft" ~· ~ J,....... __ --g I .... ..........._ .-"~.-r-- .1: 1 ~c.___, 1 · • r:•••lCv~C r--"'""': .,.. ----·-.:-~~--~···-...1...JAT.ELLA__ ._!:~J.=--J ___ : CONTl?.dCT .fl-le (St? Me$0) l ) ORM:< CHf~ LAMF 6961 '6 .A1nr SiliN~ooa DNiiliHOdc:IllS <INv SNOiilifi~OS~H -A' WARRANT NO. 11387 11388 11389 "-' 11390 11391 11392 11393 11394 11395 11396 11397 11398 11399 11400 11401 11402 11403 11404 11405 11406 11407 11408 11409 11410 11411. 11412 11413 11414 ~11415 11416 11417 11418 11419 11420 11421 11422 11423 11424 11425 11426 11427 11428 11429 11430 11431 11432 11433 11434 11435 11436 11437 11438 11439 ~11440 11441 11442 11443 11444 11445 11446 11447 JOINT OPERATING FUND WPRRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Tool Rebuilders, Inc., Tool Repair Accurate Systems, Inc., Polyurethane Aladdin Lithe & Art, Pump Station Check Forms Allied Pump Industries, Inc., Pump Parts Advance Electric, Pump Repair Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chemicals City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Packing Ap~o Supply, Furnace Supplies Armco Steel, Pipe for Euclid Repairs (MO 5/14/69) As~ociated Concrete Products, Manhole Sections Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Larry J. Baran, Employee Mileage · $ Barney's Hole Digging Serv., Euclid Dewatering Wells Bassett Office Furniture, Drafting Table Base Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Pump Parts Bell's Radiator Service, Truck Repair Blake, Moffitt & Towne Paper, Maintenance Supplies Blower Paper Co., Maintenance Supplies Bomar Magneto Serv., Inc., Magneto Repair Brian Chuchua's Jeep, New Vehicle (MO 3/12/69) Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies Business Forms Press, Inc., Accounting Forms Business Publishers, Inc., Technical Journal John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Certified Building Materials Co., Building Supp. City Wide Airconditioning, Air. Cond. Repair Coast Insurance Agency, Liability Insurance Prem. College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Hardware Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental Emsco Co., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts Costa Mesa Co. Water Dist., Water Daily Pilot, ·Bid Notice Daniels Tire Service, Tractor Reoair John M. Deck Co., Small Equipment Parts Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repair Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Small Equipment Repair Dunton Ford, Truck Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Engineers Sales-Service Co., Pump Parts Fairfax Electronics, Inc., Electrical Supplies Flair Drafting Service, Drafting Service Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Legal Ad · Freeway Machine & Welding, Pump Repair General Electric Supply Co., Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. George T. Hall Co., Inc., Boiler Parts Georgia Pacific Corp., Chlorine Golden West Fertilizer Co., Grit Disposal Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Electrical Supplies Groom's Asphalt, Pavement Repair Dist. #7 Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Serv. Fred A. Harper, Various Mtg. & C.O.D. Expenses Harris Conveyor & Rentals, Conveyor Rental L. Heitman Equipment Co., Backhoe Rental -Euclid Hertz Equipment Rental · James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Howard Supply Cq., Small Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water -A- AMOUNT 58.28 ~9.40 38.85 987.47 118.56 1,092.00 90 •. 78 42.63 12.64 . 7,005.35 320.26 _72. 62 36.30 257.50 18.38 95.21 193.06 ·22.31 69.02 289.17 2,522.17 80.42 325.19 18.oo 2,165.43 36.75 37.60 1,850.00 191.41 56.28 63.45 190.71 6.00 4.84 45.00 23.59 215.78 110.35 58.07 3,870.00 226.80 50.80 560.00 16.10 23.10 228.64 1,131.23 84.59 16,454.55 864.oo 48.31 1,068.09 95.00 425 .• 00 49.79 471.60 1,391.00 61.31 12.60 316.88 7.30 WARRANT NO. 11448 11449 11450 11451 11452 ~ 11453 11454 11455 11456 11457 11458 11459 11460 11461 11462 11463 11464 11465 11466 11467 11468 11469 11470 11471 11472 11473 11474 11475 11476 11477 ~11478 11479 11480 11481 11482 11483 11484 11485 11486 11487 11488 11489 11490 11491 11492 11493 11494 11495 11496 11497 11498 11499 11500 11501 11502 ~11503 11504 11505 11506 11507 11508 11509 11510 11'511 IN FAVOR OF Ingersoll Rand, Compressor Parts International Harvester Co., Truck Parts Keenan Pipe & Supply co., Pipe King Bearing, Inc., Bearings & Pump Parts Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware Herbert H. Kyzer, Employee Mileage LBWS, Inc., Welding Equipment L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Truck Parts H. J. Lorenz Co., Emergency Pipe (MO 5/14/69) Los Angeles Chemical Co., Odor Control Chemicals Mccalla Bros., Pump Packing R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Building Supplies McCoy Motor Co., Tractor Parts Jack Edward McKee, Consultant Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Marden-Susco, Valves Matheson Scientific of L.A., Lab Supplies Metermaster Inc., Meter Repair Milam's Electric Motor Serv., Motor Rewind Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Fire Exting. Refill Nate's Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Saw Sharpening National Chemsearch Corp., Odor Control Chemicals National Concrete Sawing, Inc., Cored Drilling City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer Co. of Orange Auditor-Controller, Juv. Work Pgm. Or. Co. Radiotelephone Service, Inc. o. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware Orahge County Water District, Water Replenishment Pacific Telephone Postmaster, Postage Postmaster, PO Box Rental Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Register, Bid Notice Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Plate Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Repair Rucker Products, Incinerator Parts Santa Ana Book Store, Inc., Repair Manual Scranton Publishing Co., Technical Journal Sub. Shell Oil Co., Gasoline Signal Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental Smith Bros. Co., Electric Equip. (MO 5/14/69) Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts The C. D. Spracher Co., Inc., Controls $ AMOUNT 360.67 258.66 86.54 165. 28 "590.31 98.47 25.30 1,917.45 850.64 11.90 75.39 . 6,191. 95 119.70 26.46 105.00 22.89 450.00 344.98 70.35 1,542.65 34.56 139-50 26.25 8.10 1,423.54 325.00 229.48 700.00 400.00 294.oo 15.03 Tax 172.80 213.90 150.00 24.oo 37.50 156.18 201.54 181.83 132.21 12.60 10.00 918.88 21.88 2,634.24 12,321.52 56.69 367. 24 105.12 125.92 Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Engine Oil, Diesel Fuel John W. Stang Corp., Euclid Dewatering 14.18 448.50 1,785.00 69.00 77.97 14,042.74 Star-Lite Electronic Co., Barricade Rental State Board of Equalization, 68-69 Sales Tax State Compensation Ins. Fund, Comp. Ins. Prem. Gary G. Streed, Employee Mileage Sully~Miller Contracting Co., Asphalt Sweco, Inc., Dewatering Equip. Supplies T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Tractor Parts Taylor-Dunn Mfg. Co., Electric Truck C. o. Tpompson Petroleum Co., Cleaning Supplies Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Locks & Keys Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Incinerator Parts -B- 32.20 30.41 249.90 90.68 1,526.70 86.94 18.80 95.53 WARRANT NO. 11512 11513 11514 11515 11516 ~11517 . 11518 11519 11520 11521 11522 11523 11524 11525 11526 I.._) . 11527 IN FAVOR OF Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline Utilities Supply Co., Lawn Sweeper Parts Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Chlor. Parts John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant D. L. Warwick, M.D., Employment Exams Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete Xerox Corp., Reproduction Service ( 2 Mos.) TOTAL JOINT OPERATING CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF $ AMOUNT 7.05 17.33 69.30 211.40 43.00 183.75 956.61 $ 101,118.61 William P. Ficker, A.I.A., Plt.l Ind. Bldg Study $ w. J. Burke Const. Co., Contractor P2-8-3 654.50 43,609.59 8,337.89 45,164.70 7,645.05 386,553.60 4.50 23,086.79 John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv., Plant Const. J. E. Hoagland & W. W. Hoagland, Cont. P2-14 w. w. Hoagland, Contractor I-7-2 Peter Kiewit, Contractor J-10 Twining Laboratories, Cont. I-7-1 Paul Vukich, Contractor I-7-1 & P2-13 TOTAL CAPITAL OtrrLAY REVOLVING OCEAN OUTFALL #2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Testing J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS -c- $ 515,056.62 $ 2,095.00 $ 2,095.00 $ 618,270.23 WARRANT NO. 11528 ~ J-529 ~530 11531 11532 \,,,,,/ 11533 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Compaction Tests 2-10-9 Boyle Engineering, Engr. Services 2-10-9 Meriwether Investment Co., Inc., Assignee of Charles L. Burch & Sons, Contractor 2-10-9 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Services Manhole Repairs ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, 3-13 & 3-14 Engr. Services 3-11, 3-12, DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B & M Excavating, Inc., Contractor 5-16 -n- AMOUNT $ 361. 79 1,312.50 17,967.60 $ 19,641.89 73.88 73.88 $ l0,890.75 $ 10,890.75 $ l0,964.63 $ 5,399.40 $ 5,399.40 WARRANT NO!.. 11534 ~535 11536 11537 11538 11539 11540 11541 11542 ·DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. -Annexations and A.D. #8 Southern California Edison Co., Utility Pole Rental ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Service 7-2R FIXED OBI.JIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Anaheim, Distribute 68-69 Oil Royalty City of Fullerton, Distribute 68-69 Oil Royalty City of Orange, Distribute 68-69 Oil Royalty City of Santa Ana, Distribute 68-69 Oil Royalty FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. -Survey-Design 7-4-2A Keith and Associates, Engr. Serv. 7-2D-P -E- $ AMOUNT -352.76 13.00 $ 8,413.50 $ 8,413.50 $ $ 121~. 72 124,71 124.72 124.72 498.87 $ 2,556.00 1,537.50 $ 4,093,50 $ 13,371. 63 . •' BI n·· Contract for: TWO, 4-DOOR PASSENGER SEDANS SPECIFICATIONNO. A-040 BIDDER 1. Toro.my Ayres Chevrolet 350 Broadway .2. La~a Beach, California .. Bea.ch City Dodge 16555 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach, Calif. .. TA~ULATION Date: June 25, 1969 TOTAL BID $-s,008.06 Sal~s tax . 250.40 Subtotal-----5,258.46 Less Trade-Ins: 1965 Plymouth, 4-door Sedan 550.00 1966 Ford Falcon, 4-door Sedan 600.00 Total Deduct-----~,150.00 TOTAL ADJUSTED BID----j4,108.46 $ 5,666.70 Sales tax 283.34 Subtotal-----5,951.04 Less Trade-Ins: 1965 Plymouth, 4-door Sedan 550.00 1966 Ford Falcon, 4-door Sedan 600.00 . Total Deduct-----1,150.00 TOTAL ADJUSTED BID----$4,801.04 ' * * * * *·* * * * * * * It is reconunended that a·ward be made to Tom,11y Ayres Chevrolet, 350 Broadway, Laguna Beach, California, the lowest and best bidder. Agenda Item #17 -F- J. Wayne Sylvester Director of Finance All Districts RESOLUTION NOo 69~54 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR. JOB NO. I-4-2B TO dAs PROCESSORS, INC. A RESOLUTION OF THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF.ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE OF DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR, JOB NO. I-4-2B . ·--. ·-· -·· -. .............._ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.·l, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND.ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the Deputy Chief Engineer, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Gas Processors, Inc., for DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSOR, JOB NOo I-4-2B, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-4-2B, be awarded to Gas ProceEis.ors·; Irie·., in the total amount of $20,882040 in accordance with terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specificatio~s and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. PASSED AND .ADOPTED at a regular meeting held July 9, 1969. Agenda Item #18 -G-All Districts \._,,/ B I D Contract For: Digester Gas I-4-2B BIDDER 1. Gas Processors, Inc. 404 North Berry Street Brea, California 92621 T A B U L A. T SHEET Compressor 2. American Compressor Company 11850 E. Florence Avenue Santa Fe Springs, California 90670 3. Ingersoll Rand Co. ·5533 Ea.st Olympic Blvd. Los Angeles, California 90022 4. Osterbauer Compressor Service 5041 South Santa Fe Avenue Los Angeles, California 90058 6. 7. 8. 10. Agenda Item #18 -H- I 0 N Date: July 7. 1969 TOTAL BID $ 19,888.oo 994.40 Sales Tax $ 20,882.40 $ 22,148.oo 1,107.40 Sales Tax $ 23,255.40 NO BID NO BID All Districts ·. 6/27/69 . Charles T. Mitchell Kerckhoff Marine Lab 101 Dahlia St. Corona del Mar, California 92625 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. Oo Box 81°27 10844 Ellis Ave. Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Attention: Subject:. Gentlemen: Hr. Fred Ao Harper, General Manager Proposal For Services-Biological Survey For Ocean Outfall No. 2 In response to your request I am pleased to submit this proposal for subject services. ~!r. Einar Anderson and the undersigned will be the principals in this venture. Short personal resumes are attached: A. Benthic trawls will be taken quarterly at stations T-1 through T-6 with equipment and techniques similar to that of Carlisle (1969), exceptine minor raodifications outli:ied in Exhibit 11·..a.m Resolution 59-5 (3-68) of the Santa Ana Regional Water ~uality Control Board. It is understood that the County Sanitation Districts will make available the trawl net and a suitable towing vessel. B. Sediment samples taken annually et Stations T-1 to T-6 with an orange. peel grab or similar device will be sifted through a 0~5 mm mesh screen and preserved for future identification. The County Sanitation Districts will supply a suitable grab and associated equipment. Co Diving surveys of the benthic biota will be conducted &mually at stations D-1 to D-4o The identification and enumeration of organisms, physical characters of the water and bottom conditions will follow those reported by Turner (1966). The artificial reef on which station D-1 is located is unmarked by a buoy, in the interests of saving both time a.nd funds . it is adirisable th~tt personnel of the County Sa.ni tat ion Districts locate this st;:i.tion. Do Laboratory analysis, evaluation and write upo This will require approxir:ic.cely 5 hours work for everJ hour spent in the fl~ld actively collecting. Q,u.a.rterly reporta will be submitted in single copies to the Co~'"lty S:.nit~t)..on District. Invoices for mc.ttcrials or services rend~red will also be submitted for payment quarterly. Stenographic services will be included in our hourly or daily fee. Agenda Item #19 I-1 All Districts ~ \._I ~' 0 EG A representative of the County Sanitation District will be trained in the more routine tasks such as trawling and the use of bottom grabs. Laboratory training will include methods of sorting and species identification of the most col!Iillon species. F. A fee of $2500.00 for outside consultants is included in our estlmated cost to assist in the identification of some of the more difficult carine invertebrate groups, such as polychaete worms and benthic amphipods. Individuals familiar with groups can often identify organisms to species with considerable savings .in time and money • .Although the fee is listed here1 it may be more advantageous for County Sanitation Districts to contract directly with the outside consultantso We will not directly employ such outside consultants without further author- ization. We·are enclosing a schedule of our fees for these services and a total estimated cost of this work. Charges will be invoiced on an hourly basis for work during any one day when time actually spen~ is less than eight hours. Agenda Item #19 ~~~~~ Charles T. ~...itchell Biological Diving Consultant I-2 All Districts ,--. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE ·COUNTY P. o; BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ____ l..__ __________ _ CONTRACTOR: W. W. Hoagland DATE : __ J_u_..1Y_3"""'~-19.._6-:;9,__ JOB: Plant No. 1 Bypass Facilities at Plant No. 2~ Job ·No·. I-7-2 Amount of this change order. (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ none I...,) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from· ·the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters of June 11, 1969 and Sanitation Districts' le~ter of June 13, 1969. EXTENSION OF CONTRACT TIME: DAYS Because of the extended period of river run~off, t~e ground water surface elevation was extr~mely high causing a dangerous situation and a delay in the project stating date to June 13, 1969, which is a delay of 120 calendar days. 120 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Contract date: Original Contract Time: . Original Contract Comp.~etion Date: Revised Contract Time: February 13, 1969 180 calendar days August 12, 1969 300 calendar days December 10, 1969 Revised Contract Completion Date: Board authorization date: '-""July 9, 1969 Agen~a Item #20 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change {ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Approved: $ 121,350.00 $ __ n_o_n_e ___ _ $ none ---- $ 121,350.00 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer W. w. Hoagland By ------------------------------- -J-All Districts CONTRACTOR: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.Oo Box 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Val1ey, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CoOo NO. 3 --.--;=------------ WoJo Burke Construction Company DATE: July 9, 1969 \..,.)JOB: Enclosures -Phase II and Operator's Building; Job No. P 2-8-3 Amount of this change order (ADD) (EXJ[H'«T) $ 581.40 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby appr·oved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated May 22, 1969, May 28, 1969, June 6, 1969 and June 23, 1969, County Sanitation Districts' letters dated May 22, 1969, June 10, 1969 and June 24~ 1969, and draw~ ings OB-9, Rev. 2, and FB-3A, "Alternate Panel Connection De- tail11. ADD: (a) (b) (c) The contractor shall enlarge the East corbel on the North facia of the Operator's Building· to match the other corbels on that facia. The contractor shall install extra clip angles at the joint of the roof decking and the wall panels at Foster Booster Station to provide diaphram action o~ the roof. · The contractor shall relocate six hatches on the Foster Booster Station roof to provide impr.oved crane access to the outfall pumping equipment. ·TOTAL ADD r No Change $ 71.40 $510.00 Original Contract Price $216,585.00 Prevo Autho Changes $ 1,242.40 This Change (ADD) $ 581040 Amended Contract Price $218,408.80 Board authorization date: Approved: July 9, 1969 Agenda Item #21 -K- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer W. J. BURKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By ______ ~--~~~------------- All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO • ___ 4 ____ _ CONTRACTOR: W. J. Burke Const. Co. DATE: July 9, 1969 JOB: Enclosures-Phase Il and Operators' Bui~ding, Job No. P2-8-3 Amourit of this change orde~ (ADD) (DEDUCT) . $ none ------ Y In accordance with contract provisions, the ·:rollowing changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. · REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of January 9, 1969 and Sanitation Dis~ricts' letter of February 4, 1969 Extension of Contract Time Days Since Compressor Building and Operators• Building sites were not available to the contractor on the contract date (January 2, 1969), the starting date was revised to February 10, 1969 which caused a delay of 39 calendar days 39 Contract date: Original contract time: Original completion date: Time extension, c.o. No. 1 January 2, 1969 190 calendar days . July 11, 1969 '...,/ Time extension, this change order Revised contract time: 3 calendar days 39 calendar days 232 calendar days August 22, 1969 Revised completion date: Board authorization date: "'-" July 9, 1969 Agenda Item #22 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 216,585.00 $ 1,823.80 This Change {ADD)(DEDUCT) . $ none Amended Contract Price $ 218,408.80 -L- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer W. J. BURKE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By ____ ~~--------~------------ All Districts· LOMAR CORPORATION County Sanitation District No. 1 Post Off ice Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Norm Trembley 700 flfTH STREET . HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIF. ~36-6535 June 16, 1969 Reference: Digester No. 8 at -Plant No. 1, Job No. Pl-14 Gentlemen: It has been brought to our attention that when submitting our bid on the above project we entered our electrical subcontractor as "Randall Electric, Santa Ana 11 • This was an error on our part -the listed name should have read Irvine Electric, Inc., Santa Ana. \.._./ Ir.vine Electric, Inc., 605-F Al ton Street, San ta Ana, submitted the low electrical sub bid to us on this project. The only other electrical sub- quote received prior to bid was from the firm of R. F. Randall, Inc., and w. M. West Co., P. o. Box 29, Huntington Beach. Randall and West's bid was somewhat h~gher, but apparently we transposed the name Randall with the Santa Ana address in lieu of Irvine. We regret any confusion caused by our error and formally request that our electrical subcontractor of record be listed as Irvine Electric, Inc., 605-F Alton St., Santa Ana, California 92705 (714) 546-8880. We have acquainted Mr. Bill West of R. F. Randall, Inc. and w. M. West co. of our error as detailed above, and he states that he understands the situation and that neither he nor his firm have any objection to the District clarifying the situation by naming Irvine Electric, Inc., as the ·electrical subcon~ractor of record as witnessed by his signature on the attachedo Very truly yours, LOMAR CORPORATION Lclft;r~'.'-;,, . • /.t ' • .._..~~~~~- I,e o A. F lu.Ji'S imon LAF:emp cc: R.F. Randell, Inc., & W.M. West Co~ Agenda Item #23 M-1 All Districts ~ "-1) '-....I ."• .. , .. • June 16, 1969 R. F. ~andall, Inc., and w. M. West Co., P. o. Box 29, Buntinqton Beach, California (714) 962-7514, has no objection to the naming of Irvine Electric, Inc., .605-F Alton Street, · Santa Ana, California as subcontractor to Lomar Corporation for the electrical work on the Digester No. 8 Plant No.l as bid May 21, 1969. R. F. RANDALL, INC. & W. Mo WEST CO. BY: 1.\.Jad\n,_Qy_.q)ei5\ Agenda Item #23 M-2 All Districts \._/ .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 ---------------- CONTRACTOR: B & M Excavating Inc. DATE: July 3, 1969 JOB: Reconstruction of the Lido.Pump Station, Contract.No. 5-16 Amourit of this change order (ADD) (~) $ . 950 .• 83 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compen~ation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of May 2, 1969. The contractor shall use 12-inch diameter pipe, fitting and flexible couplings for the temporary bypass system in lieu of the originally specified 8-inch diameter pipe. · , . (ADD) Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD) (DEPl~«~) Amended Contract Price .. .. $ __ 9......,.5 ___ 0_. 8 __ 3 __ $ 20"124.oo $ -0 - $ 950.83 $ 21,144.83 -· Board authorization date: ~ July 3, 1969 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chl.ef Engineer B & M Excavating Inc. By--------------------~--------- Agenda Item #30 -N-District No. 5 COUNTY Ss.\NITi .. \TIO~·J DISTRICT NO._a_ 7-3-69 ,. BUDGET RECOt:H ... 1ENOATIONS 1969/70 FISCAL YEAR FUND #8 OPERATING 1969/70 ESTIMATED ASSESSED Vf,LUATION $ 75, 268, 713. 1969/70 EST. A.V. ADJUSTED FO~ 5 %DEUNQ. $ 71, 505, 277.• 1969/70 EST. TAX RATE PER $100 OF A.V. $No Tax Rate ONE CENT IN TAX RAT~ WILL RAlsr; $No Tax Rate OFSCRIPTION OR ACCOUNT TITLE SALARIES AND WAGES Directors Compensation Engineers Attorneys Clerical TOTAL SALARIES AND WAGES MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION Share of· Joint Operating Directors Mileage Expense Funds Available July 1 Budgeted Requirements 68-69 Acutal Expenditures 68-69 Allowance for Accruals, Othe Income and Transfers APPROVED APPROVED BUDGET BUDGET 1967/68 1968/69 300 600 450 450 250 250 200 200 1,200 1,500 CARRY-O"VER (CASH & INVEST'S 6,193 5,568 ;: i::sr1r.~ATEO ; .. ·· ACTUAL. · ~~Pci·!Df TUREsl .... ' . 19G&/t)9 .:: I · · --i Interest & Misc. Receipts 94 130 -------.-----11·:·' TOTAL CASH & REVENUE 6,287 5,698 1--_;,..~ _ _._~~----1 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES -0--0- Agenda Item #37 -o- RECOMMENDED BUOGE.T 1969/70 500 450 250 200 1,400 4,982 130 5,112 -0- Distri t No. 8 CLAIM To: Mr.= Fred Harper, Secretary (a) (b) (c) , (d) and (e) Orange County Sanitation District No. 11 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Name of Claimant: Post Off ice Address of Claimant: Address to which any Notice is to be sent: BARNETT & THOMAS CONTRACTORS, INC. 13732 South Harbor Boulevard Garden Grove, California Barnett & Thomas Contractors, Inc. c/o Wright, Finley and Behrens Suite 200, 615 W. Eighth Street Santa Ana, California 92701 Circumstances of Occurrence: On or about February 11, 1969, claimant was contacted by persons in the Engineer- ing Department of the City of Huntington Beach, California, with regard to certain repairs required to a twenty-four inch (24") sewer line, said repairs related to damages alleged to have been caused by Co-Ordinated Developers, Inc·. while working on a project known as "Beach Parking Lot Improvements CC-081." Claimant was informed that said repairs were of an emergency nature and was re- quested to commence said repairs on February 11, 1969 and work around the clock until said repairs were com- pleted. On February 11, claimant received a letter of authorization from Co-Ordinated Developers, Inc. giving claimant notice to proceed to make said repairs. Assurances that payment for the work would be guaranteed were given to claimant by persons in the Engineering Department of the City of Huntington Beach. Claimant was informed that the exact extent and nature of the repairs were unknown and would be unknown until the site was excavated and, therefore, claimant was unable to give any firm estimate of the cost of the repairs. Claimant was instructed to proceed on a cost-plus basis. Claimant made the required repairs incurring costs for labor, material, equipment and rental equipment. During the course of making the repairs, it was discovered that the extent of the ~amage was greater than initially Agenda It·em # 40 P-1 District No. 11 (f) ...._; (£) anticipated. Claimant was informed by persons repre- senting Orange County· Sanitation District No. 11 that it was posslble that some of the damage may have been caused by the installation, maintenance or usage of the sewer line. · So far as is known to claimant, Orange County Sa~ita­ tion District No. 11 has not paid for the· benefits conferred upon it by reason of claimant's performance of required repairs. The reputed owner of the pipeline to which the repairs were made is Ora~ge County Sanitation District No. 11. From time to time during the course of the repairs, claimant received instructions and supervision as to the method and extent of repairs on the pipeline from persons representing the Orange County Sanitation District No. 11. · · Amount Claimed: $23,043.92. Basi.s of. Computation of Claim: See attached • DATE~-;~~A~~~~>-~--~;1.__,6~~~~' 1969. BARNETT & THOMAS CoNTRACTORS, _By~~~ INC. E~l4AS ~·. (Official Capacity) -2- Agenda Item #40 P-2 District No. 11 .. RESOLUTION NO. 69-53-2 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT . . A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI- TATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFoRNIA, . AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEl\mNT FROM BUTLER-HARBOUR CONSTRUCTION CO., A CORPORATION . The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated June 16, 1969, wherein BUTLER-HARBOUR CONSTRUCTION CO., a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 a permanent easement for sewer pu~poses in Lots 32,39,40, and 41 of Tract 6741, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described as follows: A 15 foot wide easement for sanitary sewer purposes originally and formerly located within the right of way lines of Lincoln Avenue, a public thoroughfare, and now through a portion of lots 32, 39, 40 and 41 of residential Tract 6741 situated in the Southeast Quarter of Section 17, Township 4 South, Range 9 West, S.B.B.M.> in the City of Orange, County of Orange, State of California described as follows: Beginning at a point on the centerline of Batavia Street distant thereon South 01° 19' 27" West 104.oo feet from the center- line intersection of Batavia Street and Lincoln Avenue; thence at right angles to said centerline of Batavia Street South 88° 40 1 33" East 40.00 feet to the easterly right of way line of said Batavia Street and the westerly boundary of said Tract 6741 and the True Point of Beginning; thence along said westerly line North 01° 19' 27" East 9.12 feet to a point on a tangent curve concave southeasterly having a radius of 27.00 feet and a central angle of 12° 34' 21"; thence northeasterly along said curve an arc length of 5.93 feet to a point on a non-tangent line, a radial through said point bears North 76° 06 1 12" West; thence leaving said westerly line South 88° 30' 57" East 145.55 feet through the northerly portion of lots 41 and 40 in said Tract 6741 to a point on a curve and the southerly right of way line of Lincoln Avenue, 100 feet wide, a radial through said point bears South 10° 09' 26 11 West; said curve being concave northeasterly having a radius of 2050.00 feet, said curve also being in the northerly boundaries of lots 40, 39 and 32 of said Tract 6741; thence easterly along said curve and said northerly boundaries an arc length of 124.20 feet and through a central angle of 3° 28 1 17" to a point, a radial through said point bears South 06° 41 1 09" West; thence leaving said curve and said boundaries North 88° 30' 57rr West 269.43 feet through the northerly portions of said lots 32,39,40 and 41 of said Tract 6741 to the True Point of Beginning. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Agenda Item # 44 Q,-1 District No. 2 • \.._) v ~ Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be .authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California • . PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting July 9, 1969. Agenda Item #44 Q-2 District No. 2· COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, qalifornia 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. 1 ---=------- CONTRACTOR:, Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. DATE: . July 9, 1969 JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-9 Amount o_f this change order (ADD) (inEXXKmQ $ . 200.00 ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the co~tract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated May 27, 1969 ADD · - Install 60-inch manhole not shown on original plans at approximate Engineer's Station 382+45.55. Partial payment for this work will be made on the basis of contract price per vertical foot of manhole under contract Item No. 4. Balance of compensation for removing and disposing of two 5-foot joints of pipe and for installing the required short sections at the manhole inlet and outlet. . . . * * * * * * * * * * * * * ADD $200.00 ~No addition.to contract time. by reason of this additional work requested or granted. Board authorization date: ~ July 9, 1969 Agenda Item #45 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 459,892.00 $ none This Change {ADD)~EEE~~ $ 200.00 $ 460,092.00 Amended Contract Price -R- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer CHARLES L. BURCH & SONS, INC. By __ ~--------~------~-------- District No. 2 .. RESOLUTION NO. 69-55-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Annexation No. 21) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "PROPOSED DANIGER ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 -(ANNEXATION NO. 21)" The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, be means of a petition filed with said Commission by the property owners; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed Daniger Annexation No. 21 to County Sanitation District No. 7", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached .hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, . Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is inhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service.to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $1,567.50 ($250 per acre) have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and, Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division l (District Reor- ganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code, Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOP.i'ED at a regular meeting on July 9, 1969. Agenda Item #56 -s-District No. 7 • RESOLUTION NO. 69-57-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,-OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM FRANK M. HOLLIDAY AND DORIS W. HOLLIDAY -------------------- The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated June 19, 1969, wherein Frank M. Holliday and Doris W. Holliday, husband and wife, as joint tenants, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached ~ hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, Cali·f ornia. PASSED AND ADOPI'ED at a regular meeting July 9, 1969. Agenda Item #57 -T-District _ _L \..,/ """' ~- MONARCH INVESTMENT COMPANY 8500 \Vilshire Bouleva:rd, Suite Sl4 . ~;t&b, ~""" /JIJ.211 Ju~y 1, 1969 Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gen. Mgr. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue, P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Re: Tract No. 5451 Dear Mr. Harper: . Tclepltone (213) 655-4151 and 652-8282 The above tract was developed by S. V. Hunsaker and Sons, Inc. (whose name has been changed to Monarch Investment Company) pursuant to a tract map filed on March 28, 1968. As a condition to granting approval to the tract map, the city of Santa Ana required the granting of a 20-foot easement over the northerly portion of the tract inunediately adjacent to an existing 20-foot easement previously granted to the County Sani- tation District No. 1 for the operation of a 36-inch trunk sewer line. This requirement imposed by the City of Santa Ana caused us to. redesign the originally,contemplated tract, reducing the number of Rl lots to be constructed from 12 to 10; required the installa-· tion of additional sidewalks and driveway approaches, street lighting changes, miscellaneous repair work, the construction of a block wall on the south side of the easement strip, various curb and gutter corrections and replacements, ~ewer laterals, etc., all at great cost to the developer. We have now received information to the effect that the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts have taken formal action to rescind their 1965 and 1966 actions authorizing the acquisition of said 20-foot easement strip. Subsequent to the construction of the lots on tract 5451, Hunsaker sold the 10 Rl lots to another party. The· result of the apparent ••recission'' as to the 20-foot easement leaves us in the unusual position of owning a 20-foot "easement strip", as to which no conceivable econo~ic use can be made. This, notwithstanding the fact that Hunsaker has always acteo in the utmost good faith with the officials of Orange County and now finds itself in the position of having incurred substantial expenses for ~ useless purpose. .....___ Agenda Item #28-A U-1 District No·~ 1 ·~ Page 2 We will appreciate your acknowledgement of this letter and prompt attention to the questions raised thereby. cc: Yours very truly, MONARCH_,.fN'VE STMENT COMPANY 112' ,ru;~ Lawrence E. Kagan, Mr. Fred A. Harper, Gen. Mgr. ~/ County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California . Mr. Paul Van Stevens, Planning Dir. Planning Department City of Santa Ana · Mr. Robert E. Thomas County Adminis~rative Officer Mr~ William Hirstein, Chairman Board of Supervisors Agenda Item #28-A U-2 ·. District No. 1 --·.