The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1969-04COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE. P.O. BOX 8127, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"CRNIA 92708 April 24, 1969 TELEPHONES: AREA CDDE 714 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY·SANITATION . . . . DISTRICT NO. 5 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on April g, 1969, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 will meet in an adjourned r~gular meeting: Tuesday, April 29, 1969 at 4:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ecreta y II BOARDS 01-' DmECTORS Coun ty Sanitat io n Di str icts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange Cou nt y, Cali fom i<J 10844 El l is Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca l if ., 92708 (1 ) (2 ) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) 0 1s·rRICT No . 5 AGE NDA Ap r il 29, 1969 -4 :30 p .m. Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of the Gene r al Manager Report of the General Counsel Consideration of r eport of Shu irman-Simpson, Engi neers , on proposed t r ansfe r of ownership of the Cameo Shores Pumping Station from the City of New~ort Beach to the District . (Copy of report enclosed) Conside ration of r equ est f r om the Irvine Industrial Complex f or withdrawal of territ ory from the District . See page "A 11 Consideration of motion to r ece i ve and f ile letter dated April 7, 1969 , from The Irvine Company , recommending that the Board of Di r ec tors initiate a study designed to update the District's Master Plan o f Sewerage Facilities . See page "B" Consideration of proposal of Shuirman -Simpson , Engineers, for updating the Di s tric t 's October, 1964 Sewerage System Study and Report . See page "c " Staff r eport on problems encountered in Recons truction of the Lido Pumping Station, Contract No . 5 -17 Other business and communications, if any Conside r ation of motion to adjourn -· . .._,; ·D IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 March 19, 1969 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 114 I a33-1010 2u I 62a-4204 Re: Area Bounded by Bison Road, Jamboree Blvd., Future Eastbluff Drive Extension and MacArthur Blvd. Dear Mr. Harper: We have investigated the feasibility of de-annexing the subject area from Sanitation District No. 5 and annexing it to Irvine Ranch Water District for the purpose of providing sewer service to the area. This course of action was suggested by the Board of Directors of District 5 at their meeting of February 25, 1969 and we find that it is feasible. Attached hereto is a letter from our attorney outlining the steps that should be followed to accomplish the detachment and annexation. Would you please submit this course of action to the Board of Directors for their approval at the earliest possible date. Upon approval, the Complex will proceed with the necessary steps to accomplish this detachment and annexation. Ray ond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer RWK/gw cc: Mr. Wm. Eppinger Mr. J. Devlin attachments Agenda Item 6 7 A-1 ,_. J • : I i I j !~ I ! !· I J ~- ·~ .. . . ... . ... . . . . . ·.· .. · .. ·. ' ·•.. . ... . . .. : : ·. . .· . ·. : March 11. 1969 . • .. . .. . . . . . ... . .. ...... · . ·:. . . . ·. •. . . · . . ·· .. .·•. .. ; .. .... .. c 9422 . •. .Mr. Ray W. Kiramey Irvine Industrial Complex P. O. Box 4404 .. · RECEIVED MAR 181969 i Irvine, California Re: Detachcent and Annexation of North Ford Area From County Sanitation District No. 5 to Irvine Ranch Water District · Dear Ray: The following is a short summary of the procedure which I believe should be followed in accomplishing detachment and annexation of tha North Ford area from County.Sanitation District ffoS to Irvine Ranch Watei:: District: . 1. If the datachm~nt and annexat lon a.re to be accompltshed in a single proceeding, it is neccss~ry to go before the Board of Supervisors, have an election, etc., i.nvolving great expense and· del.ny. Therefore, as we did in 1965, it ut.11 be castcst if we first dct~ch the area from Sunitation District ~Sand, when completed, anne:< the area to Irvine Ranch Water District. The proceedings are in essence identical and the following procedure would apply to both acttons. 2. Irvine Indust~ial Co~plc~ and The Irvine Company will file a petition with the Local Agency Forr.~tion Cocnission pur- suant to Govcrn~ent Code Section 56130. Because Irvine Industrial Comple~ and The Il-vinc Comp.:lny togcth2r own nll of the subject land, these signntures ~re sufficient to class the petition as a mandatory petition -Gov~rnnent Code Sections 55170 and 56130. . -. ' 3. Briefly, the petition will state what we are try~ng . to accomplish, includin6 a legal description of the nre~; anz special terms which arc to be imposed; c:i.nd the reasons for tLle action -Govern~cnt Code Scctio~ 56140. The only special Agenda Item 6 A-2 I .. ·: . ""-1) : ... .. Mr. Ray W. Kimmey Page Two )brch 11. 1969 .- .condition ~hich I believe should be imposed ls the exemption of the subject property from any liability for bonds of . Sanitat.ion District i~5 because, I. believe, District: 'JS bas not had any bond issu2 which includes the subject: lands.- Government Code Section 55470(c). The reason for the action will be simply tlult the area can be mo~e easily and economically served by Irvine F...:inch Water District. 4. Because all the land~1mers have signed the petition, the Local Agency Foro~tion Co~.misslon can approve the petition without notice or hearing, and can authorize the tvo districts to act l-7i thout notice or election -Government Code Section 56261. The Local Agency Forr~tion Cotm:Jission adopts a reso- lution directing the two districts to act -Government Code Section 56271. S. The two districts then adopt resolutions approving the action -Government Code Section 56310. 6. The districts file a ce~tificate of completion with the Secretary of State whereupon the change is compl~t~d Goverr~~nt Code Section 56451. ·. · . Please let me know when you want·me to proc~ed. .. Very truly yours, ...... ·.• . Hugh 3. Scallon HJS:cbd cc: Mr. ~ymond L. · Curr&J.n Agenda Item 6 A-3 ~ .. ·D IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE. CALIFORNIA 92664 April 22, 1969 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Sanitation District #5 P 0 Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Re: Proposed De-annexation of North Ford Area Dear Mr. Harper: 714/833-1010 2u I 620-4204 Enclosed are five copies each of the legal description and map delineating the proposed de-annexation. This de-annexation includes 174.84 acres with an assessed valuation of $237,060. In addition, there are 4.59 acres of easement to the Flood Control District for the San Diego Creek assessed at $580. ·If you need any further information regarding this matter, please do not hesitate to call. RWK/gw enclosures Agenda Item 6 A-4 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA q ~ ,.·. / , . .... Agenda Item 6 DISTRICT ·NO. 5 PRtJP(}SED OETA C !-lll/.C.iUT ~ PROPOSED JJREA OF iJE771CJ./M£).fT FRtJM C!.S.D.1t5 .1./ 2tt I G><t A-5 THE IRVINE COMPANY NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA• 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE• NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 • (714) 644·3011 April .7, 1969 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred Harper SANITATION DISTRICT #5 MASTER PLAN STUDY Gentlemen: In 1968, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation ~ District #5 indicated its desire to initiate a study designed to update the District's master plan of sewerage facilities, and requested information from The Irvine Company regarding its long-range planning on which to base the study. At that time, we advised the Board that we were currently updating our sewerage master plan for the entire Ranch and were also analysing our rates of planned development for specific areas. Additionally, the Irvine Ranch Water District was in the pro- cess of a master plan study of its sewerage facility needs. Each of these studies has now been completed. · The Irvine Company is presently capable of responding to the Boar~s earlier needs for updating of the District's master plan. We hereby str6ngly support the District in its desire to initiate a study to this effect. Upon initiation of the master plan study, we will be pleased to work closely with your engineering consultant to provide him with projected rates and locations of development as well as contemplated master plan facility needs which we can forsee. Agenda Item 7 B-1 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District ~fas Pa$e 2 April 7, 1969 The company specifically requests that the updated master plan study define the facilities and means by which the District intends to serve those Irvine lands currently lying within the District or contemplated to be served by the District in the future. We also wish to know the method proposed for financing of such facilities plus their phasing. We feel that all alternatives for service to these areas should be examined in the study. · We will look forward to working with Orange County Sanitation District #5 on its proposed master plan study and assur~ you of our full cooperation toward this effort. Very truly yours, ---·--·-· ~· / ~-d--/ (__c-6cCch c:-~>..,....,.e; «•:-.z........' ~rdon B. Jones.,,,/ \iwJ Director of Engineering Planning GBJ/pmc Agenda Item 7 B-2 ,- SHU J: R MAN -SJ: MPS 0 N / consulting civil engineers April 24" 1969 County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain V~lley, California Attention: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Man~ger In accordance with your request, we here:t>y submit this proposal for updating the District's October, 1964 Sewer~ge System ·study and Report. · A_ general updating of the entire report would be included, but most of the effort would be concentrated on the undeveloped areas easterly of Upper Newport Bay and within the . ultimate service boundary shown in the 1964 Report. Although all aspects of the previous Report would be reviewed, special· attention would be. given the followi~g items: 1. Updating population and sewerage flow projections based on the most recent information available ·from the City of Newport Beach Planning Department and the Irvine Company. · 2. Determination of the amount of development that can occur before major elements of the District's facilities reach capacity • . 3. Determination of the effects on the District's facilities of alternative sewering plans for the Coastal Region easterly of Cameo Shores, including the alternatives proposed in the Irvine Ranch Water District Sewerage Survey prepared by Brown and Caldwell. · · 4. Determination of the· amount of additional treatment capacity that will need to be purchased by the District to serve the undeveloped areas. 5. Investigation of the feasibility of construction of a trunk sewer from the Irvine Ranch Water District through the District to Plant No. 2 that~ would meet the requirements of the Water District and also provide an Upper Bay facility for the District. -1 -. URBANUS SQUARE MacARTHUR BLVD. AT FORD ROAD CORONA DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA 92625 (714) 644-0563 Agenda Item 8 C-1 -2 - 6. Comparison of projected revenue from the District's connection charge with the cost of constructi~g required facilities. 7. Preparation of a construction schedule for required facilities to meet the projected development. 8. Determination of the quantity of storm water infiltration that is occurring, and the effect on District facilities. Attempt to identify the major sources of infiltration and recommend means of eliminati~g. In order that the final report include all items of interest to the District, it is suggested that we make an oral progress report to the Board at the conclusion of the fact-gathering phase of the report. · · The exact scope of the work is subject to substantial variation and it is therefore requested that our fee be based on 2~ times direct labor cost. The direct labor rates applicable .to this work would be as .follows: Principal Project Engineers Designers· & Draftsmen Typist .. $10·. 00 per hour $6.00 to $8.00 per hour $4.00 to $6.00 per hour $3.00 per hour In addition to the above compensation for labor, costs of printing over and beyond that needed for the preparation of the report would be invoiced at cost. . Based on the above fee schedule, it is estimated that the cost of updating the report will not exceed $9,000. The work would be completed within 120 days after authorization to proceed. Thank you for the opportunity of submitti~g this proposal. SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON ~.d/~ Donald C. Simpson DCS:c Agenda Item 8 C-2 COUNTY SANITATION· DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 8127. FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 TELEPHONES: AREA CDDE 7.14 540-2910 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 Gentlemen: A regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be held: Wednesday evening, April 9, 1969 at 7:30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Tentative adjournments prior to the next regular meeting: District No. 5 -4:30 p.m., April 29th NOTE: 1. ThJs is the regular quarterl;y meeting for District No. 8. 2. At the staff's request, Chairman Speer is setting the Executi.ve Committee meeting for April 29th to allow more time for preparing budget material. II BOARDS OF Dl~ECTORS Cou nty Sanitati o n Di stricts of Ora nge Co unt y , Californiil DIST RICT No . 1 Sp e cial Meeting April 29, 1 969 -5 :30 p .m. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counse l P. 0. Bo)( 5175 10844 Elli:; Avenue Fo untain Val ley, Calif., 92708 AGE NDA (5) Consideration of resolut i on authoriz i ng execution of an application for Federal financial assistance under the Federal Disaster Rel i ef Act of 1966 , r elative to Ocean Outfall No . 2, Ma rine Section, Job No . J -1 0 . (6) Con s i de r ati on of motion to adjourn __ ,.._ -~· .. . ··~ ..... -~, THE IRVINE COMPANY NEWPORT FINANCIAL PLAZA • 550 NEWPORT CENTER DRIVE • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 • (714) 644·3011 April 7, 1969 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred Harper SANITATION DISTRICT #5 MASTER PLAN STUDY Gentlemen: In 1968, the Board of Directors of Orange County Sanitation District #5 indicated its desire to initiate a study designed to update the District's master plan of sewerage facilities, and requested infonnation from The Irvine Company regarding its long-range planning on which to base the study. At that time, we advised the Board that we were currently updating our sewerage master plan for the entire Ranch and were also analysing our rates of planned development for specific areas. Additionally, the Irvine Ranch Water District was in the pro- cess of a master plan study of its sewerage facility needs. Each of these studies has now been completed. The Irvine Company is presently capable of responding to the Boar~s earlier needs for updating of the District's master plan. We hereby strongly support the District in its desire to initiate a study to this effect. Upon initiation of the master plan study, we will be pleased to work closely with your engineering consultant to provide· him with projected rates and locations of development as well as contemplated master plan facility needs which we can forsee. Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District 115 Page 2 April 7, 1969 The company specifically requests that the updated master plan study define the facilities and means by which the District intends to serve those Irvine lands currently lying within the District or contemplated to be served by the District in the future. We also wish to know the method proposed for financing of such facilities plus their phasing. We feel that all alternatives for service to these areas should be examined in the study. We will look forward to working with Orange County Sanitation District #5 on its proposed master plan study and assure you of our full cooperation toward this effort. Very truly yours, ___ ··-_ /~ / ~:--~ / ·-~--::> ~~t.7cCo? c:.:-~~>-.----e-? '-'"~ C/' Gordon B. Jones . /;;;?,. Director of Engineering Planning GBJ/pmc COUNTY S ANITATION DISTRICTS of O RANGE C OUNTY , C A LI FORNIA P. 0 . BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 April 3, 1969 Conv ened: Adj o u rned : REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date : March 25 , 1969 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Directors present : Thorr.as O. Speer , Ch airman Thom a s McMichael Norm an E. Culver Lindsley Parsons Ellis N. Porter Clifton C. Miller J erry A. Matney Supv. Wm. Hirste in Directors absent : NONE Staff Me mbers present: Fred A. Harp e r Paul G. Brown John Sigler Others pres ent: Ed Wells H. Harv e y Hunt Walter Howard 5 :3 0 p.m . 8 :30 p .m. ********************** 1. Co nsideration of Industrial Waste Survey Dr aft Report as Prepared by Bartle Wells Associates . At the last meeting of t he Executive Committee, a pre limi nary draft of t he Bartle We lls Assoc i ates Report dated February , 1969, wa s distributed to the Committee members . At that time the staff I J was directed to prepare its comments re l ative to this report on i ndustrial waste charges . The staff f o r warded its written c omments to the Executive Committee , along with the Committee agenda , on March 21st . Mr. Ed We lls of Bartle Wells Associates was invited to t hi s Committee meeting and reviewed with the Committee his re - p o r t a n d the staff comments . Fo llowing. a l ength y discu ssion , Bartle Wells and the staff were directed to prepare an out l ine o f a proposed industrial waste charge ordinance for the Committee 's r eview. The Committee als o suggest ed that the Genera l Manager i nformally advise the Orange County Chamber of Commerce Water , Sanitation , Fl ood Control and Pollution Committee that the Distri cts are studying this matter and will ask the Committee t o r evi ew a d~aft ordinance i n the n ear future . 2. Ocean Outfall No . 2, Job No . J -10 -Fonnal Proposal by Contractor for Alternate Method of Construction between Stations 4+00 and 15+50 . The Committ ee considered a formal proposal from Peter Kiewit Sons ' Comp any , dated March 4th (copy attached), requesting per- m~ssion to change the method of construction of the surf section o f t h e ocean outfall . The letter states that if the a l ternate method is acceptable the Comp any will offer a $65,000 reduction in the contract price . · Mr . Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers submitted to the Committ ee a lette r dated March 21st (copy attached ) stating that "unl es s the Districts desire to go into some detailed analyses of the proposed alternate we (John Carollo En gineers) would recommend that the Di stricts r e j ect this proposal of Peter Kiewit Sons ' Company f or an alternat e method of c ons tructi on ." Mr . Hunt advised the Committ ee that upon receipt of the additional informa tion re - ferred to in the Contractor's letter of March 4th, the engineers would analyze it and be prepared to submit their findings t o the Joint Boards on April 9th . (Staff note : Mr . Harvey Hunt ha s informed us that the additiona l information from the Contractor was received in his office on March 31st .) I t is the r ecommendat i on of th e Executive Committee that the Boards accept the recommendation of John Carollo Engineers to re - ject the proposal of Pete r Kiewit Sons, dated March 4th , based on the informat ion available at this time . 3 . Apprentice II Program (1969 -70 Fiscal Year). The staff 's Training Committee has developed a recommended Apprentice II Program for apprentices who will be completing the two -year Apprentice I Program July 1 st . The attached material -2- details the Apprentice II Program for each of the departments . The Districts' Operations Engineer, John Sigler, pre sented the Training Committee's recomme ndations to the Executiv e Committee . It was the consensus of the members that the Districts' Apprentice Program has been extremely successful . Mr . Sigler noted that three of the original six apprentices will complete the Apprentice I Program July 1 st . · It is t he Committee's recommendation that the Boards adopt the Apprentice II Program as submitted . -3- ----...• -........ ' ... .. ·· ... .. ; -. PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO. CONTRACTOHS - F'OOT OF SOUTH 26TH STREET • . P. o. e ax 1 s 1 2 RICHMOND, CALIFORNIA 94802 PHONE 232•9477 March ·4, .1969 Orange ~aunty Sanitation District No. 1 P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, .California 9 2 7 0 8 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper Gentlemen: We wish to offer for your consideration a proposal for an alternate method of construction of the subject project. As shown on the accompanying drawing we propose to omit the ·permanent she~t piles,· ~s· detailed by the contract plans, from approximately Station 4+00 to Station 15+50 and substitute additional rock creating a mounded cross- section. · Our·proposed method of construction would be as follows: 1. Sheets, pipe and rock installed as.per plans and specifications on land section from Station 0+00 to approximately Station 4+00. 2. Temporary trestle installed from Station 0+00 to Station 20+00. 3. Temporar~ sheets installed from 4+00 to 15+50 with tips 10': below bottom of pipe grade. 4. Sand dike placed between sheets at Station 15+50 to minimize surge conditions while pipe and rock are . placed. '" 5. Excavate desired cross-section by means of a hy- draulic dredge. Orange County Sanitation District No. 1 March 4, 1969 P.~ge ·two . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .... 6. ~lace pipe, rock on undisturbed soil and sand backfill. 7. Remove temporary sheets and trestle. The ·construction method of both the designed section and the ·alternate proposal is similar. The.main difference between the ·two methods is that in the ·alternate proposal t:.he ·temporary shee·ts are placed 47' _apart, a greater quantity of rock is placed between these sheets and then the sheets are· removed. Protection to the existing 78" line 'during construction offered by the permanent' sheet piling is" replaced by the use of the temporary sheets in our proposed alternate method. We have been assured by our consulting engineers, the "firm of Earl & Wright, Consulting Engineers, San Francisco, . California, that our proposed method of construction will provide ·a sewer outfall eq~al in all respects to that con- structed in accordance with .the contract plans. Due to our gen·eral method of construction for this type of work, a savings would be reali.zed by using the ·alternate . method. If the alternate method is acceptable we would be pleased to offer a reduction on contract price of $65,QOO. · Your ·consideration is_ greatly appreciated. NLB:rb • I Very truly yours, jPE~ERf~~WIT SONS' CO. l\~)Lt~ N. L·. Barnes District Man~gei ---.. --------·-:·:--··· .... -:---·----------. ------·--... ·: .. ·:· : .. --.:·.:.:-:.-::-:-:-.:-_-:-.:-:-:-··· . _.,._... __ . . . -~~---. ... -----------J 01-J N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5---------- -~ Phoenix, Arizona laf ayette, Cafifornia El Paso, Texas JOHN A. CAROLLO• P.E. aoe~RT M. EIRE:R£TON. ,. .E. H. HARVEY HUNT, ii".£. HOWARD M. WAY. P.E •. llOB£RT G. WILLIAMS. P.E. CONALD R. PREISLER. P.E. March 21, 1969 ~= . Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts · of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley 1 California 92 7 08 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 Marine Section Reply to: 36SS MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94543 AREA C:OD~ 415 J-10 Below is a status report on PKS proposal for alternate method of construction. This, in general,, is what we will present Tuesday night. We have received the March 4, 1969, proposal for an alter- nate method of construction offered by the Contractor (Peter Kiewit Sons 1 Company) on the subject job. The Contractor is proposing to delete the permanent sheet piles from Stations 4+00 to 15+50 and to _place a wider section of rock .protection a!ound the pipe. We have reviewed our· design of the outfall in the area where the Contractor is proposing a change. Our reasons for requiring that steel sheet piles be used and left as permanent protection of the outfall we re as follows: I. Sheet piles were required to protect the existing 78-inch outfall . during construction. 2. Sheet piles were required to economically build the outfall at the profile we felt was necessary to insure safety. 3. Sheet piles would contain rock around outfall in case of severe erosion. 4. Sheet piles afford a deeper founded foundation. 5. Our consultant (Dr. Raichlcn) recomm~rided that sheet piles be left in place and stated that they would afford added protection to the structure. 6. The existing 78-inch outfall utilized pcrm~ncnt sheet pflcs in exactly the same condition. This outfall has been successful so far. The Contractor's proposed altc rnatc would satisfy reasons 1 and 2 above, but not the others. We realized during the design stage that prm.ri.cling pc rmancnt sheet piles would cost more money but folt that the addition2.l protection afforded was worth the extra co!:it (our calcul(l-· tion at the tim0 was +$150, 000). , .: i .. .. - ~· ..,.,, . .,._,,; ~ '..I '.,,I . The Contractor has said he will furnish us with additional information {referred to in; his letter of March 4th) on the 27th of this month. · We are not aware of any test or .. study that could provide positive proof that the proposed method is equal to the method detailed in the pl~ns and specifications. It would be possible to accomplish additional studies such as model studies which might indicate the in- tegri~y of the proposed alternate. 2 . . However, unless the Districts desire to go into some detailed . analysis of the proposed alternate, we would recommend that the Districts reject this proposal of Peter Kiewit Sons' Company for ·an alternate method of construction. For your information, Peter Kiewit Sorts' Co. first men- tioned this proposal to us Noyember 22, 1968, at which ti:rne we asked them to make·a written request. · Yours very· truly, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS ~~~A/~~ . 7arvey6-r ;~ HHH:ml , _ TEA1PCJ.?A.~'f Sl./£ETS ~ -25 1-1 1 '· ~ RS 1-l 11 . ,-------------+ p,;;-·----.-------------1 _J_: ____ rn rl __ I . I TEMPOk;&li?Y SJ/cETS .. II BOARDS Of DHl!ECTORS Co unty Sani tat io n Dis tricts P. 0. Box 5 175 of Orange Co unty , Cali forn ia 10844 Ell is Ave nue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 ( 1) ( 2 ) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) (5 ) ( 6 ). (7 ) (8 ) (9 ) (1 0 ) (11 ) (12 ) (13 ) JO INT BOARDS AG E N DA Apr i l 9 ; 1969-7:30 p.m . Pledge o f All eg i a n c e Roll Ca ll Co n s iderat i on of mot i on to r eceive and f ile excerpt s from the Cities o f Santa Ana and La Habra , and seating new Dire ctors and Al ter nates o n t h e Boards ALL DISTRICT S Ap po i ntments o f Ch a i rmen p ro tern DIS TR I CT 1 Con s i derat i on o f motion app r oving min u tes o f the a d jou rned reg u lar mee t ing held Ma r ch 12th , the regular meeting held Ma r c h 12th , and the adjour ned regular meeting held March 25t h , 1969 , as ma i led DISTRI CT 2 Co nsiderat i on o f motion approving mi nutes o f t h e reg ul ar meeting he ld March 1 2 , 1969 , as mailed DIS TRICT 3 Con siderat i on o f motion appr oving min u tes of the regular meet i ng he l d March 1 2 , 1 96 9, as mailed DIS TR I CT 4 Co ns i deration of motion approving minu tes o f the regul ar meet i ng h e l d Marc h 1 2 , 1 969 , as mailed DIS TRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes o f the regular meeting held March 12 , 1969 , as mai l ed DIST RI CT 7 Consideration of motion app r oving minu tes of the adjourned r egu lar meeting held March 1 2th , the regula r meeting held March 12th, and the adjourned reg ular meeting held March 25 t h, 1969 , as mailed DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion approving minut e s of the regular meeting he l d Mar c h 12 , 1969 , as ma i l ed DISTRICT 1 1 Considerat ion of motion approving minut es of the regular meeting held March 12 , 1969 , as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the J o int Chairman (14 ) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ~- (15) ALL DISTRICTS (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) .(21) (22) (23) (24) (25) Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee, and consideration of motion to receive and file the written report (copy in folders) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file proposal from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, and recommendation from John Carollo Engineers; and consideration of action on the Contractor's request for an alternate method of construction on Job No. J-10 (Ocean Outfall No. 2). ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion adopting an Apprentice II Program for the 1969-70 fiscal year as recommended by the Executive Committee ALL DISTRICTS Report of the engineers and staff on change in conditions on the site of the new ocean outfall, due to.flood run-off. ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file letters from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company and John Carollo· Engineers; and granting the time extension requested by the Contractor relative to Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10. See pages "F" and "G" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 69-22, approving plans and specifications for Job No. Pl-14 (Digester No. 8 at Plant No. l); and authorizing District No. 1 to award contract for said work. See page "Hn ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Addendum No. 1 to the pl~ns and specifications for Job No. P2-14 (Sedimentation Basin 'I' pi~ester 'I' ~nd Distribution Structure 'B').: See page 'I ---- ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the Directors and a maximum of twenty employees to attend the annual con- ference of the Water Pollution Control Association in Anaheim, May 7th through May 10th; and authorizing payment for registration fees, meals, transportation and incidental expenses incurred. (Conference Program in folders) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion increasing the maximum fee payable to John Carollo Engineers for Electrical Energy Study from $3,5.00 to $5,300 ~ See page "J" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has personally checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment -2- (26) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Joint Operating and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrants for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing pavment of claims listed on pages "A" , "B" , and Tr C" ~ (27) ALL DISTRICTS (28) Other business and ·communications, if any DISTRICT 1 {Deferred from March 12th meeting) Consideration of request of Holly Sugar Corporation for extension of the existing agreement with the District for .discharge of industrial wastes, through the 1969 calendar year. See page "K" (29) DISTRICT 1 (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) {35) {36) (37) {38) (39) {40) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if.any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 See Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Leroy Crandall and Associates for soil investigation services on Contracts Nos. 3-11, 3-12, 3-13, and 3-14; and authoriz- ing the General Mana~er to direct the firm to proceed for a fee not to exceed ~5,900. See page "L" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 5 See Consideration of Resolution No. 69-23-5, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation and awarding Contract No. 5-17 {Sewage Pumps, Drive and Motor, Jamboree Pum~ing Station} to Allied Pump Industries in the amount of ~13, 039. 75. See pages "M" and "N" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the Irvine Industrial Complex requesting de-annexation of territory from the District, and directing the staff to obtain additional information and report to the Board at the next meetingo See page 11 0 11 -3- , . (41) {42) DISTRICT ·5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Newport Beach relative to the Cameo Shores Pumping Station. See page "P" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion directing the staff to obtain an engineering proposal from Shuirman-Simpson, Engineers, to update the District's Master Plan dated October, 1964. . . . . { 4 3 ) DISTRICT 5 {44) (45) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 5 Other.business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., April 29. {46) DISTRICT.6 (47) (48) (49) (50) {51) (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if anyo See page "E" DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering for additional engineering services relative to Assessment District No. 8, in order to provide sewer service· to proposed Annexation No. 21 Area. See page fl Q" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving wa~rants, if any. See page II E" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "En DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -~·- Agenda Item No. __ 1....,7_., -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 L LO ENGINEERS---------- ...._,.J. .JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON. P,E, H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAYa P.E. · ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. . DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, California El Paso, Texas April 7, 1969 Roply to: 3698 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section AREA CODE 415 We have reviewed the back-up information which the contractor (Peter Kiewit Sons 1 ) submitted to us on March 28, 1969, in connection with their request to uti!.ize an alternate method of construction on the ·outfall in the surf area. Our recommendation, following this review, is the same as that presented to the Executive Committee on March 21, 1969. That is, that the Districts reject the proposal of Peter Kiewit Sons' for an alternate method of construction. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS WRH:lb 283·3895 APPRENTICE II PROGRAM COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 8127 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 Objective: (~14) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 To train personnel for the maximum benefit to the Districts, the individual, the community and industry. It is recognized, as in any apprentice program, that the Districts will lose a percentage of the men trained. However, it is believed the improvement of individuals can only result in an improved community. The Apprentice II program is generally directed toward the progressive ·development of advanced skills in specialized fields of the Districts' operations. It is specifically for graduates of the Apprentice I Program. Requirements 1. High school diploma (consideration may be given to qualified applicants with GED certificates). 2. Age limitation -twenty-eight (28) years or younger upon entering the program. 3. Satisfactory completion of Apprentice I Program. 4. Commitment by the applicant as to his intention to complete the program as outlined by Management. 5. Approval of all entrants to the program by the General Manager. Program outline 7/69 I. General Plan A. The Apprentice II program shall consist of two (2) years train- . ing in one of the following specialized fields: 1. Electrical 2. Mechanical -Mobile and Stationary 3. Plant Operations 4. Plant Maintenance & Construction 5. Laboratory 6. Engineering B. Emphasis will be given toward developing a safety consciousness and all Apprentice !I's are required to attend all safety meetings. c~ The detailed Apprentice II program shall be in accordance with a plan developed by the staff and approved by the General Manager. 2. D. outside schooling will be required to supplement.on-the-job training. The amount of outside schooling required shall be equivalent to thirty college semester units. The required subjects shall be established by the various departments. The Apprentice II wilx be expected to accomplish this on his own time and at his own expense. E. A progregs report will be maintained by.the supervisor to assure compliance with the detailed Apprentice II program. The apprentice will keep required records and reports will be reviewed quarterly by a committee designated by the General Manager. F. A certificate will be issued to recognize satisfactory completion of the program. II. Evaluation A. The Apprentice II shall have his performance reviewed not less than quarterly by his immediate supervisor. The review shall be processed by current personnel review procedures. B. Continued participation in the Apprentice II program shall be subject to approval of the General Manager. III. Classification and Salary A. The classification of Apprentice II shall be established in the participating departments. 7/69 B. The salary range of this position is established independently in each department to conform with its current salary structure. C. Provisions shall be made to enable the Apprentice II to be eligible to receive a one-half step salary advance upon the satisfactory completion of each six-month period of training, upon approval of the General Manager. D. Upon completion of the program, the Apprentice II shall have been trained to the skilled level established by each department. If there are no openings in an appropriate classification at that time, the Apprentice II will remain in his position and will be assigned first priority for the first appropriate opening that occurs. E. Upon promotion, personnel reviews and eligibility for salary advances shall be in accordance with current regulations for positions not designated as Apprentice (i.e., annually). This provision shall also apply for the remainder of the Apprentice II salary range in the event he completes the program but is awaiting a promotional opening. F. The classification of Apprentice II is considered a full-time permanent position and as such the apprentice will be entitled to the appropriate employee benefits. G. A beginning Apprentice II shall start on the first working day of a calendar quarter. APPRENTICE II -PLANT MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT ~ SALARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: EQUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITIONS: PROMOTIONAL POSITION UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: No. 40 $502/516/530/545 Maintenance Man Heavy Equipment Operator I Groundskeeper II Maintenance Mechanic I R~nge 41.5. $530/659 EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Satisfactory completion of the equivalent of thirty college semester units in courses approved by the Department Head. A minimum of fifteen units must be in trade associated courses. DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he can demonstrate he has achieved the level of proficiency required in each of the following categories: I. ROUTINE PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE A. Plant Equipment B. Scheduling C. Performance D. Record Keeping II. CONSTRUCTION -(Lay Out and Detailing of Work) A. Carpentry B. Painting C. ~asonry D. Rigging III. PIPE FITTING A. Proper Procedure B. Installation C. Pipe Fitting Identification (duPont Courses) IV. GROUNDSKEEPING A. Landscaping B. Identification 1. Trees 2. Shrubs 3. Grasses C. Testing 1. Soils 2. Waters V. DIGESTER CLEANING AND REPAIR Ao Scheduling B. Set-Up C. Safety Procedures D. D~sposal Methods 7/69 APPRENTICE II -MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE.DEPARTMENT SALARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: ~QUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITION: PROMOTIONAL POSITION UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: Noo 40 $502/516/530/545 Mechanical Maintenance Man Mechanic I Range 42 $545/677 EDUCATIONAL REQU~REMENTS: Satisfactroy completion of the equivalent of thirty college semester units in courses approved by the Department Head. A minimum of fifteen units must be in trade associated courses. DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he can demonstrate he has acheived the level of proficiency required in each of the following categories of stationary and vehicular equipment: I. PREVENTATIVE MAINTENANCE Ao How B. Why II. TUNE-UP A. Carburetors _B. Regula tors C •. Distributors D. Magnetos E. Coils and Wiring F. Valve Trains · G. Compression Testing III. MECHANICAL FUNDAMENTALS 7/69 A. Gearing B. Transmissions C. Engine Functions D. Drive Lines E. Couplings F. Governors IV. PNEUMATICS AND HYDRAULICS A. Regulators B. Compressors Co Pumps Do Valves V. HEAT RECOVERY A0 Boilers and Pressure Vessels Bo Heat Exchangers VI • FRONT END ALIGNMENT A. Brakes B. Steering . I APPRENTICE II -ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE DEPARTMENT "-AL.ARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: EQUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITION: PROMOTIONAL POSITIONS UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: .No. 41 $516/530/545/560 Electrical Maintenance Man Electrical Technician I or Instrumentation Technician I Range 43 $575/715 EDUCATIONAL REQUIREME~TS: Satisfactory completion of the equivalent of thirty college semester units in courses approved by the Department Head. A minimum of fifteen units must be in trade associated courses and in- clude the following subjects: 1. 2. ~: Electronics Physics English College Math DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he·can demonstrate he has achieved the level of proficiency required in each of the following categories: I. BASIC ELECTRICAL PRINCIPLES ~ A. Safety B. Use of Tools and Equipment c. Mechanics of Work II. PLANT SERVICE AND TRANSFORMERS A. Installation B. Hook-up and Testing III. MOTORS A. Service B. Repair IV. SWITCH GEAR A. Circuit Breakers B. Transfer Switches c. Distribution System for each Plant Vo GENERATORS A. Service B. Repair ·~ 7/69 (Continued} APPRENTICE II -Electrical Maintenance Department Cont'd. VI. CONTROL CIRCUITS A. Service B. Repair VII. ELECTRIC.AL CODE .AND DRAWINGS .A. State and National Code B. Single Line Drawings -Read and Draw VIII. METERING 7/69 .A. Basic Operation of Metering Elements B. Servicing IX. TELEMETERING .A. Leased Line Signal Transmission B. Conversion of Metering Signals for Transmission C. Coding and Decoding Tone Signals APPRENTICE II -OPERATIONS DEPARTMENT ~.ALARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: EQUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITION: PROMOTIONAL POSITION UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: No. 40.5 $502/516/530/545 Plant Operator I Plant Operator III Range 44 $608/755 EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Satisfactory completion of thirty college semester uni ts in courses approved by the Department Head·. Courses must be acceptable for a Bachelor of Science Degree in a technical field. CERTIFICATION REQUIREMENT: The Apprentice II will be expected to take the California Water Pollution Control Association's Operator Certi- fication Examinations as he becomes eligible. He must have achieved the certification level currently required for Plant Operator III be- fore he can be considered as eligible for promotion to that position. DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he can demonstrate he has achieved the level of proficiency required in the following program·which is divided into two distinct phases; the "What" and tre "Why". These phases will run concurrently and scheduling conflicts bet\'Jeen the t\'10 will be held "'-" to an absolute minimum. I. "WHAT" PH.ASE A. The "what" training 1A.Jill consist of operating a shift and performing the duties required of plant operators. At first, the Apprentice II will not be expected to stand an operating shift alone, however, every effort 1-Jill be made to train him to this level as rapidly as possible. B. This phase will require about 400 man days during the two year Apprentice II program and will be accomplished at the rate of four days per 1~eek, or about 50 man days per quarter. The Apprentice will rotate assignments each quarter and the time spent, as tabulated below, should be accomplished in blocks of 50 man days: 1. Plant ~1:1 150 Man days 2. Plant -;~~2 150 Man days 3: Chlor:tna ti on Station 50 Man days 4. Others 50 Man days a. Control Center b. Ac ti va ted Slud::;e c. Centrifuge d. Miscellaneous 7/69 (Continued) Apprentice II -Operations Department Cont'd. C •. In each quarter, approximately half of the Ap- prentices' time will be on the day shift, and the other half o~ an a.m., p.m. or weekend shift. Since schooling is considered an integral part of the program, ·shift schedules will be adjusted so as not to interfere with cla~ses. D. Proper reporting procedures and record keeping will be stressed in each assignment. II. "WHY" PHASE A. This phase will consist of 100 man days of work and will in general be accomplished at a rate of one day each week. The 100 days will be distri- buted approximately as follows, by subject matter: 1. JT..EADWORKS a. Screening b. Grit ·Removal c. Pumps 2. PRIMARY TREA Tr·IENT a. Sewage -Composition and Chemistry b. Sedimentation Basins 3. DIGESTION a. Types b. Processes c. Equipment 4. UTILITY SYSTEMS (Control, Treatment & Distribution) a. Gas b. Water c. Air d. Electrical 5. SLUDGE HANDLING a. Pumping b. Drying c. Centrifuging d. Filtering e. Metering 6 . SECOl\TDARY THI!;.f.\ TMENT a. Trickling Filters b. .Activated Sludge c. Processes d. Equipment and Contr·ols 7/69 (Continued) 7/69 Apprentice II -Operations Department Con'd. 7. CHLORINATION a. Uses b o Safety 8. BOOSTER STATIONS a. Operation b. Controls B. A week in advance of the day the "Why" project is to be performed, the Control Center Operator (CCO), who is assigned as the rotating day CCO, will assign the subject matter. The project will deal with the why of the particular assignmento The assignment may consist of a drawing to be studied or text material to be read. It may be learning the piping of a digester, testing a clari- fier for short circuiting,. trouble-shooting a process, or running an experiment, etc. C. On the completion of each day of the "why" pro- ject the Apprentice will submit a written report of the work to the CCO who will review the report, discuss it with the Apprentice, and then forward it through adopted procedures for his permanent file. III. REFERENCES MOP'S of the Federation of Sewage and Industrial Wastes Association will be considered the basic textso Where necessary, others will be used to include trade literature, duPont courses, or manfacturers literature. .APPRENTICE II -LABORATORY & RESEARCH DEPARTMENT ~ALARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: No. 40 $502/516/530/545 EQUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITION: Laboratory Technician I PROMOTIONAL POSITION UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: Laboratory Technician II Range 41.5 $530/659 EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Satisfactory completion of thirty college semester units in courses approved by the Department Head. Recommended courses of study are as follows: I. II. Courses Preferred by Laboratory* Units A. English lA 3 B. Chemistry lA 5 c. Chemistry lB 5 D. Quant. Analysis 5.A 4 E. Microbiology 2 4 F. College Algebra & Elem. Functions 3 G. Electives 6 Total 30 Minimum College Courses Acceptable* Units A. English lA 3 B. Chemistry l.A 5 c. Microbiology 2 4 D. Intermediate Algebra D 3 E. Electives 15 Total 30 *Orange Coast College catalog numbers. Laboratory experience may be substituted for some required courses; however,, 30 units are required. DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he can demonstrate he has achieved the level of pr·oficiency required in each of the following categories: I. GOALS .A. Good laboratory technique B. .Ability to set up and manipulate mathematical formulas c. Understanding of bacteria and methods of isolation D. Ability to use microscope effectively E. .Ability to perform all routine analyses F. Preparation and standardization of reagents 7/69 (Continued) Apprentice II -Laboratory & Research Department Cont'd. G. Ability to keep good records H. Ability to write comprehensive reports I. Good laboratory safety and housekeeping practices J. Experience with instrumental analysis II. WORK CATAGORIES A. Sampling 1. Beach 2. Other B. Sludge analysis c. Sewage analysis 1. Routine 2. Special D. Bacteriology 1. Routine 2. Bacterial examination E. Chlorination (demands and residuals) F. Quantatative analysis G. Solutions 1. Preparation · 2. Standardization H. Special Work 1. Analyses 2. Report t-'Jri ting I. Instrumentation 1. Analyses 2. Maintenance J. Record keeping and requisitioning of supplies 7/69 APPRENTICE II -ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT ~ALARY RANGE & PROGRAM TENURE STEPS: EQUIVALENT DEPARTMENTAL POSITION: PROMOTIONAL POSITION UPON COMPLETION OF PROGRAM: No. 40.5 $502/516/530/545 Engineering Aide I Engineering Aide II Range 42.5 $560/696 EDUCATIONAL REQUIREMENTS: Satisfactory completion of thirty college semester units in courses approved by the Department Head. Courses must be acceptable for either a Bachelor of Science Degree in Engineer- ing or an Associate of Arts Degree in Engineering Technology. A minimum of twenty units must be in mathematics and/or the physical sciences. DEPARTMENTAL TRAINING PROGRAM DETAIL: The Apprentice II shall receive training to the extent that he can demonstrate he has achieved the level of proficiency required in each of the following categories: 7/69 I. GENERAL A. Engineering Administration and Filing B. Record Drawings C. Contract Shop Drawings D. Contract Progress Payments E. Contract Drawings II. SURVEYING A. Topographic B. Traverse c •. construction III. INSPECTION A~ Concrete B. Structural Metal c. Machinery D. Pipe Systems E. Yard Pipe F. Electrical G. Coatings IV. DESIGN A. Drawings B. Specifications . ,. .. APPRE NTI CE I I PROG RAM PROJ ECTED COSTS ** .-1 9 6 9/7 0 -1970/71 AP PRE NTI CE II PER SO NNE L (Tenta tive ) 1 P l ant Mai n tenance Depa r tment • 1 Me chani c al Ma i ntenance Department 1 Elec tri c a l Mai n te nance Depar t ment 2 Operations Dep ar tment 1 La bo r atory Department "' . 1 En g i neer i ng Dep a rtment 7 • I • Pro j ected actual cost for initial two year phase base d upon e x isti ng Apprentice I Person nel t hat will g r aduate into the Apprentice II p rog r am du ri ng the period 69/7 0/71 . I .. -I • Sa laries .. Be n efits .... .. ... • I~ .. To ta l -, * l t * * * * 6 9/70 $27 ,570 2 28 1 0 $30 2380 * Pro j ected f u ture maximum cost per year assuming fu ll complement (no turn- o v er ) f or two y ear program . . ~ -~ • .. , I r I • ' I • * I -)(- Existing Apprentice annual cost . Iii • -"'-~ l '" l 1 1 -I ~ I .. .. * I ·. Sa l aries Be n efits Total ... Program approximate I I Salaries Benefits Total I. • ** Based on existing sa l ary schedules . I .. ·. • .. · 1st Year $42 ,920 42 3 80 $47 2300 -)(· .. I 1 st Year $40 ,580 4 2130 $Lt4 2 710 " 3 -2 5-69 r . ·I . , Total 7 0/7 1 (2 Ye a rs ) $44 ,430 $72 ,000 Lt 2 520 7 2330 $48 2950 $79 ,330 * * 2nd Year Total $45 ,330 $88 ,250 4 2620 9 ,000 $492950 $97 ,250 -)(--X· 2nd Year Total $45 , i1w 4 2600 $85 ,720 82730 $~-9 2 7LtO $9lt ' 450 6961 c 6 "["l=cld\f ~ !• • t ....... ... . • "' ' . I MAIN OFFICE: OMAHA 31, NEBR. ~ 1000 KIEWIT PS.AXA PETER t<IEWIT SONS' CO. CONTRACTORS ESTABLISHED 1884 ADDRESS REPLY TO: P.O. Box 552 ~ ....... Huntington Beach, Ca 926L8 John Carollo Engineers P.O. Box 528 Huntington Beach, Ca 9~648 . March 3, · 1969 Attn: H~r. Walt Bi.shop, Resident Engineer Re: Request for extension of time Gentlemen: In accordance with the general provisions of the specifications Section 6, paragraph J, we respecttully re~uest an extension of ti~e I.._} contract time for two (2) days because of weather deJP.ys (rain) on Februar-.r 211, 1969 anr1 Februar-.r 25, 1969. cc: File ~ Agenda Item #20 "'' S:incerelv Pet T ., ' ,. er Kiewi,,_ S ) _f;_(,/ " __ ons' ,.-Co. ' ' ... 1 . /) V~~ v ~~/7?.e0~/ /' /p~; . Ford Jr. { /t. . -roJect S I UDO • t I .-rin enclent -F- I I All Districts _ .... J.-.--·-___ .... u •• . . ·:. --------------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER S--i---------- Phoenix, Arizona Lafayerte, California El Paso, Texas Reply to: .SOHN A. CAROLL01 P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P .E. H. HARVEY HUNT1 P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. April 1, 1969 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE. CALIFORNIA 94549 AREA CODE 415 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County · P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section Attached is a letter from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company .requesting a two-day extension of time because of delay due to rainy weather conditions {February 24 and 25). · We recommend approval of a two-day extension of time in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General Pro·.risions of the Specifications. Heavy rain occurred on both February 24 and 25. The Contractor has requested a total of 10 days exten- sion of time through March 25, 1969. WAB:ml Enclosure Agenda Item #20 -G- Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 4~ ~ /?' ~ 4(tt/~ t--· l/. / .;:,i,~~L"-.Ll Walter A. Bishop /- Resident Engineer All Dtstricts 283·389S RESOLUTION NO. 69-22 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. Pl-14 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS. NOS. l; 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-14 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction of DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-14, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Calif- ornia; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 4:00 p.m., May 7, 1969, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts' Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. Pl-14 on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting April 9, 1969. Agenda Item /121 -H-All Districts IP·--~ -.--·· ·--. . -..... _ ... ·-..... -. -... -.. ....... { · . . . •' . . . ADDENDUM NO. 1 to Specifications for April 4, 1969 ~EDIMENTATION BASIN 1, DIQESTER 1 AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE B AT PLANT NO. 2 Job Noo P2-14 A. GENERAL PROVISIONS I·. Page GP 1, Section 1, Notice Inviting Bids, Federally Assisted Project Insert the following paragraphs betweei:i the 6th ~nd 7th paragraphs: ''This contract is a Federal Aid Project and not less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages, as determined by the Secretary of Labor in accordanc~ with the Davis-Bacon Act, shall be paid for each craft or type of workman need- ed to perform ~he contract." ''Bidders on this work will be required to comply with the President's Executive Order No. 11114 and the provisions of Executive Order No. 10925, as included therein. The requirements for bidders and contractors under this order are explained in the ·specifications.~' II. Page GP 9, Secti.on 4-4, INSURANCE Add the following to paragraph no. 1~: "The contractor shall carry and maintatn fire.and extended coverage with an endorsement for vandalism and malicious mischief in his name and also in the name of the Distri.ct in ~n amount of not less than °t\·1enty thousand dollars ($20,000.00)." IIIo Page GP 33, Section 9-18, LABOR STANDARDS Delete pages GP 31~ through 38 inclusive and substitute the attached pages for the Labor Standards: -I-All lH::~tr:i ctn ----------·-·--·---······· ADDENDUM NO. 1 Con't. page two ~. •. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS .. I• Page DS 37, Section 14-23, PRESTRESSED DIGESTER COLLAR Change the ne~t to last sentence in the first paragraph to read as follows: · ."E~ch tie down shall be prestressed to a net tensile force .·of !Q.Q pounds per tie down." John Carollo Engineers Agenda Item /J22 All Districts .. .......:. ..... ---- '--' ~ '...,,) SOL-US ('1-f4) ... U1S. DEPARTMENT OF. LABOR OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON DECISION OF THE SECRETARY This. case is before the Department of Labor pursuant to a request tor a wage pred~ termination as required by law applicable to the work described. A study has been made of wage conditions in the locality and based on information available to the Department o! Labor the wage ra~es and fringe payments listed are hereby determined by the Secretary or Labor as prevailing for the described classes ot labor in accordance with applicable law. This wage determination decision and any modifications thereof during the period prior to the stated expiration date shall be made a part of every contract for performance of the described work as provided by applicable law and regulations of the Secretary of Labor, and the wage rates and fringe payments contained in this decision, including n1odifications, shall be the minimums to be paid under any such contra~t by contractors a.rid subcontractors on the work. The contracting officer shall require that any class or laborers ·and mechanics wl1ich is not listed in the wage determination and which is to be employed under the contract, shall be classified or reclassified conf ormably ·to the wage determination, and a report of the action taken shall be sent by the Federal agency to the Secretary of Labor. In the event the inter- ested parties cannot agree on the proper classification or rcclessification of a particular class of laborers and mechanics to be used, the question accompanied by the recommendation of the contracting officer shall be referred to the Secretary for determination .. Before using apprentices on the job the contractor shall present to the contracting officer written evidence of registration of such employees in a program of a State apprenticeship. and training agency approved and recognized by the U.S. Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training. In the absence of such a State agency, the con~ractor shall submit evidence of approval and registration by the U.S. Bureau of A,Pprenticeship and Training. The contractor shalt submit to the contracting officer written evidence of the estab- lished.apprentice-journeyman ratios and wage rates in the project area, which will be the basis for establishing such ratios and rates for the project under the applicable contrad provisions. Fringe payments include medical and hospital care, compensation for injuries or illness resulting from occupational activity, unemployment benefits, life insurance, disability and sickness insurance, accident insurance (all designated as health and welfare}. pensions, vaca- tion and holiday pay, ap1>renticeship or other simiJnr programs and other bona fide fringe benefits. Agenda Item #22 By ::7 oil the :ecrea LaOO\J v/(d•1{, l', L??,·.+:/.,·nt.\ Acting Solicitor o/.~bor GP-34 Addendum No. 1 I-1 All Districts -- "'" . ., . > OQ (1) ::s 0. OJ H I I'\) ·~un.:mro, HEAV! 1£ HIOlMAY CCt~STRUCTION Asbt.!stos Yorkers Br.>Ucrc..'\.kers Boilcr.".lkorn' holpore nrickl~ycrs; Stone?:l.fl.SODS Br !.ck Tenders Ccr~n':.crs: Cn!"jY!n':.ers Scl\I fil':.lrS ~nblc p:>vcr eav ope~ator ~i~l<:::"!l ;;:i..-c!·JO'.>d M.oor leyere; Mill.Vl"iBhte P:lcur~tic nailor Pilcc~r-1 TCI":!'lcn: !".ock Slinccro !3:-ic.!:;1.:, c!ock co.rpont.ore; derrick barBemen Ecc.d rock clin\;ors r,.e.:-.,,nt. }~:;ons: C<.'.=.:on':. ::!l!JO:\S y_-.;;n.:i::!t.~; 'focncs1UJ terrnz'llo; l'.aatic Comp. C{·:.:~n':. tloti. ':.int: tc t.rovol1"8 mnch. opor. Dr-;.-.r.i.11 InsUJ.ll']rs · · El'!.''!!.:-lclnn::: Cc~lo anliccrs Elcv~t.or Conotructoro ::!en:. tor Con:J' .. ructorc' holpere !::~·rotor Coo:Jtructors' hol~ro (prob.) ul!L::ier:i :ror~vorf.ere: ~~!.nforc!.n{: Fl!:.co '!roc':.ors S t.n:c tu.. --o.l; ornu-..cntel. !r:-!~~tion ~ Lnvn Sprinlcloro !..D.!.~!!J:-o Lir.~ Co!'l~~ruction: Cr~.:n 1 lot. )roar C::-C".:."l:!..-:.:in =-:-r-·;:-,.c,~; .t.tnc equ!p:ont operat.on c.j.Q ~?·icero • !"..Jr:.l~ ~~ttcra }::.,, r~le :et~l!r:i' :telparo t'~·.-:..:.1 i:::::.,-:o' :rloor Grin~ctre :>..,~·.: ~~.:: Z::.:.·.:.-:':'\-';.:!.::'t b-.1.""nor. !:-..~l't ro~:: t.4per:s B..""t'!.:h (cv!.nc ota{:e); structural eteelr br1dg a~:-L.y • Sp:-11y :sor!r..'.: ::it:ico; onndblaster s.a.~Jola:ster :iv!..'l{t ot.aeo S~e~plojnck vor~ r.lpcrh:1.r-t:or fur:d.:,z lot at.riping vorlc Pl::.:i~crors PU\::-:.c:-er:s' Tent!;,r:s · •· · ~-:.::..Zr.:s; St.or:.f!tters ;Loadburnora ~'X>!'O!"':J !::.--:•!c:'.. P.e~l 'Jorkors !'.o!'~ :loor L:i.y.:.ro !:?:-ir.:~!or ?l t ~orn :·u:-:-:1:!::C. 1-'·:>r~~.3 :·~:-.·:.i::;:o ~o:-:~c:-:s' helpcras ?luor ~~ch~no opcrAtoru; holpor8 Doeic Hourly Rot•• H&W t.6.70 .21 6.40 .JO 6.10 .JO 5.JO .27 4.J2 .21.5 5.JJ • .)6 5.1.1 .J6 5.1.J .)6 5.1.6 .36 5.53 .)6 5.58 .J6 5.J8 .% 5.46 .J6 5.56 .J6 5.13 .40 5.25 .1.0 5.Ja .40 5.335 .lS 6.60 .15 7.14 .15 6.2) .11'S 7<rf,.JR .1~S I 50-/JR 5.47 .15 6.10 .305 6.0J .JOS 6.2J .J05 5.75 10% s.26 .19 5.55 .15 5.88 .15 6.80 .15 7.14 .15 5.615 .145 4.385 .145 4.6U .145 S.S? .;>.4 $.74 .24 e s.e:. • ;>.,4 6.09 .21. 6.)4 .24 6.9? .24 s.ns .24 4.113 .15 S.74~ .211 J..69 .21.s 5.79 10% 5.92 .275 6.00 .25. 5.118 .21 7.9S .15 s.22 1..Go5 .15 ~··~·~ "'J.'/~ tr). r D41"C 01" D&ciiloN h/3 69 Fring• Bu•fita Poy111•1tta ........... Y•c••I•• A,,, Tr. .25 .02 .1.0 • 35 .02 .1.0 .J5 • o2 ·.12 .01 .J2 .25 .45 .25 .01 .1.5 • 25 .01 .1.5 .25 .01 .45 .25 .01 .45 .25 .01 .45 .25 .01 .1.5 .2, .01 .45 .25 .01 .45 .25 .01 .35 • 35 .0125 .35 .J5 .0125 • J5 .J5 .0125 .JO .15 .045 l~ c20.ooc 1% 20.ooc • 17 11% & b .17 l.,% & b .20 a .02 .30 .25 .O'- .JO .25 .02 .JO .25 .02 16% lJ% 1% .J5 .50 .02 1:£ c20.ooc 1% 20.ooc l~ 20.ooc l~ 20.00c .1s · .24 .20 .211 .20 .25 .10 .01 .25 .10 .01 .25 .10 .01 .25 .10 .Ol .25 .10 .01 •• 25 • .10 .01 .25 .10 .01 .10 .2Se • .)5. .•.• 045 • 1.2 .45 . 16% 1J% 1% .20 .02 .22 .20 d .OlS .25 .04 . i I O•h•re .. ( Terrazzo Vork1trs' helperat (continued) All ba.se machine work Tile Set.tors Tile Sottero' holpera Volderes Receive rato proscribed tor cratt porforming operation to vhich veld• ing.is incidental • DHIC Hevrl, n .... H~W 04.87 • ts s.7s ·.us .t..65 .us ( Frh•v• C.11efita Per .. •••• r-·•-• I I .2s .24 . Y•cetlM 1.,,,. Tr, .. .• 02 . .os . Otfiera -. Footnotes: : ~ -80 hours paid vacation ofter 1 7ear 1 s continuous service vith same empl07er. »:lployeea vith less than 12 months contimious service receive additional pa7 or 7% per otraight-time hour ·upon termination. 7 po.id holidoys: A throuah F, & Docembor 24. · . · b -Employer contributes 4% basic hourly rate for over S 7eara 1 ear.rice and.ZC or basic hourly rate for 6 months' to S years' nervico as Vacation Pay Credit. 6 paid bol1d.1ya: A through r. c -Per o.nnum • d -For firot 12 months or uninterrupted aervice employer contributes 2% or gross oai-n!ngs as Vacn- . tlon Poy. For over 12 months' uninterrupted service employer contributes 1$ or groso earnings ao Vacation Poy. e -Cr.qloyer contribute• $.10 per hour to Vec.1tloD Fund and $.15 per hour to llolid4y Fund. · . 6 paid l;loli®ya: A throueh 1' • Paid Holidqa1 . A-Nov Year's D•7J B-Momorial. Da7J C-Independence DqJ D-Labor Da71 E-'l'hanksgbing ~J F-Chriotmae Dq. · /·. ( GP-35 Addendum No. 1 H l VJ '. • :·~ ... ~ {Cc:-o-t>imeond-V:igon)J J~ Drlllez>J C:...~:~:::.:: .. '!~m.• (no~~lor.o.!!J\) ~:z::.1• :::.,'.:-;~Cl ... 't!:!·:r\!l - C.!r.:.::t c:t ~wn:::.rt; PO""-dorman c::; G: c::. l'l?E!.!!iB 'h'r.APP£.'t (6" t.c over) ~!:>;'1..'.!::r.s (non-noto.llic incl. oovor dJ'n.1.n, {:.. \:.:-.:'~::-,:::""cu!'J! '!.ilo) ::-~· .. ~ (J:..c~:h:l.~~~r -2 1/2" aill :stool or l~~:i:-} :::~~-\ :::.:.!l:'J!n; :lcalor (Do:s'n' a Ch:.dr-Sa.toty :~1~-~cv:~ ~ool~) . ,;.::-;:...'.!.:' :!.\1:'.::a ll. :mc~~.S nu:c:::f!:obUo; Cesilont. :: :: :; .. ~~ (1 ;*:! or lucor a h....._"'IC!li.nc bulk c:;~~~) Cc~c~oto S~~ (oAclud!nc Tr~ctor type C:-;::!"'"''..:.r C~·o 0\:-tt.arJ On:i lL OU Pip-.:'lino ·.::=·:-: :::-:-~o~ ~er:.~.1r lt. ic..-m Ho:\.'\; Pnouin~tic c~~.:.. ~.==~~c :ool ~r~tors (r.ot ~o~:u-ntol,y c::::=:::~~); ~oto ::...~c.:v;,~; Trcd Cl.izribor- : ... ·1!~:.·-::-.:~:-.. C::i.'..'-?it.t~'J..irt:h Chl;>;><1r b. :i!.mil.~ 6!:~r:: ::.-..::h :.;h~c..! .. "!lr-. c:..:;:-.:;;:: c·;:~1 I!:PZ:rtIO'JS }~::l!l.\l~ ~ .FC.'l!~ r::.....':.1; :~~n:: ~ C:iul!~i.nc o! tlJ. non-!!:ot..'\lic ;·:-::-;~c~~;~!l( r.J.:n·.:.p :;~on~pnvor; SandblA:it.or ~r::.~ ~:;~:!or J • c_ ·~.::-:\::.~,, :;:c':~ u. :&:::s':,,;•-:-n ............... 4 .. -,::J~ :.::::-:::~!'~~ c~ .. cl ,._1 .... on t:l-ll<Nor) ~---·----...w.,.. ...... • \.ioW. w-.. ~ :;-.:..:;:=~v :.c:> :.--.:::::.. l.c r;J:S; Ten~ Seal.or & ,.., •.--.. -!:~.~=-,~-:.~ !:i:~V.:t:::.;'1: ~·.t.-.., Graf!or-Hielway 4 ::t:-er.~ ?r.•r..r-~;1 .~-po:-t:.i, null\l<lY-' ·u :ar .. Uu ~;,7_, :~~.:...-;" c<.-n:.~roct.ion; 1~1v!:icnpo Oardnor le ::· .. ~=-=--':.-:J ::.'.:l c~.!:r. ::.\ <.."'.! .. -.=.!:.~ C'.i:::::-:J ·~c:-.=1 (~c::.ollUon)J Seal.or; Tlll'ftftJ\ tt ..... · .. ··--·:l ::~:~ : .. : ... :,,..1~f r-:::,-:r!4-cerutruction-d'l!:Oll tion..Qoy ~·~ -:.::.:...-.,: ~~ cc::-.cro~-" .. 1.ndo:J clonnor )-0~ tc :.:;.1 ~·i~l!.:"'J: :'!c:=~~ .. c:=-.. --r:3 z..~::~1.Ss !::=::;l:~:l ~ n~!1 C:,::::.;-:~ - ::.:.~~ Y.en • ... ~~~.\'f_I no.re Hourly Rotor. t!1.l12 4.39S h.33 la.)l la.28 h.26 la.23. J . 4.16 L.16 L.lS . ·h.12 la.10 h.095 L.C7 L.cs l..02 3.91 1'.BJS 4.lrl!S' .).96S· I I CAL-!A!l-l.•2•)• J J!B~ l ~t_ l !>l\!:!1-( Fringe Benefits Po1111enh Ha. W ~011ale11a .24S .j2 .2l&S .,32 .2!sS .J2 .24S .32 .2l&S .32 .2hS .)2 ~2LS .32 .2l&f .32 .21iS .!2 .2LS .32 .2l&S .32 .2tas · .32 .2~s .32 .2LS .32 .2L) .32 .2l&S • .)2 ,,2hS .32 .?LS .)2 .2LS • .)2 .216 .32 . ., Vocetle11 App, Tr. OthtH .2$ .2s .2s .2s • 2s .2s .2s .2s . . . .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .2s .. i I I I I I I . GP-36 TRUCK DRIVEaS tETOURNF.Ad PULLS-Terra Cobras & ei•llar t)'pe equipmcnti Truck Repl\lrm:an DUMP (25 yds. or more, vater level, etngle unlt or combinntion) ROSS CARRIER (htr,hv:iy )-F'ork ~ltt...A Frame or S\ledish Crane Driver EUCLID-type Spreader Truck (less than 25 yda .> DUMP (16 yds. to less thnn 25 yds. vater level; 20 tons or more)-Dumpster-Translt- Mix CJ yds, o~ more)-Dumpcrete (6! yds, or l:IOr'C) TRUCK CREASER & TIREMAN YATER TANK (4000 gallons & over) T&V.NSIT-HIX (under 3 yds.)-Dumpcrete (lesa than 6! yds 0 water level) TRUCK RErAIRnAN HELP~S VAT£R TA.~K (2500 to less than 4000 gallons) Dlri-IP (12 yds. to leu thon 16 yds. vater level; 15 tons to less than 20 tons) Dl~!r (8 yds. to leso than 12 yds, v3ter level; 10 tons to less than 15 tons) VATF.R TANK (under 2500 gallons) Dl'Mtt (i, yds, to less than 8 yds. vater level; 6 tonsto loss than 10 tons) DUMP (under " yds, water level; .less than 6 tons)-TraCflc Control Pllot Car · llAREHOUSF.r-:A~ !i TF.AKSTER ROAD OJL SPRF.lt.DJHG PY TRUCK DR:'VERSt T11110 spent spread1nc o~l Other jobsite t1~o FC'OTtlOTF.St a. $JR.lo per month to Roal th le \.7eltare F\1nd b. t8.oo por veek to Pension Fund. . Addendum No. 1 Daafc Fringe Dfitefita Po)..iente Hourly RolH H&W .......... v.cotle11 Ap,. Tr. 01her1 $ . 5.465 .35 .20 .2s s.34 .35 .20 .2s . · . . s.1ss .35 .20 ,.'25 5.07 ·.35' .20 .2s . -. . 4.88 .35 .20 .2s 4.83 .35 .20 · .25 4.eo. .35 .20 .2s . lt.74 .35 .20 .2s -. 4.735 ,35 .20 .2s L.68 e)S' .20 .2S lt.66 .35 .20 ·.2s 4.58 .35 .20 .2s 4.56 .35 .20 .2s 4.53 .• 35 .20 .2s 4.so .35 .20 .2s 4,42 .35 .20 .25 h.31.a' 8 ,, 3.34 • b !?:> jq <D ::s a., °' H ,c-t I ro 13 '~ l~ H I ...i::- :J> ~ ~ t:1 i-:-m •rt 11 !-'· (.) rt Ul ( 2-C.~OAL-PEO-l-2•3 •e (1-2) ·-( . ~.:::~ ~'J~~~"!' O~!'-~ c~-:-~? ! ."'1..;~ c .... : '.?n!.S::m-~"!p-Ge:"C rAtor-~ncino1Jr# C:tl~r-S!.c~~""Un-~c3vy !)u~y Rop:t.ir~n'o ~!.~~!"-SVl~c?-..~~n-~r~c~~n f:"I"""~ !'!"' i;·c_;·~~·..2 ~~, ::k!:> typc-~onvc:ror-!'oltmn ?'!.:-c::-."1.."\-0~n·!!"n <:.or-?-~ or Coi:i?rt.?~:Jor (2-S ~~~'.!!:iv~, ;io:·~a=.o u.-.!.ts).ljon~r:itor-Pu.'"? or Cc:.:;.':-cc::o:-.?l:?.n~-~!yt!rost.."\t!.c Pw:ip-Rot.'.lry :::-'-11 ::~:l:>c:-C o!.!.!lclc! ~ypo)-'l:tiplo:u!or,uhecl ~:.'?~~or~, :'el:"£:'J:>on, .. "cc? or !1!..r:\.il.:i.r t<"?O ",!/'.:. ;::-!.. fir le::;:J (v/o c!.:-a~*..;,'?o .:i.t~chs.} ·:c:-'.':'?:"~:-Y Hc:i. tire ?l.:l."l t.-7n~c~< Cr~no Oiler r-.r!•<:> T.,,.... -··-\.· ---:~-c;:::z=:!.~h ':ruc'k-:J!n!ccy Locol"lot!.vo or ~as!c Hovrly r.otn Sh.65 ·L.92 ~>.!n~::i'!. ~ :., ... e:--~2~'~ tor i!oi!l t-!::qu!:pr.:cnt Crcnse :·-::."\!, :~!";!'.t:ion o?" :;ir.-.il::ir t.ypo (\lith drar.typ .:. ~·..:i.c~. )-::y~.!":i.-!i=~~c!" or ni."'11.l:ir t.ypc oqui? :':..·.·:::!" Cc.~:::rc .. ~o C'.!:"in,: }:1i:him-!'o..,~r Concrot.c $."'!.•J-~C!.'.:?r ::::-ivt:in .. ,.u."!':bO rorn Sct*..cr-:todm.l.n- c~~~~1~-~,~!J C~r~!cr (~ob~~to)-.!3clr pro?Oll ~:i.!"' :~='~:~~ ~~\chlnc--.c;~~!.orory Pipcvr:\pp!. .::; c:·,:.~:-.c ~!.!chlm-Tc.1b:.ica ~ ':~~-~ -::: 7.:.:· •.. ~~P!J.!::' :~~~ .. ~~-norini: !-~ch1no-!!oXNn ~!" !·:i..·~r (concrc~ or ~!l?h=il t pl.·•.Jtt)-C'>ncrot .:\~=., (!..:-~JJ.. ?o~ .... ~bl·~)-:)cr-rick :{,n(o11!1c!d)- :.':-'--1l:.r;; Y.~c:1!.ne (in::!.'.!'!i:X: 'llat.cr vcll:.i)- :..::::1:.n:> ~~~-::'-'":I Sicr-,,~~n-~tru::ion~r.i.\n• :..-:-:=-~~:.~·:_, ::::1:1!".'>1!::."-?c\/cr St:ccpcr-!?ollor, C-:.·."~~!.!..:-~~crt:c·!-7:-cnch!fl:! !·~c~ (up 't-o l !!.~ C::,:"1'.!1) C"".:".':' i :.:::-~~:::.,r-~ co~c~:: S?.,..Z.O.!>WO, !-~c?\.:ln1cal :~:::::::.~; !)~ ~'in'..!;~:-~ l!;i.ehiric-Rollcr.Soil, C :.;.;~-=. .,, .' • .!.:"'-~=".!. ~ ~!.n.tc~ ... '.::~!!.."\'!.~ !>L"\nt. Encin.oer· :i ... ;:: ~~::.:-.'l~!°:!c!•J Cb.cc~:cr-::c:\'\')' !.'.tty Repair.ii..'\! ~.:..:..°'~ .. ~~~y ~.·~:.t.e:-~·:,.c?1!.~.n ~ool-?;t•tc:"!\Ont. Drc:\k ~~'.;;'.~:.ic 1!·,:!.!!r.;; Sh!.c!c!, tun.'1c:-!to:\d 0!1 :-!ix ·!:.,: !~1~:,::-.~~0::-:c !.!.!t., un.!cr 5 t.on~!lu'bbcr-t.ir :.::-:.v;r ;).!'..7 :=:.1~ipr.,~n~, (C~h;cosh, r:.·!, £\!cllc!1 ~:'c....:.r~~:.·1, !.."\!'l:i.n~-C!l?:i.to, or eir.i!.~r !.ypo ... i:-.~!.::-~~::':. ..... :.t.~ ~'!";/ ~:•i"J .r.!.~chmo:-it.:.i)-Sk"!p ':/--.."!...~-:-, ..,~~c~ !.yp.> o·:·J~ 'J/L. :,•d., U? to ll. incl ~~=~-Sl!.p ::'o:-:l l'u."::? {im:or <!.rivo!l cydraulle ... I i ~ 5.16 I - s.21 ~ .. r- 1, He,"" .30 .30 I ·.30 .30 . . I Frl119• De11eF1t1. Poy1ttent1 . , .... , .... . .60 . .• .6o .60 .60 V..:otl•11 . .30 . . .,, .30 .. .30 .. . . APP• Tr. Other• .01 I .01 . . .01. .. ' .Ol . . • GP-37 . Pa-IER !QUIPr'.!Nl' OmtAtcas ·coNfn'UED• litt1nc devi.co tor comreto toms)-Traotor- nractypo Shovol-Bulldozor-Ta111por..Scrnpor- Push Tr:lct.or O:tOlJP VI tO}·filil~.'.L'IO?l HEAVI DUTX' ~A~MAN & \-F-Ll>m• Concrot.o ?~er, pavi~-Concreto ?-bbilo ?·li.xcr- Concr~tc PU.'11?-P\1.~croto Oun-Crushi~~ Plant ~1ncnr-ElcvatinJ! Or3dcr-Or3do nll-Miehline C.:i.blou3y-Hoi:it (Chic:ico Eoom b. Mino)-Kolnnn lhlt. Lo:ufor b. silldl>lr type-Litt. Sl:ib Ma.chine• Lo~dcr, Athey, Euclid, H3ncock, Sicrr~ or clndl."lr typo-t'ork !.1!t, over 5 ton-Motor Pa t.rol-M1lt iplo En(!ino, earth rnovi ne r.i.1ch1ne~· • Pnrt.y Chic f-Pnc\lml. tic Concrct.o Placi nc !~chi l~cklcy, Presswoll or sir.rl.lAr typc-Skl;>loooor · vhoclt.ypo owr l~ y.:ls • .Surface Heater t.:. Pl:inc Tract.or Lo;i.dcr, crawler typo-Tractor, with booD nt.tach::v!nts-Travcline Pipcvrapp1ne, cloaninc 4 bcndin"' rn.lChino-Tronchiru J·!:i.chim (over 6 rt. ~o~th~-Univcrsal Equipr.icnt.(Shovol n.1c~hoc, Dracllno, C!.:.m.shcll, Dorrlck, Dorrie Ihrgo1 Crane, P1lcdr1vor lt M.icld.rll! 1-'.;ichino) Addendum No. 1 .( ----------·-------,,,, -.. ----.. Dow.le ,,, .. ,. a .... 11t1 r., ....... ,. ftourl1 . RotH ff & ., .......... Yecetl•" '• App. Tr. Ot"'" . . CS."L6 .30 . .60 .30 .01·. . . . .. t ~ ": ~ . . I I .. . .. '• .30 .60 .30 .Ol. . --·-··. ·--.. ... - -I ..... ,I 1) 3 ;i:: \) \) ( Pa·l!R SQUI P1-:F.':T OPmATORS D~DGINO (Jtvdr:iulie suction !)re<!cesl ASSIS':/\!~ r:ar.:;;:ra (St.en111 or electric) J .,_.olGe~ w:n:c:·n~:.~ (Stern vinch or dredf:o) nru=ncrno (Cl:lM Sholl nrcdrj(?O) 1 Co•lc Hourf1 Ro tu Ht.W ~S.9!t .)o s.ris .30 s~os .;}O 4.9~S .;o 4.~.) .,o S.94 .30 s.io ,.,o s.os .30 la.90S .30 Ji.SJ .30 I ( .. _ ... LABORERS Fringe eeneflts Payment• (Tunnel & Tunnol-~haft Constl'UCtlon) P•ndon• Yocotlo11 .45 .23 .IS .23 .4S .23 .LS .23 .J1S .23 .4.S .23 .1.s. .23 .1.as .23 .t.$ .2) .hS .23 App,. Tr. I .01s · .ol) .cis .01s .c:1; ._.cis .015 .ois ' I .eis I .ois . Oth•r• '· . . I• I ; St!AFl' • Raise Hiner: Dta1110nd Driller BLi\S'mR. D-riller. Po\.ldttt'Wln; C.herntcat C"EOut Jetmln; Cherry Picke1:11'4n; Crout CuM1An; Crout Hixom11n; Crout .l"ump:'l:ln'e .Jackleg Miner; Jumbo tbn; ~cmpcr t. other J.>Murll4t1c Concrete Placer Op,; Hine\' Tunnol (ho.nd or rnnchino); Powrlet'lnan (Primer houoe): Primer r..an; Shotcrcto a.:in: Steal Fonu R41Gcr & Setter; Timberman, Rctimber1:1.1n (wood or steel); Tunnal Concrete Fintoher CABLE TENDER, Chucktcnder; tapper; Steo1 Form R4icicr t. Setter's llP.lper: Vibmtor11111n1 JackhLllMl~r, ~ncum:itic Toolo (except driller) BATCH PL.o\tir LAOORE:ts; Bull C4ng t\Jcker. Tr Trackm:ln; Concrete Crev, lncludco Roddoro & S~rCAderc; Dum;>mBn: Dum~lll4n (outoido); Sw4opor (Brakcma.n & Switchm.-in on Tunnot work) • GP-38 Addendum No. 1 ( . .. • <t.t> Ooalc Frl1t9• G.11.lita P•~••nt1 Hourly RotH H&W , ........ v ........ ,., ... ''· 01t..,. $.5.595 .24.5 .32 .2~ ~ . ·--•. . . . 5.345 .24S .;32 .25 5e19S .245 .32· .25 .. ' . . S.09S .245 .32 ·" . - . I f r ! t •• . .. . · • -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER$--------......--- Phoenix, Arizona Laf ayelte, California El Paso, Tex as Reply to: .JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.· ROBE.RT M. BRERETON. P.E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS. P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, ·P.E. April 2, 1969 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD . LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 Mr~ Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. B.ox 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Master Plan Study Electrical Energy AREA CODE 415 We request that the ma:ximum fee stipulated .for this study ($3, 500) be increased to $5, 300. 00. This request is due to an increase in scope· of the work over and above that contemplated at the time our proposal was made. The scope has been enlarged as follows: 1. Single-line Diagrams We anticipated that "as-built'.' single line diagrams wqrke·d up by t~e Districts would be essentially complete. However, it was necessary for us to expend ap ... proximately 5 man-days to bring them up to date and re-draw. 2. Emergency Generation The scope of the work was increased in your letter dated February 6, 1969, to include a review of the present emergency generation and to indicate the economic and/or feasibility of central emergency power gene ration vs. local or satellite emergency power generation. Estimated man-days to accomplish.is 6 to 8. 3. Review of methods for isolation of vital electrical devices was also requested in your letter of February 6, 1969. We estimate this to take 3 to 5 rnan .. days. We intend to have a preliminary draft of this report in your hands by April 20., 1969. Yours very truly, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 7~~-- HHH;ml Agenda Item //24 -J-All Distrtcts 283·3095 HOLLY SUGAR CORPORATION General Offices: Colorado Springs, Colo. SANT A ANA, CALIFORNIA County Sanitation Districts of Or~~ge Cow1ty California P. o. Box 5175 . Fountain Valle~ California 92708 Gentlemen: We would like to request that the proposal of tenns, conditions and charges for disposal of indu~trial waste from our Santa .Ana Plant to facilities of your County Sanitation District No. 1, tha.t existed for calendar year 1968 be extended for the calendar year 1969 o LN:nm1 CC: Jo E. Maudru Agenda Item #28 -K-District No. 1 DYER PLANT .. ~ L~:J CONSULTING FOUNDATION ENGINEERS !;=-~~l 711 NORTH ALVARADO STREET 0 LOS ANG~LES, CALIFORNIA 90026 0 TELEPHONE 386~3920 LEROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES March 20 1 1969 Board .. ·of Directors County Sanitation Dis.trict No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 fountain .Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Proposal -Soil and Foundation Investigation Proposed West-side Relie.f Trunk, Reach 24, Conf'ract No. 3-11 · Proposed Los Alamitos Pumping StoHon, Contract No. 3-12 · Proposed Wesi"minster Avenue Force Main· (First Unit) Contra cf' No. 3-13 . Proposed Westminster Branch-Knott Trunk, Reach 9, Contract No. 3-14 Seal Beach and Wesf·minsi·er, California Following our recent discussions with personnel of B;yle Engineering, we are pleased to submit our proposal for investigating the soil conditions in con- nection with the subject facilities. The locations and descriptions of the four . units to comprise the proied are shown on the drawings furnished us by Boyle Engi- neering. The purpose of the investigation will be to determine the physical char- acteristics of the soils at the site and to provide recommendations for foundatiC\n design and subterranean construction for the proposed pumping station, and dal·a for use in the design and construction of the force main and trunk units. . Based on a review of the planned' construcf'i on and our prior nearby work, we propose to explore the project areas by drilling a total of 19 borings. Two of the borings ore plann~d at the pumping station site and will be drilled to dcpfhs of approximc1tely 40 feet utilizing gecphysical-·type equipment. The remaining 17 bor- ings \Viii rang~ from 13 to 22 feet in depth, and because of overhec1d power lines at most of these I ocaH ons / H wi 11 be nccessar)' to utilize spccia I portable bu eke t-t}'pe equipment. Accordingly I dri llin[J pr-ogress will be slower thon that normally achieved with conventional drilling equipment. · L. Lr.ROY CRt\rlD;'\l.I.. c. E. Russru C. \'IFBff~. c. f. SEY~.'CIJf? s. CHILI. c. l. f'H(OfUCK A. r;,\f<iH'S J. 0. t\lili\Gt,RO. C. f. P. A. ~.lr\LJl.l\~I. C. E LEOPOL.O HIRSCllrCLOf .:M.lfS M. r.:c\-'lf.t. c. ::. Agenda Item 1135 L-1 RODERT CHIE~UZ!I. C. L JAMES L. VMl r.~_'JfHE:I. C. C. District No. l Board of Directors County Sanitation District· No •. 3 of Orange County Pose 2 · · March 20, 1969 .. The borings will be drilled under the supervision of our fie Id ·engineer / who will log the soil and groundwater conditions encountered ond obtain both loose ond undisturbed samples for laboratory inspection and testing. The pertinent phys- ical characteristics of the soils ·will be def·ermined in our laboratoiy and engineering analyses will be performed to develop the necessary design information. The results of the exploral"ions, tesf·s, and analyses will be presented in a single ieport providing definite recommendations for use in the design ond construction of the proposed facilities. Our fee for the outlined.invesi"igotion will not exceed $5,900.00, includ- ing the rental and operation of suitc1ble drilling equipment and backfif ling, tamping, ':Ind permanent patching of the borings in paved areas. We presently anticipate that fhe field work for this proiect can be commenced within two weeks of authorization ond that our report con be submitted within the following four weeks. This letter and the terms on the reverse hereof, together, ore the agree- ment for our services. Acceptance of this proposal may be indicof·ed by signing and returning one of the enclosed duplicates f·o us. We oppreciote the opportunity of submiHing this proposal and will be pleased to work with you and your consultants on this proiect. FAB-LC/ex (3 copies submiHed) cc: Boyle Engineering Attn: Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manc1ger Approved and Agreed Yours very truly, LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES ~-./-r-~ /,.-/" •. / ,// f? *·__......... /c.CC.tt°"':..~f'_, C~ C:§:/~tJ.tLf;?/ Fredrick A. Barnes County Sonitc1tion District No. 3 .or Orange County By-------------· Title Oak: ...... District No. 3 Agenda Item #35 L-2 RESOLUTION NO. 69-23-5 ..• . . AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-17 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-17 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. · That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by.Shuirman-Simpson, District's engineers and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Allied Pump Industries, for SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-17, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 5-17 be awarded to Allied Pump Industries , Contractor, in the total amount of $13,039.75 in accordance with the terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District.are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the ' specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section L~. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. Agenda Item #39 -M-District No. 5 Eng. Estimate: $12,500. BID T A B U L A T ·I 0 N ·~ Contract for: 1 . .,;,. 2. ~· 4. 5. SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION . CONTRACT NO. 5-17 Bidder Allied Pum~ Industries 955 So. "E ' Street San Bernardino 2 Calif. 92408 Allied Pump Industries 955 So. "E" Street San Bernardino 2 Calif. 22408 Char.les Lowe Company 737 W. Channel Street San Pedro 2 California 90731 Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. c/o Luscombe Engineering Co. 610 S. Arroyo Pkwy. .Pasadena 2 California 91101 Kirst Pump & Machine Works 3322 E. Florence Avenue Huntington Park 2 Calif. 90252 Kirst Pump & Machine Works 3322 E. Florence Avenue Huntington Park~ Calif. 90225 Westco Pump Sales Co. 6252 Telegraph Road Los Angeles, Calif. *Corrected f igur~ Agenda Item #39 ·. Date: April 2, 1969@ 4:00 p.m. Days for Deliver~ Total Bid . $12,476.00 . !263. 75 (alternate) 84 ~132039-72 $14,745.00 675.21 210 ~152420.21 $12,920.00 646.oo : 91 ~132500.00 $15,621.00 770.70 209 $15,391.70 $14,118.00 705.90 (alternate) 102 ~1z~2 82~0 $16,ooo.oo 800.00 168 ~102800.00 $21,000.00 12050.00* 245 22,050.0Q ·-N-District No. 5 .. -~ ... . ,. . . . D IRVINE 1.N DUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAM~US DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 . . March 19, 1969 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Sanitation District No. 5 10844 ·Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 114 I e33-1010 2u I 62a-4204 Re: Area Boun~ed by Bison Road, Jamboree Blvd., Future Eastbluff Drive Extension and MacArthur Blvd. Dear Mr. Harper: We have investigated the feasibility of de-annexing the subject area from Sanitation District No. 5 and annexing it to Irvine Ranch Water District for the purpose of providing sewer service to the area. This course of actfon was suggested by .the Board of Directors of District 5 at their meeting of February 25, 1969 and we find that it is feasible. Attached hereto is a letter from our attorney outlining the steps that should be followed to accomplish the detachment and annexation. ~ould you please submit this course of action to the Board of Directors for their approval at the earliest possible date. Upon approval, the Complex will proceed with the necessary steps to accomplish this detachment and annexation. Very truly Ray LLOnd W. Kimmey Chief Engineer RWK/gw cc: ·Mr. Wm. Eppinger Mr. J. Devlin attachments Agenda Item #L1.o -0-District No. 5 ,, ... -· . ·. ·. · ... · .. '·. I . . .. . . ~ . .. • . . ·... . . : .. .. . . . . . . . .. . . .. · .. ·, . .. • .• : ~ I I .. : . March 11, 1969 Mr. Ray W. Kimmey lrv1nc Industrial Complex P. 0. Box t.404 Irvine, California ~ .. . .· . ; . ~ . . . . ·• .· .··. : c 9422 ·. Re: Detaclu~ent and Annexation of North Ford Area From County Sanitation District No.· 5 to Irvine Ranch Hater District Dear Ray: The following is a short summary o~ the procedure which.I believe should be follm·:cd i'n accom!)lishing detachnmnt and annexation of the North It·ord are.a from County .Sanitation District 115 to Irvine Ranch Water District: . 1. If the datachm'2nt and annexatlon nrc to be accomplished in a single proceeding, it is neccss~ry to go before the Board of Supervisors, have an election, etc.1 involving great expense and delay. Th~reforeJ as we clid in 1965, it wtll be ~aslcst if we first dct~ch the area froo Sanitation District #5 and, when completed, anne:'\ the area to Irvine Ranch Water Distrlct. The procacdin3s are in essence identical and tho follcr~ing procedure would apply to both acttons. .. .. 2. Irvine Incustrlal Co!:lplc:-: and The Irvine Company will file a petition with the Loc~l Azcncy Forr.~1.tion Coouission p1Jr- suant to Govcrn~cnt Code Section 56130. Because Irvine Industrial Complex a!1d The Irvine Co:-np.:i.ny tozcth2r own nll of the subject land, these signntures ~re sufficiant to class the petition as a mandatory petition -Govcrnnent Code Sections 56170 and 56180. 3. Briefly, the petition will state what we arc trying. to accomplish, inclu<linz a legal description of th~ aren; ~nl special terms which arc.to be imposed; an<l the reasons for tae action -Govcrn~cnt Coclc Scctio~ 56140. The only special 0-1 ,. ... ' I ,. i ,. I· : ..... •.. ·. ·· ..... .. Mr. Ray W. Kimmey Page Two M:lrch 11. 1969 . . . condition which I believe should be imposed ls the exemption of the subject property from any liability for bonds of .· Sanita~ion District #5 because, I.believe, District 05 has not had any bond issu2 which includes the subject lands.• Government Code Section 56470(c). The reason for the action will be simply th~t the ~rea can be mo~e easily and economically served by Irvlne R.:lnch Water District. · '•· Because all the land6t1mers have signed the· petition, ·the Local Agency Forwation Co~iss{on can approve the petition. without notice or hearing, and can authorize the two districts to act without notice or election -Go\'ermncnt Code Section 56261. l"'he Local Agency Forr~tion Cornmission adopts a. reso- lution directing the two districts.to act -Government Code Section 56271. 5. The two districts then adopt resolutions approving the action -Government Coda Section 56310. ' 6. rlhQ districts file a certificate of completion with the Secretary of State whereupon the change is corapl~ted - Government Code Sect ion 5645,l. · Please let me know when you want: rm~ to proc~cd. '• Very truly yours, _&. .... •' Hugh J. Scallon HJS:cbd cc: ~tr. ~ymond L.·Curr~n Agenda Item 1/-~0 0-2 Distrtct No. 5 __ .,... __ ____... , . CITY OF NE\VPORT BEACI-I Mr. Fred A~ Harper General Manager Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Mr. Harper: .. CALIFORNIA 9:t660 City Hall 8300 Newport Blvd. (714) 673-2110 March 12, 19 69 At the March 10, 1969 Study Session of the City Council the staff was directed to investigate the possibility of transfering the owner- ship of the Cameo Shores Purriping Station from the City to.County Sanitation District No. 5. The matter came up as a result of .recent failures in the pump station's force main. Since this station with an enlarged force main is ultimately planned·to be a district facility, it was felt that, before the City puts a large investment in the existing force main, consideration should be given to making the transfer at this time. At your convenience I would like to meet with you regarding the District's position on this inquiry. "· Very truly yours, \\ . <-is~Q_ --T. ~Q_,~ Jqseph T. Devlin Public Wo ks Director I TD/ldg CC: City Manager Agenda Item #41 -P-District No. 5 , =-err :P· /} {gmf/l:e ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHONE <714> 547-4471 AO DRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 April 1,. 1969 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 · of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper County Sanitation District No. 7 Addition to Doniger Road Sewer to Proposed Assessment District No. 8 Eleven property owners on Doniger Road and other property served by El Roy Drive and Hinton Way have requested an~exation to County Sanitation District No. 7 for the purpose of obtaining sanitary sewers as part of proposed Assess- ment District No. 8. We have prepared and ore processing the legal description and sketch to accompany the description through the local Agency Formation Commission. In order to expedite the preparation of the construction and assessment diagram drawings for this additional area, we are requesting a modification to our proposal dated November 21, 1968 for engineering services. It is estimated that the construction cost of the expanded sewerage system wi 11 be increased by approximately $10,000 to a total C?f $50,000. We estimate the additional engineering cost to prepare pl ans and specifications, assessment diagram, and all work appurtenant thereto up to the time of award of contract wil I be $1, 000. Additional engineering cost for the additional work after award of contract and through the final public hearing will be $400, making o total additional engi- neering fee of $1,400, all in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated November 21, 1968. We respectively request authorizCJtion to proceed with the additional work as outlined above so that the Doniger Road construction drawing can be completed by the time the proposed annexation is accomplished. The enlarged assessment district can then be consfructed with the least amount of delay to the property owners. ·{i;J r?a cc· ,£;' . /:_A·/' t·· ~ /. . (. C --, t· •. c -~.J-~ Carl A. Carlson, C.E. 6654 PP 81-2920-00-00 PROFESSIONAL F.NGINEEHING AND AHCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenc1a Item # 49 ":"'Q-District No. 7 v ~ v CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIATION FORTY-FIRST ANNUAL CONFERENCE SCHEDULE OF EVENTS MAY 7-10, 1969 DISNEYLAND HOTEL Anaheim, Calif. PLEASE IP~rnQ~rn®tt~1rrnr;! ANNUAL CONFERENCE MAY 7-10, 1969 DISNEYLAND HOT~L, ANAHEIM WEDNESDAY, MAY 7 GENERAL CONFERENCE REGISTRATION 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. -2:00 to 7;00 p.m. OPERATORS SCHOOL ------------------------------------------9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Registration -----------·------------------------····------------------7:00 a.m. to 8:00 a.m. Introduction ----------------------------····--·-------------------____ Herb Johnson, Chrmn. "Useful In-Plant Laboratory Tests in 17 'Easy Lessons" Part I --------------------------------------------------------*Staff Luncheon ------------------------------------------------------------12:00 noon to l: 15 p.m. "Useful In-Plant Laboratory Tests" Part 11 ······-----·----------------------·---*Staff *Staff: Herbert Johnson, Joe Nagano, George Rooney, John Stanton, Frank Wada, all of Hyperion and Hyman. Katz, State Dept. Public Health. INDUSTRIAL WASTES SHORT SCHOOL ____________ l 2:00 noon to 5:00 p.m. Registration -------_ --------··--------. ---··. ______ ----__ -·. ------------------------------. -Morning Luncheon ----------------------------------------------------------12:00 noon to l: 15 p.m. Introduction ----------------------··-------·----------·······-----------Arthur Martin, Chm. "Detection of Industrial Wastes" ----------------------------------Ladin H. Delaney "How Industry Can Control Wastes'' -----------··-----------John M. Zasadzinski "Conservation Begins at the Source" -----·······----------------------Carl Johnston "Learning to Live with Industrial Wastes" ---------··----------····-··John E. Sigler COLLECTION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SCHOOL..8:50 a.m. -5:00 p.m. Registration --------------------------------------------------------·-7:00 a.m. to 8:50 a.m. Introduction ----------------------·-------------------····--····--------Robert Barletta, Chm. "Latest Developments in Sewer Connections" ________________ Gordon Magnuson "Root Control Research-Chemical & Physical" ·--····-·-----------Neal Townley "Sulfide Controls, Application and Mechanics" Richard Pomeroy and Harry Bailey "'Safety in Protective Coating Application" ··----------·-·-------Charles Munger i..uncheon ----------------------------------------------------------12:00 noon to l: 15 p.m. "Practical Pump Maintenance" ------------------------------------------Robert Muntsch "'Safety in Handling Chlorine" ·-----------------------·-------------------to be arranged "'Industrial Wastes Guideposts for the · Maintenance Man" ----------------··--··-·------------------------Charles G. Brisley Note: Package Registration fee of $10.00 will include any short school registration, luncheon, and workbook, but does not include General Conference Registration. Registration and workbook may be purchased separately. EVENING Hospitality Hour, hosted by Manufacturers and their representatives --------------------------6:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. TH~RSDAY, MAY 8 Registration ----------------------------------------------------------7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. BREAKFAST SESSIONS (concurrent) ----------------------------7:30 to 9:00 a.m. Industrial Wastes Breakfast ----------------------Moderator: William J. Ryan "Rocket Engines & Industrial Wastes" --------------------John E. Thompson "Industrial Water Use & Reclamation" __________________ James H. Johnson Sewer Design & Maintenance --------------------Moderator: Robert Barletta "Compaction: Fact or Fiction" --------------------------------------Bert V. Elkins OPENING SESSION ----------------------------------------------···-----9:00 to 9:20 a.m. Keith E. Murdock, City Manager, Anaheim Anaheim Conference - Short Schools v The Wednesday, May 7 short schools are designed to offer practical guidance to operators, sewer mainten- ance, and industrial waste people. The operator and sewer maintenance schools will be full day sessions includ- ing a luncheon. The industrial waste school will be an afternoon program only commencing with an optional lunch. This year an attractive package registration is offered for the short schools for only $10.00 which includes short school registration, lunch, and the appropriate workbook. Herb Johnson, Chairman of Opera- tor Training, has arranged an Opera- tors' school that will deal with useful laboratory tests for all types of treat- ment plants. Demonstrations, and il- lustrated workbook, and a specially produced movie will be featured. Sewer maintenance experts have been organized by Bob Barletta, Seweu :Maintenance Committee Chairman, and will discuss the latest developments in sewer connections, chemical clean- ing of sewer lines, sulfide control, safety in protective coating applica- tion, practical pump maintenance, safe- ty in handling chlorine, and industrial waste guideposts for the all-around maintenance man. Art Martin, Industrial ·waste Com- mittee Chairman, has arranged an ex- cellent one-half day session dealing solely with industrial wastes. Topics for discussion will be : detection of in- dustrial wastes in the system ; methods of control by industry ; conservation of water and wastes at the source, and learning to live with what industrial waste may, of necessity, enter the sew- erage system. The Short School promises to be a good one and should prove profitable to all participants. '...} TECHNICAL SESSIONS (concurrent) .......................... 9:30 to 12:00 noon A. Industrial Wastes ............................ Moderator: Lawrence A. Meyerson "Tale of Three Cities" ............................ Donald L. Feuerstein, Ph.D. Carl A. Rambow, :Ph.D., Raymond V. Stone B. Plant Operations .................................. Moderator: Franklin D.. Dryde.n "Rationale for Upstream Plants" ................................ Roger A. Deeken "Equipment & Facilities Maintenance" .................... William F. Garber "Treatment Plant Automation" .............................. Theodore V. Lutge "Digester Repair" (Reynolds Award) .................. Robert N. Galloway KEYNOTE & AWARDS LUNCHEON .......................... 12: 15 to 2:00 p.m. Speaker .................. Honorable Edward Reinecke, Lt. Gov. of California TECHNICAL SESSIONS (concurrent) ............................ 2: 15 to 5:00 p.m. C. Population Effects on Harbor & Coastal Waters Presiding Officer ------·-----····--······························----William F. Garber Panel Moderator ........................................................ P. H. McGauh.ey Panel Members .......................... Ellen Stern Harris, Kerry W. Mulligan Wheeler J. North, 'Ph.D., Richard B. Tibby, Ph.D. D. Sewer Design & Construction .................. Moderator: James E. Lenihan "Construction Responsibil 1ties" ············-------------·-···-·········Leon Turner "Sewer Design" ··········--------···--···································Robert L. White "Odor Control Methods" ................................................ Jay G. Krem.er FRIDAY, MAY 9 Registration ......................................................... .7:00 a.m. to 1 :00 p.m. BREAKFAST SESSIONS (concurrent) ........................... .7:30 to 9:00 a.m. Operators Breakfast .................................... Moderator: Carl A. Nagel "A New Approach to Operator Training" ...... Kenneth D. Kerri, Ph.D. Research & Operations ~reakfast ............ Moderator: William M. Conn "Chemical Alternatives to Biological Waste Treatment" ............................ Warren J. Kaufman, Ph.D. TECHNICAL SESSIONS (concurrent) ................ 9: 15 a.m. to 12:00 noon E. Reclamation of Water for Reuse .......... Moderator: John C. Merrell, Jr. "Advanced Waste Treatment at Pomona" ................ Charles W. Carry "Nitrogen Removal at Tahoe" ...................................... Russell L. Culp "Nitrate Removal at Firebaugh" ...... Percy P. St. Amant & Louis A. Beck "Water Reuse: A Texas Necessity" Hugh C. Yantis & Howard Boswell F. Reclamation of Water for Reuse: Op·erations .... 9: 15 a.m. to 12:00 noon Moderator: Paul C. Ward 11State Water Reuse Standards" .............................. William F. Jopling "Glendale -Los Angeles Water Reclamation Plant Feasibi I ity Study" ---····················---··--·---Eugene D. Nelson "Cooperative Area Manpower Planning Program" ... .Irving M. Ter.zich "Introducing Reclamation to the Public" ................ William R. Ree, Jr. BUSINESS LUNCHEON .............................................. 12: 15 to 2:00 p.m. TECHNICAL SESSION (General) .................................. 2: 15 to 5:00 p.m. G. Water Quality Management .................... Moderator: John D. Parkhurst "Water Qua I ity Control Law Revision" ···---------·······-·········---Ron Robie "Bay-Delta Water Quality Control Plan" Raymond Walsh & William S. Hyde "Problems Concerning the Bay-Delta Plan" Panel.. ...... H. K. Chadwick, Fr.ed H. Dierker & Richard R. Kennedy EVENING BANQUET .............................................................. 7:30 p.m. Speaker, followed by entertainment and dancing SATURDAY, MAY 10 TREATMENT PLANT TOURS Orange County Sanitation Districts Plants No. 1 and 2. Laguna Niguel Water District Irvine Ranch Water District City of Corona Diemer Water Filtration Plant Anaheim Conference Committee Co-Chairmen Jack Betz, Van Nuys Fred Harper, Orange Conf. Program Chairman· Dr. James Foxworthy Loyola University General Arrangements Coordinating Committee Carl Conner, Chairman, Santa Ana River Basin Section Ted Francis, Secretary Santa Ana River Basin Section Norm Tremblay, Garden Grove Ted Dunn, Santa Ana Wayne Sylvester, Costa Mesa John Sigler, Costa Mesa Bill Clarke, Buena Park Ladies Program and Entertainment Bob Webber, Laguna Niguel Water District Hotel Arrangements Norm Tremblay, Garden Grove Local Host -Co-Chairmen Carl Conner, Santa Ana River Basin Section Ted Francis, Santa Ana River Basin Section Short School Dick Bueerman, Executive Officer Region VI 11 Water Quality Control Board, Riverside Inspection Trips Ted Francis, Secretary, Santa Ana River Basin Section Publicity Ted Finster, Boyle Engineering, Santa Ana Bud Barber, Boyle Engineering, Santa Ana Registration Bill Clarke, Buena Park Manufacturers Percy Dykes, Amercoat Corp., Brea Finance Wayne Sylvester, Costa Mesa Speaker Aids · Roy Pendergraft, Anaheim Signs and Displays Doug Preble, Orange Printing Ted Dunn, Santa Ana LADIES ACTIVITIES WEDNESDAY, MAY 7 Hospi t a li ty Room open fr om 8:00 a.m. thru 5:00 p .m. Coffee and pastry w i II be served 11 Unsch e dul ed acti v iti es 111 Art a nd H o bby C raf ts -C a lifo rni a Room Di spl a ys and exhibits by leadi ng local a rt isan s. THURSDAY, MAY 8 I Hospi ta lity Room o p e n a ll day. II Buses depart for South C oast T our fr o m Disneyland H ot e l, 9:00 a.m . A. Po ints of interest: Irv in e Ranch, University of Ca li fo rni a at Irvine, Fash ion Is la nd, Coro n a del Mar. B. Sho pping Lagu na Beach in Art Galle r ie s and G if t Shops from l 0:00 a.m. t o 11 :45 a.m. C. Lunch -Victo r Hu go Inn, Laguna Beach , Noo n to 1 : 15 p.m. D . Pottery De m onstration -Pottery Shack -l :30 p .m. t o 2 :30 p.m. E. Visit t o San Juan Capis trano Mission. 11 l Bu ses re turn to Di s n ey la nd Hotel, 4: 1 5 p .m . FRIDAY , MAY 9 I Hospitality Room open all day 11 Buses leave H otel for Los Angeles, l 0 : 15 a .m . 111 T o ur Dorothy Chandl e r Pa v i lio n at Lo s Angeles Music Center. IV Luncheon -Music C ente r Pe nthouse, l :00 p .m . to 2:30 p.m. V Buses return Di sney land Ho tel , 3:00 p .m . MASTERMINDING 1969 C.W.P.C.A. CONFERENCE: Standing, left t o rig ht, Walter E. Garri son, P res iden t C.W.P .C.A.; Fred A. Harper and Jack Be tz, Co n ference Co-C hairmen · seated, Dr. J ames Foxworthy, Program Chairman. ' II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Cali fo rn ia JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, April 9, 1969 7:30 p.m. P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 T a leph one s: Are a Code 714 540-2910 962-2 411 April 4, 1969 Th e following is a brief explanation of the more important non- r o utine items whic h appear on the enc l osed agenda and wh i ch are not otherwise self-explanatory . warrant lists are not attached to the a ge nda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the comp lete agenda available at the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * * Districts Nos . 1, 2 , 3, and 7 No . 3 -SEATING OF NEW DIRE CTORS AND ALTERNATE DIRECTORS FROM CITIES OF SANTA ANA AND LA HABRA: As the Directors are aware, Mayor McMichael is retiring from the Santa Ana City Coun c il prior to this Board meet i ng. We have also been advised that Mr. Robert Nevil has been elected Mayor of La Habra. It is expected that communications from both Cities on this subject wi ll be received by the time of the meeting . District No. 1 No . 4 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN PRO TEM : After the seating of the new Director from the City of Sa nta Ana (see above) it will be in order for the Board to elect a Chairman pro tern to serve until the May meeting when all of the Boards hold their annual elections of Board Chairmen . Joint Boards No. 16 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: The Co mmittee met in regular session on the evening of March 25 and a report of the meeting, together with the Committee's recommendations for action by the J o int Boards is en closed . Nos. 17 and 18 -CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE'S RECOM- ME NDATIONS: These agenda items are consideration of actions on the re c ommendations of the Committee as presented in the enclosed report. As stated in the report, we expect to have an additional r~port from John Carollo Engineers concerning the proposal of Pe ter Kiewit Sons for an alternate me thod of construction of a portion of our n e vJ ocean outfall (It em No . 17). The Engineers advise us that this supple- mental report will probably not be available until the day of the Board meeting. It is possible that the supplemental report of the engineers will have a bearing on the final decision in this matter. No . 19 -REPORT OF ENGINEERS AND STAFF CONCERNING EFFECT OF FLOOD RUNOFF ON CONSTRUCT I ON OF NEW OUTFALL: Recent preliminary surveys have shown that the flood runoff in t he Santa Ana River from the J anuary and February storms has d eposited a considerab l e amount of material over the site of the inshore section of the new ocean outfall . Inasmuch as the contractor will be excavating in this area in the next few months, dredging o f this additional material will increase his costs to an extent which cannot be determined until the work is completed . We have asked our General Counsel to be prepared to advise the Boards as to whe ther the Districts would be liable for payment of this additional cost, in the event the contractor files a claim for extra work . Also, there is the possib ility that Federal funds could be obtained under the Disaster Relief Act of 1966 for a portion of this additional cost. The staff and engineers are in the process of acquiring further information on this subject and wi ll be prepared to report in greater detail at the Board meeting. If our investigation shows that a cutoff date for application for Federal disaster funds will occur before the May Board meeting , it may be appropriate to authorize filing such an application at this meeting. No. 20 -RE QUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME, OCEAN OUTFALL NO . 2 : As exp l ained in the Manager's Report for the March Board meeting, a procedure has been established to receive and file and act upon requests for extensions of time received during the preceding month . It is recommended that the request shown on the formal agenda be granted. No . 21 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS -DIGESTER NO . 8 AT PLANT NO . 1 , JOB NO . Pl-14 : This is a plant constructi on job, budgeted and scheduled in accordance with the 1968 five-year master plan for treatment facilities . It consists of the construction of a new 90 -foot diameter digeste r at Plant No . 1 to keep pace with the increasing flows reaching our Pl ants. Bids are scheduled to be received on May 7 with award one week later on May 14 at the regular Joint Board meeting. The engineer 's est i mate for the job is $425,000 . No. 22 -ADDENDUM TO PLANT CONSTRUCTION JOB NO. P2-14 : This plant job, as described in a previous agenda report, is now out for bid . Advertis ing for bids was delayed because of the necessity of obtain- ing approval o f the plans and specifications from the Federal Water Pol l ution Control Administration. This approval is required since the Federal construction grant for our new ocean outfall was extended to cover this job and Job No. Pl-14 (Item No. 21 above). Because · of this delay, the included labor rate determination by the Department of Labor has expired and accordingly . it is necessary to issue the current labor rate schedule . The addendum updates the Federal labor rates requirements and also makes three other technical changes in +,he spec ifications to correct errors discovered since Board approval. -2- No. 23 -ATTENDANCE AT CALIFORNIA WATER POLLUTION CONTROL ASSOCIA 'l'IO~ CONFERENCE IN ANAHEIM, MAY 7 THROUGH 10: For many years it has been c ustomary to authorize a number of employees to attend these confer- ences and we feel that such attendance has been beneficial to the Distri c ts in acquainting our personnel with practices and procedures o f ot~er a g encies as we ll as new developments in the sewerage field . '.12 11.v 1.)f our e mp l o yees are active in t he Santa Ana River Basin Section of this organization and have a genuine interest in these meetings. Since the conference this year will be held at the Disneyland Hotel under the g uidance of the local section, a good many of our employees have been active in the arrangements. For this reason and because of the proximity of the conference location , we are recommending that a tota l of 20 Districts' employees be authorized to attend, with fees and expenses paid, from May 7 through 10 . We are also recommending that payment be authorized for registration fees, meals, transportation, and incidental expenses for any Director who wishes to attend the conference. No . 24 -INCREASE I N MAXIMUM FEE FOR ELECTRICAL ENERGY STUDY: The Directors will recall that at the February Joint Board meeting a proposal was accepted from John Carollo Engineers for conducting of a master plan electrical energy study for our two treatment plants. After commencement of the study it became obvious that the scope should be extended to cover certain phases of the subject not originally contemplated. By letter dated April 2 (copy attached to the agenda materia l ), the engineers are requesting that their maximum fee for the study be increased from $3500 to $5300 because of this increase in scope. The staff recommends that the maximum fee be increased as requested. District No. 1 No. 28 -EXTENSION OF AGREEMENT WI TH HOLLY SUGAR COMPANY FOR INDUSTRIAL WASTE DISPOSAL: This matter was put over to this meeting from the March 12 Board meeting at Chairman McMichael 1 s request . For the past several y e ars the District's agreement with the Holly Sugar Company, establishing terms , conditions and charge s for industrial waste disposal, has been on an annual basis. This arrangement has been previously agreed to , pending the poss i ble future adoption of a uniform industrial waste charge throughout a l l of the Districts . The letter (copy included with the agenda material) from the Company requests that the agreement in effect for 1968 be extended for 1969. District No. 3 No. 35 -EMPLOYMENT OF CONSULTING FOUNDATION ENGINEERS FOR FORTH- COMING CONSTRUCT I ON JOBS: It will be recalled that Boyle Engineering was recently authorized to proceed with the design of four separate projects in the Los Alamitos and Westminster area as recommended and -3- scheduled in the appr oved 1968 Master Plan for Future Facilities in the District. Because of the magnitude of these projects, the design engineers have recommended that the Districts employ a con - sulting engineering firm to make soil borings and from the information obtained to submit recommendations for foundation requiremen ts . In accordance with this recommendation, a proposal for this work has been obtained from LeRoy Crandall and Associates of Los Angeles, who have done excellent work of this type f or the Districts in the past. The staff recommends that this firm be employed in accordance with their proposa l of March 20 (copy included with the agenda material) at a total fee not to exc~ed $5900. District No. 5 No. 39 -AWARD OF REPLACEMEN'r PUMPING EQUI PMENT FOR JAMBOREE PUMP STATION : As recommended ~y the District's engineer and in accordance with authorization of the Board, bids for this equipment were opened on April 2 . A tabula tion of the bids received is included with the agenda material and the engineer and staff recommends that the award of the purchase of this equipment be made to Allied Pump Industries of San Bernardino at a tota l cost of $13,039.75 , ~o . 40 -REQUEST OF IRVINE I NDUS TRIA L COMPLEX FOR WITHDRAWAL FROM ~I STR I CT : A copy of the request dated March 19 from the Irvine Industrial Complex for withdrawal of certain areas from the District Was forwarded to the i ndividua l Directors on March 21 . The communication, with a legal opinion prepared by the attorney for the Complex, is enclosed with the agenda material. The staff feels that it is appropriate to postBone consideration of this request to an adjourned meeting, scheduled lat er in the month, in order that further information and the exact boundary of the proposed withdrawal can bci obtained . No. 41 -REQUEST OF CITY ()F NEWPORT BEACH FO.R TRANSFERR ING OWNERSHIP OF CAMEO SHORES rUMPING STATION TO THE DISTRICT: A copy of a letter on this subject, dated March 12, from the City of Newport Beach Department of Public Works is included with the agenda material. Since receipt of this lett er, the s taff has held discussions with the City representatives and the District's engineer and has asked the latter to submit a report on the estimated cost of connecting this facility directly to the District's system. It is recommended that this matter be also held over to th e adjourned meeting later in the month in orde r to allow mo r e time for consideration o f this request and its ramifications. By that time also the report of the Di st rict 's engineer should be available . No. 42 -UPDATE REPORT ON 1964 MASTER PLAN REPORT: Chairman Parsons has requested that a proposal be obtained from the District's engineQrs, Shuirman -Simpson, to update this r e port. It is expected that this proposal will bo r eceived in time for consideration at the April 29 adjourned meating . -4- No . 45 -ADJOURNMENT TO APRIL 29: It is suggested that the Board adjourn to the above date at 4:30 p .m. in the District's office to consider the above -described matters and to take up any other business ready for Board consideration at that time. This hour and date will immediately precede the next scheduled meeting of the Executive Committee. District No. 7 No . 49 -PROPOSAL OF BOYLE ENGINEERING FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES RELATIVE TO ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 8: On March 25, the Board accepted a petition for annexation of territory to the District adjacent to proposed Assessment District No . 8 . This petition was signed by 100% of the property owners within the area to be annexed, therefore the staff asked Boyle Engineering for an engineering proposal (see copy in the agenda materia l) to include this area within the new assessment district as we believe that enlarging the project wil l reduce the individual property owner's costs for the installation of the sewers . Fred A . Harper General Manager -5- 6961 '6 1:1Jd\f S~N~w.nooa DNI~HOdclfl.S CTN~ SNOI~n~os~H 1\E WARRANT NO. 10907 10908 .10909 . '...,_/10910 10911 10912 10913 10914 10915 10916 10917 10918 10919 10920 10921 10922 10923 10924 10925 10926 10927 10928 10929 10930 10931· 10932 10933 10934 "w'l0935 10936 10937 10938 10939 10940 10941 10942 10943 10944 10945 10946 10947 10948 10949 10950 10951 10952 10953 10954 10955 10956 10957 10958 1 0959 ~960 10961 10962 10963 10964 10~65 10966 10967 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Acqre Drilling Service, Cored Drilling Advance Electric, Motor Rewind Advance Foundation Engineering, Test P2-8-3 Aladdin Litho & Art, Requisition Forms All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts Allied Pump Industries, Inc., Pump Shafts Allmetal Screw Products Co., Inc., Small Hardware City of Anaheim, Power · The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts & Packing Atlas Stationers, Office Equipment & Supplies Barksdale Valves, Valves & Parts Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Pump Parts ·Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bessen & Associates, Pump Parts Blasius Electric Truck, Truck Parts Bokelman Plating, Rotor Plating Brage Construction Co., Abandon Manhole -Ellis Ave. Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies Cal's Cameras Inc., Photo Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Service Certified Building Materials Co., Sand Chicago Miniature Lamp Co., Electrical Supplies Chrome Crankshaft Co., Inc., Cylinder Repair Clarke Dye Hardware, Small Hardware Classified Transfer Co., Move Equipment . Coast Office Equipment Co., Office quipment College Lumber Co., Inc., Small Tools & Hardware Condolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental-Emsco Co., Check Valves Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts John M. Deck, Engine Parts De Guelle & Son's Glass Co., Window Glass Diesel Control Corp., Gaskets, Freight, Filters Dixon Boiler Works, Inc., Boiler Rental Dunton Ford, Truck Parts The Eimco Corp., Air Diffusers Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electrical Supplies Electric Tool & Equipment Co., Small Equip. Engine Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Sample, Current Monitoring Fischer & Porter Co., Chlorination Parts, Controls The Flag Shop, Flags Flair Drafting Service Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machine Shop Work City of Fullerton, Water Garden Grove Lumber & Cement Co., Small Hardware Garvin's Paint & Body Shop, Vehicle Repair General Telephone Co. Georgia-Pacific Corp., Chlorine Goldenwest Fertilizer Co., Grit Hauling Goodall Rubber Co., Hose Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Serv. Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting & C.O.D. Expenses James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Honeywell, Inc., Telemetry Supplies Edward L. Houchins, Carpentry Work Jack Edward McKee, Consultant Howard Supply, Valves, Pump & Small Hardware City of Huntington Beach, Water International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Engine Parts Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe, Valves (MO 1-8-69) -A- AMOUNT 92.96 1,550.61 70.40 58.80 257 .19 . l, 516 .oo 10.~2 80.71 830.99 388.30 580.10 70.44 71.12 300.99 454.18 4~.oo 650.00 9.66 8.37 190.25 23.10 183.00 85.00 26.65 12.50 126.oo 74.92 531.13 1,434.52 424.09 32.74 42.88 189 .oo 420.00 41.49 115.75 771.35 72.16 3,750.00 1,561.12 67.04 490.00 106.20 5.16 90.35 256.56 1,068.10 4,703.81 1,088.40 276.29 505.00 75.72 11.40 229.97 36.00 450.00 1,070.91 7.30 196.38 25.44 5,170.44 .. . "). WARRANT NO. 10968 10969 10970 10971 ~10972 10973 10974 .. 10975 10976 10977 10978 10979 10980 10981 10982 10983 10984 10985 I 10986 10987 10988 10989 1099.0 10991 10992 10993 10994· 10995 10996 . 10997 ~10998 10999 11000 11001 11002 11003 11004 11005 11006 11007 11008 11009 11010 11011 11012 11013 11014 11015 11016 11017 11018 11019 11020 11021 11022 ~1023 IN FAVOR OF King Bearing, Inc., Small Hardware Kleen-Line Corp., J·anitorial Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools LaPine Scientific. Co., Lab Supplies LBJ Crane Service, Inc., Crane Rental LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies & Small Tools Lewis Bros. Battery, Batteries Judy Lee, Employee Mileage M-G Disposal Service, Inc., Truck Door McGraw-Hill Book Co., Technical Manual The Matheson Co., Inc., Lab Supplies Mine Safety Appliances, Safety Harnesses Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Extinguisher Refills The National Cash Register Co., Office Supplies · City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer o. C. Suppliers, Inc., Small Hardware Oranco Supply Co., Piping Orange County Radiotelephone Service Pacific Telephone Co. Pacific Valves, Inc., Valve Parts & Fittings Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Register, Employment Ads Public Employees Retirement System, ·Annual Adm. Fee Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing Santa Ana Electric Motors, Pump & Motor Rewind Service Motor Parts Co., Engine Parts Shell Oil Co., Gasoline Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey ,. Inc., Tires & Tubes Signal-Flash. Co., Inc., Traffic Control Barricades Smith Insurance, Fidelity Bond Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts The c. D. Spracher Co., Inc., Controls Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Engine Oil Superior Industries, Webbing Surveyors Service Co., Survey Equipment Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Yard Repair Union Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline United Automotive Service, Truck Repair Valvate Associates, Freight Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Lab Equipment John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant D. L. Warwick, M.D., Pre-Employment Physicals Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Inc., Engine Parts West Coast Sand & Gravel, Inc., Sand Western Gear Corp., Freight Western Salt Co., Salt James Wybenga, Employee Mileage AMOUNT 182.81 213.12 119 .49 . 187.54 136.00 455.48 118.21 14.oo 90.00 34.49 9.19 149.94 22.05 56.35 9-;oo 700.00 27.31 308.88 424.35 499.70 165.26 150.00 51.20 209.40 117.00 654. 71 16.12 629.19 575.00 104.81 225e35 129 .51 82.88 92.00 17,,241.02 3.00 1,379.73 99.24 259 .45 90.30 162.86 32.91 27.79 48.34 308.73 391.24 8.63 4.05 520.08 213.40 43.50 134.21 37 .59 41.65 25.62 ·30.10 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 61,151.54 -B- . \ WARRANT NO. ---=------- 11024 11025 v11026 . 11027 11028 11029 11030 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers, Engr. Serv. Plant Const. · W. J. Burke Construction Co., Contractor P2-8-3 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad PW-016 Enterprise Printing Co., Plans & Specs P2-14 Peter Kiewit Sons' Co., Contractor J-10 Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Plans & Specs P2-14 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 CONSTRUCTION INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND IN FAVOR OF Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Pipe Testing J-10 TOTAL INSPECTION REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT WARRANTS -c- AMOUNT 8,494.87· 15,594.12 . 9.92 65.31 96,638.40 66.68 $ 120,869.30 $ 1,638.00 1,638.00 $ 183,658.84 WARRANT NO. 11031 11032 '.!l.033 11034 11035 ~ 11036 11037 11038 11039 11040 ~l.041 '-6) DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 2-10-9 $ 1,619.50 Meriwether Investment Co., Inc., Assignee of Charles L. Burch & Sons, Contractor 2-10-9 72,290.70 The Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., Repairs Contract·2-10-8 171.33 City of Santa Ana, Water Main Repair Contract 2-10-7 171.97 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTL.~Y FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engineering Services 3-11, 3-12 & 3-13 'DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach, Connection Charge Admn. Shuirman-Simpso~, Irvine Industrial Area Report ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF B & M Excavating, Inc., Contractor 5-16 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad Contract 5-17 Shuirman-Simpson, Engineering Servj.ces 5-16 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Petty Pools, Refund Conn. Fee -D- $ 74,253.50 $ $ $ $ 14,368.15 14' 368 .15 80.00 649.00 729.00 3,271.43 7.61 917.00 $ 4,196.04 $ 42.00 42.00 $ 4, 967. oL~ WARRANT NO. 11042 ,_043 \.,J 11044 11045 ·11046 11047 -.,048 ~ DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv. Master Plan Report, Right-of-Way A.D. #8, Plan Check & Inspection Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund of Inspection Deposit Overpayment Pinole Northridge, Inc., Refund P~an Checking and Inspection Deposit overpayment The Tustin News, Legal Ad Assessment District #7 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Anaheim Sewer Construction, Test Holes Cont. 7-2R · Boyle Engineering, Engr. 7-2R FACILITIES .REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Enterprise Printing Company, .Plans & Specs. Cont. 7-2-DP -E· .. $ $ $ AMOUNT 4,170.20 112.50 10.00 48.oo 4,340.70 230.00 710.00 $ 940.00 !~8. 41 $ 48.41 $ 5,329.11 J ·. ... ., ... :. ' . .... , · / l .. MAIN OFFICE: OMAHA 31, NEBR. 1000 KIEWIT PLAZA PE-fER t<IEWIT SONS' CO. CONTRACTORS ESTABLISHED 1884 ADDRESS REPLY TO: P.O. Box 552 . ~'··· .,_ Huntington Beach, Ca 926h8 John Carollo Engineers P.O. Box 528 Huntington Beach, Ca 9~648 March 3, ·1969 Attn: Hr~ Walt Bi'shop, Resident Engineer Re: Request for extens:lon of' time Gentlemen: In accordance with the genoral ·provisions of the spccifica tions Section 6, paragrc::ph 3, we respectfully re~uest an ex-tension of ti.1.e contract t:iJnc for two (2) days becam;e of weather delays (rain) on . Februar-.r 211, 1969 anr1 Februar-j 25, 1969. cc: File Agenda Item #20 -F-All Districts . . . . . ·--·---4••~ ._,.;1,,.__ ~ -----------J 0 H N CA R.O LL 0 ENGINEERS---------- Phoenix, Arizona Lafayelf e, California El Paso, Texas Ropfy to: .tOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ltOBERT ftf. BRERETON. P.E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS. P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. April 1, 1969 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE. CALIFORNIA 94549 AREA CODE 41:1 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Dist_ricts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section Attached is a letter from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company .requesting a two-day extension of time because of delay due to rainy weather conditions (February 24 and 25). We recommend approval of a two-day extension of time in accordance with Section 6-3 of the General Pro·.risions of the Specifications. Heavy rain occurred on both February 24 and 25. The Contractor has requested a total of 10 days exten- sion of time through March 25., 1969. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS $41~· c?. ~.t-LJ Walter A. Bishop /-- Resident Engineer WAB:ml Enclosure Agenda Item #20 -G-All Districts .. ~-~ ' .,,. ... 283·3895 RESOLUTION NO. 69-22 . . APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. Pl-14 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF.DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-14 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo Engineers, Districts' engineers, for construction of DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-14, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Calif- ornia; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received until 4:00 p.m., May21, 1969, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards and the Districts• Engineers be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. Pl-14 on \,,,,,,,/ behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting April 9, 1969. Agenda Item #21 -~ All Districts .... ··. . . I •• ADDENDUM NO. 1. to Specifications for April 4, 1969 ~EDIMENTATION BASIN 1, DIQESTER 1 AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE B AT PLANT NO. 2 Job Noo P2-14 A. GENERAL PROVISIONS · . I.. Page GP 1, Section 1, Notice Inviting Bids, Federally Assisted f>roject -· ·--· ~ ~ -.. ~-.... ~-......... -··-" Insert the following paragraphs betwee~ the 6th ~nd 7th paragraphs: ''This contract is a Federal Aid Project and not less than the prevailing rate of per diem wages, as determined by the Secretary of Labor j_n accordanc~ with the Davis-Bacon Act, shall be paid for each craft or type of workman need- ed to perform ~he contract." "Bidders on this work will be required to comply with the President's Executive Order No. 11114 and the provisions of Executive Order No. 10925, as included therein. The requirements for bidders and contractors under this order are explained in the ·specifications.!' II. Page GP 9, Section l~-4, INSURANCE Add the following to paragraph no. 4: 11 The contractor shall carry and maintain fire.and extended coverage with an endorsement for vandalfsm and malicious mischief in his name and also in the name of the District in ~n amount of not less than 't\'1enty thousand dollars ($20, 000. 00)." IIIo Page GP 33, Section 9-18, IABOH STANDARDS Delete pages GP 31~ through 38 inclusive and substitute the attached pages for the Labor Standards: All n:i.str:i ct.s I • ADDENDUM NO. 1 Con't. 'lr:. DETAILED SPECIFICATIONS . I• Page DS 37, Section 14-23, PRESTRESSED DIGESTER COLLAR page two Change the ne~t to last sentence in the first paragraph to ·read as follows: · "Each tie down shall be prestressed to a net tensile force . ."of 100 pounds per tie down." John Carollo Engineers Agenda Item #22 All Dlstricts . . ·• SOL-t2S ('l-G4) '-· U:S. DEPARTMENT OF. LABOR· OFFICE OF THE SECRETARY WASHINGTON ·DECISION OF THE SECRETARY . ~ This. case is before the Department of ·Labor pursuant to a request for a wage prede- termination as required by law applicable to the work described. A study has been made of wage conditions in the locality and based on information available to the Department of Lnbor the wage rat.es and fringe payments listed a1·e hereby determined by the Secretary of Labor as prevailing for the described classes of labor in accordance with applicable law. This wage determination decision and any modifications thereof during the period prior to the stated expiration date shall be made a part of every contract for performance of the described work as provided by applicable law and regulations of the Secretary of Labor, and the wage rates and fringe payments contained in this decision, including modifications, shall be the minimums to be paid under any such contra~t by contractors and subcontractors on the work. . . The contracting officer shall require that any class of laborers ·and mechanics which is not listed in the wage determination and V{hich is to be employed under the contract, shall be classified or reclassified conformably to the wage determination., and a report of the action taken shall be sent by the Federal agency to the Secretary of Labor. In the event the inter- ested parties cannot agree on the proper classification or reclassification of a particular clnss of laborers and mechanics to be used, the question accompanied by the recommendation of the contracting officer sh a JI be ref erred to the Secretary for determination. Before using apprentices on the job the contractor shall present to the contracting officer written evidence of registration of such employees in a program o! a State apprenticeship. and training agency approved and recognized by the U.S. Bureau of Apprenticeship and Training. In the absence of such a State agency, the contractor shall submit evidence of approval and registration by the U.S. Bureau of Aj>prenticeship and Training. The contractor shall submit to the contracting officer written evidence of the estab- lished.apprentice-journeyman ratios and wage rates in the project area, which will be the basis for establishing such ratios and rates for the project under the applicable contrad provisions. Fringe payments include medical and hospital care, compensation for injuries or illness resulting from. occupational activity, unemployment benefits, life insurance, disability and sickness insurance, accident insurance {all designated as health and welfare). pensions, vaca- tion and holiday pay, apprenticeship or other similar programs nnd other bona tide fringe benefits. ~enda Item #22 GP-31.t- Adclen<lum No. 1 I-1 All Districts -I 1" D ~ -I I \) J'JC~Ar.t)iL • ...,T, ACt..NCY1 OK i:.u.-&.AV l\.cA.1-t,r-l\."\.iU•o,~V_.l\-u.un-1.11 n-vv-...-n \ "11>·-~1- !:::JA(C"':'\\')-rl\J\( /\S)-f'J.•/,(LQ)-'FffA-"f"S-CSA-:~-NASA-.':AV!•NPS•?E(CS)•PHS• P.O')-?.l.1.-m:;:::..~·tsm-c:\'L!FO~ DEP/JlTME~'T OF Ptrn:.IC woru<s, !'•:'l!sro~: c:-m:c.n·,:~ 1"S ---~;/~ l~Y DA.TC 01" Dt:C~ON ~/3/69 CO UM TT s;r.rm.tS :.'!.-.n: O? NG,.. 8/2i...:6...::9 _______ _ ~~70::~:!'},_ ___________ ~~~------:--------1~s;:\J-;;r;;:;;Ell8£DES Dl!~IOH HO. :u:.:;c;a.JtTlO~ OJ' WOUI "!)\J!L:m~o, m:AV! & HIOiMAT CC:NS'mOCTION Asb-!sto~ ~orkers IY.>ilc.:-::-.V.ors 3oiler!:"...'.tkor3• hclpore ~rick!t!ycrs; Stone?:1asone ?:!.c~ 7e!"lt!crs Ce.r!-...:?:'l~crs: Cn.-~ntc:-s $a\I !"i!':!!"S Toblo ri~or env opo~ator ~incb:-:i ifa ... -':!·."Ood noor loyera; Mill.vrishta ?:!cu."':'.'l°:.ic n..'\ilor Pi::. ~ch-!. TC ~.on: Tu:>ci: Sli~c rD Brit!:;'!, c!oc-:C cnrpentern; derrick 'bargetDOn Heed rock alir.cors Ce=..~:-:.t l·~s.,n~: Y-~.~~::;it•!; 1fai;ncs1.te torrnHo; l'.aatic Comp. C•.-::..!.'nt f:!.on~ifli: l. trovol1ng mncb. opor. D~-.1:1.ll In::itall~rs ·· ~e~t~!C!!l.n::: E!...:ct:-1ci~"l!I ~~lo n~l1ecra Zlcntor Con:s'..:-uct.ors' holporo ::~~'U~or Con:structora' bolporo (prob.) c:!l.:!.er:i !'.:i !..:'lforc!.n,;: Fr.:::.::o croctore Ztructu:~l; orr...u:.ent.al. !rr!~~t!.oo « L~\IIl Spri."lkloro ~ ... '"':.e:-3 Lir.~ Co~~~:-u:tion: Cr~.:.~-...:.:n, lot yOD.l" G.:"C"..:..-::!.~n :.1;:·,~.o~~ _I.ino cqu!~ont. o;>eratora C1~.o ~~.icero • ~r:,1~ !::?~!:ere ~:.: r~:e ::::t'!~O' ?!elpora z:~·::.1.1 i::::::o:'l:'o' noo? Crindorit z:.::·.!~·~...,.:.~::'t. ~""nor. !:6~~t roe:: t.cper!! E..,~~ (cv!..nc o~e); otructural steelf br1dg :S;Jrt.Y Snrev !IY!.r.C at..'.lco; oo.ndblaotor &:..."l<lbla:iter :1V!..'l{! atcco .S~<Jeplojack vor!< P=lp-c:-h!:.r-cor ~r~!:.: lot ntr1p!ng vork P'l::.!?tcro~:s ?J.A::t~rcrc' Tcn,fors · •· · F'l.-=.'::Y.lr.:s; Stor.:.i"!.t.toro ; ~a.dburnore ;'t".lO!°O!";J !:•~c~ ~~Ull ~or~~rs !'.o:~ .rlool." L.:iyuro ~?:-1.:-.::l'lr :lttora :~~~~~=~ ~~r~~3 -:·~ :-:-:.;::.::.o '..'.:>:-:".:r.3' heloorst ?luor :n.·ichi.iVl opcrnt..oru,i holporn 6nlc Hovrl1 ~otea t6.70 6.40 6.10 5.JO 4.J2 5.JJ 5.1.l 5.1.) 5.1.6 5.53 5.56 I s.Ja 5.1.6 5.56 5.lJ 5.25 5.JS 5.JJS 6.ao 7.11. 6.;?.) - 701JR · 50:fJR 5.47 6.10 6.0J 6.2J 5.75 s.26 5.55 5.88 6.80 7.14 5.615 11.:rns 11.61.5 s.s? s.11.& s.e4 6.09 6.J4 6.99 s.11$ 4.lB ~.74~ J..69 5.79 I 5.92 6.00 s.1.s 7.95 I 5.22 I 1..605 JO-CAL-Oro-l-2-J-t - Fri"V• Benefit• Pa1me11ta H&W ........... Yece•l•A A,,. Tr. .21 .25 .02 .JO .1.0 • 35 .02 .JO .1.0 .35 .o.2 .27 ·.12 .01 .21.5 • .32 .25 .36 .45 .25 .01 .)6 .1.5 .25 .01 .36 .1.5 .25 .01 .)6 .1.5 .25 .01 .J6 .45 .25 .01 • .J6 .45 .25 .01 .36 .1.5 .2~ .01 .)6 .1.5 .25 .01 .)6 .45 .25 .01 .40 .J5 .J5 .• 0125 .40 .J5 .J5 .0125 .40 • J5 .JS .0125 .lS .JO .15 .045 .15 l~ c20.ooc .15 1% 20.00c .lLS I • 17 11% (( b .lta~ .17 1,.% & b .15 I .20 a .02 .J05 .JO .25 .02 .J05 .JO .25 .02 .J05 .JO .25 .02 10% 16% 1J% 1% .19 • .35 .so .02 .15 1% c20.ooc .15 1% 20.ooc .15 l~ 20.ooc .15 l~ 20.ooc .ll+S .1s · .145 • :!It .20 .11.s • 211 .20 .24 .2·5 .10 .01 .24 .25 .10 .01 .21. .25 .10 .01 .v. .25 .10 .Ol .24 .25 .10 .01 .?.J. . .25 • .10 .01 .24 .25 .10 .01 .lS .10 .2Se .20 .J5. .•.• 045 • 245 .1.2 .45 . 10'}: 16% 1J% 1% .275 .20 .02 .25. .22 .2l .20 d .015 .15 .25 .04 I .15 : I O•h•,. - ( Terrazzo Vork.,rs' helperst (continued) All ba.se machine vork Tile Sett.ors Tile Sottero' helpers Volders: Roceivo rate proscribed for crart porformin:: operation to vhich veld• ing is incidental. Bot le H•vrl1 .Rat .. ~.87 5.75 4.65 I ( )0-CAL-Ora-1-2-3-t H &. W • u .us .l.45 F1hto• C.Hfit• P•y111•"'' ....... ". / I .25 .21. . Vecerl.M Ap,. Ti. .. .• 02 . .os Otf\111 - Footnotes a ~ -80 hours paid vncation ofter l year's continuous service vith same empl01'er. ~Pl01'eea vith less thnn 12 months contimtous eorvico recoivo odditional pa7 or 7% per straight-time hour "upon torminntion. 7 pdd hol~do.ys: A throuah F, & December 24.· b -Employer contributes 4% basic hour~ rate for ovor S years' aervice and 2~ ot basic hourl7 rate for 6 months' to"5 yeo.rs' nervico as Vacation Poy Credit. 6 paid bo11d.1ya: A through F. · c -Per nMWD • d -For rlrot 12 months or unintornipted oorvice empl07or contributes 2% or gross ea.rni.Dc:s as Vaca- tion Pay. For over 12 months' uninterrupted service omployer contributes 4i or gross earnings ao Vacation Pny. e -~U?loycr cootr1bute• $.10 per hour to Vee11tioD Yuad and $.lS per hour to nolid4y Fund. 6"poid l;tolidnya: A throunh '/ • Paid Holidqs1 I A-Nev Year's Dr7J s.Momorial Da)"J 0-Indepondence liq; ~Labor Dan E-'n-.anlr:sgirlng ~J F-Chriotmaa ~. · /·. GP-35 Addendum No. 1 1 :l> .oq l ro II~ m H I~ ~ H l lJJ l~ rtj I!-'• tQ ,ci- ·~ 'r-i· I() l'~ Vl I ('·. ~~.3 • :~ .. ~ (Cc:-o-t>i:t.o:ond-V:igon)J Jf:r,/ Drill.erJ ~:..~::-.. ,:...~~!.o:.• (no:~lo~~) ::.·r.~'.# :::..'-=~C.tt.'1::-:,\=: ,,. C'.".!r.:.:.:t c:t ~P.CTl!:."?.; PO'~-tlol"NU\ c_•_:; ~ c::. P!?E!.!:~ 'r."!".l..P.PS.1'. (6" & over) :->!:';::..'."C:is (non-not:Ul.1.c incl. cowor dr&dn_, C. -:.::-.-!c:.'.::-c-.J.':".d. ~Uo) !::::1.!.~ (.::..:~~-=-~or -2 1/2" Q-ill ctool or ~(.':'':0::") ~~C-'T. PCAT._t.AB-1-~-3-j Pe.i:e l !!Cl p~ node Frln90 Bcnor1ts Poymcnts Hourly Rotos H t. 'rt ,..,..Ion• Vecotlon App, Tt, 01heH t!1.l12 .?IJ5 .j2 .2$ u.39S .2us .32 .2s 4.33 .24S .32 .2S b.31 .2l&S .32 .25 4.28 .24S .32 .2s 4.26 .2l&S .32 .2s ( TRUCK DRIVERS LETOli'RtrF.Atf PULLS-Terra Cobras & ele1Uar type equlpmcnt; Truck Repnirm•:m DUMP (25 yds. or more, vater level, eincle unlt or comblnatton) ROSS CARRIER (hi~way)-Fork ~itt-A Frame or Swedish Crane Driver 2-C.U-SCAL-TD-1-2-3· a c(, Do arc Frl"D• D•"•"'' Payments Hovrlr Rote a H&W p ......... Yeco11011 App, Tr. $ . 5.465 .35 .20 .2s s.34 .35 .20 .2s ·. . 5.185 .35 .20 .·2s . 4.23. ~2LS .32 .2s ;:.:·:;: !".:..w.::~; 5c:.Unr (to:s•n•e Chair-So.!'ot.y ~~l~-~c..r:~ ~ool~) . ..:..::-i:..\.!..: r:,,·~;::t U. :RC!~; ~tzf:!?Uobllo; Cemont. =: ::-.:.·-==-(l Jt! or lzaocor « h:·-""X!li.nc bul.k ..:·:::.:.:.:.~) Cc:oc:o :.o S:l:w {oxclut:.!.n& Tr~ct.or t~ C:·;~:-,;'J.1 Cc:o C\:.ttor3 Oo.:i ii. OU Pipcllno :::=:~·::-;.·-:>o~ 'Acr:~!6r b. rc..-i:i M.1n; PMUC'l.1tic- C:-..:;.-..-.:".:: =~.-!.c ~Ml C},xlr.1tors (not :iopi'.rl\tol.y c::..-::.::::.:.-: .:.) ; ~ot.o ::....."":'r.~~j Trc1> Cl.illlbcr-• : .. :.::.:~.:.·-::·.:.:: .. •h.,..-?i~t::O-.l!"',i;h Cn!ppor ii. .:dJ1\ilar ~:.-.·;: :~-..;: ~1 !;h.:-c".:"--: ):-· EUCLID-type Spreader Truck (less than 25 yda DUMP (16 yds. to less thnn 25 yds. vater levol; 20 tons or more)-Dumpster-Translt- Mix (3 yds. o~ more)-Dumpcrcte (6! yds. or aorc) ,) S.07 ·.35 .20 .2s · ~:.:;:--:;::: c::~1 I!:rz;r;rous }~~1!t,\~:S u. FC..1M i::.:."':!; ~~::..:.n:: Ct Cnul!~~.n(! or All non~ot.1.l.1c ;•;:;~ :;o~.!•~~( PJ.;:r:·::.p ~to:1::;itwor; Sa.ndbln:it.or (;;,:,~ .. ~:;~:!o~} • c_ ·-· ~.::.; .. ::::cc~ "-:L::s-:,rr~~n -::::.' -:~: ~ :~ :J::: ~::~.::::~:~::.:::'.:" (!.r.cl. ~!.!l!'On Bollowor) ?~.!;:::.~.j r~c~ !,-... -=:," F,'JtS; Tulk ScoJ.or & ~~-·-~-~.,~ .~:.~:~'.: .. :: :;::rr~"!: ~·~o Gra<!or-H;ehvay 4 :~:·i:r·~ ?~vi!'..~1 :..!.:-po::-t:i, !°:uTN.lY-' lt ~ir..11.ar ~:.-::·:> ~~~.:i.·::-cc.-~t.ruc':.ionj L:Ln1acn?o O:irdnor ~ ::·.~=-=·-":':7 ::,....:i c·..:::::: .-. c.~~:~==-~ c·.;:·:::-:j ":·:::' .. ~J (lir-.ollt!on) J Scalorj Tlll':'W\ 1!t :::: ,-:::·~-:.:..'l :z-~-; :.:: ... 1 {~·::-::~.:iJ.-i:en::it:"Uetton-do=olltion-<tr,r :.-:.~::;_-..:; c-:' ec::-.cro~-' .. 1..nd~ clol'..."lor)-0~ t.c :.:;:. ~i~~:!:.,: ~:..:.:::.o:s c:-~ z......:-:.:-~~s: ~::~l:=.!:n \.t Ro<!:::cn Q:.:::..:.:n • :.:.~~~:en ... ,. !' ., ' J . li.18 .2tiS' .32 .2s • ~.16 .24S .32 .2S L.1S .2LS .32 .25 · ·h.12 .2L$ .32 .2S :.a.10 .2iis · .32 .2s L.o?S .2~s .32 .2s I 4.C7 .2LS .32 .25 L.c5 .2LS .32 .25 L.02 .21&5 .32 .2s 3.91 -~us .32 .2s b.63S .2LS .32 .2s LI.Lit) .2LS • .)2 .. 2s J.9BS· .2hS .32 .2S I .. j o I I I I ., I GP-36 TRUCK CREASER & TIREMAN ~ATER TANK (4000 gallons & over) TitANSlT-MIX (under 3 yds.)-Dumpcrete (less thnn 6! yds. vatcr level) TRUCK REPAIRMAN HELP~S \IA~ TANK (2500 to less than 4000 gallons) Dtn-IP <12 yds. to less than 16 yds. vater level: 15 tons to lesa than 20 tons) Dti:-IP (8 yds. to leu than 12 yds. v.:.ter level: 10 tons to less than lS tons) VATt:R TANK (under 2500 gallons) Dt~fP (~ yds. to less thnn 8 yds. vater level; 6 tons to less than 10 tons) DUMP (under ~ yds. vater level; .less than 6 tons)-Tro.Cf{c Control P{lot Car llAREllOUSF.f>~N !c TEAt-:STER ~OAD OJL SPHFJ,OnJC PY TRUCK DR:'VERSs Timo spent spreadinc o!l Other jobsitc ti~o Ji'('()Tl-IOTF.St a. ~36.lO per !'llonth to Jtoalt.h ''Welfare "1nd I '. b. ta.oo por veck to Pension Fund. Addendum No. 1 .. 11.se .35 .20 .2s 4.83 .35 .20 · .2s 4.eo .35 .20 .2s , 4.74 .ls .20 .2s .. . 4.735 .ls .20 .25 L.68 .3s .20 .2s 4.66 .ls .20 .25 4.58 .ls .20. .2s 4.56 .ls .20 .2s 4.53 .• 35 .20 .2s 4.so .JS .20 .2s 4.42 .35 .20 .2s L.34· a b ).)la A b O•h•H .. . ... H I .+:- ( o~.t:' ... '1' ! .t.J..:. ~ c'-': :?~~m-~~;>..Oe~rn. tor-~ni:inooi-, ~a:--$!.C!\.'l.:?_.-.~n-~ca\'y !ro.~y Rop.l1rll\ln1 a ~~~~r-..~!.~c~~~:i-~r.l..~cr.~n C~~'.':' !I l:(.;_;.~:.;·.}; :-~, ~k!~ ty?c-Oonvcyor-!.\!lt111.1.n- ?'.:..:-c::-."'!..."1.-C~n·::-n ~or-::\: .. ~ or Cor.\prc:;:Jor (2-S' ~:-:~u:;!.vc, port..'.l!>:.o u•~ ~::)-'Jcncr~tor-Pu.'I!? or C~:..~:-c::::o!" P!..:i.!1~-:!yt!rost..'\~!.e Pw;::>-!lot.'.lry ~-1: ~:~~;H?r( o!.!.!'!.c~~ ~;.";>Q) ..S:t!.plo:i.cior,\Phecl !.:.7~-::'cr.:!~ ::'crcJ::on, :~c? o:-n!.ni!.:tr t.•"?o ";/'..: :-~. l\r l~:::J (v/o c!:-a.;:~;.-;>o n!.t..'.lchs.)- • ... -c~:.-~:-.~:-y Hc:t. ~ire ?l:t.~ t-~:-"~e!< Cr~nc Oiler c~~-·? !:: !"- :--=:-=::?~!.!Y.:h :'nic~-::>!.:i!ccy !.oeol'lot!.vo or ':>.!:-.~:!: ::o~c:--:!'!\':\~or ;:.,bt-~ui.pr.cn~ C:-case :-"!~' :~:-~.~~on o:-:::i!:".!.~=t:9 t:;po (\l.!.~h d!-;l~)'1)0 =.t·-"\cr-2.)-::r...r.:i-!i~::-.:::cr or ni. .. i.il:ir type cqui? :'::.·.·;;....-Cc.:-::::-.o~ .. o Cu:-i~ ~~1chim-!>o..,~r Concro~c $..1.·..1-.:'c .. •<!r :)!"ivc:i .. "'u::o:.~o Forn So~!.cr-~oc!r.un E:~:-~~~-~':i!J C1~:-.:.~r (~o~:;!.~c)...!3a!t pro='oll I ·t e~ .. :~ .·~~~'.:".!.:-c ~~,chinc--S~!.!.omry l'ipovr~pp1 nG .: C'h=::.!r..:; ~~~..:h!.~-To\.f'::>::..:ufo I I .~:~-~ ... ~ ::~ 1..:... : .. ·~:.· P!-'.~::' :~~~ .. ~~-nor1nc ~~ch!.no-!?ox::un ::-=~;':!!" (eoni:::-ct.'l or .i!l?!l:i.lt -;:>l.".nt.)-C'>nc?"(lt ;:\~::.-.i •,!.:--l:.l ?O!""t..."'.bl•J)-::'.:?~rick :~m(oil.!'icld) £:!.~1;:-..:: ~~c~1!.!1e (ix:!.•J·!.!.:i: W.:l~cr vell:i)- ..:...:.:;~l-n:> C:l~·-c .... ~;r S!.1.,...i.l!-'..ln-Iru:tru:::.ono:.n.1n- :_-:.~ -.:-:-: ~ !;.!., •::-:::~:;i?'".'liJl':"-.i'c\/c r S\lccr>cr-!lollor C:.:.~:-.-;!.~:-.~~er-cc~-j!"•:nch!r~ !·!lch.L~ (uo ~o . I 6 !~, ~=~~~) .. C'!::-9.':" 7 ~:-~~:-:,.~'=?. CO~?:~~ S?:~'J>!NO, }~c~n1cal ::.::~!.:-::.; !>;" ~.!.!'l.!.:~:-~ lfa'.:h!no-!ioll'!r-Soil, ~ . - :!astc Hour:y P.at•• s~.65 ·b.92 s.16 . $.27 C :.....::: '..1 .'.~:i-'1='~ ~ :!.ru..c~--·.:;~!1-~lt !>l.9!nt Encincer ~-... ..:.:: ::..:'.:~:~'l~!";!<!tJ Chc:ckc:--:fo:lvy !.'u~y &.:o:i.!:rm.."\! ;::.='---::.· !-:~:-;.r ~:,~!:'.=::--:·:.'\c!?!.:--/.! ':ool-?~vc,,.on~: Dre:\~ r-~-;;'.::."":.:!.c !!.~:?.!:.r.;; :3~!.clc!1 tun.-ic!-!to:i.d 0!.l !1!.Y. er- · !:~ !~1.::,:.~.:-~0:-:c !..!.!-:., cn..!cr 5 to:i-!lu!>bcr-tir :::-:.v:;-;).!•.7 :S.1~tp!1l.!n':., (C~h:co!!h 1 ';;.-!, ~\!cl.le! :.."'7c.·.!!"::~:.·.~, !...~?l:.n~-J.;h?.:\~'J, "~ ei~~r 4.,yp~ .... r':.!:.~~~::~ ~.:.tn .:i.~.:r ~:·-;v:> .n.~!.:lc'hr.ion':.!l)-S~, l :< .... -:....,"::", 'V~~e::. ~YP" 0•:1J:-'J/lJ ~·d., u:,> to ll. incl :~-:~-5::.!.;> ::'o::-::1 l-\!::v {pC''-'Cr c!r!vo:i cyl!raulle .. . . H II. W .30 I .,o I .. ,o .30 . . I F•ln9• Deneffts Poy1Hnt• ( , ......... Yocatlaot App. Ti. 01he11 . .60 . .30 .01 . . . .. . I .. 6o .30 .01 . .60 .30 .OJ.. .. 4 .60 .30 ~Ol . . . . GP-37 D1t1lc Hourfy RotH :PO'.~R !QUIP?~!-.'l' OPmTmS 'eom'Th'tre!>t ll.!'tini; dcvico fo?" conereto !'orms)-Tractor- »raet;ypo Shovel-Bulldozer-Ta.'l'lpcr-Sernpor- Pus}l Tractor ~S."L6. O::tOtJP VI - t'O':·filll~'l'IO!l HEAVY Dtrr!' ~J.IR.V.AN & \·l'.ru>!n• Concrcto :~er, pavin;::...Concreto M>bilo 1'!.i.xer- Coner~tc Pu.'!Q-Pu::ipcrctc Gun-Crushiiv: Plant ~inc~r-~lev~tine Gr~der-Or.:ldo nlJ.-Hiehlino Cablcuay-!foi!;t (Chicaco Boo111 t.t ?·!iM)-Kol.m.1.n ~lt. L0o1c!cr U. silllil:i.r typc-L1!'t. Sl<lb !-!achine- Loaecr, Athey, F.uclid, H&lncock, Sien-~ or r:irnil.'lr typo-Fork !J.!'t.1 ovor S t.on...:-totor :>atrol-1·1.tl~iplo En~!.no, C3.rth r.iovin;:: rn:ieh1nc~ Pnrty Chicf-?ncu.rnl.t!c Concrete Placine !~ch! l!..'\cklcy, Pressvcll or sir.d.lar typc~kl;>looocr vhoclt.ypo over l~ y.:ls.-Surface Hc:atcr !.:. Pl.Ano Tractor Loader, crawler t;rpo-Tr:i.ctor, "1th boo~ attach::icnts-Tr.:ivclir~ Pipe"1'"app1ng, cloanlnc IL bcndinP nuc!uno-Tronehil\! J·!.1.chim (over 6 !t. ~cpth)-Universal Equipncnt(Shovol ll1c~hoc, Dr.:icllno, C!;msht'll, Dorr'.!.ck, Dorrie I!J.rgo, Crane, Piledrivor ~ M1cld.nt: ?~chino) ' r ~ ( .. _ S.S6 Addendum No. l ( Frht9• BH•flts Po111t•nt• . H&'ll' l'•11•l•n• Vecetl•it •, App. Tr, Othert .. . . . .30 . .60 . .30 .ol· . . .. ' ... --.. . . : .. . .. .. . .30 .60 .30 .Ol . -··-·· ---· .... ' ' ~ ) ; t- ) . ~ :t::: J .) ( Pet·IEJ't ~UlP!'.E'n' OPERATORS nru::ncm:c (l?,,·dr3ulie Suction !)rec!ccs) ASSrS-:A:.:': E:!GTI?f':ra (St.en!ll or olectrie) J ..,_.alC::e:o (Stern vinch or dre~co) SA?.Ci!:~~\N, Deck.'ulnd; N.remo.n, Oller; Loveol!IRn D!?Ena:rno (Cl..'\M Shell nrcdqQD) I Cot le Hourly Ro tu Ht..W ~S.9!.i .)o S.4S .30 s.·os .:;}O 4.9~S .;o L.~3 .30 S.94 .;50 S.JQ .• 30 s.os .30 li.935 .,o 4.SJ .;o I ' ( .. -·- LABORERS Frl1tg• Ce1teflts Poym•nta . (Tunnel & Tunnol-~hiifc Constl'Uetlon) P•ndon• Yocotlo111 .4~ .23 .2;5 .2) .4S .23 .LS .23 .l1S .23 .4S .23 .J,S · .23 .z,s • 23 .i.s .23 .hS .23 App, Tr, .olS ! • ois .cl.5 t .01S l .c15 I . I ._.cis .ois .ois ' I .cts ' .ois 0th•,. •. . I· I ; St!AFT, Raise Hiner; Diamond Drt11or Bt.AS'mR, D1:'1llcr, POWt!t"CMn; <.hcmicat Crout Jetrn:in; Cherry PickcrirAn; Grout CunraAn; Crout Hixornio.n; Ct'out l'\lmp:!l:ln: J.a.cktee ?-!iner: Jumbo tb.n: ~cmpcr t.. other l>Mumtie Concrete PlAccr Op.; Hiner Tunnel (hand or r..llchino); Povcle't"IMn (Primer homie); Primer r..nn; Shotcrcto !T4n; Steal Form Ralccr ~ Setter; Timbcrrnon. RctimbctT.1.1n (1JOod or steel)~ Tunnel Concrete Finloher CA?.L!: TENDER, Chucktender: ?:tpper; Stoot Form Il.di;:cr & Setter's llP.lper; VibnitoL"ml.\ne Jack'h4111111~r, ~ncum.'ltic Toolo (except driller) BATClf P~·urr LAOORE:tS; Bull C4ng lbcker, Tr TrAc~n: Concrete Crev, lncludcc R.oddoro & S:>ru<!o't'c; Dum;>1:14n; Dum~1114n Coutoido); Sv4r.ipor CSrnkelllll.n & Svitchm:in on Tunnot work) · GP-38 Addendum No. 1 ( •"· ... • <1.u Boa le F1l1t9• IS•1t•fit, Pe~••nta Hourly Rot•• H&W , ... , ... v .... , ... A, .. Tr. Othn• $.:S.59.:S .24.:S .32 .2~ · . •. . . . , 5.345 .245 .32 .2s 5e19S .245 .32 ' .2s .. . . 5.095 .245 .32 .u . i . I I I I I • t• ... -----------J 01-1 N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEERS---------, Phoenix, Arizona Lafayerte, California El Paso, Texas \_,.,/ .. Reply to: .IOHN A. CA.ROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P,E, H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G, WILLIAMS, P.E, DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. April 2, 1969 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD . LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 AREA CODE 415 Mr~ Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92 7 08 Subject: Master Plan Study Electrical Energy We request that the m~ximum fee stipulated for this study ($3 1 500) be increased to $5, 300. 00. This request is due to an increase in scope· of the work over and above that contemplated at the time our proposal was made. The scope has been enlarged as follows: 1. Single-line Diagrams We anticipated that "as-built" single line diagrams worked up by the Districts would be essentially complete. Howe'ver, it was necessary for us to expend ap- proximately 5 man-days to bring them up to date and re-draw. 2. Emergency Generation The scope of the work was increased in your letter dated February 6, 1969, to include a review of the present emergency generation and to indicate the economic and/ or feasibility of central emergency power generation vs. local or satellite emergency power generation. Estimated man-days to accomplish· is 6 to 8. 3. Review of methods for isolation of vital electrical devices was also requested in your letter of February 6, 1969. We estimate this to take 3 to 5 man ... days. We intend to have a preliminary draft of this re port in your hands by April 20, 1969. Yours very truly, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 7~:~-' HHH;ml Agenda Item #24 -J-All Districts 283·3995 HOLLY SUGAR CORPORATION General. Offices: Colorado Springs1 Colo. SANTA ANA, CALIFORf'llA County Sanitation Districts of Orange Cow1ty California P. O. Box 5175 . Fountain Vall~ California 92708 Gentlemen: February 7,_1969 We would like to request that the proposal of terms, conditions and charges for disposal of industrial waste from our Santa Ana Plant to facilities of yol.lr County Sanitation District No. 1, that existed for calendar year 1968 be extended for the calendar year 19690 LN:mm CC: Jo Eo Haudru Agenda Item 1128 Very truly yours, '<::.:# /~~· ///~ ~ct"-7 ~~:-u_.~.._ Lloyd Nevill · Factory Mana~er -K-District No. 1 DYER PLANT ·. . . . • e:2:3 . . L.~..,,:J CONSULTING FOUNDATION ENGINEERS~"'%:· .... , 711.NORTH ALVARADO STREET 0 LOS ANG~LES, CALIFORNIA 90026 0 TELEPl-IONE 386~3920 LEROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES Morch 20, 1969 Board. of Directors County Sanitation Disf·rict No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain _Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Proposal -Soil and Foundation Investigation Proposed Wesf·side Relie_f Trunk, Reach 24, Contract No. 3-11 · Proposed Los Alamitos Pumping StaHon, Contract No. 3-12 · Proposed Wesiminstcr Avenue Force Main {First Unit) Contracl-No. 3-.13 Proposed Westminster Branch-Knott Trunk, Rcc1ch 9, Contract No. 3-14 Seal Beach cmd Wesf"minsi·er, California Following our recent discussions wHh personnel of Boyle Engineering, we are pleased to submit our proposal for investigating the soil conditions in con- nection wHh the subicct facilities. The locations and description:; of the four . unHs to comprise the proied are shown on the drawings furnished us by Boyle Engi- neering. The purpose of the investigation will be to determine the physical char- octerisf"ics of the soils at the site and to provide recommendations for foundaticm design and subterranean construction for the proposed pumping station, and daf·a for use in the design and cons I-ruction of the force mCJin cmd trunk units. Based on a review of the planned construdi on and our prior nearby work, we propose to explore the proiect orec1s by drilling a total of 19 borings. Two of the borings ore planned a(· the pumping station site cmd will be drilled to depths of opproxinwtely 40 feet utilizing gecphysical-·typc equipment. The remaining 17 bor- ings ·will range from 13 to 22 feet in depth, and becouse of overhec1d power lines at most of these locofions, if-wi 11 be nc.ccssmy to utilize special portable buckct·-t}'pe equipment. Accordingl}', drillin~J pl"of1rcss will be slower thcin th(Jt normally achieved with convcnHonc1I drillinfJ equipment. · L. l.t!ROY CHMllVd.I.. c. f.. RUS~~r u c. VffllU:. c. r. Sn'l.'Cllft 5. CtPLI. C. L fHEOfHCK A. llM<iH:S J. lJ. ~;lj(l\(tf\P.f). c. r. r•. A. ~.1A! JINl. c. F lfOl'OlO lllR~CIHCL.Of JM.ll"S M. l,~·:Wff. C. ::. Agenda Item 1135 L-1 ~ ~·· ..... rwnrnr cH1rnu::!1. c. r. JM.:rs L. VM~ r.::.·:':iH'il. c. [. District N_~ Board of Directors . County Sanitation Districl· No •. 3 of Orange County Pose 2 March 20, 1969 .. The borings \Viii be drilled under the supervision of our fie Id engineer, who will log the soil and groundwater conditions encountered and obl·cin both loose and undisturbed setmples for laboratory inspection and testing. The pertinent phys- ical characteristics of the soils will be del·ermined in our faboral·oiy and engineering analyses will be performed to develop the necessary design information. The results of the exploral'ions, tests, and analyses will be presented in a single report providing definite recommendations for use in the design and construction of the proposed facilities. · Our fee for the out( ined 'invesHgation wil f not exceed $5, 900. 00, includ- ing the rental ond operation of suitcible drilling equipment and backfilling, tamping, ond permanent patching of the borings in paved areas. We presenl·ly anticipate that !he field work for this proiect ccm be commenced within two weeks of authorization and that our report can be submitted within the following four weeks. This le Her and the terms on the reverse hereof, together, cire the agree- ment for our services. Acceptance of this proposC11 moy be indicot·ed by signing and returning one of the enclosed duplicates lo us. We appreciate the opportunity of submitting this proposal and will be pleased to work with you and your cor:sultants on this proiect. FAB-LC/ex (3 copies submitted) cc: Boyle Engineering Attn: Mr. Fred A. Harper General MonCtger Approved and Agreed Yours very truly, LeROY CRANDALL AND ASSOCIATES .-----?~-// /~-~· -~ ~. ~-.. ~ ~ ~~ ~ ··by···· 0t't-:!?c4i. .. > ,,. · /-?l.'l--J.iLf-7/ Fredrick A. Barnes County Scmitc1tion Distrid No. 3 of Orong8 County By Tit le ---------·---·· Agenda Item l/35 L-2 Dlstrtct No. 3 · r· ·. RESOLUTION NO. 69-23-5 .. . AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-17 A RESOLUTION OF ~HE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE" AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO •. 5-17 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by_Shuirman-Simpson, District's engineers and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Allied Pump Industries, for SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR, JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-17, and the bid tabulation and proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 5-17 be awarded to Allied Pump Industries , Contractor, in the total amount of $13,039.75 in accordance· with the terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section L~. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. Agenda I tern 1139 -M-District No. 5 ·. . . Eng. Estimate: $12,500 . . BID T A B U L A T I O· N . Date: April 2, 1969@ 4:00 p.m • . '.-' , . Contract for: SEWAGE PUMPS, DRIVE AND MOTOR JAMBOREE PUMPING STATION . CONTRACT NO. 5-17 Bidder 1. Allied Pumr, Industries ... 955 So. "E ' Street San Bernardino, Calif. 92408 2. ~· Allied Pump Industries 955 So . "E" Street San Bernardino, Calif. 92408 Char.les Lowe Company 737 W. Channel Street San Pedro, California 90731 Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. c/o Luscombe Engineering Co. 610 S. Arroyo Pkwy. . Pasadena, California 91101 {alternate) l~. Kirst Pump & Machine Works 3322 E. Florence Avenue Hunti!!flton Park, Calif. 90255 (alternate) Days for Delivery 84 210 . 91 209 105 Total Bid $12,476.00 563.75 $13,039.75 $14,745.00 675.21 $15,420.21 $12,920.00 646.oo $13,566.00 $15,621.00 770.70 $16,391.70 $1~,118.00 _--.:..7..-.-05 . 90 $14,823.90 Kirst Pump & Machine works $16.,ooo.oo 3322 E. Florence Avenue Boo. 00 Huntington Park, Calif. 9025~5~~~~~~~~---1_68~~~~-_{16,800~6 5. Westco Pump Sales Co. $21,000.00 6252 Telegraph Road ..J:.,.050.0Q* Los Angeles, Calif. 2h5 22,050.00 *Corrected figur~ l:\genda Item #39 ·-N-District No. 5 -~ . ~· . , D IRVINE 1.N DUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 March 19, 1969 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Sanit~tion District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 114 I aJl-1010 213 I 62s-4204 Re: Area Boun~ed by Bison Road, Jamboree Blvd., Future Eastbluff Drive Extension and MacArthur Blvd. Dear Mr. Harper: We have invest.igated the feasibility of de-annexing the subject area from Sanitation District No. 5 and annexing it to Irvine Ranch Water District for the purpose of providing sewer service to the area. This course of action was suggested by the Board of Directors of District 5 at their meeting of February 25, 1969 and we find that. it i.s feasib_le. Attached hereto is a letter from our attorney outlining the steps that should be followed to accomplish the detachment and annexation. ~ould you please submit this course of action to the Board of Directors for their approval at the earliest possible date. Upon. approval, the Complex will proceed with the necessary steps to accomplish this detachment and annexation. Very truly yol:rn, { • ~1/P~·-·~7 Rayftond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer cc: ·Mr. Wm. Eppinger Mr. J. llcvlin attachments Agenda Item #40 -0-District No. 5 .. Yu:. Ray W. Kim.11ey P age Two M.:lrch 11, 1 969 condition which I believe should be i mposed is t he exemption of th e subject property from any liabi lity for bonds of Sanitation District US because , I believe , District ~5 has not h ~d any bond issu2 which includes t he subject lands .- Go vernment Code Section 55470(c). The reason for the action will be sinply t h~t the nrea can b2 more easily and econo~ically s erv ed by Irvine Il::lnch Water District. 4. Because all the l an<lmqners have signed the petition , the Loca l A~cncy For r:h.~tion Co ::1liliSs ton c an npprovc the pGt!.tion without notice or hearing, end c a ~ cuthoriz e the t \.·JO districts to act without notic e 6r election -Government Code Section 56 261 . The Local Ascncy Forn1<1tion Co~:1tssio n eciopts a rcso- lutl on di.recti.ng th12 two district s to act -Govcr11 r:1ent Code S ection 56271. 5. The two districts then a.c.10 i)t resolutions app.::-ovin3 the action -Governme nt Cod2 Section 56310. 6. T"ne district s file a ccr ti.fic.::tc of completion with the Sccrc t .::11:y of State whereupon th ~ change ts coi·~p l e te?d - Gov e1:nr.1cn t Cod e Sect ion 56L;.5).. · P lease l et me know ':vhen you \·J.:!nt r:ie to pro~ec<l . Very truly your s > .L •· ,' Hugh J'. Scallon HJS:c bd c c: Nr . ~ymond L. ·Cu r1·an ·I .· . J\c;eml.:) Ite m //1 10 0 -2 D.Ls trict No . :2-.. -··-. --------·----·----· ----· Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Or ange County Sanitation Distr i ct 10 844 Ellis Avenue Foun tain Va ll ey , Ca li forn ia 9270 8 Dear Mr. Ha rper: March 1 2 , 1969 At th e March 10, 1 969 Study Session of the City Counc il the staff was directed to inv estig ate the possib ili ty of tr ansfering the owner- ship of the Ca me o Shores Pumping Station from th e City to County Sanit at io n District No . 5. Th e matter ca me up as a re su lt of r ecent f a ilures i n the pump s tat i on 's force ma in . Since this stat i on with an en l arged force main is ulti mate l y plann ed ·to be a district facility, it v1as felt t hat , before the City puts a l arge i nv estment in the existing for ce main, conside ra t io n shou l d be given to mak ing th e transfer at this ti me . At your conven i enc e I wou l d li ke to meet with you regarding the Di strict 's position on this i nqu i ry . "'· Very tru l y yours, ose ph ~· Dev l in Jblic ~o ks Dire ctor TD/ld g CC: Ci ty Manager Agend a I te m //L~l ----~--- -P-Dt s tri ct No . 5 , . .p·f~ ff}([Y(fjf!2 ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHONE <714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 Apr~I 1,. 1969 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 · of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper County Sanitation District No. 7 Addition to Doniger Road Sewer to Proposed Assessment District No. 8 Eleven property owners on Doniger Road and other property served by El Roy Drive and Minton Way have requested annexation to County Sanitation District No. 7 for the purpose of obtaining sanitary sewers as part of proposed Assess- ment District No. 8. We have prepared and are processing the legal description and sketch to accompany the description through the Local Agency Formation Commission. In order to expedite the preparation of the construction and assessment diagram drawings for this additional area, we are requesting a modification to our proposal dated November 21, 1968 for engineering services. It is estimated that the construction cost of the expanded sewerage system wi 11 be increased by approximately $10,000 to a total of $50,000. We estimate the additional engineering cost to prepare pl ans and specifications, c1ssessment diagram, and all work appurtenant thereto up to the time of award of contrc1ct wi 11 be $1, 000. Additional engineering cost for the additional work ofter award of contract and through the finc1I public hearing will be $400, making a total odditional engi- neering fee of $1,400, oil in accordance with the terms of our proposal dated November 21, 1968. We respectively request authorization to proceed with the additional work as outlined c1bove so that the Doniger Road construction drawing can be completed by the time the proposed onncxc1tion is accomplished. The enlarged assessment district con then be constructed with the least amount of delay to the property owners. ·a~ ,fi?? £~.<-~~.--.__· Carl A. Carlson, C.E. (,654 PP 81-2920-00-00 PR 0 F.E S 5 I 0 NA L F.NGINCEHING AND /\HCHll.ECTURAL Agenda Item # 49 -Q-District N_~ ·. I• ··-I rt-: ,,. • •«. . i . ·' .· .... '.•, I .. . .. . . . ··: . ·. .. March 11, 1969 Mr. Ray W. Kimmey Irvine Industrial Complex P. · 0. Box t.404 Irvine, California .... .. .· ·c 9422 ·. Re: Detach.~ent and Annexation of North Ford Area From County Sanitation District No. 5 to Irvine Ranch Hater District .- -----------------------~-------------------------- Dear Ray: The follm·1ing is a short summary o~ the procedure which I believe should be followed in nccornplishing detachment and annexation of· the North 1',orc1 area from County .Sanitation District t15 to Irvine Ranch Water District: . 1. If the datachm2nt and annexatlon nrc to be accqmpliahed in a single proceeding, it is necessary to go before the Board of Supervisors, have an election> etc., involving great expense and delay. Th~refore, as we c1id in 1955, it wtll be castcst i"f we fi.rst dctnch the are~ froo Sunitation District !,~Sand, when completed, anne:-c the area to Irvine Ranch Weter Distrlct • ..i,..ne procecdin3s are in essence identical and tho follm1ing procedure would apply to both actions. ·. ' 2. Irvine lncust.rlal Cor.1plc:-: .anc1 The Irvine Company will file a petition with the Local Azcncy For~~tion Co~uission pur- suant to Govcrn~ent Code Section 56130. Because Irvine Industrial Complex and The Irvi.n~ Co~ap..'1ny to~~c thcr o~m nll of the subject land, these signntur~s ~re sufficiQnt to class the p~tition as a rr.andato.ry pcti.tion -Gov~rnnent Code Sections 56170 and 56180. 3. Briefly, the petition will state wbat we arc trying. to accomplish> incluc1h13 a lcgill description of the are,~; ant special terms which nrc to be imposed; and the reasons for tae action -Govcrn~cnt Code Section 5614q. The only special 0-1 ·~·· I •