HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-02.....
II
1 ,.
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPO RT
County Sanitation Dis tricts
of Orange County, Cal ifo rnia
DISTRICT NO. ~ J 4-7
P. 0. Box 5 175
10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, C al if., 92708
Te le ph o nes:
Ar ea Code 7 14
5 40-2910
962 -2411
February 21, 1969
DISTRICT NO. 5 -Adjourned Regular Meeting -4:30 p.m.
DISTRICT NO. 1 -Special Meeting -5:00 p.m .
DISTRICT NO. 7 -Adjourned Regular Meeting 5:00 p.m .
Tuesday, February 25, 1969
Districts' Offices
Districts Nos. 5 and 7 Board meetings will be held at the
above hours on February 25. Pursuant to call of the Chairman, the
Board of District No. 1 will also meet on the same day at 5:00 p.m.,
concurrently with District No. 7 .
The following is a brief explanation of the items which appear
on the agendas.
District No. 5
REPORT OF DISTRICT'S ENGINEER ON IMPROVEMENTS TO JAMBOREE PUMP
STATION: Shuirman-Simpson have submitted a written report on this
subject (copy enclosed) which we believe to be self-explanatory .
Mr . Simpson will be present at the meeting to go into greater detail
on this subje c t , if desired. If the recommendations contained in the
report are satisfactory with the Board, it is suggested that they be
approved and the engineers and staff instructed to secure bids on
the needed equi~ment as soon as possible . These improvements have
been budgeted ($20,000) for the current fiscal year.
REVIEW BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE IRVINE COMPANY OF LONG RANGE
SEWERAGE PROGRAM OF IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT AREA: As announced
by Chairman Parsons at the February 5 Board meeting, representatives
of The Irvine Company have requested the opportunity to discuss the
abo v e matter with the Board at this meeting.
PROPOSAL BY IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX FOR SEWERAGE OF A PORTION OF
ANNEXATION NO. 3: The Board members will recall that this matter has
been under discussion for some time, partic u larly with respe c t to
serving proposed Tract No . 6680 of the Irvine Industrial Complex. An
engineering report on sewerage of Annexation No. 3, with estimates
of cost, was submitted and taken under submission at the October 29,
1968 Board meeting. Because of the extreme cost of serving this area
thro ugh the existing District system at this time , it was the con-
census that further ne gotiations with the Irvine Ranch Water District
1 ·-~ •
•
should be held concerning sewering this low -lying area through the
facilities of t hat Dis t r i ct . Acco r dingly and after further meetings>
a formal reques t was add r essed t o the I rvine Ranch water District
for a statemen t of te r ms and conditions unde r which that Di stri ct
would be wi lling to provide such services .
We are now in receipt of a l etter, dated February 14, 1969
from the I rvine Indust ri al Comp l ex (copy enclosed) proposing a
solution to t h i s p roblem. As s t a t ed i n th e communicat i on, repre -
sentat i ves o f t he Com pa n y wi l l b e p resent a t th i s Board meeting to
go into this matte r in grea t er d e t ai l. Since this letter proposes
formation of a spec i a l i mpro v emen t d i stri ct, we have requested the
_ 1 Ger.eral Coun s el to study this aspe ct and to report verbally to the
Board at the meeting . Owing to t he shortness of time available, the
staff does not have a recommendat i on on th i s proposal at this t i me .
..
District No . 1
ACQUIS I TION OF EASEMENT FOR FUTURE TRUNK SEWER : The District's
1965 engineer's repor t recommended a future new trunk sewer to lie
in an easeme nt paral l e l to the e xi sting Distri ct No . 1 trunk sewe r
along the Pa c i f i c E l ectri c Ra i l r oad right of way between Ma i n and
Bristol St ree ts . Af te r a p prova l of t he e ng i neer's report, the
General Counse l was in s t r ucted to take appr opriate steps to acqui re
an additiona l 20-foot easement .
If District No . 1 or District s Nos . 1 and 7 together construct
the recommended sewer, this easement wi l l be necessary for the most
economical rout i ng . We are attaching a copy of a letter, dated
February 14, from Boy l e Enginee r ing to Hall & Foreman, Inc ., which
is illustrat i ve of this problem . Howeve r , there is the possibility
now that the I rvine Ranch Wate r District may wish to Join with the
two Sanitation Districts in c o nstruct i ng a joint facility farther to
the south, in which case it would not be necessary to acquire the
easement in question .
The General Counsel has asked for the opportunity to explain
to the Board the ramifi cations and problems involved in acquiring
the easement .
District No . 7
CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 7 : This is
the time advertised for the confirmat i on of property-owner assess -
ments for the sewers that were constructed i n Assessment District
No . 7 . The attached Notice to Property Owners explains the manner
in which the properties were assessed . The Engineer of Work and
leg al counsel for the Assessment Di strict will be present to answer
any questions that may be asked dur i ng the hearing . (A notice of
the hearing was mailed to each property owner on January 31.) To
date we have not received any written protests from the property
owners .
-2 -
-
•
I
'
CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY FOR WITHDRAWJ\L OF
1,015 ACRES FROM THE DISTRICT : On February 5, the Bo ard received
and t o ok under submission for study a staff position-paper (see
attached). relative to the request of The Irvine Company for
permission to withdraw 1,015 acres from the District, in exchange for
annexation, without charge, of 80 acres bordering the District 's
boundary along the Browning Avenue Subtrunk. This matter is being
placed on the agenda for the Board 's consideration .
'-. •
.. -
-.._ • •• ..-I
I ~ l
JI
...
IJ
.. .--. •
'l•1 " I • -
~.L
ii -.
\."'
t' I r
• •• r -· .. -~ , ;;-. ..
I
rl' •
• .
I
• I'
I •
• ' ....
L -:".: l ._ r .
• ' r I f
..... • -. • .:
Ii
r 11 I -I -... II'
t ,. I
-
•
I
I ..
..
•
,
•
I'
-
•
-3-
Fred A . Harper
General Manager
. •
l
..
-II-
,.,,
~rhA') ~-,(" O'' ... ~ . .-~·~,.,.,.... ·~.-:· UV U.~ ... ~ Ir' c..>'J.~!::. ·D \;..l t9;:J
County Sc:n ita tion Di str ict s P. 0. Box 5 175
108114 E:llis Avcr.uP. of Orange County, CJli fom ia
Fountain Valley, CaiiF., 92708
(1)
(2 )
(3)
(4)
(5 )
(6 )
(8 )
(9 )
DIS 'f f<JCT No.
AGF.MDA
February 25, 1969 -4 :30 p .m.
Adjourn ed Regular Meeting
Roll Call
Con sideration of motion appointing Chairman pro tern,
i f necessary
Repo rt of the General Manager
Report of the General Counsel
Report of the District 's engineer on Improvements to
t he J amboree Pump S tation , and consideration of motion
authori zing the staff to obtain bids for the reco~nended
equipment
Review by representatives of The Irvine Company of long
r ange s ewerage program of Irvine Ranch Water District
Area
Cons i deration of proposal by Irvine Industrial Complex
for s ewerage of a portion of Annexation No . 3 (see
Man ager 's Report and letter from Irvine Industrial Com p lex
in fold ers)
Other business and communications, if any
Co nsideration of motion to adjourn
COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1,.2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING
Februar~ 13, 1969 -7:30 p.m.
10 44 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
This 13th day of February, 1969, at 7:30 p.m., in the
Districts' office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California, being the time and place for the regular meeting
of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California,
there not being a quorum of said Boards present, the meeting
of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 6, 8, and 11 was thereupon adjourned by
the Secretary.
The meeting of District No. 5 was adjourned to February 25,
1969, at 4:30 p.m., and the meeting of Districts Nos. 1 and 7
was adjourned to February 25, 1969, at 5:00 p.m., in the Districts'
office.
the
Boards of Directors
II
COAt1D5 Or D!RECTO~S
Co unty San itation Distric!s
•:
P. 0. Box:;{iNX 812r{
10844 Ellis Avenue
Foun t ain Val ley, Calif., 92708
of Orange Cou nt y, Cali fornia
Adj ourned Regular Meeting
February 5 , 1969 -7 :30 p .m.
AGEN DA
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
( 2 ) Roll Call
(3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary
( 4 ) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
r egular meeting held January 8 , 1969 , and the
adj ourned regular ~eeting thereof on January 28 ,
1969 , as mailed
(5) DISTRICT 2
Con sideration of motion approving minutes of the
r egul ar meeting h e ld January 8 , 1969 , as mailed
( 6) DIS TRICT 3
Consideration of mot i on approving minutes of the
r egular meeting held J anuary 8 , 196 9 , as mai l ed
(7) DISTRICT 5
Cons ideration of moti on approving minutes of the
re gular mee'ting he ld January 8 , · 1969, and th.e
sp ecial meeting h e l d January 23 , 1969, as mai l ed
(8) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
r egular meeting h el d January 8 , 1969 , as mailed
(9 ) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of moti on approving minutes of the
reg ular meeting held J anu a ry 8 , 1969 , as mailed ,
and the adjou rned regular meeting thereof held
J anuary 21 , 1969
(1 0) DISTRICT 8
Considera tion of motion approving minutes of the
r egular meeting held January 8 , 1969, as mailed
(11)
(1 2 )
(13 )
( l~)
DISTRICT 11
Considera tjon of motion approving minutes of the
re gular meeting held January 8 , 1969, as mailed
./ ~u ''Vr~ ''°1 ALL DISTRIC'T'S
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRIC'I'S
Report of the Gc1~.eral Manager
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the ncn8ral Counsel
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee, and consideration of
motion to receive and file the written report {copy in·
folders)
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, requesting permission to
purchase pipe from American Pipe and Construction Company
for use on Job No. J-10 {Ocean Outfall No. 2); and approving
said request as recommended by the Executive Committee.
See page "F"
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
(18)
(19)
(20)
Consideration of motion accepting proposals of John
-Carollo Engineers, for studies of anticipated future
requirements for electrical energy and heat energy, as
recommended by the Executive Committee. See pages "Grr
and "H"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion instructing the General Manager to
submit a written request to the Joint Boards or to any
individual Board when, in his opinion, services are
required of a firm qualified to disseminate to the pub-
lic, information concerning the Districts' activities, as
recommended by the Executive Committee
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file request from
. The Irvine Company, for joint use of treatment facilities;
and authorizing the requested study upon receipt of written
acknowledgement that the Company will pay all study expenses
incurred by the Districts; and authorizing the General
Manager to obtain a proposal for said study from Boyle
Engineering. See page "I" Ji ';JoWM
111)'>
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file request of
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District for joint use of proposed facilities; and
authorizing· the General Manager to obtain a proposal from
Lowry-Engineering Science for a study of said joint use
upon receipt of written acknowledgement that the study
costs will be borne by the Riverside County Flood Control J/
and Water Conservation Districto See page "J" I ~,~ #'i
(21) . ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion acknowledging the requests of
Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation
District and The Irvine Company relative to the joint
use of facilities for treatment and disposal of wastes
from outside the Districts; and authorizing the requested
studies upon receipt of a written acknowledgement from
both parties that they will reimburse the Districts for
all study expenses incurred; and authorizing the General
Manager to request a proposal for said study from John
Carollo Enginee~~ as recommended by the Executive Committee.
'W' See page "J" ·
-2-
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to
attend a Water Supply and Waste Water Seminar sponsored by
the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution
Control Federation, March 4th in Washington, D.C., and
authorizing reimbursement for meals, travel, lodging and
incidental expenses incurred, as recommended by the
Executive Committee
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and
directing execution and filing of documents necessary for
Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq., as recommended by
the Executive Committee
District No. Resolution No.
2 69-4-2
3 69-5-3
5 69-6-5
6 69-7-6
7 69-8-7
11 69-9-11
1 69-3-1 See page
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving specifications for
Gravel Roadway, Headworks rrcrr (PW-016); and authorizing
the General Manager to execute a contract in a total
amount not to exceed·$4,500. (Bid opening 2-11-69)
ALL DISTRICTS .
"K"
Consideration of Resolution No. 69-13, authorizing
District No. 1 to execute an agreement dated 1-1-69, with
the State Department of Parks & Recreation relative to
Job No. J-10; and authorizing payment of $708; and
rescinding Resolution ~o. 68-83 previously adopted.
See page · "L" ·
(26) ALL DISTRICTS
(27)
(28)
Consideration of motion to receive, file, .. and approve
request of W. J. Burke Construction Co., Inc., for permission
to substitute the electrical subcontractor on Job No. P2-8-3
{Enclosures -Phase II and Operators' Building). See page
"M"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 69-14, approving plans and
specifications for Job No. P2-14 (Sedimentation Basin "I",
Digester "I" and Distribution Structure "B"); authorizing
advertising for bids upon receipt of approval from the
Federal Government; and authorizing District No. 1 to
award the contract. See page "Nn
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion author·izing payment for emergency
overtime services in excess of the 24-hour maximum, for
certain employees who performed emergency services in the
month of January as a result of rainstorms
ALL DISTRICTS
Report by Director of Finance on mid-year budget review
(material in folders)
-3-
•:
(30) · ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and
that he recommends authorization for payment ..
(31) ALL DISTRICTS
(32)
(33)
(34 ).
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1,
and authorizing oavment of claims listed on pages "A" ,
"B" , and 1' c'f'
ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 69-12-1, approving and
authorizing execution of a License Agreement with Southern
California Edison Company relative to interplant right of
~ay. See page "O"
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
(35) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
(36) DISTRICT 1
(37)
Consideration of motion to ad~ourn
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
(38) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
(39) DISTRICT 2
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-4-
...
(46) DISTRICT 6
· Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "E"
(47) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
(48) DISTRICT 6
(49)
(50)
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 69-15-7, authorizing
acceptance of an easement from Irvine Industrial Complex
at. no cost to the District. See page "P"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file Position-Paper
prepared by th~ staff; and take under submission for study.
(51) DISTRICT 7
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "E"
DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications. Change Order ftl to Contract
No. 7-lG-A (Smalley Road Subtrunk). See page · Q"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., February
25th, in the Districts' office
DISTRICT 8
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving request from the City
of Huntington Beach relative to removal of an abandoned
sewer line; and authorizing reimbursement to the City for
said work uoon receipt of invoices for the costs thereof.
See page 11 R11
.
DISTRICT.11
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "E" ·
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications., if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
-5-
-
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
ADJOURNED REGULAR MEET I NG
Wednes day , February 5 , 1969
7 :30 p .m.
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Teleph one s:
Areo Code 714
540-2910
962-241 1
January 31 , 1969
Bec aus e the regular meeting date this mon t h falls on a legal holiday
(Lincoln's birthday), it was agreed a t t he J anuary meet i ng that the
Bo ards wo uld hold their joint meeting on February 5 , Accordingly >
al l Boards were adjourned to the above hour and date.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The following is a brief explanation of the more important non -
r o utine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Wa rrant lists are not attached to the
agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but
will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 15 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE : The
Comm ittee met on the evening of J anuary 28 with Directo r s Mcinnis and
Reinhardt as guests. A report of the rather lengthy meeting with the
Comm ittee's recommendations is enclosed.
Nos . 16 through 23 -CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOM -
MENDAT IO NS: These agenda i tems are cons ideration of action on the
recommendations of the Committee as presented in the enclosed report.
No . 24 -GRAVEL ROADWAY, HEADWORKS 11 C11
, PLANT NO . 2: This is one of
the regularly budgeted projects for t he current fiscal year which is
urgently needed to provide access , during wet weather , to the new
headworks at Plant No. 2 which ha s r ecently been put into operation .
The job will involve approximately 20,000 square feet of oiled rock
roadway to be used as a basis for asphalt pavement later this year
when com pletion of current Plant No. 2 construction in the area will
make it possible to award a contract for permanent paving in this and
other areas. Because of the urgen cy of providing adequate access to
the headworks and since the next Board meeting is not scheduled until
five weeks hence , it is recommended that I b e authorized to sign the
contract for this job in an amount not to exceed $4500 . Bids wil l be
t aken February 11.
!
""'
I
• I
•
-
No. 25 -REVISED AGREEMENT WITH STA TE DEPAR TMENT OF PARKS AND
RECREAT I ON: At the October, 1968 J o i nt Board meeting, an agreement
was authorized with this State agency to provide additional con -
stru ction area in the Huntington State Park for our new ocean outfall.
I n this agreement the annual renta l for the additional land on the
beach was established at $10,000 . We had assumed that since this
agreement was originally furnished by the State agency, it would be
satisfactory to the State but after a long delay we received advice
that the Depa rtment had changed it s mind and now wanted a different
type of agreement with an annual rental of $31 ,000 . Because of th i s
sharp increase in price and because the land was n ee ded immediately
for commencement of const r uction work, we l odged a vigorous and
verbal protest with the Department personnel and were soon advised
that the matter had been recons i dered and that the annual rental had
been reduced to $11,200. The previ ously authorized pa yment of $10 ,000,
plus a number of required documents have been f orwarded t o the State
with the understanding that at this Board mee t ing the new agreement
will be approved and an additional warrant for $708 wi ll be forth-
coming . In line with this understanding, the contractor was allowed
to occupy the area on January 20 . Accordingly, i t is re commended
that the Boards authorize this payment and t he executi on, by District
No . 1, of the new agreement .
No . 26 -SUBSTITUT I ON OF SUBCONTRACTO R, PLAN T JOB NO . P2-8 -3: The
contractor for this recently awarded Pl ant job (Enclosures-Phase II
and Operators' Building) has formally r equested that he be allowed to
substitute Gilbert & Stearns of Santa Ana in l i eu of A.E .C. of Orange,
who was the electrical subcontractor named in the contractor 's origi -
nal bid proposa l. The original subcontractor has requested, in
wri ting, his release from the job and accordingly the substitution
appears to be justifiable and it is recommended for approval . Board
approval on such substitutions is required by State law.
No . 27 -AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERT I SING FOR BIDS , PIANT J OB NO . P2-14:
As described i n the accompanying report of the Executive Committee ,
this r egula rly scheduled and budgeted Plant job (Sedimentation Basin I,
Digester I and Distribution Structure Bat Plant No . 2 ) will soon be
ready for bid . Since it is anticipated that the Boards will authorize
app l ication for a Federal grant on this project, no definite bid date
can be es t ablished at this time owing to the fact that the Federal
wate r Po llution Control Administration must approve plans and specif i-
cations prior to advertising for bids. Consequently, the resolution
included with the agenda material under this it em authorizes the
General Manager to establish a bid date upon receipt of FWPCA
approval . The engineer 's construction estima t e for this job is
$875,000 .
No. 28 -PAYMENT FOR EMERGENCY OVERTIME SERVICES : As a result of the
heavy rainstorms in mid -January and the consequent greatly increa sed
flows reaching the Plants, it was necessary t o ca ll out our mainte-
nance crews on several occasions for work during evenings and weekends
in order to keep the Plants and outlying pumping stations operating
' i,. I , ".
,
•
r •
Iii • --2-
.. -
•• ..
'
normally. Because of these emergency ca ll-outs , it is ant i cipated
that some of our personne l wi l l exceed t h e 24 hour cash payment
limitation prov i ded in our regul at i ons fo r overtime work in any one
month. We therefore recommend the 24 hour limitation be waived for
the month of January . I plan to report b r iefly at the meeting on
our operating experiences following the heavy storms and runoff
during which we were fortunate to escape any major damage and to
avoid serious overflows . We bel i eve that our favorable experience
d uri ng these emergency cond itio n s was due, t o a cons i derab l e extent,
to the willing cooperat i on and hard work of many of our employees
u nder very trying conditions.
No . 29 -MID-YEAR BUDGET REV I EW : Mr. Sylvester will present a brief
but comprehensive report on our opera ting and capital outlay expendi -
t~res during the first half of the current fisca l year as compar e d
with bud g eted amou n ts. Material on this subject is included with
this ma i ling .
DistYict No. l
No . 33 -JOINT USE POLE LINE AGREEMENT WITH EDISON COMPANY : It will
be recalled t hat at the January meeting the Boards authorized
District No. 1 to enter into a joint use pole line agreement with the
Edison Company for a new power line to be installed by Edison on our
interplant right of way . A d r aft of this agreement, incorporating
the terms and conditions recommended by the staff and those added by
the Eoard s at ~he Janua ry meeting , has been f o rwarded to the Ediso n
Company . It is ther e for e reco mmended that if we receive the Company!s
concurren ce with th e agre e ment in time , the Bo ard adopt t ll e reso-
lution , included wi t h the agenda material , a u t horizing its exe c ution.
Di s trict No. 7
No. 50 -"POSIT I ON-P.~PER" ON PROPOSED WITHDRP.WAL OF 1015 ACRES OWNED
BY THE I~VINE COMP.'1N 7: On January 21, the Boa rd d irect e d the staff
to prepar'= a 11 pos:i.t io n-paper 11 relative t o t h e reque st of The Irvine
Co mpa ny t o wi t hdra w 1 0 1 5 a cres from th e Dist r i c t i n exch ange for
annexatio n , witho ut char ge, of 80 acres bordering the District's
boundary along the Browning Avenue Subtrunk . The position-paper wi ll
be prepared in time for the meeting We dnesday evening. It is our
suggestion th a t the report be taken under submission f o r st u d y to
be discu s sed at an a d jo u r n ed meeting on Februa ry 25.
No . 53 -ADJOlri.NME NT TO FE BRUARY 25 AT 5 :00 P.M .: It will be
necessar y for ~he Bo ard to adjourn to t h e abo v e mentioned time and
date to finalize the asses~ments for Assessme nt District No . 7 .
Dist rict No. 11
No. 56 -REMOVAL OF ABA ND8 NED FORCE MAIN IN GOLDEN WEST STR EE T: We
are in r ec ei pt of a lette r from the City of Hun tington Be ac h, c opy
included with the a ge nda material , re questing that the District
J
-3-
-
4
I
•
•
I
I '
reimburse the City for the cost of removing approximately 1320 feet
of abandoned District 's force main in Golden West Street in coru1ection
with street improvements t o be undertaken in the near future . As
stated in the letter, the District, at the time of the abandonment of
the force main, agr eed to pay for its removal when necessary . We
accordingly recommend that the staff be authorized to notify the City
that the District will reimburse the City for costs of removal of the
fo rce main upon receipt of invoice. It is anticipated that the
removal will be accomplished under a separate bid item in the street
improvement contract and the reimbursement will be the amount bid by
the successful street improvement contractor.
l I
.
. '
I -~
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
~~ -• . -Ir I
~
" ~r
' ....
• i
• • ~
1
• • r
~
I
r
~ I
~-
~
• ~
• • ..
• -,
-
r
r -
•
' •
~
~
I
•
I
~
~
I I
~
-...
• ~
I •
I
J
I
~
I
r
-
•
• F
•
~
•
•
I .
• L
-4-
-----------------S~N~wnnocr DNI~HOddfiS CIN~ SNOI~n~osgH
WARRANT NO.
10610
10611
10612
10613
L.2614
~615
10616
10617
10618
10619
10620
10621
10622
10623
10624
10625
10626
10627
10628
10629
10630
10631
10632
10633
10634
10635
10636
10637
10638
.,0639
'-'.£0640
10641
10642
10643
10644
10645
10646
10647
10648
10649
10650
10651
10652
10653
10654.
10655
10656
10657
10658
10659
10660
10661
10662
10663
"-'1.0664
10665
10666
10667
10668
10669
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
A-1 Bearings & Abrasives, Bearings, Seals & Belts
Acore Drilling Service, Cored Drilling
Advance Electric, Motor Repair
All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing Company,Pump Parts, Gaskets
Angelus Quarries Bldg. Mat'ls., Brick
Associated Crane & Rigging, Crane Rental
Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies
Bank of America, Coupon Collections
Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings .
Beckman Instruments, Inc., Lab. & Electrical Supplies
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
Bokelman Plating, Rotor Plating
Benz Engineering, Inc., Gaskets
Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies
Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies
John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services
Certified Building Materials, Cement
Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., Engine Parts
College Lumber Company, Inc., Small Hardware
$
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies
Continental-Emsco Company, Small Hardware & Suction Hose
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc, .Truck Parts
Daily Pilot, Employment Ad
D & D Equipment Rental Inc., Backhoe Ram Rental
Daniel Industries, Inc., Compressor Parts
Daniels Tire Service, Truck Repair
De Guelle & Sons's Glass Co., Glass Work
Dial Hydrocrane Service, Crane Rental
Diesel Qontrol Corporation, Filters
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring & Research
Enterprise Printing Company, Forms
Essex Wire Corporation, Electrical Supplies
J. Fair Tire Co., Tires & Tubes
Fischer & Porter Co., Research Supplies, Gauges, Meter
Repair
Flair Drafting Service
Friden, Inc., Mtce. Agreement
City of Fullerton, Water
General Electric Supply Co, Electrical Supplies
General Telephone Co.
Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Chlorine
Gladman &.Wallace, Truck Parts
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
W. R. Grace & Co., Building Supplies
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services
AMOUNT
33.07
54.oo
551.73
41.74
107.42
342.09
74.55
263.25
102.29
33.32
714.48
365.49
14.oo
96.00
126.36
56.85
621.39
403. 20.
36.01
149.24
210.23
46.94
1,104.88
545.52
47.92
314.50
22.73
60.00
8.64
142. 50
139.43
3,097.50
86.21
120.23
85.05
436.67
468.60
19.00
5.16
694.43
1,083.34
8,578.22
9.47
386.41
66.52
425.00
92.19
317.10
317.28
13.20
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses & C.O.D. Expenses
Hersey-Sparling Meter Co., Water Meter
Hertz Equipment Rental, Comp. & Impact Wrench Rental
James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage
Hollisters Nursery, Shrubbery
Honeywell Inc., Electrical Supplies
Howard Supply Company, Small Hardware, Line Clean Equip.
City of Huntington Beach, Water
26.04
122.64
·1, 748.40
7.30
6.93
378.15
4,032.00
46.39
International Con,.ference of Building Officials, Bldg.Code
International Harvester Company, Truck Parts
Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine
Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe & Valve
King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Small Hardware & Joints
-A-
187.62
605.24
t
E
l
~
t
' i . I
I
.I
I
I
WARRANT NO.
10670
10671
10672
10673
10674
10675
~0676
10677
10678
10679
10680
10681.
10682
10683
10684
10685
10686
10687
10688
10689
10690
10691
10692
10693
10694
10695
10696
10697
10698
10699
10700
~0701
10702
10703
10704
10705
10706
10707
10708
10709
10710
10711
10712
10713
10714
10715
10716
10717
10718
10719
10720
10721
10722
10723
10724
10725
10726 ~10727
10728
10729
10730
10731
·:
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial & Mtce. Supplies. $ 116.93
LBWS, Inc., Hardware, Small Tools & Welding Supplies 961.77
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 14.oo
Jay G. Lissner Co., Drafting Supplies 15.77
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service 641.07
R. W. McClellan & Sons., Inc., Rock 409. 50
Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work 304.43
Main Photo Service, Photo Processing 46.96
Charles J. Mattern, Chlorinator Parts 116.03
Metropolitan Supply· co., Gauges 124.48
The National Cash Register Co., Forms 635.53
National Chemsearch Corp., Solvent 132.30
CitY. of Newport Beach, Water 16.20
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer 700.00
The Ohmart Corporation, Electrical Supplies 105.04
County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Juvenile Work Program 850.00
Orange County Radiotelephone 411.90
Orange County Tree Service, Repair Sewer Interference 200.00
Pacific Diesel Parts Co., Engine Parts 341.01
Pacific Pumping Company, Pumps 672.00
Pacific Scientific Co., Test Equipment 31.10
Pacific Telephone Co. 297.60
Walter W. Perkins Co., Heat Exchangers 752.96
Postmaster, Postage 150.00
Practical Management·Assoc., Training Seminar 200.00
Douglas E. Preble, Employee.Mileage 41.20
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electrical Supplies 104.98
Rapid Blue Print Co., Map Printing . 489.70
Red's Frame, ·Wheel & Brake, Truck Repair 14.40
The Register, Employment Ad 133.44
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Tubing & Steel 481.74
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Repairs 189.26
Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc., T.V. Insp. -Dist 11 Line 885.00
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing 143.33
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Tool Repair 80.45
Select Nurseries Inc., Shrubbery 258.30
·Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies 311.52
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires & Tubes 59.12
Signal-Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental 14.28
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 20.47
Southern California Edison Company 14,333.79
Southern California Water Company 3.06
Southern Counties Gas Co. 624.86
Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water 55.13
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts 160.60
Standard Oil Co. of California, Engine Oil, Grease 540.79
Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Asphalt Stock 85.58
Sweco, Inc., Floatables Removal Equip. (M.o. 1-8-69) 2,702.67
C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene 49.99
Triangle Steel & Supply Co. 38.26
Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Sewer Repair 7th Mtce. Dist. 208.15
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. Safety Equipment 215.35
Tustin Water Works, Sewer Cleaning Water 45.00
Union Oil Co. of California, Gasoline 394.41
Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Coupling 178.50
Johh R. Waples, Odor Consultant 428.20
Western Salt Co.J Salt 51.24
Westransco Freight Co., Freight 10. 40
W. D. Wilson Company, Fittings 154.13
Western Gear Corporation, Drive Gears (M.O. 10-9-68) 2,872.80
west coast Sand & Gravel, Inc., Base Sand 82 o5 .. ~~
Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $65,024.27
-B-
.c:
yTARRANT NO •
10732
10733
10734
10735
'.,;
~
\...,'
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
John Carollo EngiDeers, Engineering Services J-10
Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Legal Ad I-7-2
State of California, R~sources Agency, Construction
Area Rental J-10
Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-13
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
.,
•
-C-
AMOUNT
$ 3,176.24
39.46
708.00 8.oo
$ 3,931.70
-
$68,955.97
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
10736 Boyle Engineering, Engineering 1-10 . $ 1,390.00
\._)
$ 1,390.00
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF I
10737 The City Management Corp., Refund Unexpended
Deposit Balance-Sewer Relocation $ 930.32
.$ 930.32
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
• 10738 Boyle Engineering, Engr. Services 2-10-9 $ 1,848.50
10739 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 2-10-9 112.50
10740 Meriwether Investment Co., Inc., Assignee of
Charles L. Burch & Sons, Contractor 2-10-9 57,672.00
$. 59,633.00
\ws)
$ 60,563.32
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
10741 Boyle Enginee~ing, Engr. Services 3-11~ 3-12, 3-13 $ 8,927.20
$ 8,927.20
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
10742 City of Newport Beach, Connection Charge Admn. $ 384.oci
$ 384.oo
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
'w!1743 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad 5-16 $ 36.52
$ 36.52
$ 420.52
-D-
WARRANT NO.
10744.
10745
10746
10747
10748
DISTRIC'11 NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv.-Master Plan Report,
Plan Check & Inspection $ 2,101.50
86.oo
Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund of Inspection
Fee Overpayment
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County of Orange, Compaction Tests 7-lG-A
Scott Bros. Construction, Inc., Contr. 7-lG-A
Donald W. Stevens, Inc., Survey 7-lG-A
-E-
$ 2,187.50
$ 96.30
3,742.96
147 .50
$ 3,986. 76
$ 6,174.26
'\
. -·-· .. ··-·-. -·----... -~---·
PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO.
CONTRACTORS -
FOOT OF' SOUTH 26TH STREET
P. D. BOX 1512
RICHMOND, CALIF'ORNIA 94802
PHONE 232•9477'
January 3, 1969
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, California
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Att'n: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Man~ger
Re: Ocean Outfall No. 2 .~ Marine Section
Gentlemen:
We hereby request that we be allowed to use American
Pipe and Construction Co. as the supplier of concrete
pipe on the above mentioned job. Although there is
some additional burden to us, there will be no addi-
tional cost to the districts. We feel this will be
a more satisfactory arrangement due to American Pipe
and Construction Company's long and excellent experi-
ence in supplyi~g this and other types of pipe. ·
Y~urs very truly,
. .
PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO.
"J8~v..~.
NLB:JFJ:cl
•
Agenda Item #"16 F-1
N. L. Barnes
District Manager
All Districts
-----------J 0 H N CAR. 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5,----------
Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, California El Paso, Texas
Reply to:
.IOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.
ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.lt.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY. P.E,
ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E.
January 7, 1969
3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549
.·
,•
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
. of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92 708
AREA CODE 415
Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section -Job No. J-10
We have received a request from Peter Kiewit Sons'
Company to change pipe manufacturers on the subject job. A copy
of the PKS letter request was transmitted to you earlier. We assume
you will act on this request.
We feel it is in the best interests of the Districts to allow
the Contractor the requested change in pipe manufacturers.
If you have any questions, please· call us.
Very truly yours,
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
:J_JJiz~,
Walter Howard
WH:ml
283·3895
·.
Agenda Item #16 F-2 All Dlstricts
•
CLARK MILLER
C.ARTHUR NISSON
NELSON KOGLER
.·
. ·
MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
January 131 1969
• •
Fred A. Harper 1 General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
P. o. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California
Re: Job No. J-10
Dear Fred:
TELEPHONE
842•6771
...
I have received your memo of January 8th concerning
whether or not there would be any question in allowing
Peter Kiewitt Sons Co. to procure the pipe from American
Pipe & Construction Co ... rather than manufacture it themselves
as they indicated their intent in thei·r proposal to the
Districts. In that the pipe compan¥ would be a supplier as
distinguished from a sub-contractor, there appears to be no
reason to raise any legal objection to the proposal of the
contractor to purchase the pipe from American Pipe & Construc-
tion Co.
CAN ct
Agenda Item #16 F-3
Yours very truly,
(!:JO~A ,, CtZ~~~
c. Arthur Nissan,
General Counsel
"All Districts
-----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5----------
,
Phoenix, Arizona · Lafayeffe, California El Paso, Texas
Reply to:
.JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.
ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.E.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY, P.E.
ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E.
December 30,. 1968 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549
Mr.· Fred A. Harper, General Manage•r
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley6 California 92708
AREA CODE 41!1
. ...
Subject: · Master Plan Study Electrical Energy
We propose to perform a study of the electrical energy
requirements at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This study would set forth
the existing requirements and anticipated future requirements.
To begin this study, we require the "Single Line" electrical
drawings which are presently being up-dated by Districts' personnel.
This information will allow us to determine the adequacy of the existing
feeders and service centers.
Our Lafayette office would then determine what the anti-
cipated power requirements would be for 1975 and 1980. Following
this, our electrical engineering department will set forth the future
electrical energy requirements at both plants for the anticipated.loads.
We would prepare a preliminary draft of the report for review
by your staff; att~nd a conference to discuss thts preliminary draft; re-
write as required and furnish the Districts .with plates of the finished
Report •..
We anticipate this study will require 60 to 90 days follow-
ing receipt of the single line diagrams.
We would perform this study under the terms of our proposal
dated November 22, 1968 1 and accepted by your Board of Directors on
December 18 1 1968.
We estimate the cost of this study at $3 1 000 to $3, 500.
Yours very truly, · ·
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
283·3895
-zb~-u?~~
• H rvcyt!/r j~
HHH:ml
Agenda Item #17 -G-All Districts
.,.
...
-----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5-----=--------
Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, Cafifornia El Paso, Texas
Reply to:
.JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E.
ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.E.
H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E.
HOWARD M. WAY, P.E.
ROBER1' G, WILLIAMS, P.E.
DONALD R. PREISLER, P.£.
December 30, 1968
36SS MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD
LAFAYETTE. CALIFORNIA 94549
Mr. Fr~d A. Harper, General Man~ger
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
P. O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley, California 92 708
Subject: Master Plan Study Heat Energy
.· AREA CODE 415
We propose to per;form a study of the Heat Energy·require-
ments at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and the available source for obtaining
same. This study would include, but not necessarily be limited to,
the following:
I. Determine as soon as possible the immediate boiler
requirement at Plant No. 2, both as ·to size and location.
Z~ Determine the quantity and loc;:ation of heat require -
ments at both plants, both at present and in 1975 and 1980 (with and
without sludge incineration). ·
3. Determine where the heat will originate to satisfy the
requirements of (2) above. That is, will the heat come from boilers,
heat recovery units on engines, heat recovery from the .turbine gen ..
erator, etc. ·
4. Determine the heat energy available in the form of
digester gas today, in 1975 and in 1980. The determination of gas
production to be from the suspended solids removed in sedimentation
and the measured volatile content of the sludge (check these results
. against metered flow to Kadane}. Determine the heat value of the
sludge, grease and skimming.
5. Discuss the use and need of the. interplant gas line as
a "balancing line" in the total energy cone e pt.
283·389!5
6. Prepare a descriptive and pictorial layout for heat require-
ments (2, above) and heat source (3,, above) for the existing plant and
the anticipated requirements in 1975 and 1980. . ·
Following completion of the above study,, a preliminary draft
of the Report would be prepared and reviewed with the Districts 1 staff.
Plates of the. finished Report would then be prepared.
Agenda Item #17. H-1 All Dlstricts
.. "' . .
. ,. ·-·
'
·:
We estimate that it would be 90 to 120 day.s after work on
the Report is started before the preliminary draft would be ready.
z
We will perform this work on the basis of our proposal dated
·November 22, 1968, which was accepted by the Districts' Board of
Directors on December 18, 1968. We estimate the cost of this study
and report at between $5, 500 and $6, 500 •
. ·
Yours very truly,
HHH:ml
Agenda Item #17 H-2 All Dlstricts
. \._)
' .. '
/
(
TI-IE IRVINE COMPANY
...
,: .
:
January 15, 1969
The Joint Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation Distri~ts
P. O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Fred Harper, Manager.
.,
IRVINE:,CALIF'ORNIA 92664
?14•544•0120
SEWAGE TREATivfENT AND DISPOSAL FOR THE IRVINE RANCH AREA
Gentlemen:
Reference is made to the enclosed Sewerage Study report
dated November 1968 prepared for the Irvine Ranch Water
District by Brown and Caldwell. A sununary of this report
as interpreted by The Irvine Company is also enclosed for
your information and u·se.
. . .
The Irvine Ranch Water District Sewerage Study concludes
that from the standpoint of long range economy the Irvlne
Ranch Water District should provide sewage treatment and
disposal facilities within the Irvine Basin and should
phase installation of facilities in increments to meet
the projected growth of the area. The report suggests
four stag~ construction"of primary treatment facilities
adjacent to the site of the present reclamation plant of
the Irvine Ranch Water Distri.ct in 1972, 1983, 1990 and
1996. Disposal facilities are recommended for two stage,
1972 and 1983, construction of effluent conveyance facil-
ities from the plant to Pelican Point and one stage, 1972,
construction of an effluent dispos~l ocean outfall off
Pelican Point.
The method selected for sewage treatment and disposal to
serve the Irvine Basin will have a majo:r effect upon lands
owned by The Irvine Company. For this reason it is essen-
tial that The Irvi.ne Company review and evaluate in detail
·•
Agenda Item #19 I-1 Districts 1 & 7
:
....
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Page 2
.. •' . -_.._ ...... ·-
January 15, 1969.
the ~rvine Ranch Water District Sewerage Study report in
order· to fully understand the implications of the alternate
means of sewage treatment and disposal available for service
of the Irvine Basin in terms of the technical needs of the
·Company's future developments, financing of facilities and
administration of such facilities.
One of the alternatives analyzed in the I.R.W.D. Sewerage
Study report is the use of exist~ng and new sewage treat-
ment and disposal facilities owned an~ operated by the
Orange County Sanitation Districts. In order to evaluate
the subject report to determine the position which The
Irvine Company should·take relative to its conclusions it
is essential that the assumptions made by I.R.W.D's
consultants for this alternative be verified through
examination by the Orange County Sanitation Districts.
The Company would. not ·wish to rely heavily upon unverified
assumptions regarding o.c.s.D. costs and policy in estab-
~ishing its position with regard to the I.R.W.D. 's ~eport.
The Irvine Company hereby respectfully requests that the
Orange County Sanitation Districts examine the Irvine
Ranch Water District report assumptions and conclusions
with respect to the Orange County Sanitation Districts
alternative of' treatment and disposal in order to deter-
mine the accuracy of the technical ·cost and phasing data
contained therein. The economic analysis of the Orange
County Sanitation Districts alternative in the I.R.W.D.
report is based upon the assumption that treatment and
disposal facilities proposed in the report or their
equivalent will be necessary and that they must be
financed by the benef iteo area to meet its needs during
the period from 1968 -2010. Phasing_and_present worth
.cost of these facilities are outlined in bhe subject
report. Exhibit A, attached, sets forth this data.
Additional. technical reasons given for the conclusions are
·discussed in the enclosed sum.mary of the subject sewerage
report. These include the present favorable effluent
discharge requirements of the Water Quality Control Board
at Pelican Point and the desirability of significa~t
separation of ocean outfalls along the shoreline of Orange
Count:y.
A major item of interest to The Irvine Cbmpany in evaluating
the O,C.S.D. alternativ~ is the provisions under which long
-.
Agenda Itetn #19 I-2 Districts 1 & 7
• .i...;.. ___ ,_
'.
, .
. . "
..
Orange County Sanitation Districts
Page.3
January 15, 1969
terit} treatment and disposal at the Joint Works could be
.achieved. The following specific questions require answers
in 6r~er for the Company to reach any logical de6ision.
1. ·What would be the administrative and/or
organizational arrangement for Orange
County Sanitation Districts acceptance
of sewage from the Irvine Basin?
2. How would ~inancing and cash flow be handled?
Would it be under the same policy as presently
a~plies to other member agencies?
3. What guarantee, if any, can be given that a
policy adopted by the present Joint Board of
Directors will be maintained during the full
term of projected de~elopment of the necessary
treatment and disposal facilities at the
Orange County Sdni~ation Districts plant?
4. What· possibilities exist for joint participation
with Sanitation Districts No. 7 and No. 1 in an
interceptor sewer to reach the Orange County
Sanitation Dis~ricts plant?
The Irvine Company appreciates the opportunity to bring
thi~ important matter to the at~ention of the Joint Board
of Directors at this time. We would like to thank the
staff of the Orange County Sanitation Districts for their
fine cooperation to date in our preliminary discussions
.and will greatly appreci?te the Board's assistance in
authorizing further exploration of this s~bject. The
timing of a decision on the appropriate alternative m·ethod
of treatment and disposal is quite critical and the Company
must take a position on the matter within one to two months
at the latest. We understand that Sanitation Districts.
No. 7 and No. l are al.so at points of decision which
further underline the appropriateness of an early decision.
Representatives of the Company will be ~resent at the
Board Meeting in order to answer such questions as may
Agenda Item #19 I-3 Districts 1 & 7
.· .
Orange County Sanitation Districts
. Page 4
·:
Ja~uary 15, 1969
_,be appropriat"ely raised during the meeting. We will atso
be pleased to supply any additional data to the Board
~hich it may desire.
Very truly yours,
~_j_~~~~~
Richard A. Reese
Vice President, Pla~ning
RAR:bl
cc: William R. Mason
·Attachments
• Agenda Item #19 I-4 Districts 1 & 7
•
JOHN W. BRYANT
CHIEF ENGINEER
4600 CRESTMORE AVENUE
P. O. BOX 1033
TELEPHONE 683•4000
..
. _;
RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND
WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT
RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502
30 January 1969
Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Cali.forn.ia
Dear Mr. Harper: Re: NRW Disposal Project
On 28 January 1969 the Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District delivered to your office for
your perusal a draft of a proposed "Waste Water Capacity
Agreement between Riverside County Flood Control and
Water Conservation District and County Sanitation District 2
of Orange County," together with ·an outline of the proposal
which set forth a basis of cooperation. between this District
and the County Sanitatl:on Districts of Orange County for
the handling of non-reclaimable wastes generated in the
Upper Santa Ana River Basin above Prado Dam.
The purpose of this letter is to request that the agreement
be formally p~esented to your Board for comprehensive ·
discussion and consideration so that it may be used as a
basis for future discussions and cooperation between the
two agencies leading to a formal agreement.
I wish t~ take this opportunity to thank you and Mr. Brown
.for the many courtesies and cooperation given to me and
other representatives of this District in developing what
we believe to be the best solution for the disposal of
non-reclaimable wastes.
Very truly yours,
j . ~ /..// . -f--" . //J-l-•r ~ · /:)_7/i.,._.
<6'hN W. BRYANT
Chief Engineer ·
..
Agenda Items_g_Q,& 21 -J-All Dlstricts
•
RESOLUTION NO. 69:...3-1
FEDERAL GRANT -DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1
AND SEDIMENTATION BASIN I, DIGESTER I AND
DISTRIBUTION STRUC%URE BAT PLANT NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 u.s.G. 466 ET SEQ., IN BEHALF OF
.. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, .3, 5, 6,
7_., AND 11
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l·of
Orange County, Califorriia
OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal· Water
Po~lution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1~66 et. seq.) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1 ¢f Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and s·afety Code·, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk·
sewer system for the bollection of sewage.from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint
sewage treatment plants an~ disposal facilit~es under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of. said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
. No. 1, of Orange County, acts for itself and as agent for County
"--11 Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange Coun~y,
California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
teiritories, all in orange County, California, for the purpose of
constructing and operatlng said joint sewage tr·eatment plants and
disposal facilities.
Agenda Item #23_ K-1 All Distr~cts
'I
Section 4. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions
set fo~th below by number, the.following County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California, ~have authoriz~d the filing of applica-
tions for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts·
set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1
as "Central Agency" for said applications as set forth in Title 23,
Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code:
District No.
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
Resolution No.
69-3-1
69-4-2
69-5-3
69-6-5
69-7-6
69-8-7
69-9-11
Application Amount
$ 51·,800
144:,900
160,500
26,500
27,700
28;800
34,200
Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare,
sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, and as agent
for County Sanitatio:r:i Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, all
documents necessary to apply for and accept qonstruction grants under
\.,,,,,I said Act of Congress in the arn.ounts set forth in Section 4 hereof for
a joint project generally described as:
DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PL.ANT NO. 1 AND
SEDIMENTATION BASIN I, DIGESTER I AND
DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE B AT PLANT NO. 2
Acceptance of said grants may be· for amounts more or less than set
forth in Section 4 hereof.
All Districts
Agenda Item #23
RESOLUTION NO. 69-13
AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS AND RECREATION RE: JOB NO. J-10
A JOINT RESOLUTION·OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS •. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN
AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTJYlENT OF PARKS
AND RECREATION
The Boards of Directors of County Sani~ation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement with the State
Department of Parks and Recreation, dated January 1, 1969, is.
hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as
agent for itself and each of the other Districts, is hereby
authorized and directed to execute said agreement to provide for
additional construction area required by the Districts in the
construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine Section, Job No. J-10;
and,
Section 3. That payment to the State of California,
Department of ·Parks and Recreation, in the total amount of $708, is
hereby authorized; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of County
Sanitation District No. 1 be authorized and directed to execute
the agreement and any documents necessary to obtain the additional
construction area required for construction of said Job No. J-10, in
form acceptable to the General Counsel; and,
Section 5. That Resolution No. 68-83, previously adopted
by these Boards, is hereby rescinded.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular. meeting February
Agenda Item #25 -L-All Districts
•
'\
.• 'r
W 1 Burke Construction Ca,lnc.
2550 EAST MIRALOMA PLACE, P.O. BOX 6319, ANAHEIM, CALIF. 92806 0 (714) 630·0500
Orange County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Ave.·
P.O. Box 8127
Fountain Valley 1 California 92708
January.}.6 1 1969
Reference: Enclosures -Phase ]] & Operators
Building Job OP-2-8-3
Gentlemen:
Enclosed please find A.E.c. Elects ~etter dated
December 30, 1968 requesting that they be releas-
ed as the electrical subcontractor on the above
named project.
We wish to use Gilbert & Stearns 1 · Inc. 609 E.
Fourth ·st., Santa Ana in lieu of A.E.c. Elect.
Gilbert & Stearns was the next low electrical
subcontractor that bid on this project.
If this meet~ with yo~r approval~ please ackn~w
lege same in letter form.
Very Truly Yours,
W.J.BURKE CO~ST. CO., INC.
COMMERCIAL
INDUSTRIAL
TILT-UP
Agenda Item #26 M-1 All 'Districts
-,
'l
-·----···--·--··· r ..... -· ..... ·-·· --· ··-· -·--•••. ---· -•
.._ --·--·----------·-·'----------·· ... ..,;_ .. _ -
I
i
·j
-~
. : :
\·
'· 'i. IC.~ NS ED
~()
BONDED
• "t
A ~ c·c-.. -~~-·, ........ ,ORA
. • L. • -------· --.... ~---~ ·. ':·--~:{] < NGE
. ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS
6275 B~och Boulevard -Phone 523-1640
BUE~A PARK, CALIFORNIA
December 30, 1968
W.J.Burko Construction Co. 2550 E. Mlraloma
/Anahef.~, California
Attn: Tom Burka.
Gentlemen:
Re: Enclosures., Phase II
Bid on 12/16/68
· With the understanding that an error was nl.o.de ln
the abovo quotation, wa request that we be released from
the listing as Electrical sub-contractor on the above
j~b. . .
INSURED
Thank you for. the oppuntunity to quote you on this
project.
LG/dg · Leonard
. ;
• Agenda Item #26 M-2 All Districts
.. . ..
RESOLUTION NO. 69-14
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB
NO. P2-14
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
SEDIMENTATION BASIN 'I', DIGESTER 'I' AND
DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE 'B', JOB NO. P2-14
~he Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE.AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
_by John Carollo Engineers, . Districts' engineers, for construction
of SEDIMENTATION BASIN 1 I 1 , DIGESTER 1 I 1 AND DISTRIBUTION
STRUCTURE 1 B1 , JOB NO. P2-14, are hereby approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions
of the Health.and Safety Cude of the State of California, after
receipt by the Districts of authorization from the.Federal
Government; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be publicly opened and
read on a date and at a time to be determined by the General
Manager after completion of the ·negotiations described in Section
2 above; and,
Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is
hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. P2-14 on
behalf of these Boards of Directors.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting
February 5, 1969.
Agenda Item #27 -N-All Districts
~-:"" ~.
I._.)
-:
RESOLUTION NO. 69-12-1
APPROVING RIGHT OF WAY LICENSE AGREEMENT
'I
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l,.OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFCRNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN INTERPLANT RIGHT OF WAY
LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
EDISON COMPANY
:The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, California~
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Interplant Right of Way
License Agreement between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of
Orange County, acting as a~ent for itself and County Sanitation
Pistricts Nos. 2, 3, 5, _6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, and SOUTHERN
CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, relati.ve to joint use of the District·s'
interplant right of way, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Agreement
Section 2. That the right of way covered in said License
is more particularly described as follows:
Those por~ions of a strip of land of var·ylr;g width which
parallels and is adjacent to the westerly property line of
the Santa Ana River ·in the City of Huntington Beach, City
_of c.osta Mesa and County of Orange, California between the ·
north~rly property line of Ga~field Avenue and the northerly
property line of California State· Highway Route No. 1
(pre.sen tly called Pacific Coa.s t High1•1ay) and which is
refer1"'ed to. as "30 1 Easement to O.C. San. Dist." or "30'
Easem' t to Sanitation Districts of Orange County'' or "30'
Easement to J.O.S." on Record of Sur·vey maps, sheets·l
through 11 inclusive, as recorded j_n Book 86, pa6es 1
through 11 incluslve, of Recor~ds of Surveys County of Oronge
County, Ca l:i.f· o l"'n:t a .
Section 3. That the Chairman and ~ecretary b~ authorized
and directed to execute said License Agreement in form acceptable to
the General Counsel.
b_genda Item #33 -0-District 1
·~
RESOLUTION NO. 69-15-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, A CORPORATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated
January 22, 1969, wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a corporation,
grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement
for· sewer purposes in Tract No. 6551, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said
easement is granted is more particularly described as follows:
The Northwesterly 20.00 feet of Lots
7, 8 and 9 of Tract No. 6551 per maps
of said Tract recorded in· Book 243,
pages 36 and 37 of Miscellaneous Maps,
records of said County.
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted
at no cost to the District; ahd,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County, California.
PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting February
Agenda Item 1149 -P-District 7
... --. COUN'I'Y SANITATION DIS'rRICTS OP OHAHGE COUNTY
P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
•
C .O. NO. 2
CONTRACTOR: Scott Bros.·Construction DATE: February 5, 1969
JOB: Smalley Road Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-lG-A
Amount of this change order (ADD) ~~ $ 761.25
~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in .the
contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation
therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price
are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated November 4, 1968.
ADD
Install gravel bedding not shown on plans under the ·
pipe and.manhole, as directed by the Engineer.
Board.authorization date:
~ February 5, 1969
:.
Agenda Item #52
217.5 tons@ $3.50/ton $ 761.25
Original Contract Price $38,391.10
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD $ 922.25
This Change {ADD)(~i~~~~) $ 761.25
Amended Contract Price
·Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By ___ ~_/!...::..s/!.-:P~a~u~l~G~.~B~r~o-w~n=-==--~----~
Chief Engineer
SCOTT BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC.
-Q-District 7
.,
January 15, 1969
Orange County SanitatiQn District
P.O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Gentlemen:
Subject: Golden West Street
Improvements, CC-097
. We are planning to improve Golden West Street between Pacific
Coast Highway and Warner Avenue, in. the near future, to four lanes of
traffic. Inasmuch·as this is a major reconstruction project, it will
be necessary to remove the abandoned 16 inch force main between Ernest
(formerly Bolsa) and approximately 1320 feet north of Talbert Avenue.
We have· a letter, from your office, stating the district would
remove the line at such time as is required. However, may we suggest
an alternate solution.
The line is at· a position of 10 feet we·st of centerline which
places it under existing paving and would be undoubtedly expensive to
remove if done as a single project. Therefore, we would suggest that
its removal be included in our street construction contract and that
the district reimburse the City for the bid amount.
we·will notify the district, after bid opening, of the actual
amount bid for the formal authorization to proceed. We would antici-
pate, if this meets your approval, that the line savings, if any, would
become property of the contractor and our specifications will be on
thaf basis.
We will.appreciate your review and comments regarding this proposed
work.
V r truly yours, _d ., ··
~~c~./ K ·a?l-l--fD-~
James R. Wheeler '---
Director of Public Works
JRW:DWK:nt
Agenda Item #56 -R-District 11