Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1969-02..... II 1 ,. MANAGER'S AGENDA REPO RT County Sanitation Dis tricts of Orange County, Cal ifo rnia DISTRICT NO. ~ J 4-7 P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, C al if., 92708 Te le ph o nes: Ar ea Code 7 14 5 40-2910 962 -2411 February 21, 1969 DISTRICT NO. 5 -Adjourned Regular Meeting -4:30 p.m. DISTRICT NO. 1 -Special Meeting -5:00 p.m . DISTRICT NO. 7 -Adjourned Regular Meeting 5:00 p.m . Tuesday, February 25, 1969 Districts' Offices Districts Nos. 5 and 7 Board meetings will be held at the above hours on February 25. Pursuant to call of the Chairman, the Board of District No. 1 will also meet on the same day at 5:00 p.m., concurrently with District No. 7 . The following is a brief explanation of the items which appear on the agendas. District No. 5 REPORT OF DISTRICT'S ENGINEER ON IMPROVEMENTS TO JAMBOREE PUMP STATION: Shuirman-Simpson have submitted a written report on this subject (copy enclosed) which we believe to be self-explanatory . Mr . Simpson will be present at the meeting to go into greater detail on this subje c t , if desired. If the recommendations contained in the report are satisfactory with the Board, it is suggested that they be approved and the engineers and staff instructed to secure bids on the needed equi~ment as soon as possible . These improvements have been budgeted ($20,000) for the current fiscal year. REVIEW BY REPRESENTATIVES OF THE IRVINE COMPANY OF LONG RANGE SEWERAGE PROGRAM OF IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT AREA: As announced by Chairman Parsons at the February 5 Board meeting, representatives of The Irvine Company have requested the opportunity to discuss the abo v e matter with the Board at this meeting. PROPOSAL BY IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX FOR SEWERAGE OF A PORTION OF ANNEXATION NO. 3: The Board members will recall that this matter has been under discussion for some time, partic u larly with respe c t to serving proposed Tract No . 6680 of the Irvine Industrial Complex. An engineering report on sewerage of Annexation No. 3, with estimates of cost, was submitted and taken under submission at the October 29, 1968 Board meeting. Because of the extreme cost of serving this area thro ugh the existing District system at this time , it was the con- census that further ne gotiations with the Irvine Ranch Water District 1 ·-~ • • should be held concerning sewering this low -lying area through the facilities of t hat Dis t r i ct . Acco r dingly and after further meetings> a formal reques t was add r essed t o the I rvine Ranch water District for a statemen t of te r ms and conditions unde r which that Di stri ct would be wi lling to provide such services . We are now in receipt of a l etter, dated February 14, 1969 from the I rvine Indust ri al Comp l ex (copy enclosed) proposing a solution to t h i s p roblem. As s t a t ed i n th e communicat i on, repre - sentat i ves o f t he Com pa n y wi l l b e p resent a t th i s Board meeting to go into this matte r in grea t er d e t ai l. Since this letter proposes formation of a spec i a l i mpro v emen t d i stri ct, we have requested the _ 1 Ger.eral Coun s el to study this aspe ct and to report verbally to the Board at the meeting . Owing to t he shortness of time available, the staff does not have a recommendat i on on th i s proposal at this t i me . .. District No . 1 ACQUIS I TION OF EASEMENT FOR FUTURE TRUNK SEWER : The District's 1965 engineer's repor t recommended a future new trunk sewer to lie in an easeme nt paral l e l to the e xi sting Distri ct No . 1 trunk sewe r along the Pa c i f i c E l ectri c Ra i l r oad right of way between Ma i n and Bristol St ree ts . Af te r a p prova l of t he e ng i neer's report, the General Counse l was in s t r ucted to take appr opriate steps to acqui re an additiona l 20-foot easement . If District No . 1 or District s Nos . 1 and 7 together construct the recommended sewer, this easement wi l l be necessary for the most economical rout i ng . We are attaching a copy of a letter, dated February 14, from Boy l e Enginee r ing to Hall & Foreman, Inc ., which is illustrat i ve of this problem . Howeve r , there is the possibility now that the I rvine Ranch Wate r District may wish to Join with the two Sanitation Districts in c o nstruct i ng a joint facility farther to the south, in which case it would not be necessary to acquire the easement in question . The General Counsel has asked for the opportunity to explain to the Board the ramifi cations and problems involved in acquiring the easement . District No . 7 CONFIRMATION OF ASSESSMENTS IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 7 : This is the time advertised for the confirmat i on of property-owner assess - ments for the sewers that were constructed i n Assessment District No . 7 . The attached Notice to Property Owners explains the manner in which the properties were assessed . The Engineer of Work and leg al counsel for the Assessment Di strict will be present to answer any questions that may be asked dur i ng the hearing . (A notice of the hearing was mailed to each property owner on January 31.) To date we have not received any written protests from the property owners . -2 - - • I ' CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY FOR WITHDRAWJ\L OF 1,015 ACRES FROM THE DISTRICT : On February 5, the Bo ard received and t o ok under submission for study a staff position-paper (see attached). relative to the request of The Irvine Company for permission to withdraw 1,015 acres from the District, in exchange for annexation, without charge, of 80 acres bordering the District 's boundary along the Browning Avenue Subtrunk. This matter is being placed on the agenda for the Board 's consideration . '-. • .. - -.._ • •• ..-I I ~ l JI ... IJ .. .--. • 'l•1 " I • - ~.L ii -. \."' t' I r • •• r -· .. -~ , ;;-. .. I rl' • • . I • I' I • • ' .... L -:".: l ._ r . • ' r I f ..... • -. • .: Ii r 11 I -I -... II' t ,. I - • I I .. .. • , • I' - • -3- Fred A . Harper General Manager . • l .. -II- ,.,, ~rhA') ~-,(" O'' ... ~ . .-~·~,.,.,.... ·~.-:· UV U.~ ... ~ Ir' c..>'J.~!::. ·D \;..l t9;:J County Sc:n ita tion Di str ict s P. 0. Box 5 175 108114 E:llis Avcr.uP. of Orange County, CJli fom ia Fountain Valley, CaiiF., 92708 (1) (2 ) (3) (4) (5 ) (6 ) (8 ) (9 ) DIS 'f f<JCT No. AGF.MDA February 25, 1969 -4 :30 p .m. Adjourn ed Regular Meeting Roll Call Con sideration of motion appointing Chairman pro tern, i f necessary Repo rt of the General Manager Report of the General Counsel Report of the District 's engineer on Improvements to t he J amboree Pump S tation , and consideration of motion authori zing the staff to obtain bids for the reco~nended equipment Review by representatives of The Irvine Company of long r ange s ewerage program of Irvine Ranch Water District Area Cons i deration of proposal by Irvine Industrial Complex for s ewerage of a portion of Annexation No . 3 (see Man ager 's Report and letter from Irvine Industrial Com p lex in fold ers) Other business and communications, if any Co nsideration of motion to adjourn COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,.2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, AND 11 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING Februar~ 13, 1969 -7:30 p.m. 10 44 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California This 13th day of February, 1969, at 7:30 p.m., in the Districts' office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, being the time and place for the regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 11, of Orange County, California, there not being a quorum of said Boards present, the meeting of Districts Nos. 2, 3, 6, 8, and 11 was thereupon adjourned by the Secretary. The meeting of District No. 5 was adjourned to February 25, 1969, at 4:30 p.m., and the meeting of Districts Nos. 1 and 7 was adjourned to February 25, 1969, at 5:00 p.m., in the Districts' office. the Boards of Directors II COAt1D5 Or D!RECTO~S Co unty San itation Distric!s •: P. 0. Box:;{iNX 812r{ 10844 Ellis Avenue Foun t ain Val ley, Calif., 92708 of Orange Cou nt y, Cali fornia Adj ourned Regular Meeting February 5 , 1969 -7 :30 p .m. AGEN DA (1) Pledge of Allegiance ( 2 ) Roll Call (3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary ( 4 ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the r egular meeting held January 8 , 1969 , and the adj ourned regular ~eeting thereof on January 28 , 1969 , as mailed (5) DISTRICT 2 Con sideration of motion approving minutes of the r egul ar meeting h e ld January 8 , 1969 , as mailed ( 6) DIS TRICT 3 Consideration of mot i on approving minutes of the r egular meeting held J anuary 8 , 196 9 , as mai l ed (7) DISTRICT 5 Cons ideration of moti on approving minutes of the re gular mee'ting he ld January 8 , · 1969, and th.e sp ecial meeting h e l d January 23 , 1969, as mai l ed (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the r egular meeting h el d January 8 , 1969 , as mailed (9 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of moti on approving minutes of the reg ular meeting held J anu a ry 8 , 1969 , as mailed , and the adjou rned regular meeting thereof held J anuary 21 , 1969 (1 0) DISTRICT 8 Considera tion of motion approving minutes of the r egular meeting held January 8 , 1969, as mailed (11) (1 2 ) (13 ) ( l~) DISTRICT 11 Considera tjon of motion approving minutes of the re gular meeting held January 8 , 1969, as mailed ./ ~u ''Vr~ ''°1 ALL DISTRIC'T'S Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRIC'I'S Report of the Gc1~.eral Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the ncn8ral Counsel (15) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee, and consideration of motion to receive and file the written report {copy in· folders) (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company, requesting permission to purchase pipe from American Pipe and Construction Company for use on Job No. J-10 {Ocean Outfall No. 2); and approving said request as recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "F" (17) ALL DISTRICTS (18) (19) (20) Consideration of motion accepting proposals of John -Carollo Engineers, for studies of anticipated future requirements for electrical energy and heat energy, as recommended by the Executive Committee. See pages "Grr and "H" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion instructing the General Manager to submit a written request to the Joint Boards or to any individual Board when, in his opinion, services are required of a firm qualified to disseminate to the pub- lic, information concerning the Districts' activities, as recommended by the Executive Committee DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file request from . The Irvine Company, for joint use of treatment facilities; and authorizing the requested study upon receipt of written acknowledgement that the Company will pay all study expenses incurred by the Districts; and authorizing the General Manager to obtain a proposal for said study from Boyle Engineering. See page "I" Ji ';JoWM 111)'> DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file request of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District for joint use of proposed facilities; and authorizing· the General Manager to obtain a proposal from Lowry-Engineering Science for a study of said joint use upon receipt of written acknowledgement that the study costs will be borne by the Riverside County Flood Control J/ and Water Conservation Districto See page "J" I ~,~ #'i (21) . ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion acknowledging the requests of Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and The Irvine Company relative to the joint use of facilities for treatment and disposal of wastes from outside the Districts; and authorizing the requested studies upon receipt of a written acknowledgement from both parties that they will reimburse the Districts for all study expenses incurred; and authorizing the General Manager to request a proposal for said study from John Carollo Enginee~~ as recommended by the Executive Committee. 'W' See page "J" · -2- (22) (23) (24) (25) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to attend a Water Supply and Waste Water Seminar sponsored by the American Water Works Association and the Water Pollution Control Federation, March 4th in Washington, D.C., and authorizing reimbursement for meals, travel, lodging and incidental expenses incurred, as recommended by the Executive Committee ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq., as recommended by the Executive Committee District No. Resolution No. 2 69-4-2 3 69-5-3 5 69-6-5 6 69-7-6 7 69-8-7 11 69-9-11 1 69-3-1 See page ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving specifications for Gravel Roadway, Headworks rrcrr (PW-016); and authorizing the General Manager to execute a contract in a total amount not to exceed·$4,500. (Bid opening 2-11-69) ALL DISTRICTS . "K" Consideration of Resolution No. 69-13, authorizing District No. 1 to execute an agreement dated 1-1-69, with the State Department of Parks & Recreation relative to Job No. J-10; and authorizing payment of $708; and rescinding Resolution ~o. 68-83 previously adopted. See page · "L" · (26) ALL DISTRICTS (27) (28) Consideration of motion to receive, file, .. and approve request of W. J. Burke Construction Co., Inc., for permission to substitute the electrical subcontractor on Job No. P2-8-3 {Enclosures -Phase II and Operators' Building). See page "M" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 69-14, approving plans and specifications for Job No. P2-14 (Sedimentation Basin "I", Digester "I" and Distribution Structure "B"); authorizing advertising for bids upon receipt of approval from the Federal Government; and authorizing District No. 1 to award the contract. See page "Nn ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion author·izing payment for emergency overtime services in excess of the 24-hour maximum, for certain employees who performed emergency services in the month of January as a result of rainstorms ALL DISTRICTS Report by Director of Finance on mid-year budget review (material in folders) -3- •: (30) · ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment .. (31) ALL DISTRICTS (32) (33) (34 ). Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing oavment of claims listed on pages "A" , "B" , and 1' c'f' ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-12-1, approving and authorizing execution of a License Agreement with Southern California Edison Company relative to interplant right of ~ay. See page "O" DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (35) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (36) DISTRICT 1 (37) Consideration of motion to ad~ourn DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (38) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (39) DISTRICT 2 (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn -4- ... (46) DISTRICT 6 · Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (47) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (48) DISTRICT 6 (49) (50) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 69-15-7, authorizing acceptance of an easement from Irvine Industrial Complex at. no cost to the District. See page "P" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file Position-Paper prepared by th~ staff; and take under submission for study. (51) DISTRICT 7 (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications. Change Order ftl to Contract No. 7-lG-A (Smalley Road Subtrunk). See page · Q" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 5:00 p.m., February 25th, in the Districts' office DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving request from the City of Huntington Beach relative to removal of an abandoned sewer line; and authorizing reimbursement to the City for said work uoon receipt of invoices for the costs thereof. See page 11 R11 . DISTRICT.11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" · DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications., if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn -5- - II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS ADJOURNED REGULAR MEET I NG Wednes day , February 5 , 1969 7 :30 p .m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Teleph one s: Areo Code 714 540-2910 962-241 1 January 31 , 1969 Bec aus e the regular meeting date this mon t h falls on a legal holiday (Lincoln's birthday), it was agreed a t t he J anuary meet i ng that the Bo ards wo uld hold their joint meeting on February 5 , Accordingly > al l Boards were adjourned to the above hour and date. * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following is a brief explanation of the more important non - r o utine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Wa rrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 15 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE : The Comm ittee met on the evening of J anuary 28 with Directo r s Mcinnis and Reinhardt as guests. A report of the rather lengthy meeting with the Comm ittee's recommendations is enclosed. Nos . 16 through 23 -CONSIDERATION OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE RECOM - MENDAT IO NS: These agenda i tems are cons ideration of action on the recommendations of the Committee as presented in the enclosed report. No . 24 -GRAVEL ROADWAY, HEADWORKS 11 C11 , PLANT NO . 2: This is one of the regularly budgeted projects for t he current fiscal year which is urgently needed to provide access , during wet weather , to the new headworks at Plant No. 2 which ha s r ecently been put into operation . The job will involve approximately 20,000 square feet of oiled rock roadway to be used as a basis for asphalt pavement later this year when com pletion of current Plant No. 2 construction in the area will make it possible to award a contract for permanent paving in this and other areas. Because of the urgen cy of providing adequate access to the headworks and since the next Board meeting is not scheduled until five weeks hence , it is recommended that I b e authorized to sign the contract for this job in an amount not to exceed $4500 . Bids wil l be t aken February 11. ! ""' I • I • - No. 25 -REVISED AGREEMENT WITH STA TE DEPAR TMENT OF PARKS AND RECREAT I ON: At the October, 1968 J o i nt Board meeting, an agreement was authorized with this State agency to provide additional con - stru ction area in the Huntington State Park for our new ocean outfall. I n this agreement the annual renta l for the additional land on the beach was established at $10,000 . We had assumed that since this agreement was originally furnished by the State agency, it would be satisfactory to the State but after a long delay we received advice that the Depa rtment had changed it s mind and now wanted a different type of agreement with an annual rental of $31 ,000 . Because of th i s sharp increase in price and because the land was n ee ded immediately for commencement of const r uction work, we l odged a vigorous and verbal protest with the Department personnel and were soon advised that the matter had been recons i dered and that the annual rental had been reduced to $11,200. The previ ously authorized pa yment of $10 ,000, plus a number of required documents have been f orwarded t o the State with the understanding that at this Board mee t ing the new agreement will be approved and an additional warrant for $708 wi ll be forth- coming . In line with this understanding, the contractor was allowed to occupy the area on January 20 . Accordingly, i t is re commended that the Boards authorize this payment and t he executi on, by District No . 1, of the new agreement . No . 26 -SUBSTITUT I ON OF SUBCONTRACTO R, PLAN T JOB NO . P2-8 -3: The contractor for this recently awarded Pl ant job (Enclosures-Phase II and Operators' Building) has formally r equested that he be allowed to substitute Gilbert & Stearns of Santa Ana in l i eu of A.E .C. of Orange, who was the electrical subcontractor named in the contractor 's origi - nal bid proposa l. The original subcontractor has requested, in wri ting, his release from the job and accordingly the substitution appears to be justifiable and it is recommended for approval . Board approval on such substitutions is required by State law. No . 27 -AUTHORIZATION FOR ADVERT I SING FOR BIDS , PIANT J OB NO . P2-14: As described i n the accompanying report of the Executive Committee , this r egula rly scheduled and budgeted Plant job (Sedimentation Basin I, Digester I and Distribution Structure Bat Plant No . 2 ) will soon be ready for bid . Since it is anticipated that the Boards will authorize app l ication for a Federal grant on this project, no definite bid date can be es t ablished at this time owing to the fact that the Federal wate r Po llution Control Administration must approve plans and specif i- cations prior to advertising for bids. Consequently, the resolution included with the agenda material under this it em authorizes the General Manager to establish a bid date upon receipt of FWPCA approval . The engineer 's construction estima t e for this job is $875,000 . No. 28 -PAYMENT FOR EMERGENCY OVERTIME SERVICES : As a result of the heavy rainstorms in mid -January and the consequent greatly increa sed flows reaching the Plants, it was necessary t o ca ll out our mainte- nance crews on several occasions for work during evenings and weekends in order to keep the Plants and outlying pumping stations operating ' i,. I , ". , • r • Iii • --2- .. - •• .. ' normally. Because of these emergency ca ll-outs , it is ant i cipated that some of our personne l wi l l exceed t h e 24 hour cash payment limitation prov i ded in our regul at i ons fo r overtime work in any one month. We therefore recommend the 24 hour limitation be waived for the month of January . I plan to report b r iefly at the meeting on our operating experiences following the heavy storms and runoff during which we were fortunate to escape any major damage and to avoid serious overflows . We bel i eve that our favorable experience d uri ng these emergency cond itio n s was due, t o a cons i derab l e extent, to the willing cooperat i on and hard work of many of our employees u nder very trying conditions. No . 29 -MID-YEAR BUDGET REV I EW : Mr. Sylvester will present a brief but comprehensive report on our opera ting and capital outlay expendi - t~res during the first half of the current fisca l year as compar e d with bud g eted amou n ts. Material on this subject is included with this ma i ling . DistYict No. l No . 33 -JOINT USE POLE LINE AGREEMENT WITH EDISON COMPANY : It will be recalled t hat at the January meeting the Boards authorized District No. 1 to enter into a joint use pole line agreement with the Edison Company for a new power line to be installed by Edison on our interplant right of way . A d r aft of this agreement, incorporating the terms and conditions recommended by the staff and those added by the Eoard s at ~he Janua ry meeting , has been f o rwarded to the Ediso n Company . It is ther e for e reco mmended that if we receive the Company!s concurren ce with th e agre e ment in time , the Bo ard adopt t ll e reso- lution , included wi t h the agenda material , a u t horizing its exe c ution. Di s trict No. 7 No. 50 -"POSIT I ON-P.~PER" ON PROPOSED WITHDRP.WAL OF 1015 ACRES OWNED BY THE I~VINE COMP.'1N 7: On January 21, the Boa rd d irect e d the staff to prepar'= a 11 pos:i.t io n-paper 11 relative t o t h e reque st of The Irvine Co mpa ny t o wi t hdra w 1 0 1 5 a cres from th e Dist r i c t i n exch ange for annexatio n , witho ut char ge, of 80 acres bordering the District's boundary along the Browning Avenue Subtrunk . The position-paper wi ll be prepared in time for the meeting We dnesday evening. It is our suggestion th a t the report be taken under submission f o r st u d y to be discu s sed at an a d jo u r n ed meeting on Februa ry 25. No . 53 -ADJOlri.NME NT TO FE BRUARY 25 AT 5 :00 P.M .: It will be necessar y for ~he Bo ard to adjourn to t h e abo v e mentioned time and date to finalize the asses~ments for Assessme nt District No . 7 . Dist rict No. 11 No. 56 -REMOVAL OF ABA ND8 NED FORCE MAIN IN GOLDEN WEST STR EE T: We are in r ec ei pt of a lette r from the City of Hun tington Be ac h, c opy included with the a ge nda material , re questing that the District J -3- - 4 I • • I I ' reimburse the City for the cost of removing approximately 1320 feet of abandoned District 's force main in Golden West Street in coru1ection with street improvements t o be undertaken in the near future . As stated in the letter, the District, at the time of the abandonment of the force main, agr eed to pay for its removal when necessary . We accordingly recommend that the staff be authorized to notify the City that the District will reimburse the City for costs of removal of the fo rce main upon receipt of invoice. It is anticipated that the removal will be accomplished under a separate bid item in the street improvement contract and the reimbursement will be the amount bid by the successful street improvement contractor. l I . . ' I -~ Fred A. Harper General Manager ~~ -• . -Ir I ~ " ~r ' .... • i • • ~ 1 • • r ~ I r ~ I ~- ~ • ~ • • .. • -, - r r - • ' • ~ ~ I • I ~ ~ I I ~ -... • ~ I • I J I ~ I r - • • F • ~ • • I . • L -4- -----------------S~N~wnnocr DNI~HOddfiS CIN~ SNOI~n~osgH WARRANT NO. 10610 10611 10612 10613 L.2614 ~615 10616 10617 10618 10619 10620 10621 10622 10623 10624 10625 10626 10627 10628 10629 10630 10631 10632 10633 10634 10635 10636 10637 10638 .,0639 '-'.£0640 10641 10642 10643 10644 10645 10646 10647 10648 10649 10650 10651 10652 10653 10654. 10655 10656 10657 10658 10659 10660 10661 10662 10663 "-'1.0664 10665 10666 10667 10668 10669 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Bearings & Abrasives, Bearings, Seals & Belts Acore Drilling Service, Cored Drilling Advance Electric, Motor Repair All Bearing Service, Inc., Seals City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Company,Pump Parts, Gaskets Angelus Quarries Bldg. Mat'ls., Brick Associated Crane & Rigging, Crane Rental Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Bank of America, Coupon Collections Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings . Beckman Instruments, Inc., Lab. & Electrical Supplies Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Bokelman Plating, Rotor Plating Benz Engineering, Inc., Gaskets Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies John Carollo Engineers, Engineering Services Certified Building Materials, Cement Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., Engine Parts College Lumber Company, Inc., Small Hardware $ Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electrical Supplies Continental-Emsco Company, Small Hardware & Suction Hose Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc, .Truck Parts Daily Pilot, Employment Ad D & D Equipment Rental Inc., Backhoe Ram Rental Daniel Industries, Inc., Compressor Parts Daniels Tire Service, Truck Repair De Guelle & Sons's Glass Co., Glass Work Dial Hydrocrane Service, Crane Rental Diesel Qontrol Corporation, Filters Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring & Research Enterprise Printing Company, Forms Essex Wire Corporation, Electrical Supplies J. Fair Tire Co., Tires & Tubes Fischer & Porter Co., Research Supplies, Gauges, Meter Repair Flair Drafting Service Friden, Inc., Mtce. Agreement City of Fullerton, Water General Electric Supply Co, Electrical Supplies General Telephone Co. Georgia-Pacific Corporation, Chlorine Gladman &.Wallace, Truck Parts Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware W. R. Grace & Co., Building Supplies Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Services AMOUNT 33.07 54.oo 551.73 41.74 107.42 342.09 74.55 263.25 102.29 33.32 714.48 365.49 14.oo 96.00 126.36 56.85 621.39 403. 20. 36.01 149.24 210.23 46.94 1,104.88 545.52 47.92 314.50 22.73 60.00 8.64 142. 50 139.43 3,097.50 86.21 120.23 85.05 436.67 468.60 19.00 5.16 694.43 1,083.34 8,578.22 9.47 386.41 66.52 425.00 92.19 317.10 317.28 13.20 Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses & C.O.D. Expenses Hersey-Sparling Meter Co., Water Meter Hertz Equipment Rental, Comp. & Impact Wrench Rental James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Hollisters Nursery, Shrubbery Honeywell Inc., Electrical Supplies Howard Supply Company, Small Hardware, Line Clean Equip. City of Huntington Beach, Water 26.04 122.64 ·1, 748.40 7.30 6.93 378.15 4,032.00 46.39 International Con,.ference of Building Officials, Bldg.Code International Harvester Company, Truck Parts Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Pipe & Valve King Bearing, Inc., Bearings, Small Hardware & Joints -A- 187.62 605.24 t E l ~ t ' i . I I .I I I WARRANT NO. 10670 10671 10672 10673 10674 10675 ~0676 10677 10678 10679 10680 10681. 10682 10683 10684 10685 10686 10687 10688 10689 10690 10691 10692 10693 10694 10695 10696 10697 10698 10699 10700 ~0701 10702 10703 10704 10705 10706 10707 10708 10709 10710 10711 10712 10713 10714 10715 10716 10717 10718 10719 10720 10721 10722 10723 10724 10725 10726 ~10727 10728 10729 10730 10731 ·: IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitorial & Mtce. Supplies. $ 116.93 LBWS, Inc., Hardware, Small Tools & Welding Supplies 961.77 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 14.oo Jay G. Lissner Co., Drafting Supplies 15.77 L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Service 641.07 R. W. McClellan & Sons., Inc., Rock 409. 50 Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work 304.43 Main Photo Service, Photo Processing 46.96 Charles J. Mattern, Chlorinator Parts 116.03 Metropolitan Supply· co., Gauges 124.48 The National Cash Register Co., Forms 635.53 National Chemsearch Corp., Solvent 132.30 CitY. of Newport Beach, Water 16.20 C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel Retainer 700.00 The Ohmart Corporation, Electrical Supplies 105.04 County of Orange Auditor-Controller, Juvenile Work Program 850.00 Orange County Radiotelephone 411.90 Orange County Tree Service, Repair Sewer Interference 200.00 Pacific Diesel Parts Co., Engine Parts 341.01 Pacific Pumping Company, Pumps 672.00 Pacific Scientific Co., Test Equipment 31.10 Pacific Telephone Co. 297.60 Walter W. Perkins Co., Heat Exchangers 752.96 Postmaster, Postage 150.00 Practical Management·Assoc., Training Seminar 200.00 Douglas E. Preble, Employee.Mileage 41.20 Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electrical Supplies 104.98 Rapid Blue Print Co., Map Printing . 489.70 Red's Frame, ·Wheel & Brake, Truck Repair 14.40 The Register, Employment Ad 133.44 Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Tubing & Steel 481.74 Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Repairs 189.26 Rodding-Cleaning Machines, Inc., T.V. Insp. -Dist 11 Line 885.00 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Printing 143.33 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor & Tool Repair 80.45 Select Nurseries Inc., Shrubbery 258.30 ·Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies 311.52 A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires & Tubes 59.12 Signal-Flash Co., Inc., Barricade Rental 14.28 Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 20.47 Southern California Edison Company 14,333.79 Southern California Water Company 3.06 Southern Counties Gas Co. 624.86 Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water 55.13 Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts 160.60 Standard Oil Co. of California, Engine Oil, Grease 540.79 Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Asphalt Stock 85.58 Sweco, Inc., Floatables Removal Equip. (M.o. 1-8-69) 2,702.67 C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene 49.99 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. 38.26 Tustin Plumbing & Heating, Sewer Repair 7th Mtce. Dist. 208.15 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. Safety Equipment 215.35 Tustin Water Works, Sewer Cleaning Water 45.00 Union Oil Co. of California, Gasoline 394.41 Waukesha Engine Servicenter, Coupling 178.50 Johh R. Waples, Odor Consultant 428.20 Western Salt Co.J Salt 51.24 Westransco Freight Co., Freight 10. 40 W. D. Wilson Company, Fittings 154.13 Western Gear Corporation, Drive Gears (M.O. 10-9-68) 2,872.80 west coast Sand & Gravel, Inc., Base Sand 82 o5 .. ~~ Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $65,024.27 -B- .c: yTARRANT NO • 10732 10733 10734 10735 '.,; ~ \...,' CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo EngiDeers, Engineering Services J-10 Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Legal Ad I-7-2 State of California, R~sources Agency, Construction Area Rental J-10 Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-13 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF ., • -C- AMOUNT $ 3,176.24 39.46 708.00 8.oo $ 3,931.70 - $68,955.97 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 10736 Boyle Engineering, Engineering 1-10 . $ 1,390.00 \._) $ 1,390.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF I 10737 The City Management Corp., Refund Unexpended Deposit Balance-Sewer Relocation $ 930.32 .$ 930.32 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF • 10738 Boyle Engineering, Engr. Services 2-10-9 $ 1,848.50 10739 County of Orange, Compaction Tests 2-10-9 112.50 10740 Meriwether Investment Co., Inc., Assignee of Charles L. Burch & Sons, Contractor 2-10-9 57,672.00 $. 59,633.00 \ws) $ 60,563.32 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 10741 Boyle Enginee~ing, Engr. Services 3-11~ 3-12, 3-13 $ 8,927.20 $ 8,927.20 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 10742 City of Newport Beach, Connection Charge Admn. $ 384.oci $ 384.oo ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 'w!1743 Daily Pilot, Legal Ad 5-16 $ 36.52 $ 36.52 $ 420.52 -D- WARRANT NO. 10744. 10745 10746 10747 10748 DISTRIC'11 NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Boyle Engineering, Engr. Serv.-Master Plan Report, Plan Check & Inspection $ 2,101.50 86.oo Irvine Industrial Complex, Refund of Inspection Fee Overpayment FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County of Orange, Compaction Tests 7-lG-A Scott Bros. Construction, Inc., Contr. 7-lG-A Donald W. Stevens, Inc., Survey 7-lG-A -E- $ 2,187.50 $ 96.30 3,742.96 147 .50 $ 3,986. 76 $ 6,174.26 '\ . -·-· .. ··-·-. -·----... -~---· PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO. CONTRACTORS - FOOT OF' SOUTH 26TH STREET P. D. BOX 1512 RICHMOND, CALIF'ORNIA 94802 PHONE 232•9477' January 3, 1969 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Att'n: Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Man~ger Re: Ocean Outfall No. 2 .~ Marine Section Gentlemen: We hereby request that we be allowed to use American Pipe and Construction Co. as the supplier of concrete pipe on the above mentioned job. Although there is some additional burden to us, there will be no addi- tional cost to the districts. We feel this will be a more satisfactory arrangement due to American Pipe and Construction Company's long and excellent experi- ence in supplyi~g this and other types of pipe. · Y~urs very truly, . . PETER KIEWIT SONS' CO. "J8~v..~. NLB:JFJ:cl • Agenda Item #"16 F-1 N. L. Barnes District Manager All Districts -----------J 0 H N CAR. 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5,---------- Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, California El Paso, Texas Reply to: .IOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.lt. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY. P.E, ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. January 7, 1969 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 .· ,• Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts . of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92 708 AREA CODE 415 Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2 -Marine Section -Job No. J-10 We have received a request from Peter Kiewit Sons' Company to change pipe manufacturers on the subject job. A copy of the PKS letter request was transmitted to you earlier. We assume you will act on this request. We feel it is in the best interests of the Districts to allow the Contractor the requested change in pipe manufacturers. If you have any questions, please· call us. Very truly yours, JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS :J_JJiz~, Walter Howard WH:ml 283·3895 ·. Agenda Item #16 F-2 All Dlstricts • CLARK MILLER C.ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER .· . · MILLER, NISSON S KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 January 131 1969 • • Fred A. Harper 1 General Manager County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California Re: Job No. J-10 Dear Fred: TELEPHONE 842•6771 ... I have received your memo of January 8th concerning whether or not there would be any question in allowing Peter Kiewitt Sons Co. to procure the pipe from American Pipe & Construction Co ... rather than manufacture it themselves as they indicated their intent in thei·r proposal to the Districts. In that the pipe compan¥ would be a supplier as distinguished from a sub-contractor, there appears to be no reason to raise any legal objection to the proposal of the contractor to purchase the pipe from American Pipe & Construc- tion Co. CAN ct Agenda Item #16 F-3 Yours very truly, (!:JO~A ,, CtZ~~~ c. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel "All Districts -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5---------- , Phoenix, Arizona · Lafayeffe, California El Paso, Texas Reply to: .JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBERT G. WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.E. December 30,. 1968 3688 MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE, CALIFORNIA 94549 Mr.· Fred A. Harper, General Manage•r County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley6 California 92708 AREA CODE 41!1 . ... Subject: · Master Plan Study Electrical Energy We propose to perform a study of the electrical energy requirements at both Plant Nos. 1 and 2. This study would set forth the existing requirements and anticipated future requirements. To begin this study, we require the "Single Line" electrical drawings which are presently being up-dated by Districts' personnel. This information will allow us to determine the adequacy of the existing feeders and service centers. Our Lafayette office would then determine what the anti- cipated power requirements would be for 1975 and 1980. Following this, our electrical engineering department will set forth the future electrical energy requirements at both plants for the anticipated.loads. We would prepare a preliminary draft of the report for review by your staff; att~nd a conference to discuss thts preliminary draft; re- write as required and furnish the Districts .with plates of the finished Report •.. We anticipate this study will require 60 to 90 days follow- ing receipt of the single line diagrams. We would perform this study under the terms of our proposal dated November 22, 1968 1 and accepted by your Board of Directors on December 18 1 1968. We estimate the cost of this study at $3 1 000 to $3, 500. Yours very truly, · · JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS 283·3895 -zb~-u?~~ • H rvcyt!/r j~ HHH:ml Agenda Item #17 -G-All Districts .,. ... -----------J 0 H N CAR 0 LL 0 ENGINEER 5-----=-------- Phoenix, Arizona Lafayette, Cafifornia El Paso, Texas Reply to: .JOHN A. CAROLLO, P.E. ROBERT M. BRERETON, P.E. H. HARVEY HUNT, P.E. HOWARD M. WAY, P.E. ROBER1' G, WILLIAMS, P.E. DONALD R. PREISLER, P.£. December 30, 1968 36SS MT. DIABLO BOULEVARD LAFAYETTE. CALIFORNIA 94549 Mr. Fr~d A. Harper, General Man~ger County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley, California 92 708 Subject: Master Plan Study Heat Energy .· AREA CODE 415 We propose to per;form a study of the Heat Energy·require- ments at Plant Nos. 1 and 2 and the available source for obtaining same. This study would include, but not necessarily be limited to, the following: I. Determine as soon as possible the immediate boiler requirement at Plant No. 2, both as ·to size and location. Z~ Determine the quantity and loc;:ation of heat require - ments at both plants, both at present and in 1975 and 1980 (with and without sludge incineration). · 3. Determine where the heat will originate to satisfy the requirements of (2) above. That is, will the heat come from boilers, heat recovery units on engines, heat recovery from the .turbine gen .. erator, etc. · 4. Determine the heat energy available in the form of digester gas today, in 1975 and in 1980. The determination of gas production to be from the suspended solids removed in sedimentation and the measured volatile content of the sludge (check these results . against metered flow to Kadane}. Determine the heat value of the sludge, grease and skimming. 5. Discuss the use and need of the. interplant gas line as a "balancing line" in the total energy cone e pt. 283·389!5 6. Prepare a descriptive and pictorial layout for heat require- ments (2, above) and heat source (3,, above) for the existing plant and the anticipated requirements in 1975 and 1980. . · Following completion of the above study,, a preliminary draft of the Report would be prepared and reviewed with the Districts 1 staff. Plates of the. finished Report would then be prepared. Agenda Item #17. H-1 All Dlstricts .. "' . . . ,. ·-· ' ·: We estimate that it would be 90 to 120 day.s after work on the Report is started before the preliminary draft would be ready. z We will perform this work on the basis of our proposal dated ·November 22, 1968, which was accepted by the Districts' Board of Directors on December 18, 1968. We estimate the cost of this study and report at between $5, 500 and $6, 500 • . · Yours very truly, HHH:ml Agenda Item #17 H-2 All Dlstricts . \._) ' .. ' / ( TI-IE IRVINE COMPANY ... ,: . : January 15, 1969 The Joint Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation Distri~ts P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred Harper, Manager. ., IRVINE:,CALIF'ORNIA 92664 ?14•544•0120 SEWAGE TREATivfENT AND DISPOSAL FOR THE IRVINE RANCH AREA Gentlemen: Reference is made to the enclosed Sewerage Study report dated November 1968 prepared for the Irvine Ranch Water District by Brown and Caldwell. A sununary of this report as interpreted by The Irvine Company is also enclosed for your information and u·se. . . . The Irvine Ranch Water District Sewerage Study concludes that from the standpoint of long range economy the Irvlne Ranch Water District should provide sewage treatment and disposal facilities within the Irvine Basin and should phase installation of facilities in increments to meet the projected growth of the area. The report suggests four stag~ construction"of primary treatment facilities adjacent to the site of the present reclamation plant of the Irvine Ranch Water Distri.ct in 1972, 1983, 1990 and 1996. Disposal facilities are recommended for two stage, 1972 and 1983, construction of effluent conveyance facil- ities from the plant to Pelican Point and one stage, 1972, construction of an effluent dispos~l ocean outfall off Pelican Point. The method selected for sewage treatment and disposal to serve the Irvine Basin will have a majo:r effect upon lands owned by The Irvine Company. For this reason it is essen- tial that The Irvi.ne Company review and evaluate in detail ·• Agenda Item #19 I-1 Districts 1 & 7 : .... Orange County Sanitation Districts Page 2 .. •' . -_.._ ...... ·- January 15, 1969. the ~rvine Ranch Water District Sewerage Study report in order· to fully understand the implications of the alternate means of sewage treatment and disposal available for service of the Irvine Basin in terms of the technical needs of the ·Company's future developments, financing of facilities and administration of such facilities. One of the alternatives analyzed in the I.R.W.D. Sewerage Study report is the use of exist~ng and new sewage treat- ment and disposal facilities owned an~ operated by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. In order to evaluate the subject report to determine the position which The Irvine Company should·take relative to its conclusions it is essential that the assumptions made by I.R.W.D's consultants for this alternative be verified through examination by the Orange County Sanitation Districts. The Company would. not ·wish to rely heavily upon unverified assumptions regarding o.c.s.D. costs and policy in estab- ~ishing its position with regard to the I.R.W.D. 's ~eport. The Irvine Company hereby respectfully requests that the Orange County Sanitation Districts examine the Irvine Ranch Water District report assumptions and conclusions with respect to the Orange County Sanitation Districts alternative of' treatment and disposal in order to deter- mine the accuracy of the technical ·cost and phasing data contained therein. The economic analysis of the Orange County Sanitation Districts alternative in the I.R.W.D. report is based upon the assumption that treatment and disposal facilities proposed in the report or their equivalent will be necessary and that they must be financed by the benef iteo area to meet its needs during the period from 1968 -2010. Phasing_and_present worth .cost of these facilities are outlined in bhe subject report. Exhibit A, attached, sets forth this data. Additional. technical reasons given for the conclusions are ·discussed in the enclosed sum.mary of the subject sewerage report. These include the present favorable effluent discharge requirements of the Water Quality Control Board at Pelican Point and the desirability of significa~t separation of ocean outfalls along the shoreline of Orange Count:y. A major item of interest to The Irvine Cbmpany in evaluating the O,C.S.D. alternativ~ is the provisions under which long -. Agenda Itetn #19 I-2 Districts 1 & 7 • .i...;.. ___ ,_ '. , . . . " .. Orange County Sanitation Districts Page.3 January 15, 1969 terit} treatment and disposal at the Joint Works could be .achieved. The following specific questions require answers in 6r~er for the Company to reach any logical de6ision. 1. ·What would be the administrative and/or organizational arrangement for Orange County Sanitation Districts acceptance of sewage from the Irvine Basin? 2. How would ~inancing and cash flow be handled? Would it be under the same policy as presently a~plies to other member agencies? 3. What guarantee, if any, can be given that a policy adopted by the present Joint Board of Directors will be maintained during the full term of projected de~elopment of the necessary treatment and disposal facilities at the Orange County Sdni~ation Districts plant? 4. What· possibilities exist for joint participation with Sanitation Districts No. 7 and No. 1 in an interceptor sewer to reach the Orange County Sanitation Dis~ricts plant? The Irvine Company appreciates the opportunity to bring thi~ important matter to the at~ention of the Joint Board of Directors at this time. We would like to thank the staff of the Orange County Sanitation Districts for their fine cooperation to date in our preliminary discussions .and will greatly appreci?te the Board's assistance in authorizing further exploration of this s~bject. The timing of a decision on the appropriate alternative m·ethod of treatment and disposal is quite critical and the Company must take a position on the matter within one to two months at the latest. We understand that Sanitation Districts. No. 7 and No. l are al.so at points of decision which further underline the appropriateness of an early decision. Representatives of the Company will be ~resent at the Board Meeting in order to answer such questions as may Agenda Item #19 I-3 Districts 1 & 7 .· . Orange County Sanitation Districts . Page 4 ·: Ja~uary 15, 1969 _,be appropriat"ely raised during the meeting. We will atso be pleased to supply any additional data to the Board ~hich it may desire. Very truly yours, ~_j_~~~~~ Richard A. Reese Vice President, Pla~ning RAR:bl cc: William R. Mason ·Attachments • Agenda Item #19 I-4 Districts 1 & 7 • JOHN W. BRYANT CHIEF ENGINEER 4600 CRESTMORE AVENUE P. O. BOX 1033 TELEPHONE 683•4000 .. . _; RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT RIVERSIDE. CALIFORNIA 92502 30 January 1969 Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cali.forn.ia Dear Mr. Harper: Re: NRW Disposal Project On 28 January 1969 the Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District delivered to your office for your perusal a draft of a proposed "Waste Water Capacity Agreement between Riverside County Flood Control and Water Conservation District and County Sanitation District 2 of Orange County," together with ·an outline of the proposal which set forth a basis of cooperation. between this District and the County Sanitatl:on Districts of Orange County for the handling of non-reclaimable wastes generated in the Upper Santa Ana River Basin above Prado Dam. The purpose of this letter is to request that the agreement be formally p~esented to your Board for comprehensive · discussion and consideration so that it may be used as a basis for future discussions and cooperation between the two agencies leading to a formal agreement. I wish t~ take this opportunity to thank you and Mr. Brown .for the many courtesies and cooperation given to me and other representatives of this District in developing what we believe to be the best solution for the disposal of non-reclaimable wastes. Very truly yours, j . ~ /..// . -f--" . //J-l-•r ~ · /:)_7/i.,._. <6'hN W. BRYANT Chief Engineer · .. Agenda Items_g_Q,& 21 -J-All Dlstricts • RESOLUTION NO. 69:...3-1 FEDERAL GRANT -DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PLANT NO. 1 AND SEDIMENTATION BASIN I, DIGESTER I AND DISTRIBUTION STRUC%URE BAT PLANT NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS.OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 u.s.G. 466 ET SEQ., IN BEHALF OF .. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, .3, 5, 6, 7_., AND 11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l·of Orange County, Califorriia OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal· Water Po~lution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 1~66 et. seq.) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1 ¢f Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and s·afety Code·, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk· sewer system for the bollection of sewage.from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants an~ disposal facilit~es under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of. said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District . No. 1, of Orange County, acts for itself and as agent for County "--11 Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange Coun~y, California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different teiritories, all in orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operatlng said joint sewage tr·eatment plants and disposal facilities. Agenda Item #23_ K-1 All Distr~cts 'I Section 4. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set fo~th below by number, the.following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, ~have authoriz~d the filing of applica- tions for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts· set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as "Central Agency" for said applications as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code: District No. 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Resolution No. 69-3-1 69-4-2 69-5-3 69-6-5 69-7-6 69-8-7 69-9-11 Application Amount $ 51·,800 144:,900 160,500 26,500 27,700 28;800 34,200 Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, and as agent for County Sanitatio:r:i Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, all documents necessary to apply for and accept qonstruction grants under \.,,,,,I said Act of Congress in the arn.ounts set forth in Section 4 hereof for a joint project generally described as: DIGESTER NO. 8 AT PL.ANT NO. 1 AND SEDIMENTATION BASIN I, DIGESTER I AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE B AT PLANT NO. 2 Acceptance of said grants may be· for amounts more or less than set forth in Section 4 hereof. All Districts Agenda Item #23 RESOLUTION NO. 69-13 AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION RE: JOB NO. J-10 A JOINT RESOLUTION·OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS •. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DEPARTJYlENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION The Boards of Directors of County Sani~ation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement with the State Department of Parks and Recreation, dated January 1, 1969, is. hereby approved; and, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and each of the other Districts, is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement to provide for additional construction area required by the Districts in the construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine Section, Job No. J-10; and, Section 3. That payment to the State of California, Department of ·Parks and Recreation, in the total amount of $708, is hereby authorized; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 be authorized and directed to execute the agreement and any documents necessary to obtain the additional construction area required for construction of said Job No. J-10, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 5. That Resolution No. 68-83, previously adopted by these Boards, is hereby rescinded. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular. meeting February Agenda Item #25 -L-All Districts • '\ .• 'r W 1 Burke Construction Ca,lnc. 2550 EAST MIRALOMA PLACE, P.O. BOX 6319, ANAHEIM, CALIF. 92806 0 (714) 630·0500 Orange County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Ave.· P.O. Box 8127 Fountain Valley 1 California 92708 January.}.6 1 1969 Reference: Enclosures -Phase ]] & Operators Building Job OP-2-8-3 Gentlemen: Enclosed please find A.E.c. Elects ~etter dated December 30, 1968 requesting that they be releas- ed as the electrical subcontractor on the above named project. We wish to use Gilbert & Stearns 1 · Inc. 609 E. Fourth ·st., Santa Ana in lieu of A.E.c. Elect. Gilbert & Stearns was the next low electrical subcontractor that bid on this project. If this meet~ with yo~r approval~ please ackn~w­ lege same in letter form. Very Truly Yours, W.J.BURKE CO~ST. CO., INC. COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL TILT-UP Agenda Item #26 M-1 All 'Districts -, 'l -·----···--·--··· r ..... -· ..... ·-·· --· ··-· -·--•••. ---· -• .._ --·--·----------·-·'----------·· ... ..,;_ .. _ - I i ·j -~ . : : \· '· 'i. IC.~ NS ED ~() BONDED • "t A ~ c·c-.. -~~-·, ........ ,ORA . • L. • -------· --.... ~---~ ·. ':·--~:{] < NGE . ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS 6275 B~och Boulevard -Phone 523-1640 BUE~A PARK, CALIFORNIA December 30, 1968 W.J.Burko Construction Co. 2550 E. Mlraloma /Anahef.~, California Attn: Tom Burka. Gentlemen: Re: Enclosures., Phase II Bid on 12/16/68 · With the understanding that an error was nl.o.de ln the abovo quotation, wa request that we be released from the listing as Electrical sub-contractor on the above j~b. . . INSURED Thank you for. the oppuntunity to quote you on this project. LG/dg · Leonard . ; • Agenda Item #26 M-2 All Districts .. . .. RESOLUTION NO. 69-14 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. P2-14 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEDIMENTATION BASIN 'I', DIGESTER 'I' AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE 'B', JOB NO. P2-14 ~he Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE.AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors _by John Carollo Engineers, . Districts' engineers, for construction of SEDIMENTATION BASIN 1 I 1 , DIGESTER 1 I 1 AND DISTRIBUTION STRUCTURE 1 B1 , JOB NO. P2-14, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health.and Safety Cude of the State of California, after receipt by the Districts of authorization from the.Federal Government; and, Section 3. That said bids will be publicly opened and read on a date and at a time to be determined by the General Manager after completion of the ·negotiations described in Section 2 above; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized to award contract for said Job No. P2-14 on behalf of these Boards of Directors. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting February 5, 1969. Agenda Item #27 -N-All Districts ~-:"" ~. I._.) -: RESOLUTION NO. 69-12-1 APPROVING RIGHT OF WAY LICENSE AGREEMENT 'I A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. l,.OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFCRNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN INTERPLANT RIGHT OF WAY LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY :The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California~ DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Interplant Right of Way License Agreement between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, of Orange County, acting as a~ent for itself and County Sanitation Pistricts Nos. 2, 3, 5, _6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, and SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, relati.ve to joint use of the District·s' interplant right of way, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Agreement Section 2. That the right of way covered in said License is more particularly described as follows: Those por~ions of a strip of land of var·ylr;g width which parallels and is adjacent to the westerly property line of the Santa Ana River ·in the City of Huntington Beach, City _of c.osta Mesa and County of Orange, California between the · north~rly property line of Ga~field Avenue and the northerly property line of California State· Highway Route No. 1 (pre.sen tly called Pacific Coa.s t High1•1ay) and which is refer1"'ed to. as "30 1 Easement to O.C. San. Dist." or "30' Easem' t to Sanitation Districts of Orange County'' or "30' Easement to J.O.S." on Record of Sur·vey maps, sheets·l through 11 inclusive, as recorded j_n Book 86, pa6es 1 through 11 incluslve, of Recor~ds of Surveys County of Oronge County, Ca l:i.f· o l"'n:t a . Section 3. That the Chairman and ~ecretary b~ authorized and directed to execute said License Agreement in form acceptable to the General Counsel. b_genda Item #33 -0-District 1 ·~ RESOLUTION NO. 69-15-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, A CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated January 22, 1969, wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for· sewer purposes in Tract No. 6551, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described as follows: The Northwesterly 20.00 feet of Lots 7, 8 and 9 of Tract No. 6551 per maps of said Tract recorded in· Book 243, pages 36 and 37 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; ahd, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at an adjourned regular meeting February Agenda Item 1149 -P-District 7 ... --. COUN'I'Y SANITATION DIS'rRICTS OP OHAHGE COUNTY P. O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER • C .O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Scott Bros.·Construction DATE: February 5, 1969 JOB: Smalley Road Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-lG-A Amount of this change order (ADD) ~~ $ 761.25 ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in .the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated November 4, 1968. ADD Install gravel bedding not shown on plans under the · pipe and.manhole, as directed by the Engineer. Board.authorization date: ~ February 5, 1969 :. Agenda Item #52 217.5 tons@ $3.50/ton $ 761.25 Original Contract Price $38,391.10 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD $ 922.25 This Change {ADD)(~i~~~~) $ 761.25 Amended Contract Price ·Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ___ ~_/!...::..s/!.-:P~a~u~l~G~.~B~r~o-w~n=-==--~----~ Chief Engineer SCOTT BROS. CONSTRUCTION, INC. -Q-District 7 ., January 15, 1969 Orange County SanitatiQn District P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: Subject: Golden West Street Improvements, CC-097 . We are planning to improve Golden West Street between Pacific Coast Highway and Warner Avenue, in. the near future, to four lanes of traffic. Inasmuch·as this is a major reconstruction project, it will be necessary to remove the abandoned 16 inch force main between Ernest (formerly Bolsa) and approximately 1320 feet north of Talbert Avenue. We have· a letter, from your office, stating the district would remove the line at such time as is required. However, may we suggest an alternate solution. The line is at· a position of 10 feet we·st of centerline which places it under existing paving and would be undoubtedly expensive to remove if done as a single project. Therefore, we would suggest that its removal be included in our street construction contract and that the district reimburse the City for the bid amount. we·will notify the district, after bid opening, of the actual amount bid for the formal authorization to proceed. We would antici- pate, if this meets your approval, that the line savings, if any, would become property of the contractor and our specifications will be on thaf basis. We will.appreciate your review and comments regarding this proposed work. V r truly yours, _d ., ·· ~~c~./ K ·a?l-l--fD-~ James R. Wheeler '--- Director of Public Works JRW:DWK:nt Agenda Item #56 -R-District 11