The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1968-10-09I II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Co unt y Sa ni ta tio n Di st ric ts P. 0. Box 5 175 of Orange County, Californi a 10844 El l is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1 ) u~) ( 3 ) ( 4 ) ( 5 ) (6 ) (7 ) (8 ) DI ST'RICT No. 5 A G~ND A Oc t o be r 29 , 1968 -4 :30 p .m. Ro ll Ca ll Ap po intment o f Ch a irma n p ro t ern , i f n ecessary Re po r t o f t h e Gene r al Manager Repo r t o f t h e Gene r a l Counsel Co n s id eration o f Or d inance No . 504 , amending Ordinance No . 503 as amende d . See pages 11 A11 and 11 B11 Con sideration of Re p ort on Sewerage Serv i ce to Annexation No . 3 and Vicinity , s ub mitted by Shu i rman - Simpson , Consulting Civil Engineers , relative to proposed d evelopment (Tract 6680 ) by the Irvine Industrial Complex . (Copy of report enclosed ). Other business a n d communications , if any Cons ideration of motion to adjourn ORDINANCE NO. 504 (AMENDING ORDINANCE ·NO. 502 .AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 503 RELATING TO CHARG.ES FOR CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SElv~RAGE FACILITIES) DRAFT 9-25-68 The Board of Directors· oT County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE I Ordinance No. 502 entitled iN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGUL.4TIQNS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 501", as amended by Ordinance No. 503, it is hereby further amended as follows: • Article 4 -Connection Charges, shall be amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE 4 -CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. (a) Connection Charge for New· Construction, Single Dwelling Buildings. For each new single dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $140.00. On January 1, 1970 and_ on.each ·succeeding January 1 the aforesaid connection charge shall be increased by adding;thereto the sum of $5.00·.unless by resolution I o~ the Board of Directors of the District said increase is postponed to another time certain. : (b) Connectj.on Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings. For each new multiple dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $140.00 for each dwelling unit or $7.00 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January.l, the aforesaid connection charge shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $5.00 and the: unit charge for each plumbing fixture shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $.25 unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District sald increase Agenda Item No. 5 A-1 District_.,2_ ·1s postponed to another time certain. (c) Connection Charges for New Construction, Other Than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not "w) limited to commercial, industrial and public building construction, the connection charge shall be $7.00 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shali be $70.00. On January l, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the_aforesafd unit charge for each plumbing fixture shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $.25, unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District said increase is postponed to another time certain. ' ,. (d} Connection Charges for Replacement Bui.ldings. For new construction replacing ~ormer buildings, the connection charge shall be as calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragrapbs (a)~ (b), and (c) hereinabove. If such reElacement construction is .... commenced within two years after demolitj_on or destruction of the former building, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $140.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $7.00 per . plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid credit shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $5.00 per dwelling unit or $.25 per plumbing fixture uni~ replaced, which~ver base is_ used for determining the credit, unless the increases as provided in Paragraphs . (a), {b), and ( c) hereinabove have been postponed by resoluti~n, in ·. which event the increases in credit provided for herein shall likewise and accordingly be postponed. (e) Connection Cha~s for Additions to or Alteratlons of ~ "...,J Existing Buildlngs. In the case of structures where further new construction or alteration is made to increase the occupancy thereof (including the finishing of commercial buiidings into sub~lease occupancies), the connectlon charge shall be $7.00 for cach·plumbing District ~ \..,I ~ '._/ \ fixture unit added. In the event·that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a credit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid plumbing fixture unit charge shall be increased by adding thereto ~he sum of $.25 unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District said increase is postponed to another time certain. If any addition or alteration to an existing building creates a complete new dwelling unit this ·Paragraph (e) does not apply and charges will be collected in accordance with Paragraph (c) "Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings." ,. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of conne·ction charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of ~ building legally exempt from the re_qui.rement of obta.ining a building ·. ..permit in.the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time or·· and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connec~ion permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Buildin~~epartment of th~ City of Ne~pdrt Beach and will: be based on p_lumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections h02 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uni~orm Plumbing Co.de, 196li Edition, as adopted by ·the City of Newport Beach on March ~4, 1965. ·~· Agenda Item No.:... 5 _ A-3 District 5 I 1.""1-IE IRVINE C 0!\1PANY October 17, 1968 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Street Fountain Valley, California AMENDMENT TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 -SEWER CONNECTION ORDINANCE NO. 504 Dear Mr. Harper: IRVINE,CALIF"ORNIA 92664 71~·544-0120 In response to your letter of October 10, 1968, we offer the following comments for consideration by the Board of Directors at the next scheduled meetingo Sewage facilities for new building construction, replacement of old buildings, and alterations of existing buildings, should be paid for through connection chatges~ Installation of new sewage facilities or refurbishing of old facilities not caused by new construction, should be paid for by existing buildingso Separation of se\\,.age costs between the old and the new con- struction, as well as equitable distribution of these costs, requires annual review of .income and expenditures of the district. We endorse the present increase in the connection charges. We would like to recommend, however, t~at the automatic annual increase in connection charges portion of the proposed ordi- nance (Article L~, paragraphs a, b, and c, in particular) be revised to provide for annual increase in connection charges by annual resolution of the Board of D~rectors, sometime be- fore January 1 of each succeeding year after January 1, 1970. Agenda It e m~_}Jg_. _ _5_ B-1 .-· . \ Fred Harper -2 -October 17, 1968 It is hoped that this revision in the proposed ordinance will provide for: 1) annual review of separation of expenditures caused by new building activity within the district; 2) com-. ments on the next increment of increase in connection charges by int~rested parties; 3) review of historical background and undei::standing of the reasons behind the subject ordinance,, by future members of the Board of Directors of District No. 5. We wish to thank the Board of Directors of the district, and the staff, for giving us this opportunity to comment on Ordinance No. 504. Sincerel~, ,/} I''/ .I /( .... '( I -. .:_/~) ··"'· •• -~l'\,.·f· ~ ,.·· . .·/ .,. _,,,..-/' .. l-'// .. /"l.."-;::---:~.:··.·-,,_·-:::.<J.~·:.":.. ..•.• / I _,,/ : .. "...-:"-··· .... (>········:;.···· JAY PANCHAL Senior Engineer es B-2 District 2 II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County , California JOI N T BOARDS REGULAR MEET I NG Wednesday, Octo ber 9, 1968 7:30 p.m . P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Aven ue Fountain Valley, Cal if., 92708 Telephones: Aren Code 714 540-2910 962 -2411 October 4, 1968 The following is a brief expl anation of the more imp ortant non - routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and wh ich are not otherwise self-explanatory. Wa rrant lists are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but wil l appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards Nos. 4, 5 and 6 -BID OPENING, OCEAN OUTFALL NO . 2 -MAR I NE SECTION : The staff and engineers ' efforts for the past two years on this project, by far the largest single construction job ever undertaken by the San itation Districts, will be c limaxed on the evening of this Board meeting with the opening of bids . We have been very encouraged by the number of contractors taking out plans and specifications and expressing an interest in bidding, as evidenced by the fact that 40 separate ge n era l contractors are now holding plans and specifications. However, in a job of this magnitude (the engineer's estimate is $15,150 ,000 ) involving marine construction, we will consider ourselves fortunate if we receive more than five actual bids, most of which are expected to be joint ventures of individual contractors. Bidding informat i on has been available to contractors fo r approximately nine weeks and very few questions have arisen concerning the work . Accord ingly, it appears that our chances of receiving a favorable bid are excellent. However, all speculation as to the out- come will be resolved by 8:00 p.m. on the evening of the Board meet - ing . Before bids are opened, it will be necessary to adopt Addendum No . 1 to the Plans and Specifications, a copy of which is included with the agenda material (Item No. 4). This addendum makes a technical change in the Spec ifications for bedding gravel and ballast rock for the job . We are still awaiting word from the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration as to the 33% Federal grant app l ied for for this project and it is possible, but not likely, that we will have definite information on this subject by the time of the Board meeting . • Nos. 18, 19, 20 and 21 -REPORTS OF EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITrEES: Included with the agenda material is a written report of the two Committees which met in joint session on the evening of September 24, together with Directo rs Shull and Hamilton and Alternate Director Nevil as guests. The recommendations adopted by the Committees are as stated in the report and Joint Board action on these recommen~ dations constitute Items Nos. 20 and 21 of the agenda. No. 22 -APPROVAL OF RIGHT OF WAY AGREEMENT WITH STATE LANDS COMMISSION, OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: In order to obtain an easement for the proposed new outfall, we have applied to the State Lands • Commission as the official body legally empowered to grant such ease- ments on behalf of the State of California. A satisfactory easement agreement , at no cost to the Districts, has been received from the Commission and is recommended for execution . ·~ No. 23 -AGREEMENT WITH STATE DIVISION OF BEACHES AND PARKS -OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: Among the numerous agencies with which we have to deal during construction of the new ocean outfall is the State Division of Beaches and Parks which has custody of Huntington State Beach, a portion of which must be used for the contractor's con- struction activities. Because of the magnitude of this project, the contractor will need ample room on the beach for storage of materials and equipment and we have been advised by the Division that its standard formula for temporary lease of this land (approximately 3 acres) will be applied to calculate the payment required from the Districts. In our case this amount will be $10,600 per year during the contractor's occupancy, with any fraction of a year being pro- rated by the month. At the time of this writing, we do not yet have a copy of the agreement but it should be in our hands before the meeting and will be recommended for execution if found by the staff to be satisfactory. No . 24 -AUTHORIZATION FOR PURCHASE OF PUMP GEARS: We have recently replaced one of the digester gas eng ine s operating at our Ocean Out - fall Booster Station No. 1 with a larger rebuilt engine. This engine drives one of the four pumps through a right -angle gearhead, the internal working portions of which should also be replaced to increase the capacity of the pumping operation and reduce engine wear. Since the replacement gears can be purchased only from the original manu- facturer of the gearhead assembly, advertising for bids would be of no benefit and would mer e ly delay the purchase . The Purchasing Department has obtained a quotation of $2,930 for the desired ass embly and it is recommended that the Boards authorize the purchase at this price. . ' rl' : f District No. 11 No. 38 -ADJOURNMENT TO OCTOBER 15 : It is recommended that the Board adjourn to the hour of 5:30 p.m ., October 15, in the Huntington Beach City Hall to discuss further the problem of service to the Sunset Beach Sanita ry District. The proposed joint meeting with the Sanitary .. -2-• M • .... • f I .. .. • I '-' • .. • .. • • District Board has not yet been arranged and it is believed more appropriate that the Board of District No. 11 meet alone at this time to discuss and possibly establish terms and conditions for service . • District No. 2 No . 39 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO . 2-10 -9 (EUCLID TRUNK SEWER ): As described in the previous Manager's report, this job will be for the last remaining segment of the lo ng -range project for replacement of the Euclid Trunk Sewer. Bids will be opened Monday, October 7, and it is expected that the staff and engineers will be able to recom- mend award of the contract by the time of the meeting . The engineer's estimate for this project is $530,685. No. 40 -QUITCLAIMING OF SEWER EASEMENTS TO CITY MANAGEMENT CORPO- R~TION: Some time ago, the District entered into a formal agreement with the above firm for relocation, at the Company's expense, of a portion of the Orange Subtrunk Sewer through the Company's property north of the Garden Grove Freeway and east of Lewis Street. The agreement provides that upon completion of the relocation, the District will quitclaim the existing easement to the Company in ex - change for a new easement for the relocated sewer . It is expected that the relocation work will be complete before the November Board meeting and since the Company is anxious for the District's quitclaim to be recorded as soon as possible, we are recommending that the quitclaim deed be authorized for execution by the Chairman upon certification by the District's engineer that the relocation work is complete and satisfactory. Nos . 41, 42 and 43 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT FOR ORANGE FREEWAY CROSSINGS: As the Directors will recall, this project consists of future sewer crossings of the Orange Freeway right of way and was undertaken to complete the work prior to the actual freeway construction this fall. The contract has been satisfactorily completed on time by the J. L. Scott Company and is being recommended for acceptance . During the construction period certain changes in grade and obstructions, as detailed in the formal change orders attached to the agenda material, were encountered and it was necessary for the contractor to perform extra work outside of the scope of his original contract. According- ly, we are recommending adoption of Change Order No. 1 (Item No. 41) providing for an additon of $1,518 for this extra work. Also recom- mended for adoption is Change Order No. 2 (Item No . 42), the custo- mary adjustment of the contract price for quantities of material actually installed. Item No. 43 is the usual resolution accepting the job as complete on September 20 and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. No. 44 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-10 -8, EUCLID TRUNK SEWER: This contract is now nearing co mpletion. During the course of con- struction, it was found necessary for the contractor to place considerable quantities 0£ base material for the asphalt pavement over the amounts shown on the original plans . This situation arose Jt .. • -~ -3-.. • L • because the requirement that the roadway be returned to its original condition, which was assumed to be the condition shown on the street plans furnished by the City of Santa Ana . However, upon excavation it was discovered that a previous street improvement contractor had been required to place extensive additional base gravel and, consequently, our contractor was ordered to do likewise. The quantity of the ~dd itional base material used and the unit price negotiated with the contractor are as shown on the formal change order attached to the agenda material, and represents an additional cost of $6,755 ,96. Also, the cont racto r encountered an abandoned corruga ted metal c ulvert in his work area which was not shown on any records of the Street Department, which culvert was removed at an additional cost of $171 .50. The recommended change order is the sum of these two items, $6,927 .46. District No. 3 No . 49 -REPORT ON POSSIBLE SEWER SERVICE TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 4: A report by the staff and engineers on this subject, as directed by the Board at the August 14 meeting, is included with the agenda material . We believe the report to be self-explanatory and recommend the Board act ion shown on the agenda. No. 50 -AUTHOR I ZATION FOR EMPLOY I NG AN APPRAISER FOR PUMP S~AT I ON SITE ON NAVY PROPERTY: For some time the staff and engineers have been holding discussions with Navy personnel concerning acquisition of an easement for a site for a large new pump station to serve the western part of the District. This pump station is recommended in the recently submitted 1968 Master Plan for Sewerage Facilities. It is anticipated that the District will eventually enter into an agreement with the Navy by which the District will provide sewer service for the Nava l Weapons Depot at Seal Beach and the Navy will provide a site for the District 's pump station at the int ersection of Westminster Avenue and Bay Boulevard. As a preliminary step in the negotiations for such an agreement, the Navy has suggested that the District employ an approved appraiser to establish the present value of the site. Authorization for employment of an appraiser is therefore recommended. No. 51 -CONSIDERATION OF AMOUNT FOR SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT ON MANHOLE COATING FAILURE: As the Directors will recall, Mr. Hohener, of Boyle Engineering, reported verbally on the results of his recent study into the extent of damage to certa in concrete manholes caused by failure of the protective coating s originally installed. This report has now been submitted in written form. At the time the report was ordered, the Board agreed that it would be used as the basis for establishing a minimum amount for settlement of the current lawsuit of the District against the contractors for damages resulting from the failure. -4- • Di s trict No. 5 ~--., .. . • I >II -• • ._ No. 55 -ORDINANCE NO. 504 (REVISION OF CONNECTION CHARGES): As directed by the Board at the September 5 meeting, the General Counsel and staff have prepared an amendment t o the existing District ordinance (No. 502) governing connection charges . A copy of the draft amendment is included with the agenda material and it is recommended that the matter be taken under submission for further action at a later meeting . • No . 56 -REPORT ON AWARD OF CONTRACT FOR BIG CANYON TRUNK SEWER: • ... I This project, tQ be undertaken by Newport Hills, Inc., under a reimbursement arrangement with the District , has been discussed at previous meetings. At our request the District's engineer has sub- mitted a report to the Board on the bids received and on the estimated total cost. A copy of this report is included with the agenda material. In order to meet the developer's schedule, he has been advised to proceed with the project at the cost set forth in the engineer 's report. When comple te and all costs are determined and r.~ satisfactory easements obtained, a reimbursement agreement will be prepared for consideration at a later Board meeting. • • ... No. 57 -DES IG N OF RECONSTRUCTION OF LIDO PUMP STATION: The District's only regularly scheduled and budgeted project for this fiscal year is the Lido Pump Station Reconstruction, similar in scope to the already completed projects at Rocky Point Pump Station and Bitter Point Pump Station . I n order to get this work under way and completed before the next summer season, we have asked the District's engineers, Shuirman and Simpson, to submit a proposal f o r the necessary design work. A copy of this proposal is included with the agenda material and is recommended for acceptance. No . 58 -SERVICE FOR TRACT NO . 6652 -80 (IRVINE INDU STRIAL COMPLEX): Another letter from the Irvi ne Industrial Complex on this subject, dated September 18 , has been received and it is reco rrunended that it • I .. .. be referred to the staff and engineers for report and recorrunendation at the proposed adjourned meeting on October 22. A copy of the l etter is included in the agenda materia l and is self-explanatory. No . 61 -ADJOURNMENT TO OCTOBER 22: It is recommended that the Board adjourn to the hour of 4 :30 p .m. on October 22 in the District's office to c onsider furth e r the matter of serv ice to the Irvine • 1 Industrial Co mp lex (Tract No . 6652) and to take up other i tems of business, including possibly a discussion of proposed Ord i nance No. 504. It will be noted that the time proposed is immediately preceding the next regularly scheduled meeting of the Executive Committee . District No . 7 • No . 63 -ESTABLISHI NG ANNEXATION -FEE POLICY AND PROCEDUR ES: This ~ matter has been under study for some time, and, in addition to the procedures recommended in the report of Boyle Engineering, dated July 25, 1968, the staff was instructed on September 24 to prepare a • • -5- • • • . ""' • --~· • ir • • .. resolution incorporating the c hanges rec ommended by the engineers and an escalation clause provi ding for an annual increase i n annexation fees to reflect the Federal Water Po l lution Control Administration Sewer Construction-Co st I ndex for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, or $10 .00 per acre, whichever is greater . The reso l ution is included with the agenda material . No. 64 -PROPOSAL OF BOYLE ENGINEERING FOR A MASTER PLAN STUDY FOR THE DI STR I CT : At the September 24 meeting of the Board, th e staff was directed to request a p r oposal from Boyle Engine ering, for a Master Plan engineering study to determine the ultimate f low require - ments for the District . Areas outside the District to be included in the report are the Ora nge Park Acres Drainage Ar e a northerly and easterly of the Di s trict boundary , and the Peters Canyon Area which lies immediately out s id e the District . • No. 65 -LETTER FROM I RVINE AND PROPOSAL OF KEITH & ASSOCIATES RE : MCGAW AVENUE LIFT STATION: The Irvine I ndustrial Complex has . i~ requested by letter (copy inc l uded i n agenda) that District No . 7 •"""= proceed with the design of the McGaw Avenue Lift Station wh ich is part of the District's Master Pl an . At the present time a trunk sewer is be i ng cons tructed wh ich will require this lift station . The Complex will financ e the construction, and following its completion, they wil l enter into a Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with th e District . We have as ked the engineering firm of Keith & Assoc iates for a propo sal to provide the engineering design and inspection se r v ic es . The sta ff r ecomme nd s acc e ptance of the proposal (see copy • enclosed ), as s ubmitted . Nos . 66, 67 and 68 -PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTR I CT : The Boa rd approved the follow ing annexations, in principle, on July 1 0, subject to ce r ta in conditions : Tentative Tract No. 6628, Annexat i on #17 Ludlow-Armbrust, Annexa tion #18 • O 'Sullivan, Annexation #19 • • rt.. !I =--..-. .. .. ~ ... t On August 12, the c onditions regarding Tentative Tract No . 6628 (Anne xation #17 ) were amended r elati ve to the requirement that ~ the area be withdrawn from the Irv ine Ranch Water District . ~ The proponents of t he annexations have paid the stipulated fees ($250 per acre), and we have been dire c ted by the Local Agency Formation Commission to i nitiate proceedings in compliance with the Commission's findings . The resolutions included under these items give Board approval, subjec t to the cond itions previously established . I Fred A . General 11 I II BOARD S OF DI RE CTO RS County Sanit ation Dist rict s P. 0. Box 51 75 of O ra nge Cou nty, Ca liforni a 10844 E ll is Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca liF., 92708 ( 1) ( 2 ) ( 3) ( 4) ( 5 ) JO IN T BOA RDS AGENDA Oc to b er 9 , 1968 -7:3 0 p .m. Pl e d ge o f Al legia n ce Rol l Ca ll Appointments of Cha i rmen pro t e rn , if nece ssary ALL DI STRICTS Con s i de r ation of mot i o n approv i ng Add endu m No . 1 to the plans and specifications for Ocean Out f all No . 2 , J o b No . J-1 0 . See page 11 F 11 AL L DI STR I CTS . Co n sideration of motion directing the Secretary to open a nd r ea d sealed bids received f or Ocean Ou tfal l No . 2 purs u ant to legal notice published in the manner ~re s c ribed by law . (Bid tab u lation sheet in folders ) (6 ) ALL DI STR I CTS Consideration of motion to refer bids for Job No. J -10 t o the engineers and Genera l Manager for tabulation and r e c ommendation ; and a u thorizing Di strict No. 1 , u pon r e c eipt of said recommendation , to award contract for sa id work 0vv-c ~· { ~ ~( (7 ) DI STR I CT 1 (8 ) (9 ) (10 ) (11 ) (12 ) Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held September 11 , 1968 , and the adjourned regular meeting thereof hel d September 24 , 1968 , as mailed DISTRICT 2 -CO nsideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held September 11 , 1968 , as mailed DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving minut es of the regular meeting held September 11 , 1968 , as mailed DISTRICT 5 Consid eration of motion approving minutes of the regul ar meeting held Sep tember 11 , 1968 , as mailed DISTRICT 6 Consid eration of motion approving minu tes of the regular meeting held September 11 , 1968, as mailed DISTRIC T 7 Consid eration of motion approving minu tes of the regular me eting held September 11 , 1968 > and the a dj ourned regular meeting thereof held September 2L~, 1968, as mailed ~~ DISTRICT 8 ~, -Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular . meeting held August 14, 1968 , as mailed (15 ) (1 6 ) (1 7 ) (1 8 ) (19 ) (20 ) ( 21 ) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular me eting held September 11 , 1968 , as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the J oint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Gen eral Manage r ALL DISTRICTS Repor t of the General Counsel ALL DISTRI CTS Verbal report of the Building Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committe e 's written rep or~ and direc ting the Committee to continue to work with the architectural consultants , the engineers , and others to re vise the plans for P2 -8 -3 (Enclosures , Phase II and Operator s ' Building ) for submission to the Boards . (C opy in folders ) ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report of the Executive Committee and consideration of motion to receive and file the Committ ee 's written report . (Copy in f old ers ) ALL DISTRICTS Conside ration of motion as recommended by the Execut i ve Committee, authorizing offer of $15 ,000 to the State Fish and Gam e De partment , thro ugh the Reg ional Water Quality Control Board , to conduct the study of ocean waters recommen ded by that Department , prior to con- struction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 . ALL DISTRICTS Consid e ra tion of motion authorizing memb ership in the California Sanitary and Sanitation Districts Association , as recommended by the Ex ec uti ve Committ ee , subject to annua l review by the Boards (22 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No . 68-82 , approving a Rig ht- of -Way Agreement with the State Lands Commission relative to construction of Ocean Outfall No . 2 , J ob No . J -10;.and authorizing Distric t 1 to execute the Agreement on behalf of the Districts . See page "G" (23 ) ALL DISTRI CTS Consid eration of Resolution No . 68-83 , approving Amendment No . 1 to the existing agreement with the State Division of Be aches and Parks, to provide additiona l construction area for Ocean Outfall No. 2 , J ob No . J -10; and authorizing District 1 to exec u te the Amendment as approved by the sta ff and in form acceptable to the General Coun sel . See page "H" (24 ) ALL DISTRICTS Consid eration of motion to receive and fil e memorand u m from the Pu rchasing Officer , and authorizing purchase of repl acement gear ·for a digester-gas engine at Oce a n Outfall Booster Statio n No . 1 , at a tota l price of $2 ,930 .00 . See page "I" -2 - &.A.... ---• (25) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked a.11 bills appear- ing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (26) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No~ 1 and authorizing payment of claims lis·ted on pages 11 Ad , ~ "B11 , and "c" . (27) ALL DISTRICTS (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) {33) (34) (35) Other business and communications. Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager, on written approval of the General Counsel and after evaluation of the bids by ·the engineers, to return (cash) bid sureties to those bidders not beihg considered for award by reason of the amounts of their bids . DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration ·of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E" DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if ·any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn See See (36) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See (37) (38) (39) {40) page "E" DISTRICT 11 Other business· and communications, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn.to 5:30 p.m., October 15th, Huntington Beach City Hall DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-84-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding 9ontract for construction of the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-9, to Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc., in the amount of $ 459,892.00 • (Bid opening October 7th). See pages 11 J 11 and "K" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-85-2, authorizing execution of Quitclaims to City Management Corporation upon recommendation of acceptance of the relocation work by the engineers. See page "L" -3- "'!' (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) (46) -(47) {48) {49) (50) (51) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to . the plans and specifications for Orange Freeway Sewer Crossings (Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-1 and Yorba Linda Fqrce Main, Contract No. 2-12) authorizing an addition'of $1,518.00 to the contract with J~ .L. Scott Company. See page "M" · DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and speci.fications for Orange Freeway Sewer Crossings (Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-1 and Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-12) adjusting engineers quantities and authorizing a deduction of. $384.oo from the contract with J. L. Scott Company. See page "N" DISTRLCT 2 I Consideration of Resolution No. 68-86-2, accepting Orange Freeway Sewer Crossings (Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-1 and Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-12) .r as complete, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "O" . DISTRICT 2 • Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 1 to plans and specifications for the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-8 authorizing an addition of $6,927.46 to the contract with Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. See page "P" · DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive, file, and refer to the General Counsel, Notice of Proceedings and Summons in Action No. 52516 (Malcolm Boring· Company, Inc., vs. Far Western Pipeline Company et al) DISTRICT 2 · Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" DISTRICT 2· Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 See Consideration of motion to receive, file, and approve_ the written recommendations of the staff and engineers concerning sewerage service for County Sanitation District No. 4; and consideration of motion directing the .General Manager to forward said recommendations to District No. 4 and call particular attention to recommendation #2 thereof. See pages "Q" and nR" . DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager tq employ an appraiser that will be acceptable to the Department of the Navy for the purpose of appraislng the pumping site on the Weapons Depot in Seal Beach DISTRICT 3 . Consideration of motion to receive and file report of the engineers regarding the failure of manhole coatings; and consideration of further instruction to the General.Counsel concerning possibility of settlement of the lawsuit. See page "S" _J~.- (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) (60) (61) (62) (63) (64) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 5 See Consideration of motion to receive and file draft of proposed Ordinance No. 504, amending Ordinance No. 502 as amended, and take under submission for study. See page "Trr · DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file report of· the engineers regarding award by Newport Hills, of contract for the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer. See page ''U'' DISTRICT 5 . Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Shuirman- Simpson, engineers for design services for"Reconstruction of the Lido Pumping Station. See page "V" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Industrial Complex regarding sewer service for Tract No. 6680, and refer to the engineers and staff. See page "W" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. · page "D" See DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:30 p.m., Tuesday, October 22nd DISTRICT 7 .... ·--·-------~ ........ ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 68-87-7, authorizing . acceptance of an easement from Irvine Industrial Complex, at no cost to the District, relative to a portion of Alton Avenue between Aston and Armstrong. See page "X" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-88-7, establishing annexation-fee policy and procedures for future annexations of territory to the District. See page "Y" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering for a Master Plan engineering study to determine the ultimate flow requirements for the District for a total fee not to exceed $11,000. See page "Z" -5- (65) (66) (67) (68) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter dated. September 23, 1968, from Irvine Industrial Complex, request- ing construction of the·McGaw Avenue Lift Station; approving the request; and accepting proposal of Keith and Associates for design and construction inspection services ·for the facility. See pages ''AA". and "BB" ~-· DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-89-7, ordering annexation of Tentative Tract No. 6628 -Annexation No. 17, to the District. See page "ccrr DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-90-7, ordering annexation of territory known as Ludlow-Armbrust, Annexation No. 18, to the District. See page "DD" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-91-7, ordering annexation; of territory known as O'Sullivan, Annexation No. 19, -to the District. See page "EE" (69) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if anyo See page "E" (70) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (71) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn -6- 896T '6 ciaqoq.oo ___ , __________________________ __ S~N~wnooa DNiiliHOadllS aNV SNOiilifi~OS~H .r;·. ·.!- I WARRANT NO. 10029 10030 10031 \...,! 10032 10033 10034 10035 10036 10037. 10038 10039 10040 10041 10042 10043 10044 10045 10046 10047 10048 10049 10050 10051 10052 10053 10054 10055 10056 ~ 10057 10058 10059 10060 10061 10062 10063 10064 10065 lOQ66 10067 10068 10069 10070 10071 10072 10073 10074 10075 10076 10077 10078 lel079 10080 10081 \w,) 10082 10083 10084 10085 10086 10087 10088 10089 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Tool Rebuilders, Inc., Small Tools . · ·$ Acore Drilling Service, Cored Drilling All Bearing Service Inc., Freight · American Compressor Co., Compressor Parts American Cryogenics, Inc., Welding, Supplies City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Packing Apco Supply, Controls Atlas Machine Works, Engine Works Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, New Vehicle John.A. Batchelor Co., Inc., Tool Repair Beacon Auto Parts, Truck Repair Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair Blower Paper Co., Paper Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repair Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Business Forms Press, Inc., Daily Time Records Carey Scale & Equip. Co., Equipment Rental Certified Building Materials C-L Chemical Products, Cleaning Supplies · College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber Consolidated Electrical Dist., Elect. Supplies Continental-Emsco Co., Small Tools, Supplies Cords Piston Ring Mfg., Engine Parts Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts De Guelle & Sons Glass, Glas~,. Sweeper Repair Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equipment Repair Dunton Ford, Truck Parts Electric Supplies Dist., Elect. Supplies Electronic Balancing Co., Centrifuge Repair Enchanter, Inc • .; Ocean Sampling ~; Current Monitoring Endevco, Vibrat:lon Study Equip. Rental · Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies Esterline Angus, Controls Fischer & Porter Co., Chlor Parts Flair Drafting Service, Drafting Services Foster Sand and Gravel Co., Crane Rental Fountain Valley Glass, Framing The Foxboro Co., Temp. Control Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Machine Shop Work City of Fullerton, Water ·General Electr~c Supply Co., Transformer General Telephone Co. Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Groom's Asphalt, Asphalt Paving Hercules, Inc., Chemicals Honeywell, Inc., Controls Service Howard Sup9ly Co., Piping, Line Clean Supplies. City of Huntington Beach, Water Internatio~al Harvester Co., Hydraulic Truck Crane Jensen Instrument, Temp. Control · Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine Kar Products, Inc., Small Hardware Keller Advertising Specialties, Calendars Keenan Pipe & Supply, Pipe King Bearing, Inc., Bearin~s, Pu.mp Parts Kleen-Line Corp., Mtce. Supplies Knox Industr:lal Supplies, Small Tools & Hardware LBWS Inc., Small r.rciols, Snpplies -A- AMOUNT 9.45 68.61 8.65 225. 75 45.55 87.10 708.03 12.81 16.17 53.91 2,109.21 104.99 54.32 41.00 13.12 25.23 109.33 54.03 335.69 52.48 38.85 12.27 68.65 . 155.05 269.90 38.50 326.78 22.10 5.05 8.05 9~.73 60.00 3,960.0Q 720.00 52.19 183.54 701.54 369 .oo 122.00 4.56 116.74 603.36 5.16 173. 75 1,154.45 116 .49 70.00 358.60 173.47 772.38 7.30 18,860.97 130.01 23,083.20 42.90 9.85 511.96 756.72 98. l~l 198 .19 299.21 WARRANT NO. 10090 10091 10092 10093 10094 ~ 10095 10096 10097 10098 10099 10100 10101 10102 10103 10104 10105 10106 10107. 10108 10109 10110 10111 10112 10113 10114 10115 10116 10117 10118 10119 ~ 10120 10121 10122 10123 10124 lO:J-25 10126 10127 10128 10129 10130 10131 10132 10133 10134 10135 10136 10137 10138 10139 10140 10141 10142 2011~3 10144 - -..,,; 10145 10146 10147 10148 1011~9 10150 10151 10152 10153 IN FAVOR OF Lewis Bros. Batteries, Batteries $ R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc., Plaster Sand McCoy Motor Co., Truck Parts · Jack Edward McKee, Consultant Bernard F. McLaughlin, Employee Mileage Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Main Photo Service, Photo Processing Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges Mission Clay Products Corp., Pipe Moore Co., Telemetering Supplies National Cash Register Co., Office Supplies City of Newport Beach, Water C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer Noland Paper Co., Paper County of Orange) Court Work Program Orange County Radiotelephone Pacific Diesel Parts Co., Engine Parts Pacific TelephonP. Postmaster, Box Rental Postmaster, Postage Lee Potter Co., Mtce. Coating Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage The Register, Employment Ad Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Aluminum Sheets Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Robertshaw Controls Co., Metering Parts Saddleback Travel & Tours, Air Fare WPCF Conference Santa Ana· Blue Print Co., Maps · Santa .Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repair Santa Ana Electronics Co., Electric Supplies Sargent-Welch Scientific Co., Lab Supplies Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage S. F. Serrantin::>, Employee Mileage Service Motor Parts, Engine Base. The Sherwin-·Williams Co • , Paints The Sidu Co., Line Clean Equipment John Sigler, Employee Mileage So. California Edison Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Southern Marine Supply, Small Hardware Southland Machinery Corp., Oil Seal Sparkletts, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Trucl{ Parts 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Engine Oil, Supplies Standard Ready Mix Concrete, Concrete Tardif Sheet Metal, Metal Shop Work Texaco, Inc., Rust-Proofing C. O. Thompson Petr::>leum Co., Kerosene Tinker & Rasor, Test Equipment Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Tri Video, Inc., Video-Tape Supplies J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Small Tools Tustin Water Works Turco Products, Cleaning Chemicals Union Oil C~. of Calif., Gasoline Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Office Sv.pplies John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant D. L. Warwick, M .·n., Empl. Physicals Warren.& Bai.ley Co., Small HardNare Waukesha Eneine Servicenter, En~ine Rebuilding Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete -B- .AMOUNT 96.59 48.22 71.32 450.00 12.90 67.22 7.18 517.89 30.68 15.91 787 .95 69 .47 22.19 700.00 95.80 418.38 415'.20 1,023.03 348.50 18.oo 150.00 53.77 44.30 50.00 216.24 465.15 199.50 224.70 52.59 63.83 33.36 201.61 22.80 21.00 500.00 121.68 193.15 31.20· 15,771.60 3.30 342 .94 38.13 22.73 99.97 164.30 30.45 478. 73 26.76 lll.58 14.34 107.16 209.35 187.65 63.00 12.60 25.20 47 .75 559.74 10.50 218.80 49 .50 336.62 596. 74 26.19 . f WARRANT NO. 10154 10155 10156 10157 10158 ~ '\wl 10159 10160 10161 10162 10163 IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Western Typewriter Co., Electric Calculator $ 1,218.28 733.01 127.40 702.39 Woodward Governor Co., Valve Everett H. York Co., Engine Parts Xerox Corp., Repro Service Fred A. Harper, Fed. Grant & Various Meeting Expenses & C.O.D. Supylies 220.67 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers William Blurock & Partners .Enterprise Printing Co. J. Putnam Henck TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- 15.20 $ 89,323.20 . $ 7 ,387 .47 150.00 60.11 41,468.93 $ 49,066.51 1 WARRANT NO. 10164 10165 10166 10167 10168 10169 10170 10171 10172 10173 10174 10175 10176 I..._,) 10177 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRJ\NTS IN FAVOR OF United California Bank I Raymond G. Osborne ACCUMUL..ATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry Enterprise Printing Co. Merco Construction Engineers C. Arthur Nisson J. L. Scott Com9any United California Bank I Raymond G. Osborne Wallace Trade Bindery Co. DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering c. Arthur Nisson DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FU11JD 1:fARRANTS IN FAVOR OF City of Newport Beach FACILITIES REVOLVING Fl11'TD W!\RR.'\NTS IN FAVOR OF Shuirman-Simpso!1 -D- 'AMOUNT '$ 218.50 -----$ 218.50 $ $ 57.00 -------57.00 1,722.96 1,580.50 55.49 26,291.96 15.00 14, 594.26 28.50 34.13 $ 44,322.80 $ 44,379.80 $ 1,053.00 286.10 $ 1,339.10 $ 232.00 -----$ 232.00 375.00 $ 375.00 $ 607.00 .. · -E- .' .r COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. SOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 September 25; 1968 ADDENDUM NO. 1 to Plans and Specifications for OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Marine Sectiori JOB NO •. J-10 TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-2910 962-2411 ~· · The purpose of this addendum is (a) to allow a smaller graded material to be used for ·gravel bedding; (b) to allow a smaller graded material to be used for quarry stone from Station 120 to 274, and (c) to correct the abrasion test designation. ~ SPECIFICATIONS 1. Page DS-37, Section 13-3(b) Gravel Bedding Delete the following: "Tests for abrasion shall be made in accordance with .ASTM C-535, Grading 1. The loss by abrasion shall not exceed 40 percent by weight after 1000 turns." Substitute the following: "Tests for abrasion shall be made in accordance with ASTM C-131, Grading A. The loss by abrasion ~hall not exceed 2~5 percent by weight after 500 turns." 2. Page DS-37, Section 13-3(b) Gravel Bedding Add the following after the table: Agenda Item No. 4 "The gravel b~dding shall be graded as spe.cified above or the gravel bedding may be graded as speci- fied in the table below: F-1 All Districts -.- 2 . Size of Squa~e . Percent by Weight Opening (inches) of Mix Less Than 2-l 100 1 90-100 3/4 40-75 3/8 0-5 fl 3. Pages DS-38 and DS-39, Section 13-3(c) quarry Stone . . Change the "apparent specific gravity" table, the "abrasion characteristic" table and the maximum-minimum table as follows: a) b) c) Page DS-38, "apparent specific gravity" table. Change "Classes D & E'to read "Classes D, E & F" in the left column. , • Page DS-38, "abrasion characteristic" table. Change "Classes D & E" to read· "Classes D, E & F" in the left column. Page DS-39, maximum-minimum table (table at the top of page). · Add "F" at the bottom ·of the left column and "i inch" at the b~ttom of the right column. 4. Page DS-42, Section 13-3(c) Quarry Stone Add the following: "(6) Class "F" Quarry Stone -Class "F" quarry stone shall have a minimum specific gravity of 2.3. The rock shall be a dense, well-graded mix with approxi- mate.ly 40 percent of the mate.rial larger than l~ inches nominal size. The grading shall be within the following limits: Size of Square Percent by Weight Opening (inches) of Mix Less Than 41. 100 2! 90-100 2 50-70 l~ 30-50 1 15-30 x 0-5 2 ff Agenda Item No. 4 F-2 All Districts .· / \..,! ·• ·-. \..,I ~ t• 3. PLANS 1. Sheet No. 13 of 19, Section L (Station 12o+OO to 233+08), Section M (station 233+08 to 251+08}, Station N (station 251+08 to 262+60) and Section P (station 262+60 to 274+00). ·· · lilffi:gg Add the following note to each of the above sections: "Quarry stone may be either Class "E" or Class "F" stone." -:~:::zfs::~lZcwt~~ H:Hiii'Vey l}Unt ri;a-rtner JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS ·calif. Regis. No. C-11001 ,.. Agenda Item No. · 4 F-3 All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 68-82 APPROVING RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING RIGHT-OF-WAY AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE LANDS COM- MISSION (P.R.C. 400709) ---~ -~ ---~ -- The Beards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Right-of-Way Agreement, dated August 28, 1968, wherein the State Lands Commission grants to County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11., a right of way for a period of forty-nine (49) years relative to construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine Section, Job No. J-10, is approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said right of way is granted is more particularly described as follows: A 100-foot wide right of way easement in the City of Huntington. Beach, I County of Los .Angeles, State of California, said easement beginning at the ordinary high water mark along the Cal.ifOl;nia mainland and lying 50 feet on each side of the following described centerline: Commencing at corner LB 68 on the Easterly line of the Rancho Las Bolsas • in the Fractional. Section 19, Range 10 West, Township 6 South, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, thence ·S 16u 37 1 24" W 428.3 feet along said Rancho line .... -:.-... -~ to an. axle (California La~bert Zone 6 Coordinate N 537,342.48; E l,4eo,339.56); thence S 5° 50 1 44" E 95.53 feet to.a 1-inch by 2-inch stake {California Lambert Zone 6 Coordinate N 537, 24 7 .1~9·; . E 1, 48o, 349. 31) ; · thence S 31 ° 06 1 44 11 W 420.31 feet to a crosscut on the top slab of the Junction Box (California Lambert Zone 6 Coordinate N 536,887.64; E l,l~e.o,132.13); thence S 34° 46 1 42 11 W 6.4o feet to the southeasterly face of the Junction Box. (California Lambert Zone 6 Coordinate.N 536,882.38; E l,4&>,128.~.8); thence S 30° 56 1 21n W to the .ordinary high water mark and ~e True Point of Beginning; thence S 30 ;J 56' 21 11 W to the Oimership boundary of the State 9f California (as determined . . a~cording to the decree·entered by the United States Supreme Court J.n United. States v. California Orie;inal No. 5 on January 31, 1966). Agenda Item No. 22 G-1 All Districts Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Right-of-Way Agreement on behalf of Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; and, Section.4. That the Secretary of the Boards of Directors be authorized to record said agreement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on October 9, 1968. Agenda Item No. ·22 G-2 All Districts j I I I ... , RESOLUTION NO. 68-83 AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 ~O EXECUTE AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH STATE DIVISION OF BEACHES AND PARKS RE: JOB NO. J-10 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3., ·5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO EXECUTE AN". AMENDMENT TO THE AGREElVIENT WITH THE STATE DIVISION OF BEACHES AND PARKS RE: JOB NO. J-10 The Beards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Amendment No. 1 to the existing Agreement with the State Division of Beaches and Parks, is hereby approved; an9, Section 2. That County Sanitation District No. 1, as agent for itself and each of the other Districts, is hereby ~ authorized and directed to execute Amendment No. 1 t.o the . i...,.J existing agreem~nt dated October 26, ig66, with the State Division of Beaches and Parks, to provide for additional construction area required by the Districts in the construction of Ocean Outfall No. 2, Marine·Section, Job No. J-10; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 be authorized and directed to execute the documents nece.ssary to obtain the additional construction area required for construction of said Job No. J-10, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on October 9, 1968 • Agenda Item No. 23 -H-All Districts ---•.. . -. ----. -----· . --.... . . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE .COUNTY, CALIFORNIA October 3, 1968 MEMORANDUM TO: FROM: SUBJECT: Mr. F.A. Harper General Manager Mr. Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer Mr. T .A. Dunn Administrative Officer P. 0. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 Board Authority for Purchase of Proprietary Gear Set. Gear Set Manufactured by Western Gear Corporation. W.O. P-9-B (to be capitalized upon completion) Bill Clarke advises the gear ratio change will increase the pump capacity by approximately 8% and will also greatly reduce engine wear by reducing engine speed by 15%. It is reconnnended that Board Authority be requested for an amount not to exceed $2,930.00 for purchase of gear set from Western Gear Corporation. Spiral Bevel Gear Set Installation not to exceed $ 2,580.00 350.00 $ 2,930.00 Labor to install may vary depending on availability of Districts' forces for installation. The above price is firm for thirty (30) days from October 1, 1968. A 6% price increase will be in effect thereafter. TAD:fhh Agenda Item No. 24 -I- cJ1°0/,'-1"1v T .Ac Dunn Purchasing Officer All Distri.cts I I ! ~ ~ngineer•s Estimate~ · $530,685.00 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N Contract: EUCLID TRUNK SEWER Contract No. 2-10-9 Contractor 1. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. 2419 No. Chico Ave. So. El Monte, California 91733 2. Steve Kral Corp. P. O. Box 40 Baldwin Park, California ·91706 3. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. 1704 Ruxton Lane Redondo Beach, California 90278 4. Zarubica Company 8550 Tujunga Sun Valley, California 5. Zarubica Bros., Inc. 5645 No. Rosemead Temple City, California 6 .. Scott Bros., Construction, Inc. 630 South Hathaway Street Santa Ana, California Robert G. Castongia 12323t Woodruff Avenue Downey, California 8. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. 16200 So. Atlantic Pl. Paramount, California 9. Andrew Papac & Sons 2030 No. Hoyt Ave. So. El Monte, California 91733 10. Aristo Construction Co. 1141 No. Highland .Oaks Drive Arcadia, California 11. Saliba-Sub-Terra P. O. Box 1244 Canoga Pa~k, California ·12. Edmond J. Vadnais P. O. Box 68 Etiwanda, California 91739 13. Paul.Vukich.Construction Company P. O. Box 1-G Arcadia, California Agenda Item No. J.2. J-1 Date: October 7, 1968 Total Bid *$459, 892. 00 . $473,231.50 $496,698.92 $497,868.25 $514,388.50 $516,739.30 $516,864~20 $563,310.00 $568,936.00 $.574, 078. 62 Distrlct 2 Contractor 14. Mike Prlich & Sons 9316 Klingerman Ave. South El Monte, California 15. Charles T. Brown Company P. O. Box 311, 1955 Glenoaks Blvd. San Fernando, California 16. Drummond & Bronneck 1710 Santa Monica Blvd. Santa Monica, California Agenda Item No._3.2 J-2 Total Bid $575,781.25 $579,393~00 $631,1io.oo • District 2 . \._,/ RESOLUTION NO. 68-84-2 . . . AWARDING CONTRACT FOR EULID TRUNK SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2~10-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-9 The Board of Dir~ctors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section lo That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle. Engi~eering, district's engineers and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. Contractor, for EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-9, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 2-10-9 be awarded to Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. , Contractor, --------------------------------------------~ in the total amount of $459., 892. 00 in accordance with the terms of its · bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign.a ·contract with .said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned.to the unsuccessful bidders • Agenda Item No~ 39 -K-District 2 l.~ RESOLUTION NO. 68-85-2 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEEDS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEEDS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMI~E AND O~ER: Section 1. That the certain Quitclaim' Deeds dated October 11, 1967, from County Sanitation District No. 2 to THE CITY MANAGEMENT CORP., a corporation, be approved as sub- mitted by the General Counsel; and, Section 2. That the real ·· propert~es to be quitclaimed is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" and rrB" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution. Section 3. That the Chairman of the District be authorized and directed to execute Quitclaim Deeds, quitclaiming the District's interest in the certain real properties hereinabove described, upon receipt by the District of Grants of Easement from THE CITY MANAGEMENT, a corporation, relative to construction in County Sanitation District No. 2. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular.meeting on October·9, 1968. Agenda Item N~4o -L-District 2 ! . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. ____ l ____ _ CONTRACTOR: J .-L. Scott Company DAT~: October 9, 1968 Cypress Avenue Relief' Se\"er, Contract No. 2-9-1) ORANGE FREmMY JOB: Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-12 } SEWER CROSSINGS Amount ~f this change order (ADD) (Dmm11I<nC) $1, 5'i8. 00 \.,,I In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated August 9 and September 6, 1g68; and our letter dated August 22, 1968 and Memorandum dated ·September 27, 1968 . · CONTRACT REVISIONS ADD 1. Extra excayation and backfill through State Highway Department's haul road which was constructed in the period between contract award and start of job. 214 cubic yards @ $3.00/c.y. 2. Extra excavation and backfill due to lowering the 18" VCP 1.18 1 so the new pip·e elevation met that of the . · existing which was installed in 1956 by the City of 3. · Fullerton. . · 55 cubit: yards @ $8.00/c.y. Extra cost to install additional plugs, to test the force. main in two operations, to excavate and·· backfill for exploration of OCWD 30" water pipe which was not indicated on record drawings. This work was necessary to omit an 18-foot section of force main in area of 30" water pipe which will be abandoned in the·near future. Lump Sum $ 642.00 440.00 736.00 TOTAL ADD $1,818.oo DEDUCT 1. ~educe the exc~vation and backfill due to rais~ng of the force main grades to avoid a conflict with a Stat~ Highway Department storm drain. 100 cubic. yards @ $3. 00/c. Y.• 300.00 Board authorization date: October 9, ·1968 Ag_enda Item No. 41. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,518.00 Original Contract Price $ 52,971.85 Prev. Auth. Changes $ none This Change_{ADD){~~~~~~ $ 1,518.00 Amended Contract Price $ 54,489.85 Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By , /s/ Paul G. Brown -C_h_i_e_f_· _E_n_g_i_n_e_e_r_ J. L. SCOTT COMPANY -M-District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. ·No • ___ 2 ____ _ CONTRACTOR: J. L. Scott Company DATE: Octobe~ 9, 1968 Cypress Avenue Relief Sewer, Contract No. 2-9-1) ORANGE F'REEWAY JOB: Yorba Linda Force Main, Contract No. 2-12 ) SEWER CROSSINGS Amount o_f this change order ~ (DEDUCT) $ 384. 00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT Ite·m Change Est'd. No. Unit From 1. L.F. 447.5 2. L.F. 1124.8 ADD . 4. V.F. 26 Board authorization date: \.._,I October 9, 1968 Agenda Item No. 42 Quant. To ,,,- 443.5 4 LF @ $19.50/LF $ 78.00 1106.8 18 LF @ $22.00/LF 396.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 474.oo 29 3 VF @ $30.00/VF 90.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $ 384.oo Original Contract Price $ 52,971.85 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change.~)(DEDUCT) $ 1,518. 00 $ 384.oo Amended Contract Price $54,105.85 -N- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By · /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer J. L. SCOTT COMPANY By District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 68-86-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACTS NOS. 2-9-1 AND 2-12 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING THE ORANGE FREEWAY SEWER CROSSINGS (CYPRESS AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-1 AND YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 2-12) AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, J. L. SCOTT COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the ORANGE FREEWAY SEWER CROSSINGS (CYPRESS AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-9-1 AND YORBA LINDA FORCE MAIN, CONTRACT NO. 2-12), on the 20th day of September, 1968; and, Section 2. That by letter, the District's Construction Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That construction of the ORANGE FREEWAY SEWER CROSSINGS (CYPRESS AVENUE RELIEF SEWER, CONTRACT NOo 2~9-1 AND YORBA LINDA FORCE.MAIN, CONTRACT NOo. 2-12), is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms.of the contract therefor, dated the 25th day of July, 1968; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of "..,.) Work therefor. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular .meeting on October 9, 1968. Agenda Item No. 43 -0-District 2 I I . ! COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.· o. BOX 8127 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, ~alifornia 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO. 1 ----------- CONTRACTOR:. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-8 DATE: Oct. 9, 1968 Amount o_f this change order {ADD) (iDm)OO[K) $ 6,927 .46 ....,; In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as compensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's claims for extra work dated September 11, ·1968 and September 17, 1968 and Engineer's letter dated October 3, 1968. EXTRA WORK 1. Removal of ·36-inch C.M.P. Culvert between Stations 240+14 and 241+50 Remove and dispose of 36-inch C.M.P. culvert found in trench prism and not shown on plans Equipment rental . $149.14 Overhead and Profit as specified {15%) 22.37 2~· Additional Pavement Base Material between Stations 217+00 and 231+00 Furnish and install, as ordered, ~dd1tional pavement base material at varying thickness between stations noted 27,816 cu. ft~ @ $0.204 Sales tax Subtotal Overhead and Profit as specif·ied (15%) $5674.46. 200.28 5874.74 881.21 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD No extension of time requeste.d or granted for above extra work $ 171.51 6,755.95 $6,927.46 Original Contract Price $ 373 ,767. 50 Board authorization date: '..._.! October 9, 1968 Agenda Item No. 44 Prev. Auth. Changes " none ;> ___ _ This Change.(ADD)~ $ 6,927 .46 $ 380, 694. 96 Amended Contract Price -P- Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By ' /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer MERCO CONSTRUCTION ENGINEERS, INC. District 2 ·~ :n /) {{)<CYc!/~ ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHONE C714> 547~4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 September 12, 1968 •• Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 District No. 3, 1968 Master Plan Trunk Sewer Facilities District No. 4 Participation The addition of a 3.0 mgd ultimate average flow from District No. 4 at the proposed Los Alamitos Pumping Station has been analyzed from a capacity and cost standpoint. In calculating new ·capacity requirements because of the District No. 4 flow, criteria used in the preparing of the master plan has been followed. Where enlargement of facilities are required, the addi- tional costs over and above the original costs have been charged·to District No. 4. Where enlargement is not necessary / costs to District No. 4 have been prorated on a capacity basis proportional to the flow each district· contributes to the particular foci lity being considered. District No. 4 fl~w would be received at the Los A_lamitos Pumpi.ng Station (refer to Plate No. 3, master plan report), pumped through the. force main system to the Westminster branch of the Knott Trunk, and thence through the Rnott Trunk system to Treatment Plant No. 1 for treatment and disposal. The District No. 4 flow will necessitate an increase of approximately 13.4 per- cent in the pumping capability of the Los Alamitos station. An additional pumping unit will have to be added with associated appurtenances and the structure facilities enla:-ged. Likewise, the force main system will have tO be increased from 30-inch to 33-inch pipelines in order to maintain system friction losses at a level compatible with the pl.Imping equipment proposed to be used. For the most part the gravity system, beginning with the West- minster branch on through to Treatment Plant No. 1, will have to be increased in diameter one pipe size to accomodate District No. 4 flow. On the accompanying table are the new capacity requirements with estimates of costs to District No. 4 for their participation in the master pl an trunk foci lities. These estimates are based on present day construction costs and do not include allowances for engineering, contingencies and administration, nor do they include any allowances for infl~tionary trends that may develop between now and actual construction time. ·This table is comparable to Table No. 9, page ~7 in the master plan report. e ' .:,~ ~;· I(]/ .... .. ../ _,,,,_ ., • ,,. • J I ..... · ..... ~!..-~ V \ . ./...._ L-. '.c ·>-c -~ 1.a.-, / Conrad Hohener, Jr. / C. E. 10951 ,.. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AN 0 ARCHITECTURAL. SERVICES Agenda Item No. 49 Q-1 District ~ i J .• \ PLAN"C' Knott Tnmk Reach 1 -Treatment Plant No. 1 to Bushard Street Reach 2 -Ellis Avenue to Newland Street . , Reach 3 -Slater Avenue to McFadden :Avenue Reach 4 -McFadden Avenue to Edwards Street Reach 9 -Edwards Street to Springdale Avenue Los Alamitos Pumping Station Westminster Avenue Force Main (two pipelines) \ ) ESTIMATED COST OF IMPROVEMENTS for FLOW TO TREATMENT PLANT NO. 1 C. S. D. No. 3 Maste· Plan Size 93" 93" 90" 87". ~ 5711 ( 30" Design Flow Ccfsl t195 !\ 191 174 162 44 44 44 C. S. D. No. 4 Participation Size 96" 9611 93" 90" 60" 33" Design Flow (cfs) ?01 197 180 167 50 so so ' I C. S. D. No. 3 Master Plan Estimated Cost $1,222,000 1,857,000 2,127,000 2,477,000 258,000 300,000 908.000 $9,1:49,000 Estimated Cost With C. S. D. No. 4 Participation $1,274,000 1,937,000 2,223,000 2,580,000 273,000 340,000 t.012.000 "$9,639,000 Additional Co~ for County Sanitation District No •. 4 Participation $ 490, 000 ) ) . ·. (\J r Ci 0 ·z E .<l> ..!-) H • .. :."'1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, f"OUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIF"ORNIA, 92708 TELEPHQNES: AREA COOE ·714 540-2910 962-2411 October 3, 1968 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 • · Subject: Report on Possible Sewer Service to County Sanitation District No. 4 (Downtown Seal ~each Area) Following submission of the recent report entitled "Master Plan Trunk Sewer Facilities, June, 1968", an .inquiry was received from County Sanitation District No. 4 concerning the possibility of sewerage service to that District through the new facilities proposed in the Master Plan Repor~. In order to consider this inquiry further, the Board directed the District's engineers to prepare a report setting forth the estimated additional cost of new facilities to provide this service •. A copy of this cost study has been received and is.attached hereto. The Board also requested the staff to prepare a brief report .incorporating the engineer's cost studies and the staff's recom- m~ndations as to a possible agreement to provide the requested service. . Recommendations The staff recommends that: ; 1. County Sanitation District No. 3 offer to enter into an agreem~nt with County Sanitation District No. 4 for permanent. set'ierage service for the area now within the boundaries of District No.-4 ·(approximately Boo acres) under the following principal terms and conditions: . (a) District No. 4 will dissolve. {b) The-area no~ within District No. 4 will anne~ to District No. 3 upon payment of an annexation fee of $790,000, payable over a ~ive-year period. Agenda Item No. 49 R-1 District 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE.COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Board of Directors of P. 0. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE County Sanitation District No. 3 October 3, 1968 FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 (714) 540-2910 . Page 2 (c) (714) 962-2411 The area now within District No.· 4 will pay for construction of facilities necessary to serve the area and connecting to the proposed District No. 3 I.os Alamitos Pumping Station at Los Alamitos Boulevard and Westminster Avenue. 2. County Sanitation District No. 3 inform District No. 4 that a decision upon entering into the above-described agreement must be made by January 1, 1969. • Discussion ., Dissolution and Annexation (Recommendations·'. i(a) and l(b)) - ·.The staff has carefully considered two alternates to the above recom- mendation to dissolve District No. 4 and to annex its territory to District No. 3. These alternates would be: (a) (b) A limited term contract"ual service agreement between the two Districts and An amendment to the Joint ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement to provide for District No. 4 to join the Joint Administrative Organization as a participating District •. The disadvantage of Alternate (a) would be that since the service to District No. 4 would be necessarily on a li.mi ted term basis, it.would be very difficult to design and plan facilities in District No. 3 for ultimate development. In addition, such an arrangement would require the approval of the other six Sanitation Districts in the Joint Administrative Organization, which approval may be difficult to obtaln. ·The disadvantage of Alternate {b) would be the overheaQ. expense ·or maintaining such an extremely small District as a separate entity. It is our opinion t0at such expense would not be justified. Either · alternate would probably necessitate District No. 4 raising a cash payment for purchase of temporary or permanent capacity in the District's system and the joint treatment works. However, such a payment would also be necessary if the recommended procedure of dissolution and annexation is adopted. · Agenda Item_No~ R-2 District 3 - -...• ,/· Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 October 3, 1968 Page 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. 0. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 (714) 540-2910 (714) 962-2411 Annexation Fee (Recommendation l{b)) -This recommended.tenta- tive annexation fee has been. calculated (a) as the sum of the ~dditional cost of capacity needed in new internql facilities in District No. 3 ($490,000), which additional costs are described in the attached cost study and (b) the estimated pro-rated net worth per acre ($375) of District No. 3 as of June 30, 1970, times the 800 acres now within ,~ District No. 4 ( $300, 000) . . Decision Deadline of January 1, 1969 -The above-mentioned "Master Plan Trunk Sewer Facilities, Jun~, 1968" reconm1ends that the new facilities through which the area in District No. 4 would be served should be constructed and in service no lat~r than in 1970. Delay beyond this point would create a serious overloading problem ·.and the probability of additional considerable expense to District No. 3 for temporary remedial measures. Since the design of the new facilities must collh~ence at the earliest possible moment and since this design must take into consideration the ultimate capacity of the facilities, a fairly firm decision as to· whether the area now within District No. 4 will be served or not must be made at the earliest possible date. ·~ FAH:PGB:gg Agenda Item No.~ R-3 Fred A. Harper General Manager ·~· District 3 1tJ If} ln~ff~ tf:#'~L~Y ENGINEERING a ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHONE (714> 547.4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 September 13, 1968 County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Volley, CA 92708 .. Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager As authorized by the Bqard of Directors at their August 14, 1968 meeting, we have investigated coating failure and corrosion damage to manholes on the Miller-Holder Trunk, Contract Nos. 3-1, 3-2, 3-3 and 3-4A. Attached as part of this letter is a table showing the condition of the manholes and a legend which defines the terms used to describe these conditions. All areas of the manhole vault and shaft were inspected, including the "T-Lock 11 vinyl plastic liner where it wraps around the end of the pipe, the shelves and channe Is {which were not coated in the origina I construction), and the frames and covers. Of prime importance during the inspection was the determination of possible structural failure in the immediate future. . Inspection of the manholes was conducted by lowering the inspector down the manhole shaft on a boatswain's choir all the way into the vault w~ere he could observe a 11 areas."· In some cases he was lowered to a point iust above the flow where he could observe the she Ives and the "T-Lock 11 lining at a very close range. Before each manhole cover was removed, a reading was t~ken with an Explosimeter which gives a direct reading in percentages in the amount ·of explosive gases contained within the manholes. : The inspection started at the. manhole in Brookhurst Street odiacent to Treatment Plant No. 2 and proceeded upstream manhole by manhole. Occasionally a manhole was not .inspected in favor of a manhole immediately adjacent to it which had identica I vol'ume, depth, and percentages of coating failure as reported in the June 1965 manhole coating inspection made by the district. Because considerable damage and coating failure was observed in all manho.les from the very start of the inspection, it was deemed necessary to inspect every manhole until the damage lessened substantially and/or a consistent pattern of damage could be logically concluded. In many cases where the coating had failed, the coating had bulged out from the concrete wall or ceiling, breaking its bond but remaining in the form of a solid she.et. Usually, when this condition PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES S-1 Distr1ct·3 . · County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County September 13, 1968 Page 3 · .. occurred, the concrete underneath it was found to be soggy for a quarter to half-inch, indicating that the coating was ineffective. In other cases, the coating had completely disappeared with exposed aggregate showing in the absence of the coating. Wherever exposed aggregate was observed approxi- mately a ha If-inch of the concrete around the aggregate was found to be soft and the individua I pieces of aggregate could be pried loose with a screwdriver. In a II manholes where exposed aggregate was observed the first place to show the exposed aggregate was in the immediate vicinity of the manhole shaft . opening. The worst damage and the largest quantity of corroded concrete was always in the vicinity of the shaft opening, with the damage being lesser at locations farther away from the shaft opening. The ceilings always had more damage than the walls, yet the upper ha If of th'e wa Ifs were a lmos·t always in better condition than the lower half of the walls. Damaged "T-Lock" vinyl . liner was found in manholes at Station 116+24 and Station 235+21 • At most manholes the cast iron frames were found to be corroded and often in poor · condition. Refer to the. attached table and legend for the precise description of the damage to each manhole. In cases where a manhole was not inspected in favor of on adiacent manhole, refer to the manhole coating inspection report made in 1965 for a direct correlation of the damage. It can be concluded that the Amercoat No~ 16 coating for all fractical purposes has failed 100 percent on Contracts Nos. 3-1, 3-2 and most o 3-3. Corrosion of the concrete manholes and shafts has progressed to the point where repairs should be undertaken in the immediate future. Time did not allow for inspection of~Contract No. 3-4A, except for one manhole.. However, projecting from the 1965 investigation and the upper portion of Contract No. 3-3, Contract No. 3-4A is probably in fairly good condition. It is recommended tho t the man holes with damaged "T-Lock 11 , and the 6 other manholes with the ·asterisk notation be repaired immediately. On these manholes deterioration is expected to reach th~ reinforcing stee I within one year. t ,~Lt· ... C_ ·7 ,J (,... ~ t' • ,,l....f I '-I J _, . .' . / '-' , i.-· L-{._ .._,..\.._/ v • • .,, ~ .•• ·conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951 cb 81-2054-00-00 BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda Item No. 51 S-2-District 3 . " ~· MANHOLE FIELD INVESTIGATION . August 20 and 21, 1968 MANI-JO LE VAULT MANHOLE SHAFT (Y) Coating Structure Rating Overall Condition ..µ Condition of C) Vault from (See Respective Notes . Overall •ri % of Total Area Overall % of Total Area View-point in Legend ior Dcscrip-% of Total Arca ·Overall· Condition H +:> Manhole in which Coating Condition Having Exposed of Structural tion of Specific ·con-in which Coating Condition of Cast-Explosimeter rfJ Station has foiled of Coating Aggregate Soundness dition within Manhole) has Failed of Conting Iron .F.-amc Rending ori A CONTRACT NO. 3-1 24+25 .100 F 10 B 3 80 D c 0 37+29 100 F 20 B 2 s 100 D D *49-HS 100 F 40 c 5 60 c D 0 *63+51 100 F so. c 2 100 F D 0 *76+70 100 F so D 2 5 100 F D 3 90+-05 , 100 F 100 c 2 4 ·s 100 F c 0 103+04 80 n· 10 A 3 4.5 100 D D 0 *116+24 80 D 30 B 1 4 70 c B 0 (Y) I 129+43 100. F 40 B 2 3· 4 s 40 B D ti.) 0 142+84 80 D 30 B I .' 2 s so· ·C D 0 156+01 80 D 30 .B 2 4 s 40 B F 0 169+13 100 F 40 B 2 4 40 B c 0 182+33 80 D 10 A 2 3 s 100 D D 0 . 195+63 100 F 30 B 2. 4 5 100 D D 0 ~I 208+79 80 D 20 A 2 s 80 D b 0 221+93 100 F 40 B 2 3 80 D D 0 0 z *235+21 100 F 40 B 1 2 4 100 D D 0 E OJ 248+53 80 D 40 B 2 3 80 D c 5 .µ H 261+79 100 F 60 B 2 3 70 F D s CV 'O *275+01 100 F 70 c 2 3 10 c D s s::: ()) ex; '• ) ) 1 .. MANHOLE FIFLD INVESTIGATION August 20 and 21, 1968 (Y) MANHOLE VAULT MANHOLE SHAFT .µ ·coating Structure · · Rating Ovcrnll Condition C) c(;nditiou of or! Vault from (Sec Respective Notes Over.all H % of Total Arco. Overall % of Total Arca .View-point in Legend for Dcscrip-. % of Total Arca ·.'Overall· Conaition .µ r/J Manl1olc ln which Coating Condition Having Exposed of Structural tion of Specific .Con--in which Coating Condition of Cast-Explosimcter or! Station lins failed ot Coating· Aggregate Soundness dition within Manl1olc} has Failed· Of Coating Iron Frame Rc:iding A CONTRACT NO. 3-1 -Continued 288+-04 70 D 30 A 2 s 80 D D 0 301+24 100 F' 60 . B 2 4 80 D D s 314+42 100 F 60 B 2 3 4 70 c c 5 327+76 100 F 80 D t 2 4 60 c c s ( ' CONTRACT NO. 3-2 , 340+97 40 c 0 A 2 20 B c • 0 354+01 40 c . 10 A 2 30 B c 0 .:::t 367+76 Assume condition to be similar to 340+97 I , Cl) 381+28 50 c 10 A· /2 30 c c 5 393+55 so c 20 A 2 30 B .·B 0 405+61 20 n· 0 A 30 B B 0 410+20 so B 10 A. 2 30 B c 5 411+20 Assume condition to be similar to 41o+20 *413+11 BO D 60 C· 2 . 3 30 n· C. 0 2 *414+47. Assume condition to be similar to 413+11 30 :z 423+19 , 70 D 10 A s '80 F F 20 E <L> 435+27 70 c 0 A 5 50 D D 10 .µ H 447+32 Assume condition to be similar to 435+27 15 cu 'O 459+32 oO c 0 A 30 c c 10 s:: <L> 472+51 Assume condition to be similar to 459-f:32 0 ~ 485+73 486+26 40 c o· ·A 40 c D s ) ) ) ., -~-----~ ------. •. • .~ MANHOLE FIELD INVESTlGA TION August 20 and 21, 1968 \ (Y) MANHOLE VAULT l\1ANHOLE SHAFT ..µ Coating Structure Rating Overall Condition C) Condition of •r-l Vault from (See Respective Notes Overall ~ % of Total Area Overall % of Total Are.a View-point in Legend for Dcscrip-% of Total Area · :0vcrali · Condition ..µ ro Manhole in which Coating Condition Having Exposed of Structural tion of Specific. Con-· in which Coating Condition of Cast'-Explosimeter .,..; Station hns failed of Coating Aggregate · Soundness dition within Manhole} has Failed· of Coating Iron Foramc Reading A COfilBAC:I HQ 3-2 -~gDtin1u:d ' 499i-OS so c s A 3 5 20 c D 5 512+23 50 c 10 B 4 30 c B s .. 512+77 Assume condition to be similar to 512+2 3 s 527+74 100 F· 25 B 2 4 20 c ·o s 539+14 70 .. D 30 B . 2 .4 50 D D 0 \ CONTRACT NO. 3-3 • \ 545+62 100 F .. 20 A 2 4 s 70 D D 3 552+o7 100 F. 30 B . ! 2 5 90 F D 3 Lf\ 565+25 100· F 30 B !2 I 60 D D 5 Cl) 578+75 : :' 592+15 60 D 0 A 2. 5 40 D ·n s . 605+13 Assume condition to be similar to 617+99 617+99 40 c 0 A 20 c c 5 632+96 •I u:\t 644+68 40 c 0 A 2 30 c ·c 5 ·1 654+17 Assume condition to be siJ)1ilar to 644+68 7 ~, 668+32 80 D E 0 A 2 20 B c 7 Q) ..µ 672+61 70 D 20 B 2 4 so D D 5 H 682+82 po D 30 B 2 3 co 4 50 D D 2 'O s:: 69o+90 Pressure coir"er; did not open (!.) co 705+84 Pressure cover; did not open c::x: ) ) ) INWJA4J¥hCUU&t QUJ .C.ZU4t.Pdiibi\4klJdMl4ChJJIL .,.Ct~,;, 14 #JC. ·•-i, 11 .. f., • ., q .-!:! ~·· ....... ~~~.,..:~"~"" '• .. . Manhole Station \ Coating. % of Total Arca in which Coating hns failed Overall Condition of Coathig · CONTRACT NO. 3-3 -Continued 30 c MANHOLE FIELD INVESTIGATION· August 20 and .21, 1968 MANHOLE VAULT MANHOLE SHAFT Structure · · Condition of Vault from % 'of Total Area Vic~point Having Exposed of Structural Aggregate Soundness 0 A Rating Overall Condition (Sec Respective Notes in Legend for Dcscrip-. % of Total Area tion of Specific Con-in which Coating dition within Manhole) has Failed· 2 0 . · •Overall· Condition of Coating B Overall Co~dition of Cast.- Iron F~mc c 720+77 736+25 742+72 755+72 770+58 783+06 796+83 809+01 822+29 Assume condition to be similar to 736+25 20. 10 CONTRACT NQ 3-4A 849+63 **864+96 1039+78 Legend 15 B B B * Manl1ole needs immediate attention 0 • 0 0 A ; . 10 B c I \ . A 5 A B A 3 5 A B Explosimcter Reading 0 6 s 3 35 **011c manhole on Contra.ct No. 3-4A was inspected. It is t11c upstream manhole for .the siphon under the flood control channel just north of B:ill Road. A-Excellent: Manhole in excellent condition. Closely resemble~ original condition wl1cn constructed. No. chance of manhole failing in the immediate future. B-Coocl: Manhole in good condition. Spotty deterioration and/or corrosion. Deterioration of coating constitutes a· lack of bond between the coating and the concrete. C-F:iir: Manhole in fofr condition. Approximately 50% of coating has deteriorated so that it no longer protects concrete. Remaining 50% intact and not c;leterioratcd. D-Poor: Manhole in poor condition. At least 80%.of coating has deteriorated and ineffective. Cast-iron frames corroded. Extension concrete corroded. F-F:dl: Coatinc; has completely. failed and is no longer effective. Very extensive concrete co1T0sion. I. "IT'T-I.ocl<" dam:tgcd: The ' T-lock" vinyl plastic liner is damaged where it wraps around th~ end of the reinforced concrete pipe and is cmbed~ed in the wall. Should be r~paircd immediately. 2. Shelves in poor condition: 1l1c sl1elvcs are covered with a considerable amount of solids and products of corrosion. Concrete is soggy and corroded for several inches. 3. Ch:tnncl in poor condition: 111c channel 11as at least 70% of its area showing exposed aggregate and lu1s refuge clinging to its sides. 4. Soggy deposits: The walls and ceilings of the vaults 11ave at least 30% of the area covered with soggy deposits of decomposed concrete. S. Franic needs replacement: The casc.-iron frame is corroded considerably to the extent that the cover does·not seat properly and th.e strength of the frame is wcakepcd. ) ) ....... _ ___.... __ ---.....__.. ·-~~ ·-·-..,_......--... . ~ -.... ·~.,....____ lb"•--~--..... - 0 z E Cl> .µ H ct: ~ ORDINANCE NO. 504 (AMENDING ORDINANCE ·NO. 502.AS PREVIOUSLY AMENDED BY ORDINANCE NO. 503 RELATING TO CHARGES FOR CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES) .DRAFT 9-25-68 The Board of Directors o"f County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE I Ordinance No. 502 entitled iN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND • REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS~ AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 501", as amended by Ordinance No. 503, it is· hereby further amended as follows: • Article 4 -Connection Charges, shall be amended 'to read as follows: "ARTICLE 4 -CONNECTION CHARGES . . Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its ·agent the charges specified herein. (a) Connection Charge for New Construction, Single Dwellin~ Buildings. For each new single dwelling bu~lding constructed, the connection charge shall be $146.oo. On January 1, 1970 and. on.each succeeding January 1 the aforesaid connection charge shall be increased by adding.thereto the sum of $5.00.unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District saj_d increase is postponed to another time certain . . {b) Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple -Dwelling_ Buildings. For each new multiple dwelling building constructed, the. connection charge shall be $14·0. 00 for each dwelling unit or $7. 00 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, . . ·whichever sum is less. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid connection charge shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $5.00 and th~ unit charge for each plmnbing fixture shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $·. 25 unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the.Distrlct said inereane Agenda Item N. 55 T-1 District_,2_ is postponed to another time certain. (c) Connection Charges for.New Construction, Other Than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including· but not limited to commercial, industrial and public building construction, the connection charge shall be $7.00 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $70.00. ·on January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid unit charge for each plumbing fixture shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $.25, unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District said increase is postponed to another time certain. .. ,,. (d) Connection Charges for Replacement Bui.ldin~ For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be as calculated on the same basis as provided in Paragraphs (a)~ {b), and (c) hereinabove. If such reP.lacement construction 1s ... commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the .. . former building, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $140.00 per dwelling unit repla~ed or $7.00 per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid credit shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $5.00 per dl~elling unit or $.25 per plumbing fixture uni~ replaced, which~ver base is_ used for determining the credit., unless the increases as provided in Paragraphs . (a), (b), and (c) hereinabove have been postponed by resoluti~n, in· .. which event the increases in credit provided for herein shall likewise and accordingly be postponed. (e) Connection Char~s for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. In the case of structure~ where further new construction or .alteration is made to increase the occupancy thereof (including the finishing of commercial buil~ings into sub~lease o.ccupancies), the conncctlon charge shall be $7. 00 for each plumblng T-2-Distric~__2 -~ '-11 v '--1 fixture unit added. In the event that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture.units, a credit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. On January 1, 1970 and on each succeeding January 1, the aforesaid plwnbing fixture unit charge shall be increased by adding thereto the sum of $.25 unless by resolution of the Board of Directors of the District said increase is postponed to another time certain. If any addition or alteration to an existing building creates .r' a complete new dwelling unit this ·paragraph {e) does not apply and charges will be collected in accordance with Paragraph (c) "Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings." ,. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case ~f a building legally exempt from the re.qui.rement of obta.ining a building -permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer . connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of · and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connec~ion permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Sche~ule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building .Department of th~ City of Ne~po"rt Beach and will: be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections lio2 and l~03 of the Western Plumbing Officials Unit:orm Plumbing Code, 196l~ Edition, as adopted by ·the City of Newport Beach on March 21~, 1·965. ~ Agenda Item_!ig..!. 55-T-3-. Di~_trict 5 SHUIRMAN-SIMPSON consulting civil engineers URBANUS SQUARE MacARTHUR BLVD. AT FORD ROAD CORONA DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA 92625 (714) 644-0563 September 24, 1968 County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Attention: Fred A. Harper, General Man~ger In accordance with the procedure outl~ned in your letter dated 9/6/68, sealed bids were received and opened for the construc- tion of the Big Canyon Trunk Sewer at 10 A.M., September 17, 1968, in the Sherman Oaks office of the Donald L. Bren Company. Enclosed are copies of the 3 bids recei~ed, together with a bid summary. Since the work was advertised, the E~gineers ~ave deter- mined that the concrete encasement included in Items 15 and 16 would not be required and could therefore be deleted. Due to a misunder-· standing of an addendum, one bidder did not include a price for Item No. 7.· To make the bids comparable, this Item was deleted.from all proposals. · The total of the bids received, after deducting the above Items and deducting the amounts bid for the increased· construction time are as follows: Mark Dakovich ................• $16 3, frO 5. 0 0 M & M Pipeline Company ........ $186,160.50 Henson Construction Inc ....... $204,690.00 The lo~ bid was substantially .in excess of the preliminary budget amount of $130,000. In analyzing the bids it was evident that th~ all-weather access road would cost a~proximately $50,000. · Mr. Kaylor indicated that development of the Big Cari.yon .area, which . will probably occur within a few years, will provide permanent all~ weather access. It was therefore decided to delete the items pertain- ing to the access road, and negotiate a new proposal with Mark Dakovich, \._) the apparent low bidder. · Agenda Item No~ 56 U-1 ;, .. The negotiated bid of Mark Dakovich is $103,025.00. A copy of this bid is enclosed. This bid was reviewed, and since it appeared reasonable it has been approved. · . The total estimated cost of the project, including engineering, permits, etc. is now $117,745.00 well within the preliminary bu~get of $130,000.00. DCS:c Encl. Agenda Item No~ • U-2 SHUIRMAN~SIMPSON ~a~ Donald c. Simpson District .2_ · / S H U I R M A "~ ~· S l M P S 0 N consulting civil eng1neers URBANUS SQUARE MacARTHUR BLVD. AT FORD ROAD CORONA DEL MAR, CALIFORNIA 92625 (714) 644-0563 October 2, 1968 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentiemen: " . In accordance with the General Manager's request ·we hereby submit this proposal to furnish E~gineeri~g Services fo~·the repair of the Lido Pumpi~g Station. Scope of Services: The E~gineeri~g Services we propose to furnish are as follows: 1. Make a field inspection· of the pumping station and determine the type of work required. 2. Make necessary field surveys. 3. Prepare preliminary engineering studies and des~gn for review· and approval. 4. Prepare engineering data for regulatory permit applications that may be required by the State Division of H~ghways. 5. Prepare detailed contract drawing.S, specifications, contract documents and cost est~mates. 6. Assist District in securing bids, tabulation and analysis of bid results, and furnish recommendations on the award of the construction contracts. 7. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. 8. Prepare elementary sketches and ~upple mentary sketches required to resolve actual field conditions. . . . V-1 pistri.ct_2_ ,.. •' ,. '1 Fee: 9 •. Make periodic inspection of construction work in progress, and provide reports to the District. . . 10. Make a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the District. 11. Furnish "as built" drawings made from notes submitted by the Construction Inspector. Since the type of work contemplated is primarily in a maintenance classification, the extent of the Engineering Services required is somewhat uncertain. For this reason, it is.proposed that our fee be based on labor expended with a maximum fee of.·$2500 • . . ·The.labor rates that would apply are as follows: Principal $25.00 per hr Project E~gineers $15·. O.Q per hr Des~gn E~gineers and Draftsmen . $12.50 to $14.00 per hr Typist $ 6". 00 per hr In addition to the compensation for labor, cost of blueprinting over and beyond that needed for the preparati.on of the construction plans would be invoiced at our cost. · Progress Payments and Final Payment: Progress payments would be made monthly amounting to 90% of the labor co~ts expended, less all previous payments on account thereof. The total fee, less all previous payments on account thereof, would be due ahd payable upon completi9n and acceptance. of the proj_ect by the District. Completion Time: Final plans and specifications for the wor.k would be filed with the District within 90 days after receipt of authorization to proceed. . . Thank you for· the opportunity of submitting this proposa~. DCS:c V-2 District 5 D IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 September 18, 1968 Board of Directors Sanitation District No. 5 P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Re: Area Bounded by Ford Aeronutronic, Jamboree Boulevard, MacArthur Boulevard and East Bluff Drive Extension Gentlemen: 114 I 833-101 o 21·3 I 62a-4204 The purpose of this letter is to respectfully request Sanitation District No. 5 to provide sewer service to the subject area. The Irvine Industrial Complex is currently developing 40 acres of land as a first phase development within this area known as· Tract No. 6680. This area is zoned planned cominunity industrial in the City of Newport Beach and was annexed to District No. 5 in February, ·196 7. Previously, it was part of the Irvine Ranch Water District. At the time of annexation it was thought that the most logical manner to sewer this area was northerly and across MacArthur Boulevard to a pump station owned by the Irvine Ranch Water District and then through a force main in MacArthur Boulevard northerly into the Sanitation Dis- trict No. 7 system. There has been no agreement, however, between other districts ·to this effect. Grading for.the first phase ~area is underway and is expected to be completed in one month. At this time th~ installation of utilities and street improvements will commence. It is, therefore, imperative to define the means of sewage disposal for . this area. ·1f. the Irvine Indus trial Complex can be of service to you or your··staff . to help solve this ·problem, we will be at your disposal. Very truly yours, ··'Y? .. /J'f / {;~;;~::~i:~:;;~p.~.~~~7 Chief Engineer RWK:gw -W-Dtstrict 5 RESOLUTION NO. 68-87-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT . FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, A CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement, dated September 17, 1968, wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, a corporatio~, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes through portions of Blocks 8 and 9 of Irvine's Subdivision, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- rnent is granted is more particularly described as follows: An easement for sewer pipe line purposes through those portions of Blocks 8 and 9 of Irvine's Sub- division, in the County of Orange, State of California, per map of said Subdivision recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Record Maps, records of said County described in Parcels as follows: Parcel 1. The Northeasterly 1.00 foot of the Southeasterly 114.oo feet of Lot 119 of said Block 8 • . Parcel 2. The Northeasterly 1.00 foot of the Northwesterly 806.68 feet of Lot 120 of said Block Bo Parcel 3. The Southwesterly. 9.00 feet of the Southeasterly 114.oo feet of Lot 114 of said Block 9o Parcel 4. The Southwesterly 9.00 feet of the Northwesterly 806.68 feet of Lot 113 of said Block 9. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item No. 62 -~ District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 68-88-7 ESTABLISHING ANNEXATION POLICY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, ESTABLISHING FEES AND PROCEDURES CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, it is in the·· public interest to establish certain requirements for territory seeking annexation to this District;· and,· WHEREAS, Boyle Engineering, District's engineers, have previously submitted a written recommendation, dated July 25, 1968, reappraising he District's existing annexation-fee schedule and recommending that certain requirements be established as conditions to the annexation of territory to the District: NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the proponents of any application for annexation of any territory to the District shall, as a condition to securing approval of the Directors of the District to such annexation, comply· with the following: Requirements: 1. Payment of all costs incurred in processing the annexation. 2. Payment to the District of the sum of $250.00 per acre of territory so annexed. Beginning January 1, 1970, and annually thereafter, this fee is to be increased to reflect the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration Sewer Construction Cost Index for the Los Angeles Metropolitan Area, or .$10.00 per acre, whichever is greater, unless post- poned by resolution of the Board. 3. That annexed territory be subje~t to the terms and conditions of all ordinances pertaining to fees for connection to the District's facilities. 4. The annexed territory shall be ~nnexed into an appropriate sewering agency for the· purpose of Agenda Item No. 63 Y-1 maintaining and operating the local sewer system including pumping stations and force mains. 5. The local sewerage system serving the annexation area shall be installed and connected to the District's system without expense to the District. 6. The territory, upon annexation, shall be subject to all ad valorem taxes required for the retirement of the existing and future bonds of the District. Section 2. That the procedures for annexations of territory to the District shall be as set forth on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, and the District's staff is hereby directed to give to the proponents of any proposed annexation a copy of Schedule "A" outlining the p_rocedures to be followed; and, Section 3. That the staff be directed to transmit to the Local Agency Formation Commission a certified copy of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the provisions of this resolution shall . apply to any annexation of territory to· the District initiated on or after October 9, 1968; and, Section 5. That all.other resolutions or motions. thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repelled and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on October 9,. 1968. Agenda Item No. 6~ Y-2 District 7 SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 68-88-7 Procedure: 1. All requests for annexation MUST be in writing and directed to the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 7 of Orange County. 2. Such written request MUST contain the following: (a) The true and correct and complete legal description of the territory for which annexation is request~d. TAX BILL DESCRIPTIONS AND ASSESSMENT NUMBERS ARE NOT ADEQUATE. (b) The names, addresses amd telephone numbers of every owner within said territory and a designation of the portion or the interest owned by each person. (c) The assessed value of each separate parcel of land within the territory having a separate assessment, as shown on the last preceding equalized assessment roll of Orange County. • (d) The total number of voters, if any, residing in the territory proposed for annexation. · (e) Said written request must request the District to annex said territory. 3. Fees to be paid; when and how: (a) When written request is filed, it mu.st be accompanied . by a CASHIER'S CHECK payable to County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County in the sum of $325.00. Should these processing costs exceed the $325.00 fee, applicants will be requested to deposit the amount of such excess with the District. NO PART of this charge is refundable under any circumstances. (b) The formal petition for annexation is prepared by the District and mailed to applicant for signature with a letter of instructions and a statement of the additional fees. When the applicant signs and returns the formal petition for annexation, it must be accompanied by a CASHIER'S CHECK equal to a fee of $250.00 per acre for each acre to be annexed. This fee is refundable if the annexation fails. NOTE: All moneys paid to the District must be by cash, cashier's check, postal or bank money·order or certified check. NO PERSONAL CHECKS WILL BE ACCEPTEDo \.,,,I The above· fees are subject to cnange. The fee schedule in effect at the time of actual payment of any fee is the one applicable. 4. It is the policy of the District not to accept for annexation any irregularly shaped territory which consists of subdivisions or proposed subdivisions where isolated Y-3 District 7 par6els of property or lots are excluded from or are not included within the territory to be annexed. 5. It is essential ·to allow 60 days f·rom the time formal petition is signed and submitted to the District and . fees are paid. Positively no use of District sewer lines until after date of hearingo Agenda Item No. 63 Y-4 District 7 ..L----·----.... ---... . . . . :n /J V<tJJJif$ ENGINEERING 0 ENGINEERS o ARCHITECTS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 • TELEPHONE (714> 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P.O. BOX 178 October 3, 1968 Boord of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Post Office Box 8127 Fountain Valley, CA 92708 · Moster Plan •• At your meeting held on September 24, 1968, we were asked to submit a proposal for preparing a master pion of trunk sewer facilities sufficient to meet the needs of the District for ultimate development. We propose that the master plan study consist of an in-depth examination of a 30,375 acre areo encompassing the District as it presently exists and approximately 8,790 acres which lie adiocent to the northerly and easterly District boundaries in the Orange Park Acres and Peters Canyon areas. The entire study area will be analyzed to determine the projected generation of sewage flows, based upon the land use planning of the various political entities within the area. Where such planning is not available, sewage flows will be determined by postulating land uses similar to those of surround- ing areas. Where deemed appropriate, existing land uses will be up-graded· to reflect intensified land uses usually experienced in the rebuilding of older established areas. In col cu loting flows which will be generated by full implementation of the various land use plans, we propose to .use flow factors appropriate for the restrictive fond uses. ln··this regard it is proposed that District personnel assist us by measuring existing flows at strategic locations in order to confirm land use flow factors and check present flows in existing trunks. Existing foci lities wi 11 then be analyzed to determine their capability to handle the proiected flows. Where facilities are inadequate, various alternatives wi 11 be analyzed to determine the most economical method of providing the required capacities. Three alternative. plans for outfall trunk facilities will be presented in the report. O.ne plan will be based o~ facilities designed to meet the ultimate needs of the lands presently within District No. 7. A second plan will be based on construction of ioint out fol I facilities with Sanitation District No. 1 • The third plan will be based on construction of joint outfall facilities with Sanitation District No. 1 and will include capo~ity to serve the 8,790 acres which are presently outside the bound a ii es of District No. 7. '. PROFESSIONAL ENGINEERING AND ARCH.ITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda Item Nq_._~~ Z-1 District 7 ... Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County October 3, 1968 Page Two The report will establish the general location , size, and capacity of facilities required to convey the proiected ultimate flows. Cost estimates of all new facilities will be mode. In coses of ioint participation in a facility, costs will be prorated. on a capacity basis. In addition, con- struction phasing of new facilities wi 11 be proiected on a priority basis. These proiections wi II be based on a maximum use of the existing systems, with construction phasing corresponding to proiected need in any given area or section regardless of the relationship to the final completed works. It is proposed that the fee for the master pion report be on a per diem basis in accordance with our hourly rates currently on file with the District. This fee is not expected to exceed $11,000. Printing and binding of the completed report is proposed to be at the expense of the District. We wi 11 furnish all mops, charts, and report texts in a form suitable for reproducing for an outside printing· firm. The report wil I require five months to prepare; however, verbal progress reports wi 11 be given every month or at such times as the Boord directs. We will work closely with the District's staff to achieve a master pion which will serve the needs of the people in the community as economically as possible, c~nsistent with the District's policies and obiectives. · Respectfully submitted, /'/ .. A1/7/J. .... 4 ja CC.J~ t.t~vvY,":-f!,:1 .. 1., ·'--" /·,k ~ _· Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E/10951 pp BOYLE ENGINEERING Agenda Item No. 64 Z-2 District .2 / D IRVl.NE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX 2122 CAMPUS DRIVE • P. 0. BOX 4404 • IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 September 23, 1968 Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Sanitation District No. 7 P 0 Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Re: McGaw Avenue Lift Station Dear Mr. Harper: • 114 I slJ-1010 2u I 62e-4204 The Irvine Industrial Complex respectfully requests that District No. 7 proceed with the design of the subject master plan lift station. The ultimate capacity for this station is to be 3.0 MGD. However, since this capacity will not be required for some time, it is requested that the ultimate size structure and interim pumping facilities be designed, as was done for the Lane Road Lift Station. The Complex will bid the project, provide contract administration and pay for the cost of construction, if upon completion District No. 7 will operate and maintain the facility and reimburse to the Complex the cost of construction as per your standard reimbursement agreement •. Very. truly yo~rs / . li:r--l~=·-7"'r Ra1f"nond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer- RWK:gw Agenda Item flo. -65 -AA-Distr-ict 7 a--.. ' .· KEITH AND ASSOCIATES CONSUL TING CIVIL ENGINEERS tat EAST WASHINGTON AVENUE SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 C714J !541-5306 Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attn: Mr. Paul Brown Chief Engineer • Re: County Sanitation District No. 7, McGaw Avenue Sewage_ Lift Station Gentlemen: ·October 3, 1968 ,.,. In response to your verbal request, ·we are pleased to submit herewith our proposal for furnishing design engineer~ng servi.ces for the subject project. HYDRAULICS We propose to furnish the follow~ng: I. Design Plans and Specifications A. Preliminary Phase 1. Review requirements of the District, .together with available material and records assembled. 2. Prepare preliminary design, layout, sketches, outline ·specifications and submit same for joint review and conference with the maintenance forces of the District. 3. Prepare a preliminary cost estimate. B. Design Phase 1. Prepare final design contract drawings in ink on linen. 2. Prepare contract special provisions, bid proposals, and other documents to be included with the Dis- trict's standard general provisions and specifi- cations. 3. Prepare a final cost estimate. MUNICIPAL Sl!RVICF.:S SURVEYS Agenda It_~]_J!o-!. _§5 BB-1 District 7 . ' Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Pistricts C. Construction Phase 10-3-68 Page 2. 1. Assist the District in the securing and tabulation of bids, analyze bid results and furnish recommenda- tions on award. 2. General supervision and advice to the District during construction. 3. Prepare supplementary sketches on design, if required, to resolve field conditions encountered • .. 4. Check detailed construction drawings and shop and erection drawings for compliance with de~ign concept. ·· 5. Conduct final field tests and prepare final report on the completed project. II. Special Services It is anticipated that the project will require special supporting services. We will furnish or retain the services of qualified personnel or companies to furnish the following: 1. Soils investigation report, if necessary and approved by the District in writing. 2. Survey services for the necessary design surveys, and ·final construction staking. 3. Furnish full time daily inspection services if requested by the District in writing. 4. Prepare legal descriptions for the acquisition of rights of way if required. Fees for furnishing the above services are as follows, and are based on the fee curves, as listed in :Manual '•S of the American Society of Civil Engineers, April 1964: I. Design Plans and Specifications, a lump sum fee of $10,250.00. II. Special Services: 1. Soils Engineering, at invoice cost as submitted. BB-2 District 7 -- .. Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation ~istricts 10-3-68 2. Survey Services, at hourly rates as follows: a. Three-man survey party -$37.00 per hour. b. Two-man survey party -$30.00 per hour • ~age 3. • • 3. Daily Inspection services at the hourly rate of $8.00. 4. Prepare legal descriptions at the office hourly rate ~ of $11.00, with a maximum fee not to exceed $100.00 per parcel. Payment of fees.is requested as follows: .... I. Design Plans and Specifications: A. Preliminary Phase submitted to the District, 25%''of the fee. B. Design Phase, plans and specifications submitted, 75% of the fee. C. Construction contract awarded and construction started, 90% of the fee. D. Project completed and accepted for operation.and maintenance by the District, 100% of the fee •. II. Special Services: 1. ·.Soils ~ngineering within 30 days after submittal of soils report to this company with copies to the District. 2. Survey services at monthly invoice costs as submitted. 3. Daily inspection services at monthly invoice costs as submitted. 4.· Legal descriptions,within 30 days after submittal of the descriptions. If this meets with~your approval, we will agree to complete the work within the following time schedule: BB-3 District 7 --- & • ·~ "-1 ~ >..._,! Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation Districts 10-3-68 Preliminary Phase within 45 days. Design Phase within 60 days after approval of the preliminary plans. Respectfully submitted, KEITH AND ASSOCIATES Page 4•. 77Zdo ;/ ~&tft Milo K. Keit;:h MKK:m ·~ Agenda Item NQ.__§5_ BB-4 Distric~_'l. ,... I ·\ RESOLUTION NO. 68-89-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Annexation No. 17) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 6628 ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (ANNEXATION NO. 17)" The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: I Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission; anti, Section 2o That the designation assign~d by said Commission to the terr·itory proposed to be annexed is "Tentative Tract No. 6628 Annexation to Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 (Annexation No, 17)", the ext~rior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to p~ovide public sanitary sewer service to ~aid territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the· amount of $5,017.50 have ·been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and; Section.6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965)· of Title 6 of the Government Code Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referr.ed to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular·meeting on October g, 1968. Agenda Item·N2....:.._66 -CC-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 68-90-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Annexation No. 18) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT·NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "LUDLOW-ARMBRUST ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 -ANNEXATION NO. 18" The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission; and, Section 2. That the designat~on assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is Ludlow- Armbrust Annexation to.Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 - Annexation No. 18, the exterior bound~ries of which.are described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4o That the reason for annexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in .the amount of $610.09 have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and,· Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Gover~ment Cod~ Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on October 9, 1968. Agenda Item .No._61. -DD-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 68-91-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY-TO THE. DISTRICT (Annexation No. 19) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT "PROPOSED O'SULLIVAN ANNEXATION TO ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 - REVISED (ANNEXATION NO. 19)rr The Beard of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE~ DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of a petition filed with said Commission; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Proposed O'Sullivan Annexation to Orange County Sanitation District No. 7 - \...,) Revised (Annexation No. 19)", the exterior boundaries of which are described on Exhibit "A" and shown on Exhibit "B" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for ~nnexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $915.00 have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and, Section 6. That, as authori_zed by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described ·hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. PASSED AND ADOPTED at a regular meeting on October 9, 1968. Agenda Item No. 68 -EE-District 7 II - MANAGER'S AG END A REPORT Co unty San itation Districts of O range Co unty, Californ ia DISTRICT N o. S eptember 24 , 196 8 -4:30 p .m. Dis trict 1 P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ell is Avenu e Fountain Valley, CaliF., 92708 ::r:::=::::;_ Phone 962-241 1 No . 5 -CONSID ERATION OF ACTI ON RELATIVE TO AWARD OF JOB NO. P2 -8-3 (E NC LOS URES , PHASE II , AND OPER~TORS ' BUILDING ) At the Sep tember J o int Board meeting , the Boards authori zed the emp l o y ment of an archi tectural consultant to revi ew this pro j ect and the bid s received. District No . 1 was authorized , at its discretion, to award the contract and approve any recommended change ord ers for the job upon receipt of the written recommendation of the architectural consultant and c oncurrence of the engineers and General Manage r . At the suggesti on o f Director Workman , I contacted a we ll-known , industrial-bui l ding con tracto r in the Los Angeles Area regarding this pro j ect . Following a brief re view of the plans and the bids received, he stated that , in his opinion , ·· the bi ds were too high fo r the project and that some of the drawings could be s i mplifi ed . He advised that the architectural firm of Blurock and Associates , of Corona d·e l Ma r, is well qualified i n this fie l d , and he volunteered to give them his comments and suggest i ons . I the n contacted Mr . William Blurock , o f Blurock and Associates , and at the present time that firm is reviewing the dr ~wings and the bids and it is anticipated that a d e finit e re comm endation will b e for thcoming . ~ · In addition to the above -mentioned activity conce r ning thif matter , Director Shull volunteered to seek a review of the pl ans and the bids received , by an engineering department of one of the aerospace industries located here in Orange County . At pre'sent , no word has been re ceived on this review . Th e District No . 1 Board will meet just prior to the meet ing of the Ex ecut ive and Building Committ ees , and could possibly recess to seek ad di tional direction from the Building Commi ttee before making its decision relative to this p r oject .