The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1968-05II County San itatio n Distr icts of O range Coun fy , Californi a May 8th, 1968 -7 :30 p .m. Pledge of Allegiance Roll Call ALL DISTRICTS P. 0. Box 5175 IOM4 Ellis Avenue Fountain V11lley, Calif., 92708 AGENDA Consideration of motion re : Receive and file minute excerpts from meetings of the various cities regarding appointments of Directors and Alternates to the Districts ' Boards . See l isting on page "F" (Jr} ALL DISTRICTS Introduc tion of Directors, and formal seating of new members j$) DISTRICT 1 yv.<"(1>. ;._tJ Annual election of Chairman of the Board ~ DISTRICT 2 ~1'__u. Annual e l ecttfon of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 3 ~ Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 5 ~~~ Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 6 . f ~ Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 7 ~ Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRIC.T 11 )ttbtA ,,,~ Annual electio~v ~ Chairman of the Board ~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ Annual electiotl of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization (1~V ALL DISTRIC'l1S f~ ~' Annual election of Vice Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization (l ~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ / Appointme nts of Chairme n pro tem , if n ecessary ,)15 ) DISTRICT 1 Consid ~ration of mo tion approving minutes of the r egular meetin g h e ld April 10 , 1968, as mailed DISTRICT 2 Considerati on of motion a.pproving minutes of the regular meeting h e ld April 10, 1968 , as mailed (17 ) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion app r oving.minutes of the regular meeting held Ap ri l 10 , 1968 , as mai l e d ( 1 ~D ISTR I CT 5 . ~' C::mside1·ati o n o f motio n approving minutes o f the regu l a r · mee tin g h e l d April 10, 1968 , and t he adjourned regula r mee tin g t hereof held April 1 2 , 1968 , as mailed ~~ISTRI CT 6 Consideration of motion app r oving minu tes of the regula r meeting he l d Apri l 1 0 , 1 968 , as mai l e d ~ DISTR I CT 7 Consideratio n of motion app r :.)Vin g minutes o f the· regular meetin g held April 10 , 1968 , as mailed f 0~I STR ICT 11 ~1 ~C onsideratio n o f motion approvin g mi nu t es o f t h e r egular . meeting h e l d Ap r i l 10 , 1968 , as mai l e d ALL DISTRICT S Report o f the Joint Chairman ALL DI STR I CTS Repo r t o f the Genera l Ma n age r AL L DISTRI CTS Report o f the Ge n eral Counsel , and consideration o f Resoluti o n No . 68 -32 , opposing Senat e Bill 715 . See pag e "S" ~ ALL DISTRICT S -(29 )" .. // ·/0 ) (31 ) Review by t h e eng i neers , of Master Pl a n Report (take n un d er s ubmi ssion fo r study b y t h e Boards o n Apr il 1 0 t h) . ALL DI STRICT S Considerat i on of Resolution No . 68-4 0, fixin g time and plac e for public h e ar i n g on Master Plan Report . See page 11 G" ALL DISTRI CTS Consideration of motion ·to r eceive a n d f ile cert ific a t i o n of t h e Genera l Ma n a g er that h e has c h ecked a ll bil l s app earin g on t h e agenda, f ound them in order , and that he recommends authorization for payme n t ALL DI STR I CTS Co n sideratio n of r oll c all vot e moti on approving J o in t Ope r atin g Fun d and Capital Out l ay Revo l ving Fun d wa rra n t b ooks f o r signatur e of the Cha i r ma n o f District N ~. 1 a n d auth o rizing payment of claims listed o n pages 11 A11 11 B11 and 11 C11 ----' ALL DI STR I CTS ' Oth er business and communications , if a n y (Letter fr om Reg i o n a l DI STRICT 1 Considerati o n page 11 D11 DISTRIC T 1 Water Qu a l i ty Co n t ro l Board , in fo l de rs ) of motion approving warrants , if any . See Other business and communications , if a n y -2 - (32) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:00 p.m., May 23rd (33) DISrrRICT 2 (34) Consideration of motion to receive and file the following Notices to Withhold against Far Weste~n Pi~eline, Contractor on Contract No. 2-10-7 (Euclid 'rrunk Sewer) Pacific Clay Products Malcolm Boring Co., Inc. R. J. Noble Company DISTRICT 2 $108,197.48 1,984.oo 13,567~27 Consideration of motion appr~ving warrants, if any. page "D" See (35) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (36) DISTRICT 2 (37) (38) (39) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion· ratifying issuance of a Purchase Order to Robert E. Lenihan mud-jacking company, in the amount of $2,386.22, for emergency grouting at Westside Force Main in April, 1968. · DISTRICT 3 Report of the General Counsel, and consideration of action on the General Counsel's written memorandum relative to an inauiry from the Cypress County Water District. See pag~s it H" and 11 I" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-33-3, approving a~d authorizing execution of an agreement with Inter Finance Corporation, prepared by the General Counsel, relative to the placin~ of a structure over the District's easement. See page 11 J (40) DISTRICT 3 (41) (42) (43) (44) (45) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to adjourp DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants; if any. See page 11 E" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-14R-2 · (Manhole Replacement and Re~air Program, Phase II), authorizing a deduction of $300 from the contract with Power Construction Company, Contractor. See page . "K" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order No. 3 to Contract No. 5-14R-2, g~anting an extension of time of four calendar days to Power Construction Co~pany, Con- tractor. See page "L" -3- (46 ) DIS TR ICT 5 Consid erat i on of Resoluti on No . 68 -34 -5, accepting Contract No . 5 -14R -2 as complete , a n d a u t h orizin g execu t i on of a Notice o f Completion o f Wo rk . S ee p age 11 M11 (47 ) DISTRICT 5 Con sideration of mot ion app r oving warrants , if any . See page 11 D11 (48 ) DISTR ICT 5 Oth er bu s iness and communic a tion s , if any (49 ) DIS TRICT 5 Cons ideration of motion to adjourn (50) DISTR ICT 6 Con sideration of mot i on approvin g warrants , if any . See page 11 E11 (51 ) DIS TR I CT 6 Other busin ess and communica tions , if any (52) DISTRICT 6 (53 ) (54 ) (55 ) Con sideratia1 o f mot ion to adj ourn DISTRICT 11 Con sideration of Re so lu tion No . 68 -35 -11 , to re ceive and file bid tabulation and recommendation , and awarding con tract for Manho l e Rec o nstruction , Phas e I , Contract No . 11 -llR-l , to Cook and Bar letta , Inc ., in t he amount of $5,250 .00 . See pag e 11 N11 · (S ee page 11 0 11 for ~~i11D£~~;_ll et ter dated 5 -2 -6 8 and b i d tabulation ) . DIST Ric1T ~i ~ Con sideration of Reso lu tion No . 68 -36 -7 , res c inding Re solu tion No . 66 -63 -7 as re commended by the General Coun sel , (said res o l ution authorized an agreement with a property ow ner in Assessment District No . 5 -A). See page "p" DISTR ICT 7 (A ssessment Dis t rict No . 7 --Pr oceed in gs can be re ferred to the special counsel and En g ineer of Work , if desired ) ( 56 ) (57 ) (58 ) ( 59 ) (60 ) (6 1) Con side rati on o f Agreement Employin g En gineer o f Work for As sessment District No . 7 (Impr ove ment Act of 1911 ) Secretary r eports t i me and place for hearin g o f prote s ts r e : Resolution o f Intenti o n for Assess - ment District No . 7 ; and rep o rts upon receipt of Affidavit s of Publicati o n and Affidavits of Posting and Mai l in g Ch airman calls for any wri t ten protests f iled with the Secretary Secretary rep o rt s on wr itte n protests filed befo r e 7 :30 p .m. ChaiPman a s ks aurli e nc e i f a ny o ne wishes to b e h eard , i .e ., pub l ic h earinG Con s jd e r at1on o f motio n to refer writte n protests l o the Enein ee r o f Wo rk f o r checkinr anrl r eport -·~ (66) (67) (68) (69) (70) (62) Recess or adjournment until ·engineers can report on protests (63) Report of Engineer of Work on percentage of protests (64) Consideration of action on protests (65) Consideration of adoption of Resolution Ordering Work in Assessment District No. 7 (Resolution No. 68-37-7) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-38-7, authorizing acceptance of an easement from Harry W. Miles and Julie V. Miles, at no cost to the District. See page "Q" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-39-7, authorizing acceptance of an easement from Irvine Industrial ~omplex, at no cost to the District, relative to the Aston Street Deere Avenue sewer construction. See page "R" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:00 p.m., May 23rd -5- 9961 '8 Z:aw . SiliNmMnOOa DNI~HOdclilS aNV SNOI~fi~OS~H -t . ·------., WARRANT NO. 9221 \.,.,19222 9223 9224 9225 9226 9227 9228 9229 9230 9231 9232 9233 9234 9235 9236 9237 9238 9239 9240 9241 9242 9243 9244 9245 9246 9247 '.,Jg248 9249 9250 9251 9252 9253 9254 9255 9256 9257 9258 9259 9260 9261 9262 9263 9264 9265 9266 9267 9268 9269 9270 9271 9272 ~9273 9274 9275 9276 9277 9278 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Bearing & Abrasives, Bearings $ Advance Electric, Motor Repairs City of Anaheim, Power Acromag, Inc., Controls Acore Drilling, Cored Drilling All Bearing Service, Bearings The Anchor Packing, Pump Packing Bank of America, Coup. Coll. Expense Barksdale Valves, Valve Controls Barnes Delaney, Tires Bay City Bearing, Coupling Benz Engineering, Compressor Parts Blower Paper, Hardware & Janitor Supplies Bomar Magneto, Magneto Repairs Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Electric Supplies Leonard Carney, CWPCA Conference Certified Building Materials, Cement Clark Dye, Small Hardware College Lumber Co., Small Tools, Lumber Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts Costa Mesa· county Water Dist. Crown Fence & Supply Co., Repair Fences W/S FM De Guelle & Sons Glass, Truck Repairs Diesel Control Corp., Filters Dodge Trucks, Inc., Truck Parts Dunton Ford, Truck Parts Electrophysics Corp., Ocean Instrument Repair Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Enterprise Printing, Forms Fischer & Porter, Instrumentation Flair Drafting, Drafting ·Services Edward R. Francis, CWPCA Conference AAA Fremont Bag & Salvage, Burlap Bags Freeway Machine & Welding, Equipment Repair City of Fullerton, Water Gails Speedometer Service, Small Hardware & Parts Robert N. Galloway, CWPCA Conference General Electric Supply, Electric Supplies General Telephone Geotronics, Aerial Photo Study for New Outfall Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physicals Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Exp. & CWPCA Conf o Glenn Harris, CWPCA Conference Hertz Equipment, Equipment Rental James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Honeywell, Inc. Instrument & Telemetering Repairs Howard Supply Co., Small Tools Hundley Co., Electric Supplies City of Huntington Beach, Water International Harvester, Truck Parts J & M Service, Carburetor Jones Chemicals, Chlorine KAR Products, Electric Supplies· Keenan Pipe & Supply, Piping Kirst Pump & Hardware, Pump Parts Klassens Welding-Works, Machine Shop Work -A- AMOUNT 101.78 48.oo 96.81 304.35 6a.96 140.87 174.oo 31.82 518.53 41.57 . 8.51 61.04 135.56 124.53 4.73 231.57 76.33 29.40 2.35 101.09 445.41 4.40 1,515.00 15.41 154.64 61.44 94.37 51.19 3,397.50 280.08 1,849.67 532.70 60.85 84.oo 55.00 10.32 11.81 59.38 431.80 1,076.90 246. 75 48.66 46.oo 227.69 103.19 88065 10.00 1,197.74 1, 381.72 277.26 9.60 47.51 20;08 20,378.40 155.81 83.65 153.56 2l~. 50 .-.~ WARRANT NO. 9279 9280 9281 9282 9283 ~9284 9285 9286 9287 9288 9289 9290 9291 9292 9293 9294 9295 9296 9297 9298 9299 9300 9301 9302 9303 9304 9305 9306 9307 9308 '._,19309 9310 9311 9312 9313 9314 9315 9316 9317 9318 9319 9320 9321 9322 9323 9324 9325 9326 9327 9328 9329 . 9330 9331 . 9332 : : 9333 "'-"9334 . 9335 9336 9337 9338 9339 IN FAVOR OF Kleen-Line Corp •. , Cleaning & Mtce. Supplies $ Knippers Rentals, Scaffold Rental Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Rental LBWS, Inc., Small Tools, Welding Supplies. Lawless GM Diesel, Wheel Loader Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Robert E. IJenihan, Mud Jacking W/S FM Lewis Bro. Battery, Truck Batteries Litton Business Equipment, Office Supplies Lord-Babcock Inc., Plumbing Supplies Lithographic Arts, Printing Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Main Photo Service, Photo Supplies Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies McCoy Motor Co., Wheel Loader Parts Bill McDaniel Equip~ Backhoe Rental W/S FM V. W. Moulton & Son~ Pipe Paul-Munroe Co., Cylinder Munselle Supply Co., Welding Supplies Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Engine Parts Co Arthur Nisson , General Counsel Retainer Fee Noland Paper Co., Office s~;~lies· o. C. Suppliers, .Piping Supplies Orange County Blueprint, Drafting Supplies Orange County Lumber Co., Lumber Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber-Stamp Orange County Radiotelephone P-W Industries, Inc., Electric Supplies Pacific Telephone Postmaster, Postage Douglas E. Preble, Employee Mileage ( 3 Mos.) Rainbow Disposal Co., Trash Pickup & Disposal Red' s Frame, Wheel & Brake Serv., 'l'ruck Repairs The Register, Employment Ad Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Small Hardware Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts F. B. Roberts Industrial Supply, Bearings, Coupo Saddleback Travel & Tours, Various Mtg. & Conf. Exp. Santa Ana Blue Print, Drafting Supplies Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Motor Repair Sequoia Forest Products Co., Sawdust The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage, CWPCA Conf. Southern Calif. Edison Co. Southern Calif. Water Southern Counties Gas Co. Southwest Flexible Co., Line Clean Tools Sparkletts, Bottled Water Standard Oil Co., Diesel Fuel Gary G. Streed, Employee Mileage Sully-Miller, Paving W/S FM J. Wayne Sylvester, CWPCA Conference T & H Equipment, Tractor Repairs c. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil F. ·Ho Toppin Co., Vacuum Repair N. R. Tremblay, CWPCA Conference Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel Truck & Auto Supply Inc., Engine Parts Harold A. Dakan & Tustin Plumbing, Lateral Repair -B- AMOUNT 78.10 23.00 91.12 688.40 460.37 55.13 17.40 2,386.22 35.60 ·: 98.93 12.23 34.18 442.45 67.05 499.46 122.80 166.75 1,942.71 69.68 180.35 256 .60 700.00 116.34 77.23 16.01 13.38 9.65 425. 70 153.80 295.35 100.00 48.30 75.00 14.40 74.oo 34.45 273.05 247.85 163.84 84.05 286.93 84.11 388096 91.98 75.45 ll,161.38 .3.90 885.43 89.50 . 107 .31 434.20 16.00 616.00 54.84 201.98 225.37 18.61 103.72 339 .47 30.72 245.00 WARRANT NO. 9340 9341 9342 9343 9344 '....,,J 9345 9346 9347 9348 9349 9350 9351 9352 9353 9354 IN FAVOR OF Twining Laboratories, Testing P2-ll Union Oil Co., Gasoline United Cartage Co., Freight United Technology Center, Techite Pipe W/S FM Utilities Supply co., Equipment Parts Wall Colmonoy Corp., Centrifuge Parts John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Gas System Parts Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts Mike Wilson, Employee Mileage Worthington Corp., Freight Everett H. York, Filters Xerox Corp., Reproduction Expense TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John Carollo Engineers J. Putnam Henck ·.,:: \ .. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- AMOUNT $ 40.00 663.68 3.90 1, 893 .15 17.33 636 .56 219.50 290.68 396.54 ·: 22.70 43.18 90.72 367,50 $ 67,785.67 $ 32,522.28 321,362,74 .$ 353,885.02 $ 421,670.69 \.,,,,/ ~ '..._/ WARRANT NO. 8288 8289 8291 8308 8292 8293 8294 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering· DISTRICT NO~ - ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle Engineering J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry Vido Samarzich Company Far Western Pipeline, Inc. DISTRICT·NO. ~ - ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Power Construction Co. Shuirman-Simpson -D- $ AMOUNT 625.50 $ 625.50 $ $ -- $ $ $ 4,383.44 3,336.75 47,117.08 31,242.60 86,079.87 35.8.75 358.75 6,023.70 81.93 $ 6,105.63 DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 8307 Power Construction Company $ 22210.00 $ 2,210.00 \._/ DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8296 Boyle Engineering $ 876.50 8297 Boyle and Lowry 2,248.oo 8295 The Tustin News 238.04 $ 3,362.54 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS .,, : ' . IN FAVOR OF 8306 Boyle & Lowry $ 612.50 $ 612.50 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8301 Boyle Engineering $ 54.oo 8299 Boyle and Lowry 2,001.50 8300 Zarubica Company 102,034.50 $ 104,090.00 $ 108,065.04 DISTRICT # 11 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8302 Huntington Beach·News 31.20 8305 Lowry .and Associates 1,688.09 $ 1,719.29 I,_/ -E- ~. CITY Anaheim Brea Buena Park Cypress MAYOR Calvin Pebley William Hamilton Jesse M. Davis Richard Bowen ALTERNATE DISTRICT(S) A. J. Schutte 2,3 Thomas o. Speer 2,3 Harold R. Bousman 3 Robert Harvey 3 \._,,) Fountain Valley Robert Schwerdtfeger Donald Fregeau 2,3 2,3;. Fullerton Louis R. Reinhardt Jerry F. Christie Huntington Beach Alvin M. Coen Alvin M. Coen (Council Member)' Ted Bartlett Laguna Beach Glenn E. Vedder La Habra Dean E. Shull La Palma Jake J. Westra Los Alamitos Dale Kroesen Newport Beach Doreen M~rshall (Council Member) Don Mcinnis (Council Member) Howard Rogers (Council Member) Lindsley Parsons Orange Don E. Smith Placentia Jack Gomez Santa Ana Tom McMichael ·George·McCracken Jerry A. M~tney None Joseph O'Sullivan Leonard Crapo Paul C. Furman Eme Otte Howard Rogers Doreen Marshall Doreen Marshall None Jack C. Hileman (None appointed) Wade Herrin $eal Beach Stanton Stanley G. Anderson ·Martha Weishaupt Harry L. Miller Clifton C. Miller Tustin A. J. Coco Villa Park James T. Workman Yorba Linda David Cro'mwell SANITARY DISTRICT Costa Mesa Sanitary District Garden Grove Sanitary District Midway City Sanitary District South Laguna Sanitary District Dennis ·F. Queyrel (None appointed) MEMBER Ellis N. Porter Norman E. Culver Lowell Amo Clay N. Mitchell 3 11 11 8 2,3 3 3 5 6 7 5 2,7 2 1,2,3,7 3 3 1,7 2 2 DISTRICT 1,6,7 2,3 3 8 COUNTY AREAS MEMBER ALTERNATE DISTRICT Chairman of Board of Supervisors Agenda Item f/3 C. M. Featherly David Baker All -F-All Dlstrtcts -.~ RESOLUTION NO. 68-40 FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ENGINEER 1 S REPORT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOSo 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO ·RECEIVE AND FILE ENGINEER'S REPORT DATED 1968, SUBMITTED BY JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS; AND FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID REPORT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the report of John Carollo Engineers, dated 1968 and ordered by Resolution Noo 66-153 was presented and con- sidered by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: Section lo That the Engineer's Report for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, dated 1968, pr~pared and submitted by John Carollo Engineers, and entitled "Master Plan Report ·on Wastewater Treatment Facilities", is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That these 11:5oards find and they do hereby find that said report.complies with the provisions of the County Sanitation District Act {Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the State Health and Safety Code) and that it is satisfactory to these Boards; and, Section 3. That these Boards fix and they do hereby fix .• the 12th day of June, 1968, at the hour of 7:30 p.m., at the regular meeting place.of said Boards as the time and place for hearing objections to said report and to doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report. Section 4. That the Secretary of the Boards is hereby ordered to publish notice of said hearing in THE REGISTER, Santa Ana, for the time and in the manner provid~d by law. Agenda Item #26 -G-All Districts -.~ ... ·.*'_,,_. JACJC J. lUMEL JOUN A. llAl~V~Y. D:I DU l·'):OJ::JlN JI. H EJ.sn:o JUCJJAHD N. JUMEL Ol~OltOJ.:: G. LOG.o\.N UICJIAJUJ A. llATTBAY LAW OJ'lfJCHS OF HIMEL, lIAHYEY & HELSING l 1 0lJ10'll l'LOOR Jo10 ~on1·u )!AI:-J s·riot'ET S.AN'fA A.~A, CALU'OH~JA 92701 ·. April 3, 1968 Honorable Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 3 10844 Ellis Avenue . Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: Ci47-7ao:s 1-JAUJSON G-7:)79 FILED In the Office of the Secretary · County Sa~ftatlon District No-. 2 · /J .. /~~ './. :1A . f' APR 1 o 1968 ~ J:.;~02·"' I n ll ,J j_,.o;> 1 /'-" ~~ '-'~"". , .... -....;... Dy_,"-,-= , ,, ... As attorneys for the Cypress County vVater District, this firm has been instructed to dir·ect this letter to you concerning representation by that agency on your Board of Directors. As you are aware,, the Cypress County ·Water District is .a member unit of your agency and is engaged~ .. ::\:clusi vely in the collection and transmission of sewage effluent. : 'Ve are informed that the membership of your Board is determined under the.provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 whereby Cities, the Board of Supervisors., and Sanitary Districts in exiqtence as of the effective date of the forn1ation of your agency are repre- sented. · rrhis letter is written to request, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Cypress County \Vater District,, that your body take the steps required by Health and Safety Code Section 47 30. 2 so .as to allow representation on your board by all member unit public agencies of Sanitation District No. 3. We will appreciate your considered study of this proposal and urge your affir1nati ve reaction to it. · RIMEL, HAR.VEY & HELSING Attorneys for Cypr~ss County V:later District By cf;~J ~e'/)geG~.~L-o_g_a_n--~------ mh cc: Mr. Arthur C. Nisson . Cypress County \Vater District Agenda Item f138 ______ ,_,,_ -H.;;. D'ist-;rict 3 ~· April 29, 1968 MEMORANDUM To: Board of -Directors County sanitation District No. 3 Re: Request by Cypress County Water District that CSD No. 3 reorganize under the provisionsof Health and Safety Code Section 4730.·1. Request has been made by the Cypress County Water District to change the make-up of the Board of Directors of County Sani- tation District No. 3. The changes requested are described and authorized under Health and safety Code Sections 4730.l and 4730.2. If such changes were made, ·the Board of Directors of county Sanitation District No. 3 would consist of the presiding officer of each city and public agency ·and the Chairman of the Board of supervisors within the territorial limits of the district. "Public .agency 11 as used herein means sanitary district, public utility district, resort district·, county water district, mun- icipal water district, sewer maintenance district, or county. maintenance district engaged in the collection, treatment, or disposal of sewage, or· any other public agency empowered to and engaged in the collection, treatment and disposal of sewage. If such representatives totaled an even number, director would be chosen by the Board of supervisors county, so that the total number of directors.of the would at all times be an odd number. . .,.\;•'!. an additional of the district It appears that if reorganized as requested, the Board of Directors of county sanitation District No. 3 would total 23 members by adding to the 16 existing directors the presiding officers or alternates from the following cities and public entities: Cities of Garden Grove and Westminster, Cypress County Water .. Dis"t;rict, Los.Alamitos County Water District, -Stanton County water District, Municipal Water District No. 1, and one additional member from the Board of Supervisors of the County of orange. At the discretion of the Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 3, it may adopt a resolution stating ~its intention to reorganize under the provisionsof Health and Safety code Section 4730.l and set a public hearing to hear objections to such proposal. After the public hearing, the Board of Directors may ·order the reorganization. All actions in connection with the request of the Cypress County water District are purely discretionary with the exist- ing Board of Directors of sanitation District No. 3. Agenda Item #38 I-1 District 3 '-11 ......, ~ By way of information which I shall report to a11· the districts at the next meeting, there is now pending before the Legislature Senate Bill No. 715 which s~eks to make mandatory the reorganization of each Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts so th~t the Board would then be consti- tuted as is now provided. on an optional basis by Health and Safety Code Section 4730.1. The effect of this bill would be ·to make it mandatory for each County Sanitation District to reorganize instead of optional as under Health and Safety Code Sections 4730.l and 4730.2. can pw: Agenda Item #38 Respectfully submitted /.}~), L 4.'£a··~~ h,,?'~~., c. Arthur Nisson General Counsel ··~ "~~. - :t-2 District 3 RESOLUTION NO. 68~33-3 . APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH INTER FINANCE CORPORATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY ·SANITATION DISTRICT _NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH INTER-FINANCE CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation· District of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement, dated April 10, 1968, wherein COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 grants to INTER FINANCE CORPORATION, a California corporation, permission to erect a structure over the District's easement is hereby approved; and, ··Section 2. That the easement referred· to hereinabove'. is more particularly described as follows: An easement and right of way for sewer purposes, over, under, along, across and through a strip of land of the uniform width of 50 feet, adjacent to and parallel with the center line of Orangethorpe Avenue, said easement being a portion of that cer- tain parcel of land, shown on a map of tract 2151, recorded in book 59, at page 5, of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, and labeled thereon 11 not a part of this subdivision", more· particularly described as follows: The southerly 50 feet of the easterly 907.55 feet of the southeast quarter of Section 31, Town- ship 3s, Range 10 west, S.B.B." & M., subjec_t to covenants, conditions, restrictions, reservations, rights, rights of way, and other matters of record, if any. Section 3. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, as prepared by the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That this resolution shall be retroactive to April 10, 1968. Agenda Item #39 -J-District 3 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ______ 2 __ ~--- CONTRACTOR:~__.P~o~~~~e~r.;__C~o~n_s~t~r_u~c~t~i~o_n...__C_om_....._pa~n~y~----~~ DATE: May 8, l968 \.,,.,I JOB: Manhole Replacement and Repair Program, Phase II, Contract No. 5-14R-2 Amount of this change order {KEE) (DEDUCT) $ 300.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated May 2, 1968 Manhole Structure No. 85 Modified to eliminate the drop structure. This was necessary because of the higher shelves .installed in the new manhole bases. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change DEDUCT Amended Contract Price ~ Board authorization date: Approved: Deduct $ 300.00 $ 27,945.00 720.00 300.00 $ 28,365.00 May 8, 1968 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Agenda Item #_41J,. -K-District 5 '.,,.I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: Power Construction Co. ------------------- C .O. NO. 3 DATE: May 8, 1968 JOB: Manhole Replacement and Repair Program, Phase II, Contract No. 5-14R~~ Amount of this change order (XEE) {EEEME~~ $ none ------ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF TIME REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated May 2, 1968 ACTS OF OTHER AGENCIES Request of City of Newport Beach that ·contractor not work during week of April 6 through 14 (Easter Week) No additional compensation is allowed for this extension of time. * * * * * * * * * * * * * 4 With this extension of 4 days, the contract was completed within the allotted time. Therefore, no liquidated damages need be assessed. Original completion date: Completion date with this extension of time (4 calendar days)~~ Actual completion date: Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD DEDUCT This change Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: Approved: April 26, 1968 April 30, 1968 April 30, 1968. $ 27,945.00 720.00 300.00 none $ 28,365.00 ~ May 8, 1968 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY Agenda Item #45 -L-District 5 RESOLUTION NO. 68-34-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPrING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, OOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2, on the 30th day of April, 1968; Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the District has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of. the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommen- dation is hereby received and ordered filed; and; Section 4. That the MANHOLE REPLt\eEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, ·PHASE II, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th day of December, 1967; and Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #46 -M-District 5 RESOLUTION NO. 68-35-11 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-llR-l A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION, PHASE I, CONTRACT NO. 11-llR-l The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry and Associates, District's engineer, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to COOK AND BARLETTA, INC., Contractor, for MANHOLE RECONS~RUCTION, PHASE I, CONTRACT NO. 11-llR~l, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 11-llR-l be awarded to COOK AND BARLETTA, INC., Contractor, in the total amount of $5,250.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pusuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section. ... 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected. Agenda Item #53 -N-District 11 81C>NEV L. L.OW"Y ~RltDIOENT LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES CIVIL ENGINEERS . 121 EAST WASHINGTON AVE:NUE: AB SOCIA.TC• SANTA ANA, CAl-IF.ORNIA • 9::t70t MILO K. KCITH Telephono 541·5301 Ar•• CO<M 714 May 2, 1968 Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 11 10844 Ellis Avenue . Fountain Valley, California HARA'/ 'c. DILUNOO Re: Bids for Manhole Reconstruction, County Sanitation District No. 11, Contract 11-llR-l Dear Mr. Harper: w·e have discussed this contract with the low bidder. He has given us a breakdown of his· costs and find them to be in order for a small job of this type. It appears that our estimate based on letters sub- mitted and meetings with contractors was extremely low. In addition, this type of s~all job, together with ~raffic control· by the State, resulted in additional costs. . Cook and Barletta have informed me that they are aware of this being an experimental job, to acquire annual 9ost i~f ormation for a manhole replacement program, and they are willing to furnish me with a final breakdown of their . costs at the ·completion of the contract, in order for us to h~ve fairly accurate annual cost information. Based on the above infornation, I recommend the contract be awarded to Cook and Barletta, 542 E. Central Park Avenue, Anaheim, California, for the unit prices bid, totaling $5250.00. Very.truly yours, Lowry and Associates · m~Kf!~ Milo K. Keith .MKK:m ----------~~-----------------------------~------------------- May 1,. 1968 BID TABU~ATION Contract for: MANHOLE RECONSTRUCTION, PHASE I CONTRACT NO. 11-llR-l 1. M. E. Fridrich Co. 5221 Kenwood Ave. Buena Park, Calif. 90620 2. Cook and Barletta, Inc. 542 E. Central Park Ave. Anaheim, California Agenda Item #53 -o- Eng. Estimate: $6,050 $ 9,750.00 $ 5,250.00 District 11 ·.~·. RESOLUTION NO. 68-36-7 RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 66-63-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 66-63-7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Resolution No. 66-63-7, adopted by the Board of Directors on May 11, 1966, providing for payment to John J. Hill in the amount of $200 for removal of trees in Parcel No. 7-5-lOE, Assessment District No. 5-A, is hereby rescinded and made of ho further effect. Agenda Item #54 -P~ District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 68-38-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM HARRY W. MILES AND JULIE·v. MILES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District Noo 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section lo That the certain Grant of Easement, dated April 11, 1968, wherein Harry W. Miles and Julie V. Miles grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection wi.th Lot 27 of El Modena Citrus Lands, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described as follows: Commencing at a point on the southeasterly line of Lot 1 in Tract 732, as per map recorded in Book 31, pages 37 and 38 of said Miscellaneous Maps, South 35° 11 1 00 11 West 332.39 feet from the most easterly corner of ·said Lot l; thence South 77° 50 1 00" East 48.05 feet; thence North 8° 23 1 50" East 98.13 feet to said southeasterly line of Lot l; thence South 35° 11' OO" West along said southeasterly line 106.39 feet to the point of commencement. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; ~nd, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #66 -Q-District 7 RESOLUTION NO·. 68-39-7. AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT FROM IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, A CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.; 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of .Easement, dated March 7, 1968, .wherein IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of sewers for Ashton Street and Deere Avenue, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. Tha.t the real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described as follows: Parcel 1: The Southeasterly 15.00 feet of the No~thwesterly 1145.21 feet of Lot 109 of said Block 9. Excepting that portion thereof lying Northeasterly of the centerline of the 34.oo feet wide easement granted to the AT and SF Railway Company by deed recorded in Book 8450, Page 651 of Official Records, records of said County o · Parcel 2: The Southeasterly 15.00 feet of the Northwesterly 1145.21 feet of the Northeasterly 30.00 feet of Lot 114 of said Block 9. Parcel. 3: The Southwesterly 15.00 feet of the Northeasterly 30.00 feet of Lot 114 of said Block 9. Excepting therefrom that portion within the Northwesterly 1145.21 feet of said Lot 114. Earcel 4: The Southwesterly 15000 feet of the Northeasterly 30.00 feet of Lot 113 of said Block 9. Excepting therefrom that portion within the Southeasterly 35.37 feet of said Lo.t 113. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4o That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #67 -R-District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 68-32 OPPOSING SENATE BILL 715 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING SENATE BILL 715 The Boards of Directors of Count~ Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. The seven County Sanitation Districts of Orange County serve and include most of the developed and populated areas of the county and all of the cities in Orange County except San Juan Capistrano and San Clemente; and, Section 2. The composition of the Boards of Directors as now provided by the law, has provided an efficient, effective, and harmonious form of organization for their respective governing bodies; and, Section 3. Senate Bill 715 proposes to compel substantial and drastic changes in the composition of boards of directors of county sanitation districts which are· deemed by the County Sanitation 'Districts of Orange County to be detrimental to the continued efficient, effe~tive, and harmonious operation of these Districts and their cooperation with other county sanitation districts; · NOW THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the c·oun.ty Sanitation Districts .of Orange County do hereby oppose Senate Bill 715 and urge the members of the State Legislature to reject said Bill and preserve the existing provisions of law relating to composition of boards of directors of county sanitation districts. Agenda Item #21~ -S-All Districts -...,.,. ··'P., P. 0. Box 5175 County S.:.mibtion Di$trict'j of Ornn$C County, Cuhforniu I08L1/; [If js Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 927C0 iliE~;.:;~~~.:~1 ADJOURNED REGULAR MEE·rnm Thursday, April 11, 1968 4:00 p.m. Newport Beach City Hall Phone 962-2411 April 8, 1968 It is expected that the only item of business to come before the Board at this meeting is consideration of the matter described and reported on below. INQUIRY OF THE IRVINE COMPANY REGAH.DING FINANCING OF A SEWER PROJECT TO SERVE THE BIG CANYON AREA: At the regular March 13 Board meeting a letter dated March 6 on this subject from the Irvine Company was received and filed and referred to the st~ff and engineers .. Since that time we have held two conferences on this subject with Irvine representatives and Mr. Donald. Simpson, District's engineer. A copy of the March 6 letter is attached and also a copy of a letter received today from the Irvine Company (dated April 5). This latter letter proposes a definite financing arrangement for the Big Canyon sewer project. · Neither letter estimates the total cost of the proposed project although a verbal figure of $130,000 has been furnished us. Financial Feasibilit~ The staff has no definite recommendation on this matter other · than to state that the proposed reimbursement arrangement in the April 5 letter is entirely feasible and workable. The connection charge revenue generated in the ax·ca served would be sufficient for complete reimbursement. However, if th.is and similar arrangements are made for future projects to serve now undeveloped areas, a problem will arise in connection with the District's present policy of financing future improvements and ~dditions to the sewetage system entirely · through current connection charges. .. •''\ '.,,/ . '..,I ~ Other Similar Projects It should be noted that the proposed Big Canyon project was not listed in Mr. Simpson's 1964 Ultimate Facilities Plan. Since this is true, we have asked the Irvine Company to supply us with information on other possible projects of this kind in the future. The map attached to the Irvine April 5 lett~r shows th~ proposed Big Canyon sewer and the area to be served and in response to our above inquiry shows two additional sewers needed in the future {Los Trancos Trunk and Buck Gully Trunk), if this area is to be served ~y existing District's facilities to which it is tributary by gravity. The Company has furnished us with an estimate of $167,000 for the Los Trances ~~runk, serving approximately 1,000 acres, and $224 ,000 for the Buck Gully Trunk, also serving approximately 1,000 acres .. The total estimated cost of all three projects is then $521,000 to serve an area of 2,700 acres with a density of from 3.0 dwelling units per acre in the Los '1.1 rancos and Buck Gully areas to 5.0 dwelling units per acre in the Big Canyon area. Background Information on Financing Since 1964 The 1964 Simpson engineering report listed total ultimate needed facilities in the District and estimated a total cost of $2,366,000 as the District 5 share (District 6 would contribute a mine~ amount). Of all these projects, all of those listed to be constructed before 1970 have been, or are, under the process of being completed. The total estimated cost of the projects completed or underway is $829,000. Of this sum, $400,000 has been borrowed from the Irvine Company, $340,800 derived from District's tax revenue and $88,200 from District connection charges. Shortly after Mr. Simpson's report was submitted, a financing report and plan by Bartle Wells and Associates ·was submitted and approved. This plan contemplated financing the entire $2,366,ooo plan ultimately from connection charges at $120 pe~ dwelling unit. An escalation of this charge by $5 per year was also recommended but not used in the financing projections. Since the 196h Simpson report was adopted two· subsequent modifications have been made ·which affect his over-all estimate. In addition, the cost of the work now completed can be precisely determined. From these two factors we can arrive at a reasonable esti~ate that total project costs to ultimate saturation will be somewhat more· t,,."1an $3 million. In addition to connection charges, the Bartle Wells report also recommended an initial annexation charge of $25Q per acre for outside areas desiring to use the District's system. However, funds raised in this manner were recommended to be applied to treatment plant expansion. -2- ··~ .. ' Comments on _Future Adequacy of Connection Charges From the foregoing, it is apparent that current connection charge revenue will not be able to finance all future needed facilities, ~ particularly if the additional projects, as proposed by the Irvine Company, are added to the over-all District's obligation. It should be noted that total revenue from connection charges and interest to date has been approximately $174,ooo as opposed to $240,000 estimated to date in the Bartle Wells report. The deficit (a more precise determination of the amount thereof would require an updating of the 1964 Engineering Report) could be made up by either {l) acknowledging at this time that ad valorem tax revenue will be required, or (2) · escalating the present conne~tion charge as originally proposed. ~ :~ -., •! -3- Fred A. Harper General Manager ··~ II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, April 10, 1968 7:30 p.m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Teleph ones: April 5, 1968 Area Code 7 14 540-2910 962-2411 The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the formal agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the c omplete agenda ava ilable at the meeting. Joint Boa rds Nos. 15 through 19 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE AND ACTIONS ON ITS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Executive Committee and the Special Building Committee met jointly during the afternoon and evening of March 28 and considered a number of items relating to Joint Board business. Directors Bousman, Parks and Rogers also met with the Committees as guests. A complete report on the meeting, including the recom- mendations adopted, is enclosed. Items Nos. 16, 17, 18 and 19 are considerations of action on the recommendations of the Executive and Special Building Committees as described in the Committees' report . No . 20 -AWARD OF PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: On March 29, bids were taken for two items of authorized equipment. The first was three, 4 1 x8 1 shaker screens and appurtenances as authorized at the February 14 meeting for the force account install ation of additional sludge dewatering facilities at Plant No. 1. As shown on the bid tabulation and recommendation form, included with the agenda material under this item, only two bids were received, one from a supplier who has no experience in the manufacturing of equipment of this particular size. Although this supplier's bid was l ower, the staff feels that because of his lack of experience record and the longer guaranteed delivery time, the award should be made to the other bidder (Link Belt Company) in the total amount of $10 ,4 23.35. The second item of equipment is a 4-wheel drive cab and chassis truck to replace our existing welding truck . We are recommending that the award be made to Tommy Ayres Chevrolet of Laguna Beach in the amount of $2,974 .82 . No. 21 -TRANSFER OF BUDGET ALLOTMENT : This recommended motion is to transfer in our Joint Operating Budget the sum of $15,000 from the Salaries and Wages account to the Utilities account. Our expenditure records to date for the current fiscal year indicate that we under - estimated, by approximately this amount, the expenditures for plant power. This underestimate was due to the fact that we antic i pated, at the time the budget was prepared, that our new power generation station (gas turbine utili zing digester gas) would be capable of more or less continuous operation during the year. However, our operating experience during the year has been less than satisfactory, princi- pall y because of downtime due to excessive impurities in the digester gas. We are still making modifications and working on the problem . The recommended budget transfer will be adequate to pay the Edison Company bills for plant power for the ba l ance of the fiscal year. It should be noted that the total expenditures for power for this fiscal year wil l still probab l y be l ess than t hat of the previous fiscal year in spite of the increase in power requirements. No . 22 -OCEAN QUALITY REQUIREMENTS FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2: As required by law and as authorized by the Boards, we filed in 1967 a Report of Waste Discharge for the change in l ocation for our effluent discharge to the ocean when Ocean Outfall No. 2 is put into operation. This report was submitted to the Santa Ana Basin Regiona l Water Quality Control Board, State of Cali f ornia. On March 8, this State agency officially prescribed, by resolution, its requirements for ocean water quality as related to our discharge in its new lo- cation. As expected and as discussed at previous Board meetings, the requirements embodied in this resolution are considerably more stringent than those presently in effect. However they wi l l not take effect until January 1, 1972 or upon placement into service of the new outfall, whichever date occurs earlier . These requirements are most important to the Districts since they dictate, to a large degree, our future joint operating and joint construction budgets . For this reason, they were formally prescribed only after many months of discussions between our staff and the staff of the Regional Board and other State and local agencies. A verbal staff report on this matter will be made at the meeting. No . 23 -1968 MASTER PLAN REPORT ON WASTE WATER TREATMENT FACI LITIES: The report, under this item, naturally ties in with the preceding item concerning ocean water quality requirements. As a matter of fact, the delay in prescribing the requirements has, until now, delayed completion and submission of the Master Plan Report . The Directors will reca l l that in late 1966 John Carollo Engineers were directed to proceed with the preparation of this report in order to provide an orderly and consistent plan of future treatment plant and disposa l facilities expansion . Similar reports were submitted in 1959 and 1962 a n d have been instrumental in meeting this objective. An abridged version of the report will be distributed at the meeting and explained in some detail by Mr. Harvey Hunt, a partner in John Carollo Engineers. The report presents a recommended definite -2- • • five-year construct ion program upon which, if the report is approved, our future construction budgets will be based, and a projection of faci lities requirements until the year 2000. It i s recommended that formal consideration of approval of the report be deferred to the May Joint Board meeting in order to allow ample time for the Directors and other interested persons to g ive it sufficient study. District No. 1 No. 27 -REQUEST OF CITY OF SANTA ANA CONCERNING NORTH BRISTOL STREET TRUNK SEWER: This project, ~onsisting of a new major sewer between Myrtle Street and Santa Clara Avenue in Bristol Street, is ready to go to bid in the next 30 days. As authorized in an agreement between the City and District No. 1, this facility will be constructed under the administration of the City Public works Department but wil l be paid for by District funds advanced during construction. It has been the uniform policy of the Districts (other than i n District No. 7) that local house co nnections should not be made to a District trunk in order to avoid dealing directly with the l ocal property owners . However in this instance, from an over -all con- struction and maintenance standpoint it is preferable that the new fa cility, for the most part, replace entirely a badly deteriorated and overloaded city sewer and that rather than to attempt to maintain the old sewer in operation, to abandon or remove it and to re-connect the existing house l ate r als to the new facility. In view of the situation, the staff has suggested to the City's staff that the new house lateral connections be included under the over-all project, but at the expense of the City as determined by a separate bid item. Also because of the fact that the new sewer will be connected directly to individual properties rather than through a City facility, it was suggested that the City assume maintenance of this trunk sewer and a lso the Fruit Street Trunk Sewer, which has a smaller number of similar connections and is now under construction. The City Director of Public Works has advised us that a letter proposing the above plan will be received by the District in time for the Board meeting. The recommended motion appearing on the agenda would put the Board on record as agreeing to the City's proposal. District No. 2 Nos. 48 and 49 -COMPLETION AND CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6: This $471,000 project, consisting of the new Euclid Trunk Sewer between Ball Road and La Palma Avenue, has been recent l y completed by the contractor, Vido Samarzich Co. In the course of c onstruction the contractor encountered difficulties apparently unanticipated by him when the job was bid. The project also include d a long bore under the Santa Ana Freeway on which occurred a major problem. Wi t h few minor exceptions, none of these difficulties invo lved the engineering plans. Accordingly, a comparatively small amount of justifiable extra work developed (Change Order No. 1 described below). We have had a number of conferences during the construction period between the staff, the engineer and the contractor concerning -3- c ompletion time and extra work . At the time of t h is writing, we believe we are now in general agreement wi th him on these matters and are awaiting his signature to a Fina l Cl oseout Agreement. I f this is obtained in time, the actions appearing on the agenda will be recommended. If not, the matter shoul d be held over to the next meeting . Item No. 48 consists of Change Orders Nos. 1 , 2 and 3. Change Order No . 1 is for the extra work encountered and as detailed on the formal change order , and is for the sum of $6,339.65. The major item was for removal of old concrete paving of which the City of Anaheim had no record. Change Order No . 2 is for the customary adjustment of contract pr i ce to reflect differences in quantities of materials ac tually installed over those originally estimated, which, in this case, amount s to a deduction of $1,392.60. Change Order No. 3 is an extension of time end a deduction of $4,500 for liquidated damages . It will be noted that a total extension of 97 days is recommended by this change order, including a 34 day extension provided for in the Closeout Agree~ent. Even with this extension, the project was still delayed a.n a.j Jitionci.l 45 days for which li quidated damages at $100 per day is proposed to be assessed. I tem No. 49 is the usual reso lution accepting the work as complete on March 29, authorizing filing of Notice of Completion and approving the Final Closeout Agreement embodying the above additions and deductions. No . 50 -AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF RIVERSIDE FREEWAY SEWER CROSSING: I t will be recalled that at the De cember, 1967 Board meeting, a similar autho~izat ion was given to proceed with future sewer construction under the O~ange Freeway right-of-way prior to commencement of free~>Jay work . Since that time, we have learned that another freeway project with the same problem will be underway l ate this year . This pro ject is the Riverside Freeway in the East Anaheim area in which a propo sed future 27-inch VCP sewer crocsing will be located . It is obvious that it will be much cheaper for the District to install the section of the future sewer in the freeway right -of- way (approximate ly 800 feet) prior to commencement of the freeway project even though the sewer will not be us eab le for a number of years . Accordingly, we are r ecommend ing that the Board authorize this project at this time with construction funds to be included in the next fiscal year budget . No . 51 -REQU:SST OF CON?RACTOR TO APPROVE SUBCONTRAC7ING OF PORTION OF WORK, COi.Y'I'RP.C T NO . 2-2.0-8: Contract I~o . 2-10 -8 was aw arded to Merco C~nstruction Er.gineers, Inc. at the March Board meeting. It consists of the segment of the new Eucl i d Trunk Sewe r between Bolsa and Tra sk Avenues . The contractor has advised us verbally that in view of the f a ct that he will encounter conside rable delay in g etting started with this project due to l ack of available equ.ipment, he may request t h at a good portion of the work b e subcontr:J.Ct '.::;j to Far Western Pipeline, I nc ., wh ich is now com pleting an adjacent s egment of the over -all Euclid sewer project . Since c o mple t io n of the 2-10-8 -4 - project is urgently needed by the Garden Grove Sanitary District, we fee l that approva l of this request i s amp l y justified under the requirements of the State law re l ating to subcontracting . At the time of this writ i ng, however, it is not known if. t he contractor will be successful in negotiat i ng a subcontract. Accordingly, we are placing this matter on the agenda in the event the formal request is received in time for the Board meeting. District No. 5 No. 38 -COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO . 5 -1 5 : This project, Recon - struction of Bitter Point Pump Station, will be complete today. The contractor, Power Construction Company of Canoga Park, success - fully completed the sma l l ($22,100 ), but complicated, project well within the allotted time and with no c l aims for extra work. Con - sequently we are recommending, by means of the formal resolution under this item, th a t the work be accepted as of Apri l 5 and the filing of a Notice of Comp l etion authorized. No . 4 1 -ADJOURNMENT TO 4:00 P .M., APRIL 11: An adjourned meeting of the Board is tentatively p l anned fo r the above hour and date at the Newport Beach City Hall to consider the March 6 inquiry of The I rvi ne Company regarding financing of a sewer project in the Big Canyon area to serve a development planned for later this year . District No. 7 No . 55 -MASTER PLAN RE I MBURSEMENT AGREEMENT FOR THE LANE ROAD LIFT STATION (CONTRACT NO. 7 -2C -P ) AND LANE ROAD SUBTRUNK SEWER (CONTRACT NO . 7 -2C ): We have been notifi ed by the engineers that the con- struction contract for the Lane Road Lift Station and Subtrunk Sewer are complete . In November, 1 966 the Board agreed to enter into a reimbursement agreement with the Irvine I ndustrial Complex upon completion of construction of these facilities. The total financed by the Complex is $143,7 68 .25 . Accord i ng to the Board 's previous action.upon execution of this reimbursement a g reement an immediate payment of $50,000 is due the Comp l ex. It is recommended that the agreement be approved in accordance with the terms previously established. No. 56 -SOUTH I RVINE SUBTRUNK SEWER EASEMENT ACROSS THE ORANGE COUNTY AI RPORT: In connection with the construction of this facility, the Rea l Property Services Department of the County prepared and granted t o the District a sewer easement. We have now been advised that the easement is in error and a corrected one has been prepared. I t is therefore recommended by the District 's engineers that the original easement be quitclaimed to the County of Orange in exchange for a corre cted easement to the District, at no cost. No. 57 -ENGINEERS' PROPOSA L FOR REAPPRAISAL OF DISTRICT 'S ANNEXATION FEE SCHEDULE : At the March meeting of the Board, Boyle Engineering was asked to submit a proposal for the purpose of updating the District 's current annexation -fee schedul e. Attached to the agenda -5 - is a per diem schedule which provides a maximum amount This fee sch edule is identical to that for the current made on the i n terim relief measures for the District . staff's recommendation that the proposal be accepted . of $1,000.00 . study being I t is the No. 59 -ANNEXATION NO . 14 TO THE DI STRIC T (APPRO XIMA TELY 42 ACRES ADJOINING NEWPORT AVENUE BETWEEN BARRET~ LANE AND DANIGER ROAD -SEE MAP I N AGENDA, PAGE X): We have been advised by the Local Ag ency Formation Commission of the County, that property owners of 37 .3 acres of an area which was excluded from the District in 1 961 have petitioned for annexation to the Dist r ict . I n the event the Commission acts favorably on this annexation, it wi ll be necessary for the District Board to initiate proceedings in compliance with the Commission 's findings. This annexation i s · unlike any previous annexation to the District, in that the annexation fees of $2 1 5 per acre wil l not be paid prior to annexation . The proponents have petitioned to be assessed by the Di strict as a separate tax code area for a period of five years to pay the annexation fees to the District. This method of col l ecting the fees is provided for by law . Nos . 60 through TREE LANE AREA : items have been counsel for the will be present 64 -FORMATION OF ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO . 7 -HOLLY The ac t ions appearing on the agenda under these submitted by the Engineer of Work and the legal assessment district. Both Mr . Finster and Mr. Rime l at the meeting to explain these proceedings. -6 - Fred A . Harper General Manager