HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-04I 00/\t~os o~: Dm:!Ci'ORS
Cou nty San itat ion Distrids P. 0 . Box 5175
of Orange County , Cali fornia 1 0841~ [llis Aven ue
Fo untain Valley, Calif., 92708
AG EM DA
April 10, 1968 -7 :30 p .m.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
(2) Roll Call
(3 ) Appointme nts of Chairmen pro tern , if n ecessary
(4) DISTRICT 1
Con sideration of motion approving minute s of the
r egular me eting he l d March 13, 1968 , as mai l ed
(5 ) DIS TRICT 2
Co nsideration of motion approving minutes of the
regul ar meeting h e l d March 13, 1968 , as mai l ed
( 6 ) DIS TRICT 3
Consideration of motion app r oving minutes of the reg u lar
me eting held March 13, 1968 , as ma iled
(7) DISTRICT 5
Cons ideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting he ld March 13, 1968 , as ma iled
(8) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
mee ting h e ld Marc h 13, 1968 , as mailed
(9 ) DISTRICT 7
Considerat ion of motion approving min ute s of the r eg ular
meeting h eld March 13 , 1968 , as mail e d
(10) DISTRICT 8
(1 1)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(1 5)
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held January 10, 1968 , as mailed
DIS TRICT 11
Consideration of motion ap£roving minutes of the regular
mee t ing held March 13, 1968 , as mailed
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the J oint Chairman
ALL DIS TR ICTS
Rep ort of the Gen e r a l Manager
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Genera l Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Re port of the Executi ve and Bui lding Committe e s; and con-
siderat ion of motion to receive and file the written report
of the Committees . (Copy in folders)
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of William P.
Ficker, A.I.A., for architectural services in connection
with alterations to the office building, as recommended
by the Executive and Building Committees. See page "F"
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion directing the staff to advertise
for bids for the sale of digester sludge gas_, as recommended
by the Executive Committee
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion directing the Executive Committee
to conduct an annual review of the performance and compen-
sation of Management personnel, and the performance of the
General Counsel, as recommended by the Executive Committee
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Legal Opinion
submitted by the General Counsel, and establishing policy
with regard to the Districts' personnel receiving compen-
sation for outside services, as recommended by the
Executive Committee. See page "G"
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
Consideration of motion authorizing purchase of the follow-
ing equipment (see pages · "H" and "I" for bid tabula-
tions):
One, 4-wheel drive Tommy Ayers Chevrolet $2,974.82
cab & chassis truck
Specification #A-033
Three, 4x8 shaker Link Belt Co. $10,423.35
screens, #E-051
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $15,000
from the Salaries and Wages account to the Utilities
account, within the Joint Operating Fund
ALL DISTRICTS
Verbal report by the staff, and consideration of motion to
receive and file Resolution No. 59-5 of the Santa Ana River
Basin Regional Water ·Quality Control Board~ setting forth
its requirements for effluent to be discharged through
Ocean Outfall No. 2
ALL DISTRICTS
Review by the engineers of Master Plan Report on Wastewater
Treatment Facilities, and consideration of motion to receive
and file the report and take under submission for study
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda for this meeting, found them in
order, and that he recommends authorization for paymen~
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.warrant
books, and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages
"A" , "B" , and "C"
-2-
#
(26) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
(27) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
the City of Santa Ana offering to provide maintenance of the
North Bristol Street Trunk and the Fruit Street Trunk, and
accepting the City's offer. See page "J"
( 28) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
(29) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
(30) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to adjourn
(31) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
(32) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications
a. Motion to receive and file letter from the
attorneys for the Cypress County Water District,
and refer to the General Counsel. See page "K"
. ( 33) DISTRICT 3
'..I . Consideration of motion to adjourn
(34) DISTRICT 11
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "E"
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICTS 5 AND 6
Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants,
if any. See page "E"
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of Resolution No. 68-18-5, accepting the
Reconstruction of Bitter Point Pump Station (Contract
No. 5-15) as complete, and authorizing execution of a
Notice of Completion of Work. See page "L"
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:00 p.m., April 11th,
Newport Beach City Hall
-3-
(42) DISTRICT 6
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly
Financial Report prepared by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and
Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period
ending December 3~, 1967
DISTRICT 8
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving the following Change
Orders to the plans and specif !cations for the Euclid
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6, (Vido Samarzich Co.,
Contractor) :
Cha~e Order No. 1, authorizing addition of
$6, 9o65 and granting extension of time.
See page "M"
Change Order Noo 2, authorizing a deduction
of $1,392.60 for adjustment of quantities.
See page "N"
Change Order No. 3, authorizing a deduction
of $4,500.00 and granting an extension of
time. See page "O"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution Noo 68-19-2, approving Final
Closeout Agreement; accepting Contract Noo 2-10-6 as complete;
and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Worko
See.page "P"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion authorizing construction of the
Riverside Freeway sewer crossing, consisting of approximately
800-feet of 27-inch VCP sewer and directing the staff to
proceed with th~ planning and implementation
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Merco Construction Engineers, Inco, requesting permission
to subcontract a portion of Contract No. 2-10-8 {Euclid
Trunk Sewer), to Far Western Pipeline, Inco; and approving
said request. See page "Q"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "D"
-4-
See
'.!fo
(53) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
(54) DISTRICT 2
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
Consideration of motion to adjourn
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 68-20-7, approving a
Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Master Plan)
with Irvine Industrial Complex, relative to construction
of Contracts 7-2C and 7-2C-P (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer
and Lane Road Sewage Lift Station). See page "R" •
See pages "S" and "T" for recommendation and
map.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 68-21-7, authorizing
quitclaim of easement to the County of Orange in
exchange for a corrected easement (at no cost). See
page "U"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle
Engineering for reappraisal of the District's annexation
fee schedule; and authorizing the General Manager to
direct the engineers to proceed for a total fee not to
exceed $1, 000. See page "V" ·
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 68-22-7, approving
Reimbursement Agreement (not Master Plan) with Standard-
Pacific Corporation, for a sewer line constructed in
East Walnut Avenue. See page "W"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 68-23-7, ordering
annexation of territory to the District (Annexation #14).
See page "x"
DISTRICT 7
Assessment District No. 7 --(Proceedings can be
referred to Engineer of ~vork and special counsel
for the assessment district, if desired)
(61) DISTRICT 7
Report of engineers on petition
DISTRICT 7.
Resolution 68-24-7, to bypass pro-
(62)
visions of 1931 Act
(63) DISTRICT 7
(64)
DISTRICT 7
Approve plans, specifications,
diagram and estimate
DISTRICT 7
Resolution of Intention, No. 68-25-7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "E"
See
(62) DISTRICT 7
other business and communications, if any
(63) DISTRICT 7
· Consideration of motion to adjourn
_i:;_
~.
8961 '01 11.Id'Q'
SiliN~nooa DNI~HOddfiS CINV SNOiilifl~OS~H
~·.
WARRANT NO.
9072
9073
9074
9075
9076
9077
9078
9079
9080
9081
9082
~ 9083
9084
9085
9086
9087
9088
9089
9090
9091
9092
9093
9094
9095
9096
9097
9098
9099
9100
9101
9102
9103
9104
9105
9106
9107
9108
9109
9110
9111
9112
9113
9114
9115
9116
9117
9118
9119
9120
9121
9122
9123
9124
9125
9126
9127
9128
9129
9130
9131
9132
9133
...-........... ·. ·.·.
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Apco Supply, Furnace Controls, Filters $
Atlas Chrysler, Truck Parts
All Bearing Service, Pump Parts
Bank of America, Coupon Coll. Expo
American Chemical, Tech. Journal Subscription
City of Anaheim, Power
The Anchor Packing, Pump Packing
Bay City Bearing, Bearings, Couplings
Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair
James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment
Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Ele6t. Supplies
Build •n Save, Ceiling Repair Material
Calif. Water Poll Cont. Assoc., Conf. Expenses
Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies
Carmen Castro, Employee Mileage
Certified Building Materials, Sand
Challenge-Cook Bros., Wheel Loader Parts
Chicago Miniature Lamp Co., Instrument Lamps
Clayton Mfg. Co., Transformer
C-L Chemical, Chemicals
College Lumber, Small Hardware & Lumber
Consolidated Electrical Dist., Elect. Supplies
Continental-Emsco Co., Tool Supplies
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts
De Guelle & Sons, Glass
Diesel Control Corp., Engine Parts
Economy Office Equip,, Office Equipment & Parts
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring
Ensign Products, Metal Preserver
Fischer Governor, Regulators
Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation & Supp.
Flair Drafting, Drafting Services
The Foxboro Co., Controls
Freedom Newspapers, Legal Ad
Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Mach. Shop Work
General Electric Supply, Elect. Supplies
General Telephone Co.
The Glidden Co., Paints
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
Graybar Electric Co., Safety Equipment
Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physicals
Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses
Hi-Fi Signs, No Parking Signs
James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage
Honeywell, Telemetering Repairs
Howard Supply Coo, Valves, Portable Hoist
City of Huntington Beach, Water
ILG Industries Inc., Centrifugal Fan
International Harvester Co., Truck Parts
J & M Service, Equipment Parts
Jones Chemicals, Chlorine
Kar Products, Inc., Electric Supplies
Kelly Pipe Co., Piping, Valves
Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts
Klassen's Welding Works, Machine Shop Work
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hdwre.
Herbert H. Kyzer, Employee Mj_leage
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Small Tools
L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Rental
Lawless GM Diesel, Wheel Loader Parts
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Lewis Bros. Battery, Battery
-A-
AMOUNT
225.78
4.02
94.59
322.00 6.oo
32.43
438.68
418.78
98.10
180.06
72.24
38.00
112.50
76.76
22.50
23.10
108.58
193.00
24.15
50.82
65.72
223.12
71.00
108.62
19.80
152.29
6.40
2,317.50
149.48
341.73
1,367.10
483.00
117.15
6.33
80.00
515.57
233.90
86.43
148.98
121.09
80.50
58.46
8.40
11.50
173.00
1,530.45
7 .65
193.69
125.00
2.40
11,088.00
21 .• 42
475.34
99.30
26.97
134.25
17.80
233.16
756.81
252.48
23.30
48.47
;
~·
WARRANT NO.
9134
9135
9136
9137 9138.
9139
9140
9141
9142
9143
9144
9145
9146
9147
9148
9149
9150
9151
9152
9153
9154
9155
9156 9157
9158
9159
9160
91661 91 2
9163
9164
9165
9166
9167
9168
9169
9170
9171
9172
9173
9174
9175
9176
9177
9178
9179
9180
9181
9182
9183
9184
9185
9186
9187
9188
9189
9190
9191
9192
9193
9194
9195
9196
IN FAVOR OF
Lithographic· Arts, Brochure Covers & Backs
Litton Business Equipment, Office Supplies
McCoy Motor Co., Portable Equipment Parts
Jack Edward McKee,· Consulting Services
Mahaffey Machine; Machine Shop Work
Main Photo Service, Photo Finishing
Dennis May, Employee Mileage
AMOUNT
96.60
88.41
61.18
450.00
301.60
54.10
19.50
Metermaster, Inc., Tool Repair
Miller, Nissen & Kogler, Legal Serv. (Anti-Trust)
Mine Safety Appliances, Safety Equipment
21.77
409.87
45.53
31.24
57.43
Mobil Oil Corp., Lubricant
Munselle Supply, Welding Supplies
Municipal Finance Officers, Acct•g. Pub.
The Nationa1·cash Register Co., Acct'g. Mach.
City of Newport Beach, Water
c. Arthur Nisson, Gen. Counsel Ret. Fee
Oakite Products, Cleaning & Mtce. Supplies o. c. Suppliers, Small Hardware
County of Orange, Juvenile Work Program
Orange County Radiotelephone
Pacific Telephone
Kenneth· A. Peterson, Employee Mileage
Postmaster Postage
Public Empioyees' Ret. System, PERS Admin. Exp.
7.65
20,729.90
12.97
700.00
174.96
12.72
500.00
415.95
295.06
11.40
150.00 121.00
109.07 Radio Products Sales, Elect. Tubes
Reggie's Diesel Serv., Wheel Loader Engine
The Ragister, 6 Mos. Subscription
Repair 32.00
13.50
143.80 212.00 Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Steel Beam
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Repairs
Saddleback Travel & Tours, Engr. to Allis Chalmers
Santa Ana Blue Print, CSD Brochure Prints
215.14
135.92
Santa Ana Electric, Elect. Supplies
Santa Ana Electronics, Elect. Supplies
E. H. Sargent co·., Lab Supplies
Select Nurseries, Plants
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint--Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
So. Calif. Edison
So. Calif. Water Co.
So. Counties Gas Co.
Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
39 S talce & Build. Supp., Surveying Supplies
Standard Oil Co., Gasoline, Engine Oil
Superior Craft Welding, Shop Work
T & H Equipment Co., Tractor Repair
Testing Machines, Inc., Automatic Sampler c. o. Thompson Petroleum, Weed Oil
Norman R. Tremblay, Engr. to Allis Chalmers
Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel
Union Oil Co., Gasoline
Wagoner Maintenance, Maintenance Supplies
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Warren & Bailey, Fittings, Gauges, Valves
Waukesha MCltor Co., Engine Parts
Westco Pump Sales Co., Pump Parts
Western Belting, Plastic Steel
Western Salt Co., Salt
Westinghouse Electric, Elect. Cart Parts
Whitie Welding & Engineering, Engine Repairs
Whitney's Speedometer, Trucl< Parts
Zonne Industrial Tool Co., Engine Parts
TOTAL JOil{T OPERATING FUND
-B-
$
12.39
27.27
487.17
58.80
449.15
64.72
30.90
9, 595.47
3.90
701.58
88.21
252.20
16.07
325.20
20.00
196.07
462. 77
292.08
66.35
49.03
379 .39
187.00
220080
525.57
46.57
123.87
62.37
21.00
185.00
204.43
11.58
37.04
. \w)
r
I
!·
-.._,,,)
""-"
WARRANT NO!..
9197
9198
9199
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT -
John Carollo Engineers $ 18,825.39
J. Putnam Henck 99,,732.86
Twining Laboratories 40.00
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $ 118., 598 .25
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 183.,858.12
-c-
DISTRICT NO. l
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NOo IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
9200 Boyle Engineering $ i,274.oo
9201 City of Santa Ana 65,000.00
$ 66,274.oo
DISTRICT NOo 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
9202 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,458.00 9203 Far Western Pipe.line 125, 18.60
9204 Industrial Pipeline Construction 8,559.20
9205 Vido Samarzich 6,215.31
9206 Wallace Trade Bindery 27.30
$ 147,978.41
DISTRICT NO. 3
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
·......_,;
3,238.00 9207 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry
9208 Miller, Nisson & Kogler 50.00
9209 c. Arthur Nisson 455.00
3,743.00
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND \·TARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
9210 City of Newport Beach 524.oo
9211 Power Construction Co. 8,024.40
$ 8,548.40
-D-
DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6·
SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. I.N FAVOR OF AMOUNT
9212· Power Construction Co. $ 7,956 .oo
9213 Shuirman-Simpson 186.43
8,142.43
DISTRICT NOo 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
9214 Boyle and Lowry $ 1,336.00
·9215 c. Arthur Nisson 166.25
$ 1,502.25
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
9216 Boyle and Lowry $ 3,256.71
9217 Irvine Industrial Complex 50,000.00
9218 Zarubica Company 65,601.13
$ 118,857.84
""""' $ 120,360.09
.. E-
.. u.t
'...I
".,,.I
~
WILLIAM P. FICKER, A. I. A.
Architecture cincl Planning
SUITE 21)2 • -146 N. NEWI'OUT BLVD., NEWPOJ?'i' nKACI!, CALW. • 646-773!>
April 5, 1968
Mr. Fred Harper
County Sanitation District
10844 Ellis Avenue
P. 0. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708
Dear Mr .. Harper:
Thank you for the opportunity of worki~g with you on
the remodeling of the Orange County Sanitation District
Administrative Offices.
I have looked at the drawings and made a rather hurried
appraisal of the scope of work to be done and the scope
of our involvement. I would suggest that we proceed on
an hourly basis for this work.·· As you and your board
are probably aware, it is difficult to estimate what a
fair fee for this 11 piece 11 work might be. I would suggest
working on the normal multiple of direct personnel expense
a s f o ·11 ow s :
1. 2-1/2 times· staff salaries. This will normally equal
approximately'$10.00 to $12.00 per hour.
2. Principal's time {time contributed by William P.
Ficker only -$25.00 per hour.)
At this point, I would suggest budgeting a miximum of
$1,000.00 for architect's· fees. I would guess that this
would cover substantially the maximum amount of effort we
might expend on this job. We will work with you to de-
termine the scope of our contributiODS to the project and
help in determining whether it would·be better for us to
provide all of the plans and specifications or to perhaps
have some of your staff do a portion of the drawings;
thereby reducing this total fee. As we progress, we will
keep you informed of the time spent to date and the estimated
time to complete the job.
Agenda Itemh.§. F-1 All Distrj_cts
~.·~
...._;
.'-"'
'--I
p~ge two
I will be very happy to discuss this project further with
you. If you are in ~greement with this proposal, we will
prepare a contract and a more detailed proposal for your
review.
Very truly yours,
~L 7
If!: --:.:~
William P. Ficker, A.I.A.
WPF/njl
Agenda Item #16 F-2 All Distrif'tS
';~
CLARK MILLER
c. ARTHUR NISSON
NELSON KOGLER
MILLER, NJSSON M KOGLER.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9270G
April 2, 1968
Fred A. Harper .
County sanitation Districts
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Re: Legal opinion regarding other work
activities of employees
Dear Fred:
The provisions of Health and Safety Code §4768 ~ake §19251
of the Government Code applicable to employees of the
County sanitation Districts. I am· enclosing herewith for
your guidance. and review a copy of Government Code §19251
which deals with employees engaging in work other than that
of their usual district occupation.
If the Districts desire to provide guidelines ·over, above
TELE: PHONE
5'42•G771
and beyond the provisions of the applicable government code
section, they are at liberty to do so. Otherwise, I presume
the enforcement of this provision is left up to you as General
Manager. You may establish guidelines by preparing a statement
of policy to be made available and known to the employees of
the Districts.
If you desire other and further information on this, please
advise. Otherwise, I believe this adequately answers your
request.
CAN/vlj
Enclosure (1)
Agenda Item #19
c. Arthur Nissan
G-1 All Districts
~
""'111
..._;
:~·.
#c?tf -#-7'76?
G oVEn:ornNT Com'! § 1925i
§ 19251. Engngcmcnt in employment etc., inconsistent, incom-·
j pa.tiblc, or in conflict with clnties: Determination of inconsistent,
I incompatible, or conflicting duties: Devotion of full time, atten-
1 tion and efforts to office or e1:1ployme11t: Adoption rules governing ·1 application of section: n'.fo.ttcrs rules may include. . I A state officer or employee sha11 not engage in nny employment,
i activity, or ent('1·prisc which [1] i.c: clearly inconsistent, incompatible,
! (2] in conflict wit11, or inimical io his duties as a state officer or
employee or with the cluti<.>s, funetions or responsibiliti~s of his lip·
pointing power or t.he agency by which he is employed.
}Jnch appointing powl}r shall determine [3], subject to appro\'al
of the board, those activiti('s, which, for employees under his
jurisdiction, arc inconsistent, incompatible or in conflict ".-ith their
duties as state officers or employees. [4] Consideration shall be gfocn
to employment, activity or enterprise which: (a) involves the use
for private gain or adYantagc of state time, facilities,. equipment
and supplies; or the badge, uniform, prestige or influence of one's
state office or employment or, (b) im·oh-cs receipt or acceptance
by the officer or employee of any money or other consideration irom
anyone other than the State for the performance of an act \Vhich
the officer or employee, if not performing such act, 'vould be
required or expected to render in the regular course or hours of
his state employment or as a part of his duties as a state officer or
employee or, (c) inYolves the performance of an act in· other than
bis capacity as a state officer or employee which act may later be
subject directly or indirectly to the control, inspection, review,
audit or enforcement by such officer or employee or the agency by
which he is employed, or, {d) involves such time demands as would
render performance of lzis clutics as a state officer or employee less
efficient •.
Each state officer and employee shall during his l1ours of duty as a
state officer or employee and subject to such other laws, rules or
regulations as pertain thereto, devote his full time, attention and
efforts to his state office or employment.
The board may adopt rule.~ governing tlrc application of tlii.~ section.
Suclt rules may include vrovision for notice to employees prior to tire
determination of vroscn'be<l activitfos and for appeal by employees
from suclL a determination an cl from its application to an employee.
[Amended by Stats 1963 ch 1411 § 1.]
1. Deleted: "bas been <lctcrmined to be"
2. Deleted: "or"
3. Deleted: "an(l prescrib\!"
4. Deleted: "In making this determination the appointing power shall give''
34 Ops Atty Gen 171 (office of school trustee :is incompatible ::i.ctivity for
member of J1ighway patrol); 34 Ops Atty Gen 2·1-1 (positions of deputy re:il
estate commissioner and city couocilm?n as not inherently incompntiL1e).
Under tl1is sect.ion nn1l stnt.-.ueut of
Department of Alcoholic B~\·crngC?
Control making of rt!ceh·ing of gr:i.tu·
itics from liquor liccnsc~s by ucp:trt·
ment empJoyces an activity ineompati·
ble with their e111ploymt~nt, ncCl'ptnncc
by ::i.gent of department or drink pnitl
for by manager of Jh~cnscc's bar wn~
acceptance of gr:ituity by agent io
( I B Gov Coded
A~enda Item #19
\'iolation of regulations of llcp:irtml'nt,
since· act of man:tgcr was nr.t of Ii·
cC'nSel', it hn\·ing taken pince during
tlh;cus~ion of some phase of licensee's
business with Department of Alcoholic· ·
ncvcrage Control. Byrne v St:ite-
Personncl Board (19Ci0 )179 CA2d 5i6,·
4 Cal Rptr 32;
73·
G-2
·-
,. ..... -
All Districts -
ALL DISTRICTS
MOVED:
MOTION
That these Boards of Directors hereby establish the
following policy with·respect to employees of the Districts
engaging in work .other than that of their usual District
occupation:
"That the General Manager, in his discretion,
may consent to the Districts' professional
employees performing outside services, based
on the following guidelines:
a. That compensatory services be
performed on the employee's
own time
b. That the outside services shall
not b~ in conflict with the
Districts' interests
c. That the performance of such
services shall not affect the
employee's efficiency and job
performance for the Districts
That the provisions of Section 4768 of the State
Health and Safety Code {Government Code Section
19251) shall apply to all such services."
Agenda Item #19 G-3 All Districts
BID TABULATION
Contract for:
ONE, 4-WHEEL DRIVE CAB & CHASSIS TRUCK
Specification No. A-033
Bidder Make & Model
Date: March 11, 1968
Days
Delivery Bid Price
·· ~ · 1. Tommy Ayres· Chevrolet
350 Broadway
Chevrolet
KE 2093
3/4 Ton
Approx.
45
. . $3,074~-82
100.00*
$2,974.82
• .A
~~··
Laguna Beach, Calif.
2. Saddleback Dodge
1401 N. Tustin Ave.·
Santa Ana, Calif.
3. International Harvester Co.
1110 E. Katella Ave.
Anaheim, Calif.
*Trade-in allowance
1968 Dodge
W200-
4-wheel drive
International
1200C 4x4
45-60
60-75
Present at opening: Pete Heikes (International Harvester),
Harvey Hunt, Fred Harper, Paul G. Brown,
Sylvia Wilson and Grace Geier
Specifications were mailed to 5 automotive dealers
$3,170.94
75.00*.
$3,095.94
$3,614.01
75.00*
$3,539.01
It is recommended that the award be made to Tommy Ayres
Chevrolet, 350 Broadway, Laguna Beach, California, as the lowest and
best bid.
Agenda Item #20 -H-
. T. A. Dunn
Purchasing Officer
All Districts
BID TABULATION
Date: March 29, 1968
'..I FOR:
1.
2.
-~"' ·.
THREE, 4 1 x8 1 SHAKER SCREENS
Specification No. E-051
Bidder
Link Belt Div. F.M.C. Corp.*
P. o. Box 22056
I.os Angeles, Calif.
Medearis Oilwell Supply Corp.
21000 S. Normandie Ave.
Torrance, California
Unit Price Extension
(3) $3,474.45 $10,~23.35
(3) $2,739.45 $ 8,218.35
Persons present: Pete Heikes, Harvey Hunt, Fred Harper, Paul
Brown, Sylvia Wilson and Grace Geier
*It is recommended that award be made.to Link Belt Div. F.M.C. Corp.
for three (3), 4 1 x8 1 Shker Screens for the total amount of $10,423.35.
The low bid submitted by Medearis Oilwell Supply did not contain
submittals required by the specifications to qualify their e-quipment
for the Districts intended use. Subsequent inquiries revealed that
the Medearis Company has no experience with the size of equipment
required and specified.
Link Belt has numerous operating installations of the equipment
specified and qualify as the best bid to meet the requirements of
the Districts. The units will be manufactured locally and delivery
time will allow the Districts to have our installation operational
more than six weeks sooner than the delivery time proposed by the
Medearis Company.
Agenda Item #20 -I-
T. A. Dunn
Purchasing Officer
All Districts
April 5, 1968
THf CITH Of £HnTH HnH
CALIFORNIA
92701
Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager
Orange County Sanitation District ONE
P. O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Please addr.:ss replies to:
217 North Main Street
Phone: 547-0511
NORTH BRISTOL STREET TRUNK SEWER BETWEEN MYRTLE STREET M.lD
SANTA CLARA AVENUE, FRUIT STREET TRUNK SEWER (CONTRACT NO. 1-9)
The City is willing to accept the additional costs involved in
connecting the existing laterals to the Bristol Street Trunk.
We would also be willing to pay for the additional engineering
costs required to modify the plans so that our old sewer wi~l
be removed and the existing laterals connected to the new
trunk as part of the project.
Because there will be no additional maintenance· costs to the
City, and because existing and future laterals will be connected
directly to both the Bristol Street and the Fruit Street Trunks,
the City will maintain these sewers.
We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in these projects, and
we ask that the above proposals be approved by your Board. We
expect to have funds to cover our obligations on this after
July 1, 1968.
C?~t.£.ft~
.RONALD E. WOLFORD
Director of Public rks
Agenda Item #27 -J-District 1
.,.,-.,:
:.e$·.
JACJC J. RIMEL
JOJIN A. IIARVEY, Ill
DUl'.FERN ll. }{El.SING
RICJIARD N. l?IMEL
0 EORGE O. LOGAN
RICIIAUD A. RATTRAY
LAW Ofl"ICES OF
RIMEL, HARVEY & HELSING
l'OlJU'!"ll l"LOOR
1010 NOR'l"Jl )..!AI:N STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIJ:'.OH.1."\IA. 92701
April 3, 1968
Honorable Board of Directors
Orange County Sanitation District No. 3
10844 Ellis Avenue
. Fountain Valley,, California
Gentlemen:
547-7303
MA.Dl:SON 5-7070
As attorneys for the Cypress County Water District, this firm has
been instructed to dir.ect this letter to you concerning representation
by that agency on your Board of .Directors.
As you are aware, the Cypress County Water District is a member
unit of your agency and is engaged exclusively in the collection and
transmission of sewage effluent.
We are informed that the membership of your Board is determined
under the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 whereby
Cities, the Board of Supervisors, and Sanitary Districts in exi~tence
as of the effective date of the formation of your agency are repre-
sented.
This letter is written to request, on behalf of the Board of Directors
of the Cypress County Water District, that your body take the steps
required by Health and Safety Code Section 47 30. 2 so as to allow
representation on your board by all member unit public agencies of
Sanitation District No. 3.
We will appreciate your considered study of this proposal and urge
your affirmative reaction to it.
RIMEL, HAR.VEY & HELSING
Attorneys for Cypress County Water District
By
~~---~--.~e~.o-r-.g~·e--G~.__,L_o_g_a_n~~~~~--
(/
mh
cc: Mr. Arthur C. Nisson
Cypress County Water District
l . ,
Agenda Item #32 -K-District 3
:-•
RESOLUTION NO. 68-18-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-15 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
5-15 AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of
the contract for the RECONSTRUCTION OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-15, on the 5th day of April, 1968; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the. District
has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4o That the RECONSTRUCTION OF BITTER POINT PUMP
STATION, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract therefor, dated the 9th day of February, 1968;
and,
. Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
Agenda Item #38 ~L-District 5
......
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. __ l ___ _
DATE: April 10, 1968 CONTRACTOR: Vido Samarzich Co. ----------
JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6
Amount of this change order (ADD) (~N(R'K) $ 6,339. 65
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the.
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's letter of April 3, 1968 and Contractor's letters
dated December 18, 1967 and February 5, 15, and 18, 1968
1. Reinforcement of existing deteriorated dist·rict sewer
at Sta. 559+50 in order to perform work required.
2. Unknown utility at Sta. 515+07.
3. Support for existing Euclid Trunk at Sta. 471+00
due to concrete encasement which was unknown and
not shown on existing records.
4.-Support existing Euclid Trunk at Sta. 482+90 due
to cracked condition where new Euclid Trunk
undercrosses.
5. Unknown utility at Sta. 539+13.43.
6. Improperly constructed house lateral (by others)
at Sta. 473+00 which contractor corrected.
$ 380.07
324.30
365.70
310.50
324.30
60.00
7. Contractor had to break, remove and dispobe of
concrete paving 6 inches thick, 18 feet wide between
Station 524+85 and Station 532+63. This pavement
was covered by 4 inches of asphalt concrete pavement
and consequently could not be detected in advance of
construction. Existing city records also make no
mention of the concrete pavement.
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD
. 4,574. 78
$6,339.65
An extension of time of 12 days for the above extra work
is hereby granted for completion of the contract.
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
This Change (ADD)(EEEM~~)
Amended Contract Price
$ 470,723.75
none
6,339.65
$ 477,063.40
Board authorization date: Approved:
April 10, 1968
Agenda Item #48
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
VIDO SAMARZICH CO.
By----------------------~------
-M-District 2
",ll!C
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO~ 2 ------
CONTRACTOR: Vido Samarzich Co. DATE: April 10, 1968
JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6
Amount of this change order (~Xk~ (DEDUCT)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMEN·r OF ENGINEER 1 S QUANTITIES
REFERENCE: Engineer's Resort of Construction Progress dated
March 31, 196
DEDUCT
Item Change Est'd. Quant.
..1!£.:.. Unit From To
6 L.F. 215 200 15 @ $ 8.00/L.F. $ 120.00
8 V.F. 7 6 l@ 28.00/V.F. 28.00
9 V.F. 171 168.9 2.1 @ 32.00/V.F. 67.20
10 V.F. 16 15.8 .2 @ 37.00/V.F. 7.40
20 C.Y. 10 0 10 @ 17.00/C.Y. 170.00
21 Each 10 2 8@ 100.00/Ea~h 800.00
22 Each 10 0 10 @ 125.00/Each 12250.00
2.442.60
ADD
11 L.F. 368 374 6@ $175.00/L.F. 12050.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $1,392.60
Original Contract Price $ 4702723.75
~revious Authorized Changes 6,339.65 ADD
This Change {KEEj(DEDUCT) 1,392.60
Amended Contract Price $ 475,670.80
Board authorization date: Approved:
April 10, 1968
Agenda Item #48 -N-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown ..
· Chief Engineer
VIDO SAMARZICH CO.
By ____ ~--------~~~--~-
District 2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: Vida Samarzich Co.
JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6
Amount of this change order (X1ID09 (DEDUCT)
C.O. No. ____ 3r.-.--~---
DATE: April 10, 1968
$ 4,500.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
, pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
EXTENSION OF TIME
REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated April 3, 1968 and Final Closeout
Agreement dated April 10, 1968
1. Extension of time per Section 5-10 of Specifications:
Rain and inclement weather -November & December,
1967 (13); Acts of other agencies -delay in approval
of freeway bore change by State Division of Highways
(30); Acts of Districts -delay pending decision as
to electrical panel for relocated lift station (8);
Extra work -Change Order No. 1 {12) 63
2. Extension of time per Final Closeout Agreement
dated April 10, 1968 34
TOTAL CALENDAR DAYS ALLOWED 97
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Original specified completion date:
Completion date with this extension
of time (97 calendar days):
Actual completion date:
November 8, 1967
February 13, 1968
March 29, 1968
Contractor did not complete his work within the originally
specified completion time plus this extension of time. Consequently,
the sum of $4,500, representing 45 days liquidated damages between
February 13 and March 29, 1968, is hereby assessed and deducted from
the Contract amount as provided in Section 5-10 of the Specifications.
Original Contract Price $ 470,723.75
Previous Authorized Changes ADD 4,947.05
This Change (X:E>E}){DEDUCT) 4,500.00
Amended Contract Price $ 471,170.80
Board Authorization Date: Approved:
April 10, 1968
Agenda Item #48
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
VIDO SAMARZICH CO.
By __ ~-----------------------
-0-District 2
.,.,...,,
RESOLUTION NO. 68-19-2
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
·2-10-6 AS COMPELTE AND APPROVING FINAL
CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, VIDO SAMARZICH COMPANY,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6, on the
29th day of March, 1968; and,
Section 2o That by letter·, J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney
L. Lowry, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said
work as.having been completed in accordance with the terms of the con-
tract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said .engineers' recommendation, which said recommendation
is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO.
2-10-6, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of
the contract therefor, dated the 21st day of June, 1967; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby .
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with VIDO
SAMARZICH COMPANY, providing for payment to the contractor in the
amount of $471,170.80, is hereby approved; and,
Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of the Districto
Agenda Item #49 -P-District 2
RESOLUTION NO. 68-20-7
APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEfv1ENT AGREEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION
OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
(MASTER PLAN) WITH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse-
ment Agreement (Master Plan), between County Sanitation District
No. 7 and IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, providing for reimbursement
by the District for the LANE ROAD SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NOo
7-2C and the LANE ROAD LIFT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-2C-P, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree-.
ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General
Counsel; and,
Section 3. That reimbursement for the LANE ROAD SUB-TRUNK
SEWER in the total amount of $73,738.25 and for the LANE ROAD LIFT
STATION in the total amount of $70,030.00 is hereby authorized to
be made in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said
agreement, from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District.
Agenda Item #55 -R-District 7
BOYLE mu! LO\VRY
Consulting E11giueers 1 A ]oit:t \I euture of
BOYLE~ ENGINEERING & LOWm' /\ND ASSOCIATES
Fred A. Harper, G~neral Manager
County Sanitation District No. 7
P. 0. Box 517 5
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Sir:
P. 0. Box 178
Santa Aua1 California 92i02
Telep11oue S47-44i I
March 22, 1968
The Irvine Industrial Complex has filed notices
of completion covering the Lane Road Sub-Trunk Sewer,
contract 7-2C and the Lane Road Sewage Lift Station, con-
tract 7-2C-P.
Enclosed is a copy of the final pay quantities
for the Lane Road Sub-Trunk Sewer in the amount of $73,738.25
and for the Lane Road Sewage Lift Station in the amount of
$70,030.00, for your use in preparing a reimbursement agree-
ment for this -sub-trunk sewer and sewage lift station.
SLL:m
!f.enda Item #55 -S-
Very truly yours,
Boyle and Lowry.
Consulting _E~gineers
17 /__//_I
.4&-dt'-< . .:/ ..\--< ;,:....,·-rt.I • ""? ~T
Sidney L. Lowry
District 7
-.r.----·---#.........._. ........... ,_ .. _b __ ... _ ............. ~ ..................................... -----------------------
. . ~~· .
..... • .. ·-
.··
· .. ·
.. . . . . . .: ~-
. • .. · .... . . ~ . . -. ·' t4"-'\ .. ~:.
.... .
·":--.: .
. . : .
. · .. · .
. . . ~ •.. •,
. . . . ,.....--:....,,-. .,..."'~-~-,..~~ .. ~-&.l\...,•~~~~ ... ,n ..... ~-. .. ~..o...·.,..,....i.~~~-~.~:.M~ .. .....,.........-ho~<eJ......,.....,..__.. ......... , • ..,......~-. ....... _..~ ... ---
---~:~-:-:--::~-.;::-:-::-;:-:-:---;--. .--·-·----------------------,.....--,..-
\wl'
RESOLUTION NO. 68-21-7
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED
TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ-
ING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE IN EXCHANGE FOR A CORRECTED
EASEMENT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the quitclaiming to the County of Orange,
of a certain easement acquired in connection with construction of the
South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer and recorded NoYember 14, 1966 as Document
No. 7333 in Book 8102, Page 755 of Official Records of Orange County,
is hereby authorized; and,
Section 2. That the easement to be quitclaimed is more
particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Quit-
claim Deed on behalf of the Board of Directors, in form acceptable
to the General Counsel; and,
Section 4. That the certain Correction Deed from the
County of Orange to County Sanitation District No. 7, granted in
exchange for the quitclaiming by the District of the easement
referred to hereinabove, is hereby accepted at no cost to the District
and as recommended by the District's engineers; and,
Section 5. That the easement covered in said Correction
'
Deed is more particularly described on Schedule "B" attached hereto
and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 6. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorlzed and directed to record said Correction Deed in the
Official Records of Orange County, California.
A~enda Item #56 -U-District 7
v ;fJ) '/J I~
{}_
;(). fi.~ .... i . //r-~";;""·1 ,7i , :?.~~.)
/ ;· / I 'rJ•./ • ,. , / .. ·· : •. · I • ,• A \ ·,... • • /. '_,. 1_.,4r . ....._,. \,../· 1· '-·' ',::,., . ,,,
ENGINEERING
{]
ARCHITECTS o ENGINEERS
412 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 547-4471
ADDRESS REPLY TO P. 0. BOX 176
Apr ii 5, 19 68
Board of Di rectors
County Soni tat ion District No. 7
of Orange County
P.O. Box 5175
Fountain Volley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
In accordance with the request of the Board of Directors, we are pleased
to submit the following proposal for your consideration.
It is herein proposed that the annexation policies of the district established
in 1966 be reviewe9 and updated.
Because of the many variables that exist in a study of this type, it is
difficult to establish a fixed fee; therefore, it is proposed that the study
.· be performed on a per diem basis in accordance with the per diem rates
set forth herein. At th is time it is. estimated that the total cost to prepare
such a report should not exceed $1,000. If, during the course of the study,
it is anticipated that the total cost of the work could exceed this amount,
we shall immediate I y advise the board of this foe t.
Ou-per diem rates are as follows:
Principal Engineer
/usociate Engineer
Assistant Engineer
Supervising Draftsman
. Senior Draftsman
· Draftsman
Licensed Surveyor
3-man Survey party
Clerical
Reproduction
BOYLE ENGINEERING .,,,..-. , / ,. /
) / :-e, /~r-y· . <.. .. _ ,,-~ei,.· ""/ I• ..-'-.,..,..:J. ·'-}
Edwin H. Finster
Vice President, Santa Ana
i~
$22 .50 per hour
16. 00 per hour
t2.00 per hour
12.50 per hour
11.50 per hour
10. 00 per hour
15. 00 per hour ·
34. 00 per hour
6.00 ~r hour
Cost + 15 percent
--~
P R 0 F E S S I o· N A L ENGINEERING AN 0 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES
Agenda Item #57 -V-District 7
:a·.
RESOLUTION NO. 68-22-7
APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SEWERAGE FACIL-
ITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT !~STER PLAN)
WITH. STANDARD-PACIFIC CORPORATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse-
ment Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 7 and
STANDARD-PACIFIC CORPORATION, providing for reimbursement by the
District for a sewer line constructed in East Walnut Ave. is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree-
ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General
Counsel; and,
Section 3o That reimbursement in the total amount of
$5,917.90 is hereby authorized to be made from the Facilities
Revolving Fund of the District in accordance with the terms and
conditions as outlined in said agreement, and as recqmmended by
the District's engineerso
Agenda Item 1158 W-1 District 7
'.,,;) .
BOYLE mul LO\VHY
Comultiug Eugiuc:crs, A Joiut Vcuturc of
BOl'LE ENGINEEHING & LOWln' AND ASSOCIATES
\
February 19, 1968
County Soni tation District No. 7
Post Office Box 51 75
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Pou I Hogon .
County Sanitation District No. 7
Troct 6484 Reimbursement Agreement
P. 0. Do.'( 178
Sa>ita Atza, Califon:i•t 92702
Telcp1ionc S·-17·4-17 I
We have reviewed the request of the Standard-Pacific Corp. for a reim-· ·
bursement agreement as requested in their letter dated February 8, 1968.
The quantities I isted in the I etter are accurate and the unit prices shovm
ore reasonable. It is therefore recommended that the district enter into
a reimbursement agreement with Standard-· Pacific Corp. in the amount of
$5,917.90. . .
Since only the northeasterly side of Walnut Avenue between the tract
boundary and Browning Avenue will ever connect to this sewer, the front
footage charge should be based upon the northeasterly frontage allowing
for o future 40-foot half width of Browning Avenue. This net frontage ·
length omounts to 1,281.63 feet which divided into $5, 917. 90 gives a
front footage charge of approxjmatefy $4.62. ·
BOYLE and LOWRY
CQ_J t?~
~arl A. Corlson, C. E. 6654
pp
41-7635-63-00
cc: Lowry and Associates
Agenda Item #58 W-2 District 7
•
-?
tJ
> ~
.J
-'
:c
• Q
w
~
·-
:V\
)
ll 1T ao · r:u•uR~ · I L.-WIQ'\""t-1
COUNTY OF ORANGS.. ·
TRACT b484
// . / .. / / .. / ,/ /.· ..... ,.· _.,,· ./' .' ... / . ." .·
_,/ , ./ . . ./ / .·. . ,,·· .. / ./ ,,-·· ,, .. .' , y·· . , / .· .. · ,/ .• , , / /~~c~,i~·d;-r. ·~~E.~ "?."<>:/
/, / /' . . , . /. . .,,::; .. /.'-;>·" . .
/, , ,,,,.· ·' ..... . . .· < .· / .· . • ,, .. / .•
. , / " .. ,, .. . .
/ -.. . . , ·' .... ·.. , . .... ~ ,· ~· .·.
.. ~"FRONr · rOOT~G~ ~· \28l. b3 ." ·· . .
, . ,,.·
"WALNUT AVE.
SEWtH'!. t\. MANJ.ID1..ll.5 CowSYRuG-rr-z.n
8 ~ STAMOARO •PA~lPI(. C~RP FIA TR. C.4Srq.
C.lT\' OF TuS\!N
SC~\.E.. t "' = 4oq'
~5KE.iCH TO ACCOMPANY RE.1~.18URSE.\\t"d:.NT
.. AGRt:.E.ME.NT Bf!.TWEE-[\J COUNTY SANl~A TtON.
OISTRlCT NO. 7 If STANDARD-PAClFl.C Co RP.,
)
..
tt! ·> ~
\')
z ·-z
:>-_,
a
~ en
TRuN~ -s rzw~R
)
;1
.n
H .µ
rl.l
•r-l r=i··
(V")
I
~
0)
~
':::t:t:::
E
(])
.µ
H
co
'O
~
(l)
bD
c::t:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.a. sax 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
March 8, 1968
TELEPHCN ES:
AREA CODE 714
540-291 a
962-2411
TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
Gentlemen:
The next regular meeting pf the Boards of Directors of
County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11
of Orange County, California, will be ·held:
Wednesday evening, March 13, 1968
at 7:30 Porn.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calirornfa
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, March 13, 1968
7:30 p.m .
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Telephones:
Area Code 714
540-2910
962-241 1
March 8, 1968
The following is an explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the formal agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to
the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting
but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No. 12 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: Under this item we have asked
Mr . H. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers to give a short talk
regarding information he gathered during his trip to Washington, D.C.
last month . Some of the information obtained by Mr . Hunt is of
extreme importance to the Districts in that it concerns the likeli-
hood of the Districts obtaining Federal funds for the new 120-inch
ocean outfall. Also of interest to the Districts is rece n t
information as to Federal policies and regulations for enforcement of
water pollution control standards.
No. 14 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: The
Executive Committee and the Special Building Committee met jointly
during the afternoon and evening of February 29 and considered a
number of important items affecting all Districts. Director Bigonger
also met with the Committees as a guest. A complete report on the
meeting, including recommendations adopted, is enclosed.
No. 15 -PROPOSED ALTERATIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING:
This matter is covered in the accompanying report of the Executive
Committee and the recommended motion, appearing on the agenda, is in
accordance with action taken by the Executive and Special Building
Committees at their February 29 meeting.
No . 17 -NEGOTIATIONS WI TH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ON POSSIBLE
LAND LEASE: Attached to the agenda material under this item is a
letter from the Orange County Water District dated March 5, 1968 . The
question of a possible cooperative arrangem ent between the Water
District and the Sanitation Districts re gar ding use of land adjacent
to our Treatment Plant No. 1 has come up becau8e of the proposed water
reclamation facilities of the Water District and because of the fact
that our present farm lease of approximately 36 acres expires on
June 1 of this year. The Water District now owns approximately 20
acres adjacent to ours on which, we understand, its farm lease has
also expired.
As indicated on the recommended motion appearing on the agenda~
the staff suggests that this matter be referred to the Executive
Committee for study and recommendation to the Boards.
No. 18 -LEASE OF LAND TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOR PARK PURPOSES: The
Directors will recall that at the February meeting the preparation of
a le ase for approximately 2 acres of Districts' property to the City
of Fountain Valley for park purposes was authorized, with the lease
to contain certain provisions recommended by the Executive Committee.
We have furnished the City with a draft of a lease prepared by the
General Counsel and at the present time are awaiting the City's
action on this matter. If we receive advice by the time of the Board
meeting that the City has executed the lease as submitted, the
resolution appearing on the agenda under this item will be recommended
for adoption.
No. 19 -PROPOSAL FROM JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR REDESIGN WORK ON
NEW OPERATORS' BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2: The engineers, in connection
with a new Operators' Building at Plant No. 2, submitted plans for
the Operators' Building incorporating "tilt-up" construction. During
the review of the plans by the Executive and Special Building
Committees, it was brought up that perhaps a l ess expensive type of
construction would be more appropriate for the Operators' Building
and the engineers were asked to reappraise this matter together with
Director Miller (Building Committee Chairman) and the staff. After
further study of the engineers' appraisal, the Committees asked the
engineers to submit an alternate design for the building in question,
incorporating more conventional commercial construction.
Inasmuch as this additional design work cannot be compensated
for under the existing contract between the Districts and the
engineers, the latter were asked to submit a proposal for the
additional work involved. This proposal has been received and is
included with the agenda material under this item. Mr. Miller has
reviewed the proposal and recommends its acceptance by the J oint
Boards.
No. 20 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, J OB NO. P2-ll: This construction
contract (Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2) fo r approximately $2.5 million,
has been under way for almost one year and is proceeding satis-
factorily and on schedule . During the design stages of this work a
very painstaking effort by the staff and engineers was made to insure
that a minimum of changes during construction would be necessary.
Because of this effort, no major changes have been found to be
necessary in the first eleven months except for the first three items
of the recommended change order attached to the agenda material.
With respect to the largest of these items (No. 3, Tunnel Revisions -
$2544), the reason for the extra work were decisions reached as to
final location of new structures under a subsequent contract (see
Item No. 19 ), which decisions have been reached prior to the award
of the present contract. Doing this work under the present contract
-2 -
will simplify and reduce the over-all cost of the subsequent contract.
The fourth item on the change order, for a negotiated lump sum price
of $750, is the result of an error on the part of the Districts as
well as of the contractor. location of two tie-in points was incor -
rect ly furnished the contractor before excavation began and also the
contractor was remiss in not verifying this information in the field .
For this reason it was agreed with the contractor that the Districts
would compensate the contractor for 50% of the additiona l construction
work up to a maximum of $750. The recommended change order a lso
g rants the contractor an extension of time of 23 calendar days for
this additional work.
No. 2 1 -ATTENDANCE OF DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL AT CWPCA MEETING IN
SANTA ROSA: This item is a recommended motion authorizing the
General Manager to designate ten Districts' employees to attend the
40th annual conference of the California Water Pollution Control
Association at Santa Rosa on April 24 through 27.
For many years it has been customary to authorize a number of
employees to attend the CWPCA conferences and they have been of
consistent benefit to the Districts in acquainting our personnel with
practices and procedures of other sewering agencies and new develop-
ments in the sewerage field . The Association is quite active, its
annual meeting being attended by more than 800 municipal and District
personnel and consulting engineers active in the fie l d of sewage
collection, treatment and disposal. It is the only meeting during
the year which more than one or two of our personnel regularly attend .
No. 22 -PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Bids were t aken on February 23 for
two items of budgeted equipment: (1) a replacement hydraulic truck
crane, and (2) a replacement for a 1/2-ton pickup truck. A tabulation
of bids received and a recommendation for award, in each case, is
included in the agenda material under this item. It is recommended
that award of the purchase of these items be made as indicated under
the motion appearing on t he a g enda .
No. 23 -RECEIVE AN:) FILE FINANCIAL REPORT: The customary quarte rly
financial report for the period ending December 31, 1967, as prepared
by our independent auditors, Hanson , Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester,
has been mailed directly from that firm 's office to the Directors.
The staff will be prepared to answer any questions concerning data
contained in the report, if desired.
District No. 2
Nos. 30 and 31 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 2 -11-2: Com p letion of this
project (Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main
Sewer) was delayed for a considerable period of time because of late
delivery of equipment caused by strikes affecting the manufacturer.
However, as of February 14 the work was finally completed and we are
recommending that it be accepted as of that date. Another difficulty
arose towards the end of the project in that the contractor did not
have available work forces to make a number of mechanical and other
-3-
corrections determined necessary before acceptance. In order to put
the pumping station into operation, the contractor, staff and
engineers agreed that the District's forces would make the necessary
corrections and back-charge the contractor.
In order to close out this contract, we are therefore recom-
mending the actions appearing on the agenda. Item No. 30 is the
adoption of Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 which provide for the back-
charge mentioned above and a small item of extra work as described
(for a net deduction of $365.12) and a deduction of $700 for liqui-
dated damages due to delay in completion not justified under the
specifications. Item No. 31 is the customary resolution accepting
the job as complete on February 14 and directing filing of Notice of
Completion.
No. 32 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 2-10-8: As authorized at the February
Board meeting, bids for the construction of the next section of the
Euclid Trunk Sewer will be taken on the afternoon of March 11 . This
project was described in the Manager's Report for the February
meeting and has an estimated construction cost of approximately
$410,000.
If the bids received on March 11 are in order and satisfactory,
a resolution naming the successful bidder will be prepared for the
final agenda.
No. 33 -CLAIM ARISING OUT OF ACCIDENT ON CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6: This
item pertains to a claim for personal injuries in connection with the
above contract (Euclid Trunk Sewer from Ball Road to La Palma Avenue).
The motion appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended for
adoption.
No. 34 -ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR LAST SEGMENT OF EUCLID TRUNK SEWER
CONSTRUCTION: The remaining construction project in the District
budgeted for this fiscal year is Contract No. 2-10-9, the one remain-
ing portion of the Euclid Trunk Sewer replacement project which
commenced in 1964 and has been proceeding piecemeal as funds became
available. This contract involves the installing of approximately
two miles of 33-inch V.C.P. between Chapman Avenue and Ball Road in
Garden Grove and Anaheim. The construction cast is estimated at
$434,000. Early completion of this project is desired in order to
better serve these two cities and to provide relief for the Magnolia
Trunk Sewer. Upon completion of this work, the construction set forth
in the approved Engineer's Report of July, 1965, will have been
carried out approximately three years ahead of schedule.
For this particular project, and with the concurrence of
Chairman Speer, I have asked Boyle Engineering of Santa Ana to submit
a proposal for engineering services for consideration of the Board.
This proposal is included with the agenda material and has been
analyzed by the staff. It has been found to be satisfactory and is
recommended for acceptance.
-4-
District No. 11
No. 48 -PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT -PHASE I:
The first phase of the manhole replacement and repair program
budgeted for this year will be ready for bidding after receipt of
necessary permits from the City of Huntington Beach and the State of
California. A total of $25,000 was budgeted for this work in the
current year; however, the engineers and staff are now recommending
that only a portion of the work be done immediately in order that the
type of repair proposed can be evaluated before proceeding with the
balance of the work. For this reason the first project will involve
only three manholes, two of which will be provided with a proven
plastic lining and the other reconstructed by guniting or forming,
at the option of the contractor. It is hoped that the guniting
method, which is considerably less expensive than the plastic instal-
lation, will prove, upon evaluation over a period of time, to be
satisfactory for the remaining manholes in need of repair due to
hydrogen sulfide attack.
We plan to advertise for bids for this first phase as soon as
the above permits are obtained and recommendation for award will be
made at a subsequent meeting . The cost is estimated to be $2700.
District No. 7
No. 52 -REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT MASTER PLAN) WITH STANDARD-
PACIFIC CORPORATION: The resolution appearing with the agenda autho-
rizes the execution of a Reimbursement Agreement with Standard-Pacific
Corporation, for connections which may be made to the offsite sewer
for Tract No. 6484. The District agrees to charge $4.62 per front
foot, and any collections would be paid to Standard-Pacific
Corporation, up to an amount of $5,917.90 .
The District does not guarantee to the developer that he will
recover his costs, as his reimbursement is based strictly on the
collection of the front-footage charge from adjacent property owners
as their properties are developed. (See page T-1)
Nos. 54 and 55 -PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS TO THE DISTRICT: No . 54 is the
Kordes Annexation, located in Cowan Heights, and contiguous to the
District's boundary. It consists of 3.66 acres, and can be served
by a gravity sewer which the proponents plan to finance on their own.
Based on the present annexation charge of $215 per acre, $786 .90 has
been deposited with the District.
No. 55 is the Irvine Annexation, which involves 42.61 acres
contiguous to the District's boundary just east of the Browning Sub-
trunk and north of the Navy Way Pumping Station. We have not yet
received the annexation fees of $9,161.15; however, we have been
advised by the developer, R. H. Grant Co., that payment will be made
before meeting time.
-5-.
No. 56 -CONS IDERATION OF REAPPRAISAL OF ANNEXATION FEES: In
February, 1966, the District's engineers submitted a sewerage facility
report for the Santiago Creek-Peters Canyon Study Area, which was
dated December, 1965. Among other conclusions in the report, an
annexation fee of $215 per acre was recommended. Since then, all
annexations to the District have been charged in accordance with this
recommendation.
Chairman Miller has suggested that in view of the time lapse,
and the increased investment in Plant and District facilities, it
wou ld be timely for the District to have a reappraisal of its present
annexation fees.
It is the staff's recommendation that Boyle Engineering be
asked to submit a proposal to make this reappraisal, since members
of this firm calculated the existing annexation fee.
No. 57 -REPORT ON CONTRACT NO . 7-1-SCHEDULE C: On November 8, 1 967,
the Board awarded Contract No . 7-1-Schedule C (Gisler Trunk Sewer)
to the Zarubica Company for the amount of $223,868.32 and the
contract provided for 140 calendar days for construction beginning
November 23 (completion date, April 11, 1 968 ). To date, neither
equipment nor work forces have arrived at the site of the project.
Numerous telephone conversations have transpired, and several letters
have been written to the contractor in an effort to get the project
underway. We understand that his crews are tied up on a project in
the Calabasas area, which, of course, should have nothing to do with
onr contract.
The contractor's bid price is extremely favorable to the
District and the firm has done satisfactory work for the Districts in
the past. As the Directors will recall, the engineers recommended
the construction of this sewer to prevent overflows this summer.
We have invited the contractor to appear before the Board,
to indicate h is company's position in the matter (see page _ll_).
The General Counsel has been counseling the staff and will
advise the Board at the meeting of its lega l position.
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
~
" NE .. 'L A'ID sr
7( "
SCA t.£ /~# APPllO.X .J Jil l
COUNTY SANI TATION DISTRICTS
OI ~.&,,'££ COUN1T
D I S-1..BJJL!.§
ANO
U!_U NK ~
I 9 6 7
0
"
~
~
,,_
-x-
-... A"""'~,, ·' -·-I • I -
_.-I "'..-
/ ' _,Q I '~.,_
/ -· . ~ -J \1'-'.,,
I ,,0
,.,.. .. ~ ""-,,,. 0
·-•• ---~----·-······' '"" 0 •.
~~
:: ··~
~-... :..... :
( >;.·.-.·.:-·/'
./ )\'\.
"
•.t •• ;
r''
/\~:_...,----·,_<:
...... #
/~: ............. ..
·~· .................. ..
{_;\..
1·-··'/
":
:·:
__ .,. ...