Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1968-04I 00/\t~os o~: Dm:!Ci'ORS Cou nty San itat ion Distrids P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County , Cali fornia 1 0841~ [llis Aven ue Fo untain Valley, Calif., 92708 AG EM DA April 10, 1968 -7 :30 p .m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3 ) Appointme nts of Chairmen pro tern , if n ecessary (4) DISTRICT 1 Con sideration of motion approving minute s of the r egular me eting he l d March 13, 1968 , as mai l ed (5 ) DIS TRICT 2 Co nsideration of motion approving minutes of the regul ar meeting h e l d March 13, 1968 , as mai l ed ( 6 ) DIS TRICT 3 Consideration of motion app r oving minutes of the reg u lar me eting held March 13, 1968 , as ma iled (7) DISTRICT 5 Cons ideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting he ld March 13, 1968 , as ma iled (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular mee ting h e ld Marc h 13, 1968 , as mailed (9 ) DISTRICT 7 Considerat ion of motion approving min ute s of the r eg ular meeting h eld March 13 , 1968 , as mail e d (10) DISTRICT 8 (1 1) (12) (13) (14) (1 5) Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 10, 1968 , as mailed DIS TRICT 11 Consideration of motion ap£roving minutes of the regular mee t ing held March 13, 1968 , as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the J oint Chairman ALL DIS TR ICTS Rep ort of the Gen e r a l Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Genera l Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Re port of the Executi ve and Bui lding Committe e s; and con- siderat ion of motion to receive and file the written report of the Committees . (Copy in folders) (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion accepting proposal of William P. Ficker, A.I.A., for architectural services in connection with alterations to the office building, as recommended by the Executive and Building Committees. See page "F" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion directing the staff to advertise for bids for the sale of digester sludge gas_, as recommended by the Executive Committee (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion directing the Executive Committee to conduct an annual review of the performance and compen- sation of Management personnel, and the performance of the General Counsel, as recommended by the Executive Committee (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Legal Opinion submitted by the General Counsel, and establishing policy with regard to the Districts' personnel receiving compen- sation for outside services, as recommended by the Executive Committee. See page "G" (20) ALL DISTRICTS (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) Consideration of motion authorizing purchase of the follow- ing equipment (see pages · "H" and "I" for bid tabula- tions): One, 4-wheel drive Tommy Ayers Chevrolet $2,974.82 cab & chassis truck Specification #A-033 Three, 4x8 shaker Link Belt Co. $10,423.35 screens, #E-051 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $15,000 from the Salaries and Wages account to the Utilities account, within the Joint Operating Fund ALL DISTRICTS Verbal report by the staff, and consideration of motion to receive and file Resolution No. 59-5 of the Santa Ana River Basin Regional Water ·Quality Control Board~ setting forth its requirements for effluent to be discharged through Ocean Outfall No. 2 ALL DISTRICTS Review by the engineers of Master Plan Report on Wastewater Treatment Facilities, and consideration of motion to receive and file the report and take under submission for study ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda for this meeting, found them in order, and that he recommends authorization for paymen~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund.warrant books, and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A" , "B" , and "C" -2- # (26) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Santa Ana offering to provide maintenance of the North Bristol Street Trunk and the Fruit Street Trunk, and accepting the City's offer. See page "J" ( 28) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (29) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (30) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to adjourn (31) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (32) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications a. Motion to receive and file letter from the attorneys for the Cypress County Water District, and refer to the General Counsel. See page "K" . ( 33) DISTRICT 3 '..I . Consideration of motion to adjourn (34) DISTRICT 11 (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-18-5, accepting the Reconstruction of Bitter Point Pump Station (Contract No. 5-15) as complete, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "L" DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to adjourn to 4:00 p.m., April 11th, Newport Beach City Hall -3- (42) DISTRICT 6 (43) (44) (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) (52) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly Financial Report prepared by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ending December 3~, 1967 DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving the following Change Orders to the plans and specif !cations for the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6, (Vido Samarzich Co., Contractor) : Cha~e Order No. 1, authorizing addition of $6, 9o65 and granting extension of time. See page "M" Change Order Noo 2, authorizing a deduction of $1,392.60 for adjustment of quantities. See page "N" Change Order No. 3, authorizing a deduction of $4,500.00 and granting an extension of time. See page "O" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution Noo 68-19-2, approving Final Closeout Agreement; accepting Contract Noo 2-10-6 as complete; and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Worko See.page "P" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion authorizing construction of the Riverside Freeway sewer crossing, consisting of approximately 800-feet of 27-inch VCP sewer and directing the staff to proceed with th~ planning and implementation DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Merco Construction Engineers, Inco, requesting permission to subcontract a portion of Contract No. 2-10-8 {Euclid Trunk Sewer), to Far Western Pipeline, Inco; and approving said request. See page "Q" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" -4- See '.!fo (53) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (54) DISTRICT 2 (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) (60) (61) Consideration of motion to adjourn DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-20-7, approving a Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement (Master Plan) with Irvine Industrial Complex, relative to construction of Contracts 7-2C and 7-2C-P (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer and Lane Road Sewage Lift Station). See page "R" • See pages "S" and "T" for recommendation and map. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-21-7, authorizing quitclaim of easement to the County of Orange in exchange for a corrected easement (at no cost). See page "U" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering for reappraisal of the District's annexation fee schedule; and authorizing the General Manager to direct the engineers to proceed for a total fee not to exceed $1, 000. See page "V" · DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-22-7, approving Reimbursement Agreement (not Master Plan) with Standard- Pacific Corporation, for a sewer line constructed in East Walnut Avenue. See page "W" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 68-23-7, ordering annexation of territory to the District (Annexation #14). See page "x" DISTRICT 7 Assessment District No. 7 --(Proceedings can be referred to Engineer of ~vork and special counsel for the assessment district, if desired) (61) DISTRICT 7 Report of engineers on petition DISTRICT 7. Resolution 68-24-7, to bypass pro- (62) visions of 1931 Act (63) DISTRICT 7 (64) DISTRICT 7 Approve plans, specifications, diagram and estimate DISTRICT 7 Resolution of Intention, No. 68-25-7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E" See (62) DISTRICT 7 other business and communications, if any (63) DISTRICT 7 · Consideration of motion to adjourn _i:;_ ~. 8961 '01 11.Id'Q' SiliN~nooa DNI~HOddfiS CINV SNOiilifl~OS~H ~·. WARRANT NO. 9072 9073 9074 9075 9076 9077 9078 9079 9080 9081 9082 ~ 9083 9084 9085 9086 9087 9088 9089 9090 9091 9092 9093 9094 9095 9096 9097 9098 9099 9100 9101 9102 9103 9104 9105 9106 9107 9108 9109 9110 9111 9112 9113 9114 9115 9116 9117 9118 9119 9120 9121 9122 9123 9124 9125 9126 9127 9128 9129 9130 9131 9132 9133 ...-........... ·. ·.·. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Apco Supply, Furnace Controls, Filters $ Atlas Chrysler, Truck Parts All Bearing Service, Pump Parts Bank of America, Coupon Coll. Expo American Chemical, Tech. Journal Subscription City of Anaheim, Power The Anchor Packing, Pump Packing Bay City Bearing, Bearings, Couplings Bell's Radiator Service, Radiator Repair James G. Biddle Co., Test Equipment Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Ele6t. Supplies Build •n Save, Ceiling Repair Material Calif. Water Poll Cont. Assoc., Conf. Expenses Cal's Cameras, Photo Supplies Carmen Castro, Employee Mileage Certified Building Materials, Sand Challenge-Cook Bros., Wheel Loader Parts Chicago Miniature Lamp Co., Instrument Lamps Clayton Mfg. Co., Transformer C-L Chemical, Chemicals College Lumber, Small Hardware & Lumber Consolidated Electrical Dist., Elect. Supplies Continental-Emsco Co., Tool Supplies Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts De Guelle & Sons, Glass Diesel Control Corp., Engine Parts Economy Office Equip,, Office Equipment & Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Ensign Products, Metal Preserver Fischer Governor, Regulators Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation & Supp. Flair Drafting, Drafting Services The Foxboro Co., Controls Freedom Newspapers, Legal Ad Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Mach. Shop Work General Electric Supply, Elect. Supplies General Telephone Co. The Glidden Co., Paints Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Graybar Electric Co., Safety Equipment Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physicals Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses Hi-Fi Signs, No Parking Signs James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage Honeywell, Telemetering Repairs Howard Supply Coo, Valves, Portable Hoist City of Huntington Beach, Water ILG Industries Inc., Centrifugal Fan International Harvester Co., Truck Parts J & M Service, Equipment Parts Jones Chemicals, Chlorine Kar Products, Inc., Electric Supplies Kelly Pipe Co., Piping, Valves Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts Klassen's Welding Works, Machine Shop Work Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools & Hdwre. Herbert H. Kyzer, Employee Mj_leage LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Small Tools L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Rental Lawless GM Diesel, Wheel Loader Parts Judy Lee, Employee Mileage Lewis Bros. Battery, Battery -A- AMOUNT 225.78 4.02 94.59 322.00 6.oo 32.43 438.68 418.78 98.10 180.06 72.24 38.00 112.50 76.76 22.50 23.10 108.58 193.00 24.15 50.82 65.72 223.12 71.00 108.62 19.80 152.29 6.40 2,317.50 149.48 341.73 1,367.10 483.00 117.15 6.33 80.00 515.57 233.90 86.43 148.98 121.09 80.50 58.46 8.40 11.50 173.00 1,530.45 7 .65 193.69 125.00 2.40 11,088.00 21 .• 42 475.34 99.30 26.97 134.25 17.80 233.16 756.81 252.48 23.30 48.47 ; ~· WARRANT NO. 9134 9135 9136 9137 9138. 9139 9140 9141 9142 9143 9144 9145 9146 9147 9148 9149 9150 9151 9152 9153 9154 9155 9156 9157 9158 9159 9160 91661 91 2 9163 9164 9165 9166 9167 9168 9169 9170 9171 9172 9173 9174 9175 9176 9177 9178 9179 9180 9181 9182 9183 9184 9185 9186 9187 9188 9189 9190 9191 9192 9193 9194 9195 9196 IN FAVOR OF Lithographic· Arts, Brochure Covers & Backs Litton Business Equipment, Office Supplies McCoy Motor Co., Portable Equipment Parts Jack Edward McKee,· Consulting Services Mahaffey Machine; Machine Shop Work Main Photo Service, Photo Finishing Dennis May, Employee Mileage AMOUNT 96.60 88.41 61.18 450.00 301.60 54.10 19.50 Metermaster, Inc., Tool Repair Miller, Nissen & Kogler, Legal Serv. (Anti-Trust) Mine Safety Appliances, Safety Equipment 21.77 409.87 45.53 31.24 57.43 Mobil Oil Corp., Lubricant Munselle Supply, Welding Supplies Municipal Finance Officers, Acct•g. Pub. The Nationa1·cash Register Co., Acct'g. Mach. City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nisson, Gen. Counsel Ret. Fee Oakite Products, Cleaning & Mtce. Supplies o. c. Suppliers, Small Hardware County of Orange, Juvenile Work Program Orange County Radiotelephone Pacific Telephone Kenneth· A. Peterson, Employee Mileage Postmaster Postage Public Empioyees' Ret. System, PERS Admin. Exp. 7.65 20,729.90 12.97 700.00 174.96 12.72 500.00 415.95 295.06 11.40 150.00 121.00 109.07 Radio Products Sales, Elect. Tubes Reggie's Diesel Serv., Wheel Loader Engine The Ragister, 6 Mos. Subscription Repair 32.00 13.50 143.80 212.00 Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Steel Beam Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts & Repairs Saddleback Travel & Tours, Engr. to Allis Chalmers Santa Ana Blue Print, CSD Brochure Prints 215.14 135.92 Santa Ana Electric, Elect. Supplies Santa Ana Electronics, Elect. Supplies E. H. Sargent co·., Lab Supplies Select Nurseries, Plants The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint--Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage So. Calif. Edison So. Calif. Water Co. So. Counties Gas Co. Sparkletts Drinking Water, Bottled Water Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts 39 S talce & Build. Supp., Surveying Supplies Standard Oil Co., Gasoline, Engine Oil Superior Craft Welding, Shop Work T & H Equipment Co., Tractor Repair Testing Machines, Inc., Automatic Sampler c. o. Thompson Petroleum, Weed Oil Norman R. Tremblay, Engr. to Allis Chalmers Triangle Steel & Supply, Steel Union Oil Co., Gasoline Wagoner Maintenance, Maintenance Supplies John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey, Fittings, Gauges, Valves Waukesha MCltor Co., Engine Parts Westco Pump Sales Co., Pump Parts Western Belting, Plastic Steel Western Salt Co., Salt Westinghouse Electric, Elect. Cart Parts Whitie Welding & Engineering, Engine Repairs Whitney's Speedometer, Trucl< Parts Zonne Industrial Tool Co., Engine Parts TOTAL JOil{T OPERATING FUND -B- $ 12.39 27.27 487.17 58.80 449.15 64.72 30.90 9, 595.47 3.90 701.58 88.21 252.20 16.07 325.20 20.00 196.07 462. 77 292.08 66.35 49.03 379 .39 187.00 220080 525.57 46.57 123.87 62.37 21.00 185.00 204.43 11.58 37.04 . \w) r I !· -.._,,,) ""-" WARRANT NO!.. 9197 9198 9199 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT - John Carollo Engineers $ 18,825.39 J. Putnam Henck 99,,732.86 Twining Laboratories 40.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $ 118., 598 .25 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 183.,858.12 -c- DISTRICT NO. l ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NOo IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9200 Boyle Engineering $ i,274.oo 9201 City of Santa Ana 65,000.00 $ 66,274.oo DISTRICT NOo 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 9202 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,458.00 9203 Far Western Pipe.line 125, 18.60 9204 Industrial Pipeline Construction 8,559.20 9205 Vido Samarzich 6,215.31 9206 Wallace Trade Bindery 27.30 $ 147,978.41 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF ·......_,; 3,238.00 9207 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry 9208 Miller, Nisson & Kogler 50.00 9209 c. Arthur Nisson 455.00 3,743.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND \·TARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 9210 City of Newport Beach 524.oo 9211 Power Construction Co. 8,024.40 $ 8,548.40 -D- DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6· SUSPENSE FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. I.N FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9212· Power Construction Co. $ 7,956 .oo 9213 Shuirman-Simpson 186.43 8,142.43 DISTRICT NOo 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 9214 Boyle and Lowry $ 1,336.00 ·9215 c. Arthur Nisson 166.25 $ 1,502.25 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 9216 Boyle and Lowry $ 3,256.71 9217 Irvine Industrial Complex 50,000.00 9218 Zarubica Company 65,601.13 $ 118,857.84 """"' $ 120,360.09 .. E- .. u.t '...I ".,,.I ~ WILLIAM P. FICKER, A. I. A. Architecture cincl Planning SUITE 21)2 • -146 N. NEWI'OUT BLVD., NEWPOJ?'i' nKACI!, CALW. • 646-773!> April 5, 1968 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation District 10844 Ellis Avenue P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, Calif. 92708 Dear Mr .. Harper: Thank you for the opportunity of worki~g with you on the remodeling of the Orange County Sanitation District Administrative Offices. I have looked at the drawings and made a rather hurried appraisal of the scope of work to be done and the scope of our involvement. I would suggest that we proceed on an hourly basis for this work.·· As you and your board are probably aware, it is difficult to estimate what a fair fee for this 11 piece 11 work might be. I would suggest working on the normal multiple of direct personnel expense a s f o ·11 ow s : 1. 2-1/2 times· staff salaries. This will normally equal approximately'$10.00 to $12.00 per hour. 2. Principal's time {time contributed by William P. Ficker only -$25.00 per hour.) At this point, I would suggest budgeting a miximum of $1,000.00 for architect's· fees. I would guess that this would cover substantially the maximum amount of effort we might expend on this job. We will work with you to de- termine the scope of our contributiODS to the project and help in determining whether it would·be better for us to provide all of the plans and specifications or to perhaps have some of your staff do a portion of the drawings; thereby reducing this total fee. As we progress, we will keep you informed of the time spent to date and the estimated time to complete the job. Agenda Itemh.§. F-1 All Distrj_cts ~.·~ ...._; .'-"' '--I p~ge two I will be very happy to discuss this project further with you. If you are in ~greement with this proposal, we will prepare a contract and a more detailed proposal for your review. Very truly yours, ~L 7 If!: --:.:~ William P. Ficker, A.I.A. WPF/njl Agenda Item #16 F-2 All Distrif'tS ';~ CLARK MILLER c. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER MILLER, NJSSON M KOGLER. ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 9270G April 2, 1968 Fred A. Harper . County sanitation Districts Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Re: Legal opinion regarding other work activities of employees Dear Fred: The provisions of Health and Safety Code §4768 ~ake §19251 of the Government Code applicable to employees of the County sanitation Districts. I am· enclosing herewith for your guidance. and review a copy of Government Code §19251 which deals with employees engaging in work other than that of their usual district occupation. If the Districts desire to provide guidelines ·over, above TELE: PHONE 5'42•G771 and beyond the provisions of the applicable government code section, they are at liberty to do so. Otherwise, I presume the enforcement of this provision is left up to you as General Manager. You may establish guidelines by preparing a statement of policy to be made available and known to the employees of the Districts. If you desire other and further information on this, please advise. Otherwise, I believe this adequately answers your request. CAN/vlj Enclosure (1) Agenda Item #19 c. Arthur Nissan G-1 All Districts ~ ""'111 ..._; :~·. #c?tf -#-7'76? G oVEn:ornNT Com'! § 1925i § 19251. Engngcmcnt in employment etc., inconsistent, incom-· j pa.tiblc, or in conflict with clnties: Determination of inconsistent, I incompatible, or conflicting duties: Devotion of full time, atten- 1 tion and efforts to office or e1:1ployme11t: Adoption rules governing ·1 application of section: n'.fo.ttcrs rules may include. . I A state officer or employee sha11 not engage in nny employment, i activity, or ent('1·prisc which [1] i.c: clearly inconsistent, incompatible, ! (2] in conflict wit11, or inimical io his duties as a state officer or employee or with the cluti<.>s, funetions or responsibiliti~s of his lip· pointing power or t.he agency by which he is employed. }Jnch appointing powl}r shall determine [3], subject to appro\'al of the board, those activiti('s, which, for employees under his jurisdiction, arc inconsistent, incompatible or in conflict ".-ith their duties as state officers or employees. [4] Consideration shall be gfocn to employment, activity or enterprise which: (a) involves the use for private gain or adYantagc of state time, facilities,. equipment and supplies; or the badge, uniform, prestige or influence of one's state office or employment or, (b) im·oh-cs receipt or acceptance by the officer or employee of any money or other consideration irom anyone other than the State for the performance of an act \Vhich the officer or employee, if not performing such act, 'vould be required or expected to render in the regular course or hours of his state employment or as a part of his duties as a state officer or employee or, (c) inYolves the performance of an act in· other than bis capacity as a state officer or employee which act may later be subject directly or indirectly to the control, inspection, review, audit or enforcement by such officer or employee or the agency by which he is employed, or, {d) involves such time demands as would render performance of lzis clutics as a state officer or employee less efficient •. Each state officer and employee shall during his l1ours of duty as a state officer or employee and subject to such other laws, rules or regulations as pertain thereto, devote his full time, attention and efforts to his state office or employment. The board may adopt rule.~ governing tlrc application of tlii.~ section. Suclt rules may include vrovision for notice to employees prior to tire determination of vroscn'be<l activitfos and for appeal by employees from suclL a determination an cl from its application to an employee. [Amended by Stats 1963 ch 1411 § 1.] 1. Deleted: "bas been <lctcrmined to be" 2. Deleted: "or" 3. Deleted: "an(l prescrib\!" 4. Deleted: "In making this determination the appointing power shall give'' 34 Ops Atty Gen 171 (office of school trustee :is incompatible ::i.ctivity for member of J1ighway patrol); 34 Ops Atty Gen 2·1-1 (positions of deputy re:il estate commissioner and city couocilm?n as not inherently incompntiL1e). Under tl1is sect.ion nn1l stnt.-.ueut of Department of Alcoholic B~\·crngC? Control making of rt!ceh·ing of gr:i.tu· itics from liquor liccnsc~s by ucp:trt· ment empJoyces an activity ineompati· ble with their e111ploymt~nt, ncCl'ptnncc by ::i.gent of department or drink pnitl for by manager of Jh~cnscc's bar wn~ acceptance of gr:ituity by agent io ( I B Gov Coded A~enda Item #19 \'iolation of regulations of llcp:irtml'nt, since· act of man:tgcr was nr.t of Ii· cC'nSel', it hn\·ing taken pince during tlh;cus~ion of some phase of licensee's business with Department of Alcoholic· · ncvcrage Control. Byrne v St:ite- Personncl Board (19Ci0 )179 CA2d 5i6,· 4 Cal Rptr 32; 73· G-2 ·- ,. ..... - All Districts - ALL DISTRICTS MOVED: MOTION That these Boards of Directors hereby establish the following policy with·respect to employees of the Districts engaging in work .other than that of their usual District occupation: "That the General Manager, in his discretion, may consent to the Districts' professional employees performing outside services, based on the following guidelines: a. That compensatory services be performed on the employee's own time b. That the outside services shall not b~ in conflict with the Districts' interests c. That the performance of such services shall not affect the employee's efficiency and job performance for the Districts That the provisions of Section 4768 of the State Health and Safety Code {Government Code Section 19251) shall apply to all such services." Agenda Item #19 G-3 All Districts BID TABULATION Contract for: ONE, 4-WHEEL DRIVE CAB & CHASSIS TRUCK Specification No. A-033 Bidder Make & Model Date: March 11, 1968 Days Delivery Bid Price ·· ~ · 1. Tommy Ayres· Chevrolet 350 Broadway Chevrolet KE 2093 3/4 Ton Approx. 45 . . $3,074~-82 100.00* $2,974.82 • .A ~~·· Laguna Beach, Calif. 2. Saddleback Dodge 1401 N. Tustin Ave.· Santa Ana, Calif. 3. International Harvester Co. 1110 E. Katella Ave. Anaheim, Calif. *Trade-in allowance 1968 Dodge W200- 4-wheel drive International 1200C 4x4 45-60 60-75 Present at opening: Pete Heikes (International Harvester), Harvey Hunt, Fred Harper, Paul G. Brown, Sylvia Wilson and Grace Geier Specifications were mailed to 5 automotive dealers $3,170.94 75.00*. $3,095.94 $3,614.01 75.00* $3,539.01 It is recommended that the award be made to Tommy Ayres Chevrolet, 350 Broadway, Laguna Beach, California, as the lowest and best bid. Agenda Item #20 -H- . T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer All Districts BID TABULATION Date: March 29, 1968 '..I FOR: 1. 2. -~"' ·. THREE, 4 1 x8 1 SHAKER SCREENS Specification No. E-051 Bidder Link Belt Div. F.M.C. Corp.* P. o. Box 22056 I.os Angeles, Calif. Medearis Oilwell Supply Corp. 21000 S. Normandie Ave. Torrance, California Unit Price Extension (3) $3,474.45 $10,~23.35 (3) $2,739.45 $ 8,218.35 Persons present: Pete Heikes, Harvey Hunt, Fred Harper, Paul Brown, Sylvia Wilson and Grace Geier *It is recommended that award be made.to Link Belt Div. F.M.C. Corp. for three (3), 4 1 x8 1 Shker Screens for the total amount of $10,423.35. The low bid submitted by Medearis Oilwell Supply did not contain submittals required by the specifications to qualify their e-quipment for the Districts intended use. Subsequent inquiries revealed that the Medearis Company has no experience with the size of equipment required and specified. Link Belt has numerous operating installations of the equipment specified and qualify as the best bid to meet the requirements of the Districts. The units will be manufactured locally and delivery time will allow the Districts to have our installation operational more than six weeks sooner than the delivery time proposed by the Medearis Company. Agenda Item #20 -I- T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer All Districts April 5, 1968 THf CITH Of £HnTH HnH CALIFORNIA 92701 Mr. Fred A. Harper, General Manager Orange County Sanitation District ONE P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Please addr.:ss replies to: 217 North Main Street Phone: 547-0511 NORTH BRISTOL STREET TRUNK SEWER BETWEEN MYRTLE STREET M.lD SANTA CLARA AVENUE, FRUIT STREET TRUNK SEWER (CONTRACT NO. 1-9) The City is willing to accept the additional costs involved in connecting the existing laterals to the Bristol Street Trunk. We would also be willing to pay for the additional engineering costs required to modify the plans so that our old sewer wi~l be removed and the existing laterals connected to the new trunk as part of the project. Because there will be no additional maintenance· costs to the City, and because existing and future laterals will be connected directly to both the Bristol Street and the Fruit Street Trunks, the City will maintain these sewers. We sincerely appreciate your cooperation in these projects, and we ask that the above proposals be approved by your Board. We expect to have funds to cover our obligations on this after July 1, 1968. C?~t.£.ft~ .RONALD E. WOLFORD Director of Public rks Agenda Item #27 -J-District 1 .,.,-.,: :.e$·. JACJC J. RIMEL JOJIN A. IIARVEY, Ill DUl'.FERN ll. }{El.SING RICJIARD N. l?IMEL 0 EORGE O. LOGAN RICIIAUD A. RATTRAY LAW Ofl"ICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & HELSING l'OlJU'!"ll l"LOOR 1010 NOR'l"Jl )..!AI:N STREET SANTA ANA, CALIJ:'.OH.1."\IA. 92701 April 3, 1968 Honorable Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No. 3 10844 Ellis Avenue . Fountain Valley,, California Gentlemen: 547-7303 MA.Dl:SON 5-7070 As attorneys for the Cypress County Water District, this firm has been instructed to dir.ect this letter to you concerning representation by that agency on your Board of .Directors. As you are aware, the Cypress County Water District is a member unit of your agency and is engaged exclusively in the collection and transmission of sewage effluent. We are informed that the membership of your Board is determined under the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4730 whereby Cities, the Board of Supervisors, and Sanitary Districts in exi~tence as of the effective date of the formation of your agency are repre- sented. This letter is written to request, on behalf of the Board of Directors of the Cypress County Water District, that your body take the steps required by Health and Safety Code Section 47 30. 2 so as to allow representation on your board by all member unit public agencies of Sanitation District No. 3. We will appreciate your considered study of this proposal and urge your affirmative reaction to it. RIMEL, HAR.VEY & HELSING Attorneys for Cypress County Water District By ~~---~--.~e~.o-r-.g~·e--G~.__,L_o_g_a_n~~~~~-- (/ mh cc: Mr. Arthur C. Nisson Cypress County Water District l . , Agenda Item #32 -K-District 3 :-• RESOLUTION NO. 68-18-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-15 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-15 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, POWER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the RECONSTRUCTION OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-15, on the 5th day of April, 1968; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the. District has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4o That the RECONSTRUCTION OF BITTER POINT PUMP STATION, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 9th day of February, 1968; and, . Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #38 ~L-District 5 ...... COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. __ l ___ _ DATE: April 10, 1968 CONTRACTOR: Vido Samarzich Co. ---------- JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6 Amount of this change order (ADD) (~N(R'K) $ 6,339. 65 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the. contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's letter of April 3, 1968 and Contractor's letters dated December 18, 1967 and February 5, 15, and 18, 1968 1. Reinforcement of existing deteriorated dist·rict sewer at Sta. 559+50 in order to perform work required. 2. Unknown utility at Sta. 515+07. 3. Support for existing Euclid Trunk at Sta. 471+00 due to concrete encasement which was unknown and not shown on existing records. 4.-Support existing Euclid Trunk at Sta. 482+90 due to cracked condition where new Euclid Trunk undercrosses. 5. Unknown utility at Sta. 539+13.43. 6. Improperly constructed house lateral (by others) at Sta. 473+00 which contractor corrected. $ 380.07 324.30 365.70 310.50 324.30 60.00 7. Contractor had to break, remove and dispobe of concrete paving 6 inches thick, 18 feet wide between Station 524+85 and Station 532+63. This pavement was covered by 4 inches of asphalt concrete pavement and consequently could not be detected in advance of construction. Existing city records also make no mention of the concrete pavement. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD . 4,574. 78 $6,339.65 An extension of time of 12 days for the above extra work is hereby granted for completion of the contract. Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD)(EEEM~~) Amended Contract Price $ 470,723.75 none 6,339.65 $ 477,063.40 Board authorization date: Approved: April 10, 1968 Agenda Item #48 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer VIDO SAMARZICH CO. By----------------------~------ -M-District 2 ",ll!C COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO~ 2 ------ CONTRACTOR: Vido Samarzich Co. DATE: April 10, 1968 JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6 Amount of this change order (~Xk~ (DEDUCT) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMEN·r OF ENGINEER 1 S QUANTITIES REFERENCE: Engineer's Resort of Construction Progress dated March 31, 196 DEDUCT Item Change Est'd. Quant. ..1!£.:.. Unit From To 6 L.F. 215 200 15 @ $ 8.00/L.F. $ 120.00 8 V.F. 7 6 l@ 28.00/V.F. 28.00 9 V.F. 171 168.9 2.1 @ 32.00/V.F. 67.20 10 V.F. 16 15.8 .2 @ 37.00/V.F. 7.40 20 C.Y. 10 0 10 @ 17.00/C.Y. 170.00 21 Each 10 2 8@ 100.00/Ea~h 800.00 22 Each 10 0 10 @ 125.00/Each 12250.00 2.442.60 ADD 11 L.F. 368 374 6@ $175.00/L.F. 12050.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $1,392.60 Original Contract Price $ 4702723.75 ~revious Authorized Changes 6,339.65 ADD This Change {KEEj(DEDUCT) 1,392.60 Amended Contract Price $ 475,670.80 Board authorization date: Approved: April 10, 1968 Agenda Item #48 -N- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown .. · Chief Engineer VIDO SAMARZICH CO. By ____ ~--------~~~--~- District 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: Vida Samarzich Co. JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-6 Amount of this change order (X1ID09 (DEDUCT) C.O. No. ____ 3r.-.--~--- DATE: April 10, 1968 $ 4,500.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- , pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF TIME REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated April 3, 1968 and Final Closeout Agreement dated April 10, 1968 1. Extension of time per Section 5-10 of Specifications: Rain and inclement weather -November & December, 1967 (13); Acts of other agencies -delay in approval of freeway bore change by State Division of Highways (30); Acts of Districts -delay pending decision as to electrical panel for relocated lift station (8); Extra work -Change Order No. 1 {12) 63 2. Extension of time per Final Closeout Agreement dated April 10, 1968 34 TOTAL CALENDAR DAYS ALLOWED 97 * * * * * * * * * * * * * Original specified completion date: Completion date with this extension of time (97 calendar days): Actual completion date: November 8, 1967 February 13, 1968 March 29, 1968 Contractor did not complete his work within the originally specified completion time plus this extension of time. Consequently, the sum of $4,500, representing 45 days liquidated damages between February 13 and March 29, 1968, is hereby assessed and deducted from the Contract amount as provided in Section 5-10 of the Specifications. Original Contract Price $ 470,723.75 Previous Authorized Changes ADD 4,947.05 This Change (X:E>E}){DEDUCT) 4,500.00 Amended Contract Price $ 471,170.80 Board Authorization Date: Approved: April 10, 1968 Agenda Item #48 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer VIDO SAMARZICH CO. By __ ~----------------------- -0-District 2 .,.,...,, RESOLUTION NO. 68-19-2 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. ·2-10-6 AS COMPELTE AND APPROVING FINAL CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, VIDO SAMARZICH COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6, on the 29th day of March, 1968; and, Section 2o That by letter·, J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, District's engineers, have recommended acceptance of said work as.having been completed in accordance with the terms of the con- tract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said .engineers' recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 21st day of June, 1967; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby . authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Section 6. That the Final Closeout Agreement with VIDO SAMARZICH COMPANY, providing for payment to the contractor in the amount of $471,170.80, is hereby approved; and, Section 7. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districto Agenda Item #49 -P-District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 68-20-7 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEfv1ENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) WITH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse- ment Agreement (Master Plan), between County Sanitation District No. 7 and IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, providing for reimbursement by the District for the LANE ROAD SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NOo 7-2C and the LANE ROAD LIFT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 7-2C-P, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree-. ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement for the LANE ROAD SUB-TRUNK SEWER in the total amount of $73,738.25 and for the LANE ROAD LIFT STATION in the total amount of $70,030.00 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement, from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. Agenda Item #55 -R-District 7 BOYLE mu! LO\VRY Consulting E11giueers 1 A ]oit:t \I euture of BOYLE~ ENGINEERING & LOWm' /\ND ASSOCIATES Fred A. Harper, G~neral Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 517 5 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Sir: P. 0. Box 178 Santa Aua1 California 92i02 Telep11oue S47-44i I March 22, 1968 The Irvine Industrial Complex has filed notices of completion covering the Lane Road Sub-Trunk Sewer, contract 7-2C and the Lane Road Sewage Lift Station, con- tract 7-2C-P. Enclosed is a copy of the final pay quantities for the Lane Road Sub-Trunk Sewer in the amount of $73,738.25 and for the Lane Road Sewage Lift Station in the amount of $70,030.00, for your use in preparing a reimbursement agree- ment for this -sub-trunk sewer and sewage lift station. SLL:m !f.enda Item #55 -S- Very truly yours, Boyle and Lowry. Consulting _E~gineers 17 /__//_I .4&-dt'-< . .:/ ..\--< ;,:....,·-rt.I • ""? ~T Sidney L. Lowry District 7 -.r.----·---#.........._. ........... ,_ .. _b __ ... _ ............. ~ ..................................... ----------------------- . . ~~· . ..... • .. ·- .·· · .. · .. . . . . . .: ~- . • .. · .... . . ~ . . -. ·' t4"-'\ .. ~:. .... . ·":--.: . . . : . . · .. · . . . . ~ •.. •, . . . . ,.....--:....,,-. .,..."'~-~-,..~~ .. ~-&.l\...,•~~~~ ... ,n ..... ~-. .. ~..o...·.,..,....i.~~~-~.~:.M~ .. .....,.........-ho~<eJ......,.....,..__.. ......... , • ..,......~-. ....... _..~ ... --- ---~:~-:-:--::~-.;::-:-::-;:-:-:---;--. .--·-·----------------------,.....--,..- \wl' RESOLUTION NO. 68-21-7 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF QUITCLAIM DEED TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE IN EXCHANGE FOR A CORRECTED EASEMENT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the quitclaiming to the County of Orange, of a certain easement acquired in connection with construction of the South Irvine Subtrunk Sewer and recorded NoYember 14, 1966 as Document No. 7333 in Book 8102, Page 755 of Official Records of Orange County, is hereby authorized; and, Section 2. That the easement to be quitclaimed is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Quit- claim Deed on behalf of the Board of Directors, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That the certain Correction Deed from the County of Orange to County Sanitation District No. 7, granted in exchange for the quitclaiming by the District of the easement referred to hereinabove, is hereby accepted at no cost to the District and as recommended by the District's engineers; and, Section 5. That the easement covered in said Correction ' Deed is more particularly described on Schedule "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 6. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorlzed and directed to record said Correction Deed in the Official Records of Orange County, California. A~enda Item #56 -U-District 7 v ;fJ) '/J I~ {}_ ;(). fi.~ .... i . //r-~";;""·1 ,7i , :?.~~.) / ;· / I 'rJ•./ • ,. , / .. ·· : •. · I • ,• A \ ·,... • • /. '_,. 1_.,4r . ....._,. \,../· 1· '-·' ',::,., . ,,, ENGINEERING {] ARCHITECTS o ENGINEERS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 547-4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P. 0. BOX 176 Apr ii 5, 19 68 Board of Di rectors County Soni tat ion District No. 7 of Orange County P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Volley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager In accordance with the request of the Board of Directors, we are pleased to submit the following proposal for your consideration. It is herein proposed that the annexation policies of the district established in 1966 be reviewe9 and updated. Because of the many variables that exist in a study of this type, it is difficult to establish a fixed fee; therefore, it is proposed that the study .· be performed on a per diem basis in accordance with the per diem rates set forth herein. At th is time it is. estimated that the total cost to prepare such a report should not exceed $1,000. If, during the course of the study, it is anticipated that the total cost of the work could exceed this amount, we shall immediate I y advise the board of this foe t. Ou-per diem rates are as follows: Principal Engineer /usociate Engineer Assistant Engineer Supervising Draftsman . Senior Draftsman · Draftsman Licensed Surveyor 3-man Survey party Clerical Reproduction BOYLE ENGINEERING .,,,..-. , / ,. / ) / :-e, /~r-y· . <.. .. _ ,,-~ei,.· ""/ I• ..-'-.,..,..:J. ·'-} Edwin H. Finster Vice President, Santa Ana i~ $22 .50 per hour 16. 00 per hour t2.00 per hour 12.50 per hour 11.50 per hour 10. 00 per hour 15. 00 per hour · 34. 00 per hour 6.00 ~r hour Cost + 15 percent --~ P R 0 F E S S I o· N A L ENGINEERING AN 0 ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES Agenda Item #57 -V-District 7 :a·. RESOLUTION NO. 68-22-7 APPROVING REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SEWERAGE FACIL- ITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT !~STER PLAN) WITH. STANDARD-PACIFIC CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse- ment Agreement between County Sanitation District No. 7 and STANDARD-PACIFIC CORPORATION, providing for reimbursement by the District for a sewer line constructed in East Walnut Ave. is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree- ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 3o That reimbursement in the total amount of $5,917.90 is hereby authorized to be made from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District in accordance with the terms and conditions as outlined in said agreement, and as recqmmended by the District's engineerso Agenda Item 1158 W-1 District 7 '.,,;) . BOYLE mul LO\VHY Comultiug Eugiuc:crs, A Joiut Vcuturc of BOl'LE ENGINEEHING & LOWln' AND ASSOCIATES \ February 19, 1968 County Soni tation District No. 7 Post Office Box 51 75 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Pou I Hogon . County Sanitation District No. 7 Troct 6484 Reimbursement Agreement P. 0. Do.'( 178 Sa>ita Atza, Califon:i•t 92702 Telcp1ionc S·-17·4-17 I We have reviewed the request of the Standard-Pacific Corp. for a reim-· · bursement agreement as requested in their letter dated February 8, 1968. The quantities I isted in the I etter are accurate and the unit prices shovm ore reasonable. It is therefore recommended that the district enter into a reimbursement agreement with Standard-· Pacific Corp. in the amount of $5,917.90. . . Since only the northeasterly side of Walnut Avenue between the tract boundary and Browning Avenue will ever connect to this sewer, the front footage charge should be based upon the northeasterly frontage allowing for o future 40-foot half width of Browning Avenue. This net frontage · length omounts to 1,281.63 feet which divided into $5, 917. 90 gives a front footage charge of approxjmatefy $4.62. · BOYLE and LOWRY CQ_J t?~ ~arl A. Corlson, C. E. 6654 pp 41-7635-63-00 cc: Lowry and Associates Agenda Item #58 W-2 District 7 • -? tJ > ~ .J -' :c • Q w ~ ·- :V\ ) ll 1T ao · r:u•uR~ · I L.-WIQ'\""t-1 COUNTY OF ORANGS.. · TRACT b484 // . / .. / / .. / ,/ /.· ..... ,.· _.,,· ./' .' ... / . ." .· _,/ , ./ . . ./ / .·. . ,,·· .. / ./ ,,-·· ,, .. .' , y·· . , / .· .. · ,/ .• , , / /~~c~,i~·d;-r. ·~~E.~ "?."<>:/ /, / /' . . , . /. . .,,::; .. /.'-;>·" . . /, , ,,,,.· ·' ..... . . .· < .· / .· . • ,, .. / .• . , / " .. ,, .. . . / -.. . . , ·' .... ·.. , . .... ~ ,· ~· .·. .. ~"FRONr · rOOT~G~ ~· \28l. b3 ." ·· . . , . ,,.· "WALNUT AVE. SEWtH'!. t\. MANJ.ID1..ll.5 CowSYRuG-rr-z.n 8 ~ STAMOARO •PA~lPI(. C~RP FIA TR. C.4Srq. C.lT\' OF TuS\!N SC~\.E.. t "' = 4oq' ~5KE.iCH TO ACCOMPANY RE.1~.18URSE.\\t"d:.NT .. AGRt:.E.ME.NT Bf!.TWEE-[\J COUNTY SANl~A TtON. OISTRlCT NO. 7 If STANDARD-PAClFl.C Co RP., ) .. tt! ·> ~ \') z ·-z :>-_, a ~ en TRuN~ -s rzw~R ) ;1 .n H .µ rl.l •r-l r=i·· (V") I ~ 0) ~ ':::t:t::: E (]) .µ H co 'O ~ (l) bD c::t: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.a. sax 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 March 8, 1968 TELEPHCN ES: AREA CODE 714 540-291 a 962-2411 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting pf the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 of Orange County, California, will be ·held: Wednesday evening, March 13, 1968 at 7:30 Porn. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calirornfa II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 13, 1968 7:30 p.m . P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 962-241 1 March 8, 1968 The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the formal agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 12 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: Under this item we have asked Mr . H. Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers to give a short talk regarding information he gathered during his trip to Washington, D.C. last month . Some of the information obtained by Mr . Hunt is of extreme importance to the Districts in that it concerns the likeli- hood of the Districts obtaining Federal funds for the new 120-inch ocean outfall. Also of interest to the Districts is rece n t information as to Federal policies and regulations for enforcement of water pollution control standards. No. 14 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: The Executive Committee and the Special Building Committee met jointly during the afternoon and evening of February 29 and considered a number of important items affecting all Districts. Director Bigonger also met with the Committees as a guest. A complete report on the meeting, including recommendations adopted, is enclosed. No. 15 -PROPOSED ALTERATIONS TO THE ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE BUILDING: This matter is covered in the accompanying report of the Executive Committee and the recommended motion, appearing on the agenda, is in accordance with action taken by the Executive and Special Building Committees at their February 29 meeting. No . 17 -NEGOTIATIONS WI TH ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICT ON POSSIBLE LAND LEASE: Attached to the agenda material under this item is a letter from the Orange County Water District dated March 5, 1968 . The question of a possible cooperative arrangem ent between the Water District and the Sanitation Districts re gar ding use of land adjacent to our Treatment Plant No. 1 has come up becau8e of the proposed water reclamation facilities of the Water District and because of the fact that our present farm lease of approximately 36 acres expires on June 1 of this year. The Water District now owns approximately 20 acres adjacent to ours on which, we understand, its farm lease has also expired. As indicated on the recommended motion appearing on the agenda~ the staff suggests that this matter be referred to the Executive Committee for study and recommendation to the Boards. No. 18 -LEASE OF LAND TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOR PARK PURPOSES: The Directors will recall that at the February meeting the preparation of a le ase for approximately 2 acres of Districts' property to the City of Fountain Valley for park purposes was authorized, with the lease to contain certain provisions recommended by the Executive Committee. We have furnished the City with a draft of a lease prepared by the General Counsel and at the present time are awaiting the City's action on this matter. If we receive advice by the time of the Board meeting that the City has executed the lease as submitted, the resolution appearing on the agenda under this item will be recommended for adoption. No. 19 -PROPOSAL FROM JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS FOR REDESIGN WORK ON NEW OPERATORS' BUILDING AT PLANT NO. 2: The engineers, in connection with a new Operators' Building at Plant No. 2, submitted plans for the Operators' Building incorporating "tilt-up" construction. During the review of the plans by the Executive and Special Building Committees, it was brought up that perhaps a l ess expensive type of construction would be more appropriate for the Operators' Building and the engineers were asked to reappraise this matter together with Director Miller (Building Committee Chairman) and the staff. After further study of the engineers' appraisal, the Committees asked the engineers to submit an alternate design for the building in question, incorporating more conventional commercial construction. Inasmuch as this additional design work cannot be compensated for under the existing contract between the Districts and the engineers, the latter were asked to submit a proposal for the additional work involved. This proposal has been received and is included with the agenda material under this item. Mr. Miller has reviewed the proposal and recommends its acceptance by the J oint Boards. No. 20 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, J OB NO. P2-ll: This construction contract (Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2) fo r approximately $2.5 million, has been under way for almost one year and is proceeding satis- factorily and on schedule . During the design stages of this work a very painstaking effort by the staff and engineers was made to insure that a minimum of changes during construction would be necessary. Because of this effort, no major changes have been found to be necessary in the first eleven months except for the first three items of the recommended change order attached to the agenda material. With respect to the largest of these items (No. 3, Tunnel Revisions - $2544), the reason for the extra work were decisions reached as to final location of new structures under a subsequent contract (see Item No. 19 ), which decisions have been reached prior to the award of the present contract. Doing this work under the present contract -2 - will simplify and reduce the over-all cost of the subsequent contract. The fourth item on the change order, for a negotiated lump sum price of $750, is the result of an error on the part of the Districts as well as of the contractor. location of two tie-in points was incor - rect ly furnished the contractor before excavation began and also the contractor was remiss in not verifying this information in the field . For this reason it was agreed with the contractor that the Districts would compensate the contractor for 50% of the additiona l construction work up to a maximum of $750. The recommended change order a lso g rants the contractor an extension of time of 23 calendar days for this additional work. No. 2 1 -ATTENDANCE OF DISTRICTS' PERSONNEL AT CWPCA MEETING IN SANTA ROSA: This item is a recommended motion authorizing the General Manager to designate ten Districts' employees to attend the 40th annual conference of the California Water Pollution Control Association at Santa Rosa on April 24 through 27. For many years it has been customary to authorize a number of employees to attend the CWPCA conferences and they have been of consistent benefit to the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices and procedures of other sewering agencies and new develop- ments in the sewerage field . The Association is quite active, its annual meeting being attended by more than 800 municipal and District personnel and consulting engineers active in the fie l d of sewage collection, treatment and disposal. It is the only meeting during the year which more than one or two of our personnel regularly attend . No. 22 -PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: Bids were t aken on February 23 for two items of budgeted equipment: (1) a replacement hydraulic truck crane, and (2) a replacement for a 1/2-ton pickup truck. A tabulation of bids received and a recommendation for award, in each case, is included in the agenda material under this item. It is recommended that award of the purchase of these items be made as indicated under the motion appearing on t he a g enda . No. 23 -RECEIVE AN:) FILE FINANCIAL REPORT: The customary quarte rly financial report for the period ending December 31, 1967, as prepared by our independent auditors, Hanson , Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, has been mailed directly from that firm 's office to the Directors. The staff will be prepared to answer any questions concerning data contained in the report, if desired. District No. 2 Nos. 30 and 31 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 2 -11-2: Com p letion of this project (Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer) was delayed for a considerable period of time because of late delivery of equipment caused by strikes affecting the manufacturer. However, as of February 14 the work was finally completed and we are recommending that it be accepted as of that date. Another difficulty arose towards the end of the project in that the contractor did not have available work forces to make a number of mechanical and other -3- corrections determined necessary before acceptance. In order to put the pumping station into operation, the contractor, staff and engineers agreed that the District's forces would make the necessary corrections and back-charge the contractor. In order to close out this contract, we are therefore recom- mending the actions appearing on the agenda. Item No. 30 is the adoption of Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2 which provide for the back- charge mentioned above and a small item of extra work as described (for a net deduction of $365.12) and a deduction of $700 for liqui- dated damages due to delay in completion not justified under the specifications. Item No. 31 is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete on February 14 and directing filing of Notice of Completion. No. 32 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 2-10-8: As authorized at the February Board meeting, bids for the construction of the next section of the Euclid Trunk Sewer will be taken on the afternoon of March 11 . This project was described in the Manager's Report for the February meeting and has an estimated construction cost of approximately $410,000. If the bids received on March 11 are in order and satisfactory, a resolution naming the successful bidder will be prepared for the final agenda. No. 33 -CLAIM ARISING OUT OF ACCIDENT ON CONTRACT NO. 2-10-6: This item pertains to a claim for personal injuries in connection with the above contract (Euclid Trunk Sewer from Ball Road to La Palma Avenue). The motion appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended for adoption. No. 34 -ENGINEERING PROPOSAL FOR LAST SEGMENT OF EUCLID TRUNK SEWER CONSTRUCTION: The remaining construction project in the District budgeted for this fiscal year is Contract No. 2-10-9, the one remain- ing portion of the Euclid Trunk Sewer replacement project which commenced in 1964 and has been proceeding piecemeal as funds became available. This contract involves the installing of approximately two miles of 33-inch V.C.P. between Chapman Avenue and Ball Road in Garden Grove and Anaheim. The construction cast is estimated at $434,000. Early completion of this project is desired in order to better serve these two cities and to provide relief for the Magnolia Trunk Sewer. Upon completion of this work, the construction set forth in the approved Engineer's Report of July, 1965, will have been carried out approximately three years ahead of schedule. For this particular project, and with the concurrence of Chairman Speer, I have asked Boyle Engineering of Santa Ana to submit a proposal for engineering services for consideration of the Board. This proposal is included with the agenda material and has been analyzed by the staff. It has been found to be satisfactory and is recommended for acceptance. -4- District No. 11 No. 48 -PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT -PHASE I: The first phase of the manhole replacement and repair program budgeted for this year will be ready for bidding after receipt of necessary permits from the City of Huntington Beach and the State of California. A total of $25,000 was budgeted for this work in the current year; however, the engineers and staff are now recommending that only a portion of the work be done immediately in order that the type of repair proposed can be evaluated before proceeding with the balance of the work. For this reason the first project will involve only three manholes, two of which will be provided with a proven plastic lining and the other reconstructed by guniting or forming, at the option of the contractor. It is hoped that the guniting method, which is considerably less expensive than the plastic instal- lation, will prove, upon evaluation over a period of time, to be satisfactory for the remaining manholes in need of repair due to hydrogen sulfide attack. We plan to advertise for bids for this first phase as soon as the above permits are obtained and recommendation for award will be made at a subsequent meeting . The cost is estimated to be $2700. District No. 7 No. 52 -REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (NOT MASTER PLAN) WITH STANDARD- PACIFIC CORPORATION: The resolution appearing with the agenda autho- rizes the execution of a Reimbursement Agreement with Standard-Pacific Corporation, for connections which may be made to the offsite sewer for Tract No. 6484. The District agrees to charge $4.62 per front foot, and any collections would be paid to Standard-Pacific Corporation, up to an amount of $5,917.90 . The District does not guarantee to the developer that he will recover his costs, as his reimbursement is based strictly on the collection of the front-footage charge from adjacent property owners as their properties are developed. (See page T-1) Nos. 54 and 55 -PROPOSED ANNEXATIONS TO THE DISTRICT: No . 54 is the Kordes Annexation, located in Cowan Heights, and contiguous to the District's boundary. It consists of 3.66 acres, and can be served by a gravity sewer which the proponents plan to finance on their own. Based on the present annexation charge of $215 per acre, $786 .90 has been deposited with the District. No. 55 is the Irvine Annexation, which involves 42.61 acres contiguous to the District's boundary just east of the Browning Sub- trunk and north of the Navy Way Pumping Station. We have not yet received the annexation fees of $9,161.15; however, we have been advised by the developer, R. H. Grant Co., that payment will be made before meeting time. -5-. No. 56 -CONS IDERATION OF REAPPRAISAL OF ANNEXATION FEES: In February, 1966, the District's engineers submitted a sewerage facility report for the Santiago Creek-Peters Canyon Study Area, which was dated December, 1965. Among other conclusions in the report, an annexation fee of $215 per acre was recommended. Since then, all annexations to the District have been charged in accordance with this recommendation. Chairman Miller has suggested that in view of the time lapse, and the increased investment in Plant and District facilities, it wou ld be timely for the District to have a reappraisal of its present annexation fees. It is the staff's recommendation that Boyle Engineering be asked to submit a proposal to make this reappraisal, since members of this firm calculated the existing annexation fee. No. 57 -REPORT ON CONTRACT NO . 7-1-SCHEDULE C: On November 8, 1 967, the Board awarded Contract No . 7-1-Schedule C (Gisler Trunk Sewer) to the Zarubica Company for the amount of $223,868.32 and the contract provided for 140 calendar days for construction beginning November 23 (completion date, April 11, 1 968 ). To date, neither equipment nor work forces have arrived at the site of the project. Numerous telephone conversations have transpired, and several letters have been written to the contractor in an effort to get the project underway. We understand that his crews are tied up on a project in the Calabasas area, which, of course, should have nothing to do with onr contract. The contractor's bid price is extremely favorable to the District and the firm has done satisfactory work for the Districts in the past. As the Directors will recall, the engineers recommended the construction of this sewer to prevent overflows this summer. We have invited the contractor to appear before the Board, to indicate h is company's position in the matter (see page _ll_). The General Counsel has been counseling the staff and will advise the Board at the meeting of its lega l position. -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager ~ " NE .. 'L A'ID sr 7( " SCA t.£ /~# APPllO.X .J Jil l COUNTY SANI TATION DISTRICTS OI ~.&,,'££ COUN1T D I S-1..BJJL!.§ ANO U!_U NK ~ I 9 6 7 0 " ~ ~ ,,_ -x- -... A"""'~,, ·' -·-I • I - _.-I "'..- / ' _,Q I '~.,_ / -· . ~ -J \1'-'.,, I ,,0 ,.,.. .. ~ ""-,,,. 0 ·-•• ---~----·-······' '"" 0 •. ~~ :: ··~ ~-... :..... : ( >;.·.-.·.:-·/' ./ )\'\. " •.t •• ; r'' /\~:_...,----·,_<: ...... # /~: ............. .. ·~· .................. .. {_;\.. 1·-··'/ ": :·: __ .,. ...