The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1967-11 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA,92708 November 24, 1967 MANAGER'S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE Meeting Date: November 30, 1967 Chairman Parsons has invited Directors Dries and Noe to attend this meeting and to participate in the discussions . The following is an explanation of the items of business proposed to be taken up at the November 30th joint meeting of the Executive Committee and the Building Committee: 1. Status Report Re : Design of the Districts Proposed Ocean Outfall No. 2. At the time the Engineers were assigned the job of designing the new outfall they were instructed to prepare plans and specifications for a 96 inch outfall and a 120 inch outfall as well as a number of alternates for the construction of the diffuser legs. The reason was the possibility that the Districts would not have sufficient funds available to build the recommended 120 inch outfall and that a smaller outfall would have to be constructed. The Engineers are well along in the design of the larger outfall and have decided on a diffuser which from an ecomonic standpoint should be constructed at the time the outfall is built. They are now seeking directions from the staff as to whether or not they should design a 96 inch outfall, as previously instructed. They estimate that this will add approximately $20,000 to their design fees. The staff has been working on an analysis of the Districts ' financial capabilities for the next two fiscal years, which is the anticipated construction period. The financial analysis will be available at the meeting and should be useful in determining whether or not the Engineers need to design a second outfall for bidding purposes. 2. Consideration of an Extension of Time for the Preparation of the Master Plan Report by John Carollo Engineers . On December 14, 1966 the Boards authorized John Carollo Engineers to prepare a master plan report outlining the future sewerage requirements for the Districts treatment facilities . At the time the study was authorized we thought that the new water quality standards would be established during the summer of 1967. To date the U. S. Depart- ment of Interior has not approved the California Water Quality Standards, which would enable the Regional Water Quality Control Board -2- to finalize our future requirements . It is for this reason, the staff recommends that the Districts instruct the Engineers to delay their report and grant them an extention of time to the April 10, 1968 joint meeting. 3. Consideration of Approving the Architectural Design of the Enclosures for Treatment Plant No. 2. On August 9th the Engineers were instructed to proceed with the preparation of the plans and specifications for the construction of the building enclosures at Treatment Plant No. 2, in accordance with the architectural master plan which was adopted that same date. This work was to be co-ordinated with the architectural design consultant, Willard T. Jordan & Associates . On September 29th and October 5th the preliminary drawings of the buildings were forwarded to the architect with requests that the architectural treatment of the buildings be reviewed with comments for any desirable changes. In view of the fact that, they have not received a reply from the architect to date, we have asked the Engineers to present the preliminary drawings of the buildings to the Building and Executive Committees for their comments so that this project can proceed as scheduled. 4. Consideration of Uniform Industrial Waste Charge Policy. This matter was discussed at the October 2 th Committee meeting at which time the members agreed that it was a very complex subject requiring considerable time and study before final decisions could be made. In addition to this discussion, the Committee members will recall the November 8th request of the Marcal Paper Mills Company for an agreement with District No. 2 regarding charges for industrial disposal from the Company' s o proposed new plant in the City of Orange. The Committee, directed the staff on October 26th to supply further information on this subject for consideration and study prior to the next Committee meeting. The same action was taken by District No. 2 at its November th meeting. The Committee also felt that, if possible, the staff should draft a definite proposal relative to industrial waste charges for consideration at its next meeting. In the meantime, the staff has been active in accumulating information on policies and regulations with regard to waste disposal by the other major sewage and industrial waste treatment • agencies in Southern California. (See separate report) . In addition we have, within the limited time available to the existing staff, been acquiring data with respect to major industrial establishments in the Districts both with, and without, major waste disposal requirements. -3- This morning we received a letter from the Districts ' Joint Chairman, Lindsley Parsons, suggesting that we consider employing a consulting firm to look into the matter of industrial• waste disposal charges and develop a policy for consideration ty our Boards . (See enclosed letter November 22, 1967) . I concur with him that this idea merits Committee discussion. The staff has concluded that rather than presenting a definite proposal to the Committee at the November 30th meeting, a further discussion should be held between the Committee and the staff with the benefit of the experience gained from the Marcal Paper Mills Company problem and the information enclosed with this report. 5 . Consideration of Proposal of C. Arthur Nisson for Legal Services. At the last meeting of the Committee the Districts ' General Counsel proposed a revision of his current legal fee schedule. He has submitted a proposed resolution which we are enclosing. The Committee instructed the manager to check with other agencies and firms in and about Orange County to determine what they were paying for legal services . We have not concluded our investigation but we will have the information for the Committee members by meeting time. 6. Review of Proposals Submitted by Willard T. Jordon Architect & Associates . At the October 2 th meeting of the Building ' and executive Committees, the Chairman of the Building Committee and the Manager were instructed to write the Architect requesting further information relative to the Master Plan for Improving the Appearance of the Districts ' Treatment Plant No. 2. The enclosed letter was prepared by the Chairman of the Building Committee and to date the Architect has not replied. (See attached letter) . 7. Consideration of Revision of Purchasing Procedures. At the last meeting of the Executive Committee, the members agreed to review the Districts' purchasing procedures established by Resolution No. 884 - September, 1960. Because of the press of other projects, the staff has been unable to accumulate the information that the Committee would need before proceeding. Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH: sw Current Industrial Waste Charge Information Theory of Waste Dis osal Charges - Historically sewers have been considered a general service to the public rendered by the municipality or sewering agency, rather than as a utility in which the user pays in proportion to the service rendered. However, in recent years there has been a marked tendency towards establishing sewer service charges at the municipal and district level. The reason for this is to shift the burden of cost of sewerage on the actual user, as in the case of water, gas, electricity, and highways, rather than on the property taxpayer. There is, for this reason, a strong movement on a national level to encourage sewer use charges . The most urgent need for service charges relates to industrial waste disposal where the service obtained by the industry from the municipality or district may be many-fold greater than the industry pays in taxes . Nation-wide industrial waste disposal charges are gaining acceptance and, in general, are not opposed by industry as a whole because of the logic behind the charges . Policies of Other Southern California Agencies - The following information has been obtained through personal interview, telephone calls, etc. A. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts This agency has no uniform policy, ai hough admitting it would be desirable to establish one . They have only recently begun to establish industrial waste charges of any type and at the present time rely on negotiating individual agreements with individual dischargers, the charges being dependent upon location, type of wastes, assessed valuation, etc . It is the staff' s opinion that this method of approach will prove unsatisfactory in the long run. B. Los Angeles City The City, at present, does not impose an industrial waste charge per se but does collect nominal inspection charges, depending on the size of the operation, and in many instances requires expensive pre-treatment of the waste prior to discharging it to the sewers . The City Attorney has held that industrial waste disposal is a "privilege" and not a "right" and that the City can completely prohibit either a proposed or an existing discharge if it is found to be in the City' s best interest to do so. A uniform City charge was proposed at an election this year and was defeated. This pro- posal would have imposed a sewer charge on every user, including householders, and would have been based on the size of the water meter serving the property. We are advised that the City' s staff is still in hopes of establishing a city-wide sewer service charge to amortize bonds issued for major sewerage construction and believes that if the public is properly informed, the proposal will eventually be adopted. \quo, C. San Diego City The City of San Diego imposes a uniform sewer service charge on all users which is established by ordinance at fifty percent (50%) of the water bill. D. County of San Diego Most of the various special sewerage districts in unin- corporated areas of the county are administered under contract with the County Department of Special District Services. Consequently, it has been possible to devolop a more or less uniform procedure within these Districts resulting in elimination of disparity of charges for one area over another. These charges are based on a rather complicated formula involving "treatability" of the waste and volume of flow. It is inter- esting to note that they give a break to larger users, apparently following the precedent of water purveyors. It is also of interest that these special districts place a minimum charge on every user, from $18 per year and up, which charges are computed and placed on the property tax bill. :e L MOTION PICTURES INTERNATIONAL, INC. PRODUCTION DIVISION SAMUEL GOLDWYN STUDIOS • 1041 NORTH FORMOSA AVENUE LOS ANGELES. CALIF. 90046 - HO 9.6161 November 22 , 1967 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation District of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Dear Fred: It would seem to me that your Item No. 2 should be brought to the immediate attention of Tom Speer, chairman of District No. 2, since it would appear in the absence of any Joint Board policy, that District 2 could grant a permit for the paper mill under con- sideration. I would also suggest that Tom consider sending copies to all board members of District 2 , and that both items be included in the agenda material for the next executive meeting. I have the impression that you may not have enough staff time to take on a project demanding as much re- „ search, leg work, chamber of commerce and industrial opinion polls, local civic group informational and indoctrination programs , Orange County League of Cities, press communications, etc. It would not seem advisable, on the other hand, to in- crease the staff for a one-shot policy program. What do you think about employing a consulting firm to bring together the policies of other similarly situated sani- tations agencies, survey the local industrial and govern- ment groups, and bring us a policy for consideration by the boards that would place us in a competitive position with other areas, without placing any burden on the local taxpayers. (font. ) Fred Harper November 22 , 1967 , Page -2- If the idea of a consultant appears to you to merit executive committee discussion, you might include this letter, or pertinent paragraphs, in the executive committee agenda material. Enclosed is a recent copy of ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL NOTES , published monthly by the First National Bank of Orange County. This might be an appropriate organ for letting industry and local governments know that we are considering the formulation of a policy for industrial waste disposal. With kindest regards , Lindsley Parsons LP:dr Encl. ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL NOTES 1J Puhlishod by lho Niesl National 11ank of Orango County, as it Offlcea: 101 F. Chapinan,1C1'10 1,. Chapnwn and 1010 11. Collins, community sorvico, to stimulate Iho [low of buginnsa between Orange; 1050 Adams Avenue, Costa Willi; liillview office, industrial plants in Orange County.C. G.Schroeder,President. Soventeenth Street at Tustin Avenue,Santa Ana. November 15, 1967 Orange County Industry In Fifteen Seconds Aeronutronic has seven Orange County installations. . . . .Trans- metrics manufactures primary standards equipment. . . . .Autocycle auto- matic chucker faster. . . . .Mortarless line includes parking lot bumpers . . . . .L. & M. has industrial building available. . . . .There is a reason for our loyalty to you. Aeronutronic Has Seven Orange County Installations Aeronutronic Division of Philco-Ford Corporation is engaged in research, development, test and manufacture of tactical missiles, missile weapon systems, air defense systems, reconnaissance and in- telligence systems, radar and advanced radar, and advanced electron- ics concepts, propulsion products, stabilized fire control systems, automatic weapons and high strength armor, and missile bomb fuzes. John B. Lawson, who earlier had held executive positions with Ford, is general manager of Aeronutronic, and a vice-president of Philco-Ford. Aeronutronic employs over 6,200 persons, including a large number of scientists, engineers and technicians. Orange County instal- lations are located in Newport Beach, Anaheim, Santa Ana and El Toro. The division' s headquarters is at Newport Beach, on a 200-acre site, in a 750,000 square-foot facility. Employees here number 3,300, engaged in a wide variety of projects. In Anaheim there are three Aeronutronic installations, two of 130,000 square feet and one of 73,000. Here 1,000 persons are em- ployed in advanced engineering and production of the Chaparral Air Defense guided missile system and in development and production of the M?5 and XM129 grenade launchers and the XM140 automatic cannon. Headquarters for Aeronutronic Radar and Intelligence Operation "w is in a 63,000 square-foot engineering facility in Santa Ana. A 16,000-square-foot plant in Santa Ana is used for manufacture of Aeronutronic ' s bullet shattering armor. The El Toro facility is located in Big Canyon and is used for the test of rocket engines, ordnance and other materials. The 20-acre installation has been used to test-fire Shillelagh missile systems, Chaparral units, rocket engines, grenade launchers and the automatic cannon. Transmetrics Manufactures Primary Standards Equipment Transmetrics, Inc. , manufactures a full product line of preci- sion balances, mass comparators and mercury manometers used as standards in industrial applications and laboratories. George J. Brown is president of Transmetrics. The company has been in business for six years. A majority interest in the firm was recently purchased by John A. Kennedy, president of James Electronics, Inc. , in Chicago, from Aeroflex Laboratories Inc. , a New York company. Transmetrics weight-manufacturing capabilities have been accept- ed by the National Bureau of Standards, one of its customers. The precision weights made by the company range in size from one milli- gram to thirty kilograms. The company has a standard line of precision balances. Delivery varies from thirty days to four months, depending on the Transmetric workload. The company is located at 896 Production Place, Newport Beach 92663. The telephone number is 646-6676. Autocycle Automatic Chucker Faster Autocycle Corporation manufactures the Autocycle automatic chucker, built on a granite surface plate, using 2" diameter solid hard chrome finished ways to turn, bore and face , holding tolerances of + .0001 on the part. C. 0. Anderson is president of Autocycle and Robert K. Burtner is vice-president, marketing. The company is the largest solely-owned machine tool manufacturer on the West Coast and has been selling the Autocycle for about four years. The Autocycle is- twice as fast as other chuckers and can be \"'� operated by inexperienced help. The operator loads the part in the air collet closer and presses a button. The part is finished auto- ` matically without the use of tape or cams. The Autocycle swings 13" over the table and can pass up to 1-1/16" through the spindle. About 150 of them are in use in Orange and Los Angeles counties. Using an engineered tooling concept, there are over 70 configurations of Autocycles' for turning, boring or facing applications. Autocycle is located at 4260 Artesia Street, Fullerton. The telephone number is 523-0570. Mortarless Line Includes Parking Lot Bumpers Mortarless Block, Inc. , manufactures a line of trailer piers, parking lot bumper stops and miscellaneous concrete items, in addition to a minor volume of concroto construction blocks. Heyward C. Bailey is president of Mortarless, and Norman Vollan is vice-president and general manager. The company has been in busi- ness since 1946. The miscellaneous items manufactured by Mortarless include steppingstones, down-drains, building piers, bicycle stands and diamond blocks. The Mortarless line is sold direct and through dealers. A recent addition to the traditionally-concrete products is a steel leveling jack to be used in conjunction with the trailer piers. The company plant is located at 16808 South Harbor Boulevard, Santa Ana. The telephone number is 531-2627. L. & M. Has Industrial Building Available L. & M. Properties has available a 20,000-square-foot building situated with good exposure to the Newport Freeway, in the Irvine Industrial Complex. J. H. Lowe and H. D. Meyer are proprietors of L. & M. The firm has been in the business of developing industrial tracts here for fifteen years. The available building is situated on a corner site of 64,000 square feet, with extensive landscaping. Its exposure' to the traffic on the freeway would be of value to a company which places promotional NOV 2 4 1567 worth on its name. COUNTY SANITATION V.-- Or ORANGE COUNT L. & M. usually follows a pattern of developing industrial sites in a tract, and building speculatively, with the thought of fitting an occupant into a structure. This particular site was developed by the Irvine people. L. & M. offerings have been in the 8,000-24,000 square-foot range. The company is located at 2005 Quail Street in Newport Beach. The telephone number is 540-0868. There Is_ A Reason For Our Loyalty To You You may have noticed that we put a lot of sincere effort into showing people we want them for our customers. That is an indication that your business means much to us. It follows that we give you our best service, and keep our eyes open for new ways to help you. We 've been doing this for our local people for over sixty years. This local- ity, and its prosperity, means more to us than other localities do. So we spend our un-divided effort in bettering the local business picture. Part of this "bettering" , is top banking service to our local people. It' s one of the bonuses you get when you let the oldest local independent bank be the one to serve you! -CES. In the industrial field, probably our most active man is our vice president, James Beam. If you'd like to call him direct, the telephone number here is 532-2561. To: C. E. Schroeder, President, First National Bank of Orange County 101 East Chapman Avenue, Orange. Please call us about financing _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - - - -(ffame7 - - - - - - - - (7irm)- - - - - -' -(SEreet MmFer j - - - - - - (7it7) - - - - (Use coupon also to request additional complimentary subscriptions. ) 1.967 / r,,y, r.1!^^'�'j-'�'? Pale 82 �. � -16".2 ��.i..�.i r:1...71+1a �r i.:.711 �;;rY�t1 i _-- ----- .,...,�� FISH KILLS DECLINE $2.5-MILLION IN '66 (Cont.) The two worst kills last year, more than one million each, FWPCA stated "were caused by two of the most difficult problems facing pollution control experts-- mine drainage and over enrichment of water by municipal and other wastes." Heavy rains on the Allegheny . L,l River watershed in August, 1966, washed mine acid deposits into the;river causing death of 1-million fish near Sharpsburg, Pa. Effluents from a citrus:-p'rocessing plant, from city's sewage treatment plant, and drainage from farms containing fertilizers and pesti- cides reduced the oxygen in Lake Apopka, Winter Garden, F.Ia. , in July, 1966, to point of killing\another 1-million. Industrial pollution was identified as the No. .1"killer, responsible for 4,622,790 or 53% of the t•gtal fish killed. Second was waste from cities, blamed for 1,347,248 killed. Agricultural opYrations, such as drainage and use' of fertilizers were third, with 1,259,599 killed:` Transportation accidents, ch as leaky pipeline or overturned tank cars, were responsive for 102,631. The rOa s`fiining kills -- total of 1,410,569 -- were attributed to such activities as highwaVnd building construction, airplane washing, and illegal disposal of pgisons in wauO"Lways. FWPCA reported that Ax or 1,4 ,000 were game fish, with total of 3,098,000 fish of commercial value lost by pail. ion. The 18-pp. booklet, "Fish i is by Pollution, 1966," listing all of the 436 reported kills by state and type, is ailab from Supt. of Documents, Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C. 20402. �) . 4 LAKE MICHIGAN STATES EEK TO COMBINE LEGFIORCES TO HALT POLLUTION Attorneys gene 1 of Illinois, Indiana, W� consin, and Michigan scheduled a meeting in Chicago, Nov. to plan ways of combining the legal forces to halt pollution of Lake Michigan. linois Atty. Gen. William G. Clark scribed the meeting as the first such conferen aimed at joint action to stop water pol ion in the lake. "We hope to mass the le powers of the four states into a single force„' he said, suggesting the states wo d file suits jointly against water polluters. •. /ast te October, Vinton Bacon, general superintendent of the. Chicago Metropolitan istrict, announced the district had filed water pollution suits in Circuit Court. ese 12 Indiana harbor corporations: Inland Steel, Youngstown Sheet & Tube, teel Foundry, Cities Service Oil Co. , Socony-Mobil, Lake Cities Corp. , Clark finery, U.S. Gypsum, Texas Co. , Sinclair Refinery, American Oil, and Union Carbie and Carbon Corp. Suit asked permanent injunction against polluting waters of Lake Michigan within territorial jurisdiction of the District. W CA ECONOMIST SAYS INDUSTRY SHOULD SPEND $l-BILLION ANNUALLY ON POLLUTION CONTROL U.S. industry should spend $1-billion annually on pollution control, in the view' of the Federal Water Pollution Control Administration chief economist who is supervising the current search for economic incentives for industry to spend more capital on abatement equipment and measures. The FWPCA industrial incentives study is scheduled for transmis- sion to Congress by end of January, 1968, with recommendations for new legislation. In arriving at the $1-billion per year figure, Federal officials note that industrial , pollution is about equal to pollution caused by cities; with U.S. communities and states spending up to $800-million a year on waste treatment plant construction, industry must spend at least as much. "To really get under way, they must spend $1-billion a year," James F. Flannery, FWPCA chief economist, stated last month. The $1-billion annually, he pointed out, would be less than 2% of industry's total annual capital investment. The following six methods for encouraging industry to increase investments for pollu- tion control are under study, Flannery said: (1) Tax credits: A percentage figure would be deducted from the company's tax bill for any expenditure on pollution control equipment. (2) Accelerated depreciation: Total cost of control equipment would be deducted from \%O� gross taxable profits over 2-5 year period, instead of present 10-20 year write-off period. (3) User charges: Industries would be charged for sewage and water treatment by { local treatment plants. This would underscore what firms are paying for waste disposal, ;��- (Continued on following page) VJo ,�� mhel', 1067 �� ww? ..r.(w i:i'�.:i:,.: u Lu� �lt:►idS Pa^.e Pia INDUSTRY SHOULD SPEND $1-BILLION ANNUALLY (Cont. ) and presumably prod them into seeking ways to reduce these charges by curtailing water use .. and waste disposal. Charge would be based on volume and effect on operating_ costs of treatment plant. r--,•_._._— '� (4)_Ef1f1uent charges: Except for toxic materiald, industries would pay for dumping wastes directly into public waters. Charge could be made prohibitively high so as to encourage industry to treat its wastes . (5) Waste acceptance service: Industrial wastes would be collected and treated through an authorized agency of state, city, or an authority, operating like community fire pro- tection. (6) Grants and loans: These are commonly used now, with government paying part of cost or lending money at low interest rates. Flannery said it was impossible to tell now, which plan is preferable, but noted that industry favors both tax credits and accelerated 'depreciation. Effluent charges, he said, are unlikely to be accepted by government. There is much support, he said, for user charges for linking industry with local sewer systems, and also for the waste acceptance service. "The trend is toward industry looking to cities for more treatment. It is con- venient and it means industry does not have to borrow money to .do it." Industrial Data Needed Flannery disclosed that FWPCA is planning to mail up to 20,000 questionnaires for a statistical sampling of how much industry is spending on air and water pollution control and what its requirements are. Enough is not now known, he said, about industrial wastes and. how they are being handled. This information is vital for arriving at an equitable arrangement under which indus- try will be paying its fair share for cost of building and operating the larger sewage treatment plants required to handle additional loads of industrial wastes, he explained. PUGET SOUND 'ABATEMENT RECOMMENDATIONS SEEN COSTING PAPER MILLS $90-MILLION J'ight lltigcL Sound pulp and hapor mills tire faced with capital outlay of $90-million Co nl0.0L rocom111elidationn, made by Vedera.l-state conferees at a roconvenod enforcement conference in Seattle. Earlier estimates had placed the cost at $40-million, but a spokesman for the . "orthwest Pulp & Paper Association said that later studies pointed to the higher figure. The recommendations adopted by representatives of state and Federal Water Pollution Control Administration were similar to those made last April, culminating a four-year siudy -of' Puget Sound and adjacent waters. The recommendations call for the mills to install facilities to remove at least 70% organic solids in discharges; install submarine outfalls with diffusers at depth of 50 ft. except where shallower outfalls are specifically permitted; reduce waste liquor discharges; dredge and make land disposal of present sludge blankets; eliminate wood-chip spills. Mills involved are those of Georgia-Pacific Corp. , Bellingham; Scott Paper Co. , Weyer- haeuser, and Simpson Lee Paper Co. at Everett; Scott Paper at Anacortes; Fiberboard Paper Products Corp. , Rayonier, and Crown-Zellerbach at Port Angeles. The initial conference was called in 1962 by the governor of Washington, after charges by oyster growers that pulp mills were poisoning beds and fiber wastes were creating sludge harmful to shellfish and other marine life. Conferees agreed that carrying out the recom- mendations would be costly, but expressed belief the costs could be absorbed by the indus- try and its customers. They said the recommendations were no more stringent than those established for mills on the Columbia and Willamette Rivers in Washington and Oregon and other parts of the country. Most of the extimated $90-million capital outlay would be for facilities to recover waste liquor from four sulfite mills operated by Scott, Rayonier, Georgia Pacific, and Weyerhaeuser. These facilities must be in operation by Sept. 30, 1972. Primary treat- ment facilities to remove settleable solids from mill effluents would be required by Sept. 30, 1970, except for Crown Zellerbach's mill at Port Angeles which would be given additional "reasonable time" to stabilize property being eroded by wave action. Submar- ine outfalls would be required by same date. Donald J. Benson, executive secretary of NPPA, said there was no immediate decision on what steps industry might take, but there were earlier indications of a possible court test in December when mill permits must be renewed by. the state. RESOLUTION NO. RESOLUTION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63-150 REGARD- ING DUTIES AND COMPENSATION OF LEGAL COUNSEL WHEREAS, it is deemed to be in the best interests of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California, to modify the provisions concerning the duties and compensation of the General Counsel of the Districts in order to bring them up to date and in line with current operations of the Districts ; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That Sections 3, 4 and 5 of Resolution No. 63-150 are hereby amended to read as follows : Section 3. That the General Counsel shall by monthly written report account for the time spent and his activi- ties on behalf of the Districts and the Joint Administra— tive Organization. That at the conclusion of each quarter • of the calendar year, the General Counsel shall be compen- sated at the rate of $45.00. per hour for that time consumed in work for the Districts and the Joint Administrative Organization in excess of 46-1/2 hours during the quarter. Section 4. Appearances by the General Counsel in any court of law or before any administrative or legislative committee or agency or, at any public hearing on behalf of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County or the Joint Administrative .Organization shall be at the rate of Two Hundred and Fifty Dollars ($250 .00) per day or any part of a day; and all such time so compensated shall not be credited to the 46-1/2 hours of time per quarter or be considered compensated in any other or additiona'1'-•xdy: Section 5. That, in addition to the compensation hereinabove provided, the actual expenses of travel, food and lodging outside the County of Orange on the business of the Districts and all other necessary expenditures on -1- • i mbursed in the � • . is shati�- be rea. �;;.'•. of -the Dlstryc the business expended. all take effeot " tual .amo-ants so re o ution sr . '• .. aC t this s 1 ' Se�ti,on grog. wary 1� 1 an S ' - • 1 { - •• -fl a • ' OUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ,',R;; ;� *_• AREA CODE 4 sao-z91o. OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA �L�� 962-2411 Jn L 10644 ELLIS AVENUE, P.C. 6OX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 9270E November 7, 1967 Mr. Willard T. Jordan Architect A. I.A. and Associates 1500 Adams Avenue, Suite 301 Costa. Mesa, California Re: Master Plan for Improving the Appearance of the Districts ' Treatment Plant 2 Dear Mr. Jordan: The Districts ' Executive and Building Committees at their October meeting reviewed your statement for services rendered. The committees questioned the basis of your request for payment for architectural design services as well as the scope of the services you provided under the master plan. The Committees had thought CD that the elevation sketches you showed and the single perspective drawing of the pumping station were presented to show the boards the master architectural vocabulary you proposed for structures to be constructed. With the exception of the small undimensioned building elevation for the operators building, the members believe that your sketches represented the original building designs by Joan Carollo Engineers as redrawn by your people and not original designs on your part. The committee members also asked when they .wbuld receive the major rendering of the master plan. As you will recall, you said in your proposal of March 22, 1967 that you would furnish as part of the :Waster plan at least one major rendering. The Committees do not think that the plot plan or any of the other material furnished qualifies as a major rendering. They are expecting a rendered birds eye perspective in. color of the plant showing the buildings with the architectural vocabulary you propose and the landscaping and site development described and indicated on the small sketches you presented. Tile Committees asked me to convey to you that they are disappointed t'.^.at you have not yet furnished the major rendering and surprised at your bill asking for payment for architectural design which they had thought was presented as an essential part of the master plan work. Sincerely, VC. Miller the Districts ' Building Committee Current Industrial Waste Charge Information Theory of Waste Disposal Charges - Historically sewers have been considered a general service to the public rendered by the municipality or sewering agency, rather than as a utility in which the user pays in proportion to the service rendered. However, in recent years there has been a marked tendency towards establishing sewer service charges at the municipal and district level. The reason for this is to shift the burden of cost of sewerage on the actual user, as in the case of water, gas, electricity, and highways, rather than on the property taxpayer. There is, for this reason, a strong movement on a national level to encourage sewer use charges . The most urgent need for service charges relates to industrial waste disposal where the service obtained by the industry from the municipality or district may be many-fold greater than the industry pays in taxes . Nation-wide industrial waste disposal charges are gaining acceptance and, in general, are not opposed by industry as a whole because of the logic behind the charges . Policies of Other Southern California Agencies - The following information has been obtained through personal interview, telephone calls, etc. A. Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts This agency has no uniform policy, although admitting it would be desirable to establish one. They have only recently begun to establish industrial waste charges of any type and at the present time rely on negotiating individual agreements with individual dischargers, the charges being dependent upon location, type of wastes, assessed valuation, etc . It is the staff' s opinion that this method of approach will prove unsatisfactory in the long run. B. _Los Angeles City The City, at present, does not impose an industrial waste charge per se but does collect nominal inspection charges, depending on the size of the operation, and in many instances requires expensive pre-treatment of the waste prior to discharging it to the sewers. The City Attorney has held that industrial waste disposal is a "privilege" and not a "right" and that the City can completely prohibit either a proposed or an existing discharge if it is found to be in the City' s best interest to do so. A uniform City charge was proposed at an election this year and was defeated. This pro- posal would have imposed a sewer charge on every user, including householders, and would have been based on the size of the water meter serving the property. We are advised that the City' s staff is still in hopes of establishing a city-wide .� sewer service charge to amortize bonds issued for major sewerage construction and believes that if the public is properly informed, the proposal will eventually be adopted. C. San Diego City The City of San Diego imposes a uniform sewer service charge on all users which is established by ordinance at fifty percent (50%) of the water bill. D. County of San Diego Most of the various special sewerage districts in unin- corporated areas of the county are administered under contract with the County Department of Special District Services . Consequently, it has been possible to devolop a more or less uniform procedure within these Districts resulting in elimination of disparity of charges for one area over another. These charges are based on a rather complicated formula involving "treatability" of the waste and volume of flow. It is inter- esting to note that they give a break to larger users, apparently following the precedent of water purveyors . It is also of interest that these special districts place a minimum charge on every user, from $18 per year and up, which charges are computed and placed on the property tax bill. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA,92708 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITTEES October 26, 1967 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PRESENT: Directors Parsons (Chairman) , McMichael, Speer, Culver, Porter, Miller ABSENT: Directors Shipley and Baker OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Workman and Rogers BUILDING COMMITTEE PRESENT: Directors Miller (Chairman) , Parsons, Culver ABSENT: Director Schwerdtfeger Staff Present: Fred A. Harper, Paul G. Brown, Norman R. Tremblay, Wayne Sylvester Convened: 5:30 p.m. Adjourned: 10: 15 p.m. JOINT COMMITTEE ACTIONS 1. IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. Willard T. Jordan, Architect A. I.A. & Associates, submitted a proposal for construction design services relative to the landscaping, entrance, and wall construction at Treatment Plant No. 2. The Boards referred the proposal, at the September Board meeting, to the Executive and Building Committees for study and recommendation. Following a lengthy discussion by the Committees concerning -2- the material the - architect submitted for the Master Plan to Improve the Appearance of Treatment Plant No. 2, the General Manager was directed to secure more information from Mr. Jordan regarding his submittals to date, and report back to the Committees . Therefore the Committees have postponed their recommendation on this matter until further study. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTIONS 2. PERSONNEL MATTERS A. Salary Adjustments Staff Report - For the past several years the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors have reviewed the Districts ' employees ' salary schedules by December of each year. The staff has prepared its recommendation for the Committee ' s consideration well in advance of December lst, to allow sufficient time for the informa- tion to be reviewed. We have conducted two rather extensive surveys; one with respect to salaries paid by other public agencies in Orange County, and another with regard to salaries paid by other agencies on the west coast in the sewage treatment and disposal field. Our salary recommendations for positions 'such as laborers, maintenance men, engineering aides, mechanics, foremen, and clerical positions, are intended to reflect the salaries paid in Orange County for similar positions . For positions peculiar to the waste water treatment field (plant operators, technicians, and supervisors) , the salary recom- mendations are made on the basis of the survey of other sewage treatment agencies . (See salary review material marked Page "A" ) . Executive Committee Report - The Committee reviewed with the staff, the material which was mailed to the members on October 20th. During this discussion the Districts ' Personnel Evaluation Program was reviewed, 'and it was learned that even though the increase granted in 1966 averaged 6% ($30,025) , due to the personnel review and evalua- tion procedure established last year the actual cost to the Districts was $21,758 (4. 3%) . Authorized salary adjustments are not given to the employees -3- automatically. All raises are based on merit, and each employee ' s performance is reviewed before any increase is granted. The staff also reported on the Apprentice Program and the Committee members present had the opportunity to review the performance records of the apprentices. The staff recommended that the current step plash, which provides for a possible merit increase (one step) every six months, be accelerated to permit a salary adjustment (1./2 step) each quarter since the training program is conducted in quarterly phases. This will in- crease the cost of the program by approximately $504 per year. It is also recommended that the apprentices ' salary schedule be increased by approximately 72� because the productivity of the participants has been far greater than that anticipated when the program was initiated. Committee Recommendation - It is the recom- mendation of the Committee that the attached salary schedule be approved, and that authorization be given or quarterly pay adjustments l'orMe- Districts ' apprentices, on a merit basis. B. Updating Employee Insurance Program. Staff Report - Approximately three years ago the Districts updated the Group Insurance program, and since that time rates (particularly hospital rates) have increased dramatically; in fact, the average charge for room and board in hospitals in Orange County is $43 per day. The daily benefit provided by our current coverage is $25 per day. We have asked for a quotation from the current insurance carrier, Connecticut General Insurance Company, to update the Plan. We have also asked for a proposal from the Occidental Life Insurance Company. To date, we have not received a response from Occidental but Connecticut General has sub- mitted a proposal for updating the existing Group Plan. (See Page B) . The coverage under Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5, is desirable and the cost for this coverage will be $2.50 for each employee and $4.06 for his -4- dependents . The staff recommends that the Districts agree to pay $2.50 per month, which :is the additional premium for the employee . At present, the Districts pay $10 per month toward the employee coverage) . Committee Recommendation - Concur in the recom- mendation of the staff that the coverage under Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5, be placed with Connecticut General Insurance Company, and that the additional cost for this coverage for the employee be approved in the amount of . 2.50. It is further recommended by the Committee that Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant, be employed__ to review the Districts ' present coverage to make certain that it is the best available for the amount of the premium. C. COMPENSATION FOR BOARD MEMBERS. Committee Report - During the last session of the State Legislature, Assembly Bill .No. 1701 was adopted (effective November 8, 1967) , which increases the maximum compensation payable to Board members . See page "C" The present compensation for members of the Boards is $25 per meeting, with a maximum of $50 per calendar month. The Comm:i.ttec doe:1 not have a rerommenduti can on buL . w:r-11 be cti_acussod in Executive Se._:,_i.on along with other personnel matters at the November dth meeting. 3 . REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS ' INSURANCE COVERAGES . Staff Report - Earlier this year the Districts employed Charles L. Robinson, an Insurance Consultant, to review the Districts ' insurance coverages . Following his investigation he submitted a -report in which he recommended that the Districts improve their fire and extended coverage insurance to include all facilities and equipment above ground, both at the treatment plants and the outlying pumping stations. In March, the Districts directed Mr. Robinson to prepare bid - specifications for the coverages he recommended. These bids were taken on July 21st and Mr. Robinson has submitted an evaluation report on the bids, dated September, 1967'. After a study of his evaluation report, the Districts ' -5- Vow Construction Engineer, Norman Tremblay, and I met with the Insurance Consultant on October 18th, to clarify some of his recommendations . Following a lengthy discussion, the three of us agreed that in the event of a major earthquake disaster, $400,000 of earthquake insurance coverage, subject to $100,000 deductible, would not even begin to restore the Districts ' facilities . If earthquake insurance is considered necessary, we would need approximately $9,000,000 coverage. Mr. Robinson doubts that we could obtain more than $6,000,000 and, if available, it could cost $75,000 annually. Therefore earthquake insurance does not appear to be practical, and the staff concurs with Mr. Robinson that the $2 460 bid of the Lumberman' s of Mansfield Insurance Company be accepted, for coverage of '3,250,000, on a stipulated basis, including fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief, and difference-in-conditions coverage. Earth- quake coverage is not included. (See Mr. Robinson' s letter, Page D attached . Committee Recommendation - In view of the high cost of earthquake insurance, the Committee concurs in the recommendation shown as Item No. 1 of Charles L. Robinson' s letter dated September llth. 4. WEEKEND WORK PROJECT. Staff Report - For several months the staff has been working with personnel from the County Probation Department in an attempt to assist them in finding gainful employment for indivi- duals assigned to their jurisdiction by the local courts . These negotiations were entered into with the idea of helping to reduce the welfare and public assistance costs in the County. We have now been approached by the Juvenile Probation Department staff concerning a weekend program established by the Court. Our Superintendent of Operations ' memorandum (attached as Page "E" outlines the project. Committee Recommendation - It appears that this is a worth- while project, and the Committee recommends that the staff be granted the necessary authority to implement the program with the provision that if it is not successful, it can be immediately terminated. • *(General Manager) 263 Soutk Blain Street,Suite 205 " - Oranga,California 92668 ��•• ••---- Telephone 628.1121 •L...i 4.�..r ...JL.�''�..iV+a.i J.� �;�./� _.l.b~_r1_`'•�.../��J r J�..".y.�_.il_�� _iG+ ...c�L=`wi...�� ..Y�� .!•.: 'Y: \I' C-4 3'," 7Li. _ 5: .. �[\!' K.i :17:ti C:� Gam► :Yr/f. ys /�„ Z\I' -Z� Rkl+ard A.Slraaxrl Assi.;&ml Group.11anaga October 12, 1967 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation District #1 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: Re: Group Insurance Plan I have had an opportunity to review your Group Plan, and I feel that the following additions or changes are worthy of consideration: 1. Increase in the Hospital Room and Board Benefit from $25 per day to $35 per day. As you know, hospitals have increased their costs to a point where our average charge in Orange County is now about $43. Under your present plan, as under the proposed program, charges above the basic room and board benefit are reimbursed under Major Medical. In most cases, however, the employee must come up with the additional money at the time he or his dependent is discharged. Good insur-: ance underwriting suggests that the basic Room and Board Benefit should be approximately 80% of the average charge for a hospital room. The cost of this increase is: Employee $1.32 Dependents 1.92 2. Increase the Surgical Benefit by changing to a new schedule which is an adaptation of the 1964 California Relative.-•Values Study. This Study was done by the medical profession and assigned units rather than dollars to each operation. We can convert this to a dollar schedule by applying a dollar value per unit. I would suggest $6. This will give us a schedule providing up to $1,200 for one operation and amounts: in addi- tion to that if there are peculiar or unusual complications._.. The overall per disability maximum under this schedule would t be raised to $3,600. Thus, we have an increase in the maximum from the present $400 to the proposed $1,200, and in the maxi- rrum per disability from $400 to $3,600. The cost for this change is: Employee $0.46 Dependents 0.94 -B-1- Mr. Fred harper October 12, 1967 a Page 2 3. Addition of an Out-of-Hospital Diagnostic X-Ray & Laboratory Benefit. This benefit is meant to pay for diagnostic and x-ray cork done in a doctor°s office or in an outside laboratory. The avallability of payment in the doctorgs office might keep one or two people from becoming hospital confined for their lab =;ts. Payir.ant is based on a schodule with an overall maximum of $130. Once again, the individual payments are based on a unit value with a $6 value. The cost for this benefit is: Employee $0.45 Dependents 0.54 4. Cut-of-Hospital Doctor visits. This is a benefit to provide pay- ment towards the cost of physician's office and home visits. Payment begins with the fourth visit in a calendar year. The visits do not have to be for related illnesses or injuries. Payment will be made at the rate of $6 per visit and the maximum per calendar year is $300. Payment is made for only .one-visit during any one day. The cost for this benefit is: Employee $0.90 Dependent 2.07 IQ 5. A change in the deductible in your Major Medical from $100 per cause with disability required to $100 cumulative (all cause) per calendar year. We have discussed this at various times and felt that .this provision might very well open the doors to a rash of usage. While the provision does have some attractive features, I am still some- what afraid of it. The cost would be: Employee $0.27 Dependents 0.66 At the same time, the Major Medical maximum would go from a per cause per benefit maximum to a lifetime maximum with $1,000 per year automatic restoration of benefits. I think we might also consider increasing the weekly income benefit which would be done at rates that- are presently in force. I wanted you to have these figures so that you could review them, and I expect to call you shortly to discuss. these possibilities. Sincerely, Richard A. - Strassel, C.L.U. RAS/leh -B-2- j 1967 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 874 IF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS—COMPENSATION OF BOARD MEMBERS CHAPTER 873 ASSEMBLY I3II,L NO. 1701 An act to amend Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to compen- satlon of county sanitation district board members. i The people of the Stale of California do enact as iollotos: j SE,CTIO\' 1. Section 4733 of the health and Safety Code is amended to read: 4733. The district hoard shall have power to fix the amount of compensation per meeting Ro lie paid each member of the board for his services for each meeting attended by him; provided,that said compensation shall not exceed • • • fifty dollars • • ($50) for each meeting of the district board attended by him, not to exceed • • • one hundred dollars • • • ($100) in any one month, together with expenses neces- sarily incurred by him in traveling between his place of residence and the place of meeting. The compensation herein mentioned shall be in addition to any other fees or compensation allowed by law for the other official positions mentioned in Sec- tion 4730 that are occupied by members of said district board. .Approved and filed July 21, 1967. SUI:\'1:1v1 CiIIAY2Y.Y:5 L. lZomNSON MANA011MCNT NPRVICY.N1 �•a1��a�xRA INSURANCE CONSULTANT IxnvuAMCKD►.rAlr/Nsx?YUJfM0J( COYANA(11f 11 Y.YALUATOIr Or Illf,tl 871L►INRUNANCn N7A►r 11911UPAPWCU ADYr11pN IxeunAxca Aiimsw18TN^T0x NATIONAI. O1I,TWILDINO HArrnr 1'nooNw>.s AND ACCDv1rrlNO 000 HOUTII (IItAND AVI:NUL' ' LOB ANOSLSB.CALIPORNIA 00017 (213) 625-1011 September 11, 1967 fir. Fred A. Harper General Manager, Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al.. Dear Mr. Harper: We have evaluated the bids and bidders on property insurance for the properties of the Sanitation Districts, excluding the collect- -i.ng system, as authorized in your letter of May 12 , 1967. ' 1 Quotations ranged across a rather broad spectrum due principally to three factors: 1) Formally appraised property insurable val- ues do not exist; 2) The request for Earthquake Coverage with its varying deductibles; and 3) The request to delete or reduce the usual policy penalties. Our analysis and discussion of the bids is attached supporting the following recommendations in order on an annual basis: I,' If the Districts desire rise, Extended Coverage, Vandalism & ' Malicious Mischief, and Difference in Conditions Coverages (hereafter collectively called "Basic Coverage") for an amount of $3,250, 000 on a 90% Stipulated Basis and excluding Earth- quake Insurance: Lumbermen' s bid of $2, 460 is recommended with the expecta- tion that the amount of insurance and premium will increase somewhat in the future with the completion or addition of new major structures. The penalties are waived by contract. 2. If the Districts desire the Basic Coverage as described just above with $400, 000 Earthquake Insurance subject to an Earth- quake deductible of $100,000 per Earthquake: Lumbermen' s bid of $6,110 is recommended as described. 3. If the Districts desire the Basic Coverage for a flat amount of $600,000 at a fixed premium without penalties, and no Earthquake Insurance: Industrial Indemnity' s flat bid for the policy term of $2,460 is recommended. 4. If Basic Coverage for an amount of $5, 970,535 without penal- ties is desired by the Districts with Earthquake Insurance -D- CITAni.i:,; Y_ 11onixsoN INSUfiANCK CONSULTANT d..� fir. Fred A. Harper Page two ' September 11, 1967 on a $5,000 deductible basis (for EQ) , the following Grain Dealers bids are recommended at the premiums indicated for maximum- Earthquake Coverages of: EQ Insuring Amounts Total Annual Policy Premiums $1.00, 000 ($5, 000 deduct. per quake) $71142 $350 ,000 ($5,000 deduct. per quake) 101392 Modifications in coverages would probably be reasonably possible at corresponding• adjustments to respective rates, as a matter of information. The recommended companies meet the requirements of the Specifica- tions either directly or by virtue of being 10076 reinsured by the Improved Risk Mutual Group which has assets in excess of $1 bil- lion. Policies would be non-assessable by contract. Five year policies could be written at 4.4 times an annual premium if paid in advance, and that is recommended if permissable . Should this be referred to the Executive Committee or to the Board • of Directors, I would expect to attend the respective meetings . I will, of course, be available for discussions with you or desig- nated alternates whenever desired.. When the selected policy is presented to - your Off ice, I plan to * , . examine it carefully on behalf of the Districts and report. Respectfully submitted, CLR:hwh Charles L. Robinson Insurance Consultant Att: Ltr 9-8-67 IM::0 TO: Fred A. Harper FROM: Robert N. Galloway DATE: October 18, 1967 The Orange County Juvenile Probation Department offered to furnish up to a maximum of 15 youths on probation for week- end work during the school year. They would, for the most part, do weed cutting and clean- - up worm around the plant sites as well as the right-of-way area between plants. Work could also be found for them inside on rainy days. The cost to the Districts would be 50(, per day per person for l;;rch and $24.00 per day for their counselor, There would also be sorle transportation involved when working away from ' either plant. to order to obtain their services, it is necessary for the Districts to write a letter requesting their services and guaranteeing the payment for luncheons, and counselor. . • I i -E- October 20, 1967 SUMMARY OF FU= AVAILABLE FOR RECOMMENDED SALARY ADJUSTMENTS Cost of Recommended Salary Adjustments Projected payroll for period 12/1/67 - 6/30/68 based on recommended salary adjustments $ 583,298. Projected payroll for period 12/1/67 - 6/30/68 based on existing salaries 552,088. Estimated cost of recommended salary adjustments $ 31,210.* Add: Estimated additional Retirement System costs 1,697. Estimated additional Compensation Insurance costs 1, 108. Estimated cost of recommended Group Insurance changes 1,925. Total cost of recommendations $ 35,940. Funds Available for Recommended Salary Adjustments Authorized reserve provided for in 1967-68 budget $28,000. Less : Previously authorized adjustments 2� 500. $ 25, 500. Estimated payroll savings for period 7/1/67-11/30/67 based on budget and resulting from vacant positions and ositions-personnel flexibility (salaries only 44,330. $ 69,830. *Estimated annual cost is $53, 508. and the average increase is 5.7%. OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 1 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Range No. Salary Title Range No. Salary No . Summary of Changes Maintenance and Construction Group Maintenance Supt. 49.5 819/1020 Maintenance Supt . 50.5 865/1077 1 One Range Increase Plant Mtce. Supvr, 47.5 735/914 Plant Mtce . Supvr. 48. 755/940 1 One-half Range Increase Trunk Mtce. Supvr. 46. 677/842 Trunk Mtce. Supvr. 47. 715/889 1 • One Range Increase Electrical Supvr. 45. 641/797 Electrical Supvr. 46 .5 696/865 1 One and One-half Range Increase Mechanical Supvr. 45. 641/797 Mechanical Supvr. 46.5 696/865 1 One and One-half Range Increase Foreman 43.5 591/735 Foreman 44.5 624/776 6 One Range Increase Trunk Mtce. Foreman 42. 545/677 Trunk Mtce. Foreman 43. 575/715 2 one Range Increase Mechanic II 42. 545/677 Mechanic II 43. 575/715 5 One Range Increase Mechanic I 40. 489/6o8 Mechanic I 41. 516/641 7 One Range Increase Maintenance Man 38.5 452/560 Maintenance Man 39. 464/575 14 One-half Range Increase Laborer 36.5 4o6/502 Laborer 37.5 428/530 23 One Range Increase Laboratory and Research Group Research Chemist 46.5 696/865 Research Chemist 46 .5 696/865 0 None Chief Lab. Analyst 44. 60.8/755 Chief Lab. Analyst 46. 677/842 1 Two Range Increase Lab. Analyst III 41 .5 530/659 Lab. Analyst III 42.5 560/696 1 . One Range Increase Lab. Analyst II 4o. 489/6o8 Lab. Analyst II 40.5 502/624 0 One-half Range Increase Lab. Analyst I 37.5 428/530 Lab. Analyst I 39. 464/575 2 One and One-half Range Increase Laboratory Aide 36.5 406/502 Laboratory Aide 37 .5 428/530 3 One Range Increase COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) (5) 34.5 365 375 385 �95 406 417 428 44o 402 134.5 35 375 385 �95 06 417 428 440 452 454 M 35.5 385 95 o6 417 428 440 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 3 .5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 .38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 56o. .38.5 39 464 476 489 502 5i6 5 0 545 560 575 39 9.5 476 489 502 516 530 5 5 560 575 591 39.5 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 40 4o.5 502 516 530 545 56o 575 591 6o8 624 40•5 41 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 41 42.5 530 545 560 575 591 62� 624 641 659 659 42.5 5 5 56o 575 591 608 77 , 42.5 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 42.5 43 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 6o8, 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 43.5 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 45•5 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45.5 659 677 696 7i5 735 755 776 �97 81946'S 46.5 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 19 842 46. 96 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 47 5 47 715 735. 755 776 797 819. 842 865 889 47.5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 47.5 48.5 755 776 797 819 842 865 88 914 94o 48.776 797 819 842 S65 889 914 940 966 5 49 797 819 842 865 88 914 94o 966 92 149 49 819 842 865 889 91� 940 966 992 1 20 149.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1 48 50 5o•5 865 889 914 946 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 50.5 51.5 889 914 940 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 51 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1�38 51.5 �52.5 940 966 992 1020 1048 1�07 1138 1170 1203 52.5 3 992 1020 1048;2 1020 1048 1�777 1138 1170 1203 1236 153 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 12770 1203 1236 1271 "53.5 10?7 1107 1138 1170 3 1236 1271 13o6 N.5 .4.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 5555.5 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 56 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 5,6.5 �6.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 i4 9 57 57 1236 1271 1305 1343 Nlq 80 1419 1458 1499 15 o 7 57.5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1458 1499 1540 i583 58.5 58 13o6, 1343 1360 3.419 1458 1499 15�+0 1583 1627 y ,b- OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 2 10-20-6 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Range No. Salary Title Range No, Salary No. Summary of Changes Operations G_roup Supt. of Operations 54.5 1077/1343 Supt. of Operations 55.5 1138/1419 1 One Range Increase Operations Engineer 50. 842/1o48 operations Engineer 51. 889/1107 1 One Range Increase Chief Control Cntr. Op. 46. 677/842 Chief Control Cntr. Op. 47. 715/889 1 One Range Increase Chlorination Supvr. 44. 6o8/755 Chlorination Supvr, 45 641/797 1 One Range Increase Control Center Oper. 44.. 608/755 Control Center Oper, 45. 641/797 5 One Range Increase Plant Operator 41. 516/641 Plant Operator 43. 575/715 8 Two Range Increase Chlorinator Operator 40. 489/608 Chlorinator Operator 41. 516/641 3 One Range Increase Operator Trainee 39. 464/575 Operator Trainee 39.5 476/591 1 One-half Range Increase Engineerin& Groff Construction Engineer 53..5 1020/1271 Construction Engineer 54.5 1077/1343 1 One Range Increase Assistant Engineer- 46.5 696/865 Assistant Engineer 47.5 735/914 0 One Range Increase Construction Inspector 45. 641/797 Construction Inspector 45.5 659/819 1 One-half Range Increase Ass't . Const. Insp. 43. 575/715 Ass't. Const,. Insp. 44. 603/755 1 One Range Increase Engineering Aide III 42. 545/677 Engineering Aide III 43.5 591/735 2 One and One-half Range Increase Engineering Aide II 40. 489/6o8 Engineering Aide II 41.5 530/659 0- One and One-half Range Increase Engineering Aide I 38.6 440/545 Engineering Aide I 39.5 476/591 1 One and One-half Range Increase Student Ass't.-P.T. $1.75-2.30/hr. Student Ass't.-P.T. $1.75-2.30/hr. 2 None COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES (",) Range No . Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) (5) a 34.5 365 3775 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 442 t4.5 375 385 �95 �+06 417 428 44o 452 464 $5 35.5 385 395 o6 417 428 44o 452 464 416, 85.5 36 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489: 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 5i6 530 545 560 575 39 4.5 476 489 502 516 530 5�+5 560 575 591 39.5 489 502 516 53o 545 560 575 591 608 40 4o•5 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 40.5 41 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 41 41.5 540 545 560 575 591 624 624 659 659 41.5 5 5 56o 575 591 608 77 42 42.5 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 677 696 42.5 43 575 591 608 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 6o8: 624 641 659 677 696 7�5 735 43.5 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 44.5 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 45.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 46•5 477 715 735 755 776 779 �7 8�9 842 865 889 47 48.5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 47 5 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 94o 48 48.5 776 ?97 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 8.5 49 797 819 842 865 88 914 94o 966 9t2 9 9.5 819 842 865 889 91 94o 966 992 logo 9.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 0 o. 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50.5 51 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 51 51.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 52 52.5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 53 992 1020 1048- 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 53.5 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 . 1203 1236 1271 �306 554 4 5 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 55 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 55.5 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 56 56.5 r"1 56.5 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 149g9 57 57 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 MO 57.5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 i458 i499 1540 i583 5�-5 58 1306, 1343 13� 1419 -1.453 i499 1540 1583 1627 5- - OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 3 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Range No. Salary Title Ranpe No. Salary No. Summary of Changes A22rentices Apprentice II 38.5 452/560 Apprentice II 39.5 476/591 1 One Range Increase Apprentice I 34.5 365/452 Apprentice I 36. 395/489 8 One and One-half Range Increase DISTRICT NO. 7 EMPLOYEES R/W Agent-Part time Max. 900/Mo. R/W Agent-Part time Max. 900/Mo. 1 None Field Supvr. 46.5 696/865 Field Supvr. 47. 715/889 1 One-half Range Increase Steno-Clerk 35. 375/464 Steno-Clerk 35.5 385/476 1 One-half Range Increase Q Y i i { COUNTY. SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) , (3.5) (4) (4.5) (5) 34.5 365 375 385 395` 4o6 417 428 44o 452 34.5 35 375 385 �95 4o6 417 428 440 452 464 35 355.5 385 395 o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o .452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o -452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 -464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 • 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 5i6 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 56o 575 39 9.5 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 39.5 4 40.5 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 40 41 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 40.5 41 41.5 5i6 530 545 560 575 1 591 608 624 6 1 42 5�O 545 560 575 591 ; 6o8i 624 641 6 1.5 5 5 56o 575 591 608 6241 641 659 6 , 42 42.5 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 6?7 696 42.5 43 575 591 608 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 6o8, 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 43.5 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 45.5 45 641 659 677 696 7�5 735 755 776 797 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 7797 819 45.5 46.5 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 9 .715 735 755 7?6 797 819 842 865 5 47 715 735 755 776 �97 819 842 865 889 47 47.5 735 755 776 797 19 .842 865 88 914 7.5 48 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 48 48.5 776 797 819 842 865, 889 914 940 966 •48.5 9 797 819 842 865 88g 914 94o 966 992 49 49 819 842 865 889 9l4 940 966 992 1020 49.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 50 50.5 865 889 914 946 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50.5 51889.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 51 52 g914 4o 966 966 992 1020 1077 1107 1138 ��70 52.5 992 1020 1048 52.5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 53 992 1020 1048, 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53 53.5 1020 1048 10?7 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 53.5 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 54 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 �343 54.5 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 55.5 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 f. . 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 145P5 56.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380� 1419 1458 149g��9 57 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 1540 57.5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 1540 1583 5�-5 58 1306, 1343 13� 1419 1453 . 1499 15 0 1583 1627 - _ v ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Title Range No. Salary Title Range No. Salary No. Summary of Changes General Manager 21, 500/yr. General Manager 21, 500/yr. 1 Ass' t, Gen. Manager- 20,OOO.yr. Ass 't . Gen. Manager- 20,000/yr. 1 Chief Engineer Chief Engineer Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Director of Finance 50.5 865/1077 Director of Finance 51.5 914/1138 1 One Range Increase Administrative & 50.5 865/1077 Administrative & 51.5 914/1138 1 One Range Increase Purchasing Officer Purchasing Officer Accountant 44.5 624/776 Accountant 45.5 659/819 1 One Range Increase Ass't. Purchasing 43.5 591/735 Ass't. Purchasing 44.5 624/776 1 One Range Increase Officer Officer Senior Accounting Tech. 42. 545/677 Senior Accounting Tech. 42. 545/677 0 None Secretary II 39 .5 476/591 Secretary II 41.5 530/659 1 Two Range Increase Secretary I 38. 440/545 Secretary I 39. 464/575 2 One Range Increase Account Clerk 36.5 406/502 Accounting Technician 38. 440/545 2 One and One-half Range Increase & Title Change Senior Steno-Clerk 36.5 406/502 Senior Steno-Clerk 37. 417/516 1 One-half Range Increase Office Aide 1.90/hr. Office Aide 2.10/hr. 1 $.20/hr. Increase Stenographer (Part time) 2.30/hr. Stenographer (Part time) 2.30/hr. 1 None COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE nF SALARY RANGES ,•o. Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) (5) 34.5 365 375 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 34.5 35 375 385 395 4o6 41 428 44o 452 464 35 355.5 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 . 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 5i6 530 545 56Q 575 39 339.5 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 39.5 40 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 40 4o•5 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 624 40.5 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 41 41.5 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 41.5 545 56o 575 591 608 624 ; 641 659 677 42 42.5 56o 575 591 6o8 624 641" 659 677 696 42.5 43 575 591 608 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 43.5 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 44.5 45 641 659 677 696 7i5 735 755 776 797 45 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 45.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 46.5 47 715 735 755 776 819 842 865 889 47 4�•5 735 755 776 797 �ig 842 865 88 9i4 47.5 7555 776 797 819 842 865 88 48 48 .5 914 940 77 48.797 819 842 865 889 914 940 , 966 5 49 797 819 842 865 88 914 940 966 992 49 49.5 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 49.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 lo48 50 50.5 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50.5 51 889 9i4 940 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 51 51.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 5�•5 52 94o 966 992 1020 1o48 1077 1107 1138 1170 52 52.5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 53 992 1020 1048; 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 53.5 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 554 4.5 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 55 55 1107 ' 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 �306 1343 1380 1419 555.5 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 56 56.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 i4999 ,56.5 57 1236 1271 1305 1343 1380 14191 1458 1499 15�+0 57.5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 i458 1499 154o �583 5�.5 58 1306 , 1343 13£�l 1419 -1.453 1499 1540 1583 1627 5- - DISTRICT NO. 7 FIN, ENGINEERING jO ;ONSTR ENGR 4l4 1077 H4S ONS LAB 6 RESEARCH R:W AG?;P}Pm�l FIELD SUPY :cl �OIR-LABE.REG.jSECRETARIAL POOL APYRZ— StEtit �I K 5?ENO RESICH.CNEMIS 3 417151 697a bb@ 1EN lPf tm r-�" FF C.z OP CHF LAB ANAL tS5? ENGR L30hrNryt l�hr-M'] 6771842 735 914 PLANT MAINTENANCE 6 CONSTRUCTION !a.25 Mt CE SUPY OUT i.TR OP ,-755/94-0 641/T97� L6S9/B19 AP �N STRUCTURES MECHANICAL 6 PIPfNG GROUNDS NVY EOUIt tI 9 ' 6 a 1 APPREN BACTERIOLOGY CHEMICAL APPREN c !FORE,MANI FOREMAN 2 WMUTt M& L24/77te 1624/7714 —J ME LH II I IlEL?t 2E 1 MECH II 1 MECN II PLT.OPER [Z"01/6% IA Alf 4NAL N�.'rDE III Iito 575 715I �575/715 575 15 7?/71D 560' s MECH T MECH 3 MECH t ME.•I AS ANAL 7 ENG A,OE II 2 I c 2 ` 2 2 2 516/sIl L /G4t 536/6Ci .`:.. SIG/4 gob 624 330 S9 _ N II, MTCE MAN MAN MICE MAN MTCE VAN MTCEE tP PREN II LAB ANAL I APPREN B ENG A:OE i I Z 3 2 I I 2 I 2 — "4/575 573 1464'S75 4G4 3 S ,� 1 4716 9 464 474 59 1 � ABORER �I L ABZPE R I rLAROPER LABORER LAO AIDE 4Z8/5+S?f 28 530 428 350 42B 590 {0 42&5 A —EN 2 APPREN I ,TDT ASS T APPREN S rf GT t55'1 I I I ( f 49 r4 343 {. b►. S 1.75?, hr. OPEN P051T.014 TC BE FILLED ONLY 'AN( LEGEND =7 HIGHER LEVEL POSITION 15 NOT FILLED, PROPOSED FUTURE POSITIONS RI/ October 20, 1967 COMPARISON OF BENCH MARK POSITIONS OF VARIOUS PUBLIC AGENCIES IN ORANGE COUNTY Engineering Maintenance City or Agency Foreman Aide III Mechanic II Man Laborer Secretary I Account Clerk Anaheim 660/801 598/727 598/727 493/598 447/543 493/598 469/570 Brea ---- 628/763 ---- 469/570 425/517 436/530 436/530 Buena Park 628/763 613/745 584/710 481/584 447/543 493/598 469/570 Costa Mesa 553/779 553/779 482/679 392/553 365/517 392/553 392/553 Fountain Valley ---- 638/785 ---- 459/561 ---- 470/575 459/561 Fullerton 598/727 563/684 556/676 481/584 425/517 475/577 447/523 Garden Grove 602/733 587/715 573/698 459/559 437/532 482/587 448/545 Huntington Beach 607/764 580/730 580/730 460/530 419/529 419/529 460/580 La Habra 677/824 599/729 599/729 469/570 447/543 447/543 436/530 Newport Beach 636/773 636/773 576/701 474/576 430/523 498/605 441/536 Orange 650/780 620/745 590/710 470/565 430/515 470/565 450/540 Santa Ana 680/815 ---- 590/710 470/565 450/540 502/605 460/552 County of Orange 696/865 591/735 591/735 476/591 452/560 516/641 417/516 Average 635/784 601/743 574/710 466/570 431/532 469/577 445/547 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Existing (43.5)591/735 (42)545/677 (42)545/677 (38,5)452/560(36-5)406/502 (38)440/545(36-5)406/502 Recommended (44.5)624/776 (43-5)591/735 (43)575/715 (39)464/575(37.5)428/530 (39)464/575 (38)440/545 Change . 1 Range 12 Range 1 Range z Range 1 Range 1 Range 12 Range Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase O o 0 0 0 o o • 1' N \i LA80FEC' o Cud --J rN L Aa AP4.YST I Ua. 4/DE I MAUL PP,� /Jrrc�' z1 0 of a b O tf� OPERAi OAP T2A/(1EE14 - b �{ CI✓LO/Z/,(4M? OPE24TD Q y `� O PLA//' r OPE?ATO.Q 4AB0,eATO2Y ANAL YST IIIkA T PU,UK /!fA/,UTE�vA�uCE F,02,64 XI v Z W I y y E,C/G//JEE/2/116 A/DE I17• y � � I '1 O ASS'T. Ca usr/?UCT/O,v /,vSPECT02 FO?EN/q A/ CN/EF L.4BOl2AT0/?Y A�t/gG yST CO,C/TrlOG CD.I rE? OPE/?ATO2 C//L 02/1114T/ox/ .511-11-716?Y/.70/2' EL ECT?/CAL SUPE/21//S02 V /.�EC�/A.c//CAL .s'UPEl2l//S02 0 Co,usr2Ucrio,v W-5'FECrO/2 v T?U.t//C CIA/,UTEC/ANCE SUPE2(//S02 CN/EF CO,UTIZOL CE1./TeR OPE.QArO? k N 2ESEA?CN CNE/I!/ST .4SS/sTA,vr EN6/.t/EE/2 l� PGA,UT MA/�t/TE�(1A,(/CE SUPE2l�/SO? � /✓JA/ilTE�t/A�t/CE SU/'E2/,UTE,(/DE�t/T � N O �O/�E?AT/O/✓s' E�t/G/�t/EE�2 � � -El/DEl/T OF 1 ' w y October 20, 1967 COMPARISON OF SAILARIES OF VARIOUS WASTE WATER TREATMENT AGENCIES Plant Engineering Maintenance Superintendent Agency Laborer Operator Mechanic II Aide III Superintendent of Operations Co . San. Dists. L. A. County 476/591 624/776* 624/776 591/735 914/1138 1203/1499 City of Los Angeles (Hyperion) 476/591 560/696* 608/755 624/776 992/1236 1306/1627 Metropolitan Seattle 465/525 630/695 630/695 670/790 ' ?50/875 lo4l/1167 City of San Diego 438/532 507/616 587/713 601/731 _ 954/1160 1160/1410 East Bay Municipal Utilities Dist. _ 5221582 621/692 692/770 673/741 1213/1350 F/1685 Average 477/566 5881695 628f742 632/756 965f1152 1178/1478 592/736{ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Existing (36.5)406/502 (41)516/641 (42)545/677 (42)545/677 (49-5)819/1020 (54.5)1077/1343 Recommended (37•5)428/530 (43�575/715* (43)57�L715 (43.5)5 1/735 (50'5)865/1077 (55•5)1138/14� 9 Change 1 Range 2 Range 1 Range 12 Range 1 Range 1 Range Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase *The staff is recommending a two range increase in this classification to maintain a competitive position with the metropolitan Los Angeles agencies. S/YO/.LffL3d0 .'0 . N � • Z7.F/Y1!,rVYY /YOl1--)/IL1S/YOa r— = h o 1IY.a0/Y31/Y/2/�dnS. YJ21YO Y31rYll W . .'.. - - � , . -. zfoS�iJaJ�dns 3arrdly3lirld`v 1/Yd7d O/Y3 1/Yd1 S/SSy 2101b2'3d0 d'31/Y3J 742/1/YOJ Y7/117 wt O SOS//1 t�'SdOS a7J/Yf�/Y31/Y/(11�1' �//Yr1211 Ida 216'S1112J7clI,.5 /YO/1t1/Y/4JO7/0 BYO- 2 z7dO 4131/Y-7a 7O&Z/YO.J t w "'aS.X 7d/Y7' 21O1.29ds/Y/ Ir0/1.717elL.V70J 1,sstl 2II a70/YJ/Y/?/39/Y/9/7,7 N NAZO'AYOV .- 1Y&'1Y.91/Y/dl�Y �/!Y/Ia'1 ,, �I lr v/1rrrHa.��v t V W I7I.ZO i AY1Yd AelolddoPd7 &O.4VVY610 1/Yty7d. J � ,aocaa�do ao1r!/Y/do7iy,7 zr IS/7d//d *9V7 tn � n 33/Y/b'd1 d'Olb'a'.�d0 sr .5air/Y34yds4y Q O ; • • � ,� .. '°� . . .. - h/Yb'/'►'3.7Nb'1Y311Y/f/p✓ O M 11S176YYb'YC7 W r I $ 3'3d'09d7 Cjq `3 � :WOS7 ;c November 16, 1967 ADJOURNED MEETING Tuesday, November 21, 1967 4:30 p.m. The primary purpose of this adjourned meeting is to bring the Directors up to date on the numerous activities in and around the District. 1. Irvine Industrial Complex Requests for Master Plan Sewers : As the Directors will recall, we have two -requests from the Irvine Industrial Complex, regarding the installation of master plan subtrunk sewers within their new industrial development north- east of MacArthur Blvd. and Red Hill Ave . (see attachments I & II) . The staff will have a recommendation for the Board on the request, dated September 21st. The financing for the construction requested in the letter dated October 20th, has not been worked out sufficently to permit a recommendation at this time. The staff and engineers will be prepared to go into these matters in detail. 2. Progress Report on Discussions with Representatives of the Irvine Ranch Water District: On March 1, 19 7, the Board authorized the staff to proceed with discussions with personnel of the Irvine Ranch Water District concerning development of master plan for sewering the Irvine Ranch area easterly of the District 7 boundary, and the use of District 7 waste water for water reclamation purposes . Since March we have had three meetings and the staff is prepared to report on the discussions . 3. Verbal Status Report by the District's Engineers : We have asked Conrad Hohener of Boyle and Lowry to report briefly, to the Board, on the present status of the District' s sewer system and the District' s requirments for the immediate future. Fred A. Harper General Manager Enclosures � � �` � �� 1 .� I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Telephone: 540-2910 or 962-2411 November 16, 1967 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on November 8th, 1967, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: Tuesday, November 21st, 1967 at 4:30 P.M. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California �/ Secretary t E -' �• !� � cam. `.^i _KA19ER S.L — .. —y ... �� II I;� i'. • y..a.�n 1 � - �� I ..:' ......,. - - / anc AR'CH�R t �\ J I ' •}y 3'`r^ \`�J � s ° -- -- w .• � 1C • - ---- ' ,---- -- •. ' h i` � --- .: r _ an {7 ... •. 47 u 46 RCCrasrae bp�•scAd 1.-" -.-r:•ari a.. Ica ` .. .. j` .. .. 1 ..- man.asJ II / VON KARMAN AVE .-....... -. .. ....... ......... ....----_ ....... . VIA a II _ . JAMBOREE ROAD 47 47 1 46 a 46 43 {p 4 -- GO Go sa s: as p V 1 Ni E' S S U B I 1 S 1 0 N — -. ..- -...--� ............ . ..- D I R V 1 N '((; E' S `4 S �.0 B I- V 1 v`� I m m I 61 i s \R I 47 ! °p se Iw `SG�G � 2c 99.0 o i ..1 .......................... ............................_ __.._....................... ,off �� 'f�F ��c I �. _ sFb4 �0 XY sa •. I sa e• 10 Ilk- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 _ DISTRICT No. IIAGENDA Tuesday, November 21, 1967 4: 30 P .M. (1) Roll Call �� l r (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Consideration of Actions re : Proposed Gillete Sub-trunk Sewer A. Consideration of motion to receive and file letter ti from The Irvine Industrial Complex requesting a sub-trunk master plan reinbursement agreement with the District for the Gillete Sub-trunk (realigned) as per Exhibit A. See page "A" B. Consideration of motion that the facilities described in the letter from The Irvine Industrial Complex dated September 21, 1967 meets the criteria out- lined in the Districts master plan of sub-trunk sewer facilities adopted April 12, 1967, and as more particularly described on page 8 of said report, paragraph 8, Gillete Sub-trunk Sewer; and further moved that on the completion of the construc- tion of said Gilleib Sub-trunk Sewer the District will enter into a master plan reinbursement agreement with The Irvine Industrial Complex. (6) Consideration of Actions re : The Construction of a Portion of McGaw Sub-trunk Sewer, McGaw Avenue Pump Station and Armstrong Sub-trunk Sewer (Realigned) . A. Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from The Irvine Industrial Complex requesting a sub-trunk master plan reinbursement agreement with f ,A the District for the McGaw and Armstrong Sub-trunk ` Sewers and McGaw Avenue Pump Station (realigned) as per Exhibit A. See page "B" . B. Consideration of motion that the facilities described in the letter from The Irvine Industrial Complex dated October 20, 1967 meets the criteria outlined in the Districts master plan of sub-trunk sewer N` facilities adopted April 12, 1967, and as more _-partig,la-rly des.cr-ib ion page 9, paragraph 11, Armstrong Avenue Pump Station and Sub-trunk Sewer McGaw) , paragraph 12, Kaiser Street Sub-trunk Sewer VV Armstrong) ; and further moved that on the completion of the construction of said portion of McGaw Sub-trunk Sewer, McGaw Avenue Pump Station and Armstrong Sub- trunk Sewer the District will enter into a master plan reinbursement agreement with The Irvine Industrial Complex. C. Consideration of motion directing engineers to proceed with preparing of plans and specifications for con- struction of the required portion of the McGaw Avenue n Sub-trunk Sewer, the McGaw Avenue Pump Station and the Armstrong Sub-trunk; and further moved that theq District provide inspection services during the �.., construction of said facilities. (7) Progress Report on Discussions with The Irvine Ranch Water District A. Use of District No. 7' s waste water for water reclama- tion purposes . B. Future sewerage requirements of the Irvine Ranch area easterly of District No. 7. (8) Engineers Status Report on the District' s Sewer System and Immediate Future Requirements (9) Consideration of Resolution No. 67-109-7 Authorizing the Acceptance of Grant of Easement from Grace B. Anderson and Thomas W. Anderson Relative to Providing Sewerage v Facilities for the Lil,jeblad-Wessinger Annexation, at No Cost to the District. See page "C" (10) Other Business and Communications, If Any (11) Consideration of Motion to Adjourn L � RESOLUTION NO. 67-109-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM GRACE B. ANDERSON & THOMAS W. ANDERSON The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein Grace B. Anderson and Thomas W. Anderson grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of sewers in the Liljeblad-Wessinger Annexation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District.; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #9 -C- District 7 Schedule "A" To Resolution No. 67-109-7 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby. acknowledged, GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON, Grantors, grant to. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a Public Corporation, Grantees, the real property in the County of Orange, State of California, described as: v A non-exclusive easement for public sewer purposes in, under and upon the property hereinafter described: All that certain land situated in the State of California, County of Orange, described as follows: An easement under a strip of land 20. 00 feet in width, in Block 15 of Irvine's Subdivision in the County of Orange, State of California, as shown in a map thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, and being a portion of Parcel 1 of the land described in deed to Thomas W. Anderson and wife, recorded Tanuary 30, 1959, in Book 4569, Page 64, Official Records, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, the northerly line of said 20. 00 foot strip being described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly angle point in the exterior boundary of said land conveyed to Anderson, said angle point being the southeasterly terminus of that certain course described as S. 82 49' 15" E. 134. 64 feet, and running thence along said exterior boundary N. 82° 49' 15" W. 134. 64 feet; thence N. 62° 27' 15" W. , 159. 31 feet to the most northerly angle point in said exterior boundary of land conveyed to Anderson, being the termination of the 20. 00 foot wide strip of land described1erein. That Grantors reserve the right to use the surface of the land in the manner compatible with the full and free exercise of said easement and acknowledge that Grantees and their successors in interest have the right to construct a sanitary sewer line or lines, manholes, connection structures and other appurtenances, which structures may not extend above .the surface of the ground and that said Grantees and their successors have `•.•� the right to. construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along the real property hereinabove described providing said real property shall be r. estorod to the condition it was or a better condition than it was prior to any Schedule "A" -1- . . dim entry by Grantee or their successors in interest and prior to construction by Grantees or their successors in interest. Dated: 1967. 2 / GRACE B. ANDERSON THOMAS W. ANDERSON STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On / 9 1967, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and or said County ,,,Seal}• and State MUTAM L. ANDERSON Notary Public �•'''S: State of California Principal Office in II Orange County AA• 1N....u....MI.....................................N.` Lhpl.cs Qr-t. 19, 1969 - o \.Wd COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Telephone : 540-2910 or 962-2411 November 16, 1967 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Gentlemen: Pursuant to adjournment of the regular meeting on November 8th, 1967, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 will meet in an adjourned regular meeting: Tuesday, November 21st, 1967 at 4: 30 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California ecretary MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 517510844 Ellis Avenue of Orange County, California Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Telephones: Area Code 714 540-2910 DISTRICT NO. 7 962-241I IINovember 16, 1967 ADJOURNED MEETING Tuesday, November 21, 1967 4:30 p .m. The primary purpose of this adjourned meeting is to bring the Directors up to date on the numerous activities in and around the District. 1. _Irvine Industrial Complex Requests for Master Plan Sewers : As the Directors will recall, we have two requests from the Irvine Industrial Complex, regarding the installation of master plan subtrunk sewers within their new industrial development north- east of MacArthur Blvd. and Red Hill Ave. (see attachments 18c II) . The staff will have a recommendation for the Board on the request, dated September 21st. The financing for the construction requested in the letter dated October 20th, has not been worked out sufficently to permit a recommendation at this time . The staff and engineers will be prepared to go into these matters in detail. 2. Progress Report on Discussions with Representatives of the Irvine Ranch Water District: On March 1, 19 7, the Board authorized the staff to proceed with discussions with personnel of the Irvine Ranch Water District concerning development of master plan for sewering the Irvine Ranch area easterly of the District 7 boundary, and the use of District 7 waste water for water reclamation purposes. Since March we have had three meetings and the staff is prepared to report on the discussions . 3. Verbal Status Report by the District's Engineers : We have asked Conrad Hohener of Boyle and Lowry to report briefly, to . the Board, on the present status of the District' s sewer system and the District' s requirments for the immediate future. Fred A. Harper General Manager Enclosures +; "• IRVINE 17 INDUSTRIAL ' . . COMPLEX _ • •• '' , ', ... . ..,c , 1 s ' t September 21, 1967 .. "" Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager ' County Sanitation District P. 0. Box 5175 •��' Fountain Valley, California 92708 ' Attention: Mr. Paul Hogan • County Sanitation District No. 7 Gentlemen: The purpose of this letter is' to request inclusion 'into your Master • •'�'"` Plan of Sub-trunk Sewers those facilities which are outlined on the enclosed Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "C". The sewer outlined on the enclosed Exhibit "A" corresponds to the ` Gillette Avenue sub-trunk as outlined on your Master Plan of Sub- . . trunk Sewer Facilities. This facility has already been designed and bid prices obtained as part of the development of Tract No. 6411. The bid results are shown on the enclosed Exhibit "B". The sub- " trunk sewer outlined on the enclosed Exhibit "C" corresponds to a portion of the Armstrong sub-trunk sewer and the Kaiser Street sub- ; �Erunk sewer as outlined on your Master Plan of Suh-trunk Facilities. - • We are hopeful of including these sub-trunk sewers in your Master Plan :•. and entering into a reimburseable agreement between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the Irvine Industrial Complex for the cost of their' ': construction. Ver truly you s, ; Raymond W. Kimmey. - . . . s Chief Engineer t RWK:js 4: Item I 2122 Campus Drive,P 0 Box 4404,Irvine,California 92664(714)833-1010.(213)628-4204 IRVINE INOUSTRIAL '} COMPLEX r October 20, 1967 _ F . ' Mr. Fred Harper -Orange County Sanitation District 1' P. 0. Box 5175 _ Fountain Valley, California 92708 s' Attention. Mr. Paul Hogan ,. . Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Harper: Reference is made to our meeting of October 18, 1967 and the dig- `. . cussions relating to the establishment of a subtrunk sewer that would best serve the area bounded by Red Hill Avenue, Barranca Road, future Von Karman Avenue and McGaw Avenue. This area and the location of the proposed subtrunk sewer is contained on the enclosed Exhibit "A" In accordance with the policies of County Sanitation District No. 7, it is requested that your engineers design and prepare' the construe tion plans and specifications for the installation of this subtrunk. `'. sewer. The Irvine Industrial Complex will then bid and construct this subtrunk sewer line. As soon as the costs are known for this ` ;, :.. :• increment of your master plan system, a reimbursement agreement can : be prepared and submitted to your Board for approval. Also, enclosed herein is a 500 scale topography map which may be of assistance in determining design volume for- this sewer line. If any other information or data is required, please contact this office. ..: Very truly yours, , `:.,.• ' �;: ti: ;. Raymond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer C En . t Item II PIP;! Cr,mrria Drivo,h 0 Dog 1404,I+wino.Colifornin 02664(71-4)033-1010.(W)6210-4204 0 C C f L 01 N 11 \N _ J 1 L,4 iY IA NN \~ TNIRD SEVERMAI a� \ C.STRl NANCE P DISTRICT �.Tr'1 NL I r—`^ v e'VE 9 I r _ _ -�.kr• l, I rL g A N t00 LOS ALAY/ros " r 0 A R TAoa :LnR �., w STY HSr£R GH() PUYPCO ARSTAS 0 R 0 E uJ MI YAL -RED WILL AYYVNSr10M IIiw `• :� L • r�'. } - r UP STA SEA rrr ArAar l I %^ rA, BEAD UF7 A fAP o� Np OAE- 3� _ u n I•� L q I 1',� uinv st N" Y`ivd < EATER AV - I ` . PUMP SrA ` i A T N O B m q4 l V A L L tv Tzr - O I 41 tt. 0L t:.F<V Y srA i� O q �_ .e •-�n ,A "c� 'rt'u^ w4 NFIYL ANO 57 A'l!1✓: ''C ` / NGS YOON JIY/I (O PUNT � �;• Y, ,F•�• AouNAAAr i NO. 2 OUTPALL L SrA _Y• �'. a ................... .. / N i 1..00 PPV su n AL;-r POM'r - BAY BRI✓0€t % ` l� c .tOJJY00N HIMP Sr. ;Iuw SrA/ ` LrIJVRr YOR . BArSlBF OA:1i-`••,, - I,,,Y._.• _ JOAL r I',APMOJ a rt t \5q COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of aAYD[ town *mow CISTRLCTS ? AND ;^ LAO TRUNK sews z- •'' 1 9 6 7 , November 16, 1967 ADJOURNED MEETING Tuesday, November 21, 1967 4:30 p.m. The primary purpose of this adjourned meeting is to bring the Directors up to date on the numerous activities in and around the District. 1. Ir.vine Industrial Complex Requests for Master. Plan Sewers : As the Director.- will recall, we have two requests from the Irvine Industrial Complex, regarding the installation of master plan subtrunk sewers within their new industrial development north- east of MacArthur Blvd. and Red Hill Ave . (see attachments I & II) . The staff will have a recommendation for the Board on the request, dated September 21st. The financing for the construction requested in the letter dated October 20th, has not been worked out sufficently to permit a recommendation at this time . The staff and engineers will be prepared to go into these matters in detail. 2. Progress Report on Discussions with Representatives of the Irvine Ranch Water District: On March 1, 19 7, the Board authorized the staff to proceed with discussions with personnel of the Irvine Ranch Water District concerning development of master plan for sewering the Irvine Ranch area easterly of the District 7 boundary, and the use of District 7 waste water for water reclamation purposes. Since March we have had three meetings and the staff is prepared to report on the discussions . 3. Verbal Status Report by the District's Engineers: We have asked Conrad Hohener of Boyle and Lowry to report briefly, to the Board, on the present status of the District' s sewer system and the District' s requirments for the immediate future. Fred A. Harper General Manager Enclosures t IRVINE ` INDUSTRIAL ' COMPLEX .. October 20, 1967 Mr. Fred Harper i .,,.• .�: �:':'; •', I:7.5 I -orange County Sanitation District { ''' ~' c = / ~ • 14 P. 0. Box 5175 - a,;',I, p• :,� y. ... y Fountain Valley, California 92708 • ' '"� '' '' ' 1 r `: �'' y. . Attention: Mr. haul Hogan Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Harper: ;',• Reference is made to our meeting of October 18, 1967 and the dis- cussions relating to the establishment of a subtrunk sewer that would best serve the area bounded by Red Hill Avenue, Barranca load, future Von Karman Avenue and McGaw Avenue. This area and 7 : the location of the proposed subtrunk sewer is contained on the �•t, enclosed Exhibit "A" ' "'•• in accordance with the policies of County Sanitation District &No. 7, it is requested that your engineers design and preparet the construe-. - • ' tion plans and specifications for the installation of this subtrunk.,• sewer. The Irvine Industrial Complex will then bid and construct , ' this subtrunk sewer line. As soon as the costs are known for this increment of your master plan system, a reimbursement agreement can: . be prepared and submitted to your Board for approval. . " Also, enclosed herein is a 500 scale topography map which may be of ' assistance in determining design volume for- this sewer line. If any.- other information or -data is required$ please,contact this office. ' . Very truly yours, ;;. _. Raymond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer Eno. „ ' , . ;�•i . t . enda Item #6 ` -B- District' 7 ' ?.Ir, Cnmriva Orivo,f1' Q Ck�A'4/10�1,hwinA,Cnli(ornin U2bf��1(11�}A0a•IOIn,(?.1;�C�40•�320� • • IRVINE :. INDUSTRIAL '. . COMPLEX :7 .- .., •.. September 21, 1967 . .. : : L:• :fr. Fred Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District :;;:�«. � :,: .; •%. ;' " P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 „ ` • :. Attention: Mr. Paul Rogan County Sanitation District No. 7 Gentlemen: t The purpose of this letter is' to request inclusion 'into your Master Plan of Sub-trunk Sewers those• facilities which are outlined •on the '•�'- enclosed Exhibit "A" and Exhibit "C". ••••ram. i... • ' The sewer outlined on the enclosed Exhibit "A" corresponds to the j.. .,�� ',tit •e' �s-,f , :;: ;:• �• Gillette Avenue sub-trunk as outlined on your Master Plan of Sub- 'c. trunk Sewer Facilities. This facility has already been designed and bid prices obtained as part of the development of Tract No. 6411. The bid results are shown on the enclosed Exhibit "B". The sub- trunk sewer outlined on the enclosed Exhibit "C" corresponds to a ::+ ,..•- portion of the Armstrong sub-trunk sewer and the Kaiser Street sub- trunk sewer as outlined on your Master Plan of Sub-trunk Facilities We are hopeful of including these sub-trunk sewers in your 'faster PlanIr and entering into a reimburseable agreement between County Sanitation •. ' _ District No. 7 and the 'Irvine Industrial Complex for the-cost of their'; r •: construction. - ,,•.. Ver truly you s, "'+ ` Raymond ,' ;,:',• ' .. .<:... Chief Engineer , + :: ..• :N �r` RWK:j s A.zenda Item #5 -A- District �7 ` • , 2122 Campus Drive,2 0 Box 4404.Irvine.California 92664(`14 833-006(2io 628-4204_ RESOLUTION NO. 67-109-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM GRACE B. ANDERSON & THOMAS W. ANDERSON The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein Grace B. Anderson and Thomas W. Anderson grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of sewers in the Liljeblad-Wessinger Annexation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #9 -C- District 7 Schedule "A" To Resolution No. 67-109-7 GRANT DEED �.d FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby. acknowledged, GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON, Grantors, grant to COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a Public Corporation, Grantees, the real property in the County of Orange, State of California, described as: A non-exclusive easement for public sewer purposes in, under and upon the property hereinafter described: All that certain land situated in the State of California, County of Orange, described as follows: An easement under a strip of land 20. 00 feet in width, in Block 15 of Irvine's Subdivision in the County of Orange, State of California, as shown in a map thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, and being a portion of Parcel 1 of the land described in deed to Thomas W. Anderson and wife, recorded January 30, 1959, in Book 4569, Page 64, Official Records, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, the northerly line of said 20. 00 foot strip being described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly angle point in the exterior boundary of said land conveyed to Anderson, said angle point being the southeasterly terminus of that certain course described as S. 820 49' 15" E. 134. 64 feet, and running thence along said exterior boundary N. 82' 49' 15" W. 134. 64 feet; thence N. 620 27' 15" W. , 159. 31 feet to the most northerly angle point in said exterior boundary of land conveyed to Anderson, being the termination of the 20. 00 foot wide strip of land described;herein. That Grantors reserve' the right to use the surface of the land in the manner compatible with the full and free exercise of said easement and acknowledge that Grantees and their successors in interest have the right to construct a sanitary sewer line or lines, manholes, connection structures and other appurtenances, which structures may not extend above the surface of the ground and that said Grantees and their successors have the right to construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along the real property hereinabove described providing said real property shall be restored to the condition it was or a better condition than it was prior to any Schedule"A" -1- entry by Grantee or their successors in interest and prior to construction by Grantees or their successors in interest. Dated: ;?l<<~��:, 1L,� ��" % 1967. 1. GRACE B. ANDERSON THOMAS W. ANDERSON STATE OF CALIFORNIA } SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On 1967, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and for said State, personally appeared GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. otary Public in and f Zof said County 5.... Seal).......................................� and State ... WILLIAM L. ANDERSON cz• Notary Public o1.'•a : State of California Principal Office in Orange County pp; N.f�...N//...NNNN...........a NN.■ 79u9 t.d -2- RESOLUTION NO. 67-109-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT �..✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM GRACE B. ANDERSON & THOMAS W. ANDERSON The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein Grace B. Anderson and Thomas W. Anderson grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of sewers in the Liljeblad-Wessinger Annexation, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described in Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein; and, Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #9 -C- District 7 Schedule "A" To Resolution No. 67-109-7 GRANT DEED FOR A VALUABLE CONSIDERATION, receipt of which is hereby. acknowledged, GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON, u Grantors, grant to COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, a Public Corporation, Grantees, the real property in the County of Orange, State of California, described as: A non-exclusive easement for public sewer purposes in, under and upon the property hereinafter described: All that certain land situated in the State of California, County of Orange, described as follows: An easement under a strip of land 20. 00 feet in width, in Block 15 of Irvine's Subdivision in the County of Orange, State of California, as shown in a map thereof recorded in Book 1, Page 88 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, and being a portion of Parcel 1 of the land described in deed to Thomas W. Anderson and wife, recorded January 30, 1959, in Book 4569, Page 64, Official Records, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County, the northerly line of said 20. 00 foot strip being described as follows: Beginning at the most easterly angle point in the exterior boundary of said land conveyed to Anderson, said angle point being the southeasterly terminus of that certain course described as S. 820 49' 15" E. 134. 64 feet, and running thence along said exterior boundary N. 82° 49' 15" W, 134. 64 feet; thence N. 620 27' 15" W. , 159. 31 feet to the most northerly angle point in said exterior boundary of land conveyed to Anderson, being the termination of the 20. 00 foot wide strip of land described:herein. That Grantors reserve the right to use the surface of the land in the manner compatible with the full and free exercise of said easement and acknowledge that Grantees and their successors in interest have the right to construct a sanitary sewer line or lines, manholes, connection structures and other appurtenances, which structures may not extend above .the surface of the ground and that said Grantees and their successors have `•.✓ the right to construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along the real property hereinabove described providing said real property shall be "restored to the condition it was or a better condition than it was prior to any Schedule "A" -1- ., M � entry by Grantee or their successors in interest and prior to construction by Grantees or their successors in interest. _ 1967. -._ ._.. . Dated: �•,_ <<�_ ,,,�-,��,> ��•-�:% ho G CE B. ANDERSON ThUMAS W. ANDERSON STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. _ COUNTY OF ORANGE ) On 1967) before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and :for said State, personally appeared GRACE B. ANDERSON and THOMAS W. ANDERSON known to me to be the persons whose names are subscribed to the within instrument and acknowledged that they executed the same. WITNESS my hand and official seal. Notary Public in and fof said County �Sel} and State .... ........................................: WILLIA�,� L. ANDEESO,I. Notary Public State of California ti a ��.t-Y•4 a Principal Office in ; Orange County ° p. t SN.I........N...........°°...........a........... °.M..[ u.Pucs ud. 19, 1969 -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P.O. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY,CALIFORNIA,92708 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE AND BUILDING COMMITTEES October 26, 1967 EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE PRESENT: Directors Parsons (Chairman) , McMichael, Speer, Culver, Porter, Miller ABSENT: Directors Shipley and Baker OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Workman and Rogers BUILDING COMMITTEE PRESENT: Directors Miller (Chairman) , Parsons, Culver ABSENT: Director Schwerdtfeger Staff Present: Fred A. Harper, Paul G. Brown, Norman R. Tremblay, Wayne Sylvester Convened: 5: 30 p .m. Adjourned: 10: 15 p.m. JOINT COMMITTEE ACTIONS 1. IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF TREATMENT PLANT NO. 2. Willard T. Jordan, Architect A. I.A. & Associates, submitted a proposal for construction design services relative to the landscaping, entrance, and wall construction at Treatment Plant No. 2. The Boards referred the proposal, at the September Board meeting, to the Executive and Building Committees for study and recommendation. Following a lengthy discussion by the Committees concerning -2- the material the architect submitted for the Master Plan to Improve the Appearance of Treatment Plant No. 2, the General Manager was directed to secure more information from Mr. Jordan regarding his submittals to date, and report back to the Committees . Therefore the Committees have postponed their recommendation on this matter until further study. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ACTIONS 2. PERSONNEL MATTERS A. Salary Adjustments Staff Report - For the past several years the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards of Directors have reviewed the Districts ' employees ' salary schedules by December of each year. The staff has prepared its recommendation for the Committee ' s consideration well in advance of December lst, to allow sufficient time for the informa- tion to be reviewed. We have conducted two rather extensive surveys; one with respect to salaries paid by other public agencies in Orange . County, and another with regard to salaries paid by other agencies on the west coast in the sewage treatment and disposal field. Our salary recommendations for positions such as laborers, maintenance men, engineering aides, mechanics, foremen, and clerical positions, are intended to reflect the salaries paid in Orange County for similar positions . For positions peculiar to the waste water treatment field (plant operators, technicians, and supervisors) , the salary recom- mendations are made on the basis of the survey of other sewage treatment agencies . (See salary review material marked Page "A" ) . Executive Committee Report - The Committee reviewed with the staff, the material which was mailed to the members on October 20th. During this discussion the Districts ' Personnel Evaluation Program was reviewed, and it was learned that even though the increase granted in 1966 averaged 6% ($30,025) , due to the personnel review and evalua- tion procedure established last year the actual cost to the Districts was $21,758 (4. 3%) . Authorized salary adjustments are not given to the employees • 'i -3- automatically. All raises are based on merit, and each employee ' s performance is reviewed before any increase- is granted. The staff also reported on the Apprentice Program and the Committee members present had the opportunity to review the performance records of the apprentices. The staff recommended that the current step plan, which provides for a possible merit increase (one step) every six months, be accelerated to permit a salary adjustment (1/2 step) each quarter since the training program is conducted in quarterly phases. This will in- crease the cost of the program by approximately $504 per year. It is also recommended that the apprentices' salary schedule be increased by approximately 71% because the productivity of the participants has been far greater than that anticipated when the program was initiated. Committee Recommendation - It is the recom- mendation of the Committee that the attached salary schedule be approved, an hat authorization_ be given for quarter y pay adjustments For the Districts' apprentices, on a merit basis. B. Updating Employee Insurance Program. Staff Report - Approximately three years ago the Districts updated the Group Insurance program, and since that time rates (particularly hospital rates) have increased dramatically; in fact, the average charge for room and board in hospitals in Orange County is $43 per day. The daily benefit provided by our current coverage is $25 per day. We have asked for a quotation from the current insurance carrier, Connecticut General Insurance Company, to update the Plan. We have also asked for a proposal from the Occidental Life Insurance Company. To date, we have not received a response from Occidental but Connecticut General has sub- mitted a proposal for updating the existing Group Plan. (See Page B) . The coverage under Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5, is desirable and the cost for this coverage will ... be $2.50 for each employee and $4.06 for his � I -4- dependents . The staff recommends that the Districts agree to pay $2.50 per month, which is the additional premium for the employee. At present, the Districts pay $10 per month toward the employee coverage) . Committee Recommendation - Concur in the recom- mendation of the staff that the coverage under Proposals 1, 2, 3, and 5 , be placed with Connecticut General Insurance Company, and that the additional cost for this coverage for the employee be approved in the amount of �2.50. It is further recommended by the Committee that Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant, be employed to review the Districts ' present coverage to make certain that it is the best available for the amount of the premium. C. COMPENSATION FOR BOARD MEMBERS. Committee Report - During the last session of the State Legislature, Assembly Bill No. 1701 was adopted (effective November 8, 1967) , which increases the maximum compensation payable to Board members . See page "C" The present compensation for members of the Boards is $25 per meeting, with a maximum of $50 per calendar month. The Committee does not have a recommendation on this matter, but it will be discussed in Executive Session along with other personnel matters at the November dth meeting. 3. REVIEW OF THE DISTRICTS ' INSURANCE COVERAGES . Staff Report - Earlier this year the Districts employed Charles L. Robinson, an Insurance Consultant, to review the Districts ' insurance coverages . Following his investigation he submitted a report in which he recommended that the Districts improve their fire and extended coverage insurance to include all facilities and equipment above ground, both at the treatment plants and the outlying pumping stations. In March, the Districts directed Mr. Robinson to prepare bid specifications for the coverages he recommended. These bids were taken on July 21st and Mr. Robinson has submitted an evaluation report on the bids, dated September, 1967'. ,No After a study of his evaluation report, the Districts ' -5- x Conti L'.ruc i;.ton 1-m1rincer, Nur•►nun Tremblay, and 1 inct w.i. t;h thc. Insurance Consultant on October 18th, to clarify some of his recommendations . Following a lengthy discussion, the three of us agreed that in the event of a major earthquake disaster, $400,000 of earthquake insurance coverage, subject to $100,000 deductible, would not even begin to restore the Districts ' facilities . If earthquake insurance is considered necessary, we would need approximately $9,000,000 coverage. Mr. Robinson doubts that we could obtain more than $6,000,000 and, if available, it could cost $75,000 annually. Therefore earthquake insurance does not appear to be practical, and the staff concurs with Mr. Robinson that the $2 460 bid of the Lumberman' s of Mansfield Insurance Company be accepted, for coverage of '1,250,000, on a stipulated basis, including fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief, and difference-in-conditions coverage. Earth- quake coverage is not included. (See Mr. Robinson' s letter, Page D attached) . Committee Recommendation - In view of the high cost of earthquake insurance, the Committee concurs in the recommendation shown as Item No. 1 of Charles L. Robinson' s letter dated September llth. 4. WEEKEND WORK PROJECT. Staff Report - For several months the staff has been working with personnel from the County Probation Department in an attempt to assist them in finding gainful employment for indivi- duals assigned to their jurisdiction by the local courts . These negotiations were entered into with the idea of helping to reduce the welfare and public assistance costs in the County. We have now been approached by the Juvenile Probation Department staff concerning a weekend program- established by the Court. Our Superintendent of Operations ' memorandum (attached as Page "E" ) , outlines the project. Committee Recommendation - It appears that this is a worth- while project, and the Committee recommends that the staff be granted the necessary authority to implement the program with the provision that if it is not successful, it can be immediately terminated. *(General Manager) TELEPHONE: (714) G22-1090 Agenda Item � POST OFFICE BOX 2587 MARCAL Iff-'APER DILLS CO. 1400 WEST HOLTAVENUE • POMONA, CALIFORNIA 91766 PLANTS MARCAL PAPER PRODUCTS POMONA. CALIF. THE COMPLETE LINE EAST PATERSON. N.J. November 8 1967 OF PRODUCTS FOR CHICAGO. ILL. EVERY HOUSEHOLD NEED Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District No.2 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: We are at present negotiating for a piece of property, about eight acres, to establish a plant in the City of Orange. We are a nation wide organization, with ten plants scattered across the Eastern part of the United States. We have been operating in the City of Pomona for the past thirty years, We manu- facture household tissue products, irax papers and extrude polyethylene for food wrap. Our expansion facilities are limited since we are ,aituated on three acres. Our desire to locate in Orange is three fold. First we have a piece of property . that krill provide room for expansion for all future needs. Secondly, you have water and sewage facilities available. Thirdly, we will be closer to market and distribution center for our goods. The only obstacle to be resolved now is the question of our effluent. We plan to install a paper making machine similar to one now in use by Kimberly Clark in Fullerton. It will produce approximately forty to fifty tons of paper per day. The following information may be a guide towards arriving at a favorable decision. 1. Our effluent will consist of substances such as clays, inks, dyes and such Mat Ll as used in nonnal preparation of papers for all uses. It SV-----2cau?tic will be de ted with water containing soap and detergents formed by Oda and phosphates. The pH would range from ? to 92. The solids would amount to 8 - 10,aYtoper 1,000 allons of,�iquid or approx- imately 8 to 10 tons per day;S T _ C '"Jr O0c 2. Our initial discharge would be 450 gallons per minute or 650,000 gallons per day for the first six months. 3. Within twelve months to two years we shall be discharging approximately 1,500 gallons per minute or 2,160,000 gallons per day. 4. Our initial capital investment would be approximately $2,000,000.00. 5. Our ultimate investment would be approximately $3,000,000.00 and employing 300 employees. 6. It is needless to say that unless we are provided with means of disposing of our effluent, at a reasonable cost, we could not entertain plans foe erecting a plant of this size in the City of Orange. /�a-'► Our accountants and engineers have compiled figures and have come up with theyd�-� folloiNzng cost.figure based on use per one million gallons per day_-or-as follows.av— ::'e shall accept a charge for sewage conveying, treatment and disposing of our'�a°`"`�`��"`. industrial waste of $30.00 per million gallons, plus $8.00 per ton of solids dry oasis, or $40,00 per million gallons with a $7.50 per ton charge for suspended solids. We hope that these figures will assist you in your determination. Respestfull , )l npP.'Ida ,tem No. -) \ James ,tarcalus i 263 South Main Street,Suite 205 Oranpa,California 92668 Telephone 638-1121 `� �.�.� �._..:�._i'�. �_�,.�Flu Et..! ._.1��'1:`��i 1.�f�l_ ♦,�.r- '.•—o ��_� �i�'�.�—� a17 [•-A -V" :A:i. .f '[\f- <s _a:=- _I-%- ZNJ' 'Y liiehard A,titra.1sel rlssistuutGroup Jlaumucr October 12, 1967 Mr. :red Harper County Sanitation District #1 10844 Ellis Avenue Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: Re: Group Insurance Plan I have had an opportunity to review your Group Plan, and I feel that the following additions or changes are worthy of consideration: 1. Increase in the Hospital Room and Board Benefit from $25 per day to $35 per day. As you know, hospitals have increased their costs to a point where our average charge in Orange County is now about $43. Under your present plan, as under the proposed program2 charges above the basic room and board benefit are reimbursed under Major Medical. In most cases, however, the employee must come up with the additional money at the time he or his dependent is discharged. Good insur-, ance underwriting suggests that the basic Room and Board Benefit should be approximately 80% of the average charge for a hospital room. The cost of this increase is: Employee $1.32 w Dependents 1.92 2. Increase the Surgical Benefit by changing to a new schedule ! .. which is an adaptation of the 1964 California Relative'•Values Study. This Study was done by the medical profession and , assigned units rather than dollars to each operation. We can convert this to a dollar schedule by applying a dollar value per unit. I would suggest $6. This will give us a schedule providing up to $1,200 for one operation and amounts: in addi- tion to that if there are peculiar or unusual complications.. . The overall per disability maximum under this schedule would be raised to $3,600. Thus, we have an increase in the maximum from the present $400 to the proposed $1,200, and in the maxi- mum per disability from $400 to 43,600, The cost for this change is: Employee $0.46 Dependents,.. 0.94 -B-1- Fred Harper October 12, 1967 r.n.� Page 2 3. rddition of an Out-of-Hospital Diagnostic X-Ray & Laboratory Benefit. This benefit is meant to pay for diagnostic and x-ray work done in a doctor°s office or in an outside laboratory. The availability of payment in the doctors office might keep one or two people from becoming hospital confined for their lab tosts, Payr,.::nt is based on a schedule with an overall maximum of $150. Once again, the individual payments are based on a unit value with a $6 value. The cost for this benefit is: Employee $0.45 Dependents 0.54 4. Cut-of-Hospital Doctor visits. This is a benefit to provide pay- ment towards the cost of physician's office and home visits. Payment begins with the fourth visit in a calendar year. The visits do not have to be for related illnesses or injuries. Payment will be made at the rate of $6 per visit and the maximum per calendar year is $300. Payment is made for only one visit during any one day. The cost for this benefit is: Employee $0.90 Dependent 2.07 a 5. A change in the deductible in your Major Medical from $100 per cause with disability required to $100 cumulative (all cause) per calendar year. We have discussed this at various times and felt that this provision might very well open the doors to a rash of usage. While the provision does have some attractive features, I am still some- what afraid of it. The cost would be: Employee $0.27 Dependents 0.66 At the same time, the Major Medical maximum would go from a per cause per benefit maximum to a lifetime maximum with $1,000 per year automatic restoration of benefits. I think we might also consider increasing the weekly income benefit which would be done at rates that are presently in force. I wanted "you. to have these figures so that you could review them, and I expect to call you shortly to discuss these possibilities. Sincerely, . Richard A. Strassel, C.L.U. RAS/leh —B-2— • i ��,/_!/.. (ram,_/ �� ' { 1967 REGULAR SESSION Ch. 974 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS-COMPENSATION OF BOARD MEMBERS CHAPTER 873 ASSEMBLY BILL NO. 1701 An act to amend Section 4733 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to compen- sation of county sanitation district board members. The people of the State of California do enact as follows: i SECTION 1. Section 4733 of the Health and•Safety Code is amended to read: f 4733. The district board shall have power to fix the amount of compensation per meeting No Ile paid each member of the hoard for his services for each meeting attended by him; provided,that said compensation shall not exceed • ' • fifty dollars • • • ($30) for each meeting of the district board attended by him, not to exceed • • • one hundred dollars • • • ($100) In any one month, together with expenses neces- sarily incurred by him in traveling between his place of residence and the place of meeting. The compensation herein mentioned shall be in addition to any other fees or compensation allowed by law for the other official positions mentioned in Sec- tion 4730 that are occupied by members of said district board. Approved and filed July 21, 1067. &Ul1\'1:1'it Cr'r/ RLE-,S L. R.OBINSOX MANA(AI:alr.NT 1471,11VICP.HI I A,tiA�xxA INSURANCE, CONSULTANT IxAUNANCA DrrAlrrNixT FUl/CTIUI( C.orauAoxe V VALUATIO)1 0r 11f4e .%xLr INAuxANCu HTArr 1xAUxANCx ADVI.Oa 7NAUIiANCE ADMIMMUATION NATIONAL 011,DUILDINO dA►sTT PaooaAre AND ACCOUNTiX0 000 SOUTH UIIAND AVENUE LOS ANGELES, CALIVOUNIA 900111 . (213) 625-1011 September ll,. 1967 Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager, Sanitation Districts of Orange County, et al.. Dear Mr. Harper: We have evaluated the bids and bidders on property insurance for the properties of the Sanitation Districts, excluding the• collect- ling system, as authorized in your letter of May 1-2 , 1967. ' Quotations ranged across a rather broad spectrum due principally to three factors: 1) .Formally appraised property insurable val- ues do not exist; 2) The request for Earthquake Coverage with its varying deductibles; and 3) The request to delete or reduce • the usual policy penalties. Our analysis and discussion of the bids is attached supporting the following recommendations in order on an annual basis: 1. If the Districts desire Fire, Extended Coverage, Vandalism & ' Malicious Mischief, and Difference in Conditions Coverages (hereafter collectively called "Basic Coverage") for an amount of $3, 250, 000 on a 907D Stipulated Basis and excluding Earth- quake Insurance: Lumbermen' s bid of $2, 460 is recommended with the expecta- tion that the amount of insurance and premium will increase somewhat in the future with the completion or addition of new major structures. The penalties are waived by contract. 2. If the Districts desire the Basic Coverage as described just • above with $400,000 Earthquake Insurance subject to an Earth- quake deductible of $100,000 per Earthquake: Lumbermen' s bid of $6,110 is recommended as described. 3. If the Districts desire the Basic Coverage for a flat amount of $600,000 at a fixed premium without penalties, and no Earthquake Insurance: Industrial Indemnity' s flat bid for the policy term of $2,460 is recommended. 4. If Basic Coverage for 'an amount of $5,970, 535 without penal- ties is desired by the Districts with Earthquake Insurance -D- CTT.�RLTC3 L. t20ilI\SON WOUAANCK CONOULTANr Mr. Fred A. -Harper Page two `..� September 11, 1967 on a $5,000 deductible basis (for EQ) , the following Grain Dealers bids are recommended at the premiums indicated for maximum- Earthquake Coverages of: EO Insuring Amounts Total Annual Policy Premiums $1.001000 ($5,000 deduct. per quake) $7,142 $3501000 ($5,000 deduct. per quake) 10, 392 Modifications in coverages would probably be reasonably possible at corresponding• adjustments to respective rates, as a matter of information. The recommended companies meet the requirements of the Specifica- tions either directly or by virtue of being 100% reinsured by the Improved Risk Mutual Group which has assets in excess of $1 bil- lion. Policies would be non-assessable by contract. Five year policies could be written at 4.4 times an annual premium if paid in advance, and that is recommended if permissable. Should this be referred to the Executive Committee or to the Board of Directors, I would expect to attend the respective meetings. I will, of course, be available for discussions with you or desig- nated alternates whenever desired.. When the selected policy is presented to your Office, I plan to ' examine it carefully. on behalf 'of .the Districts and report. ' Respectfully submitted, CLR:hwh Charles L. Robinson Insurance Consultant 7 Att: Ltr 9-8-6 `..d .Mf0 T0: Fred A. Harper FROM: Robert N. Galloway DATE: October 18, 1967 - - The Orange County Juvenile Probation Department offered to furnish up to a maximum of 15 youths on probation for week- end work during the school year. They would, for the most part, do weed cutting and clean- -'an w3ri� around the plant sites as well as the right-of-way area between plants. Work could also be found for them inside on rainy days. The cost to the Districts would be 50� per day per person for lunch and 524.00 per day for their counselor. There would also ne some transportation involved when working away from ' either plant. In order to obtain their services, it is necessary for the Districts to write a letter requesting their services and guaranteeing the payment .for luncheons and counselor. . j i j K , . -E- ub-Tei B(orp. os�- i Cron Steve P. Rados, In G. R. McKervey, Ir George Mi 1 Ie.r ood l art 1 ant i c . B)v • 15236 Bur r,� , 1 12 W. M�ip l e Ave. 23882 Es tac i a A 3032 Band i n i Bl aIIf. Calif. Van Nuys, Monrovia, Calif . SOUth Laguna, Los Angeles, 90201 Calf. 91016 Calif. Calif. 3)341 el : 213-EL8-5151 el : 714-837-167o Tel : AN 98777 121 3 e1 : -873-S�3� Lic: 102918 / Lic: 246616 A Lic: 110873 -a/ Lic : 107945 Pr-i ce ;/n; To to/ Jn r To fd/ Un - Ta to! Un,f Tc to/ 1 Ur�it , To t.p _ .3.� r�/;cam B!� A/iCP 6 a P��Ce B o O�•fe I 8io� h,-,ce A/•CP Pr :e ;6,715 . 00 38. 00 116,660. 00 40. 00 1122,800. 00 43.00 132,010. 00• 42.80 � 131 ,396.0 .- 00 35•A0 69y 65o•00 36. 00 1 71 ,640. 00 38.80 77,212.00 37• 20 74,028.o ; L5'490. 00 28. 00 47,32d 00 - 43,771 . 00 . . _ 2,016. --- fi -_r 32.0 o 54,080:00 25.90 27. l o j 45,799 0 - 0 48. 00 2,016. 00 0.00 2, 100.00 86.00 3 ,612.00� 5 5.500, - 0 L S,000.'00 6,Soo. 00 _ 1 l ,000.00? --- - -,750-0 12,-30.0.0 _ - 6.o0 12 464. oo U 7 ,_2� r 100. oo i l 6,400 93 00 15,252 00 _7 _ 113,.-OQ 2,9( 0 0' 70. 00 3 ,�9 00� 74. 00t 4,218.00 70.00 3 ,990. 00 0.o0 2�8�0. ��- oa 800_00� 1 '000. 00 900.001 1oo.oa .•- - - - 44- 2, l oo.oQ, - �- 2,000. 00 � 2 000. o0 2,800.oo ' --�-,500.oo� �-- -- --- -- - - 1 00 ? 1 ,200. 00 1 ,200. oo -� 1 I�QQQ, � -- -- - � - - - - - -- -, - - -- 900_00� -- .. 13 ,500. o --- .. - ' --- -'- 00 20,000. 00 10,000. 00 14,500. 00 '1 2,000.0 00 40. 00 400.00 40.00 _ 400.00 400. - - --- ��-00 -- 250. 00, 30. 00 300_00� A - -- -0Q� 140.00 1 ,400.00 70.00 700.00 100.o0 1 ,000. 00 75.00 750. 0 1 --ADO 0d1 100.00 1 ,000- 00 70-00 I 700.00� 100.00 I ,OCO. 00 150-00 1 ,500.-001 - -- - - 287,836. 00 - $ 292,590.00 -- - * - --- -- -- -- - - -- ,1 $ 05,409.00 $ 308,831 . 00 - � . 1 i FTIME : C BIDS 4I-8325-21 -00 v. I , 1j67 TABUAT/0N o! L�IQJ LarubicaCo. atfl ine Ptpe Can-00 P.M. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 7 8550 Tuiunya Ave. tracting, Inc. PLACE : Sun Valley , 1231 N. Lemon St 10844 Ellis Ave. GI�IER TRUNK SEWER Calif. Anaheim, Calif. Fountain Valley, Cuntract No. 7-1 , Schedule C i California J.R. LESTER 80YLE "and S•IDNrY .. . LOWRY /Tel : TR 7-86, 1 el : 879-2681 Tel : (2 Santa Ana California ic: 100224A Lic : 236624 Lic: 15 !rm e57':1.177ared Unit Tote/ j Unet Tc-ai Unat N4 Quantity B%d Price `1 9r,0(e P-ice P-ce A-I ce 1 . "' VCP sewer , Type III bedding3 ,070 L. F. 28.72 88, 170.4Q 6. 50 1 sewer. Tye I I I bedd i n 1 0 L. F. ii 26. Z 53 , 172 .80 -11_00 61 6 0.0 28. 0 0 L_F. 25.36_ 42 8 8.4 13.E 32,E -O 2I-oo 4 . Encased 33" VCP sewer b encasement 42 L. F. 65. 57 2,753.94. 45 .00 1 ,890.0 i 48. 00 ! 27" VCP siphon & 27'' VCP-bed�c-ing , �- - i -- - �- eta su o is & a ur enances 1 Each : r 4,262 .91 _ _ S. ac 36" min, rID steel casing with olce ma i n pipe t 164 L.. F. 74. 1155 -� 12 , 160.60, �00 12.300.0 pp " - iV. F. 4 . 00 12 6' .oul 60.00 3 .420 .001 75.00 r rje and -cover I 'Each! 704.00i 7 0.0 I Manhole, structure � �I Each _ T, r 2 ,677.881 3 000.O - ID r 1 e 1 0.O -2,500.o 1 Ry_ s55tructure & aoour tenon es 1 Eachil 11 ,502.3 _ 8 000 0 r - __ 2� Cl�s_5 A-_encasement concrete 10 C.Y. 20.00 200.0 15�( 0 — 1 . I 25.0 _ 1 House lateral su ort Case 2 10 Each 75.00 --750,0 2Q-00 2�0._0 _40.00 use lateral support Case 3 _ _ 10 Each 50.00 500:0 (L00 —_�42.Q - r TOTAL OF ITEMS 1 THROUGH 14 , INCLUSIVE * 223,868.32' 247,��4-,-0- _ $2 _ f *correc ed total i� r October 20, 1967 SUMMARY OF FUNDS AVAILABLE FOR RECOMMENDED SALARY ADJUSTMENTS Cost of Recommended Salary Adjustments Projected payroll for period 12/1/67 - 6/30/68 based on recommended salary adjustments $ 581,298. Projected payroll for period 12/1/67 - 6/30/68 based on existing salaries 552,038. Estimated cost of recommended salary adjustments $ 311210.* Add: Estimated additional Retirement System costs 1,697. Estimated additional Compensation Insurance costs 1,108. Estimated cost of recommended Group Insurance changes 1,925. Total cost of recommendations $ 35,940. Funds Available for Recommended Salary Adjustments Authorized reserve provided for in 1967-68 budget $28,000. Less : Previously authorized adjustments 21 500. $ 25, 500. Estimated payroll savings for period 7/i/67-11/30/67 based on budget and resulting from vacant positions and ositions-personnel flexibility (salaries only 44,330. $ 69,330. *Estimated annual cost is $53, 508. and the average increase is 5.7%. ..v N ` OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 1 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Range No. Salary Title Range No. Salary No. Summary of Changes Maintenance and Construction Group Maintenance Supt . 49.5 819/1020 Maintenance Supt . 50.5 865/1077 1 One Range Increase Plant Mtce. Supvr. 47.5 735/914 Plant Mtce. Supvr. 48. 755/940 1 One-half Range Increase Trunk Mtce. Supvr. 46. 677/842 Trunk Mtce, Supvr. 47. 715/889 1 One Range Increase Electrical Supvr. 45. 641/797 Electrical Supvr. 46.5 696/865 1 One and One-half Range Increase Mechanical Supvr. 45. 641/797 Mechanical Supvr. 46.5 696/865 1 One and One-half Range Increase Foreman 43.5 591/735 Foreman 44..5 624/776 6 - One Range Increase Trunk Mtce. Foreman 42. 545/677 Trunk Mtce. Foreman 43. 575/715 2 One Range Increase Mechanic II 42. 545/677 Mechanic II 43• 575/715 5 One Range Increase Mechanic I 40. 489/6o8 Mechanic I 41. 516/641 7 One Range Increase Maintenance Man 38.5 452/56o Maintenance Man 39. 464/575 14 One-half Range Increase Laborer 36.5 4o6/502 Laborer 37.5 428/530 23 One Range Increase Laboratory and Research Groin Research Chemist 46.5 696/865 Research Chemist 46.5 696/865 0 None Chief Lab. Analyst 44. 608/755 Chief Lab. Analyst 46 . 677/842 1 Two Range Increase Lab. Analyst III 41.5 530/659 Lab. Analyst III 42.5 56o/696 . 1 One Range Increase Lab. Analyst II 4o. 489/6o8 Lab. Analyst II 40.5 502/624 0 One-half Range Increase Lab. Analyst I 37.5 428/530 Lab. Analyst I 39. 464/575 2 One and One-half Range Increase Laboratory Aide 36.5 -4o6/502 Laboratory Aide 37.5. 428/530" 3 One Range Increase j � COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE nF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) (�5) 1 34.5 365 375 385 �95 4o6 417 428 44o 452 .234.5 35 375 385 395 06 417 428 44o 452 466 ;35 35.5 385 395 4o6 417 428 440 452 464 7 35.5 36 395 4o6 417 428 440 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 56o .388.5 39 464 476 489 502 516 5 0 545 560 575 39.5 476 489 502 516 53o 545 560 575 591 39.5 4o 489 502 516 530 545 56o 575 591 608 4o.5 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 40.5 41 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 41 4i.5 41.5 5 0 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 42 6 42 5 5 56o 575 591 608 624 641 659 6?77 42.5 42.5 56o 575 591 6o8 624 641 59 677 69 43 43 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 43.5 43.5 591 6o8: 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 44 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44.5 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 45 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 5.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 ?76 797 819 842 46.5 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 81g 842 865 47 715 735 755 776 Z97 819 842 8695 889477.5 8.5 735 755 776 Z97 19 865 88999 9814 94o 48 4 755 776 797 lg 842 889 g14 940 66 48•5 8.5 776 797 819 842 865 149 49 797 819 842 865 8899 914 94o 966 392 149.5 49.5 819 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1�20 150 50 842 865 889 914940 966 992 1020 1 48 50.5 50.5 865 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 51 889 914 940 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 51 51.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52.5 966 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 1170 52.5 5 9 99 1020 1048 1077 ll07 1138 1170 1203 53 5 53 992 1020 1048' 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 54 1p48 10?7 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 54 � 1236 1271 1306 1343 54.5 S .5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1271 13o6 1343 1380 55 55 1107 ' 1138 1170 1203 1236 13ob 1343 1380 141g 55.5 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1343 13$0 1419 1458 0-6 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 138o 1419 1458 14999 56.5 56 .5 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1419 1458 1499 1540 457 5 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1458 1499 154o i583 5�•5 57.5 1271 1306 1343 11380 1419 58 13o6, 1343 1380 1.1-19 1453 1499 154o 1583 1627 - - OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 2 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Ranixe No. Salary Title Range No. Salary No. Summary of Changes Operations Grout Supt . of Operations 54.5 1077/1343 Supt. of Operations 55.5 1138/1419 1 One Range Increase Operations Engineer 50. 842/1048 Operations Engineer 51. 889/1107 1 One Range Increase Chief Control Cntr. Op. 46. 677/842 Chief Control Cntr. Op. 47. 715/889 1 One Range Increase Chlorination Supvr. 44. 608/755 Chlorination Supvr. 45 641/797 1 One Range Increase Control Center Oper. 44. 608/755 Control Center Oper. 45. 641/797 5 One Range g Increase Plant Operator 41. 516/641 Plant Operator 43. 575/715 8 Two Range Increase Chlorinator Operator 4o. 489/6o8 Chlorinator Operator 41 . 516/641 3 One Range Increase Operator Trainee 39. 464/575 Operator Trainee 39.5 476/591 1 One-half Range Increase Engineering Group Construction Engineer 53.5 1020/1271 Construction Engineer 54.5 1077/1343 ; 1 One Range Increase Assistant Engineer 46.5 696/865 Assistant Engineer 47 .5 735/914 O One Range Increase Construction Inspector 45. 641/797 Construction Inspector 45.5 659/819 1 One-half Range Increase Ass't . Const. Insp. 43. 575/715 Ass't. Const . Insp. 44. 608/755 1 One Range Increase Engineering Aide III 42. 545/677 Engineering Aide III 43.5 591/735 2 One and One-half Range Increase Engineering Aide II 40. 489/608 Engineering Aide II 41.5 530/659 0 One and One-half Range Increase Engineering Aide I 38. 440/545 Engineering Aide I 39.5 476/591 1 One and One-half Range Increase Student Ass 't.-P.T. $1.75-2.30/hr. Student Ass't.-P.T. $1.75-2.30/hr. 2 None COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) (5) 34.5 365 375 385 �95 4o6 417 428 44o 452 4.5 35 375 385 395 o6 41 428 44o 452 4 4 5 35.5 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 4 6 52 464 4 5.5 36 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 4776 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 516 540 545 560 575 39 �9-5 476 489 502 516 530 5 5 560 575 591 39.5 0 489 502 516 530 545 56o 575 591 6o8 40.5 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 40.541 41 516 530 545 560 575 608 624 641 659 41.5 41.5 530 545 560 575 591 624 641 659 677 42 42 545 56o 575 591 608 641 659 677 696 43.5 42.5 56o 575 591 608 624 659 677 696 695 43 575 591 608 624 641 677 696 696 735 43.5 43.5 591 6o8 624 641 659 696 696 735 755 44 6o8 624 641 659 677 44 44.5 624 641 659 6?7 696 715 . 735 755 776 45'S 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45,5 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 46 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46.5 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 47.5 715 735 7555 776 797 819 842 865 889 47.5 735 755 77 797 8 9 842 865 8899 914 48 755 776 797 819 842 865 8899 914 940 48.5 48 .5 776 797 819 842 865 889 91�+ 940 9 6 9 49 797 8l9 842 865 889 914 940 966 9 2 49.5 819 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 10 0 9.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 l0 8 0.5 50.5 865 88 914 940 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 51 51 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 51.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52 94o 966 992 1020 1048 io77 1107 1138 1170 52 52.5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 53 992 1020 1048; 1077 ll07 1138 1170 1203 1236 53.5 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 54.5 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1271 1306 1343 1380 55 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 55.5 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1343 1380 1419 1458 56 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 57,5 56.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 14 9 57 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 15�+0 5 .5 57.5 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 i458 1499 154o 1583 58 13o6, 1343 13� 1419 1.453 1499 1540 1583 1627 5^ \q OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES - Page 3 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Title Range No. Salary Title Ranze No. Salary No; Summary of Changes Apprentices Apprentice II 38.5 452/560 Apprentice II 39.5 476/591 1 One Range Increase Apprentice I 34.5 365/452 Apprentice I 36. 395/489 8 One and One-half Range Increase DISTRICT NO. 7 EMPLOYEES R/W Agent-Part time Max. 900/Mo. R/W Agent-Part time Max. 900/Mo. 1 None Field Supvr. 46.5 696/865 Field Supvr. 47. 715/889 2 One-half Range Increase Steno-Clerk 35. 375/464 Steno-Clerk 35.5 385/476 1 One-half Range Increase COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS SCHEDULE OF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) , (3.5) (4) (4.5) (�) , 34.5 365 375 385 395 406 417 428 440 452 34.5 35 375 385 �95 406 417 428 440 452 464 35 355.5 385 395 06 417 428 440 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 516 5 0 545 560 575 39 9.5 476 489 502 516 530 5 5 560 575 591 39.5 ° 489 502 516 5 0 545 560 575 591 608 40 4o.5 5022 516 530 5 5 560 575 591 608 624 40.5 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 41.5 5330 545 560 575 591 6081 624 641 699 .1.5 5�+5 560 575 591 608 6241 641 659 677 ,2 42.5 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 42.5 43 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 608, 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 43.5 44 6o8 624 641 659 6?7 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 44.5 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 45.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 46.5 47 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 4 ,5 7 47.5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 9i4 48 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 48 48.5 48. 4 776 797 819 842 865, 889 914 94o 966 T4 5 49 797 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 992 49 9.5 819 842 865 889 91�+ 94o 966 992 1020 9.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 50 50.5 865 88 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50.5 51. 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 5 5 9i4 94o 966 992 logo. 1048 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52 94o 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 52 52.5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1�03 52.5 53 992 1020 1048, 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53.5 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 54 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 54.5 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1�71 1306 1343 1380 55 55.5 1139 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 555.5 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 { 1343I 1380 1419 14 .5 56.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 113801 1419 1458 14 57 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 15 0 5 .5 57.5 1271 1306 1343 13�80 1419 i458 i499 1540 1583 5� 58 1306, 1343 1380 1J119 1.453 1499 1540 1583 1627 - - ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES 10-20-67 Existing Positions & Salaries Title Range No . Salary Title Range No. Salary No . Summary of Changes General Manager 21, 500/yr. General Manager 21, 500/yr. 1 Ass 't. Gen. Manager- 20,OOO.yr. Ass't . Gen. Manager- 20,000/yr. 1 Chief Engineer Chief Engineer Staff Recommendations Approved by Executive Committee Director of Finance 50.5 865/1077 Director of Finance 51.5 914/1138 1 One Range Increase Administrative & 50.5 865/1077 Administrative & 51.5 914/1138 1 One Range Increase Purchasing Officer Purchasing Officer Accountant 44.5 624/776 Accountant 45.5 659/819 1 One Range Increase Ass't. Purchasing 43.5 591/735 Ass't. Purchasing 44.5 624/776 1 One Range Increase Officer Officer Senior Accounting Tech, 42. 545/677 Senior Accounting Tech. 42. 545/677 0 None Secretary II 39 .5 476/591 Secretary II 41.5 530/659 1 Two Range Increase Secretary I 38. 440/545 Secretary I 39. 464/575 2 . One Range Increase Account Clerk 36.5 406/502 Accounting Technician 38. 440/545 2 One and One-half Range Increase & Title Change Senior Steno-Clerk 36.5 406/502 Senior Steno-Clerk 37. 417/516 1 One-half Range Increase Office Aide 1.90/hr. Office Aide 2.10/hr. l $ .20/hr. Increase Stenographer (Part time) 2.30/hr. Stenographer (Part time) 2.30/hr. 1 None COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS f SCHEDULE nF SALARY RANGES Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1) (1.5) (2) (2.5) (3) (3.5) (4) (4.5) . (5) i 34.5 365 375 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 34.5 35 375 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 35 35.5 385 395 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 4o6 417 428 440 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37.5 38 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 5i6 5330 545 560 575 39 �9.5 476 489 502 516 530 5�+5 560 575 591 39.5 0 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 40 4o.5 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 40.5 41 516 530 545 56o 575 591 6o8 624 641 41 41.5 50 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 41.5 342 5 5 56o 575 591 608 624! 641 659 677 �42 42.5 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 42.5 43 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 591 6o8 624 641 659 43.5 44•5 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 44•5 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 45.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 46•5 47 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 47 47.5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 47.5 48 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 48 48 .5 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 ; 966 148.5 9 797 819 842 865 88 914 94o 966 992 49 49.5 819 842 865 889 91 94o 966 992 1020 49.5 50 842 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 50 50•5 865 889 914 946 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50.5 51 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 51 51•5 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 1170 52 52.5 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 53 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53 53.5 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 53•5 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 �3o6 54.5 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 55 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1�71 13o6 1343 1380 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 55.5 ,,.Wk ?6 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 �6.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1 43 1380� 1l,,419 1458 �4 9 j56.5 57 1236 1271 13o6 1343 �38o 1419, 1�+589 1499 15 0 157 57.5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1410 1458 1499 1540 1583 5 •5 58 1306 , 1343 1380 1,453 i499 t -,40 1583 1627 5_ _ COUNTY SANITA OF L P RETARY II30 SSTENC CL• SEC.RE TAR7�511. 575 DISTRICT NO. 7 FINANCE & ADMINISTRATION MAIN :114 OF FINANCE PURCH 6 ADM OFF q 14�I 19 B q 14 113B MAIN1 4a p;C"P!�, FSUPV -r t '[�.S ASS OUR )Fi SECRETARIAL POOL 8>vI MAX. goof L6 4/d6°f 545 677 624/774 S*ENC R STENO ACC', CLK �ACCT CLr1 LABORER I SECCN D 41715� L4�1 1440� IJ5 C? 15 4:4I575; TEN U•! E " A�DEI YfN{P•!m L l0 b.NeA p M•NAA P.30 h. PLANT MAINTENANCE fa CONSTRUCTION COLLECTION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE TRUCK 6 STAT. EO 755 940 715 689� �6a r x...�_.. .. AvcRFN STRUCTURE IC S M(ECHANAL I,PIPING 6ROVRDS NVY EQaAP OPER APPkEH. CDNNEGTION INSP SEWER LINE PUMP STATIONS APPREN STATIONAF FOREMAN FpREM4N WLON INS [FCRE MAN 624/77M 624/7T fC8/755 24 776 �fot MECH II y�yy� MELN II MECH II MECH II �E� ! iDREIM O I MAN 0 IM 575 715 75/TIS 575 715 1375/715 575/7115 S75/715 575/715 i575/7t! MEC- i t MECH 1 MECH 1 .2 MECH I I MECH I MECH i 2 2 2 .•_. 2 2 516/u41 g1' 1 S16/b41 ; 51:4141 516/G41 514/b4 BEN- ( -- r �_, II IMiC[MAN IMYCE MAN MTCE MAN MTCE MA N MTCf MAN 1MYCL MAN MICE"M;N MT!:E M4N 4'_f VA•: �� 4f•. .I C I ] ! 2 I I 4G4 375 4G 5 5 4G4 575 64 575 � 46q 575 4r.4 575 _ 4a LABORER LABORER II.ABUREP LABORER LABORER LABORERI LABORER y, 11. I!4 428/53� 428 426 �29/2530 2 30 4W 30 536 428/530 ZS/6301 L AvvRFN 1 AVPgEN 1 Ll'p7R--EN 1 =9R 9 9451484 489 CPFN POSITON TO BE FILLED ONLY WHEN LEG_E_ND r'+�u+J HIGHER LEVEL POSITION IS NOT FILLED y PROPOSED FUTURE POSITIONS DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ANIIATIONAL CHART ECl:mesF,, 19G ' 80C,R0S j Of -- DIRECTORS 62 170 J :;.r;c tr• 9ENEA.AL MANAGER I791/MO. ASS'T GEN MGR C,HiEF ENGINEER 1667`Mo. STAf F WMMIT TEE GENERAL T.Onrnq,Sof�iT, COUNSEL EmArq�nq Planning Row bm .NANCE 6 OPERATIONS ENGINEERING Q! '4 UPT OF OPERATIONS i GON+TR ENGW 1156/14i9 �I 1077 34.3 NANCE OPERATIONS LAB & RESEARCH •�Pr OPER.ENOR. F. -LAB CaRCSq RES CH CHEMIS n96 as CW GGN,TR GP ,Hf CAB ANAL ASS'i E NGP 1 � 715 aa9 477 B42 795 1 P MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE a +0 SUPV -- ;,IILOR SUPV CANT CIA OP i r+`T h:P s 6+59 619, Is i G41/797 641/797J EQUIPMENT SHOP APPREN iN3Tf1U4ENTATION ELECTRICAL APPREN APPREN BACTTift10L06Y CHEMICAL APPREN u:N �OR[YAN FOREMAN I 1776 6?J�/776 IG' 24/776 6?4 7G E-- �--- —_ _ J76 ER I AE AN AB ANAL' uC� A NEC„ a 1¢ON IT iMEGH II MECH ti r 573 71'J 375 713 j 471/715 57D/TIS 560G SGo 9 'MECH1 MECH [ MECH 1 MECH S 4�PE -:,[S ANAL,1 t',�=..E2 77 2516+/4L 151lsX41 'Sifi/441 SI6/(4 'S02 Gtt4 —M4N ^.f MA rPPREN EI -- MICE YANrPPREN OT APPREN II LAB WAL l APPREN II -5T5 S75 _ _ _j 5476 9 �464 7 47b'94 L74 59iLAB`_7 RER LABORER LBAIDE2428/5 42'515!0 4 APPREN 1 APPREN 1 APPREN i TQi ASST APPREN 1 r 395 4d9 51 9 iw. 5 I.73 ?.$O;hr. October 20, 1967 COMPARISON OF BENCH MARK POSITIONS OF VARIOUS PUBLIC AGENCIES IN ORANGE COUNTY Engineering Maintenance City or Agency Foreman Aide III Mechanic II Man Laborer Secretary I Account Clerk Anaheim 66o/8ol 598/727 598/727 493/598 447/543 493/598 469/570 Brea ---- 628/763 ---- 469/570 425/517 436/530 436/530 Buena Park 628/763 613/745 584/710 481/584 447/543 493/598 469/570 Costa Mesa 553/779 553/779 482/679 392/553 365/517 392/553 392/553 Fountain Valley ---- 638/785 ---- 459/561 ---- 470/575 459/561 Fullerton 598/727 563/684 556/676 481/584 425/517 475/577 447/523 Garden Grove 602/733 587/715 573/698 459/559 437/532 482/587 448/545 Huntington Beach 607/764 580/730 580/730 460/530 419/529 419/529 460/580 La Habra 677/824 599/729 599/729 469/570 447/543 447/543 436/530 Newport Beach 636/773 636/773 576/701 474/576 430/523 498/605 441/536 Orange 650/780 620/745 590/710 470/565 430/515 470/565 450/540 Santa Ana 68o/815 ---- 590/710 470/565 450/540 502/605 460/552 County of Orange 696/865 591/735 591/735 476/591 452/560 516/641 417/516 Average 635/784 6ol/743 574/710 466/570 431/532 469/577 445/547 COUNTY SANITATIOP DISTRICTS Existing (43'S)591/735 (42)545/677 (42)545/677 (38'5)452/56o(36'5)4o6/502 (38)440/545(36-5)406/502 Recommended (44.5)624/776 (43.5)591/735 (43)575/715 (39)464/575(37.5)428/530 (39)464/575 (38)440/545 Change . 1 Range 12 Range 1 Range z Range 1 Range 1 Range 12 Range Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase 0 0 0 0° o 0 0 L'foeER rq O r L ,5,AN L Y.Sr 10 � �V � o � „V4 V7--Na,W�F a�P��/✓r�cE rt o o� �` b Lag. Af✓.AIL yST SI e y y a ENG/,UEc'.2/,C/G 4/10E II a a o y CNLOR11.14r2ZP 0PEZ47el? y \ Q PLANT 0Rr e,4TOZ a 1-4,5O,Q4T02y ANAL YST m" ZA a XE c:/AVIC Zr C/rZV4NCE FORffd4.V v Z g�j y '� y E,(/G//✓EC2/.G�6 A/DC� .Ill" `� ��i �' W� � p ASS'T. CO,UST/2UCT/p�{/ /l/SPECTOIZ � � y . F02E/11.4 AI ,N C'N/EF L.4j60/2A7'0/2Y 41V4L yST �y t COIC/T20L C5417'E2 OPE/ZATOI? EL ECT2/CAL SUPE/Z!//SoR /�IECNA�c//CAL S'lJPE2ll/S02 � CO,USTIZ!/CT/OA1 !NS!'ECTOR T,PUf✓/C MA/,C/TE 1,41-/CE SUPE1,?d/S02 C/!/EF CO.C/T20L rz-XlrE.P D/�ElZAT02 N .2ESEA/ZCN CNE/1!/ST � ASS/;TA.t/T E�r/G/�(/EE2' lti PGA.c✓T N/A/i!/TErC/Ai(/CE sv/�ERY/so.2 /✓lA/,CITE/JA rt/CE SU/:EV/,C/r.--X DErcl T N o Q$ { `43 ,;U/>f-:r'//✓TE/JGE.C/T OF OPE/2AT/O�t/.,^ I� � � y October 20, 1967 COMPARISON OF SALARIES OF VARIOUS WASTE WATER TREATMENT AGENCIES Plant Engineering , Maintenance Superintendent Agency Laborer Operator Mechanic II Aide III Superintendent of Operations Co . San. Dists. L. A. County 476/591 624/776* 624/776 591/735 914/1138 1203/1499 City of Los Angeles (Hyperion) 476/591 56o/696* 608/755 624/776 992/1236 1306/1627 Metropolitan Seattle 465/525 63o/695 630/695 670/790 * 750/875 1041/1167 City of San Diego 438/532 507/616 587/713 601/731 . 954/116o 116o/1410 East Bay Municipal Utilities Dist. 2 8 621 6 2 692ZI70 6 41 121 1 0 168 Average 477/566 58�/6q 628/742 632/756 965/1152 1178/1478 592%736* COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS Existing (36.5)406/502 (41)516/641 (42)545/677 (42)545/677 (49.5)819/1020 (54.5)'1077/1343 Recommended (37-5)428/530 (43)575/715* (43)575/715 (43.5)591/735 _(50.5)865/1077 (55.5)1138/14+ 9 Change 1 Range 2 Range 1 Range 1z Range 1 Range 1 Range Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase Increase *The staff is recommending a two range increase in this classification to maintain a competitive position with the metropolitan Los Angeles agencies. �� - •. s/YoildL�dv ,�o , 1/Ya�Q'/Y�1/Y��J�'dns o Cl- CIA • o a'3.�rYr�/Y3 d'/YO/•L d�JSdo, r- h 0 11X7(71 7.L/Y/Z✓.7d/7S 3J/Y b'/Y311Y1l �45/�!d'3d/IS _701Yb X5WYA5`" 1rYa7d .. PD 1S//tY3NJ H.•�TJd�5.7d' , . N ?�Olr/11'Fd0 4Y.71/Y3J 70111/YOJ •dS/HJ Z/dS//l?1Sdn5' .7JN!//Y31/Y/t11�' 211YO,31 ZJ01 J•3dS1v/ /Y0/10/ILl S/YOJ • - ... . • • • � .. •..• f ,', �.,,� �. a � 2rosr�z/.�dns 7dorrYdNJ3w Z1O.S'rA2laFd/7,S /70/1 alY/ZrO7/HJ h �01 daodv 2/71 N3J 70?lllYOJ if 2/Ol&'"9a7 23/NJ i ,,,, •t: fi .. :• .. . :. :,, "' '. n 21491.794S9/Y/ /YO/1J/71J1S/70.7 Y,SSa 22T Roia �rn�9�rrrorr7 f N&W-AMY 371 d/r3.cr/rr`v N1Y17&1 W 'O Jill V.7c 4\\1 a'ocrL�do a�o1a/rr�o7No .o Q � - W J �;� '''��• ��. W � .II 30/G' •'J/Y/2133/Y/9�.� \ to Jr 15 7b'/Yb' '� 7 1YY?Y 9J/Yb'/Y31/Y1M tn O IS" 1• R t� r ls�7drYd'9 30'/C 9a7 ,w 1` � Q v L.._. ..•� , .. . • � y'�r odds POSITIONS AND SALARIES - 1967 RESOLUTION No. 67-102 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5,6,7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA., AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 67-66, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION 67-86 ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE POSITIONS AND FIXING SALARIES THEREFOR; AND AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL `✓ The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 13 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, hereby resolve that: Section 1. Section 1 of Resolution No. 67-66 is amended to read as follows: "Section 1. There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the following Basic Salary Ranges: Range No. Monthly Step Rates Range No. (1.5) (2) ( •5) (4) (4. 5) 35.5 385 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 35.5 36 395 406 417 428 44o 452 464 476 489 36 36.5 4o6 4�7 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 36.5 37 417 428 440 452 464 476 489 502 5i6 37 37.5 428 44o 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 37. 5 38 440 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 38 38.5 452 464 476 489 502 516 530 545 560 38.5 39 464 476 489 502 516 5 0 545 560 575 39 39.5 476 489 502 516 530 5 5 560 575 591 39. 5 4o 489 502 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 4o 40.5 502 516 530 545 56o 575 591 608 624 40.5 41 516 530 545 560 575 591 6o8 624 641 41 41.5 530 545 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 41.5 42 545 56o 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 42.5 560 575 591 608 624 641 659 677 696 42. 5 43 575 591 6o8 624 641 659 677 696 715 43 43.5 591 608 624 641 659 6?7 696 715 735 43. 5 44 608 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 44 44.5 624 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 44.5 45 641 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 45 .� 45.5 659 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 8�9 45.5 46 677 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 46 46.5 696 715 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 46.5 47 7�5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 47 47.5 735 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 9i4 47. 5 4 755 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 48 4 •5 776 797 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 48. 5 49 797 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 992 49 49.5 819 842 865 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 49. 5 50 842 865 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 1048 50 50. 5 865 889 914 940 966 992 1020 1048 1077 50. 5 51 889 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 51 51.5 914 94o 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 51.5 52 940 966 992 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 1170 52 52. 5 966 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 52.5 \qw� 53 992 1020 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 53 53.5 1020 lo48 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 53.5 54 1048 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 54 54.5 1077 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 54.5 55 1107 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 13o6 1343 1380 55 55.5 1138 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 138o 1419 55.5 56 1170 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 56 56.5 1203 1236 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 56.5 57 1231 1271 13o6 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 1540 57 57. 5 1271 1306 1343 1380 1419 1458 1499 1540 1583 57.5 58 13o6 1343 138o 1419 1458 1499 154o 1583 1627 58 Agenda Item # 17 -1- All Districts Section 2. Section 2A of Resolution No. 67-66, as amended, is amended to read as follows: "Section 2. There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the following positions of employment by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, by and through the Joint Administrative Organization, at the salaries indicated for d•�' each position: A. OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Position Classification Range No. Salary Superintendent of Operations 55.5 1138/1419 Construction Engineer 54.5 1077/1343 Operations Engineer 51 889/1107 Maintenance Superintendent 50.5 865/1077 Plant Maintenance Supervisor 48 755/940 Assistant Engineer 47.5 735/914 Trunk Maintenance Supervisor 47 715/889 Chief Control Center Operator 47 715/889 Research Chemist 46.5 696/86 5 Mechanical Supervisor 46.5 696/865 Electrical Supervisor 46.5 696/865 Chief Laboratory Analyst 46 677/842 Construction Inspector 45.5 659/819 Chlorination Supervisor 45 641/797 Control Center Operator 45 641/797 Foreman 44.5 624/776 Assistant Construction Inspector 44 608/755 Engineering Aide III 43.5 591/735 Trunk Maintenance Foreman 43 575/715 Mechanic II 43 575/715 Plant Operator 43 575/715 Lab. Analyst III 42.5 56o/696 �.d Engineering Aide II 41 .5 530/659 Chlorinator Operator 41 516/641 Mechanic I 41 516/641 Agenda Item #17 --2- All Districts Lab. Analyst II 40.5 502/624 Operator Trainee 39.5 476/591 Engineering Aide I 39.5 476/591 Apprentice II 39.5 476/591 Maintenance Man 39 464/575 Lab. Analyst I 39 464/575 Laboratory Aide 37.5 428/530 Laborer 37.5 428/530 Apprentice I 36 395/489 Student Assistant - Part Time $1.75/2.30 per hour ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Administrative & Purchasing Officer 51.5 914/1138 Director of Finance 51.5 914/1138 Accountant 45.5 659/819 Assistant Purchasing Officer 44.5 624/776 Senior Accounting Technician 42 545/677 Secretary II 41 .5 530/659 Secretary I 39 464/575 Accounting Technician 38 440/545 Senior Stenographer Clerk 37 417/516 Stenographer, Part Time Maximum of $2.30/hr. Office Aide Maximum of $2 .10/hr. Section 3. The second paragraph of Section 11 of Resolution 67-66 is amended to read as follows: "For each employee assigned to a position designated as Apprentice, as established in Section 2 hereof, there shall be four salary anniversary dates, the first of which shall be the first day of the month after such an employee completes the first calendar quarter of service; and the subsequent of which shall be the first `ad day of the month after such employee completes each calendar quarter of service." Section 4. This resolution shall become effective December 1, 1967. Agenda Item #17 -3- All Districts i DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 4NIZATIONAL CHART EXHIBIT A LOIRE IA ASS'T GEN MGR. CHIEF ENGINEER I STAFF COMMITTEES irolning,SOI.Iy. Emtvgoncy Planning VANCE B.OPERATIONS ENGINE ING !20 ---- l'UPT OF OPERATIONS CONSTR ENDR. t ANCE OPERA ONS LAS fiR SEARCH —1 .3 ----- IPT OPER.ENDR p..-_LAB.6=ES L_ �d RESCH CHF MIS CHF CON CTR OP GHF LAB ANALYS ASS'T ENGR MAINTENANCE ELECTRICAL AINTENANCE py J l ELEC 5UPV CHLOR SUPV CONT CTR OP CONST INSP I 1 S 1 _ I IIIPMEMT SH Ok APPREN. INSTQU NTATION ELEB ICAL API I APZ N BACTERIOLOGY CHEMICAL nPI'r,7,€N r.tN FOREMAN fOREMAN FOREMAN II 1 iFCH D MECH n MECK li MECH II MECH II PLT OPER LAB ANA LAB ANAL NG.AIDE M 10 I 2 JECH I MECH 1 MECH MECH I MECH t OR OPE AB ANAL Q ENG AWE II 2 I 2 4 2 AN� MTCE MAN iWP 0 , MTCE MAN TAPPREN pT OP TRNNE APPREN II LAB ANAL.[ APPREN Q ENa AIDE I J I O I 2 p 2 2 2 I I 1 I --TT L '.n � LABORER LABORER LABORER LAB AIDEJ I 2 2 APPREN I APPREN i APPREN 1 TDT ASS'T APPREN 1 STDT ASS'T I i t 1 1 3 COUNTY SANITATIC OR SECRETARY II SR STENO Lilt SECRETARY I I FINANCE E4 DMINISTRATION MAIN' OIR OF FINANCE PURCH 6 ADM OFF I ACCOUNTANT ' INAINTI SECRETARIAL POOL 86 Sr Au},T ASS'T PUR OFF MAINI Pj3fR ONK A"TA STENO ALCT.1'C AGC T.TFC JLABORER SFC'Y I I I I I I TEN IPt t Oii L.AIDE 1EN IPI Im PLANT MAINTENANCE CONSTRUCTION COLLECTION FACILITIES MAINTENANCE TRUCK bI STAT. EQU sa 20/ 7 .' '.I'Gf SUPv TRNN MTCE SU MECH APP N STRUC.}II1RES tV � M.E7 N_ICA_6R9 G- _ HVY E OPER AP R.E_N. GON T-IO-N-114_S P SEWEI INE- PUMP - A-PZP�-N S-TA- ION—AR�Y 6 a J -_St FOALMAY FO h MLON MS FOREMAN FOR' I I I 1 4t .i rJI�T It IrMECH II MECH II i0R MAN M N R MA MECH II MECH Q I I i I I I r MI CH i MECr I MECH 1 MECH t MEOH I 1 2 2 2 2 �PPHEq Q 4'rE MAN, MTLE MAN MTCE MAN MTf,E MAN MTLE MAN MTCE MAN MTCE MAN MTLE MAN MTCE MAN IAPPREN II ] [- 2 I I I I ? � n 1 n LABORER LABORER LABORER LABORER 2 2 ] 2 2 APPREN I APPREN I �APPRIN 1 I I 2 OPLN POSITION TO BE FILLED ONLY WHEN LEGEND M77HIGHER LEVEL POSITION IS NOT FILLED _s PROPOSED FUTURE POSITIONS 7 SJTH• ..�. n.rl�• . r•:' rI�, A� t.,c '5 POSITIONS IN ORGANIZATIONAL LI►,E 0PHONES: (714) 540-291�0 FRED A. HARPER 962-2411 0 GENERAII MANAGER OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. BOX 5175-10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 dw..•no„ PHONES: (714) 540-2910 s FRED A. HARPER 962-2411 0W� GENERAL MANAGER OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. BOX 5175-10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA 92708 31 jj S j `7 V _ , PHONES: (714) 54 ar <. s♦ J FRED A. i4ARPER 862-2411 GENERAL MANAGE:!, OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. BOX 5175—10644 ELLis AVENUE FOU NTAIN VALL��AL IFDR�N I�Ay9i708 � n co c-f CPO �j �„� !.�•-z,.�''-�E '� _�ri' (,.emu....�. 6--e �7 Ole; 2" ATLAS STATIONERS, L.A. MEMORANDUM TO DATE FROM SUBJECT ORAL messages waste your time and the time of the other person; they often cause annoying interruptions and are apt to be misunderstood or forgotten. Put it in writing. l -c i (z4 3 _� ®fib ,� lr-�►�.,5� �-, �� 4 214 "T`"8 8T"T'°"ERB, L.A. MEMORANDUM TO DATE FROM SUBJECT e ORAL messages waste your time and the time of the other person; they often cause annoying interruptions and are apt to be misunderstood or forgotten. Put it in writing. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS II ----- - - _- AGENDA -- November 8, 1967 - '7 :30 P .M. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (5) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof held October 26, 1967, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held October 11, 1967, as mailed (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to convene in executive session to consider personnel matters (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to reconvene in regular session (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file the written report of the Executive and Building Committees (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-102 (salary adjustments) . (Copy of resolution in folders) . (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion updating the Districts ' Group Insurance Program and authorizing payment of an additional $2.50 per employee, toward the premium; and authorizing employment of Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant, to review the Districts ' present coverage to make certain that it is the best available for the premium being paid, as recommended by the Executive Committee (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of action regarding compensation for Board members (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion accepting the bid of Lumberman' s of Mansfield Insurance Company, in the amount of $2,460, for coverage of $3,250,000, on a stipulated basis, including fire, extended coverage, vandalism, malicious mischief, and difference-in-conditions coverage, as recommended by the Executive Committee (21) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to implement a Work program in cooperation with the C6unty Probation Department, with the provision that if it is not successful, it can be immediately terminated, as recommended by the Executive Committee (22) ALL DISTRICTS ons deration of motion to receive and file the certifi- cation of the General Manager, that he has checked all bills on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "All "B" and 'Cn (24) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (25) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See Page 11D11 �.d (26) DISTRICT 1 ther business and communications, if any (27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -2-- (28) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-103-2, approving and authorizing execution of agreement with Shell Oil Company, providing rules and regulations for disposal of industrial waste from recently annexed territory, and establishing a charge therefor. See page "F" (29) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (30) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any. A. Letter from Marcal Paper Mills Company. (31) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (32) DISTRICT J Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (33) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (34) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (35) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-104-5, approving plans and specifications for Manhole Replacement and Repair Program, Phase II, Contract No. 5-14R-2, and authorizing advertising for bids to be received December 5th at 4:00 p.m. See page "G" (36) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (37) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (38) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (39) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-105-6, authorizing execution and recordation of a Consent Instrument with the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare regarding the District' s quitclaiming a 10-foot sewer easement. See page "H" (40) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" �41) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (42) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -3- (43) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Irvine Industrial Complex regarding the District' s Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers, and refer said letter to the staff and engineers for study. See page "I" (44) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-106-7, authorizing acceptance of an easement from Standard Pacific Corporation, at no cost to the District. See page "J" (45) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-107-7, to receive and file the bid summary and recommendation; waiving the irregularity in the bid of Zarubica Company in not acknowledging receipt of Addendum No. 1; and awarding contract for the Gisler Trunk Sewer (Contract No. 7-1-Schedule C) to Zarubica Company in the total amount of $223,868.32. See page "K ' (See page "L" for bid summary) . (46) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (47) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any. A. Consideration of Resolution No. 67-108-7 (for salary adjustment) . See page "M" (48) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment tp 4f0o p.m. , November 16th (49) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (50) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any (51) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -4- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS NAvember 8, 1967 b..} JOINT OPERAmING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO, 12N FAVOR OF AMOUNT 8286 A. Sanitation, Chemical Toilet Rental $ 33.75 8287 A-1 Tool Rebuilders, Inc., Truck Parts 40.65 8288 Acore Drilling Service, Cored Drilling 35.00 8289 All Bearing Services Pump Pars 567.40 8290 Advance Electric, Motor Rewind 352.73 8291 American Water Works, Safety Lectures 9 .00 8292 The Anchor Packing Co., Pump Parts 428.39 8293 Apco Supply, Filters and Controls 190.29 8294 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 204.84 8295 Bank of America, Bond & Coup. Collect, Expense 22.43 8296 Beckman Instruments, Lab Supplies 366-55 8297 Bee Plastics, Lab Supplies 155.19 8298 Eenz Engineering, Gaskets 6o.98 8299 Blower Paper Co., Janitorial Supplies 126.15 8300 Bomar Magneto Service, Magneto Repairs 181.58 8301 Brulin & Co ,, Cleaning Supplies 120.07 8302 Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies 103.27 8303 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Transformers 245.08 8304 Calls Cameras, Photo Supplies & Finishing 37.01 8305 Certified Building Materials, Cement 29.93 83o6 Chem-Star Mfg, Co., Repair Materials 16.38 8307 Chrome Crankshaft Co,, Engine Parts 259.00 8308 City Sand & Gravel, Sand 783.92 8309 C-L Chemical Products, Chemicals 66.73 8310 College Lumber Co ., Lumber, Hardware 133.73 8311 Consolidated Electrical Dist., Electric Supp. 272.o6 8312 Continental Emsco Co., Suction Hose 1,755.60 8313 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts 350.58 8314 Costa Mesa County Water Dist ,, Water 4.40 8315 Costa Mesa Welding Supply, Demurrage 7.65 8316 County of Orange, daps 2.10 8317 Crown Fence & Supply Co., Temp. Fencing WS/FM 564.o0 8318 De Guelle & Son' s Glass Co ,, Desk Top 8.30 8319 Dept. of General Services, Publications 2.89 8320 Ted A. Dunn, Nuclear Conference Expense 51,00 8321 Dunton Ford, Truck Parts 68.26 8322 Electric Supplies Dist., Electrical Supplies 691.18 8323 Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring 3,727.50 8324 Ensign Products, Paint Supplies 256�32 8325 Enterprise Printing Co Office Supplies 1 1.02 8326 Essick Machinery, Pump Parts 90.09 8327 Chas. A. Estey, Inc., Piping Supplies 132.91 8323 Fairbanks Morse Inc., Scale Repairs 50.37 8329 Fairfax Electronics, Instrumentation Darts 39. 9 8330 Filter Supply & Service, Engine Parts 38.40 8331 Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation 1,4o0.49 5332 Fisher Governor Co., Regulator Parts 11.20 8333 Flair Drafting Service, Professional Service 556.4o 8334 The Flag Shop, Flags 84.83 8335 Foster-Barker Co,, Instrumentation Repairs 46.73 8336 Fowler Equipment, Crane Rental 584.00 8337 Freeborn Equipment, Dump Parts 16.35 8338 Freeway Machine Shop, Machine Shop Work 116.8o 8339 General Electric Supply, Chlor. Parts 389,81 834o General Telephone 1,062.61 8341 Fred A. Harper, WPCF Conf, & Var. Other Mtg. Exp. 303.89 8342 R. L. Hawley, L. A. Times Subscription 18.00 8343 Heathkit Electronic Center, Walkie-Talkie Repair 25,15 8344 L. Heitman Equip, Co., Equip, Rental 345,00 8345 Hertz Equip. Rental, 'Crane & Compactor Rental 1,497.00 -A- WARRANT NO, IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 8346 James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage $ 11.00 8347 Honeywell, Inc ., Instrumentation Repairs 894.39 8348 Howard Supply Co., Tools & Hardware 565.04 8349 City of Huntington Beach, Water 7.30 8350 ILG Industries, Inc., Blowers 372.79 8351 International Harvester Co., Truck Parts 101.45 8352 J & M Service, Gas Tanks 36 .85 8353 Johnston Pump Co .., Pump Parts 322.35 8354 Jones Chemicals, Chlorine 20,160.00 8355 Kar Products, Inc., Truck Parts 126.74 8356 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valve Parts 10.51 8357 Kingmann-White Inc., Recording Ink 31.69 8358 Kirst Pump & Machine Works, Pump Parts 1,086.04 8359 Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies 63.84 836o Knippers Rentals, Scaffold Rental 50.00 8361 Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Tools 40.35 8362 LBWS, Inc., Small Tools & Hardware 383.39 8363 Lambert Co ., Ltd., Truck Parts 46.94 8364 L & N Uniform Supply, Uniform Rental 766 .52 8365 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 16.20 8366 Litton Business Equip., Office Supplies 221.79 8367 M & J Equipment Co., Compressor Parts 16.75 8368 Mahaffey Machine, Machine Shop Work 133.10 8369 Main Photo Service, Photo Finishing 24.95 8370 Manufacturers Service, Turbine Mtce. Supplies 47.25 8371 Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies 242.15 8372 Milamts Electric Motor Serv., Tool Repairs 43.47 8373 Minnesota Mining & Mfg., Chemicals 155.40 8374 Moore Associates, Inc., Telemetering Supplies 1, 323.59 8375 Munselle Supply Co., Welding Supplies 83.37 8376 Nalco Chemical Co., Consulting Services 112.50 8377 National Cash Register Co., NCR Rental (2 Mos. ) 399.00 8378 City of Newport Beach, Water 9.43 8379 C. M. Nelson Agency, Insurance Premium 414.00 8380 C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer Fee 700,00 8381 M. C. Nottingham Co., Pumping Services 45.00 8382 Nuclear-Chicago Corp., Instrument Parts 51.45 8383 Oakite Products, Cleaning Supplies 252.13 8384 ONC Motor Freight System, Freight 3.90 8365 Orange County Radiotelephone Service 447.81 8386 Pacific Telephone 290.45 8387 Postmaster, Postage 150.00 8388 The Pryor-Giggey Co., Incinerator Materials 177.84 8389 R E A Express, Freight 17.50 8390 Repco Engineering, Heat Exchanger Repairs 86 .07 8391 Reynolds Aluminum Supply, Steel Stock 103.28 8392 Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts 69.05 8393 Saddleback Travel & Tours, Nuclear Conference 221.18 8394 Santa Ana Blue Print Co ., Blueprints 8.14 8395 Santa Ana Electronics, Electrical Supplies 83.07 8396 E. H. Sargent & Co ., Lab Supplies 685.83 8397 Russell M Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage 37.40 8398 Select Nurseries, Inc., Plants 177.19 8399 The Sherwin--Williams Co., Paint Supplies 179 .99 8400 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 34.80 8401 Signal-Flash Co., Barricade Rental 100.32 8402 Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 7.83 8403 Snyder Transfer Co ., Freight 4.80 8404 Southern Calif. Edison 2,714.76 8405 Southern Calif. Water 3.90 8406 Southern Counties Gas 1,444.83 -B- WARRANT NO, IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 8407 Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts $ 490.57 8408 Spencer Sheet Metal, Supply Cabinets 172.94 8409 Standard Oil Co., Oil 447.86 8410 Standard Ready Mix, Concrete 413.07 8411 Stonehouse Signs, Signs 71.80 8412 Sully-Miller, Asphalt 43.38 8413 Superior Craft Welding, Shop Work 15.00 8414 Tektronix, Inc., Instrument Repairs 68.04 8415 C. 0. Thompson Petroleum, Weed Oil 275.75 8416 Tiernan' s, Office Equipment Repairs 25.63 8417 Union Oil Co., Gasoline 561.38 8418 United Automotive Serv., Engine 58.30 8419 John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant 233.90 8420 Warren & Bailey Co., Pipe Supplies 96.39 8421 Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts 60.43 8422 Welch' s, Concrete 47.27 8423 Michael Wilson, Employee Mileage 20.40 8424 Everett H. York, Oil Filters 79.97 8425 Xerox Corp., Reproduction Charges 253.40 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 59, 136.77 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8426 Advanced Foundation Engineering $ 60.84 8427 John Carollo Engineers 12, 502.35 8428 J. Putnam Henck 156,814.03 8429 Twining Laboratories 88.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 169, 465.22 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING - AND CORF $ 228,601.99 -C- DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS � WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 8430 Boyle Engineering $ 8,524.15 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8431 J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry $ 11,820.75 8432 Industrial Pipeline Construction 700.00 8433 Vido Samarzich Company 69,615.45 $ 82,136.20 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8434 County Sanitation Districts of L. A. County $ 418.65 8435 J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry 883.50 $ 1, 302.15 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8436 J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry $ 935.00 $ 2,237.15 DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8437 City of Newport Beach $ 92.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS :LN FAVOR OF' 8438 Daily Pilot $ 14.76 $ lo6.76 -D- DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR 0 WARRANT NO. AMOUNT 8439 Boyle and Lowry $ 12950.50 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 8440 Aladdin Litho & Art $ 537.14 8441 Boyle and Lowry 979.00 8442 Daily Pilot 38.16 8443 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 43.22 $ 1,597.52 $ 3,548.02 -E- RESOLUTION NO. 67-103-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH SHELL OIL CO. �.d A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SHELL OIL COMPANY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated January 1, 1968, between SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, providing for certain charges and estab- lishing certain rules and regulations with regard to industrial waste discharged to the District' s facilities, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. Agenda Item #28 -F- District 2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-104-5 APPROVING PLANS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2 ------------------ The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Donald C. Simpson, District' s engineer, for MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, PHASE II, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3 . That said bids will be received by the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , December 5, 1967) at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the engineer and the District ' s staff be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. Agenda Item #35 -G- District 5 RESOLUTION NO. 67-105-6 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONSENT IN- ti.r' STRLTMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ- ING EXECUTION OF A CONSENT INSTRUMENT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION AND WELFARE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 65, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Consent Instrument dated October 31, 1967, wherein the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, acting by and through the Secretary of Health, Education, and Welfare, grants its consent to COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 61 OF ORANGE COUNTY, executing to A. J. GISLER AND MARY A. GISLER, husband and wife, a Quitclaim Deed covering a certain 10-foot sewer easement acquired by the District from the Federal Government in 1956, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 is hereby authorized and directed to execute said Consent Instrument on behalf of the District; and, Section 3. That recordation of said Consent Instrument, when fully executed, is hereby authorized. Agenda Item #39 -H- District 6 r IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX October 20, 1967 'Mr. Fred Harper Orange County Sanitation District P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Paul Hogan ' ` Sanitation District No. 7 Dear Mr. Harper: Reference is made to our meeting of October 18, 1967 and the dis- cussions relating to the establishment of a subtrunk sewer that would best serve the area bounded by Red Hill Avenue, Barranca Road, future Von Karman Avenue and McGaw Avenue. This area and the location of the proposed subtrunk sewer is contained on the enclosed Exhibit "A". In accordance with the policies of County Sanitation District No. 7, it is requested that your engineers design and prepare the construc- tion plans and specifications for the installation of this subtrunk sewer. The Irvine Industrial Complex will then bid and construct this subtrunk sewer line. As soon as the costs are known for this increment of your master plan system, a reimbursement agreement can be prepared and submitted to your Board for approval. Also, enclosed herein is a 500 scale topography map which may be of assistance in determining design volume for this sewer line. If any.- other information or data is required, please contact this office. Very truly yours, Raymond W. Kimmey Chief Engineer RWK:js Eno. ?.IPLI Compli's Orim p 0 [lox 4,10,1,Irvinn,Coli(ornin <)2GG/1(71+1)0a:1•1010.(?I I)C2t3-4204 Agenda Item #43 -T= District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 67-106-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT PROM STANDARD I RP. , A CORPORATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT FROM STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. , A CORPORATION --------------- The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein STANDARD PACIFIC CORP. , A CORPORATION, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described as follows: THE EASTERLY 10.00 FEET OF LOT 34, TRACT NO. 6082 AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 34, PAGES 1 AND 2 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District. Agenda Item #44 -J- District 7 RESOLUTION NO. 67-107-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-1-SCHEDULE C A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE GISLER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-1-SCHEDULE C --------------- The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle and Lowry, District ' s engineers, and concurred in by the District' s Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to ZARUBICA COMPANY, Contractor, for GISLER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-1-SCHEDULE C, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the irregularity in the bid of ZARUBICA COMPANY, in not acknowledging receipt of Addendum No. 1, is here- by waived; and, Section 3. That the contract for said Contract No. 7-1-SCHEDULE C be awarded to ZARUBICA COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of $223,868.32 (Corrected Total) , in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the provisions of the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 5. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the un- successful bidders. Agenda Item #45 -K- District 7 Engineer' s Estimate: $278,885 B I D S U M M A R Y Contract for: Date: November 1, 1967 Gisler Trunk Sewer Contract No. 7-1-Schedule C Contractor Total Bid 1. Zarubica Company 8550 Tujunga Ave. Los Angeles, California $2233868.32* 2. Dateline Pipe Contracting, Inc. 1231 North Lemon Street Anaheim, California 247,794.00 3. Sub-Terra, Inc. P. 0. Box 687 Woodland Hills, California 249,481.00 4. Anro Construction Company 2480 Ramona South El Monte, California 2533493.00 5. M & M Pipeline Company 1072 West Kensington Los Angeles, California 255,155.00 6. Matt J. Zaich Company 6828 Farmdale Avenue North Hollywood, California 256,527.50 7. M.P. Mitrovich & Vido Samarzich 233 Longley Way Arcadia, California 256,671.00 8. Far Western Pipeline, Inc. 6611 Fee Ana Street Anaheim, California 260,489.40 9. Drummond & Bronneck 1710 Santa Monica Boulevard Santa Monica, California 262,319.00 10. Edmond J. Vadnais 7257 Etiwanda Avenue Etiwanda, California 2653109.00 11. Mike Prlich & Sons 9316 Klingerman South El Monte, California 266,924.40 12. Peter Salata Construction Inc. 108 Fano Street Arcadia, California 269,462.00 13. George Dakovich Co. 715 Anoakia Lane Arcadia, California 270,927.00 14. Lomar Corporation 700 Fifth Street Huntington Beach, California 273,928.20 Agenda Item #45 L-1 District 7 B I D S. U M M A R Y (continued) Contractor Total Bid 15. Sanitary Pipeline Co . , Inc. �..� 7688 Speer Avenue Huntington Beach, California $280,217.00 16. Guho Corporation 8333 Atlantic Boulevard Cudahy, California 280,442.00 17. Rossi Construction Company 15236 Burbank Van Nuys, California 287,836.00 18. Steve P. Rados, Inc . 112 West Maple Avenue Monrovia, California 292,590.00 19. G. R. McKervey, Inc. 23882 Estacia Avenue South Laguna, California 305,409.00 20. Geo. Miller Construction Co. 3032 Bandini Boulevard Los Angeles, California 308,831.00* *Corrected totals Agenda Item #45 L-2 District 7 r RESOLUTION NO. 67-108-7 POSITIONS AND SALARIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0, 71 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE POSITIONS AND FIXING SALARIES THEREFOR; AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 66-145-7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. There are hereby established the following positions of employment by County Sanitation District No. 7, at the salaries indicated by the range number or monthly rate as set forth opposite the respective positions, said range numbers being descriptive of monthly salaries as set forth in Resolution No. 67-10re Number of Range Number Positions Classification or Salary 1 Rights of Way Agent (Part Time Basis) Maximum of $900/mo. 1 Field Supervisor 47 $715/889 1 Stenographer Clerk 35.5 $385/476 Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy the positions established in Section 1 hereof at the salary rates set forth above, all in accordance with the applicable provisions of Resolution No. 67-66, as amended, previously adopted by this Board; and, Section 3. That the persons employed to fill the positions outlined above shall be subject to all regulations and shall be \map", entitled to all the rights privileges and benefits p g provided for permanent, full time employees of the Districts. Agenda Item #47 -M- District 7 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRSCI' NO. , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. , -7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of ?:30 o'clock p.m. , November 8, 196 7 , 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7: 30 o' clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Clifton C. Miller (Chairman), Howard Rogers, Thomas McMichael, Rex A. Parks, Ellis N. Porter, and David L. Baker Directors absent: NE Present: Fred Harper, Secretary of the Board . DISTRICT -T Moved, econded and duly carried: Adjournment That thi meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation Distr ct No. 7 be adjourned to 4:30 p.m. , November 21, 1967, in th District' s office. The Chairman then declare the meeting so adjourned at 8:47 p.m. , November 8, 19 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED P . HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of :�arit L-c;on D_.s t_,ict NO, 7 , of Orange County, Californ"a., jo !-ere".-v certify tiie above and foregoiilg to be full, true anu ^erect ^opy of minute entries on record taken fron the minutes or the regular meetir; of said Board on the 8th day of November, 1T O 7 . IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and aff1 x.ed the official seal of County Sanitation District No , 7 , of Orange County, California, this 9th day of November , 1967 . Secretary, Board o '- Dii4kctors of County Sanitation District No. 7