HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-08_-,_ '~__/ / -
r ... ,~"V On behalf of the directors and the ~~-the County Sanitation Districts, I ~"\.
operating staff of
wo.d like to a 7 -
welcome our guests and express uur pleasure that you are
here. t T~ere is no need for us to point out the importance
of this operation, but we hope that you may have gained some
knowledge concerning•• its size and COJJlplexi ty.
This sanitajion machine can be compared to a giant
octupus with tentacles in every portion of Orange County.
If anything were to happen to tme nerve center, such as an
earthquake, sabotage or atom bombing, this whole county '31 1
would soon become uninhabitableo
~~~ ,,._
But d~y by day thisJt· ' ma<J.I"ne functions smoothly
and quietly and c6ntinues to expand with the meeds of a
growing county. For the skillful handling of the ia~x
daily operations and for commehdAble foresight in planning
ahead for the next 50 years we are all indebted to the staff
of the County Sanitation Distr<lt.;ts under the leadership of
""" General Manager Fred Harper and Assistant General Mager and
A
Chief Engineer Paul Brown.
J
f <C/l/t I(_ (\ ~ f-1. Cou~JTY SAN ITATION Dlsrit'icrs
of 0RA1\GE COUNTY , CALIFO?.~.IA
P. O. COX 5175
FOUNiAl:-0 VALLEY, CAUFO;iN!A, 927ve
IviANAGER 1 S REPORT TO 'I'HE EXECUTIVE COIV1.MI1l'TEE
Chairman Parsons has invited Directors Gruber and Hock to
attend ~~is meei::;ing a:'."ld to par~icipate in the discussions .
':'he :~ollowing is an explc...na t;ion or· the i i:;ems o~ busir.es s
proposed to be taken up at the Augu2i:; 2nd joint meeting o~ the
Execui:;ive Committee and i:;he Euildi:'."lg Comrr..i~tee . At the "tiYr:e
-c:'1e ~ .. ee-.:ing ~·ms called, we )::oped -;:;o t\.eep -che r;.u:nber o: c.genda
i te?ns to a minir!lurn since the Cor.uni -;:;"'cees t:ave been having ra tfier
long ~onthly meetings; however, we feel that these items ~re of
such im?ortance that they should be brought to the Com..~ittees '
a tter:.-cion .
1.. MASTER PLAN FOR IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE O? TREATMENT PLAl~T
NO . 2 .
?ollowing the July 6th mee-cing of the Cor!lmii::;i:;ees, Architec-c
Willard T . Jo r dan was given i:;he following instructions :
a . Proceed with tne prepara-cion of es-cirnates for -che
re~edial work on the exis-cing buildings and the new
structures, (Project No . 2072, included in i::;he 1967-68
budgei:;), including a layout :or an Operators' building .
b . ?repare cost estimates :or the f ollowing :
Phase l . I~ediai::;e perimeter landscaping and
wall, including entrance to the plant, based on
i:;he Architec-c's preseni:;ation of July 6th .
Phase 2 . Interior sjte improvements, primarily
landscaping and moundin~.
J>h:u_;c ~. Pc.r1mctcr p.L: .. mting oi' thut portion oi'
tne plant site northerly of the present entrance .
c . Submit revised drawings o: i::;ne proposed Operai::;ors '
building for the Boards 1 consideration .
Should tI'-e Committees approve his recommendations, a~d i:
it is feasible for the Districts -co proceed, the Committees may
desire that Mr . Jordan make a fo.L!!La~n~to ~ Join-c
Boards at the August meeting .
2 .
2 . REVIE~<! OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 1 S COMPENSATION .
During the la-vter part of 1966, the Executive Committee
reviewed with the General Counsel his fee schedule as estaolished
by Resolution No . 63-150 (attached). At that meeting , it wa.s
agreed that a monthly report of his services would be subrritted
w:. th his invoice, and the Cor:ur.i ttee would review the reports and
re -examine the General Counsel 1 s fee schedule prior to the adoption
of the 1967-68 budgets .
At 'the last meeting of the Executive Committee, the :-;ionthly
reports o~ his services rendered were reviewed, and the staff was
directed to compile information from other special districts in
the County to determine the current fees paid by them for legal
services . This information is attached to this report, along
with the material submitted to the Committee at the last meeting .
V 3 . CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT OPERATL1TG 3UDGET ITEM TO PROV:DE
FOR SPECIAL J:t 'UNCTIONS, ACTIVITIES, ETC.
I~ was agreed at the joint meeting in July, that the
Executive Committee should consider the possibility of establish-
ing a budget expense item which would provide payment for certain
types of activi ties such as the proposed d i nner meeting on
September 13th (which include guests who a r e City Officials from
the vario~s cities represented on the Districts 1 Boards). Tne
staff ~·Iill have ·oudget informat.ion available at the meeting .
J 4 . CLOSEOUT OF JOB NO . P2 -7A TURBIKE -GENERATOR SET NO . 1 PLANT
NO . 2 .
The Districts have retained the amount of $46,074 .60 ~rom
funds due the contractor, unt.il the sludge gas turbine and heat
recovery unit. perform satisfactorily . In our last discussions
Ki th representatives of Orenda, Inc ., and their subcontractor ~'
\.\'"ho suppl:'...ed the heat. recovery unit (Engineering Controls), we ~cf
r,;e r e unable to resolve substantial dollar differences . (\ g.;
' /'
The equipment is now acceptable, and the amount of the (\~~I.
f :'..nal payment must be deterrr..ined . The staff would like to discuss p) v~)
ti1is matter ·wit.!'! the Executive Conunittee at the meeting . *~tp if~I
-h>--A ~ 5 . =~~DIVIDUAL DISTRICTS 1 BlJDGETS . ~' µ, · l ~
I ~· .,-'/ ~·Te ant.icipate having final assessed valuation figures by >')/)I'
tDe ti~e of the meeting, and the staff wi ll present recommendations ~
fo r t.~e final budgets .
~6 . ~STA3LISHING CLASSIFICATION OF SENIOR ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN .
~t ~he present time, the Districts 1 position of Accountant
is vacant and we have encountered difficul ty i n securing a
aual ifi ed anpli c ant to f ill i t . We have al so discov ere d that ~ ~
")
.) .
other public agencies in Orange County, and throughout the State ,
are having the same problem . Several of the agencies have found
it necessary to go out of state to fill their positions .
To alleviate this situation the staff is recommending that
the classification of Senior Accounting Technic~an be established
as an inte1~media te level accounting position . With this new
classification, in the event qualified applicants are not available
to fill the position of Accountant, the flexibility derived from
the rece~t:y adopted positions -personnel concept will permit the
staff to fill the Senior Accounting Technician position, at a
lower salary, with an applicant who has not yet comp l eted the
r equirements of the Accountant position .
It should be noted that the recommendation is for the
addition of the position only , and not for additional personne l .
FAH : jb
Enclosures
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
MILLER, NISSON & KOGLER
CLARK MILL£R
C.ARTHUR NISSON
NELSON KOGl.E:R
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
ATTORN EVS AT L.AW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
August l, .1967
County sanitation District No. l
of Orange County, California
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd ..
Dear Fred:
TELEPHONE
54~·6771
Enclosed herewith is a suggested draft of a letter for
you to write to Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd. with reference
to closing out contract P-2-7a.
A normal close-out resolution waiving any claim for liquidated
damages by reason of the fact that the District contributed to
any delays in performance will be sufficient. I think your
proposed settlement and the negotiations of your staff have been
very well handled in this matter.
Yours v;;~ truly,
(r@r'
c. Arthur Nisson
CAN:mij
Enclosure
Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd.
7 King Street East
Toronto l
Ontario, Canada
Attention Mr. L. D. Dwyer
Purchasing Analysis coordinator
Re: Orenda, Inc.
Contract P-2-7a
County sanitation District No. l of
Orange County, California
Gentlemen:
With reference to the final close-out and payment of the
balance due on the subject contract, I am authorized to propose
the following terms of compromise and understanding, most of
which have been discussed and tentatively agreed upon:
1. The District has, on July 14, 1967, accepted the
equipment supplied and work performed under the contract as in
satisfactory condition and in compliance with specifications.
2. The District will pay to Orenda, Inc~, the sum of
$37,214.12 which is the sum of $46,074.60 less applicable sales
tax in the sum of $8,860.48 which the District agreed to pay for
Orenda, Inc., by deducting said sum from the contract balance
due.
3. The following equipment warranties shall be es-
tablished as acceptable to all parties concerned:
a. Boiler control for ninety days from April 11,
1967.
b. All condensate returns and boiler feed system
for ninety days from April 11, 1967.
c. water circulating pumps for ninety days from
a date, which date is sixty days after the successful opera-
tion of said pumps without down-time due to malfunction
(in this connection they have been successfully operating
without down-time from July 12, 1967 to date).
d. The heat recovery unit (boiler) for one year
from April 11, 1967.
2.
4. By accepting the payment of money proposed to be
paid, all claims arising out of the subject contract and modi-
fications thereof against the District and its agents and employees
are to be dAemed ·satisfied in full and each party does release
the other from all further duties, obligations and liabilities
except as to the warranties hereinabove set forth.
If this embodies all of the terms of an acceptable compliance
and close-out agreement of the subject contract, please sign a
copy of this letter and return it to me at your earliest con-
venience and the balance due will be forwarded upon receipt
of your signed copy.
Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this drawn
out and complicated transaction.
Yours very truly,
HAWKER SIDDELEY CANADA LTD.
By
Title:
Dated:
~I
u
Definition:
Duties:
Qualifications:
·' ) u
SENIOR ACCOlJNTING TECHNICIAN
Range l.J.2.
9:.5-677
August 1, 1967
Under direction of the Director of Finance to
~;erform accounting functions in the maintenance
of the general accounting budget, and cost systems
of the Districts, and to do other work as required.
(1) To maintain the Districts 1 journals and
ledgers.
( 2) To reconcile account balances 1·ri th County
reco1~0.s.
(3) To prepare payrolls and related reports.
( L~) To accumulate cost data and maintain work
order journals on all material and labor 0xpenses.
To process cJ.aims for payment.
(6) To prepare work sheets and reports derived
from the foregoing functions.
(7) To perform other related duties as assigned.
(1) Combination of education and exoerience eauiva-
lent to completion of two years of college or univer-
sity work \·.rith emphasis in business and accountingo
(2) Knowledge of acc.:>unting principles and office
methods.
(3) Ability to prepare financial and statistical
reports.
(4) An understanding of local government fiscal
affairs.
(5) It is desirable that a continuing effort is
being made toward a baccalaureate degree in account-
ing from an accredited institution.
.....
Dist. No.
1
2
3
5
6
~ 7
11
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
FINAL BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1967-68 Fiscal Year
Total Budget Requirements Increase
or
Preliminary Final ( Decr·ea~-~)
$ 2, 674, 258. $ 2_, 639, 258. $ ( 35, 000 0)
7,859,288. 8,029,2~8. 170,000.
7, 126, 459. 7,417,311. 290,852 ..
1,145,328. 1,201,8020 56, 474.
1,066,456. 1,116,040. 49, 584.
1,989,733. 2,072,935. 83,202.
1,681,125. 1,812,836. 131,711.
* 2966-67 Tax rate dropped 4.58¢
; I
~
August 2, 1967
1967-68
2967-68
Projected
Tax Rate Tax Rate
$ .4518 $ .4468
.4651 .4451
04132 .4102
.2874 .2774
.2604 .2554
.441.!-4 .4744~·
.4725 .4625
--,; ~~
ii'.,. I .,
I.
!!1
I '~ L
•1 ~<
(
..
.
..
..
.
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
..
..
..
.
..
.
.•
.
.
.•
.
.
.
.
..
..
..
..
.
..
.
.
.
..
(
..
.
..
•
l
'
.
<\
;
(I
)
f
3
I
~
(f
J
:
.>
'
0
rn
r·
>
N
0
u
~
()
'
:-
-
,
SH
(:
l
C:
l
(:
\
I·
'
·
(>
:
)
'd
::
)
I
~
(I
)
I·
'
·
(>
c:
:
. .,
.q
c~
<
tn
r:
p.
.
•0
p.
.<
>
er
-
r:
'.
>
l"
s~
r:
'
..
.
<~
:
:)
o
er
-
r~
>
:;
·
:>
s~
>
d
I-
'
·
I
'·
:)
er
-
(
r·
·-
~
I
'·
cf
·
•
"
q
(
•.
..
.
f\
\
1
5
:
"i
I
'·
X!
O
:
i
Ci
>
b
i.
:
/
d·
t.
:
!
:-
-
:
,
'c
t
·
(i
l
0
•:
I
~
(
;-
'-
'
·~
(
f·
I·
~
(j
>
1
)'
~.
J\
.
)
IJ
<!
U1
I-
'
-
p,
1:\
•
!;
to
1-
1
c~
to
·
~
::
•
u
:.
~
~
•J
CL
>
::
£
:
1
~
(~
)
0
..
)
(~
)
c;
.
·
,
C>
<!
>
p,
0
()
to
I·
'
·
't
!
()
'r
'
~·
(.
'
;.
\
l)
'
l·
!
J
f?
J
o
Jn
{~
o
:.
~
ti
)
lJ
j
(J
.
;
•c
j
.
p
i;
J
..
d'
«:
o
·~
c:
-
c,
-
,
f-
J
o
t-
'
c:
·
"
o
er
·
~J
"'
•.
s
1-
-
'
rJ
j
.
c~
f~
~-
1
.
.
?:
t~
#
•,
J
J'
·
U
n)
nl
1.
1
,
~>
"
'
I·
'
·
::
>
'
<~
>
P·
q,
1;
t•
J
o
I'
·
i=
J
l·
'
"
·
'
,.
:
-
'-
)
~
')
0
I·
'
•
c·
l
·
p,
C>
~>
t-
1
1
Cn
0
1-
·
1
f"
~.
.
,
1-
1
<
•·
:
,
,
:i
.
:
>
.t
-
:
"
1
:
t
•
•.
•
Y.
•
,
.
.
_
.
.
··
~
•
·
:
0
~
c·
~
\j
~-
·
·
0
:.
-
>
C.
l
l
:"
'
)
"
f'
.
.
.
>
:J
J-
-
'
0
0
fl
l
:,
.
5
•
j•
CL
>
()
CJ
)
\0
I
1•
C>
{f
J
0
•·
;
:
.
.
:
~
O
..
-
:~
"
!
"-
·
:
;
:i
..
1~
0
0
'-
:
,
i
ct
CV
:_
5
--
.
.
I-
·
'
lj
t·
'
.
>
l·
J
'J
~
l
:J
d
"
.f
~
(!
)
a.
-
J
"
v>
i-
;
-
J
tJ
·
~;
j
~(
:
~
;
;
.
:~
r-
~
f-
!
··
~
~!
lJ
.
.
'
•}
0J
-~
-
!
)
-
I\
)
#
::
>
1-
1
.J
"
.
.
J
•c
s
u1
ro
•-
'
·
:J
..
.
!J
j
.t
:
J
t:
h
-
-
:
b
~.
c.
-
·~
t"
.
'
•:
-
-
•
·
l-
-
'
c.
z
-.
J
•
n
f·
'
·
c+
o
•
L;
-
:
j
1-
J
t-
'
·
'"
o
1.
1
.
r.
)
t=
J
V
co
::
>
!
:
Y
1-
·
"
t·
i
"
1-
·
·
t.
>
f'
.
>
O
(>
ll
)
0
CV
SD
::
r
<>
•J
J
C>
P·
cl
"
:s
f•
J
1-
-
'
.t
:
.
·
o
t:
·
~
O
L-
:
r)
L.
'
>
l-
'
<
~'
)
0
c:
-
ct
P·
:~
·
0
"
.@
r.
;
•
o
~
•.
>
P>
·
to
~
1-
'
U1
•
.
:
.
;
1
-
.
:
-
~
·
t:
~-
~
·
'
c:
-
1
-
~
O
o
·~
l·
'
-
1-
J
(!
)
•j
p.
>
•
1-
'
:
l
D
•5
--
~
••
'
:3
~.
.
u,
..
.
>
·
tr
-
.
~=
:
•
c·
'
··
~
(
-
.
>
•
..
.
•
·:
,
'
~
•
,-
:
.
.
•
r'
J
·-
.
'
•
,-
•
'-
=
-
"
-
..
.
.
.
'
.r
:
,
t-
)
0.
0
.
Q
:-
-
>
c·
t
-
f-
J
0
:
>
Ci
>
S'
.
>
Ct
>
ti
)
!i
'
t,
"
l
J
G
0
t-
1
PJ
·
0
(i
J
0
~
_;
:
.
t
3
r,
:
;
o
P·
••
'!
o
•o
:>
.
r.
>
o
.
t-
J
o
P.
l
:-
.
.
s
;~
t-
'
·
<t
>
f!
)
~
a-
~
H
..
.
.
~
f-
>
Y.
~~
i
H
1:
~
~
•
0
•)
t-
)
0
c-
?
-
t-
!
>
!I
-
-
.
.
~
c·
:
-
Ct
)
P.
1
O~
l-
·
1
c-
:
-
W
c:
-
0
fb
'd
~
t:
J
H
0
~.
·
>
e
r
c~
C1
•
!-
~
< :-
•-
~
8'
o'
·~
.
~
t:
.
-
J
~
C!
J
d
t-
·
'
d"
.
p.
~
1:
-
J
~-
?
~
t;
-
_
:
~~
)
t:
l
P
1-
.
1
;
1
P
0
.
rt
0
:J
Ci
>
t:
J
cf
"
f:
.
>
0
d·
t-
!
>
O
S:
:
ro
t!
1
µ.
.
0
p·
·
.
.
!;
J
H
.·
:
<
tr
.
~
~
!;
j
~
o
er
-
1)
::
)
.
.
t-
.
)
I-
'
·
o
:~
,
.
l-
-
'
H.
1
O
•
H
!d
t-
'
·
(1
)
~
0
·
~
t;
·
j
~
•
._
1
O
(/
,
;.
.
r
.
:
t:
.
J
0
1-
!
·
C:
:
~
-~
·
.
>
F·
(!
)
~
fl
>
;:
.
>
1d
}-
J
C:
J
0
•·
,
5
1-
J
t-
>
1-
)
·•
•
•.
•
0\
1
0
Qr
-
:
•.
;
j
t-
'
:.
-
:
.
V'
~
1-
-
:
.
>
~:
.
1 :.
~J
o
J.
J
"
:j
I·
'
·
P
t·
'
o
c·
r
-
o
:c
,
ct
Ct
l
:c
~
)
c_
1
c·
:
·
o
I
·o
)
t
:
J
o
cL
-
J
o
t·
:
.
}
t-
)
<-
<
:s
P
t-
i
.
.
O~
en
~
P>
(I
)
O
:-
)
~
c
:·
~
!J
.
_
1
O
ti
)
PJ
(>
.
:)
~
O
.c
:~
t:
J
.-
<
0
1-
:
.
l
H
t
·:
o
•-
'
ti
)
=.
:
:
o
<o
c-
:
-
::
:
1-
$
f'
J
~;
<D
:.
.
s
:=
-
>
"
c:
ti
J
o
I-
'
·
c~
)
~
1
t·
'
c:
i-
:
o
Ho
c:
t-
,
>
c~
P
0
•
t·
)
J-
J
·~
c;
,
~
CQ
•-
'
:>
f·
'
·
c:
-
-
<~
!
::
>
.
.
tr
>
p_
,
1-
-
•
c:
·
:.
:
;
::
.
>
·H
1-
:
1
~
c~
c~
:,
!
.
,.
_
~
:
P
~
< :-
o
~
r-
,
o
fn
:J
P>
cr
.
>
t-
;
~
c
o
r)
r=
o
c:
-
rn
c:
-
1
%~
H
o
~.
;
.
-
;
:-
,
;
;
-
·
,
1
:
.f
.
'
i
F·
~
f-
'
·
O
O
ci
-
c·
:
-
•c
>
a-
;
<:
.
>
c.
.
z
1-
;
L-
1
c
r·
d"
•
p>
~
.
('
)
t:
J
1·
)
l.
-
:
:
:-
.
:
J
o
1.
'?
t/
<
}:
~
·
·
c
:-
:~
r:
1-
·
·
0
~
•-
'
~
tf
J
o
<1
@
•
1-
'
·
o
:1
>
:J
1
w
t-
1
1
<
.
I
o
~
o
o
o
c-
:
-
"
JJ
·
;·
:
>
<
1·
-
b
t-
.
~
•
o
PJ
r
•·
~
l!
J
"
o
o
f}
CV
tn
!;
:
t
t;
.
1
~~
;;
J
t)
'
..
.:
>
cf
-
Ci
>
0
0
lj
:.
:
>
~j
1-
-
,
~
U
::
.
>
:J
d
~
~J
I
t:
J
~ ..
0
Ci
.
'
C:
.
•
~.
.
:
~
O
i"
:
~
()
O
(J
~~
<.
.
.
~
·
1j
:1
t-
~
~·
•J
·
c·
:
-
ti
)
•
{I
J
f·
~
·
l·
·
'
:=
>
Vi
~~
~
:.
<
>
:~
~
:
.
"
'1
~~
~
0
0
f-
·
·
'
0
>-
~
0
O
0
(f
J
ct
tr
z
!i
>
('
.
>
0
:.
-
.
>
C:
l
I-
'
-
I
0
tJ
t·
:
!"
.
:
,
t-
;
~
t,
::
1
~:
c-
f
"
1-
'
•
1-
)
C-
:
-
::
:
>
c·
r
·
{U
:i
:
>
0
Cf
J
:'
)
l-
-
'
P.
.
C~
C:
-
..
t:
l·
I
.!
.
-
j
C
>
:.
>
H
l-
'
i-
-
;
·'
-
<
::
;
o:
.
!
::
>
c-
:
-
::
>
r.
>
c.
-
:
·
p.
:.
:
s
p,
.P
·
{!
)
r»
r.
>
1
··
e!
o
o
•·
J
.C
:
>·
c;
,
('
I
·
0
I-
"
r:
.
>
cf
·
'd
p,
PJ
CD
::
s
-
'
(t
>
::
s
.J
.
:.
~
~
"'
l.
;
t
j
p,
":
·
J-
J
d"
.
..
.
;:
0
()
>
..
_
t
.
.
l
t
I
Lt
.
'
t.
<
I·
·
~
c!
"
:'
Z
Ci
>
I-
'
·
::
:
;
'"
p.
0
P·
0
c:
-
-
~.
>
•
I-
~
l·
"
·.
H
:·
.
<
c.
:
>-
)
"'
1
c:
-
..
.
~
•
ti
)
<
I-
'
·
Cf
-
1
0
t,
j
::
.
J
C.
.
.
.
:
(-
1
0
c-
t
-
P'
()
0
··
0
t'
-
1
~~
H
,_
9
1:'
.
c:
-
C>
•c
.
s
I-
'
·
N
cv
tn
<~
,
o
p.
t-
.
s
f-
t
·
·
<D
ct
-
o
:s
2;
t;
-
J
t.
'
J
o
-.
·
I
'
-
?
'-
11
:-
>
C:
.
>
D'
t-
v
0
p.
.
ft
>
:_
'
)
~
:5
•d
t_
-
J
t'
>
•
0
t1
'
P·
S.
~
ll
)
Z
t.
:
J
!~
\.
J
t
-=
-
!
0
<i
>
0
o
t-
?
>
r.
:
d-
C:
.
>
IJ
·
C!
.
>
(1
)
1-
"
ct
-
"
.
~
t-
S
d
<
:J
t:
i
ln
t-
:
'=
=
'
;-
~
0
H.
>
{1
fl
>
P·
lj
p,
1$
lj
ti
>
~
tr
.
>
I-
'
-
:-
>
(L
>
ti
>
l-
'
·
~
:t
~
'
"
tJ
'"
'
1 ·
r•
0
!
$
0
t-
~
:e
I-
'
0
f'
-
'
f\
)
S'
J
ct
·
P>
U
••
:.
:
S
CV
(O
(f
}
0
•-
)
H
;~
j
q
..
~
t.
>
o
t-
-
J
~-
s
1-
-
'
ti
>
t-
-
'
ct
·
•:
;
c-
t
ro
O'
=
?
~
l-
'
c~
{f
l
H
l-
.
:
.
J
c~
~
..
'
r.
.
.
t'
.
)
0
:-
.
s
1-
3
~
fl
>
l-
1
·
P·
I-
'
·
<
v~
1
,.
.
;
)
•
o
r
~
1-
:
,
G
'
..
;-
J
(;
:
1
0
X°
fl
>
l-
'
I-
'
O
0
0
<:
r.
>
ct
-
·
S'
-
'
lj
17
P·
~~
~
~l
!
Gl
\
~
~
c.
·
:
·
CJ
P
(:
>
{)
>
~)
C:
)
{D
0
:S
d"
CD
:.
-
s
.:
:
_
)
.
.
1-
;
(i
'
::
;
0
\.
0
t-
·
h
;.
~
\
~
:J
:J
ti
)
tn
~$
P,
,
(;
:
1
•
~
r,
Cf
.
I
to
P,
.
Cl
>
P•
f\
>
d-
ro
..
.
~
0
'-
.
.
I
.
(>
t<
:
'-
..
.(
p,
~
~
[~
.
'"
0
.
0
El
~\
ti
>
..
.
0
·~
(f
J
'<
rJ
d-
1-
'
li
>
•
0
•-
;
:)
.
.
·.
0
~
(i
)
P
t>
"'
r~
·-
·
f-
J
(.
>
:1
·
( t·
CL
>
P>
t;
,
o·
-
:
C:
J
p
{!
)
:.
-
s
()
I-
~
:J
p.
.
<<
>
1-
'
0
n>
t1
1
0
f-
'
::
S
('
.
>
:
~
cl
-
0
:)
f.
J
.
0
:.
:
Ci
-
?
I-
'
C-
i
>
p,
0
:>
..
.
.
.
t\
:
S
S\
l
I;
)
c'
·
•J
I·
"
P
tJ
'
I·
'
0
t·
J
l)
,
Cl
>
I-
~
I·
'
·
t•
>
CV
0
p.
.
P3
0
r:
:
1
:s
1-
'
Cv
CV
0
<
Ci
>
::
;
·
er
·
f\
l
N
:)
c:
-
S'
-
1
r~
•;
.
I
f·
>
I
C>
f.
:
l·
'
·
{~
l
:)
·
"5
1'
1
::
l
·
l•
>
f
'·
C:
-
;\
f·
~
ci
·
p,
d
:.
s
(>
('
.
.
>
I·
.J
{)
)
rh
(
:·
c~
)
fn
8
(L
l
{)
•
~
(I
)
0
l
1•
(l
(t
J
J-
I
<I
·
(I
)
l-
1
•
I$
(
f"
•)
P•
(;
'
(.
'
-
>
(.
)
<:
«
VI
0
<~
>
..
.
.
.
tl
l
(L
l
H
Ca
>
t)
'
:.
s
g·
~
Ci
J
I-
I
•
(1
>
~
.:
l
p,
<.
:
:
:
•
..
....... .
3. 0th~~ work on behalf of the County Sanitation
Districts o-:: OranGc Cour .. ty wr.1.ich in the opinion
o-: th0 Gencr·al i~an~ze:.'t and Gcne1..,al Coun~0 l is
not ~·11-Chin "~he work conte;·nplatcd under tho
1 ... otaine:. ... , subj cc ·c· to a~")p:roval of the Dis tric .. ~~.
Section LL .ccmpensatio~ fol" appearances in any cou.z·t of
law· Ol"' befor~ a.dministra tive o:..~ le8isla-'cive corr.mi t .. cees er agencies
or at p~olic heari~ss on behalf of the County Sanitation Distrlct3
of Ora~se County~ shall be at the rate ot ~wo Hundred ($200.00)
Dolla~s per day or any part of a day.
'I·:~a t all other ext~a wc::-1<: shall be compensated at the ra .. (;e
of 'E1irty-five ($35.00) Dollars pe~ hour.
in addition to the compensation hereinabove p~o-
vided 3 the actual expenses ot travel) food and lodging outside the
County of Orange on the business of the Districts and all other
necessa~y expenditures o~ the business of the Districts shall be
reimbursed in the actual amounts.so expended.
Saction 5. That whera special counsel have haretofore
oeen e~ployed and are now employed on behalf ot the Districts, their
corn::.e:.-~sati.on shall be in accordance wi'"ch .. chat hereinabove provided
fo~ t:~e Ge:!eral Cou."lsel for extra wcj,~k~ and that,,· in the absence of
special.p~ovisicns to the contrary~ any future special couns~l
acco:.'"'C.ance with the compensation her·einabova provided for the
Section 6. T.11at Resolutions Nos. 98, 403, 45~ and 768,
~ist~icts haretofc~e
are hereby repealed and
r:.2.c.(; I'. ·'l' ""'·0 r:. f"f" r. c~--. v.. •• \;.-;~ ... w "' and that this resolution shall take eff ~ct
1963.
July
SURVEY OF LEGAL COUNSEL FEES PAID
BY SPECL\L DISTRICTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
Costa Mesa Sanitary
District
Laguna. Beach Water
District
Los Alamitos County
Water District
Garden Grove Sanitary
District
Midway City Sanitary
District
Orange Cour..ty
1viunic ipal Water
District
Ora~ge Col:nty Water
District
South Laguna Sanitary
District
Stanton Co:.:nty Water
District.
Yorba Linda County
Water District
Salary or Retainer
$250/month
Contract by Resolution
Minilp.um of *60 for
Board Mtg. of 2 hours
$35/hr. for general
work as needed
$60 for meeting of 2
hours
$475
No retainer
$250 monthly retainer
for attendance at
meetings and handling
routine work
No retainer
$30/hour for attend-
ing meetings with a
minimum fee of $60 for
any one Board meeting
$30/hour minimum of
$60 per meeting
$300/month retainer
for attendance at 2
different Board Mtgs.
Extras
For everything that is
required
Court app6aranccs:
1/2 day ---SlOO
Full day --$200
$30/hr. for extra work
Contracts, etc. -Flat Rate
Research -$15 per hour
All work, including
meetings, $30 per hour
Extra work over 10 hours
paid at the rate of $35/hr.
Special fee arrangenent for
Court appearance -about
$40 per hour
$45 per hour (principals),
and $32.50 per hour
$200/day for court appear-
·ances over 1/2 day; $100/day
for 1/2 day or less
ttave not had any court
cases so no provision has
been set up for this work
Submits bill for general
office work. Pay S20/hour
for associate and $30/hour
for a partner to cover
services to the District except in bo~di~g matters,
litigation appearances, legislation or adninistrative
matters. Pay for court proceedings at rate of
$125/day for an associate and $175/day for a partner.
COUN1-y S.A~NI'TA'I"'ION DISr-fi{ICTS
OF OR.A.NOE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
T~l..C::?HON C:~!
ARCA cc:;,r;,t;: 714
.540•291 D
9G2·2411 1 u;t===========================================
10844 EL.LIS AVENUE, P. 0.130X 5175, rOUNTAIN VAL.1-EY, CAL.lrORNIA, 92708
1966 November
Dece:c.ber
1967 Jarn.~ary
February
March
April
May
June
AVERAGE:
July 28, 1967
S1.JMYlARY OF ACTIVITY REPORTS
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel
November, 1966 through June, 1967
Total Time
on District
Business
13 hrs. 0 mins.
10 hrs. 10 mins.
Less Tir;ie
Chargeable: at
$35 per hour
2 hrs. 20 mins.
l hr. 15 mins.
29 hrs. 10 mins. 13 hrs. 45 mins.
16 hrs. 50 mins. 1 hr. 0 mins.
13 hrs. 50 mins. 4 hrs. O ~nins.
24 hrs. 25 mins. 10. hrs. 55 mins.
:) hrs. 40 mins. 0 hrs. 0 mins.
6 hrs. 40 mins. 0 hrs. 0 mins.
14 hrs. 58 mins. 4 hrs. 9 mins.
Time A-r/Glicaole to
S7QQ .. =;. ,_ ·r ·rr ,-.·r.7-"r. T 1 :!C:::::-•• lvJ. ... v ••
Rete..ine:r Fee
10 hrs. 4o r.c.ins.
8 hrs. 55 mins.
15 hrs. 25 mir.s ..
15 hrs . 50 :-:1ins .
9 hrs. 50 rn.:!.ns.
13 hrs. 30 ~;.ins.
5 hrs. 40 rr;.ir.s.
6 hrs. 40 rr~iYls.
10 hrs. 49 mins.
l ,
t
F r. ;:
t
f
I
f
I
l
I
I
I
I
I
j
_____________ _... ______________________________ """··-··'·''"~·-:::.=.-·--
,.,
. .
. ;:
Coldwell, Banker & Company
A CALIFORNIA Cl>llPOllAllON
REAL ESTATE • PROPERTY MANAGEMENT • MORTGAGE LOANS • INSURANCE
2200 EAST COAST HIGHWAY • NEWPORT BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92660 • Kl 9·8851
•'
· .
i '.'
. ' .
;.· 26 July· 1967
. ' ~ .
,.
':•I f .• ; '
: : . . ~: ' . ~ ...
C. Arthur Nisson, Attorney at Law
Miller, Nisson & Kogler
2014 North Broadway
Santa Ana, California
Dear Mr. Nisson:
...
On behalf of Mrs. Constance S. Samnis who is on vacation, I am
enclosing my check in the amount of $115 as payment for the
sewer assessment, Sanitation District No. 7, for the property
located at 4300 Campus Drive in Newport Beach.
I have already expressed myself to you regarding this matter,
but wish to go on record in writing. Granted this sum is not
a major contribution; frankly its payment represents the 1 ine
of least resistance as opposed to reverting to 1 itigation to
determine if the Sanitation District's contention that respon-
.. s i bi 1 i ty for payment res ts with the subsequent owner /1 es see is
actually val id. I believe if the Sanitation District's claim
.·: .. were contested, a court of 1aw would rule that the claim should
have been levied against the original owner who held the prop-
erty at the time the sewer connection was made (the tenant in
this case, since this is a leasehold interest).
..
~ .
In reviewing this with the land owner, the Irvine Industrial
Cornple;<, it appears evident that the Sanitation District was
remiss in not requesting payment at that time, then in the course·
of events simply forgot to 1 evy such payment •. Now, of course,
the expedient approach from their standpoint is to pass th is
responsibility on to subsequent owners rather than going through
·the throes·of_establishing original responsibil~ty.
JUL 271967-
CONVENIENT OFFICES IN CALIFORNIA, ARIZONA, NEVADA
. I
.;
··.·.
. ; I
'·
. ~ ..
. i
In any case much appreciate your looking into this matter
and your explanat~on to me of the situation.
.: .. . . . • . ..
pls •. ·.:.}. ·.1.
Enc ls. (2)
.:·
cc: ·Paul J. Hogan
:·:··.·:
... ' : .. ·~--. ~.. . ' . <. : -~ . . :.
... :': . :~ . . . . ·. ', . ' .
.... ·\.~:;.-; .. !· ...
.: : ..
; . . .. ' ~
;._.
. . . : ~: '
. :. .·.
: '
. ,• . :: :~ ~ ... · ~
··>,·.:· .... ·.;·:·. · ..... ·· .. ...... : .. :
• ',•' ',• • '• • • ". ': I ~~: o, .I.,,, •
,'.: ·: :_.· :~~:.' ( '<, ".:::~ ••
' • • ' 1 ' •
1
I : l ,' ' ~
J ;; :·:.\\.: .. ;; , .. i .. .. :"' '• . ~
; ..
. .. :. ~ . ·.
-: .
. ~ ..
... , . . " . ~ ..
... . .. . .
·_, ..
i·
,:.
. . ~ " ..
.. • ~· I'
...
... '
· ....
'!'
. '·
-2
'I
,.·:
..... ·
.. · ..
'>/ >
• . _. : • : ~ . • •. t
. : ... :·· ~ . '
: : I I
".•··: . ..·•:.·
.·, .·
.• •· ,1.,
..::-''
• ~· •• • •• · ~· ! ·1.
. • .. ·.
'" ::: .
. .. '.
t' t
•, •'':.
.. :. -,'.·
'•
· .... · ....
: .. ·:·.
'•:'
. .:·
I • ~· , ..
..
: .·.
: .. ·· .. ··,;
1 . . ..
•
..
; ) • J ..._.:
...
. ;,
Agenda Item #5~·: The General Counsel will discuss this matter under District 7,
"Other Business".
MOTION FOR DISTRICT NO. 7
Motion authorizing and directi~g the Chairman to
execute "~greement R~gardi'.tlg Compensation for
Privately Constructed Sewer" between the District and
Frances G. Wendt and authorizing the payment of
$4,445 to Frances G. Wendt pursuant to the terms of said
agreement from Assessment District No. 6 funds and to
authorize the acceptance of a Quit Claim Deed from
Frances G. Wendt and the recordi~g thereof.
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOI N T BOARDS
REGULAR MEET I NG
Wednesday, August 9, 1967
8:00 p.m.
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Ave nu e
Fountai n Va ll ey, Cal i f., 92708
Te lephones:
Areo Code 71 4
540-2910
962-2411
August 4, 1967
The followi ng is an explanation of the more important non-
ro u tine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to
the agenda s i nce they are made up i mmedia t ely preceding the meeting
but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
J oint Boards
No. 12 -REPORT OF GENERA L MANAGER: I ncluded in the verba l staff
report under this item wi l l be a review of the joint operating
expenses of the District s for the fiscal year just ended . The
Director of Finance i s in the proce s s of c l osing the Districts ' books
for 1966 -67 and pre l iminary figures show that the staff has been
successful in keeping operating expenses to a minimum consistent
with efficient treatment and disposal.
Nos . 14 and 15 -REPORT AND RECOMMENDAT IO NS OF THE EXECUTIVE
COMMI TTEE: The Executive Committee and the Specia l Building Committee
met joint l y again during the evening of August 2 and arrived at
recommendations to the Joint Boards on three separate matters. These
subjects are discussed i n the accompanying written report and recom -
mendations of the Comm i ttee . Consideration of Joint Board action
on these recommendations constitutes the above agenda items.
Nos. 26, 32, 37, 42, 46, 52 and 60 -ADOPI'I ON OF 1967-68 DISTRICT
BUDGETS: On the forma l agenda, consideration of final individual
District budget material appears under the individual District's
business but, for convenience, in this report they are grouped under
this one heading . The norma l procedure in the past has been to adopt
these budgets at the Jul y meeting which, since assessed valuations
are not availab l e that early, has often resulted in a sharp decrease
or increase in the t a x rate . This situation is caused by the fact
that the Districts are unable legally to establish a tax rate per se,
but must submit budget requirements to the Board of Supervisors which
formally sets the rate after the equalized assessment roll is adopted.
In order to avoid fluctuating tax rates, our timetable has been delayed
this year to the extent that fina l budget adoption is taking place
at this meeting, wh e n sem i-f i na l assessed valuations are avai l ab l e,
rather than in J uly.
The Directors will recall that at the June meeting tentative
individual District budget requirements and tax rates were presented
and reviewed by the staff . These budgets had been previously gone
over with the individual district chairmen at the Executive Committee
meeting on June 7. With semi-final assessed valuation figures no w
a vailable, it is possible for the staff to revise the tentative
budget requirements in keeping with the Boards' general policy of
maintaining, where poss ible, a stable or slightly lower tax rate in
the individual Districts . As the Directors are we l l aware, in
connection with their duties with the various cities and sewering
a gencies and the County government, assessed valuation increased in
most areas of the County considerably more than had been expected.
Consequently, the Districts, as wi t h the other agencies, are in a
more favorable position with respect to tax revenue than or i ginally
anticipated. I n the table below this can be seen reflected in a
decrease in the expected tax r ate for all Districts except District
No. 7, which had a sharp drop (4.58 cents ) in tax rate last year,
while at the same time maintaining or increasing reserve funds for
future District facilities construct i on .
Recommended 1967-68 Decrease
District Budget 1966-67 Projected or
Number Reguirements Tax Rate Tax Rate (Increase}
1 $2,639,258 . $ .4518 $ .4468 $ .0050
2 8,029,288 . .4651 .4451 .0200
3 7,417,311 . .4132 .4102 .0030
5 1,201,802 . .2874 .2774 .0100
6 1,116,040 . .2604 .2554 .0050
7 2,072,935 . .4444 .4744 (.0300)*
11 1,812,836 . .4725 .4625 .0100
*Rate dropped .0458 in 1966 -67
At the present time we are in the process of incorporating
the final changes in the recommended detailed budget requirements,
resulting in the totals shown in the above table. Because of lack of
time, i t will not be possible to include this material in this mailing
but the detailed breakdown of recommended requirements and supporting
data will be available f or review and discussion at the Board meet i ng.
No. 16 -CONSIDERATION OF CHANGE I N MEETING HOUR: At the July Joint
Board meeting, there was considerable discussion with respect to
changing the regul ar mee ting hour from 8 :00 p.m. to 7:30 p .m.
Following this discussion, the staff was directed to prepare a reso -
lution amending our Formal Procedures resolution, which amendment
would change the regular meeting hour to 7:30 p .m. Consideration of
this resolution , as attached to the agenda, will therefore allow a
formal vote on this matter .
-2 -
No . 17 -DEFE NSE OF POSSIBLE CROSS COMPLAINTS IN ORANGE COUNTY WATER
DISTR I CT LAWSUIT: We are in receipt of a letter from the Orange
County Water District (copy attached t o age nda), advising the
Districts, as owners of two wa ter wells, that there is a possibility
that defendants in the current Water District suit against the up -
river water extractors will file cross complaints against all water
users in the Orange County Water District. The Water District, in
the event the cross complaints are filed, is offering , by means of
this letter, to defend at no cost the Districts and other Orange
County water users with the Wa ter District's Counsel . According l y,
we are recommending that the offer be accepted and the General Manager
authorized to sign in behalf of the Districts the authorization
requested by the Water District.
No. 18 -PURCHASE OF 30 11 PUMP PARTS: The recommended motion appear-
ing on the agenda under this item would authorize the purchase of
three sets of 30 11 pump impeller wear rings and suction head wear
rings at a total cost of $2,349, plus sales tax and freight. These
parts are to replace worn parts from headworks' pumps which have been
in service for over eight years. The staff has requested quotations
from the orig inal manufacturer of the pumps, the Fairbanks Morse
Pump Division of Colt Industr ies , and has also obtained informal
quotations from custom manufacturers of these parts . It is concluded
that the Fairbanks Morse quota tion is considerably less and therefore
we are requesting authorization to proceed with the purcha se.
No . 19 -ADJUSTMENT OF CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT, JOB NO . P2 -ll, TO
REFLEC T INC REASE IN SALES TAX: We are in receipt of a letter (copy
included in agenda material ) from J. Putnam Be nck , our contractor
for the construction of Headworks 11 c" at Plant No . 2 , requesting that
the Districts give consideration to a bsorbing t he August 1 increase
in sales tax . In t h e case of this contract, the amount involved is
approximately $10,000 . Since we are unaware of any precedent in this
matter, we are suggesting it be referred to the General Counsel for
research and recommendation. It is obvious that a great number of
public agencies in California will be confronted with the same problem
and it seems desira ble t hat a policy consist ent with t hose of other
agencies should be adopted in the case of this contract and possibly
other contract work within the Districts . The State of California
itself will possibly clarify this matter soon with re spect to its
own construction contracts in progress on August 1.
No . 20 -APPROVA L OF PLAINTIFF 'S COMPACT, WESTERN PIPE CASES: The
General Counsel has requested that the a genda include cons ideration of
a resolution appro ving Plaintiff 's Comp ac t . This action is in
connect ion with the present settlement of the Attorney Gen eral 's
antitrust suit against th e pipe manufacturers, wh i ch the Districts
joined and were represented by the Attorney General's office.
District No. 1
No. 23 -MODIFICATION OF ENGINEER'S REPORT FOR DISTRICT FACILIT IES :
_., At the June Bo ard meeting, the District 's engineers, Boyle Engineering,
-3-
were directed to prepare a formal modification to their engineering
report of J uly, 1965 to incorporate addit i onal trunk sewer fac ilities
recently requested by the City of Santa Ana. Before design of these
facilities can proceed, it is necessary to formally approve the
modification report, which is included with the agenda material .
Briefly, the modification provides for the construction of an 18-inch
and 15-inch trunk sewer generally along Fruit Street from Main Street
and thence norther l y on Grand Avenue to 17th Street and a 21 -inch and
18-inch trunk sewer, in Bristol Street, from Myrtle Street to Santa
Clara Avenue.
No . 24 -OFFER OF CITY OF SANTA ANA TO RELIN QUISH MYRTLE STREET SEWER
TO DISTRICT: In connection with the above described modification,
the engineers are recommending that the District acquire, at no cost,
a 24-inch and 21 -inch trunk sewer in Myrtle Street between Bristol
Street and the District's existing Greenville -Sullivan Trunk. This
acquisition is recommended to establish physical continuity in the
District's system when the propo se d Bristol Street Subtrunk Sewer,
as described above, is constructed by the District. We have been
advised that the City Council, at its meet ing on August 7~ will
signify its intention to relinquish this City facility to the District
upon completion of the new construction . This action by the City
Council will be included with the agenda material at the meeting, if
received in time.
No. 25 -REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS FOR ENGINEERING DESIGN WORK : If the
modification of the engineer 's report, described under Item No . 23
above, is approved, it is recommended that the District's engineers
submit proposals for consideration at the September meeting for
engineering design services in order that the recommended construction
projects can proceed without delay .
District No. 2
No. 30 -FORMAL ACT I ON I N CONNECTION WITH ANNEXATION #4 : This
annexation, involving 267,3 acres of Shell Oil Company l and in the
Yorba Linda area, has been considered at previous meetings and the
District's stipulations with respect to the annexation were adopted
at the June meeting . I n compliance with the stipulations, the Shell
Oil Company has deposited the required annexation fees ($66,825) and
has submitted a formal letter (copy inc luded with agenda materia l)
signifying its intention to enter into an agreement with the District
to establish charges for excess was te water disposal through the
District 's system . Since it appears that the Board's requirements
for this annexation have been met, the ac tions ap pearing on the
agenda under this item are recommended . The excess waste water
agreement, incorporating the charges established by the Board, will
be prepared for Board consideration prior to its proposed effective
date, J anuary 1, 1968 .
No . 31 -LICENSE AGREEMENT, CONTRACT NO . 2-10 -6: In connection with
this construction project, now we ll under way, it is necessary in one
location for the contractor 's men to enter private property to
excavate and change the grade of a house lateral serving the property .
-4-
For this reason , the Gene r al Couns e l has prepared an agreement between
the property owner and the District granting us a license to encroach
on the property and consenting to a change in the grade of the lateral
sewer . It is recommende d t hat t he motion appearing on the agenda,
authoriz i ng the signing of th i s agr eement, be adopted.
District No . ~
No . 36 -REPAIR OF WESTSI DE FORCE MA I N:
status report on t his subject, which is
District No . 3. The items appear i ng on
are explained in detail in the report .
Districts Nos. 5 and 6
The s t aff has prepared a ·
enclosed fo r the Directors of
the agenda under this number
No . 41 -ROCKY PO I NT PUMP STATION EASEMENT MAT TER : The Directors
will reca l l that at t he J u ne meeting the question was raised as to
whether the existing Rocky Point Pump Stat i on was actually constructed
within the easement owned by Distri cts Nos . 5 and 6 . This question
arose in connect i on with a s light e n croachme nt of t he new Balboa Bay
Club bui l ding over a portion of the easement.
In 1965 the archit ects for the Bay Cl ub sent us a letter
stating t hat their survey had disclosed that the pump s t ation was not
located entirely within the existing District easement . I n order to
clear the record, we requested that the Bay Cl ub re-stud y the
situation and on July 14 we received a letter from the Club's
surveyor certifying that the pump station is within the easement as
shown by further survey dated J une 16, 1967 . To complete the record,
it is recommended that the surveyor 's letter be received and filed .
District No . 7
No . 50 -SETTLEMENT WITH PROPERTY OWNER IN ASSESSMENT DI STR I CT #6 :
At the J une meeting, the Board approved sett lements with all but one
of the property owners involved to cover the cost of da ma ge to
property and incomplet e work in Assessment Di s trict #6. The final
settlement h as now been reached and it is recommended that the motio n,
appearing on the agenda under this item, be adopted.
District No . 11
No . 56 -RECE IVE AND FILE NO TI CES TO WITHHOLD AND NOTICE OF PROCEED -
INGS , CONTRACT NO. 11-10-2 : Two additional notices to withhold pay-
ments, received from subcontractors and material sup pliers on this
contract, have been submitted and it is recommended that they be
made a part of the record. In addi tion, the International Testing
Corporation has filed a legal Notice of Proceedings, which should be
similarly handled and referred to the General Counsel .
Nos . 58 and 59 -COMPLE TION AND ACC EPT ANCE OF CONTRACT NO . 11 -10-2:
This c~n~ract with the Lomar Corporation and Orange County Pipeline,
Inc ., Joint venture, is now ready for acceptance, as the necessary
-5 -
clearances from the City of Huntington Beach and the Telephone
Company have been obtained or are in the process of being obtained.
Problems in connection with this project have been discussed in pre-
vious meetings but a delay in accepting the work was recommended
pending receipt of the above -mentioned clearances. In order to
complete the necessary formalities and to release retained funds,
we are recommending the actions appearing on the agenda under these
items.
Item No . 58 is the approval of Change Orders Nos. 1 and 2.
Change Order No. 1 is the customary adjustment of quantities to change
the original contract price to reflect differences in amounts in-
stalled over those originally estimated . I n the case of this project,
t his results in a deduction of $109.80 from the original contract
amount. Change Order No. 2 is the granting of an extension of time
for the reasons shown on the formal change order attached to the
agenda, and as agreed upon at the May 31 adjourned Board meeting .
Item No. 59 is the customary formal resolution accepting the
work as of August 4, 1967 and authorizing filing of a Notice of
Completion.
-6-
Fred A . Harper
General Manager
COU NTY S ANI TATIO N DISTRICTS
of O RA NGE C OU NTY , C ALI FORN IA
Aug us t 4 , 1967
P. 0. BOX 51 75
10844 ELLIS AVEN UE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALI FORNIA , 92 708
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
August 2, 1967
EX~CUTIVE COMMITTEE
PRESENT : Directors Parsons (Cha irman ), McMichae l , Spe er ,
Porter , and Culver
ABSEN~: Directors Baker , Miller , and Sh i p l ey
BUILDING COMMITTEE
?RESENT : Directors Parsons, Culver , and Sc hwe r dt f ege r
ABSENT : Director Miller (Chairman )
OTHERS PRESENT : Directors Gruber and Ho c k
Convened :
Adjourned :
5 :30 p .m.
8 :25 p .m.
Fred A. Harper, Paul G. Brown , No ::::'ma n
R. Tremblay, Willard T . J or dan , Ke n
Doyle , and Howard Way
* ~.<-·X· ·X· * * ·X--X· 7:· * ·X-·X-* ·X-
1 . MASTER PLAN FOR IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF TREATMENT
PLA~T NO . 2.
At the regular meeting held April 12th , the Districts 1
Boa~ds of Directors accepted the proposal of Wi l lard T .
Jorda~. Archi tect, for architectural services for deve :oping
a ;.~aster Plan for improving the appearance of the Dis-cr:..ct s 1
Treatment Plant No . 2 . Since then the Executive Commit-cee
and Building Committee have met jointl y on num erous occasions
with the Arch:'...te c t and his associates t o develop a n accept -
ab~e program for the Districts wh i ch wo u ld g r eat l y improve
t~e appearance of Tr eatment Plant No . 2 , and wou ld be
economically within the Districts ' capabilities a nd po l i c ies .
The Exec u tive Committee and Bui l d ing Comm ittee jointly
recorn~end to the Boards of Directors that the enclose d Mas~e r
Plan ror Plant No . 2 be approved and adopted .
2 .
The Com:n:_ "C~ees fur-c~er :r·eco:n:r;ie:id that the f'ollo•1::_r:.g
actions be ta~en by the Boards of Directors to implement
~he Master Plan :
Landscaolng
a . Tnat the D:stricts proceed immediately with
Phases 1 and 3 as outlined in the Master Plan ,
plus the planting of trees on that portion o ~
the Districts r property bordering the Santa Ana
Ri ver (a portion of Phase 2 of the Plan ).
b . T~at t~e Districts request a proposal fro~
Willard T. Jordan, Archi~ect , for the prepara -
~ion cf detailed plans ~nd specifications for
the implemen-cation of Landscaping Phases l and
3 , etc .
c . Tnat-the major ~·rnr-:< included in Phase 2 of
Landscaping be delayed un t il the completion
of tne proposed equ:.pment enclosur es .
Architecture
a . ~hat the Districts proceed with the construction
o f Buildings A through E as ou tlined in the
Master Plan (1967 -68 budget -Project No . 2072 ).
b . That John Carollo Engineers be directed to
proceed with the preparation of plans and
specif .:.cat:.ons ::or· -che construction of Bu::.:d:ngs
A through E . This work to be coordinated with
Ar·chi tee -cural Design Consultant , Willard T .
Jordan .
The current plant construction budget provides $220,000
for site improvements and equipment enclosures at Plant No . 2.
The Architect 's total estimate, including the buildings and
all phases of landscaping , is $144,276 . ~he staff anticipates
an expenditure for additional pav::.ng and improved draina;e
facilities d u ring tne 1968 -69 fiscal year, but the ~otal ex-
penditure should not exceed the budgeted amount .
Tne Com~ittee has requested that Mr. Jordan attend ~he
Joint Boar·d rr.eeting to review his recommendations and present
dra~ings a~d sketches of the proposed improvements . The
proposed Master Plan and related cost estimates are enclosed
~o r tte D:rec~ors ' study .
2 . C~OSEOUT OF JOB NO. P2 -7A TURBINE -GENERATOR SET NO . 1 , PLAN~
NO . ? .
Staff ReDort -The Districts have re t ained the amoun t of
$46 ,074 .60 f r om f u nds due the con tracto r, p e nding the sati s f a c t ory
? .) .
perfo~rn,nce of the sludge gas turbine and heat recovery unit .
In ou:" :.as~ discussio!ls with representatives o:' Orenda , Inc . ,
and ~h~·~ subcontractor who suppl::..ed the heat recovery u -~
(Engineering Controls), we were unable to resolve substantial
dollar d::.f~erences . Tne equipment is now acceptable , and the
amou~ t o:' the :"ina::. payrr.ent must be determined .
:Jor?nan Tremblay, the D::.str·::..c-cs' Construction Enginee~·,
revie\:c:::d for the Committee members the extensive discuss:.ons
and negotiations conducted by the staff with the representatives
of -~e e~uipment supplier rega~ding a back-charge by the
D::..s'tricts in tne amount of $9 ,988 .00 for modificat::..ons and
revisions in the installation of the -curbine generator equ i p -
:nen-:; .
. The equipment supplier countered wi th additional charges
f $-2 79-2l.i . . h t' ., . ., t d ... , . "". . o ~ , ?· ., wn~c . ney c_a~m ~esu_ e _rom :noa~I~cat~ons
no~ included in the speci:'ications, ~na the lack of proper
water treatment of the boiler water during preliminary test i ng
sta~es . (The General Counsel ~as advised the staff that
eit!':er claim would be d i fficult to support from a legal sta~d
po::..nt . )
Committee Recommendat~on -Following a Jengthy discussion
with th~ ntaJ.·J.·, the Commi tt88 r(;;commr:ndc that the c:lrJ.:.mr; hy
the Di.<' r·l<:t · c. the cla ·mr; by tni:-, 1uinm nt ·uool ·er· b ci!'f-
sct , ·:! i th no dollar-excr1an, ·e, ::i.nd that the General ·~anager oe
author~zed tc execute and !'orwa~d to the equioment suoplier
the ~e ter -a~reement prepared by the General Counsel and
inc~uded with the agenda under Item No . 15 , setting forth
the co~ditions for final payment.
3 . EST.C\BLISHING CLASSIFICATION OF SENIOR ACCOUNTING TECHl\TICIAN .
St,_t.:' Report -At the present time, the Districts 1
position or' Accountant is vacan-c and we have encountered difficu l ty
:.n secur~ng an applicant qualified to ~ill it . ~e have also
di~co\ered that other public agenc~es in Orange County , and
throughout the State , are having the same problem . Several of
the agencies have found it necessary t o go out of state to fil l
t!·.e.:.r positions .
~o allev i a-ce this situation the staf.:' is recornrnending
tha-c the class i fication of Senior Accounting Technician
be established as an intermediate leve l accounting position .
~~th this ne~ classifica-cion , in the eve~t qualified applicant s
are no-c avai:able to fill the position of Accountan't , ~he
~lexibility derived from the recently adopted positions -
person;.el concept will permit -che staff to fill the Sen:.or
Accounting Technician position, at a lower salar y , wi th an
applicant who has not yet completed the requirements of the
Acccun~ant position .
It s~ould be noted that the recommendation is for 'the
aduit~on of the classification only , and not for add i tional
pe~·sonnel .
....,,.
4 .
Committee Recommendation -In view of the difficulty
encountered oy the starf in securing an applicant ~ualified
to flll the position of Accountant, the Executive Committee
recommends that a classification of Senior Accountin~
Technician be established . This is in keeping with the
recently adopted positions -personnel concept .
II
-
0A-Harper
BO ARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175
of Orange Coun ty, California 10844 Ell is Avenu e
Fountain Valley, Ca l if., 92708
(1 )
( 2 )
( 3 )
( 4 )
(5 )
(6 )
(7 )
(8 )
(9 )
(10 )
(11 )
(12)
( i3)
JOINT BOARDS
A GE ND A
August 9tll, 1967 -8:00 p.m .
Pledge of Allegiance
Roll Call
Appointments of Cnairmen pro tern , if necessary
DISTR I CT 1
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held July 12, 1967, as mailed
DI STRICT 2
Considerat i o n of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held July 12, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held July 12 , 1967, as mai l ed
DI STR I CT 5 ~...._._
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular /d
meeting held July 1 2 , 1967 , as mailed
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held July 12 , 1967, as mailed
DI STRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving minutes o f the regul ar
meeting held July 12 , 1967, as mailed
DI STRICT 11
Consideration of motion appro v ing minutes of the regul ar
meeting held July 12 , 1967 , as mailed
ALL DI STRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTR I CTS
Report of the General Manager
AL L DISTRICTS
Report of toe General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee and Building Committee
(14)
(15)
A. Presentation by Willard T. Jordan, Architect, ~ ')0"1L
of proposed Master Plan for improving the /
appearance of Treatment Plant No. 2
B. Consideration of motion adopting Master Plan p !-;-~
as recommended by the Executive and Building V-"' p
Committees
C. Consideration of motion accepting recommendation
of the Committees, and ordering implementation
of the Master Plan for Improving the Appearance of
Treatment Plant No. 2, as follows:
Landscaping
a. That the Districts proceed immediately
with Phases 1 and 3 as outlined in
the Master Plan, plus the planting
of trees on that portion of the
Districts' property bordering
the Santa Ana River (a portion
of Phase 2 of the Plan).
b. That the Districts request a
proposal from Willard T. Jordan,
Architect, for the preparation
of detailed plans and specifi-
cations for the implementation
of Landscaping Phases 1 and 3,
etc.
c. That the major work included in
Phase 2 of Landscaping be delayed
until the completion of the pro-
posed equipment enclosures(Bldgs. A -E).
Architecture
a. That the Districts proceed with
the construction of Buildings
A through E as outlined in the
Master Plan (1967-68 budget -
Project No. 2072).
b. That John Carollo Engineers be
directed to proceed with the
preparation of plans and speci-
fications for the construction
of Buildings A through E. This
work to be coordinated with
Architectural Design Consultant,
Willard T. Jordan.
A.. Consideration of Resolution No. 67-85, regarding
completion of Job No. P2-7A, and authorizing the
General Manager to execute a letter-agreement Ai~
prepared by the General Counsel, with the equip-l/~~u Q~
ment supplier, setting forth the conditions for /?~-
final payment (as recommended by the Executive -,
Committee). See pages ''F" and "G"
-2-
"..,_/
~
(16)
B.
c.
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-86, amending ~~~
Resolution No. 67-66, establishing the classifica-~~~~~
tion of Senior Accounting Technician (as recommended~~
by the Executive Committee). See pages "H" and
"I"
Consideration of motion to receive and file the ~ J,..A/'--
written report of the Executive Committee ~v
ALL DISTRICTS ~
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-79, amending
Resolution No. 64-3, as amended, changing the hour of
the Joint Board meetings from 8:00 p.m., to 7:30 p.m. Y~ p~
See page "J" ~
(17) ALL DISTRICTS
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
the Orange County Water District offering to defend the ~
Sanitation Districts, at no cost, in the event cross /1
complaints are filed in the Water District's lawsuit ufr'~ A~
against certain water extractors; and authorizing the ~Q
General Manager to execute all documents necessary in
this connection. See page "K" -
ALL DISTRICTS K
Consideration of motion authorizing purchase of pump
~arts from Fairbanks Morse, in the total amount of ~. J--
$2, 349.00 plus sales tax and freight. VV"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
J. Putnam Henck, Contractor on Job No. P2-ll, requesting
that the Districts absorb the August 1st increase in
sales tax; and refer the matter to the General Counsel.
See page "L"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-87, approving Plaintiffs'
Compact, Western pipe cases, as recommended by the General
Counsel. See page "GG"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that he
recommends authorization for payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
books, and authorizing pa~ent of claims listed on pages
"A" , "B 11 , and 11 c11
DISTRICT l
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-80-1, to receive and file
report of Boyle Engineering, and approving Modification~
No. 2 to the Engineers' Report dated July, 1965. See '
pages "M" and "N" l"i?:)Y
-3-
(?4)
(25)
(26)
_(?8)
(29)
{30)
(31)
(32)
{33)
(34) .,..
(35)
(36)
DISTRICT 1 I
Consideration of motion to receive and file communication
from the City of Santa Ana offering to convey to the ~
District, ownership of a 24-inch and 21-inch trunk sewer\{t
in Myrtle Street. See page "O"
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion requesting that Boyle Engineering,
District's Engineers, submit a proposal for design services \J)f-
required by Modification No. 2 of the July, 1965 ~oJ'.~~
Engineers' Report '<(~
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion ar.proving budget for-the 1967-68
fiscal year. See page 1 P 11 (Budget in folders)
DISTRICT 1
~motion
~_.£:__
DISTRICT l
Other business and communications, if any
if' any • :3ee
DISTRICT l ~~
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment r,71 O
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
Shell Oil Company declaring intent to enter into an
agreement with the District relative to disposal of
excess waste water through the District's system; and
authorizing the General Manager to acknowledge receipt
of said letter.
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-81-2, ordering
annexation to the District of certain land owned by Shell
Oil Company. See pages "Q" and "R"
·DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager
to execute an Encroachment Permit in connection with
construction of the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No.
2-10-6.
DISTRICT 2
Oonsideration of motion
fiscal year. See page
~~
approving budget for the 1967-68 \~-~\}'(
"S" (Budget in folders) !),</"~\\
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
DISTRICT 2 /1 JI . -/ {),;/_
Other business and communications, if any~/""'~(}Ja/.4 •
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 3 ?(µ/'~
Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file ~r ~~
Status Report submitted by the staff regarding repair ~
of the Westside Force Main; and authorizing issuance of
a purchase order to Pacific Pipeline Construction Co.,
in the amount of $7,873.00, for installation of approximately
146 ft. of 20 11 epoxy-lined, cement-asbestos pipe under the
Bolsa Chica off-ramp at the San Diego Freeway. (Status
Report in Folders).
-4-
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion app,roving budget for the 1967-68 ~
fiscal year. See page "T' (Budget in folders) ~ ~
DISTRICT 3 ~~
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 3 t\Y~~
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment i ', 1
DISTRICTS 5 and 6 ;rt
Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from
the surveyors employed by Balboa Bay Club, Inc., certifying ·I~
that the Rocky Point Pumping Station is within the · ~6f'F
Districts' easement. See page "u" /
DISTRICT 5 kt
Consideration of motion a~proving budget for the 1967-68
fiscal year. See page V" (Budget in folders) ~Y
DISj'RICT 5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 5 (Motion approving
Other business and communications, if any revised de~cription & map, Irvine annexa-
DISIRICT 5 tion)
C -~~ onsideration of motion re: Adjournment g ,
1
'-{ .l r
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion aRproving budget for the 1967-68
fiscal year. See page W" (Budget in folders)
DISTRICT 6
Consider.a;~~-01:"'""'1110'=&
pa 'E 11
DISTRICT 6
approving warrants, if an •
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 7 ~ Consideration of motion approving settlement with Refugio
Cortez for property damage incurred during construction ~ l.ua
in Assessment District No. 6, and authorizing payment in ./)~-
the amount of $80 upon receipt of a signed release as ~
prepared by the Assessment District Counsel.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolutions Nos. 67-82-7 and 67-83-7,
authorizing acceptance of easements, at no cost to the
District~ relative to Assessment District No. 1. See
pages "X" and "Y"
-5-
•
(52) DISTRICT 7
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
(61)
(62)
(63)
Consideration of motion aR.proving budget for the 1967-68
fiscal year. See page 'Z" (Budget in folders)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See \.~
page "E
11 ~~·-
DISTPICT 1. (a. Motion approving P
.... 07:h'Etr business and communications, if any abgmtR. wilthtiF • Wendt . eso u on accept-
DISTRJCT 7 ing easement at no
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment cost {Irvine)
DISTRICT 11
i ',:)o~"'
-COnsider~f.ion of motion to receive and file the following,
in connection with Contract No. 11-10-2 (Slater Avenue /
Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue Sewage Pumping Station and
Force Main Sewer):
/ Notice to Withhold International $ 836.00
Testing Corp.
Notice to Withhold Valves, Inc. $ 1,643.50
Notice of Proceedings International
Testing Corp.
DISTRICT 11
-Consideration of motion to receive and file letters from ·9
the City of Huntington Beach and General Telephone Company, ~..k{)j
releasin~ the Contractor on Contract No. 11-10-2. See
pages -~Land :'BB" '\I
DISTRICT lJ. Con .. ~1d.era"t.ion of motion approving Change Orders 1 and 2
to Contra.ct Noo 11-10-2, adjusting engineers' quantities
and granting an extension of time to the Contractor. , ~~
See pages 11 CCli and "DD" C;fl'
1'ISTH1CT 11 ~
Co:1s:Cderation of Resolutj.on No. 67-84-11, accepting ~~
Contract No. 11-10-2 as complete, and authorizing the
filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page /
"EE:_
DI8'1;RT.CT 11 ~
Uon-61.·a-e?&-.~ion of motion approvin~ budget for the 1967-68 y ~ . ]/tr*
fiscal year. See page ~;F~'---tBudget in folders) CPf-
DIS'J:'RICT 11
C0n£{der&~i'ion of motion approving warrants, if any.
pacre "E 11
t::J ,...._......_.....,__,
DIS'!'RI~T 11
-Ot"her~usiness and communications, if any
DISTRICT 11
Con~ioeration of motion re: Adjournment
-6-
~-
l96t '6 .r.snunv
S.LN~wnooa ONLLHOdctflS aNV SNOI.tn~os~H
'· ~-:~-··i
. ·-·
., --~
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NOo .mJi'AVOR OF AMOUNT
.....; 7830 A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies $ 112.32 7831 Advance Electric, Electric Motor Repair 54.16 7832 City of Anaheim, Power 32.56
7833 Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts 22.46
7834 Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Repairs 50.00
7835 The Anchor Packing Coo, Insulation, Gaskets 235.04 7836 Angeles Welding & Mfg., Inco, Muffler Repair 35.36 7837 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 159.44 7838 Barnes Delaney, Tubes for Gasket Material 120.06
7839 Bascom Rush Co., Truck Parts 87.77 7840 Bay City Bearing Co., Equipment Parts 617.13 7841 Blower Paper co., Janitor Supplies 205.09
7842 Blue Ribbon Cleaners, Clean Drapes 41.30
7843 Bradfield Mfg., Modify Tank 66.68
7844 Charles Bruning Co., Reproduction Supplies 132.28
7845 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Elect. Supplies 498.45 7846 Certified Building Materials, Cement 34. 0
7847 Chem-Star Mfge Co., Electric Supplies 11.13
7848 Clark Dye Hardware, Hardware 20.01
7849 College Lumber Coo, Inc., Lumber, Small Hardware 140.15
7850 Collier-Macmillan Dist., Training Material 3.80
"" 7851 Consolidated Electrical Disto 1 Elect. Supplies 109.10
_,,._ 7852 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Truck Parts & Tools 260.84
7853 Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repairs 161.45
7854 Diesel And Gas Turbine, Technical Journal 20.00
7855 Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Equip. Repairs a.oo
7856 Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitor & Install Diff. 11,540.00
7857 Enterprise Printing co., Printing 161.97
7858 J. Fair Tire Coo, Tubes for Gasket Material 18.72
7859 Filter Supply & Service Coe, Filter Equipo 454.23
7860 Fischer & Porter Coo, Instrumentation Repairs 456.42
7861 Flair Drafting Service, Drafting Service 486.oo
7862 Garden Grove Camera Center, Equip. & Supplies 166.87
7863 Garvin's Paint & Body Shop, Truck Repairs 79.00
7864 General Telephone Coe 229.90
7865 Gentry Cesspool Service, Sewer Repairs 238.00
7866 Goodall Rubber Coo, Hose 65.74
7867 B. F. Goodrich Co., Tires 123.57
7868 Bob Gosche Coo, Small Hardware 55.67
7869 3 G1 s Concrete,. Dist. #7 Repairs 535.80
7870 George To Hall Co., Inc., Controls 113.68
7871 Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Auditing 658.00
7872 Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses 38.18
7873 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Chlor. Parts 15.02
7874 James E. Hilborn, Employee Mileage 10.00
7875 Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation Repairs 910.90
7876 Howard Supply Coo 1 Piping Supplies 610.48
7877 City of Huntington Beach, Water 7.30
7878 IBM Corporation, Office Supplies 51075
7879 International Harvester Coo, Truck Parts 160.76
7880 Jensen Instrument Co., Controls 74.67
.,I 7881 Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine 28,953.60
7882 J & T Equipment co., Small Hardware 41.98
7883 Keeler Advertising Specialties, Dists. Emblems 121.26
7884 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Piping Supplies 545.02
7885 Kerona, Inc., Diffuser Pipe 7,941.40
7886 Knox Industrial Supplies, Hose 144.52
7887 Anthony J. Lauricha, Employee Mileage 6.40
7888 Lawless GM Diesel, Engine Parts 175.97
-A-
WARRANT NO.
7889
7890
7891
7892
7893
7894
7895
7896
7897
7898
7899
7900
7901
7902
7903
7904
7905
7906
7907
7908
7909
7910
7911
7912
7913
7914
7915
7916
7917
7918
7919
7920
7921
7922
7923
7924
7925
7926
7927
7928
7929
7930
7931
7932
7933
7934
7935
7936
7937
7938
7939
7940
7941
7942
7943
7944
7945
7946
7947
7948
m FAVOR OF
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supplies, Hardware $
Judy Lee, Employee Mileage
Litton Business Equip. Center, Office Supplies
Los Angeles Times, Employment Ads
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental
Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work
Main Photo Service, Photo Finishing
Manufacturer's Serv., Inc., Turbine Mtce. Supp.
McCoy Ford, New Truck
McCoy Motor Co., Tractor Parts
Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges
Milam 1 s Electric Motor Service# Motor Repairs
Mine Safety Appliances Co., Safety Equip.
J. R. E. Morden, M.D., Employee Medical Exam
Morrison Co., Valves & Fittings
Motor Rim & Wheel Serv., Axle Accessory
Munselle Supply Co., Welding Supplies
Nalco Chemical Co., Boiler Consultant
Nates Saw & Lawnmower Shop, Tool Repairs
The National Cash Register Co., Accounting Forms
National Lead Co., Paint Supplies c. M, Nelson Agency, Insurance
Neptune Meter Co., Water Meter
City of Newport Beach, Water c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel Retainer Fee
Noland Paper Co., Reproduction Supplies o. c. Suppliers, Inc., Valves, Fittings
Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc.,
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Orenda Engines, Inc,, Parts
Pacific Telephone Co.
Plou Cement Pipe Co., Pipeline Repairs
Postmaster, Postage
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Test Equipment
Rams Express, Freight
Red's Frame, Wheel & Brake Serv., Truck Repair
The Register, Employment Ad
Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co., Steel Stock
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Parts
Santa Ana Electronics co., Electrical Parts
E. H. Sargent & Coo, Lab Supplies
The Scam Instrument Corp., Electrical Supplies
SCM Corp., Office Equip. Mtce.
Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage
Select Nurseries, Inc., Plants
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies
Sibal Engineering Co., Inc., Compressor Parts
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Southern Calif. Water Co,
Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses
Southern Calif. Edison Co.
Southern Counties Gas Co.
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Truck Parts
Spencer Sheet Metal Shop, Electrical Panels
Standard 011 Co. of Calif., Engine Oil
Superior Upholstering, Furniture Repair
Synchro-Start Products, Governors
Tardif Sheet Metal, Control Panels
Thermowells, Inc., Controls
-B-
AMOUNT
572.63
19.40
118.87
558.77
755.40
232.95
60.84
15.44
1,793.08
18.88
36.45
100.92
102.00
13.00
101.43
510.74
63.10
112.50
9.00
229.09
20.57
33.00
144.35
75.88
700.00
273.31
231.72
411.35
10.22
299.00
161.70
28.00
100.00
196.56
4.15
12.43
117.42
357.24
307.30
29.58
197.74
209.04
235.60
42.00
37.30
146.64
163.88
175.97
27.80
3.90
9.83
l0,882.95
1,201.43
346.32
284.58
701.57
42.00
147.60
184.08
43.46
WARRANT NO.
7949
7950
7951
7952
7953
7954
't.955
7956
7957
7958
7959
7960
7961
7962
7963
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
c. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed 011 $ 120.54
174.oo
124.43
Tiernan 1 s Office Equip., Office Equip. Mtc. Agmt.
Wagoner Maintenance & Janitor, Janitor Supplies
Wallace Trade Bindery Co., Office Supplies 6076.
224.70
7 .50 -
101.93
565.96
1.25
1,296.67
384.44
John R. Waples R.s., Odor Consultant
Water & Sewage Works, Technical Publication
Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts
Welch's Concrete, Concrete
City of Westminster, Water
Woodward Governor Co., Governor Repairs
Xerox Corp., Reproduction Charges
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bank of America NT&SA
Assignee of Vinnell Corporation
John Carollo Engineers
J. Putnam Henck
Orenda Inc.
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
-c-
$ 85,462.07
$ 65,962.00
15,707.16
50,321.22
37,214.12
$ 169,204.50
$ 254,666.57
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
""-" WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
7964 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,516.00
7965 Industrial Pipeline Construction 12,940.00
7966 M. P. Mitrovich 14,270.20
7967 Vido ~q Company 64,116.22
S.-1 ;l cu./y~
~ 922842.42
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7968 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,187.25
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN.FAVOR OF
7979 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,695.00
$ 2,882.25
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7980 City of Newport Beach $ 484.oo
-D-
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
"._/ WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
7969 Aladdin Lithe & Art $ 225.74
7970 Boyle and Lowry 135.00
7971 Refugio Cortez and Josephine Cortez 80.00
7972 Enterprise Printing Co. 71.31
7973 County of Orange 41.75
7974 Southern California Edison Company 13:00
7975 Southern California Edison Company 18:61
7976 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 64.27
$ 649.68
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7977 Boyle & Lowry ~ 4,760.50
~ 5,410.18
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7978 Lowry & Associates $ 2,040.00
-E-
..•
Hawker Siddcley Canada Ltd.
7 King Street East
Toronto l
Ontario, Canada
Attention Mr. L. D. Dwyer
Purchasing Analysis Coordinator ..
Re: Orenda, Inc.
Contract P-277a
County sanitation District No. l of
Orange county, California
Gentlemen:
With reference to the final close-out and payment of the
balance due on the subject contract, I am authorized to propose
the following terms of compromise and understanding, most of
which have been discussed and tentatively agreed upon:
l. The District has, on July 14, 1967, accepted the
equipment supplied and work performed under the contract as in
satisfactory condition and in compliance with specifications.
2. The District will pay to Orenda, Inc~, the s~m of
$37,214.12 which is the sum of $46,074.60 less applicable sales
ta:x: in the sum of $8,860.48 which the District agreed to pay for
Orenda, Inc., by deducting said sum from the contract balance
due.
3. The following equipment warranties shall be es-
tablished as acceptable to all parties concerned:
a. Boiler control for ninety days from April 11,
1967.
b. All condensate returns and boiler feed system
for ninety days from April 11, 1967.
c. Water circulating pumps for ninety days £row
a date, which date is sixty days after the successiul opera-
tion of said pumps without down-time due to rnalfu~ction
(in this connection they have been successfully operating
without down-time from July 12, 1967 to date).
d. The heat recovery unit (boiler) for one year
from April 11, 1967.
.•.·
~. ..
.· .. . ..
{; I .··
F-1 All Dist~icts
......
2.
4. By accepting the payment of money proposed to be
paid, all claims arising out of the subject contract and modi-
fications there~~ against the District and its agents and employees
·are to be d~emed 'satisfied in full and each party does release
the other from all further duties, obligations and liabilities
except as to the warranties hereinabove set forth.
If this embodies all of the terms of an acceptable compliance
and close-out agreement of the subject contract, please sign a
copy of this letter and return it to me at your earliest con-
venience and the balance due will be forwarded upon receipt
of your signed copy •
. Thank you for your 9onsideration and cooperation in this drawn
out and complicat_ed transaction ....
Yours·very truly,
HAWKER SIDDELEY CANADA LTD.
By
Title: .•
Dated:
. . . :.~ ... \ : . : .· . . .....
• ; I ', ... · ..... .. · ... :.:L.' .
. , .:···-...
l. • ••••
~ ..... : · .. · .,
\. I ·._.
Arrenda Item /115 F-2 All Districts ·
RESOLUTION NO. 67-85
APPROVING CLOSEOUT AGREEMENT (P2-7A)
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING FINAL CLOSE-
OUT AGREEMENT RELATIVE TO THE COMPLETION
OF JOB NO. P2-7A
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain letter-agreement prepared
by the Districts' General Counsel, setting forth the terms of
compromise and understanding relative to the final close-out of
Contract No. P2-7A (TURBINE GENERATOR SET NO. l, PLANT NO. 2), is
hereby approved as recommended by the Districts' Executive Committee;
and,
Section 2. That as set forth in said letter-agreement,
the District will pay to Orenda, Inc., the sum of $37,214.22 which
is the sum of $46,074.60 less applicable sales tax in the sum of
$8,860.48 which the District agreed to pay for Orenda, Inc., by
deducting said sum from the contract balance due; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager is hereby authorized
and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the Districts;
and,
Section 4. That the payment set forth in Section 2 is
to be made to Orenda, Inc., upon receipt by the Districts of the
executed letter-agreement acknowledging the conditions set forth
therein; and,
Section 5. That there will be no liquidated damages
assessed in connection with this work as the Districts have, through
modifications, contributed to the delays encountered during the course
of the contract.
Agenda Item #15-A -G-All Districts
Definition:
Duties:
Qualifications:
SEr~IOR ACCOUXTII'TG S:ECHHICIAN
Range l~2.
51~5-6Tl
~ "--., .J..., 9or7 i~ugus v .t.,
Under direction of the Director of Finance to
Derform accounting functions in the maintenance
of the general accounting, budget, and cost systems
of the Districts, and to do othe~ work as required.
(1) To maintain the Districts 1 journals and
ledgers.
(2) To reconcile account balances with County
records.
(3) To prepare payrolls and related reports.
( 4-) To accumulate cost data and maintain work
order journals on all material and labor expenses.
(5) To process claims for payment.
(6) To prepara work sheets and reports derived
from the foregoing functions.
(7) To perform other related duties as assigned.
( l) Combination O'I.... education and ex~oerience equi va-
lent to completion of two years of college or univer-
sity work with emphasis in business and accounting.
(2) Knowledge of accounting principles and office
methods.
(3) Ability to prepare financial and statistical
reports.
(4) An understanding of local government fiscal
affairs.
(5) It is desirable that a continuing effort is
being made toward a baccalaureate degree in account-
ing from an accredited institution.
-H· .. AJ.l Distr:l.cts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-86
AMENDING SALARY RESOLUTION
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 67-66 {POSITIONS AND SALARIES)
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 2, Subsection A, of Resolution
No. 67-66 is hereby amended by the addition thereto of one position
of employment effective August 9, 1967, as follows:
ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL
Number of
Positions Classification
Salary and
Range Number
l Senior Accounting Technician 545/677 42
Section 2. That any other resolutions or motions or
portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby repealed and made
of no further effect; and,
Section 3. That the establishment of the position of
Senior Accounting Technician in accordance with the Districts'
positions-personnel concept is in no way to be construed as
authorization for employing additional personnel.
Agenda Item #15-B -I-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-79
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64-3, AS AMENDED
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64-3 (RULES OF PRO-
CEDURE FOR MEETINGS), AS AMENDED
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Paragraph 1 of Section B of Resolution
No. 64-3, adopted by the Boards of Directors on January 8, 1964,
and amended on May 10, 1967, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"1. REGULAR MEETINGS -There shall be a regular monthly
meeting of the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation
Districts of Orange County, parties to the Joint Ownership,
Operation and Construction Agreement dated October 8, 1958,
as amended, on the second Wednesday of every month at 7:30
p.m., in the Joint Administrative offices of the Districts
at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, provided
however, if the second Wednesday of the month falls upon a
legal holiday, said monthly meeting shall be held on the
next day thereafter, at the same time and place.
The Secretary shall mail to each Director a notice of
such regular meetings, together with a proposed agenda, not
later than the Friday immediately preceding such regular
meetings. Said agenda, insofar as possible, shall include
copies of resolutions and motions to be considered, together
with any pertinent supporting documents.
The Board of Directors may adjourn any regular, adjourned
regular, special or adjourned special meeting to a time and
place specified in the order of adjournment."
Agenda Item #16 J-1 All Districts
..
Section 2. That any other resolutions or motions, or
portions thereof, in conflict with this resolution are hereby
rescinoed and made of no further effect.
Agenda Item #16 J-2 All Districts
hi:~t,\" i·. ~..:~Ui~':'HOM. t·1.~:.•":" Vu:.: Pi~c:;&OCNT
C-."u.,;:-.:.:\' H. Ct1A:-..i.)1.C11. :..:1.~.:>N;) VIC~ rHi::>IOCNT-
HOWAH;J W. ~n-."IO'<C. ::;::.::l'iL l'AUV MANAGCH
L.A1'0COON W. OWCN. ;:>1::>iUICT LNC:.INtCH
PILLSDURY, MAl::\l!".0:-.0 At>i:l S\JTtiO
SPtc1t.1. cour-;s::L.
Wll •. LIAM C. OA1'1':<:Mi:'l'Cll
CPCCIAI. COUN!#CI.
DllfL:CTClrl!O
1•111.~";"C1/l r<. AL.t.I t:, AUAtl£.11-:
COUHTl•l:Y H. c11.1111r1:..i.;;c, !.>.lliA """
HOWl\lc(J , ... C"llrl'lll~L.L, Fv:..L.LFlTOll
~·· L<'luu. LA1<1:. COAllDCU C.1!(.Vt.
CllAICL.1:~ A. f•CAll~C.U, At4Alll:IM
HOV !.t;l.l.l/llOC.r., >IUtl'tlNGTCJN 11::1\CH
llCtlll'( T. St.Gl:H!.THOM, GA:o'7'A ANA
M£AWIN VIAGNCR. Pl.ACCNTIA.
MINOR VIMHlC. TU!OTIN
£. 1', W"TSON, 01'{,,.NGC
CONr.ULTING l:NCINCCRS: 0 nA ,. I Gr
,.,:wrs l:N~INl:CnlfH;. INC. ~\ d\! -t
t\0.::>1·0•\AN. AN:> CCMONSTON
COUNTY VJ ATER DISTRICT
CCOS, H:Ll. ANO JCWCTT. INC. ~A .. u:s "'· MON'r(;OMO::RY. CON~LTING
CNGINCERS, INC.
1629 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREEi • TELE?HONE (714} 547-6781
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
. 92705
~!SL Z 4 1SS7
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County
Lee l-1. Nelson, Genl. Mgr.
P. o. Box 5175
Fountain Valle~, Calif.. 92708
In October, 1963, the Orange County Water District conu~enced a
legal action against all upstream parties who produce water from
the Santa Ana River system above Prado Dam. This suit was filed
by the District.under the provisions of the Orange County Water
District Act in behalf of all the inhabitants and water users
within the District in order to preserve for them their share of
the natural water supply.
A recent ruling of the court in this litigation requires the
defendants, .who are the upstrearn users, to file "answers" to our
complaint, setting forth their respective claims to water. Several
of these defendants have indicated they intend to file "cross
complaints" against water users in Orange County.
such cross complaints may be served upon you.
One or more of
Our Board of Directors has determined that the Orange County \vater
District will defend at the District's expense anyone within the
:!)istrict who is served with·a cross complaint. The Board has
Agenda Item //17 K-1· All Districts
'
'I
""
:
determined that a unified defense of such cross complaints will
~aterially contribute to the processing of the suit in an effective
and orderly manner. In order to effect such. a defense, it is
necessary that the enclosed authorization be signed by you and
returned to us in the envelope that is provided. You may, of
~ · course, employ counsel of your own choosing. In that event, how-
ever, any expense incurred will be your responsibility.
..__)
So that the District may plan now for defense of cross complaints,
we urge that you execute the authorization. and return it to us as
soon as possible, eve"l1 though you may not yet have been served.
On each occasion that you are served with a cross complaint, in
order to assure that our attorneys may properly represent you, we
ask that you note on the summons which will accompany the cross
complaint,. the t_ime, the date, and the place you were served, and
notify the Orang·e County Water District off ice immediately by for-
warding the summons and cross complaint to this office. An answer
must be filed within ten days after you are served. It is therefore
of the utmost importance that there be no delay in notifying this
office.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please address
them to Howard Crooke, Secreta·ry Manager, Orange County Water
District, 1629 West 17th Street, Santa Ana, California •
. Yours very truly,
v~p(rtiµr£_
HOWARD W. CROOKE
· Secretary Manager
Agenda Item #17-K-2· All Districts
i .,
Orange County Water District
1629 West 17th Street
Santa Ana, California
Attention: Howard w. Crooke, Secretary Manager
Re: Orange County Water District vs. City of Chino, et al
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 117628
Gentlemen:
In the event cross complaints are filed in the above referenced
matter naming the undersigned as a defendant, the undersigned
hereby authorizes the Orange County Water District to defend
said cross complaints on the undersigned's behalf and to
employ the attorneys for said District, Pillsbury, Madison
& Sutro and Rutan & Tucker, to represent the undersigned in
said action.
It is understood that the Orange County Water District will
pay all legal fees involved or incurred in connection with
said representation. In addition, the Orange County Water
District will pay all other costs including court costs,
expert witness fees, and other expenses involved in said defense.
Dated: ' 1967 -------------------------
(Name typed or printed)
Agenda Item #17
(Signature)
Address:
Telephone number
K-3
-------
All Districts
t ·•.
J. PUT~Alv\ H~NC!<
G~NCRAL :::oN-ti.;:ACTOR
:1?4 WE:OT 4CTH o·rr--1;:0::1 • ?. o. oox 24•1c.
GAN 6E:RNAROINC, CAI.If". g.2406
1 Auoust 196?
•'
County S3nit3tion' Districts of Dra0ge County
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: HEAD:JORKS 11 C" Contract Job ?2-11
Gant le ii18 n :
~i~h reference to the State of California Salas and Use Taxes,
there has been a Tax Rate Increase from 4% to 5%, affective
e.s of this data.
Curi~g prepa~ation of our sealej bid on the above referenced
project, we were careful to make ourselves aware of all
pr~ba8le increases in wsge rates and fringe benefits which would
affact overall job costs; such ite~s ware provided for in the
fir:~l proposal.
Tha i~crease in ~he Sales and Use Tax rate will affact approx-
~ffiately ~l,000,000 worth of raatarials being purchased for Job
P2-ll and will result in added and unforeseeable casts of
about $10,000.
It is respectfully requasted that the District co~sider ~he
whether thara is, under~ terms of the
Con~ract, relief for the Contractor.
Yours truly,
cc.
-L-
~-
ARCHITECTS o ENGINEEl<S
..;;2 SOUTH LYON STREET • SANIA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92.702. • Ki11.uc:Fc:..Y 7.447~
AO.:>F-li::SS RC:?!..V iO ?, 0. uCX i7G
Juiy 27, 1967 ...
·n10 Soo!·ci of Di rectors
Counr;' Sc::iirction District No"
Post C~f:ce Sox 5175
Fouiirc:i n Vci! ey, :California 92708
iV~r. Fred A~ Hcroer
Genera! Menage~
r ' •• r ,r J.." • I ' ' .. ! ., J. .j,. '7 :n occo:·ccnc~ w1 ·;,1 rna aci ion ro<.an a·: your r~gular meer; ng on "'une 1.:.:·1 Yo .r we
~,,..-:-. -,,i""-... ~: .•. :.._c 1Moa:~.::·1c-r·=o!"'I No 2 /.o 1··:..-=-e""rt1",...-:.~1·'C' ....... , ... 0, • .1.. ·'lo .. rou"''·y '0"'~1.,..:.~-.... .._.,1:;: ::>\J"""'"'""'v 1! ~ 4 1. ., I .. \;; 11~ 1,1;;1;; .~ 1c!"' 11 • , ..., 111 oJ ''"''"'i•'""'"
D . . . . N 1 ,.. 0 c . ' . I I • ., 9 ' ,... I· J. d. ~. . . N 2 . 1 is;-r:ci ; ·oo • or range oum"/'i ca;-e(l .... uiy ~ o.'.). v10 it1canon o" !Jrov;aas
fo·· • .i ... -:-. ---"',····u,.:··1-n .... 1: ;.~n,:, c: ... u=• '.i..--:-.~ .... 7 "'':".1-" ~,.., s-:-.··ve ... ~:::. ""O"~r...-.=..as•c. ................. ,·o ........ i; • • d•\:: \..ov••"'" ""'' V• V• .i 1,::;, i 11 .... 1,1;;\;;;1 l1v1 .. , .v ...,, '••\;;; 11 ••llv 1..-111 I"'""''' .i u.
rhe d;s;;;.::; co:1struction of the North Bri::;to~ St~·a.::t Trur:k to serve the north ccr:trcl
' • .-• r I. J. • . ..J .i.Y r l • I .... r • • (' s fo A .i.T • ~A .i. l ... . "' poi:·;o;1 o:· -:ne a1s;ncr; a~u die c~eulr.g oy ;:1e c:iy or en.a na, .~eir Jv\yr •• e ~rree1
T:·un:< to :·I10 d ish·ict.. The modification hes been c:·eoared in accordance wi;h Section I I
47-<-3 of t:~e ~(;;al th and Scfe!"y Code of ~·he Sto~e of California ..
Wa r.::ccm:-.~:~nd the beard of directors cdopt Modificat!on No. 2 in occordanca w~th rhe
:·.:::rr:.~ ar.= co:-.dit!o:1s soecified in !"he Ccur;ty Sar.i!"ation District Act., It is further
--.. --._,,..,,,,.,.._ .... ,..;_~ ·~,...:. .:.t -· ~; ·~·,....:. --~ "'=\ -_ •• ~r-~ ,.,..:.: ..-: .... ~ .. ~ ... jlll\f .... ·1 .cc~....,:. ... ~, ... l\;;'"'""""'"'1,;; .. -...~"' 1,.-.;, :Ot;: a.Sid .... rcC\::;V.:. Vi;.;,,,.c,...,.on i.0.11 .eie C11y CvU .. Cl, 01 ""'""'"·'-r"\:iC
.:.~ .... ,.:.~ ~"'.:.-...,..:. :..-. ,J ,..,.! .:.r ~J •• :.j,.. $""-::.:.. •t,., ,..I : ..... _: ~ 1:5•~· t ..,+ ,.. -• v-.. ;::·,..,...;.~ "'
••• .:: ••• _, .. 1;; •• 1 ,..., ,_e~ ..... ne Jv\y& •• c ,r .... e ••. u.i.< .v ir.., a, ,11c ,_,no ""0::>1. c;; ••• 1'"''-·'o ..
r r ' L • r • :.. .t.T d t• • "' b • J ,.. tr ~ '• ' . T !o..: , r sr:o0:a C..'.; recaivea prior 10 1ne a ver ~s:0g or :'-"s ror ne cons.rucr1on 01 rne :"'ot;-;-,
!:>~~ ..... ,.. i c.:. .. _ ,. .. T"un 1-"' wi;..·1 1e '·he ac .... ua' •ra"'si:~ .. or·~ t;tle may be mad!:> a-•t..e co--.1 :::.-:o,... l.lii.;.,;J • ..,,;~l,;;;i •' Ii'°/ •I 1 '' • t I &I 11;;1 1 ' U v I Ill '''6"''\;11 11
cf -::.e cor.srrucrion contract o
v~:'/ :-1uiy your-s,
f.OYLE ENGINEERING
Cor.rcd Hohener, J:Q/ C. E. i095l
~h 51-0035-07-00
C: N: G I N E' E R I N G
I. ,. ~ r· r r·· • • ·_r_· i-, ,,..,"."·'' :If: 0 .. -:OJ .. ;~·,.;,l.l~,.,, ... tt..r-.
A;-..: D ARCHlTECTURAL.
M-1 District l
·,
;
/
i
;,
•.
•: . . . .
~
~
i
!
l
l
j
J
i
1
!
,.
MODIFICATION NO. 2
to
ENGINEER 1S REPORT
COUNTY SAN1TAT10N DISTRlCT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY
dated July, 1965
Modify Section 11
Page 3
Page 4
'.
f~.rrnnda Item .-/l_23
Portion of second sentence, second paragraph modified to reod
.as fol lows:
uGroup A improvements, ·consisting of approximately 38, 490
feet of _trunk sewe-:s, are recommended for present construction; u
Group A improvements -Present Construction Program
Add Item 6, to read cs fol lows:
a'Fruit Street Trunk beginning at Sixth ond Main Streets,
extending a long Sixth Street to French Street, thence a long
· Fruit Street to Grand Avenue, north on Grand Avenue to
Seventeenth Street. Construction of the Fruit Street Trunk
would consist of approximately 5, 000 feet of 18-inch VCP
end 2, 700 feet of 15-inch VCP together with required
mcmho!es and appurtenant work. u
Add item 7, to read as fol lows:
"North Bristol Stto0r Trunk cxtcndin~ north on Bl"isto! Strccr
from Myrtle S1·reet to Santa Clora Avenue. Construction of
the North Bristol Street Trunk wou Id consist of approximcte ly
6,500 feet of 2i-inch VCP and 2,640 feet of 18-inch VCP
together with ·required manholes and oppurterant work. n
I.
! f
. ' , M-2 District J. :;
Modification No. 2 to Engineer 1s Report 2
Modify Section IV
Page 8
..
Agenda Itcm·#23
Add new paragraph to read as follows:
u1n order to establish physical continuity of the North Bristol
Street Trunk with the district's existing trunk system, it will
be r:.ecessary for the district to obtain title to the Myrtle Street
Trunk owned by the city of Santa Ana. Physical continuity of
the district's system is considered to be necessary for ma intenonce
and hydrau Ii c control purposes. The Myrtle Street Trunk begins
at the west end of Myrtle Stroot where it discharges into tho
district 1s Greenville-Sullivan Trunk and extends easterly to /
Bristol Street. The trunk was built in 1951 at a total cost of
$34,000 which included construction and incidental expenses.
It consists of approximately 1,523 feet of 24-inch VCP end
2,372 feet of 21-inch VCP with manholes and appurtenant works. 11
.,
M-3 District 1
·....,;_
-.. :;.-........ _, __ -· :\-·-· -. --··--··-'--·-· --........... •"••-··· -.... -.-... -··-· -··-·----·-·····-· ............ ,_,,, ____ .. ___ .•.•... --·-·-··-·----·-· .. ···-···----·--·-----· ----
J\.\odification No. 2 to Engineer 1s Report '.)
'-'
Modify Section Vl
Page 11
j Lj ly 25 I 1967
51-0035-07-00
CH: ls
Agenda Item //.23
Tab le 1, u Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvements, 11
Group A Improvements is revised as fol lows:
Group A Improvements
1. Upper Ma in Street and Broadway Trunk
2 .. Seventeenth Street Subtru(lk
3. Washington Avenue Subtrunk
4. Grand Avenue T ru:1k
5. Warner Avenue Subinm:<
6. Fruit Street Trunk
7. North Bristol Street Trunk
8 •. Myrtle Street Trunk (Purchase from
city of Santa Ana)
Contingencies @ 10%
s . 358,000
33,000
18 ,000
86,000
35,000
160,000
230,000
None
$ 920,000
92,000
$1,012,000
Engineering, surveying & inspection@10% 101,000
$1I113, 000
Administration & Miscellaneous cost@5% 57,000
Grand Total-Group A Improvements '$1, 170,000
Prepared by,
BOYLE ENGINEERING
'
/ ') . . . ... , .~ --~--'~· /;,, •/ .. // '/
. • ,,. .. ·-1 .. ~· /1 /L I\_../ :0"-/ . ,. / J/ .. ·.b-· .
" • . •• I (,,, ...... v..-•. 1 .,.. o.(.. / ,_,.,. L I .. ' ,·
,·,,·
Coniad Hohener, Jr., C. E. 10951
M-4· District 1
RESOLUTION NO. 67-80-1
AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION #2 TO REPORT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND
MODIFYING ENGINEER'S REPORT DATED JULY,
1965 (Modification #2)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Boyle Engineering, Consulting Engineers,
have prepared a modification of the Engineer's Report dated July,
1965, to provide for the construction of the North Bristol Street
Trunk to serve the north central portion of the District; con-
struction of the Fruit Street Trunk to serve the northeastern
portion of the District; and the deeding by the City of Santa Ana
of its Myrtle Street Trunk to the District; and,
Section 2. That the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. l does hereby find and determine tha~ the
public interest requires a modification or departure from the plans
and specifications as contained in the Engineer's Report dated
July, 1965, and modified August 10, 1966, in the manner set forth
on Schedule "A" and Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of
this resolution as though fully set forth herein, all in accordance
with Section 4758 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of
California.
Agenda Item # 23 -N-District 1
MOTION ---... ---
DISTRICT 1 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director --------------------
seconded by Director -------------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, as
recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee
and submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August,
1967, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following
total amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of the District.
DISTRICT NO. 1
Operating Fund Budget
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
$ 373,778.
194,338.
2,071,142.
2,639,258.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tem of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #26 -P-Distri_ct 1
..
S'H ELL 01 L COMPANY
SHELL uUILDiNG
1008 WEST SIXTH STREET
LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA 90054
July 21, 1967
TELEPHONE• "'82•l 131
Subject: .Annexation to County Sanitation
Diztrict No. 2 267.3 Acres
Shell Oil Company Land
Board of Directors
County Sanit8tion District No. 2
of Orange County~ Cell if ornia
P.O. Bo:.{ 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Gentlemen:
Reference i$ made to the proposed Shell snnexation of 257.3 acres,
as described in ~xhibit nA'' attached hereto and made a part hereof, to the
County S~nitation District No. 2.
We forw<lrd our check in the "mount of $66,825.00 to cover the
~nneAction fee charge. This dif~ers upwsrd ~ome $75.00, as indiccted in
your staff report, due to the Or~nge County Azsessor and Surveyor adding·
f~actional acreage at the time of the 1Anncxation hearins.
It is our understanding th~t the attached EY.hibit B (your June 9,
1967 staff recc~.mendation letter) is to be the basis for an agree~ent
between Shell and the County Sanitation Dist4-i.cts. These points were
discussed by your Hr. Fred A. Harp.ar, l·u;. Paul Brown and our Mr. Bruce
Kerr and as a result of the discussion/understand that Exhibit B. has.
been modified as follows:
Recom.~endations:
1. Consideration $250 per acre for 267.3 acres of $66,825.00.
2. No cb.snge as written. Eowever, it is our understanding that
the credit to be allowed for ta.~es includes our total tax to
the di~trict.
3. He understand fro~ Hr. Harner that item three has been changed
to now read entry into the District•s system will be at a location
acceptable and approvable to the District •
. ~
Aa.enda Item #3Q Q-1 District 2
,.
.~
~
.,..)
·-··--·-··-·---.... :::.~-7'=~:=·~::.·:.:~-~-::-.;.::..;...;...~----. -----------------------------------..... ~.;;-..;~~: ..... -.:-. ..;...:. :-=-~·-. .., ---.-.-...... --.~--·----~--------------
.:•
Gr.:1.nge County
July 21, 1967
This corpo!'ation is re.ucly to e:.:ecute .~:.1 agrcc~1cmt with the.
Sanit.:tion Di::;trict upon its pre.sentuticn per the :ceco1nmcnd::!tion of
your staff 1 s June 9 letter and the modification thereto as explained
to ou~ Mr. Kerr.
You~c very truly,
SEELL OIL COM:?lillY
BGK: ere I ~A.1 '(\1 ~\)
By '.~:--3 V~l7'°'tV'\.
tJAttomay in Fact
-2-
Agenda Item #30 Q-2 District 2
,
RESOLUTION NO. 67-81-2
APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
DISTRICT (ANNEXATION #4)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNI"Y SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING A~mXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (SHEl.L OIL COMPANY
ANNEXATION TO COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 2) ANNEXATION #4
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to
County Sanitation District No. 2, by means of a petition filed with
said Commission; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission
to the territory proposed to be annexed is "Shell Oil Company
Annexation to County Sanitation District No. 2" (Annexation #4), the
exterior boundaries of which are described as follows:
A parcel of land in the County of Orange, State of
California more particularly described as follows:
Beginning at the intersection of the centerlines of
Citrus Avenue and Lakeview Avenue as shown on the map
of Yorba Linda Tract recorded in Book 5, Pages 17 and 18,
Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California;
said intersection being also the southeast corner of
Block 7 of said Yorba Linda Tract; and an angle in the
existing boundary of County Sanitation District No. 2
created June 9, 1948 thence along said existing boundary
N. 0°-47•-06" w., 1354.43 feet to the northeast corner
of said Block 7, thence S. 89°-25 1 -04" w., 1933.27 feet
along the north line of said Block 7; thence North
2176.43 feet; thence leaving the existing boundary of
County Sanitation District No. 2, N. 89°-53'-41" E.,
934 feet; thence N. 0°-06 1 -19" w., 320 feet; thence East
1340 feet; thence South 930 feet; thence East 2022.20
feet; thence South 2879.21 feet to the north line of
Block 10 of said Yorba Linda Tract said last mentioned
point being also on the boundary of said existing County
Sanitation District No. 2; thence S. 89e-25•-23" W.,
2344 feet along the north line of Blocks 10 and 11 of
said Yorba Linda Tract to the point of beginning.
Containing 267.3 acres more or less.
Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is
uninhabited; and,
Agenda Item #30 R-1 District 2
Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is
to provide public sanitary sewer service to said territory; and,
Section 5. That paymen~of annexation fees in the total
amount of $66,825 has been made to the District; and,
Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of
the State of California, under the provisions of Government Code
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County
Sanitation District No. 2.
Agenda Item #30 R-2 District 2
. ~
MOTION -_., -----
DISTRICT 2 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director -----------------------------------
seconded by Director --------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call voteJ to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967"1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 2 and 2A, of Orange County, California, as
recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee and
submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August, 1967,
be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total
amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of the District:
DISTRICT NO. 2
Operating Fund Budget
1958 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital ·Outlay Fund Budget ·
DISTRICT NO. 2 AND 2A
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
$ 962.413.
1,090.850.
5,852,781.
123,244.
$ 8,029,288.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tem of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #32 -S-District 2
. ~
MOTION
~-----
DISTRICT 3 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director ------------------------------------
seconded by Director ---------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 3, ot Orange County, California, as
recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee and
submitted to this Board of Directors on this 9th day of August,
1967, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following
total amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of the District:
DISTRICT NO. 3
Operating Fund Budget
Bonds, Interest and Sinking Fund Budget
Accuinulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
$ 1,221,395.
1,500,107.
4,695,809.
$ 7,417,311.
The Chairman of Chairman pro tem of this Board of Directors
. . ")
is her=by authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
w
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #37 -T-District 3
·..._,)
RAUB, BElN, ~=-ROST·&. ASSOCIATES
E:NGIN[;:Er-.!S & SUl~VC::'.'Or~s
f'HCNC :.·HJ·•n:.::.i p, o. ucx. u·1
CO~iA Mai:SA,, CA ... iF'ORNIA
July 14, 1967
~·lr. Fred. l-la:cna~, Direct.or
O::a."1ge Cou.."1.ty Sanitation'· District
10844 Ellis Avenue
Or.s..."1ga County, Califo~'"nia
De~r Sir:
?~::suc.::;.t to -:he req1.!ast of ~fr. Tho;ilas Black of :Slack, Pagli\!so ~"1d .t~..ssocia.tes,
architects for the Balboa Bay Club) I hav~ perfol-rr.ed a survey this 13th c~y of
July) 196 7, and I hereby certify th.a·.: t:r.~ sewer pu:"lp statio:i is withi:l th~
S~it~ticn District as e~s~ment a."1d is correctly delineated on a s~rvey ::iap
parfo=::ed under ~y direction dated t~e 16th day of Ju:ie, 1967, our Job
No. 10016.
Enclosed please find a copy of our Job No. 10016 mentio~ed above, and if I
ca.~ be of f~rther service do not hesitate to call.
3-:lclos\;re
WJ"S:v: ....
cc: l·~r. Thomas Black
'.
-U-Districts ,-5 & 0
, . \
MOTION ---..... --
DISTRICT 5 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director ------------------------------------
seconded by Director ---------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, as
recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee and
submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August, 1967,
be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total
amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of the District:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Operating Fund Budget
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget
Facilities Revolving Fund
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
$ 290,350.
59,435.
835,180.
16,837.
$ 1,201,802.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tem of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
fu;enda Item #42 -V-District 5
. '
DISTRICT 6 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director ---------------------------------------seconded by Director ------------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, as recom-
mended by the District's member of the Executive Committee and
submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August, 1967,
be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following total
amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of this District:
DISTRICT NO. 6
Operating Fund Budget
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
217,089.
74,679.
824,272.
$ 1,116,040.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tern of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
l1ereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #46 -W-District 6
RESOLUTION NO. 67-82-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ-
ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FOR PARCEL
NO. 7-1-lla
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein
Thomas R. Moore and Dorella Moore grant to County Sanitation
District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in
connection with the construction in Assessment District No. 6,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said ease-
ment is granted is more particularly described in Schedule "A"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though
fully set forth herein; and,
Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no
cost to the District; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in
the Official Records of Orange County, California.
Agenda Item # 51 -X-District 7
·~
RESOLUTION NO. 67-83-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ-
ING ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT
FROM RUTH E. PENIWELL {Parcel #7-1-lla)
--------
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
June 12, 1967, wherein Ruth E. Peniwell grants to County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, a permanent easement
for sewer purposes, is hereby approved and accepted as submitted
by the General Counsel, at no cost to the Districts; and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said ease-
ment is granted is more particularly described on Schedule 11 A11
attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County, California.
Agenda Item #51 -Y-District 7
,c.· .,
MOTION -.... ----
DISTRICT 7 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director --------------------------------------
seconded by Director ------------------------------------------
and carried by t11e following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 7, 7A and 7B, of Orange County, California,
as recommended by the District's member of the Executive Committee
and submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August,
1967, be and they are hereby approved and adopted in the following
total amounts, and said budgets are hereby ordered filed with t11e
Secretary of the District:
DISTRICT NO. 7
Operating Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget
1962 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Construction Fund Budget
Facilities Revolving Fund Budget
DISTRICT NO. 7, 7A
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Fixed Obligation Fund Budget
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
353,097.
874,147.
299,784.
18,732.
474,855.
36,820.
15,500.
$ 2,072,935.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tern of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to t1"1e County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #52 -Z-District 7
. tfi· .•. ·-···-:.'~:·--···-------·-·-·---·--··-··-....... -· -·---·
r• T r:,-."':.T
........, ~ JL. ..::.
July 21, 1967
Orange County Sanitation D~strict No. 11
P.O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Paul Brown
Subject: Slater Ave. Sanitary Sewer
Dear Sir:
Please be advised that the street improvements completed
by your contractor for the subject project are acceptable
to this office.
JRW:EEH:ae
cc: LoWFY & Assoc.
A~r,enda Item #57
Very truly yours,
James R. Wheeler
Director of Pubiic Works
/,/ f'· //_./ ·r-~-By . -. ... .,-.:.: . . -: r ·' /~:;; :: . .
H. Eo Hartge
Deputy Director of Public Works
-AA-District 11
i ;.
~OWRV AN'D ASSOCIATES
CIVIL. ENGINEERS .
QION.:V I.. 1.0WftY
l'ft•a1C.tNT
HU l:AG"r WAUMINOTON AV~NUG:
....
•·••;t~J\e
~1·~301
"""Code 71'4
General Telephone Co •
?. 0. Box 889
GANTA ANAo CA'-ll"OANIA oa'701
A~gus~·l, 1967
Santa Monica, California 90~06
Attn: Mr. Jim Lowe·.·
Dear Sir:·
Mll.O Kt ICCIT"4
HA,.ftV o, alloWHOa
Enclosed is a sketch showing the existing eleva-
tions of the curb and gutter on the perimeter of the General
Te~ephone Co. parki~g· lot at Hu~ti~gton Beach.
A field investigation was ffiade by Mr. Phillips and
Mr. Peterson of our office on Friday, July 28. A water test
was made in the area of the two outlets through the curb
adjacent to the new pump station, and it was· found that there
was a minor shallow pocket at each outlet, as indicated by the
elevations shown on the sketch.
As discussed with Mr. Jim Lowe of your staff on
August 1, 1967, and after you have completed your field
i~spection, will you please indicate yQur acceptance of
the work by signing the copy of .this letter and returning
it to this office~ ·
MKl<:m
Zncl.
Very truly yours,
Lowry and Associates
Milo l<. Keith
The work for County Sanitation
Ccntrac~ 11-10-2, located in an easement
Co. prope~ty in Hunti~gton Beach, is he
.. .. "·:_ .· .... _ •····· -···-·:..._-.. ····-···-····
Agenda Item #57 -BB-District 11
·.
;
!•
....
lllON.:V '-.. ow,.y
,.,. .. QIO"NT
~OWRV AN'D ASSOCIATES
CIVIL. ENGINEERS .
HU li:AO"I' WAUHINO"l'ON AVl:NUG:
GAN'l"A ANA1 CA&..ll"OANIA oa'101
Ml .. O Ko KCIT ...
....
•• , • .,~fte
$'1•$301
NN CoM 71~
"A""V Oo ••'°'"'HO•
General Telephone Co •
?. O. Box 889
A:ugust·l, 1967
Santa Monica, California 90406
Attn: Mr. Jim Lowe· . ".
Dear Sir:·
Enclosed is a sketch showing the existing eleva-
tions of the curb and gutter on the perimeter of the General
Te~ephone Co. parki~g· lot at Hun.ti!lgton Beach.
A field investigation was made by Mr. Phillips and
Mr. Peterson of our office on Friday, July 28. A water test
was made in the area of the two outlets through the curb
adjacent to the new pump station, and it was· found that there
was a minor shallow pocket at each outlet, as indicated by the
elevations shown on the sketch.
As discussed with Mr. Jim Lowe of your staff on
August 1, 1967, and after you have completed your field
i~spection, will you please indicate yqur acceptance of
the work by signing the copy of .this letter and returning
it to this of rice·. ·
XKK:m
Zncl.
. . ·····-.· --·--·····-···-··-··
Very truly yours,
Lowry and Associates
Milo K. l<eith
• .•••• 1 ....... .
..
Agenda Item #57 -BB-District 11
. ·· ..
COUNTY SANI'l'ATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Lomar Corporation and
C.O. NO. ___ l ________ _
CONTRACTOR: Orange County Pipeline 1 Inc. DATE: Aug. 9, 1967
Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and the Slater Avenue Sewage
JOB: Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. ill-10-2
Amount of this change order (>i\1E9 (DEDUCT)
J
$ 109.80
In accordance.with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's report of construction progress dated
May 31, 1967
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S Q.UANTITIES
DEDUCT
Item Change Est'd. Quant.
No. Unit From To
1. L.F. 1013 1009 4 L.F. @ $53.20/LF $ 212.80
ADD
2. L.F. 955 959 4 L.F. @ $25.75/LF 103.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $ 109.80
Original Contract Price $ 251,692.05
Prev. Auth. Changes ----~n~o~ne.;;..._ ________ _
This Change {DJllQ {DEDUCT) 109. 80
Amended Contract Price $ 251,582.25
Board authorization date: Approved:
August 9, 1967
Agenda Item #58
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
LOMAR CORPORATION AND ORANBE.
COUNTY PIPELINE, INC.
By ____________________________ __
-CC-District 11
I~
COLIN'1.Y S.n1Li.T.n'r.LON DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Lemar Corporation and C.O. NO. 2 ------
CONTRACTOR: Orange County Pipeline, Inc. DATE: Aug. 9, 1967
Slater Avenue Gravity sewer and the slater Avenue sewage
JOB: Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 11-10-2
Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ None -----------------
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated June 7 and Contractor's letters
dated November 18, 1966, April 19, April 21 and April 28,
1967
An extension of time to the contract completion date in accordance
with Section 5-10 of the Specifications is hereby granted for the
following reasons and in the following amounts.
1. Inclement Weather
November, December, January,
February, March & April
2. Acts of Other Agencies
24
(a)
(b)
Delay in Gas Company relocation
Delay due to supplying power to
the station by Edison Company
3
16
TOTAL 43
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
Original completion date: March 23, 1967
May 5, 1967
May 5, 1967
Completion date with this
extension of time (43 days)
Actual Operational Completion Date
Original Contract Price $ 251,692.05
Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 109.80
This Change {ADD) (DEDUCT) _..;n~o-n;;;;.e _____ _
Amended Contract Price $ 251,582.25
Board authorization date: Approved:
August 9, 1967
Agenda Item #58 -DD-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
LOMAR CORPORATION and ORANGE
COUNTY PIPELINE, INC.
By ____________________________ __
District 11
RESOLUTION NO. 67-84-11
ACCEPTING JOB NO. 11-10-2 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0.11, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
JOB NO. 11-10-2 AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, Lomar Corporation
and Orange County Pipeline, Inc., has completed the con-
struction in accordance with the terms of the contract for
the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND THE SLATER AVENUE SEWAGE
PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER, JOB NO. 11-10-2 on the
4th day of August, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the District
has recommended acceptance of said work as having been com-
pleted in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District
has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said
recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER
AND THE SLATER AVENUE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN
SEWER, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with
the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of
September, 1966; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
"'-"' authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of
Work therefor.
Agenda Item #59 -EE-District 11
MOTION -------
DISTRICT 11 -Roll Call Vote
MOVED by Director ----------------------------------------
seconded by Director -------------------------------------------
and carried by the following roll call vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
That the 1967-1968 fiscal year budgets for funds of County
Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, as recom-
mended by tt1e District's member of the Executive Committee and
submitted to this Board of Directors this 9th day of August, 1967,
be and they are hereby apnroved and adopted in the following total
amounts, and said budgets are 11ereby ordered filed with the
Secretary of the District:
DISTRICT NO. 11
Operating Fund Budget
1958 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
1951 Bond, Interest & Sinking Fund Budget
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Budget
Total Amount of said 1967-1968 Budgets
$ 326,285.
155,710.
33,870.
l,296.971.
$ 1,812,836.
The Chairman or Chairman pro tern of this Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to sign said budgets; and,
The required copies of said approved and signed budgets are
hereby ordered transmitted to the County Auditor-Controller.
Agenda Item #6o_ -FF-District 11
FINAL BUDGET -··-----
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOMMENDATION
1967-1968 FISCAL YEAR
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Requirements:
Operating Fund
Bond Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available July 1, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxes
DISTRICT 1 S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES
Tax Rate:
Operating Fund
Bond Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total
Fiscal Year
66-67
$ 334,525.
196,701.
2,,042,628.
$2,573,854.
$1,806,602.
$ 767,252.
Tax Rate
66-67
$ .0945
.0608
.2965
$ .4518
August 2, 1967 Rev.
Fiscal Year
67-68
373,778.
194,338.
2,071,142.
$2,639,258.
$1., 841, 734.
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0997
.0551
.2920
$ .4468
* The estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $187,891,5400 ($178,496j9630 5% Delinquency Factor)
One cent will raise $17,8470 in taxes.
-1-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OPERATING FUND SUMMARY:
Approved
Budget
66-67 (1) -
Salaries and Wages
Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
(66-67 Actual$ 1,375.) $
(66-67 Actual $175,536.)
3,500.
203,517. 24,ooo.
Total (66-67 Actual $176,911.) $ 231,017.
103,508.
334,,525.
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes & Misc. Income
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
BOND FUND SUMMARY:
$
162,667.
6,500.
3,,000.
$ 172,167.
$ 162,358.
Principal on 1951 Bonds
Interest
(66-67 Actual$ 70,000.) $ 70,000.
( 66-67 Actual $ 38, 063.) ____ 3_8_, 0_6 ___ 3_.
Total (66-67 Actual $108,063.) $ 108,063.
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash &. Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
$
$
$
$
88,638.
196,, 701.
90,118.
900.
2,,000.
93,018.
103,683.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
Treatment Plant Expansion (66-67 Actual $300,168.) $1,160,628.
Trunk Improvements & .
Extensions (66-6TActual $368,587.) 880,000.
Tax Collection Expense -ACO .
Fund (66-67 Actual $ 1,281.) 2,000.
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $670,036.) $2 2 042,628.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Sale of Equity in Joint Works
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
$1,403, 290 0
105,000.
20,000.
13,,127.
$1,,541,417.
$ 501,2110
(1) See page 3 for actual 66-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Operating Fund detail for 67-68.
Note: May and June estimated for 66-67·Actual Expenditures.
-2-
Recommended
Budget
67-68 (1)
$
3,500.
229,685.
24,000.
257,185.
116' 593.
373,,778.
181,788. 8,ooo.
6,000.
$ 195, 788.
$ 177,990.
$
$
I
$
106,488.
87,850.
194,338.
91, 929.
1,000.
3,000.
95, 929.
98, 409.
$1, 262, 142 .·
807,000.
2,000.
$2,071,142.
$1,424,369.
80, 536.
30,000.
15,112.
$1,550,,017.
$ 521,125.
i ..
~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Wages:
Directors
Employees
Total
Maintenance and Operation:
District Share of Joint Operating
Directors 1 Mileage Expense
Bond Collection Expense
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads
Maintenance Expense
Professional Services
Tax Collection Expense
Total
Total Salaries & Wages,
Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOTAL OPERATING FUND
*May and June estimated.
-3-
1966-67
Actual*
$ 1,375.
-0-
$ . 1.2375.
$173,010.
44.
350.
-0-
. 1,496.
200.
436.
$175,536.
$176,911.
-0-
$
$
1967-68
Estimated
2,500.
1.2000.
3.2500.
$223,360.
125.
400.
250. 4,ooo.
1,000.
550.
$229.2685.
$233,185.
24.2000.
$257,185.
Project
DISTRICT NO . 1
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
1967 -68
1 . Purchase of easements for future
trunk sewer between Bristol and
Main Streets
2 . Contract ~o . 1 -9 , Fruit Street
Subtrunk bet.ween Main Street
aYid Grand Avenue
3 . Contract No . 1 -10 , Bristol Street
Subtrunk between Myrtle Street
and Memory Lane
4 . Remodeling of Plant magnetic
me~er
Sub -Total
5 . Funds available for projected
facilities expansion
Total Budget fo r Trunk Improvements
and Extension
*Requested by City of s ·a n ta Ana
August 2, 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cost
$ 50 ,000
185 ,000*
300 ,000*
1,500
$ 536 ,500
270,500
$ 807,000
FINAL BUDGET August 2, 1967 Rev~
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1967-1968 FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
66-67 67-68
GEI\TERAL SUMMARY:
Requirements:
Operatin§O" Fund
Bond 195 Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available, July 1, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxes
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES
Tax Rate:
Operatin§ Fund
Bond 195 Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total
$ 830,359.
1,075,650.
124,764.
4,693,638.
423.
$6,724,834.
$4,001,13lJ..
$2,723,700.
Tax Rate
66-67
$ .0491
.1043
.0109
.3008
$ .4621
*The estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $690,086,1300 ($655,581,8230 5% Delinquency Factor)
...,,I
One cent will raise $65,558oin taxes.
-1-
$ 962,413.
1,090,850.
123,244.
5,852,781.
-0-
$8,029:288.
$5,111,294.
$2,917,994.
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0744
.0889
.0096
.2722
$ .4451
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND SUMMARY:
Salaries and Wages
Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
(66-67 Actual $ 3,350)
(66-67 Actual $439,546)
Total (66-67 Actual $442,896)
~Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest & Misc. Receipts
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
1958 BO~m FUND SUM1v1ARY:
Pr).ncipal on 1958 Bonds
Interest
Total
Auth0rized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
(66-67 Actual $300,000)
(66-67 Actual $322,250)
(66-67 Actual $622,250)
Cash & Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUTu~ TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
1951 BOND FUND SUMMARY:
Principal on 1951 Bonds
Interest
Total
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments
Delinquent 'J.1axes
Intere~3t
(66-67 Actual $ 45,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 23~345)
(66-67 Actual $ 68,345)
Transfer from Fixed Obligation Fund
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget
66-67 (1)
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,500.
502,406.
70,000.
576,906.
253,453.
830,359.
502,890.
15,000.
22,000.
539,890.
290,469.
$ 300,000.
322,250.
$ 622,250.
453,400.
$1,075,650.
$ 435,564.
20,00~.
7,000.
$ 462,564.
$ 613,086.
$
$
45,000.
23,345.
68,345.
56,419.
Recommended
BudP-et
67-68 (1)
$
$
$
$
$
$
$
4,ooo.
590,942.
70,000.
664,942.
297,471.
962,413.
434,630.
15,000.
25,000.
474,630.
350,000.
304,250.
654,250
436~600.
$1,090,850.
$ 473,865.
25,000.
9,000.
$ 507 J 865.
$ 582,985.
$
$
45,000.
22,331.
67,331.
55,913.
$ 124,764. $ 123,244.
$ 56,671. $
2,500.
600.
423.
57, 059.
2,800.
600.
-0-
$ 60, 194. ...,$ __ 6_o.....;..,_4_5_9_.
$ 64,570. $ 62,785. --------------------
( 1) See pg. 3 for Actual 66-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and Operating
Fund detail for 67-68.
NOTE: May and June estimated for 66-67 Actual Expenditures.
-2-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2
.t\Ccm.mLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
Treatment Plant Expansion (66-67 Actual
Payment Due County
~Sanitation District #3 (66-67 Actual
Purchase of Orangethorpe
Trunl< (66-67 Actual
Reconstruction of Euclid
Trunk · (66-67 Actual
Sewerage Facilities
~66-67 Actual Improvements
Tax Collection Expense 66-67 Actual
$ 825,463)
$ 86,484)
$ 46,427)
r.. ·I> 21.j.J+' 978)
$ 163,045l
$ 4,554
Approved
Budget
1966-67
$3,191,727.
86,484.
46,427.
790,000.
575,000.
4~000.
Recommended
Budget
1967-68
$3,464,370.
86,484.
46,427.
J.,805,000.
445,000.
2~200.
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $1,370,956) ~4,693,638. $5,852,781.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Receivable from District No. 3
for Miller-Holder
Interest
Sale of Equity in Joint Works
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
$2,253,777.
60,000
300,000.
40,000.
284,286.
$2,938,063.
$1,755,575.
$3, 447, 29 5.
79,557.
200,000.
80,000.
2611488.
$4,,068,340.
Sl-t784,441o
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
SALARIES Ai'ID W.AGES:
Directors
Total
MAINTENANCE i\ND OPERATION:
District Share of Joint Operating
Directors' Mileage
Bond Collection Expense
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads, etc.
Interest Expense
Professional Services
Maintenance Expense -General
U~ilities Expense
Odor Control Expense
._..,.;Inter-District Sewer Use Charge
Tax Collection Expense
Total
Total Salaries and Wages, Maintenance
and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOTAL OPERATING FUND
(1) May and June Estimated
-3-
1965-66
Actual (1)
1967-68
Estimated
$
$
3, 350. _$ __ 4_• ,.._o_o_o_.
3, 350. ....._$ __ 4_, _oo_o_.
$ 405,840.
221.
1,479.
488.
13,837.
905.
15,349.
386.
15 .
270.
756.
$ 43g,546.
$ 442,896.
$ -0-
$ 442,896.
$ 535,892.
400.
1,750.
700.
10,400.
10,000.
20,000.
3,000.
7,500.
300.
1,000.
$ 590,942.
$ 594,942.
$ 70,000.
$ 664,942.
..
Project
DISTRICT NO . 2
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
1967 -68
1 . Contract No . 2 -10 -6, Euclid
Avenue Trunk Sewer Reconstruct i on
between Ball Road and La Palma
Avenue
2 . Contract No . 2 -10 -7, Euclid
Avenue Trunk Sewer Reconstruction
between Edinger and Bolsa Streets
3 . Contract No . 2 -10 -8, Euclid
Avenue Trunk Sewer Reconstruction
between Bolsa Street and Trask
Avenue
4 . Contract No . 2 -10 -9, Euclid
Avenue Trunk Sewer Reconstruction
between Chapman Avenue and Ba ll
Road
5 .
6 .
7 .
Total Budget for Reconstruction
of Euclid Trunk
Contract No. 2 -11-1, Rolling Hills
Drive Sub -Trunk Sewer (under
construction -incompleted portion)
Contract No . 2 -11-2, Rolling Hills
Drive Sewage Pumping Station and
Force Main Sewer (under construction-
incomplete portion)
Remodelin~ of Plant magnetic
meters ( 2)
Sub -Total
8 . Funds available for projected
facilities expansion
Total Budget for Sewerage Facilities
Improvements
Grand Total
August 2, 1967 Rev .
Estimated Costs
$ 550 ,000
325 ,000
435 ,000
495,000
$ 1,805,000
80 ,000
150,000
3,000
$ 233,000
212,000
$ 2, 250' 000
FINAL BUDGET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1967-68 FISCAL YEAR
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Total Requirements
Operating Fund
Bcmd Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Construction Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available July l, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue
from Sources Other Than Taxes
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES
Tax Rate:
Operating Fund
Bond Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total
Fiscal Year
66-67
$1,077,410.
1,645,125.
4,395,901.
890,640.
$8,009,076.
$5,302,414.
$2' 706' 662. ·--
Tax Rate
66-67
$
$
.0859
.0065
.3208
.4132
August 2, 1967 Rev.
Fiscal Year
67-68
$1, 221, 395.
1,500,107.
4,695,809.
·0-
$'"(, 417' 311.
$4,355,024.
$3., 062, 287.
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0881
.0651
.2570
.4102
*The estimated tax rate was computed an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $785,826,5300 ($746,535,2040 5% Delinquency Factor)
One cent will raise $74,6540 in taxes.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
~RA TING Fu.ND Sulvfi.'f-ARY:
Salaries and Wages
Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
Total
Authorized General Reserve
(66-67 Actual $ 3 700)
(66-67 Actual $560:718)
(66-67 Actual $564,418)
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Inter-District Sewer Use Charges
Interest and Misc. Receipts
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOU1'J'r TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
BOND FUND SUMMARY:
Principal on Bonds
Interest
Total
(66-67 Actual $435,000)
(66-67 Actual $477,694)
(66-67 Actual $912,694}
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Receivable from District No. 2
Transfer from Construction Fund
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget
1966-67(1)
$ 5,500.
646,107.
100.2000.
$ 751,607.
$ 3252803.
~1 2 077 2 410.
$ 473,379.
20,000.
-0-
202000.
~ 5132372·
~ 5642031.
435,000.
477 6 4.
$ 912,694.
7322431.
~126452125.
$ 656,998.
35,000. 8,ooo.
-0-
890, 640.
$1,5202638.
$ 54,487.
(1) See Page 3 for Actual 1966-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Operating Fund detail for 1967-68.
(2) See Footnote (2), Page 3.
NOTE: May and June estimated for 1966-67 actual expenditures.
-2-
Recommended
Budget
1967-68 (1)
$ 5,000.
709,263.
1502000.
$ 864,263.
$ 35I.rl32.
$1.2221 2 395.
$ 500,977. 20,000.
22,500.
20.2000.
~ 563" ll-77.
$ 6C37. 918.
$ 435,000.
4522207.
$ 887,907.
612~200.
~12500.2107.
$ 909,, 584.
3,000.
15,000.
86,484.
-0-
$1,014,068.
$ l!-86' 039 0
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
.~\CCU:·.fUL'\']:'~D C1\PI 1r/\L OUTLAY FUND:
Tre3t~c~t Plant Expansion
Pm"":~1e:lt O!'l Facilities Pur-
:· .... 'l ~ ~ .,-:-, .. om D.; ('!.1.. ..... ic+ ·'~") ._,-...L . .i...1.. l: ... .:.iv.1. v 1/'-~':: ..;_ Y'.: c -i· 11' ·"'I ..... 'i , ·i .:.. :i..· e s 1 ..,J.--.• v--"' -\,.,\..... __ ..... v .
Improvements .
Purc~~se ~quity in Joint
~·!or:~s
Tax Collection Expense
Purc~ase of Orangethorpe
T::.."u:lk Se\·:er
-. • D" . . . J'll :aymen-c 1..0 t J.. S"Gl"l.Cv tr
Westside Pump Station
Im.prove!nents
(66-67 Actual $884,817)
(66-67 Actual $300,000)
. .
(66-67 Actual $407,000).
(66-67 Actual $ 5,395)
(66-67 Actual $ 14,677)
·(66-67 Actual.$190,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 34,040)
Approved
Budget
1966-67
$3,421,224 ..
300,000.
-o-
430,000.
5,000.
14,677.
190,000.
35 2 000.
Rccom;r~cnded
B~;c GC:t
1967-63
$3,878,220.
200 ,ooo ..
503, ooo •.
9~852. ,ooo.
, ll ,..77 -. '0 .. -o-
-0-
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $1,835,929) $4,395,901.. $4,695 2 809.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July l
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Total Cash and Revenue
.~MOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXT~S ·· ..
$2,202,757.
55,000.
50,000.
$2,307.? 757 • ..
$2,652,268.
65,211.
60,000.
s2,777, 479.J..
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
SALAR!ES P.i'-:"D WAGES:
Di~ectors
Total
~istrict Share of Joint Operating
~irec~ors: Kile~ge Expense
3~~d Co~lection Expense
Supplies, 3:ueprints, Legal Ads, etc.
I~tere s~;· Ezpc:-lse
1·~2.::.:;~~c:-1<::.::!ce Expense -General
:=-'o~c:e l1:ui.r-1 !=:e;>::;.irs
?~c~Gssic~al Services
U~ilitias 2xpense
· 0Cor Cont~ol Expense
:~ter-D~st~ict Sewer Use Charge
Tax Coll8ction Expense
Total
Total Salaries and Wages, Maintenance
c.r.rJ Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOTAL OPERATI~G FUND
:966-67
Actual(l)
1967-68
Esti~ated
3~700. s 5,000. ---=----
.,, 7Jo. _s ___ 5_~ o_o_o_.
440,391. $ 572,963.
259. 500.
, lJ.67 ..;.. , . . . • r-.""O .L,ov •
10. 500.
12,20?. 35,000.
25,572. 30,000.
66,245. 40,000.
604. 5,COO.
10,114. 15,000.
lr}t 6,ooc .. 0-:-.
2,219. 500.
1~466. 2 .. 000.
560._718. "' ,.~ 70922630
$ 564,418. $ 714,263.
(2) l~0 .. 000.
i._564 .. hlS. ~~ 864,,263._
( ~ . ' J.)
(2J
U~y Qnd Jun0 Estim~ted
Eo~rd ~uthorizcd $85,000 from unQppropriated reserve to Force Mai~ Repairs
to co .. .rcr co:-.;J~3 of Wcr.;tsidc Force r-t.ain. repairs.
i::s?. Ult
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
SCHEDULE OF BUDGET RESERVES AND CARRY-OVERS
OPERATING FUND
Salaries & Wages
Maintenance & Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
Authorized General Reserve
Carry-over
Other Income & Transfers
Total Carry-over
BOND FUND
Principal on Bonds
Interest
Authorized General Reserve
for 67-68
Carry-over
Other Income & Transfers
Total Carry-over
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
$
Approved
Budget
1966-67
5,500.
646,107.
100,000.
325,803.
$ 435,000.
477,694.
732,431.
Treatment Plant Expansion $1,830,744.
Reserve for Ocean Outfall 1,590,400.
Other Facilities Improvements
& Purchases, and Expenses 974,677.
Carry-over
Other Income & Transfers
Total Carry-over
(1) May & June Estimated
(2) Transfer for Force Main Repairs
-4-
Actual
1966-67(1)
$ 3,700.
560,718.
66,245.{2)
-0-
$435,000.
477,694.
-0-
$884,817.
-0-
951,112.
Carry-Over
or Reserve
for 1967-68
$ 1,800.
85,389.
33,755.
325,803.
$-' 446,747.
54,253.
$ 501,000.
$ -0-
-0-
7322431.
$ 732,431.
1762562.
~ 909.?000.
$ 945,927.
1,590,480.
23,565.
$2,559,972.
71,028.
$2,631,000.
.r
.....,,
...
Project
P I : ;'l'I\ W'I' NO . j
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
1967 -68
1 . Master Plan Report
2 . Funds available for projected
facilities expansion
Total Budget for Facilities
Improvements
August 2 , 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cos t
$ 15 ,000
488 2.ooo
~ 503_2.000
FINAL BUDGET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
PRELIMINARY BUDGETARECOMMENDATIONS
1967-68 FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal Year
66-67
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Requirements:
Operating Fund $ 255,934.
Bond Fund 60,185.
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 855,272.
Facilities Revolving Fund 50,678.
Total Requirements $ 1,222,069.
Funds Available July 1, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other.Than Taxes $ 864, 519.
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES $ 357, 550.'
Tax Rate
Tax Rate: 66-67
Operating Fund $ .0815
Bond Fund .0250
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund .1809
Facilities Revolving Fund -0-
Total $ .2874
August 2, 1967 Rev.
Fiscal Year
67-68
$ 290,350.
59,435.
835,180.
16,837.
$ 1,201,802.
$ 801,210.
$ 400, 592.
Tax Rate ..
67-68
Estimated*
$ .1142
.0217
.1415
-0-
$ .2774
* The estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $152,009,9400 ($144,409,443. 5% Delinquency Factor)
One cent will raise $14,4410 in taxes.
-1-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
Approved
Budget
196 ·-67{ Jj_
OPERATING FUND SUMJ.VtARY:
Salaries and Wages f 66-67 Actual $ 1, 525~ $ 1,750.
Maintenance and Operation 66-67 Actual $153,164 162,206.
Unappropriated Reserve (2) 25:,000.
Total (66-67.Actual $154,689) $ 188,956.
Authorized General Reserve 66,978 •.
Total Requirements ~ 255,934.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1 $ 145,469.
Interest & Misc. Income 2,500.
Delinquent Taxes 2,500.
Total Cash & Revenue $ 150,469.
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 105, 465.
BOND FU.ND SUMMARY:
Principal on 1951 Bonds f 66-67 Actual i 20,000~ $ 20,000.
Interest Payable 66-67 Actual : 13,540 13,540.
Total (66-67-Actual $ 33,040) $ 33,540.
'Authorized General Reserve --3_6, 6L~5.
Total Requirements ~ 60,185.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1 $ 27,107.
Interest 100.
Delinquent Taxes 200.
Total Cash & Revenue * 27, L~07.
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 32,778.
(1) See Page 3 for actual 66 .... 67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
anticipated 67-68 expenditures.
(2) See footnote (2), page 3.
Note: May & June estimated for 66-67 actual expenditures
-2-
Recommended
Budget
1967-68( 1 ~
$ 1, 750.
175,150.
25,000.
$ 201,900.
88,450.
~ 290,350.
$ 117,460.
4,500.
3,500.
$ 125, 460.
$ 164, 890.
$ 20,000.
13,040.
<;•
\j) 33,040.
_26,395.
~ 59,435.
$ 26,900.
200.
1,000.
~; r 28,100.
$ 31,335.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
ACCUMULATED C.l\PITl\L OUTLJ\Y FUND:
~reatment Plant Expansion (66-67 Actual
~~ui ty Purchase in Joint w·orks
Purchase of Jamboree Trunk ~66-67 Actual
Facilities Improvements Ext 66-67 Actual
Tax Coll. Exp.: ACO Fund 66-67 Actual
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Sale of Equity in Joint Works
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAIS~D BY TAXES
FACILI~IES REVOLVING FUND SUMriIARY:
$152,960)
2 31,037~ ·p333, 790
~ 586
$518,373)
Sewerage Facilities Const~ (66-67 Actual $ 87,610)
Less: Cash & Investments, July 1
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Actual
Budget
1966-6'""(
$ 591, 435.
-0-
31,037.
232,000.
800.
~ 855,272.
$ 515,785.
95, 000.
19,000.
6,180.
$ 635,965.
$ 219,307.
Recommended
Bude et
1967-68
ii> 'i) 646, 380.
-0-
-0-
188,ooo.
800.
~ 835,180.
$ 573,452.
40, 268.
10,000.
7, 093.
$ 630,813.
$ 204,, 367.
$ 50,678. $ 16,837.
50,678. 16, 837.
$ -0-$ -0-
OPERATING FUND DETAILED FJCPENDITURES
Salaries and Wa~:
Directors:
Total
Maintenance and Operation.: ~
District's Share of Joint Operating
Directors' Mileage Expense
Bond Collection Expense
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads
Maintenance Expense -General
Manhole & Force Main Repair
Utility Expense
Engineering and Legal Expense
Tax Collection Expense
Total
Total Salaries & Wages, Mtce. & Operation
~!appropriated Reserve
( 1) lliay and June Estimated
1966-67
Actual (1)
$ 1,525.
1,525.
60,302.
84.
70.
150.
28,515.
47,083.
15, 191.
1, L~82.
287.
$ 153,164.
$ 154,689.
(2)
$ 154,689.
1967-68
Estimated
1,750.
$ 1,750.
$ 80,100.
100.
100.
500.
32,000.
35,000.
22,000.
5,000.
350.
$ 175,150.
$ 176,900.
25,000.
$ 201,900.
(2) Board authorized $20,000 transfer from Unappropriated Reserve to Manhole
& Force Main ~epair to cover additional costs.
-3-
1.
2.
3.
l)ltJ'.rHlC'I' NO . 0
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
1967 -68
Project
Reconstruction of Bitter Point
Pump Station, Contract No. 5 -15
Additional pumping equipment
for Bay Bridge Pumping Station,
Contract No . 5-12-A
Sub -Total
Funds available for projected
facilities expansion
Total Budget for Facilities
I mprovements and Extensions
August 2, 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cost
$ 20,000
18,ooo
$ 38 ,000
150,000
$ 188,ooo
....
FINAL BUDGET
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1967-68 FISCAL YEAR
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Total Requirements:
Operating Fund
Bond Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available July 1, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxes
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES
Tax Rate:
Operating Fund
Bond Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total
Fiscal Year
66-67
$ 186,649.
75,804.
746,080.
$1,008,533.
$ 670,533.
$ 338,000.
Tax Rate
66-67
$ .0606
.0322
.1676
$ .2604
August 2, 1967 Rev.
Fiscal Year
67-68
217,089.
74,679.
824., 272.
$1,116,040.
$ 74 ... (' 218.
$ 368,822.
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0757
.0267
.1530
$ .2554
*The. estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed
Valauation of $152,009,9400 ($144,409,4430 5% Delinquency Factor)
One cent will raise $14,441. in taxes.
-~·
··---· ······--··--···-····-······---··--------··--~·--·~-·--------------
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OPERATING FUND SlWuVIARY:
Salaries and Wages
~Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
Total
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
(66-67 Actual·$ 1,325)
(66-67 Actual $ 88,153)
(66-67 Actual $ 89,478)
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest & Misc~ Income
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash & Reserve
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
BOND FUND SUMll!ARY:
Principal on 1951 Bonds
Interest
Total
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
(66-67 Actual $ 25,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 17,328)
(66-67 Actual $ 42,328)
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash & Reserve
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
ACClJ11IDLATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
Approved
Budget
196g-67(1)
$ 1,600.
96,166.
40,000.
$ 137,766.
48,883.
$. 186,649.
$ 99,996.
2,500.
2,000.
$: 104,496.
$ 82,153.
$ 25,000.
17,328.
$ 42,328.
33,476.
$ 75,804.
$ 33,342.
300.
2,200.
$ 35,842.
$ 39,962.
Recommended
Budg~t
1967-68..Ll:_L
$ 1,600.
116,459.
40,000.
$ 158,059.
59,030.
$ 217,089.
$ 101,332. 4,ooo.
2, 500 ..
$ 107,832.
$ 109,257.
$ 25,000.
16,578.
$ 41,578.
33,101.
$ 74,679.
$ 33,284.
300.
2,500.
$ 36,084.
$ 38, 595.
Treatment Plant Expansion (66-67 Actual $151,653) $. 586,380. $ 659,988.
District Facilities, Improvements ·
and Extensions (66-67 Actual$ 21,969) 149,000. 151,000.
Tax Collection Expense -
ACO Fund (66-67 Actual $ 543) 700. 700.
Purchase of Additional Equit~ in
Jointly 01-med Facilities (56-67 Actual$ 9,836) :·10·;000. 12,584.
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $184,001) $ 746,080. $ 824,272.
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Sale of Equity in Joint Works
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
$ 437,679.
7,515.
10,000.
75,000.
$ 530,195.
$ 215,885.
(1) See page 3 for Actual 66-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Operating Fund detail for 67-68.
NOTE: May and June estimated for 66-67 Actual Expenditures.
-2-
$ 5$2,179.
10,000.
11,123.
-0-
$ 603,302.
$ 220,970.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
Salaries and Wages:
Directors
Total
Maintenance and Operation:
District Share of Joint Operating
Directors' Mileage Expense
Bond Collection Expense
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads
Maintenance Expense
Utilities Expense
Interest Expense
Professional Services
Tax Collection Expense
Total
Total Salaries & Wages,
Maintenance & Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOTAL OPERATING
~ (1) May and June Estimated.
-3-
1966-67
Actual (1)
~ 1 2 325.
~ 12325.
$ 71,518.
41.
71.
110.
14,980.
1,236.
-0-
-0-
197.
$ 882153.
$ 89,478.
-0-
$ 892478.
1967-68
Estimated
$ 12600.
$ 12600.
$ 91,509.
100.
150.
150.
20,000.
3,000.
200.
1,000.
350.
$ 1162459.
$ 118,059.
40,000.
$ 158,059.
Proiect
DISTRICT !'!O. 6
CAPITAL Our.:':::.J,Y PROJECTS
1967 -60
1 . Contr2ct No . 5 -15, Reconstruction
of Bicter Point Pump Station
2 . Contract :~. 7 -1 -C, Gisler Avenue
Force Main ..:i.nd Trunk Sewer
3 . Remodeling of Plant magnetic meter
August 2 , 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cost
$ 5,000
15,000
1,500
Sub -Total $ 21,500
4 . Funds available for projected
facilities expansion
Total Budget for Dis~rict Facilities
Improve~ents and Extensions
129,500
$ 151;000
... -..
FINt~L BUDG3T
COUl\TTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECOlf~'1ENDATIONS
1967-68 FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal Year
66-67 .
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Requirements:
Operating Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Bond 1962 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Construction Fund
Facilities Revolving Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available July 1, 1967
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxes
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMEJ\TTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES
Tax Rate:
Operating Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Bond 1962 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Total
332,670.
37, 308.
284,914.
670,783.
15,500.
95,601.
367, 225.
*1,804,001.
$1,169,114.
$ 634,887.
Tax Rate
66-67
$ .1154
.0109
.1319
.1804
.0058
$ .4444
August 2, 1967 Rev.
Fiscal Year
67-68
353,097.
36,820.
299, 781-~.
87l~, i1.~7.
15,500.
18,132.
474,855.
$2, 07'?.., 931).
$1, 340' 109.
$ 732, 826.
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0765
.0124
.1263
.2530
.0062
$ .4744
*The estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $162,604,420. ($154,474,199. 5% Delinquency Factor)
One cent will raise $15,447.in taxes
... 1 ~·
•
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
.....,.,._,P_ERA_T_I_N_·G_F_UND __ S_U_MMA __ R_Y:
Salaries and Wages (66-67 Actual $ 25,099)
Maintenance and Operation .(66-67 Actual $127,086)
Unappropriated Reserve
Total (66-67 Actual $152,185)
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Receivable from Assessment Districts {Net}
Misc. Income
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
\..,_)
Treatment Plant Expansion (66-67 Actual $131,520)
Payment Due Costa Mesa San.(66-67 Actual$ 16,250)
Sewerage Facilities,
Improvements (66-67 Actual $ -0-)
Purchase of Equity in Joint
Works (66-67 Actual $ 74,600)
Tax Collection Expense (66-67 Actual $ 650)
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $223,020)
Less: Cash and Revenue·
Cash & Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget
· 1966-67 ( 1)
$ 26,560.
195,220.
202000.
$241,780.
902890.
$332,670.
$116,374.
3,500.
2,000.
42,302.
52000.
~169.?176.
$163,494.
$508,533 .
. 16, 250.
60,000.
85,000.
1 2000.
~670.?783.
$400,565.
8,000.
8i?ooo.
~4162565.
~2542218.
(1) See Page 4 for Actual 66-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Operating Fund detail for 67-68. ·
NOTE: May and June estimated for 66-67 Actual Expenditures.
-2-
Recommended
Budget
1967-68 (1)
$ 26,600.
208,798.
20.2000.
$255,398.
972699.
$353,097.
$159,720.
10,000.
6,ooo.
54,192.
52000.
~234.?912.
$118,185.
$646,380.
16,250.
37,370.
173,147.
12 000.'
~874, 147.
$462, 410.
10,975.
10,000.
~483, 385.
~390, 762.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND SUMMARY:
Total Requirements (66-67 Actual $ 10,376)
\,.,I
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash on Hand, July 1
Interest & Misc. Income
Delinquent IJ~axes
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
19 51 BOND FUND SUMf.'IARY:
Principal on 1951 Bonds
Interest
(66-67 Actual $ 13,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 7,593)
Total (66-67 Actual $ 20,593)
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY.TAXES
1962 BOND FUND SUMrr.LARY:
Principal on 1962 Bonds
Interest
(66-67 Actual $ 60,oool
(66-67 Actual $131,640
Total (66-67 Actual $191,640)
Authorized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Interest
Delinquent Taxes
Total Cash & Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
-3-
Approved
Budget
66-67
$ 15,500.
4,323.
J.1.00.
Lt.OO.
$ 5,123.
$ 10,377.
$ 13,000.
7' 593.
$ 20, 593.
16,715.
$ 37,308.
$ 16, 474.
200.
700.
$ 17,374.
$ 19,934.
$ 60,000.
131,640.
$ 191,640.
93,274.
$ 284,914.
$ 90,050.
2,000.
6,ooo.
$ 98,050.
~ 186,864.
Recommended
Budget
67-68
$ 15,500.
$ 5,126.
J.~oo.
J.wo.
$ 5,926.
$ 9,574.
$ 13,000.
7,268.
$ 20,268.
16,552.
$ 36,820.
$ 16,496.
200.
1,000.
$ 17 ,696.
$ 19,124.
$ 80, 000 •.
128,790.
$ 208,790.
90,994.
$ 299,784.
$ 93,603.
3,000. 8,ooo.
$ 104,603.
$ 195, 181.
CONSTRUCTION FUND SUMMARY:
Sewerage Facilities
Construction
Less: Cash and Revenue
(66-67 Actual $ 76,880)
Cash and Investments, July·l
Interest
\._/ Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND SUMMARY:
Sewerage Facilities
Extensions and Reimburse-
ment Agreement Payments (66-67 Actual $152,235)
Payable to Irvine Company
for Lane Road
Total
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Transfer from District Operating
Fund and Other Charges
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget
1966-67
Recommended
Budget
1967-78
$ 95,601. $ 18:732.
$ 93,677. $ 18,732 ..
1,924. -0--
~ 95,601. $ 18,732.
$ -0--0-
$ 367,225. $ 424~855.
-o-50,000
$ '36z.,225. $ 474~855.
$ 327,225.
40,000.
370~855.
104,ooo.
$ 367-' 225. $ 474, 855.
$ -0-$ -o-
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
1966-67
Actual(l)
1967-68
Estimated
SALARIES AND WAGES:
Directors
Employees
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION:
Total
District Share of Joint Operating
Directors' Mileage
Bond Collection Expense
Connection Charge Administration
Employees' Mileage
Maintenance Expense -General
Utj_ li ties Expense
Interest Expense
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads, etc.
Professional Services
Transfer to Facilities Revolving Fund
Inter-District Sewer Use Charges
1x Collection Expense
"'-"
Total
Total Salaries and Wages, Maintenance
and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOT/\L OPEHl\TING PUND
May and June estimated
$ 2,850. $
22,249.
3,600.
23,000.
$ 25,099. $ 26,600.
$ 70,358. $ 95,598.
177. 200.
15. 100.
8,170. 9,000.
1,600. 1,600.
18,09~~ 27,000.
6,628~ 8,000.
3,214. 5,700.
1,072. 1,500.
15,346. 17,500.
-0-40,000. (2)
2,000. 2,000.
412. 600.
$ 127,086. $ 208,798.
$ 152,185.
-0-
,,, J r-r") I r.·~ i:~ ~~--::~.:.~ ?;.: ;.~ .. ~---·-~<'-··\~
$ 235,398.
20,000.
~·. 2~1') -~<)(\.
::.,_:,·::=.,~--·_:-~:.::· -..=.· .. -=. ··'.::::!.-.:.."":":::::
m Return funds used to finance Assessment Districts, to the
Facilities Revolving Fund of the District.
-h-
DISTHICT TW. 7
CA.PITAL OUTI.1-iY PROJ~CTS
1967 -60
Pro.iect
1 . Contract No. 7 -1-C, Gisler Avenue
Force Main and Trunk Sewer
Financing as follows:
District No. 7 Facilities
~evo:..ving Fund
Unencumbered Funds from
1966 -67 $ 182,500
Estimated Funds available
~rom :..967 -68 6~;000
District No. 7 Accumulated
Cap~tal Outlay Funds pro -
vided in Final
1967 -68 Budgets
Distr~ct No . 6 Share
(5% of $300,000)
August 2, 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cost
$ 300,000
246 ,'.)00
37,370
15,000
$ 298,870
-
'"!>
August 2, 1967 Revo
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
PRELIMINARY BUDGET RECO~llv!ENDATIONS
1967-68 FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal Year Fiscal Year
66-67 67-68
GENERAL SUMMARY:
Reouirements:
Operating Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Bond 1958 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
$ 235,133.
34,275.
157,030.
1,275,073.
$ 326, 285.
33,870.
155,710.
1,2962971.
Total Requirements
Funds Available July 1, 1967
$1,701,511. $1,812,836.
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxes $ 987,156. $ 926,170.
DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE
RAISED BY TAXES $ 714,355. $ 8862666.
Tax Rate:
Operating Fund
Bond 1951 Fund
Bond 1958 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Total
Tax Rate
66-67
$ .0720
.0123
.0572
.3310
$ .4725
*The estimated tax rate was computed usin~ an estimated Assessed
Valuation of $208,382,180" ($191,711,6000 8% Delinquency Factor,
increased from the usual 5% due to tax impounds orde~ed by County
Board of Supervisors.) (Total Taxes impounded 64-65, $17,075;
~5-66, $19,373; 66-67, $40,228.)
\..,.I
One cent will raise $19,1710 in taxes.
-1-
Tax Rate
67-68
Estimated*
$ .0996
.0092
.0447
.j~90
$ .4625
-COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 ....
OPERATING FUND SUMMARY:
Salaries and Wages
Maintenance and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
Total
~
Authorized General Reserve
(66-67 Actual $ 1,425)
(66-67 Actual $120,061)
(66-67 Actual $121,486)
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinauent Taxes
Interest and Misc. Income
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
1951 BOND FUND SUMMARY:
Principal on 1951 Bonds
Interest
Total
Authorized General Reserve
(66-67 Actual $ 12,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 6,895)
(66-67 Actual $ 18,895)
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July l
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
1958 BOND FUND SUMMARY
Principal on 1958· Bonds
Interest
Total
Authorized General Reserve
(66-67 Actual $ 40,000)
(66-67 Actual $ 52,750)
(66-67 Actual $ 92,750)
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget (l) 1966-67
$ 1,600.
141,822.
202000.
$163,422.
71 2711.
~232213:2·
$118,350.
1,000.
42000.
$123,350.
$111,783.
$ 12,000.
62822.'
$ 18,895.
·~ 122380.
~ 342212.
$ 15,287.
300.
100.
t 152687.
~ 182588.
$ 40,000.
. 522120.
$ 92,750.
642280.
~1272030.
$ 67,964.
1,500.
500.
~ 622964.
$ 87,066.
(1) See page 3 for actual 66-67 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Operating Fund detail for 67-68.
NOTE: Hny and June estimated for 66-67 actual expenditures.
-2-
Recommended
Budget (l) 1967-68
$ 1,600.
202,590.
20 2000.
$224,190.
102 2 025·
~326228!2.
$128,811.
1,500.
5,000.
$135,,311.
$190,974.
$ 12,000.
"62625.
$ 18,625.
$ 152245.
$ 332870.
$ 15,901.
300.
100.
$ 16,,301.
$ l7.z269.
$ 40,000.
202350.
$ 90,350.
652360.
~1222710.
$ 67,,478.
1,500.
12000.
$ 69~978.
$ 85,732.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND:
Treatment Plant Expansion
Facilities Improvements
Equity Purchase in Joint
"-"' Works
Tax Collection Expense
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue:
( 66-67 Actual $168, 126)
(66-67 Actual $353,135)
(66-67 Actual $120,lQO)
(66-67 Actual $ 1,356)
(66-67 Actual $642,717)
Cash and Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest & Misc. Revenue
Receivable from District No. 3
Total Cash and Revenue
AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
Approved
Budget
1966-67
$ 650,073.
515,000.
110,000.
-o-
$1,275,073.
574,767.
3,388.
10,000.
1202000.
~ 7782155.
~ . 4262218.
Recommended
Budget
1967-68
$ 782,460.
410,000.
102,711.
1,800.
$1: 296? 971.
$ 682,875.
6,705.
15,000.
-o-
$ 704.! 580.
~ 2~22 391.
OPERATING FUND DETAILED EXPENDITURES
SALARIES AND WAGES:
Directors
Total
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION:
District Share of Joint Operating
Directors' Mileage
Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads, etc.
Maintenance Expense -General
Manhole Repairs
Utilities Expense
Interest Expense
Professional Services
Inter-District Sewer Use Charges
Tax Collection Expense
Total
Total Salaries and Wages, Maintenance
and Operation
Unappropriated Reserve
TOTAL OPERATING FUND
(1) May and June estimated
-3-
1966-67 1967-68
Actua~ (1) Estimated
$
t
$
12425. _$ __ 1_,_60_0_.
1, 425. ....,$ __ 1-"'-,_60_0_.
82,058.
61.
303.
16,420.
-0-
11, 060.
3,603.
631.
5,625.
300.
$ 106,540.
100.
350.
27,000.
25,000.
15,000.
3,100.
2,500.
22,500.
500.
$ 120,061. $ 2022590.
$ 121,486. $ 204,190.
-o-20,000.
$ 121,486. $ 224,190.
Project
DISTRICT NO . 11
CAPITAL OUTLAY PROJECTS
1967-68
1 . Contract No. 11 -10 -2, Slater
Avenue Gravity Sewer and the
Slater Avenue Sewage Pumping
Station and Force Main Sewer
(portion of completed contract
remaining unpaid)
2 . Contract No. 11-11, Slater -
Springdale Trunk Sewer Relief
Total Budget for District
Facilities I mprovements
August 2, 1967 Rev .
Estimated Cost
$ 44,ooo
366;000
$ 410,000
Agenda Item #54: The General Counsel will discuss this matter under District 7,
"Other Business 11 • :
MOTION FOR DISTRICT NO. 7
Motion authorizing and directi~g the Chairman to
execute "Agreement Regardi~g Compensation for
Privately Constructed Sewer" between the District and
Frances G. Wendt and authorizing the payment of
$4,445 to Frances G. Wendt pursuant to the terms of said
agreement from Assessment District No. 6 funds and to
authorize the acceptance of a Quit Claim Deed from
Frances G. Wendt and the recordi~g thereof.
OFITICERS Pl RECTORS
MERWIN WAGNER. PRESIDENT
HENRY T. SCGERSTROM. ~·1R::>T VICE: PRESIDENT
COURTNEY R. CHANDLER. SCCOND VICE PRESIDENT
~ HOWARD W. CROOKC. SECR£7ARY MANAGER
LANGDON W. OWEN. Ol~TRICT ENGINEER
PHCSTO~i I<. ALLEN. ANAHCIM
COUHTN~Y R. CHANDLER. SANTA ANA
HOWAHD M. CORNWELL. FULLERTON
H. LOUIS LAKE. GARDEN GROVE
CHAHLCS A. PEARSON. ANAHEIM
.""-I
RUTAN & TUCKER
GENERAl. COUNSl.::L
PILLSDURY. MADISON ANO SUTRO
S?ECll\l. COUNSEL
WILLIAM E. DANNEMEYER
SPECIAL COUNSEL
CONSULTING ENGINEERS: ORANGE
TOUPS ENGINEERING, INC.
BOOKMAN ANO EDMONSTON
COUNTY VVATER DISTRICT
LEEDS. HILL ANO JEWETT. INC.
JAMES M. MONTGOMERY. CONSUL.TING
ENCOINEERS. INC.
1629 WEST SEVENTEENTH STREET 0 TELEPHONE (714) 547-6781
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA
92706
August 3, 1967
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
of Orange County, California
P. O. Box 5175
Fo~ntain Valley, California 92708
Attention: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
ROY SEADRIOGC. HUNTINGTON BEACH
HENRY T. SCGCHSTROM. SANTA ANA
MCRWIN WACNCR. PLACENTIA
MINOR WARNE. TUSTIN
E. T. WATSON. ORANGE
Re: Proposed Water Reclamatio~ Plant in the Northern
Part of Orange County
On behalf of our Board of Directors, I am pleased to
forward herewith a certified copy of Resolution No.
67-62 which the Board adopted at its regular meeting
held on July 19, 1967, declaring its intent to
cooperate in studies to determine the economic feasi-
bility of a water reclamation plant in the northern part
of Orange County.
.Enclosure
Yours very truly,
. // ·. I ,/Jl ~ ~--;-cL<..,v--~A (tYu'-t"/[ S::
HOWARD W. CROOKE
Secretary Manager
CC: Orange County Board of Supervisors
Sanitation Study Review Board
ORMWi!; COU:NTY \1 T:"~r.rEP. DIS'l1RICT
1629 West l'lth Street
Santa Ana, California
RESOLUTION NO. 67-62 DECLAi\ING INTENT OF BOARD OF DI~.
RECTORS OF ORANGE COUNTY 'WAT~R
DISTRICT TO COOPERATE IN STUDIES
TO DETEPJHI'-IB TIIE ECONOMIC FEASI-
BILITY OF A WATER RECLAMATION
PLANT
Wl-IEREAS,, the Board of Supervisors of Orange County in July
1966 received and approved a report entitled DWaste Water
Disposal and Recormnendation for the County of Orange, Calif-
ornia, 1966-2000, 11 which report reconunended the establishment
of a water reclamation plant in the northern part of Orange
County:J and
W:EEREAS_, the Sanitation Study Review Board appointed by the
Board of Supervisors to review and assist in the preparation
of said report to the Board of Supervisors has diligently
pursued studies for the purpose of determining the economic
feasibility and the methods of financing said reclamation
plant, and
WHEREAS, in connection with said studies said Sanitation
Study_ Review Board, in response to a request from t!-ie Board
of Supervisors, prepared and on May 3, 1967 submitted to the
Board of Supervisor·s a supplementary repor·t entitled 11 A
Proposed Water Reclamation Plant in Northern Part of Orange
County, 11 and
WHERE.AS, the Board of Supervisors on May 3, 1967 adopted
Resolution No. 67-454 directing the forwarding of said
report of the Sanitation Study Review Board to County Sanitation
District No. 2 of Orange County and to this District and
encouraging said Districts to continue the studies and
planning requirements to determine the economic feasibility
and, if feasibleJ to accomplish its implementation_,
'i.\ro-~.(, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED _n.s FOLLOWS:
(1) That the report prepared by the Sanitation Study Review
Board dated May 3, 1967, entitled "A Proposed Water Reclamation
Plant in Northern Part of Orange Cm.mty" and Resolution No.
67-454 of the Orange County Board of Supervisors are hereby
ordered received and filed;
(2) That this Board hereby gratefully acknowledges and corrrrnends
the Board of Supervisors and said Sanitation Study Review
Board for their foresight and attention to the general public
interest as evidenced by the reports heretofore described
and for their diligence and thoroughness in their studies of
the reclamation project under consideration;
,.
(3) That.this Board declares its intent to cooperate
fully with County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange
County and others in continuing necessary studies and
planning requirements to determine the economic feasibility
of said water reclamation project and, if found feasible,
to study methods of accomplishing its implementation; and
(4) That a copy of this resolution is hereby ordered to
be forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors
and to the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2 of Orange County and to all members of the Sanitation
Study Review Board.
# # # # # # # # # #
I, HOWARD W. CROOKE, Secretary Manager of the Orange .
County Water District, do hereby certify the above
to be a true and correct copy of resolution duly
adopted by the Board of Directors at the regular meeting
of said Board held July 19, 1967.
HOWAP.D W. CROOKE
Secretary Manager
COU NTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
o f O RANGE C OUNTY , CALI FORNIA
August 4 , 1967
P. 0. BOX 5175
10844 l:LLIS AVl:NUI:
FOUNTAIN VALL(;'(, CALIFORNIA, 92708
REPORT OF TF.E EXECUTIVE COMi'f:ITTEE
August 2, 1967
EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
PRESENT : Directors Parsons (Cha i rman), McM ichael , Speer ,
Porter , and Culver
ABSENT : Directors Baker , Mil l er , and Shipley
BUILDING COMMITTEE
PRESENT : Directors Parsons, Culver , and Schwerdtfeger
ABSENT : Di rector Miller (Chairman)
OTHERS PRESENT: Directors Grub er and Hock
Convened :
Adjourned :
5 :30 p .m.
8 :25 p .m.
Fred A. Harper , Paul G. Brown , Norman
R. ~remblay, Wi ilard T . Jordan , Ken
Doyle, and Howard Way
1 . MASTER PLAN FOR IMPROVING THE APPEARANCE OF TREATMENT
PLANT NO. 2.
At the regular meet ing held Ap ril 12th , the Districts'
Boards o~ Directors accepted the proposal of Willard T .
Jorda~. Architec~. ~or archi~ectural services for developing
a Y!aster Plan for improving the appearance of the Dis~ric~s 1
~reatment Plant No. 2 . Since then the Executive Commit~ce
and Building Committee have met jointly on numerous occasions
with the Architect and his associates to develop an accept -
able program for the Districts which would greatly improve
the appearance of Treatment Plant No . 2 , and would be
economically within the Districts' capabilities and policies .
i:::r.e Exe c utive Committee and Building Comm ittee ,ioi:-.:.tly
recom:nend to the Boards of Directors that the enclosed Mas1:;er
Plan for Plant No . 2 be approved and adopted .
2 .
The Committees further recommend that the following
actions be taken by the Boards of Directors to imp l ement
the Master Plan :
Landscaping
a . That the Districts proceed immediately with
Phases 1 and 3 as outlined in the Master Plan ,
plus the planting of trees on that portion of
the Districts' property bordering the Santa Ana
River (~portion of Phase 2 of the Plan).
b . That the Districts request a proposal from
Willard T . Jordan, Architect, for the prepara-
tion of detailed plans and specifications for
the implementation of Landscaping Phases 1 and
3, etc .
c . That the major work included in Phase 2 of
Landscaping be delayed until the completion
of the proposed equipment enclosures .
Architecture
a . That the Districts proceed with the construction
of Buildings A through E as outlined in the
Master Plan (1967 -68 budget -Project No . 2072).
b . That John Carollo Engineers be directed to
proceed with the preparation of plans and
specifications for the construction of Buildings
A through E . This work to be coordinated with
Architectural Design Consultant, Willard T .
Jordan .
The current plant construction budget provides $220,000
for site improvements and equipment enclosures at Plant No. 2 .
The Architect 1 s total estimate, including the buildings and
all phases of landscaping, is $144,276 . The staff anticipates
an expenditure for additional paving and improved drainage
facilities during the 1968-69 fiscal year, but the total ex-
penditure should not exceed the budgeted amount .
The Committee has requested that Mr. Jordan attend the
Joint Board meeting to review his recommendations and present
drawings and sketches of the proposed improvements . The
proposed Master Plan and related cost estimates are enclosed
for the Directors 1 study .
2 . CLOSEOUT OF JOB NO. P2 -7A TURBINE -GENERATOR SET NO. 1, PLANT
NO. 2 .
Staff Reoort -The Districts have retained the amount of
$46 ,074 .bO from funds due the contractor , pending the satisfactory
3 .
perfor~ance of the sludge gas turbine and heat recovery un:t .
I~ our :ast discussions w:th representatives of Orenda, :nc .,
and their subcontractor who supplied the heat recovery un~t
(Engineering Controls), we were unable to resolve substantial
dollar differences . The equipment is now acceptable , and the
amount of the final payment must be determined .
Norman Tremblay , the Districts' Construction Engineer,
rev:eNed for the Committee members the extensive discussions
and negotiations conducted by the staff with the represe~tatives
of L • e~uipment supplier regarding a back-charge by the
District~ ln the amount of ~9 ,988 .00 for modificat~onP and
rev~sions in the installation of the turbine generator equip -
ment .
The equipment supplier countered with additional charges
of $1?,795 .24, which they claim resulted from modifications
not ·included ln the specj_fications, < 1.d th3 1 ack of proper
\v:1 tci· t.1·t·n tment ol' the baller water durinG pr·elimlna1·,y tc:-_;tlng
stages . (The General Counsel has advised the staff tnat
either claim would be dif J.'icul t to support from a legal stand -
• +-) pain..,,
Committee Recommendat~on -Following a lengthy discussion
with tne staff, the Committee recommends that the claims by
the District and the claims by the eouioment suoplier be off _
se~, with no dollar exchange, and that the General Manager be
authorized to execute and forward to the eouipment supol~er
t~e letter-agreement prepared by the General Counsel and
included with the agenda under Item No . 15 , setting forth
the conditions for final payment .
3 . ESTABLISHING CLASSIFICATION OF SENIOR ACCOUNTING TECHI\TICIAN .
Sta~f Report -At the present time , the Districts 1
position of Accountant is vacant and we have encountered difficulty
in securing an applicant qualified to fill it . We have also
d~scovered that other public agencies in Orange County, and
throughout the State, are having the same problem . Several of
the agencies have found it necessary to go out of state to fill
the:r positions.
~o alleviate this situation the staff is recommending
that ~he classification of Senior Account~ng Technician
be established as an intermediate level accounting position .
With this new classification, in the event qualified applicants
are r.o~ available to fill the position of Accountant, the
~lexibility derived from the recently adopted positions -
personnel concept will permit the staff to fill the Senior
Accounting Technician position, at a lower salary , with an
applica~t w~o has not yet completed the requirements of the
Accountant position .
It shou:d be noted that the recommendation is for the
addition of the classification only , and not for additional
personnel .
4 .
Con~m i ttee Recommendation -In view of' the dif'ficul ty
encou~~erea oy tne starr in securing an apolicant qualif~ed
~o f:~l the posltlcn of Accountant, the Executive Committee
i-ecorr.!Tiends that a classi.:·icaticn of Senior Accoum:;::.ncr
Technic ·an be establ~shed. This is in keeping with the
recently adopted positions-personnel concept .
CO UNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY , C ALIFORNIA
P. 0 . BO;< 5175
1oe44 E:LLI~ AVENUE:
f'OUNTAIN VALLEY, CAUf'ORNIA, 92708
July 28 , 1967
MANAGER 1 S REPORT TO THE EXECUTDTE COKMITTEE
Chairman Parsons has invited Directors Gruber and Hock to
attend this meeting and to participate in the discussions .
~he following is an explanation of the items of bus~ness
proposed to be taken up at the Aug~st 2nd joint meeting of the
Execu0ive Committee and the Building Committee . At the 0ime
the meetinG i:r1as c .::tlled , we hoped to keep the number of agenda
j_ terns to i.l. minimum since the Co:·rur . .:.. ttees have been hewing rather
long mon~hly meetings ; however, we feel that these items are of
such importance 0hat they should be brought to the Committees 1
a tter.."Cion .
1. r.·~Ci,_STER PLAN FOR I~PnOVING THE APPEARANCE OF TREAT1'1ENT PLA~rT
\0 . 2 .
Following the July 6th rne\.;tinc; of' the Commit teE:s, Archi tee t
Willard T . Jordan was given the following instructions :
a . Proceed with the preparation of estimates for the
re~edial wo r k on the existing buildings and the new
structures, (Project No . 2072, included in the 1967-68
budget), including a layout for an Operato r s 1 building .
b . Prepare cost estimates for the following :
Phase 1 . Imm edi ate perime0er landscaping and
wall, including entrance to the plant, based on
the Architect 's presentation of July 6th .
Ptase 2 . Interior site improvements, primarily
landscap ing and mounding .
Phase 3 . Perimeter planting of that portion of
the plant site northerly of the present entrance .
c . Submit revised drawings of the proposed Operators '
bu~lding ~o r the Boards 1 consideration .
Should the Committees approve his recommendatio~s, and if
i"C is f0~sible for the Districts 00 proceed, the Committees ~ay
desire that Mr . Jordan make a formal presentation to the Joint
Bou r ds at the August meeting .
...
"... ..
2 .
2 . REVIK-J OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL 1 S COMPENSATION .
During the latter part of 1966> the Executive Commit~ee
reviewed with the General Counsel his fee schedule as established
by Resolution No . 63-150 (attached). At that meeting > it was
agreed that a monthly report of his servi ces would be submitted
·with his invoi c e> and the Committee would review the reports and
re -examine the General Counsel's fee schedule prior to the adoption
of the 1967-68 budgets .
At the last meeting of the Executive Committee > the monthly
repor~s o~ h~s services rendered were reviewed> and the staf: was
direc0ed to compile information from o~her special dis~ricts in
the Coun~y to determine the c urrent fees paid by them f or legal
services . This information is attached to this report , along
wi th 0he material submitted to the Commit~ee at the last meeting .
3 . CONSIDERATION OF A JOINT OPERATING BUDGET ITEM TO PROVIDE
FOR SPECIAL FUNCT~ONS, ACTIVI~IES, ETC .
I~ was agreed at the join~ meeting in July> that the
Ex e c utive Comm i ttee should consider the possibility of e stabli sh-
i ng a budget e x pense item which would provide payment for certai n
types of ac~iv i ties such as the proposed dinner meeting on
Septemoe:r 13th (which include guests who are City Officials from
the various citi es represented on the Districts ' Boards). The
s t aff ';-;ill have budget inforrr.ation available at the meeting .
4 . CLOSEOUT OF JOB NO. P2 -7A TURBINE -GENERATOR SET NO . 1, ?LANT
NO . 2 .
The Dis~ricts have retai ned the amount of $46,074 .60 :rom
funds due the c ontractor, un t il the sludge gas turbine and hea ~
r ecovery unit p e rform satisfactorily . In our last dis c ussions
Ni th representat i ves of Orenda> Inc., and their subcontrac~or
-.v:no supplied t he heat recovery unit (Engi neering Contro l s)> r.-re
we r e unable t o reso lve substantial dollar d i fferences .
The equipmen t is now acceptable, and the amount of the
:ina: pay;1ent must be determined . The s ~aff would like ~o discuss
t!'l i s ma t ~er wi t h the Executi ve Committee at the mee t ing .
5 . I:•:-DIVIDUAL DISTRICTS' BULGETS.
We anticipate havi ng f i nal assessed v aluation figures by
the time of the meet i ng , a nd t he s t a f f wi l l pr e s e n t r e c ommenda tion s
for tr.e final budgets .
6 . ESl1P3LISHDTG CLASSIFICA::='ION OF SENIOR ACCOUN·rING 'I·B CH~IC:-::AN .
At the present t i me > the Distri cts ' position of Accountant
is vacant and we have encountered d i ff iculty in securi ng a
qual ified app licant t o f ill it . We hav e also d isc overed that
-:.
..) .
ot~er public agencies in Orange County, and throughout the State,
are havin~ the same problem . Several of the aeencics have found
it necessary to go out of state to fill their positions .
'::'o al::.eviate this situat:'...;:n the sta:f is recom~r.endir:.g that
the classification of Senior Accounting Technician be established
as an inter~ediate level acco~~tinb position . Wit~ this new
classi~ic~tion, in the event Qualified applicants are r-o~ available
to fill the position of Accountant, the flexibility derived from
"the recent2.y adopted posi tioYLs -personnel concept vrill perr;,i t the
staf: 00 ::_11 the Senior Accounting Tech~ician position, at a
lower salary, with an applicant who has not yet completed the
requireffie~~~ of the Accountan~ position .
It should b e noted that the recommendation is for the
addition o: the position only, and not for additional personne l .
FAH : jb
Enclosures
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
..
.
.
..
.
..
.
..
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
.
.
·-
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
..
--
-
..
.
--
-
·
,
•
'
•
'•
'
•
•
-
'
,.
,
.
,
.
•
•
•
I•
-
•
·~
••
•
o
•
'
'
-
••
•
.-
*
(
(
' .
..
..
t'
(~
\
(I
)
f
.\
·~
[I
)
~.
)
·
()
fl
)
f•
)
I'
>
0
tJ
..
.
.
.
()
..
:
~
"'
,,
,
('
J
(:
l
(:
\
I·
'
·
()
'
:-
.
)
•o
~~
I!
.
>
Cv
..
.
.
0
.
'
<
:-
:'
,n
c~
·
<
ln
r:
:
p
..
•0
p.
.0
c:
·
s:
I.
)
, '"
s;
{:
\
(~
)
::
>
0
ct
·
(t
>
:;
·
:
s
t.
>
d
..
,
.
..
.
.
·
..
:j
d"
d"
•·
!
>
I·
'
·
cf
·
:·
,
.
ti
d·
S\
'
t.
)
:~
l·
'
·
~
()
..
(:
>
(:
)
u'
d·
v'
.
)
.,
~
d·
(;
l
0
-:
1!
c;
-
"
•}
«I
·
I{
Ci
>
:
>'
'•
I\
)
l-
'
(}
tn
I·
'
·
f>
,
'-
:
\
.
r:
{f
J
I·
,
(!
>
(f
J
-~
:·
_
,
u
..
.
.
.
fj
Ct
.
>
..
.
-
•
. -~
-..
""
!
.
,
I)
(~
)
0
~'
)
(~
)
(i
i
0
(!
)
p,
C:
>
0
(f
J
,.
I
,
• t:
0
:
!
:
~·
(.
\
:.
,
()
'
I-
!
_
,
p.
()
P>
{!
)
0
--
·
(,
I
)
lJ
J
OJ
•u
.
p
t1
j
--
.
:
.
.
. .
c:
-
«
(~
\
·~
c:
-
cr
1
f.
J
()
1-
-
'
(
:·
"'
0
c
r·
:.
;
J
'"
'
IJ
..
.
.
,J
J
d"
p
~-
\
.
>
t)
'
.,
i
I-
'
·
t-
J
(!
l
(°
t
l
I-
'
•
~)
..
.
P·
::
>
'
(~
..
.
.
.
~!
I
I
•
t•
J
0
I
'·
t:
j
)
.
J·
"
~'
\)
• ..
.
i
t-
)
I)
0
I·
'
·
ct
·
p,
0
r.
>
l·
!
I
o:
i
0
~J
.
'·
!•
~
l-
'
<
..
~
:t
>
.r
:
.
-
.
:
l
~·
Y.
~>
::
}
•:
.
.
:
0
~
c·
~
''
-
-
.
;
1-
"
·
(,
\
:.
~
[I
)
r.
>
..
J'
.
)
~
J-
-
•
0
0
Ct
>
:.
:
>
:1
.
:
(i
)
()
(/
)
\.
!
)
P·
(>
{f
J
0
~·
~
~
0
••
~'
-
J
~i
ti
0
(.
'
I
·
~
:
>
e·
:
-
CD
~
,
__
,
fj
·-
~
H
,_
>-
J
l·
.
·
.
•
-.
.
.
.
.
l-
'
~~
d
"
··
·
-
C/
)
"
v'
t:
J
u
·
~;
j
'c
.
.
:
A
•o
p
r.
,
H)
p
v-
'
I}
p,
-~
.
I
)
-
I\
.
)
:J
1-
'
=-
1
.
J
·d
lf
J
CX
>
l-
'
·
:-
_
·
;
'-
!J
j
t!
J
~~
:
~
~
t:
i
s:
:
c
:-
t)
l'
:
a
•$
•
..
.
.
.
.
c.
,
-l
.
o·
I·
'
·
d"
(.
>
.
t:
-
J
J-
1
I-
'
·
"
0
P·
r-
>
t:
J
t~
·e
n
r~
ct
F·
r ..
>
f.
l
(>
(>
tn
0
(i
)
{t
l
:
..
f
0
•.
r
J
0
P·
c-
1
·
:5
f!
.
>
~.
I
.r
:
:
:
-
o
t:
;
:
o
t-
;
fr
)
~-
'
)
l-
'
<
:"
'
>
0
c:
-
c~
I-
'
·
:)
·
0
"
.
<D
~
.
0
~
:.
5
P>
U1
"
,
. .J
\J
l
•;
.
j
•
)
t:
~-
.
I
-c
:
O
F
·
O
O
•
;
•
J.
~
(/
)
:>
p)
•
1-
·
3
0
::
l
.
1-
=
1
~·
er
-
·-
·
·
:»
\[
)
l"
•
C'
:.
-
!
;
o
·-
·
-.
1
1
.
'
t)
P.
0
0
c·
:
-
-
l-
'
0
:-
5
-
'
(;
)
S'
.
>
(O
{/
)
!5
'
~J
0
0
co
p.
·
0
(i
J
0
!t
>
Jj
t
•
t-
-
J
r.
:
1
0
l
·'
-
00
ta
:>
r.
>
0
..
.
.
.
.
.
0
{'
.
>
:
..
'S
::
s
I-
'
·
(!
,
)
f!
l
~
f-
!
.
>
H
.I
-
!
>
f-
>
~
~~
i
H
:~
~
.
()
:>
·
~
(=
)
.
c:
-
I-
~
!t
>
.
~
c-
t
-
CD
P.
:
0:
}
l-
·
'
c-
i
"
~
c:
-
0
p.
•c
s
:.
:
S
l
:
i
H
0
;:
;
.
:
; :5
-
!
d·
O
.
l-
..
c-
t
-
1-
1
,
,
e·
o·
J-
;
)
p-
'
~
Co
d·
..
.
.
ct
-
.
p.
~
l:
J
~~
(·
_,
••
J
(;
)
p
(-
J
::
i
PO
rt
0
:.
1
Ci
>
t:
J
cf
·
r:
.
>
0
c-
1
-
1-
!
.
>
0
~
(l
)
tf
J
~ ..
0
:.
)
·
·
..
:.
.
U
H
.-
-
:
<
U:
!
Y
i
!.
;
J
>-
-
;
0
c~
l)
.
:-
_
)
I·
.
)
..
.
.
.
.
0
:)
"
"
l-
'
·-
~
0
.
H
~d
JJ
·
(I
)
<4
0
.
~
t;
:
i
~
~\
,
.
1
0
(.
.
:
>
';
_
,
r
~
t.
J
O
F·
C
~
-~
·
)
}.
.
.
!
·
0,
P>
::
)
•o
l-
'
(:
J
0
lj
t-
J
t-
~
1-
)
·.
.
·.
.
0V
v
~)
t-
:
• ..
-
j
d=
~
"
>
(_
.
;
i-
·
:
;
::
;
I
.:
.
:.
.
J
0
1-
'
.
~
••
J,
f:
>
•-
'
()
c-
r
-
0
:i
:
.
~
ct
(L
l
:(
t
>
c_
t
c-
:
-
0
I
·o
n
=
J
o
C.
:
.
!
;
.
-
:
;
0
C·
:
:
o
t<
:-
j
f . .\
..
~
0:
}
{/
}
~
""
[I
)
0
p ..
~
c-
1
"
t3
~J
0
ti
'
)
p,
0
.
:)
·
0
•
:,
-
-
;
.
.
l:
J
t·
<
0
~-
;
~
-t
t-
:
0
•-
'
[I
)
::
:
0
(t
)
<.
-
:
-
:.
.
:
J-
)
{!
>
f:
;
Ci
.
>
:.
-
s
:=
>
'
c-
:
-
M
0
p.
\:
.
l
r.
;
.
I
t-
:
C!
H
0
i:
.
:
o
C'
·•
..
>
0
~·
}
0
.
t·
J
J-
J
•.
;
)
(:
)
{f
J
J-
1
~-
;
J-
1
·
c-
:
-
0
::
>
(f
J
p_
.
f-
·
·
c-
:
·
::
>
rs
·H
l
·
J
~
C
!
s:
~
:-
!
,
~:
:
P
~)
c~
·
0
r.
;
..
.
,
0
f'
J
..
.
.
~)
{/
}
..
J
~
~
0
r)
~
0
Ci
"
t'
i
c:
-
I
~
•-
:
0
!~
H
._
.
)
.-
-
:
•
:J
~-
·
·
~~
f-
'
·
0
(>
<.
:
-
c·
;
-
"'
"
C
)
·~
(:
)
C.
.
1
t-
i
c-
J
-
("
)
-
f:
>
<.
:
'
.
0
["
:
j
I·
)
L"
.
:
~.
:
r
0
~
.
'
le
>
~'
-
!
C:
/
<
•~
t
~
·d
~
r:
·-
·
·
~)
«
l-
'
~
(/
J
0
tJ
CD
.
l
'·
()
:l
>
:j
I
en
t-
1
1<
~
-.
.
.
(>
0
0
c:
-
"
.J
.
:,
<
·-
~
..
.
•
0
f'
J
..
.
.
.
z
"
0
0
g.
(L
)
{I
)
!:
1
J
t-
.
:
.
j
\.
.
.
"
.
"
~
:;
J
·'
t)
•
.
..
j
<.
f
-
(I
)
0
0
1-
)
:-
:
;
:5
·-
'·
u
:5
..
.
:j
~
~J
I
t;
-
J
>
0
Ct
.
•
c~
·
~~
..
,
()
p
(>
0
()
th
~·
•-
;
$
s
··
~
~·
l-
'
•
c-
:
-
to
[I
)
P·
•-
'
:.
.
-
>
V1
~~
;
:.
:
-
=
-
:~
.
:
a
..
i ~-
!
()
0
1·
·
'
0
•-
1
;
0
0
0
(f
J
d·
tl
l
!r
>
r.
>
0
::
>
0
i-
a
.
I
.
0
tJ
t·
:
~~
~
.
~
..
.
;
~
•
~
!:
j
r.
.
:
er
-
l-
'
·
•>
e·
:
-
..
.
.
.
.
er
·
fl
l
~
0
(/
)
:~
f-
-
'
p.
.
o~
ci
·
ti
H
.!
:
j
\-
:
-
}
.>
..
(1
\
:.
>
~~
f-
'
,_
s
·:
a
~
o:
:
~,
C"
i
"
:.
)
..
P.
>
cf
-
8·
~>
P~
.f
-
'
·
CD
P>
r.
1
1
..
C!
0
0
t-
)
('
r
•c
-
.
ct
·
O
1-
·
·
~:
>
ct
p.
,
~)
Cl
>
~
(~
:-
s
P·
:3
"
•.
c
j
P1
c:
-
..
_
.
(
:·
..
.
J
0
0
=·
=
=
-
\.
.
~
!
t
i
l1
.
'
~
•·
:
i
c:
-
:
;
Ct
>
P·
::
;
'-
p,
0
.J
.
0
ct
'
-
{'
.
.
)
.
~.
;
)
l-
'
·
·.
H
:-
<
c:
t·
J
"J
o
I
cl
-
..
.
~
.
ti
)
<
l-
'
·
Cf
.
1
Cc
)
::
l
µ
C.
.
:
t-
r
0
d
P-
>
()
0
. .
0
t\
.
f
~~
H
•-
'
.
\H
c:
-
(.
)
•o
p.
N
Ci
>
C/
)
(I
)
0
l-
'
·
f·
J
t-
t
••
@
ct
0
~
~
t;
-
J
t:
'
J
0
-.
·
j
O
:>
"
'
c~
o·
•u
0
P1
fl
)
:_
}
f\
>
::
l
•o
t-
J
t?
.
.0
o•
..
.
,
.
~
(I
.
>
~
~
t;
j
~~
\.
T
I
_
_.
0
•a
~
-
,
(i
.
>
(:
)
Q
l-
t
J
~
d
(i
)
P·
(!
)
Ct
>
..
.
.
ct
-
"
~
Ii
d"
<
tj
{/
)
t"
'
·.
.
.
:
:
(
~
..
.
.
'-
c~
0
Hj
,.
,
ft
>
P·
•-
.
s
p,
•j
•s
[I
)
•-
s
Cl
.
>
l-
'
-
..
.
.
CD
(/
)
..
.
.
~
:r
>
"
'
t,
:
J
•'
t-
J
()
!$
0
•-
s
~
..
.
.
.
.
0
f\
)
J\
>
fl
.
>
c1
-
$1
>
u'
..
~
CD
(L
>
(f
)
o
..
~
H
0
•-
s
p
0
1-
-
'
:s
..
.
.
.
.
ti
>
l-
'
ct
·
•:
)
c:
t
C'
J
~
~
l-
'
ct
-
{I
)
H
>.
:
J
(.
t
)
~:
:
-
-
>
r.
;
P
>
0
:.
s
1-
J
«!
f\
J
P•
fJ
•
P·
<
•)
•
OH
~
~
c.
;
~j
en
"
}-
;
'
{I
>
•-
'
..
_
.
0
0
()
<
f:
.
>
ct
-
f\
.
l
Ii
p.
fJ
·
~.
.
:
:
x
:l
t
"1
~
c:
·
o
P
(:
)
fl
>
:j
0
~)
0
::
s
er
-
Ci
>
:.
.
>
.
.:
-
.
)
..
l·
j
(j
)
::
;
()
\.
0
HH
. -
~
~
::
.
s
:.
s
tr
>
tf
J
:5
p,
~
·~
§
(I
)
to
p
..
•
(l
)
I-
'
·
(~
)
c~
o:
>
zo
'-
,
(>
'<
!
""
g
p,
~
<4
..
.
0
·o
ri
~\
ti
>
..
.
.
0
•-
3
ti
l
t
<
d-
I-
'
{.
l
)
.
0
J-
)
~ ..
~
()
~
(l
l
()
J:
>
"
rj
•-
'
I-
'
(.
>
:}
·
<l
·
('
&
)
P>
HJ
o:
:
(:
)
R
to
::
s
()
l-
'
-
:J
fh
0
l-
'
0
n>
(f
J
0
I-
'
:-
s
('
.
\
..
'
cl
-
0
:~
f.
J
.
0
::
i
(i
l
I-
'
C"
t
>
p.
0
:-
>
l-
'
·
·~
s
S'
J
·~
c'
·
'J
•·
'
"
p
tT
1-
·
'
0
•-
;
l1
..
C/
)
t-
~
P·
Cl
l
CV
()
P~
p,
0
f1
:
J
:s
·-
1
(V
CV
0
<
(i
1
~5
·
cl
·
fl
>
N
:j
er
-
r-
'
r>
••
.•
;)
I
p
I
C>
f .!
fJ
·
{!
>
: .,
.
•)
p1
:)
'
(/
}
I
'·
c:
-
:)
J'
.
l
ct
·
p,
ct
·
• .s
C>
f'
.
>
I·
·
'
fl
>
(h
er
-
(~
)
J\
l
0
(l
l
()
:~
(t
>
.
I-
'
·
<J
('
~
l-
'
cl
·
Cl
>
..
,
.
I,
ct
:·
~
p.
(~
'
(.
~
,,
(~
<!
<-
<
V1
0
0
l"
((
)
(l
\
H
(I
)
o·
:j
t.
>
"
0
(t
J
J-
I
.f
i
.
>
<.
.
:
!
:5
p.
c~
•
..
.
..
...........
Othc: ... wo~lc on bcl:alf of ·ch0 Cou!'lty Sanitation
Districts of 01~8.nGC Cou~·::·cy which in the opinion
01' th~ Ge~c::..~a.1 Mm--..r:.ze:.~ and G8ner·al Counzcl is
::-iot \·1i thin the 1.·1ork cc1-.-;;e:·::plat;cd under tho
retaine~~ subject· to ap?roval of the DistrictG.
Sectlon 4. -Compensatio~ fc~ appeara~ces in any cou.::·t of
la\i o~ before administrative o~ legislative committees er agencies
or at public hearinss en behz.lf ot the Coun"'~y Sanitation Distr·:Lcts
of Ora~ge County~ shall b? at the ~ate of ~wo Hundred ($200.00)
Dolla~s p~r day er any part of a day.
'I·:~at; all other extra wo:.---l\: shall be compensated at tr.e rate
of T.11:' ty-f i ve Dollars pe~ hour.
~~2t~ in addition to the conpensation herainabcve pro-
actual expenses of travel; food and lodging outside the
County Orange on the business of the Districts and all other
necessc..~y eX:9enditures Ou ·~ne business of the Districts shall be
reimbursed in the actual amounts.so expended.
T.~at whera special counsel have heretofore
~een e~~lcyed and are now employed on behalf of the Districts, their
co::.:)e::-.;.sa-'.;ion shall be in accorda:'lce wi.th that hereinabove provided
for t~e Ge~eral Counsel for extra work, and that,· in the absence of
z~ecial.provisicns to the contrary, a~y future special counsel
0~)lcy~~ by t~c District~· or a Dist~ict ~h~ll be compcnsat?d in
acco::-·ca:.cc with the compensation hereinabove provided tor the
'Eiat Resolutio~s Nos. 98, 403, 45~ and 768J
and that this r~solution shall take effect
1963.
SURVEY OF LEGAL COUNSEL FEES PAID
BY SPECIAL DIS~l'RICTS IN ORANGE COUNTY
Costa Mesa Sanitary
District
Water
Les Alamitos Cou.:'lty
Wate::. .. District
Garden Grove Sanitary
District
Midway City Sanitary
District
Orange County
)!~1icipal Water
District
Orar.ge County Water
j)istrict
South Laguna Sanitary
District
Stan~on County Water
District.
Yorba Linda County
Water District
Salary or Reta~ner
$250/month
Contract by Resolution
Mini~um of $60 for
~oard Mtg. of 2 hours
$35/hr. for general
work as needed
$60 for meeting of 2
hours
$475
No retainer
$250 monthly retainer
for attendance at
meetings and handling
routine work
No retainer
$30/hour for attend-
ing meetings with a
minimum fee of $60 for
any one Board meeting
$30/hour·minimum of
$60 per meeting
$300/month retainer
for attendance at 2
different Board Mtgs.
Eztre:.s
For everything that is
required
Court app~aranc~s:
1/2 day ---$100
Full day --$200
$30/hr. for extra work
Contracts~ e~c. -?lat Rate
Research -$15 per ~our
All work, including
meetings, $30 per hcur
Extra work over 10 hours
P!:l-; d at t'n-::. ·r-r ..... -o~ ~· -:.c:;;... .• f't o..._ .i. C ... Ci. vC ... y .J./ ••-•
Special fee arrange~er.t for
Court appearance -abo~t
$40 :per hour
$45 per hour (principals),
and $32.50 per hour
$200/day ror court anuaar-
·ances over 1/2 day; $iCO/day
for 1/2 day or less
Have not had any court
cases so no provision ~as
· been set up for this wo:"k
Submits bill for ge~e~al
office work. ?ay $20/ho~r
for associate a~d $30/hcur
for a partner ~o covar
services to the District except in bondi~g rr.a~ters,
litigation appearances, legislation or ad~inistrative
matters. Pay for court proceedings a~ rate of
$125/day for an associate and $175/day for a partr.er.
11
,1
.I
jj
COUN' i-:-1 \T C'A Nr1TA 'T': 0. ~N-1......,·· 1 ~r;..,TI -r.r-.TS J. u .J. --........ v_ LJ ... v _ .-\.. .... v J.
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORi\fIA
TC:L.C:PHON C:S:
ARCA COuC: "/14
540-2910
962•2411
ll 10844 EL.LIS AVENUE:, P.O. BOX 5175, F'OUNTAIN VALL.EV, CAL.IF'ORNIA, 92708
1966 Noverr.ber
December
1967 January
February
March
April
May
June
AVERAGE:
July 28, 1967
SUlV~ARY OF ACTIVITY REPORTS
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel
November, 1966 through June, 1967
Total Time
on District
Business
13 hrs. 0 mins.
10 hrs. lO mins.
Less Time
Chargeable at
$35 per hour-
2 hrs. 20 mins.
1 hr. 15 mins.
29 hrs. 10 mins. 13 hrs. 45 mins.
16 hrs. 50 mins. 1 hr. O mins.
13 hrs. 50 mins. 4 · ... n·"'s. O ·mi· ·ris • • 4 ... •
24 hrs. 25 mins. 10 hrs. 55 mins.
5 hrs. 4o mins. O h:-cs. 0 mins.
6 hrs. 40 mins. O hrs. 0 mins.
14 hrs. 58 mins. 4 hrs. 9 mins.
Time Ar.mlicaole to
$7 ""0 ... :;._ e .,,. w .. cr: ..:.-;... U ::! -U4 • VJ..i.
Re~a.:-;..ner Fee
10 hrs . 40 r~ins.
8 hrs. 55 m.ins.
15 hrs . 25 m.ins ..
15 hrs. 50 mins.
9 hrs. 50 m~ns.
13 hrs. 30 mins.
5 hrs. 40 rr.ins.
6 hrs. 40 !':1ins.
10 hrs. 49 mins.
Dist. No.
1
2
3
5
6
7
11
COD1~TY SANITATION DISTRICTS
FINAL BUDGET RECOMMENDATIONS
1967-68 Fiscal Year
Total Budget Requireme~ Increase
or
_!lreliminary. Final (.Decrease)
$2,674, 258. $2,639,258. $ ( 35, 000.)
7,859,288. 8,029,288. 170,000.
7' 126, 459. 7,417,311. 290,852.
1,145,328. 1,201.,802. ~6 J.174 ~ , . .
1,066,456. 1,116,040. JJ.9 r-34 . . ':J •
1,989,733. 2,072,935. 83,202.
1,681,125. 1,812,836. 131,711.
* 1966-67 Tax rate dropped 4.58¢
1967-68
1967-68 Projected
~rax Rate Tax Rate ----
d· l.!.~i 8 $ .4468 ip .. ..,,_
.4651 .4451
.4132 .4102
.2874 .2774
.2604 2~~4 . ..,,..,,
.441.t.J.i. lq 4 L!.-X· . . '
.4725 .4625
. -···~ ...........
(;/.'7/ \ ~,'//·._ )
I· '··'
L/-/-g
Definition:
Duties:
Qualifications:
SENIOR ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN
H.anr;-:c Ji.~2.
51!.5-6'"('7
August 1, 1967
Under direction of the Director of Finance to
perform accounting functions in the maintenance
of the general accounting budget, and cost systems
of the Districts, and to do other work as required.
(-) rn ; · i· .L lO ma_n-ca_n the Districts 1 journals and
ledgers.
( 2) To reconcile account balances t·Ji th Cou..Ylty
records.
(3) To prepare payrolls and related reports.
( 4) To accumulate cost. data and maintain "V.rork
order journals on all material and labor expenses.
(5) To process cJ.aims for payment.
(6) To prepare work sheets and reports derived
from the foregoing functions.
(7) To perform other related duties as assigned.
( 1) Combina tic>n of education and ex-oerience equi va-
lent to completion of two years of college or univer-
sity work with emphasis in business and accounting ..
(2) Knowledge of accounting principles and office
methods.
(3) Ability to prepare financial and statistical
reports.
(4) An understanding of local government fiscal
affairs.
(5) It is desirable that a continuing effort is
being made toward a baccalaureate degree in account-
ing from an accredited institutiono
1966
1967
ios..;...;. ELLIS AVSNLIS, P. ::J. BOX 5175, F"OUNTAIN VALLE:Y, CALIF'ORNIA, «;)27_08
November 1 ':\ _ _,
December 10
Januar·y 29
Feb~uary 16
~arch 13
April 24
May 5
r
\
June 23, 1967
SGMMARY OF ACTI"\lITY REPORTS
C. Arthur Nissan, General Counsel
November, 1966 thr·ough May, 1967
Total 'rime
on District
Business
hrs., 0 r.1ins.
hrs. , 10 mins ..
hrs., 10 mins.
hrs., 50 mins.
hrs., 50 mins.
hr·s., 25 mins ..
hrs., 40 mins.
2
1
Less Time
Chargeable at
$35 ·oer· hour
hrs., 20 mins.
hr·s, 15 mins.
13 • l.1.,.., • nr·s., :~. mins.
l hr., 0 mins.
4 hrs., 0 mins.
10 hrs .. , 55 mins.
0 hr .. , 0 mins.
I
Time AnDlicable to
$7oo''· per month
Retainer Fee
10 hrs., 40 mins.
8 hr·s., 55 mins.
15 hrs., 25 rnins.
15 hrs., 50 mins.
9 hj,_"S., 50 mins.
13 hrs., 30 mins.
5 hrs., 40 mins.
MONTHLY AVERAGE 11 hrs., 24 mins.
0
A-3
: ~
'_.
~ 1 ~ i
·I
(_
0
~
w
~
!:
:
d
:i
>
Q
t:
r
:
:
I
~·
~
.
·~
.
~
r
~·
r~
rn
~f
""
"
0
·r
-
I-
'
•
:J
rn
\
,
J .
lj
UJ
;_
)
{/
J
y>
~~
~
r
(<
!
f'
l\
J
I
r
':_
)
·
·~
UJ
f
lg
..
.
.
r
H
I-
'
·
::
:
)
UJ
"Q
.
.
'
o
C>
'
f
'"
"
"
i
'
,.
$
0
?:
-
t
i=
·
·
:j
(.
I
)
~
)\
)
1
rl
:·
)
'
··
~
ro
~
c 1
.
~
.f
:
:
-
0
::
.
1
I-
'
·
:5
lf
1
.·
..
.
-.
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
:
..
~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
:1
:
•
'<
.
)
I\
,.
·
..
I·
'
(\
.
)
r--
.
-
..
)J
i$
U1
rD
\)
1
t1
I-
:
'
•
:j
UJ
•.
1-
-
'
0
~)
·
t·
~
UJ
"
\.
n
u·
1
q
r,
.
•i
to
,_
,
VJ
~,
1-
j
{f
J
UJ
0
tt
I-
'
·
:.
i
(/
.
)
•;
_
.
_
,
l;
r
j
{~
>
'
Ct
>
··
~
u'
0
I.
{
.
•·
)
'
r-
~
•·
fn
·-
~
~
l·
-
1
I-
'
lJ
J
0\
::
)
J
~.
)
·~
·~
lf
l
UJ
\)
I
\J
I
()
0
·~
~<
~
~
.~
.~
~
~
UJ
w
.(
:
:
:
:
-
I-
'
:~
·
~-
)
'
·~
·~
lO
'-
'
0
0
~
~
~~
P•
~
~
lO
w
I·
•
\0
(f
\
(
•
..
:
:
!
c,
u
sn
.
(!
I
:
:i
(;
>
~~
(:
>
{D
:
J
1·
$
Li
'
<-
<
(l
)
·~
(\
)
,_
,
\0
0
:.
.
.
>
·
:.
,
..
•·
5
•·
s
({
.
)
UJ
J-
.
l
•-
'
0
0
t1
:1
IJ
•
~J
,
r>
~i
(l
'
.
l
(f
)
I-
'
f-
1
lJ
J
~)
..
'~
·
I:
\
I-
~
(0
{/
)
-f
:
:
"
,_
,
\)
~
\)
l
~ :i
8
i=
1 •
r-
·
·
:j
~>
co
tQ
I-
'
t-
•
\D
:.
)
'
·-
~
lO
\.
l
l
0
l~
I-
'
·
::
~
{I
}
\.
J
l
\.
J
I
~_
)
"
'
~·
•$
·~
{I
}
lO
\.
l
l
I\
.
)
0
\.
J
I
:1
t1
I'
·
I-
'
•
:~
:~
{I
)
{1
)
CD
:~
)
'
·~
(Q
\J
l
\.
J
I
!j
••
J,
:i
{I
}
I·
'
\(
J
(J
'
\
0\
I
I
/.
'
.
1
(J
<!
(j
l
u u'
(l
l
·-
~
I-
'
lJ
.
J
~)
..
•:
-
:
UJ
0
L~
I-
'
•
rs
(f
J
(\
)
~·
;~
UJ
I\
.
)
0
:~
·-
"
I-
'
·
::
>
co
..
.
.
.
0
•J
'
·
·
~
..
..
:
.
co
.[
'
:
.
-
0
~-
~
..
,.
~:
'
)
w
0
1-
J
l}
)
:J
0
~
c:
·
w
tJ
p
I-
'
·
1-
1•
1-
1
:=
>
(i
'
j
Ci
>
(
:-
1-
]
tf
.
l
1$
•-
"
UJ
.J
.
:~
(.
'
I
G
c-
:
-
-c
r
.
.
-
o
vJ
:)
..
\J
I
p
t·
I
..
.
.
.
(i
i
c>
o·
~
t;
!
(L
)
(:
)
t1
}
t-
~
p.
;
o·
•-
;
1
I
\"
'
I·
-
'
I-
'
·
0
(i
)
:~
c
<•
,
i~
fl
)
-
d-
8
!~
·(
.
r
:
>
-
~
3
!.
X
S
--
.
.
:
?
(i
l
Cl
)
0
ct
-
O
:r
:
•
S\
>
't
i
I·
'
·
'c
>
'C
i
::
i
(!
\
•
•-
'
(l
l
I~
f-
'
•
·~
()
H
{\
l
•:
~
J
o
o
·
(l
l
::
'
I-
'
(l
l
(.
·
f
·
Ci
'
~,
('
f
·
0
~(
)
o·
<
(!
)
:·
.
>
U.
1
r~
_
,
';
!
.
~J
(J
("
1
••
-.
(!
)
!)
'
:-
s
·~
f.
~
:C
>
·~
~j
•<
I-
'
~
\0
1
·
1•
0
0\
V
i
1:.
j
O\
{
I
)
0
:r
-
-
d
:J
0
~·
..
.
..
.
=
1
..
.
:\
1-
:
1
o
c2
<
~O
H
D.
:.
~
8
~-
y
'
(j
)
K!
1-
:
\
:~
p)
!J
J
~
I-
'
l:
.
:
.
J
~
•t
i
00
0
!J
:
i
l-
'
~:
;
1-
:
1
\D
::
.
'
i
{!
.
)
0\
U
J
~
(i
)
I-
'
II
--
-..
-
.
•
--
0
0
0
•
,
:
_:
;
0.
-
.;
I
-
--
0
..
.
.
.
-
· · -
i
(
.
(.
l
n
J.
.
J.
.
l'
I
,-,-ti
)-<
l;
i
z
1.
:
fl
·o
0
[:
J
lJ
x
l'
l
'3
l'
1
.,
.
d
c z
):
z <
)•
r·
r
1-
1
~{
n
)·
!.
:
··
1
tJ
;i
J
z
I
()
I
c·
·
-
.
.
)
I
(J
·'
I
.
(
.
I
>j
J
..
.
!
I
, ..
I
I
r-
.
/
..
I
,_
)
I·
_
1J
I·
'
t
/·
'
/
i
,
J.
.
-
I
.'
<
I
>
,.
'
£:
(
i
I
i
C.
)
,:
·.
·'
i
l"
;
"
j
/_
.
.
;
.
I
>-
-
~
I
()
/!
I
Q
!~
l
I
C;
>1
>
I
•-
/
)'
/.
_
,
t-
~
.
-
,
>·
-
-
]
~
I
~-
<
()
)-
-
,
I
()
L!
'1
;
,
.
L.
~
tJ
I
..
J.
1
,.
.
:!
I
()
(.
'
)
I
YJ
I·
j
L:
-
:
, ..
··
j
·=
:
~
r:
:
:
('
')
>
.
>
()
l
l·
·
-
J
(/
'
)
)-
.•
\.
"
"
l~
::
.
.
•
r~
(\
..
..
:
~
,:
t.
.
'
n
r1
I
I
(~
'\
'
~
:-
.
.
•
n
:I
:
f\
c
l'
l'
:
..
.
.
.
r~
::
:
•"
'
C
J
~
t~
~
l~
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
··
·
-
·
·
·
·
·
-
·
·
..
--
.
·
·
·
-
-
-
·
·
·
·
..
.
.
-·
-
·
·
..
.
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
·
·
·
·-
·
..
.
.
.
.
.
.
-
.
--
·
-
.
.
..
.
..
.
.
..
·-
.,
_
..
.
--
-
-
•
-
~
·
-
.
r
·
-
-
·
"
'
•
•
"
•
•
·
-
__
_
..
.
.
,_
"
.;
;
:
.
,
"•
~
.
.
.
-
·
~
·
~
'
"
l
o
•
..
.
••
.
-
.
~
•
.
•
•
·
•
.
,
•
,
,
,
.
,
.
l"
_
-
• ..
_
~
.
-
..
•
.-
·
'
1
.
~
-
T
~
S
.
.
~
-
'
1
'
.
-
.
.
r
.
-
"
"
'
'
:
"
•
~
..
.
;:
,
•
.
~-
•
.>
~
t
1
.
:
.
:
_
·
:
-
-
.
,
l
-
:
~
~
..
••
..
·~
."
:
.
·
..
.
::
.
:.
r
-
.
•
t
~
~
\.
"
"
:
:
.
:
.
:
"
:
'
=
.
;
~
.
:
,
:
..
.
··
.
-
=
.
-·
~
~
..
~:
:
~
,
.
_,
·-
:
:
::
:
.
:
_
:
"
·
-
·
·•
"
.
:
.
:
-
.
~
-
-
:
..
-.
.
.
-
•
.
.
,.
MILLER, NISSON g KOGLER
CL.ARK MILLEA
c. ARTHUR NISSON
NELSON KOGLER
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
ATTORN E:VS AT LAW
2014 NORTH BROADWAY
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706
August 1, 1967
County sanitation District No. l
of orange County, California
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Re: Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd .•
Dear Fred:
TEL.CPHONE
542•6771
Enclosed herewith is a suggested draft of a letter for
you to write to Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd. with reference
to closing out contract P-2-7a.
A normal close-out resolution waiving any claim for liquidated
damages by reason of the fact that the District contributed to
any delays in performance will be sufficient. I think your
proposed settlement and the negotiations of your staff have been
very well handled in this matter.
Yours v;~ truly,
/~/~( ~u)f
c. Arthur Nissan
CAN:mij
Enclosure
_,; )
-ti
Hawker Siddeley Canada Ltd.
7 King Street East
Toronto l
Ontario, Canada
Attention Mr. L. D. Dwyer
Purchasing Analysis Coordinator
Re: Orenda, Inc.
Contract P-2-7a
County sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California
Gentlemen:
Wi,th reference to the final close-out and payment of the
balance due on the subject contract, I am authorized to propose
the following terms of compromise and understanding, most of
which have been discussed and tentatively agreed upon:
1. The District has, on July 14, 1967, accepted the
equipment supplied and work performed under the contract as in
satisfactory condition and in compliance with specifications.
2. The District will pay to Orenda, Inc~, the sum of
$37,214.12 which is the sum of $46,074.60 less applicable sales
tax in the sum of $8,860.48 which the District agreed to pay for
Orenda, Inc., by deducting said sum from the contract balance
due.
3. The following equipment warranties shall be es-
tablished as acceptable to all parties concerned:
a. Boiler control for ninety days from April 11,
1967.
b. All condensate returns and boiler feed system
for ninety days from April 11, 1967.
c. Water circulating pumps for ninety days from
a date, which date is sixty days after the successful opera-
tion of said pumps without down-time due to malfunction
(in this connection they have been successfully operating
without down-time from July 12, 1967 to date).
d. The heat recovery unit (boiler) for one year
from April 11, 1967.
2.
4. By accepting the payment of money proposed to be
paid, all claims arising out of the subject contract and modi-
fications thereof against the District and its agents and employees
are to be d~emed satisfied in full and each party does release
the other from all further duties, obligations and liabilities
except as to the warranties hereinabove set forth.
If this embodies all of the terms of an acceptable compliance
and close-out agreement of the subject contract, please sign a
copy of this letter and return it to me at your earliest con-
venience and the balance due will be forwarded upon receipt
of your signed copy.
Thank you for your consideration and cooperation in this drawn
out and complicated transaction.
Yours very truly,
HAWKER SIDDELEY CANADA LTD.
By
Title:
Dated:
3~9 '511/ -. . '-.-. -. .. .. ~ ,.~ '-"V ""'"'--:-.._.. _ _.# ...,,J ~.i.-V'"""-:.f
... --.. -~ ·-
--\,,.!--'-'-'
__;, .. ~ ..... . -..... -,., ·-
_.,,, --..... """ --·-v
··;...,,~-~ ......
.• ~V\.:,;-~v.r.:~:·~;;·c b~r ~\._.;.,o li.:.J~:_o r1
.. ·.: ·~ • •. ·Y1 U"'"° .. "' -::() .,:\-. . .,, -~---·· ......... ~1 .l \>V ..L V.!.
7o:..~ eve::.·yt hing ·cha·c
rc(j,_· ..... :.:i. e:d
~ ( ;
-./ _., .. ,
is
:.::;:::..:..:.:. :-:t~. 01· 2 f:ou r s
13(. ;,;;;:JJ1~;·: ~or g3~;e r ..... l
-..0 .. ~:·:\. ~s ~ce:.e:.
Cm:._·"c e.ppear c:..:..'1c--s:
:../2 day ---SlOO
Full day --~20 0
43 ) .,;; .:1 02 3
_0 ... .. . -~...::::_ ·-: 2>..,) ""\ -.-.,. --.,.,,.
v v .. .1 .... '"'""'
-.• • .... • .... --.... --........ • '°\-
....... v'-.;-_J _,;..;, '-'-..L\,,; v
ti . ":J C/ yJ S ..J 1 ,_;} . ·~ ~ .. ~~ \r-;:_~V" .· .·. !' ··y '--.·--\......... L. -'-J ' \,,,.. -• --V -..N -
•• • ~-........... t"'I --
....) ·--· v ---\.... v
~ 9 .3·~~-...S-..:! -. .... :..\. ........... ~:_-.:,y s~:~i ~ar:r
-'-s·c :.. ... :L~--el-
'Ff ,.:::U5 -'7 6 l/ D
..... -... ,. __ ,. "'-.. ··-·'-·r
_,...,.._ .. vV--vV""'-•l,,tJ
:.:.:.s-~::'~c-~
··0 " .• 1 . . '-J'-:.,v :-.:c~ .. -::: y Z\~·cc:..:..i:e y·
:~o::· c..·v ·c ..... :!':cia::cc a/c
~ev~~r.gs a..~d handling
:..·ou-.:;::i.:.c work
1c/ r.. 7
~~30/:-:.ou:r fo:..n a:.:;tcr.d -
in~ ~ee ~ings with a
··1-: n"' ., .... ,!') -':'ee o·"' '"o,..O ·"'o r
'6 • ...... J..J . .1.vl. .. ,.. .L J. "? .L
sr.y one Boa:::-d :::1ec:;·cing
Con·c· :tac·cs, e·-r, .r·'i'l· ·-·q,. ... ,, ; V \....v -C....•..1 -.. ~\/\,... '\
3csea?ch -~1 5 per n~u: ~M~~ . . , \I'
~:.:..: .. «·rork, inc ludi n.; :::.ee c::i..r • .;s ,
'-~::.c lie r hour
3x-c,ra wo r k ever ~O r..o·..:.::·..:
"~~~ ~~ -~e ~---o~ ·~~;~-_, ... ___ ~-v v•. -C..vC: -y._,_, •• :.. ..
S;,ecia:.. fee arra:.'1gerr1e!'l~ f o'!"
Cou:.ct appearance -a b ou:c
~)-'.-0 )er nour \'• s . . ~r I
(c.,.,. .I.,,· " 'c-l.r. -t "I',_
..,;1.. .. 5 p.=::t :r..o ·-i.r (principal s), 1L
and $32 . 50 per hour IAn f!J ' ;4 I
~~200/ciay f o :r co-J.r-c appea.r~nce s
over 1 /2 day ; \'100/day :.:·o r
1 /2 day or le ss
Eave: :'101:; f"_ad any .;ct:.:.': .::c...s~:
so ~o ?rovisio~ has ~~;~ 5S~
::.::;> for thi s wor~
St.~):·.:..·~s ':nll for r.;e:·.2_~~:_
o: .. :~ · _e:e wo:.~l\:. Pay ~20/!:'"'·..:.:. · :;~
G....3~.:.::_~-ce z.:: • .:.. ~.>30/hou:.· _'c:. c..
::>::. ..... ·~_-_c:..' -co :-·c"~c :" serv:_c2_; ·:.""
..., .... \..: :,:_:, ~ric~ excc~:·c -.... ~J....,: .... ·.:. -:: ...... v:c~e:""->... ::.. ~i~a-c :....c:_
~-)\... .... .:· .. ....:rices, ~cs::.~=-~ .. ·c::.o:.: JT _:.._·:-.. ~:._.:_,tr· ... ~:~:. ve ma t ·c2 • .s ...
· .... -v "c·~ cou·r--· ·"re~:. . .-..;.;,1-:·L· ,., ··~·-c -..," ·· .. -;::;;;;ay .:oo ..,. ,.. ---o.1 ---v _.J "-''--\...:..-.1 ~~ a.l.,.. .1'--'-''-' v.:.. '/_c.._,, \..4 J. -e-..
c..ssc~:..c.:::.:;e a::-_:_ $17'3/day for a :_)a:::-~ne r.