Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-04II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) ( 2) (3) (4) (5) DISTRICT No. AGENDA ~ril 27, 1967 -5:30 p.m. Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of the General Manager Report of the General Counsel Report of the staff on estimate of costs for re-surfacing, f7v c-~ ~ repairs of d i:!fective work, backfill compaction, and other Qc/ necessar y work to complete Assessment District No. 6 (6 ) Consideration of actions to be taken in order to complete the work a;0~utlined by the staff: '\),,.--..r ,-v\-.. ~ ~~ 5~ a . Setting amount to be deposited by the Surety on the Faithful Performance bond (in the form of a cash depos i t) to cover the cost of said repairs b . Orderi ng release of the warrant for Assessment District No . 6, upon receipt of the cash deposit c. Directing the General Manager to proceed with the work as outlined by the staff, in order to complete the project (7) Consideration of motion approving the following warrants : Operating Fund g? / 7189 7190 City of Orange City of Orange $ 1,899 .00 l0,344.oo $12,243 .00 (8) (9) Other business and communications, i f any Considerat i on of motion re: Adjournment r • f./.J .> . ~ fk... _, II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Coun ty Sani tat ion Districts P. 0. Box 5175 / of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. 5 AGENDA April 27, 1967 -5:00 p.m. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Report of the General Counsel Consideration of Resolution No . 67-49 -5, to receive and fi l e bid tabu l ation and recommendation, and awarding con- tract for Demolition and Removal of the Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station (Contract No. 5 -1 2-1) to Gangi Excavatinw Company in the total amount of $1,960.00. See page "A (See page 11 B11 for bid tabulation) Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to ,\ ... ~ Contract No. 5 -14R (Manhole Replacement and Repair Program), Ver" J authorizing an addition of $1, 200 .60 to the contract with /~" -.<"" AAA Construction Company , Contractor. See page 11 C11 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-50-5, accepting the \3 4" .... J'-"'- construction of Contract No. 5-14R as complete, and 1 / •. authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work . YI~ See page "D" (<Jj --lv).. Report of the staff o~ explosive gas problem in Trunk A \C.,..'9;Y{ Consideration of motion approving the following warrant: Operating Fund 7191 AAA Construction Company (10) Other business and communications, if any (11) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ~'-,~" (l :::__ 7 \.,,...... .-/ ~&·-yq--> b7-~'D--':J ~ ~ v (f~<-:? ~ v v ~/ b~/ RESOLUTION NO. 67-49-5 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineer, and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to Gangi Excavating Company, Inc., Contractor, for DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BA¥ BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1, and the proposal sub- mitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 5-12-1 be awarded to Gangi Excavating Company, Inc., Contractor, in the total amount of $ 1,960.00 in accordance with the terms of its bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the /- District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pur- suant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 67-35-5 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. .Agenda Item #5 -A-District No. 5 Engineer's Est. $3,000.00 B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N SHEET· Contract For: DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID * . 1. Gangi Excavating Company, Inc. 213 62nd Street $1,960.00 2. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. Newport Beach, California Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc. 10027 Canoga Avenue Chatsworth, Cal:i.f ornia Fowler Equipment, Inc. P.O. Box 1296 12705 South Cambridge Orange, Cal1forv1a R. W. McClellan & Sons Inc. 151 Commercial Way C9sta Mesa, California 92627 .... · .. $2,382.00 $2,864.oo $4,280.00 \ ·.· ·-·.-··-··•·-···-·.-:.· ....... ··-:····-··-·······-·· .:··-·· ........... ··-·----· ·--· . •·I, I •, Agenda Item No.: 5 · ~B-. District ·,No·. 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain V..tlley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. __ 1 __ _ CONTRACTOR: ___ ~A~A~A...._.C~o_n~s~t~ru~c~t-i~o~n ___ c_o~m~p~an~y.__ _____ __ DATE: April 20 2 1967 JOB: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R Amount of this change order (ADD) ~ $ 1,200.60 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's claim dated March 3, 1967 and report of Engineer dated April 19, 1967 l. Extra labor and material caused by dimensions of Vaults #2 and 3 being larger than those shown on drawings Lump Sum $ 750.00 2. Extra labor and material for installation of concrete thrust block at bend and 27-inch force main Lump Sum 60.00 3. Imported sand backfill and bedding rock used as directed by Engineer 93 C.Y. at contract price of $4.20 390.6o TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,200.60 * * * * * * * * * * * * * ACCEPTANCE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER BY CONTRACTOR AS EVIDENCED BY SIGNATURE BELOW RELEASES DISTRICT FROM ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE CLAIMS FOR EXTRA WORK ON THIS CONTRACT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8-4 OF THE SPECIFICATIONS. Original Contract Price $_4 __ 0;;..,.2~9;...;.8_0..._. 0._0 ____ _ Prev. Auth. Changes ____ n_o_n_e ____________ _ This Change ADD __ 1;;;..,~2;;..o_.o_.._6_0 ____ _ Amended Contract Price $ 42,180.60 Board authorization date: Apri.l 27, 1967 -C- eOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer Accepted: AAA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY By ______________________________ _ Date: ____________________ _ District No. 5 \ \ RESOLUTION NO. 67-50-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, AAA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R, on the 4th day of April, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the District has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineer•s recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 6th day of December , 1966; and, __ ........... ..........., ______ _ Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #7 -D-District #5 II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 ~llis Avenue Founta in Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. 7 AGENDA April 26th, 1967 -7:00 p.m. (1) Ro ll Call {2 ) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager ...,,/ (4) Report of the General Counsel ~ (5) Hearing -Assessment District No . 6: (6) a. Secretary announces hearing in the matter of assessme nt for the work and improvement con- sisting of the construction o f sanitary sewers in Assessment District No. 6 b. Secretary reports on written obj ections filed in his office prior to the hearing c. Chairman hears objections, if any, from ~persons , present at the hearing l '7-<fr r (~#-~~·(" ._/, d. Consideration of action on confi rm ation o f assessments Consideration of Resolution No. 67-48-7, approv ing an·amendm e ~t'to1t~e a-00.lze agre e ment t6>provide ~f or · p ayment o f funds received by the Dist ric t from proceeds of Assessment District No. 6, for capacity rights . See page 11 A11 (See page 11 B11 f or amendment). (7) Proposed construction of facilities between Colleg e Avenue and Treatment Plant No. l: a. Report and recommendation of engineers f or construction of sewerage facili ties b. Report o f the staff concerning financing of the proposed project c. Consideration of proposa l of the engineers for engineering design and survey services for the proposed facilities (C opy of p rop os al attached) ~) (8 ) Consideration of motion approving the foll owing warrants : (9 ) (10) 7189 7190 Operating Fund City of Orange City o f Orange Other business and communications, if any Consideration o f motion re: $ 1,899.00 io,344.oo $12,243 .00 .~ Jo_,) ·._,! RESOLUTION NO. 67-48-7 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE (Amendment No. 1) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE DATED APRIL 12, 1967 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1, dated April 26, 1967, to the certain agreement with the City of Orange dated April 12, 1967, providing for payment of funds received by the Di~trict from proceeds of Assessment District No. 6, for capacity rights, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said amendment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. Agenda Item No ._6 __ _ -A-District No. 7 '.,,I .._J AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE, DATED APRIL 12, 1967 (Amendment No. 1) THAT Paragraph 5 of that certain agreement by and between the ·cITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation, and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, of Orange County, California, a publ~c corporation, is hereby amended to read as follows: "5. PAYMENT. Upon execution of this agreement BUYER agrees to pay SELLER the total amount of the purchase price hereinabove mentioned of FORTY SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HrThlJRED SIXTEEN DOLLARS AND TWENTY CENTS ($46,716.20) for said sewerage facilities and appurtenances thereto hereinabove described; THIRTY SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY TWO DOLLARS. AND TWENTY CENTS ($36,372.2q from the funds heretofore collected by SELLER as an agent of BUYER as connection charges within the territorial limits of BUYER, and TEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY FOUR DOLLARS AND N0/100 ($10,344.oo) from proceeds collected by BUYER from sewer Assessment District No. 6 for certain sewer capacity rights. Upon pay~ ment of the purchase price title to said sewerage facilities and appurtenances shall pass to BUYER." IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto caused the names and seals of the public corporations and the names of the officers thereof to be subscribed hereto the day and year first hereinabove written. (SEAL) (SEAL) Agenda Item No. 6 ----B.:. .. :· CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation By Mayor By __ ~--~--~~----~~--~~----C it y Clerk COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, of Orange County, California, a public corporation By--::-:-~~--~=-~~~~~~------~ Chairman, Board of Directors By__,,~--~~---=---~~~~----:-------Se c re tary, Board of Directors District No. 7 l l h I ( f ' I f " ii 1 • f l H :: 11 ----·•I I ' ~ .. -·-. r:1 1~ -· '. ~ r1 ~l ~ w I f, I I I r, •.. ll.:J ;j tj, ill f'. 1111 ..cL:! L.J ti.J lJ !~ ~ ~ I °' CJl ! ~ ~ e 1 :;; 1 1 c --- • :r j: ~ tLl •:t f., : lL] r .,, , .. j' I 11 ·j_ :··~--. _ ,_ ' ' ~. ' !, lb "I 'ljjj dlil ; l• 0 0 i c f ST ~I m ,.,. '100 ~ - ·-····--·-·. ··-· ·····-'·-··---'·-.. -------· ... / ·-·-.. --·· ... --···-.... ·-·-· ... -· -·-·-·- ···"'' ". f I r f , i { ! i t . t t. I l ' e~v;.:~...,...,·,,.-....... ~.-------:.....,-----VI i' .; · •~··'I('' • · -• · ' · ~ ~-..... .--r.:•· .,t..,*( ~~ . ""'.)I; .:·· : . ·vlj'IJ ,;./tr. ;-, :··!... · .Scaf~-· t :::JOO · :·· . · · . -~ U.-. ~-•J :..---~ • . • . ' ',.; . .' :0::· ~ (I. i,: ~ . ; ~ . •. • . . >. • .. . . ;_.., • :' "': . -'. • • .,.......... .• ~ . . l . , ~ • .,,. • I ... ; 1 • ' (; f~•J ,•,/""' • 0:• '· ". , •• • -• \• I • • ~ -_;. • ._,.' '., •-f C'?...:-;:. ~ 'C>tlA'-s..·!... : . ~ i . ~ . ii'f'r/" . · .. < '/. :: . _: ·.. ··, .. -i""etz / :·-.. ·. . . ; ' . l ti .. -." .... :.::~= ·_,; -. ... " ..... tt 1' : ... ·. tj}{~litl/'.:.-:! .· ... ;:;::~·-::= .~·~ ... /~ ..... ·_:. :-1,..t..{ /~"· ...... -.. -. ·' ·'{ . . . . . .. _ t~:i..:f~ . llJ' ..• ~··.. . L.0 C-l' -·~-· .. " "··: ----· . -->··:·. : .·1"Ff>. -·-· -·-- ... ,.,;.J · ..... :--:-· · _._ ... ;-:.: · · ·· ::.-. ,... ~ ... r;, !!.'! ~ SEE DETAii-· B ,, ,.i_I'-··.~. • ~ • . • , .... ·.·-.. ;.·· . ._ .... ·;; ~ : . r>~ ... ~~ ... ~~~-~· ... · -~--... ~ . I · · .... ·· . V,f.!;~1 //J ... -:' .. _ ~ · ....... ~ ........ -oV .. ~--_. . .:.·. ·: _ .... _ -.......... _·::--~:· _ .. .•• '1,L'J°. -. '".'J.:-~· .. _,.,-:-.. -··:· • .;:•:-:·--.· .. ··-0 • .-.. •• ,(j"'7f// .·. · BELOW .. --(At.."'· .. -. : ",/;." ........ · •. -.. ·· :.-':: · .. -.: ;~. ,,-~ .-'-. "',.,:-:1 .:• ' i-':>: L;· .· ~'<~ · '.\ ',' ·;.:/·,: .: : :: , : , '· . · If' 'IL ~ · . :: : · . -,. !!. ..,.~ · · ·: -: .. , . · ... : .. '· ::. ;--: ·: -: :<> ;_ 0" • f. ~--' ~: · ,, : . ;. : ._.~.,., ""·-"···· '· '·•·.-·· . .;.., .· .. ,!' ·#99"A~'4.tW. .• l .... 4.0.c..h'et.=.· 5.,,.AVE:-· 0.:· .. ~.:"r --~: ..• : .-.-., .... _, ··~ •• ;_.-!,. ~.-_. · ...-Z:Y'../AG£.f 7'1T'l~~.T'~' •:.. -/ ! lfl ;.;~-· .i,ltJ, '. · 'Y,;__:-PO/:/\/~ '· '·" • --. --. , . . j • ;-·'. .-?;c:·:: :::~.: ?e:/~''.c.( :., '.9'/0"H/. ~c.&~s. 1.: .. <o · • . .,-. ~ .. 'ZG' R~c.:~_:. : ."· .: . . .· '::. ~'..-;_!. ·' ]~~~f 1:s~§~I":'.i\ ' . .:'._~:~j~~ :-,/,'.;_~: . : . t ' .. ~:: : : • . > ::-: ·lf.-~SE~;~'(::·;L;:~~~~~~-:--~:~ .. o:«~~":_·=;.:--. ~~<-::_<:·_ ... ~/:·~)~,,--~:~::::_ · ·:1: ,~--~~:_-· 0-#'-!!~~~~-~.:.~.?~~~~: . .. . ' . .' ··~./~ .• .· · · ·.. AVeN{JE .. ~ .. ,'.. ·.I·-· I .· . -:---....a;s 7' ~--;,._ .. · .. · ... '· . . .338.10' . . . 7" >"-?>r..... . . IS--'-:-. . a--,.· . .-·, .J , ._"tl:\r~;'.:_-~:···_~t~\_.,:'.·U:'.:_: ... -._-__ ·,::,~~~~1!ff i;E;~.f <~~-----... _;_:_·-_:••D::,;,?/t:::.-:-.:~;•-~·· __ ; .. '. .... ;_:t I' (!-1 .~ .. -· .. ··.: ..... ~'\' c;G~ ... j~/"" .. fAt.t.· ·. -1. ~ .. ···-·. ·""· ... ' .. --· .. · I I i -"ttJ'(~~ .. '.·.~-:<:~:<:~:_~.'.:~·._/\:", ·. _;:~. ~ ;P . ·. ·. cfo!1 ·~ ·; '". . ·1.i ·_·'J;.-, .. __ ·.··:<-.·~~> ·:-.. _: ..... >·'_ ·.··::. ;-: <: .. _.)·; ~-· ... . ; • • •. ~;'.··:. •. -...\., .. · ....... : • ./~/ ............ _:......./" ~· A j.H~:" • ·1! '-..."'~.:·~ ... , • ·;. : .. • .... ;-,•· ...... _·. " ....... -·::· . .-·1 I • .·: · .. ~'lo.· ' • '• _.." ~ ,,, ~..Jfl"' ~ ",·· f,. ... ~ ·.• . . , ·; .. ·· .-.. · .. •·";'• . .'•: ·.· . .,, .. : .. _. .. i· I -..... ~ ~~ ~ ,,.,., ~ ~ ,. . ..... .. . ' -. . -. -, ' ' ' ' · 1 • -~ ' • ~·_.. ... ,I ,.,,..,... r•"' ;(I • ' • ;. ' • • ' < • ~ :•' • ' '' -'. •• '_. • • .'" • • • ~ ... •, • • ·::< ·<:··-<-1-·: '\\'._,:> -·. -~ •:y\t.i;!..~)fb.<Q ..... t : AQUISITION rRACi" I .. .<:< .. ·:; ...... ··~:.:,-.. ~ ·:.;: ,:_,'_:_.· -. "\~-· ~-. 'pf!.!!J.-<-: ,J/1t~ ,· ~ : .. ~ . ~~ . . .. .. . ·-:::: ,-·; ·• ~_.:;· : .... _.,. ·· ·· · ... · \ \ -". ~-. 0P_9..1---:--. ... .. . . -· · J: ~· ~ . . . . ~-LA/VO' Ov</A-'E R ·,.' .. 1 _· .. ··.a l ~ ·":-".::.-.:·; ·:-:·;: ..... ::-~-·~<:~.~~· ;_. ·:::: ·.·\. ·--~.~-!~,· .-. '.. ·>-.... _ ·._· ~ .. , ~ .:~ ... ',.. ... . ---. -·--~~~-· .. _. __ ._ I .-.:··.·.·.'.· ..... :-·.·' ; .. -·.1\~ \.\ . ._ ·· . .-·:." ... • .· · :.-., El· .,,;:<nfo.,-,-::Borcho.-0'& .. ·.I .:1.-r· ·:· · .. :~.~-"'·:· .. : -.· ·. :_-. ..: · .. ·~· ' ·. _·.· ~ ·..' ·.· . .' .:·, J / "' . · ··~nno 8or&hard· ·.'. ·· :i.&: I .·:·:"·~<·.~ ':'·::,-::·" .. >·:···.-· .. >>:.: J.J0-~· ~-':.~\h 7 .:<.:·. ·: ~-~z;,.··: ' /' , . 1 ,t.:;; ~ ... ' · .. ". · E z El.eo-;,;;;.. .Stanl~y Sl"'T?Olli.,;oodj. ~ ·.Ji~· .::< .. ·.::·>: · ·--::_..:-., -~1/-.> ... <·~~ ~\~ '. .·._ ;. · .. · .... : .· _ .. ~/.,.· ~: . "~/;-·,>-; . ~(er~·.·. :··~·~_""·.· __ ._"~~: .. ~:-{::""':. • •' • · .,.·-· .. (/~/:.-.• · ·. \"t\ ~~ ... _ ._. I;;. ·. "l) . E.3 r;,-sf/yahona;.C.qn.t.·.-nS~·:""w-.4na t : ::,.r.: :·;·~_·,..:· .. ::.->· ·~~<,·.-:·.'_.:.:_,:.·;;~ .'.,: ~ .. ~~--"·· .. · ··_, · -.. ! ~: ::;:'· ·:·:._; :.-·· · ondC-:~..,~".c/O,..cn:~~ ._.-:: __ :·j~.B~ ". ·. .. .. . . . (;4-:' .. _: ... .'.: .. .:.-. .. . ...... <!\~ \ • e 7 :: . ! ...... ; •: .. ·. '' ·-E 4 Chor/es .L ... Rondolpi·'T St.'::· > t > r~ <:! . ·iP-·<··.-. ;?,iJe\·<~·· .:.:· ... C\~\\\~ ,·:: ~ -l-:. · ~ ,~ •· . -F/oren<;:""e e: RPnefc.:>/_ah .. · .. :·:.:·I'·· etc · ..... q~<;;~~;,po ·: ~'_:-:. ~-.'.:>: .. : := .. ~---;~\\ ·/~.-· :;.~;·-.>.--. <" =1·· ._ :·. ~: ~:·.:-_..: · > · · es· . ·.s~~ ·:G,.;~~;.. :. ~·:. ~<· .~~~-~~; "-'-. . --,. rJ (; . . ·--.• • .-. -• ~ / . . . I ~ . . .-. . . --. , --, _,. '· l °" ·_ .:.-~ .. ,, ~-··· ·· .... ·· . " _·:-:::\~. /.-1•-s•:-. · · ... a9t. A.J.G.-s/er & .. ,-.'. .... .;'·.:: . : " -,:/ . .' .. : .. :. >·>"~; >·:-... > ... ~.--·: ••.. ·: ·... _ · ... ~\ ::· -~ -,~--~-$>.: "'•,::.-.. _' .· . .,.. -·#:ary A. Gisler_~.··_. ____ _:_ .. ~~----~~ ··· -, _ _.,::,·~->.~.\~:>.~;;~:.:.~>·;·.:·:'/.-:\.·>-.·::::::-.·::-· · . \~ .: \\\\·.r~. }~~-/:: .. ·>:'. .~·:.:· ··'>:-~ E.9_-._/C:rne~.-~ ~6,.i·_--··:·,..~;_ .. '.·::. \ -~;~ . . . . .. ,,_... .••. :_... ·,..,·11 . --. ' \ t I t, ·..... . ··. -. -.. ·-·-·------"""-. -r--· ,' . . . : " . . ...,, i:: , ,., ~ . 0 . . ~ . . . ' ' . •' ' ' . ·. . . .. ~.:.· . ·. sc:c/e·i--.r7oo· ·. \\\\~ /--~ · E/Oj Cc-.~.;,...,,.,.>,o.l"Oro:·-;qc ·-, : : .. : :: ·-.· ·:·· .. f:·:\ .. ~-.. ~~ .. > .. ·-:<·:·.:~-" Pon.:7-"·e·~.:.\':'~~1 :/· .. ::}-'... "~~···· ~-"7'r--::-·:-~·.:.~-·--:-::--·--~~----------~----~-. .. · . . ·•· . ' · · · . · . · '. -.._ \ \1-1 t' l_e IJ • . c.a~-,-,_ / O/ Ur.;,r; ge · . . _. :~ ·: ·::. · ; . . . _. · . . . · . ·~~ :~f ?S.t'. L-"~; .. ,, r 2 ~ · ·. · -/~-t .. ~'. ".~-~:~ ,. :.~:·.;:,~ :.~~ ·=~_:___ ~ _L __ . .. . . . . June 30, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 . PROPOSED BUDGET FOR . 1966-1967 FISCAL YEAR Fiscal Year 65-66 Fiscal Year ~ \,~,a.it.r. . • 66-67 · ,~t,1-loO I GENERAL SUl'-'TIVIARY: Total Requirements: Operating Fund Bonds 1951 Fund Bonds 1962 Fund Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund Fixed Obligation Fund Construction Fund Facilities· Revolving Fund Total Requirements Funds Available July 1, 1966 and Anticipated Revenue from Sources Other Than Taxe.s DISTRICT 1 S REQUIREMENTS· TO BE RAISED BY.TAXES Tax ~ate: Ope:--a ting ~u.nd Bonds 1951 Fund 5onds 1962 Fund Acc·~~ulated Capital Outlay Fund Fixed Obligation Fund Total $ 294,779. 37,796. 274,999. 614,984. i5, 000. 75,037. 341,559. $1, 654, 154'. $1, 066) 745. $ 587,409. Tax Rate 65-66 .1167 $ 332,670. 37, 308. 284,914. 670,783. 15, 500. 95,601. -367, 225. $1,169,114. $ 634,?87. Tax Rate 66-67 Estimated* (oC. ... lo1 A-t.'NA\- . ''~"' .1259 .0138 . ,Olo'J .0153 .1494 .1437 .1?.''l .2039 . ''°" , ,... ... 5 . ·~::'.' .0064 • oo.r6 .0080 .• 4902 • Lf .,...,y .4884 *T~e estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed. Valua~ion of $137,000,000. ($130,000,000. 5% Delinquency Factor) Ac\uJ\\ li\b(:. ... b1 ksc;ee.c;~b VA-\-uC ,~~.~,u-ro ~s·" t) '~ <>1 • fa.i JrJ<e~A~ 1~1 crw o-o-o / -t".' . 1 ~I a1j"'t) ' a-cJ"'l) -1- 3o<=J,o~c 3G:t, ii..\ J-q1, '1f'1 '6l.Co, 130 1~1 ~OcJ 14" ,~\ 1. '+1i, t'f <1 l,1J4,~3 I U;9,bf{ • ot;OI .o \2.0 ',,_,9 .• "l..0'1 "{ , OO~l-" • ~'fS"2- .· \wl' COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 7 Approved Bud(')'et Proposed ?.., e\,IA,N/\V'/ Budget ~\le). 65-66 (1) 66-67 (1) One~ating Fu~d Sum~ary: (65-66 Expenditures:. $155,523.) Sala~ies and Wages Maintenance and Operation U~appropriated Reserve Total Aut~orized General Reserve Total Requirements Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investments, July 1 Delinquent Taxes Interest Receivable f~om Assessment Districts Misc. Income Receivable from Construction Fund Total A~OUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES ,I, 21"" 5,... ~ o> oO. 1,....8 ~ ,.... 0 ) ..... 5;::J. 20,000. $21.5)119. 78,260. $293>379. 46,037. 2:1500. 3:1000. 89:1441. 5,000. -0- $145)978. §147,401. Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund: (65-66 Expenditures: Treat~ent Plant Expansion . Acq~isit~on of Facilities from . Ci~y of Santa Ana (Portions of 7-5-a) ?ay~ent Due Costa Xesa San. Dist. Sewerc..ge ~acili.cies) Improv.eme.:::ts ?urchase of Equity i~ Joint· Works Tax Collection Expense -ACO Fund Less: Cash and ~evenue Cash & Investments> July l Delino~ent Taxes· 7·""-!-e·r·e-... ._ ...... v -;:)IJ Total • =-.:·-:Oli~T 0::0 BE RAISED BY TAXES ·~.:$390' 780. 84:1954. 1 I'" 2-0 ...... o' '.:> • 115,000. ·7' 000. 1,000. $614,984. 351)894. 6,000. 7,000 . $364,894. $_250, 090 . $ 2,... c;:c 0>..100. 195)220. 20,000. •$241)780. 90,890. $332,670. 116:1374. 3:1500. 2,000. 42,302. 5,000. -0- $169,176. $163,494. $215,634.) $508,533. -0- 1,... 2-0 ..i..O, '.) • 60,000. 85) 000. 1, 000. $670,783. 400,565. 8,000. 8,000. $416,565. $254,218. (:.) S2e ?aze 5 ~o~ Actual 65-66 Operating Fund Expenditures and Cp8rat~ng Fund detail for 66-67. -2- 2.~ 0-0-0 I fbl)iOO 2-ol oo 0 2.\ ).,100 . q~,5{0 30~ o{O I r~~,o-tro 10. ()1)0 (,,~ ) &°I C1"V'O , .=::a, 0-U-0 '13,eoo >st. a{c I . ·I b,,..~o 1~ 0-0-0 ~i.~Dc) JI f;-<jU. &"1~ r3o tl4o,~ . 11'-~ I JO,ov-o ~l'Y,~ 3>~.J'?>u COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Appr·oved Budget ,,...,.... ,,...,,... 0'.:)-00 Fixed Obl~.0.:a tion Fund Summa:c·y: (65-66 Expenditures: $10,492.) Total rt0quirements Less: C&sn end Revenue Cas~ on Hand, July 1 I~~eras~ & Misc. Income :Ueiinql.:ent Taxes Total L~,552. 400. L~oo. $ 5)352. ~~6L~8.!.. 1951 3ond .:fund Su~n:ary: ( 65-66 Expenditures: $20 ,_ 918. ) Principal on 1951 Bonds In.teres"C ':i:otal Authorized General Reserve Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investrr.ents, July l ::Lr .. ter·est Delinquent Taxes Total Ar/l00::\1::1 r::o BE RAISE:!) BY TAY.ES $ $ $ $ $ 13,000. 7,918. 20,918. 16,878. 37,796. "16 861.L .,._ , .. 200. 700. -7 7,,...4 .LI ) Q • 20)032. ( ,,...,..... ,,...~ ":""> • J-. o~-oo ~xpenai~ures: $184 ;015.) ?rinc~pal on 1962 Bonds Total Aut~orized Ge~eral neserve ~o~al Requirexents ~eSS: Cas~ anc Revenue 0as~ & I~vest~e~ts> July l :C2:.. ::.r-~q_·.;...::r. t ir·c..xe s Ir-.:."'cE::r·e st Tot;al A~r.ou:,!T ~·o :SE RAISED BY TAXES ..... -::>- $ 50,000. i 3LL 01 5 -. ) -. $184)015. ao 9Qll. '::J ' v ' • $274,999, 88 '"'?It '.)-..,.. 5,000. . 2,000. $ ' 95) 32l~. 4·J 7c 67r:. •1>.. _-;)) '.) • 4 ~2~ ) ...J ..J • 400. 4co. $ 5)123. $ 10,377. $ 13,000. 7,593. $ 20,593. -,,... T5 .LO' I ..!.. • $ 37,308. 16,474. 200. 700. $ 17,374. $ 19,934. $ 60,000. ., 31 ,....l.!.o .L ...... ) 0 ..:......_:.. $191)640. 93,274. $284,914. 9'"' o-'"' u, '.)v. 6,000. 2,000 . s 98,050. _.,_ 81'" 8,,...1.!. ~l o,\.,.o .• 1.{,~oo ~ O'"trQ lfoo t;zo~ Cf,?ou 13,6-0'"o 1, 1...b6' 'J.-0, v<, ~ l&,{{3 3b,~~ J /71 /:>O0 j.oo .If,~ I~ Ot..1 ---'-- °8'D I CrfTO li!i, 7'10 2.o~-,q 0 qo c;qtf ' ?11110{ r.{', H-0 10,~ 3,o-o-o } Ui WU fC, 1,1~~ P..~; pr·o\J'ec 3-..:.cget ~-,,.-,,-0'.)-00 ?:c·c~..1CZE.:d ~,.~_d[~E:t 66-67 Expe~di tur·es: S',.... 0,-.1, \ . .? ) ":)'-. • ) Sewage 7acilities Cons~ruction Less: Cs.sh 2~::1.C. Revenue To ... cal ;-.-..~ _v B~ RAISED BY TAXES Sewerage Facilities Extensions I.ass: C2s:: & I~.;.vcs·trr~e:'lt,s;i July l ~ra~sfer fro~ ~istrict Opera-ci~g F'Ll.nd. f o-r-"'~ <.Ht-,1~C.~s AMOuN~ TO 3E·RAISED BY TAXES ,. 7-,-,-. ,., '! 'J' Uj r • .,l.·3JJ..-,.--9 y . .L,J.? • 40,000. s -0--·-·-· ,, I\ S.c..H€'°D U\, \::' c... . F1 f\JA tJ c. it-JG:. A-s Pot.. \...c .... ~ S ', 'D 'ST ~ 1 ri~c J ~ + \ ~ s ee \i () l \J It~ q i::u N d UN~N ltJM. hPvt> J {\J,_ .. J~ IC\~~.-61 ESY'~ ~U)J~S, AV,~\\~,~\<' ~VoM lC\~\-~'l Dr sr .; -l AccuM 0 \A~(' J UuPf\S.(l\J,'V\ \x--v e ~ CAr, 4,,, \ o.., ~\A 1 Fu"'~ ~utv l~ t'H.( ,.~ 1 · -Li-- LJ( GOO I I ,.. -v- $367,225 . 327)225. . 40 ~COG. $ -0- ~300 ()OQ J ~o 1 oo o J!'ooo I 'f-f 't, lt'i" bo,ooo '126 > IC/1 • ('t COuNTY SANITA?ION DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING Fu1~D EXPENDITURES ,.._ ,..,,.. o~-oo .Actual (1) Direc~ors En:ployees Total Mainte~ance a~d Oneration: District Sh&re of Joint Operating Directors: Mileage Bo~c Collection Expense Co~nection Charge Administration E~ployees 1 Mileage Xa:..:1. --ce:::anc e Ex:?ense Utilities Expense Inter·est Expense S~pplies, .3lueprints, Legal Ads ?rof essior.al Services Tra:'.1sfer to Facilities :.qevolvi:'.1g Fur.d :r.ter-District Sewer Use Charges Tax Collection Expense, Operating Total ir·otal Q & w, ¥ &·c u ... Unapprop~:..ated Reserve 'I'OTA:G O?ERATING c 2, 750. y 20,294. $ 23·, 044. $· 64,292. .. 127. 67. 12,727. ·:,o4o. 2,.... l.Li3 0) I..... • 6 l.!." 8 ) . j • 1,648. i,583. 16,166. -0- 1,629. Fund 349. $132,479. $155,523. -0- §155,523 ' 66-67 b1-b6 Estimated ?r-~\'"""M"'' $ ·3,600. · 3/oo o 22,960. 2.1 ' y. () <.) $ 26,560. l-~ 0-0-0 $ 84,620. '1{1 Coou 200. ~-o 100. IC o 9,000. 'Ji 0-0-0 1,500. 1 1~00 27,000. ':2-1, o-rr:> . 7,000. -,, OirV 3,700. 3,toc 2,000. J,&iu 17,500. "'l-0,~ 40, 000. (2) -e,- 2,000. 2,(]T-J 600. be> t) $195,220. I f,'7 1 7Do $221,780. fOf "l.1 /Dc 20,000. :i.'1 ov~ $241, 780. J,/J,,1 7o<. (2) ~e~ur~ funds used to finance Assessment Districts, to the ~ac~li~ies Revolving FuDd o: the District. -5- Agenda Item No. ~ < BOYLE and LOWRY ConsuZti?ig Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES Apri I 26, 1967 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County .... Post Office B9x. 517 5 Fo~!ltairr-Valley, California Gentlemen: P. O. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone 547-4471 Pursuant to your instructions at the regular meeting of April 12, 1967, we have made additional studies on extending the Gisler Trunk sewer from the College Avenue Pumping Station to Treatment Plant No. l. Fou,r different systems have been investigated and cost estimates prepared for each one. Cost estimates include construction, engineering, surveying, con- struction inspection, and contingencies. The systems are as fol lows: 1. A 1300' ± 20 11 force main in Gisler Avenue to run from the pumping station crossing Harbor Boulevard and discharge into a 33 11 gravity sewer which extends along Gisler Avenue to Gibraltar Avenue, then north to California Street to the existing District easement, and along the easement to connect with the existing 39 11 sewer which crosses under the Santa Ana River. Estimated cost -$300,000. This is the system on which a verbal report was given at the regular meeting of Apri I 12, 1967. 2. A 27 11 force main from the pumping station to the 39 11 sewer which crosses the river along the same route as system (1). Estimated cost -$263,000. 3. A 27 11 force main from the pumping station, along Gisler Avenue, crossing over the Greenvi I le-Banning flood control channel and under the Santa Ana River to the west side and connect to the 48" inter-plant line. Estimated cost -$284,000. 4. Modify existing pumps and motors to produce higher head at 2500 gpm pump capacity in order to utilize smaller 24 11 force main between pumping station and point of discharge at 39 11 river crossing. Same route as system (1). Estimated cost - $294,000. Board of Di rectors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County April 26, 1967 Page Three h. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the District's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distribution to prospective bidders, etc. i. Assist District in securing bids, tabulafion and analysis of bid results, and in letting of contract. i. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the contractor. k. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. I:.. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections and correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and speci- fications. m. Furnish periodic observations of construction work in progress and provide appropriate reports to the District. n. Furnish a final inspection and report of the completed project with a representative of the District. o. Prepare and record drawings (11 as-constructed 11 ) when the con- struction work has been completed and accepted by the District. This shall mean the original tracings 'of the plans wil I be modified, if necessary, because of deviations from the original work. When District staff construction inspection is employed, modifications to the original tracings wi II be based upon information supplied Engineer by District. The original tracings after being modified shal I become District property. We propose to provide these services for a lump sum fee of $15,280. The time and method of payment for our services is to be mutually agreed upon. There will be field surveys required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys will include taking topography and culture within the project limits. We propose that al I fie Id surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis. Our current per diem rate for surveying services, $32 per hour for a three-man survey party. The total cost for this work shou Id not exceed $1 , 500. This particular area of the county is noted for unstable soi Is conditions. It is recom- mended that a competent recognized soils mechanics firm be employed by the District for subsurface soi Is investigations and tests. It is also recommended that we draw up the criteria and specifications for the investigations and tests and assist your general manager in selecting a suitable firm. Board of Di rectors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Apri I 26, 1967 Page Three h. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible plates of the specifications for the District's use in preparing the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distribution to prospective bidders, etc. i. Assist District in securing bids, tabula!ion and analysis of bid results, and in letting of contract. i. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the con tr actor. k. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction. I:.. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections and correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and speci- fications. m. Furnish periodic observations of construction work in progress and provide appropriate reports to the District .. n. Furnish a final inspection and report of the completed proiect with a representative of the District. o. Prepare and record drawings (11 as-constructed 11 ) when the con- struction work has been completed and accepted by the District. This shall mean the original tracings ·of the plans will be modified, if necessary, because of deviations from the original work. When District staff construction inspection is employed, modifications to the original tracings wi II be based upon information supplied Engineer by District. The original tracings after being modified shal I become District property. We propose to provide these services for a lump sum fee of $15,280. The time and method of payment for our services is to be mutually agreed upon. There wi 11 be field surveys required in order to prepare the plans and specifications. These surveys wi II include taking topography and cu I tu re within the proiect limits. We propose that al I fie Id surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem basis. Our current per diem rate for surveying services, $32 per hour for a three-man survey party. The total cost for this work shou Id not exceed $1 , 500. This particular area of the county is noted for unstable soils conditions. It is recom- mended that a competent recognized soils mechanics firm be employed by the District for subsurface soi ls investigations and tests. It is also recommended that we draw up the criteria and specifications for the investigations and tests and assist your general manager in selecting a suitable firm. Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County Apri I 26, 1967 Page Four In the event you wish to employ our firm for inspection and construction stakin~ during the course of construction work, we wil I provide on inspector at $8. 00/hour and a three-man survey party at the hourly rate quoted herein. If this proposal meets with your approval, we are prepared to proceed immediately with the work. Very truly yours, BOYLE and LOWRY /) 0 J'•H .. / V'/ I i /2 /./, (] l'~l~ /L l.tUW/f-c'7t..t!; -i~ Jv J Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. l 0951 pp 41-:8325-21-00 cc: Lowry and Associates I: r ·~-' fu f ' )?' t ' '£•• •·+ i +d •1 ••-,t '#"" c'etrW ra..• '>'teec't u =new• •a )We ,.g ,·y;·10 G tb• P' '>4"11..-# ''r' ,..,:.._W".4.1 :•)\'+f'•.,, .. )'@f~'-d ft * i'ilito..L -·,d -;-r - ~:~ 1 -c I ::..·!~=_=-.-:~ ~~;~ ~....:..~ ~ ........... ~J '"-"-~..,, -~.·d -,~,.,~ ;:~~ ~~~~ ~~ !:...-=a:;~J .. ~--=- =--~11 -_ ......... ~~~ ~j =-~h'l.-.Jl I ~~ ~...=, ·-~~~ ' \ -~1 .~·-;;j ~s . -. , • ... < ~ 21 1 A •1~ C.H ~ -:.'1 . \tj\ ~ 1 2 \ ij c. I . ELL!S ;I.... 1 AV1. -. _7 £ »'.'"~ .. 5 13 :::.:in:::.CJ:21tJ••m.r ----·--· .. -·-··· E :1 l F I H;l;U111H>W AV I, J I I ·AN ~A i I t:I I ,,. • 2cho: _•1..92. : ,,.. !{ i 1 1 ~ ~ER ! AV g ___________ L------------~-- 1 I w r ---~~+--i-----+-------~-. ~l I g I ·1 J_ 6 _ WAKE HAM_._ L~v rt; ----.••• --· u 1 4 \, :1 I! il , . i l ,, ,! •I .j I • •1 ' ,, I . ' •I I • ! . I I I • i' :., ; j I ·1. r i I I ! i ) -----.... -.---·"'---·~--... ---·--·-·-~·----··------..... _._ -·-·-..... -··----· ... ·-·----- r- f,; I r· L >. 1 .. (\ .· .. : ..... ~ . . .•· . ".. . .. -... _.-_, ·. . ·.·· _ ... ".•, ... -' .. ; .... ~ :· f: ~ . . .. ~. . (, \ x . . . . ·•"·;J~ I -. . l.•Z/ ~,-:• ~;I _.,,.,,, .. -~ ,· ... -;.J. l:Ji"".db'-' ET~ V'/l.rl.i'?S" . :· .. ':··"-:.:·>.:-.~~-.:. ~:._. _ _:./:">L--~::··~-. ,·· __ ,·.; ·'. .::·...,:..' 1· :·~:·~ -:·-·/.1 ,1 \\.\" -~ .·> -;-.~ '1f ;i/f_....14. · : .. ~-~-"··.:-:·:·>1:?~';...t.nO ...LN10~ . · · ··-· .. , . ·-...... " . -· "' -.. ··· : '. ~ -" · ··-~ : : · · . .. · I: '' _..-"'/ft'l-,~t s · /11 .,.-: J · t . · ·. . · · · .~..JIJ(nO.:;J .=!S>NV,:. ~ ... . ..... ; .... _:-·._·:--:. .. ·,._.·-... ·-:·":. - \. .. :.·"./ ~1yJd ... : .... _ .-~ ....... ---.. ".·.·.:rt~ If"} "• I '?I·. ·~1:-r.:1••-..••-..-.-.-~~~ t°:'.' -~--~< ~~--::·· .. ··. ·7~~~5 .-.. .-_ ~:~.·~ .. :-:~._'/'/~ .. ;~·-~:,:~--~\~-.--<·:·(~:b;fJ\~;fl -.'. ,_. i. ~-: -~~-_· .. ~·;::;·;~·~"· >"_.·~:·· .t~ i ... -.. · .: . ; -~ -2:i • :--.... ·'; . . .·. ·• -, -·: .~ .. : · .. ;: ~-.. -~' k'""' 1 f)~ : · ... • .. r b ~-, ~'rue. -:f,,._;;:"1-s::> ! -. -...... ~--. -..... -·:.---'-.· .. ..· ....... -:-·.,; ... ;. ~,t:.iti.-;':-~··~ .•. :-· .. tr~-. -... : -4 , C,.; -_;.,--. ,001::;.1.-0110::7.S .. ;_ •. ..:. .. l'tt,~1;'1.,j,. .. ·;-.-:_< ... -. i' ~ .. 6":?-6'ft ·····:··;~·-:-~:-~ • ) _/. . . .,... .., f\ ............... ~~-~---~~;:: ... ....!;;~~~~ EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 (OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~flA) An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 (of Orange County, California), was held at 7:00 p.m., April c.6-196_1_ at 10844 Ellis Avenue~ Fountain Valleyt California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at_..7.;~o.o._.._p_._m_. ______________ . The roll was called and a quorum of the Board was reported present, Directors present: Cl if tor: C. Miller {Cha 1 rman), Al Forgi i.:_, Thomas McMichael, Rex A. Parks; Ellis N. PorLer, and David L. Baker Directors abs~nt: None Present: Fred A, Harper• Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. 7 ADJOURNMENT Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County San:.tation Distr1c .. No. 7 se adjourr.ed to 5:30 p.m.,, April 27, 1967'., in he District's office at 10844 Ellis Avenue~ Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman then declared the meetine_ so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., April ~6, 1Q67. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS, I, FRED A. HARPER 1 Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. ? (of Orange County, California), do hereby certify the above and""fO'regoing to be full~ true and correct copy of minute entries on recprd taken from the minutes of the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No, 7 (of Orange County• California), on the ·>6th day of Aprj J , 196'-'f:" ---IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.J._this ·-~6 tb day of April ~ 196..1_. Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No • ..1_. P.genda Item No.--..~tf"'"-_ ........ -. April 26, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA P. O. BOX 5175 10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 Attached are copies of protest letters received as of 5:00 p.m., April 26th; and formal letters of reply to several · protestants. RE: April 14, 1967 11362 Church Street Orange, California BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No.· 7 OF ORANG£ COUNTY RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7; Modified by Resolution No. 66-51-7; and also Modified by Resolution No. 67-4-7; IN THE MATTER OF: "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" Description of Property: Assessment No. M.Frazier's 2nd Addition Block B 36 to Modena Lot s, together with portion of abandoned street adjoining on north. NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Protest and/or an Appeal is made for the $735,92 cost 'of putting in 24-feet of sewer pipe in front of my house. I believe that a re-eva.luation should be made on this amount. I am perfectly willing to pay for the cost of the pipe and the labor involved; hoY?ever,. I can ·not possibly conceive that 24-fee·t of pipe and the i·abor involved can come to $73 5. 92 ! My home is at the end of the ·block where the construction crew started the line. Th.is line came in on a diagonal just a.few feet from my driveway· . . and i'n no.way· did the pipe traverse the·frontage of my.lot as it·' certainly had .to do· in .. continuity -for the houses that were subsequently ~iped in down the block. In all fairness· I believe that a re~estimate of this cha~ge is in order. J/af P 5ia£er 1932 PARK SKYLINE ROAD SANTA ANA {LEMON HEIGHTS\, CALIFORNIA 92705 . TELEPHONE 544-3958 a;C/v'vl I 11 / f t 7 ; #:-7 yi., : t?.z--u~~~ '?z,o·. f 0 :Ji_ c<--vh ;;i 1 i 1 X ~ ~ ~ /ltheF~r ti;M ;;2 ~, /rt t} t{/~ r,/i~tf.· a~?~/~~~ J-rV'~~J, /?-/ 2//-uu ~/,lz~ 1 J(/ 1 /f ~ f S . I ) ~ ~ ~J~ Mrf~ _L; ~: ~ ~~~. W--e ~~cf' ~i.-~-4 ~--r'~~._/'L ._,{;" /(,--At .. ~vi/ ..A/~./1./ /vi . ,Nv?vo rJ ._,L....VJ. .. ·t:· t&lk~~) /h . ;/ ~ ·I / / t/z-:J. 0cuf. -{;~J4~flt. I °I 8 ~ P~ }J~..:: .. (_ 12~ ..... f<. r -1---r-i ~';, ~~(:>..-j&""-1 l_: U-~( I 7 d 7" ~ l Q BOYLE aud LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A Joint V cnture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES April 24, 1967 Mrs. Hal Fisher 1932 Park Skyline Road Santa Ana, California 92705 Dear Mrs. Fisher: County Sanitation District No. 7 Assessment District No. 6 P. 0. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone 547-4471 Your letter dated April 17, 1967 to County Sanitation District No. 7 requests information regarding the correctness of the tentative $745. 95 assessment against . your lot located at the northeast comer of Grovemont Street and Tustin Avenue. You also stated that you have not connected to the sewer. The fact that you have not connected to the new house lateral constructed to your front property I ine has no bearing on the amount of the assessment or of the assessment itself. The new sewer has been constructed in Grovemont Street and a house lateral has been constructed to the property line; thus, there is a benefit to this lot whether or not it is used at the mome!1t. A sanitary sewer system can be likened unto other public street improvements such as asphalt pavement, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and street I ighting systems. The tentative assessment against your lot is based upon an 81-1/2-foot lot width times the front footage cost of $6.6789274 per foot of width, which equals $~44.33 plus the house lateral benefit of $165.62 to wli ch has been added the Orange County Treasurer's $36 bond handling charge, making a total assessment of $745. 95. We hope we have answered your letter satisfactorily, however, if you h·ave any further questions do not hesitate to cal I. Very truly yours, BOYLE and LOWRY Q,_J (l~,f'~ Carl A. Carlson, C. E. 6654 pp 41-895-06-oo cc: :Vcounty Sanitation District No. 7 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper Lowry and Associates. Aprtl 18, 1967 Board of Dtrectors County Sanitatton Dtstrtct #7 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Cal1forn1a Gentlemen: RE: Lot 11, Block B Oge and Bond Resolution #67-4-7 Please be advised that the above indicated tmproved property was properly connected to the existing main sewer line on Hewes Avenue tn·Aprtl of 19660 The sub-contractor on the job was Western Supply and Sewer or Bellflower. The general contractor was Ronald V. Natton., Performance was 137 feet of 4 inch D.CoPo, 25 feet of 4 inch cast tron, and 20 feet of 6 inch DoCoPo to do the job. An assessment charge .of $175oOO, sewer permit of $5000, and street repair charge of ~3lo00 paid to the county at that ttme. I therefore appeal to the board to repeal the proposed assess- ment charge as presented of $1,498070 on the above indlcated property. Slncer~ly, .. . . ··~. ,-··· .~._ ... ~ · .. "Ji(,i~£ ·J ob.n S • Fe tka BOYLE aud LOvVRY Consulting E11giuecrs, A Joi11t V cuturc of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES April 24, 1967 Mr. John S. Feike 12082 Theta Road Santa Ana, Calif9rnia 92705 Dear Mr. Feike County Sanitation District No. 7 Assessment District No. 6 P. O. Box 178 Santa Ana1 California 92702 Telephone 547-4471 County Sanitation District No. 7 has forwarded your letter doted Apri I 18, 1967 protesting the tentative assessment of $1, 4.98. 70 ogainst the property_ located at 11622 Hewes presently used as a mortuary. About April or May, 1966, we were contacted by the general contractor, Ronald V. Nation and also a representotive of the Mettler Funeral Home, regarding the need for an early sewer connection to this property. At this time we were certain that the Assessment District No. 6 sewer system would be constructed. Included in this assessment district was the ~onstruction of the sewer in the private rood along the north side of your property as wel I as acquisition of capacity rights in the city of Orange sewer already in existence in front of your property in Hewes Avenue. Since a corner lot is usuol ly given a choice of sewer connection, we. reasoned that your prope.rty cou Id be connected to the city of Orange sewer by Ronald V. Nation as soon· as desired rather than wait several months for the assessment district contractor to bui Id the lateral or connect to the new assessment district sewer in the private street north of your property. Therefore, to al low early occupancy and completion of building permit requirements for the remodeling of the existing structure into a funeral home, we suggested to the county bui !ding deportment, as wel I as County Sanitation District No. 7, that a connection permit to the Hewes sewer be granted at that time. Thus, the funeral home would not be involved with a special temporary permit for a private disposal system and also would avoid the necessity to disturb the new landscaping and yard paving that would be involved if the connection were not allowed until such time as the Assessment District No. 6 contractor · arrived to do the work. Based upon our suggestion to the building deportment and the County Sanita- tion District No. 7, a permit for connection was taken .out by Ronald V. Nation under A. K. Mettler, as applicant, on Moy 16,-l966. The $175 sewer permit fee paid at that time to County Sanitation District No. 7 is c;i use connection charge based upon a connection fee schedule that~ is paid by al I property owners at the time they use the pub Ii c sewer the first time. This fee is collected whether the sewer· was built by a developer, installed as· po"rt of an assessment district, or involves a connection to a trunk sewer .• ' Mr. John S. Feike Apri I 24, 1 967 Page Two This fee has absolutely nothing to do with paying for the construction cost of a sewer. We assume that the $5 permit referred to in your letter is the Orange County Building Department 1 s plumbing inspection fee to cover the inspection of the abandonment of the existing private disposal system and the construction of a new sewer pipe in private property. In our telephone conversations with Ronald V. Nation and the representative . of the Mettler Funeral Home, we were very careful to state that this property would be subject to an assessment at the time of completion of all work in Assessment District No. 6 regardless of whether or not the connection was made to the sewer in Hewes or the sewer in the private street known as Easement No. 1 in these proceedings. Your assessment was computed by multiplying the 219 feet of frontage on the private street by the front-foot cost unit price of $6.6789274 per front foot which totaled $1,462.70 to which has been added the Orange County Treasurer's $36 bond handling charge giving a total assessment of $1,498. 70. You were not assessed for any laterals since your own contractor constructed the lateral to the sewer in Hewes Avenue. Your letter will be read at the protest hearing, however, we felt it advisable to inform you of the detai Is in connection with your property prior to the date of the hearing. If you hove any further questions, do nof hesitate to coll. Very truly yours, . BOYLE and LOWRY ·-/l· t1 a /? r· l-A"~ .· ~c/c.~- Corl A. Carlson, . C. E. · 6654 pp "41-8435-06-00 cc: s-i'ounty Sanitation District No. 7 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper Mr. C. Arthur Nisson, Jr. Mr. Jack J. Rimel Lowry and Associates :/ ·! I I '· ~1 .,J.;! Y(./hvl--t.£/J'f,[/-Z..,,,.; ~ . ~ ~7:t~ p _;?L,, --€-?~·~:?!_! ~~~L . ·<::/ S?:<-••w ...h,.~~"?c»-u:;fj; .-d?> -/1·-r~:f ~-ZJIZ/ -4-/ ~ S/ p." · DMPh:t~ SI "':~ Jh ;&~~)7_ 7 &?~cz, ~ rJ"~ .,,C:&?!~ '°/' ( .:z) -U .LP/ ...:::&-~ 4'--e~ .e'-42~. ~ ~~v~e~ ~eJ Jcr"?t _,a;q ./c.a7 &J/~~i~~ ~-~j~-t(j 4 S-~~7 -fl:b~e ~£ -~ -:~od,/ 7 ~/ __JcUI ~ 1u';~-d7 ~ Y Y -if/:~I. .12ahran ·~ rr$ A4 7/JJ!-i. -r -n~ <d-.0--/ .JL'rl~ __I).¢ a.;S~fU:.ul' .# :u 2 . -w-~~ o.A,,1,;±;,,._ 'fo:I-1 13.P~ B. ) rJ </-Yr+~~ .:# ~".1 lt.kq-~ ~ .. St, ~d '/-11 #f ~ .£-12 c~ ~ 4 ?JD tr. . l3l«--f< B . ~ _Q,4 I ~(:--eJe 13 Ct.~.iu.n~,vJ d.b~i -:fL .~ ~ ef -·1 rJ () _/) ~ d .... ~.,er ~ ''7 ~ '-f~ ~ C5 <::f:. (fV\.._ -X-o-f J;;5 ~rx.u ~l; :i :J ~ 4'7l ~f ,~9 ._ 1~wr:~:? 2~. 2 -z1-rhe$-r ::;// ~/J1~1-~~ ~ ~ '°¥r: ~~~9-~'I .,an au:~~cJ ~~~ YL J!l1 ~/1 .cm-~ ~/~ --IV't-~k_ .;::tfcr,41 a::-~~M,,,? ~c;3 _ 4Z ~p4u~ ..-Ju/ 4'e1c-/j ..,,uC-6~~-w . , . . $~ J ,o~t,/ _,UJ,zt/ ~ d~ ~ ~~ ~ ~/ J ac-) ~-a ~zc/ ~ -.£e.-~r:tr J~ ~??- .£(-t-Lc/ ;:c:u-'l;t..z-/ __;;dHt ,,aeeffu:,,iri ;l)j;;f/~~ 'I:- co ~ (,J • 0 -l . co N '5 {'\( -,..J 0 (I -l. -rJ ·-t (j) ~ c t:' <lJ (lJ ~ ·• '> .c: ~ • s::::' 'l> -~ :g > OJ r/) q: "'1 ~ tJ) /°'- (Q ~ '\ f -~s-- l..«1 .. ~1 ., I ,.. I ·"' ) l"r) -~ ... ~ 0 N ~ t! "-:t-Q.J ~ 11 -;:1--'= ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 ":>--;.J -;-.. :lJ t-=S: ~l ~ .-<:)I <); 41 ""ti -'= \J ti)"~ ~-1-' Q.. <t ::> ti-:\ . 0 Q,; ~ ..,; 01 cx>~ <t ~'1.J-4-.> 9- '.3-'=j..::.: f.-. 'J) ~41./ ,I i...e\{~'(o.i.. \ I .S ew-ev \\I"\ e £a r //1 & 'tY\. ··. (Jr. st~ Ass~s;ne,1-l. :i..to 3 ~--/, B Nas 1 da•eHi n~ -Lo s~v-v e J ~re.H"'-fro"--.\ sew er \ i "-E' , ·) ~ ~ > ~7/;z--/ /ZIC/~ ~~v?T''.~ 7;: . . ,~~7~.Y .~~ u~ tf'~r r "'7i1-n-~ /:#fr ~uv ./ r?7UV-,~?~ ~r ~U-'~ :.h~ ~;_::-,1-7r1~ r ·117~~/?r ..p2Zf77/~ 17/1-_;n~ /'/'pt,,7 ": 1'9.r ,rp ~-177~,:r /::;JIV'-!f';Jzv.r 7C ;z.7-;?Z..7r fZ d~'"u.}P"..!P . .;17tp-r-d/_.... /tf'~rztr ~~·??F /' /_?W/?r r-7-u,p-' ~S'" ·~r?~1,,.,... 7-r f./2~;-~ r '''r"?-cl 7r /:r-~~ /fr~r I' La?' 7/?!f? ~ ~?-~<;-7-f-<rz/'_:(,,,,.-~?_,. r _/?p.z..z,.W /r" ./77+; .nev/?T;_?-~ a-#-.. ""'-W-,1u&?t<h:Jl>~ 7;e ffl..?-yf--rr-'7? -?r P' /;~/mv-''f:-~~ r.r.:rr-r/ '1'r-~JI.''r /: /7r /~Y 7r-"7-,>7r-~7Y-~ #~:r /JL-tif<"fr?r;·;p-i /$?-.1!'??/1.r /: -zr nu....., /~,,..7--'-P/ .,,.#-.. ~~r 11.:-:::1.71-... k:r--·-~f" t?n.~;o-~r ~ ;z:;-./7/7.:::: ?.?tY527-rz/:..... r ~<77 ... /-~-77n:nt'!.9 :p;;z_-? ~; ·-rr."'7/:p-p:.--~'7?'? /~ipgr 7,r rr.7_,:.?Z,Y-/.7" "~~· ~r""'-fL.7~--7z:'" ff°w~:r-~nr ~ /:9,p,.//" "'17,t:Z:-d-""i'V~ J'f},/.~-""7" . ~ 7 :f .f ~ & I -; .'H/f J ?~Yd~ ;/V/f",,~ ~ /.,,p T ·-;:r .g.d:~t'a:J • r-s-_f' #:-/71/71¢~0 }t-NJ47v ~ ~1~1-t:i'~ /-~ ~ / ~t? /~.,.,~V Jf/CfJ /#~~ v~:J} : "-~;;~lfl·?C-"crJ?..Y-. , If- / 7.;t!.-/z?1f-. (';r-----;rp ~ . . . .. 'Y ](~?;;. 71:r~ /vu-j;) --:~ t!~-7... ?'t-!-.-.;(J ~)">1-1 ~.Y/-"' _ r 7' ·U/ • (~ ~ ~ -~ .... . tlMd "I Aie~ e~ ,/rtuiut-W;-, ~-nt[J.? 108~1-<ff'~ ~ r~.,. v~, ~ /(Ja;vk,: //();// J/).evdv t2av. tJMMpi Clz4~ 9::<66 7 . ;{ 5 °!'~ 196 7 j) Cl?J1/ ~";; ~ hPiv ~ ~ Zo ,,(}~ # 7 ~ au~ ilGtt/-t7J1.J l't.u //./?S . ..k;LA! ..6DZZe/ 4 /(}()-/t2(} Al #~ /./~ P./ O~r&n~ / &¥-- t(J;yJ rv ~~ 771 {"-" r ~~ ~d;.c~ ~ ~d-~; PNJ~ ¥ #tV ~/~;4 ¥ stiu t:~ ~ a.j />..eMb ~ ~mu~~ ~ ~ ~£,,,u .. ..&v~, ~-~ ~ niv~ ~ .ku),&-~;3 ~ .i'&-uZZ~ ht/ #iu ~~ ~nv th,L ~~L if ~r-~g .V)U r-~~4 ~-14 ~ y(u ~<14d;-~ ~ ~ ~ ~P _,w.,./!ef~ ~ t?~. /p £w .a.d£tr.n 1 ,w.u CVLU -M-a~a k-~ fl«/~ ·~ If #~ Lru-Jt!t~ ft tf.J Jtna-.J; s-ht a,. y~ ~ht~ ett!T~ ~~ref#; /'"fJicuv I ~ ~ .L<u /Zlf~ ;d /l.C;du:~ ~ fe/' ~j r;,k; /Iii-~.;,~~~ Jl,r,~ ~lhv I» htU-V ~ 1~~-J. tlflv'J'.c·fk~ ~ ~w ~ AJ-i?Av {){,//V Adh; ~ ~~~~uLh~~~~:t tJA£wip ,u;, ~u ;G ~ ,,d.~ ~~-Cliu1 ~ AJ~1M.,f ~f &WV £/~ {f ~ kdu~~ ¥ ~ ~% ~µ;;./ ;z;!A.U ¥4 ~ ~ tlf ~ ~ ~ l,(}.ed-"/-~ ~k,,~ ~cifc,c/ ;fJAAuf ?/b'?f; rff~ ~T eizrfhv ~ J fa.vf Jt/LU ~ ~ tLarv Ad~ k° #.ru ~4Pf /;?$./~ x/ker~ $v~~J-1~~<4t4~~~ ~ ~ ~~~:; #t.u ~;j :· . (j) .2)/\V;iw-o ~ ttfl.f.; ~ ~~ -£/~ ~ k &J41k~/ Wv~~ (2) ~ ~L M>_;f!iu/;J //~ 'f ~~ ~ ., ~~~ k lW!Lu ~ ~-~,£ ~ -.dPM ~~.9·· d) tuu ./~ ac&Fdl., ~~ ~"';}-Cit~~ ~ - ~ ~ q_; t!P>uu~ tl.+.,tY~ ~~ ~'d.. '._/ l~.:Jk-l!M'~~ ~ ~1n<J~P ft~ r~ rJ _Aeudf ~ · ~n~~ ~ 1~ //£S &.el~ SPECIAL NOTICE TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531, 541, 542, 543, 550 and 551). Your assessments are lower than other assessments in Assessment District No. 6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3.00 per front-foot connec- tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you will be required i·o pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this prior reimbursement agreement between the city of Orange and the developer who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot charge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent to you so that you wi 11 be completely informed about future cos·ts before you will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property • . . ROLL CALL Date tt'f*L~J /2<'k7 .. JOINT BOARDS Parsons Amo Bartlett Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Forgit Furman Gruber Gummere Hock Long Miller, Clifton Miller, Harry McMichael far ks Porter Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Stewart Walters Workman Baker OTHERS: ; i\ Brown~· Niss on '\Galloway Tremblay Lowry j Carlson Rimel ~ Maddox 1>VV\ ~·~~ {o~ ~:r:Q_ .H-~ ~JJ1~~~ ~;(..(_ 13~ (,) DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Baker Davis Noe Shull Gruber Bouma Forgit· Anderson Michel Brown Mack Kohl Hfleman Krein Harwood Fregeau Clark Green Coen Herbst Featherly Lambourne Featherly District ,_, -------------------Regular Adjourn-e~d ______ ;;?'_,.< ________ _ Time Z? tJ () dlh I , DISTRICT 1 McMichael Miller, Clifton Porter Baker Parks Crapo Culver McMichael Hock DISTRICT 2 Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Walters Workman Baker Speer Amo Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Furman Gummere McMichael Long DISTRICT 3 Miller, Harry Schutte Schwerdtfeger Stewart Walters Baker Parsons Gruber Baker Porter Gruber Baker DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 -~--------------~· ---------------·--··--- / DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton ~ Forgit v::=- McMichael ~ Parks k'(' Porter J/" Baker ~/ Stewart ·-'' Bartlett Baker --D!'"STitICT 11 Mack Featherly Hileman Shull Michel Krein Harwood Clark Herbst Featherly Clark Davis Noe Shull Bouma Anderson Brown Kohl Krein Fregeau Green Herbst Featherly Forgit Featherly Forgit Featherly ~~~~er ~ Hileman ~ Featherly // __ _____.,/ Coen Featherly ROLL CALL District -------------------Regular ~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time ----------------------------------------- Parsons \.._,) Amo Bartlett Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Forgit Furman Gruber Gummere Hock Long JOINT BOARDS Miller, Clifton Miller, Harry McMichael ,far ks Porter · Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Stewart Walters Workman Baker OTHERS: Davis Noe Shull Gruber Bouma Forgit' Anderson Michel Brown Mack Kohl Hb.eman Krein Harwood Fregeau Clark Green Coen Herbst Featherly Brown Niss on Galloway Tremblay Lowry Carlson Rimel · ~· Maddox ~ "\ ~\v ,~ 4' ~} ~·~'J v. \t \f . DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Baker Lambourne Featherly '·'' DISTRICT l McMichael Miller, Clifton Porter ----- Baker Parks · Crapo Culver McMichael Hock DISTRICT 2 Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Walters Workman Baker Speer Amo Bousman Bowen Crapo .Culver Furman Gummere McMichael Long DISTRICT 3 Miller, Harry Schutte Schwerdtfeger Stewart Walters Baker Parsons Gruber Baker DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 6 Mack Featherly Hileman Shull Michel Krein Harwood Clark Herbst Featherly Clark Davis Noe Shull Bouma Anderson Brown Kohl Krein Fregeau Green Herbst Featherly Forgit Featherly Porter Gruber Baker Forgit . Feathe~~~ DISTRICT 7 Y-~ Miller, Clifton V: Mack · / Forgit .,_....... Gruber ·v-~~~~~haei :::::-Hileman ·.,/' Porter ~ V'/ Baker 2"" Featherly \/' DISTRICT 11 Stewart Coen Bartlett Baker Featherly JACK J. RIME L JOHN A . HARVEY, III D UFFERN H. HELSING RICHARD N. RIMEL GEORGE G. LOGAN RICHARD A.RATTRAY LA.W OFFICES OF RIMEL, HARVEY & HELSING FOU RTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA .ANA, CALIFORL"LA. 927 01 May 25, 1967 Fred A. H arper, General Manage r County Sanitati on Dis trict No . 7 of Orange County P . 0. Box 5175 Founta in Valley, Cal ifornia Attention: Jean Bankston, Secret ary D ear Jean: 547-7395 MADXSON 5-757 9 Enclosed is a corrected set of minutes for the meeting of Apr il 26th a nd the adjourned meeting on April 27th. You may want to change the wording for the adjournment, etc . but t his is generally the form to u se . j c e n cl Sincere ly, ime ~ ~ "-• ~"' ti I I! ·' 11 '1 p 1 ii -,, I 2 ! I· !, 3 •; :' I L;_ I -1 ., 511 I 6 '! 1: 7 '1! s:I g ll ;1 lj lO !i ll il 1'2 \1 I 1 ... ,, J I: ,. ,, 14 i1 -5 Ii .L ' ! 1 6 , -711 .L . I " ;. 18 11 19 ; 20 · !. 21 :1 1· 22 ' 1: I 23 !. 24!: 25 11 26 1' II 27 i I 28 i 29 I I I 30 ! 31 ii 32 li LAW OFFICES OF Ii RIMEL. HARVEY & Ii H!::LSING I! FOURTH FLOOR 1 , 1 , 101 0 NORTH MAIN S'l'. SANTA ANA. I CALIFORNIA 927 0 1 p ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 Hearing on Asse ssme nt April 2 6, 1967 7 :00 p . m . The Secreta:::-y advised the Board that this is the time and place fixed , pursuan t to s tatute and notice give n, for the hearing in the matter of the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and a ppurtenant wor k in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 , 11 as contempla ted by R e solution of Intention No . 66 -19 -7, adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9 , 1966 , as amended by Resolutio~ N o . 66 -51 -7, adopted on May 5 , 1 966, and by Resolution No . 67 -4 -7 , adopted on January 11, 1967. The Sec retary als o i nformed the Board of Directors that affidavits of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing A ssess men t were 1 on file in his office , and that b written appeals or objections had been filed in his office p rior t o the d ate set for the heari ng by: The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered filed. The Chairman then asked if there were any inter ested per sons pres e nt desiri ng to b e heard in the abov e menti oned matter. The following persons then addressed the Board of Dir e ctors : ( -, ;. I I ._L t A. \,. -1 - ,, I I ! I l After the oral communications were heard, a letter was h anded to 2 , the Board signed by Dolor es Herrera, one of the property owners within the 3 . District, pertaining to the failure of the contractor to replace some fences on ' 1, 4 ~1 her property which were removed in the process of construction and which she 5 ! stated the District had promised her would be restored. T his letter was not ,1 ,. 6 , received as a formal objection or complaint inasmuch as it was received I 7-il after the time fixed for the opening of the hearing . From further discussion , lj 8 q g !l I 10 ,, I 11 ' I r2 i! I 13 !1 I; 1 4 1 18 1 9 22 · 23 · ,. it appeared that there were apparently other instances where fences and per - haps other improvements were removed and destroyed during the process of construction for which ,it was stated by the property owners, promises had been made by the District to restore . There followed a general discussion by the Board members as to what should be done . Attorney F . MacKenzie Brown, representi ng both the contractor and his assignee , addressed the Board, urging the Board not to delay its action on confirmation of the assess - ment by reason of the unrestored fences and other similar items and present - ing to the Board a letter fro m the legal firm representing the contractor's surety on the contractor 1 s faithful performance bond , which letter advised the Board that the surety would make good on any deficiencies in the work . This letter was received and filed . A ll persons interested having been given full opportunity to show cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all ·objec t ions pre - sented having been heard and fully considered, it was t hereupon moved by Director ~~ that all objections , appeals and protests , both oral and i 24 ; written, be overrule d and denied . Said motion was seconded by Director 25 I! ~ and carried by the following roll call vote : 26 1 A YES : Directors - 27 I NOES : Directors - I 28 .! II 29 1 ~o i: .) , I I: 31 ' 32 1 Ii RIM EL, HARVEY 3' II HELSING ,1 f'O!..!l<TH FLOOR LAVI OFF'JC?:S OF 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I SANTA ANA, I", r.t.I I T:'t"\PMIA ~?701 ABSENT: Directors - -2 - ..._, II •I !. '• '· i: 11 I· " Ii i 3 , i . . ' -' -" d -I 0 ., 11 i t. !' -"d 15 11 16 ii 1 7 ;i .J-.I 22. 22 " ' ·23 ·: " i1 ~~~I ~ -I I 25 '' 26 " 27 !\ 29 •i I, ' ' 30 •I . I I 32 , "-AV/ c..r:--.c;.::: o.-: R1~1.::.. ":--:r.r~v-:.v :.?< ~:=:_~i >-:G ' ,·'Ot.;i,7H r:..ooN: :010 :>:OR';'rl :.~AiS C7, :1 ,, i I I _\ ::,'~,)~~:~:.,):\ r-.) 'oc numbered "Resolution ~o . 67-45-7 '1 c:Jtitle:C: as follows: "A R2SOi.UTIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COu:\TY S.~:\IT.,-\ TIO:\ D:STrtICT NO. 7 OF ORAKGE COL.i:\TY, CA LIFOR?\IA , COR:S.ECTIXG . ..\XD :VIODIFYIXG THE ASSESS::VIE:\T A:\D DIA GR-~ Y;: ::\:_..\:UE A i\'TI FILED BY T HE E::.\GI:\iEER OF WOrtK OF SAID DISTRICT o~ THE 31ST D . ..\ y OF :!'fl.ARCH , 1967, TO COVER TEE su::vrs Du:2 :s'OR T H::S WORK A?\D I:VIPROVE:\IJ:ENT CO?\SISTI:\G OF THE CO:\-I STRUCTIO:\ OF CERT.A.I~ SA:\ITARY SEWERS AKD P .. PPURTE:\'A:\CES ! . ..\:\D .-.PP:;R TE:\Al\T vVORK I~ 11 ASSESSME:\T DISTR!CT :\0. 6 11 I:\ SAID SA NIT.I\ TIO::>; DISTRICT, AS CON TEMP LA TED BY RESOLUTI O?\ OF I ::>JTEKTIO:\' NO . 66 -19 -7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTIO:\ i\O . 66 -51 -7 AND RESOLUTION 1 0 . 67 -4 -7 OF SAID DISTRICT; A~'TI ORDERIKG A l\D DIRECTIKG THE EXGINEER OF WORK TO J:.)JI EXD _..\ND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIA GRA M OX Tr:L FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH, 11 was the reupon presented to the Board of Directors for ii:S co:'ls:dera:ion, a:::e r which it was moved by Dir e ct0r 1M,l~~ , seconded by Direcrnr ~\.f;,d , I ! that said Resolution No . 67-45 -7 be adopted, and the same was adopted oy the :allowing roll call vote : AYES : Directors - NOES : Directors - ABS E NT: Directors - Tne heari ng upon said assessment was thereupon re c essed for _f_1_~_e_minutes :o permii: the Engineer of Work to make th e corrections and modiiica:tior ... s i n t he assessmem and diagrar.' ... as directed by said Resolutio:-i i\o . 67 -45 -7 . The :S:::!gineer o: Wor"r>. t:-i ereaiter returned i:he assessment anci cia.gram as corrected, I o:.<i mociifieci uncier t:"le orcer ar.d d ireci:ion o: tne Boe.re o: Dire ctor s as sei: I I :orfr1 in said R es olu tion No . 67 -45 -7 , and the said Board o: Directors r:..ow be:r.g I .satis:ieci with the correctness of be assessment and diagrarr ... , as correc-ced anc 1 modified by their i nst n:ctio ns ~ it was moved by Director \?J~ thai: saic l i assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the ?ro-I ceedings , be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work sha:l :onh -; with attach a warrant to. sai d a:sessment bearing the .date of this ~r of tlle Board of Directors, which mo~10n was seconded by Director Q , a nd carried by the followin g roll call vote: AYES: Directors - NOES: Directo rs - ABSENT: Directors- -3 --' -,_ ----..J -\ ii ~ ;1 ... -. . " !: .i i: 11 1: ~ . I! i: i' ii l!i !i :· 2'' 'I jl II ·! 31: il t1. I! -P ·' !I 51! It 61! I! 7-l! j'. ii a': 11 i! I' 9'! II 11 lOjj I 11!! :: 1'2\i H 13!: 1! 141; :. ii l5!i j; l~i' Oi; 1; 1.7!: iall !! 19:; 2Qfi Ii 21li i 221~ . I: 2 .... :1 JI 25\i !' 26 27 281 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL., HARVEY Sc HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, /""4r ls::'l"\f<OMIA Q?'7f'l1 The Board further instructed the Engineer of Work to record the assessment, warrant and diagram, but not to deliver the same to the contractor or his assignees until the problem of the unrestored fences and other similar items w.as clarified. The Board then further engaged in discussion among the Board members pertaining to the fence replacement and other similar matters after which the Board· instructed the General Manager and his staff to conduct an immediate survey in the field to determine the work to be done and to submit back to the Board a report and cost estimate of the work to be 1 l done at an adjourned regular meeting to be held on the following day, Thursday~ ! April 27th. i ! It was thereupon moved, seconded and unanimously carried that this j ! meeting of the Board be adjourned to 5:30 o'clock p. m. on Thursday, April 27 ,i I 1967, at the same meeting place, to receive the requested report from the General Manager. I j ! I I ! I ' I -4- ! I i ! ' i I I i ! l t l l ·--~ i ";"':"' ~ ...,._.,~ i I i II I I 11/ 1' 2 d I' d ;;/I 4// 11 5'! '1 6!i 11 7-11 :11 II lOil 1111 l~J I! 13ll 1: 141! 151! 1: 161! 1.71! ial! 'I I, 19!1 ii (1 j 20'; 21/I Ii 22!! 2~11! . ! 24·! 25 26 ! I I 27 I 2e I '..._; I 29. 30 I 311 321 ! LAW OFFICES OF 11 RIMEL. HARVEY Sc I HELSING Ii FOURTH FLOOR 1 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, l 1 1 SANTA ANA, I CALIFORNIA 9270f I ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 Adjourned Regular Meeting Thursday, April 27, 1967 5:30 p. m. In connection with Assessment District No. 6 of this District, the General Manager and his staff filed with the Board a written report and cost estimate of remedial work to be done consisting of some fence restorations and other items of similar import. Said co.st estimate was approximately the sum of $5, 000. After som,e discussion, the General Manager and his I staff was instructed by the Boar'd to proceed immediately with the remedial work or, in lieu thereof, to secure releases from the property owners, and . \ the Board further directed its leg~l counsel, Arthur Nisson, to advise the attorney representing the surety company which issued the contractor's faithful performance bond, that the District would require the bonding company . ! to deposit the sum of $5, 000 with the District to cover the cost of such remedial work. It appearing that there was no further business to come before the Board at this time, it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried that this meeting be adjourned, and the same was so adjourned. ! i I I I I l l I I I ! I l ! I i l ,. I t I NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that heretofore .there was filed with the undersigned, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California, an assessment to cover the sum due for the work and improvement done and performed by the contractor under and in pursuance of the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 reference being made to Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation district on March 9, ~ 966, as modified by Resolutfon No. 66-51-7, adopted May 5, 1966 by said Board, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted January 11, 1967 by said Board, in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant -work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in said district, for the description of said work and improve- ment and of the district to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof; said assessment being made pursuant to the provisions and requirements .of said Act, according to the charac- ter of the work done, and has attached thereto a diagram of said disl·rict as required by said Act. . . Said assessment shows the amount to be paid to the contractor .for said work and improvement contracted for and performed, together with al I incidental expenses, and shows the amount of ~ach assessment against each lot or parce I of land assessed to ·pay the same • . NOTICE IS FURTHER HEREBY GIVEN that on WEDNESDAY APR 2 61967 at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p.m. of said day, is the· time fixed by the undersigned Secretary of said sanita- tion district when any and· all persons interested in the work done, or in the assessment on file, may appear at the regular place of meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7 of Orange County, located at 10844 ·Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Orange County, California, and be then and there heard•by said Board of Directors. Protests or appeal~ must be in writing and made to said Board of Directors prior to said time of hearing, in accordance with the provisions of said _Act. A description of your property and the amount of the proposed assessment against the same are as fol lows: Assessment No. Tract FRED A. HARPER,. Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot Block Amount COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA lnfonnation Regarding the Assessment for Sewe.r Improvements in Assessment District No. 6 At the time and date indicated in the enclosed notice, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will hold a public hearing in connection with the assessments for payment of sewers and house laterals in Assessment District No. 6. This hearing will be held at the location specified in the enclosed notice. The new sewers in Assessment District No. 6 have been installed under a California statute entitled "Improvement Act of 1911," as amended, being Division 7 of Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The total cost of the sewer system, including incidental expenses, is $378, 884.37. The law provides that this total amount must be spread, or prorated, among the parcels of land in the district in accordance with the benefit received from the improvements. The total cost of the work has been spread, and the assessment roll and assessment diagram are on file in the office of the Secretary of the Sanitation Districts and are open for public inspection. In addition, a copy of the assessment roll and diagram are on file in the office of Boyle and Lowry, Engineer of Work, at 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California. NEW SEWER LOT ASSESSMENTS The following is an example of the three charges which made up the assessment on a typical average sized 64-foot wide residential lot which received a new sewer and a house lateral. 1. 4 11 V .C. P. house lateral unit -1 @ $165.62 = 2. Front footage charge -64 feet@ $6.6789274 = 3. Bond handling charge by County Treasurer TOTAL The unit assessment values were calculated in the fol lowing manner: $165.62 427.45 36.00 $629.07 House Lateral -The total cost of the 4 11 and 6 11 house laterals, including incidental expenses, was divided by the number of house lateral units to give a house lateral unit cost of $165.62. Most of the laterals in public streets were assigned a value of one house lateral unit or $165.62. The shorter laterals in narrow private road easemenfSwere assigned a value of one-half lateral unit or $82. 81 • . Acreage -Property over 150 feet in depth was assessed an acreage charge at the rate of $200.UO per acre for that portion of the property behind the 150-foot set-back. Front: Footage -The total cost of-the house lateral and acreage assessments was subtracted from tfie total cost of the work, leaving a total of $252,273.11 to be prorated by front-footage or width of property. There is a total of 37,771.5 front-feet in the District which, when divided into the $252,273. 11, gives a front-foot charge of $6.6789274 per foot. The so called front-footage method of assessing ·property was used to spread the cost of Assessment District No. 6. This method was used because almost all of the lots within the District were rectangular. The few odd shaped lots in the District were assigned "adiusted front-footage" values based on an average width of property. Corner lots were usually assessed on the narrow width frontage rather than along the long side frontage. In general the front-footage method wi II result in the most equitable assessment since the length of new sewer and, therefore, cost is proportional to the width of the property. However, other methods of assessment such as a combination of a uniform lot charge and a lot area charge wi 11 resu It in comparable assessments since the sum of all of the assessments must equal the total cost of $378, 884. 37. TRUNK-SEWERED LOTS Within the boundary of Assessment District No. 6 there are several properties with frontage U on a street having a trunk sewer. These properties were given a "Nil" or zero assessment unless the new Assessment District No. 6 sewers provided a benefit. County Sanitation District No. 7 and the city of Orange have established separate connection charge schedules for trunk sewer connections. PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT THE ATTACHED NOTICE IS NOT A B{LL but is a notice of the hearing and the tentative amount of the assessment on the property described in the notice. If you do not own the property described in the notice, please return the form to Boyle and Lowry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana, California 92702, with a notation as to the new owner, if avai I able. If the address is incorrect, please notify Boyle and Lowry. Afterthe District Board of Directors has heard the protests and has acted upon the protests, they will conclude the public hearing and confirm the assessment. The assessment becomes a lien on each property at this time. Shortly after the assessment has been confirmed, YOU WI LL RECEIVE A BILL FOR YOUR ASSESSMENT FROM CROWELL., WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90014, as this firm is the assignee of the contractor. Payment of the entire assessment or any portion thereof~ be made to Crowell, Weedon & Company at the address shown in the bill within 30 day'SlrOm the date of mailing. The County Treasurer will refund the $36 bond handling charge to those pr~perfy owners who have paid their assessments in full during the 30-day cash payment period. The total of the bill, including the $36, must be paid in full. The refunds wi II be made shortly after the com- pletion of the cash payment period. DO NOT MAKE ANY PAYMENTS TO COUNTY SAN- ITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. Any assessment, or balance of $50, remaining unpaid following this 30-day period will automatically go to bond. If ou desire that your assessment go to bond, no action is required on your part upon receipt o t e 1 mg rom rowe , ee n Company. If all or a portion of;your assessment goes to bond, you will then pay for your assessment over a period of approximately ten years. During this period you will make one principal payment and two interest payments each year to the Coun Treasurer of Orange Count , California. The principal payment and one interest paymen ecomes ue an paya eon ctober 15, and delinquent on December 2, of each year, and the second interest payment becomes due and payable on April.15, and delinquent on June 2, of each year. The interest payments are computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the unpaid balance of the assessment with each of .the interest payments being one half of the annual interest payment. In the event it is desirable, or necessary, the bond may be paid in full and the lien cancelled at any time prior to matutity by payment to the County Treasurer of the unpaid principal, plus interest calculated up to the next coupon paying period, plus a premium of 5% on the unmatured principal. You are referred to the County Treasurer for any other information . relative to the $36 bond handling charge and payments for principal and interest on the bonds, telephone number 834-2911. In case any property owner desires further information regarding his assessment, please call BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer of Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, telephone number 547-4471, between 10:00 a.m. and noon daily. (This information sheet has been translated into Spanish and mailed in both English and Spanish to al I property owners in the El Modena area for the benefit of Spanish speaking property owners who may find the Spanish translation easier to understand.) DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DE ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Inforinacion con Respecto a las Tasas por Mejoramiento de Alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. En la fecha y hora indicadas en la notification adjunta, el Cons~jo Directivo del Distrito de Sanidad No. 7 de Orange County celebrara una _audiencia pUblica en relacion con las tasas para pago del nuevo alcan~ tarillado y conexiones domiciliarias instalados en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. Esta audiencia tendra lugar en la dire~cion qu.e se es- pecifica en la nota adjunta. El nuevo alcantarilla~o del Distrito No. 6 ha sido insta·lado bajo un estatuto de California, titulado, "Acto d·e Mejoramiento de 1911 11 , segun enmiendas, perteneciente al Codigo de Calles y Carreteras del Estado de California, Division No. 7. El costo total del sistema de alcantarillado, incluyendo el capitulo de gastos varios, es de 378,884.37 dolares. La ley estipula que dicha cantidad se divida, 6 prorratee, entre las parcelas de tierra pertenecientes al distrito, de acuerdo con el beneficio recibido en cada una par las me- j oras de alcantarillado. El caste-total se ha dividido y la relacion y diagrama de tasas estan archivados en la oficina del Secretario de los Distritos de Sanidad y abiertos para inspeccion publica. Tambien se encuentran copias disponibles de estos documentos en las oficinas de Boyle & Lowry, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California. TASACION DE LOTES POR NUEVO ALCANTARILLAOO A continuacion se da un ejemplo de las tres cantidades que componen la tasa final para un lote residencial de extension media, 64 pies de ancho, donde se ban instalado nuevo alcantarillado y conexion domiciliaria: 1. Una unidad de conexion domiciliaria con tuberia de 4 pulgadas V.C.P. -1 @ $165.62: 2. Tasa par pies de extension delantera - 64 pies @ $6.6789274= 3. Gastos de la Tesoreria del Condado por precesamiento de bonos. TOTAL $165.62 $427.45 $ 36.00 $629.07 La tasa por cada unidad de conexion domiciliaria ha sido calculada de · la siguiente fonna: Conexion Domiciliaria -El costo total de las tuberias de 4 y 6 pulga- das, incluyendo gastos varios, se dividio entre el nU:mero de unidades de conexion domiciliaria para hallar el costo de una unidad, que resul- to ser $165.62. A la mayoria de las conexiones hechas en calles pUbli- cas se las asigno el valor de una unidad de conexion domiciliaria, 6 sea $165.62. A las conexiones mas cortas, instaladas en caminos priva- dos y estrechos (easements), se las asigno el valor de media unidad,. 0 sea·$82.81. Extension -A las propiedades con mas de 150 pies de f ondo (profundidad hacia dentro) se las calculo una tasa de $200.00 par acre en exceso de los 150 pies. Extension Delantera -El costo total de las conexiones domiciliarias y de las tasas por extension se substrajo del costo total de la obra, que- dando un resto de $252.273 .• 11 para ser dividido entre las propiedades, de acuerdo con su extension delantera 6 ancho. Hay un total de 37.771.S pies de extension delantera en el Distrito, que divididos por ~ $252;273.ll resulta en un costo de $6.6789274 ~or pie. El.metodo de tasar propiedades por extension delantera se utilize para dividir el costo del alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. Se hizo as1, debido a que casi todos los lotes en este Distrito son rectangulares. A otros lotes con formas varias no rectangulares, per- tenecientes a este distrito, se les asigno una tasa de acuerdo con un calculo basado en el ancho medio de la propiedad, 6 "ajuste de la exten- sion delantera". A los lotes situados en esquinas se les asignaron tasas de acuerdo con la extension delantera menor, y no con la mas larga. En general, el metodo de extension delantera resulta ser el mas equita- tivo, puesto que el largo de una nueva alcantarilla, y por lo tanto su costo, es proporcional al ancho de la propiedad. No obstante, otros metodos de tasacion, tales come la combinacion de una tasa unif orme para todos los lotes y una tasa por extension de cada lote, resultar1an en tasas comparables, ya que la suma de todas las tasas ·debe ser igual al costo total de $378,884.37. · LOTES SERVIDOS POR TUBERIA PRINCIPAL. DE ALCANTARILLADO Dentro de los 11mites del .Distrito de Tasaci6n No. 6 existen Vqrias pro- piedades cuya parte delantera d' a una calle por donde pasa una tuberta principal de alcantarillado. A estas propiedades se las asigno una tasa de "NIL• o cero, a menos que·e1 nuevo alcantarillado del Distrito de Ta- sacion No. 6 las haya beneficiado en alguna fonna. El Distrito de Sani- dad No. 7 de Orange County y la Ciudad de Orange ban establecido.proqra- mas de tasacion dif erentes para aquellas conexiones que se sirven de la tuber1a principal de alcantarillado. PAGO DE LA TASA LA NOTA ADJUNTA NO ES UNA FACTURA. sino una notification de la audiencia p6blica y·de la cantidad de la tasa asignada a la propiedad queen ella se describe. Si no es Vd. propietario de la parcela descrita, rogamos devuelva el impreso a: Boyle & LCMry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana, California 92702, indicando el nombre del nuevo propietario, si es posi- ble. Si la direccion es incorrecta, rogamos asi lo notifique a Boyle & Lowry. Despues de que el Consejo Directive del Distrito·haya escuchado las protestas y actuado con respe·cto a las mismas, se cerrara la audien- cia pllblica y se confirmaran las tasas. En este punto, todas las tasas pasaran a ser de caracter obligatorto para cada propietario. Poco tiempo despues de que las tasas hayan sido confirmadas, RECIBIRA VD. UNA FACTURA POR VALOR DE LA TASA QUE LE CORRESPONPA. REMITIDA POR CROWRLJ, WEEDON & COMPANY. 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90014, firma asignada por el contratante. El pago del total de la tasa, o de cualquier porcion de ella, podra. hacerse a Crowell Weedon & Company, a la direccion indicada en la fac- tura, dentro de un termino de 30 dias a partir de la fecha que lleve dicha factura. La Tesorer1a del Condado reembolsara la cantidad de $36 por gastos de procesamiento de bones a aquellos propietarios que hayan pagado el total de su tasa dentro del termino de los 30 d1as. Se U debera ef ectuar el pago por el total de la f actura, incluyendo los 36 dolares. Los reembolsos se llevaran a efecto en breve despues de termi- nado el periodo de 30 d1as marcado para el pago. ROGAMOS NO EFECTUEN NINGUN PAGO AL DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DEL CONDADO. Aquellas tasas 0 resto de 50 dolares o masque queden pendientes de pago,_despues del termino de 30 dias, pasaran automaticamente a convertirse en bonos. Si Vd. desea gtie.el valor de su tasa pase a bonos, ·nose reguiere accion ninguna por su parte al recibir la f actura de Crowell Weedon & Company. · Si la totalidad o parte de su tasa pasa a bonos, pagara Vd. la cantidad correspondiente en un periodo de, aproximadamente, 10 anos. Durante este per1odo efectuara Vd. un.pago principal y dos pages d~ intereses cada afto a la Tesoreria del Condado de Orange,California. El.pago principal y un pago de intereses deberan ser abonados desde el d1a 15 de Octubre hasta el 2 de Diciembre de ca4a ano, en cuya techa cumplira el plazo, y el segundo pago de intereses debera efectuarse del 15 de Abril al 2 de Junio de cada afio. Los pages de intereses estan calcula- dos en un 6% por afto sobre la :parte de la tasa que haya quedado pendien~ te de pago, correspondiendo cada pago de interese• a la mitad del total· de interes anual. . Si es necesario, o conveniente, se puede abonar la totalidad del bono, cancelando la obligacion antes del tiempo concedido, ef ectuando paqo a la Tesorerta del Condado de la cantidad principal que quede por abonar,. mas el interes que correspond~ al per1odo de tiempo que deba.transcurr~r ha~ta el pro~imo paqo de cupones, mas un recargo del 5% sobre la canti• . -dad:·:principal. En caso de requerir cualquier informacion adicional con ··"-respecto· a la cantidad de 36 dolares por gastos de procesamiento de bones, 6 a los pagos de la cantidad principal y de intereses, rogamos se pongan en contacto con la Tesorer1a del Condado, Telefono 834-2911. En caso de que el propietario desee hacer. alguna consulta con respecto a la tasa que le ha correspondido, rogamos llame a BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, Telefono No. 547-4471, entre las 10:00 y las 12.:00 horas de la maftana. Esta circular de informacion ha sido traducida al espaftol,_ enviando ambas versiones de inqles y esP.aftol a todos ~os propietarios de parcelas en el area de "El Modena". Esto se ha llevado a cabo con.objeto de benef iciar a aquellos propietarios de habla espafiola que pudiesen tener dificultad en entender la version ingle~a. SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN MARMON AVENUE AND WASHINGTON STREET. (Assessments Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425, 426, 430, 431 and 432) . You have only been assessed for house lateral construction benefit and the $36 bond handling charge because your new laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer. This city of Orange sewer is located on the easterly side of Hewes Street and required much longer than average length laterals to reach your front property line on the west side of Hewes. Accordingly, you have been assessed for 1-1/2 lateral units amounting to 1.5 times $165.62 which eq~als $248.43 per lateral. To this last amount has been added the $36 bond handling charge, giving a total assessment for your new lateral of $284.43 per lot. Although your assessment appears to be much lower than the assessment of your neighbors elsewhere in Assessment District No. 6, you will be required to pay a connection fee to the city of Orange amounting at present to $3.00 per front foot of width. This amount represents a reimbursement amount to be paid to the developers who originally installed the sewer in Hewes Avenue. For further information regarding this subject, we refer you to the Department of Public Works, city of Orange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ( AVISO ESPECIAL A LOS PROPIETARIOS DE TERRENO EN LOS LOTES DEL LADO OESTE DE LA CALLE HEWES ENTRE MARMON AVENUE Y WASHINGTON STREET. (Tasas Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425, 426, 430, 431 y 432) La tasacion de la cantidad a pagar por Vd. corresponde unicamente a ~a construccion de conexiones domiciliarias, mas $36 por gastos de"procesamiento de bonos, por existir una tuberia de alcantarilla- do principal de la Ciudad de Orange cerca de su propiedad, a la que han sido conectadas las diferentes unidades domiciliarias. No obstante, esta tuberia principal esta instalada en el lado este de Hewes Street y, por lo tanto, se han·necesitado unidades de conexion domiciliaria de un largo mayor de lo normal para l.legar a la parte delantera de su propiedad en el lado oeste de Hewes. De acuerdo con lo anterior, su tasa corresponde al. importe de 1-1/2 unidades de conexion domiciliaria, o sea 1.5 veces $165.62,-equi- valente a $248.43.por la conexion domiciliaria a su propiedad. A· esta cantidad hay que anadir los $36 por gastos de procesamiento de bones~ resultando una tasa total de $284.43 por lote. Aunque su tasa parece ser menor que· las tasas de otros propietarios_. del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6, tambien debera Vd. abonar una cuota de conexion a la Ciudad de Orange que en el presente es de $3.00 por pie de extension delantera. Estas cuotas representan una can- tidad que esta destinada a reembolsar a los contribuyentes que originalmente instalaron la tuberia principal d.e alcantarillado en la Hewes Avenue. Para informacion mas detallada a este respecto, rogamos se dirija al Departamento de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad de Orange (Department of Public Works, city of Orange). . ~ SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, TRACT 3935, QUENT DRIVE AND ROSALIE PLACE. (Assessments 514 -528, inclusive) The enclosed information sheet does not explain how the assessment was calcu- lated for your lots. The street sewer mains and individual lot house laterals were installed in Quent Drive and Rosalie Place before the streets were paved. The two street sewers dead-ended in Mitchell Avenue and remained as dry sewers until Assessment District No. 6 provided the means for extending the existing sewer in Mitchel I Avenue northwesterly to the existing sewers in your tract. The assessment on your I ot was ca I cu I ated as fo 11 ows: The total cost, including incidental expenses, of the new se-wer and two new manholes in Mitchell Avenue between the southeasterly tract.boundary and the existing Quent Drive sewer amounts to $3,320.40. · Dividing this amount by the 15 lots on these two streets gives a lot assessment of $221 . 36. To this amount was added the $36 bond handling charge as explained in the attached information sheet. The total assessment for each of the lots on Quent Drive and Rosalie Place is $257. 36 as shown rn the enclosed notice. JACK J. RIMEL JOHN .A . HARVEY, lII DUFFERN H . HELSING R I C HARD N. RIMEL GEORGE G . LOGAN RI C H.ARD A.RATTRAY LA.W OFFICES OF RIMEL , HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1 0 10 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 927 0 1 Apr il 18, 1967 Fred A. Harper, Manager County Sanitation District No . 7 of Orange County P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California D ear Fred: Re: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 547 -7 395 MADISON 5 -7570 The hearing on the assessment in the above m a tter i s now set for Apr il 26th and w e enclose herewith the following documents for your use a t tha t time: (1) Form of Minutes -as u s ual, page 3 is to be us e d if the r e are no changes or corrections to be m a de to the assessment, and page 3a is to be used if there are changes or correcti ons to b e made to the as sessment. (2) Resolution -to be used if t here are changes or corrections to be m ade to the assessment, to w hich would be a ttache d a Schedule of Modifi cations to be furnish ed by the Engineer of Work. (3 ) Notice of Assessment -to be recorded after the assess ment is confirme • If you have any questions, please call. jc encl cc: Eng ineer of Work Attn Carl C arl s on C. Arthur Nisson Yours very truly , JACK J. RIMEL and C. ARTHUR N I SSON l 2 3 4 5· 6 7 :' 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ·23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL HARVEY Sc HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTAANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Form of Minutes for Assessment Hearing ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 April 26, 1967 7:00 p. m. The Secretary advised the Board that this is the time and place fixed, pursuant to statute and notice giyen, for the hearing in the matter of the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 1966, as amended by Resolution No. 66-51-7, adopted on Mary 5, 1966, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted on January 11, 1967. The Secretary also informed the Board of Directors that affidavits of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assessment were on file in his office, and that written appeals or objections had ---- been filed in his office prior to the day set for the hearing by: The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered .~ filed. The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons present desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following persons then addressed the Board of Directors: ,... ,A .. -1- I, .,r .. .. . -----....... , l 2 --..... 3 4 5· 6 7 8 9 10 :1:-l 12 13 14 15 ) ,,\· !_f\),L\ 16 7r 17 /M·\M 18 19 20 21 22 ·23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 321 ~=i:'=~~~:; & ll HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 0 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTAANA, LIFORNIA 92701 All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections presente having been heard and fully considered, it was thereupon moved by Director that all objections,, appeals and protests, both oral and ~--~~~--~ written,, be overruled and denied. Said motion was seconded by Director _________ and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: · Directors - -2- ( I l The Board of Directors now being satisfied with the correctness of 2 the assessment and diagram,, it was moved by Director ~~--~~------~~- 3 that said assessment and diagram,, together with the proceedings,, be confirmed 4 and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant 5 to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors,, 6 which motion was seconded by Director and carried by the ~--~~----~~~- 7 following roll call vote: 8 9 10 ~l 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ·23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY Be HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTAANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Directors- Directors- Directors- -3-(if~ changes) ._ / ' . ~ l 2 ~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 . (• 10 ') Y~/. (~) ,.,~,) l:-1 \, ~/\ 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 ·23 17/LJ~ 24 <Z~ 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF R.IMEL. HARVEY 8c HELSING FOURTH FJ.OOR tOIO NORTH MAIN ST. SANTAANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No. " entitled as follows: ---- "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 1967, TO COVER THE SUMS DUE FOR THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT CONSISTING OF THE CON- STRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 66-51-7 AND RESOLUTION NO. 67-4-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH,'' was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director ----- that said Resolution No. be adopted, and the same was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for minutes --- to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. • The ---- Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as corrected and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set forth in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors now bein ---- satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as corrected an modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director that said ----- assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the pro- ceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forth- with attach a warrant to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors, which motion was seconded by Director ------- and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- -3- (if changes ~ to be m; SPECIAL NOTICE TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531, 541, 542, 543, 550 and 551). Your assessments are lower than other assessments in Assessment District No. 6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3. 00 per front-foot connec- tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you wil I be required to pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this prior reimbursement agreement between the city of Orange and the developer who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot charge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent to you so that you wi II be complete!y informed about future: cosi·s before you will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 Form of Minutes for Assessment Hearing ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 l April 26, 1967 7:00 p.m. 211 s I The Secretary advised the Board that this is the time and place 4 fixed, pursuant to statute and notice given, for the hearing in the matter of 5 the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction 6 of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT 7 DISTRICT NO. 6," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7., 8 adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 19 66, as amended by Resolution 9 No. 66-51-7, adopted on Mary 5, 196 6, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted 10 on January 11, 1967 • . :1:-1 The Secretary also informed the Board of Directors that affidavits 12 I of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assessment 13 were on file in his office, and that written appeals or objections had ---- 14 been filed in his office prior to the day set for the hearing by: 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 1 221 I ·23 24 25 The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered 26 filed. 27 The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons 28 present desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following 291 persons then addressed the Board of Directors: 30 1 1 3~ I 32! JI t.A.W OFFICES OF I RIMEL. HARVEY 8c HELSING FOURTH FLOOR I tOIO NORTH MAIN 5T, 1 1 SANTAANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 -1- I / All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections presente having been heard and fully considered, it was thereupon moved by Director that all objections, appeals and protests, both oral and ~~~~~~~~~ written, be overruled and denied. Said ~otion was seconded by Director and carried by.the following roll call vote: ~~~--~~--~~ AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- -2- l! I, 211 311 41 -1 5 l1 " :~ 81 9, 10 I ~l 12 13 141 I 151 16 17 181 19 20 211 22!1 I ·23 I 24 25 26 271 ~ 2s1I 29 1 301 31 32il LAW OFFICES OF I RIMEL, HARVEY&! I HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTAANA, I CALIFORNIA 92701 11 The Board of Directors now being satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, it was moved by Director ~~~~~~~~~~- that said assessment and diagram, together with the proceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors, which inotion was seconded by Director and carried by the ~~~~~~~~~- following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- -3-{if no changes) · ~ I ~ \1 I I Ii ill 11 211 11 31' ,1 Ii 4 [j 511 611 II 7 11 al 91 10 ~l 12 13 141 151 161 17 18 19 20 I 2111 2211 ,, ·23!1 2411 251 26 271 i 2811 291 3~1 3111 321 LAW OFFICES OF i RIMEL, HARVEY & 1 1 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA A'NA, 1,· CALIFORNIA Sa'.(01 . ,~~/~ . A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No.& 1 " entitled as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 1967, TO COVER THE SUMS DUE FOR THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT CONSISTING OF THE CON- STRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN 11 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 66-51-7 AND RESOLUTION NO. 67-4-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND ORDERING AND DIB.ECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH, 11 was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director ------ that said Resolution No. be adopted, and th~ same was adopted by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for minutes ---- to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. . The ---- Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as corrected and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set fort~ in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors now bein ---- satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director that said ----- assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the pro- ceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forth- with attach a warrant to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors, which motion was seconded by Director ------- and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors- NOES: Directors- ABSENT: Directors- -3- ~ -vL '\/,,, '\'>i < r ~ '?\ / 1'0< / ~\) / ,1<; / 1\ (Io vu V' ~\ NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that heretofore .there was fl led with the undersigned, Secretary of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California, an assessment to cover the sum due for the work and improvement done and performed by the contractor under and in pursuance of the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 reference being made to Resolution of Intention No. 66~ 19-7, adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation district on March 9, .1966, as modified by Resolution No. 66-51-7, adoptedMay5, 1966by said Board, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted January 11, 1967 by said Board, in the matter of the construction of 5anitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in said district, for the description of said work and improve- ment and of the district to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof; said assessment being made pursuant to the provisions and requirements of said Act, according to the charac- ter of the work done, and has attached thereto a diagram of said distri :::t as required by said Act. . . Said assessment shows the amount to be paid to the contractor for said work and improvement contracted for and performed, together with al I incidental expenses, and shows the amount of ~ach assessment against each lot or parce I of land assessed to ·pay the same. NOTICE IS AJRTHER HEREBY GIVEN that on WEDNESDAY APR 2 6 l&&l at the hour of 7:00 o'clock p. m. of said day, is the· time fixed by fhe undersigned Secretary of said sanita- tion district when any and· all persons interested in the work done, or in the assessment on file, may appear at the regular place of meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7 of Orange County, located at 10844 ·Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Orange County, California, and be then and there heord•by said Board of Di rectors. Protests or appeal~ must be in writing and made to said Board of Directors prior to said time of hearing, in accordance with the provisions of said .Act. A description of your property and the amount of the proposed assessment ogai nst the same are as follows: Assessment No. Tract FRED A. HARPER,. Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY Lot Block Amount COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA lnfonnotion Regarding the Assessment for Sewer Improvements in Assessment District No. 6 At the time and date indicated in the enclosed notice, the Boord of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 will hold a public hearing in connection with the assessments for payment of sewers and house laterals in Assessment District No. 6. This hearing will be held at the location specified in the enclosed notice. The new sewers in Assessment District No. 6 have been installed under a California statute entitled "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 as amended, being Division 7 of Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The total cost of the sewer system, including incidental expenses, is $378, 884. 37. The law provides that this total amount must be spread, or prorated, among the parcels of land in the district in accordance with the benefit received from the improvements. The total cost of the work hos been spread, and the assessment ro 11 and assessment diagram are on file in the office of the Secretory of the Sanitation Districts and ore open for public inspection. In addition, a copy of the assessment roll and diagram are on file in the office of Boyle and Lowry, Engineer of Work, at412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California. NEW SEWER LOT ASSESSMENTS The following is an example of the three charges which made up the assessment on a typical average sized 64-foot wide residential lot which received a new sewer and a house lateral. 1. 4 11 V .C •. P. house .lateral unit -1 @ $165.62 = 2. Front footage charge -64 feet @ $6. 678927 4 = 3. Bond handling charge by County Treasurer TOTAL The unit assessment values were calculated in the fol lowing manner. $165.62 427.45 36.00 $629.07 House Lateral -The total cost of the 4 11 and 6 11 house laterals, including incidental expenses, was divided by the number of house lateral units to give a house lateral unit cost of $165.62. Most of the laterals in publlc streets were assigned a value of one house lateral unit or $165. 62. The shorter laterals in narrow private road easemenfSwere assigned a value of one-half lateral unit or $82. 81 • Acreage -Property over 150 feet in depth was assessed an acreage charge at the rate of $200. 0 per acre for that portion of the property bebind the 150-foot set-back. Front footage -The total cost of ·the house .lateral and acreage assessments was subtracted from tlie total cost of the work, leaving a total of $252,273. 11 to be prorated by front-footage or width of property. There is a total of 37,nl .5 front-feet in the District which, when divided into the $252,273. 11, gives a front-foot charge of $6.6789274 per foot. The so cal led front-footage method of assessing property was used to spread the cost of Assessment District No. 6. This method was used because almost all of the lots within the District were rectangular. The few odd shaped lots in the District were assigned 11 adiusted front-footage" values based on an average width of property. Corner lots were usually assessed on the narrow width frontage rather than along the long side frontage. In general the front-footage method wi 11 resu It in the most equitable assessment since the length of new sewer and, therefore, cost is proportional to the width of the property. However, other methods of assessment such as a combination of a uniform lot charge and a lot area charge will result in comparable assessments since the sum of all of the assessments must equal the total cost of $378, 884. 37. TRUNK-SEWERED LOTS Within the boundary of Assessment District No. 6 there are several properties with frontage (\, on a street having a trunk sewer. These properties were given a 11 NIL 11 or zero assessment unless the new Assessment District No. 6sewers provided a benefit. County Sanitation District .No. 7 and the city of Orange have established separate connection charge schedules for' trunk sewer connections. PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT THE ATTACHED NOTICE IS NOT A BrLL but is a notice of the hearing and the tentative amount of the assessment on the property described in the notice. If you do not own the property described in the notice, please return the form to Boyle and Lowry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana, California 92702, with a notation as to the new owner, if available. If the address is incorrect, please notify Boyle and Lowry. After the District Board of Directors has heard the protests and has acted upon the protests, they will conclude the public hearing and confirm the assessment. The assessment oecomes a lien on each property at this time. Shortly after the assessment has been confirmed, YOU WILL RECEIVE A BILL FOR YOUR ASSESSMENT FROM CROWELL, WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 SOuth Spring Street, LOs Angeles, California 90014, as this firm is the assignee of the contractor. Payment of the entire assessment or any portion thereof~ be mode to Crowel I, Weedon & Company at the address shown in the bill within 30 daySlTO"m the date of mailing. The County Treasurer will refund the $36 bond handling charge to those pr~perfy owners who have paid their assessments in full during the 30-day cash payment period. The total of the bill, including the $36, must be paid in full. The refunds wi II be made shortly after the com- pletion of the cash payment period. DO NOT MAKE ANY PAYMENTS TO COUNTY SAN- ITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. Any assessment, or balance of $50, remaining unpaid following this 30-day period will automatically go to bond. If ou desire that your assessment go to bond, no action is re uired on our art upon receipt o t e 1 mg rom rowe , ee n ompany. If all or a portion of>your assessment goes to bond, you wi II then pay for your assessment over a period of approximately ten years. During this period you will make one principal payment and two interest payments each year to the Coun~ Treasurer of Orange Countt) California. The principal payment and one interest payment ecomes due and payable on ctober 15, and delinquent on December 2, of each year, and the second interest payment becomes due and payable on April.15, and delinquent on June 2, of each year. The interest payments are computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the unpaid balance of the assessment with each of the interest payments being one half of the annual interest payment. In the event it is desirable,' or necessary, the bond may be paid in full and the lien cancelled at any time prior to maturity by payment to the County Treasurer of the unpaid principal, plus interest calculated up to the next coupon paying period, plus a premium of 5% on the unmatured principal. You are referred to the County Treasurer for any other information relative to the $36 bond handling charge and payments for principal and interest on the bonds, telephone number 834-2911. In case any property owner desires further information regarding his assessment, please call BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer of Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, telephone number 547-4471, between 10:00 a.m. and noon daily. (This information sheet has been translated into Spanish and mailed in both English and Spanish to al I property owners in the El Modena area for the. benefit of Spanish speaking property owners who may find the Spanish translation easier to understand.) DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DE ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA Informacion con Respecto a las Tasas por Mejoramiento de Alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. En la fecha y hara indicadas en la notification adjunta, el Cons~jo Directive del Distrito de Sanidad No. 7 de Orange County celebrara una audiencia piiblica en relacion con las tasas para pago del nuevo alcan~ tarillado y conexiones domiciliarias instalados en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. Esta audiencia tendra lugar en la direccion que se es- pecifica en la nota adjunta. El nuevo alcantarillaqo del Distrito No. 6 ha sido instalado bajo un estatuto de California, titulado, "Acto d'e Mejoramiento de 1911", segun enmiendas, perteneciente al Codigo de Calles y Carreteras del Estado de California, Division No. 7. El costo total del sistema de alcantarillado, incluyendo el cap1tulo de gastos varios, es de 378,884.37 dolares. La ley estipula que dicha cantidad se divida, 6 prorratee, entre las parcelas de tierra pertenecientes al distrito, de acuerdo con el beneficio recibido en cada una por las me- j oras de alcantarillado. El caste total se ha dividido y la relacion y diagrama de tasas estan archivados en la oficina del Secretario de los Distritos de Sanidad y abiertos para inspeccion publica. Tambien se encuentran copias disponibles de estos documentos en las of icinas de Boyle & Lowry, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California. · · · TASACION DE LOTES POR NUEVO ALCANTARILLADO A continuacion se da un ejemplo de las tres cantidades que componen la tasa final para un late residencial de extension media, 64 pies de ancho, donde se ban instalado nuevo alcantarillado y conexion domiciliaria: 1. Una unidad de conexion domiciliaria con tuberia de 4 pulgadas V.C.P. -1 @ $165.62: 2. Tasa por pies de extension delantera - 64 pies @ $6.6789274= 3. Gastos de la Tesorer1a del Condado por precesamiento de bonos. TOTAL $165.62 $427.45 $ 36.00 $629.07 La tasa por cada unidad de conexion domiciliaria ha sido calculada de la siguiente f orma: Conexion Domiciliaria -El costo total de las tuberias de 4 y 6 pulga- das, incluyendo gastos varios, se dividio entre el numero de unidades de conexion domiciliaria para hallar el costo de una unidad, que resul-. to ser $165.62. A la mayor1a de las conexiones hechas en calles pUbli- cas se las asigno el valor de una unidad de conexion domiciliaria, 6 sea $165.62. A las conexiones mas cortas, instaladas en caminos priva- dos y estrechos (easements), se las asign6 el valor de media unidad,. 0 sea·$82.81. . Extension -A las propiedades con mas de 150 pies de f ondo (profundidad hacia dentro) se las calculo una tasa de $200.00 por acre en exceso de los 150 pies. Extension Delantera -El costo total de las conexiones domiciliarias y de las tasas por extension se substrajo del costo total de la obra, que- dando un resto de $252.273.11 para ser dividido entre las propiedades, de acuerdo con su extension delantera 6 ancho. Hay un total de 37.771.S pies de extension delantera en el Distrito, que divididos por $252;273.11 resulta en un costo de $6.6789274 por pie. El metodo de tasar propiedades por extension delantera se utilize para dividir el costo del alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6. Se hizo asi, debido a que casi todos los lotes en este Distrito son rectangulares. A otros lotes con formas varias no rectangulares, per- tenecientes a este distrito, se les asigno una tasa de acuerdo con un calculo basado en el ancho medio de la propiedad, 6 "ajuste de la exten- sion delantera". A los lotes situados en esquinas se les asignaron tasas de acuerdo con la extension delantera menor, y no con la mas larga. En general, el metodo de extension delantera resulta ser el mas equita- tivo, puesto que el largo de una nueva alcantarilla, y por lo tanto su costo, es proporcional al ancho de la propiedad. No obstante, otros metodos de tasacion, tales como la combinacion de una tasa unif orme para todos los lotes y una tasa por extension de cada lote, resultar1an en tasas comparables, ya que la SUll)a de todas las tasas debe ser igual al costo total de $378,884.37. LOTES SERVIDOS POR TUBERIA PRINCIPAL .. DE ALCANTARILLADO Dentro de los l1mites del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6 existen vqrias pro- piedades cuya parte delantera d' a una calle por donde pasa una tuber1a principal de alcantarillado. A estas propiedades se las asigno una tasa de "NIL• o cero, a menos que·el nuevo alcantarillado del Distrito de Ta- sacion No. 6 las haya beneficiado en alguna forma. El Distrito de Sani- dad No. 7 de Orange County y la Ciudad de Orange ban establecido proqra- mas de tasacion diferentes para aquellas conexiones que se sirven de la tuber1a principal de alcantarillado. PAGO DE LA TASA LA NOTA ADJUNTA NO ES UNA FACTURA, sino una notification de la audiencia pUblica y·de la cantidad de la tasa asignada a la propiedad queen ella se describe. Si no es Vd. propietario de la parcela descrita, rogamos devuelva el impreso a: Boyle & LCMry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana, California 92702, indicando el nombre del nuevo propietario, si es posi- ble. Si la direccion es incorrecta, rogamos asi lo notifique a Boyle & La11ry. Despues de que el Consejo Directive del Distrito haya escuchado las protestas y actuado con respecto a las mismas, se cerrara la audien- cia pUblica y se confirmaran las tasas. En este punto, todas las tasas pasaran a ser de caracter obligatorio para cada propietario. Pooo tiempo despues de que las tasas hayan sido confirmadas, RECIBIRA VD. UNA FACTURA POR VALOR DE LA TASA QUE LE CORRESPONDA. REMITIDA POR CRQWBJ,J, WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90014, firma asignada por el contratante. El page del total de la tasa, o de cualquier porcion de ella, podra. hacerse a Crowell Weedon & Company, a la direccion indicada en la fac- tura, dentro de un termino de 30 d1as a partir de la fecha que lleve dicha factura. La Tesorer1a del Condado reembolsara la cantidad de $36 por gastos de procesamiento de bonos a aquellos propietarios que ~ hayan pagado el total de su tasa dentro del termino de los 30 d1as. Se debera ef ectuar el pago por el total de la f actura, incluyendo los 36 dolares. Los reembolsos se llevaran a efecto en breve despues de termi- nado el periodo de 30 dias marcado para el pago. ROGAMOS NO EFECTUEN NINGUN PAGO AL DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DEL CONDADO. Aquellas tasas o resto de 50 dolares o mas que queden pendientes de pago, despues del termino de 30 d1as, pasaran automaticamente a convertirse en bonos. Si Vd. desea gue el valor de su tasa pase a bonos, no se reguiere accion ninguna por su parte al recibir la factura de Crowell Weedon & Companv. ' Si la totalidad o parte de su tasa pasa a bonos, pagara Vd. la cantidad corresponqiente en un periodo de, aproximadamente, 10 aftos. Durante este per1odo efectuara Vd. un pago principal y dos pagos de intereses cada afto a la Tesorer1a del Condado de Orange,California. El pago principal y un pago de intereses deberan ser abonados desde el dia 15 de Octubre hasta el 2 de Diciembre de cada ano, en cuya fecha cumplirl el plazo, y el segundo pago de intereses debera ef ectuarse del 15 de Abril al 2 de Junie de cada afto. Los pagos de intereses estan calcula- dos en un 6% por afto sobre la parte de la tasa que haya quedado pendien- te de pago, correspondiendo cada pago de intereses a la mitad del total de interes anual. · Si es necesario, o conveniente, se puede abonar la totalidad del bono, cancelando la obligacion antes del tiempo concedido, ef ectuando pago a la Tesore~ia del Condado de la cantidad p~incipal que quede por abonar, mas el interes que corresponda al per1odo de tiempo que deba transcurrtr ha~ta el pro~imo pago de cupories, mas un recargo del 5% sobre la canti- ·:·., : _-dad:·:principal. En caso de requerir cualquier informacion adicional con '"respecto a la cantidad de 36 dolares por gastos de procesamiento de bones, 6 a los pagos de la cantidad principal y de intereses, rogamos se pongan en contacto con la Tesorer1a del Condado, Telef ono 834-2911. En caso de que el propietario desee hacer alguna consulta con respecto a la tasa que ·1e ha correspondido, rogamos llame a BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, Telef ono No. 547-4471, entre las 10:00 y las 12:00 horas de la maftana. Esta circular de inf ormacion ha sido traducida al espaftol, enviando ambas versiones de ingles y espaflol a todos los propietarios de parcelas en el area de "El Modena". Esto se ha llevado a cabo con objeto de benef iciar a aquellos prOpietarios de habla espafiola que pudiesen tener dificultad en entender la version inglesa. SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS.OF LOTS ON THE WESTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN MARMON AVENUE AND.WASHINGTON STREET. (Assessments Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417J 418, 423, 424, 425, 426, 430, 431 and 432) You have only been assessed for house lateral construction benefit and the $36 bond handling charge because your new laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer. This city of Orange sewer is located on the easterly side of Hewes Street and required much longer than average length laterals to reach your front property line on the west side of Hewes. Accordingly, you have been assessed for 1-1/2 lateral units amounting to 1.5 times $165.62 which equals $248.43 per lateral. To this last amount has been added the $36 bond handling charge, giving a total assessment for your new lateral of $284.43 per lot. Although your assessment appears to be much lower than the assessment of your neighbors elsewhere in Assessment District No. 6, you will be required to pay a connection fee to the city of Orange amounting at present to $3.00 per front foot of width. This amount represents a reimbursement amount to be paid to the developers w~o originally installed the sewer in Hewes Avenue. For further information regarding this subject, we refer you to the Department of Public Works, city of Orange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . AVISO ESPECIAL A LOS PROPIETARIOS DE TERRENO EN LOS LOTES DEL LADO OESTE DE LA CALLE HEWES ENTRE MARMON AVENUE Y WASHINGTON STREET. (Tasas Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425, 426, 430, 431 y 432) La tasacion de la cantidad a pagar por Vd. corresponde unicarnente a la construccion de conexiones dorniciliarias, mas $36 por gastos de procesamiento de bonos, par existir una tuberia de alcantarilla- do principal de la Ciudad de Orange cerca de su propiedad, a la que han sido conectadas las diferentes unidades dorniciliarias. No obstante, esta tubed.a principal esta instalada en el lado este de Hewes Street y, por lo tanto, se han necesitado unidades de conexion domiciliaria de un largo mayor de lo normal para llegar a la parte delantera de su propiedad en el lado oeste de Hewes. De acuerdo con lo anterior, su tasa corresponde al. importe de 1-1/2 unidades de conexion domiciliaria, o sea 1.5 veces $165.62, equi- valente a $248.43.por la conexion dorniciliaria a su propiedad. A· esta cantidad hay que afiadir los $36 por gastos de procesamiento de bonos, resultando una tasa total de $284.43 por late. Aunque su tasa parece ser menor que las tasas de otros propietarios_ del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6, tarnbien debera Vd. abonar una cuota de conexion a la Ciudad de Orange que en el presente es de $3.00 por pie de extension delantera. Estas cuotas representan una can- tidad que esta destinada a reembolsar a los contribuyentes que originalmente instalaron la tuberia principal de alcantarillado en la Hewes Avenue. Para informacion mas detallada a este respecto, rogamos se dirija al Departarnento de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad de Orange (Department of Public Works, city of Orange) • SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, TRACT 3935, QUENT DRIVE AND ROSALIE PLACE. (Assessments 514 -528, inclusive) The enclosed information sheet does not explain how the assessment WGS calcu- lated for your. lots. The street sewer mains and individua! lot house laterals were installed in Quent Drive and Rosalie Place before the streets were paved. The two street sewers dead-ended in Mitchell Avenue and remained as dry sewers unti I Assessment District No. 6 provided the means for extending the existing sewer in Mit_che II Avenue northwesterly to the existing sewers in your tract. The assessment on your lot was calculated as follows: The total cost, including incidental expenses, of the new sewer and two new manholes in Mitche 11 Avenue between the· southeasterly tract boundary and the existing Quent Drive sewer amounts to $3, 320.40. · D'ividing this amount by the 15 lots on these two streets gives a lot assessment of $221 . 36. To this amount was added the $36 bond handling charge as explained in the attached information sheet. The total assessment for each of the lots on Quent Drive and Rosalie Place is $257. 36 as shown in the enclosed notice. ( ·. SPECIAL NOTICE TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531, 541, 542, 543, 550 ond 551). · Your assessments ore lower thon other assessments in Assessment District No. 6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3.00 per front-foot connec- tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you will be required to pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this prior reimbursement agreement betwaen the city of Orange and the developer who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot diarge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent to you so that you wi 11 be comple~e!y informed about future cos·rs before you will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property • . . II .. . BOARDS OF DIRECTORS .. County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS APRIL 12, 1967 -8:00 P.M. P. 0 . Box 51 75 10844 Ell is Avenu e Fountain Valley, C alif., 92708 AGENDA (1) Pledge of Allegiance ( 2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) tJ ~} & (16) Roll Call DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3,7 J Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpts /YI $ from the City of Santa Ana, showing election of mayor and appointment of alternate to serve on the Boards DISTRICT l /(/<!.. ._.. · "'... ' !. Election of Chairman of the Board /!~ ALL DIS~ ~ ot.._ Chairmen pro tem,---1.[ necessary (Distr3..--G-t-s-j_ DISTRICT 1 ) Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular lli1 S. meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, and the adjourned regular meeting held March 30, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed DISTRICT 11 j Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular /}') c meeting held March 8, 1967, as maile d .../ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Manager /fl c/~ Report of the General ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Ge neral Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) {23) (24) (25) (26) ALL DISTRICTS f C'onsiders.tlon of motion to receive and file written M,.5 report of the Executive Committee ALL DISTRICTS j~AJ,AJ Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Willard T. ~~ Jordan, Architect, for preparation of a Master Plan for ?/ improving the appearance of Treatment Plant No. 2, as rece»mmended by the Executive Committee. See page "F' ALL DISTRICTS ~ Report of=-tiie engineers; and consideration of Resolution '{'{\ No. 67-38 finding satisfactory the engineers' report on Ocean Outfall No. 2, and setting May 10th as the date for public hearing on the report. See page "G" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of. motion authorizing the Directors and ~ a maximum of twenty employees, to attend the annual conference of the Water Pollution Control Association in._Long Beach Ma~througb_May 6th; and authorizing paymen:&-ror-registration fees,--ro--s-a-is, ""transportation and incidental expenses incurred. See page "H" for Conference program. k ALL DISTRICTS fY\ } / Consideration of proposal of Charles L. Robinson, ,/'/ Insurance Consultant, for preparation of specifications ~'"/ f'or the Districts' property insurance and for "uninsured .,e, / 1 ,,/ perils and exposures" as outlinel in Mr. Robinson 1 s ~ v tr Report of Survey dated December, 1966. See page "I" ~ ALL DISTRICTS ConsfdeI="'ation of motion approving Change Order #1 to ~ Job No. Pl-12-2 {Site Improveme~ -Phase III), authorizing an addition of' $913 5 to the contract with Sully-Miller Contracting Compan • See page "J" Consideration of Resolution No. 67-40, accepting Job No~A , ALL DISTRICTS I Pl-12-2 as complete and authorizing the filing of a "l / Notice of Completion of Work. See page "K 11 ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to Job No. P2-8-2 (Site Improvements -Phase II), authoriz-o ing an addition of $375.39 to the contract with R. J. 1 Noble Company, Contractor. See page "L" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-39, accepting Job Nop P2-8-2 as complete and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page __ "_M_" __ _ ALL DISTRICTS £ Consideration of motion av.proving Change Order #3 to ~ Job No. P2-12 (Clarifier 'H11 ), authorizing an extension ~1)})1Yfl1 of time of 130 days to the contract with J. Putnam Henck,V- Contractor. See page "N" -2- {27) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) {37) {38) (39) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-41, P2-12 as complete, and authorizing the of Completion of Work. See page "O" accepting Job No. M~ filing of a Notic~/~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Interim Financial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ending December 31, 1966 0· ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written certification of the General Manager that he has checke all bills appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint · Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1 and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "Aft "B" , and "c" ALL D~ers ~ :::etiier businesS _nd co!!ID\lmications, if any--.....__ DISTRICT l Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRIC~ h:tiie?"6Uiiness arie, comm__yp1 ga:tlons, 1f any DISTRICT l Consideration of motion re: Adjournment 1: J/ f'lh • ' DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-42-2, approving and ~/J c authorizing execution of Hold Harmless. and Irldemnificatiorl'~ 7 Agreements in favor of Southern Counties G~s Company of California, as prepared by the General Counsel. See page "P" · DISTRICT 2 l ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 67-43-2, approving and ~. authorizing execution of an easement agreement with ~ Southern Pacific Company, at no cost to the District, in connection with the construction of Contract No. 2-10-6. See page "Q" DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" and connnm'lications, if aAN seem/> DISTRICT 2 ' I ~ p i/J') I Adjournment ,dj I {/ Consideration of motion re: ~, -3- ; . (40) (41) {42) (43) (44) (45) {46) {47) (48) DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 .~A~~ Consideration of Resolution No. 67-44, approving and ffj~, authorizing execution of an agreement for use of the ~B Lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer (between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue) by District No. 11. See page 11 R" • Copy of agreement on page "S" DISTRICT 3 ~ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See.~~ page "D" ~/ tJl"i'ri!r busine~ communicati 0 os, if any DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment Cf! !J{~/Yl' DISTRICT 11 0 Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice to~ ~ Withhold in the amount of $640.95, filed by Concrete Tie and Anchor Corporation against Lomar Corporation and Orange County Pipeline, Inc., Contractors on Contract No. 11-10-2 DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E" See~ s (49) DISTRICT 5 (50) (51) (52) (53) (54) (55) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 ~ 17 Consid1ation of motion re: Adjournment to~:OO p.m.,q\ April th DISTRIC 6 .~ / Cons .. ~~ion of m on app/rrants ~~.:,.,.9J'IY. See DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion declaring public hearing open~. on engineers 1 report entitled "Master Plan of Subtrunk . Sewer Facilities -January, 1967" . - -4- I!> (56) (58} (59) (61} (62) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion declaring the public hearing 1 ~A closed; and consideration of Resolution No. 67-47-7 !~ ,~ overruling protests and adopting the report. See page :7 "T" DISTRICT 7 Report of the General Counsel re: Acquisition of ease- ments to serve property recently annexed to the District (Liljeblad-Wessinger -Annexation No. 11) Consideration of Resolution No. 67-46-7, approving and ~A ~ DISTRICT 7 I authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of f 'l Orange, for purchase of the Prospect-Spring Subtrunk and canacity rights in the Hewes Avenue Subtrunk. See page 1'U" • Copy of agreement on page "V" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion instructing the staff to submit a request to the City of Orange, for permission to connect to certain existing facilities owned by the City. See page "W" DISTRICT 7 Verbal report of the staff and engineers regarding construction of District's sewerage facilities between the College Avenue Pumping Station and Treatment Plant No. 1 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "E" See (63) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 7:00 p.m., JfJ:tJ/ April.26th -5- l96t 'at 'lil:IdV S~N:!IWOOOa DNI~HOddflS a.NV SNOIJJl~OS~ WARR ANT NO. 696 1 696 2 696 3 696 4 6965 6966 6967 6968 6969 69 70 6971 6972 6973 6974 6975 6976 6977 6978 6979 6980 6981 6982 6983 6984 6985 6986 698 7 6988 6989 6990 699 1 6992 6993 699 4 6995 6996 6997 6998 6999 7000 7001 7002 7003 7004 700 5 7006 7007 7008 700 9 70 18 7011 70 12 7013 7014 701 5 7016 7017 7018 7019 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FA VOR OF Acore Drilling Service, Core Drilling Adach i Nursery Co ., Shrubs Advance Electric, We l de r Repair All Bearing Service, Inc ., Pump Parts The Allen S ystem, Inc., Ma r king Tape Al l is -Chalmers Mfg., Compressor Parts AMO UNT American Chemical Soc iety, Technical Publi c ation American Compr ess or Co ., C.:>m p r essor Parts 1 56 .6 0 1 5 .60 291 .05 12 5 .37 38.90 492.09 11 .8 5 132.60 29 .68 14.24 17 4.32 Ci ty of Anaheim, Powe r Anahe i in Truck & Transfe r Co ., Fre igh t The Ancho r Packing Co ., Gaskets , Pac king Apc o Supp l y, Fue l Valve Arrowhead Puri t as Wate r, Bottled Water A ~las S t a tio ners, Office Supplies Bank of America, Bond & Coup. Collec t . Expen se Ba rksda le Valv es , Pres sure S1'1itches Ba y Ci t y Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings , Fittings Beach Fabricating Co., We l ding Se r v ic e Beckman I nstrumen ts, I nc ., Lab Suppl ies Bell Pipe & Supply Co ., Piping Be ll's Radiato r Servi ce, Truck Repa ir Bomar ~·1ag ne to Service , Inc ., Magneto Repair Le s Bowma n Engineering Co ., Safety Ra iling Brookmart, Safety Rai l ing H . B . Brown C·::>., Boiler· Pa r t s Bu e na Park Who lesale Electric, Elec t . Suppl ies Bu f nel Company, Metal Treatment of Pa rts Bureau of Business Prac tice, Training Mate rial Ra lph B. Carter Co ., Freight Ch evron Asphalt Co ., Roofing Ce me n t Ci ty Sand & Gravel , Inc ., Rock Base College Lumber Co ., I n c ., Lu mber Con solidated Elec trical Dist ., Controls Costa ii1esa Auto Parts , I nc ., Tr·uck Parts Crane Packing Co ., Comp ressor Part s l e & Son 's Glass Co., Gl ass C::>n t rol Corp ., Go ve r nor Repair Dye Hardwa re, Small Hardware, Too ls Electric Supplies Dis c . Co ., E i ectric Suppl ies Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring Enterprise Print ing Co ., F orms Essick Machinery Co ., Eng ine Parts Chas . A. Estey, Inc., F i ttings Fairfa x El ectron ics, I n c ., Intercom Parts . Rimm on c. Fay, Ph.D ., Microbiological Rese arch Fi scher & Porter Co ., Ch l orina tor Repair Fischer Go vern::>r Co ., Regu lato r Parts Flair Draf t~ng Service, Fowle r Equipmen t Inc ., Crane Rental Freeborn Equipmen t Co., Inc ., Pump Parts F reeway Machi ne & Weld i ng, Pump Repair Rober t N. Ga ll oway, Mis c. Expen ses Ga rvin's Paint & Body Shop, Tr uck Repair Gibbons ~et~Pro duc ts Co ., Metal Fabrication General Electric Suppl y Co . De partment o f General Ser vices, Tech. Pub. General Telephone Co. Gl adman & Wa llace, Truck Ti res The Glidde n Company, Paint Supplies l!.84 .12 162 .47 325 .61 1 ,734 .02 33 9 .10 1,596 ,74 74.82 14 5 .91 65 .8 3 12.00 696 .60 489 . 53 18 .69 62.77 1,143.88 143 .22 12.00 9,93 99 .34 107 .22 101.23 300 .82 352.60 193 .23 40 .90 233.89 41 .94 375.66 3 ,067 .58 1 52 . 56 101 . 56 6 4 .36 36.40 46 4.00 69 .7 5 1 54 .10 520 .63 336 .13 27 .63 390 .67 33 .02 525.25 275 .18 1,84 1 .34 5 .20 921.85 223 .23 95 ,79 ,. WARR ANT NO. 7020 702 1 702 2 7023 7024 7025 70 26 70 27 7028 70 29 7030 703 1 7032 7033 7034 7035 7036 7037 7038 7039 7040 7041 7042 7043 7044 704 5 7046 7047 7048 7049 70 50 7051 7052 70 53 70 54 70 55 7056 7057 7058 70 59 70 60 7061 70 62 7063 7064 7065 7066 70 67 7068 7069 7070 7071 7072 7073 7074 7075 707 6 7077 7078 70 79 7080 IN FAVOR OF Bob Gosche Co., Sm a ll Ha rd\\f are W. W. Grainger, I nc., Elect ric Blower GJ."'aves and How l ey, I nc., Equipment Rental Gu arant y Che vro l et Motors, Truck Repair Guardian F ence Co., F ence Remova l AI10UNT 162.19 30 .1 6 96 .00 19 .50 George T . Hall Co., Inc., Temp . Regulat:irs Fred A. Harper, Vari ous Meeting Expenses Heathki·c Electro nic Cen ter, Co mmunication Ho ne y1"!e ll, Inc ., Ins trumen tation Repair How ard Supp l y Co., Pump , Va l ves, Hardware 398 .00 41 5 .05 21.,..,.l Equip . 298 .48 173 .00 37 2 .77 City of Huntington Bea ch, Wa te r ILG Industri es , Inc ., Fan Uni ts Int erna tio nal Harve s ter Co ., TJ."'UCk Pa rts J ensen Instrument Co ., Contro l Sw itches J ones Chemica ls , Inc ., Chl orine Robert E . J ones, Whee l .A l ign . Equip . Kar Pr oducts, Inc ., Truck Parts Kell y Pipe Company, Va l ves Keenan Pipe & Supply Co ., Chlorinato r Piping Kl een -Line Corp . J anitorial Suppl ie s Knipper s Rental s, Equipment Re ntal Kno x I ndust rial Suppl ies , Sma ll Ha rdwa re, T:>o l s Herbert H. Kyzer, Emp l oyee Mi l eage L & N Un iform Supply Co ., Uniform Rental LBWS , Inc ., We ldi n g Supplies, T oo l s J udy Lee, Emp l oyee Mi l eage Leupo l d & Stevens Inst .,Water Level Recorders Litho graphic Arts , I nc., Printing R . W. McClellan & Sons , Sand J ack Ed ward McKee , Consultant Bill McDan iel Equ ipment, Equipme n t Ren t a l McGraw~Hi ll Bo~-Technical Publication Mine Sa f ety Af)p l ~;~ Co ., Sa fety Eq uip . Robe.c t E . MocKe'E""~M . . , I rradiation Samp l ing St anl ey E . Morris Co ., Cas t ers Morrison Co ., Piping, Va lves Munselle Supply Co., I nc ., \·,fe l ding Supp lie s National Chemsearch Corp., Janttorial Supp li es Na tional Lead Co ., Pa int Supp l ies Lee M. Ne l son, Consulting Services Ci ty of Ne~·.rport Beach, Water -~ C . .Ar t hur Nisson, Genera1 ,couseel Re tainer Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaning Solvent 0 N C M:itor Freight Sy s tem, Freight Orange Coast Nursery, Landscap ing Su pp lie s Orange Cou n ty Radiote l ephone Service , I nc. Orenda Limited,Turbine Part s Pac ific Tel ephone Co . Penetryn-Western, Inc ., TV I nspection of SeHer Troy L. Pe\·1thers Co ., Crane Parts Pi oneer Roof & Floor Co ., Roof Repair Randolph Industries, I nc ., Electric Supplies Rayco Equipment Supp l y, \'!inches Red 1 s F1"'ame, Whee l & Br•a ke Serv., Truck Repair The Register, Emp l oyment Ad Reyno l ds Aluminum Su pply Co ., Steel Stock Charles L . Robinson, In suranc e Consul t ant A. Rooke Cooperage Co ., Oil Drums Rutan & Tucker, Legal F ees Re Chlor . Suit Santa An a Blue Prin t Co ., Reproduction Service Santa Ana ~lectr o nic s Co ., El ect . Tubes, Tools 14.60 369.24 186 .78 823.96 13,977.60 L~l 6 . 00 96 .11 77 .79 790 .34 138. 36 1 54.75 1 51 .26 20 .60 720 .32 44 9 . 57 17 .40 865 .00 144 .56 46 .1 4 450 .00 13 '.;. 25 13 .55 384 .33 500 .00 19 .0 5 h9 6 r:. _., . _., 94 . 39 43 .0 5 38 ,93 320.00 12 0 .54 700 .00 173 .28 7 .85 1,017 .20 414 .35 1,329 .12 312 .99 350 .00 24 5 .35 403 .00 105 .0 5 520 .00 13 .23 47 .40 665 .93 250 .00 265 .20 457 .12 34 .84 94 .16 F' WARRANT NO. 7081 7082 7083 7084 708 5 7086 7087 7088 7089 7090 7091 7092 70 93 7094 7095 7096 7097 7098 7099 7100 7101 7102 7103 7104 7105 7106 7107 7108 7109 7110 7111 7112 7113 7114 7115 7116 7117 7118 7119 7120 7121 7122 IN FAVOR OF E . H. Sargent & Co., Lab. Supplies Ru ssell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage Sears, RJebuck and CJ ., Brick AMOUNT The Sherwin~-Wi llia ms Co., Paint Supplies Sibal En gineering Co., In c., Compressor Par·i;s John Sigler, Employee Mileage 434 .05 33 .10 12.46 444 .69 !::;.~·1 6.:. _.,,_.,, . ...,, 24 .60 72.16 27.98 Signal ~Flash Co., Barricade Ren t al Smi th Op t ical Service, Safety Glas ses Southern California Edison Co ., Power Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sou t hern Marine Supp l y, Small Hardware Speed-E --Au ~o Parts, Truck Parts 17' J 085 . 86 82 .64 Standard Carriage Works, Inc., Flex Lift Repair Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Oil, Diesel Fuel State Employees' Retiremen t System ., Adm. Chg. State Pipe and Supply Co., Pipe 1 ,853 .70 224.88 247.94 194 . 42 1,9 21. 57 132 .50 949 .10 27.04 16 .19 302.1 5 Steverson Bros., Oil Drums Teaching Aids , Inc., Training Materials Tel-Co of Calif., Elec tric Wire Thomas Bro s . Maps, Map s C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co ., Weed Triangle S i;eel & Supp l y Co ., Steel J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Tools Un ion Oil Co . of Calif., Gasoline 202 .80 Oil, Kerosene ~.3 . s ·;;o ck ~ 107 .98 Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Lab Equipment Wallace a indery Co., Office Supplie s John R . es R.S., Odor Consultant Wai"nock -Bancroft Equipmen·c Co., Truck Parts Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Welch 1 s Co astal Concrete Co ., Concrete Western Salt Co ., Indu st~ia l Salt 869.41 58 .08 12.48 225 . 78 36 ,94 Western States Engine Serv ., Compressor Part s Ci ty of Westminster, Water 2, 189 .93 63 .49 20.80 13 .00 5 .00 1. 51 354.26 W. D. Wi l son Co ., Fit ting& Xe rox Corp., Reproduct:1.on Service Charge TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAP IT AL OUTLAY RE VOLVI NG FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Bank of America, NT&SA Assignee ~ Vinne ll Corp. John Carollo Engineers J. Pucnam Henck R. J. Noble Co. Sully-Miller Contracting Co . Twining Laboratories TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY R2VOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- $ 80,866. 59 $ .67~080 .00 26 ,813.72 7,425.54 7,250.12 23,327.51 48.oo $ 121,944.89 ;~ 202, 811. 48 ~:NG;,~ ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FtJND-itA~S ~~-NO-.-IN;IS@~lOR-.. Q~ ---~----AM.otfN[' ~ 7123 City or Santa Ana $ 30,000.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 7124 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 2,997.00 DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUNp WARRANTS ( IN FAVOR OF 7125 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,,300.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 7126 Fairbanks Morse, Inc. $ 3,505.49 $ 4,80~,.49 DISTRICT NO. !;2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 7127 AAA Construction Company $ 4,230.00 7128 City or Newport Beach 280.00 7129 Donald c. Simpson 230.00 $ 4,740.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 7130 Far Western Pipeline, Inc. $ 21,482.90 7131 Donald c. Simpson 2,704.30 $ 24,187.20 $ 28,927.20 -D- DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 7132 Cook & Barletta Inc. 7133 7134 7135 7136 7137 7138 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle and Lowry AD NO. Amount $ 88.oo 6 Other Engineering 5,065.19 $5,153.19 Southern California Edison Co. The Tustin News FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle and Lowry DISTRICT NO . 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Lamar Corp. & Orange County Pipeline, Inc. Lowry and Associates -E- AMOUNT $ 1,575 .80 $ 5,153.19 7.85 25 .44 $ 5,186.48 $ 3,882 .42 $ 9,068 .90 $ 49,172 .40 2,349.00 $ 51,521.40 Willard T. Jordan, Architect A.I.A. and Associates. 1500 Adams Avenue, Suite 301 Telephone 545-736 Costa Mesa California Agenda Item #18 County Sanitation Districts Executive Committee c/o Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California March 22, 196? Re: ~ubject: Architectural Services for Development of a Master Plan for Improving the Appear- ance of the Districts' Treatment Plant No. 2 I propose to furnish all necessary master planning for the improvements on the treatmen~ plant No. 2, for a sum of $4000.DO. This master plan would include all necessary area plans, cost estimates, phasing of the program, land- scape architect's fees, and a minimum of one major render- ing. I further propose to work as architectural design consultant with the district engineers on the new facilities on the hourly basis of $25.00 per man hour for myself as prin- cipal, and $13.50 per man hour for my drafting staff. If we are selected by your board to work with you on this project, we are in a position to start immediately, and I will personally attend any conferences necessary to further the program. I hope this proposal meets with your approval, and apprec- iate very much the opporturiity of being considered by your board. WTJ/me Enc. -F-All Districts RESOLUTION N0.67-38 FIXING TIME AND PIACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ENGINEER 1 S REPORT A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO RE- CEIVE AND FILE ENGINEERS' REPORT DATED MARCH, 1967, SUBMITTED BY JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS; AND DIRECTING THE SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID REPORT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, resolve as follows: WHEREAS, the report of John Carollo Engineers, dated March, 1967, and ordered in August, 1966, was presented and con- sidered by the Boards. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the Engineers' Report for County Sanita- tion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, prepared and submitted by John Carollo Engineers, entitled "Ocean Outfall No. 2 -March,1967", is hereby received and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary of the Districts; and, Section 2. That these Boards find and they do hereby find that said report complies with the provisions of the County Sanitation Districts' Act (Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California) and that it is satisfactory to the Boards; and, Section 3. That these Boards fix and they do hereby fix the 10th day of May, 1967, at the hour of 8:00 p.m., at the regular meeting place of said Boards as the time and place for hearing objections to said report and to doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report; and, I· Section 4. The Secretary be and is hereby ordered to publish notice of said hearing for the time and in the manner pre- scribed by law. Agenda Item #19 -G-All Districts CWPCA CONFERENCE PROGRAM May 3-6, 1967 Lafayette Hotel, Long Beach REGISTRATION FEES: CWPCA Member Nonmember Short School Only* $ 9.00 12.00 3.00 *Regular registration includes Short Schools -Work Books will be sold at schools MEALS: Short School Lunch {Wednesday) 3.25 Keynote & Awards Lunch (Thursday) 3.50 Business Lunch {Friday) 3.50 Breakfast -Operators, Chemist, Maintenance (Thursday) 3.00 Breakfast -Sewer Design, Industrial Waste (Friday) 3.00 Banquet (Friday) 7.50 WEDNESDAY, May 3 GENERAL CONFERENCE 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. -2:00 to 7:00 p.m. Registration OPERATOR'S SCHOOL -9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. --Registration Introduction --K. R. Jones Fundamentals of Sewage Treatment --K. R. Jones Principles of Sludge Digestion --William F. Garber Pumping of Sludge --Joe Cessna Digester Equipment --Charles Lawrance Digester Operation --Carl Nagel Analyses and Interpretation --Dr. David Jenkins Digester Problems --Larry Trumbull Disposal of Sludge --David L. Irving Discussion, Questions and Answers --Staff WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SCHOOL -9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. 7:00 to 9:00 a.m. --Registration Introduction --Robert M. Powell Contracting Sewer Maintenance --Robert H. King Protection of Pipes and Structures Against Sulfide Attack Richard Pomeroy Maintaining Large Diameter Trunk Sewers --John Murphy Safety Programs --John N. Jepson General Discussion Report on International Conference on Water Pollution Research William I. Kersteiner Workmen's Compensation Benefits and Facts for Supervisors Paul Becker, Jr. What's New In Safety Equipment --James Hagerman Unusual Sewer Maintenance Problems --William R. Teague, Donald Robbins, William Taylor Agenda Item #20 H-1 All Districts EVENING 6:30 to 8:00 p.m. --Hospitality Hour --Hosted by Manufacturers and their Representatives THURSDAY, MAY 4 7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. --Registration BREAKFAST SESSIONS -7:30 to 9:00 a.m. Industrial Waste Breakfast -Moderator: Robert E. Burt General Subject: Industrial Reuse of Water Chemists Breakfast -Moderator: William F. Garber Subject: "Trace Element Determination" -George Uman Sewer Maintenance Breakfast -Moderator: Robert M. Powell Subject: "Safety in Sewer Maintenance" -Elmer Ross TECHNICAL SESSION "A" 9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon MODERATOR --Gordon Magnuson Welcome by City of Long Beach --Mayor Edwin w. Wade "Waste Disposal as a System" --Francis R. Bowerman "Development of Standards Under Federal Water Quality Act of 1965" "California's Approach" --Paul R. Bonderson 11 The Federal Approach" --Harold W. Wolf "Ultimate Disposal of Contaminants from Wastewater Reclamation" -- Rolf Eliassen KEYNOTE AND AWARDS LUNCHEON SESSION 12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. Mr. Arthur D. Caster, Water Pollution Control Federation President, will address the Association on Federation affairs SESSION "B" 2:15 to 5:00 p.m. MODERATOR --Paul V. Hennessy "Engineer-Contractor Relationships" "My Favorite Gripes about Engineers" --J. R. Van Valkenburgh "My Favorite Gripes about Contractors" --Robert L. White "New ApJ.>roaches to Problems in the Design and Maintenance of Sewers "Tees as a New Concept for Mainline Sewer Connections" -- Mark J. Rifkin "Los Ange le s ' Super Sewer" --Clarence A • Nipper "Load Bearing Characteristics of Pipe Bedding Materials" A. J. Reed "A Universal Solvent" --Marvin E. Stephenson SESSION "C" 2:15 to 5:00 p.m. . MODERATOR --Edwin R. Stowell "Controlling Activated Sludge" ''Control Bases on Cell Residence Time" --David Jenkins and Walter E. Garrison "Automated Control of Dissolved Oxygen" --Charles s. Zickefoose "Instrumentation in Action" "Hyperion Diesel Plant Data Logger" --Clayton Beckman "Data Logger Experience at San Jose" --Richard Worthey "Special Instruments at Seattle Metro's Renton Plant" -- Warren R. Uhte "The Petroleum Industry's Waste Disposal Plans" --Irving Brown Agenda Item #20 H-2 All Districts SECTION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS 2:00 to 5:00 p.m. Maintenance Certification Committee 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. Local Section Officers 5:00 to 6:30 p.m. Combined Operator and Maintenance Certification Committees FRIDAY, MAY 5 7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. --Registration BREAKFAST SESSIONS -7:30 to 9:00 a.m. Sewer Design Breakfast -Moderator: Dean M. Fuller Subject: "Sewer Design With Maintenance In Mind" Charles H. Lawrance, Steven Goodman and w. James Horsley Operators Breakfast -Moderator: Harry Y. Dering Subject: "Air Diffuser Cleaning" --Chester Holtom SESSION "D" 9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon MODERATOR --Perry L. McCarty "Research Symposium on Anerobid Waste Treatment" 11 Measurement of Digester Mixing with a Radioactive Tracer" Andrew L. Gram and John Zoltek "Notes on Chromatographic Analysis of Digester Gases" -- T. G. Shea, W. A. Pretorius and E. A. Pearson "The Anerobic Filter for Waste Treatment" --J. c. Young and Perry L. McCarty · "Sulfate in Digestion" --Daniel F. Seidel, Allen J. Burdoin, Roel K. Stratton and Wayne Wolfe "Anerobic Treatment of Cannery Wastes -A Bench Scale Study" Franklin J. Agardy and Robert G. Spicer SESSION "E" 9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon MODERATOR --Robert D. Bargman "Techniques for Digester Cleaning" --Carl A. Nagel "How to Get Federal Grants" --Ra.r.mond Stone "Burbank's Activated Sludge Plant' --Ben Onodera "Sea.ling Sewers Externally by Subsurface Injection of Asphaltic Sealants" --Steve Serdahely and Leon Anderson "A Method of Controlling Flow Through Sewage Treatment Plants Utilizing Submerged Effluent Collectors" --Theodore V. Lutge BUSINESS LUNCHEON -12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m. SESSION "F" 2:15 to 4:30 p.m. MODERATOR --John T. Norgaard "Ocean Outfall Maintenance" Robert M. Powell and Robert E. Van Heui t 11 "Effects of Wastewater Disposal to San Francisco Bay Erma.n A. Pearson, Robert E. Selleck and Phil N. Storrs "Systems Analysis and Simulation Techniques Employed in San Francisco Bay Delta Water Quality Control Study" "Scope of Data Input for Co~rehensive Study" --Raymond Walsh "Ba.sic Field Data. for Models' --James McCarty J.,,.J "Hydrologic and Water Quality Models" --Gerald T. Orlob and Don Evenson EVENING 7:30 to 12:00 midnight --Lafayette Hotel, International Ballroom BANQUET SPEAKER --Frank c. DiLuzio, Assistant Secretary of Interior Dancing and Entertainment to follow banquet Agenda Item #20 H-3 All Districts ~ i..,,I .> SATURDAY, MAY 6 TREATMENT PIANT TOURS 8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon --The following plants open for inspection with guided tours City of Los Angeles -Hyperion Treatment Plant Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts -Whittier Narrows Water Reclamation Plant and Joint Water Pollution Control Plant Orange County Sanitation Districts -Orange County Sanitation Districts Plants Nos. land 2 Agenda Item #20 H-4 All Districts SUR\"EYS: El;1•ost:1a~s Cov1rnA<:lrn Cl-I.A.RLES L. ROBINSON INS'G"RANCE CONSULTANT :.u~.NAGr-::.rnNT s1mvrCES1 I:-:au11ANCz D&&>Annn::.-.r FUNCTJO"ll '.EVA.LUA.TIO~ 01!' DID.El s~::.J:" I::n~\1ltA:s'Cl: IxsunA:s-cn Al>llnNI6TilA.TION AND ACCOUN"l·i:-:o Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager ~ATIONAL OIL DUILDING 609 SOU'l'II GRAND AVENU:C: LOS .A.NGELZS, OALiltORNIA. 00017 STA'li'"I!' IN8UllANC:C ADVIBOil SA.n:n :rnoou..u.ta (213) 62:>-lOll . March 15, 1967 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Dear Mr. Harper: Thank you for your letter of March 10, 1967 (which I received yesterday, as a matter of information) indicating that the Dis- tricts desire this office to design specifications for its pro- pe.rty insurance, including· bid data for uninsured perils and ex- posures as outlined in our Report of Survey. We assume that the commitment would include, in addition: 1) Assisting with the selection and distribution of specifica- tions to certain types of brokers and markets; 2) Evaluating and comparing the responding bids on a 11 spread sheet" which would become a permanent document in your files; 3) Recommend- ing in writing one or more bidders for consideration by the Boards of Directors; and 4) Verifying in writing that the submitted pol- icy conforms to what was represented by the selected bidder. As you know our fee is $20. per hour of consulting time, as sup- ported by a written Log, ·.and our Maximum Fee would be $1,200 for this project. We. do not expect our earned fee. will be the Maxi-. mum Fee, as that rarely occurs, for reasons that are usually be- yond our control. Our Deposit Fee for this would be $250 which will, of course, be credited against our terminal billing of fee. Our invoice is attached for the Deposit Fee. This com.~itment can be scheduled to start at your convenience and it will be completed with all reasonable dispatch. I will expect to hear from you in the. near future, and Itm look- ing forward to serving the Districts again. CLR:hwh Attch: · Inv. for Dep. Fee Agenda Item /121 -I- Si~cerely yo~rs~./J ;:,;·11/ I! . v:-~ 71 ·· /! , ~ .L_/c,---;,..it-t.\L ·X. / {1· / .:.. .. '-Ji)C).'" Charles L. Robinson Insurance Consultant All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE· ORDER C .O. NO • __ 1 __ _ CONTRACTOR Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE: April 12 2 1967 JOB: Site Improvements -Phase III at Plant No. 1 2 Job No. Pl-12-6 Amount of this change order (ADD) (mEEJIE~) $ 913.55 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEERt S Q.UANTITIES ADD Item ' • . Change Est'd. Quant. J2.:_ Unit From To 2. S.F. 73,400 73,931 I 531 . @ $0. 11 $ 58.41 ~: S.F. 2,800 3,526 726 @ 0.22 159.72 S.F. 1,880 . 5,406 3,526 @ 0.25 881.50 6. L.F. 900 . 904 4 @ 1.75 z.oo TOTAL ADD $1,106.63 DEDUCT 1. S.F. 26,800 25,812 988 @ $0.16 158.08 5. L.F. 3,000 2,900 100 @ 0.35 J~.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 193.08 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD m 213.55 Original Contract Price $ 17,873.00 Previous Authorized Changes __ n_o_n_e ____ _ This Change {ADD)(~~) 913.55 Amended Contract Price $ 18,786.55 Board authorization date: Approved: April 12, 1967 Agenda Item #22 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By ~/s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY By ____________________________ ___ -J-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-40 ACCEPTING JOB NO• Pl-12-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. ~-1-12-2 AS COMPLETE --------- The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-12-2, on the 24th day of March, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts• Construction Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer•s recommendation, which said recom- mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-12-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 23rd day of day of March, 1967; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #23 -K-All Districts CONTRACTOR: COUi~'l'Y S.hNI'l'ATlON lJI3'l'hICTS OF' ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO • __ 1 ___ _ ---------------------------------R. J. Noble DATE: April 12, 1967 JOB: Site Im~rovements -Phase II at Plant No. 2a Job No. P2·8-2 Amount of this change order (ADD) (JllKJIOlllK) $ 375.39 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S O.UANTITIES . film. Item Change Est'd. Quant. No. Unit From 1. s.F. 23,212 2. S.F. 700 3. S.F. 11,500 4. S.F. 4,756 DEDUCT 5. L.F. 875 To ~~;J74 162 @ $0.215 $ 34.83 1,237 531 . @ 0.145 77.86 13,109 1,609 @ 0.145 233.30 5,091 335 ·. @ 0.12 40.20 TOTAL ADD $ 386.19 848 27 @ $0.40 10.§0 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 375.39 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 7,680.10 none This Change {ADD)~'1 375.39 Amended Contract Price $ 8,055.69 Board authorization date: Approved: April 12, 1967 _!~enda Item #24 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA BY __ --1./~s~/-=-P=a.::.:.ul~G~·:......::B~r~ow~n~~~~~~ Chief EngineE:r R. J • NOBLE COMPANY By __ ~------------------------ -L-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-39 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-8-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-8-2 AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, R. J. NOBLE COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, on the 24th day of March, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Construction Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recom- mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 16th day of March, 1967; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Comp1etion of Work therefor. Ap.;enda Item #25 -M-All Districts CONTRACTOR: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTtl OF ufu.,.NGE COUNTY P.O. !\OX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO • _ ___...3 __ _ J. !'utnam Henck -----------------------------------DATE: Apr. 12, 1967 . .:,-oB: __ C_LA_R_I_F_I_E_R_"H_" ,&.--J--=~;.._B_N_O_._P_2_-1_2 ________________ _ Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT} $ none In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Extension of Time Delay in delivery of Raw Sludge Pump due to non-availability of copper wire for motor caused by Vietnam conflict 130 days * * * * * * * * * * * * Original completion date: November 22, 1966 November 27, 1966 Change Order No. 2 -5 calendar days Completion date with this extension of time -130 calendar days April 6, 1967 April 6, 1967 Actual completion date: Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change {ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price $ 241,518.00 2,266.18 none $ 249,784.18 Board authorization date: Approved: April 12, 1967 Agenda Item #26 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By ____ ....J./~s~/-=-P;au~l~G~-~B~r_o~wn-=---::------Chief Engineer J. l'utnam Henck 'liy _______________ _ -N-All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-41 ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-12 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-12 AS COMPLETE ------.. .- The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, J. PUTNAM BENCK, a corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for CIARIFIER "H", JOB NO. P2-12, on the 6th day of April, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recom- mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of CIARIFIER "H", JOB NO. P2-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 26th day of May, 1966; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #27 -0-All Districts 'vwV RESOLUTION NO. 67-42-2 AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION OF HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREEMENTS RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECU- TION OF HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREE- MENTS IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA • The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, does hereby resolve, determine and order: Section 1. That Fred A. Harper as General Manager of the District be authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the District a hold harmless agreement in favor of Southern Counties Gas Company of California in the form of Exhibit 11 A11 attached hereto and ma.de a part hereof for the purpose of re- solving and determining a dispute concerning the deposit of the contractor Nick Bebek and Jack Brkich arising out of Contract 2-2 in the sum of $4,580.33 made on behalf of the District with Southern Counties Gas Company of California. Section 2. That Fred A. Harper as General Manager of ' \ the District be authorized and directed to execute on behalf of the District a hold harmless agreement in favor of Southern Counties Gas Company of California in the form of Exhibit 11 B" attached hereto and made a part hereof for the purpose of re- solving and determining a dispute concerning the deposit of the contractor Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., arising out of Contract 2-1 in the sum of $6,389.82 made on behalf of the District with '...,.,; Southern Counties Gas Company of California. PASSED AND APPROVED at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors held on the 12th day of April, 1967. Agenda Item #34 -P-District #2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-43-2 APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the easement agreement with Southern Pacific Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, granting the District permission to enter upon that Company's property and trackage to construct, reconstruct, maintain and operate the Euclid Trunk Sewer between Ball and La Palma Avenues {Contract No. 2-10-6), is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary be authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. Agenda Item #36 -Q-District #2 i RESOLUTION NO. 67-44 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LOWER MILLER•HOLDER TRUNK SEWER A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LOWER MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated April 1, 1967, entitled "Agreement for Use of Lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer (Districts No. 3 and 11 -between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue)", wherein District No. 11 will use, temporarily, that portion of The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue owned solely by District 3, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairmen and the Secretary of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement, on behalf of the Districts, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. Agenda Item #40 -R-Districts # 3 and 11 , "-'/ AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LOWER MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER (Districts No. 3 and 11 - between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue) THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County, hereinafter called "THREE" and County Sanita- tion District No. 11 of Orange County, hereinafter called "ELEVEN" on the 1st day of April, 1967. W I T N E S S E T H: ________ .._._ WHEREAS, a certain territory of Eleven, hereinafter described, is in need of temporary sewerage service which can conveniently be provided temporarily by the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer owned solely by Three in its reach between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue in Huntington Beach; and WHEREAS, Eleven owns permanent capacity rights in said Miller- Holder Trunk Sewer in the reach between Hamilton Avenue and Treatment Plant No. 2; and WHEREAS, the said Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in the reach between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue has capacity beyond the present needs of Three; and WHEREAS, it is planned and anticipated that within a period of five years from the date of this agreement Eleven will provide separate sewerage facilities designed to eliminate the necessity of Eleven's use of Three's facilities as provided in this agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS: 1. Three hereby grants permission for the discharge of sewage and industrial waste from Eleven to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at the intersection of Nichols Street and Warner Avenue from the territory in Eleven described as follows: All that area included within the present boundaries of Eleven located north of Talbert Avenue and Talbert Avenue as may be extended westerly Agenda Item #40 S-1 Districts #3 and 11 2. That said discharge of sewage and industrial waste as described in Section 1 hereof shall not exceed a maximum peak flow of 16 million gallons per day during the term of this agreement. 3. That Three will charge Eleven quarterly for discharge of sewage and industrial waste originating within the hereinabove desig- nated territory and discharged as hereinabove described and Eleven agrees to pay FIFTEEN DOLLARS PER MILLION GALLONS for all sewage and industrial waste so discharged. 4. That this agreement will terminate on April 1, 1972 unless cancelled or extended by mutual agreement. 5. It is agreed and understood that on or before April 1, 1972, measures will be undertaken to provide separate and permanent fac111~ ties for the conveyance of sewage and industrial waste from the here- inabove designated territory of Eleven. 6. That in the event it is determined that areas within Three can be conveniently served by the facilities of Eleven provided by Eleven within the boundaries of Three for the purpose of effectuating the temporary discharge of sewage and industrial waste to the said Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street, the sewage and industrial waste originating within Three shall be conveyed by Eleven to said Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer free of charge. Agenda Item #40 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, of Orange County, California, a public corporation By 'Uhairman, Board of Directors By _..S_e_c_r_e_t_a_r_y-, -B!!!!!'o_a_r_d ..... o-r~b~1'""'' r_e_c_,t,_.o_r_s __ _ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, of Orange County, California, a public corporation By ""!l:C_h_a-..i_r_m_a_n-,-E=--oa_r,..d ...... o-r~b;qol~r---e~c~t~o~r~s~--- By •si--e_c_r..,.e•t ... a ... r ... y-, -B6~a~r~d"!l"-o---r~b~1~r~e~c~t~o~r~s~-- S-2 Districts #3 and 11 RESOLUTION NO. 67-47-7 OVERRULING PROTESTS TO ENGINEERS'REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS MADE OR FILED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REPORT OF BOYLE AND LOWRY, CON- SULTING ENGINEERS; AND APPROVING AND ADOPl'- ING SAID REPORT AS MADE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. This being the time and place set by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, for the hearing on any objections to the report of Boyle and Lowry, Consulting Engineers, Sanitation Engineers for said District dated January, 1967, or to doing all or any par.t of the work referred to in said report, pursuant to legal notices of said hearing published for the time and in the manner prescribed by law, the matter was called up. Section 2. There were ______ verbal protests or objections made by those present at the hearing. ---- Section 3. The Secretary reported that there had been written protests filed in the office of the Secretary of the Board. Section 4. All protests and objections, both oral and written, made or filed in connection with the report of Boyle and T.owx·y ;a Conei1l t.i ng F.ngineers, dated January, 1967, filed with this Board on March 1, 1967, be and tlle same are hereby overruled and denied, and said report is hereby adopted as made. Agenda Item #56 -T-District #7 RESOLUTION NO. 67-46-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE FOR PURCHASE OF FACILITIES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Sale and Purchase dated April 12, 1967, between the District and the City of Orange, providing tor purchase by the District of the PROSPECT-SPRING SUBTRUNK SEWER and capacity rights in the Hewes Avenue Subtrunk Sewer, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary be authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, as prepared by the General Counsel. Agenda Item #58 -U-District No. 7 AG.Rf.:!;;~·!l!:NT FOR SALE AN'D Ptm.ca .. ;;sE OF PROSPECT-SPRING SUBTRUNK SEWER THIS AGREEl1lENT r::.ad..:;; and er.tered into on the t.\·;el£th day of April, 1967, by "nd between the CITY o~ OP~NG~, a municipal corpo~ation in tne State of California, hereinafter called c.,;:..LI20R:.~IA, a duly ~uthorized and existing public agency in the county of Orange, Sta-Ce of Califoi:nia, hereina:f-'~er called i~{ERE.~S, B~'YER has heretofore adopted and approved after public hearing an engineering report made in accordw4ce with the provisions of Section 474.3 of .. the Health and Safety Code o:O: the state of California which report, aroong o·t:her things, describes a ~aster plan of subtrunk sewer facilities for BUYER, and WHEREAS, SELLER is the ct-mer of certain subtrunk sewer facilities more particularly hereinafter described which may properly be made a part of the subtrunk sewer system of BUYSR. and vl£-iEf<.EAS, Bu-YER is willing to purchase said subt.ru11k sewer facilities and thereafte~ to use and main-C.ain them as a part of its subtrunk s~w~r system, and viP..E.REAS, SELLER is willing to sel1 said subtrunk sewer facilitie~, NOtv, Tr--!ERE~'ORE, the parties hereto do hereby covenant, promise a..~d agree as follows: l. ~· · SELLER promises and agrees to sell to BUYER and BUYER agrees to buy from szr.T~R for the uses and purposes aforesaid that cGrt-ain ii1.terc0pter sewer cominonly known as Agenda Item #5'Q . V-1 District No. 7 the PROSPECT-S~RING SUBTRUNK SEWER described as that certain vitrified clay pipe sewer complete in place with appurtenances extending from a connection with BUYER'S manhole in Chapman Avanue at Prospect Avenue running thence northerly and easterly to its terminus in Spring· Street at Esplanade for a distance of 3,779 feet more or less. Said sewer line is constructed of twelve-inch vitrified clay sewer pipe and the purchase price is the sum of T~-."E~""I'Y-HI!m THOUSA.i..~D FOUR I-IUNDP..ED SEVENTY- S!X DOLL.~~ AL~D TWENTY CENTS ($29,476.20). SELLER further agrees to sell to BUYER and Bu-YER agrees to purchase from SELLER sewer capacity rights in SELLER'S twelve-inch vitrified clay pipe sewer beginning at the intersection of Spring and Esplanade Streets ·thence running easterly in spring Street to Hc-:,;cs Avenue, thence northly in Hewes Avenue for a total length of 3,448 feet. said sewer capacity rights shall be equivalent and equal.to tha~ amount of sewage and/or industrial wastes an eigh~-inch sewer would tra11sport over the sa.11e route and at the same gradient. The selling price of said capacity rights in said set•."er is "i:rie sum of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED- FO:r\.TY DOLL~~RS ($17 ,240) •. Said sewer lines are entirely located within public property. 2. et·~RST:UP. SELLER does hereby warrant, agree and p~omise to deliver full title and ownership to the aforesaid sewerage facilities hereinabove described free an~ clear of all encu.rnbrances, adverse claims and liens of any and all nature \~lather recorded or not or otherwise. SELLER covenants a~d ag~ees to hold BUYER and its successors or assigns safe and harmless from any and all adverse claims against or claims of interast or ownership in the property conveyed. Agenda Item #58 V-2 District No. 7 --~:--~~-.-· -:-:-~--·~ --'"':'-·--· con.di tion. and BU'.!ER is willing to ilccept the camo in their present condition subject to the above warranty. 4. POSSESSION. BW~R shall be entitled to possession o~ the subject sower facilities on and after the date of this· agreement and BUYER agrees to maintain and operate the facilities aftel:' said date. 5. Pl-:.!~B~~. Upon the execution of this agreement BUYER agrees to pay SELI~R the total amount of the purchas~ price hereinabove mentioned of FORTY-SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HU~"DRED- SIXTEEN DOLLf.\..RS AND TWEN'I'Y. CE~""TS ($46,716.20) for said sewerage facilities and appurtenances thereto hereinabove described from the BU'IER'S ·funds heretofore collected by SELLER as an agent of BU'lER as connection charges within the territorial limits of Bu-YER. Upon payment of the purchase price title to said sewerage facilities and appurtenances shall pass to BuYER. ZN WITNESS ~aiEREOP the parties hereto caused the names a.~d seals of the public corpora·tions and th.e na.'n~s of the officers thereof to ba subscrihad·hereto the day and year first hereinabove written. {SE.~L) (SEAL) -:~ ".! ;'1 • • " .' '; :' JI• '•' • - Azenda Item #58 V-3 CZTY OF ORANGE,·a municipal corporation By By COUNTY $.P-.NITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORt~NGE COUMTY, CALIFORNIA, a public corporation By Chairman, Board of Directors By secretary, Board of Directors District No. 7 ·. -,_ City of Orange City Counci I 300 East Chapman Orange, California 92666 DRAFT Attention , City Clerk ---------------------- Gentlemen: In accordance with the instruction of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, request is hereby made on behalf of said District for permission to connect to existing sewer foci I ities of the city of Orange at the fol lowing locations and as shown on the attached portion of the map of Assessment District No. 6. 1 • Bond Avenue at Hewes Avenue 2. Church Street at East Walnut Avenue 3. Private road off Hewes Avenue at .. a point approximately 500 feet northerly of Spring Street. 4. Spring Streat at Hewes Avenue 5. McPherson Road at Chapman Avenue The requested connections wi 11 al low sewage originating in county areas as indicated on the enclosed map to flow through the city's facilities and then be discharged into the trunk sewer foci Ii ties of County Sanitation District No. 7. These connections wi 11 void a duplication of foci Ii ties as we II as expedite completion of the district's program in the assessment district involved. Your early response wi II be appreciated. Fred A. Harper, Secretary I . ·. Agenda Item #59 -W-District No. 7_ ~, -~--_____./ ~ c. I ~~~ / I ~' , -~ ..; .;e 8-~"t.--;- ~d/ <==-=-- c: - L /A-~, ) --r ,,.-s ,___.,. _;7 I -~ =----u t ( I) ) . .r ' l ,; L • \ ...__ _ _,,_,,.. \'f '(yo ( J. I ( ____ __,,, -~- ). \ ~11' · _)-z , _,, .......--~. ~71--f -r --_{ ) ..... I / ~r "'-..-'L ~---c .. 7 c ...... c>~ -;-\ ~'-......._ I ' ./'-~-. -~-;y-0' ..) /" -:> , ~ . ~ <--'C ;;-£__ (~ -c:...-..~' ' (:? -~ ~ ~07: ~ /? ----__5/$ _,~ (!) ~ J -~,~ G ~b ~~ _J ~ ~/ ~(;_ / 77}~-vV~ ~rW _y ~· G 1(!!'11 Yff01 ~ ~~~ -~~ (; 26 r/~ ~'~fl . J ;z, s, -n;:I? ///( ' (] ~ k'~ (:' U(/ &-£--: Y-? ;?-~®'p/~~ iJ¥ ?<--PJi77~'~ ~ .. ~ ~ / . c::::::=> ~ ' ) .b ~Yr / -0A ~ 6? ' cs:z_-~ /~) , eJ I~ _) A lf1 'tT / \ 24-/3/(J -L---7 A 5~/ ( ~/~ --y /~ / II • MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Co unty Sani tati o n Di st ricts of Ora nge Cou nty, Ca lifo rni a JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, Apri l 12, 1967 8 :00 p.m. P. 0 . Box 5 175 10844 Elli s Avenue Fou ntain Va lley, Cal i f ., 92708 Phone 962-2411 April 7, 1967 The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items whic h appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appe ar in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Jo i nt Bo ards No. 3 -SEATING OF NEW REPRESENTATIVE FROM SANTA ANA : The Mayor of Santa Ana, or his alterna te, sits on the Boards of Directors of Districts No. 1, 2, 3, and 7 . Fo l lowing Mayor Harvey's retireme nt and the April 4 municipal elections in that city, the City Council is s chedu l ed to elect a new mayor on April 10. Accordingly, it is antieipated that we will receive official notification of the election o f the new mayor and his alternate before our meeting in order that the new representative can be seated. No . 4 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO . 1: Since retiring Mayor Harvey wa s Chai r man of the Board of Directors of District No. 1, it will be ne cessary to name a new chairman at this meeting . It is perhaps appropriate to call to the attention of the Directors a lso that our establishe d procedures require the annual election of the chairman o f each District Board at the next regular meeting after this (May 10 ). No . 14 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER AND GUEST SPEAKER: From time to time during the past year we ha ve scheduled g uest speakers to di scuss matters of general interest to the Directo r s and guests . For this meeting , we have been fortunate in being able to obtain as a spea ker Dr . J. E . McKee, Professor of Environmental En g ineering at the California Institute of Technology . As the Directors are aware, Dr. McKee is considered a n international expert in the field of water pollution and g eneral environmental science and serves as the Districts ' consulta nt o n current problems and special assignments. Dr . McKee is planning to cover in his talk a topic mostly unrelated to water pollution but which should be of general interest to the Directors and the public at l arge . The subject is ''The Expansion of Nuclear Power". Dr. McKee serves the Atomic Energy Commission as a member of the Committee on Reactor Safety and consequently has a broad knowledge of nuclear power generat ion. We believe his presentation will disclose facts and projections as to the extent of nuclear power development which most persons are unaware of. Nos. 16 through 20 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITT EE AND ITS RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee met in lengthy session on March 29 and discussed and reviewed a number of matters concerning our Joint operations. On three subjects, the Committee arrived at definite recommendations which are discussed and presented in detail in the accompanying written report of the Co mmittee . Consideration of action on these recommendations constitutes Items No. 18, 19 and 20 on the accompanying formal agenda for the meeting. No. 21 -CONSIDER~TION OF PROPOSAL OF CHARLES L. ROBINSON, INSURANCE CONSULTANT: At the March Joint meeting, the Boards authorized the employment of Mr. Robinson for preparing specifications for the Districts' property insurance, and bid data for "uninsured perils and exposures" as outlined in his Report of Survey dated December, 1966. The Boards limited the fees to be paid for these services to the unused portion ($790) of his original proposal. Mr. Robinson submitted a new proposal for these services, dated March 15, which stated a maximum fee of $1,200. (A copy of this proposal is included with the agenda.) The staff advised Mr . Robinson not to proceed with the work as it would be necessary to obtain authorization from the Boards for the maximum fee quoted. Nos. 22 and 23 -CLOSE OUT OF PLANT NO. 1 PAVING JOB (Pl-12-2): This job, consisting of miscellaneous paving additions at Plant No. 1, was completed satisfactorily during the past month by the contractor, Sully -Miller Contracting Company of Orange. Item No. 22 is the customary adjustment of engineer's quanti· ties to change the original contract price to reflect differences in amounts of paving installed over those originally estimated. In the case of this project, this results in an addition of $913 .55 to the original contract estimate. Item No. 23 is the usual resolution accepting the work as complete on March 24, 1967 and authori z ing filing of Notice of Completion. Nos. 24 and 25 -CLOSEOUT OF PLANT NO . 2 PAVI~G J OB (P2-8-2): This job, consisting of miscellaneous paving additions at Plant No . 2, was completed satisfactorily during the past month by the contractor, R. J. Noble Company of Orange. -2- Item No. 24 is the customary adjustment of engineer's quanti - ties to change the original contract price to reflect differences in amounts of paving installed over those originally estimated . In the case of this project, this results in an addition of $375 .39 to the original contract estimate. Item No . 25 is the usual resolution accepting the work as complete on March 24, 1967 and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. Nos. 26 and 27 -CLOSEOUT OF PLANT J OB NO . P2 -12: This contract consisted of the construction o f a new pr i mary clarifier at Plant No. 2 and adds 20 million gallons per day to our treatment capacity there. With the final installation and testing of variable speed s l udge pumping equipment on Ap r il 6, the job was completed by the contractor, J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino, at a total contract price of $249 ,784.18 . There was a delay of over four months in completion of this contract over the time allowed, through no fault of the contractor. Th i s was occasioned by the non -delivery of a 20 HP motor as a part of the variable speed automated s ludge pumping equipment. We are assured by the supplier of this equipment and the contractor that the delay in supp l ying this motor was due to the current non - ava i lability of copper wire, except under tight priority allocations, caused by the Vietnam conflict . Our standard specifications do not provide for an extension of time for this type of delay since , technically, we are not in a state of national emergency or war . However the facts as stated above are such that we can see no alternative but to grant the contrac tor the necessary extension o f time in order to avoid unjust imposition of liquidated damages . This recommendation for an extension of time of 130 days appears on the agenda as Change Order No . 3 (Item No . 26). Item No . 27 is the customary resolut i on accepting the job as complete on April 6 and authorizing filing a Notice of Completion. No . 28 -RECEIVE AND FILE FINANC I AL REPORT: The Districts' independent auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have recently submitted their interim financia l report for the first six months of fiscal year 1966-67. A copy of this report is being forwarded with this agenda and it will be in order for it to be received and filed . Also, if there are any questions in connection with this report, the staff wi ll be glad to go into it in any detail desired. -3 - District No. 2 No. 35 -RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION DEPOSITS BY SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY: During the 1958 bond issue construction in the District, agreement was reached with the Gas Company that it would be responsible for paying for any necessary relocation of its lines due to the sewer construction. However in our construction contracts, as originally written, the District's contractors were obliged to pay for the relocations with the cost thereof included in their bids. As a result of the above determination made as to the Gas Company's responsibility, refunds to the District were obtained in all contracts except two which, for various reasons, we have been unable to settle until now . In one of these instances the contractor is deceased and therefore unable to sign a release and in the other, the signature of one of the partners cannot be obtained. Consequently, an agree - ment has been worked out with the Gas Company that if the District will sign a Hold Harmless Agreement releasing the Gas Company from responsibility, the funds on deposit ($6,389.82 and $4,580.33 respectively) will be refunded directly to the District. Accordingly, we are recommending the resolution appearing on the agenda authori- zing the General Manager to sign such agreements and the General Counsel and I will be prepared to go into greater detail on this matter if desired. No. 36 -PERMIT AGREEMENT FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY: This company requires formal execution of an agreement for each new sewer crossing of its right of way. The District's next construction contract (2-10-6, Euclid Trunk Sewer between Ball and La Palma Avenues) involves such a crossing and consequently it will be necessary to authorize the execut ion of such an agreement by the Chairman and Secretary. Districts No. 3 and 11 No. 40 -AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER USE BY DISTRICT NO. 11 : A copy of this recommended agreement is included with the agenda material and is, we believe, self-explanatory. However, it should be recalled for the Directors that the terms of this agreement were worked out by a special joint committee of Directors of the two Districts last year as a part of an over-all accommodation arrangement between the Districts. District No. 11, in the next few days, will commence discharging to the Miller -Holder Trunk as described in the agreement and, accordingly, it is appropriate to authorize final formal execution of this agreement at this meeting. District No. 11 No . 44 -NOTICES TO WITHHOLD FROM CONTRACT NO. 11-10-2: We have rec e ived two formal notices to withhold funds for monies due the contractor for this project, Lomar Corporation and Orange County Pipeline, Inc. I t will be necessary to receive and file the notices as set forth on the formal agenda . -4- District No. 5 No. 51 -ADJOURNMENT TO 7:00 P.M., APRIL 26: It is suggested that the Directors adjourn to a later meeting this month in order to award the contract for the demolition work on the old Bay Bridge Pumping Station, no w out for bid, and t o close out the manhole repair contract. The suggested time and date coincides with a sc h eduled meeting of District No. 7 and a suggested meeting of the Executive Committee. District No. 7 No . 55 -HEARING ON MASTER PLAN REPORT: This is the time set for a public hearing on the District's proposed Ma s ter Plan of Subtrunk Sewers. Copies of this report were made available at the following locations in order to facilit?t e inspection of the report by any person interested: City of Orange City of Tustin County Libra ry in Tustin Lowry and Associates After the public hearing, the Board will consider adoption of a resolution approving the report (Item No. 56). No . 58 -AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF THE PROSPECT-SPRING SUBTRUNK, AND 8-INCH CAPACITY RIGHT IN HEWES AVENUE SUBTRUNK FROM THE CITY OF ORANGE: To provide trunk sewer facilities to serv e sev eral sewers constructed within Assessment District No. 6, it is necessary that the District acquire certain sewerage facilities a s outlined in the Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers. This agreement, a copy of which is attached to the agenda, provides for the purchase of the following facilities: 3,779 feet of 12" VCP sewer, complete in pla ce, extending from a connection to a District No. 7 manhole in Chapman Avenue at Prospect Avenue, thence northerly and easterly to its terminus in Spring Street at Esplanade. The purchase price is $7.80 per lineal foot , for a total price of $29,476.20. 8 11 sewer capacity rights in the City of Orang e's 12" sewer beg inning at the intersection of Spring and Esplanade Streets, then easterly in Spring Street to Hewes Avenue, thence northerly in He wes for a combined total length of 3,448 feet. The cost is $5.00 per lineal foot, for a total of $17,240. The total purchase price of $46,716.20 for the two facilities is to be paid to the City of Orange from the fund established by the City for collecting the District No. 7 connection charges. -5- No. 59 -REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO USE FACILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY OF ORANGE: The engineers for Assessment District No . 6 have advised that it will be necessary for the District to obtain permission from the City of Orange to connect to and use certain existing facilities owned by the City. This will permit sewage originating in County areas within Assessment District No. 6 to flow through the City's facilities and then be discharged into District No. 7 trunk sewers. If the draft letter attached to the agenda is approved, a formal request will be forwarded to the City. No . 60 -VERBAL REPORT OF STAFF AND ENGINEERS RE: POSSIBLE CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES BETWEEN COLLEGE AVENUE PUMP STATION AND TREATMENT PIANT NO. 1: District No. 7's sewage flow between the College Avenue Pumping Station and Treatment Plant No. 1 will soon exceed the capacity rights. The engineers would like to present a brief verbal report outlining their recommendations, and the staff will report on the financing aspects of the engineer's plan. No. 63 -ADJOURNMENT TO 7:00 P.M., APRIL 26: The public hearing on the spreading of assessments in Assessment District No. 6 has been set for this date. Accordingly, it will be necessary for the Board to adjourn. -6- Fred A. Harper General Manager -- =- - - = - ~ . . . . : = -- - =- - = = ~~ - = = = _=- , = = : : o - - = =t : : == = = - = += ( =- ~ -~= = ; ! t i ~ = = = - - = = ' ' j, ~ ~~ , f ~ t ~ I ' ·- = - -_ == -_ ~ - f ~t ~ ~1 " - _- = -- -~ - 1- - ~ ~ - . ~ ~ -- -- - - - - - ~~ - ~ -·~ ---- - - -- ---- ~ ~~-- = - ~- -=· __ _ - _ __ - -- = - - - - - ~ ~" -- - -- - -- t_, ~ · - · .r - I ~, ~- .. . - - ~ Ir - \ : 'f , ( \ t . - ll . -- - r. ':- - - -- - -- - - - - -- , ~ -- - - -- - -- - - - -- ·- - <. . . i - =, I- - = - = = == = - ~ - - ~:_ - - -- - - - ~ - ~ -· -· - - - -- - - - - - - - - ~ '" " -- ~ - '3 w (N l\ i \c \ - - - . - -- -- - '- ' '3 - - - -- - -- - - - -- - ' ~ - "" . . - - -- · - -- - ~ ~ w ~ ~ r- 1 -- - - - -- - - - - ~ t- ' - - -- - - - - - - - - - - - ~ ~ - ~ = ~~ - - -- -_-____ _ ,_ ~- ~c l . . . ~ - -- ~~ 1- - - - - 11- - '\ · ~-- - - - -- - - - · - -· -- --- -- - - --- - - , __ _ _ ~ · ~ .<l ' - '- l '1 '1 c~ := ! ! = = = == = = == == == = l = == = r = = = ~ =! = == = = ~:= = = = l = = = = = =l = = = = l = = = = = r = = l = = = = j = = = = = ~ = = = t = = = = = = = = = = ! = = r = = = = = = = = l = ~ ~= = = = = # = = = ~ l '( ) ' (A .. . . . . ~ ~- ·- - i I :: : s -- - {, , . . _ ~ ~ ~ - -- - -- (N ' ~ "' c, . , c ; : . ~ . . . . _ • - - .• ~ ~ I -1 -- · -- - - -· . - ~ -- - - -- - - -- - ~ ~ -- ~ 'l - 1- - - - -- \ \ - .- ~ '- . I "' " ' w - - -- - - · --~ - I CJ ' , . - f: l \ ~ Cl ' • -- - '{ \ " -. . . . l ~ v- . , •- - ~ -- . - - - '" ' " 1- - -- - 0 oq ~ - - ~ -- "C : . _ - - - - - -- - -- ~ __ ., _ _ __ _ __ _ 0 - - - - -- - - -- -- - - - - ~ -- -- .-- - - -- - · - y ~. J "> ... . .) , .. . . . -- .. ~ ~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ p - l- - -- ~ -- -- - - -. : !-- = - - - - = = = - - - -- = - - '=- == . . ; . . - : : . : : . . -- - . - -- - - - - -- - - -- .. ~ -- -- - -- - - - ·- 'f ' f' r ~ r- l, ~ '1 ~ t ~ 1~ - ~ II ~ ( ·, ~~ ~ ' ~ .. . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - : ~~ ~ · . t ~~ ~ J~ ~ l~ ~ ' t~ i t ~' ~ ~ . ~ ~. ~ i. , N. ~ a ~~ ~ ~ J) : - ~~ \ \ b , 0~ ~ ~ ~ t ~ ? ~ ~ l~ 1., ~ ~ ~ ~' \ . ~ .. . . . ' .. . . . , _ ,_ " ~ ' ' I I ? "-~ ~- ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~. ": : : : : , I ~ - - ~ I ~- ~~ ~ ~ :- . : 1 - - - ' - • ~ - - - ' - - - - I " " ~ - ·' _ I ~ f "\ t' ~~ ' - > - ~ -- 1 -_ . _ ~ -- - - -- -- -_- ~ -- - - -· - - ·- - -- - -- - - ~ - -~-= - -- - ·- ~ ~ -- - - - - ~ - - - , ~ -- . . ~ __ " __ _ _ ~ I '1 : i ~ - ' - ~ --- ~ - - \' ' -- - - - -- - _ , _ .. __ _ - -- -- It ~ w _ ~ - - - -· - - - - - -- - -- -· - - - - -- - - I .. J u. -- - - ~- '3 _ (. . . , (J . J "' - ~ - ·- - . - ·- · - - - " '1 -- - - ~ w ~ ~ ' t- ' - -- - - 'I . -- - - - - - -- - . ' IV ~ - - - . ,~ q- . . _ - ' "' ~ -- - ~ - - - <1 ' ~ ~ I '1 '1 1 "f . . ~~ n- . . ' - - - -- -· - - - . - -- '- -- ' - -- - . "' ( ) ' (, . I ' ~ ~ c ~ ~ -- -- - w - -- ~ - Cl . \ ~ t- - '- l '1 1' J ~ ~ w 6' ' ~ ~~~ 0 ~ () - -- ~ -- - - -- 0 lN w ' () "1 (- - ·- ~ ·~ - -- __ _ _ _. _ . _ . . __ -- , - - -- - - ' C> ' ~-- ~. : , . ._ _ _ _ () ~ -- - - -- -\ ; I r ~ ~ " ~ 'b \ . . . : VJ I' - - ' , ~ - - - ~ -- ~ - -- - -- - -- Lo J er - . - - - -- - I - - - - "- - -- - - ~ .. . . . ~ ~ " ~ '- - - ~ c -- - - -- - - - - - - -- ~ 0( ) - -- - - c- ~ __ _ _, - · -- -- - N) -- - ~ -- 0 . \ ·- >- - - - ., ., , , "' . , ~, "' " ,, 6 . :: : : ~ "- - =. . > .. . . "' .. . , ~ w N - .. , , ,. . -~ - ~· f. ~ ~ " ;' \ :l ~ ~t \ . ~ ' ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' -- - -· -- - - - - - - - ~- - - - - -- - - - - - ,, _ . - - -- - - - - -- - - -- ~ - - -- - - - ?' 9 -- - - - c -- - - 0\ ) -- - - <: : J . -- .. . . , - - - tL I I - ~ 1i tt t 1 tt ~ ~ · ~ ~ ~~ ~ •' I~ ~~ \ : I ~ ~ . ~ ~ r ~1 L ~- ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ·~ 1\ ~; ~ I. ~ ~" " I ., i: ' - ' . I~ ~ .. . ~ 1: - . . . , . I t~ 'l ~ - - -- - - -- - ~ - -- · - ~ '? A - <. . i ~- · - - - - - "" - ~ ~ - - ' ~ - ~ ~ - ,_ _ __ __ __ - ' -- - - ' (, . , - - w ' "' ~ w -- - N' i "' .. . . . . . i w C) " ~ ~ (. . . KN ~ t> r: : : , \, - "( ) ~ w - ~ () '\ - - -- - - -- - · - -- - - - - - -- - -- - - ·-- - - - - ' ~ " - 'I I ' 11 ! I , Ji . I I ;j I Agenda Item No. r _,/ Chairman Parsons (13) Executive Committee meeting 4:30 p.m., April 26th, to consider personnel requirements, and Joint Operating & Joint Construction Budgets for 1967-68 f iscal year. (This meeting will coincide with the adjourned meetings of Districts 5 and 7 , tentatively set f or 7:00 p.m., April 26). Suggested names o f Directors to be invited to Executiv e Committee meeting: Directors Furman and Bousman Suggested names o f alternates in the event one, or both, of the above cannot attend: Directors Crapo and I.Dng (19) Call on Harvey Hunt o f John Carollo Engineers f or verbal report (21) Do you wish to make a recommendation on this item? (55) Call on Sidney I.Dwry or Boyle and I.Dwry to describe the report (60) Call on Conrad Hohener of Boyle and I.Dwry for verbal report Call on Genera l Manager f or report on financing the recommended f acilities • Harper ROLL CALL District -------------------Regular ~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time ---------------------------------------- JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Parsons Amo Bartlett Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Forgit Furman Gruber Gummere Hock McMichael Miller, Clifton Porter Mack Davis Noe Shull Baker Parks Crapo Culver McMichael Hock Schutte Featherly DISTRICT 2.,........ v Hileman v Shull v"' v ~ Michel Krein Long Gruber Bouma Forgit Anderson Michel Brown Mack Kohl Schwerdtfeger ,./ Harwood Miller, Clifton Miller, Harry McMichael ;J?arks Porter Sc!mtte Schwerdtfeger Speer Stewart Walters Workman Baker ~ Hileman Krein Harwood Fregeau Clark Green Coen Herbst Featherly Speer Walters Workman Baker Speer Amo Bousman Bowen Crapo .Culver Furman Gummere McMichael Long V' Clark lZ Herbst 0- v Featherly DISTRICT 3 L./' Clark ,c:= ~· Davis ::::=::-Noe ---&..:< Shull ~ Bouma Anderson ,ee=· Brown OTHERS: 1 u~ i~~~mt::::: f'J · . Stewart . ,,,. Kohl -.....i~--Krein __ .......-::-~ Fregeau ~ Green Brown Niss on Galloway Tremblay Lowry Carlson Rimel Maddox 1 \ .'.~ ~i7....~-Walters ~\ µ. · fo Baker 'Df"Y'-'A~ "\ (LL a~ l Parsons 0 r·-~· -y ~ Gruber J~ ~~/Ju~ Baker ~~[ ~~dzr~:J: ~~~~;~ v,,, Herbst ,7 Featherly DISTRICT~ --~-Forgit ,,/ Featherly DISTRICT 6 &/"' v-/ Forgit ,_?' Featherly DISTRICT 7 \)~ N ,#, (k. i V\'\ ~ ( < (.,L \)A ij ~ ~ \-l" ~ \~.V- Clifton 7 Mack Miller, Forgit McMichael Parks Porter DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Baker "' ~f \~ \rt, J u.-;:Baker 6 (,0 Stewart Lambourne .,, Bartlett 0--1? .L Featherly Baker ~ Gruber 7 •7 Hileman ~ Featherly DISTRICT 11 l;/'Coen _ _.....~- __ ;;<Y_ Fea therly ROLL CALL District -------------------Regular ~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time ---------------------------------------- JOINT BOARDS Parsons Amo Bartlett Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Forgit Furman Gruber Gummere Hock Long Miller, Clifton Miller, Harry McMichael Parks I' Porter · Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Stewart Walters Workman Baker OTHERS: Brown Niss on Galloway Tremblay Lowry Carlson Rimel Maddox ~ VWl e-,/<-&t-i~) 7/ v. i7 7 \/« .. V' < \7'/ Davis 7, Noe \7, Shull V"', i7 Gruber Bouma Forgit , Anderson _..._\:?_,._ Mic he 1 i7 Brown Mack Kohl Hfleman Krein Harwood " Fregeau -,z__.,,_ Clark 1/ Green , Coen --'7....-. . Herbst ~ Featherly DISTRICT 1 McMichael Miller, Clifton Porter Baker Mack Featherly DISTRICT 2, Parks Crapo Culver McMichael Hock Schutte Schwerdtfeger Speer Walters Workman Baker Speer Amo Bousman Bowen Crapo Culver Furman Gummere McMichael Long Miller, Harry Schutte Schwerdtfeger Stewart Walters Baker a// Hileman 17' / Shull 17/ &?' :?:' Michel !ie' Krein * ~~~~~od . HEC_rbs t ;/Al ~ /} lprf'1"1 I Featherly Clark Davis Noe Shull a_..< Bouma L/" Anderson v' &:?'/ Brown & Kohl Krein &:?'; Fregeau ;::;>/ Green L?" J"' Herbst 7 Featherly DISTRICT 5 Parsons Gruber Baker Porter Gruber Baker i7/ &7 ;:;::;=-' DISTRICT 6,,, &;/< i7' 7' Forgit Featherly Forgit Featherly ~ DISTRICT 7,, Clifton 17', Miller, Forgit McMichael Parks Porter Baker &?'/ 7 * Mack Gruber Hileman .~ DISTRICT 8 Martin 1-.{i tchell Baker A;/ Lambourne ~ ........ 7 Featherly ·•' Stewart Bartlett Baker &:?" Featherly DISTRICT 11, V' / Coen i/'/ Z Featherly EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., A-pril 12 , 196 7, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Clifton C. Miller (Chairman), Al Forgit, Thomas McMichael, Rex A. Parks, Ellis N. Porter, and David L. Baker Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. 7 Moved, seconded and duly ADJOURNMENT Carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 7:00 p.m., April 26, 1967, in the District's office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley~ California. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 10:01 p.m., April 12, 1067. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County S~nitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, tru~ and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 12th day of April , 196 7. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation Distric_t _ _!'Io. 7, of Orange County, California, this 12th day of ~~ril . . , !6 7,. d1Q iJa~a- Secreta.,w,Yoard ~f Dired~ ~f County _Sanitation District No. 7 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., April 12 , 1967 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Lindsley Parsons (Chairman), Paul Gruber and David L. Baker Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. 5 ADJOURNMENT Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 5:00 p.m., April 27, ia67; in the District's office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:17 p.m., April 12, io67. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County S~nitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, tru7 and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 12th day of April , 19fy · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation Distr1-ct, J'fo • 5 , of Orange County, California, this 12th day of ,/~~H~~:-;~_~r 7. ~J__{}.~a...~t" Secr:etary-,_-Board G:t Dire ors of County_Sanitat1~-~istrict No.5 Agenda Item No. ~'-1 Chairman Parsons (13) Executive Committee meeting 4:30 p.m., April 26th, to consider personnel requirements, and Joint Operating & Joint Construction Budgets for 1967-68 fiscal year. (This meeting will coincide with the adjourned meetings of Districts 5 and 7, tentatively set for 7:00 p.m., April 26). Suggested names of Directors to be invited to Executive Committee meeting: Directors Furman and Bousman Suggested names o f alternates in the event one, or both, of the above cannot attend: Directors Crapo and long (19) Call on Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers f or verbal report (21) Do you wish to make a recommendation on this item? (55) Call on Sidney Lowry o f Boyle and Lowry to describe the report (60) Call on Conrad Hohener of Boyle and Lowry for verba l report Call on General Manager for report on financing the recommended facilities Vol. 1, No. 5 April 1967 .~ For the Employees of the County Sanit.ation Districts o~ OrangeCounty Editor: George Cantrell, ·control Center Operator · NEW GRADE I's At a meeting of the Boards of Directors of the County San- itation Districts of Orange County, Mayor Harry H. Harvey, Chairman of the Joint Boards, presented Grade I Certificates as Treatment Plant Operators to Gerald Baldwin and Leonard Carney. These men were awarded the Grade I Certificates as a result of an examination given last November by the California Water Quality Control Associa- tion. Gerald Baldwin lives with his wife, Peggy, and their children at 15950 Los Reyes in Fountain Valley, He has been employed with the Districts since 1961 and has served as a . Control Center Operator since 1963. A.native of Philadelphia, P~nnsylvania, he played halfback on his .high school team and then contJpued playing in the mili- tary service. He played on the championship teams in the Air- borne· Bowl games of 1957 and 1958. Serving in both the 11th and the lOlst Airborne Divisions as a paratrooper he rose to the rank of Staff Sgt. and found time to complete 58 parachute jumps successfully. Before com- ing to. California in 1961, he served on a· local police depart- ment in·Kentucky.· Both Gerry and his ,.wife are active as Den Mother and Den Dad in Cub Pack 281 in Garden Grove. · .(continued on page 2) CHANGE OF COMMAND Prior to the March Board meeting Mayor Harry H. Harvey announced he would not run for re-election in Santa Ana and as a consequence he could no longer serve as a member of the Board of Directors and its Joint Chairman. The Boards then elected Mr. Lindsley Parsons to the post of Joint Chairman. He had served as Vice-Chairman under Mayor Harvey in the past year • Mr • Parsons, a councilman from New- port Beach, is also the Chairman of the Board for District No. 5. Councilman Thomas·o. Speer from Brea, Chairman of District No. 3 was elected Joint Vice-Chairman. -l- HOW TO LIFT 1. Size up the load first. Get he·lp if you need it. 2. Be sure of your footing • 3. Lift with your legs, not your back. 4. Keep your balance. Don't twist w1der strain or jerk the load~ 5. Use proper mechanical aids whenever possible. USE TOOLS SAFELY 1. Do not overstrain a tool. Use the right size for the job. 2. Use the proper tool for the job., i.e., a screw driver is to be used ·to loosen or tighten screws and not as a chisel or pry bar. 3. Do not use defective tools. Inspect them before using or taking them to the job. See that shovel and pick handles are free of splinters and splits. Do not use a chisel with a mushroomed head--turn it in to the equip- ment maintenance man for· repair. 4. When using air compressor and air tools check the air hoses and couplings on pneumatic tools. Air discharged under high press- ure from an open hose end· is very dangerous. Wear the safety equip- ment provided such as toe guards, goggles, dust masks, hard hats, and work gloves. (Bill Landon) THINK SAFETY NEW GRADE I's (continued from page 1) Leonard Carney lives with his wife, Marie, at 814 South Shannon Drive in Santa Ana. Their daughter, Mrs. Linda Jones is a registered nurse at St. Joseph's Hospital in Orange and their son, Patrick, is due to return from the Navy in Vietnam soon. Leonard has been employed with the Districts since 1964 and was promoted to a Control Center Operator in 1966. A native of Aurora, Missouri, he served with distinction .as an artillery spotter with a for- ward observer party in the 90th Division. From his D-Day land- ing in France to his rise to Tech. Sgt., he won a Silver Star at St. Vith in the relief of Bastogne, a Bronze Star with V for Valor in Cherbourg and an Oak Leaf Cluster to his Bronze Star in Luxemburg. After the war he attended the Water and Sewage Technical School in Neosha, Missouri; and then be- came the Operator of the Aurora, Missouri treatment plant. He continued this until he came to California in 1964 and joined the staff of the Districts. Leonard is a Deacon in St. Luke's Presbyterian Church in Santa Ana and still carries on his affiliation with the Masonic Lodge and Shriners that he established while in Missouri. His hobbies are stamp collecting (a plate block collector) and coin collecting (mint proof sets) . Both men have served as editors of the Gas Dispatch, the Districts bimonthly news bulletin, Gerry fo~ the October issue and Leonard for· the Febru- ary issue. These men now bring the total to five on the Dis- tricts' staff who hold the Grade I Certification. THE BOOB TUBE Joe Vormittag reported a contractor working in the City of Garden Grove dug up a gas service line to a residence and pulled it apart in the house causing a fire. Firemen arrived and in- spected the house for occupants and found a little old lady sit- ting watching TV. When ' she was informed that the house was on fire she said she couldn't leave until her program was over. Firemen removed the settee, with the little old lady on it, and sat her in the street with her portable TV so she could finish her program. NOTES FROM THE PIANTS #5 digester was back in service after being down for 29 days for cleaning. This may not be a record but those who saw the conditions marveled that Smokey Garten and his crew could do so much in so little time. Wes'tside put on one of its frequent performances by burst- ing its force main again. This time we were prepared with emer- gency equipment standing by. The districts forces made the repairs in jig time and at much less cost. If the .cbsts of repairs keep decreasing' as they have been on each subsequent break, maybe we can soon stop collecting tax- es and whe.never we need more money just go out and punch a hole in the Westside Force Main. (P.S. this method of making mon- ey is not advocated.) The Gas Turbine has been ·perking away and since the gas systems are now complete we can supply gas from either plant. The use of natural gas has been decreasing steadily as the sys- tems are adjusted and stabilized. . The heat recovery unit is about ready for final test and oper-~ ation as this goes to press. Blacktop and drainage at both plants is essentially com- plete. The area is improved in appearance and much less dust blows. This will be a big help in keeping the areas clean. Westside has had some landscaping replaced since it lost the battle with an airplane. The planting 'experiments are underway at Plant #2. All these, we hope, will convince our neighbors and the public at large that while we remove filth from water we can have a pleasant looking facility they need not be ashamed of. Bernie Heying and his crew seem to have caught the idea and our grounds are acquiring that well tended look. The training and briefing sessions on Thursdays are cover- ing a wide range of subjects and ·we operators would like to ex- press our appreciation to manage- ment for the opportunities these sessions offer to broaden our knowledge. (George Cantrell) · HAPPY ANNIVERSARY ' . 2. We didn't forget this month but it seems that 5, 8, or 10 years ago no one joined the districts' forces in February and March to remain with us until this date. J •• A ST. PATRICK'S DAY SALUTE TO LMN No better .day ~·ould have been selected t.o salute a friend and former boss. Mr. Nelson was not born in the Emerald Isle but he is "gifted" .with the charm of those who come from Ireland and furthermore, he is "from the old sod" having been born on a farm in Nebraska. Consequently, on St. Patrick's Day some fifty friends and former employees gathered at the Driftwood Inn for a sur- prise appreciation luncheon. Credit must be given to Bill Kroeger and Paul Hogan who had to do some fancy maneuvering to· steer Mr. Nelson to the Drift-.. : wood Inn without his becoming suspicious that there was some- thing brewing, and it was only when Mr. Nelson was informed that the lunch would not be in the regular small dining room that he felt this was something more than a business lunch. The St. Patrick's Day theme was carried out in the decora- tions of the tables and Mr. Nelson was presented with a green hat and a green carnation~, being the honored guest. This was a "fun" party and Mr. Harper also called on some of the "old- timers" present who had struggled with Mr. Nelson during the early days of the Sanitation Districts, namely Mr. Frank Schweitzer, Mr. Courtney Chandler, Mr. Claire Nelson and Mr. Jerome Kidd, who had been former Board members. In addition, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Lowry, and Mr. Boyle had a few words of reminiscing. The remarks by these engineers were especially appreciated by those who had been with the Districts for a period of years during the beginning of the expansion programs. Mr. Lou Hanson, CPA, who so closely and carefully watches the Districts' finances,·was selected to present Mr. Nelson with a plaque and a purse of money. In addition Mr. Nelson was presented the following mementos of this occasion, such as a Miniature Emergency Kit by Mr. Brown, a wrist watch by Mr. Galloway (said watch being the type that shows the correct time only twice during the day), a Barrel of Monkeys to remind him of his days at the County Sanitation Districts, a Good Luck Doll to bring him the best Of everything now that he has shed the responsibilities of the CSD, a Hopping Chick to test his skill in mechanical engineering, -3- a Tool Chest so he will not lose his adeptness in structural en- gineering. On the:more serious aspect of the occa~~on, Mr. Nelson was presented with a book on the American West and a bo'ok·on Alaska, his two favorite subjects.· All present enjoyed the im- promptu speeches and the most sincere best wishes were extend- ed to Mr. Nelson with the feeling of "well done, thou good and faithful servant, well done" as Mr. Nelson had come to Orange County at a critical time in the formation of the Sanitation Districts. It was thru his efforts and management that the Districts played such an impor- tant part in the industrial de- velopment of Orange County as one of the prime factors for the development of any area is the "sanitation facilities". Again, Mr. Nelson, all of us wish you the best of every- thing in the years to come and sincerely hope that you will enjoy your "free· time". (Florence Hagen) NEW EMPLOYEES We welcome the following new employees to the CSD: Elmer Black, Mar. 27, 1967, from Buena Park Richard Debruin, Feb. 6, 1967, from Costa Me~! William Miller, Feb. 20, 1967, from Orange · Curtis Poole, Mar. 17, 1967, from Santa Ana Nolan Smith, Feb 20, 1967, from Santa Ana PROMOTIONS Congratulations to the following CSD personnel who have recently earned promQtions: George Gossar to Laboratory Aide Robert Mccrane to Mainten- ance Man I Ray Young to Laboratory Analyst I ~t, 'f\At)' 'AA,Y 1q(;1 ~ On November 3, 1952, your now e,x-general _manager· ·arrived on the scene and took over the management of the Sanitation Districts. You might say that the Districts were in the dia- per s~age, being less than three years old. By the time I retired on May·1, 1966, I had gone through so many retirement parties and testimonial dinners that I found they had become very boring · and many times lacking in sin- cerity, i.e., it was just the thing to do. Mr. Harper.had suggested such an affair and I vetoed it, at least I suggested it be postponed indefinitely. On St. Patrick's Day, by a lot of maneuvering and skullduggery, I found I was the recipient of It . an appreciation" luncheon. Mr. Harper cleverly juggled words .and called it an "apJ?reciation" luncheon instead of retirement". It was a wonderful affair and I was most grateful in that they had carefully selected many of the Board Chairmen, Engineers and other associates I had work- ed with for fifteen years. In.1952, my first year here, I supervised the grand total of .four employees. These were administrative only as the Districts had not taken over from the old JOS at that time and hence, we had no plant oper- ations. In 1954, I inherited Bob Galloway and the JOS plant and that is the year my troubles began. More seriously, we went into operation at two plants and there were several of the "old timers" who came to the Sanita- t:ion Districts from the JOS. Within a year or two, we had about forty employees which in those days we thought was a lot. From about 1954 to 1958 I was fortunate enough to know every- one by his first name and had close contact with them. Due to the work load and the big expansion program which dates from about 1958, much to my regret, I lost this personal ,contact. Now with 115 employees, r·regret very much that I am acquainted with only about half of them.· 4. This luncheon was in real- ity a group of the old-timers or "pioneers" of the Sanitation Districts. . .It is regretable that all of ·the employees could not be present but after you have worked in the treatment and disposal business for a short time, you realize people will persist in flushing toilets; hence some have to remain at home to keep the store. So thanks to ·all of you who stayed on the job to see to it that the effluent continued to flow to- wards Na.go. I want to thank everyone for all the gifts I received and also many thanks for the little "gimmicks" that were toss- ed in. · LEE M. NELSON INFERNAL REVENUE TIME AGAIN April 17th is drawing near. All persons who had a gross in- come of $600 or more must· file. a Federal income tax return. A single person with an income of more than $2,000, or a married couple with a combined income of more than $4,ooo must file a State income tax return. Federal forms and instructions are available from the local Internal Revenue Office at 2024 N. Broadway, Santa Ana, and at post office branches •. state forms and instructions are available at the local Franchise Tax Board office at 1010 N. Main Street, Santa Ana, and several banks throughout the county. . Federal forms are mailed to: District Director of Internal Revenue, Los Angeles, California 90012. State forms are mailed to: Franchise Tax Board, 1025 "P" St., Sacramento, California 95814. ~ Envelopes MUST be postmarked prior to midnight April 17th. KNOW YOUR ENGINEERS Our Engineer for this month is not a firm but an individual who is employed as a consultant to the staff: Dr. Jack E. McKee is Professor of Environ- mental Health Engineering at California Institute of Technol- ogy in Pasadena. He visits our plant at least once a month and usually has several contacts by phone or mail in between visits. A native of Pittsburgh, he graduated in Civil Engineering from Carnegie Tech and then received his Master of Science and Doctor of Science Degrees from Harvard University with his majors in Sanitary Engineer- ing. He held professional posi- tions with the TVA and U.S. Public Health Service before serving with the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers for the Normandy invasion and the European cam- paign. He currently holds the rank of Lt. Colonel, U.S. Army Reserves. After the war he joined the engineering partnership of Camp, Dresser & McKee in Boston, Mass. and still maintains an interest in the firm. Since 1949 he has been on the staff at Cal Tech. Through his work there, he has become renowned in the sanitary engineering field as an advisor and consultant in matters of public health from an environ- mental point of view. In his ca~acity as an ad- visor and consultant, he has served a wide range of agencies from the local to the world- wide level. We would list these in order of importance as follows -Orange County Sanitation Districts, and others. The others would in- clude -National Institutes of Health, U.S. Public Health· Service, Office of Saline Water, California Water Pollution Control Boards, World Health Organization, California Dept. of Water Resources, Los Angeles County Flood Control, City of San Di'ego, Orange County Water Distric·t, State of Washington, Space Science Board, and offi- cer of Water Resources Research. He is currently a member of the influential advisory commit- tee on Reactor Safegards, which exercises control over the construction and operation of commercial nuclear power plants in the U.S. (In all likelihood we have missed a few and ·for those we apologize). 5. Dr. McKee is a strong sup- porter of his· profession and has served on many professional committees in the engineering and.water quality control fields. In 1962-63, he was president of the Water Pollution Control Fed- eration. The Los Angeles section of the American Society of Civil Engineers named him as the En- gineer. of the year in 1965. Long a supporter of the use of the metric system in technical publi.cations, he is apt to sug- gest to his colleagues that they should use Imperial gigafirkins per millenium as a basic unit rate of Fluid flow. Translated into household quantities this means "a billion 9-gallon bar- rels {Imperial) per thousand years." It is roughly equival- ent to one quart per second. Besides being a registered engineer in California, New York, Connecticut and Massachusetts, Jack is also a Diplomata in the American Academy of Environmental Engineers. ~e received the Desmond Fitzgerald med~l from the Boston Society of Civil Engineers and the Rudolf Hering medal in sanitary engineering from the American Society of Civil Engineers. S.A.R.B.S.C.W.Q.C.A. Tony Lauricha led a delegation of five em~loyees to the Desert Section meeting at Palmdale in March. Besides a good lunch, Paul Blevins, Howard Lembke, Bill Wildeman, and Buford McDaniel attended a session on pump main- tenance and installation and tour- ed the treatment facilities on the airbaae. All were impressed with the clean but old paint and no signs of rust. Seems the wind blows the sulfides away. The Ma.rch evening meeting was held at R5.alto and featured a talk by Dick Co0n of Honeywell on instrumentation principles and hardware. The total attendance of 55 was amplified with 20 men from our districts. ENGINEERING OFFICE SCOOP Student Assistant Tom Bibleheimer, who has been employed part-time since November, 1965, and attended Long Beach State College, has now joined Rotary Oil Tool Co. in Buena Park as a full time mechanical engineer. Student Assistant Ron Mueller left to devote full time to his senior studies at Cal. Poly., Pomona. Don Peters became the proud papa of Sandi Jo, 6 lbs. 6 oz., February 8th, at St. Joseph!s Hospital, Orange. Congratulations Don and Collen. {Don Lord) -\ NOTES FROM A ROVING EDITOR'S TRIP THROUGH THE PLANTS Did you know that ·Leonard . Ingro may put the Orange County Sanitation Districts on the map? He is entered in the Olympics at Mexico City as a "weight lifter"- we wish him the-best. Jack Lassiter is spending his spare time restoring a 1929 De Soto. It seems his main source of supply parts has to be second- hand yards. For his birthday last month, George Cantrell received a beauti- ful· walnut gun case -6t feet high -now he has his six-gun collection under lock and key. He is not only a nut about guns, he also has 18 .clocks at home - but his clocks take a poor second to the 50 clocks, more or less, that Glenn Harris has in his garage -all of them in good run- ning order -repaired by Glenn himself (he doesn't allow the clocks to strike or chime for fear his neighbors would complain). Another gun enthusiast is Frank Johnson who rebuilds-guns and reloads the ammunition. Dan Walker and his son keep ·trying for a "big one" in Mexican waters. On his last trip to Sea of Cortez they hit pay dirt and brought home many big fish in- cluding a 225 pounder! \1-. NBC. 'f8,G \<WTZ · ~\_;) It'~ A ,. <Ot:;,ABC q<r.s €ZY '-' -~e. 'RTZ \<i .In the sand and water divi- sion -Elmer Parker and his wife have purc~ased a lot of sand and water at Salton Sea and.drive down occasionally to see if it (the sand, -~hat is) is still there. We have several other desert rats (men, that.is) who spend many weekends out in the great high desert. Art Marcotte, Jim Hilborn, and Mel Templar -also · Jim Chapman zooms around in his dune buggy looking for mountains · to climb. ~ ~~ Bill Cure is a water skier···u and has the boat and all the trim- mings. He heads for the river whenever he can. Another boat owner is Tony Lauricha who also is an avid water skier. When Tony doesn't have time for a water trip, he spends his spare time with the new pool table. Talk1n' about pool tables brings up Jerry Baldwin -also a proud new owner of a pool table -maybe we-can s::;::~ Fred Harper likes to ski .at Lake Arrowhead and this editor suggests if Fred has any more problems with his Mercury -try avw • .$~ #¢ $~#· ~ John Wright watches the Dow Jones averages and tries to keep up with all the jazz on the mar- ket results -maybe some day we can say we knew him when! $ $ Now that the blessed event has arrived at the Glenn Harris house -four French Poodle pups I wonder if he might pass around cigars? Most reports are on what people have. In the case of Bill Cure it's a case of have-not. Bill no longer has his tonsils. We hope this operation brought an end to his difficulties. · Wilburn Wimberly returned to .·work after a 7-month absence due to illness. After only 10 days back on the job, he had to return to-the hospital for some tests. We all wish him the best results from the tests so he can again return to work. -6- ·Mayor Harry H. Harvey, Cha:lrman of the Joint Board of Directors of the Sanitation Distr icts of Orange County presents Geral d Baldwin , 15950 Los Reyes , Fountain Vall ey , with his Grade I Treatment Plant Operator Certificate . Mrs . Peggy Baldwin, l1i s wife , looks on proudl y . \~ : -~ \• ' .J Vil 'H. J\• Mayor Harry H. Harvey, Chairman of the Joint Board of Directors of the Sa.nitat:lon District s of Orange Co u nty prese nts Leonard Carney o f 814 South Shannon Drive , Santa Ana, with his Grade I Treatment Plant Ope rator Certif lcate . Mrs . Marie Carney b eamingly looks on . /