HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-04II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
(1)
( 2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
DISTRICT No.
AGENDA
~ril 27, 1967 -5:30 p.m.
Roll Call
Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Report of the General Manager
Report of the General Counsel
Report of the staff on estimate of costs for re-surfacing, f7v c-~ ~
repairs of d i:!fective work, backfill compaction, and other Qc/
necessar y work to complete Assessment District No. 6
(6 ) Consideration of actions to be taken in order to complete
the work a;0~utlined by the staff:
'\),,.--..r ,-v\-.. ~ ~~ 5~
a . Setting amount to be deposited by the Surety on the
Faithful Performance bond (in the form of a cash
depos i t) to cover the cost of said repairs
b . Orderi ng release of the warrant for Assessment District
No . 6, upon receipt of the cash deposit
c. Directing the General Manager to proceed with the
work as outlined by the staff, in order to complete
the project
(7) Consideration of motion approving the following warrants :
Operating Fund
g?
/
7189
7190
City of Orange
City of Orange
$ 1,899 .00
l0,344.oo
$12,243 .00
(8)
(9)
Other business and communications, i f any
Considerat i on of motion re: Adjournment r • f./.J .> .
~ fk...
_, II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Coun ty Sani tat ion Districts P. 0. Box 5175 /
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No. 5
AGENDA
April 27, 1967 -5:00 p.m.
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
(3) Report of the General Manager
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Report of the General Counsel
Consideration of Resolution No . 67-49 -5, to receive and
fi l e bid tabu l ation and recommendation, and awarding con-
tract for Demolition and Removal of the Old Bay Bridge
Pumping Station (Contract No. 5 -1 2-1) to Gangi Excavatinw
Company in the total amount of $1,960.00. See page "A
(See page 11 B11 for bid tabulation)
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to ,\ ... ~
Contract No. 5 -14R (Manhole Replacement and Repair Program), Ver" J
authorizing an addition of $1, 200 .60 to the contract with /~" -.<""
AAA Construction Company , Contractor. See page 11 C11
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-50-5, accepting the \3 4" .... J'-"'-
construction of Contract No. 5-14R as complete, and 1 / •.
authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work . YI~
See page "D" (<Jj
--lv)..
Report of the staff o~ explosive gas problem in Trunk A \C.,..'9;Y{
Consideration of motion approving the following warrant:
Operating Fund
7191 AAA Construction Company
(10) Other business and communications, if any
(11) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ~'-,~" (l :::__
7
\.,,...... .-/ ~&·-yq--> b7-~'D--':J ~
~ v (f~<-:? ~
v
v
~/ b~/
RESOLUTION NO. 67-49-5
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BAY BRIDGE
PUMPING STATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 5, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineer,
and concurred in by the District's Chief Engineer, that
award of contract be made to Gangi Excavating Company, Inc.,
Contractor, for DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BA¥ BRIDGE
PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1, and the proposal sub-
mitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed;
and,
Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 5-12-1
be awarded to Gangi Excavating Company, Inc., Contractor, in
the total amount of $ 1,960.00 in accordance with the terms
of its bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
/-
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into
and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pur-
suant to the specifications and contract documents therefor,
adopted by Resolution No. 67-35-5 on record in the office of
the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's
checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
.Agenda Item #5 -A-District No. 5
Engineer's Est. $3,000.00
B I D T A B U L A T I 0 N
SHEET·
Contract For: DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION,
CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
* . 1. Gangi Excavating Company, Inc.
213 62nd Street $1,960.00
2.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
10.
Newport Beach, California
Roger Roy Land Clearing, Inc.
10027 Canoga Avenue
Chatsworth, Cal:i.f ornia
Fowler Equipment, Inc.
P.O. Box 1296
12705 South Cambridge
Orange, Cal1forv1a
R. W. McClellan & Sons Inc.
151 Commercial Way
C9sta Mesa, California 92627
.... · ..
$2,382.00
$2,864.oo
$4,280.00
\
·.· ·-·.-··-··•·-···-·.-:.· ....... ··-:····-··-·······-·· .:··-·· ........... ··-·----· ·--· .
•·I,
I •,
Agenda Item No.: 5 · ~B-. District ·,No·. 5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain V..tlley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. N0. __ 1 __ _
CONTRACTOR: ___ ~A~A~A...._.C~o_n~s~t~ru~c~t-i~o~n ___ c_o~m~p~an~y.__ _____ __ DATE: April 20 2 1967
JOB: MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, CONTRACT NO. 5-14R
Amount of this change order (ADD) ~ $ 1,200.60
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's claim dated March 3, 1967 and report of
Engineer dated April 19, 1967
l. Extra labor and material caused by dimensions of
Vaults #2 and 3 being larger than those shown on
drawings Lump Sum $ 750.00
2. Extra labor and material for installation of
concrete thrust block at bend and 27-inch force
main Lump Sum 60.00
3. Imported sand backfill and bedding rock used as
directed by Engineer
93 C.Y. at contract price of $4.20 390.6o
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,200.60
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
ACCEPTANCE OF THIS CHANGE ORDER BY CONTRACTOR AS EVIDENCED BY
SIGNATURE BELOW RELEASES DISTRICT FROM ALL PRESENT AND FUTURE CLAIMS
FOR EXTRA WORK ON THIS CONTRACT AS DEFINED IN SECTION 8-4 OF THE
SPECIFICATIONS.
Original Contract Price $_4 __ 0;;..,.2~9;...;.8_0..._. 0._0 ____ _
Prev. Auth. Changes ____ n_o_n_e ____________ _
This Change ADD __ 1;;;..,~2;;..o_.o_.._6_0 ____ _
Amended Contract Price $ 42,180.60
Board authorization date:
Apri.l 27, 1967
-C-
eOUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
Accepted:
AAA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY
By ______________________________ _
Date: ____________________ _
District No. 5
\
\
RESOLUTION NO. 67-50-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-14R AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
5-14R AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, AAA CONSTRUCTION COMPANY,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for the MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM, CONTRACT
NO. 5-14R, on the 4th day of April, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineer for the District
has recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineer•s recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the MANHOLE REPLACEMENT AND REPAIR PROGRAM,
CONTRACT NO. 5-14R, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance
with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 6th day of
December , 1966; and, __ ........... ..........., ______ _
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
Agenda Item #7 -D-District #5
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 ~llis Avenue
Founta in Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No. 7
AGENDA
April 26th, 1967 -7:00 p.m.
(1) Ro ll Call
{2 ) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
(3) Report of the General Manager ...,,/
(4) Report of the General Counsel ~
(5) Hearing -Assessment District No . 6:
(6)
a. Secretary announces hearing in the matter of
assessme nt for the work and improvement con-
sisting of the construction o f sanitary sewers
in Assessment District No. 6
b. Secretary reports on written obj ections filed
in his office prior to the hearing
c. Chairman hears objections, if any, from ~persons ,
present at the hearing l '7-<fr r (~#-~~·(" ._/,
d. Consideration of action on confi rm ation o f
assessments
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-48-7, approv ing
an·amendm e ~t'to1t~e a-00.lze agre e ment t6>provide ~f or ·
p ayment o f funds received by the Dist ric t from proceeds
of Assessment District No. 6, for capacity rights .
See page 11 A11 (See page 11 B11 f or amendment).
(7) Proposed construction of facilities between Colleg e
Avenue and Treatment Plant No. l:
a. Report and recommendation of engineers f or
construction of sewerage facili ties
b. Report o f the staff concerning financing of
the proposed project
c. Consideration of proposa l of the engineers for
engineering design and survey services for the
proposed facilities (C opy of p rop os al attached)
~)
(8 ) Consideration of motion approving the foll owing warrants :
(9 )
(10)
7189
7190
Operating Fund
City of Orange
City o f Orange
Other business and communications, if any
Consideration o f motion re:
$ 1,899.00
io,344.oo
$12,243 .00
.~
Jo_,)
·._,!
RESOLUTION NO. 67-48-7
APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH CITY OF ORANGE (Amendment No. 1)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE AGREEMENT
WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE DATED APRIL 12, 1967
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Amendment No. 1, dated April 26, 1967,
to the certain agreement with the City of Orange dated April 12,
1967, providing for payment of funds received by the Di~trict from
proceeds of Assessment District No. 6, for capacity rights, is
hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said
amendment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the
General Counsel.
Agenda Item No ._6 __ _ -A-District No. 7
'.,,I
.._J
AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF
ORANGE, DATED APRIL 12, 1967
(Amendment No. 1)
THAT Paragraph 5 of that certain agreement by and
between the ·cITY OF ORANGE, a municipal corporation, and COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, of Orange County, California, a publ~c
corporation, is hereby amended to read as follows:
"5. PAYMENT. Upon execution of this
agreement BUYER agrees to pay SELLER the total
amount of the purchase price hereinabove mentioned
of FORTY SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HrThlJRED SIXTEEN DOLLARS
AND TWENTY CENTS ($46,716.20) for said sewerage
facilities and appurtenances thereto hereinabove
described; THIRTY SIX THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED SEVENTY
TWO DOLLARS. AND TWENTY CENTS ($36,372.2q from the
funds heretofore collected by SELLER as an agent
of BUYER as connection charges within the territorial
limits of BUYER, and TEN THOUSAND THREE HUNDRED FORTY
FOUR DOLLARS AND N0/100 ($10,344.oo) from proceeds
collected by BUYER from sewer Assessment District
No. 6 for certain sewer capacity rights. Upon pay~
ment of the purchase price title to said sewerage
facilities and appurtenances shall pass to BUYER."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF the parties hereto caused the names and
seals of the public corporations and the names of the officers thereof
to be subscribed hereto the day and year first hereinabove written.
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
Agenda Item No. 6 ----B.:. .. :·
CITY OF ORANGE, a municipal
corporation
By Mayor
By __ ~--~--~~----~~--~~----C it y Clerk
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
of Orange County, California, a
public corporation
By--::-:-~~--~=-~~~~~~------~ Chairman, Board of Directors
By__,,~--~~---=---~~~~----:-------Se c re tary, Board of Directors
District No. 7
l l h I ( f ' I f " ii 1
• f l H :: 11 ----·•I I ' ~ .. -·-. r:1 1~ -· '. ~ r1 ~l ~ w I f, I I I r, •..
ll.:J ;j tj, ill f'. 1111
..cL:! L.J ti.J lJ
!~
~ ~
I °' CJl
!
~
~
e
1 :;;
1
1
c
---
• :r j: ~
tLl
•:t f., :
lL]
r .,, , .. j' I 11 ·j_ :··~--. _ ,_
' ' ~. ' !, lb "I 'ljjj dlil ; l•
0
0
i
c
f ST
~I
m
,.,. '100
~ -
·-····--·-·. ··-· ·····-'·-··---'·-.. -------· ... / ·-·-.. --·· ... --···-.... ·-·-· ... -· -·-·-·-
···"'' ".
f
I r
f ,
i
{
!
i
t .
t
t.
I
l
'
e~v;.:~...,...,·,,.-....... ~.-------:.....,-----VI i' .; · •~··'I('' • · -• · ' · ~ ~-..... .--r.:•· .,t..,*( ~~ . ""'.)I; .:·· : . ·vlj'IJ ,;./tr. ;-, :··!... · .Scaf~-· t :::JOO · :·· . · · . -~
U.-. ~-•J :..---~ • . • . ' ',.; . .' :0::· ~ (I. i,: ~ . ; ~ . •. • . . >. • .. . . ;_.., • :' "': . -'. • • .,.......... .• ~ . . l .
, ~ • .,,. • I ... ; 1
• ' (; f~•J ,•,/""' • 0:• '· ". , •• • -• \• I • • ~ -_;. • ._,.' '., •-f C'?...:-;:. ~ 'C>tlA'-s..·!... : . ~ i . ~ . ii'f'r/" . · .. < '/. :: . _: ·.. ··, .. -i""etz / :·-.. ·. . . ; ' . l
ti .. -." .... :.::~= ·_,; -. ... " ..... tt 1' : ... ·. tj}{~litl/'.:.-:! .· ... ;:;::~·-::= .~·~ ... /~ ..... ·_:. :-1,..t..{ /~"· ...... -.. -. ·' ·'{
. . . . . .. _ t~:i..:f~ . llJ' ..• ~··.. . L.0 C-l' -·~-· .. " "··: ----· . -->··:·. : .·1"Ff>. -·-· -·--
... ,.,;.J · ..... :--:-· · _._ ... ;-:.: · · ·· ::.-. ,... ~ ... r;, !!.'! ~ SEE DETAii-· B ,, ,.i_I'-··.~. • ~ • . • , .... ·.·-.. ;.·· . ._ .... ·;; ~ : .
r>~ ... ~~ ... ~~~-~· ... · -~--... ~ . I · · .... ·· . V,f.!;~1 //J ... -:' .. _ ~ · ....... ~ ........ -oV .. ~--_. . .:.·. ·: _ .... _ -.......... _·::--~:· _ ..
.•• '1,L'J°. -. '".'J.:-~· .. _,.,-:-.. -··:· • .;:•:-:·--.· .. ··-0
• .-.. •• ,(j"'7f// .·. · BELOW .. --(At.."'· .. -. : ",/;." ........ · •. -.. ·· :.-':: · .. -.: ;~. ,,-~ .-'-.
"',.,:-:1 .:• ' i-':>: L;· .· ~'<~ · '.\ ',' ·;.:/·,: .: : :: , : , '· . · If' 'IL ~ · . :: : · . -,. !!. ..,.~ · · ·: -: .. , . · ... : .. '· ::. ;--: ·: -: :<> ;_ 0" • f. ~--' ~: · ,, : . ;. : ._.~.,., ""·-"···· '· '·•·.-·· . .;.., .· .. ,!' ·#99"A~'4.tW. .• l .... 4.0.c..h'et.=.· 5.,,.AVE:-· 0.:· .. ~.:"r --~: ..• : .-.-., .... _, ··~ •• ;_.-!,. ~.-_.
· ...-Z:Y'../AG£.f 7'1T'l~~.T'~' •:.. -/ ! lfl ;.;~-· .i,ltJ, '. · 'Y,;__:-PO/:/\/~
'· '·" • --. --. , . . j • ;-·'. .-?;c:·:: :::~.: ?e:/~''.c.( :.,
'.9'/0"H/. ~c.&~s. 1.: .. <o · • . .,-. ~ ..
'ZG' R~c.:~_:. : ."· .: . . .· '::. ~'..-;_!. ·'
]~~~f 1:s~§~I":'.i\
' . .:'._~:~j~~ :-,/,'.;_~: . : . t ' .. ~:: : : • . >
::-: ·lf.-~SE~;~'(::·;L;:~~~~~~-:--~:~ .. o:«~~":_·=;.:--. ~~<-::_<:·_ ... ~/:·~)~,,--~:~::::_ · ·:1:
,~--~~:_-· 0-#'-!!~~~~-~.:.~.?~~~~: . .. . ' . .' ··~./~ .• .· · · ·.. AVeN{JE .. ~ .. ,'.. ·.I·-· I .· . -:---....a;s 7' ~--;,._ .. · .. · ... '· . . .338.10' . . . 7" >"-?>r..... . . IS--'-:-. . a--,.· . .-·, .J
, ._"tl:\r~;'.:_-~:···_~t~\_.,:'.·U:'.:_: ... -._-__ ·,::,~~~~1!ff i;E;~.f <~~-----... _;_:_·-_:••D::,;,?/t:::.-:-.:~;•-~·· __ ; .. '. .... ;_:t
I' (!-1 .~ .. -· .. ··.: ..... ~'\' c;G~ ... j~/"" .. fAt.t.· ·. -1. ~ .. ···-·. ·""· ... ' .. --· .. · I
I
i -"ttJ'(~~ .. '.·.~-:<:~:<:~:_~.'.:~·._/\:", ·. _;:~. ~ ;P . ·. ·. cfo!1 ·~ ·; '". . ·1.i ·_·'J;.-, .. __ ·.··:<-.·~~> ·:-.. _: ..... >·'_ ·.··::. ;-: <: .. _.)·; ~-· ... . ;
• • •. ~;'.··:. •. -...\., .. · ....... : • ./~/ ............ _:......./" ~· A j.H~:" • ·1! '-..."'~.:·~ ... , • ·;. : .. • .... ;-,•· ...... _·. " ....... -·::· . .-·1
I • .·: · .. ~'lo.· ' • '• _.." ~ ,,, ~..Jfl"' ~ ",·· f,. ... ~ ·.• . . , ·; .. ·· .-.. · .. •·";'• . .'•: ·.· . .,, .. : .. _. .. i·
I
-..... ~ ~~ ~ ,,.,., ~ ~ ,. . ..... .. . ' -. . -. -, ' ' ' ' · 1 • -~ ' • ~·_.. ... ,I ,.,,..,... r•"' ;(I • ' • ;. ' • • ' < • ~ :•' • ' '' -'. •• '_. • • .'" • • • ~ ... •, • •
·::< ·<:··-<-1-·: '\\'._,:> -·. -~ •:y\t.i;!..~)fb.<Q ..... t : AQUISITION rRACi"
I
.. .<:< .. ·:; ...... ··~:.:,-.. ~ ·:.;: ,:_,'_:_.· -. "\~-· ~-. 'pf!.!!J.-<-: ,J/1t~ ,· ~ : .. ~ . ~~ . . .. ..
. ·-:::: ,-·; ·• ~_.:;· : .... _.,. ·· ·· · ... · \ \ -". ~-. 0P_9..1---:--. ... .. . . -· · J: ~· ~ . . . . ~-LA/VO' Ov</A-'E R ·,.' .. 1 _· .. ··.a
l ~ ·":-".::.-.:·; ·:-:·;: ..... ::-~-·~<:~.~~· ;_. ·:::: ·.·\. ·--~.~-!~,· .-. '.. ·>-.... _ ·._· ~ .. , ~ .:~ ... ',.. ... . ---. -·--~~~-· .. _. __ ._
I .-.:··.·.·.'.· ..... :-·.·' ; .. -·.1\~ \.\ . ._ ·· . .-·:." ... • .· · :.-., El· .,,;:<nfo.,-,-::Borcho.-0'& .. ·.I .:1.-r· ·:· · .. :~.~-"'·:· .. : -.· ·. :_-. ..: · .. ·~· ' ·. _·.· ~ ·..' ·.· . .' .:·, J / "' . · ··~nno 8or&hard· ·.'. ·· :i.&:
I
.·:·:"·~<·.~ ':'·::,-::·" .. >·:···.-· .. >>:.: J.J0-~· ~-':.~\h 7 .:<.:·. ·: ~-~z;,.··: ' /' , .
1
,t.:;; ~ ... ' · .. ". · E z El.eo-;,;;;.. .Stanl~y Sl"'T?Olli.,;oodj. ~ ·.Ji~· .::< .. ·.::·>: · ·--::_..:-., -~1/-.> ... <·~~ ~\~ '. .·._ ;. · .. · .... : .· _ .. ~/.,.· ~: . "~/;-·,>-; . ~(er~·.·. :··~·~_""·.· __ ._"~~: .. ~:-{::""':.
• •' • · .,.·-· .. (/~/:.-.• · ·. \"t\ ~~ ... _ ._. I;;. ·. "l) . E.3 r;,-sf/yahona;.C.qn.t.·.-nS~·:""w-.4na t : ::,.r.: :·;·~_·,..:· .. ::.->· ·~~<,·.-:·.'_.:.:_,:.·;;~ .'.,: ~ .. ~~--"·· .. · ··_, · -.. ! ~: ::;:'· ·:·:._; :.-·· · ondC-:~..,~".c/O,..cn:~~ ._.-:: __ :·j~.B~
". ·. .. .. . . . (;4-:' .. _: ... .'.: .. .:.-. .. . ...... <!\~ \ • e 7 :: . ! ...... ; •: .. ·. '' ·-E 4 Chor/es .L ... Rondolpi·'T St.'::· > t > r~ <:! . ·iP-·<··.-. ;?,iJe\·<~·· .:.:· ... C\~\\\~ ,·:: ~ -l-:. · ~ ,~ •· . -F/oren<;:""e e: RPnefc.:>/_ah .. · .. :·:.:·I'·· etc · ..... q~<;;~~;,po ·: ~'_:-:. ~-.'.:>: .. : := .. ~---;~\\ ·/~.-· :;.~;·-.>.--. <" =1·· ._ :·. ~: ~:·.:-_..: · > · · es· . ·.s~~ ·:G,.;~~;.. :. ~·:. ~<· .~~~-~~;
"-'-. . --,. rJ (; . . ·--.• • .-. -• ~ / . . . I ~ . . .-. . . --. , --, _,. '· l °"
·_ .:.-~ .. ,, ~-··· ·· .... ·· . " _·:-:::\~. /.-1•-s•:-. · · ... a9t. A.J.G.-s/er & .. ,-.'. .... .;'·.:: . : " -,:/ . .' .. : .. :. >·>"~; >·:-... > ... ~.--·: ••.. ·: ·... _ · ... ~\ ::· -~ -,~--~-$>.: "'•,::.-.. _' .· . .,.. -·#:ary A. Gisler_~.··_. ____ _:_ .. ~~----~~
··· -, _ _.,::,·~->.~.\~:>.~;;~:.:.~>·;·.:·:'/.-:\.·>-.·::::::-.·::-· · . \~ .: \\\\·.r~. }~~-/:: .. ·>:'. .~·:.:· ··'>:-~ E.9_-._/C:rne~.-~ ~6,.i·_--··:·,..~;_ .. '.·::. \ -~;~
. . . . .. ,,_... .••. :_... ·,..,·11 . --. ' \ t I t, ·..... . ··. -. -.. ·-·-·------"""-. -r--· ,' . . . : " . . ...,, i:: , ,., ~ . 0 . . ~ . . . ' ' . •' ' ' . ·. . . .. ~.:.· . ·. sc:c/e·i--.r7oo· ·. \\\\~ /--~ · E/Oj Cc-.~.;,...,,.,.>,o.l"Oro:·-;qc ·-, : : .. :
:: ·-.· ·:·· .. f:·:\ .. ~-.. ~~ .. > .. ·-:<·:·.:~-" Pon.:7-"·e·~.:.\':'~~1 :/· .. ::}-'... "~~···· ~-"7'r--::-·:-~·.:.~-·--:-::--·--~~----------~----~-. .. · . . ·•· . ' · · · . · . · '. -.._ \ \1-1 t' l_e IJ • . c.a~-,-,_ / O/ Ur.;,r; ge · . . _. :~ ·: ·::. · ; . . . _. · . . . · . ·~~ :~f ?S.t'. L-"~; .. ,, r 2 ~ · ·. · -/~-t .. ~'. ".~-~:~ ,. :.~:·.;:,~ :.~~ ·=~_:___ ~ _L __
. ..
. . . .
June 30, 1966
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
. PROPOSED BUDGET FOR .
1966-1967 FISCAL YEAR
Fiscal Year
65-66
Fiscal Year ~ \,~,a.it.r.
. • 66-67 · ,~t,1-loO I
GENERAL SUl'-'TIVIARY:
Total Requirements:
Operating Fund
Bonds 1951 Fund
Bonds 1962 Fund
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Construction Fund
Facilities· Revolving Fund
Total Requirements
Funds Available July 1, 1966
and Anticipated Revenue from
Sources Other Than Taxe.s
DISTRICT 1 S REQUIREMENTS· TO BE
RAISED BY.TAXES
Tax ~ate:
Ope:--a ting ~u.nd
Bonds 1951 Fund
5onds 1962 Fund
Acc·~~ulated Capital Outlay Fund
Fixed Obligation Fund
Total
$ 294,779.
37,796.
274,999.
614,984.
i5, 000.
75,037.
341,559.
$1, 654, 154'.
$1, 066) 745.
$ 587,409.
Tax Rate
65-66
.1167
$ 332,670.
37, 308.
284,914.
670,783.
15, 500.
95,601.
-367, 225.
$1,169,114.
$ 634,?87.
Tax Rate
66-67
Estimated*
(oC. ... lo1
A-t.'NA\-
. ''~"' .1259
.0138 . ,Olo'J .0153
.1494 .1437 .1?.''l .2039 . ''°" , ,... ... 5 . ·~::'.'
.0064 • oo.r6 .0080
.• 4902 • Lf .,...,y .4884
*T~e estimated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed.
Valua~ion of $137,000,000. ($130,000,000. 5% Delinquency Factor)
Ac\uJ\\ li\b(:. ... b1 ksc;ee.c;~b VA-\-uC ,~~.~,u-ro
~s·" t) '~ <>1 • fa.i JrJ<e~A~ 1~1 crw o-o-o / -t".' . 1 ~I a1j"'t) ' a-cJ"'l)
-1-
3o<=J,o~c
3G:t, ii..\
J-q1, '1f'1
'6l.Co, 130
1~1 ~OcJ
14" ,~\ 1.
'+1i, t'f <1
l,1J4,~3 I
U;9,bf{
• ot;OI
.o \2.0
',,_,9
.• "l..0'1 "{
, OO~l-"
• ~'fS"2-
.·
\wl'
COUNTY SANITATION DIST~ICT NO. 7
Approved
Bud(')'et Proposed ?.., e\,IA,N/\V'/
Budget ~\le).
65-66 (1) 66-67 (1)
One~ating Fu~d Sum~ary: (65-66 Expenditures:. $155,523.)
Sala~ies and Wages
Maintenance and Operation
U~appropriated Reserve
Total
Aut~orized General Reserve
Total Requirements
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investments, July 1
Delinquent Taxes
Interest
Receivable f~om Assessment
Districts
Misc. Income
Receivable from Construction Fund
Total
A~OUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES
,I, 21"" 5,... ~ o> oO. 1,....8 ~ ,.... 0 ) ..... 5;::J.
20,000.
$21.5)119.
78,260.
$293>379.
46,037.
2:1500.
3:1000.
89:1441.
5,000.
-0-
$145)978.
§147,401.
Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund: (65-66 Expenditures:
Treat~ent Plant Expansion
. Acq~isit~on of Facilities from
. Ci~y of Santa Ana (Portions
of 7-5-a)
?ay~ent Due Costa Xesa San. Dist.
Sewerc..ge ~acili.cies) Improv.eme.:::ts
?urchase of Equity i~ Joint· Works
Tax Collection Expense -ACO Fund
Less: Cash and ~evenue
Cash & Investments> July l
Delino~ent Taxes·
7·""-!-e·r·e-... ._ ...... v -;:)IJ
Total
• =-.:·-:Oli~T 0::0 BE RAISED BY TAXES
·~.:$390' 780.
84:1954.
1 I'" 2-0 ...... o' '.:> •
115,000.
·7' 000.
1,000.
$614,984.
351)894.
6,000.
7,000 .
$364,894.
$_250, 090 .
$ 2,... c;:c 0>..100.
195)220.
20,000.
•$241)780.
90,890.
$332,670.
116:1374.
3:1500.
2,000.
42,302.
5,000.
-0-
$169,176.
$163,494.
$215,634.)
$508,533.
-0-
1,... 2-0 ..i..O, '.) •
60,000.
85) 000.
1, 000.
$670,783.
400,565.
8,000.
8,000.
$416,565.
$254,218.
(:.) S2e ?aze 5 ~o~ Actual 65-66 Operating Fund Expenditures and
Cp8rat~ng Fund detail for 66-67.
-2-
2.~ 0-0-0 I fbl)iOO
2-ol oo 0
2.\ ).,100
. q~,5{0
30~ o{O I
r~~,o-tro
10. ()1)0
(,,~
) &°I C1"V'O ,
.=::a, 0-U-0
'13,eoo
>st. a{c I
. ·I b,,..~o
1~ 0-0-0
~i.~Dc)
JI f;-<jU.
&"1~ r3o
tl4o,~
. 11'-~ I
JO,ov-o
~l'Y,~
3>~.J'?>u
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
Appr·oved
Budget ,,...,.... ,,...,,...
0'.:)-00
Fixed Obl~.0.:a tion Fund Summa:c·y: (65-66 Expenditures: $10,492.)
Total rt0quirements
Less: C&sn end Revenue
Cas~ on Hand, July 1
I~~eras~ & Misc. Income
:Ueiinql.:ent Taxes
Total
L~,552.
400.
L~oo.
$ 5)352.
~~6L~8.!..
1951 3ond .:fund Su~n:ary: ( 65-66 Expenditures: $20 ,_ 918. )
Principal on 1951 Bonds
In.teres"C
':i:otal
Authorized General Reserve
Less: Cash and Revenue
Cash & Investrr.ents, July l
::Lr .. ter·est
Delinquent Taxes
Total
Ar/l00::\1::1 r::o BE RAISE:!) BY TAY.ES
$
$
$
$
$
13,000.
7,918.
20,918.
16,878.
37,796.
"16 861.L .,._ , ..
200.
700.
-7 7,,...4 .LI ) Q •
20)032.
(
,,...,..... ,,...~ ":""> • J-. o~-oo ~xpenai~ures: $184 ;015.)
?rinc~pal on 1962 Bonds
Total
Aut~orized Ge~eral neserve
~o~al Requirexents
~eSS: Cas~ anc Revenue
0as~ & I~vest~e~ts> July l
:C2:.. ::.r-~q_·.;...::r. t ir·c..xe s
Ir-.:."'cE::r·e st
Tot;al
A~r.ou:,!T ~·o :SE RAISED BY TAXES
..... -::>-
$ 50,000.
i 3LL 01 5 -. ) -.
$184)015.
ao 9Qll. '::J ' v ' •
$274,999,
88 '"'?It '.)-..,..
5,000.
. 2,000.
$ ' 95) 32l~.
4·J 7c 67r:. •1>.. _-;)) '.) •
4 ~2~ ) ...J ..J •
400. 4co.
$ 5)123.
$ 10,377.
$ 13,000.
7,593.
$ 20,593.
-,,... T5 .LO' I ..!.. •
$ 37,308.
16,474.
200.
700.
$ 17,374.
$ 19,934.
$ 60,000. ., 31 ,....l.!.o .L ...... ) 0 ..:......_:..
$191)640.
93,274.
$284,914.
9'"' o-'"' u, '.)v.
6,000.
2,000 .
s 98,050.
_.,_ 81'" 8,,...1.!. ~l o,\.,.o .•
1.{,~oo
~ O'"trQ
lfoo
t;zo~
Cf,?ou
13,6-0'"o
1, 1...b6'
'J.-0, v<, ~
l&,{{3
3b,~~ J
/71 /:>O0
j.oo
.If,~
I~ Ot..1
---'--
°8'D I CrfTO
li!i, 7'10
2.o~-,q 0
qo c;qtf
'
?11110{
r.{', H-0
10,~
3,o-o-o
} Ui WU
fC, 1,1~~
P..~; pr·o\J'ec
3-..:.cget
~-,,.-,,-0'.)-00
?:c·c~..1CZE.:d
~,.~_d[~E:t
66-67
Expe~di tur·es: S',.... 0,-.1, \ . .? ) ":)'-. • )
Sewage 7acilities Cons~ruction
Less: Cs.sh 2~::1.C. Revenue
To ... cal
;-.-..~ _v B~ RAISED BY TAXES
Sewerage Facilities Extensions
I.ass:
C2s:: & I~.;.vcs·trr~e:'lt,s;i July l
~ra~sfer fro~ ~istrict
Opera-ci~g F'Ll.nd. f o-r-"'~ <.Ht-,1~C.~s
AMOuN~ TO 3E·RAISED BY TAXES
,. 7-,-,-. ,.,
'! 'J' Uj r •
.,l.·3JJ..-,.--9 y . .L,J.? •
40,000.
s -0--·-·-·
,, I\
S.c..H€'°D U\, \::' c... .
F1 f\JA tJ c. it-JG:. A-s Pot.. \...c .... ~ S ',
'D 'ST ~ 1 ri~c J ~ + \ ~ s ee \i () l \J It~ q i::u N d
UN~N ltJM. hPvt> J {\J,_ .. J~ IC\~~.-61
ESY'~ ~U)J~S, AV,~\\~,~\<' ~VoM lC\~\-~'l
Dr sr .; -l AccuM 0 \A~(' J
UuPf\S.(l\J,'V\ \x--v e ~
CAr, 4,,, \ o.., ~\A 1 Fu"'~
~utv l~ t'H.( ,.~ 1 ·
-Li--
LJ( GOO
I I
,.. -v-
$367,225 .
327)225.
. 40 ~COG.
$ -0-
~300 ()OQ
J
~o 1 oo o
J!'ooo
I
'f-f 't, lt'i"
bo,ooo
'126 > IC/1
• ('t
COuNTY SANITA?ION DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING Fu1~D EXPENDITURES
,.._ ,..,,..
o~-oo
.Actual (1)
Direc~ors
En:ployees
Total
Mainte~ance a~d Oneration:
District Sh&re of Joint Operating
Directors: Mileage
Bo~c Collection Expense
Co~nection Charge Administration
E~ployees 1 Mileage
Xa:..:1. --ce:::anc e Ex:?ense
Utilities Expense
Inter·est Expense
S~pplies, .3lueprints, Legal Ads
?rof essior.al Services
Tra:'.1sfer to Facilities
:.qevolvi:'.1g Fur.d
:r.ter-District Sewer Use Charges
Tax Collection Expense, Operating
Total
ir·otal Q & w, ¥ &·c u ...
Unapprop~:..ated Reserve
'I'OTA:G O?ERATING
c 2, 750. y
20,294.
$ 23·, 044.
$· 64,292. ..
127.
67.
12,727. ·:,o4o.
2,.... l.Li3 0) I..... •
6 l.!." 8 ) . j •
1,648.
i,583.
16,166.
-0-
1,629.
Fund 349.
$132,479.
$155,523.
-0-
§155,523 '
66-67 b1-b6
Estimated ?r-~\'"""M"''
$ ·3,600. · 3/oo o
22,960. 2.1 ' y. () <.)
$ 26,560. l-~ 0-0-0
$ 84,620. '1{1 Coou
200. ~-o
100. IC o
9,000. 'Ji 0-0-0 1,500. 1 1~00
27,000. ':2-1, o-rr:> . 7,000. -,, OirV
3,700. 3,toc
2,000. J,&iu
17,500. "'l-0,~
40, 000. (2) -e,-
2,000. 2,(]T-J
600. be> t)
$195,220. I f,'7 1 7Do
$221,780. fOf "l.1 /Dc
20,000. :i.'1 ov~
$241, 780. J,/J,,1 7o<.
(2) ~e~ur~ funds used to finance Assessment Districts, to the
~ac~li~ies Revolving FuDd o: the District.
-5-
Agenda Item No. ~ <
BOYLE and LOWRY
ConsuZti?ig Engineers, A Joint Venture of
BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
Apri I 26, 1967
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County ....
Post Office B9x. 517 5
Fo~!ltairr-Valley, California
Gentlemen:
P. O. Box 178
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telephone 547-4471
Pursuant to your instructions at the regular meeting of April 12, 1967, we have
made additional studies on extending the Gisler Trunk sewer from the College
Avenue Pumping Station to Treatment Plant No. l.
Fou,r different systems have been investigated and cost estimates prepared for
each one. Cost estimates include construction, engineering, surveying, con-
struction inspection, and contingencies. The systems are as fol lows:
1. A 1300' ± 20 11 force main in Gisler Avenue to run from the
pumping station crossing Harbor Boulevard and discharge into
a 33 11 gravity sewer which extends along Gisler Avenue to
Gibraltar Avenue, then north to California Street to the
existing District easement, and along the easement to connect
with the existing 39 11 sewer which crosses under the Santa Ana
River. Estimated cost -$300,000. This is the system on which
a verbal report was given at the regular meeting of Apri I 12,
1967.
2. A 27 11 force main from the pumping station to the 39 11 sewer
which crosses the river along the same route as system (1).
Estimated cost -$263,000.
3. A 27 11 force main from the pumping station, along Gisler Avenue,
crossing over the Greenvi I le-Banning flood control channel and
under the Santa Ana River to the west side and connect to the
48" inter-plant line. Estimated cost -$284,000.
4. Modify existing pumps and motors to produce higher head at
2500 gpm pump capacity in order to utilize smaller 24 11 force
main between pumping station and point of discharge at 39 11
river crossing. Same route as system (1). Estimated cost -
$294,000.
Board of Di rectors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
April 26, 1967
Page Three
h. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible
plates of the specifications for the District's use in preparing
the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distribution
to prospective bidders, etc.
i. Assist District in securing bids, tabulafion and analysis of bid
results, and in letting of contract.
i. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the
contractor.
k. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction.
I:.. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections and
correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and speci-
fications.
m. Furnish periodic observations of construction work in progress
and provide appropriate reports to the District.
n. Furnish a final inspection and report of the completed project
with a representative of the District.
o. Prepare and record drawings (11 as-constructed 11
) when the con-
struction work has been completed and accepted by the District.
This shall mean the original tracings 'of the plans wil I be modified,
if necessary, because of deviations from the original work. When
District staff construction inspection is employed, modifications to
the original tracings wi II be based upon information supplied
Engineer by District. The original tracings after being modified
shal I become District property.
We propose to provide these services for a lump sum fee of $15,280. The time and
method of payment for our services is to be mutually agreed upon.
There will be field surveys required in order to prepare the plans and specifications.
These surveys will include taking topography and culture within the project limits.
We propose that al I fie Id surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem
basis. Our current per diem rate for surveying services, $32 per hour for a three-man
survey party. The total cost for this work shou Id not exceed $1 , 500.
This particular area of the county is noted for unstable soi Is conditions. It is recom-
mended that a competent recognized soils mechanics firm be employed by the District
for subsurface soi Is investigations and tests. It is also recommended that we draw up
the criteria and specifications for the investigations and tests and assist your general
manager in selecting a suitable firm.
Board of Di rectors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
Apri I 26, 1967
Page Three
h. Deliver the original tracings of the plans and reproducible
plates of the specifications for the District's use in preparing
the necessary number of copies for record purposes, distribution
to prospective bidders, etc.
i. Assist District in securing bids, tabula!ion and analysis of bid
results, and in letting of contract.
i. Check shop and working drawings as may be submitted by the
con tr actor.
k. Furnish consultation and advice to the District during construction.
I:.. Review laboratory reports on material tests and inspections and
correlate such reports with the intention of the plans and speci-
fications.
m. Furnish periodic observations of construction work in progress
and provide appropriate reports to the District ..
n. Furnish a final inspection and report of the completed proiect
with a representative of the District.
o. Prepare and record drawings (11 as-constructed 11
) when the con-
struction work has been completed and accepted by the District.
This shall mean the original tracings ·of the plans will be modified,
if necessary, because of deviations from the original work. When
District staff construction inspection is employed, modifications to
the original tracings wi II be based upon information supplied
Engineer by District. The original tracings after being modified
shal I become District property.
We propose to provide these services for a lump sum fee of $15,280. The time and
method of payment for our services is to be mutually agreed upon.
There wi 11 be field surveys required in order to prepare the plans and specifications.
These surveys wi II include taking topography and cu I tu re within the proiect limits.
We propose that al I fie Id surveys necessary for design be performed on a per diem
basis. Our current per diem rate for surveying services, $32 per hour for a three-man
survey party. The total cost for this work shou Id not exceed $1 , 500.
This particular area of the county is noted for unstable soils conditions. It is recom-
mended that a competent recognized soils mechanics firm be employed by the District
for subsurface soi ls investigations and tests. It is also recommended that we draw up
the criteria and specifications for the investigations and tests and assist your general
manager in selecting a suitable firm.
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County
Apri I 26, 1967
Page Four
In the event you wish to employ our firm for inspection and construction stakin~
during the course of construction work, we wil I provide on inspector at $8. 00/hour
and a three-man survey party at the hourly rate quoted herein.
If this proposal meets with your approval, we are prepared to proceed immediately
with the work.
Very truly yours,
BOYLE and LOWRY
/)
0 J'•H .. / V'/ I i /2 /./, (] l'~l~ /L l.tUW/f-c'7t..t!; -i~ Jv J
Conrad Hohener, Jr., C. E. l 0951
pp
41-:8325-21-00
cc: Lowry and Associates
I: r
·~-' fu f ' )?' t ' '£•• •·+ i +d •1 ••-,t '#"" c'etrW ra..• '>'teec't u =new• •a )We ,.g ,·y;·10 G tb• P' '>4"11..-# ''r' ,..,:.._W".4.1 :•)\'+f'•.,, .. )'@f~'-d ft * i'ilito..L
-·,d -;-r -
~:~ 1 -c
I
::..·!~=_=-.-:~
~~;~
~....:..~
~ ........... ~J
'"-"-~..,,
-~.·d
-,~,.,~
;:~~
~~~~
~~
!:...-=a:;~J ..
~--=-
=--~11 -_ ......... ~~~
~j
=-~h'l.-.Jl
I
~~
~...=,
·-~~~
'
\
-~1
.~·-;;j
~s . -. , •
... < ~
21 1 A
•1~
C.H ~
-:.'1
. \tj\ ~
1
2 \ ij c. I . ELL!S ;I....
1
AV1. -. _7 £ »'.'"~
.. 5
13
:::.:in:::.CJ:21tJ••m.r ----·--· .. -·-···
E
:1 l F
I
H;l;U111H>W AV
I,
J I I ·AN ~A i I
t:I I ,,. • 2cho: _•1..92.
: ,,..
!{
i 1 1 ~ ~ER ! AV g ___________ L------------~--
1 I w r
---~~+--i-----+-------~-. ~l I g I
·1 J_ 6 _ WAKE HAM_._ L~v
rt; ----.••• --·
u
1
4
\,
:1
I!
il , .
i l ,,
,!
•I
.j
I • •1 '
,,
I . '
•I
I
• !
. I
I
I •
i' :.,
;
j I
·1.
r i
I I
! i
)
-----.... -.---·"'---·~--... ---·--·-·-~·----··------..... _._ -·-·-..... -··----· ... ·-·-----
r-
f,;
I r·
L
>.
1 ..
(\
.· .. : ..... ~ . . .•· . ".. . .. -... _.-_, ·. . ·.·· _ ... ".•, ... -' .. ; .... ~ :· f: ~ . . .. ~. . (, \ x . . . . ·•"·;J~ I -. . l.•Z/ ~,-:• ~;I _.,,.,,, .. -~ ,· ... -;.J. l:Ji"".db'-' ET~ V'/l.rl.i'?S" .
:· .. ':··"-:.:·>.:-.~~-.:. ~:._. _ _:./:">L--~::··~-. ,·· __ ,·.; ·'. .::·...,:..' 1· :·~:·~ -:·-·/.1 ,1 \\.\" -~ .·> -;-.~ '1f ;i/f_....14. · : .. ~-~-"··.:-:·:·>1:?~';...t.nO ...LN10~ . · · ··-· .. , . ·-...... " . -· "' -.. ··· : '. ~ -" · ··-~ : : · · . .. · I: '' _..-"'/ft'l-,~t s · /11 .,.-: J · t . · ·. . · · · .~..JIJ(nO.:;J .=!S>NV,:.
~ ... . ..... ; .... _:-·._·:--:. .. ·,._.·-... ·-:·":. -
\. .. :.·"./ ~1yJd ... : .... _ .-~ ....... ---.. ".·.·.:rt~ If"} "• I '?I·. ·~1:-r.:1••-..••-..-.-.-~~~
t°:'.' -~--~< ~~--::·· .. ··. ·7~~~5 .-.. .-_ ~:~.·~ .. :-:~._'/'/~ .. ;~·-~:,:~--~\~-.--<·:·(~:b;fJ\~;fl -.'. ,_. i. ~-: -~~-_· .. ~·;::;·;~·~"· >"_.·~:·· .t~
i ... -.. · .: . ; -~ -2:i • :--.... ·'; . . .·. ·• -, -·: .~ .. : · .. ;: ~-.. -~' k'""' 1 f)~ : · ... • .. r b ~-, ~'rue. -:f,,._;;:"1-s::>
! -. -...... ~--. -..... -·:.---'-.· .. ..· ....... -:-·.,; ... ;. ~,t:.iti.-;':-~··~ .•. :-· .. tr~-. -... : -4 , C,.;
-_;.,--. ,001::;.1.-0110::7.S .. ;_ •. ..:. .. l'tt,~1;'1.,j,. .. ·;-.-:_< ... -. i' ~ .. 6":?-6'ft ·····:··;~·-:-~:-~
• ) _/. . . .,... .., f\ ............... ~~-~---~~;:: ... ....!;;~~~~
EXCERPTS FROM MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
(OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFO~flA)
An adjourned regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 (of Orange County, California), was held
at 7:00 p.m., April c.6-196_1_ at 10844 Ellis Avenue~
Fountain Valleyt California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at_..7.;~o.o._.._p_._m_. ______________ .
The roll was called and a quorum of the Board was reported present,
Directors present: Cl if tor: C. Miller {Cha 1 rman), Al Forgi i.:_,
Thomas McMichael, Rex A. Parks; Ellis N. PorLer,
and David L. Baker
Directors abs~nt: None
Present: Fred A, Harper• Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT NO. 7
ADJOURNMENT
Moved, seconded and duly
carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County San:.tation Distr1c .. No. 7 se adjourr.ed to
5:30 p.m.,, April 27, 1967'., in he District's office
at 10844 Ellis Avenue~ Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman then declared the meetine_ so adjourned
at 9:45 p.m., April ~6, 1Q67.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) SS,
I, FRED A. HARPER 1 Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. ? (of Orange County, California),
do hereby certify the above and""fO'regoing to be full~ true and
correct copy of minute entries on recprd taken from the minutes of
the meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No, 7 (of Orange County• California), on the ·>6th day of Aprj J ,
196'-'f:"
---IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No.J._this ·-~6 tb
day of April ~ 196..1_.
Secretary, Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No • ..1_.
P.genda Item No.--..~tf"'"-_ ........
-.
April 26, 1967
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
P. O. BOX 5175
10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
Attached are copies of protest letters received as of
5:00 p.m., April 26th; and formal letters of reply to several
· protestants.
RE:
April 14, 1967
11362 Church Street
Orange, California
BEFORE THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No.· 7
OF ORANG£ COUNTY
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7;
Modified by Resolution No. 66-51-7; and
also Modified by Resolution No. 67-4-7;
IN THE MATTER OF: "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6"
Description of Property:
Assessment No. M.Frazier's 2nd Addition Block B
36 to Modena
Lot s, together with portion of
abandoned street adjoining on north.
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that a Protest and/or an
Appeal is made for the $735,92 cost 'of putting in 24-feet
of sewer pipe in front of my house. I believe that a
re-eva.luation should be made on this amount. I am perfectly
willing to pay for the cost of the pipe and the labor involved;
hoY?ever,. I can ·not possibly conceive that 24-fee·t of pipe and
the i·abor involved can come to $73 5. 92 ! My home is at the end
of the ·block where the construction crew started the line. Th.is
line came in on a diagonal just a.few feet from my driveway·
. .
and i'n no.way· did the pipe traverse the·frontage of my.lot as
it·' certainly had .to do· in .. continuity -for the houses that were
subsequently ~iped in down the block. In all fairness· I believe
that a re~estimate of this cha~ge is in order.
J/af P 5ia£er
1932 PARK SKYLINE ROAD
SANTA ANA {LEMON HEIGHTS\, CALIFORNIA 92705
. TELEPHONE 544-3958
a;C/v'vl I 11 / f t 7
;
#:-7
yi., : t?.z--u~~~ '?z,o·. f 0
:Ji_ c<--vh ;;i 1 i 1
X ~ ~ ~ /ltheF~r ti;M ;;2 ~, /rt t}
t{/~ r,/i~tf.· a~?~/~~~
J-rV'~~J, /?-/ 2//-uu ~/,lz~ 1 J(/ 1 /f ~ f S
. I ) ~ ~ ~J~ Mrf~ _L; ~: ~
~~~. W--e ~~cf' ~i.-~-4 ~--r'~~._/'L
._,{;" /(,--At .. ~vi/ ..A/~./1./ /vi . ,Nv?vo rJ ._,L....VJ.
..
·t:·
t&lk~~)
/h . ;/ ~ ·I
/ / t/z-:J. 0cuf. -{;~J4~flt.
I °I 8 ~ P~ }J~..:: .. (_ 12~ ..... f<.
r -1---r-i ~';, ~~(:>..-j&""-1 l_: U-~( I 7 d 7" ~
l Q
BOYLE aud LOWRY
Consulting Engineers, A Joint V cnture of
BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
April 24, 1967
Mrs. Hal Fisher
1932 Park Skyline Road
Santa Ana, California 92705
Dear Mrs. Fisher: County Sanitation District No. 7
Assessment District No. 6
P. 0. Box 178
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telephone 547-4471
Your letter dated April 17, 1967 to County Sanitation District No. 7 requests
information regarding the correctness of the tentative $745. 95 assessment against
. your lot located at the northeast comer of Grovemont Street and Tustin Avenue.
You also stated that you have not connected to the sewer.
The fact that you have not connected to the new house lateral constructed to
your front property I ine has no bearing on the amount of the assessment or of the
assessment itself. The new sewer has been constructed in Grovemont Street and
a house lateral has been constructed to the property line; thus, there is a benefit
to this lot whether or not it is used at the mome!1t. A sanitary sewer system can
be likened unto other public street improvements such as asphalt pavement, curbs,
gutters, sidewalks and street I ighting systems.
The tentative assessment against your lot is based upon an 81-1/2-foot lot width
times the front footage cost of $6.6789274 per foot of width, which equals
$~44.33 plus the house lateral benefit of $165.62 to wli ch has been added the
Orange County Treasurer's $36 bond handling charge, making a total assessment
of $745. 95.
We hope we have answered your letter satisfactorily, however, if you h·ave any
further questions do not hesitate to cal I.
Very truly yours,
BOYLE and LOWRY
Q,_J (l~,f'~
Carl A. Carlson, C. E. 6654
pp
41-895-06-oo
cc: :Vcounty Sanitation District No. 7
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper
Lowry and Associates.
Aprtl 18, 1967
Board of Dtrectors
County Sanitatton Dtstrtct #7
of Orange County
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Cal1forn1a
Gentlemen:
RE: Lot 11, Block B
Oge and Bond
Resolution #67-4-7
Please be advised that the above indicated tmproved property
was properly connected to the existing main sewer line on
Hewes Avenue tn·Aprtl of 19660
The sub-contractor on the job was Western Supply and Sewer or
Bellflower. The general contractor was Ronald V. Natton.,
Performance was 137 feet of 4 inch D.CoPo, 25 feet of 4 inch
cast tron, and 20 feet of 6 inch DoCoPo to do the job. An
assessment charge .of $175oOO, sewer permit of $5000, and street
repair charge of ~3lo00 paid to the county at that ttme.
I therefore appeal to the board to repeal the proposed assess-
ment charge as presented of $1,498070 on the above indlcated
property.
Slncer~ly, .. . .
··~. ,-··· .~._ ... ~ · .. "Ji(,i~£
·J ob.n S • Fe tka
BOYLE aud LOvVRY
Consulting E11giuecrs, A Joi11t V cuturc of
BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
April 24, 1967
Mr. John S. Feike
12082 Theta Road
Santa Ana, Calif9rnia 92705
Dear Mr. Feike County Sanitation District No. 7
Assessment District No. 6
P. O. Box 178
Santa Ana1 California 92702
Telephone 547-4471
County Sanitation District No. 7 has forwarded your letter doted Apri I 18,
1967 protesting the tentative assessment of $1, 4.98. 70 ogainst the property_
located at 11622 Hewes presently used as a mortuary.
About April or May, 1966, we were contacted by the general contractor,
Ronald V. Nation and also a representotive of the Mettler Funeral Home,
regarding the need for an early sewer connection to this property. At this
time we were certain that the Assessment District No. 6 sewer system would
be constructed. Included in this assessment district was the ~onstruction of
the sewer in the private rood along the north side of your property as wel I
as acquisition of capacity rights in the city of Orange sewer already in
existence in front of your property in Hewes Avenue. Since a corner lot is
usuol ly given a choice of sewer connection, we. reasoned that your prope.rty
cou Id be connected to the city of Orange sewer by Ronald V. Nation as
soon· as desired rather than wait several months for the assessment district
contractor to bui Id the lateral or connect to the new assessment district
sewer in the private street north of your property. Therefore, to al low early
occupancy and completion of building permit requirements for the remodeling
of the existing structure into a funeral home, we suggested to the county
bui !ding deportment, as wel I as County Sanitation District No. 7, that a
connection permit to the Hewes sewer be granted at that time. Thus, the
funeral home would not be involved with a special temporary permit for a
private disposal system and also would avoid the necessity to disturb the
new landscaping and yard paving that would be involved if the connection
were not allowed until such time as the Assessment District No. 6 contractor ·
arrived to do the work.
Based upon our suggestion to the building deportment and the County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, a permit for connection was taken .out by Ronald V.
Nation under A. K. Mettler, as applicant, on Moy 16,-l966. The $175
sewer permit fee paid at that time to County Sanitation District No. 7 is c;i
use connection charge based upon a connection fee schedule that~ is paid by
al I property owners at the time they use the pub Ii c sewer the first time. This
fee is collected whether the sewer· was built by a developer, installed as·
po"rt of an assessment district, or involves a connection to a trunk sewer .•
'
Mr. John S. Feike Apri I 24, 1 967
Page Two
This fee has absolutely nothing to do with paying for the construction cost
of a sewer. We assume that the $5 permit referred to in your letter is the
Orange County Building Department 1 s plumbing inspection fee to cover the
inspection of the abandonment of the existing private disposal system and
the construction of a new sewer pipe in private property.
In our telephone conversations with Ronald V. Nation and the representative
. of the Mettler Funeral Home, we were very careful to state that this property
would be subject to an assessment at the time of completion of all work in
Assessment District No. 6 regardless of whether or not the connection was
made to the sewer in Hewes or the sewer in the private street known as
Easement No. 1 in these proceedings. Your assessment was computed by
multiplying the 219 feet of frontage on the private street by the front-foot
cost unit price of $6.6789274 per front foot which totaled $1,462.70 to
which has been added the Orange County Treasurer's $36 bond handling
charge giving a total assessment of $1,498. 70. You were not assessed for
any laterals since your own contractor constructed the lateral to the sewer
in Hewes Avenue.
Your letter will be read at the protest hearing, however, we felt it advisable
to inform you of the detai Is in connection with your property prior to the
date of the hearing. If you hove any further questions, do nof hesitate to
coll.
Very truly yours,
. BOYLE and LOWRY
·-/l· t1 a /? r· l-A"~ .· ~c/c.~-
Corl A. Carlson, . C. E. · 6654
pp
"41-8435-06-00
cc: s-i'ounty Sanitation District No. 7
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper
Mr. C. Arthur Nisson, Jr.
Mr. Jack J. Rimel
Lowry and Associates
:/
·!
I
I
'·
~1 .,J.;!
Y(./hvl--t.£/J'f,[/-Z..,,,.;
~ . ~ ~7:t~ p _;?L,, --€-?~·~:?!_! ~~~L
. ·<::/ S?:<-••w ...h,.~~"?c»-u:;fj; .-d?> -/1·-r~:f ~-ZJIZ/ -4-/ ~ S/ p."
· DMPh:t~ SI "':~ Jh ;&~~)7_ 7 &?~cz, ~ rJ"~
.,,C:&?!~ '°/' ( .:z) -U .LP/ ...:::&-~ 4'--e~ .e'-42~. ~
~~v~e~ ~eJ Jcr"?t _,a;q ./c.a7 &J/~~i~~
~-~j~-t(j 4 S-~~7 -fl:b~e ~£ -~ -:~od,/ 7 ~/
__JcUI ~ 1u';~-d7 ~ Y Y -if/:~I. .12ahran ·~ rr$
A4 7/JJ!-i. -r -n~ <d-.0--/ .JL'rl~ __I).¢ a.;S~fU:.ul' .# :u 2 . -w-~~ o.A,,1,;±;,,._ 'fo:I-1 13.P~ B. ) rJ </-Yr+~~
.:# ~".1 lt.kq-~ ~ ..
St, ~d '/-11 #f ~ .£-12
c~ ~ 4 ?JD tr. . l3l«--f< B .
~ _Q,4 I ~(:--eJe 13 Ct.~.iu.n~,vJ d.b~i -:fL .~
~ ef -·1 rJ () _/) ~ d .... ~.,er ~ ''7 ~ '-f~ ~ C5 <::f:. (fV\.._ -X-o-f J;;5 ~rx.u ~l; :i
:J ~ 4'7l ~f ,~9 ._ 1~wr:~:? 2~. 2 -z1-rhe$-r ::;// ~/J1~1-~~ ~ ~ '°¥r: ~~~9-~'I
.,an au:~~cJ ~~~ YL J!l1 ~/1 .cm-~ ~/~
--IV't-~k_ .;::tfcr,41 a::-~~M,,,? ~c;3 _ 4Z ~p4u~ ..-Ju/
4'e1c-/j ..,,uC-6~~-w . , . .
$~ J ,o~t,/ _,UJ,zt/ ~ d~ ~ ~~ ~
~/ J ac-) ~-a ~zc/ ~ -.£e.-~r:tr J~ ~??-
.£(-t-Lc/ ;:c:u-'l;t..z-/ __;;dHt ,,aeeffu:,,iri
;l)j;;f/~~
'I:-
co
~
(,J •
0
-l . co
N
'5
{'\( -,..J
0
(I -l.
-rJ ·-t
(j) ~ c t:' <lJ
(lJ ~ ·• '> .c: ~
• s::::' 'l> -~ :g > OJ
r/) q:
"'1
~ tJ)
/°'-
(Q
~
'\ f -~s--
l..«1 .. ~1
.,
I
,..
I
·"'
)
l"r) -~ ...
~ 0
N ~ t!
"-:t-Q.J ~ 11 -;:1--'= ~ ~ ~ ~ c 0 ":>--;.J -;-..
:lJ t-=S: ~l ~ .-<:)I <); 41 ""ti -'= \J ti)"~ ~-1-'
Q.. <t ::> ti-:\ . 0 Q,;
~ ..,; 01 cx>~
<t ~'1.J-4-.> 9-
'.3-'=j..::.: f.-. 'J)
~41./
,I i...e\{~'(o.i.. \
I
.S ew-ev \\I"\ e
£a r //1 & 'tY\.
··.
(Jr.
st~
Ass~s;ne,1-l.
:i..to 3
~--/, B
Nas 1 da•eHi n~
-Lo s~v-v e J ~re.H"'-fro"--.\
sew er \ i "-E' ,
·)
~
~ >
~7/;z--/ /ZIC/~
~~v?T''.~
7;:
. . ,~~7~.Y .~~ u~
tf'~r r "'7i1-n-~ /:#fr ~uv ./ r?7UV-,~?~
~r ~U-'~ :.h~ ~;_::-,1-7r1~ r
·117~~/?r
..p2Zf77/~ 17/1-_;n~ /'/'pt,,7 ": 1'9.r ,rp ~-177~,:r
/::;JIV'-!f';Jzv.r 7C ;z.7-;?Z..7r fZ d~'"u.}P"..!P . .;17tp-r-d/_....
/tf'~rztr ~~·??F /' /_?W/?r r-7-u,p-' ~S'" ·~r?~1,,.,... 7-r f./2~;-~ r '''r"?-cl 7r /:r-~~ /fr~r I'
La?' 7/?!f? ~ ~?-~<;-7-f-<rz/'_:(,,,,.-~?_,. r _/?p.z..z,.W /r" ./77+;
.nev/?T;_?-~ a-#-.. ""'-W-,1u&?t<h:Jl>~ 7;e ffl..?-yf--rr-'7? -?r P' /;~/mv-''f:-~~ r.r.:rr-r/ '1'r-~JI.''r /: /7r
/~Y 7r-"7-,>7r-~7Y-~ #~:r /JL-tif<"fr?r;·;p-i
/$?-.1!'??/1.r /: -zr nu....., /~,,..7--'-P/ .,,.#-.. ~~r 11.:-:::1.71-... k:r--·-~f" t?n.~;o-~r ~ ;z:;-./7/7.:::: ?.?tY527-rz/:..... r ~<77 ...
/-~-77n:nt'!.9 :p;;z_-? ~; ·-rr."'7/:p-p:.--~'7?'? /~ipgr 7,r
rr.7_,:.?Z,Y-/.7" "~~· ~r""'-fL.7~--7z:'" ff°w~:r-~nr
~ /:9,p,.//" "'17,t:Z:-d-""i'V~ J'f},/.~-""7" . ~ 7 :f .f ~ & I -; .'H/f J
?~Yd~ ;/V/f",,~ ~ /.,,p T ·-;:r .g.d:~t'a:J • r-s-_f' #:-/71/71¢~0 }t-NJ47v ~ ~1~1-t:i'~
/-~ ~ / ~t? /~.,.,~V
Jf/CfJ /#~~ v~:J}
: "-~;;~lfl·?C-"crJ?..Y-. , If-
/ 7.;t!.-/z?1f-. (';r-----;rp ~ . . . .. 'Y ](~?;;. 71:r~ /vu-j;) --:~ t!~-7... ?'t-!-.-.;(J ~)">1-1 ~.Y/-"' _ r
7' ·U/ • (~
~
~
-~
....
. tlMd "I Aie~
e~ ,/rtuiut-W;-, ~-nt[J.?
108~1-<ff'~ ~
r~.,. v~, ~
/(Ja;vk,:
//();// J/).evdv t2av.
tJMMpi Clz4~ 9::<66 7 .
;{ 5 °!'~ 196 7
j) Cl?J1/ ~";; ~ hPiv ~ ~ Zo ,,(}~ # 7
~ au~ ilGtt/-t7J1.J l't.u //./?S . ..k;LA! ..6DZZe/
4 /(}()-/t2(} Al #~ /./~ P./ O~r&n~ / &¥--
t(J;yJ rv ~~ 771 {"-" r ~~ ~d;.c~
~ ~d-~; PNJ~ ¥ #tV ~/~;4
¥ stiu t:~ ~ a.j />..eMb ~ ~mu~~ ~ ~
~£,,,u .. ..&v~, ~-~ ~ niv~ ~
.ku),&-~;3 ~ .i'&-uZZ~ ht/ #iu ~~ ~nv th,L ~~L
if ~r-~g .V)U r-~~4 ~-14 ~ y(u
~<14d;-~ ~ ~ ~ ~P _,w.,./!ef~ ~ t?~.
/p
£w .a.d£tr.n
1
,w.u CVLU -M-a~a k-~ fl«/~ ·~ If #~ Lru-Jt!t~ ft tf.J Jtna-.J; s-ht a,. y~ ~ht~
ett!T~ ~~ref#; /'"fJicuv I ~ ~ .L<u
/Zlf~ ;d /l.C;du:~ ~ fe/' ~j r;,k; /Iii-~.;,~~~
Jl,r,~ ~lhv I» htU-V ~ 1~~-J.
tlflv'J'.c·fk~ ~ ~w ~ AJ-i?Av {){,//V Adh; ~
~~~~uLh~~~~:t
tJA£wip ,u;, ~u ;G ~ ,,d.~ ~~-Cliu1 ~
AJ~1M.,f ~f &WV £/~ {f ~ kdu~~ ¥ ~
~% ~µ;;./ ;z;!A.U ¥4 ~ ~ tlf ~ ~ ~
l,(}.ed-"/-~ ~k,,~ ~cifc,c/ ;fJAAuf ?/b'?f; rff~ ~T
eizrfhv ~ J fa.vf Jt/LU ~ ~ tLarv Ad~ k° #.ru
~4Pf /;?$./~ x/ker~
$v~~J-1~~<4t4~~~ ~
~ ~~~:; #t.u ~;j :· .
(j) .2)/\V;iw-o ~ ttfl.f.; ~ ~~ -£/~ ~ k &J41k~/
Wv~~
(2) ~ ~L M>_;f!iu/;J //~ 'f ~~ ~
., ~~~ k lW!Lu ~ ~-~,£ ~ -.dPM ~~.9··
d) tuu ./~ ac&Fdl., ~~ ~"';}-Cit~~ ~ -
~ ~ q_; t!P>uu~ tl.+.,tY~ ~~ ~'d..
'._/ l~.:Jk-l!M'~~ ~ ~1n<J~P ft~ r~
rJ _Aeudf ~
· ~n~~ ~ 1~ //£S &.el~
SPECIAL NOTICE
TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET
BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531,
541, 542, 543, 550 and 551).
Your assessments are lower than other assessments in Assessment District No.
6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer
in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3.00 per front-foot connec-
tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you will be
required i·o pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this
prior reimbursement agreement between the city of Orange and the developer
who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot
charge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent
to you so that you wi 11 be completely informed about future cos·ts before you
will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property •
. .
ROLL CALL
Date tt'f*L~J /2<'k7 ..
JOINT BOARDS
Parsons
Amo
Bartlett
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Forgit
Furman
Gruber
Gummere
Hock
Long
Miller, Clifton
Miller, Harry
McMichael
far ks
Porter
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Stewart
Walters
Workman
Baker
OTHERS:
; i\ Brown~·
Niss on
'\Galloway
Tremblay
Lowry
j Carlson
Rimel
~ Maddox
1>VV\ ~·~~
{o~
~:r:Q_ .H-~
~JJ1~~~ ~;(..(_ 13~ (,)
DISTRICT 8
Martin
Mitchell
Baker
Davis
Noe
Shull
Gruber
Bouma
Forgit·
Anderson
Michel
Brown
Mack
Kohl
Hfleman
Krein
Harwood
Fregeau
Clark
Green
Coen
Herbst
Featherly
Lambourne
Featherly
District ,_, -------------------Regular Adjourn-e~d ______ ;;?'_,.< ________ _
Time Z? tJ () dlh I ,
DISTRICT 1
McMichael
Miller, Clifton
Porter
Baker
Parks
Crapo
Culver
McMichael
Hock
DISTRICT 2
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Walters
Workman
Baker
Speer
Amo
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Gummere
McMichael
Long
DISTRICT 3
Miller, Harry
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Stewart
Walters
Baker
Parsons
Gruber
Baker
Porter
Gruber
Baker
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 6
-~--------------~· ---------------·--··---
/ DISTRICT 7
Miller, Clifton ~
Forgit v::=-
McMichael ~
Parks k'('
Porter J/"
Baker ~/
Stewart
·-'' Bartlett
Baker
--D!'"STitICT 11
Mack
Featherly
Hileman
Shull
Michel
Krein
Harwood
Clark
Herbst
Featherly
Clark
Davis
Noe
Shull
Bouma
Anderson
Brown
Kohl
Krein
Fregeau
Green
Herbst
Featherly
Forgit
Featherly
Forgit
Featherly
~~~~er ~
Hileman ~
Featherly // __ _____.,/
Coen
Featherly
ROLL CALL
District -------------------Regular
~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time -----------------------------------------
Parsons
\.._,) Amo
Bartlett
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Forgit
Furman
Gruber
Gummere
Hock
Long
JOINT BOARDS
Miller, Clifton
Miller, Harry
McMichael
,far ks
Porter ·
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Stewart
Walters
Workman
Baker
OTHERS:
Davis
Noe
Shull
Gruber
Bouma
Forgit'
Anderson
Michel
Brown
Mack
Kohl
Hb.eman
Krein
Harwood
Fregeau
Clark
Green
Coen
Herbst
Featherly
Brown
Niss on
Galloway
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
Rimel · ~·
Maddox ~ "\
~\v ,~
4' ~} ~·~'J
v. \t \f .
DISTRICT 8
Martin
Mitchell
Baker
Lambourne
Featherly
'·''
DISTRICT l
McMichael
Miller, Clifton
Porter -----
Baker
Parks ·
Crapo
Culver
McMichael
Hock
DISTRICT 2
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Walters
Workman
Baker
Speer
Amo
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
.Culver
Furman
Gummere
McMichael
Long
DISTRICT 3
Miller, Harry
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Stewart
Walters
Baker
Parsons
Gruber
Baker
DISTRICT 5
DISTRICT 6
Mack
Featherly
Hileman
Shull
Michel
Krein
Harwood
Clark
Herbst
Featherly
Clark
Davis
Noe
Shull
Bouma
Anderson
Brown
Kohl
Krein
Fregeau
Green
Herbst
Featherly
Forgit
Featherly
Porter
Gruber
Baker
Forgit . Feathe~~~
DISTRICT 7 Y-~
Miller, Clifton V: Mack · /
Forgit .,_....... Gruber ·v-~~~~~haei :::::-Hileman ·.,/'
Porter ~ V'/
Baker 2"" Featherly \/'
DISTRICT 11
Stewart Coen
Bartlett
Baker Featherly
JACK J. RIME L
JOHN A . HARVEY, III
D UFFERN H. HELSING
RICHARD N. RIMEL
GEORGE G. LOGAN
RICHARD A.RATTRAY
LA.W OFFICES OF
RIMEL, HARVEY & HELSING
FOU RTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANTA .ANA, CALIFORL"LA. 927 01
May 25, 1967
Fred A. H arper, General Manage r
County Sanitati on Dis trict No . 7
of Orange County
P . 0. Box 5175
Founta in Valley, Cal ifornia
Attention: Jean Bankston, Secret ary
D ear Jean:
547-7395
MADXSON 5-757 9
Enclosed is a corrected set of minutes for the meeting
of Apr il 26th a nd the adjourned meeting on April 27th. You may
want to change the wording for the adjournment, etc . but t his is
generally the form to u se .
j c
e n cl
Sincere ly,
ime ~
~ "-• ~"'
ti
I
I! ·'
11
'1 p
1 ii -,,
I 2 ! I·
!,
3 •;
:'
I
L;_ I
-1
.,
511
I
6 '!
1:
7
'1!
s:I
g ll
;1
lj
lO !i
ll il
1'2 \1
I 1 ... ,,
J I: ,. ,,
14 i1
-5 Ii .L '
!
1 6 ,
-711 .L . I
" ;.
18 11
19 ;
20 ·
!.
21 :1
1·
22
' 1:
I
23 !.
24!:
25 11
26 1'
II
27 i
I
28 i
29 I
I
I
30 !
31 ii
32 li
LAW OFFICES OF Ii
RIMEL. HARVEY & Ii
H!::LSING I!
FOURTH FLOOR
1
,
1
,
101 0 NORTH MAIN S'l'.
SANTA ANA. I
CALIFORNIA 927 0 1 p
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
Hearing on Asse ssme nt
April 2 6, 1967
7 :00 p . m .
The Secreta:::-y advised the Board that this is the time and place
fixed , pursuan t to s tatute and notice give n, for the hearing in the matter of
the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction
of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and a ppurtenant wor k in "ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 6 , 11 as contempla ted by R e solution of Intention No . 66 -19 -7,
adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9 , 1966 , as amended by Resolutio~
N o . 66 -51 -7, adopted on May 5 , 1 966, and by Resolution No . 67 -4 -7 , adopted
on January 11, 1967.
The Sec retary als o i nformed the Board of Directors that affidavits
of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing A ssess men t were 1
on file in his office , and that b written appeals or objections had been
filed in his office p rior t o the d ate set for the heari ng by:
The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered
filed.
The Chairman then asked if there were any inter ested per sons
pres e nt desiri ng to b e heard in the abov e menti oned matter. The following
persons then addressed the Board of Dir e ctors : (
-, ;. I I ._L t A.
\,.
-1 -
,,
I
I
!
I
l After the oral communications were heard, a letter was h anded to
2 , the Board signed by Dolor es Herrera, one of the property owners within the
3 . District, pertaining to the failure of the contractor to replace some fences on
' 1,
4 ~1 her property which were removed in the process of construction and which she
5 ! stated the District had promised her would be restored. T his letter was not
,1 ,.
6 , received as a formal objection or complaint inasmuch as it was received
I
7-il after the time fixed for the opening of the hearing . From further discussion ,
lj
8
q
g !l
I
10 ,,
I 11 ' I
r2 i!
I
13 !1
I;
1 4 1
18
1 9
22 ·
23 · ,.
it appeared that there were apparently other instances where fences and per -
haps other improvements were removed and destroyed during the process of
construction for which ,it was stated by the property owners, promises had
been made by the District to restore . There followed a general discussion
by the Board members as to what should be done . Attorney F . MacKenzie
Brown, representi ng both the contractor and his assignee , addressed the
Board, urging the Board not to delay its action on confirmation of the assess -
ment by reason of the unrestored fences and other similar items and present -
ing to the Board a letter fro m the legal firm representing the contractor's
surety on the contractor 1 s faithful performance bond , which letter advised
the Board that the surety would make good on any deficiencies in the work .
This letter was received and filed .
A ll persons interested having been given full opportunity to show
cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all ·objec t ions pre -
sented having been heard and fully considered, it was t hereupon moved by
Director ~~ that all objections , appeals and protests , both oral and
i 24 ; written, be overrule d and denied . Said motion was seconded by Director
25 I! ~ and carried by the following roll call vote :
26 1 A YES : Directors -
27 I NOES : Directors -
I
28 .!
II
29 1
~o i: .) , I
I:
31 '
32 1
Ii RIM EL, HARVEY 3' II
HELSING ,1
f'O!..!l<TH FLOOR
LAVI OFF'JC?:S OF
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I
SANTA ANA, I",
r.t.I I T:'t"\PMIA ~?701
ABSENT: Directors -
-2 -
..._, II
•I
!. '• '· i:
11
I· " Ii
i
3 ,
i . . ' -' -"
d
-I 0 .,
11
i t. !' -"d
15 11
16 ii
1 7 ;i
.J-.I
22.
22
" '
·23 ·:
"
i1
~~~I ~ -I
I
25 ''
26 "
27 !\
29 •i I,
' ' 30 •I
. I
I
32 ,
"-AV/ c..r:--.c;.::: o.-:
R1~1.::.. ":--:r.r~v-:.v :.?<
~:=:_~i >-:G
'
,·'Ot.;i,7H r:..ooN:
:010 :>:OR';'rl :.~AiS C7, :1 ,,
i
I
I _\ ::,'~,)~~:~:.,):\ r-.) 'oc numbered "Resolution ~o . 67-45-7 '1 c:Jtitle:C: as follows:
"A R2SOi.UTIO~ OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COu:\TY
S.~:\IT.,-\ TIO:\ D:STrtICT NO. 7 OF ORAKGE COL.i:\TY, CA LIFOR?\IA ,
COR:S.ECTIXG . ..\XD :VIODIFYIXG THE ASSESS::VIE:\T A:\D DIA GR-~ Y;:
::\:_..\:UE A i\'TI FILED BY T HE E::.\GI:\iEER OF WOrtK OF SAID DISTRICT
o~ THE 31ST D . ..\ y OF :!'fl.ARCH , 1967, TO COVER TEE su::vrs Du:2
:s'OR T H::S WORK A?\D I:VIPROVE:\IJ:ENT CO?\SISTI:\G OF THE CO:\-I
STRUCTIO:\ OF CERT.A.I~ SA:\ITARY SEWERS AKD P .. PPURTE:\'A:\CES !
. ..\:\D .-.PP:;R TE:\Al\T vVORK I~ 11 ASSESSME:\T DISTR!CT :\0. 6 11 I:\
SAID SA NIT.I\ TIO::>; DISTRICT, AS CON TEMP LA TED BY RESOLUTI O?\
OF I ::>JTEKTIO:\' NO . 66 -19 -7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTIO:\ i\O .
66 -51 -7 AND RESOLUTION 1 0 . 67 -4 -7 OF SAID DISTRICT; A~'TI
ORDERIKG A l\D DIRECTIKG THE EXGINEER OF WORK TO J:.)JI EXD
_..\ND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIA GRA M OX Tr:L
FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH, 11
was the reupon presented to the Board of Directors for ii:S co:'ls:dera:ion, a:::e r
which it was moved by Dir e ct0r 1M,l~~ , seconded by Direcrnr ~\.f;,d , I
!
that said Resolution No . 67-45 -7 be adopted, and the same was adopted oy
the :allowing roll call vote :
AYES : Directors -
NOES : Directors -
ABS E NT: Directors -
Tne heari ng upon said assessment was thereupon re c essed for _f_1_~_e_minutes
:o permii: the Engineer of Work to make th e corrections and modiiica:tior ... s i n
t he assessmem and diagrar.' ... as directed by said Resolutio:-i i\o . 67 -45 -7 . The
:S:::!gineer o: Wor"r>. t:-i ereaiter returned i:he assessment anci cia.gram as corrected,
I
o:.<i mociifieci uncier t:"le orcer ar.d d ireci:ion o: tne Boe.re o: Dire ctor s as sei: I
I
:orfr1 in said R es olu tion No . 67 -45 -7 , and the said Board o: Directors r:..ow be:r.g
I
.satis:ieci with the correctness of be assessment and diagrarr ... , as correc-ced anc
1
modified by their i nst n:ctio ns ~ it was moved by Director \?J~ thai: saic l
i
assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the ?ro-I
ceedings , be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work sha:l :onh -;
with attach a warrant to. sai d a:sessment bearing the .date of this ~r of tlle
Board of Directors, which mo~10n was seconded by Director Q ,
a nd carried by the followin g roll call vote:
AYES: Directors -
NOES: Directo rs -
ABSENT: Directors-
-3 --' -,_ ----..J -\
ii
~
;1
... -. . " !: .i
i:
11
1:
~ .
I!
i: i' ii
l!i
!i :·
2'' 'I jl II ·! 31: il
t1. I! -P ·' !I
51!
It
61!
I!
7-l!
j'.
ii
a': 11
i!
I'
9'! II
11 lOjj
I
11!!
::
1'2\i
H 13!:
1!
141; :.
ii
l5!i
j;
l~i' Oi;
1;
1.7!:
iall
!!
19:;
2Qfi
Ii
21li
i 221~
. I:
2 .... :1
JI
25\i
!' 26
27
281
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL., HARVEY Sc
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA,
/""4r ls::'l"\f<OMIA Q?'7f'l1
The Board further instructed the Engineer of Work to record the
assessment, warrant and diagram, but not to deliver the same to the
contractor or his assignees until the problem of the unrestored fences and
other similar items w.as clarified.
The Board then further engaged in discussion among the Board
members pertaining to the fence replacement and other similar matters
after which the Board· instructed the General Manager and his staff to
conduct an immediate survey in the field to determine the work to be done
and to submit back to the Board a report and cost estimate of the work to be 1
l
done at an adjourned regular meeting to be held on the following day, Thursday~
!
April 27th. i
!
It was thereupon moved, seconded and unanimously carried that this j
!
meeting of the Board be adjourned to 5:30 o'clock p. m. on Thursday, April 27 ,i
I
1967, at the same meeting place, to receive the requested report from the
General Manager.
I
j
!
I
I
!
I
' I
-4-
!
I
i
!
' i
I
I
i
!
l
t
l
l ·--~ i ";"':"' ~ ...,._.,~ i
I
i
II
I
I
11/
1'
2 d
I' d
;;/I
4//
11
5'!
'1
6!i
11
7-11
:11
II lOil
1111 l~J
I! 13ll
1:
141!
151!
1:
161!
1.71!
ial!
'I I,
19!1 ii
(1
j 20';
21/I
Ii
22!!
2~11! . !
24·!
25
26 ! I
I
27 I
2e I
'..._; I 29.
30 I
311
321 !
LAW OFFICES OF 11
RIMEL. HARVEY Sc I
HELSING Ii
FOURTH FLOOR 1
1010 NORTH MAIN ST, l 1
1
SANTA ANA, I
CALIFORNIA 9270f I
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 Adjourned Regular Meeting
Thursday, April 27, 1967
5:30 p. m.
In connection with Assessment District No. 6 of this District, the
General Manager and his staff filed with the Board a written report and cost
estimate of remedial work to be done consisting of some fence restorations
and other items of similar import. Said co.st estimate was approximately
the sum of $5, 000. After som,e discussion, the General Manager and his
I
staff was instructed by the Boar'd to proceed immediately with the remedial
work or, in lieu thereof, to secure releases from the property owners, and . \
the Board further directed its leg~l counsel, Arthur Nisson, to advise the
attorney representing the surety company which issued the contractor's
faithful performance bond, that the District would require the bonding company . !
to deposit the sum of $5, 000 with the District to cover the cost of such
remedial work.
It appearing that there was no further business to come before the
Board at this time, it was moved, seconded and unanimously carried that
this meeting be adjourned, and the same was so adjourned.
!
i
I
I
I
I
l
l
I
I
I
!
I
l
!
I
i
l ,.
I
t
I
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that heretofore .there was filed with the undersigned, Secretary
of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California, an assessment to
cover the sum due for the work and improvement done and performed by the contractor under
and in pursuance of the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 reference being made
to Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation
district on March 9, ~ 966, as modified by Resolutfon No. 66-51-7, adopted May 5, 1966 by
said Board, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted January 11, 1967 by said Board, in the
matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant -work in
"ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in said district, for the description of said work and improve-
ment and of the district to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof; said assessment
being made pursuant to the provisions and requirements .of said Act, according to the charac-
ter of the work done, and has attached thereto a diagram of said disl·rict as required by said Act. . .
Said assessment shows the amount to be paid to the contractor .for said work and improvement
contracted for and performed, together with al I incidental expenses, and shows the amount
of ~ach assessment against each lot or parce I of land assessed to ·pay the same • .
NOTICE IS FURTHER HEREBY GIVEN that on WEDNESDAY APR 2 61967 at the hour of
7:00 o'clock p.m. of said day, is the· time fixed by the undersigned Secretary of said sanita-
tion district when any and· all persons interested in the work done, or in the assessment on
file, may appear at the regular place of meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7 of Orange County, located at 10844 ·Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
Orange County, California, and be then and there heard•by said Board of Directors. Protests
or appeal~ must be in writing and made to said Board of Directors prior to said time of hearing,
in accordance with the provisions of said _Act.
A description of your property and the amount of the proposed assessment against the same
are as fol lows:
Assessment
No. Tract
FRED A. HARPER,. Secretary of
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lot Block Amount
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
lnfonnation Regarding the Assessment for Sewe.r Improvements in Assessment District No. 6
At the time and date indicated in the enclosed notice, the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 will hold a public hearing in connection with the assessments
for payment of sewers and house laterals in Assessment District No. 6. This hearing will be
held at the location specified in the enclosed notice. The new sewers in Assessment District
No. 6 have been installed under a California statute entitled "Improvement Act of 1911,"
as amended, being Division 7 of Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The
total cost of the sewer system, including incidental expenses, is $378, 884.37. The law
provides that this total amount must be spread, or prorated, among the parcels of land in the
district in accordance with the benefit received from the improvements. The total cost of
the work has been spread, and the assessment roll and assessment diagram are on file in the
office of the Secretary of the Sanitation Districts and are open for public inspection. In
addition, a copy of the assessment roll and diagram are on file in the office of Boyle and
Lowry, Engineer of Work, at 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California.
NEW SEWER LOT ASSESSMENTS
The following is an example of the three charges which made up the assessment on a typical
average sized 64-foot wide residential lot which received a new sewer and a house lateral.
1. 4 11 V .C. P. house lateral unit -1 @ $165.62 =
2. Front footage charge -64 feet@ $6.6789274 =
3. Bond handling charge by County Treasurer
TOTAL
The unit assessment values were calculated in the fol lowing manner:
$165.62
427.45
36.00
$629.07
House Lateral -The total cost of the 4 11 and 6 11 house laterals, including incidental
expenses, was divided by the number of house lateral units to give a house lateral unit cost
of $165.62. Most of the laterals in public streets were assigned a value of one house
lateral unit or $165.62. The shorter laterals in narrow private road easemenfSwere assigned
a value of one-half lateral unit or $82. 81 • .
Acreage -Property over 150 feet in depth was assessed an acreage charge at the rate of
$200.UO per acre for that portion of the property behind the 150-foot set-back.
Front: Footage -The total cost of-the house lateral and acreage assessments was subtracted
from tfie total cost of the work, leaving a total of $252,273.11 to be prorated by front-footage
or width of property. There is a total of 37,771.5 front-feet in the District which, when
divided into the $252,273. 11, gives a front-foot charge of $6.6789274 per foot.
The so called front-footage method of assessing ·property was used to spread the cost of
Assessment District No. 6. This method was used because almost all of the lots within the
District were rectangular. The few odd shaped lots in the District were assigned "adiusted
front-footage" values based on an average width of property. Corner lots were usually
assessed on the narrow width frontage rather than along the long side frontage. In general
the front-footage method wi II result in the most equitable assessment since the length of new
sewer and, therefore, cost is proportional to the width of the property. However, other
methods of assessment such as a combination of a uniform lot charge and a lot area charge
wi 11 resu It in comparable assessments since the sum of all of the assessments must equal the
total cost of $378, 884. 37.
TRUNK-SEWERED LOTS
Within the boundary of Assessment District No. 6 there are several properties with frontage U
on a street having a trunk sewer. These properties were given a "Nil" or zero assessment
unless the new Assessment District No. 6 sewers provided a benefit. County Sanitation
District No. 7 and the city of Orange have established separate connection charge schedules
for trunk sewer connections.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
THE ATTACHED NOTICE IS NOT A B{LL but is a notice of the hearing and the tentative
amount of the assessment on the property described in the notice. If you do not own the
property described in the notice, please return the form to Boyle and Lowry, P.O. Box 178,
Santa Ana, California 92702, with a notation as to the new owner, if avai I able. If the
address is incorrect, please notify Boyle and Lowry. Afterthe District Board of Directors
has heard the protests and has acted upon the protests, they will conclude the public hearing
and confirm the assessment. The assessment becomes a lien on each property at this time.
Shortly after the assessment has been confirmed, YOU WI LL RECEIVE A BILL FOR YOUR
ASSESSMENT FROM CROWELL., WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles,
California 90014, as this firm is the assignee of the contractor.
Payment of the entire assessment or any portion thereof~ be made to Crowell, Weedon &
Company at the address shown in the bill within 30 day'SlrOm the date of mailing. The
County Treasurer will refund the $36 bond handling charge to those pr~perfy owners who have
paid their assessments in full during the 30-day cash payment period. The total of the bill,
including the $36, must be paid in full. The refunds wi II be made shortly after the com-
pletion of the cash payment period. DO NOT MAKE ANY PAYMENTS TO COUNTY SAN-
ITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. Any assessment, or balance of $50, remaining unpaid following
this 30-day period will automatically go to bond. If ou desire that your assessment go to
bond, no action is required on your part upon receipt o t e 1 mg rom rowe , ee n
Company.
If all or a portion of;your assessment goes to bond, you will then pay for your assessment over
a period of approximately ten years. During this period you will make one principal payment
and two interest payments each year to the Coun Treasurer of Orange Count , California.
The principal payment and one interest paymen ecomes ue an paya eon ctober 15, and
delinquent on December 2, of each year, and the second interest payment becomes due and
payable on April.15, and delinquent on June 2, of each year. The interest payments are
computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the unpaid balance of the assessment with each of
.the interest payments being one half of the annual interest payment.
In the event it is desirable, or necessary, the bond may be paid in full and the lien cancelled
at any time prior to matutity by payment to the County Treasurer of the unpaid principal, plus
interest calculated up to the next coupon paying period, plus a premium of 5% on the
unmatured principal. You are referred to the County Treasurer for any other information .
relative to the $36 bond handling charge and payments for principal and interest on the bonds,
telephone number 834-2911.
In case any property owner desires further information regarding his assessment, please call
BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer of Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California,
telephone number 547-4471, between 10:00 a.m. and noon daily.
(This information sheet has been translated into Spanish and mailed in both English and
Spanish to al I property owners in the El Modena area for the benefit of Spanish speaking
property owners who may find the Spanish translation easier to understand.)
DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DE ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Inforinacion con Respecto a las Tasas por Mejoramiento de Alcantarillado
en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6.
En la fecha y hora indicadas en la notification adjunta, el Cons~jo
Directivo del Distrito de Sanidad No. 7 de Orange County celebrara una
_audiencia pUblica en relacion con las tasas para pago del nuevo alcan~
tarillado y conexiones domiciliarias instalados en el Distrito de
Tasacion No. 6. Esta audiencia tendra lugar en la dire~cion qu.e se es-
pecifica en la nota adjunta. El nuevo alcantarilla~o del Distrito No.
6 ha sido insta·lado bajo un estatuto de California, titulado, "Acto d·e
Mejoramiento de 1911 11 , segun enmiendas, perteneciente al Codigo de
Calles y Carreteras del Estado de California, Division No. 7. El costo
total del sistema de alcantarillado, incluyendo el capitulo de gastos
varios, es de 378,884.37 dolares. La ley estipula que dicha cantidad
se divida, 6 prorratee, entre las parcelas de tierra pertenecientes al
distrito, de acuerdo con el beneficio recibido en cada una par las me-
j oras de alcantarillado. El caste-total se ha dividido y la relacion
y diagrama de tasas estan archivados en la oficina del Secretario de
los Distritos de Sanidad y abiertos para inspeccion publica. Tambien
se encuentran copias disponibles de estos documentos en las oficinas
de Boyle & Lowry, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana,
California.
TASACION DE LOTES POR NUEVO ALCANTARILLAOO
A continuacion se da un ejemplo de las tres cantidades que componen la
tasa final para un lote residencial de extension media, 64 pies de ancho,
donde se ban instalado nuevo alcantarillado y conexion domiciliaria:
1. Una unidad de conexion domiciliaria con
tuberia de 4 pulgadas V.C.P. -1 @ $165.62:
2. Tasa par pies de extension delantera -
64 pies @ $6.6789274=
3. Gastos de la Tesoreria del Condado por
precesamiento de bonos.
TOTAL
$165.62
$427.45
$ 36.00
$629.07
La tasa por cada unidad de conexion domiciliaria ha sido calculada de ·
la siguiente fonna:
Conexion Domiciliaria -El costo total de las tuberias de 4 y 6 pulga-
das, incluyendo gastos varios, se dividio entre el nU:mero de unidades
de conexion domiciliaria para hallar el costo de una unidad, que resul-
to ser $165.62. A la mayoria de las conexiones hechas en calles pUbli-
cas se las asigno el valor de una unidad de conexion domiciliaria, 6
sea $165.62. A las conexiones mas cortas, instaladas en caminos priva-
dos y estrechos (easements), se las asigno el valor de media unidad,.
0 sea·$82.81.
Extension -A las propiedades con mas de 150 pies de f ondo (profundidad
hacia dentro) se las calculo una tasa de $200.00 par acre en exceso de
los 150 pies.
Extension Delantera -El costo total de las conexiones domiciliarias y
de las tasas por extension se substrajo del costo total de la obra, que-
dando un resto de $252.273 .• 11 para ser dividido entre las propiedades,
de acuerdo con su extension delantera 6 ancho. Hay un total de
37.771.S pies de extension delantera en el Distrito, que divididos por ~
$252;273.ll resulta en un costo de $6.6789274 ~or pie.
El.metodo de tasar propiedades por extension delantera se utilize para
dividir el costo del alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6.
Se hizo as1, debido a que casi todos los lotes en este Distrito son
rectangulares. A otros lotes con formas varias no rectangulares, per-
tenecientes a este distrito, se les asigno una tasa de acuerdo con un
calculo basado en el ancho medio de la propiedad, 6 "ajuste de la exten-
sion delantera". A los lotes situados en esquinas se les asignaron
tasas de acuerdo con la extension delantera menor, y no con la mas larga.
En general, el metodo de extension delantera resulta ser el mas equita-
tivo, puesto que el largo de una nueva alcantarilla, y por lo tanto su
costo, es proporcional al ancho de la propiedad. No obstante, otros
metodos de tasacion, tales come la combinacion de una tasa unif orme para
todos los lotes y una tasa por extension de cada lote, resultar1an en
tasas comparables, ya que la suma de todas las tasas ·debe ser igual al
costo total de $378,884.37. ·
LOTES SERVIDOS POR TUBERIA PRINCIPAL. DE ALCANTARILLADO
Dentro de los 11mites del .Distrito de Tasaci6n No. 6 existen Vqrias pro-
piedades cuya parte delantera d' a una calle por donde pasa una tuberta
principal de alcantarillado. A estas propiedades se las asigno una tasa
de "NIL• o cero, a menos que·e1 nuevo alcantarillado del Distrito de Ta-
sacion No. 6 las haya beneficiado en alguna fonna. El Distrito de Sani-
dad No. 7 de Orange County y la Ciudad de Orange ban establecido.proqra-
mas de tasacion dif erentes para aquellas conexiones que se sirven de la
tuber1a principal de alcantarillado.
PAGO DE LA TASA
LA NOTA ADJUNTA NO ES UNA FACTURA. sino una notification de la audiencia
p6blica y·de la cantidad de la tasa asignada a la propiedad queen ella
se describe. Si no es Vd. propietario de la parcela descrita, rogamos
devuelva el impreso a: Boyle & LCMry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana,
California 92702, indicando el nombre del nuevo propietario, si es posi-
ble. Si la direccion es incorrecta, rogamos asi lo notifique a Boyle &
Lowry. Despues de que el Consejo Directive del Distrito·haya escuchado
las protestas y actuado con respe·cto a las mismas, se cerrara la audien-
cia pllblica y se confirmaran las tasas. En este punto, todas las tasas
pasaran a ser de caracter obligatorto para cada propietario. Poco
tiempo despues de que las tasas hayan sido confirmadas, RECIBIRA VD.
UNA FACTURA POR VALOR DE LA TASA QUE LE CORRESPONPA. REMITIDA POR CROWRLJ,
WEEDON & COMPANY. 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90014,
firma asignada por el contratante.
El pago del total de la tasa, o de cualquier porcion de ella, podra.
hacerse a Crowell Weedon & Company, a la direccion indicada en la fac-
tura, dentro de un termino de 30 dias a partir de la fecha que lleve
dicha factura. La Tesorer1a del Condado reembolsara la cantidad de
$36 por gastos de procesamiento de bones a aquellos propietarios que
hayan pagado el total de su tasa dentro del termino de los 30 d1as. Se U
debera ef ectuar el pago por el total de la f actura, incluyendo los 36
dolares. Los reembolsos se llevaran a efecto en breve despues de termi-
nado el periodo de 30 d1as marcado para el pago. ROGAMOS NO EFECTUEN
NINGUN PAGO AL DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DEL CONDADO. Aquellas tasas 0
resto de 50 dolares o masque queden pendientes de pago,_despues del
termino de 30 dias, pasaran automaticamente a convertirse en bonos.
Si Vd. desea gtie.el valor de su tasa pase a bonos, ·nose reguiere
accion ninguna por su parte al recibir la f actura de Crowell Weedon &
Company. ·
Si la totalidad o parte de su tasa pasa a bonos, pagara Vd. la cantidad
correspondiente en un periodo de, aproximadamente, 10 anos. Durante
este per1odo efectuara Vd. un.pago principal y dos pages d~ intereses
cada afto a la Tesoreria del Condado de Orange,California. El.pago
principal y un pago de intereses deberan ser abonados desde el d1a 15
de Octubre hasta el 2 de Diciembre de ca4a ano, en cuya techa cumplira
el plazo, y el segundo pago de intereses debera efectuarse del 15 de
Abril al 2 de Junio de cada afio. Los pages de intereses estan calcula-
dos en un 6% por afto sobre la :parte de la tasa que haya quedado pendien~
te de pago, correspondiendo cada pago de interese• a la mitad del total·
de interes anual. .
Si es necesario, o conveniente, se puede abonar la totalidad del bono,
cancelando la obligacion antes del tiempo concedido, ef ectuando paqo a
la Tesorerta del Condado de la cantidad principal que quede por abonar,.
mas el interes que correspond~ al per1odo de tiempo que deba.transcurr~r
ha~ta el pro~imo paqo de cupones, mas un recargo del 5% sobre la canti•
. -dad:·:principal. En caso de requerir cualquier informacion adicional con
··"-respecto· a la cantidad de 36 dolares por gastos de procesamiento de
bones, 6 a los pagos de la cantidad principal y de intereses, rogamos
se pongan en contacto con la Tesorer1a del Condado, Telefono 834-2911.
En caso de que el propietario desee hacer. alguna consulta con respecto
a la tasa que le ha correspondido, rogamos llame a BOYLE and LOWRY,
Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, Telefono
No. 547-4471, entre las 10:00 y las 12.:00 horas de la maftana.
Esta circular de informacion ha sido traducida al espaftol,_ enviando
ambas versiones de inqles y esP.aftol a todos ~os propietarios de parcelas
en el area de "El Modena". Esto se ha llevado a cabo con.objeto de
benef iciar a aquellos propietarios de habla espafiola que pudiesen tener
dificultad en entender la version ingle~a.
SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS ON THE WESTERLY SIDE
OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN MARMON AVENUE AND WASHINGTON STREET.
(Assessments Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425,
426, 430, 431 and 432) .
You have only been assessed for house lateral construction benefit
and the $36 bond handling charge because your new laterals were
connected to an existing city of Orange sewer. This city of
Orange sewer is located on the easterly side of Hewes Street and
required much longer than average length laterals to reach your
front property line on the west side of Hewes. Accordingly, you
have been assessed for 1-1/2 lateral units amounting to 1.5 times
$165.62 which eq~als $248.43 per lateral. To this last amount has
been added the $36 bond handling charge, giving a total assessment
for your new lateral of $284.43 per lot.
Although your assessment appears to be much lower than the
assessment of your neighbors elsewhere in Assessment District No.
6, you will be required to pay a connection fee to the city of
Orange amounting at present to $3.00 per front foot of width.
This amount represents a reimbursement amount to be paid to the
developers who originally installed the sewer in Hewes Avenue.
For further information regarding this subject, we refer you to
the Department of Public Works, city of Orange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . (
AVISO ESPECIAL A LOS PROPIETARIOS DE TERRENO EN LOS LOTES DEL
LADO OESTE DE LA CALLE HEWES ENTRE MARMON AVENUE Y WASHINGTON
STREET. (Tasas Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425,
426, 430, 431 y 432)
La tasacion de la cantidad a pagar por Vd. corresponde unicamente
a ~a construccion de conexiones domiciliarias, mas $36 por gastos
de"procesamiento de bonos, por existir una tuberia de alcantarilla-
do principal de la Ciudad de Orange cerca de su propiedad, a la
que han sido conectadas las diferentes unidades domiciliarias. No
obstante, esta tuberia principal esta instalada en el lado este
de Hewes Street y, por lo tanto, se han·necesitado unidades de
conexion domiciliaria de un largo mayor de lo normal para l.legar
a la parte delantera de su propiedad en el lado oeste de Hewes.
De acuerdo con lo anterior, su tasa corresponde al. importe de 1-1/2
unidades de conexion domiciliaria, o sea 1.5 veces $165.62,-equi-
valente a $248.43.por la conexion domiciliaria a su propiedad. A·
esta cantidad hay que anadir los $36 por gastos de procesamiento
de bones~ resultando una tasa total de $284.43 por lote.
Aunque su tasa parece ser menor que· las tasas de otros propietarios_.
del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6, tambien debera Vd. abonar una cuota
de conexion a la Ciudad de Orange que en el presente es de $3.00
por pie de extension delantera. Estas cuotas representan una can-
tidad que esta destinada a reembolsar a los contribuyentes que
originalmente instalaron la tuberia principal d.e alcantarillado en
la Hewes Avenue. Para informacion mas detallada a este respecto,
rogamos se dirija al Departamento de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad
de Orange (Department of Public Works, city of Orange).
. ~
SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, TRACT
3935, QUENT DRIVE AND ROSALIE PLACE. (Assessments 514 -528, inclusive)
The enclosed information sheet does not explain how the assessment was calcu-
lated for your lots. The street sewer mains and individual lot house laterals
were installed in Quent Drive and Rosalie Place before the streets were paved.
The two street sewers dead-ended in Mitchell Avenue and remained as dry
sewers until Assessment District No. 6 provided the means for extending the
existing sewer in Mitchel I Avenue northwesterly to the existing sewers in your
tract. The assessment on your I ot was ca I cu I ated as fo 11 ows:
The total cost, including incidental expenses, of the new se-wer and two new
manholes in Mitchell Avenue between the southeasterly tract.boundary and
the existing Quent Drive sewer amounts to $3,320.40. · Dividing this amount
by the 15 lots on these two streets gives a lot assessment of $221 . 36. To this
amount was added the $36 bond handling charge as explained in the attached
information sheet. The total assessment for each of the lots on Quent Drive and
Rosalie Place is $257. 36 as shown rn the enclosed notice.
JACK J. RIMEL
JOHN .A . HARVEY, lII
DUFFERN H . HELSING
R I C HARD N. RIMEL
GEORGE G . LOGAN
RI C H.ARD A.RATTRAY
LA.W OFFICES OF
RIMEL , HARVEY & HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1 0 10 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 927 0 1
Apr il 18, 1967
Fred A. Harper, Manager
County Sanitation District
No . 7 of Orange County
P. O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
D ear Fred:
Re: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
547 -7 395
MADISON 5 -7570
The hearing on the assessment in the above m a tter i s now
set for Apr il 26th and w e enclose herewith the following documents
for your use a t tha t time:
(1) Form of Minutes -as u s ual, page 3 is to be us e d if the r e
are no changes or corrections to be m a de to the assessment, and page
3a is to be used if there are changes or correcti ons to b e made to the
as sessment.
(2) Resolution -to be used if t here are changes or corrections
to be m ade to the assessment, to w hich would be a ttache d a Schedule of
Modifi cations to be furnish ed by the Engineer of Work.
(3 ) Notice of Assessment -to be recorded after the assess ment
is confirme •
If you have any questions, please call.
jc
encl
cc: Eng ineer of Work
Attn Carl C arl s on
C. Arthur Nisson
Yours very truly ,
JACK J. RIMEL and C. ARTHUR N I SSON
l
2
3
4
5·
6
7
:'
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
·23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL HARVEY Sc
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTAANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
Form of Minutes for
Assessment Hearing
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
April 26, 1967
7:00 p. m.
The Secretary advised the Board that this is the time and place
fixed, pursuant to statute and notice giyen, for the hearing in the matter of
the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction
of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 6," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7,
adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 1966, as amended by Resolution
No. 66-51-7, adopted on Mary 5, 1966, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted
on January 11, 1967.
The Secretary also informed the Board of Directors that affidavits
of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assessment
were on file in his office, and that written appeals or objections had ----
been filed in his office prior to the day set for the hearing by:
The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered .~
filed.
The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons
present desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following
persons then addressed the Board of Directors:
,...
,A ..
-1-
I,
.,r
..
..
. -----....... ,
l
2 --.....
3
4
5·
6
7
8
9
10
:1:-l
12
13
14
15
) ,,\·
!_f\),L\ 16
7r 17
/M·\M 18
19
20
21
22
·23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
321
~=i:'=~~~:; & ll HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
0 NORTH MAIN ST,
SANTAANA,
LIFORNIA 92701
All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show
cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections presente
having been heard and fully considered, it was thereupon moved by Director
that all objections,, appeals and protests, both oral and
~--~~~--~
written,, be overruled and denied. Said motion was seconded by Director
_________ and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: · Directors -
-2-
(
I
l The Board of Directors now being satisfied with the correctness of
2 the assessment and diagram,, it was moved by Director
~~--~~------~~-
3 that said assessment and diagram,, together with the proceedings,, be confirmed
4 and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant
5 to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors,,
6 which motion was seconded by Director and carried by the
~--~~----~~~-
7 following roll call vote:
8
9
10
~l
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
·23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL. HARVEY Be
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST,
SANTAANA,
CALIFORNIA 92701
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors-
Directors-
Directors-
-3-(if~ changes)
._ / ' . ~
l
2
~ 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
. (• 10 ') Y~/. (~) ,.,~,) l:-1
\,
~/\ 12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
·23
17/LJ~ 24
<Z~ 25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICES OF
R.IMEL. HARVEY 8c
HELSING
FOURTH FJ.OOR
tOIO NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTAANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No. " entitled as follows: ----
"A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM
MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT
ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 1967, TO COVER THE SUMS DUE
FOR THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT CONSISTING OF THE CON-
STRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES
AND APPURTENANT WORK IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" IN
SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION
OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO.
66-51-7 AND RESOLUTION NO. 67-4-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND
ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND
AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE
FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH,''
was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after
which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director -----
that said Resolution No. be adopted, and the same was adopted by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for minutes ---
to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in
the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. • The ----
Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as corrected
and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set
forth in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors now bein ----
satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as corrected an
modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director that said -----
assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the pro-
ceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forth-
with attach a warrant to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the
Board of Directors, which motion was seconded by Director -------
and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
-3-
(if changes ~ to be m;
SPECIAL NOTICE
TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET
BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531,
541, 542, 543, 550 and 551).
Your assessments are lower than other assessments in Assessment District No.
6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer
in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3. 00 per front-foot connec-
tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you wil I be
required to pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this
prior reimbursement agreement between the city of Orange and the developer
who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot
charge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent
to you so that you wi II be complete!y informed about future: cosi·s before you
will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property.
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
Form of Minutes for
Assessment Hearing
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
l April 26, 1967
7:00 p.m.
211
s I The Secretary advised the Board that this is the time and place
4 fixed, pursuant to statute and notice given, for the hearing in the matter of
5 the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction
6 of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT
7 DISTRICT NO. 6," as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.,
8 adopted by the Board of Directors on March 9, 19 66, as amended by Resolution
9 No. 66-51-7, adopted on Mary 5, 196 6, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted
10 on January 11, 1967 •
. :1:-1 The Secretary also informed the Board of Directors that affidavits
12 I of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assessment
13 were on file in his office, and that written appeals or objections had ----
14 been filed in his office prior to the day set for the hearing by:
15
16
17
18
19
20
21 1
221 I
·23
24
25 The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered
26 filed.
27 The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons
28 present desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following
291 persons then addressed the Board of Directors:
30 1
1 3~ I
32!
JI
t.A.W OFFICES OF I
RIMEL. HARVEY 8c
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR I
tOIO NORTH MAIN 5T, 1
1
SANTAANA,
CALIFORNIA 92701
-1-
I
/
All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show
cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections presente
having been heard and fully considered, it was thereupon moved by Director
that all objections, appeals and protests, both oral and
~~~~~~~~~
written, be overruled and denied. Said ~otion was seconded by Director
and carried by.the following roll call vote:
~~~--~~--~~
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
-2-
l!
I,
211
311
41 -1
5 l1
" :~
81
9,
10 I
~l
12
13
141
I
151
16
17
181
19
20
211
22!1
I
·23 I
24
25
26
271
~ 2s1I
29 1
301
31
32il
LAW OFFICES OF I
RIMEL, HARVEY&! I
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST,
SANTAANA, I
CALIFORNIA 92701 11
The Board of Directors now being satisfied with the correctness of
the assessment and diagram, it was moved by Director
~~~~~~~~~~-
that said assessment and diagram, together with the proceedings, be confirmed
and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant
to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors,
which inotion was seconded by Director and carried by the
~~~~~~~~~-
following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
-3-{if no changes) ·
~
I
~ \1
I
I
Ii
ill
11
211
11 31' ,1
Ii
4 [j
511
611
II
7
11
al
91
10
~l
12
13
141
151
161
17
18
19
20
I
2111
2211 ,,
·23!1
2411
251
26
271
i
2811
291
3~1
3111
321
LAW OFFICES OF i
RIMEL, HARVEY &
1
1
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA A'NA, 1,·
CALIFORNIA Sa'.(01
. ,~~/~ .
A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No.& 1 " entitled as follows:
"A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM
MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT
ON THE 31ST DAY OF MARCH, 1967, TO COVER THE SUMS DUE
FOR THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT CONSISTING OF THE CON-
STRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES
AND APPURTENANT WORK IN 11 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 IN
SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION
OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO.
66-51-7 AND RESOLUTION NO. 67-4-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND
ORDERING AND DIB.ECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND
AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE
FACE THEREOF IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH, 11
was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after
which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director ------
that said Resolution No. be adopted, and th~ same was adopted by
the following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for minutes ----
to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in
the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. . The ----
Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as corrected
and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set
fort~ in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors now bein ----
satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as corrected and
modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director that said -----
assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified, together with the pro-
ceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forth-
with attach a warrant to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the
Board of Directors, which motion was seconded by Director -------
and carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Directors-
NOES: Directors-
ABSENT: Directors-
-3-
~
-vL '\/,,, '\'>i < r
~ '?\ / 1'0< /
~\) / ,1<; /
1\ (Io vu V' ~\
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that heretofore .there was fl led with the undersigned, Secretary
of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California, an assessment to
cover the sum due for the work and improvement done and performed by the contractor under
and in pursuance of the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 reference being made
to Resolution of Intention No. 66~ 19-7, adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation
district on March 9, .1966, as modified by Resolution No. 66-51-7, adoptedMay5, 1966by
said Board, and by Resolution No. 67-4-7, adopted January 11, 1967 by said Board, in the
matter of the construction of 5anitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in
"ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in said district, for the description of said work and improve-
ment and of the district to be assessed to pay the costs and expenses thereof; said assessment
being made pursuant to the provisions and requirements of said Act, according to the charac-
ter of the work done, and has attached thereto a diagram of said distri :::t as required by said
Act. . .
Said assessment shows the amount to be paid to the contractor for said work and improvement
contracted for and performed, together with al I incidental expenses, and shows the amount
of ~ach assessment against each lot or parce I of land assessed to ·pay the same.
NOTICE IS AJRTHER HEREBY GIVEN that on WEDNESDAY APR 2 6 l&&l at the hour of
7:00 o'clock p. m. of said day, is the· time fixed by fhe undersigned Secretary of said sanita-
tion district when any and· all persons interested in the work done, or in the assessment on
file, may appear at the regular place of meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7 of Orange County, located at 10844 ·Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
Orange County, California, and be then and there heord•by said Board of Di rectors. Protests
or appeal~ must be in writing and made to said Board of Directors prior to said time of hearing,
in accordance with the provisions of said .Act.
A description of your property and the amount of the proposed assessment ogai nst the same
are as follows:
Assessment
No. Tract
FRED A. HARPER,. Secretary of
County Sanitation District No. 7
of Orange County, California
DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
Lot Block Amount
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
lnfonnotion Regarding the Assessment for Sewer Improvements in Assessment District No. 6
At the time and date indicated in the enclosed notice, the Boord of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7 will hold a public hearing in connection with the assessments
for payment of sewers and house laterals in Assessment District No. 6. This hearing will be
held at the location specified in the enclosed notice. The new sewers in Assessment District
No. 6 have been installed under a California statute entitled "Improvement Act of 1911, 11
as amended, being Division 7 of Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. The
total cost of the sewer system, including incidental expenses, is $378, 884. 37. The law
provides that this total amount must be spread, or prorated, among the parcels of land in the
district in accordance with the benefit received from the improvements. The total cost of
the work hos been spread, and the assessment ro 11 and assessment diagram are on file in the
office of the Secretory of the Sanitation Districts and ore open for public inspection. In
addition, a copy of the assessment roll and diagram are on file in the office of Boyle and
Lowry, Engineer of Work, at412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California.
NEW SEWER LOT ASSESSMENTS
The following is an example of the three charges which made up the assessment on a typical
average sized 64-foot wide residential lot which received a new sewer and a house lateral.
1. 4 11 V .C •. P. house .lateral unit -1 @ $165.62 =
2. Front footage charge -64 feet @ $6. 678927 4 =
3. Bond handling charge by County Treasurer
TOTAL
The unit assessment values were calculated in the fol lowing manner.
$165.62
427.45
36.00
$629.07
House Lateral -The total cost of the 4 11 and 6 11 house laterals, including incidental
expenses, was divided by the number of house lateral units to give a house lateral unit cost
of $165.62. Most of the laterals in publlc streets were assigned a value of one house
lateral unit or $165. 62. The shorter laterals in narrow private road easemenfSwere assigned
a value of one-half lateral unit or $82. 81 •
Acreage -Property over 150 feet in depth was assessed an acreage charge at the rate of
$200. 0 per acre for that portion of the property bebind the 150-foot set-back.
Front footage -The total cost of ·the house .lateral and acreage assessments was subtracted
from tlie total cost of the work, leaving a total of $252,273. 11 to be prorated by front-footage
or width of property. There is a total of 37,nl .5 front-feet in the District which, when
divided into the $252,273. 11, gives a front-foot charge of $6.6789274 per foot.
The so cal led front-footage method of assessing property was used to spread the cost of
Assessment District No. 6. This method was used because almost all of the lots within the
District were rectangular. The few odd shaped lots in the District were assigned 11 adiusted
front-footage" values based on an average width of property. Corner lots were usually
assessed on the narrow width frontage rather than along the long side frontage. In general
the front-footage method wi 11 resu It in the most equitable assessment since the length of new
sewer and, therefore, cost is proportional to the width of the property. However, other
methods of assessment such as a combination of a uniform lot charge and a lot area charge
will result in comparable assessments since the sum of all of the assessments must equal the
total cost of $378, 884. 37.
TRUNK-SEWERED LOTS
Within the boundary of Assessment District No. 6 there are several properties with frontage (\,
on a street having a trunk sewer. These properties were given a 11 NIL 11 or zero assessment
unless the new Assessment District No. 6sewers provided a benefit. County Sanitation
District .No. 7 and the city of Orange have established separate connection charge schedules
for' trunk sewer connections.
PAYMENT OF ASSESSMENT
THE ATTACHED NOTICE IS NOT A BrLL but is a notice of the hearing and the tentative
amount of the assessment on the property described in the notice. If you do not own the
property described in the notice, please return the form to Boyle and Lowry, P.O. Box 178,
Santa Ana, California 92702, with a notation as to the new owner, if available. If the
address is incorrect, please notify Boyle and Lowry. After the District Board of Directors
has heard the protests and has acted upon the protests, they will conclude the public hearing
and confirm the assessment. The assessment oecomes a lien on each property at this time.
Shortly after the assessment has been confirmed, YOU WILL RECEIVE A BILL FOR YOUR
ASSESSMENT FROM CROWELL, WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 SOuth Spring Street, LOs Angeles,
California 90014, as this firm is the assignee of the contractor.
Payment of the entire assessment or any portion thereof~ be mode to Crowel I, Weedon &
Company at the address shown in the bill within 30 daySlTO"m the date of mailing. The
County Treasurer will refund the $36 bond handling charge to those pr~perfy owners who have
paid their assessments in full during the 30-day cash payment period. The total of the bill,
including the $36, must be paid in full. The refunds wi II be made shortly after the com-
pletion of the cash payment period. DO NOT MAKE ANY PAYMENTS TO COUNTY SAN-
ITATION DISTRICT NO. 7. Any assessment, or balance of $50, remaining unpaid following
this 30-day period will automatically go to bond. If ou desire that your assessment go to
bond, no action is re uired on our art upon receipt o t e 1 mg rom rowe , ee n
ompany.
If all or a portion of>your assessment goes to bond, you wi II then pay for your assessment over
a period of approximately ten years. During this period you will make one principal payment
and two interest payments each year to the Coun~ Treasurer of Orange Countt) California.
The principal payment and one interest payment ecomes due and payable on ctober 15, and
delinquent on December 2, of each year, and the second interest payment becomes due and
payable on April.15, and delinquent on June 2, of each year. The interest payments are
computed at the rate of 6% per annum on the unpaid balance of the assessment with each of
the interest payments being one half of the annual interest payment.
In the event it is desirable,' or necessary, the bond may be paid in full and the lien cancelled
at any time prior to maturity by payment to the County Treasurer of the unpaid principal, plus
interest calculated up to the next coupon paying period, plus a premium of 5% on the
unmatured principal. You are referred to the County Treasurer for any other information
relative to the $36 bond handling charge and payments for principal and interest on the bonds,
telephone number 834-2911.
In case any property owner desires further information regarding his assessment, please call
BOYLE and LOWRY, Engineer of Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California,
telephone number 547-4471, between 10:00 a.m. and noon daily.
(This information sheet has been translated into Spanish and mailed in both English and
Spanish to al I property owners in the El Modena area for the. benefit of Spanish speaking
property owners who may find the Spanish translation easier to understand.)
DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DE ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
Informacion con Respecto a las Tasas por Mejoramiento de Alcantarillado
en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6.
En la fecha y hara indicadas en la notification adjunta, el Cons~jo
Directive del Distrito de Sanidad No. 7 de Orange County celebrara una
audiencia piiblica en relacion con las tasas para pago del nuevo alcan~
tarillado y conexiones domiciliarias instalados en el Distrito de
Tasacion No. 6. Esta audiencia tendra lugar en la direccion que se es-
pecifica en la nota adjunta. El nuevo alcantarillaqo del Distrito No.
6 ha sido instalado bajo un estatuto de California, titulado, "Acto d'e
Mejoramiento de 1911", segun enmiendas, perteneciente al Codigo de
Calles y Carreteras del Estado de California, Division No. 7. El costo
total del sistema de alcantarillado, incluyendo el cap1tulo de gastos
varios, es de 378,884.37 dolares. La ley estipula que dicha cantidad
se divida, 6 prorratee, entre las parcelas de tierra pertenecientes al
distrito, de acuerdo con el beneficio recibido en cada una por las me-
j oras de alcantarillado. El caste total se ha dividido y la relacion
y diagrama de tasas estan archivados en la oficina del Secretario de
los Distritos de Sanidad y abiertos para inspeccion publica. Tambien
se encuentran copias disponibles de estos documentos en las of icinas
de Boyle & Lowry, Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana,
California. · · ·
TASACION DE LOTES POR NUEVO ALCANTARILLADO
A continuacion se da un ejemplo de las tres cantidades que componen la
tasa final para un late residencial de extension media, 64 pies de ancho,
donde se ban instalado nuevo alcantarillado y conexion domiciliaria:
1. Una unidad de conexion domiciliaria con
tuberia de 4 pulgadas V.C.P. -1 @ $165.62:
2. Tasa por pies de extension delantera -
64 pies @ $6.6789274=
3. Gastos de la Tesorer1a del Condado por
precesamiento de bonos.
TOTAL
$165.62
$427.45
$ 36.00
$629.07
La tasa por cada unidad de conexion domiciliaria ha sido calculada de
la siguiente f orma:
Conexion Domiciliaria -El costo total de las tuberias de 4 y 6 pulga-
das, incluyendo gastos varios, se dividio entre el numero de unidades
de conexion domiciliaria para hallar el costo de una unidad, que resul-.
to ser $165.62. A la mayor1a de las conexiones hechas en calles pUbli-
cas se las asigno el valor de una unidad de conexion domiciliaria, 6
sea $165.62. A las conexiones mas cortas, instaladas en caminos priva-
dos y estrechos (easements), se las asign6 el valor de media unidad,.
0 sea·$82.81. .
Extension -A las propiedades con mas de 150 pies de f ondo (profundidad
hacia dentro) se las calculo una tasa de $200.00 por acre en exceso de
los 150 pies.
Extension Delantera -El costo total de las conexiones domiciliarias y
de las tasas por extension se substrajo del costo total de la obra, que-
dando un resto de $252.273.11 para ser dividido entre las propiedades,
de acuerdo con su extension delantera 6 ancho. Hay un total de
37.771.S pies de extension delantera en el Distrito, que divididos por
$252;273.11 resulta en un costo de $6.6789274 por pie.
El metodo de tasar propiedades por extension delantera se utilize para
dividir el costo del alcantarillado en el Distrito de Tasacion No. 6.
Se hizo asi, debido a que casi todos los lotes en este Distrito son
rectangulares. A otros lotes con formas varias no rectangulares, per-
tenecientes a este distrito, se les asigno una tasa de acuerdo con un
calculo basado en el ancho medio de la propiedad, 6 "ajuste de la exten-
sion delantera". A los lotes situados en esquinas se les asignaron
tasas de acuerdo con la extension delantera menor, y no con la mas larga.
En general, el metodo de extension delantera resulta ser el mas equita-
tivo, puesto que el largo de una nueva alcantarilla, y por lo tanto su
costo, es proporcional al ancho de la propiedad. No obstante, otros
metodos de tasacion, tales como la combinacion de una tasa unif orme para
todos los lotes y una tasa por extension de cada lote, resultar1an en
tasas comparables, ya que la SUll)a de todas las tasas debe ser igual al
costo total de $378,884.37.
LOTES SERVIDOS POR TUBERIA PRINCIPAL .. DE ALCANTARILLADO
Dentro de los l1mites del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6 existen vqrias pro-
piedades cuya parte delantera d' a una calle por donde pasa una tuber1a
principal de alcantarillado. A estas propiedades se las asigno una tasa
de "NIL• o cero, a menos que·el nuevo alcantarillado del Distrito de Ta-
sacion No. 6 las haya beneficiado en alguna forma. El Distrito de Sani-
dad No. 7 de Orange County y la Ciudad de Orange ban establecido proqra-
mas de tasacion diferentes para aquellas conexiones que se sirven de la
tuber1a principal de alcantarillado.
PAGO DE LA TASA
LA NOTA ADJUNTA NO ES UNA FACTURA, sino una notification de la audiencia
pUblica y·de la cantidad de la tasa asignada a la propiedad queen ella
se describe. Si no es Vd. propietario de la parcela descrita, rogamos
devuelva el impreso a: Boyle & LCMry, P.O. Box 178, Santa Ana,
California 92702, indicando el nombre del nuevo propietario, si es posi-
ble. Si la direccion es incorrecta, rogamos asi lo notifique a Boyle &
La11ry. Despues de que el Consejo Directive del Distrito haya escuchado
las protestas y actuado con respecto a las mismas, se cerrara la audien-
cia pUblica y se confirmaran las tasas. En este punto, todas las tasas
pasaran a ser de caracter obligatorio para cada propietario. Pooo
tiempo despues de que las tasas hayan sido confirmadas, RECIBIRA VD.
UNA FACTURA POR VALOR DE LA TASA QUE LE CORRESPONDA. REMITIDA POR CRQWBJ,J,
WEEDON & COMPANY, 629 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California 90014,
firma asignada por el contratante.
El page del total de la tasa, o de cualquier porcion de ella, podra.
hacerse a Crowell Weedon & Company, a la direccion indicada en la fac-
tura, dentro de un termino de 30 d1as a partir de la fecha que lleve
dicha factura. La Tesorer1a del Condado reembolsara la cantidad de
$36 por gastos de procesamiento de bonos a aquellos propietarios que ~
hayan pagado el total de su tasa dentro del termino de los 30 d1as. Se
debera ef ectuar el pago por el total de la f actura, incluyendo los 36
dolares. Los reembolsos se llevaran a efecto en breve despues de termi-
nado el periodo de 30 dias marcado para el pago. ROGAMOS NO EFECTUEN
NINGUN PAGO AL DISTRITO DE SANIDAD NO. 7 DEL CONDADO. Aquellas tasas o
resto de 50 dolares o mas que queden pendientes de pago, despues del
termino de 30 d1as, pasaran automaticamente a convertirse en bonos.
Si Vd. desea gue el valor de su tasa pase a bonos, no se reguiere
accion ninguna por su parte al recibir la factura de Crowell Weedon &
Companv. '
Si la totalidad o parte de su tasa pasa a bonos, pagara Vd. la cantidad
corresponqiente en un periodo de, aproximadamente, 10 aftos. Durante
este per1odo efectuara Vd. un pago principal y dos pagos de intereses
cada afto a la Tesorer1a del Condado de Orange,California. El pago
principal y un pago de intereses deberan ser abonados desde el dia 15
de Octubre hasta el 2 de Diciembre de cada ano, en cuya fecha cumplirl
el plazo, y el segundo pago de intereses debera ef ectuarse del 15 de
Abril al 2 de Junie de cada afto. Los pagos de intereses estan calcula-
dos en un 6% por afto sobre la parte de la tasa que haya quedado pendien-
te de pago, correspondiendo cada pago de intereses a la mitad del total
de interes anual. ·
Si es necesario, o conveniente, se puede abonar la totalidad del bono,
cancelando la obligacion antes del tiempo concedido, ef ectuando pago a
la Tesore~ia del Condado de la cantidad p~incipal que quede por abonar,
mas el interes que corresponda al per1odo de tiempo que deba transcurrtr
ha~ta el pro~imo pago de cupories, mas un recargo del 5% sobre la canti-
·:·., : _-dad:·:principal. En caso de requerir cualquier informacion adicional con
'"respecto a la cantidad de 36 dolares por gastos de procesamiento de
bones, 6 a los pagos de la cantidad principal y de intereses, rogamos
se pongan en contacto con la Tesorer1a del Condado, Telef ono 834-2911.
En caso de que el propietario desee hacer alguna consulta con respecto
a la tasa que ·1e ha correspondido, rogamos llame a BOYLE and LOWRY,
Engineer at Work, 412 South Lyon Street, Santa Ana, California, Telef ono
No. 547-4471, entre las 10:00 y las 12:00 horas de la maftana.
Esta circular de inf ormacion ha sido traducida al espaftol, enviando
ambas versiones de ingles y espaflol a todos los propietarios de parcelas
en el area de "El Modena". Esto se ha llevado a cabo con objeto de
benef iciar a aquellos prOpietarios de habla espafiola que pudiesen tener
dificultad en entender la version inglesa.
SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS.OF LOTS ON THE WESTERLY SIDE
OF HEWES STREET BETWEEN MARMON AVENUE AND.WASHINGTON STREET.
(Assessments Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417J 418, 423, 424, 425,
426, 430, 431 and 432)
You have only been assessed for house lateral construction benefit
and the $36 bond handling charge because your new laterals were
connected to an existing city of Orange sewer. This city of
Orange sewer is located on the easterly side of Hewes Street and
required much longer than average length laterals to reach your
front property line on the west side of Hewes. Accordingly, you
have been assessed for 1-1/2 lateral units amounting to 1.5 times
$165.62 which equals $248.43 per lateral. To this last amount has
been added the $36 bond handling charge, giving a total assessment
for your new lateral of $284.43 per lot.
Although your assessment appears to be much lower than the
assessment of your neighbors elsewhere in Assessment District No.
6, you will be required to pay a connection fee to the city of
Orange amounting at present to $3.00 per front foot of width.
This amount represents a reimbursement amount to be paid to the
developers w~o originally installed the sewer in Hewes Avenue.
For further information regarding this subject, we refer you to
the Department of Public Works, city of Orange. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
AVISO ESPECIAL A LOS PROPIETARIOS DE TERRENO EN LOS LOTES DEL
LADO OESTE DE LA CALLE HEWES ENTRE MARMON AVENUE Y WASHINGTON
STREET. (Tasas Nos. 409, 411, 413, 415, 417, 418, 423, 424, 425,
426, 430, 431 y 432)
La tasacion de la cantidad a pagar por Vd. corresponde unicarnente
a la construccion de conexiones dorniciliarias, mas $36 por gastos
de procesamiento de bonos, par existir una tuberia de alcantarilla-
do principal de la Ciudad de Orange cerca de su propiedad, a la
que han sido conectadas las diferentes unidades dorniciliarias. No
obstante, esta tubed.a principal esta instalada en el lado este
de Hewes Street y, por lo tanto, se han necesitado unidades de
conexion domiciliaria de un largo mayor de lo normal para llegar
a la parte delantera de su propiedad en el lado oeste de Hewes.
De acuerdo con lo anterior, su tasa corresponde al. importe de 1-1/2
unidades de conexion domiciliaria, o sea 1.5 veces $165.62, equi-
valente a $248.43.por la conexion dorniciliaria a su propiedad. A·
esta cantidad hay que afiadir los $36 por gastos de procesamiento
de bonos, resultando una tasa total de $284.43 por late.
Aunque su tasa parece ser menor que las tasas de otros propietarios_
del Distrito de Tasacion No. 6, tarnbien debera Vd. abonar una cuota
de conexion a la Ciudad de Orange que en el presente es de $3.00
por pie de extension delantera. Estas cuotas representan una can-
tidad que esta destinada a reembolsar a los contribuyentes que
originalmente instalaron la tuberia principal de alcantarillado en
la Hewes Avenue. Para informacion mas detallada a este respecto,
rogamos se dirija al Departarnento de Obras Publicas de la Ciudad
de Orange (Department of Public Works, city of Orange) •
SPECIAL NOTICE TO PROPERTY OWNERS OF LOTS 4 THROUGH 18, TRACT
3935, QUENT DRIVE AND ROSALIE PLACE. (Assessments 514 -528, inclusive)
The enclosed information sheet does not explain how the assessment WGS calcu-
lated for your. lots. The street sewer mains and individua! lot house laterals
were installed in Quent Drive and Rosalie Place before the streets were paved.
The two street sewers dead-ended in Mitchell Avenue and remained as dry
sewers unti I Assessment District No. 6 provided the means for extending the
existing sewer in Mit_che II Avenue northwesterly to the existing sewers in your
tract. The assessment on your lot was calculated as follows:
The total cost, including incidental expenses, of the new sewer and two new
manholes in Mitche 11 Avenue between the· southeasterly tract boundary and
the existing Quent Drive sewer amounts to $3, 320.40. · D'ividing this amount
by the 15 lots on these two streets gives a lot assessment of $221 . 36. To this
amount was added the $36 bond handling charge as explained in the attached
information sheet. The total assessment for each of the lots on Quent Drive and
Rosalie Place is $257. 36 as shown in the enclosed notice.
(
·.
SPECIAL NOTICE
TO OWNERS OF PROPERTY ON THE EASTERLY SIDE OF HEWES STREET
BETWEEN VIA LARDO AND MARMON AVENUE (ASSESSMENTS 531,
541, 542, 543, 550 ond 551). ·
Your assessments ore lower thon other assessments in Assessment District No.
6 because your laterals were connected to an existing city of Orange sewer
in Hewes. The city of Orange has at present a $3.00 per front-foot connec-
tion charge for property connecting to this Hewes sewer which you will be
required to pay when you apply for a sewer connection. Because of this
prior reimbursement agreement betwaen the city of Orange and the developer
who originally built this sewer, you were not assessed for the $6.68 front-foot
diarge for your property width in Hewes. This special notice is being sent
to you so that you wi 11 be comple~e!y informed about future cos·rs before you
will be able to use the new house laterals built in Hewes to serve your property •
. .
II
.. .
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS ..
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
APRIL 12, 1967 -8:00 P.M.
P. 0 . Box 51 75
10844 Ell is Avenu e
Fountain Valley, C alif., 92708
AGENDA
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
( 2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
tJ
~}
&
(16)
Roll Call
DISTRICTS 1,2 ,3,7 J
Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpts /YI $
from the City of Santa Ana, showing election of mayor
and appointment of alternate to serve on the Boards
DISTRICT l /(/<!.. ._.. · "'... ' !.
Election of Chairman of the Board /!~
ALL DIS~
~ ot.._ Chairmen pro tem,---1.[ necessary (Distr3..--G-t-s-j_
DISTRICT 1 )
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular lli1 S.
meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held March 8, and the adjourned regular meeting
held March 30, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular
meeting held March 8, 1967, as mailed
DISTRICT 11 j
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular /}') c
meeting held March 8, 1967, as maile d .../
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
Manager /fl c/~ Report of the General
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Ge neral Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
{23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
ALL DISTRICTS f C'onsiders.tlon of motion to receive and file written M,.5
report of the Executive Committee
ALL DISTRICTS j~AJ,AJ
Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Willard T. ~~
Jordan, Architect, for preparation of a Master Plan for ?/
improving the appearance of Treatment Plant No. 2, as
rece»mmended by the Executive Committee. See page "F'
ALL DISTRICTS ~ Report of=-tiie engineers; and consideration of Resolution '{'{\
No. 67-38 finding satisfactory the engineers' report
on Ocean Outfall No. 2, and setting May 10th as the date
for public hearing on the report. See page "G"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of. motion authorizing the Directors and ~
a maximum of twenty employees, to attend the annual
conference of the Water Pollution Control Association
in._Long Beach Ma~througb_May 6th; and authorizing
paymen:&-ror-registration fees,--ro--s-a-is, ""transportation
and incidental expenses incurred. See page "H" for
Conference program. k
ALL DISTRICTS fY\ } /
Consideration of proposal of Charles L. Robinson, ,/'/
Insurance Consultant, for preparation of specifications ~'"/
f'or the Districts' property insurance and for "uninsured .,e, / 1 ,,/
perils and exposures" as outlinel in Mr. Robinson 1 s ~ v tr
Report of Survey dated December, 1966. See page "I" ~
ALL DISTRICTS
ConsfdeI="'ation of motion approving Change Order #1 to ~
Job No. Pl-12-2 {Site Improveme~ -Phase III),
authorizing an addition of' $913 5 to the contract with
Sully-Miller Contracting Compan • See page "J"
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-40, accepting Job No~A , ALL DISTRICTS I
Pl-12-2 as complete and authorizing the filing of a "l /
Notice of Completion of Work. See page "K 11
ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to
Job No. P2-8-2 (Site Improvements -Phase II), authoriz-o
ing an addition of $375.39 to the contract with R. J. 1
Noble Company, Contractor. See page "L"
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-39, accepting Job Nop
P2-8-2 as complete and authorizing the filing of a
Notice of Completion of Work. See page __ "_M_" __ _
ALL DISTRICTS £ Consideration of motion av.proving Change Order #3 to ~
Job No. P2-12 (Clarifier 'H11 ), authorizing an extension ~1)})1Yfl1
of time of 130 days to the contract with J. Putnam Henck,V-
Contractor. See page "N"
-2-
{27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
{37)
{38)
(39)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-41,
P2-12 as complete, and authorizing the
of Completion of Work. See page "O"
accepting Job No. M~
filing of a Notic~/~
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file Interim
Financial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles
and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the
period ending December 31, 1966 0·
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file written
certification of the General Manager that he has checke
all bills appearing on the agenda, found them in order,
and that he recommends authorization for payment
ALL DISTRICTS ~
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint ·
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1
and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "Aft
"B" , and "c"
ALL D~ers ~ :::etiier businesS _nd co!!ID\lmications, if any--.....__
DISTRICT l
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRIC~
h:tiie?"6Uiiness arie, comm__yp1 ga:tlons, 1f any
DISTRICT l
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment 1: J/ f'lh •
'
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-42-2, approving and ~/J c
authorizing execution of Hold Harmless. and Irldemnificatiorl'~ 7
Agreements in favor of Southern Counties G~s Company of
California, as prepared by the General Counsel. See
page "P" ·
DISTRICT 2
l ~ Consideration of Resolution No. 67-43-2, approving and ~.
authorizing execution of an easement agreement with ~
Southern Pacific Company, at no cost to the District,
in connection with the construction of Contract No.
2-10-6. See page "Q"
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "D"
and connnm'lications, if aAN
seem/>
DISTRICT 2 ' I ~ p i/J') I
Adjournment ,dj I {/ Consideration of motion re: ~,
-3-
; .
(40)
(41)
{42)
(43)
(44)
(45)
{46)
{47)
(48)
DISTRICTS 3 AND 11 .~A~~
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-44, approving and ffj~,
authorizing execution of an agreement for use of the ~B
Lower Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer (between Nichols Street
and Hamilton Avenue) by District No. 11. See page 11 R" •
Copy of agreement on page "S"
DISTRICT 3 ~
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See.~~
page "D" ~/
tJl"i'ri!r busine~ communicati 0 os, if any
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment Cf! !J{~/Yl'
DISTRICT 11 0
Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice to~ ~
Withhold in the amount of $640.95, filed by Concrete
Tie and Anchor Corporation against Lomar Corporation
and Orange County Pipeline, Inc., Contractors on
Contract No. 11-10-2
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "E"
See~ s
(49) DISTRICT 5
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 5 ~ 17
Consid1ation of motion re: Adjournment to~:OO p.m.,q\
April th
DISTRIC 6 .~ /
Cons .. ~~ion of m on app/rrants ~~.:,.,.9J'IY. See
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion declaring public hearing open~.
on engineers 1 report entitled "Master Plan of Subtrunk .
Sewer Facilities -January, 1967" . -
-4-
I!>
(56)
(58}
(59)
(61}
(62)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion declaring the public hearing 1 ~A
closed; and consideration of Resolution No. 67-47-7 !~ ,~
overruling protests and adopting the report. See page :7
"T"
DISTRICT 7
Report of the General Counsel re: Acquisition of ease-
ments to serve property recently annexed to the District
(Liljeblad-Wessinger -Annexation No. 11)
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-46-7, approving and ~A ~ DISTRICT 7 I
authorizing execution of an agreement with the City of f 'l
Orange, for purchase of the Prospect-Spring Subtrunk
and canacity rights in the Hewes Avenue Subtrunk. See
page 1'U" • Copy of agreement on page "V"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion instructing the staff to submit
a request to the City of Orange, for permission to
connect to certain existing facilities owned by the
City. See page "W"
DISTRICT 7
Verbal report of the staff and engineers regarding
construction of District's sewerage facilities between
the College Avenue Pumping Station and Treatment Plant
No. 1
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "E"
See
(63) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 7:00 p.m., JfJ:tJ/
April.26th
-5-
l96t 'at 'lil:IdV
S~N:!IWOOOa DNI~HOddflS a.NV SNOIJJl~OS~
WARR ANT NO.
696 1
696 2
696 3
696 4
6965
6966
6967
6968
6969
69 70
6971
6972
6973
6974
6975
6976
6977
6978
6979
6980
6981
6982
6983
6984
6985
6986
698 7
6988
6989
6990
699 1
6992
6993
699 4
6995
6996
6997
6998
6999
7000
7001
7002
7003
7004
700 5
7006
7007
7008
700 9
70 18
7011
70 12
7013
7014
701 5
7016
7017
7018
7019
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FA VOR OF
Acore Drilling Service, Core Drilling
Adach i Nursery Co ., Shrubs
Advance Electric, We l de r Repair
All Bearing Service, Inc ., Pump Parts
The Allen S ystem, Inc., Ma r king Tape
Al l is -Chalmers Mfg., Compressor Parts
AMO UNT
American Chemical Soc iety, Technical Publi c ation
American Compr ess or Co ., C.:>m p r essor Parts
1 56 .6 0
1 5 .60
291 .05
12 5 .37
38.90
492.09
11 .8 5
132.60
29 .68
14.24
17 4.32
Ci ty of Anaheim, Powe r
Anahe i in Truck & Transfe r Co ., Fre igh t
The Ancho r Packing Co ., Gaskets , Pac king
Apc o Supp l y, Fue l Valve
Arrowhead Puri t as Wate r, Bottled Water
A ~las S t a tio ners, Office Supplies
Bank of America, Bond & Coup. Collec t . Expen se
Ba rksda le Valv es , Pres sure S1'1itches
Ba y Ci t y Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings , Fittings
Beach Fabricating Co., We l ding Se r v ic e
Beckman I nstrumen ts, I nc ., Lab Suppl ies
Bell Pipe & Supply Co ., Piping
Be ll's Radiato r Servi ce, Truck Repa ir
Bomar ~·1ag ne to Service , Inc ., Magneto Repair
Le s Bowma n Engineering Co ., Safety Ra iling
Brookmart, Safety Rai l ing
H . B . Brown C·::>., Boiler· Pa r t s
Bu e na Park Who lesale Electric, Elec t . Suppl ies
Bu f nel Company, Metal Treatment of Pa rts
Bureau of Business Prac tice, Training Mate rial
Ra lph B. Carter Co ., Freight
Ch evron Asphalt Co ., Roofing Ce me n t
Ci ty Sand & Gravel , Inc ., Rock Base
College Lumber Co ., I n c ., Lu mber
Con solidated Elec trical Dist ., Controls
Costa ii1esa Auto Parts , I nc ., Tr·uck Parts
Crane Packing Co ., Comp ressor Part s
l e & Son 's Glass Co., Gl ass
C::>n t rol Corp ., Go ve r nor Repair
Dye Hardwa re, Small Hardware, Too ls
Electric Supplies Dis c . Co ., E i ectric Suppl ies
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring
Enterprise Print ing Co ., F orms
Essick Machinery Co ., Eng ine Parts
Chas . A. Estey, Inc., F i ttings
Fairfa x El ectron ics, I n c ., Intercom Parts .
Rimm on c. Fay, Ph.D ., Microbiological Rese arch
Fi scher & Porter Co ., Ch l orina tor Repair
Fischer Go vern::>r Co ., Regu lato r Parts
Flair Draf t~ng Service,
Fowle r Equipmen t Inc ., Crane Rental
Freeborn Equipmen t Co., Inc ., Pump Parts
F reeway Machi ne & Weld i ng, Pump Repair
Rober t N. Ga ll oway, Mis c. Expen ses
Ga rvin's Paint & Body Shop, Tr uck Repair
Gibbons ~et~Pro duc ts Co ., Metal Fabrication
General Electric Suppl y Co .
De partment o f General Ser vices, Tech. Pub.
General Telephone Co.
Gl adman & Wa llace, Truck Ti res
The Glidde n Company, Paint Supplies
l!.84 .12
162 .47
325 .61
1 ,734 .02
33 9 .10
1,596 ,74
74.82
14 5 .91
65 .8 3
12.00
696 .60
489 . 53
18 .69
62.77
1,143.88
143 .22
12.00
9,93
99 .34
107 .22
101.23
300 .82
352.60
193 .23
40 .90
233.89
41 .94
375.66
3 ,067 .58
1 52 . 56
101 . 56
6 4 .36
36.40
46 4.00
69 .7 5
1 54 .10
520 .63
336 .13
27 .63
390 .67
33 .02
525.25
275 .18
1,84 1 .34
5 .20
921.85
223 .23
95 ,79
,.
WARR ANT NO.
7020
702 1
702 2
7023
7024
7025
70 26
70 27
7028
70 29
7030
703 1
7032
7033
7034
7035
7036
7037
7038
7039
7040
7041
7042
7043
7044
704 5
7046
7047
7048
7049
70 50
7051
7052
70 53
70 54
70 55
7056
7057
7058
70 59
70 60
7061
70 62
7063
7064
7065
7066
70 67
7068
7069
7070
7071
7072
7073
7074
7075
707 6
7077
7078
70 79
7080
IN FAVOR OF
Bob Gosche Co., Sm a ll Ha rd\\f are
W. W. Grainger, I nc., Elect ric Blower
GJ."'aves and How l ey, I nc., Equipment Rental
Gu arant y Che vro l et Motors, Truck Repair
Guardian F ence Co., F ence Remova l
AI10UNT
162.19
30 .1 6
96 .00
19 .50
George T . Hall Co., Inc., Temp . Regulat:irs
Fred A. Harper, Vari ous Meeting Expenses
Heathki·c Electro nic Cen ter, Co mmunication
Ho ne y1"!e ll, Inc ., Ins trumen tation Repair
How ard Supp l y Co., Pump , Va l ves, Hardware
398 .00
41 5 .05
21.,..,.l
Equip . 298 .48
173 .00
37 2 .77
City of Huntington Bea ch, Wa te r
ILG Industri es , Inc ., Fan Uni ts
Int erna tio nal Harve s ter Co ., TJ."'UCk Pa rts
J ensen Instrument Co ., Contro l Sw itches
J ones Chemica ls , Inc ., Chl orine
Robert E . J ones, Whee l .A l ign . Equip .
Kar Pr oducts, Inc ., Truck Parts
Kell y Pipe Company, Va l ves
Keenan Pipe & Supply Co ., Chlorinato r Piping
Kl een -Line Corp . J anitorial Suppl ie s
Knipper s Rental s, Equipment Re ntal
Kno x I ndust rial Suppl ies , Sma ll Ha rdwa re, T:>o l s
Herbert H. Kyzer, Emp l oyee Mi l eage
L & N Un iform Supply Co ., Uniform Rental
LBWS , Inc ., We ldi n g Supplies, T oo l s
J udy Lee, Emp l oyee Mi l eage
Leupo l d & Stevens Inst .,Water Level Recorders
Litho graphic Arts , I nc., Printing
R . W. McClellan & Sons , Sand
J ack Ed ward McKee , Consultant
Bill McDan iel Equ ipment, Equipme n t Ren t a l
McGraw~Hi ll Bo~-Technical Publication
Mine Sa f ety Af)p l ~;~ Co ., Sa fety Eq uip .
Robe.c t E . MocKe'E""~M . . , I rradiation Samp l ing
St anl ey E . Morris Co ., Cas t ers
Morrison Co ., Piping, Va lves
Munselle Supply Co., I nc ., \·,fe l ding Supp lie s
National Chemsearch Corp., Janttorial Supp li es
Na tional Lead Co ., Pa int Supp l ies
Lee M. Ne l son, Consulting Services
Ci ty of Ne~·.rport Beach, Water -~
C . .Ar t hur Nisson, Genera1 ,couseel Re tainer
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaning Solvent
0 N C M:itor Freight Sy s tem, Freight
Orange Coast Nursery, Landscap ing Su pp lie s
Orange Cou n ty Radiote l ephone Service , I nc.
Orenda Limited,Turbine Part s
Pac ific Tel ephone Co .
Penetryn-Western, Inc ., TV I nspection of SeHer
Troy L. Pe\·1thers Co ., Crane Parts
Pi oneer Roof & Floor Co ., Roof Repair
Randolph Industries, I nc ., Electric Supplies
Rayco Equipment Supp l y, \'!inches
Red 1 s F1"'ame, Whee l & Br•a ke Serv., Truck Repair
The Register, Emp l oyment Ad
Reyno l ds Aluminum Su pply Co ., Steel Stock
Charles L . Robinson, In suranc e Consul t ant
A. Rooke Cooperage Co ., Oil Drums
Rutan & Tucker, Legal F ees Re Chlor . Suit
Santa An a Blue Prin t Co ., Reproduction Service
Santa Ana ~lectr o nic s Co ., El ect . Tubes, Tools
14.60
369.24
186 .78
823.96
13,977.60
L~l 6 . 00
96 .11
77 .79
790 .34
138. 36
1 54.75
1 51 .26
20 .60
720 .32
44 9 . 57
17 .40
865 .00
144 .56
46 .1 4
450 .00
13 '.;. 25
13 .55
384 .33
500 .00
19 .0 5
h9 6 r:. _., . _.,
94 . 39
43 .0 5
38 ,93
320.00
12 0 .54
700 .00
173 .28
7 .85
1,017 .20
414 .35
1,329 .12
312 .99
350 .00
24 5 .35
403 .00
105 .0 5
520 .00
13 .23
47 .40
665 .93
250 .00
265 .20
457 .12
34 .84
94 .16
F'
WARRANT NO.
7081
7082
7083
7084
708 5
7086
7087
7088
7089
7090
7091
7092
70 93
7094
7095
7096
7097
7098
7099
7100
7101
7102
7103
7104
7105
7106
7107
7108
7109
7110
7111
7112
7113
7114
7115
7116
7117
7118
7119
7120
7121
7122
IN FAVOR OF
E . H. Sargent & Co., Lab. Supplies
Ru ssell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage
Sears, RJebuck and CJ ., Brick
AMOUNT
The Sherwin~-Wi llia ms Co., Paint Supplies
Sibal En gineering Co., In c., Compressor Par·i;s
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
434 .05
33 .10
12.46
444 .69
!::;.~·1 6.:. _.,,_.,, . ...,,
24 .60
72.16
27.98
Signal ~Flash Co., Barricade Ren t al
Smi th Op t ical Service, Safety Glas ses
Southern California Edison Co ., Power
Southern California Water Co.
Southern Counties Gas Co.
Sou t hern Marine Supp l y, Small Hardware
Speed-E --Au ~o Parts, Truck Parts
17' J 085 . 86
82 .64
Standard Carriage Works, Inc., Flex Lift Repair
Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Oil, Diesel Fuel
State Employees' Retiremen t System ., Adm. Chg.
State Pipe and Supply Co., Pipe
1 ,853 .70
224.88
247.94
194 . 42
1,9 21. 57
132 .50
949 .10
27.04
16 .19
302.1 5
Steverson Bros., Oil Drums
Teaching Aids , Inc., Training Materials
Tel-Co of Calif., Elec tric Wire
Thomas Bro s . Maps, Map s
C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co ., Weed
Triangle S i;eel & Supp l y Co ., Steel
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Tools
Un ion Oil Co . of Calif., Gasoline
202 .80
Oil, Kerosene ~.3 .
s ·;;o ck ~
107 .98
Wallace & Tiernan, Inc., Lab Equipment
Wallace a indery Co., Office Supplie s
John R . es R.S., Odor Consultant
Wai"nock -Bancroft Equipmen·c Co., Truck Parts
Waukesha Motor Co., Engine
Welch 1 s Co astal Concrete Co ., Concrete
Western Salt Co ., Indu st~ia l Salt
869.41
58 .08
12.48
225 . 78
36 ,94
Western States Engine Serv ., Compressor Part s
Ci ty of Westminster, Water
2, 189 .93
63 .49
20.80
13 .00
5 .00
1. 51
354.26
W. D. Wi l son Co ., Fit ting&
Xe rox Corp., Reproduct:1.on Service Charge
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
CAP IT AL OUTLAY RE VOLVI NG FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Bank of America, NT&SA Assignee ~
Vinne ll Corp.
John Carollo Engineers
J. Pucnam Henck
R. J. Noble Co.
Sully-Miller Contracting Co .
Twining Laboratories
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY R2VOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
-c-
$ 80,866. 59
$ .67~080 .00
26 ,813.72
7,425.54
7,250.12
23,327.51
48.oo
$ 121,944.89
;~ 202, 811. 48
~:NG;,~
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FtJND-itA~S
~~-NO-.-IN;IS@~lOR-.. Q~ ---~----AM.otfN['
~ 7123 City or Santa Ana $ 30,000.00
DISTRICT NO. 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7124 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 2,997.00
DISTRICT NO. 3
OPERATING FUNp WARRANTS
( IN FAVOR OF
7125 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,,300.00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7126 Fairbanks Morse, Inc. $ 3,505.49
$ 4,80~,.49
DISTRICT NO. !;2
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7127 AAA Construction Company $ 4,230.00
7128 City or Newport Beach 280.00
7129 Donald c. Simpson 230.00
$ 4,740.00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
7130 Far Western Pipeline, Inc. $ 21,482.90
7131 Donald c. Simpson 2,704.30
$ 24,187.20
$ 28,927.20
-D-
DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
7132 Cook & Barletta Inc.
7133
7134
7135
7136
7137
7138
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle and Lowry
AD NO. Amount
$ 88.oo 6
Other
Engineering 5,065.19
$5,153.19
Southern California Edison Co.
The Tustin News
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle and Lowry
DISTRICT NO . 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Lamar Corp. & Orange County Pipeline, Inc.
Lowry and Associates
-E-
AMOUNT
$ 1,575 .80
$ 5,153.19
7.85
25 .44
$ 5,186.48
$ 3,882 .42
$ 9,068 .90
$ 49,172 .40
2,349.00
$ 51,521.40
Willard T. Jordan, Architect A.I.A. and Associates.
1500 Adams Avenue, Suite 301 Telephone 545-736 Costa Mesa California
Agenda Item #18
County Sanitation Districts
Executive Committee
c/o Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
P. O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
March 22, 196?
Re: ~ubject: Architectural Services for Development of
a Master Plan for Improving the Appear-
ance of the Districts' Treatment Plant No. 2
I propose to furnish all necessary master planning for the
improvements on the treatmen~ plant No. 2, for a sum of
$4000.DO. This master plan would include all necessary
area plans, cost estimates, phasing of the program, land-
scape architect's fees, and a minimum of one major render-
ing.
I further propose to work as architectural design consultant
with the district engineers on the new facilities on the
hourly basis of $25.00 per man hour for myself as prin-
cipal, and $13.50 per man hour for my drafting staff.
If we are selected by your board to work with you on this
project, we are in a position to start immediately, and I
will personally attend any conferences necessary to further
the program.
I hope this proposal meets with your approval, and apprec-
iate very much the opporturiity of being considered by your
board.
WTJ/me
Enc.
-F-All Districts
RESOLUTION N0.67-38
FIXING TIME AND PIACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING
ON ENGINEER 1 S REPORT
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO RE-
CEIVE AND FILE ENGINEERS' REPORT DATED MARCH,
1967, SUBMITTED BY JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS; AND
DIRECTING THE SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF
PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID REPORT
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, resolve as
follows:
WHEREAS, the report of John Carollo Engineers, dated
March, 1967, and ordered in August, 1966, was presented and con-
sidered by the Boards.
NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED:
Section 1. That the Engineers' Report for County Sanita-
tion Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County,
California, prepared and submitted by John Carollo Engineers,
entitled "Ocean Outfall No. 2 -March,1967", is hereby received
and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary of the Districts;
and,
Section 2. That these Boards find and they do hereby find
that said report complies with the provisions of the County
Sanitation Districts' Act (Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the
Health and Safety Code of the State of California) and that it is
satisfactory to the Boards; and,
Section 3. That these Boards fix and they do hereby fix
the 10th day of May, 1967, at the hour of 8:00 p.m., at the
regular meeting place of said Boards as the time and place for
hearing objections to said report and to doing all or any part of
the work referred to in said report; and,
I·
Section 4. The Secretary be and is hereby ordered to
publish notice of said hearing for the time and in the manner pre-
scribed by law.
Agenda Item #19 -G-All Districts
CWPCA CONFERENCE PROGRAM
May 3-6, 1967
Lafayette Hotel, Long Beach
REGISTRATION FEES:
CWPCA Member
Nonmember
Short School Only*
$ 9.00
12.00
3.00
*Regular registration includes
Short Schools -Work Books will
be sold at schools
MEALS:
Short School Lunch {Wednesday) 3.25
Keynote & Awards Lunch (Thursday) 3.50
Business Lunch {Friday) 3.50
Breakfast -Operators, Chemist,
Maintenance (Thursday) 3.00
Breakfast -Sewer Design,
Industrial Waste (Friday) 3.00
Banquet (Friday) 7.50
WEDNESDAY, May 3
GENERAL CONFERENCE
7:00 to 9:00 a.m. -2:00 to 7:00 p.m. Registration
OPERATOR'S SCHOOL -9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m.
7:00 to 9:00 a.m. --Registration
Introduction --K. R. Jones
Fundamentals of Sewage Treatment --K. R. Jones
Principles of Sludge Digestion --William F. Garber
Pumping of Sludge --Joe Cessna
Digester Equipment --Charles Lawrance
Digester Operation --Carl Nagel
Analyses and Interpretation --Dr. David Jenkins
Digester Problems --Larry Trumbull
Disposal of Sludge --David L. Irving
Discussion, Questions and Answers --Staff
WASTE WATER COLLECTION SYSTEMS MAINTENANCE SCHOOL -9:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m.
7:00 to 9:00 a.m. --Registration
Introduction --Robert M. Powell
Contracting Sewer Maintenance --Robert H. King
Protection of Pipes and Structures Against Sulfide Attack
Richard Pomeroy
Maintaining Large Diameter Trunk Sewers --John Murphy
Safety Programs --John N. Jepson
General Discussion
Report on International Conference on Water Pollution Research
William I. Kersteiner
Workmen's Compensation Benefits and Facts for Supervisors
Paul Becker, Jr.
What's New In Safety Equipment --James Hagerman
Unusual Sewer Maintenance Problems --William R. Teague,
Donald Robbins, William Taylor
Agenda Item #20 H-1 All Districts
EVENING
6:30 to 8:00 p.m. --Hospitality Hour --Hosted by Manufacturers
and their Representatives
THURSDAY, MAY 4
7:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. --Registration
BREAKFAST SESSIONS -7:30 to 9:00 a.m.
Industrial Waste Breakfast -Moderator: Robert E. Burt
General Subject: Industrial Reuse of Water
Chemists Breakfast -Moderator: William F. Garber
Subject: "Trace Element Determination" -George Uman
Sewer Maintenance Breakfast -Moderator: Robert M. Powell
Subject: "Safety in Sewer Maintenance" -Elmer Ross
TECHNICAL SESSION "A"
9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon
MODERATOR --Gordon Magnuson
Welcome by City of Long Beach --Mayor Edwin w. Wade
"Waste Disposal as a System" --Francis R. Bowerman
"Development of Standards Under Federal Water Quality Act of 1965"
"California's Approach" --Paul R. Bonderson
11 The Federal Approach" --Harold W. Wolf
"Ultimate Disposal of Contaminants from Wastewater Reclamation" --
Rolf Eliassen
KEYNOTE AND AWARDS LUNCHEON SESSION
12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m.
Mr. Arthur D. Caster, Water Pollution Control Federation President,
will address the Association on Federation affairs
SESSION "B"
2:15 to 5:00 p.m.
MODERATOR --Paul V. Hennessy
"Engineer-Contractor Relationships"
"My Favorite Gripes about Engineers" --J. R. Van Valkenburgh
"My Favorite Gripes about Contractors" --Robert L. White
"New ApJ.>roaches to Problems in the Design and Maintenance of
Sewers
"Tees as a New Concept for Mainline Sewer Connections" --
Mark J. Rifkin
"Los Ange le s ' Super Sewer" --Clarence A • Nipper
"Load Bearing Characteristics of Pipe Bedding Materials"
A. J. Reed
"A Universal Solvent" --Marvin E. Stephenson
SESSION "C"
2:15 to 5:00 p.m.
. MODERATOR --Edwin R. Stowell
"Controlling Activated Sludge"
''Control Bases on Cell Residence Time" --David Jenkins
and Walter E. Garrison
"Automated Control of Dissolved Oxygen" --Charles s. Zickefoose
"Instrumentation in Action"
"Hyperion Diesel Plant Data Logger" --Clayton Beckman
"Data Logger Experience at San Jose" --Richard Worthey
"Special Instruments at Seattle Metro's Renton Plant" --
Warren R. Uhte
"The Petroleum Industry's Waste Disposal Plans" --Irving Brown
Agenda Item #20 H-2 All Districts
SECTION AND COMMITTEE MEETINGS
2:00 to 5:00 p.m. Maintenance Certification Committee
5:00 to 6:30 p.m. Local Section Officers
5:00 to 6:30 p.m. Combined Operator and Maintenance Certification
Committees
FRIDAY, MAY 5
7:00 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. --Registration
BREAKFAST SESSIONS -7:30 to 9:00 a.m.
Sewer Design Breakfast -Moderator: Dean M. Fuller
Subject: "Sewer Design With Maintenance In Mind"
Charles H. Lawrance, Steven Goodman and w. James Horsley
Operators Breakfast -Moderator: Harry Y. Dering
Subject: "Air Diffuser Cleaning" --Chester Holtom
SESSION "D"
9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon
MODERATOR --Perry L. McCarty
"Research Symposium on Anerobid Waste Treatment"
11 Measurement of Digester Mixing with a Radioactive Tracer"
Andrew L. Gram and John Zoltek
"Notes on Chromatographic Analysis of Digester Gases" --
T. G. Shea, W. A. Pretorius and E. A. Pearson
"The Anerobic Filter for Waste Treatment" --J. c. Young
and Perry L. McCarty ·
"Sulfate in Digestion" --Daniel F. Seidel, Allen J. Burdoin,
Roel K. Stratton and Wayne Wolfe
"Anerobic Treatment of Cannery Wastes -A Bench Scale Study"
Franklin J. Agardy and Robert G. Spicer
SESSION "E"
9:15 a.m. to 12:00 noon
MODERATOR --Robert D. Bargman
"Techniques for Digester Cleaning" --Carl A. Nagel
"How to Get Federal Grants" --Ra.r.mond Stone
"Burbank's Activated Sludge Plant' --Ben Onodera
"Sea.ling Sewers Externally by Subsurface Injection of Asphaltic
Sealants" --Steve Serdahely and Leon Anderson
"A Method of Controlling Flow Through Sewage Treatment Plants
Utilizing Submerged Effluent Collectors" --Theodore V. Lutge
BUSINESS LUNCHEON -12:00 noon to 2:00 p.m.
SESSION "F"
2:15 to 4:30 p.m.
MODERATOR --John T. Norgaard
"Ocean Outfall Maintenance" Robert M. Powell and
Robert E. Van Heui t 11 "Effects of Wastewater Disposal to San Francisco Bay
Erma.n A. Pearson, Robert E. Selleck and Phil N. Storrs
"Systems Analysis and Simulation Techniques Employed in
San Francisco Bay Delta Water Quality Control Study"
"Scope of Data Input for Co~rehensive Study" --Raymond Walsh
"Ba.sic Field Data. for Models' --James McCarty
J.,,.J "Hydrologic and Water Quality Models" --Gerald T. Orlob
and Don Evenson
EVENING 7:30 to 12:00 midnight --Lafayette Hotel, International Ballroom
BANQUET SPEAKER --Frank c. DiLuzio, Assistant Secretary of
Interior
Dancing and Entertainment to follow banquet
Agenda Item #20 H-3 All Districts
~
i..,,I
.>
SATURDAY, MAY 6
TREATMENT PIANT TOURS
8:00 a.m. to 12:00 noon --The following plants open for inspection
with guided tours
City of Los Angeles -Hyperion Treatment Plant
Los Angeles County Sanitation Districts -Whittier Narrows Water
Reclamation Plant and Joint Water Pollution Control Plant
Orange County Sanitation Districts -Orange County Sanitation
Districts Plants Nos. land 2
Agenda Item #20 H-4 All Districts
SUR\"EYS:
El;1•ost:1a~s
Cov1rnA<:lrn
Cl-I.A.RLES L. ROBINSON
INS'G"RANCE CONSULTANT
:.u~.NAGr-::.rnNT s1mvrCES1
I:-:au11ANCz D&&>Annn::.-.r FUNCTJO"ll
'.EVA.LUA.TIO~ 01!' DID.El
s~::.J:" I::n~\1ltA:s'Cl:
IxsunA:s-cn Al>llnNI6TilA.TION
AND ACCOUN"l·i:-:o
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
~ATIONAL OIL DUILDING
609 SOU'l'II GRAND AVENU:C:
LOS .A.NGELZS, OALiltORNIA. 00017
STA'li'"I!' IN8UllANC:C ADVIBOil
SA.n:n :rnoou..u.ta
(213) 62:>-lOll
. March 15, 1967
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Dear Mr. Harper:
Thank you for your letter of March 10, 1967 (which I received
yesterday, as a matter of information) indicating that the Dis-
tricts desire this office to design specifications for its pro-
pe.rty insurance, including· bid data for uninsured perils and ex-
posures as outlined in our Report of Survey.
We assume that the commitment would include, in addition:
1) Assisting with the selection and distribution of specifica-
tions to certain types of brokers and markets; 2) Evaluating
and comparing the responding bids on a 11 spread sheet" which
would become a permanent document in your files; 3) Recommend-
ing in writing one or more bidders for consideration by the Boards
of Directors; and 4) Verifying in writing that the submitted pol-
icy conforms to what was represented by the selected bidder.
As you know our fee is $20. per hour of consulting time, as sup-
ported by a written Log, ·.and our Maximum Fee would be $1,200 for
this project. We. do not expect our earned fee. will be the Maxi-.
mum Fee, as that rarely occurs, for reasons that are usually be-
yond our control. Our Deposit Fee for this would be $250 which
will, of course, be credited against our terminal billing of fee.
Our invoice is attached for the Deposit Fee.
This com.~itment can be scheduled to start at your convenience
and it will be completed with all reasonable dispatch.
I will expect to hear from you in the. near future, and Itm look-
ing forward to serving the Districts again.
CLR:hwh
Attch: · Inv. for
Dep. Fee
Agenda Item /121 -I-
Si~cerely yo~rs~./J
;:,;·11/ I! . v:-~ 71 ·· /! , ~ .L_/c,---;,..it-t.\L ·X. / {1· / .:.. .. '-Ji)C).'"
Charles L. Robinson
Insurance Consultant
All Districts
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE· ORDER
C .O. NO • __ 1 __ _
CONTRACTOR Sully-Miller Contracting Company DATE: April 12 2 1967
JOB: Site Improvements -Phase III at Plant No. 1 2 Job No. Pl-12-6
Amount of this change order (ADD) (mEEJIE~) $ 913.55
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEERt S Q.UANTITIES
ADD
Item ' • . Change Est'd. Quant.
J2.:_ Unit From To
2. S.F. 73,400 73,931 I 531 . @ $0. 11 $ 58.41
~: S.F. 2,800 3,526 726 @ 0.22 159.72
S.F. 1,880 . 5,406 3,526 @ 0.25 881.50
6. L.F. 900 . 904 4 @ 1.75 z.oo
TOTAL ADD $1,106.63
DEDUCT
1. S.F. 26,800 25,812 988 @ $0.16 158.08
5. L.F. 3,000 2,900 100 @ 0.35 J~.00
TOTAL DEDUCT $ 193.08
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD m 213.55
Original Contract Price $ 17,873.00
Previous Authorized Changes __ n_o_n_e ____ _
This Change {ADD)(~~) 913.55
Amended Contract Price $ 18,786.55
Board authorization date: Approved:
April 12, 1967
Agenda Item #22
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By ~/s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY
By ____________________________ ___
-J-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-40
ACCEPTING JOB NO• Pl-12-2 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO.
~-1-12-2 AS COMPLETE
---------
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7. and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING
COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE III AT PLANT
NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-12-2, on the 24th day of March, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts• Construction
Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts
has concurred in said engineer•s recommendation, which said recom-
mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the construction of SITE IMPROVEMENTS -
PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. Pl-12-2, is hereby accepted as
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor
dated the 23rd day of day of March, 1967; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation
District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a
Notice of Completion of Work therefor.
Agenda Item #23 -K-All Districts
CONTRACTOR:
COUi~'l'Y S.hNI'l'ATlON lJI3'l'hICTS OF' ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO • __ 1 ___ _
---------------------------------R. J. Noble DATE: April 12, 1967
JOB: Site Im~rovements -Phase II at Plant No. 2a Job No. P2·8-2
Amount of this change order (ADD) (JllKJIOlllK) $ 375.39
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S O.UANTITIES
. film.
Item Change Est'd. Quant.
No. Unit From
1. s.F. 23,212
2. S.F. 700
3. S.F. 11,500
4. S.F. 4,756
DEDUCT
5. L.F. 875
To
~~;J74 162 @ $0.215 $ 34.83
1,237 531 . @ 0.145 77.86
13,109 1,609 @ 0.145 233.30
5,091 335 ·. @ 0.12 40.20
TOTAL ADD $ 386.19
848 27 @ $0.40 10.§0
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 375.39
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$ 7,680.10
none
This Change {ADD)~'1 375.39
Amended Contract Price $ 8,055.69
Board authorization date: Approved:
April 12, 1967
_!~enda Item #24
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
BY __ --1./~s~/-=-P=a.::.:.ul~G~·:......::B~r~ow~n~~~~~~ Chief EngineE:r
R. J • NOBLE COMPANY
By __ ~------------------------
-L-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-39
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-8-2 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO.
P2-8-2 AS COMPLETE
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, R. J. NOBLE COMPANY,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO.
P2-8-2, on the 24th day of March, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the Districts' Construction
Engineer has recommended acceptance of said work as having been
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts
has concurred in said engineer's recommendation, which said recom-
mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the construction of SITE IMPROVEMENTS -
PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, is hereby accepted as
completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor
dated the 16th day of March, 1967; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District
No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of
Comp1etion of Work therefor.
Ap.;enda Item #25 -M-All Districts
CONTRACTOR:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTtl OF ufu.,.NGE COUNTY
P.O. !\OX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C. 0. NO • _ ___...3 __ _
J. !'utnam Henck -----------------------------------DATE: Apr. 12, 1967 .
.:,-oB: __ C_LA_R_I_F_I_E_R_"H_" ,&.--J--=~;.._B_N_O_._P_2_-1_2 ________________ _
Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT} $ none
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
Extension of Time
Delay in delivery of Raw Sludge Pump due to
non-availability of copper wire for motor
caused by Vietnam conflict 130 days
* * * * * * * * * * * *
Original completion date: November 22, 1966
November 27, 1966 Change Order No. 2 -5 calendar days
Completion date with this extension
of time -130 calendar days April 6, 1967
April 6, 1967 Actual completion date:
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD
This Change {ADD)(DEDUCT)
Amended Contract Price
$ 241,518.00
2,266.18
none
$ 249,784.18
Board authorization date: Approved:
April 12, 1967
Agenda Item #26
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By ____ ....J./~s~/-=-P;au~l~G~-~B~r_o~wn-=---::------Chief Engineer
J. l'utnam Henck
'liy _______________ _
-N-All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-41
ACCEPTING JOB NO. P2-12 AS COMPLETE
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF
DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO.
P2-12 AS COMPLETE
------.. .-
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, J. PUTNAM BENCK, a
corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for CIARIFIER "H", JOB NO. P2-12, on the
6th day of April, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recom-
mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the construction of CIARIFIER "H", JOB
NO. P2-12, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the
terms of the contract therefor dated the 26th day of May, 1966; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation
District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a
Notice of Completion of Work therefor.
Agenda Item #27 -0-All Districts
'vwV
RESOLUTION NO. 67-42-2
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECUTION
OF HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION
AGREEMENTS
RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE EXECU-
TION OF HOLD HARMLESS AND INDEMNIFICATION AGREE-
MENTS IN FAVOR OF SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS COMPANY
OF CALIFORNIA •
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.
2, of Orange County, California, does hereby resolve, determine
and order:
Section 1. That Fred A. Harper as General Manager of
the District be authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
the District a hold harmless agreement in favor of Southern
Counties Gas Company of California in the form of Exhibit 11 A11
attached hereto and ma.de a part hereof for the purpose of re-
solving and determining a dispute concerning the deposit of the
contractor Nick Bebek and Jack Brkich arising out of Contract 2-2
in the sum of $4,580.33 made on behalf of the District with
Southern Counties Gas Company of California.
Section 2. That Fred A. Harper as General Manager of
' \
the District be authorized and directed to execute on behalf of
the District a hold harmless agreement in favor of Southern
Counties Gas Company of California in the form of Exhibit 11 B"
attached hereto and made a part hereof for the purpose of re-
solving and determining a dispute concerning the deposit of the
contractor Vido Artukovich & Son, Inc., arising out of Contract
2-1 in the sum of $6,389.82 made on behalf of the District with
'...,.,; Southern Counties Gas Company of California.
PASSED AND APPROVED at a regular meeting of the Board of
Directors held on the 12th day of April, 1967.
Agenda Item #34 -P-District #2
RESOLUTION NO. 67-43-2
APPROVING EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN
PACIFIC COMPANY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF EASEMENT AGREEMENT WITH SOUTHERN
PACIFIC COMPANY
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the easement agreement with Southern
Pacific Company, a corporation of the State of Delaware, granting
the District permission to enter upon that Company's property and
trackage to construct, reconstruct, maintain and operate the
Euclid Trunk Sewer between Ball and La Palma Avenues {Contract No.
2-10-6), is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the
District; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary be
authorized to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, in
form acceptable to the General Counsel.
Agenda Item #36 -Q-District #2
i
RESOLUTION NO. 67-44
APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR USE OF
LOWER MILLER•HOLDER TRUNK SEWER
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR USE
OF LOWER MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 3 and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated April 1,
1967, entitled "Agreement for Use of Lower Miller-Holder Trunk
Sewer (Districts No. 3 and 11 -between Nichols Street and
Hamilton Avenue)", wherein District No. 11 will use, temporarily,
that portion of The Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer between Nichols
Street and Hamilton Avenue owned solely by District 3, is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairmen and the Secretary of County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 are hereby authorized and
directed to execute said agreement, on behalf of the Districts,
in form acceptable to the General Counsel.
Agenda Item #40 -R-Districts # 3 and 11
,
"-'/
AGREEMENT FOR USE OF LOWER
MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER
(Districts No. 3 and 11 -
between Nichols Street and
Hamilton Avenue)
THIS AGREEMENT, made by and between County Sanitation District
No. 3 of Orange County, hereinafter called "THREE" and County Sanita-
tion District No. 11 of Orange County, hereinafter called "ELEVEN" on
the 1st day of April, 1967.
W I T N E S S E T H: ________ .._._
WHEREAS, a certain territory of Eleven, hereinafter described,
is in need of temporary sewerage service which can conveniently be
provided temporarily by the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer owned solely
by Three in its reach between Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue in
Huntington Beach; and
WHEREAS, Eleven owns permanent capacity rights in said Miller-
Holder Trunk Sewer in the reach between Hamilton Avenue and Treatment
Plant No. 2; and
WHEREAS, the said Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer in the reach between
Nichols Street and Hamilton Avenue has capacity beyond the present
needs of Three; and
WHEREAS, it is planned and anticipated that within a period of
five years from the date of this agreement Eleven will provide separate
sewerage facilities designed to eliminate the necessity of Eleven's
use of Three's facilities as provided in this agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS MUTUALLY AGREED AS FOLLOWS:
1. Three hereby grants permission for the discharge of sewage
and industrial waste from Eleven to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at
the intersection of Nichols Street and Warner Avenue from the territory
in Eleven described as follows:
All that area included within the present boundaries
of Eleven located north of Talbert Avenue and Talbert
Avenue as may be extended westerly
Agenda Item #40 S-1 Districts #3 and 11
2. That said discharge of sewage and industrial waste as
described in Section 1 hereof shall not exceed a maximum peak flow
of 16 million gallons per day during the term of this agreement.
3. That Three will charge Eleven quarterly for discharge of
sewage and industrial waste originating within the hereinabove desig-
nated territory and discharged as hereinabove described and Eleven
agrees to pay FIFTEEN DOLLARS PER MILLION GALLONS for all sewage and
industrial waste so discharged.
4. That this agreement will terminate on April 1, 1972 unless
cancelled or extended by mutual agreement.
5. It is agreed and understood that on or before April 1, 1972,
measures will be undertaken to provide separate and permanent fac111~
ties for the conveyance of sewage and industrial waste from the here-
inabove designated territory of Eleven.
6. That in the event it is determined that areas within Three
can be conveniently served by the facilities of Eleven provided by
Eleven within the boundaries of Three for the purpose of effectuating
the temporary discharge of sewage and industrial waste to the said
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer at Nichols Street, the sewage and industrial
waste originating within Three shall be conveyed by Eleven to said
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer free of charge.
Agenda Item #40
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3,
of Orange County, California, a
public corporation
By
'Uhairman, Board of Directors
By _..S_e_c_r_e_t_a_r_y-, -B!!!!!'o_a_r_d ..... o-r~b~1'""'' r_e_c_,t,_.o_r_s __ _
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11,
of Orange County, California, a
public corporation
By ""!l:C_h_a-..i_r_m_a_n-,-E=--oa_r,..d ...... o-r~b;qol~r---e~c~t~o~r~s~---
By •si--e_c_r..,.e•t ... a ... r ... y-, -B6~a~r~d"!l"-o---r~b~1~r~e~c~t~o~r~s~--
S-2 Districts #3 and 11
RESOLUTION NO. 67-47-7
OVERRULING PROTESTS TO ENGINEERS'REPORT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS
AND OBJECTIONS MADE OR FILED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE REPORT OF BOYLE AND LOWRY, CON-
SULTING ENGINEERS; AND APPROVING AND ADOPl'-
ING SAID REPORT AS MADE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. This being the time and place set by the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange
County, California, for the hearing on any objections to the report
of Boyle and Lowry, Consulting Engineers, Sanitation Engineers for
said District dated January, 1967, or to doing all or any par.t of
the work referred to in said report, pursuant to legal notices of
said hearing published for the time and in the manner prescribed by
law, the matter was called up.
Section 2. There were ______ verbal protests or objections
made by those present at the hearing.
----
Section 3. The Secretary reported that there had been
written protests filed in the office of the Secretary of
the Board.
Section 4. All protests and objections, both oral and
written, made or filed in connection with the report of Boyle and
T.owx·y ;a Conei1l t.i ng F.ngineers, dated January, 1967, filed with this
Board on March 1, 1967, be and tlle same are hereby overruled and
denied, and said report is hereby adopted as made.
Agenda Item #56 -T-District #7
RESOLUTION NO. 67-46-7
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF ORANGE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF ORANGE FOR PURCHASE OF FACILITIES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Sale and
Purchase dated April 12, 1967, between the District and the City of
Orange, providing tor purchase by the District of the PROSPECT-SPRING
SUBTRUNK SEWER and capacity rights in the Hewes Avenue Subtrunk Sewer,
is hereby approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and Secretary be authorized
and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District, as
prepared by the General Counsel.
Agenda Item #58 -U-District No. 7
AG.Rf.:!;;~·!l!:NT FOR SALE AN'D Ptm.ca .. ;;sE OF
PROSPECT-SPRING SUBTRUNK SEWER
THIS AGREEl1lENT r::.ad..:;; and er.tered into on the t.\·;el£th day
of April, 1967, by "nd between the CITY o~ OP~NG~, a municipal
corpo~ation in tne State of California, hereinafter called
c.,;:..LI20R:.~IA, a duly ~uthorized and existing public agency in
the county of Orange, Sta-Ce of Califoi:nia, hereina:f-'~er called
i~{ERE.~S, B~'YER has heretofore adopted and approved after
public hearing an engineering report made in accordw4ce with
the provisions of Section 474.3 of .. the Health and Safety Code
o:O: the state of California which report, aroong o·t:her things,
describes a ~aster plan of subtrunk sewer facilities for BUYER,
and
WHEREAS, SELLER is the ct-mer of certain subtrunk sewer
facilities more particularly hereinafter described which
may properly be made a part of the subtrunk sewer system of
BUYSR. and
vl£-iEf<.EAS, Bu-YER is willing to purchase said subt.ru11k sewer
facilities and thereafte~ to use and main-C.ain them as a part
of its subtrunk s~w~r system, and
viP..E.REAS, SELLER is willing to sel1 said subtrunk sewer
facilitie~,
NOtv, Tr--!ERE~'ORE, the parties hereto do hereby covenant,
promise a..~d agree as follows:
l. ~· · SELLER promises and agrees to sell to BUYER
and BUYER agrees to buy from szr.T~R for the uses and purposes
aforesaid that cGrt-ain ii1.terc0pter sewer cominonly known as
Agenda Item #5'Q . V-1 District No. 7
the PROSPECT-S~RING SUBTRUNK SEWER described as that certain
vitrified clay pipe sewer complete in place with appurtenances
extending from a connection with BUYER'S manhole in Chapman
Avanue at Prospect Avenue running thence northerly and easterly
to its terminus in Spring· Street at Esplanade for a distance of
3,779 feet more or less. Said sewer line is constructed of
twelve-inch vitrified clay sewer pipe and the purchase price
is the sum of T~-."E~""I'Y-HI!m THOUSA.i..~D FOUR I-IUNDP..ED SEVENTY-
S!X DOLL.~~ AL~D TWENTY CENTS ($29,476.20). SELLER further
agrees to sell to BUYER and Bu-YER agrees to purchase from
SELLER sewer capacity rights in SELLER'S twelve-inch vitrified
clay pipe sewer beginning at the intersection of Spring and
Esplanade Streets ·thence running easterly in spring Street to
Hc-:,;cs Avenue, thence northly in Hewes Avenue for a total length
of 3,448 feet. said sewer capacity rights shall be equivalent
and equal.to tha~ amount of sewage and/or industrial wastes
an eigh~-inch sewer would tra11sport over the sa.11e route and at
the same gradient. The selling price of said capacity rights
in said set•."er is "i:rie sum of SEVENTEEN THOUSAND TWO HUNDRED-
FO:r\.TY DOLL~~RS ($17 ,240) •. Said sewer lines are entirely located
within public property.
2. et·~RST:UP. SELLER does hereby warrant, agree and
p~omise to deliver full title and ownership to the aforesaid
sewerage facilities hereinabove described free an~ clear of
all encu.rnbrances, adverse claims and liens of any and all
nature \~lather recorded or not or otherwise. SELLER covenants
a~d ag~ees to hold BUYER and its successors or assigns safe and
harmless from any and all adverse claims against or claims of
interast or ownership in the property conveyed.
Agenda Item #58 V-2 District No. 7
--~:--~~-.-· -:-:-~--·~ --'"':'-·--·
con.di tion. and BU'.!ER is willing to ilccept the camo in their
present condition subject to the above warranty.
4. POSSESSION. BW~R shall be entitled to possession
o~ the subject sower facilities on and after the date of this·
agreement and BUYER agrees to maintain and operate the facilities
aftel:' said date.
5. Pl-:.!~B~~. Upon the execution of this agreement BUYER
agrees to pay SELI~R the total amount of the purchas~ price
hereinabove mentioned of FORTY-SIX THOUSAND SEVEN HU~"DRED-
SIXTEEN DOLLf.\..RS AND TWEN'I'Y. CE~""TS ($46,716.20) for said sewerage
facilities and appurtenances thereto hereinabove described from
the BU'IER'S ·funds heretofore collected by SELLER as an agent
of BU'lER as connection charges within the territorial limits of
Bu-YER. Upon payment of the purchase price title to said sewerage
facilities and appurtenances shall pass to BuYER.
ZN WITNESS ~aiEREOP the parties hereto caused the names a.~d
seals of the public corpora·tions and th.e na.'n~s of the officers
thereof to ba subscrihad·hereto the day and year first hereinabove
written.
{SE.~L)
(SEAL)
-:~ ".! ;'1
• • " .' '; :' JI• '•' • -
Azenda Item #58 V-3
CZTY OF ORANGE,·a municipal
corporation
By
By
COUNTY $.P-.NITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
OF ORt~NGE COUMTY, CALIFORNIA, a
public corporation
By
Chairman, Board of Directors
By
secretary, Board of Directors
District No. 7
·.
-,_
City of Orange
City Counci I
300 East Chapman
Orange, California 92666
DRAFT
Attention , City Clerk ----------------------
Gentlemen:
In accordance with the instruction of the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7, request is hereby made on behalf of said
District for permission to connect to existing sewer foci I ities of the city
of Orange at the fol lowing locations and as shown on the attached portion
of the map of Assessment District No. 6.
1 • Bond Avenue at Hewes Avenue
2. Church Street at East Walnut Avenue
3. Private road off Hewes Avenue at .. a point
approximately 500 feet northerly of Spring Street.
4. Spring Streat at Hewes Avenue
5. McPherson Road at Chapman Avenue
The requested connections wi 11 al low sewage originating in county areas as
indicated on the enclosed map to flow through the city's facilities and then
be discharged into the trunk sewer foci Ii ties of County Sanitation District
No. 7. These connections wi 11 void a duplication of foci Ii ties as we II as
expedite completion of the district's program in the assessment district
involved. Your early response wi II be appreciated.
Fred A. Harper, Secretary
I .
·.
Agenda Item #59 -W-District No. 7_
~, -~--_____./ ~ c.
I
~~~
/
I
~' , -~ ..; .;e 8-~"t.--;-
~d/ <==-=--
c: -
L /A-~, ) --r ,,.-s ,___.,. _;7 I -~ =----u t
( I) ) . .r ' l ,;
L • \ ...__ _ _,,_,,..
\'f '(yo ( J. I ( ____ __,,, -~-
). \ ~11' · _)-z , _,,
.......--~. ~71--f
-r --_{ ) ..... I / ~r "'-..-'L ~---c .. 7 c ...... c>~ -;-\
~'-......._
I ' ./'-~-.
-~-;y-0' ..) /" -:> , ~ .
~ <--'C ;;-£__ (~ -c:...-..~' ' (:? -~
~ ~07: ~ /? ----__5/$
_,~
(!) ~ J
-~,~ G ~b ~~
_J ~ ~/ ~(;_ / 77}~-vV~
~rW _y ~· G 1(!!'11 Yff01 ~ ~~~
-~~ (; 26 r/~ ~'~fl
. J ;z, s, -n;:I? ///( ' (] ~
k'~ (:' U(/ &-£--: Y-? ;?-~®'p/~~ iJ¥
?<--PJi77~'~ ~ .. ~ ~
/
. c::::::=> ~ ' ) .b
~Yr
/
-0A
~ 6? ' cs:z_-~ /~)
, eJ I~ _) A lf1 'tT / \ 24-/3/(J
-L---7 A 5~/ ( ~/~ --y /~
/
II
• MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
Co unty Sani tati o n Di st ricts
of Ora nge Cou nty, Ca lifo rni a
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, Apri l 12, 1967
8 :00 p.m.
P. 0 . Box 5 175
10844 Elli s Avenue
Fou ntain Va lley, Cal i f ., 92708
Phone 962-2411
April 7, 1967
The following is an explanation of the more important non-
routine items whic h appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to
the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting
but will appe ar in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
Jo i nt Bo ards
No. 3 -SEATING OF NEW REPRESENTATIVE FROM SANTA ANA : The Mayor of
Santa Ana, or his alterna te, sits on the Boards of Directors of
Districts No. 1, 2, 3, and 7 . Fo l lowing Mayor Harvey's retireme nt
and the April 4 municipal elections in that city, the City Council
is s chedu l ed to elect a new mayor on April 10. Accordingly, it is
antieipated that we will receive official notification of the
election o f the new mayor and his alternate before our meeting in
order that the new representative can be seated.
No . 4 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO . 1: Since retiring Mayor
Harvey wa s Chai r man of the Board of Directors of District No. 1, it
will be ne cessary to name a new chairman at this meeting . It is
perhaps appropriate to call to the attention of the Directors a lso
that our establishe d procedures require the annual election of the
chairman o f each District Board at the next regular meeting after
this (May 10 ).
No . 14 -REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER AND GUEST SPEAKER: From time to
time during the past year we ha ve scheduled g uest speakers to di scuss
matters of general interest to the Directo r s and guests . For this
meeting , we have been fortunate in being able to obtain as a spea ker
Dr . J. E . McKee, Professor of Environmental En g ineering at the
California Institute of Technology . As the Directors are aware,
Dr. McKee is considered a n international expert in the field of
water pollution and g eneral environmental science and serves as the
Districts ' consulta nt o n current problems and special assignments.
Dr . McKee is planning to cover in his talk a topic mostly
unrelated to water pollution but which should be of general interest
to the Directors and the public at l arge . The subject is ''The
Expansion of Nuclear Power". Dr. McKee serves the Atomic Energy
Commission as a member of the Committee on Reactor Safety and
consequently has a broad knowledge of nuclear power generat ion. We
believe his presentation will disclose facts and projections as to
the extent of nuclear power development which most persons are
unaware of.
Nos. 16 through 20 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITT EE AND ITS
RECOMMENDATIONS: The Committee met in lengthy session on March 29
and discussed and reviewed a number of matters concerning our Joint
operations. On three subjects, the Committee arrived at definite
recommendations which are discussed and presented in detail in the
accompanying written report of the Co mmittee . Consideration of
action on these recommendations constitutes Items No. 18, 19 and 20
on the accompanying formal agenda for the meeting.
No. 21 -CONSIDER~TION OF PROPOSAL OF CHARLES L. ROBINSON, INSURANCE
CONSULTANT: At the March Joint meeting, the Boards authorized the
employment of Mr. Robinson for preparing specifications for the
Districts' property insurance, and bid data for "uninsured perils
and exposures" as outlined in his Report of Survey dated December,
1966. The Boards limited the fees to be paid for these services to
the unused portion ($790) of his original proposal.
Mr. Robinson submitted a new proposal for these services,
dated March 15, which stated a maximum fee of $1,200. (A copy of
this proposal is included with the agenda.) The staff advised
Mr . Robinson not to proceed with the work as it would be necessary
to obtain authorization from the Boards for the maximum fee quoted.
Nos. 22 and 23 -CLOSE OUT OF PLANT NO. 1 PAVING JOB (Pl-12-2): This
job, consisting of miscellaneous paving additions at Plant No. 1,
was completed satisfactorily during the past month by the contractor,
Sully -Miller Contracting Company of Orange.
Item No. 22 is the customary adjustment of engineer's quanti·
ties to change the original contract price to reflect differences
in amounts of paving installed over those originally estimated. In
the case of this project, this results in an addition of $913 .55 to
the original contract estimate.
Item No. 23 is the usual resolution accepting the work as
complete on March 24, 1967 and authori z ing filing of Notice of
Completion.
Nos. 24 and 25 -CLOSEOUT OF PLANT NO . 2 PAVI~G J OB (P2-8-2): This
job, consisting of miscellaneous paving additions at Plant No . 2,
was completed satisfactorily during the past month by the contractor,
R. J. Noble Company of Orange.
-2-
Item No. 24 is the customary adjustment of engineer's quanti -
ties to change the original contract price to reflect differences
in amounts of paving installed over those originally estimated . In
the case of this project, this results in an addition of $375 .39 to
the original contract estimate.
Item No . 25 is the usual resolution accepting the work as
complete on March 24, 1967 and authorizing filing of a Notice of
Completion.
Nos. 26 and 27 -CLOSEOUT OF PLANT J OB NO . P2 -12: This contract
consisted of the construction o f a new pr i mary clarifier at Plant
No. 2 and adds 20 million gallons per day to our treatment capacity
there. With the final installation and testing of variable speed
s l udge pumping equipment on Ap r il 6, the job was completed by the
contractor, J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino, at a total contract
price of $249 ,784.18 .
There was a delay of over four months in completion of this
contract over the time allowed, through no fault of the contractor.
Th i s was occasioned by the non -delivery of a 20 HP motor as a part
of the variable speed automated s ludge pumping equipment. We are
assured by the supplier of this equipment and the contractor that
the delay in supp l ying this motor was due to the current non -
ava i lability of copper wire, except under tight priority allocations,
caused by the Vietnam conflict .
Our standard specifications do not provide for an extension
of time for this type of delay since , technically, we are not in a
state of national emergency or war . However the facts as stated
above are such that we can see no alternative but to grant the
contrac tor the necessary extension o f time in order to avoid unjust
imposition of liquidated damages . This recommendation for an
extension of time of 130 days appears on the agenda as Change Order
No . 3 (Item No . 26).
Item No . 27 is the customary resolut i on accepting the job as
complete on April 6 and authorizing filing a Notice of Completion.
No . 28 -RECEIVE AND FILE FINANC I AL REPORT: The Districts'
independent auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have
recently submitted their interim financia l report for the first
six months of fiscal year 1966-67. A copy of this report is being
forwarded with this agenda and it will be in order for it to be
received and filed . Also, if there are any questions in connection
with this report, the staff wi ll be glad to go into it in any detail
desired.
-3 -
District No. 2
No. 35 -RELEASE OF CONSTRUCTION DEPOSITS BY SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS
COMPANY: During the 1958 bond issue construction in the District,
agreement was reached with the Gas Company that it would be
responsible for paying for any necessary relocation of its lines due
to the sewer construction. However in our construction contracts,
as originally written, the District's contractors were obliged to
pay for the relocations with the cost thereof included in their
bids. As a result of the above determination made as to the Gas
Company's responsibility, refunds to the District were obtained in
all contracts except two which, for various reasons, we have been
unable to settle until now .
In one of these instances the contractor is deceased and
therefore unable to sign a release and in the other, the signature
of one of the partners cannot be obtained. Consequently, an agree -
ment has been worked out with the Gas Company that if the District
will sign a Hold Harmless Agreement releasing the Gas Company from
responsibility, the funds on deposit ($6,389.82 and $4,580.33
respectively) will be refunded directly to the District. Accordingly,
we are recommending the resolution appearing on the agenda authori-
zing the General Manager to sign such agreements and the General
Counsel and I will be prepared to go into greater detail on this
matter if desired.
No. 36 -PERMIT AGREEMENT FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC COMPANY: This
company requires formal execution of an agreement for each new sewer
crossing of its right of way. The District's next construction
contract (2-10-6, Euclid Trunk Sewer between Ball and La Palma
Avenues) involves such a crossing and consequently it will be
necessary to authorize the execut ion of such an agreement by the
Chairman and Secretary.
Districts No. 3 and 11
No. 40 -AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER USE BY
DISTRICT NO. 11 : A copy of this recommended agreement is included
with the agenda material and is, we believe, self-explanatory.
However, it should be recalled for the Directors that the terms of
this agreement were worked out by a special joint committee of
Directors of the two Districts last year as a part of an over-all
accommodation arrangement between the Districts. District No. 11,
in the next few days, will commence discharging to the Miller -Holder
Trunk as described in the agreement and, accordingly, it is
appropriate to authorize final formal execution of this agreement
at this meeting.
District No. 11
No . 44 -NOTICES TO WITHHOLD FROM CONTRACT NO. 11-10-2: We have
rec e ived two formal notices to withhold funds for monies due the
contractor for this project, Lomar Corporation and Orange County
Pipeline, Inc. I t will be necessary to receive and file the notices
as set forth on the formal agenda .
-4-
District No. 5
No. 51 -ADJOURNMENT TO 7:00 P.M., APRIL 26: It is suggested that
the Directors adjourn to a later meeting this month in order to
award the contract for the demolition work on the old Bay Bridge
Pumping Station, no w out for bid, and t o close out the manhole repair
contract. The suggested time and date coincides with a sc h eduled
meeting of District No. 7 and a suggested meeting of the Executive
Committee.
District No. 7
No . 55 -HEARING ON MASTER PLAN REPORT: This is the time set for
a public hearing on the District's proposed Ma s ter Plan of Subtrunk
Sewers. Copies of this report were made available at the following
locations in order to facilit?t e inspection of the report by any
person interested:
City of Orange
City of Tustin
County Libra ry in Tustin
Lowry and Associates
After the public hearing, the Board will consider adoption of
a resolution approving the report (Item No. 56).
No . 58 -AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE OF THE PROSPECT-SPRING SUBTRUNK, AND
8-INCH CAPACITY RIGHT IN HEWES AVENUE SUBTRUNK FROM THE CITY OF
ORANGE: To provide trunk sewer facilities to serv e sev eral sewers
constructed within Assessment District No. 6, it is necessary that
the District acquire certain sewerage facilities a s outlined in the
Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers. This agreement, a copy of which is
attached to the agenda, provides for the purchase of the following
facilities:
3,779 feet of 12" VCP sewer, complete in pla ce,
extending from a connection to a District No. 7
manhole in Chapman Avenue at Prospect Avenue, thence
northerly and easterly to its terminus in Spring
Street at Esplanade. The purchase price is $7.80
per lineal foot , for a total price of $29,476.20.
8 11 sewer capacity rights in the City of Orang e's
12" sewer beg inning at the intersection of Spring
and Esplanade Streets, then easterly in Spring
Street to Hewes Avenue, thence northerly in He wes
for a combined total length of 3,448 feet. The cost
is $5.00 per lineal foot, for a total of $17,240.
The total purchase price of $46,716.20 for the two facilities
is to be paid to the City of Orange from the fund established by the
City for collecting the District No. 7 connection charges.
-5-
No. 59 -REQUEST FOR PERMISSION TO USE FACILITIES OWNED BY THE CITY
OF ORANGE: The engineers for Assessment District No . 6 have advised
that it will be necessary for the District to obtain permission from
the City of Orange to connect to and use certain existing facilities
owned by the City. This will permit sewage originating in County
areas within Assessment District No. 6 to flow through the City's
facilities and then be discharged into District No. 7 trunk sewers.
If the draft letter attached to the agenda is approved, a formal
request will be forwarded to the City.
No . 60 -VERBAL REPORT OF STAFF AND ENGINEERS RE: POSSIBLE
CONSTRUCTION OF DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES BETWEEN COLLEGE AVENUE
PUMP STATION AND TREATMENT PIANT NO. 1: District No. 7's sewage
flow between the College Avenue Pumping Station and Treatment Plant
No. 1 will soon exceed the capacity rights. The engineers would
like to present a brief verbal report outlining their recommendations,
and the staff will report on the financing aspects of the engineer's
plan.
No. 63 -ADJOURNMENT TO 7:00 P.M., APRIL 26: The public hearing on
the spreading of assessments in Assessment District No. 6 has been
set for this date. Accordingly, it will be necessary for the Board
to adjourn.
-6-
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
--
=-
-
-
=
-
~
.
.
.
.
:
=
--
-
=-
-
=
=
~~
-
=
=
=
_=-
,
=
=
:
:
o
-
-
=
=t
:
:
==
=
=
-
=
+=
(
=-
~
-~=
=
;
!
t
i
~
=
=
=
-
-
=
=
'
'
j,
~ ~~
,
f
~
t
~
I
'
·-
=
-
-_
==
-_
~
-
f
~t
~
~1
"
-
_-
=
--
-~
-
1-
-
~
~
-
.
~
~
--
--
-
-
-
-
-
~~
-
~
-·~
----
-
-
--
----
~
~~--
=
-
~-
-=·
__
_
-
_
__
-
--
=
-
-
-
-
-
~
~"
--
-
--
-
--
t_,
~
·
-
·
.r
-
I
~,
~-
..
.
-
-
~
Ir
-
\
:
'f
,
(
\
t
.
-
ll
.
--
-
r.
':-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
,
~
--
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
--
·-
-
<.
.
.
i
-
=,
I-
-
=
-
=
=
==
=
-
~
-
-
~:_
-
-
--
-
-
-
~
-
~
-·
-·
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
'"
"
--
~
-
'3
w
(N
l\
i
\c
\
-
-
-
.
-
--
--
-
'-
'
'3
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
-
--
-
'
~
-
""
.
.
-
-
--
·
-
--
-
~
~
w
~
~
r-
1
--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
~
t-
'
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~
~
-
~
=
~~
-
-
--
-_-____
_
,_
~-
~c
l
.
.
.
~
-
--
~~
1-
-
-
-
-
11-
-
'\
·
~--
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
·
-
-·
--
---
--
-
-
---
-
-
,
__
_
_
~
·
~
.<l
'
-
'-
l
'1
'1
c~
:=
!
!
=
=
=
==
=
=
==
==
==
=
l
=
==
=
r
=
=
=
~
=!
=
==
=
=
~:=
=
=
=
l
=
=
=
=
=
=l
=
=
=
=
l
=
=
=
=
=
r
=
=
l
=
=
=
=
j
=
=
=
=
=
~
=
=
=
t
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
!
=
=
r
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
=
l
=
~
~=
=
=
=
=
#
=
=
=
~
l
'(
)
'
(A
..
.
.
.
.
~
~-
·-
-
i
I
::
:
s
--
-
{,
,
.
.
_
~
~ ~
-
--
-
--
(N
'
~
"'
c,
.
,
c
;
:
.
~
.
.
.
.
_
•
-
-
.•
~
~
I
-1
--
·
--
-
-
-·
.
-
~
--
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
~
~
--
~
'l
-
1-
-
-
-
--
\
\
-
.-
~
'-
.
I
"'
"
'
w
-
-
--
-
-
·
--~
-
I
CJ
'
,
.
-
f:
l
\
~
Cl
'
•
--
-
'{
\
"
-.
.
.
.
l
~
v-
.
,
•-
-
~
--
.
-
-
-
'"
'
"
1-
-
--
-
0 oq
~
-
-
~
--
"C
:
.
_
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
~
__
.,
_
_
__
_
__
_
0
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
--
-
-
-
-
~
--
--
.--
-
-
--
-
·
-
y
~.
J
">
...
.
.)
,
..
.
.
.
--
..
~
~
-
~
~
~
~
~
p
-
l-
-
--
~
--
--
-
-
-.
:
!--
=
-
-
-
-
=
=
=
-
-
-
--
=
-
-
'=-
==
.
.
;
.
.
-
:
:
.
:
:
.
.
--
-
.
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
..
~
--
--
-
--
-
-
-
·-
'f
'
f'
r
~
r-
l,
~
'1
~
t
~
1~
-
~
II
~
(
·,
~~
~
'
~
..
.
.
.
~
~
~
~
~
~
~~
~
~
~
~
-
:
~~
~
·
.
t
~~
~
J~
~
l~
~
'
t~
i
t
~'
~
~
.
~
~.
~
i.
,
N.
~
a ~~
~
~
J)
:
-
~~
\
\
b
,
0~
~
~
~
t
~
?
~
~
l~
1.,
~
~
~
~'
\
.
~
..
.
.
.
'
..
.
.
.
,
_ ,_
"
~
'
'
I
I
?
"-~
~-
~
~
~
~
-
~.
":
:
:
:
:
,
I
~
-
-
~
I
~-
~~
~
~
:-
.
:
1
-
-
-
'
-
•
~
-
-
-
'
-
-
-
-
I
"
"
~
-
·'
_
I
~
f
"\
t'
~~
'
-
>
-
~
--
1
-_
. _ ~
--
-
-
--
--
-_-
~
--
-
-
-·
-
-
·-
-
--
-
--
-
-
~
-
-~-=
-
--
-
·-
~
~
--
-
-
-
-
~
-
-
-
, ~
--
.
.
~
__
" __
_
_
~
I
'1
:
i
~
-
'
-
~
---
~
-
-
\'
'
--
-
-
-
--
-
_
,
_
..
__
_
-
--
--
It
~
w
_
~
-
-
-
-·
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-·
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
I
..
J
u.
--
-
-
~-
'3
_
(.
.
.
,
(J
.
J
"'
-
~
-
·-
-
.
-
·-
·
-
-
-
"
'1
--
-
-
~
w
~
~
'
t-
'
-
--
-
-
'I
.
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
.
'
IV
~
-
-
-
.
,~
q-
.
.
_
-
'
"'
~
--
-
~
-
-
-
<1
'
~
~
I
'1
'1
1
"f
.
.
~~
n-
.
.
'
-
-
-
--
-·
-
-
-
.
-
--
'-
--
'
-
--
-
.
"'
(
)
'
(,
.
I
'
~
~
c
~
~
--
--
-
w
-
--
~
-
Cl
.
\
~
t-
-
'-
l
'1
1'
J
~
~
w
6'
'
~
~~~
0
~
()
-
--
~
--
-
-
--
0
lN
w
'
()
"1
(-
-
·-
~
·~
-
--
__
_
_
_.
_
.
_
.
.
__
--
,
-
-
--
-
-
'
C>
'
~--
~.
:
,
.
._
_
_
_
()
~
--
-
-
--
-\
;
I
r
~
~
"
~
'b
\
.
.
.
:
VJ
I'
-
-
'
,
~
-
-
-
~
--
~
-
--
-
--
-
--
Lo
J
er
-
.
-
-
-
--
-
I
-
-
-
-
"-
-
--
-
-
~
..
.
.
.
~
~
"
~
'-
-
-
~
c
--
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
--
~
0(
)
-
--
-
-
c-
~
__
_
_,
-
·
--
--
-
N)
--
-
~
--
0
.
\
·-
>-
-
-
-
.,
.,
,
,
"'
. ,
~,
"'
"
,,
6
.
::
:
:
~
"-
-
=.
.
>
..
.
.
"'
..
.
,
~
w
N
-
..
,
,
,.
.
-~
-
~·
f.
~
~ "
;'
\
:l
~
~t
\
.
~
'
~ ~
~ ~
~
'
--
-
-·
--
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
~-
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
,,
_
.
-
-
--
-
-
-
-
--
-
-
--
~
-
-
--
-
-
-
?'
9
--
-
-
-
c
--
-
-
0\
)
--
-
-
<:
:
J
.
--
..
.
.
,
-
-
-
tL
I I
-
~
1i
tt
t
1
tt
~
~
·
~
~
~~
~
•'
I~
~~
\
:
I
~
~
.
~
~
r
~1
L
~-
~
~~
~
~
~
·~
1\
~;
~
I.
~
~"
"
I
.,
i:
'
-
'
.
I~
~
..
.
~
1:
-
.
.
.
,
.
I t~
'l
~
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
~
-
--
·
-
~
'?
A
-
<.
.
i
~-
·
-
-
-
-
-
""
-
~
~
-
-
'
~
-
~
~
-
,_
_
__
__
__
-
'
--
-
-
'
(,
.
,
-
-
w
'
"'
~
w
--
-
N'
i
"'
..
.
.
.
.
.
i
w
C)
"
~
~
(.
.
.
KN
~
t>
r:
:
:
,
\,
-
"(
)
~
w
-
~
()
'\
-
-
--
-
-
--
-
·
-
--
-
-
-
-
-
--
-
--
-
-
·--
-
-
-
-
'
~
"
-
'I
I '
11
!
I
,
Ji
.
I
I
;j
I
Agenda
Item No.
r _,/
Chairman Parsons
(13) Executive Committee meeting 4:30 p.m., April 26th, to
consider personnel requirements, and Joint Operating &
Joint Construction Budgets for 1967-68 f iscal year.
(This meeting will coincide with the adjourned meetings
of Districts 5 and 7 , tentatively set f or 7:00 p.m., April 26).
Suggested names o f Directors to be invited to
Executiv e Committee meeting:
Directors Furman and Bousman
Suggested names o f alternates in the event
one, or both, of the above cannot attend:
Directors Crapo and I.Dng
(19) Call on Harvey Hunt o f John Carollo Engineers f or verbal report
(21) Do you wish to make a recommendation on this item?
(55) Call on Sidney I.Dwry or Boyle and I.Dwry to describe the report
(60) Call on Conrad Hohener of Boyle and I.Dwry for verbal report
Call on Genera l Manager f or report on financing the recommended
f acilities
•
Harper
ROLL CALL
District -------------------Regular
~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time ----------------------------------------
JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1
Parsons
Amo
Bartlett
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Forgit
Furman
Gruber
Gummere
Hock
McMichael
Miller, Clifton
Porter
Mack
Davis
Noe
Shull
Baker
Parks
Crapo
Culver
McMichael
Hock
Schutte
Featherly
DISTRICT 2.,........ v Hileman
v Shull
v"'
v
~ Michel
Krein
Long
Gruber
Bouma
Forgit
Anderson
Michel
Brown
Mack
Kohl
Schwerdtfeger ,./ Harwood
Miller, Clifton
Miller, Harry
McMichael
;J?arks
Porter
Sc!mtte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Stewart
Walters
Workman
Baker
~ Hileman
Krein
Harwood
Fregeau
Clark
Green
Coen
Herbst
Featherly
Speer
Walters
Workman
Baker
Speer
Amo
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
.Culver
Furman
Gummere
McMichael
Long
V' Clark
lZ Herbst
0-
v Featherly
DISTRICT 3
L./' Clark
,c:=
~· Davis ::::=::-Noe ---&..:< Shull
~
Bouma
Anderson
,ee=· Brown
OTHERS: 1 u~ i~~~mt::::: f'J · . Stewart
. ,,,. Kohl
-.....i~--Krein __ .......-::-~ Fregeau
~ Green
Brown
Niss on
Galloway
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
Rimel
Maddox
1 \ .'.~ ~i7....~-Walters ~\ µ. · fo Baker
'Df"Y'-'A~
"\ (LL a~ l Parsons 0 r·-~· -y ~ Gruber
J~ ~~/Ju~ Baker
~~[ ~~dzr~:J: ~~~~;~
v,,, Herbst ,7 Featherly
DISTRICT~
--~-Forgit ,,/ Featherly
DISTRICT 6 &/"'
v-/ Forgit
,_?' Featherly
DISTRICT 7 \)~ N ,#,
(k. i V\'\ ~ ( < (.,L
\)A ij ~ ~ \-l" ~ \~.V-
Clifton 7 Mack Miller,
Forgit
McMichael
Parks
Porter
DISTRICT 8
Martin
Mitchell
Baker
"'
~f \~ \rt, J u.-;:Baker
6 (,0 Stewart
Lambourne .,, Bartlett
0--1? .L Featherly Baker
~ Gruber
7 •7 Hileman
~ Featherly
DISTRICT 11
l;/'Coen _ _.....~-
__ ;;<Y_ Fea therly
ROLL CALL
District -------------------Regular
~------------------Adjourned -------------------Date Time ----------------------------------------
JOINT BOARDS
Parsons
Amo
Bartlett
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Forgit
Furman
Gruber
Gummere
Hock
Long
Miller, Clifton
Miller, Harry
McMichael
Parks
I'
Porter ·
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Stewart
Walters
Workman
Baker
OTHERS:
Brown
Niss on
Galloway
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
Rimel
Maddox
~
VWl e-,/<-&t-i~)
7/ v.
i7
7 \/« ..
V' < \7'/ Davis
7, Noe
\7, Shull
V"', i7 Gruber
Bouma
Forgit
, Anderson _..._\:?_,._ Mic he 1
i7 Brown
Mack
Kohl
Hfleman
Krein
Harwood
" Fregeau -,z__.,,_ Clark
1/ Green
, Coen --'7....-. . Herbst ~ Featherly
DISTRICT 1
McMichael
Miller, Clifton
Porter
Baker
Mack
Featherly
DISTRICT 2,
Parks
Crapo
Culver
McMichael
Hock
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Speer
Walters
Workman
Baker
Speer
Amo
Bousman
Bowen
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Gummere
McMichael
Long
Miller, Harry
Schutte
Schwerdtfeger
Stewart
Walters
Baker
a// Hileman
17' / Shull
17/
&?'
:?:' Michel
!ie' Krein
*
~~~~~od
. HEC_rbs t ;/Al ~ /} lprf'1"1 I
Featherly
Clark
Davis
Noe
Shull
a_..< Bouma
L/" Anderson v'
&:?'/ Brown & Kohl
Krein
&:?'; Fregeau
;::;>/ Green
L?" J"' Herbst 7 Featherly
DISTRICT 5
Parsons
Gruber
Baker
Porter
Gruber
Baker
i7/
&7
;:;::;=-'
DISTRICT 6,,,
&;/<
i7'
7'
Forgit
Featherly
Forgit
Featherly
~ DISTRICT 7,,
Clifton 17', Miller,
Forgit
McMichael
Parks
Porter
Baker
&?'/
7
*
Mack
Gruber
Hileman
.~
DISTRICT 8
Martin
1-.{i tchell
Baker
A;/ Lambourne
~ ........ 7 Featherly
·•'
Stewart
Bartlett
Baker
&:?" Featherly
DISTRICT 11,
V' / Coen
i/'/ Z Featherly
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 8:00 o'clock p.m., A-pril 12 , 196 7, at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present.
Directors present: Clifton C. Miller (Chairman), Al Forgit,
Thomas McMichael, Rex A. Parks, Ellis N.
Porter, and David L. Baker
Directors absent: None
Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT NO. 7 Moved, seconded and duly
ADJOURNMENT Carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to
7:00 p.m., April 26, 1967, in the District's office
at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley~ California.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned
at 10:01 p.m., April 12, 1067.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •
I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County S~nitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, tru~ and
correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of
the regular meeting of said Board on the 12th day of April , 196 7.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation Distric_t _ _!'Io. 7, of Orange
County, California, this 12th day of ~~ril . . , !6 7,. d1Q iJa~a-
Secreta.,w,Yoard ~f Dired~ ~f
County _Sanitation District No. 7
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUI.AR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 8:00 o'clock p.m., April 12 , 1967 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present.
Directors present: Lindsley Parsons (Chairman), Paul Gruber
and David L. Baker
Directors absent: None
Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT NO. 5
ADJOURNMENT
Moved, seconded and duly
carried:
That this meeting of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned
to 5:00 p.m., April 27, ia67; in the District's
office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley,
California.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so
adjourned at 9:17 p.m., April 12, io67.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •
I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County S~nitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, tru7 and
correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of
the regular meeting of said Board on the 12th day of April , 19fy ·
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation Distr1-ct, J'fo • 5 , of Orange
County, California, this 12th day of ,/~~H~~:-;~_~r 7.
~J__{}.~a...~t"
Secr:etary-,_-Board G:t Dire ors of
County_Sanitat1~-~istrict No.5
Agenda
Item No.
~'-1
Chairman Parsons
(13) Executive Committee meeting 4:30 p.m., April 26th, to
consider personnel requirements, and Joint Operating &
Joint Construction Budgets for 1967-68 fiscal year.
(This meeting will coincide with the adjourned meetings
of Districts 5 and 7, tentatively set for 7:00 p.m., April 26).
Suggested names of Directors to be invited to
Executive Committee meeting:
Directors Furman and Bousman
Suggested names o f alternates in the event
one, or both, of the above cannot attend:
Directors Crapo and long
(19) Call on Harvey Hunt of John Carollo Engineers f or verbal report
(21) Do you wish to make a recommendation on this item?
(55) Call on Sidney Lowry o f Boyle and Lowry to describe the report
(60) Call on Conrad Hohener of Boyle and Lowry for verba l report
Call on General Manager for report on financing the recommended
facilities
Vol. 1, No. 5 April 1967
.~ For the Employees of the County Sanit.ation Districts o~ OrangeCounty
Editor: George Cantrell, ·control Center Operator ·
NEW GRADE I's
At a meeting of the Boards
of Directors of the County San-
itation Districts of Orange
County, Mayor Harry H. Harvey,
Chairman of the Joint Boards,
presented Grade I Certificates
as Treatment Plant Operators
to Gerald Baldwin and Leonard
Carney. These men were awarded
the Grade I Certificates as a
result of an examination given
last November by the California
Water Quality Control Associa-
tion.
Gerald Baldwin lives with
his wife, Peggy, and their
children at 15950 Los Reyes
in Fountain Valley, He has
been employed with the Districts
since 1961 and has served as a
. Control Center Operator since
1963. A.native of Philadelphia,
P~nnsylvania, he played halfback
on his .high school team and then
contJpued playing in the mili-
tary service. He played on the
championship teams in the Air-
borne· Bowl games of 1957 and
1958. Serving in both the 11th
and the lOlst Airborne Divisions
as a paratrooper he rose to the
rank of Staff Sgt. and found
time to complete 58 parachute
jumps successfully. Before com-
ing to. California in 1961, he
served on a· local police depart-
ment in·Kentucky.· Both Gerry
and his ,.wife are active as Den
Mother and Den Dad in Cub Pack
281 in Garden Grove.
· .(continued on page 2)
CHANGE OF COMMAND
Prior to the March Board
meeting Mayor Harry H. Harvey
announced he would not run for
re-election in Santa Ana and as
a consequence he could no longer
serve as a member of the Board
of Directors and its Joint
Chairman.
The Boards then elected
Mr. Lindsley Parsons to the post
of Joint Chairman. He had served
as Vice-Chairman under Mayor
Harvey in the past year • Mr •
Parsons, a councilman from New-
port Beach, is also the Chairman
of the Board for District No. 5.
Councilman Thomas·o. Speer from
Brea, Chairman of District No. 3
was elected Joint Vice-Chairman.
-l-
HOW TO LIFT
1. Size up the load first. Get
he·lp if you need it.
2. Be sure of your footing •
3. Lift with your legs, not your
back.
4. Keep your balance. Don't
twist w1der strain or jerk the
load~
5. Use proper mechanical aids
whenever possible.
USE TOOLS SAFELY
1. Do not overstrain a tool.
Use the right size for the job.
2. Use the proper tool for the
job., i.e., a screw driver is to
be used ·to loosen or tighten
screws and not as a chisel or
pry bar.
3. Do not use defective tools.
Inspect them before using or
taking them to the job. See that
shovel and pick handles are free
of splinters and splits. Do not
use a chisel with a mushroomed
head--turn it in to the equip-
ment maintenance man for· repair.
4. When using air compressor and
air tools check the air hoses and
couplings on pneumatic tools.
Air discharged under high press-
ure from an open hose end· is very
dangerous. Wear the safety equip-
ment provided such as toe guards,
goggles, dust masks, hard hats,
and work gloves. (Bill Landon)
THINK SAFETY
NEW GRADE I's
(continued from page 1)
Leonard Carney lives with
his wife, Marie, at 814 South
Shannon Drive in Santa Ana.
Their daughter, Mrs. Linda Jones
is a registered nurse at St.
Joseph's Hospital in Orange and
their son, Patrick, is due to
return from the Navy in Vietnam
soon. Leonard has been employed
with the Districts since 1964
and was promoted to a Control
Center Operator in 1966. A
native of Aurora, Missouri, he
served with distinction .as an
artillery spotter with a for-
ward observer party in the 90th
Division. From his D-Day land-
ing in France to his rise to
Tech. Sgt., he won a Silver
Star at St. Vith in the relief
of Bastogne, a Bronze Star with
V for Valor in Cherbourg and an
Oak Leaf Cluster to his Bronze
Star in Luxemburg. After the
war he attended the Water and
Sewage Technical School in
Neosha, Missouri; and then be-
came the Operator of the Aurora,
Missouri treatment plant. He
continued this until he came
to California in 1964 and joined
the staff of the Districts.
Leonard is a Deacon in St.
Luke's Presbyterian Church
in Santa Ana and still carries
on his affiliation with the
Masonic Lodge and Shriners that
he established while in Missouri.
His hobbies are stamp collecting
(a plate block collector) and
coin collecting (mint proof
sets) .
Both men have served as
editors of the Gas Dispatch,
the Districts bimonthly news
bulletin, Gerry fo~ the October
issue and Leonard for· the Febru-
ary issue. These men now bring
the total to five on the Dis-
tricts' staff who hold the Grade
I Certification.
THE BOOB TUBE
Joe Vormittag reported a
contractor working in the City of
Garden Grove dug up a gas service
line to a residence and pulled
it apart in the house causing a
fire. Firemen arrived and in-
spected the house for occupants
and found a little old lady sit-
ting watching TV. When ' she was
informed that the house was on
fire she said she couldn't leave
until her program was over.
Firemen removed the settee, with
the little old lady on it, and
sat her in the street with her
portable TV so she could finish
her program.
NOTES FROM THE PIANTS
#5 digester was back in
service after being down for 29
days for cleaning. This may not
be a record but those who saw the
conditions marveled that Smokey
Garten and his crew could do so
much in so little time.
Wes'tside put on one of its
frequent performances by burst-
ing its force main again. This
time we were prepared with emer-
gency equipment standing by. The
districts forces made the repairs
in jig time and at much less
cost. If the .cbsts of repairs
keep decreasing' as they have been
on each subsequent break, maybe
we can soon stop collecting tax-
es and whe.never we need more
money just go out and punch a
hole in the Westside Force Main.
(P.S. this method of making mon-
ey is not advocated.)
The Gas Turbine has been
·perking away and since the gas
systems are now complete we can
supply gas from either plant.
The use of natural gas has been
decreasing steadily as the sys-
tems are adjusted and stabilized.
. The heat recovery unit is about
ready for final test and oper-~
ation as this goes to press.
Blacktop and drainage at
both plants is essentially com-
plete. The area is improved in
appearance and much less dust
blows. This will be a big help
in keeping the areas clean.
Westside has had some landscaping
replaced since it lost the battle
with an airplane. The planting
'experiments are underway at
Plant #2. All these, we hope,
will convince our neighbors and
the public at large that while
we remove filth from water we can
have a pleasant looking facility
they need not be ashamed of.
Bernie Heying and his crew seem
to have caught the idea and our
grounds are acquiring that well
tended look.
The training and briefing
sessions on Thursdays are cover-
ing a wide range of subjects and
·we operators would like to ex-
press our appreciation to manage-
ment for the opportunities these
sessions offer to broaden our
knowledge. (George Cantrell)
· HAPPY ANNIVERSARY
' .
2.
We didn't forget this month
but it seems that 5, 8, or 10
years ago no one joined the
districts' forces in February
and March to remain with us until
this date.
J ••
A ST. PATRICK'S DAY SALUTE TO LMN
No better .day ~·ould have
been selected t.o salute a friend
and former boss. Mr. Nelson
was not born in the Emerald Isle
but he is "gifted" .with the
charm of those who come from
Ireland and furthermore, he is
"from the old sod" having been
born on a farm in Nebraska.
Consequently, on St.
Patrick's Day some fifty friends
and former employees gathered
at the Driftwood Inn for a sur-
prise appreciation luncheon.
Credit must be given to Bill
Kroeger and Paul Hogan who had
to do some fancy maneuvering to·
steer Mr. Nelson to the Drift-.. :
wood Inn without his becoming
suspicious that there was some-
thing brewing, and it was only
when Mr. Nelson was informed
that the lunch would not be in
the regular small dining room
that he felt this was something
more than a business lunch.
The St. Patrick's Day theme
was carried out in the decora-
tions of the tables and Mr.
Nelson was presented with a
green hat and a green carnation~,
being the honored guest. This
was a "fun" party and Mr. Harper
also called on some of the "old-
timers" present who had struggled
with Mr. Nelson during the early
days of the Sanitation Districts,
namely Mr. Frank Schweitzer,
Mr. Courtney Chandler, Mr. Claire
Nelson and Mr. Jerome Kidd, who
had been former Board members.
In addition, Mr. Hunt, Mr. Lowry,
and Mr. Boyle had a few words
of reminiscing. The remarks by
these engineers were especially
appreciated by those who had been
with the Districts for a period
of years during the beginning
of the expansion programs.
Mr. Lou Hanson, CPA, who so
closely and carefully watches
the Districts' finances,·was
selected to present Mr. Nelson
with a plaque and a purse of
money. In addition Mr. Nelson
was presented the following
mementos of this occasion, such
as a Miniature Emergency Kit by
Mr. Brown, a wrist watch by Mr.
Galloway (said watch being the
type that shows the correct
time only twice during the day),
a Barrel of Monkeys to remind
him of his days at the County
Sanitation Districts, a Good
Luck Doll to bring him the best
Of everything now that he has
shed the responsibilities of the
CSD, a Hopping Chick to test his
skill in mechanical engineering,
-3-
a Tool Chest so he will not lose
his adeptness in structural en-
gineering. On the:more serious
aspect of the occa~~on, Mr. Nelson
was presented with a book on
the American West and a bo'ok·on
Alaska, his two favorite subjects.·
All present enjoyed the im-
promptu speeches and the most
sincere best wishes were extend-
ed to Mr. Nelson with the feeling
of "well done, thou good and
faithful servant, well done" as
Mr. Nelson had come to Orange
County at a critical time in the
formation of the Sanitation
Districts. It was thru his
efforts and management that the
Districts played such an impor-
tant part in the industrial de-
velopment of Orange County as
one of the prime factors for
the development of any area is
the "sanitation facilities".
Again, Mr. Nelson, all of
us wish you the best of every-
thing in the years to come and
sincerely hope that you will
enjoy your "free· time".
(Florence Hagen)
NEW EMPLOYEES
We welcome the following
new employees to the CSD:
Elmer Black, Mar. 27, 1967,
from Buena Park
Richard Debruin, Feb. 6,
1967, from Costa Me~!
William Miller, Feb. 20,
1967, from Orange ·
Curtis Poole, Mar. 17, 1967,
from Santa Ana
Nolan Smith, Feb 20, 1967,
from Santa Ana
PROMOTIONS
Congratulations to the
following CSD personnel who
have recently earned promQtions:
George Gossar to Laboratory
Aide
Robert Mccrane to Mainten-
ance Man I
Ray Young to Laboratory
Analyst I
~t, 'f\At)'
'AA,Y
1q(;1
~
On November 3, 1952, your
now e,x-general _manager· ·arrived
on the scene and took over the
management of the Sanitation
Districts. You might say that
the Districts were in the dia-
per s~age, being less than three
years old.
By the time I retired on
May·1, 1966, I had gone through
so many retirement parties and
testimonial dinners that I found
they had become very boring ·
and many times lacking in sin-
cerity, i.e., it was just the
thing to do. Mr. Harper.had
suggested such an affair and I
vetoed it, at least I suggested
it be postponed indefinitely.
On St. Patrick's Day, by a lot
of maneuvering and skullduggery,
I found I was the recipient of It . an appreciation" luncheon. Mr.
Harper cleverly juggled words
.and called it an "apJ?reciation"
luncheon instead of retirement".
It was a wonderful affair
and I was most grateful in that
they had carefully selected many
of the Board Chairmen, Engineers
and other associates I had work-
ed with for fifteen years.
In.1952, my first year
here, I supervised the grand
total of .four employees. These
were administrative only as the
Districts had not taken over
from the old JOS at that time
and hence, we had no plant oper-
ations. In 1954, I inherited
Bob Galloway and the JOS plant
and that is the year my troubles
began. More seriously, we went
into operation at two plants and
there were several of the "old
timers" who came to the Sanita-
t:ion Districts from the JOS.
Within a year or two, we had
about forty employees which in
those days we thought was a lot.
From about 1954 to 1958 I was
fortunate enough to know every-
one by his first name and had
close contact with them. Due
to the work load and the big
expansion program which dates
from about 1958, much to my
regret, I lost this personal
,contact. Now with 115 employees,
r·regret very much that I am
acquainted with only about half
of them.· 4.
This luncheon was in real-
ity a group of the old-timers or
"pioneers" of the Sanitation
Districts. . .It is regretable
that all of ·the employees could
not be present but after you
have worked in the treatment and
disposal business for a short
time, you realize people will
persist in flushing toilets;
hence some have to remain at
home to keep the store. So
thanks to ·all of you who stayed
on the job to see to it that
the effluent continued to flow to-
wards Na.go.
I want to thank everyone
for all the gifts I received
and also many thanks for the
little "gimmicks" that were toss-
ed in. ·
LEE M. NELSON
INFERNAL REVENUE TIME AGAIN
April 17th is drawing near.
All persons who had a gross in-
come of $600 or more must· file.
a Federal income tax return. A
single person with an income of
more than $2,000, or a married
couple with a combined income of
more than $4,ooo must file a
State income tax return.
Federal forms and instructions
are available from the local
Internal Revenue Office at 2024
N. Broadway, Santa Ana, and at
post office branches •. state forms
and instructions are available at
the local Franchise Tax Board
office at 1010 N. Main Street,
Santa Ana, and several banks
throughout the county.
. Federal forms are mailed to:
District Director of Internal
Revenue, Los Angeles, California
90012.
State forms are mailed to:
Franchise Tax Board, 1025 "P" St.,
Sacramento, California 95814.
~ Envelopes MUST be postmarked
prior to midnight April 17th.
KNOW YOUR ENGINEERS
Our Engineer for this month
is not a firm but an individual
who is employed as a consultant
to the staff: Dr. Jack E.
McKee is Professor of Environ-
mental Health Engineering at
California Institute of Technol-
ogy in Pasadena. He visits our
plant at least once a month and
usually has several contacts
by phone or mail in between
visits.
A native of Pittsburgh, he
graduated in Civil Engineering
from Carnegie Tech and then
received his Master of Science
and Doctor of Science Degrees
from Harvard University with
his majors in Sanitary Engineer-
ing.
He held professional posi-
tions with the TVA and U.S.
Public Health Service before
serving with the U.S. Army Corps
of Engineers for the Normandy
invasion and the European cam-
paign. He currently holds the
rank of Lt. Colonel, U.S. Army
Reserves.
After the war he joined the
engineering partnership of Camp,
Dresser & McKee in Boston, Mass.
and still maintains an interest
in the firm. Since 1949 he has
been on the staff at Cal Tech.
Through his work there, he has
become renowned in the sanitary
engineering field as an advisor
and consultant in matters of
public health from an environ-
mental point of view.
In his ca~acity as an ad-
visor and consultant, he has
served a wide range of agencies
from the local to the world-
wide level. We would list
these in order of importance
as follows -Orange County
Sanitation Districts, and
others. The others would in-
clude -National Institutes of
Health, U.S. Public Health·
Service, Office of Saline Water,
California Water Pollution
Control Boards, World Health
Organization, California Dept.
of Water Resources, Los Angeles
County Flood Control, City of
San Di'ego, Orange County Water
Distric·t, State of Washington,
Space Science Board, and offi-
cer of Water Resources Research.
He is currently a member of
the influential advisory commit-
tee on Reactor Safegards, which
exercises control over the
construction and operation of
commercial nuclear power plants
in the U.S. (In all likelihood
we have missed a few and ·for
those we apologize).
5.
Dr. McKee is a strong sup-
porter of his· profession and has
served on many professional
committees in the engineering
and.water quality control fields.
In 1962-63, he was president of
the Water Pollution Control Fed-
eration. The Los Angeles section
of the American Society of Civil
Engineers named him as the En-
gineer. of the year in 1965.
Long a supporter of the use
of the metric system in technical
publi.cations, he is apt to sug-
gest to his colleagues that they
should use Imperial gigafirkins
per millenium as a basic unit
rate of Fluid flow. Translated
into household quantities this
means "a billion 9-gallon bar-
rels {Imperial) per thousand
years." It is roughly equival-
ent to one quart per second.
Besides being a registered
engineer in California, New York,
Connecticut and Massachusetts,
Jack is also a Diplomata in the
American Academy of Environmental
Engineers. ~e received the Desmond
Fitzgerald med~l from the Boston
Society of Civil Engineers and the
Rudolf Hering medal in sanitary
engineering from the American
Society of Civil Engineers.
S.A.R.B.S.C.W.Q.C.A.
Tony Lauricha led a delegation
of five em~loyees to the Desert
Section meeting at Palmdale in
March. Besides a good lunch, Paul
Blevins, Howard Lembke, Bill
Wildeman, and Buford McDaniel
attended a session on pump main-
tenance and installation and tour-
ed the treatment facilities on the
airbaae. All were impressed with
the clean but old paint and no
signs of rust. Seems the wind
blows the sulfides away.
The Ma.rch evening meeting was
held at R5.alto and featured a talk
by Dick Co0n of Honeywell on
instrumentation principles and
hardware. The total attendance of
55 was amplified with 20 men from
our districts.
ENGINEERING OFFICE SCOOP
Student Assistant Tom
Bibleheimer, who has been employed
part-time since November, 1965,
and attended Long Beach State
College, has now joined Rotary Oil
Tool Co. in Buena Park as a full
time mechanical engineer.
Student Assistant Ron Mueller
left to devote full time to his
senior studies at Cal. Poly.,
Pomona.
Don Peters became the proud
papa of Sandi Jo, 6 lbs. 6 oz.,
February 8th, at St. Joseph!s
Hospital, Orange. Congratulations
Don and Collen. {Don Lord)
-\
NOTES FROM A ROVING EDITOR'S
TRIP THROUGH THE PLANTS
Did you know that ·Leonard .
Ingro may put the Orange County
Sanitation Districts on the map?
He is entered in the Olympics at
Mexico City as a "weight lifter"-
we wish him the-best.
Jack Lassiter is spending his
spare time restoring a 1929 De
Soto. It seems his main source
of supply parts has to be second-
hand yards.
For his birthday last month,
George Cantrell received a beauti-
ful· walnut gun case -6t feet
high -now he has his six-gun
collection under lock and key.
He is not only a nut about guns,
he also has 18 .clocks at home -
but his clocks take a poor second
to the 50 clocks, more or less,
that Glenn Harris has in his
garage -all of them in good run-
ning order -repaired by Glenn
himself (he doesn't allow the
clocks to strike or chime for fear
his neighbors would complain).
Another gun enthusiast is
Frank Johnson who rebuilds-guns
and reloads the ammunition.
Dan Walker and his son keep
·trying for a "big one" in Mexican
waters. On his last trip to Sea
of Cortez they hit pay dirt and
brought home many big fish in-
cluding a 225 pounder!
\1-. NBC. 'f8,G \<WTZ
· ~\_;) It'~ A ,. <Ot:;,ABC q<r.s €ZY '-' -~e. 'RTZ \<i
.In the sand and water divi-
sion -Elmer Parker and his wife
have purc~ased a lot of sand and
water at Salton Sea and.drive
down occasionally to see if it
(the sand, -~hat is) is still there.
We have several other desert
rats (men, that.is) who spend
many weekends out in the great
high desert. Art Marcotte, Jim
Hilborn, and Mel Templar -also ·
Jim Chapman zooms around in his
dune buggy looking for mountains ·
to climb. ~
~~
Bill Cure is a water skier···u
and has the boat and all the trim-
mings. He heads for the river
whenever he can.
Another boat owner is Tony
Lauricha who also is an avid
water skier. When Tony doesn't
have time for a water trip, he
spends his spare time with the
new pool table. Talk1n' about
pool tables brings up Jerry
Baldwin -also a proud new owner
of a pool table -maybe we-can
s::;::~
Fred Harper likes to ski .at
Lake Arrowhead and this editor
suggests if Fred has any more
problems with his Mercury -try
avw • .$~ #¢ $~#· ~ John Wright watches the Dow
Jones averages and tries to keep
up with all the jazz on the mar-
ket results -maybe some day we
can say we knew him when! $ $
Now that the blessed event
has arrived at the Glenn Harris
house -four French Poodle pups
I wonder if he might pass around
cigars?
Most reports are on what
people have. In the case of Bill
Cure it's a case of have-not.
Bill no longer has his tonsils.
We hope this operation brought an
end to his difficulties. ·
Wilburn Wimberly returned to
.·work after a 7-month absence due
to illness. After only 10 days
back on the job, he had to return
to-the hospital for some tests.
We all wish him the best results
from the tests so he can again
return to work.
-6-
·Mayor Harry H. Harvey, Cha:lrman of the Joint Board
of Directors of the Sanitation Distr icts of Orange
County presents Geral d Baldwin , 15950 Los Reyes ,
Fountain Vall ey , with his Grade I Treatment Plant
Operator Certificate . Mrs . Peggy Baldwin, l1i s
wife , looks on proudl y .
\~
: -~ \•
'
.J Vil 'H. J\•
Mayor Harry H. Harvey, Chairman of the Joint Board
of Directors of the Sa.nitat:lon District s of Orange
Co u nty prese nts Leonard Carney o f 814 South Shannon
Drive , Santa Ana, with his Grade I Treatment Plant
Ope rator Certif lcate . Mrs . Marie Carney b eamingly
looks on .
/