HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-03 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS'
County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No.
AGENDA
March 30, 1967 - 11:00 a.m.
City Hall, Newport Beach, California
M Roll Call
` intmert-of-otmj tea.i-f--necessary
Appointment of Jean Bankston as Secretary pro tem
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-35-5, approving plans
and specifications for Demolition and Remo-VA -of Old Bay
Bridge Pumping Station, Contract No. 5-12-1; and
authorizing the staff to open bids at 4:00 p.m. , April
21s t. See page "A" '�;
_/(5) Report of engineer on additional pumping equipment neede T
at the Bay Bridge Pumping Station . See page "B"
(6) Consideration of motion authorizing advertising for bids
for additional pumping equipment, as recommended by the .
engineer /
.(7) Consideration of Resolution No. 67-36-5, authorizing the
quitclaiming of an easement to the County of Orange
(acquired in connection with construction of Contract
No. 5-13); and authorizing execution of a Quitclaim
Deed as prepared by the General Counsel. See page "C"
(8) Consideration of Resolution No . 67-37-5, abandoning cer-
tain facilities no longer required by the District, and
ordering the value thereof removed from the District' s
Books of Account. See page "D"
(9 Staff report on explosive gas problem in Trunk A (Coast
Highway near Howard' s Restaurant) .
f10-Y Other 'bus-iness-afid-communicati6ns`, i_f-any
(11) Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
RESOLUTION NO. 67-35-5
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 5-12-
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by
Donald C . Simpson, District' s engineer, for DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL
OF OLD BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1, are hereby
approved and adopted; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said Contract No. 5-12-1 in the manner
prescribed by law; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , April 21, 19675
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the staff and the engineer be authorized
to open said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Directors .
\.d
Agenda Item No. 4 -A-
DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER
3245 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT OEACH, CALIFORNIA • OR 6-1431
INVESTIGATIONS A REPORTS
WATER - SEWERAGE
DRAINAGE • STREETS
STAFF ENGINEERING
Marnh 22, 1967
Fred A. 1Iarpe-r, General 1lanager
CoLulty Sanitation. District 1Vo . 5
10844 Dllis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
In accordance with your- request, I have reviewed the need"
for an additional pump at the Bay Bridge Pumping Station.
The existing pumping units and their capacity under current
head conditions -are as follows:
Unit No .. Description Capacity
1 10x10x212 720..R211 2.75MGD
25 H.P. , Var. Speed.
2 12 x 12 x 21, 900..RPM 5 .75 1-M
75 H.P. , Var. Speed.
The present average and peak flows are approximately 2.0 : GD
and 3 .9 DIGD respectively.
Since.peals flows are now e..ceeding the capacity of the No . 1
unit, there is no longer 100% standby protection. If the No . 2
unit failed, the incoming peak flows would exceed the capacity of
the No . 1 unit, and overflowing could occur. The original design
contemplated 100/ standby, and I would therefore recommend the
installation of a third unit as soon as possible .
The ultimate plans contemplate that all three additional
units will be 12 x 12 x-. 217 1200 RPTrI, 200 H.P. with one unit
equipped with a variable speed drive .
If one of these 200 H.P . . units were added now, it should be
equipped with. the variable speed drive, costing approximately
a5000, in order that the maximum output of the No . 2_ puuIp could
be matched . Initially this unit..would operate at a fraction of
full-speed, and hence it would. be very inefficient . This
inefficiency coupled. with higher standby charges would substan-
tially increase the electrical energy .charges.
An interim. solution would be to add. a constant speed pumping .
unit of the same size as. unit No . 2. The shafting. could be sized
so that in the future the 75 H.P. motor could be replaced with a
Agenda Item No . 5 B-1
200 H.P . motor and the speed of the punp increased from 900 P211F.
to 1200 Ml. Some adjustment in the. impeller might need to be
made but the piping, valving, and electrical panel would remain
unchanged.
The addition of another 75 H.P . - unit would provide 100%
standby until the peak flows increased by 47�. . A substantial
incrAass in flows will occur this next Fall when Nevport Center
is opened for business . The 75. H.P . unit will provide ample
capacity to serve the initial.- development at the Center plus
additional growth in other areas.
. The estimated cost of the new pump, motor, electrical panel,
valves, and piping,, exclusive of installation labor, . is S11,000 .
It is our understanding that a 75 H.P. motor is presently avail—
able which could be used.
Since delivery of the equipment will take at least six
months, it is recommended that orders be placed as quickly as
possible .
Donald C. Simpson
DCS: c
`.✓
Agenda Item No . 5 B-2
RESOLUTION NO. 67-36-5
AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO
THE COUNTY OF ORANGY
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 55
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ-
ING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY
OF ORANGE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the quitclaiming to the County of Orange,
of a certain easement acquired December 12, 1962, in the vicinity
of Newport Dunes Aquatic Park, relative to the construction of
Contract No. 5-13, is hereby authorized; and,
Section 2. That the easement to be quitclaimed is more
particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Quitclaim
Deed on behalf of the Board of Directors, in form acceptable to the
General Counsel.
Agenda Item No. 7 C-1
SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 67-35-5
That certain 20-foot wide perpetual easement and right
of way for construction and maintenance of sewer lines in, on and
over the real property in the County of Orange, State of California,
described in the Official Records of Orange County in Book 6359,
Pages 148 through 150, excepting therefrom all that portion of
said easement lying northerly of a line that intersects at right
angles the ordinary High Tide Line, as said Tide Line is described
in said Easement, at a point located 190.00 feet northerly along
said Tide Line from Station 21.
Also excepting therefrom all portions lying within the
20-foot wide easement described in Official Records of Orange
County in Book 8151, page 633•
Together with all sewer lines and appurtenances thereto
located within the hereinabove described easement.
�d
Schedule "A"
Agenda Item No. 7 C-2
RESOLUTION NO. 67-37-5
ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED
STRUCTURE D EQUIPMENT REMOVED ROM
BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 53 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF
CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND
EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT' S BOOKS
OF ACCOUNT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, certain District property is no longer required
for the purposes of the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT:
Section 1. The letters from Donald C . Simpson, District' s
engineer, dated March 22, 1967, recommending that the value of
certain facilities be removed from the District' s Books of Account,
w,e hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. The certain District property listed below is
hereby formally abandoned or quitclaimed and the value thereof is
hereby ordered removed from the District' s Books of Account:
1. 2709 feet of 18" VCP Sewer, 2297 feet
of 15" VCP Sewer, and 15 manholes in
Bayside Drive and Newport Dunes
Acquatic Park (constructed in 1957
and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . $273000.00
2. 768 feet of 15" VCP Sewer and 4 man-
holes in Back Bay Drive (constructed
in 1958 and purchased from The
I1 iine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . 4 $ 7,344.oo
3. 1295 feet of 8" force main in Jamboree
Road (constructed in 1958 and purchased
from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,180.0o
4. Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station (con-
structed in 1937 and purchased from
the City of Newport Beach December
12, 1951) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,750.o0
5. 12" force main on the Upper Bay Bridge
(constructed in 1952 and purchased from
the City of Newport Beach October 143
1952) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 83 039.57
Total $56,313.57
Agenda Item No. 8 -D-
RESOLUTION NO. 67-37-5
ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED
STRUCTURE ' AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED r OM
BOOKS OF ACCOUNT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF
CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND
EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT' S BOOKS
OF ACCOUNT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, certain District property is no longer required
for the purposes of the District,
NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT:
Section 1. The letters from Donald C . Simpson, District' s
engineer, dated March 22, 1967, recommending that the value of
certain facilities be removed from the District' s Books of Account,
are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. The certain District property listed below is
hereby formally abandoned or quitclaimed and the value thereof is
hereby ordered removed from the District's Books of Account:
>-1.e 2709 feet of 18" VCP Sewer, 2297 feet
of 15" VCP Sewer, and 15 manholes in \
Bayside Drive and Newport Dunes
Acquatic Park (constructed in 1957
and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . $27,000.00
r
2. 768 feet of 15" VCP Sewer and 4 man-
holes in Back Bay Drive (constructed
in 1958 and purchased from The
I. pine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,344.oo
3. 1295 feet of 8" force main in Jamboree
Road (constructed in 1958 and purchased
from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,180.00
I
4. Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station (con- i it
-
structed in 1937 and purchased from
the City of Newport Beach December 4
12, 1951) . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,750.00
i
\. 5. 12" force main on the Upper Bay Bridge
(constructed in 1952 and purchased from
the City of Newport Beach October 143
1952) . $ 8,039 .57
Total $56,313 .57
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
JOINT BOARDS
—' MARCH 8, 1967 - 8:00 p.m.
AGENDA
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
2 Roll Call
(3) Election of Joint Chairman
V
(4) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (Districts)
(5)
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed ,p
(6) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(7) DISTRICT 3 ,a��''
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the el/
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, and the special
meeting held February 23, 1967
(8) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(9) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �,
i
(10) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �''�
(11) DISTRICT 11 A111V
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
r
(13) ALL DISTRICTS -L"7
Report of the General Manager____`
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee on the report of
Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant. See page
11Fn
06v
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following actions on the written
report of the Executive Committee:
a. Motion approving recommendations
�
b. Motion directing the General Manager
to implement the recommended changes
in insurance coverages (�
c. Motion authorizing the General Manager
to employ Charles L. Robinson, Insurance
Consultant, to prepare specifications
and outline bidding procedures for
g acquisition of the recommended property
;�)Ynsurance coverage, including bid
t specifications for "uninsured perils & exposures"
outlined in the Insurance Consultant' s
report dated December, 1966
` v ) ALL STRICTS
�^ taff report on award of Job No. P2-11 (Headworks "C"�4ort)
See page "G" for bid tabulation. (See Manager' s
, (18) ALL DISTRICTS�
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-24, granting an
easement to the City of Fountain Valley in connection �. Oe
with improvements to Ellis Avenue. See page "H"
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons dera ion of motion authorizing issuance of a
purchase order for the following emergency equipment:
Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set, Specifi-
cation #E-049 - $10,337.00to!>
See page "I" for bid tabulation
' X
1 '
' 2 ALL DISTRICTS
Cons deration of motion authorizing the General
Manager to sign and submit report of waste discharge,
as required by the provisions of Section 13054 of the State
\ Water Code
J
(21) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing
and directing execution and filing of documents necessary
for Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq. :
District No. Resolution No. Page No.
a. 2 67-18-2 "Jrr
b. 3 67-19-3 rr K11
c. 5 67-20-5 rr Lrr
d. 6 67-21-6 "M"
e. 7 67-22-7 It Nn
f. 11 67-23-11 ri Or' �
g. 1 67-17-1 P ��
(22) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file General
Manager' s certification that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order,
and that he recommends authorization for payment
(23) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrants
listed on pages "A , "A" , and "C '
(24) ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
(25) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-27-1, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding
contract for Job No. P2-11 to J. Putnam Henck in the
total amount of $2,495,961.00. See page 'rQ"
(26) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
(27) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
(28) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(29) DISTRICT 11
Consideration. of motion approving warrants, if any. (,
See page "E"
(30) DISTRICT 11 r�
Other business and communications, if any
(31) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment � � \
(32) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-28-2, authorizing
acceptance of an easement from the Fullerton Elementary
School District relative to construction of Contract '
No. 2-11-1, as recommended by the General Counsel.
See page "R"
(33) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-29-2, to receive and pp
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding
contract for Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station
and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-2 to Industrial
Pipeline Construction Company in the total amount of
P P Y
$161,347.05. (Bid opening at 4:00 p.m. , March 6th. See
page "S" T. ) (See page " " for bid tabulation. )
(34) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
-3-
(35) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
(36) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (� ►
(37) DISTRICT 3 b
Consideration of request by the staff for deferment 1
of report on establishment of reserve fund for future �J+J
facilities. (See Manager' s Report) VIA
(38) DISTRICT _____
Con ' e _ ovi ,
e pag
9
(39) DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any VA
(40) DISTRICT 3 A
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment `
(41) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 'Al,
Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants, ,
if any. See page "E" �Ilp
(42) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13,
authorizing an addition of $1,219 to the contract with
Far Western Pipeline, Inc. , Contractor. See Page "U"
(43) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #2 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13,
adjusting engineers' quantities. See page
(44) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of Resolution No . 67-30-5 accepting
Contract No. 5-13 as complete, and authorizing the Y ,
filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page N
W -�
(45) DISTRICT ..5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
(46) DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any.
(47) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion r Ad 'o r mentVA,.,3 TX
(48) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6
(Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction), granting AA
an extension of time to Cook & Barletta, Inc. , Q
Contractor. See page "X"
(49) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-31-6 accepting
Contract No . 6-6 as complete, and authorizing the filing
of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "Y" ,AA
-4-
(50) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Robert
E. Lenihan, Long Beach, for grout stabilization on
Dover Drive, in the amount of $7, 213.96
(51) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
(52) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
(53) DISTRICT 6 Ci l "
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment ,
e(54) DISTRICT 7 Sk
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-32-7, ordering , ,GV
annexation of territory to the District (Panorama YN
Elementary School site) . See page Z
(55) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the General Manager to request annexation to the 7th
Sewer Maintenance District of the following proposed
annexations within county territory, for the purpose
of maintaining the local sewers included within these
proposed annexations : (See page "AA" ) 6t0
1. Prospects`,
2. El Modena
3. Hewes-Bond
4. Tustin-Fairhaven
5. Arroyo-La Loma
(56) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E" 119 "C,,
(57) DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications, if any
(58) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
I �
-5-
That the Boards of Directors adopt
resolution NO. expressing the appreciation
of the Directors for the services of retiring
DiFeeterx Joint Chairman HHH ; and that the
Seeretary be directed to present a suitable
copy of this resolution to Harvey
as a token of the �;-- T esteem.
MEMO ,iom PHONE
THE OFFICE OF FRED A. HARPER 962-2411
SECRETARY OF DISTRICTS&DIRECTOR OF FINANCE
OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
P.O. BOX 5175-10844 ELLIS AVENUE
FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708
d
I
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708
r. Phone 962-2411
JOINT BOARDS
IIMarch 3, 1967
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, March 8, 1967
8:00 P.M.
The following is an explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to
the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting
but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting.
Joint Boards
No . 3 - ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIRMAN: Joint Chairman Harvey has
announced his forthcoming retirement from the Santa Ana City Council
upon installation of the new Mayor in April, and since he will no
longer be serving on the Districts ' Boards he has requested that
an election for the office of Joint Chairman be held at the March
8 meeting.
Nos. 15 and 16 - RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON CHANGES
IN DISTRICTS' INSURANCE COVERAGE: The Committee met on January 18
and March 1 and among other items considered recommendations of our
insurance consultant, Mr. Charles L. Robinson, and the staff' s
comments thereon. These recommendations are summarized as an
attachment to the formal agenda . Following receipt of the report
of the Committee, it is recommended that the Boards consider
adoption of the motions appearing under Item No . 17 which implement
the recommendations made by the Committee on this matter.
No. 17 - STAFF REPORT ON AWARD OF PLANT CONTRACT NO. P2-11: This
proposed Plant project (Headworks "C" - Plant No . 2) is the largest
undertaken to date. It will be recalled that at the December, 1966
Board meeting when plans and specifications were approved, a joint
report was filed with the Boards by the engineers and myself pointing
out that the estimated cost would exceed, by a considerable margin,
the amount originally budgeted. This report also proposed deferring
other Plant construction jobs scheduled for this fiscal year in
order that this necessary project could be funded. At that time,
it was also agreed that this matter would be reported on to the
Boards again after bids were taken and a more exact project cost
established. Under the usual circumstances, awards such as this
are made routinely by the Board of District No . 1 without discussion
by the other Directors . However in this instance, because of the
magnitude of the project and of the financing problems, we feel
that it is appropriate that all Directors be apprised of this
matter.
Bids for this project were opened by the Board of District
No . 1 on March 1 and a bid tabulation is included with the formal
agenda . As will be noted, the bids are well distributed from a ZIa ' �
total of six contractors, all of whom were obviously bidding
earnestly for the job. Also it will be observed that the low bid,
that of J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino, ($2,495,961) was only �\oit''
slightly above the engineer' s original estimate ($2,450,000) . It
has always been our policy to compute our estimates as low as
realistically possible and this case was no exception to this rule.
Since, as reported at the December meeting, there is no satisfactory
alternate to the construction of this project as designed and since
the low bidder is a highly competent firm who has worked for us
before, we are recommending to the Board of District No . 1 (Item
No . 32) that the award be made at this time to the low bidder.
Inasmuch as the project cost will be approximately the same as
estimated in December, our former recommendations for deferment of
the other projects will be carried out as proposed.
No . 18 - GRANT OF STREET EASEMENT TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY: Last year
the Boards authorized entering into an agreement with the City
whereby Ellis Avenue would be widened and improved along the
Districts ' frontage, with the City contracting for the necessary
construction under a reimbursement arrangement with the Districts.
The City' s staff now advises they are ready to proceed with this
project and has forwarded a description of the street easement
necessary to be granted by the Districts to allow widening the
street to its full ultimate width (80 feet against 50 feet at
present) . The resolution on the agenda under this item is to autho-
rize granting of this necessary easement to the City.
No. 19 - PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: On February 28, the Districts '
staff took bids on several items of mobile equipment budgeted for
purchase this year. Only one of these items was of sufficient cost
to require Board authorization before purchase. This is an
Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set (150 KW) to be used in situations
where a large mobile emergency power unit is required. A bid
tabulation is included with the agenda and it will be recommended
that the purchase be authorized from Lawless GM Diesel at their bid
price of $10,33'7.
No . 20 - A721HORIZATION TO FILE REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE : The
State Water Code requires that each person or agency proposing to
establish a new point of discharge for its waste water, file a
formal report thereon with the Regional Water Quality Control Board
(Section 13054) . Since our proposed new ocean outfall will soon be
under final design, it will be in order for the Districts to file
this required report as soon as possible. Also, the State requires
that any application for Federal assistance (Item No . 21) on a
-2-
project such as this must be accompanied or preceded by such a
report. Accordingly, it is recommended that the General Manager be
authorized to prepare and file this required report with the State
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
No. 21 - FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL: At the January
meeting, the Joint Boards directed the staff to prepare the
individual District ' s applications for Federal construction grants
for the proposed new outfall. As explained at the January meeting,
this action is preliminary to the ado.ption of formal resolutions by
each District authorizing execution and submittal of the necessary
documents to the Federal ?later Pollution Control Agency.
The deadline for filing these applications for the coming
fiscal year is March 31. Therefore, unless a special meeting is held
for this purpose after the regular March 8 Board meeting, it will be
necessary for each District to act upon this matter on March 8.
The forthcoming formal engineer ' s report on the construction
of the new ocean outfall estimates the total project cost to be
$15,442,000. In the following table, the third column sets forth
the contribution of each District to this total under the current
ownership percentages . The Federal Act provides that 300 of each
District ' s share can be obtained as a Federal contribution. The
fourth column indicates the 30% grants each District may apply for
and therefore are the amounts appearing in the formal resolutions
for consideration at this meeting.
Amount of Federal
Percent of District Share Grant to be
District Ownership* of Project Cost Applied for
1 11.48 $ 1,772,740 $ 531,820
2 31.57 4,875,o4o 1,462,510
3 33•84 5,225,570 1,567,670
5 5. 85 903,360 271,010
6 5. 8o 895, 64o 268,690
7 5.03 776,730 233,020
11 6.43 992,920 297,88o
TOTAL 100.00 $15,442,000 $4, 632, 60o
*for fiscal year 1966-67
The resolutions included with the agenda under these items
must be considered individually by each District although they are
grouped together on the agenda for convenience in discussion. As
pointed out in our verbal report on this matter at the January
Meeting, any District can choose to decline to apply for Federal
assistance and because of past controversey in this regard the
staff is not making a formal recommendation but merely presenting
this matter for Board determination. Also it is called to the
Directors ' attention that although each District must act
-3-
independently, the prepared resolutions name District No . 1 to act
for the other Districts in applying for and accepting the grants .
The staff will be prepared to go into any further detail desired on
this matter.
District No. 1
No . 25 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. P2-11: This matter was discussed in
some detail under Item No . 18 of the Joint Board business .
District No . 2
No . 32 - ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT : We have received a formal easement
document from the Fullerton Elementary School District granting
right of way needed for the Rollling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping
Station and Force Main Sewer (Item No. 33) . This easement was
granted at no cost . The motion on the agenda accepts this easement
and orders its recordation.
No . 33 - AWARD OF ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND
FORCE MAIN SETTER (CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2) : This regularly budgeted
project was described at the February Board meeting when bids were
authorized to be taken. These bids will not be received until next
Monday, March 6, and therefore a bid tabulation and recommendation
for award will not be available until the time of the meeting.
District No . 3
No. 37 - REPORT OF STAFF ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL RESERVE FUND
FOR FUTURE FACILITIES: At the special Board meeting on February 23
to consider repair and/or replacement of the Westside Force Main
Sewer, the staff was directed to report at the March meeting on the
establishment of a reserve fund in the District ' s future budgets
for construction of needed facilities. The Board also authorized
the District ' s engineers to undertake a survey of alternate plans
for providing additional facilities needed in the coming years . It
now appears to the staff that establishment of this reserve fund at
this time, without prior knowledge of the amount of monies eventually
needed, would be premature. We are therefore recommending that
action on this matter be deferred until the engineering study is
under way but not later than the time of preparation of the
District ' s budget for the next fiscal year.
District No . 5
Nos . 42 through 44 - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO. 5-13: This District
project, Trunk Sewer, Back Bay Drive to Pacific Coast Highway, will
be satisfactorily completed today, which is well within the time
limit imposed by the contract . The District ' s engineer has recom-
mended acceptance of the work as meeting plans and specifications
and has also recommended two change orders to adjust the final
price, in accordance with the contract, for materials actually
installed.
-4-
Item No . 42 is recommended Change Order No . 1 which would add
the sum of $1,219 to the contract amount for additional priming of
the sand base with liquid asphalt prior to re-paving the Dunes
parking lot and the placement of 195 cubic yards of special rock
bedding under the pipe as directed by the engineer and at the
established contract price .
Item No . 43 is recommended Change Order No . 2, the customary
adjustment of quantities to change the original contract price to
reflect differences in amounts installed over those originally
estimated. In the case of this project, this results in a deduction
of $3,760. 39 from the original contract estimate .
Item No . 44 is the usual resolution accepting the work as
complete on March 3 and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion.
District No . 6
Nos . 48 and 49 - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO. 6-6: This project, the
Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction, has been previously
described. It has now been satisfactorily completed by the cont-
tractor, Cook & Barletta of Anaheim.
Item No . 48 is Change Order No . 3 granting an extension of
time of 29 days to the contractor as recommended by the staff for
the reasons shown on the formal change order attached to the agenda .
Item No . 49 is the customary resolution accepting the work as
complete on February 24 and authorizing filing of Notice of
Completion.
No . 50 - PAYMENT FOR GROUT STABILIZATION - REPAIR OF DOVER DRIVE
SUBSIDENCE: This matter was deferred from the February meeting at
which time it was explained in detail in the Manager' s Report .
Deferment was recommended since the actual total amount of the
described work had not been received by the time of the meeting.
This total has now been established at $7,213. 96 and the suggested
motion appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended for
Board adoption.
District No . 7
No . 54 - ANNEXATION OF THE PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE : The
annexation fees have been received and the District ' s application
to the Local Agency Formation Commission has been approved. The
recommended action under this item will complete the annexation of
the Orange Unified School District property on Newport Boulevard.
No . 55 - ANNEXATION TO THE 7TH SEINER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT : The
sewers constructed within Assessment Districts 5-A and 6 are now
operational, and in order to provide maintenance for these sewers,
all of which are within County territory, it is necessary for these
areas to be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District . County
-5-
Sanitation District No . 7, by contract with the Board of Supervisors
which is the governing body of the Maintenance District, is
responsible for these sewers; therefore our District, by letter,
should note request annexation of these areas. The motion appearing
under this item authorizes the General Manager to submit the
necessary letters .
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
-6-
J
1 •
*awe
1J�f_ L
[1 �fC G�✓7
1
WV
lax
' r
CO
G
1
/
r
i
may - € �.
� ,� . �,.,....�e
� . �,�
_ ---
��� �
�. ���
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e- A
AREA CODE 714
540-2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA % 9 6 2-241 1
10644 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
February 24, 1967
REPORT OF THE STAFF ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF
CHARLES L. ROBINSON
Insurance Consultant
LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Pacific Indemnity Company Policy.
Consultant' s Recommendations
1. When services or purchased equipment are obtained from
others, the Districts should continue to require that
such must conform to any applicable California Code .
In designing Specifications the Districts may addition-
ally wish to require its sources to carry a special form
of coverage which could, in effect, protect such sources
and the Districts from liability for some time in the
future . That coverage has two names : a) "Products
Liability Coverage" when it applies to the design or
fabrication of machinery or equipment, or b) "Completed
Operations Coverage" when it applies to construction work.
Those coverages of such sources would be available for the
Districts to claim against for damages in the event the
particular piece of equipment fails or if a portion of the
specific construction work fails , providing the failure is
due to negligence of the source . Some contractors carry
such insurance .
That will predictably add the cost of the premium of such
coverage to each bid price in some cases . But in the event
of failure of the property due to supplier' s or contractor' s
negligence, the Districts would have an additional party
(the insurance company) available to claim against for most,
if not all, of the direct expense involved during the
immediate future . Current coverage can be claimed against
in future years even though the supplier or contractor has
ceased operations for any reason .
1. Staff' s Recommendation - Not to add the coverage .
The contracts for purchase of equipment and
construction of facilities include warranties
for defective materials and unauthorized work.
The materials and equipment called for in the
-1-
contracts are specified by the Districts '
engineers and, in most cases , are of a
known standard or quality.
Most of the Districts ' purchases are made
from well-known, established companies and
when defective equipment is discovered the
suppliers readily make the necessary adjust-
ment . If this coverage is added to each
equipment and construction bid, it will in-
crease the bid prices to the Districts , as
well as make bidding more detailed and cum-
bersome . Further, it could reduce the
number of bidders , thereby decreasing compe-
tition .
Coverage like this on equipment could tend
to let the suppliers "off the hook," in that
they might feel that the responsibility has
been transferred to the insurance company.
2. The "Family Protection" coverage should be deleted from the
subject policy, if that has not already been done . And,
ideally, the entire $315 premium should be credited to the
Districts on the theory that the existence and purpose of
.the coverage should have been explained to the Districts
by the insurance agent upon delivery, when it would have
been declined .
3 . In lieu of "Family Protection" , the Districts may wish to
consider the purchase of "Medical Payments Coverage" for
its seven passenger vehicles . That is a voluntary coverage
that would be available to any non-employee in a Districts '
vehicle in the event of injury. The cost per car is reason-
able and a limit of $1,000 per person should suffice for
most accidents . Voluntary payment of such expense to an
occupant frequently forestalls notions of lawsuits depending
somewhat, of course , upon the injured occupant . The benefit
is paid whether the Districts were liable for the accident
or not .
2 and 3 . Staff' s Recommendation - Provide
1,000 Medical Payment cbvera e on Class 1.70
Vehicles (passenger automobiles at an annual
premium cost of 132 and delete uninsured
motorist coverage at an annual premium cost
of 315 .00. We have seven passenger cars at
present, but one is being eliminated in March. )
See -attached letter from Jones-Gillespie In-
surance Company, on page A
4 . The existence of six monitoring devices utilizing small
amounts of radio-active material probably poses something
of a potential problem with respect to the present exposure ,
-2-
if any, of employees to radiation poisoning, which would be
outside of the knowledge of this -office . The duration and
frequency of the exposure has been discussed . In spite of E
supposedly adequate shielding from radio-active material,
the Districts may wish to have the present use and exposures
of the monitors measured by a proper laboratory in order to
establish an independent opinion about the margin or lack
of safety which now exists and which could be tolerated by
heretofore exposed individuals (employees) in the future .,
The "state of the art" in this field does change and can
easily justify periodic measures of the devices and receipt
of new advices from an independent authority from time to t
time .
- c
4. Staff' s Comment - We are ordering and install- i
ing permanent monitoring devices in each area +
of radioactive material usage to detect any
possible approach to a limit which might be
cause for a change in our present monitoring
program.
i
We are licensed by the State of California for
the possession of the radioactive density meters .
The Orange County Health Department is the local
enforcement agency. We. are required to make
periodic tests on this equipment to check for any
leakage . The shielding on these devices is such j
that the levels are well below the standards set
for a radiation area.
A training course was conducted by the Orange
County radiological personnel to qualify our key
people . We have a training session scheduled
for our operational and maintenance personnel
which will advise them of normal precautions
and also of emergency procedures in event of a j
major accident involving this equipment .
Moving, installation and repairs to the source
i
holders are under the supervision of an out-
side concern licensed to do this type of work.
In addition, we also conduct our own independ-
ent monitoring at such times .
5 . In discussing the customary emergency, repair, and clean-
up steps followed by the Districts for ruptured lines , the
reported degree of preparedness and relatively efficient
procedures .were impressive . One point is suggested: Upon
completion of tending or repairing an emergency involving
a ruptured line, always invite the local Public Health and
Welfare Office to send a representative to the site for a
final inspection and recommendations . This would relieve
the Districts of responsibility for not performing its work
satisfactorily which, in most cases, would have to be
—3—
y
established if a claimant successfully claimed damages against
the Districts .
5. Staff' s Comment - We have always maintained
close liason with the public agencies in an
emergency. This practice will be continued .
On February 14th we experienced another break
in the Westside Force Main in District No. 3.
The County Health Department, the Executive
Officer of the Regional Water Pollution Con-
trol Board, and the State Health officials were
notified of the emergency. Since we planned
to discharge into a Flood Control channel
during the emergency, Orange County Flood Con-
trol personnel were also alerted . Following
this incident personnel from these same
agencies were invited to meet with the staff
to discuss the emergency and to visit the
site .
EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
Company Policy.
Consultant' s Recommendations
1. •Malpractice should be added to conform to the underlying
policy.
1. Staff' s Comment - The staff has directed the
insurance carrier to add malpractice cover-
age to conform to the underlying policy.
2. Premiums for higher Limits of Liability should be obtained
and may be considered by the Districts . The cost of one
or more additional increments of $1,000,000 should be small
and might justify some increase to the present Limit of
Liability.
2. Staff' s Recommendation - In view of the
slight additional increase in premium, the
staff recommends that the Districts ' lia-
bility covera e be increased to at least
2 000 000 .
The staff has received the following quota-
tions for higher limits of liability
(present coverage is $1,000,000) :
$2,0003000 - Annual premium increase
of $450.00 .
/$5,000,000 - Annual premium increase
of $1,125 .00.
See letter on page B
-4-
PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage and Vandalism) - -
Empire Insurance Company Policy.
Consultant' s Recommendations
1. Insure all Districts properties at both plants, and else-
where if above grade level, for Fire, Extended Coverage, and
Vandalism & Malicious Mischief.
2. Amount of insurance should not exceed 90% of the combined
gross values (not depreciated) of both plants and adjacent
structures, and probably not in excess of $1,000,000 .
3 . Coverage to be on a $1,000 deductible, replacement cost,
agreed amount, blanket basis without an average clause and
without property being necessarily scheduled on the policy.
New M.000
perties to be covered automatically and those exceed-
ing each to be reported within 60 days .
4 . Three or five year policy with equal, flat annual premiums .
5 . Difference of Conditions coverage, as a separate part of the
foregoing, in effect for $100,000 to apply as All-Risk Cover
for all contents of Districts ' structures . Rate should be
attractive .
6 . Fire rate for items 1 thru 4 not to exceed $ .13 per $100
value .
1 through 6 . Staff Recommendation - That
the Insurance Consultant be employed to
prepare specifications and outline bidding
procedures for acquisition of the neces-
sary property insurance coverage .
At the Insurance Consultant ' s suggestion,
the staff forwarded a copy of his recommenda-
tions regarding this coverage to the Empire
Insurance Company. That company advised us
that they are unable to provide property
insurance coverage as outlined in the Con-
sultant' s recommendations .
BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE - - The Travelers Indemnity Company
Policy.
Consultant' s Recommendations
1. The Districts might wish to consider the advisability of in-
suring on a Replacement Cost basis . That would avoid contro-
versy, in the event of a loss, in determining the amount for
depreciation that must be deducted on an Actual Cash Value
settlement basis for depreciation . Further it would avoid
the need for the Districts " to find" money unexpectedly for
the amount of the depreciation, once agreed to, that would
,ow/ be deducted from the insurance company payment of loss .
That amount of depreciation on a costly piece of equipment
over 5 years of age, or older, could be sizeable what with
-5-
inflation of values in recent years .
1. Staff' s Recommendation - Amend the
Districts ' current Boiler & Machinery
insurance policy to provide for pay-
ment of loss on Replacement Cost basis .
The increase in annual premium will be
$209 .00, as shown in the attached letter.
See page C
WORKMEN' S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - - State Compensation Insurance
Fund Policy.
Consultant ' s Comment
1. Excepting for continuous improvement in Accident Prevention,
there is not too much the Districts can do about this form
of coverage .
1. Staff' s Comment - The Districts have an
active and aggressive Safety Program
which is supervised by a competent
Safety Committee of Districts Super-
visory personnel.
PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND - - Fidelity and Deposit Company
Policy.
Consultant' s Comment
1. Coverage should suffice and is recommended.
1 . Staff Recommendation - None .
UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES
Consultant ' s Comments
Some exposures exist which have not been mentioned on the
preceding pages, and they are cited for the purpose of in-
formation even though their probabilities may vary consider-
ably.
Explosion of the by-product of gas may be a possibility about
which the Districts ' engineers are knowledgeable . Operators
of some sewage treatment plants have been encountered with
this fear. It could be insured, although the constant cur-
rents of winds at both plants might well make such coverage
ostensibly unnecessary.
Flood Damage is quite difficult to insure against, particu-
larly in the wide-spread and varying terrain of the Districts .
Its .cost would probably be excessive in terms of the limited
exposure of a submerged collection system up to this time .
�.d
Use and Occupancy insurance was mentioned in my report as
-6-
having doubtful value in expediting restoration of property
after a loss . Theoretically, after a plant is damaged the
volume of material to be processed would continue at about
its usual rate, and could reportedly be disposed of currently
if the plants were operating at 50% capacity except for a few
hours per day. Additional insurance money could not alter
either feature, nor could any process be contracted to another.
Earthquake insurance is available at tolerable cost . How-
ever, all surface structures of importance of the Districts
have a favorable ratio of length-width vs . height which, in
the past, have successfully withstood earthquake forces with
only minor damage .
UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES -- Staff' s
Recommendation - That these items be in-
cluded in the bid specifications for the
property damage coverage . After the pre-
mium charges are known, a determination
can be made as to whether the Districts
should insure against any one , or all of
the perils listed .
In the event the staff' s recommendation on
property insurance is accepted, and the
Insurance Consultant is employed to prepare
bid specifications, we recommend that in-
surance rates be obtained at the same time
for the uninsured perils and exposures by
requesting them in our specifications .
The staff contacted several insurance
brokers to obtain insurance rates on the
"Uninsured Perils and Exposures" as out-
lined in the Insurance Consultant' s
December report, and in each case we were
asked for detailed information concerning
our facilities and our present insurance
coverages . When we encountered this
situation, we contacted Mr. Robinson, the
Insurance Consultant, and he submitted the
attached letter commenting on the Districts '
uninsured perils and exposures . See page
D
-7-
D. K. JONES (�� FRED E. GOPPERT
PRESIDENT J O N E S - G I L L E S P I E, INC; . UNDERWRITING MANAOQR,
A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE ANo REAL ESTATE H. F. RAMPTON
VICC PRESIDENT 207 FIFTH STREET . POST OFFICE BOX 271 MOR. MP caTATS D[l'T.
FRANCES L.JONES PHONE 530-2031
SECRETARY-TREASURER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92048
January 27, 1967
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co.
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
Dear Mr. Harper:
In reply to your request for a quotation for medical payments on your
automotive equipment in lieu of the uninsured motorists coverage now
carried by the Districts, I am pleased to submit the following quota-
tions.
To provide $1,000.00 medical coverage on the Districts vehicles
would be broken down into the following categories:
Class 6 vehicles as shown on the present schedule -- $14.00
per vehicle
I
Class CA5 vehicles -- $21.00 per vehicle
Class 1.70 vehicles -- $22.00 per vehicle
Our present schedule shows 23 Class 6 vehicles, 29 Class CA5 vehicles
and 7 Class 1.70 vehicles, which is your private passenger automobiles.
Projecting this out, this would be a premium on the Class 6 vehicles
of 322.00, on the Class CA vehicles $609.00, and on the Class 1.70
private passenger vehicles 9154.00.
The uninsured motorists coverage represents a premium of $315.00 per
year.
Perhaps the Sanitation Districts would only desire to place this
medical coverage on certain types of vehicles and waive the uninsured
motorists coverage. . I will be happy to meet with you and your
committee for further explanation.
NOTE: Class 1.70 - Passenger automobiles
Class 6 - Pickup trucks
Class CA - Large, 12 ton trucks i �,� Qµ.. _A-
Trusting this information is what .you require and I am awaiting your.'. ;:,_:"..` :•; ;:
• instruotions.
Yours very truly,
{ JONES-GILLESPI INC. j{
j Dave K. on '
i •
r' DKJ i ghg ,
If
D. N.JONES •" �^q FRED E. GOPPERT
r PRESIDE J ® N E �' _ G I L L E SNT '!,'; ,r•' P I E/ ' 61 i.
UNDERWg171N0 MANAOQR
A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE
VICB PREGIDENT 207 FIFTH STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 271 H. F. RAMPTON
f •'' '' MOIL 11[AL QDTATQ DC". '
FRANCES L.JONES PHONQ 030-2531 .'. • t ' '
/ GICRUTARY-TREAGURQR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 02648 .r.' .' , t'•. /
r { , r ., , 1} , •i'1?r Vic.:
January 279 1967 • • '
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Coo
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Fred Harper
' General Manager
Dear Mr. Harpers
In answer to your request for a quotation to increase the
limits under the Sanitation Districts umbrella policy, I am ;.
pleased to make the following quotation. ? i'=
To increase the limits of the St. Paul Fire and Marine policy .' '
! 566XA7718 from the present $1,000,000 limit to a $2,000,000 '•:';"•
limit, the annual premium would be $1,628.00, or an annual
increase of $450.00. To increase the present limit to
w5,000,000, the annual premium would be $2,303.00, or an in. M1 '
? crease over the present policy of $$1,125.00.
St. Paul Fire and Marine has informed me that they do not
care to quote above the $5,000,000 limit and in order to get . '•
limits above $5,000,000 it would be necessary for me to go to',.°.;' ' ;_::. _
another excess market for a quotation. If you or your board .'`
feel this is advisable please let me know and I will pursue
this further.
Yours very truly,
JONES-GILLS I , INC.
if Dave
r DKJsghg t
r t , -B_ .
I ,
,
C. M. .Nelson ,agency Insurance For Every Need
P. Di' BOX 366 ; S83 WEST 19TH STREET
I PHONE 546*735D COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92627
Vebruary 39 1967
Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager,
County Sanitation Districts of Orange County'
P. 0. Box 51759 : ' ,?;•
Fountain Valley, Calif.
Dear Fredt Policy BM-2061040
l# Travelers Insurance Co. '
1
i In reply to your question of Replacement Cost Coverage
on the above policy.
This type of coverage can be accomplished with an increase:,..:.
in the Annual Premium Payment of $209.00.
This would be an endorsement on the present policy and the•,•
i first payment would be on a pro-rate basis to July 12, 1967.
` Yours truly, '
C. M. NELSON AGENCY
+ -C-
GURVExet CHARLES L. ROBINSUN MANAOEDIENT 9ERVIOEBt
EZPOBORae INSURAA0a DarAaTMaaT I'OaOTIOX
Oovaawoae INSURANCE CONSULTANT. EVALUATION or Dme
I 6al.r INevawlvoa '
STArr IaevaAWca AaVIeoiz
IN oa Aaxnaetawt[pI1 NATIONAL OIL DIIILDINO
AND
Acu A000vNTlNo ewrsrr Paooluz.e
800 90IITH GRAND AVENUE
LOS ANOELEB.OALIPORNIA 90017 (213) 825.1011
i February 21, 1967
i Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
{ of Orange County
aDear Mr. Harper:
This will comment upon the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" sec-
tion of our Report . of Survey. Your Board quite properly wishes
a to evaluate each item as to: 1) Estimated degree of risk; and
2) Cost to insure such risk.
Since you tentatively are considering, inviting competitive bids
on your property insurance, you' could obtain insurance rates at
the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by request-
ing them in your Specifications. The bidders would respond with
quotations and the Board could then decide to insure some, all or
none of the latter. Many of the coverages could be endorsed to
your property insurance policy.
It may be helpful to your Board if a capsule opini.gn was now ven-
tured for each uninsured peril, bearing in mind that our crystal
ball is apt to be as opaque as the next one about future perils
and exposures:
i
Explosion - Estimated Maximum Loss could be extensive at any one
i location; but probability will vary depending upon dissipation
of gases by natural wind forces. Insurance cost should be toler-
able with receptive markets.
Flood: Insurance probably not 'available at bearable cost.
1 -
{ Use and OccupancX: This can pay for loss of profit and continu-
ing expense which could not be earned after a loss, for extra
J expense incurred for operations after a loss, for cost of sub-
contracting your services to another, and for exceptional expe-
diting expense (such as shipping components by air instead of
by surface) , etc. The need for such insurance may not be uncom-
fortable yet, but as your daily volume increases, some future '
insurance of this type may become indicated. Markets are recep-
tive. .
Earth uake: Estimated Maximum Loss to plants, equipment and sys-
tems coul be severe if the force of the earthquake were intense.
1 �
;y -D-
i
CHARLES 1. ROBINSON �� V 4 ,
. .. INSURANCE CONSULTANT .. •..
1
Mr. Fred A. Harper Page two.
February 21, 1967
However, as our Report stated: "All surface structures of the
Districts of importance have a favorable ratio of length-width
vs. height which, in the past, has successfully withstood earth-
quake forces (up to moderate) with only minor damage". At least
three uncertainly located faults are thought to penetrate or
bisect the aggregate areas of your Districts. Coverage is writ
ten on a percentage deductible ( 2 to 10%) of total vai1 of all ld
properties at the time of the loss. Insurance markets are mo-
derately receptive at this time, but tend to fluctutate. The
cost to insure against damage by Tidal Wave should probably be
obtained at the same time with respect to Plant 2. Exposure is
moderate or greater; probability is, of course, unknown.
The epicenter of the Long Beach Earthquake of March 10, 1933 is
reputed to be located about 2 3/4 miles offshore of Newport Beach
and about 32 miles south of the mouth of the Santa Ana River.
I shall be pleased to be available to you or to your Board to
explore these points, if desired.
Respectfully submitted
CLR:hwh Charles L. Robinson
Insurance Consultant
i
D
NIYAT/p,
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ��e*"�� `"'@ AREA COODE 714
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 962--2411
2910
'
0
c
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX S175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
March 3, 1967
STAFF REPORT ON THE DISTRICTS' APPRENTICE PROGRAM
The Apprentice I program is fully outlined and we are ready
to contact the schools in Orange County. Our first contacts
will be to familiarize the shop instructors with what we
have to offer and then we will present the story to the
potential enrollees. We plan to start the first trainees
on July 1, 1967.
In preparing the program in a general sense, it became
obvious to the Training Committee that, while we were train-
ing men for the over-all work of the Districts, we would
also need to specialize these, or other people, to fill our
future needs for foremen and skilled technicians . With this
in mind, a tentative program for the second phase was outlined
with the emphasis on specialization in one of our major fields.
These two programs, as a whole, match the standard connotation
of an apprenticeship program in that a man is a skilled,
specialized worker at the end of the training period.
While we would like to carry an individual through both phases,
we also will need some men completing the second phase before
the four years it will take to produce the first graduates of
the completed course. To fill this void we plan to enroll
personnel currently employed by the Districts who can qualify
to begin with the second phase. At present, the size of the
working complement is too small to allow us the latitude of
training an extra man to do a job that we now have one man
trained to do. In the last two years of the course the trainee
will be earning his pay with the Districts in the work he is
assigned, while progressing with his training.
The State and Federal Apprentice Programs have been investi-
gated, but we feel that nothing can be gained by joining
either of these programs by contract. The facilities and
experience of the State are available to us on a consulting
basis which we intend to use to the fullest extent.
.�%Ww
(This report is for information only; no Board action
is necessary at this time) .
ti
APPRENTICE I PROGRAM
Objective:
To train personnel for the maximum benefit to the Districts, the
individual, the community and industry.
It is recognized, as in any apprentice program, that the Districts
will lose a percentage of the men trained. However, it is believed
the improvement of individuals can only result in an improved community.
The Apprentice I program is generally directed toward the progressive
development of recent high school graduates by on-the-job training.
Requirements•
1. High school diploma (consideration may be given to qualified
applicants with GED certificates) .
2. Recommendation by high school Administration.
3. Age limitation - twenty-five (25) years or younger on
entering the program.
4. Commitment by applicant as to his intention to complete
the program as outlined by Management .
5. In initiating the program, consideration may be given to
present employees who express an interest in the program
and meet the requirements. If the employee requests a
transfer to the program, the salary will be established
at his present rate or the top step of the apprentice-
range, whichever is lower.
6. Approval of all entrants to the program by the General
Manager.
Program Outline:
I. General Plan
A . An Apprentice I program shall consist of three (3)
months training in each of the following categories:
1. Maintenance of Sewage Transmission Facilities.
2. Electrical and Instrumentation Systems .
3. Mechanical-Stationary Equipment.
4. Mechanical-Mobile Equipment.
5. Plant Maintenance.
2.
6. Laboratory Procedures .
7. Engineering.
8. Plant Operations .
B. Detailed training in each category is listed on the
attached plans . These plans are subject to revision
by the General Manager as experience dictates. The
training plans specify the required hours in each subject.
The actual training supervisor is allowed some latitude
in the program. The required hours in each subject are
5 to 2001'o' less than the total hours required in each
category. The supervisors will use these hours as best
suits the needs of the Districts and the Apprentice I.
C. A weekly progress report shall be maintained by the
Supervisor to assure compliance with the detailed Apprentice
I program. The Apprentice I shall keep a detailed record
of time worked on each subject and turn in appropriate
records monthly.
D. Supervisors shall schedule training so that at least
30% of the required time is covered each month.
E. While the listings of the eight major categories is
random, some restrictions exist on the sequence of
training.
a. Mechanical-Stationary Equipment must precede
Mechanical-Mobile Equipment .
b. Plant Operations must be preceded by at least one
period in some other area of the Plant site
excluding Transmission Facilities .
II. Evaluation
A. Upon completion of each category of training, a
performance review will be completed by the supervisor
and the review will be processed by current procedures.
B. The continued participation in the apprenticeship program
shall be subject to approval of the General Manager.
III. Classification and Salary
A. A classification of Apprentice I shall be established
for this position.
B. The salary range of this position will be established
as 34.5 ($365-452) .
3•
C. The salary resolution shall provide that the Apprentice I
.� shall be eligible for a full step increase in pay on the
satisfactory completion of each six months training period
upon approval of the General Manager.
D. Upon completion of the program, the apprentice shall be
reclassified. In the event there are no openings in an
appropriate classification, the apprentice will be re-
classified at such time as the first appropriate opening
occurs before consideration is given to an outside
applicant .
E. The classification of Apprentice I is to be considered
a full-time permanent position and as such, the apprentice
will be entitled to the appropriate employee benefits .
F. A beginning Apprentice I shall start on the first working
day of a month and subsequent changes in categories shall
be effective on the first working day of the month.
IV. Special Conditions
1. The Safety Committee will make a special effort to see
that all Apprentice I ' s are instructed in safe working
practices and procedures .
2. The Training Committee will make available such material
and training as is necessary to properly instruct the
Apprentice I.
3. The Apprentice I will be required to work some shift
work and/or overtime and will be reimbursed in accordance
with established salary provisions.
4. Instruction of the Apprentice I will be to the level of
Maintenance Man or equivalent . While time will be too
short for full comprehension at this level, subsequent
advanced training at a later date will be more
comprehensive.
5. No Apprentice I will be allowed to stand an operational
shift alone.
COLLECTION FACILITIES
SUBJECT HOURS
Small Lines 80
Safety procedures - traffic control - various
cleaning procedures - disposal of solids
Large Lines 80
Safety procedures - traffic control - various
cleaning procedures - disposal of solids
Trunk Flow Measurements 40
Safety and traffic control, dye tests, gauging
procedures, installation. and servicing of water
height recorders
Inspections 40
Inspection of trunks and connections. Inspection
of construction. Safety practices
Stoppages 40
Methods and equipment usage to clear stoppage
of large or small lines
Station and Line Service 80
Installation and repair of pump station equipment.
Inspection of backfilling.
Station Run 80
Service, cleaning and inspection of pump stations.
Patticipation in preventative maintenance and
diagnosis
TOTAL REQUIRED 440
ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE
SUBJECT HOURS
Basic Electrical Principles 60
Safety, use of tools and equipment. Soldering,
splicing, and connecting wires. Proper use
of meters
Metering 80
Basic operation of metering elements . Servicing
of meters and recorders
Plant Service and Transformers 80
Installation, hook-up and testing of Plant
electrical service
Utility Service 20
Safety and work on Plant transmission equipment
Motors 40
Service and repair of electric motors
Switch Gear 60
Operation and servicing of circuit breakers,
transfer switches . Distribution system for
each Plant
Control Circuits 40
Servicing and repair of control circuits for
Plant equipment
Telemetering 20
Transmission of signals by leased lines. Conversion
of metering signals for transmission. Coding and decoding
tone signals
TOTAL REQUIRED 400
,,or,
MECHANICAL STATIONARY EQUIPMENT
SUBJECT HOURS
Basic Principles of Engines 40
Textbook and cut-away model. Study of 2 and 4
cycle, gas, gasoline and diesel principles
Preventative Maintenance on Engines 80
Inspection, adjustment and servicing of
stationary engines
Preventative Maintenance of Governors 20
Servicing of hydraulic, mechanical and
electronic types
Preventative Maintenance of Carburetors 20
Servicing and repair of gas and gasoline carburetors
E„ - Contro1s 20
Instruction in basic principles of automotive
engine controls
Major Overhaul 40
Assist in major overhaul of large internal
combustion engine
Gear Boxes 40
Adjustment and servicing of bearings and gear
tooth contact. Herringbone, bevel, worm and
planetary
Compressors 40
Service and repair of reciprocating and rotary
gas and air compressors
Pressure Regulators and Power Actuated Valves 40
Theory of operation, servicing and repairs .
Includes related equipment
Turbines - Gas and Steam 60
Theory and servicing of gas and steam turbines
Includes study of waste heat recovery unit and
associated equipment
TOTAL REQUIRED 400
liECE4NICAL-MOBILE EQUIPMENT
V
SUBJECT HOURS
Vehicle Servicing 110
Gassing, washing, lubrication of cars and trucks
Minor Tune-Up 40
Maintenance and repair of ignition and carburetion .
system
Major Inspection & Servicing 40
Brake, bearing and gear box inspection and
adjustment
Major Tune-Up 30
Inspection and servicing of electrical components,
fuel system, valve train adjustment, and engine
performance analysis
Preventative Maintenance Scheduling; 20
Instruction in selection of proper interval for
preventative maintenance of equipment . Completion
and filing of records
Portable Equipment 20
Servicing, testing, and inspection of portable
equipment including state of readiness of
emergency equipment
Transmissions 24
Theory and repair of mechanical type transmissions
Differentials 24'
Theory and repair of automotive type differentials
Steering and Brakes 32
Service and -repair of systems including power
assisted types
Hydraulic Systems 20
Theory, service and repair of hydraulic control
systems including brakes, power shovels, and backhoes,
and hydraulic cranes
2.
MECHANICAL--MOBILE EQUIPMENT
SUBJECT HOURS
Steam Cleaning and Painting Preparation 20
Proper methods of cleaning, sanding, and masking of:
mechanical equipment for repainting
Engine Breakdown 20
Assist in repair of automotive type engines
TOTAL REQUIRED 400
PLANT MAINTENANCE
SUBJECT HOURS
Grounds Keeping 40
Proper care and trimming of shrubs and trees.
Care of lawn and beds. Weed control
Bar Screens 20
Servicing and repair of bar screens and
conveying equipment
Incinerators 20
Servicing, cleaning and repair of incinerators
and feed mechanisms
Clarifier and Sludge Pumping 60
Servicing of clarifier mechanisms . Servicing
and repair of sludge pumps and metering devices
Digester Equipment 40 (60)
Servicing and repair of circulating and gas
pumps . Maintenance of lines, valves and
digester safety equipment
Water Pumps 40
Servicing and repair of water and sump pump.
Proper installation of valves and checks
Boilers 40
Servicing, cleaning and repair of boilers and
associated equipment . Feed water treatment
Pipe Fitting and Welding 60 (80)
Principles of fitting pipe using both screwed
and flanged pipe. Elementary welding and cutting
using both electric and gas torches
Painting 4o
Proper preparation of surfaces. Painting for
protection from atmosphere. Selection of proper
type of protective coatings
Large Pumps 20 (40)
Servicing and repair of large pumps including
shafts
. 2.
PLANT MAINTENANCE
SUBJECT HOURS
Digester Cleaning 20 (40)
Cleaning and returning a digester to operation.
Methods of grit disposal. Safety and ventilation.
TOTAL REQUIRED 400
NOTE: Figures in parentheses show suggested places where extra
time is thought to be most needed.
Last two items may not be covered in period of training
due to scheduling but will be included before end of
course.
CONTROL LABORATORY
SUBJECT HOURS
Introduction to Procedures 10
Laboratory safety and familiarization with
basic equipment
Sampling 40
Proper• sampling of various plant streams, liquid,
solid, and gas . Handling and storage of samples and
proper preparation for analysis
Sludge and Digestion Analysis 80
Analysis of sludges from throughout Plants.
Analysis of digester contents and how each
parameter affects operational efficiency.
Sewage Analysis 120
Analysis of sewage and industrial waste samples
for routine and special analysis
Bacteriology 120
Collection and analysis of samples for bacteria
control. Study of various methods for confirmation
of results .
Chlorination Analysis 20
Analysis of chlorine residual and demands on
various types of treatment plant streams and
preparation of analytical reagents
Quantitative Analysis 40
Introduction to the procedures for analyzing
samples in a quantitative manner
TOTAL REQUIRED 430
ENGINEERING
`.J
SUBJECT HOURS
General 4.0
Introduction to departmental procedures,
equipment and methods
Drafting 200
Translation of physical configurations into
representative drawings involves both field
and board work
Surveying 160*
Elementary surveying. Use of tools and
instruments
Inspection 40*
Inspection of contract work for compliance
with plans and specifications, sampling and
testing of material
TOTAL REQUIRED 440
*Extra time should be concentrated in these phases
PLANT OPERATIONS
SUBJECT HOURS
Treatment Plant No . 1 160
(80 hours will be on shift work) Operation of
all units of the Treatment Plant to include
records and sampling
Treatment Plant No . 2 160
(80 hours will be on shift work) Operation of
all units of the Treatment Plant to include
records and sampling
Chlorine Station 80
(40 hours will be on shift work) Operation, servicing
and routine maintenance of the chlorination equipment,
trickling filter plant, outfall booster station and
related testing procedures
Sludge Handling 40
Operation of the centrifuge and sludge handling
equipment to include servicing, records and
sampling
Control Center 40
Operation with a Control Center operator.
Interpreting the operating conditions of the
units from the console displays. Record
keeping and chart servicing
TOTAL REQUIRED 480
NOTE: Apprentice I will not stand an operating shift alone
S*111JFT1°I '
NOUN Y SANITAI ION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 714
° 1
y
'( OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0 962-54029
11 1
I
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 9270E
February 28, 1967
To: Fred A. Harper, General Manager
From: Training Committee
Subject : Apprentice Program
As the Com,* ittee developed the Apprentice Program to give an
over-all training in the Districts ' work, it became apparent that
t1;e needed a second program to carry on where the first stopped.
This second program should be specialized in each of our main
fields of endeavor.
Sttac ed is a reco-ximended Apprentice II program to compliment
the Apprentice I -rog`rarr..
To date, c•:e ave not carried the development of this program
to t e detail of t,::a Apprentice I program. In the program, as
presently conceived, we would require outside study at college
level and in effect be training our skilled technicians and foremen
of the future .
With your co::currence, we will develop this program in the
same detail as ou"_ Apprentice I program..
it ,,could be a bcod selling point for our Apprentice I program,
when we present it to future applicants, if we can show that there
is a good chance to grow in skills and training with the Districts.
Jo., . L. Sigler
JDS:gg
Attachment
RECOMMEAMATION FOR AN APPRENTICE II PROGRAM
Objective
To train ?personnel for the maximum benefit to the Districts, the
individual, the community and industry.
it is recognized, as in any apprentice program, that the Districts
will lose a percentage of the men trained. However, it is believed
the improvement of individuals can only result in an improved community.
The Apprentice II program is generally directed toward the progressive
development of advanced skills in the Districts ' operations in
specialized fields . It is for graduates of the Apprentice I program
and/or other District personnel who the General Manager feels are
qualified to benefit the Districts by this training.
Requirements :
1. High school diploma (consideration may be given to qualified
applicants with GED certificates)
2. Abe limitation - twenty-eight (28) years or younger on
entering the program.
3. Satisfactory completion of Apprentice I program.
4. Commitment by the applicant as to his intention to
complete the program as outlined by Management.
5. Consideration may be given to current employees who express
an interest in the program and meet the requirements. If the
employee requests a transfer to the program, the salary will be
established at his present rate or the top step of the
Apprentice II -range, whichever is lower.
6. Approval of all entrants to the program by the General Manager.
Program Outline:
Y r
1. Ge.,c ' Ran
A. An Apprentice II program shall consist of two (2) years
training in one of the following specialized fields:
1. Electrical
2. Mechanical - Mobile and Stationary
3. Plant Operations
4. Plant Maintenance & Construction
5. Laboratory
6. Engineering
• ~ 2.
B. The detailed Apprentice II program shall be in accordance
�../ with a plan developed by the staff and approved by, the
General Manager.
C. Outside schooling will be required to supplement his on-
the-job training. The amount of outside schooling required
will vary with the various fields but will involve a sub-
stantial amount of time . The Apprentice II will be expected
to accomplish this on his own time and at his own expense.
D. A certification procedure will be established to recognize
co-mpletion of the -required work.
weekly progress report will be maintained by the super-
vsor to assure co,:,pliarce with the detailed Apprentice II
program. The apprentice will keep required records and
reports will be reviewed at least monthly by a committee
designated by the General Manager.
II. Bval;,ation
A. '^::e apprentice II shall be given a performance review
not less than bi-annually by his immediate supervisor and
the review shall be processed by current procedures.
• B. The continued participation in the Apprentice II program
shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager.
III . Cias< .'cation and Salary
A. A classification of Apprentice II shall be established.
B. The salary range of this position will be established
Gt 38.5 (� 52/56o) .
C. -ovi:ions shall be Trade to enable the Apprentice II to
receive one step salary advances upon the satisfactory
completion of each six months period of training upon
approval of the General Manager.
D. Upon completion of the program, the Apprentice II shall
,;ave teen trained to an equivalent 'level. of Mechanic T.
�f the-re are no openings in an appropriate classification
at that time, the Apprentice II will be assigned. first
priority for the first appropriate opening occuring.
E. The classification: of Apprentice II is to be considered a
full time permanent position and as such the apprentice
will be entitled to the appropriate employee benefits.
F. A beginning Apprentice II shall start on the first working
-day of a month and his o' months. anniversary shall 'be
determined from that date.
EXCERPTS FRO1,.1 THE, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No.6 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 8:00 o'clock p .m. , March 8 , 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o' clock p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present.
Directors present: Porter, Gruber, and Baker
Directors absent: None
Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board.
STRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Authorizing payment
for stabiliza- That payment to Robert E. Lenihan,
tion Long Beach, California, for grout
stabilization on Dover Drive, is
hereby authorized to be made in the total amount of $7,213.96.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS .
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6 , of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and
correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes 19f6
the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March 9 7
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
A-O- the official seal of County Sanitation District No.6 , of Orange
County, California, this 8th day of March , 1967 .
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No.
ROLL CALL
District
Regular
Adjourned
Date = 2 i / Time
JOINT BOARDS /�`' DISTRICT 1
Harvey, H. V"' McMichael Harvey McMichael
Amo � Miller, Clifton Mack
Bartlett —� Porter
Bousman - Davis Baker Featherly
Bowen Noe
Crapo Shull DISTRICT 2
Culver -� Parks Hileman
Forgit Gruber Crapo Shull
Furman Bouma Culver
Gruber Forgit Harvey �� McMichael
Gummere Anderson Hock �- Michel
Hock Michel Schutte Krein
Long �� Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood
Miller, Clifton Mack Speer �G Clark
Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst
Parks Hileman Workman
Parsons Baker Featherly
Porter
Schutte L.-I� Krein DISTRICT 3
Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer ✓ Clark
Fregeau Amo �L
Speer �� Clark Bousman -�� Davis
Stewart Green Bowen �- Noe
Coen Crapo Shull
Walters -� Herbst Culver
Workman � Furman � Bouma
Baker Featherly Gummere Anderson
Harvey McMichael
Long Brown
Miller, Harry Kohl
Schutte Krein
OTHERS: Schwerdtfeger Fregeau
Stewart Green
Brown Walters Herbst
Nisson - Baker Featherly
Galloway -�
Tremblay �` DISTRICT 5
Lowry �L Parsons
Carlson Gruber Forgit
Rimel Baker Featherly
Maddox
DISTRICT 6
Porter
Gruber Forgit
Baker �G Featherly
DISTRICT 7
Miller, Clifton f Mac_t
Forgit Gruber
` Harvey McMichael
Parks Hileman
Porter
v Baker �� Fea ,arly
DT v DISTRICT 11
Stewart Coen
Mai , L m ou e Fwrtlett
- Baker Featherly
Ba `1, eat r
" ROLL CALL
District
Regular
Adjourned
Date Time -�f �40'('
JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1
Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey ✓ McMichael
�..✓ Amo —� Miller, Clifton Mack
Bartlett Porter
Bousman �� Davis Baker Featherly
Bowen -� Noe
Crapo -� Shull DISTRICT 2
Culver �� Parks Hileman
Forgit to Gruber Crapo � Shull
Furman � Bouma Culver
Gruber ^� Forgit Harvey McMichael
Gummere Anderson Hock /' Michel
Hock Michel Schutte - Krein
Long Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood
Miller, Clifton / Mack Speer Clark
Miller, Harry `�` Kohl Walters Herbst
Parks Hileman Workman
Parsons Baker Featherly
Porter
Schutte ,/ Krein DISTRICT 3
Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer Clark
Fregeau Amo
Speer —� Clark Bousman -i�� Davis
Stewart � Green Bowen Noe
Coen Crapc Shull
Walters Herbst Culver
-�-
Workman Furman Bouma
Baker Featherly Gummere Anderson
Harvey �� McMichael
Long Brown
Miller, Harry —� Kohl
Schutte Krein
OTHERS : Schwerdtfeger Fregeau
Stewart Green
Brown Walters Herbst
Nisson Baker Featherly
Galloway
Tremblay DISTRICT 5
Lowry Parsons
Carlson Gruber Forgit
Rimel Baker —�� Featherly
Maddox
DISTRICT 6
Porter
Gruber -�L Forgit
Baker Featherly
DISTRICT 7
Miller, Clifton Mack
Forgit Gruber
Harvey McMichael
Parks Hileman
Porter
`..� Baker Featherly
DISTRICT DISTRICT 1
Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen
Bartlett
Mitchell Baker — ✓ Featherly
Baker Featherly
isOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. x 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 EIVAvenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
JOINT_BOARDS
IIAGENDA
MARCH 8, 1967 - 8:00 p.m.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
(2) Roll Call
(3) Election of Joint Chairman
(4) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (Districts)
(5) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �y
(6) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(7) DISTRICT 3 y,q,
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, and the special
meeting held February 23, 1967
(8) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(9) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(10) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(11) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion approving minutes of the
regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed
(12) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
(13) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
- Report -of the Gen a1 Counsel
(15) ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Executive Committee on the report of
Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant. See page
n F,n
(16) ALL DISTRICTS
onsiderat on of the following actions on the writte
report of the Executive Committee:
a. Motion approving recommendations
b. Motion directing the General Manager
to implement the recommended changes
in insurance coverages
f c. Motion authorizing the General Manager
to employ Charles L. Robinson, Insurance (A
Consultant, to prepare specifications
and outline bidding procedures for
• acquisition of the recommended property
insurance coverage, including bid
specifications for it perils & exposures"
as outlined in the Insurance Consultant's
report dated December, 1966
(17) ALL DISTRICTS �/�.
Staff report on award of Job No. P2-11 (Headworks "C") .
See page "G" for bid tabulation. (See Manager' s Deport
(18) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-24, granting an
easement to the City of Fountain Valley in connection f
with improvements to Ellis Avenue. See page "H"
(19) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons deration of motion authorizing issuance of a
purchase order for the following emergency equipment:
Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set, Specifi-
cation #E-049 - $10,337.00
See page "I" for bid tabulation
(20) ALL DISTRICTS
Cons d�eration of motion authorizing the General �(1
Manager to sign and submit report of waste discharge,
as required by the provisions of Section 13054 of the State
Water Code
(21) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing
and directing execution and filing of documents necessary
for Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq. :
District No. Resolution No. Page No.
�a 2 67-18-2 It ill
b. 3
67-19-3 tl K'l
c. 5
67-20-5 nV?
d. 6 67-21-6 "M"
e. 7
67-22-7 a N►r
f.
11 67-23-11 110"
g, 1 67-17-1 " P"
-2-
(22) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file General
Manager' s certification that he has checked all bills
appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order,
and that he recommends authorization for payment
(23) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint
Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolvin§ Fund warrants
listed on pages "A , "A" , and "C
(24) ALL DISTRICTS y � C /i " �
Other business and communications' if an
(25) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-27-1, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awardin
contract for Job No. P2-11 to J. Putnam Henck in the
total amount of $2,495,961.00. See page "Q"_
(26) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D" Jam✓
27) DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if anyr
(28) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(29) DISTRICT 11 G✓
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
(30) DISTRIC
0 r busi d common if any
(31) DISTRICT 11 1 N9 S l r •/"
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment `
(32) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-28-2, authorizing
acceptance of an easement from the Fullerton Elementary
School District relative to construction of Contract
No. 2-11-1, as recommended by the General Counsel.
See page "R"
(33) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-29-2, to receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding
contract for Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station o
and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-2 to Industrial
Pipeline Construction Company in the total amount of
$161,347.05. (Bid opening at 4:00 p.m. , March 6th. See
Iftp/ page "S" . ) (See page "T" for bid tabulation. )
(34) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. fvjl�
See page "D"
-3-
(35) DISTRIC
0 r busine a mmunications, if any
(36) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment � S
(37) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of request by the staff for deferment
of report on establishment of reserve fund for future
facilities. (See Manager' s Report)
(38) DISTRICT 3
Consi ation of mo ion approvin rants.
See age "D"
P39 DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any .
40) DISTRICT 3 , ✓�► ,
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(41) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 5
Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants,
if any. See page "E"
(42) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13,
authorizing an addition of $1,219 to the contract with
Far Western Pipeline, Inc. , Contractor. See Page "U"
(43) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #2 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13,
adjusting engineers' quantities. See page "y"
(44) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of Resolution No . 67-30-5 accepting
Contract No. 5-13 as complete, and authorizing the
filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page
t1W11
(45) DISTRICT 5 �n
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
(46) DISTRICT 5
0 ne and communications, i �/J�'1 ,
TA
(47) DISTRICT 5
i
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(48) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to
the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6
(Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction) , granting
an extension of time to Cook & Barletta, Inc. ,
Contractor. See page "X"
(49) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-31-6 accepting
Contract No . 6-6 as complete, and authorizing the filing
of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "y"
-4-
(5 ) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Robert
E. Lenihan, Long Beach, for grout stabilization on
Dover Drive, in the amount of $7, 213.96
(51) DISTRICT 6 l G�
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. d
See page "E"
(52) DISTRICT,
0 busin�s�a,1dr cord"U catio
(53) DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
(54) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-32-7, ordering
annexation of territory to the District (Panorama
Elementary School site) . See page "z"
(55) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion authorizing and directing
the General Manager to request annexation to the 7th
Sewer Maintenance District of the following proposed
annexations within county territory, for the purpose
of maintaining the local sewers included within these
proposed annexations : (See page "AA" )
1. Prospect
2. E1 Modena
3. Hewes-Bond
4. Tustin-Fairhaven
5. Arroyo-La Loma
(56) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
(57) DISTRICT-,7---
business -and ommunica n
(58) DISTRICT 7 M,
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment /�T ', 01 r '
-5-
RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS
March 8, 1267
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
6759 Adachi Narsery Co. , Plants for Westside Stn. 248.04
6760 Alemite Company, Tools, Small Hardware 176 .03
6761 All Bearing Service, Inc . , Pump Bearings 79 .82
6762 Allis -Chalmers Mfg. Co ., Compressor Parts 1,100.46
6763 Aloe, Thermometer 3.74
6764 Alpine Aromatics, Inc . , Odor Control Chemicals 1, 544.40
6765 American Well Works, Inc . , Sludge Probe 129 .00
6766 City ol' Anaheim, Power 30 .76
6767 The Anchor Packing Co. , Packing & Gaskets 63.06
6768 Apeo Supply, Air Filters 23.97
6769 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 207.27
6770 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 345.E
6771 Barksdale Valves, Pressure Switches 332.0
6772 Bay City Bearing Co ., Inc . , Bearings, Hardware 315.82
6773 Bell Pipe & Supply Co. , Valves 55.04
6774 Blower Paper Company, Janitorial Supplies 90.23
6775 Charles Bruning Co. , Reproduction Supplies 174.63
6776 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Protective Wrapping 63.85
6777 Calii. Wholesale Electric Co . , Temp Switch Controls 29.72
6778 Certified Building Materials Co ., Cement 90.53
6779 City Sand & Gravel Co . , Rock Base, Fill Dirt jr-.02
6780 R. B. Clapp Co. , Inc. , Electric Timers 0.83
6781 College Lumber Co . , Inc . , Small Hardware, Lumber 146.93
6782 Consolidated Electrical Dist. , Electric Supplies 169 .24
6783 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc ., Truck Parts 271 .03
6784 Costa Mesa County Water Dist . , Water 4.40
6785 Leonard C . Crapo, Reimb. for Auto Damages Dist 2&3 19.77
6786 Daniels Tire Service, Truck Repair 17 . 50
6787 Data Transportation Co ., Inc . , Freight 25.00
6783 Deaver Mfg. Co . , Equipment Parts 16 .23
6789 John M. Deck Co . , Equipment Repair 5.27
6790 De Guelle & Son' s Glass Co . , Truck Repair 74.25
6791 Diesel Control Corp. , Engine Parts 269 .59
6792 Dunton Ford, Truck Parts 30.58
6793 Electric Supplies Dist. Co . , Electric Supplies 266.11
6795 Enchanter Inc. , Ocean Monitoring& Research 1,762.50
6796 Estekote Company, Steel Spool 8.94
6797 Fischer & Porter Co ., Chlorinator Parts 247.46
6798 Fowler Equipment, Inc . , Equipment Rental 194.25
6799 Freeborn Equipment Co . , Inc . , Portable Pump 494.00
6800 Freeway Machine & Welding, Machine Shop Work 72.00
6801 General Electric Supply Co. , Cable, Elect. Supp. 1,949 .57
6802 General Telephone Co . 982 .20
6803 Gladman & Wallace, Truck. Tires 250.35
6804 Glenmart Company, Inc . , Angle Steel 202.55
6805 Glidden Company, Paint Supplies 75.84
6806 Graybar Electric Co., Inc . , Electric Supplies 71.76
6807 A . P. Green Refractories, Inc. , Insulation 161 .94
6803 Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Serv. 294.00
6809 Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses 43.58
6810 J. Howard Hawk Equipment, Equipment Jacks 46.70
6811 Health Education Service, Technical Publication 11
6812 L. Heitman Equipment Co . , Equipment Rental 170.52
6813 Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. , Equipment Rental 47.02
6814 B. F. Heying, Employee Mileage 19 .20
6815 Honeywell, Inc . , Instrumentation Parts 453.63
6816 Howard Supply Co ., Valves, Piping, Hardware 778. 30
6317 International Harvester Co . , Truck Parts 132.31
6B18 J & M Service, Engine Parts 52.64
..A,-
WARRANT NO. IN FACTOR OF AMOUNT
6819 Jasco Materials Co . , Roofing Supplies 39 .53
6820 B. R. Jones & Co . , Inc . , Engine Parts 361 .34
6821 Jones Chemicals, Inc . , Chlorine 10,472.80
6822 Kar Products, Inc. , Truck Parts 259 .82
6823 Kelly Pipe Co. , Piping Supplies 111.62
6824 Kleen-Line Corp. , Trash Containers 43.37
6825 K Mart, File Case 11.44
6826 Knippers Rentals, Equipment Rental 120.00
6327 Anthony J. Lauricha, Employee Mileage 12.00
6825 LBWS, inc . , Cleaning Supplies, Hardware, Tools 4?7.73
6829 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 19.10
683o Lewis Bros. Batteries, Truck Batteries 91.02
6831 McCalla Bros . , Pump Parts 53.69
6832 McCoy Motor Co ., Tractor Parts 16 .12
6833 Bill McDaniel Equipment, Equipment Rental 168.50
6834 Mahaffey Machine Co ., Machine Shop Uork 151.59
6835 Munselle Supply Co . , Inc . , Welding Supplies 92.15
6836 Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals 213.72
6837 The National Cash Register Co . , Acctg. Mach. Mtce. 286.00
6838 National Chemsearch Corp. , Insecticide 654.94
6839 Lee M. Nelson, Consulting Services 320.00
6840 Nelson--Dunn, Inc. , Engine Parts 241 .25
6841 City of Newport Beach, Water 4.50
6842 C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer 700.00
6843 Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc . 420.65
6844 Overst-rom & Sons, Shaker Screen Parts 122.76
6845 Pacific Intermountain Express, Freight 7.46
6346 Pacific Telephone 277.45
6847 Postmaster, Postage 100.00
6848 Protek Specialty Company, Mobile Equip. Parts 56.28
6849 Radio Products Sales, Inc . , Electronic Tubes 125.64
6850 Rapid Blue Print Co. , Reproduction Service 231.30
6851 The Register, Legal Publication 79 .09
6852 Reliable Steel Supply Co ., Blower 17.26
6853 Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co. , Structural Steel 199 .38
6854 Al Roberts Plymouth, Auto Repair 12.72
6855 Ruff' s Saw Service, Saw Sharpening Service 4.95
6856 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints 43.29
6857 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Supplies 71 .76
6858 Santa Ana Paint Co., Drafting Supplies 12.69
6859 E. H. Sargent & Co . , Lab. Supplies 1,671 .05
6860 Russell M. Scott, Sr. , Employee Mileage 33.50
6861 Sibal En; ineering Co . , Inc. , Compressor Parts 430.77
6862 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 22.50
6863 Signal Flash Company, Barricade Rental 140.00
6864 Signal Oil Company, Gasoline 496.80
6865 Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 55.4
6866 Southern California Edison Co . 2, 534.5E
6867 Southern California Water Co . 66.49
6868 Southern Counties Gas Company 388.23
6869 Southern Marine Supply, Small Hardware 74.88
6870 Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies 12.64
6871 Speed--E--Auto Parts, Truck Parts 223.89
*or, 6872 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies 40.8(
6873 Standard Oil Company of Calif. , Oil 740.83
6874 Sully.-Miller Contracting Co. , Asphalt 19 .92
6375 Tardif Sheet Metal, Metal Fabrication 440.02
6876 Technical Associates, Lab. Equipment Repair 14.68
6877 C . 0. Thompson Petroleum Co . , Weed Oil 119 .33
6878 Tony' s Building Materialls, Blasting Sand 60.32
6879 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. , Line Cleaner Cable 454.13
. B-,
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
6880 Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline 4.24
6881 U. S. Divers Co ., Chlorine Safety Equipment 361.40
,low/ 6832 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. , Office Supplies 24.96
6883 John R. Waples, Odor Consultant 220.20
6884 Warren & Bailey Co . , Inc ., Valves, Fittings 356.94
6885 D. L. Warwick, M.D., Pre-Employment Physicals 32.50
6886 Waukesha Hotor Company, Engine Repairs 836.39
6887 Welch' s Coastal Concrete Co . , Concrete 32.84
6888 Whitneys, Truck Repair. 10.02
6889 W. D. Wilson Company, Fittings 149 .91
6890 Winter & Co ., Photo Supplies & Finishing 25.64
6891 W-K--M Valve Division ACF Industries, Valve 13.51
6892 Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Charges . 379.70
6893 Flair Drafting Service 447.13
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND 42,9 59 .36
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6894 Bank of America NT&SA 42, 545.00
Assignee - Vinnell Corporation
6895 John Carollo Engineers 1,107. 50
6896 Freedom Newspapers, Inc . 8265
6897 Kemper Construction & W. W. Hoagland 9,942:80
6898 Southern California Edison Co. 7, 315.74
6899 Sully-Miller Contracting Co . 3, 580.38
69oo Twining Laboratories 16 .00
6901 Wallace Trade Bindery Co . 115.40
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING 64,705.47
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF 107,664.83
DISTRICT NO. 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND VARRANTS
WAR11ANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
6902 Boyle En3ineerine 340.00
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERATING FUND t- ARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6903 J. R. Lester Boyle x Sidney L. Lowry 105.00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
69o4 J. R. Lester Boyle x Sidney L. Lowry $ 4,183.00
6905 The Orange Daily News 46-76
6906 i;allace Trade Bindery 6. 0
4,286.66
4,391.66
DISTRICT NO. _ 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6907 AAA Construction Company $ 13,185.00
69o8 City of Newport Beach 64.00
6909 Donald C. Simpson 270.00
13,519.00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6910 Far Western Pipeline Inc. 116,281.54
6911 Donald C. Simpson 2,363.46
118,645.00
$ 132,164.00
-D-
DISTRICT NO. 6
OPERPTING FUND t`rRiUNTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
6912 Robert E. Lenihan 7;213.56
DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
6913 Cook & Barletta Inc. s 3,066.67
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND Tjt ARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6914 Boyle & Lowry 2,649.50
A_D�NO. Amount
$1, 3+� 5.50
Plan Check &
Inspection 1,214.00
$2,649.50
6915 Irvine Industrial Complex 668.50
6916 County of Orange (AD NO. 6) 149.80
6917 Southern California Edison Co. 364.68
$ 3,832.48
FIXED OBLIGATION FUND tr'ARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6918 City of Anaheim $ 1,561.8o
6910 City of Buena Park 96.70
6920 City of Fullerton 1,561.80
6121 Garden Grove Sanitary District 241 .80
6922 Ci tf of La Habra 386.90
6923 City of Orange 1,474.70
6924 City of Placentia 241.80
6925 City of Santa Ana 4,434.50
$ 10,000.00
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6926 Boyle and Lowry 5d 60.00
6927 The Tustin News 31. 16
6928 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 19.24
$ 110.40
q, 13,942.88
D.T.STRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND V:ARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
6929 Lomar Corporation & Orange County Pipeline $ 29,659.27
d..J
6930 Lowry and Associates 2,293.00
$ 31,952.27
-E-
March 1, 1967
REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO THE JOINT
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
RE: Insurance Consultant's Report dated December, 1966
At the January llth meeting of the Boards, the recommendations
of the Insurance Consultant were referred to the Executive Committee
for study and final recommendation as to changes to be made in the
Districts' insurance coverages.
The Executive Committee met on January 18th and March 1st to
review the Consultant' s recommendations and a written staff report
on the matter. As a result of its deliberations, the Committee
submits the following recommendations for the Boards' consideration:
1. LIABILITY INSURANCE:
a. Provide $1,000 Medical Payment coverage
on District-owned passenger vehicles
at a premium cost of $132 per year,
and delete Uninsured Motorist coverage
at an annual premium cost of $3�5
2. EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE:
a. At no additional cost add "Malpractice"
coverage to conform to the underlying
liability policy
b. Increase the Districtst Liability
coverage to $5,000,000, for an additional
annual premium cost of $1,125.00
3. PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage & Vandalism)
a. The Districts' current insurance carrier
is unable to provide coverage as recom-
mended by the Insurance Consultant;
therefore the Committee recommends that
the Consultant be employed to prepare
specifications and outline bidding pro-
cedures for acquisition of the necessary
coverage .
4. BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE
a. Amend the current Boiler & Machinery
policy to provide payment of loss on
a Replacement Cost basis, for an annual
premium increase of $209
5. UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES
a. The Insurance Consultant listed a
number of "uninsured perils" such as
flood damage and earthquake. The
Committee recommends that these un-
insured perils and exposures be
included as separate bid items in the
bid specifications for the Property
Damage coverage. After the premium costs
are known, a determination can be made as
to whether the Districts should insure
against any one, or all, of the perils listed .
Agenda Item 15 -F- All Districts
Engineers ' estimate as stated in engineers '
letter dated.•December 6, 1966 -- $2,475,000
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date March 1, 1967
Contract For: HEADWORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2
JOB NO. P2-11
CONTRACTOR TOTAL DID
1. J. Putnam Henck, a corporation $2,495,961.00
374 West 40th Street
San Bernardino, California
2. Hydrocarbon Construction Company 23536,507.00
1116 'St. Jo Professional Building
2000 Crawford Street
Houston, Texas
3. Kemper Construction Company and 2,648,000.00
W. W. Hoagland, A Joint Venture
3254 Cherry Avenue
Long Beach, California
4. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. 216825200.00
1704 Ruxton Lane
Redondo Beach, California
5. Vinnell Corporation 2,8333825.00
1145 Westminster Avenue
Alhambra, California
6. Alex Robertson Company 2,960,449.00
3065 Rosecrans Place
San Diego, California
Agenda Item #17'' -G- All Districts
RESOLUTION NO. 67-24
GRANTING EASEMENT TO THE CITY
OF FO T
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos . 1, 22 32 53 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 22 3,
52 6, 7, and 11, grant to the CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, A Municipal
Corporation, a perpetual easement and right of way for street and
highway purposes in connection with improvements to Ellis Avenue;
and,
Section 2. That the real property over which said easement
is to be granted is described as follows :
The North 40.00 feet, measured at right angles, of
the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 5
South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, as
per map recorded in Book 51, Page 12 of Miscellaneous
Maps, Records of said County.
Except therefrom the West Half of the Northwest
Quarter of said Southeast Quarter.
Section 3. That said easement is to be granted at no
cost to the City of Fountain Valley; and,
Section 4. Execution of this easement on behalf of the
Districts is hereby authorized.
Agenda Item #i8 -H- All Districts
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date February 28, 1967
AUXILIARY DIESEL GENERATOR SET
SPECIFICATION NO. E-049
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Lawless G. M. Diesel $10,337.00
13644 East Nelson Averue
City of Industry
2. Shepherd Machinery Corp. 11,549.96
11971 Westminster Avenue
Garden Grove, California
It is recommended that award be made to Lawless G.M. Diesel as
the lowest and best bid.
(Note--the above unit is highly specialized and as such, there is
limited qualified competition. However, due to the fact that the
complete unit will incorporate a generator that is surplus
Districts ' property, the net result will be an excellent piece
of equipment at a substantial savings to the Districts. )
T. A. Dunn
Purchasing Officer
Specifications were sent to the following:
Shepherd Machinery
Lawless G.M. Diesel
Reggaes Diesel Service
Agenda Item #19 -I- All Districts
RESOLUTION N0. 67-18-2
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and ll, of Orange
County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item #21 J-1 District #2
No. 2 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a
'construction grant under said Act of Congress in the
amount of $1.462,510 for a joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc-
tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of
the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent
for County Sanitation District No. 2 in all ways necessary to carry
out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 2 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-18-2
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN TN!ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my habd and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
Fred Harper, gecretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 2, of
Orange County, California
`rd
Agenda Item #21 J-2 District #2
RESOLUTION N0. 67-19-3
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has ,joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange
4`0/ County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item #21 K-1 District #3
No. 3 all documents necessary to apply for and accept
a construction grant under said Act of Congress in the
amount of $1,567,670 for a joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated"Central Agency" for said construction
project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the
California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for
County Sanitation District No. 3 in all ways necessary to carry out
the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 3 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE }
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-19-3
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
Fred rper, Secretary of fhe
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 3, of
Orange County, California
Agenda Item #21 K-2 District #3
RESOLUTION NO. 67-20-5
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
NN ✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.S.c. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining ,joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange
County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item #21 L-1 District #5
No. 5 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a
construction grant under said Act of* Congress in the*.
amount of $271,010 for a joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc-
tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of
the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent
for County Sanitation District No. 5 in all ways necessary to carry
out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 5 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-20-5
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES :
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
e./ Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5, of
Orange County, California
Agenda Item #21 L-2 District #5
RESOLUTION N0. 67-21-6
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
-
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Aet of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has ,joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintainingjoint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange
County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item #21 M-1 District #6
No. 6 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a
construction grant under said Act of Congress in the' .
amount of $268,690 for a Joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc-
tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of
the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent
for County Sanitation District No. 6 in all ways necessary to carry
out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 6 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-21-6
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
?red A. Harper, Secretary or the
`ft� Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 6, of
Orange County, California
Agenda Item #21 M-2 District #6
RESOLUTION N0. 67-22-7
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
�.d A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5. 6 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange
County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item J21 N-1 District #7
No. 7 all documents necessary to apply for and accept
a construction grant - under said Act ofCongress in- the "
amount of $2330020 for a joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc-
tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of
the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent
for County Sanitation District No. 7 in all ways necessary to carry
out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 7 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA)
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-22-7
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 7, of
Orange County, California
Agenda Item #21 N-2 District #7
RESOLUTION N0. 67-23-11
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2,
3, 5, 6 and 7 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange
14s/ County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California.
Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in-
structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District
Agenda Item #21 0-1 District #11
No. 11 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a
construction grant under said Act of Congres�',in the
amount of $297,880 for a ,point project generally described as:
�d OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than
hereinabove set forth.
Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County,
California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc-
tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of
the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent
for County Sanitation District No. 11 in all ways necessary to carry
out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 11 as
hereinabove expressed.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-23-11
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to
wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange
County, California this 8th day of March, 1967.
�..� Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the
Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 11, of
Orange County, California
Agenda Item #21 0-2 District #11
RESOLUTION N0. 67-17-1
FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION
AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL
GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. IN BEHALF OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6,
7 AND 11
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of
Orange County, California
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT:
Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water
Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides
for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works.
Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County
is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3,
Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for
the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk
sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other
local collection sewering agencies,. and has ,joined with other County
Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3,
5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining ,joint
sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement
dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and
Construction Agreement.
Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner-
ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County acts for itself and as agent for County
Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5. 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County,
l"� California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different
territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of
constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and
disposal facilities.
Agenda Item #21 P-1 District #1
Section 4. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions
set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California have authorized the filing of applica-
tions for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts
set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1
as "Central Agency" for said applications as set forth in Title 23,
Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1 ) of the California Administrative Code:
District No. Resolution No. Application Amount
1 67-17-1 .531,820
2 67-18-2 1,462,510
3 67-19-3 1,567,670
5 67-20-5 271,010
6 67-21-6 268,690
7 67-22-7 233,020
11 67-23-11 297,88o
Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare,
sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, and as agent
for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, all
documents necessary to apply for and accept construction grants
under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth in Section 4
hereof for a joint project generally described as:
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2
Acceptance of said grants may be for amounts more or less than
set forth in Section 4 hereof.
Agenda Item #21 P-2 District #1
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE
�.d I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange County, California, do
hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-17-1
was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board
on the 8th day of March, 1967, by the following vote, to wit:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official seal of County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange
County, California, this 8th day of March, 1967.
Fred A. Harper, Secretary, Boar
of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1, of Orange County,
California
Agenda Item #21 P-3 District #1
RESOLUTION NO. 67-27-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-11
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR HEADWORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-11
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts ' engineers, and
concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made
to J. PUTNAM HENCK, a corporation for HEADW ORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-11, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for
said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-11 is hereby
awarded to J. PUTNAM HENCK, a corporation in the total amount of
$2,495,961.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the
prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the
lowest and best bid received therefor on March 1, 1967; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution
No. 66-154 as amended, on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s
checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders .
Agenda Item #25 -Q- District #1
RESOLUTION NO.67-28-2
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS
�./ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ-
ING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANTS OF EASEMENTS
FROM FULLERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Temporary Working Easement
dated February 23, 1967, wherein FULLERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT
grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 a temporary working ease-
ment for the purpose of placing dirt, machinery, refuse and other
materials and equipment relating to the construction of Rolling Hills
Drive Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-1, is hereby approved and
accepted at no cost to the District; and,
Section 2. That the certain real property over which said
easement is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "A"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the certain permanent Grant of Easement and
right of way dated February 23, 1967, wherein FULLERTON ELEMENTARY
SCHOOL DISTRICT grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 a
permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con-
struction of Rolling Hills Drive Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No.
2-11-1, is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the District;
and,
Section 4. That the certain real property over which said
easement is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "B"
attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County, California.
Agenda Item #32 -R- District #2
RESOLUTION NO. 67-29-2
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 OR ORANGE
... COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
AND FORCE MAIN SEWER
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and
concurred in by the District' s Chief Engineer, that award of con-
tract be made to INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor,
for construction of ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
AND FORCE MAIN SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2, and the proposal sub-
mitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 2-11-2 be
awarded to INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in
the total amount of $ 1614347.05 in accordance with the terms of
their bid and the prices contained therein; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the speci-
fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution
No. 67-14-2 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That the written request of D. K. Moran
Construction Company dated March 7, 1967 for rescission of Ito bid
for said work in the amount of $128,293.74 be received and ordered
filed, and that said request is hereby granted; and,
Nft�
Section 5. That all bids received for said work, except
for the bid of Industrial Pipeline Construction Company, are hereby
rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks sub-
mitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
Agenda Item #33 -S- District #2
ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $154,801.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date March 7, 1967
Contract For: ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
AND FORCE MAIN SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
*1. D. K. Moran Construction Co. $128,293.74
610 East Holt
Ontario, California
**2. Industrial Pipeline Construction Co. $16l,347.05
13801 So. Central Avenue
Los Angeles,59, California
3. Far Western Pipeline, Inc. $165,282.4o
6611 Fee Ana
Anaheim, California
4. Cook & Barletta, Inc. $170,867.10
542 East Centra' Park Avenue
Anaheim, California
5. Lomar Corporation $171,720.00
700 Fifth Street
Huntington Beach, California
6. Ecco Contractbrs, "Ind. $177,458.00
7931-Lampson Avenue
Garden..Grove, ' California
7. Charles L. McLaughlin $177,468.00
3429 Ocean View Blvd.
Glendale, California
8. J. M. Covington Corp. $186,201.00
10114 Shoemaker Avenue
Santa Fe Springs, California
9. R. E. Ziebarth & S. B. Alper $187,800.00
21205 Bolsa Street
Torrance, California
Continued:
Agenda Item #33 T-1 District #2
ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $154,801.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date March 7, 1967
Contract For: ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION
AND FORCE MAIN SEWER
CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
*1. D. K. Moran Construction Co. $128,293.74
610 East Holt
Ontario, California
**2. Industrial Pipeline Construction Co. $161,347.05
13801 So. Central Avenue
Los Angeles,59, California
3. Far `,,Festern Pipeline, Inc. $165,282.40
6611 Fee Ana
Anaheim, California
4. Cook & Barletta , Inc . $170,867.10
542 East Central Park Avenue
Anaheim, California
5. Lomar Corporation $171,720.00
700 Fifth Street
Huntington Beach, California
6. Ecco Contractbre, -Ind. $177,458.00
7931-Lampson Avenue
Garden•.Grove, ' California
7. Charles L. McLaughlin $177,468.00
3429 Ocean View Blvd.
Glendale, California
8. J. M. Covington Corp. $186,201 .00
10114 Shoemaker Avenue
Santa Fe Springs, California
9. R. E. 2iebarth & S. B. Alper $187,800.00
21205 Bolsa Street
Torrance, California
Continued.
Agenda Item #33 T-1 District #2
10. Dateline Pipe Contracting, Inc. $187,817.00
1231 North Lemon Street
Anaheim, California
11. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc . $199,455.00
1500 West Ninth Street
Upland, California
* See letter requesting that bid be rescinded Page T-3
** See engineers ' recommendation of award Page T-4
Agenda Item #33 T-2 District-#2
CONCRETE PIPE 610 EAST HOL? EILVD. PIPE LINE CONSTRUCTION
IRRIGATION SYSTEMS TRENCHING
SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS TELEPHONE YUKON 6.4075
UNDERGROUND AIR DUCTS D. K. MORAN, PREG.
D. F. CARAWAY, VICE PREG.
R. W. CONNOR. EEC:TREAS.
AREA CODE 714 /!��\�g�'p r/� {� rr� {�p p ,A���p p� �y g� 9
TELEPHONE
656 SN 4-7634 ��• d,• 1'V Y`V a 11 Y Co Ii5 i 4 l� 6 V G J Company
0�'LA i Y�Y
�"'��'�C�+�•Qti:.'�r_'1'�'D•�:.rCJ�G,r"�...rr..n:.rr�'r�-C�' ..rGCf�rr..�.�-r�..r+.f1�{
GENET NAL Y 1?ZLUI�EZ CONTZACTOU
ANYWHERE
CONCRETE FOR PERMANENCE
ONTARIO, Ott. I: RWIA
7 March 1967
County Sanitation #2
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley , California.
Re : Contract #2-11-2
Atten: fir . Paul Brown
Gentlemen :
Due to an error in extension of our bid on the concrete ,
which amounted to $29 ,600 .00 , we respectively request permission
to withdraw our bid .
Very Truly yours ,
D . K . Moran Construction Co .
B
Dr: xaway.__.._.._... �.._
DrC/br
Agenda Item #33 T-3 District #2
J. R. LESTER mid SIDJ\ILY L. LOWLY
Coiu:,liing Engineers, A Joint Venture of
BOYLE EiNGINEERING LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
412 South Lyon Street
P.O. Box 178
Santa Ana, Calif., 92702
Telephone 547.4471
March 7 , 1967
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 2
P. 0. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Subject: Rolling Hills Pump Station and Force Main
Sewer, Contract 2-11-2
Gentlemen:
Eleven bids for the subject contract were opened on
:larch 6, 1967. A tabulation of these bids is on file.
On March 7, 1967 , D. K. Moran rescinded his bid
because of an error in preparing it.
Mr. Fred Harper, Mr. Paul Brown and I reviewed the
work sheets used to compile the bid of D. K. Moran, and it
appears an error in concrete extension of $29 ,600 was omitted
in his tabulation. We therefore recommend approval of his
action in rescinding his bid.'
We further -recommend that the contract be awarded to
Industrial Pipeline Construction •Co. in the amount of
$161, 347. 05 . This bid is approximately 4% above the. Engineer's
estimate of $154, 801. 00 .
We make the above recommendations subject to concur-
rence by the Administrative and Legal Staffs of the District.
Very truly yours,
J. R. Lester Boyle
and Sidney L. Lowry
Consulting Engineers
Milo K. Keith
MKK:m
I hereby concur in reabovyrecommevni'd at' n.
�..✓ March 8, 1967 \., i
Chief Engineer
Agenda Item #33 T-4 District #2
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 1
CONTRACTOR: Far Western Pipeline, Inc. DATE: March 8. 1967
JOE: Trunk Sew_er�Back Bay Drive to Pacific Coast Highway, Contract 5-13
Amount of this change order (ADD) (R R2) $ 1,0219.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer' s letter of March 1, 1967 and Engineer' s
final progress estimate
ADD
1. Additional asphalt priming of sand base with
0.50 gallons per square yard of liquid asphalt
as directed by engineer $ 400.00
2. Special rock bedding at established Contract
price 195 C.Y. @ $4.20/C.Y. 819.00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,219.00
Original Contract Price $ 2173370.35
Prev. Authorized Changes none
This Change (AM) (DEEM) 1,219.00
Amended Contract Price $ 218,582.35
Board authorization date: Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
r.. March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY.9 CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC.
By
Agenda Item #42 -U- District ..n#5
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 2
CONTRACTOR: Far Western Pipeline, Inc . DATE: March 8, 1967
Trunk Sewer, Back Bay Drive to Pacific
JOB: Coast Highway, Contract No . 5-13
Amount of this change order ( ) (DEDUCT) $ 3,760.39
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES
DEDUCT
Item Change Est 'd. Quant.
No. Unit From To
2. L.F. 725 724.66 .34 LF @ $ 23.70/LF $ 8.o6
5. L.F. 200 74 126 LF @ 12.00/LF 1,512.00
6. L.F. 200 0 200 LF @ 13.00/LF 2,600.00
7. Each 2 1 1 EA @ 150.00/EA 150.00
8. Each 1 0 1 EA @ 150.00/EA 150.00
TOTAL DEDUCT $3,760.39
ADD
1. L.F. 4021 4021.32 .32 LF @ $ 45.85/LF $ 14. 67
3. Each 15 16 1 EA @ 645.00/EA 645.00
TOTAL ADD $ 659.67
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $3,760•39
Original Contract Price $ 217,370. 35
Prev. Authorized Changes ADD 1,219.00
This Change ) (DEDUCT) 3,760•39
Amended Contract Price $ 214,828.96
Board authorization date: Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC.
By
Aa-enda+Item -V- District #5
RESOLUTION NO. 67-30-5
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-13 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
`a•► OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
CONTRACT NO. 5-13 AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC. ,
a California corporation has completed the construction in accord-
ance with the terms of the contract for the TRUNK SEWER, BACK BAY
DRIVE TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 5-13, on the 3rd day
of March, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4 . That the construction of the TRUNK SEWER, BACK
BAY DRIVE TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 5-133 is hereby
accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract
therefor, dated the 6th day of December 1966; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
Agenda Item #44 -W- District #5
COUNTY SAaTITATTON DISTRICTS OF 0..AG2 COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO.
CONTRACTOR: Cook & Barletta, Inc. DATE: March 8, 1967
JOB: Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction - Job No. 6-6
ti...� Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ none
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor' s letter dated March 2, 1967 and Contract
Revision No. 3
EXTENSION OF TIME
Weather - Inclement Days
November 2
December 7
January 5
Acts of the Districts
Conflict with existing contractor constructing
Balboa Bay Club apartments limiting access to
pump station 1�_
TOTAL 29
Original Completion Date: January 4, 1967
Change Order No . 1 15 calendar days January 19, 1967
Change Order No. 2 7 calendar days January 26 1967
Change Order No. 3 29 calendar days February 24, 1967
Actual completion date: February 24, 1967
Original Contract Price $ 24,058.00
Prev. Authorized Changes ADD 300.00
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) none
Amended Contract Price $ 24,358.00
Board authorization date: Approved:
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By_ ,1s/ Paul G. Brown
Chief Engineer
COOK & BARLETTA, INC.
By
Agenda Item #48 -X- District #6
RESOLUTION NO. 67-31-6
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 6-6 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING
CONTRACT N0, 6-6 AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, COOK AND BARLETTA INC. ,
a California corporation has completed the construction in
accordance with the terms of the contract for the ROCKY POINT
PUMPING STATION RECONSTRUCTION, CONTRACT NO. 6-6, on the 24th day
of February, 1967; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has
concurred in said engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the Rocky Point Pumping Station
Reconstruction, Contract No. 6-6, is hereby accepted as completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the
6th day of October, 1966; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
Agenda Item #49 -Y- District #6
RESOLUTION NO. 67-32-7
APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE
ISTRIC Annexation 13
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF
TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Panorama Elemen-
tary School Site - Annexation #13)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to
the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory
to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No.
67-12-7 filed with said Commission; and,
Section 2. That the designation assigned by said
Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "ANNEXATION
NO. 13 - PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ANNEXATION", the exterior
boundaries of which are described on EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto
and by reference made a part of this resolution; and,
Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to
is uninhabited; and,
Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory
is to provide public sanitary sewer service to the property of the
Orange Unified School District, known as the "Panorama Elementary
School"; and,
Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of
$1,325 have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and,
Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local
Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District
�..✓ Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of
the State of California, under the provisions of Government Code
Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described
hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation
District No. 7.
Agenda Item #54 -Z- District No. 7
BOYLE and LOWRY
Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of
BOYLE ENCINEE-11ING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
P. 0. Box 178
Santa Ana, California 92702
Telephone 547-4471
February 23, 1967
County Sanitation District No. 7
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper
Gentlemen: County Sanitation District No. 7
Annexations to Seventh Sewer
Maintenance District
Enclosed are reproducible copies of the legal descriptions and the sketches to
accompany the descriptions of the following proposed annexations to the Seventh
Sewer Maintenance District.
1 . Prospect
2. El Modena
3. Hewes-Bond
4. Tustin-Fairhaven
5. Arroyo-La Loma
Also enclosed are copies of letters from the Local Agency Formation Commission
dated January 30, February 6 and February 10, stating that the boundaries of the
proposed annexations are reasonably definite and certain. We have sent the legal
description and sketch for the Yorba Annexation within the city limits of the city
of Tustin to Ben Wheelock for processing by the city of Tustin.
County Sanitation District No. 7 by letter from the general manager or by Resolu-
tion of the Board of Directors, should now request annexation of the five proposed
annexations within county territory. The communication to the Board of Super-
visors should state that all of these areas now have operating sewers,and that the
sewers cannot be cleaned and maintained by County Sanitation District No. 7 until
these areas have been annexed to the Seventh Sewer Maintenance District.
It is our understanding that the county of Orange in connection with these annex-
ations and the hearing will mail a notice of the hearing to each inhabitant of the
territory sought to be annexed. It is also our understanding that the county uses
the registered voters address list for such mailings rather than the property owners
address list. In connection with a property owners address list, we have already
Agenda Item #55 AA-1 District No. T
County Sanitation District No. 7 February 23, 1967
Page Two
assembled ownership address lists for most of the area within these five annexa-
tions utilizing the mailing list for Assessment District No. 6 and can furnish
ownership address lists for the rest of the areas. However, since the county
says the list is to go to the inhabitants, we will not do anymore work on com-
piling a complete property owners address list.
Very truly yours,
BOYLE and LOWRY
Carl A. Carlson, C.E. 6654
PP
41-7635-40-00
Enc.
cc: Lowry and Associates
\owl
r n,7e AA-2 DJ.etrict; Nc�.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
y„r of 8:00 o'clock p.m. , March 8 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m.
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present.
Directors present: Lindsley Parsons (Chairman) , Paul J . Gruber,
and David L. Baker
Directors absent: None
Present: Fred A . Harper, Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT NO. _,5 Moved, seconded and duly carried :
Adjournment
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned
to 11:00 a .m. March 30 1967, in the Council Chambers ,
City Hall, Newport Beach, California .
Whereupon the Chairman declared the meeting so adjourned
at 8:56 p .m. , March 8, 1g67.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS.
COUNTY OF ORANGE )
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and
correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of
the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March , 1967.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
^AWVI the official seal of County Sanitation District No- 5 , of Orange
County, California, this 8th day of March �96 7•
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No . 5
Hut,n„
T '� TELEPHONES:
�JN a Y SANITATION DISTRICTS . ,�{} � AREA CODE 714
540-2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � � 962-2411
" 10.o44 E*LLl9 AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
February 24, 1967
MANAGER' S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE
The following is an explanation of the various items
of bu,liness propose(] to be considered at the March lst
meet-ing of the Executive Committee and the Building Committee.
Arta.ched to this Manager' s Report are the minutes of
z:he ,jc,int; meeting of f.;he Executive Committee and Building
Comma i.i;ee on Ja,nllary 18t;h.
1 . Alt('fIITECT]_IRAL WEATMI-,NT FOR PLANT NO. 2 STRUCTURES.
Director Clifton Miller was instructed by the Committees to
requesi; proposals from several well-known architects for
developing an over-all plan for improving the appearance
:,f Plant No. 2. D-irector Miller advises that he has con-
i;acted three archif;ectural firms, and that representatives
from each will be available for discussions with the
Committees at the:, March lst meeting.
2. i I)i S'PRIC'.l'S 1 APHtEN`i'ICESHIP PROGRAM. In November, 1966,
the ,W Lnt boards authorized the staff to develop an apprentice-
ship program, which is scheduled to begin in July. The staff' s
Training Committee has now developed what we consider to be a
comprehensive program which we would like to outline in detail
to the Executive Committee for their comments and suggestions .
3. RECOMMENDATIONS OF CHARLES L. ROBINSON INSURANCE
CONSULTANT. The December, 1966 report of Charles L. Robinson,
Insurance Consultant, was referred, at the January joint meeting
of the Boards, to the Executive Committee for study and final
recommendation as to changes to be made in the Districts '
insurance coverages .
At the January 18th meeting of the Committee, sufficient
information was not available for the Executive Committee to
-2-
ti..
take any action. The staff: has now prepared a report for
the Committee' s consideration, a copy of which is attached.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
FAH:j b
'MLTATIpy
COUNTY ° '` ��SANITATION DISTRICTS TELEPHONERS,. AREA CODE 714
540-2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA o 9 6 2-2 41 1
11 1 IS44 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 9270E
February 24, 1967
REPORT OF THE STAFF ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF
CriA.RLES L. ROBINSON
Insurance Consultant
LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Pacific Indemnity Company Policy.
Consultant ' s Recommendations
1. When services or purchased equipment are obtained from
others, the Districts should continue to require that
such must conform to any applicable California Code .
In designing Specifications the Districts may addition-
ally wish zo require its sources to carry a special form
of coverage which could, in effect, protect such sources
and '.:_e Districts from liability for some time in the
future . That coverage has two names : a) "Products
Liacilizy Coverage" when it applies to the design or
fabrication of machinery or equipment, or b) "Completed
Ope:^atio;,s Coverage" when it applies to construction work.
Those coverages of such sources would be available for the
Districts to claim against for damages in the event the
^articular piece of equipment fails or if a portion of the
specific construction work fails , providing the failure is
due -:;o negligence of the source . Some contractors carry
such insurance.
That will predictably add the cost of the premium of such
coverage to each bid price in some cases . But in the event
of failure of the property due to supplier' s or contractor' s
negligence, the Districts would have an additional party
(the insurance company) available to claim against for most,
if not all, of the direct expense involved during the
.1-mmediate future . Current coverage can be claimed against
in future years even though the supplier 'or contractor has
ceased operations for any reason .
1. Staffs Recommendation - Not to add the coverage .
The contracts for purchase of equipment and
construction of facilities include warranties
for defective materials and unauthorized work.
The materials and equipment called for in the
-1-
contracts are specified by the Districts '
engineers and, in most cases, are of a
known standard or quality.
Most of the Districts ' purchases are made
from well-known, established companies and
when defective equipment is discovered the
suppliers readily :Hake the necessary adjust-
ment . If this coverage is added to each
equipment and construction bid, it will in-
crease the bid prices to the Districts, as
well as mate bidding more detailed and cum-
bersone . Further, it could reduce the
number of bidders , thereby decreasing compe-
tition.
Coverage like this on equipment could tend
to let the suppliers "off the hook," in that
they might feel t' at the responsibility has
been transferred to the insurance company.
2. The "Family Protection" coverage should be deleted from the
subject policy, if tha;, has not already been done . And,
ideally, the entire $315 premium should be credited to the
Districts on the theory that the existence and purpose of
.the coverage should have been explained to the Districts
by the insurance agent upon delivery, when it would have
been declined.
3. In lieu of "Family Protection," , the Districts may wish to
cons the purchase of "Medical Payments Coverage" for
its seven passenger vehicles . That is a voluntary coverage
tha;, t-:ould be available 'Go any non-employee in a Districts '
vehicle in zhe event of injury. The cost per car is reason-
able and a limit of $1,000 per person should suffice for
most accidents . Voluntary payment of such expense to an
occupant frequently forestalls notions of lawsuits depending
somewhat', of course , upon the injured occupant . The benefit
is paid whether the Districts were liable for the accident
or not .
2 and 3. Staff' s Recommendation - Provide
$1,000 Medical Payment cbvera e on Class 1.70
Vehicles assen er automobiles at an annual
-oremiura cost of $132, and delete uninsured
motorist coverage at an annual premium cost
of $315 .00. Tree have seven passenger cars at
present, but one is being eliminated in March.
See "attached letter from Jones-Gillespie In-
surance Company, on page A
4. The existence of six monitoring devices utilizing small
amounts of -radio-active material probably poses something
of a potential problem with respect to the present exposure,
-2-
i
if any, of employees to radiation poisoning, which would be
outside of the knowledge of this -office . The duration and
frequency of the exposure has been discussed. In spite of
supposedly adequate shielding from radio-active material,
the Districts may wish to have the present use and exposures
of the monitors measured by a proper laboratory in order to
establish an independent opinion about the margin or lack
of safety which now exists and which could be tolerated by
heretofore exposed individuals (employees) in the future .,
The "state of the art" in this field does change and -can +
easily justify periodic measures of the devices and receipt
of new advices from an independent authority from time to
time .
4. Staff' s Comment - We are ordering and install- (,
rg -oe=.,.anent, devices in each area i
of radioactive material usage to detect any
'oossible approach to a limit which might be I
cause for a change in our 'Present monitoring
"program
i
We are licensed by -che- State of California for
the possess_on of the radioactive density meters .
The Orange County Health Department is the local
enforcer.ent agency. We. are required to make
periodic tests on this equipment to check for any
leakage . T:�e shielding on these devices is such
that the levels are well below the standards set
for a radiation area.
9 training course was conducted by the Orange
County radiological personnel to qualify our key
people . We have a training session scheduled
for our ope-rationa'_ and maintenance personnel
which will advise them of normal precautions
and also of emergency procedures in event of a
major accident involving this equipment .
Moving, installation and repairs to the source
holders are under the supervision of an out-
side concern licensed to do this type of worn.
In addition, we also conduct our own independ-
ent monitoring at such times .
; . In discussing the customary emergency, repair, and clean-
up steps followed by the Districts for ruptured lines , the
reported degree of preparedness and relatively efficient
procedures .were impressive . One point is suggested: Upon
completion of tending or repairing an emergency involving
a -rupturred line, alwa. s invite the local Public Health and
Welfaxe Office to send a representative to the site for a
final inspection and recommendations . This would -relieve
the Districts of responsibility for not performing its work
satisfacto-r__1y which, in most cases , would have to be
-3- ;
established if a claimant successfully claimed damages against
the Districts . i
r..� 5. Staff' s Comment - We have always maintained
close liason with the public agencies in an
emergency. This practice will be continued .
On February 14th we experienced -another break
in the Westside Force Main in District No. 3.
The County Health Department, the Executive
Officer of the Regional Water Pollution Con- `
trol Board, and the State Health officials were
notified of the emergency. Since we planned
to discharge into a Flood Control channel
during the emergency, Orange County Flood Con-
trol personnel were also alerted. Following
this incident personnel from these same
agencies were invited to meet with the staff
to discuss the emergency and to visit the
site.
EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance
Company Policy.
Consultant ' s Recommendations
1. Malp-ractice should be added to conform to the underlying
policy.
1. Staff' s Comment - The staff has directed the
insurance carrier to add malpractice cover-
age to conform to the underlying policy.
2.. Premiums for higher Limits of Liability should be obtained
and may be considered by the Districts . The cost of one
or more additional increments of $1,000,000 should be small
and might justify some increase to the present Limit of
Liability.
2. Staff' s Recommendation - In view of the
slight additional increase in premium, the
staff recommends that the Districts ' lia-
bility coverage be increased to at least
$2,000,000 .
The staff has received the following quota-
tions for higher limits of liability
(present coverage is $1,000,000) :
$2,000,000 - Annual premium increase
of $450.00.
$5,000,000 - Annual premium increase
of $1,125 .00 .
See letter on page B
-4-
PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage and Vandalism) - -
Empire Insurance Company Policy.
Consultant ' s Recommendations
1. Insure all Districts ' properties at both plants, and else-
where if above grade level, for Fire, Extended Coverage, and
Vandalism & Malicious Mischief.
2. Amount of insurance should not exceed 90% of the combined
gross values (not depreciated) of both plants and adjacent
structures, and probably not in excess of $1,000,000.
3. Coverage to be on a $1,000 deductible, replacement cost,
agreed amount, blanket basis without an average clause and
Without. property being necessarily scheduled on the policy.
New properties to be covered automatically and those exceed-
ing �50,000 each to be -reported within 60 days .
4. Three or five year policy with equal, flat annual premiums .
5 . Difference of Conditions coverage, as a separate part of the
foregoing, in effect for $100' 000 to apply as All-Risk Cover
for all contents of Districts ' structures . Rate should be
attractive .
6 . yi-re rate for items 1 thru 4 not to exceed $ .13 per $100
value .
1 through 6 . Staff Recommendation - That
,,..c- insurance Consultant be employed to
prepare specifications and outline bidding
procedures for acquisition of the neces-
sary property insurance coverage .
At the Insurance Consultant' s suggestion,
the staff forwarded a copy of his recommenda-
tions regarding this coverage to the Empire
Insurance Company. That company advised us
that they are unable to provide property
insurance coverage as outlined in the Con-
sultant' s recommendations .
3011JER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE - - The Travelers Indemnity Company
Policy.
Consultant' s Recommendations
1. The Districts might wish to consider the advisability of in-
suring on a Replacement Cost basis . That would avoid contro-
versy, in the event of a loss, in determining the amount for
depreciation that must be deducted on an Actual Cash Value
settlement basis for depreciation . Further it would avoid
the need for the Districts " to find" money unexpectedly for
the amount of the depreciation, once agreed to, that would
be deducted from the insurance company payment of loss .
That amount of depreciation on a costly piece of equipment
over 5 years of age, or older, could be sizeable what with
-5-
inflation of values in recent years .
l. ' Staff' s Recommendation - Amend the
�.d Districts ' current Boiler & Machinery
insurance policy to provide for pay-
ment of loss on Replacement Cost basis .
The increase in annual premium will be
$209 .00, as shown in the attached letter. .
See page C
WORIUv N' S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - - State Compensation Insurance
Fund Policy.
Consultant' s Comment
1. Excepting for continuous improvement in Accident .Prevention.,
there is not too much the Districts can do about this form
of coverage .
1. Staff' s Comment - The Districts have an
active and aggressive Safety Program
which is supervised by a competent
Safety Committee of Districts Super-
visory personnel.
PUBLIC: EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND - - Fidelity and Deposit- Company
Policy.
Consultant' s Comment
1. Coverage should suffice and is recommended.
1. Staff Recommendation - None .
UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES
Consultant ' s Comments
Some exposures exist which have not been mentioned on the
preceding pages, and they are cited for the purpose of in-
formation even though their probabilities may vary consider-
ably.
Explosion of the by-product of gas may be a possibility about
which the Districts ' engineers are knowledgeable . Operators
of some sewage treatment plants have been encountered with
this fear. It could be insured, although the constant cur-
rents of winds at both plants might well make such coverage
ostensibly unnecessary.
Flood Damage is quite difficult to insure against, particu-
larly in the wide-spread and varying terrain of the Districts .
Its ,cost would probably be excessive in terms of the limited
exposure of a submerged collection system up to this time .
Use and Occupancy insurance was mentioned in my report as
-6-
having doubtful value in expediting restoration of property
after a loss . Theoretically, after a plant is damaged the
volume of material to be processed would continue at about
�..d its usual rate, and could reportedly be disposed of currently
if the plants were operating at 50% capacity except for a few
hours per day. Additional insurance money could not alter
either feature, nor could any process be contracted to another.
Earthquake insurance is available at tolerable cost. How-
ever, all surface structures of importance of the Districts
have a favorable ratio of length-width vs . height which, in
the past, have successfully withstood earthquake forces with
only minor damage .
UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES -- Staff' s
Recommendation - That these items be in-
cluded in the bid specifications for the
property damage coverage . After the pre-
mium charges are known, a determination
can be made -'as to whether the Districts
should insure against_ any one , or all,, of
the perils listed .
In the event the staff' s recommendation on
property insurance is accepted, and the
Insurance Consultant is employed to prepare
bid specifications , we recommend that in-
surance rates be obtained at the same time
for the uninsured perils and exposures by
requesting them in our specifications .
The staff contacted several insurance
brokers to obtain, insurance rates on the
"Uninsured Perils and Exposures" as out-
lined in the Insurance Consultant' s
December report, and in each case we were
asked for detailed information concerning
our facilities and our present insurance
coverages . When we encountered this
situation, we contacted Mr. Robinson, the
insurance Consultant, and he submitted the
attached letter, commenting on the Districts '
uninsured perils and _exposures . See page
D
;�a. e FREE) E. GOPPERT
O, K. JONES y
PREWDENT J O N E S - G I L L E S P I E. 1 N C VNOiRWRITINO MANAO[R
A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE '
r H.VicE PREOIDENT YOy FIFTH STREET F. RAMPTON POST OFFICE BOX 271 :y..: man.IttALReunPxPT. i•`
PRANCES L.JONES PHONe 530.2531 s ` t•� . . •.
SECRETARY•TAKAOURER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92640
January 27, 1967
Cou::ty Sanitation Districts of Orange. Co. 5
1O844 Ellis Avenue
Fountaln Valley, California
_ Attention: Mr. Fred Harper
General Manager
Dear Mr. Harper:
in reply to your request for a quotation for medical payments on your
automotive equipment in lieu of the uninsured motorists coverage now
carried by the Districts, I am pleased to submit the following quota-
tions.
To provide $1,000.00 medical coverage on the Districts vehicles
would be broken down into the following categories:
Class 6 vehicles as shown on the present schedule -- $14.00 ' • ,:. .i ... '
per vehicle
i Class CA5 vehicles -- $21.00 per vehicle '
Class 1.70 vehicles -- $22.00 per vehicle
Our present schedule shows 23 Class 6 vehicles, 29 Class CA5 vehicles
and 7 Class 1.70 vehicles, which is your private passenger automobiles.
Proectin- this out, this would be a premium on the Class 6 vehicles
of _322.00, or, the Class CA vehicles $609.009 and on the Class 1.70
private passenger vehicles' 154.00.
The uninsured motorists coverage represents a premium of $315.00 per
year.
Perhaps the Sanitation Districts would only desire to place this
medical coverage on certain types of vehicles and waive the uninsured
motorists coverage. . I will be happy to meet with you and your
co::::,I ttee for further explanation. ,
NOTE: Class 1.70 - Passenger automobiles
Cass 6 - Pickup trucks
Class CA - Large, 112 ton trucks _A_
�.. , . i
h.• " ;cY
' this lnforaation is what .you require. and I am awaiting your <<
t T,usti..£�
il.struations. ,� J
. `!+_• , ' Yours very truly, 1 "x , „.
I , , JONES GILLES +w T,'..:•1;1y,:
','
. 1 . ;'j:
. .. ' i ... - } , �' .
'•f ' !In I ,.. .l . I.•t r t : t t'
f . .j f K.. _ * J J• f c
. ..• ,. . t •1 i,. J. -•r- .'L iJ t
.1 •i. at! •�f 1 ..: ^:�•••II - ..:�i. 1 -y ..
{ A ice. t ! ., 1 .rr • J l r` '{ 1 •}
e t •J:.t •i 4 .1
E µ`
j' . . . • :i
.i, 1 1
r I, 4;t r
• Y- , '1'
. 1 r:..•, ° .t
K ,: It i f n
:' i 1 1 ` 5 ';:`i`;' t
i :, :, .
, . . {' n: ;'fit;.,..!. .' `.
'7 t,J t.
. .
t �A_
.
.
' PREGIOENT j 1 Y O N E S- G I L L E S P ' S, I N C• FAED E. GOPPEAT
1 !' N ,'�.!• •�' UNDEAWRITING MANAGER
A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE r �'
NT EOV FIFTH STREET •','�'::• •. H•its AAMPTON '+
• POST OFFICE 80X 271 PNDN4 d30.2d31 '
• - "� ','; •''t• MOR.REAL EYTATi DE!?
Vicr rAEGIDE .•
a ECR¢TART•TR FAGU NCR HUNTINGTON ULACH, CALIFORNIA 02040 i�' '
January , 7'
County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co•,'
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, -California • '> .' ` '
Attention: Mr. Fred harper
General Manager
Dear ►:r. Harper:
In answer to your request for a quotation to increase the '
limits under the Sanitation Districts umbrella policy, I am
pleased to make the following quotation.
To increase the limits of the 'St. Paul Fire and Marine policy
? 566XV718 from the present VA1,000,000 limit to a $2,000,000
z _ limit, the annual premium would be $19628.00, or an annual
i increase of $450.00. To increase the present limit to '
5,000,000, the annual premium would be $2,303.00, or an In-
crease over the present policy of $1,125.00.
St. Paul Fire and Marine has informed me that they do not
{ care to quote above the $5,000,000 limit and in order to get
limits above 559 000,000 it would be necessary for me to go to'
} another excess market for a quotation. If you or your board
feel this is advisable please let me know and I kill pursue
this further.
+.
Yours very truly9
JONF,S-GILLS PI , INC.
Dave K o
DXJ:sh- I .
—B—
insurance for I;verY Need f
ge�C� 5B3 WEST 19TH sTREOR IA 92637'.
• ,1 ' 9t�)t 366 ,'I;;FI 'r''' t;OBTA ME5Ar C�►1.If
3 _ pHaNg 5 f '"�r ` r ebrua�'Y 3 g 1967
. 7 t t •L t,4 •, , t t
'� . .• ! .' + t,., ,r..I{tit••' ,y1 � '
.1 •. 1. • .7•if. • t
tFred $arpexs General.a a of Orange Countfs
° Sanitatlon Distr9. t
Co'un,Jy 51759
C� Box Val�eys Calif. .R.�.;
1 Four.gain Policy BM-2��anCe coo
i Dear Fr ed g have"lets
j ofpZ acement Cost Coverage
�, your question
ir, r 6piy °
roe above Po1i cY° ishea With Gn
in
02' covexage can be 209�Q I
�tu.s 4YIp Payment of w and the .
the knnual prem�. ton the present PolicY
11967 ..:t
i u1d b an endorsenen ate basis to Ju7Y
finis wo uld be an a pro-r
t first payment wo Ya,n's trulY9
+ C. M.
( •• ` I�: ''i '.11 ••,• fill • • • . ..
,'t• '. '•'1'eft t .{ lit _ � ' '.
F•sroevnre
1 CIIA.RLES L. R013INSON ' r xANAOF.MENT BERVIOEBI
INSURANCE CONSULTANT. •: -% .�`i'.',•- INOVAAHCADarAnTmnxzYVN(mor ..
Sr.LY IFOUnANOn RVALVASION Or DIDO
STAYr IxOVAANcm Awnaon
Ioa ADu:xleanArcox NATIONAL OIL DAILDINO '
AnD Aoc000vNrtxo • 8Arrr[PROGRAMS
000 SOUTH OnAND AVENtM
LOS ANOELESI CALIFORNIA 90017
�✓ r (218) 625.1011
i February21 1967 }
Mr. Fred A. Harper '
General Manager
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County
Dear. Mr. Harper:
This will comment upon the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" sec-.
i tion of our Report . of Survey. Your Board quite properly wishes
{ to evaluate each item as to: 1) Estimated degree of risk; and
2) Cost to insure such risk.
Since you tentatively are considering, inviting competitive bids
on your property insurance, you could obtain insurance rates at
the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by request-
ing them in your Specifications. The bidders would respond with
quotations and the Board could then decide to insure some, all or .'.
none of the latter. Many of" the coverages could be endorsed to
your property insurance policy.
St may be helpful to your Board if a capsule opinion was now ven-
tured for each uninsured peril, bearing in mind that our crystal
ball is apt to be as opaque as the next one about future perils
and exposures:
Exalosion - Estimated Maximum Loss could be extensive at any one
loMlon; but probability will vary depending upon dissipation
of gases by natural wind forces. Insurance cost should be toler-
able with receptive markets.
Flood: insurance probably not 'available at bearable cost.
Use and Gccupan�: This can pay for loss of profit and continu-
ing expense w �c could not be earned after a loss, for extra
expense incurred for operations after a loss, for cost of sub-
contracting your services to another, and for exceptional expe-
diting expense ( such as shipping components by air instead of
by surface) , etc. The need for such insurance may not be uncom-
�o^table yet, but as your daily volume increases, some future '
insurance of this type may become indicated. Markets are recep-
tive.. •
Earthquake: Estimated Maximum Loss to plants, equipment and sys-
tems could be severe if the force of the earthquake were intense.
-D-
. CHARLES I- ROBINSON
•i INSURANCE CONSULTANT :
Mr. Fred A. Harper Page two
�• . February 21, 1967
However, as our Report stated: "All surface structures of the
Districts of -importance have a favorable ratio of length-width
vs. height which, in the past, has successfully withstood earth-
quake forces (up to moderate) with only minor damage" . At least
three uncertainly located faults are thought to penetrate or
bisect the aggregate areas of your Districts. Coverage is writ
ten on a percentage deductible ( 2 to 10%) of total va14� of all
properties at the time of the loss. Insurance markets are mo-
derately -receptive at this time, but tend to fluctutate. The
I cost to insure against damage by Tidal Wave should probably be
obtained at the same time with respect to Plant 2• Exposure is
moderate or greater; probability is, of course, unknown.
The epicenter of the Long Beach Earthquake of March 10, 1933 is
reputed to be located about 2 3/4 mites offshore of Newport Beach
and about 32 miles south of the mouth of the Santa Ana River.
•� 1 shall be pleased to be available to you or to your Board - to. .. ...,.
explore these points, . if desired.
Respectfully submitted
CLR:hwh ''� Charles L. Robinson
Insurance Consultant '
-D-
MILLER,NISSON & K,OGLER
CLARK MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE
C.ARTHUR NISSON 2014 NORTH BROADWAY 542-0771
NELSON KOGLER SANTA ANA,CALIFOKNIA 92706
February 27 , 1967
Mr. Fred Harper
County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County
Post Office Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 92708
Dear Fred:
I have reviewed your staff report relating to the report
of the insurance consultant. I wish to state that in my
opinion your staff report is correct in all respects and
well prepared. It should be sufficient to proceed on as
.recommended without further delay. I know of no insurance
risks which are not considered and I would recommend no
additional or other action other than that set forth in
the staff report.
Yours very truly,
C. Arthur Nisson
CAN:mi j
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No. 1 7
IIAGENDA
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(3) Report of the General Manager
(4) Report of the General Counsel
(5) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to open bids received for
Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11
(�) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion referring bids for Job No.
P2-11 to the staff and engineers for tabulation
and recommendation
(7) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-25-1, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and
awarding contract for Site Improvements - Phase II
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2 to R. J. Noble Company
in the total amount of $7,680.30. See page "A"
(See page "B" for bid 'tabulation) .
(8) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received
for Job No. P1-12-3 (Fence and Entrance Revisions at
Plant No. 1) , as recommended by the staff. See page
"C" for bid tabulation
19) D1 STRI CT 7 ,(.
Consideration of "Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers" '
Report prepared by Boyle and Lowry
(If the report is approved as submitted, the Board
s;lould *adopt a resolution setting date for public
hearing) .
(10) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation; and concurring in award
of Contract No. 7-2C (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer) , to
Far Western Pipeline, Inc . , in the total amount of
$725184. 25. (Bid tabulation in folders)
-� (11) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file
written recommendation of the staff; and authorizing
the Utaff to proceed with the discussions with Irvine
Ranch Water District concerning development of a Master
Plana for sewering the area, and the use of District 7
waste water for water reclamation purposes. See page
"D" for staff recommendation.
l
j'
(12) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Other business and communications, if any
(13) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
�.d
(14) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
RESOLUTION NO. 67-25-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-8-2
`mod A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO.
2, JOB N0. P2-8-2
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Construction
Engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of
contract be made to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -
PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, and the tabulation of bids
and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-8-2 is hereby
awarded to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY in the total amount of 7 680. 0,
in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best
bid received therefor on February 28, 1967; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by
Resolution No. 67-9 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work
ti..d are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s
checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid-
ders .
Agenda-Item N.o. .5 -A- District No. .1
ENGINEERV ESTIMATE $83500.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date February 28, 1967
Contract For: SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2,
JOB NO. P2-8-2
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. R. J. Noble Company $. 7,680.30
P. 0. Box 620
Orange, California
2. Griffith Company 8,633. 60
P. 0. Box 395
Costa Mesa, California
3. R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc. 93155.92
151 Commercial Way
Costa Mesa, California
4. Goode, Schroeder, Inc . %510.14
3036 Treadwell Street
Los Angeles, California
5. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 103272.70
P. 0. Box 432
Orange, California
6. John W. Tiedemann Co . 105754•64
13827 East Tedemory Drive
Whittier, California
7. Yoder & Sons 10,875. 66
7890' Alhambra
Huntington Beach, California
8. Stanford Trunk & Paving Service 13,357.55
6761 Stanton Avenue
Buena Park, California
A _B_ District No . 1
Agenda Item No. 5
ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $2,006.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date February 28, 1967
Contract For: MISCELLANEOUS FENCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-12-3
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Crown Fence & Supply Co. , Ltd. $3,088.00
922 East 4th Street, Santa
Santa Ana, California
2. Star D Iron Works, Inc. 4,638.00
16951 Harbor Blvd.
Santa Ana, California
3. Brown' s Ornamental Iron, Inc. No Bid
3526 W. Westminster Avenue
Santa Ana, California
Azenda Item No. 8 -C- District No. 1
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �; Fi , AREAECODE 714
$ S40-2910
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA oa 9 6 2-241 1
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
\""' March 1, 1967
Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
On February 17th, at•. the request of Irvine Ranch Water
District personnel, I met with their representatives to
discuss the sewering of the Irvine Ranch Area southeast .
of the District' s boundary, from the San Diego Freeway
to Irvine Boulevard. The Irvine interests wish to
develop a Master Plan for sewering this area, which is
in the Irvine Ranch Water District. They are also
interested in acquiring suitable waste water for water
reclamation purposes . Our discussion was very preliminary,
as we were attempting to determine whether the two entities
had any common areas of interest.
The sewage flows in District No. 7 increased 45% last year,
and at the present time the flows in District No. 7 exceed
the flows in either Districts 5 or 6. All this has occurred
since 1963. The District ' s Red Hill Trunk will soon be
utilized to its designed capacity. We have made some
preliminary samplings of the discharge in the Red Hill
Trunk, in the vicinity of the Marine Corps Air Facility,
and the quality of this waste water appears to be suitable
for water reclamation. The Irvine Ranch Water District '
representatives would like to investigate, with us, the
feasibility of utilizing facilities owned by both Districts
in developing a Master Plan for sewering the above-mentioned
area on the Irvine Ranch.
It is the staff' s recommendation that further discussions be
held with Irvine Ranch Water District representatives, as
there appear to be far-reaching benefits possible for both
entities .
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
FAH:jb
Agenda Item No . 11 -D- District No. 7
1
� III
I
ROLL CALL
District r
Regular
Adjourned
i
Date - / (. Time
JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1
Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey ✓ McMichael
Amo Miller, Clifton Mack
Bartlett Porter �
Bousman Davis Baker Featherly,/;
Bowen Noe
Crapo Shull DIST T 2
Culver Parks Hileman
Forgit Gruber Crapo Shull
Furman Bouma Culver
Gruber Forgit Harvey McMichael
Gummere Anderson Hock Michel
Hock Michel Schutte Krein
Long Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood
Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark
Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst
Parks Hileman Workman
Parsons Baker Featherly
Porter
Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3
Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer Clark
Fregeau Amo
Speer Clark Bousman Davis
Stewart Green Bower, Noe
Coen Crapo Shull
Walters Herbst Culver
Workman Furman Bouma
Baker Featherly Gummerre Anderson
Harvey McMichael
Long Brown
Miller, Harry Kohl
Schutte Krein
OTHERS: Schwerdtfeger Fregeau
Stewart Green
Brown ✓ Walters Herbst
Nisson Baker Featherly
Galloway
Tremblay �- DISTRICT 5
Lowry Parsons
Carlson Gruber Forgit
Rimel Baker Featherly
Maddox
DISTRICT 6
Porter
✓rl� Gruber Forgit
cJ, Baker Featherly
DISTRICT 7
\/Miller, Clifton. Mack
.� `- t Gruber
LZ'arvey McMichael
,Parks Hileman
Q Imo er - -
' korr ►���c ken � Featherly
C o
DISTRICT d
..r Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen
Mitchell Bartlett
Baker Featherly Baker Featherly
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175
of Change County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No.
IIAGENDA
ow
(1) Roll Call
(2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(3) e General Mana r
(4) RPnprt of th��e el
(5) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion to open bids received for
Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11
(6) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion referring bids for Job No.
P2-11 to the staff and engineers for tabulation rj-
and recommendation
(7) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 67-25-1, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and
awarding contract for Site Improvements - Phase III
at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2 to R. J. Noble Comany
in the total amount of `�7,680.30. See page "Al' ' Ale-
(See page "B" for bid tabulation) .
(8) DISTRICT l
Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received
for Job No. P1-12-3 (Fence and Entrance Revisions at
Plant No. 1) , as recommended by the staff. See page
"C" for bid tabulation
9) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of "Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers"
Report prepared by Boyle and Lowry
%."
! Z
(If the report is approved as submitted, the Board fo
should 'adopt a resolution setting date for public
hearing) .
(10) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to receive and file bid
tabulation and recommendation; and concurring in award��
of Contract No. 7-2C (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer) , to
Far Western Pipeline., Inc . , in the total amount of
$723184. 25. (Bid tabulation in folders)
•.. (11) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file (� (
written recommendation of the staff; and authorizing
the staff to proceed with the discussions with Irvine 1 '
Ranch Water District concerning development of a Master
Plan for sewering the area, and the use of District 7
waste water fox, water reclamation purposes. See page
"D" for staff recommendation.
(12) DISTRICTS 1
Ott siness and ' ommuni 'ozT�any
(13) DISTRICT 1 d
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(14) DISTRICT 7 _
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment � � �
RESOLUTION NO. 67-25-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-8-2
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO.
23 JOB NO. P2-8-2
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts ' Construction
Engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of
contract be made to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY for SITE IMPROVEMENTS -
PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 23 JOB NO. P2-8-2, and the tabulation of bids
and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-8-2 is hereby
awarded to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY in the total amount of $7 680.30,
in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained
therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best
bid received therefor on February 28, 1967; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by
Resolution No. 67-9 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4 . That all other bids received for said work
ti..t are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's
checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid-
ders .
Agenda Item No. 5 -A- District No. 1
ENGINEERS' ESTIMATE $8,500.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date February 28, 1967
Contract For: SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 21
JOB NO. P2-8-2
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. R. J. Noble Company $: 7,680.30
P. 0. Box 620
Orange, California
2. Griffith Company 8,633. 60
P. 0. Box 395
Costa Mesa, California
3. R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc. 9,155. 92
151 Commercial Way
Costa Mesa, California
4. Goode, Schroeder, Inc . 93510.14
3036 Treadwell Street
Los Angeles, California
5. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 10,272.70
P. 0. Box 432
Orange, California
6. John W. Tiedemann Co . 105754.64
13827 East Tedemory Drive
Whittier, California
7. Yoder & Sons -, 10,875. 66
7890' Alhambra
Huntington Beach, California
8. Stanford Trunk & Paving Service 13,357.55
6761 Stanton Avenue
Buena Park, California
�d
_B_ District No. 1
P.genda Item No . 5 _
ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $2,000.00
B I D T A B U L A T I O N
S H E E T
Date February 28, 1967
Contract For: MISCELLANEOUS FENCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1
JOB NO. P1-12-3
CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID
1. Crown Fence & Supply Co . , Ltd. $3,088.00
922 East 4th Street, Santa
Santa Ana, California
2. Star D Iron Works, Inc . 4,638.00
16951 Harbor Blvd.
Santa Ana, California
3. Brown' s Ornamental Iron, Inc . No Bid
3526 W. Westminster Avenue
Santa Ana, California
Agenda Item No. 8 -C- District No . 1
-0�
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 714
a 540-291❑
Or ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1
10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708
March 1, 1967
Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No . 7
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
On February 17th, at- the request of Irvine Ranch Water
District personnel, I met with their representatives to
discuss the sewering of the Irvine Ranch Area southeast
of the District' s boundary, from the San Diego Freeway
to Irvine Boulevard. The Irvine interests wish to
develop a Master Plan for sewering this area, which is
in the Irvine Ranch Water District. They are also
interested in acquiring suitable waste water for water
reclamation purposes . Our discussion was very preliminary,
as we were attempting to determine whether the two entities
had any common areas of interest.
The sewage flows in District No. 7 increased 45% last year,
and at the present time the flows in District No. 7 exceed
;,he flows in either Districts 5 or 6. All this has occurred
since 1963. The District' s Red Hill Trunk will soon be
utilized to its designed capacity. We have made some
preliminary samplings of the discharge in the Red Hill
Trunk, in the vicinity of the Marine Corps Air Facility,
and the quality of this waste water appears to be suitable
-or water reclamation. The Irvine Ranch Water District
representatives would like to investigate, with us, the
feasibility of utilizing facilities owned by both Districts
in developing a Master Plan for sewering the above-mentioned
area on the Irvine Ranch.
It is the staff' s recommendation that further discussions be
held with Irvine Ranch Water District representatives, as
there appear to be far-reaching benefits possible for both
entities .
Q.
Fred A. Harper
General Manager
FAH:jb
Agenda Item No . 11 -D- District No . 7