Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-03 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS' County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. AGENDA March 30, 1967 - 11:00 a.m. City Hall, Newport Beach, California M Roll Call ` intmert-of-otmj tea.i-f--necessary Appointment of Jean Bankston as Secretary pro tem Consideration of Resolution No. 67-35-5, approving plans and specifications for Demolition and Remo-VA -of Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station, Contract No. 5-12-1; and authorizing the staff to open bids at 4:00 p.m. , April 21s t. See page "A" '�; _/(5) Report of engineer on additional pumping equipment neede T at the Bay Bridge Pumping Station . See page "B" (6) Consideration of motion authorizing advertising for bids for additional pumping equipment, as recommended by the . engineer / .(7) Consideration of Resolution No. 67-36-5, authorizing the quitclaiming of an easement to the County of Orange (acquired in connection with construction of Contract No. 5-13); and authorizing execution of a Quitclaim Deed as prepared by the General Counsel. See page "C" (8) Consideration of Resolution No . 67-37-5, abandoning cer- tain facilities no longer required by the District, and ordering the value thereof removed from the District' s Books of Account. See page "D" (9 Staff report on explosive gas problem in Trunk A (Coast Highway near Howard' s Restaurant) . f10-Y Other 'bus-iness-afid-communicati6ns`, i_f-any (11) Consideration of motion re : Adjournment RESOLUTION NO. 67-35-5 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-12- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Donald C . Simpson, District' s engineer, for DEMOLITION AND REMOVAL OF OLD BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12-1, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said Contract No. 5-12-1 in the manner prescribed by law; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , April 21, 19675 at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the staff and the engineer be authorized to open said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Directors . \.d Agenda Item No. 4 -A- DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3245 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT OEACH, CALIFORNIA • OR 6-1431 INVESTIGATIONS A REPORTS WATER - SEWERAGE DRAINAGE • STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING Marnh 22, 1967 Fred A. 1Iarpe-r, General 1lanager CoLulty Sanitation. District 1Vo . 5 10844 Dllis Avenue Fountain Valley, California In accordance with your- request, I have reviewed the need" for an additional pump at the Bay Bridge Pumping Station. The existing pumping units and their capacity under current head conditions -are as follows: Unit No .. Description Capacity 1 10x10x212 720..R211 2.75MGD 25 H.P. , Var. Speed. 2 12 x 12 x 21, 900..RPM 5 .75 1-M 75 H.P. , Var. Speed. The present average and peak flows are approximately 2.0 : GD and 3 .9 DIGD respectively. Since.peals flows are now e..ceeding the capacity of the No . 1 unit, there is no longer 100% standby protection. If the No . 2 unit failed, the incoming peak flows would exceed the capacity of the No . 1 unit, and overflowing could occur. The original design contemplated 100/ standby, and I would therefore recommend the installation of a third unit as soon as possible . The ultimate plans contemplate that all three additional units will be 12 x 12 x-. 217 1200 RPTrI, 200 H.P. with one unit equipped with a variable speed drive . If one of these 200 H.P . . units were added now, it should be equipped with. the variable speed drive, costing approximately a5000, in order that the maximum output of the No . 2_ puuIp could be matched . Initially this unit..would operate at a fraction of full-speed, and hence it would. be very inefficient . This inefficiency coupled. with higher standby charges would substan- tially increase the electrical energy .charges. An interim. solution would be to add. a constant speed pumping . unit of the same size as. unit No . 2. The shafting. could be sized so that in the future the 75 H.P. motor could be replaced with a Agenda Item No . 5 B-1 200 H.P . motor and the speed of the punp increased from 900 P211F. to 1200 Ml. Some adjustment in the. impeller might need to be made but the piping, valving, and electrical panel would remain unchanged. The addition of another 75 H.P . - unit would provide 100% standby until the peak flows increased by 47�. . A substantial incrAass in flows will occur this next Fall when Nevport Center is opened for business . The 75. H.P . unit will provide ample capacity to serve the initial.- development at the Center plus additional growth in other areas. . The estimated cost of the new pump, motor, electrical panel, valves, and piping,, exclusive of installation labor, . is S11,000 . It is our understanding that a 75 H.P. motor is presently avail— able which could be used. Since delivery of the equipment will take at least six months, it is recommended that orders be placed as quickly as possible . Donald C. Simpson DCS: c `.✓ Agenda Item No . 5 B-2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-36-5 AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 55 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING QUITCLAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE COUNTY OF ORANGE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the quitclaiming to the County of Orange, of a certain easement acquired December 12, 1962, in the vicinity of Newport Dunes Aquatic Park, relative to the construction of Contract No. 5-13, is hereby authorized; and, Section 2. That the easement to be quitclaimed is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute a Quitclaim Deed on behalf of the Board of Directors, in form acceptable to the General Counsel. Agenda Item No. 7 C-1 SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 67-35-5 That certain 20-foot wide perpetual easement and right of way for construction and maintenance of sewer lines in, on and over the real property in the County of Orange, State of California, described in the Official Records of Orange County in Book 6359, Pages 148 through 150, excepting therefrom all that portion of said easement lying northerly of a line that intersects at right angles the ordinary High Tide Line, as said Tide Line is described in said Easement, at a point located 190.00 feet northerly along said Tide Line from Station 21. Also excepting therefrom all portions lying within the 20-foot wide easement described in Official Records of Orange County in Book 8151, page 633• Together with all sewer lines and appurtenances thereto located within the hereinabove described easement. �d Schedule "A" Agenda Item No. 7 C-2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-37-5 ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURE D EQUIPMENT REMOVED ROM BOOKS OF ACCOUNT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 53 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT' S BOOKS OF ACCOUNT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, certain District property is no longer required for the purposes of the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT: Section 1. The letters from Donald C . Simpson, District' s engineer, dated March 22, 1967, recommending that the value of certain facilities be removed from the District' s Books of Account, w,e hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. The certain District property listed below is hereby formally abandoned or quitclaimed and the value thereof is hereby ordered removed from the District' s Books of Account: 1. 2709 feet of 18" VCP Sewer, 2297 feet of 15" VCP Sewer, and 15 manholes in Bayside Drive and Newport Dunes Acquatic Park (constructed in 1957 and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . $273000.00 2. 768 feet of 15" VCP Sewer and 4 man- holes in Back Bay Drive (constructed in 1958 and purchased from The I1 iine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . 4 $ 7,344.oo 3. 1295 feet of 8" force main in Jamboree Road (constructed in 1958 and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,180.0o 4. Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station (con- structed in 1937 and purchased from the City of Newport Beach December 12, 1951) . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,750.o0 5. 12" force main on the Upper Bay Bridge (constructed in 1952 and purchased from the City of Newport Beach October 143 1952) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 83 039.57 Total $56,313.57 Agenda Item No. 8 -D- RESOLUTION NO. 67-37-5 ORDERING VALUE OF ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURE ' AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED r OM BOOKS OF ACCOUNT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE VALUE OF CERTAIN ABANDONED OR REMOVED STRUCTURES AND EQUIPMENT REMOVED FROM THE DISTRICT' S BOOKS OF ACCOUNT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, RESOLVES AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, certain District property is no longer required for the purposes of the District, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY RESOLVED AND ORDERED THAT: Section 1. The letters from Donald C . Simpson, District' s engineer, dated March 22, 1967, recommending that the value of certain facilities be removed from the District' s Books of Account, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. The certain District property listed below is hereby formally abandoned or quitclaimed and the value thereof is hereby ordered removed from the District's Books of Account: >-1.e 2709 feet of 18" VCP Sewer, 2297 feet of 15" VCP Sewer, and 15 manholes in \ Bayside Drive and Newport Dunes Acquatic Park (constructed in 1957 and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . $27,000.00 r 2. 768 feet of 15" VCP Sewer and 4 man- holes in Back Bay Drive (constructed in 1958 and purchased from The I. pine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . $ 7,344.oo 3. 1295 feet of 8" force main in Jamboree Road (constructed in 1958 and purchased from The Irvine Co. ) . . . . . . . . . . . $ 5,180.00 I 4. Old Bay Bridge Pumping Station (con- i it - structed in 1937 and purchased from the City of Newport Beach December 4 12, 1951) . . . . . . . . . . $ 8,750.00 i \. 5. 12" force main on the Upper Bay Bridge (constructed in 1952 and purchased from the City of Newport Beach October 143 1952) . $ 8,039 .57 Total $56,313 .57 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS —' MARCH 8, 1967 - 8:00 p.m. AGENDA (1) Pledge of Allegiance 2 Roll Call (3) Election of Joint Chairman V (4) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (Districts) (5) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed ,p (6) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 3 ,a��'' Consideration of motion approving minutes of the el/ regular meeting held February 8, 1967, and the special meeting held February 23, 1967 (8) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �, i (10) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �''� (11) DISTRICT 11 A111V Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman r (13) ALL DISTRICTS -L"7 Report of the General Manager____` (14) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel (15) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee on the report of Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant. See page 11Fn 06v (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following actions on the written report of the Executive Committee: a. Motion approving recommendations � b. Motion directing the General Manager to implement the recommended changes in insurance coverages (� c. Motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant, to prepare specifications and outline bidding procedures for g acquisition of the recommended property ;�)Ynsurance coverage, including bid t specifications for "uninsured perils & exposures" outlined in the Insurance Consultant' s report dated December, 1966 ` v ) ALL STRICTS �^ taff report on award of Job No. P2-11 (Headworks "C"�4ort) See page "G" for bid tabulation. (See Manager' s , (18) ALL DISTRICTS� Consideration of Resolution No. 67-24, granting an easement to the City of Fountain Valley in connection �. Oe with improvements to Ellis Avenue. See page "H" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Cons dera ion of motion authorizing issuance of a purchase order for the following emergency equipment: Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set, Specifi- cation #E-049 - $10,337.00to!> See page "I" for bid tabulation ' X 1 ' ' 2 ALL DISTRICTS Cons deration of motion authorizing the General Manager to sign and submit report of waste discharge, as required by the provisions of Section 13054 of the State \ Water Code J (21) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq. : District No. Resolution No. Page No. a. 2 67-18-2 "Jrr b. 3 67-19-3 rr K11 c. 5 67-20-5 rr Lrr d. 6 67-21-6 "M" e. 7 67-22-7 It Nn f. 11 67-23-11 ri Or' � g. 1 67-17-1 P �� (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file General Manager' s certification that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrants listed on pages "A , "A" , and "C ' (24) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (25) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-27-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding contract for Job No. P2-11 to J. Putnam Henck in the total amount of $2,495,961.00. See page 'rQ" (26) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (27) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (28) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (29) DISTRICT 11 Consideration. of motion approving warrants, if any. (, See page "E" (30) DISTRICT 11 r� Other business and communications, if any (31) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment � � \ (32) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-28-2, authorizing acceptance of an easement from the Fullerton Elementary School District relative to construction of Contract ' No. 2-11-1, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "R" (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-29-2, to receive and pp file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding contract for Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-2 to Industrial Pipeline Construction Company in the total amount of P P Y $161,347.05. (Bid opening at 4:00 p.m. , March 6th. See page "S" T. ) (See page " " for bid tabulation. ) (34) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" -3- (35) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (36) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (� ► (37) DISTRICT 3 b Consideration of request by the staff for deferment 1 of report on establishment of reserve fund for future �J+J facilities. (See Manager' s Report) VIA (38) DISTRICT _____ Con ' e _ ovi , e pag 9 (39) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any VA (40) DISTRICT 3 A Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ` (41) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 'Al, Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants, , if any. See page "E" �Ilp (42) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13, authorizing an addition of $1,219 to the contract with Far Western Pipeline, Inc. , Contractor. See Page "U" (43) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13, adjusting engineers' quantities. See page (44) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No . 67-30-5 accepting Contract No. 5-13 as complete, and authorizing the Y , filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page N W -� (45) DISTRICT ..5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (46) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any. (47) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion r Ad 'o r mentVA,.,3 TX (48) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6 (Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction), granting AA an extension of time to Cook & Barletta, Inc. , Q Contractor. See page "X" (49) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-31-6 accepting Contract No . 6-6 as complete, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "Y" ,AA -4- (50) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Robert E. Lenihan, Long Beach, for grout stabilization on Dover Drive, in the amount of $7, 213.96 (51) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (52) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (53) DISTRICT 6 Ci l " Consideration of motion re : Adjournment , e(54) DISTRICT 7 Sk Consideration of Resolution No. 67-32-7, ordering , ,GV annexation of territory to the District (Panorama YN Elementary School site) . See page Z (55) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Manager to request annexation to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District of the following proposed annexations within county territory, for the purpose of maintaining the local sewers included within these proposed annexations : (See page "AA" ) 6t0 1. Prospects`, 2. El Modena 3. Hewes-Bond 4. Tustin-Fairhaven 5. Arroyo-La Loma (56) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" 119 "C,, (57) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (58) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment I � -5- That the Boards of Directors adopt resolution NO. expressing the appreciation of the Directors for the services of retiring DiFeeterx Joint Chairman HHH ; and that the Seeretary be directed to present a suitable copy of this resolution to Harvey as a token of the �;-- T esteem. MEMO ,iom PHONE THE OFFICE OF FRED A. HARPER 962-2411 SECRETARY OF DISTRICTS&DIRECTOR OF FINANCE OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P.O. BOX 5175-10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY. CALIFORNIA 92708 d I MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708 r. Phone 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS IIMarch 3, 1967 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, March 8, 1967 8:00 P.M. The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No . 3 - ELECTION OF JOINT CHAIRMAN: Joint Chairman Harvey has announced his forthcoming retirement from the Santa Ana City Council upon installation of the new Mayor in April, and since he will no longer be serving on the Districts ' Boards he has requested that an election for the office of Joint Chairman be held at the March 8 meeting. Nos. 15 and 16 - RECOMMENDATIONS OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE ON CHANGES IN DISTRICTS' INSURANCE COVERAGE: The Committee met on January 18 and March 1 and among other items considered recommendations of our insurance consultant, Mr. Charles L. Robinson, and the staff' s comments thereon. These recommendations are summarized as an attachment to the formal agenda . Following receipt of the report of the Committee, it is recommended that the Boards consider adoption of the motions appearing under Item No . 17 which implement the recommendations made by the Committee on this matter. No. 17 - STAFF REPORT ON AWARD OF PLANT CONTRACT NO. P2-11: This proposed Plant project (Headworks "C" - Plant No . 2) is the largest undertaken to date. It will be recalled that at the December, 1966 Board meeting when plans and specifications were approved, a joint report was filed with the Boards by the engineers and myself pointing out that the estimated cost would exceed, by a considerable margin, the amount originally budgeted. This report also proposed deferring other Plant construction jobs scheduled for this fiscal year in order that this necessary project could be funded. At that time, it was also agreed that this matter would be reported on to the Boards again after bids were taken and a more exact project cost established. Under the usual circumstances, awards such as this are made routinely by the Board of District No . 1 without discussion by the other Directors . However in this instance, because of the magnitude of the project and of the financing problems, we feel that it is appropriate that all Directors be apprised of this matter. Bids for this project were opened by the Board of District No . 1 on March 1 and a bid tabulation is included with the formal agenda . As will be noted, the bids are well distributed from a ZIa ' � total of six contractors, all of whom were obviously bidding earnestly for the job. Also it will be observed that the low bid, that of J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino, ($2,495,961) was only �\oit'' slightly above the engineer' s original estimate ($2,450,000) . It has always been our policy to compute our estimates as low as realistically possible and this case was no exception to this rule. Since, as reported at the December meeting, there is no satisfactory alternate to the construction of this project as designed and since the low bidder is a highly competent firm who has worked for us before, we are recommending to the Board of District No . 1 (Item No . 32) that the award be made at this time to the low bidder. Inasmuch as the project cost will be approximately the same as estimated in December, our former recommendations for deferment of the other projects will be carried out as proposed. No . 18 - GRANT OF STREET EASEMENT TO FOUNTAIN VALLEY: Last year the Boards authorized entering into an agreement with the City whereby Ellis Avenue would be widened and improved along the Districts ' frontage, with the City contracting for the necessary construction under a reimbursement arrangement with the Districts. The City' s staff now advises they are ready to proceed with this project and has forwarded a description of the street easement necessary to be granted by the Districts to allow widening the street to its full ultimate width (80 feet against 50 feet at present) . The resolution on the agenda under this item is to autho- rize granting of this necessary easement to the City. No. 19 - PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: On February 28, the Districts ' staff took bids on several items of mobile equipment budgeted for purchase this year. Only one of these items was of sufficient cost to require Board authorization before purchase. This is an Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set (150 KW) to be used in situations where a large mobile emergency power unit is required. A bid tabulation is included with the agenda and it will be recommended that the purchase be authorized from Lawless GM Diesel at their bid price of $10,33'7. No . 20 - A721HORIZATION TO FILE REPORT OF WASTE DISCHARGE : The State Water Code requires that each person or agency proposing to establish a new point of discharge for its waste water, file a formal report thereon with the Regional Water Quality Control Board (Section 13054) . Since our proposed new ocean outfall will soon be under final design, it will be in order for the Districts to file this required report as soon as possible. Also, the State requires that any application for Federal assistance (Item No . 21) on a -2- project such as this must be accompanied or preceded by such a report. Accordingly, it is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to prepare and file this required report with the State Regional Water Quality Control Board. No. 21 - FEDERAL CONSTRUCTION GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL: At the January meeting, the Joint Boards directed the staff to prepare the individual District ' s applications for Federal construction grants for the proposed new outfall. As explained at the January meeting, this action is preliminary to the ado.ption of formal resolutions by each District authorizing execution and submittal of the necessary documents to the Federal ?later Pollution Control Agency. The deadline for filing these applications for the coming fiscal year is March 31. Therefore, unless a special meeting is held for this purpose after the regular March 8 Board meeting, it will be necessary for each District to act upon this matter on March 8. The forthcoming formal engineer ' s report on the construction of the new ocean outfall estimates the total project cost to be $15,442,000. In the following table, the third column sets forth the contribution of each District to this total under the current ownership percentages . The Federal Act provides that 300 of each District ' s share can be obtained as a Federal contribution. The fourth column indicates the 30% grants each District may apply for and therefore are the amounts appearing in the formal resolutions for consideration at this meeting. Amount of Federal Percent of District Share Grant to be District Ownership* of Project Cost Applied for 1 11.48 $ 1,772,740 $ 531,820 2 31.57 4,875,o4o 1,462,510 3 33•84 5,225,570 1,567,670 5 5. 85 903,360 271,010 6 5. 8o 895, 64o 268,690 7 5.03 776,730 233,020 11 6.43 992,920 297,88o TOTAL 100.00 $15,442,000 $4, 632, 60o *for fiscal year 1966-67 The resolutions included with the agenda under these items must be considered individually by each District although they are grouped together on the agenda for convenience in discussion. As pointed out in our verbal report on this matter at the January Meeting, any District can choose to decline to apply for Federal assistance and because of past controversey in this regard the staff is not making a formal recommendation but merely presenting this matter for Board determination. Also it is called to the Directors ' attention that although each District must act -3- independently, the prepared resolutions name District No . 1 to act for the other Districts in applying for and accepting the grants . The staff will be prepared to go into any further detail desired on this matter. District No. 1 No . 25 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. P2-11: This matter was discussed in some detail under Item No . 18 of the Joint Board business . District No . 2 No . 32 - ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT : We have received a formal easement document from the Fullerton Elementary School District granting right of way needed for the Rollling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer (Item No. 33) . This easement was granted at no cost . The motion on the agenda accepts this easement and orders its recordation. No . 33 - AWARD OF ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SETTER (CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2) : This regularly budgeted project was described at the February Board meeting when bids were authorized to be taken. These bids will not be received until next Monday, March 6, and therefore a bid tabulation and recommendation for award will not be available until the time of the meeting. District No . 3 No. 37 - REPORT OF STAFF ON ESTABLISHMENT OF SPECIAL RESERVE FUND FOR FUTURE FACILITIES: At the special Board meeting on February 23 to consider repair and/or replacement of the Westside Force Main Sewer, the staff was directed to report at the March meeting on the establishment of a reserve fund in the District ' s future budgets for construction of needed facilities. The Board also authorized the District ' s engineers to undertake a survey of alternate plans for providing additional facilities needed in the coming years . It now appears to the staff that establishment of this reserve fund at this time, without prior knowledge of the amount of monies eventually needed, would be premature. We are therefore recommending that action on this matter be deferred until the engineering study is under way but not later than the time of preparation of the District ' s budget for the next fiscal year. District No . 5 Nos . 42 through 44 - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO. 5-13: This District project, Trunk Sewer, Back Bay Drive to Pacific Coast Highway, will be satisfactorily completed today, which is well within the time limit imposed by the contract . The District ' s engineer has recom- mended acceptance of the work as meeting plans and specifications and has also recommended two change orders to adjust the final price, in accordance with the contract, for materials actually installed. -4- Item No . 42 is recommended Change Order No . 1 which would add the sum of $1,219 to the contract amount for additional priming of the sand base with liquid asphalt prior to re-paving the Dunes parking lot and the placement of 195 cubic yards of special rock bedding under the pipe as directed by the engineer and at the established contract price . Item No . 43 is recommended Change Order No . 2, the customary adjustment of quantities to change the original contract price to reflect differences in amounts installed over those originally estimated. In the case of this project, this results in a deduction of $3,760. 39 from the original contract estimate . Item No . 44 is the usual resolution accepting the work as complete on March 3 and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. District No . 6 Nos . 48 and 49 - COMPLETION OF CONTRACT NO. 6-6: This project, the Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction, has been previously described. It has now been satisfactorily completed by the cont- tractor, Cook & Barletta of Anaheim. Item No . 48 is Change Order No . 3 granting an extension of time of 29 days to the contractor as recommended by the staff for the reasons shown on the formal change order attached to the agenda . Item No . 49 is the customary resolution accepting the work as complete on February 24 and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. No . 50 - PAYMENT FOR GROUT STABILIZATION - REPAIR OF DOVER DRIVE SUBSIDENCE: This matter was deferred from the February meeting at which time it was explained in detail in the Manager' s Report . Deferment was recommended since the actual total amount of the described work had not been received by the time of the meeting. This total has now been established at $7,213. 96 and the suggested motion appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended for Board adoption. District No . 7 No . 54 - ANNEXATION OF THE PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE : The annexation fees have been received and the District ' s application to the Local Agency Formation Commission has been approved. The recommended action under this item will complete the annexation of the Orange Unified School District property on Newport Boulevard. No . 55 - ANNEXATION TO THE 7TH SEINER MAINTENANCE DISTRICT : The sewers constructed within Assessment Districts 5-A and 6 are now operational, and in order to provide maintenance for these sewers, all of which are within County territory, it is necessary for these areas to be annexed to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District . County -5- Sanitation District No . 7, by contract with the Board of Supervisors which is the governing body of the Maintenance District, is responsible for these sewers; therefore our District, by letter, should note request annexation of these areas. The motion appearing under this item authorizes the General Manager to submit the necessary letters . Fred A. Harper General Manager -6- J 1 • *awe 1J�f_ L [1 �fC G�✓7 1 WV lax ' r CO G 1 / r i may - € �. � ,� . �,.,....�e � . �,� _ --- ��� � �. ��� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS e- A AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA % 9 6 2-241 1 10644 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O.BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 February 24, 1967 REPORT OF THE STAFF ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF CHARLES L. ROBINSON Insurance Consultant LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Pacific Indemnity Company Policy. Consultant' s Recommendations 1. When services or purchased equipment are obtained from others, the Districts should continue to require that such must conform to any applicable California Code . In designing Specifications the Districts may addition- ally wish to require its sources to carry a special form of coverage which could, in effect, protect such sources and the Districts from liability for some time in the future . That coverage has two names : a) "Products Liability Coverage" when it applies to the design or fabrication of machinery or equipment, or b) "Completed Operations Coverage" when it applies to construction work. Those coverages of such sources would be available for the Districts to claim against for damages in the event the particular piece of equipment fails or if a portion of the specific construction work fails , providing the failure is due to negligence of the source . Some contractors carry such insurance . That will predictably add the cost of the premium of such coverage to each bid price in some cases . But in the event of failure of the property due to supplier' s or contractor' s negligence, the Districts would have an additional party (the insurance company) available to claim against for most, if not all, of the direct expense involved during the immediate future . Current coverage can be claimed against in future years even though the supplier or contractor has ceased operations for any reason . 1. Staff' s Recommendation - Not to add the coverage . The contracts for purchase of equipment and construction of facilities include warranties for defective materials and unauthorized work. The materials and equipment called for in the -1- contracts are specified by the Districts ' engineers and, in most cases , are of a known standard or quality. Most of the Districts ' purchases are made from well-known, established companies and when defective equipment is discovered the suppliers readily make the necessary adjust- ment . If this coverage is added to each equipment and construction bid, it will in- crease the bid prices to the Districts , as well as make bidding more detailed and cum- bersome . Further, it could reduce the number of bidders , thereby decreasing compe- tition . Coverage like this on equipment could tend to let the suppliers "off the hook," in that they might feel that the responsibility has been transferred to the insurance company. 2. The "Family Protection" coverage should be deleted from the subject policy, if that has not already been done . And, ideally, the entire $315 premium should be credited to the Districts on the theory that the existence and purpose of .the coverage should have been explained to the Districts by the insurance agent upon delivery, when it would have been declined . 3 . In lieu of "Family Protection" , the Districts may wish to consider the purchase of "Medical Payments Coverage" for its seven passenger vehicles . That is a voluntary coverage that would be available to any non-employee in a Districts ' vehicle in the event of injury. The cost per car is reason- able and a limit of $1,000 per person should suffice for most accidents . Voluntary payment of such expense to an occupant frequently forestalls notions of lawsuits depending somewhat, of course , upon the injured occupant . The benefit is paid whether the Districts were liable for the accident or not . 2 and 3 . Staff' s Recommendation - Provide 1,000 Medical Payment cbvera e on Class 1.70 Vehicles (passenger automobiles at an annual premium cost of 132 and delete uninsured motorist coverage at an annual premium cost of 315 .00. We have seven passenger cars at present, but one is being eliminated in March. ) See -attached letter from Jones-Gillespie In- surance Company, on page A 4 . The existence of six monitoring devices utilizing small amounts of radio-active material probably poses something of a potential problem with respect to the present exposure , -2- if any, of employees to radiation poisoning, which would be outside of the knowledge of this -office . The duration and frequency of the exposure has been discussed . In spite of E supposedly adequate shielding from radio-active material, the Districts may wish to have the present use and exposures of the monitors measured by a proper laboratory in order to establish an independent opinion about the margin or lack of safety which now exists and which could be tolerated by heretofore exposed individuals (employees) in the future ., The "state of the art" in this field does change and can easily justify periodic measures of the devices and receipt of new advices from an independent authority from time to t time . - c 4. Staff' s Comment - We are ordering and install- i ing permanent monitoring devices in each area + of radioactive material usage to detect any possible approach to a limit which might be cause for a change in our present monitoring program. i We are licensed by the State of California for the possession of the radioactive density meters . The Orange County Health Department is the local enforcement agency. We. are required to make periodic tests on this equipment to check for any leakage . The shielding on these devices is such j that the levels are well below the standards set for a radiation area. A training course was conducted by the Orange County radiological personnel to qualify our key people . We have a training session scheduled for our operational and maintenance personnel which will advise them of normal precautions and also of emergency procedures in event of a j major accident involving this equipment . Moving, installation and repairs to the source i holders are under the supervision of an out- side concern licensed to do this type of work. In addition, we also conduct our own independ- ent monitoring at such times . 5 . In discussing the customary emergency, repair, and clean- up steps followed by the Districts for ruptured lines , the reported degree of preparedness and relatively efficient procedures .were impressive . One point is suggested: Upon completion of tending or repairing an emergency involving a ruptured line, always invite the local Public Health and Welfare Office to send a representative to the site for a final inspection and recommendations . This would relieve the Districts of responsibility for not performing its work satisfactorily which, in most cases, would have to be —3— y established if a claimant successfully claimed damages against the Districts . 5. Staff' s Comment - We have always maintained close liason with the public agencies in an emergency. This practice will be continued . On February 14th we experienced another break in the Westside Force Main in District No. 3. The County Health Department, the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Pollution Con- trol Board, and the State Health officials were notified of the emergency. Since we planned to discharge into a Flood Control channel during the emergency, Orange County Flood Con- trol personnel were also alerted . Following this incident personnel from these same agencies were invited to meet with the staff to discuss the emergency and to visit the site . EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Policy. Consultant' s Recommendations 1. •Malpractice should be added to conform to the underlying policy. 1. Staff' s Comment - The staff has directed the insurance carrier to add malpractice cover- age to conform to the underlying policy. 2. Premiums for higher Limits of Liability should be obtained and may be considered by the Districts . The cost of one or more additional increments of $1,000,000 should be small and might justify some increase to the present Limit of Liability. 2. Staff' s Recommendation - In view of the slight additional increase in premium, the staff recommends that the Districts ' lia- bility covera e be increased to at least 2 000 000 . The staff has received the following quota- tions for higher limits of liability (present coverage is $1,000,000) : $2,0003000 - Annual premium increase of $450.00 . /$5,000,000 - Annual premium increase of $1,125 .00. See letter on page B -4- PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage and Vandalism) - - Empire Insurance Company Policy. Consultant' s Recommendations 1. Insure all Districts properties at both plants, and else- where if above grade level, for Fire, Extended Coverage, and Vandalism & Malicious Mischief. 2. Amount of insurance should not exceed 90% of the combined gross values (not depreciated) of both plants and adjacent structures, and probably not in excess of $1,000,000 . 3 . Coverage to be on a $1,000 deductible, replacement cost, agreed amount, blanket basis without an average clause and without property being necessarily scheduled on the policy. New M.000 perties to be covered automatically and those exceed- ing each to be reported within 60 days . 4 . Three or five year policy with equal, flat annual premiums . 5 . Difference of Conditions coverage, as a separate part of the foregoing, in effect for $100,000 to apply as All-Risk Cover for all contents of Districts ' structures . Rate should be attractive . 6 . Fire rate for items 1 thru 4 not to exceed $ .13 per $100 value . 1 through 6 . Staff Recommendation - That the Insurance Consultant be employed to prepare specifications and outline bidding procedures for acquisition of the neces- sary property insurance coverage . At the Insurance Consultant ' s suggestion, the staff forwarded a copy of his recommenda- tions regarding this coverage to the Empire Insurance Company. That company advised us that they are unable to provide property insurance coverage as outlined in the Con- sultant' s recommendations . BOILER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE - - The Travelers Indemnity Company Policy. Consultant' s Recommendations 1. The Districts might wish to consider the advisability of in- suring on a Replacement Cost basis . That would avoid contro- versy, in the event of a loss, in determining the amount for depreciation that must be deducted on an Actual Cash Value settlement basis for depreciation . Further it would avoid the need for the Districts " to find" money unexpectedly for the amount of the depreciation, once agreed to, that would ,ow/ be deducted from the insurance company payment of loss . That amount of depreciation on a costly piece of equipment over 5 years of age, or older, could be sizeable what with -5- inflation of values in recent years . 1. Staff' s Recommendation - Amend the Districts ' current Boiler & Machinery insurance policy to provide for pay- ment of loss on Replacement Cost basis . The increase in annual premium will be $209 .00, as shown in the attached letter. See page C WORKMEN' S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - - State Compensation Insurance Fund Policy. Consultant ' s Comment 1. Excepting for continuous improvement in Accident Prevention, there is not too much the Districts can do about this form of coverage . 1. Staff' s Comment - The Districts have an active and aggressive Safety Program which is supervised by a competent Safety Committee of Districts Super- visory personnel. PUBLIC EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND - - Fidelity and Deposit Company Policy. Consultant' s Comment 1. Coverage should suffice and is recommended. 1 . Staff Recommendation - None . UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES Consultant ' s Comments Some exposures exist which have not been mentioned on the preceding pages, and they are cited for the purpose of in- formation even though their probabilities may vary consider- ably. Explosion of the by-product of gas may be a possibility about which the Districts ' engineers are knowledgeable . Operators of some sewage treatment plants have been encountered with this fear. It could be insured, although the constant cur- rents of winds at both plants might well make such coverage ostensibly unnecessary. Flood Damage is quite difficult to insure against, particu- larly in the wide-spread and varying terrain of the Districts . Its .cost would probably be excessive in terms of the limited exposure of a submerged collection system up to this time . �.d Use and Occupancy insurance was mentioned in my report as -6- having doubtful value in expediting restoration of property after a loss . Theoretically, after a plant is damaged the volume of material to be processed would continue at about its usual rate, and could reportedly be disposed of currently if the plants were operating at 50% capacity except for a few hours per day. Additional insurance money could not alter either feature, nor could any process be contracted to another. Earthquake insurance is available at tolerable cost . How- ever, all surface structures of importance of the Districts have a favorable ratio of length-width vs . height which, in the past, have successfully withstood earthquake forces with only minor damage . UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES -- Staff' s Recommendation - That these items be in- cluded in the bid specifications for the property damage coverage . After the pre- mium charges are known, a determination can be made as to whether the Districts should insure against any one , or all of the perils listed . In the event the staff' s recommendation on property insurance is accepted, and the Insurance Consultant is employed to prepare bid specifications, we recommend that in- surance rates be obtained at the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by requesting them in our specifications . The staff contacted several insurance brokers to obtain insurance rates on the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" as out- lined in the Insurance Consultant' s December report, and in each case we were asked for detailed information concerning our facilities and our present insurance coverages . When we encountered this situation, we contacted Mr. Robinson, the Insurance Consultant, and he submitted the attached letter commenting on the Districts ' uninsured perils and exposures . See page D -7- D. K. JONES (�� FRED E. GOPPERT PRESIDENT J O N E S - G I L L E S P I E, INC; . UNDERWRITING MANAOQR, A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE ANo REAL ESTATE H. F. RAMPTON VICC PRESIDENT 207 FIFTH STREET . POST OFFICE BOX 271 MOR. MP caTATS D[l'T. FRANCES L.JONES PHONE 530-2031 SECRETARY-TREASURER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92048 January 27, 1967 County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Dear Mr. Harper: In reply to your request for a quotation for medical payments on your automotive equipment in lieu of the uninsured motorists coverage now carried by the Districts, I am pleased to submit the following quota- tions. To provide $1,000.00 medical coverage on the Districts vehicles would be broken down into the following categories: Class 6 vehicles as shown on the present schedule -- $14.00 per vehicle I Class CA5 vehicles -- $21.00 per vehicle Class 1.70 vehicles -- $22.00 per vehicle Our present schedule shows 23 Class 6 vehicles, 29 Class CA5 vehicles and 7 Class 1.70 vehicles, which is your private passenger automobiles. Projecting this out, this would be a premium on the Class 6 vehicles of 322.00, on the Class CA vehicles $609.00, and on the Class 1.70 private passenger vehicles 9154.00. The uninsured motorists coverage represents a premium of $315.00 per year. Perhaps the Sanitation Districts would only desire to place this medical coverage on certain types of vehicles and waive the uninsured motorists coverage. . I will be happy to meet with you and your committee for further explanation. NOTE: Class 1.70 - Passenger automobiles Class 6 - Pickup trucks Class CA - Large, 12 ton trucks i �,� Qµ.. _A- Trusting this information is what .you require and I am awaiting your.'. ;:,_:"..` :•; ;: • instruotions. Yours very truly, { JONES-GILLESPI INC. j{ j Dave K. on ' i • r' DKJ i ghg , If D. N.JONES •" �^q FRED E. GOPPERT r PRESIDE J ® N E �' _ G I L L E SNT '!,'; ,r•' P I E/ ' 61 i. UNDERWg171N0 MANAOQR A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE VICB PREGIDENT 207 FIFTH STREET • POST OFFICE BOX 271 H. F. RAMPTON f •'' '' MOIL 11[AL QDTATQ DC". ' FRANCES L.JONES PHONQ 030-2531 .'. • t ' ' / GICRUTARY-TREAGURQR HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 02648 .r.' .' , t'•. / r { , r ., , 1} , •i'1?r Vic.: January 279 1967 • • ' County Sanitation Districts of Orange Coo 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Fred Harper ' General Manager Dear Mr. Harpers In answer to your request for a quotation to increase the limits under the Sanitation Districts umbrella policy, I am ;. pleased to make the following quotation. ? i'= To increase the limits of the St. Paul Fire and Marine policy .' ' ! 566XA7718 from the present $1,000,000 limit to a $2,000,000 '•:';"• limit, the annual premium would be $1,628.00, or an annual increase of $450.00. To increase the present limit to w5,000,000, the annual premium would be $2,303.00, or an in. M1 ' ? crease over the present policy of $$1,125.00. St. Paul Fire and Marine has informed me that they do not care to quote above the $5,000,000 limit and in order to get . '• limits above $5,000,000 it would be necessary for me to go to',.°.;' ' ;_::. _ another excess market for a quotation. If you or your board .'` feel this is advisable please let me know and I will pursue this further. Yours very truly, JONES-GILLS I , INC. if Dave r DKJsghg t r t , -B_ . I , , C. M. .Nelson ,agency Insurance For Every Need P. Di' BOX 366 ; S83 WEST 19TH STREET I PHONE 546*735D COSTA MESA, CALIFORNIA 92627 Vebruary 39 1967 Mr. Fred Harper, General Manager, County Sanitation Districts of Orange County' P. 0. Box 51759 : ' ,?;• Fountain Valley, Calif. Dear Fredt Policy BM-2061040 l# Travelers Insurance Co. ' 1 i In reply to your question of Replacement Cost Coverage on the above policy. This type of coverage can be accomplished with an increase:,..:. in the Annual Premium Payment of $209.00. This would be an endorsement on the present policy and the•,• i first payment would be on a pro-rate basis to July 12, 1967. ` Yours truly, ' C. M. NELSON AGENCY + -C- GURVExet CHARLES L. ROBINSUN MANAOEDIENT 9ERVIOEBt EZPOBORae INSURAA0a DarAaTMaaT I'OaOTIOX Oovaawoae INSURANCE CONSULTANT. EVALUATION or Dme I 6al.r INevawlvoa ' STArr IaevaAWca AaVIeoiz IN oa Aaxnaetawt[pI1 NATIONAL OIL DIIILDINO AND Acu A000vNTlNo ewrsrr Paooluz.e 800 90IITH GRAND AVENUE LOS ANOELEB.OALIPORNIA 90017 (213) 825.1011 i February 21, 1967 i Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager County Sanitation Districts { of Orange County aDear Mr. Harper: This will comment upon the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" sec- tion of our Report . of Survey. Your Board quite properly wishes a to evaluate each item as to: 1) Estimated degree of risk; and 2) Cost to insure such risk. Since you tentatively are considering, inviting competitive bids on your property insurance, you' could obtain insurance rates at the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by request- ing them in your Specifications. The bidders would respond with quotations and the Board could then decide to insure some, all or none of the latter. Many of the coverages could be endorsed to your property insurance policy. It may be helpful to your Board if a capsule opini.gn was now ven- tured for each uninsured peril, bearing in mind that our crystal ball is apt to be as opaque as the next one about future perils and exposures: i Explosion - Estimated Maximum Loss could be extensive at any one i location; but probability will vary depending upon dissipation of gases by natural wind forces. Insurance cost should be toler- able with receptive markets. Flood: Insurance probably not 'available at bearable cost. 1 - { Use and OccupancX: This can pay for loss of profit and continu- ing expense which could not be earned after a loss, for extra J expense incurred for operations after a loss, for cost of sub- contracting your services to another, and for exceptional expe- diting expense (such as shipping components by air instead of by surface) , etc. The need for such insurance may not be uncom- fortable yet, but as your daily volume increases, some future ' insurance of this type may become indicated. Markets are recep- tive. . Earth uake: Estimated Maximum Loss to plants, equipment and sys- tems coul be severe if the force of the earthquake were intense. 1 � ;y -D- i CHARLES 1. ROBINSON �� V 4 , . .. INSURANCE CONSULTANT .. •.. 1 Mr. Fred A. Harper Page two. February 21, 1967 However, as our Report stated: "All surface structures of the Districts of importance have a favorable ratio of length-width vs. height which, in the past, has successfully withstood earth- quake forces (up to moderate) with only minor damage". At least three uncertainly located faults are thought to penetrate or bisect the aggregate areas of your Districts. Coverage is writ ten on a percentage deductible ( 2 to 10%) of total vai1 of all ld properties at the time of the loss. Insurance markets are mo- derately receptive at this time, but tend to fluctutate. The cost to insure against damage by Tidal Wave should probably be obtained at the same time with respect to Plant 2. Exposure is moderate or greater; probability is, of course, unknown. The epicenter of the Long Beach Earthquake of March 10, 1933 is reputed to be located about 2 3/4 miles offshore of Newport Beach and about 32 miles south of the mouth of the Santa Ana River. I shall be pleased to be available to you or to your Board to explore these points, if desired. Respectfully submitted CLR:hwh Charles L. Robinson Insurance Consultant i D NIYAT/p, COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS ��e*"�� `"'@ AREA COODE 714 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 962--2411 2910 ' 0 c 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX S175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 March 3, 1967 STAFF REPORT ON THE DISTRICTS' APPRENTICE PROGRAM The Apprentice I program is fully outlined and we are ready to contact the schools in Orange County. Our first contacts will be to familiarize the shop instructors with what we have to offer and then we will present the story to the potential enrollees. We plan to start the first trainees on July 1, 1967. In preparing the program in a general sense, it became obvious to the Training Committee that, while we were train- ing men for the over-all work of the Districts, we would also need to specialize these, or other people, to fill our future needs for foremen and skilled technicians . With this in mind, a tentative program for the second phase was outlined with the emphasis on specialization in one of our major fields. These two programs, as a whole, match the standard connotation of an apprenticeship program in that a man is a skilled, specialized worker at the end of the training period. While we would like to carry an individual through both phases, we also will need some men completing the second phase before the four years it will take to produce the first graduates of the completed course. To fill this void we plan to enroll personnel currently employed by the Districts who can qualify to begin with the second phase. At present, the size of the working complement is too small to allow us the latitude of training an extra man to do a job that we now have one man trained to do. In the last two years of the course the trainee will be earning his pay with the Districts in the work he is assigned, while progressing with his training. The State and Federal Apprentice Programs have been investi- gated, but we feel that nothing can be gained by joining either of these programs by contract. The facilities and experience of the State are available to us on a consulting basis which we intend to use to the fullest extent. .�%Ww (This report is for information only; no Board action is necessary at this time) . ti APPRENTICE I PROGRAM Objective: To train personnel for the maximum benefit to the Districts, the individual, the community and industry. It is recognized, as in any apprentice program, that the Districts will lose a percentage of the men trained. However, it is believed the improvement of individuals can only result in an improved community. The Apprentice I program is generally directed toward the progressive development of recent high school graduates by on-the-job training. Requirements• 1. High school diploma (consideration may be given to qualified applicants with GED certificates) . 2. Recommendation by high school Administration. 3. Age limitation - twenty-five (25) years or younger on entering the program. 4. Commitment by applicant as to his intention to complete the program as outlined by Management . 5. In initiating the program, consideration may be given to present employees who express an interest in the program and meet the requirements. If the employee requests a transfer to the program, the salary will be established at his present rate or the top step of the apprentice- range, whichever is lower. 6. Approval of all entrants to the program by the General Manager. Program Outline: I. General Plan A . An Apprentice I program shall consist of three (3) months training in each of the following categories: 1. Maintenance of Sewage Transmission Facilities. 2. Electrical and Instrumentation Systems . 3. Mechanical-Stationary Equipment. 4. Mechanical-Mobile Equipment. 5. Plant Maintenance. 2. 6. Laboratory Procedures . 7. Engineering. 8. Plant Operations . B. Detailed training in each category is listed on the attached plans . These plans are subject to revision by the General Manager as experience dictates. The training plans specify the required hours in each subject. The actual training supervisor is allowed some latitude in the program. The required hours in each subject are 5 to 2001'o' less than the total hours required in each category. The supervisors will use these hours as best suits the needs of the Districts and the Apprentice I. C. A weekly progress report shall be maintained by the Supervisor to assure compliance with the detailed Apprentice I program. The Apprentice I shall keep a detailed record of time worked on each subject and turn in appropriate records monthly. D. Supervisors shall schedule training so that at least 30% of the required time is covered each month. E. While the listings of the eight major categories is random, some restrictions exist on the sequence of training. a. Mechanical-Stationary Equipment must precede Mechanical-Mobile Equipment . b. Plant Operations must be preceded by at least one period in some other area of the Plant site excluding Transmission Facilities . II. Evaluation A. Upon completion of each category of training, a performance review will be completed by the supervisor and the review will be processed by current procedures. B. The continued participation in the apprenticeship program shall be subject to approval of the General Manager. III. Classification and Salary A. A classification of Apprentice I shall be established for this position. B. The salary range of this position will be established as 34.5 ($365-452) . 3• C. The salary resolution shall provide that the Apprentice I .� shall be eligible for a full step increase in pay on the satisfactory completion of each six months training period upon approval of the General Manager. D. Upon completion of the program, the apprentice shall be reclassified. In the event there are no openings in an appropriate classification, the apprentice will be re- classified at such time as the first appropriate opening occurs before consideration is given to an outside applicant . E. The classification of Apprentice I is to be considered a full-time permanent position and as such, the apprentice will be entitled to the appropriate employee benefits . F. A beginning Apprentice I shall start on the first working day of a month and subsequent changes in categories shall be effective on the first working day of the month. IV. Special Conditions 1. The Safety Committee will make a special effort to see that all Apprentice I ' s are instructed in safe working practices and procedures . 2. The Training Committee will make available such material and training as is necessary to properly instruct the Apprentice I. 3. The Apprentice I will be required to work some shift work and/or overtime and will be reimbursed in accordance with established salary provisions. 4. Instruction of the Apprentice I will be to the level of Maintenance Man or equivalent . While time will be too short for full comprehension at this level, subsequent advanced training at a later date will be more comprehensive. 5. No Apprentice I will be allowed to stand an operational shift alone. COLLECTION FACILITIES SUBJECT HOURS Small Lines 80 Safety procedures - traffic control - various cleaning procedures - disposal of solids Large Lines 80 Safety procedures - traffic control - various cleaning procedures - disposal of solids Trunk Flow Measurements 40 Safety and traffic control, dye tests, gauging procedures, installation. and servicing of water height recorders Inspections 40 Inspection of trunks and connections. Inspection of construction. Safety practices Stoppages 40 Methods and equipment usage to clear stoppage of large or small lines Station and Line Service 80 Installation and repair of pump station equipment. Inspection of backfilling. Station Run 80 Service, cleaning and inspection of pump stations. Patticipation in preventative maintenance and diagnosis TOTAL REQUIRED 440 ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE SUBJECT HOURS Basic Electrical Principles 60 Safety, use of tools and equipment. Soldering, splicing, and connecting wires. Proper use of meters Metering 80 Basic operation of metering elements . Servicing of meters and recorders Plant Service and Transformers 80 Installation, hook-up and testing of Plant electrical service Utility Service 20 Safety and work on Plant transmission equipment Motors 40 Service and repair of electric motors Switch Gear 60 Operation and servicing of circuit breakers, transfer switches . Distribution system for each Plant Control Circuits 40 Servicing and repair of control circuits for Plant equipment Telemetering 20 Transmission of signals by leased lines. Conversion of metering signals for transmission. Coding and decoding tone signals TOTAL REQUIRED 400 ,,or, MECHANICAL STATIONARY EQUIPMENT SUBJECT HOURS Basic Principles of Engines 40 Textbook and cut-away model. Study of 2 and 4 cycle, gas, gasoline and diesel principles Preventative Maintenance on Engines 80 Inspection, adjustment and servicing of stationary engines Preventative Maintenance of Governors 20 Servicing of hydraulic, mechanical and electronic types Preventative Maintenance of Carburetors 20 Servicing and repair of gas and gasoline carburetors E„ - Contro1s 20 Instruction in basic principles of automotive engine controls Major Overhaul 40 Assist in major overhaul of large internal combustion engine Gear Boxes 40 Adjustment and servicing of bearings and gear tooth contact. Herringbone, bevel, worm and planetary Compressors 40 Service and repair of reciprocating and rotary gas and air compressors Pressure Regulators and Power Actuated Valves 40 Theory of operation, servicing and repairs . Includes related equipment Turbines - Gas and Steam 60 Theory and servicing of gas and steam turbines Includes study of waste heat recovery unit and associated equipment TOTAL REQUIRED 400 liECE4NICAL-MOBILE EQUIPMENT V SUBJECT HOURS Vehicle Servicing 110 Gassing, washing, lubrication of cars and trucks Minor Tune-Up 40 Maintenance and repair of ignition and carburetion . system Major Inspection & Servicing 40 Brake, bearing and gear box inspection and adjustment Major Tune-Up 30 Inspection and servicing of electrical components, fuel system, valve train adjustment, and engine performance analysis Preventative Maintenance Scheduling; 20 Instruction in selection of proper interval for preventative maintenance of equipment . Completion and filing of records Portable Equipment 20 Servicing, testing, and inspection of portable equipment including state of readiness of emergency equipment Transmissions 24 Theory and repair of mechanical type transmissions Differentials 24' Theory and repair of automotive type differentials Steering and Brakes 32 Service and -repair of systems including power assisted types Hydraulic Systems 20 Theory, service and repair of hydraulic control systems including brakes, power shovels, and backhoes, and hydraulic cranes 2. MECHANICAL--MOBILE EQUIPMENT SUBJECT HOURS Steam Cleaning and Painting Preparation 20 Proper methods of cleaning, sanding, and masking of: mechanical equipment for repainting Engine Breakdown 20 Assist in repair of automotive type engines TOTAL REQUIRED 400 PLANT MAINTENANCE SUBJECT HOURS Grounds Keeping 40 Proper care and trimming of shrubs and trees. Care of lawn and beds. Weed control Bar Screens 20 Servicing and repair of bar screens and conveying equipment Incinerators 20 Servicing, cleaning and repair of incinerators and feed mechanisms Clarifier and Sludge Pumping 60 Servicing of clarifier mechanisms . Servicing and repair of sludge pumps and metering devices Digester Equipment 40 (60) Servicing and repair of circulating and gas pumps . Maintenance of lines, valves and digester safety equipment Water Pumps 40 Servicing and repair of water and sump pump. Proper installation of valves and checks Boilers 40 Servicing, cleaning and repair of boilers and associated equipment . Feed water treatment Pipe Fitting and Welding 60 (80) Principles of fitting pipe using both screwed and flanged pipe. Elementary welding and cutting using both electric and gas torches Painting 4o Proper preparation of surfaces. Painting for protection from atmosphere. Selection of proper type of protective coatings Large Pumps 20 (40) Servicing and repair of large pumps including shafts . 2. PLANT MAINTENANCE SUBJECT HOURS Digester Cleaning 20 (40) Cleaning and returning a digester to operation. Methods of grit disposal. Safety and ventilation. TOTAL REQUIRED 400 NOTE: Figures in parentheses show suggested places where extra time is thought to be most needed. Last two items may not be covered in period of training due to scheduling but will be included before end of course. CONTROL LABORATORY SUBJECT HOURS Introduction to Procedures 10 Laboratory safety and familiarization with basic equipment Sampling 40 Proper• sampling of various plant streams, liquid, solid, and gas . Handling and storage of samples and proper preparation for analysis Sludge and Digestion Analysis 80 Analysis of sludges from throughout Plants. Analysis of digester contents and how each parameter affects operational efficiency. Sewage Analysis 120 Analysis of sewage and industrial waste samples for routine and special analysis Bacteriology 120 Collection and analysis of samples for bacteria control. Study of various methods for confirmation of results . Chlorination Analysis 20 Analysis of chlorine residual and demands on various types of treatment plant streams and preparation of analytical reagents Quantitative Analysis 40 Introduction to the procedures for analyzing samples in a quantitative manner TOTAL REQUIRED 430 ENGINEERING `.J SUBJECT HOURS General 4.0 Introduction to departmental procedures, equipment and methods Drafting 200 Translation of physical configurations into representative drawings involves both field and board work Surveying 160* Elementary surveying. Use of tools and instruments Inspection 40* Inspection of contract work for compliance with plans and specifications, sampling and testing of material TOTAL REQUIRED 440 *Extra time should be concentrated in these phases PLANT OPERATIONS SUBJECT HOURS Treatment Plant No . 1 160 (80 hours will be on shift work) Operation of all units of the Treatment Plant to include records and sampling Treatment Plant No . 2 160 (80 hours will be on shift work) Operation of all units of the Treatment Plant to include records and sampling Chlorine Station 80 (40 hours will be on shift work) Operation, servicing and routine maintenance of the chlorination equipment, trickling filter plant, outfall booster station and related testing procedures Sludge Handling 40 Operation of the centrifuge and sludge handling equipment to include servicing, records and sampling Control Center 40 Operation with a Control Center operator. Interpreting the operating conditions of the units from the console displays. Record keeping and chart servicing TOTAL REQUIRED 480 NOTE: Apprentice I will not stand an operating shift alone S*111JFT1°I ' NOUN Y SANITAI ION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 714 ° 1 y '( OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 0 962-54029 11 1 I 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 9270E February 28, 1967 To: Fred A. Harper, General Manager From: Training Committee Subject : Apprentice Program As the Com,* ittee developed the Apprentice Program to give an over-all training in the Districts ' work, it became apparent that t1;e needed a second program to carry on where the first stopped. This second program should be specialized in each of our main fields of endeavor. Sttac ed is a reco-ximended Apprentice II program to compliment the Apprentice I -rog`rarr.. To date, c•:e ave not carried the development of this program to t e detail of t,::a Apprentice I program. In the program, as presently conceived, we would require outside study at college level and in effect be training our skilled technicians and foremen of the future . With your co::currence, we will develop this program in the same detail as ou"_ Apprentice I program.. it ,,could be a bcod selling point for our Apprentice I program, when we present it to future applicants, if we can show that there is a good chance to grow in skills and training with the Districts. Jo., . L. Sigler JDS:gg Attachment RECOMMEAMATION FOR AN APPRENTICE II PROGRAM Objective To train ?personnel for the maximum benefit to the Districts, the individual, the community and industry. it is recognized, as in any apprentice program, that the Districts will lose a percentage of the men trained. However, it is believed the improvement of individuals can only result in an improved community. The Apprentice II program is generally directed toward the progressive development of advanced skills in the Districts ' operations in specialized fields . It is for graduates of the Apprentice I program and/or other District personnel who the General Manager feels are qualified to benefit the Districts by this training. Requirements : 1. High school diploma (consideration may be given to qualified applicants with GED certificates) 2. Abe limitation - twenty-eight (28) years or younger on entering the program. 3. Satisfactory completion of Apprentice I program. 4. Commitment by the applicant as to his intention to complete the program as outlined by Management. 5. Consideration may be given to current employees who express an interest in the program and meet the requirements. If the employee requests a transfer to the program, the salary will be established at his present rate or the top step of the Apprentice II -range, whichever is lower. 6. Approval of all entrants to the program by the General Manager. Program Outline: Y r 1. Ge.,c ' Ran A. An Apprentice II program shall consist of two (2) years training in one of the following specialized fields: 1. Electrical 2. Mechanical - Mobile and Stationary 3. Plant Operations 4. Plant Maintenance & Construction 5. Laboratory 6. Engineering • ~ 2. B. The detailed Apprentice II program shall be in accordance �../ with a plan developed by the staff and approved by, the General Manager. C. Outside schooling will be required to supplement his on- the-job training. The amount of outside schooling required will vary with the various fields but will involve a sub- stantial amount of time . The Apprentice II will be expected to accomplish this on his own time and at his own expense. D. A certification procedure will be established to recognize co-mpletion of the -required work. weekly progress report will be maintained by the super- vsor to assure co,:,pliarce with the detailed Apprentice II program. The apprentice will keep required records and reports will be reviewed at least monthly by a committee designated by the General Manager. II. Bval;,ation A. '^::e apprentice II shall be given a performance review not less than bi-annually by his immediate supervisor and the review shall be processed by current procedures. • B. The continued participation in the Apprentice II program shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager. III . Cias< .'cation and Salary A. A classification of Apprentice II shall be established. B. The salary range of this position will be established Gt 38.5 (� 52/56o) . C. -ovi:ions shall be Trade to enable the Apprentice II to receive one step salary advances upon the satisfactory completion of each six months period of training upon approval of the General Manager. D. Upon completion of the program, the Apprentice II shall ,;ave teen trained to an equivalent 'level. of Mechanic T. �f the-re are no openings in an appropriate classification at that time, the Apprentice II will be assigned. first priority for the first appropriate opening occuring. E. The classification: of Apprentice II is to be considered a full time permanent position and as such the apprentice will be entitled to the appropriate employee benefits. F. A beginning Apprentice II shall start on the first working -day of a month and his o' months. anniversary shall 'be determined from that date. EXCERPTS FRO1,.1 THE, MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.6 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p .m. , March 8 , 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o' clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Porter, Gruber, and Baker Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. STRICT 6 Moved, seconded and duly carried: Authorizing payment for stabiliza- That payment to Robert E. Lenihan, tion Long Beach, California, for grout stabilization on Dover Drive, is hereby authorized to be made in the total amount of $7,213.96. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS . COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes 19f6 the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March 9 7 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed A-O- the official seal of County Sanitation District No.6 , of Orange County, California, this 8th day of March , 1967 . Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date = 2 i / Time JOINT BOARDS /�`' DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. V"' McMichael Harvey McMichael Amo � Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett —� Porter Bousman - Davis Baker Featherly Bowen Noe Crapo Shull DISTRICT 2 Culver -� Parks Hileman Forgit Gruber Crapo Shull Furman Bouma Culver Gruber Forgit Harvey �� McMichael Gummere Anderson Hock �- Michel Hock Michel Schutte Krein Long �� Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood Miller, Clifton Mack Speer �G Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Baker Featherly Porter Schutte L.-I� Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer ✓ Clark Fregeau Amo �L Speer �� Clark Bousman -�� Davis Stewart Green Bowen �- Noe Coen Crapo Shull Walters -� Herbst Culver Workman � Furman � Bouma Baker Featherly Gummere Anderson Harvey McMichael Long Brown Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein OTHERS: Schwerdtfeger Fregeau Stewart Green Brown Walters Herbst Nisson - Baker Featherly Galloway -� Tremblay �` DISTRICT 5 Lowry �L Parsons Carlson Gruber Forgit Rimel Baker Featherly Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter Gruber Forgit Baker �G Featherly DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton f Mac_t Forgit Gruber ` Harvey McMichael Parks Hileman Porter v Baker �� Fea ,arly DT v DISTRICT 11 Stewart Coen Mai , L m ou e Fwrtlett - Baker Featherly Ba `1, eat r " ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time -�f �40'(' JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey ✓ McMichael �..✓ Amo —� Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman �� Davis Baker Featherly Bowen -� Noe Crapo -� Shull DISTRICT 2 Culver �� Parks Hileman Forgit to Gruber Crapo � Shull Furman � Bouma Culver Gruber ^� Forgit Harvey McMichael Gummere Anderson Hock /' Michel Hock Michel Schutte - Krein Long Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood Miller, Clifton / Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry `�` Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Baker Featherly Porter Schutte ,/ Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer —� Clark Bousman -i�� Davis Stewart � Green Bowen Noe Coen Crapc Shull Walters Herbst Culver -�- Workman Furman Bouma Baker Featherly Gummere Anderson Harvey �� McMichael Long Brown Miller, Harry —� Kohl Schutte Krein OTHERS : Schwerdtfeger Fregeau Stewart Green Brown Walters Herbst Nisson Baker Featherly Galloway Tremblay DISTRICT 5 Lowry Parsons Carlson Gruber Forgit Rimel Baker —�� Featherly Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter Gruber -�L Forgit Baker Featherly DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton Mack Forgit Gruber Harvey McMichael Parks Hileman Porter `..� Baker Featherly DISTRICT DISTRICT 1 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Bartlett Mitchell Baker — ✓ Featherly Baker Featherly isOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. x 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 EIVAvenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT_BOARDS IIAGENDA MARCH 8, 1967 - 8:00 p.m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3) Election of Joint Chairman (4) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (Districts) (5) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed �y (6) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 3 y,q, Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, and the special meeting held February 23, 1967 (8) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (11) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held February 8, 1967, as mailed (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (14) ALL DISTRICTS - Report -of the Gen a1 Counsel (15) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Executive Committee on the report of Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant. See page n F,n (16) ALL DISTRICTS onsiderat on of the following actions on the writte report of the Executive Committee: a. Motion approving recommendations b. Motion directing the General Manager to implement the recommended changes in insurance coverages f c. Motion authorizing the General Manager to employ Charles L. Robinson, Insurance (A Consultant, to prepare specifications and outline bidding procedures for • acquisition of the recommended property insurance coverage, including bid specifications for it perils & exposures" as outlined in the Insurance Consultant's report dated December, 1966 (17) ALL DISTRICTS �/�. Staff report on award of Job No. P2-11 (Headworks "C") . See page "G" for bid tabulation. (See Manager' s Deport (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-24, granting an easement to the City of Fountain Valley in connection f with improvements to Ellis Avenue. See page "H" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Cons deration of motion authorizing issuance of a purchase order for the following emergency equipment: Auxiliary Diesel Generator Set, Specifi- cation #E-049 - $10,337.00 See page "I" for bid tabulation (20) ALL DISTRICTS Cons d�eration of motion authorizing the General �(1 Manager to sign and submit report of waste discharge, as required by the provisions of Section 13054 of the State Water Code (21) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of the following resolutions authorizing and directing execution and filing of documents necessary for Federal Grant under 33 USC 466 Et Seq. : District No. Resolution No. Page No. �a 2 67-18-2 It ill b. 3 67-19-3 tl K'l c. 5 67-20-5 nV? d. 6 67-21-6 "M" e. 7 67-22-7 a N►r f. 11 67-23-11 110" g, 1 67-17-1 " P" -2- (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file General Manager' s certification that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolvin§ Fund warrants listed on pages "A , "A" , and "C (24) ALL DISTRICTS y � C /i " � Other business and communications' if an (25) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-27-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awardin contract for Job No. P2-11 to J. Putnam Henck in the total amount of $2,495,961.00. See page "Q"_ (26) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" Jam✓ 27) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if anyr (28) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (29) DISTRICT 11 G✓ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (30) DISTRIC 0 r busi d common if any (31) DISTRICT 11 1 N9 S l r •/" Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ` (32) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-28-2, authorizing acceptance of an easement from the Fullerton Elementary School District relative to construction of Contract No. 2-11-1, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "R" (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-29-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding contract for Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station o and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-2 to Industrial Pipeline Construction Company in the total amount of $161,347.05. (Bid opening at 4:00 p.m. , March 6th. See Iftp/ page "S" . ) (See page "T" for bid tabulation. ) (34) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. fvjl� See page "D" -3- (35) DISTRIC 0 r busine a mmunications, if any (36) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment � S (37) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of request by the staff for deferment of report on establishment of reserve fund for future facilities. (See Manager' s Report) (38) DISTRICT 3 Consi ation of mo ion approvin rants. See age "D" P39 DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any . 40) DISTRICT 3 , ✓�► , Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (41) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 5 Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants, if any. See page "E" (42) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13, authorizing an addition of $1,219 to the contract with Far Western Pipeline, Inc. , Contractor. See Page "U" (43) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 5-13, adjusting engineers' quantities. See page "y" (44) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of Resolution No . 67-30-5 accepting Contract No. 5-13 as complete, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page t1W11 (45) DISTRICT 5 �n Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (46) DISTRICT 5 0 ne and communications, i �/J�'1 , TA (47) DISTRICT 5 i Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (48) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6 (Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction) , granting an extension of time to Cook & Barletta, Inc. , Contractor. See page "X" (49) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-31-6 accepting Contract No . 6-6 as complete, and authorizing the filing of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "y" -4- (5 ) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion authorizing payment to Robert E. Lenihan, Long Beach, for grout stabilization on Dover Drive, in the amount of $7, 213.96 (51) DISTRICT 6 l G� Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. d See page "E" (52) DISTRICT, 0 busin�s�a,1dr cord"U catio (53) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (54) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-32-7, ordering annexation of territory to the District (Panorama Elementary School site) . See page "z" (55) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion authorizing and directing the General Manager to request annexation to the 7th Sewer Maintenance District of the following proposed annexations within county territory, for the purpose of maintaining the local sewers included within these proposed annexations : (See page "AA" ) 1. Prospect 2. E1 Modena 3. Hewes-Bond 4. Tustin-Fairhaven 5. Arroyo-La Loma (56) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (57) DISTRICT-,7--- business -and ommunica n (58) DISTRICT 7 M, Consideration of motion re : Adjournment /�T ', 01 r ' -5- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS March 8, 1267 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6759 Adachi Narsery Co. , Plants for Westside Stn. 248.04 6760 Alemite Company, Tools, Small Hardware 176 .03 6761 All Bearing Service, Inc . , Pump Bearings 79 .82 6762 Allis -Chalmers Mfg. Co ., Compressor Parts 1,100.46 6763 Aloe, Thermometer 3.74 6764 Alpine Aromatics, Inc . , Odor Control Chemicals 1, 544.40 6765 American Well Works, Inc . , Sludge Probe 129 .00 6766 City ol' Anaheim, Power 30 .76 6767 The Anchor Packing Co. , Packing & Gaskets 63.06 6768 Apeo Supply, Air Filters 23.97 6769 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 207.27 6770 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 345.E 6771 Barksdale Valves, Pressure Switches 332.0 6772 Bay City Bearing Co ., Inc . , Bearings, Hardware 315.82 6773 Bell Pipe & Supply Co. , Valves 55.04 6774 Blower Paper Company, Janitorial Supplies 90.23 6775 Charles Bruning Co. , Reproduction Supplies 174.63 6776 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Protective Wrapping 63.85 6777 Calii. Wholesale Electric Co . , Temp Switch Controls 29.72 6778 Certified Building Materials Co ., Cement 90.53 6779 City Sand & Gravel Co . , Rock Base, Fill Dirt jr-.02 6780 R. B. Clapp Co. , Inc. , Electric Timers 0.83 6781 College Lumber Co . , Inc . , Small Hardware, Lumber 146.93 6782 Consolidated Electrical Dist. , Electric Supplies 169 .24 6783 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc ., Truck Parts 271 .03 6784 Costa Mesa County Water Dist . , Water 4.40 6785 Leonard C . Crapo, Reimb. for Auto Damages Dist 2&3 19.77 6786 Daniels Tire Service, Truck Repair 17 . 50 6787 Data Transportation Co ., Inc . , Freight 25.00 6783 Deaver Mfg. Co . , Equipment Parts 16 .23 6789 John M. Deck Co . , Equipment Repair 5.27 6790 De Guelle & Son' s Glass Co . , Truck Repair 74.25 6791 Diesel Control Corp. , Engine Parts 269 .59 6792 Dunton Ford, Truck Parts 30.58 6793 Electric Supplies Dist. Co . , Electric Supplies 266.11 6795 Enchanter Inc. , Ocean Monitoring& Research 1,762.50 6796 Estekote Company, Steel Spool 8.94 6797 Fischer & Porter Co ., Chlorinator Parts 247.46 6798 Fowler Equipment, Inc . , Equipment Rental 194.25 6799 Freeborn Equipment Co . , Inc . , Portable Pump 494.00 6800 Freeway Machine & Welding, Machine Shop Work 72.00 6801 General Electric Supply Co. , Cable, Elect. Supp. 1,949 .57 6802 General Telephone Co . 982 .20 6803 Gladman & Wallace, Truck. Tires 250.35 6804 Glenmart Company, Inc . , Angle Steel 202.55 6805 Glidden Company, Paint Supplies 75.84 6806 Graybar Electric Co., Inc . , Electric Supplies 71.76 6807 A . P. Green Refractories, Inc. , Insulation 161 .94 6803 Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Serv. 294.00 6809 Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses 43.58 6810 J. Howard Hawk Equipment, Equipment Jacks 46.70 6811 Health Education Service, Technical Publication 11 6812 L. Heitman Equipment Co . , Equipment Rental 170.52 6813 Hertz Equipment Rental Corp. , Equipment Rental 47.02 6814 B. F. Heying, Employee Mileage 19 .20 6815 Honeywell, Inc . , Instrumentation Parts 453.63 6816 Howard Supply Co ., Valves, Piping, Hardware 778. 30 6317 International Harvester Co . , Truck Parts 132.31 6B18 J & M Service, Engine Parts 52.64 ..A,- WARRANT NO. IN FACTOR OF AMOUNT 6819 Jasco Materials Co . , Roofing Supplies 39 .53 6820 B. R. Jones & Co . , Inc . , Engine Parts 361 .34 6821 Jones Chemicals, Inc . , Chlorine 10,472.80 6822 Kar Products, Inc. , Truck Parts 259 .82 6823 Kelly Pipe Co. , Piping Supplies 111.62 6824 Kleen-Line Corp. , Trash Containers 43.37 6825 K Mart, File Case 11.44 6826 Knippers Rentals, Equipment Rental 120.00 6327 Anthony J. Lauricha, Employee Mileage 12.00 6825 LBWS, inc . , Cleaning Supplies, Hardware, Tools 4?7.73 6829 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 19.10 683o Lewis Bros. Batteries, Truck Batteries 91.02 6831 McCalla Bros . , Pump Parts 53.69 6832 McCoy Motor Co ., Tractor Parts 16 .12 6833 Bill McDaniel Equipment, Equipment Rental 168.50 6834 Mahaffey Machine Co ., Machine Shop Uork 151.59 6835 Munselle Supply Co . , Inc . , Welding Supplies 92.15 6836 Nalco Chemical Co., Chemicals 213.72 6837 The National Cash Register Co . , Acctg. Mach. Mtce. 286.00 6838 National Chemsearch Corp. , Insecticide 654.94 6839 Lee M. Nelson, Consulting Services 320.00 6840 Nelson--Dunn, Inc. , Engine Parts 241 .25 6841 City of Newport Beach, Water 4.50 6842 C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel Retainer 700.00 6843 Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc . 420.65 6844 Overst-rom & Sons, Shaker Screen Parts 122.76 6845 Pacific Intermountain Express, Freight 7.46 6346 Pacific Telephone 277.45 6847 Postmaster, Postage 100.00 6848 Protek Specialty Company, Mobile Equip. Parts 56.28 6849 Radio Products Sales, Inc . , Electronic Tubes 125.64 6850 Rapid Blue Print Co. , Reproduction Service 231.30 6851 The Register, Legal Publication 79 .09 6852 Reliable Steel Supply Co ., Blower 17.26 6853 Reynolds Aluminum Supply Co. , Structural Steel 199 .38 6854 Al Roberts Plymouth, Auto Repair 12.72 6855 Ruff' s Saw Service, Saw Sharpening Service 4.95 6856 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints 43.29 6857 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Electric Supplies 71 .76 6858 Santa Ana Paint Co., Drafting Supplies 12.69 6859 E. H. Sargent & Co . , Lab. Supplies 1,671 .05 6860 Russell M. Scott, Sr. , Employee Mileage 33.50 6861 Sibal En; ineering Co . , Inc. , Compressor Parts 430.77 6862 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 22.50 6863 Signal Flash Company, Barricade Rental 140.00 6864 Signal Oil Company, Gasoline 496.80 6865 Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 55.4 6866 Southern California Edison Co . 2, 534.5E 6867 Southern California Water Co . 66.49 6868 Southern Counties Gas Company 388.23 6869 Southern Marine Supply, Small Hardware 74.88 6870 Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies 12.64 6871 Speed--E--Auto Parts, Truck Parts 223.89 *or, 6872 39 Stake & Building Supplies, Survey Supplies 40.8( 6873 Standard Oil Company of Calif. , Oil 740.83 6874 Sully.-Miller Contracting Co. , Asphalt 19 .92 6375 Tardif Sheet Metal, Metal Fabrication 440.02 6876 Technical Associates, Lab. Equipment Repair 14.68 6877 C . 0. Thompson Petroleum Co . , Weed Oil 119 .33 6878 Tony' s Building Materialls, Blasting Sand 60.32 6879 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. , Line Cleaner Cable 454.13 . B-, WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6880 Union Oil Company of California, Gasoline 4.24 6881 U. S. Divers Co ., Chlorine Safety Equipment 361.40 ,low/ 6832 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. , Office Supplies 24.96 6883 John R. Waples, Odor Consultant 220.20 6884 Warren & Bailey Co . , Inc ., Valves, Fittings 356.94 6885 D. L. Warwick, M.D., Pre-Employment Physicals 32.50 6886 Waukesha Hotor Company, Engine Repairs 836.39 6887 Welch' s Coastal Concrete Co . , Concrete 32.84 6888 Whitneys, Truck Repair. 10.02 6889 W. D. Wilson Company, Fittings 149 .91 6890 Winter & Co ., Photo Supplies & Finishing 25.64 6891 W-K--M Valve Division ACF Industries, Valve 13.51 6892 Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Charges . 379.70 6893 Flair Drafting Service 447.13 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND 42,9 59 .36 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6894 Bank of America NT&SA 42, 545.00 Assignee - Vinnell Corporation 6895 John Carollo Engineers 1,107. 50 6896 Freedom Newspapers, Inc . 8265 6897 Kemper Construction & W. W. Hoagland 9,942:80 6898 Southern California Edison Co. 7, 315.74 6899 Sully-Miller Contracting Co . 3, 580.38 69oo Twining Laboratories 16 .00 6901 Wallace Trade Bindery Co . 115.40 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING 64,705.47 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF 107,664.83 DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND VARRANTS WAR11ANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6902 Boyle En3ineerine 340.00 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND t- ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6903 J. R. Lester Boyle x Sidney L. Lowry 105.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 69o4 J. R. Lester Boyle x Sidney L. Lowry $ 4,183.00 6905 The Orange Daily News 46-76 6906 i;allace Trade Bindery 6. 0 4,286.66 4,391.66 DISTRICT NO. _ 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6907 AAA Construction Company $ 13,185.00 69o8 City of Newport Beach 64.00 6909 Donald C. Simpson 270.00 13,519.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6910 Far Western Pipeline Inc. 116,281.54 6911 Donald C. Simpson 2,363.46 118,645.00 $ 132,164.00 -D- DISTRICT NO. 6 OPERPTING FUND t`rRiUNTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6912 Robert E. Lenihan 7;213.56 DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6913 Cook & Barletta Inc. s 3,066.67 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND Tjt ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6914 Boyle & Lowry 2,649.50 A_D�NO. Amount $1, 3+� 5.50 Plan Check & Inspection 1,214.00 $2,649.50 6915 Irvine Industrial Complex 668.50 6916 County of Orange (AD NO. 6) 149.80 6917 Southern California Edison Co. 364.68 $ 3,832.48 FIXED OBLIGATION FUND tr'ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6918 City of Anaheim $ 1,561.8o 6910 City of Buena Park 96.70 6920 City of Fullerton 1,561.80 6121 Garden Grove Sanitary District 241 .80 6922 Ci tf of La Habra 386.90 6923 City of Orange 1,474.70 6924 City of Placentia 241.80 6925 City of Santa Ana 4,434.50 $ 10,000.00 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6926 Boyle and Lowry 5d 60.00 6927 The Tustin News 31. 16 6928 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 19.24 $ 110.40 q, 13,942.88 D.T.STRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND V:ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6929 Lomar Corporation & Orange County Pipeline $ 29,659.27 d..J 6930 Lowry and Associates 2,293.00 $ 31,952.27 -E- March 1, 1967 REPORT OF THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE TO THE JOINT BOARDS OF DIRECTORS RE: Insurance Consultant's Report dated December, 1966 At the January llth meeting of the Boards, the recommendations of the Insurance Consultant were referred to the Executive Committee for study and final recommendation as to changes to be made in the Districts' insurance coverages. The Executive Committee met on January 18th and March 1st to review the Consultant' s recommendations and a written staff report on the matter. As a result of its deliberations, the Committee submits the following recommendations for the Boards' consideration: 1. LIABILITY INSURANCE: a. Provide $1,000 Medical Payment coverage on District-owned passenger vehicles at a premium cost of $132 per year, and delete Uninsured Motorist coverage at an annual premium cost of $3�5 2. EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE: a. At no additional cost add "Malpractice" coverage to conform to the underlying liability policy b. Increase the Districtst Liability coverage to $5,000,000, for an additional annual premium cost of $1,125.00 3. PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage & Vandalism) a. The Districts' current insurance carrier is unable to provide coverage as recom- mended by the Insurance Consultant; therefore the Committee recommends that the Consultant be employed to prepare specifications and outline bidding pro- cedures for acquisition of the necessary coverage . 4. BOILER & MACHINERY INSURANCE a. Amend the current Boiler & Machinery policy to provide payment of loss on a Replacement Cost basis, for an annual premium increase of $209 5. UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES a. The Insurance Consultant listed a number of "uninsured perils" such as flood damage and earthquake. The Committee recommends that these un- insured perils and exposures be included as separate bid items in the bid specifications for the Property Damage coverage. After the premium costs are known, a determination can be made as to whether the Districts should insure against any one, or all, of the perils listed . Agenda Item 15 -F- All Districts Engineers ' estimate as stated in engineers ' letter dated.•December 6, 1966 -- $2,475,000 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date March 1, 1967 Contract For: HEADWORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-11 CONTRACTOR TOTAL DID 1. J. Putnam Henck, a corporation $2,495,961.00 374 West 40th Street San Bernardino, California 2. Hydrocarbon Construction Company 23536,507.00 1116 'St. Jo Professional Building 2000 Crawford Street Houston, Texas 3. Kemper Construction Company and 2,648,000.00 W. W. Hoagland, A Joint Venture 3254 Cherry Avenue Long Beach, California 4. Merco Construction Engineers, Inc. 216825200.00 1704 Ruxton Lane Redondo Beach, California 5. Vinnell Corporation 2,8333825.00 1145 Westminster Avenue Alhambra, California 6. Alex Robertson Company 2,960,449.00 3065 Rosecrans Place San Diego, California Agenda Item #17'' -G- All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-24 GRANTING EASEMENT TO THE CITY OF FO T The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 22 32 53 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 22 3, 52 6, 7, and 11, grant to the CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY, A Municipal Corporation, a perpetual easement and right of way for street and highway purposes in connection with improvements to Ellis Avenue; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said easement is to be granted is described as follows : The North 40.00 feet, measured at right angles, of the Southeast Quarter of Section 32, Township 5 South, Range 10 West, in the Rancho Las Bolsas, as per map recorded in Book 51, Page 12 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of said County. Except therefrom the West Half of the Northwest Quarter of said Southeast Quarter. Section 3. That said easement is to be granted at no cost to the City of Fountain Valley; and, Section 4. Execution of this easement on behalf of the Districts is hereby authorized. Agenda Item #i8 -H- All Districts B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date February 28, 1967 AUXILIARY DIESEL GENERATOR SET SPECIFICATION NO. E-049 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Lawless G. M. Diesel $10,337.00 13644 East Nelson Averue City of Industry 2. Shepherd Machinery Corp. 11,549.96 11971 Westminster Avenue Garden Grove, California It is recommended that award be made to Lawless G.M. Diesel as the lowest and best bid. (Note--the above unit is highly specialized and as such, there is limited qualified competition. However, due to the fact that the complete unit will incorporate a generator that is surplus Districts ' property, the net result will be an excellent piece of equipment at a substantial savings to the Districts. ) T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer Specifications were sent to the following: Shepherd Machinery Lawless G.M. Diesel Reggaes Diesel Service Agenda Item #19 -I- All Districts RESOLUTION N0. 67-18-2 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 2 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and ll, of Orange County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item #21 J-1 District #2 No. 2 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a 'construction grant under said Act of Congress in the amount of $1.462,510 for a joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange County, California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc- tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 2 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 2 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-18-2 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN TN!ITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my habd and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. Fred Harper, gecretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California `rd Agenda Item #21 J-2 District #2 RESOLUTION N0. 67-19-3 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has ,joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange 4`0/ County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item #21 K-1 District #3 No. 3 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress in the amount of $1,567,670 for a joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California is hereby designated"Central Agency" for said construction project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 3 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 3 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE } I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-19-3 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. Fred rper, Secretary of fhe Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 K-2 District #3 RESOLUTION NO. 67-20-5 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 NN ✓ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 u.S.c. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining ,joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item #21 L-1 District #5 No. 5 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of* Congress in the*. amount of $271,010 for a joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc- tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 5 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 5 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-20-5 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES : ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. e./ Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 L-2 District #5 RESOLUTION N0. 67-21-6 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. - The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Aet of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 6 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has ,joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintainingjoint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item #21 M-1 District #6 No. 6 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congress in the' . amount of $268,690 for a Joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc- tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 6 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 6 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-21-6 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. ?red A. Harper, Secretary or the `ft� Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 M-2 District #6 RESOLUTION N0. 67-22-7 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 �.d A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5. 6 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item J21 N-1 District #7 No. 7 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant - under said Act ofCongress in- the " amount of $2330020 for a joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc- tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 7 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 7 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-22-7 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 N-2 District #7 RESOLUTION N0. 67-23-11 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 11 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies, and has joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 and 7 in constructing, operating and maintaining joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, for convenience, acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange 14s/ County, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California. Section 4. The General Manager is hereby authorized and in- structed to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District Agenda Item #21 0-1 District #11 No. 11 all documents necessary to apply for and accept a construction grant under said Act of Congres�',in the amount of $297,880 for a ,point project generally described as: �d OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grant may be for an amount more or less than hereinabove set forth. Section 5. County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California is hereby designated "Central Agency" for said construc- tion project as defined in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1) of the California Administrative Code and is directed to act as agent for County Sanitation District No. 11 in all ways necessary to carry out the purposes and intent of County Sanitation District No. 11 as hereinabove expressed. STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-23-11 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967 by the following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California this 8th day of March, 1967. �..� Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 0-2 District #11 RESOLUTION N0. 67-17-1 FEDERAL GRANT - OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION AND FILING OF DOCUMENTS NECESSARY FOR FEDERAL GRANT UNDER 33 U.S.C. 466 ET SEQ. IN BEHALF OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. An Act of Congress known as the Federal Water Pollution Control Act, as amended (33 U.S.C. 466 et seq. ) provides for Federal grants for construction of sewage treatment works. Section 2. County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County is a separate and distinct agency organized under Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California, for the purpose of constructing, operating and maintaining a major trunk sewer system for the collection of sewage from the cities and other local collection sewering agencies,. and has ,joined with other County Sanitation Districts namely, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 in constructing, operating and maintaining ,joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities under an agreement dated October 8, 1958, known as the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Section 3. In accordance with the terms of said Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement, County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County acts for itself and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5. 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, l"� California, each organized for similar purposes and serving different territories, all in Orange County, California, for the purpose of constructing and operating said joint sewage treatment plants and disposal facilities. Agenda Item #21 P-1 District #1 Section 4. By means of this resolution and of the resolutions set forth below by number, the following County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California have authorized the filing of applica- tions for grants under said Act of Congress in the respective amounts set forth below and have designated County Sanitation District No. 1 as "Central Agency" for said applications as set forth in Title 23, Chapter 3, Section 2101 (1 ) of the California Administrative Code: District No. Resolution No. Application Amount 1 67-17-1 .531,820 2 67-18-2 1,462,510 3 67-19-3 1,567,670 5 67-20-5 271,010 6 67-21-6 268,690 7 67-22-7 233,020 11 67-23-11 297,88o Section 5. The General Manager is hereby authorized to prepare, sign and submit for County Sanitation District No. 1, and as agent for County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, all documents necessary to apply for and accept construction grants under said Act of Congress in the amounts set forth in Section 4 hereof for a joint project generally described as: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 Acceptance of said grants may be for amounts more or less than set forth in Section 4 hereof. Agenda Item #21 P-2 District #1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE �.d I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 67-17-1 was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March, 1967, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. l, of Orange County, California, this 8th day of March, 1967. Fred A. Harper, Secretary, Boar of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California Agenda Item #21 P-3 District #1 RESOLUTION NO. 67-27-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-11 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR HEADWORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-11 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts ' engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to J. PUTNAM HENCK, a corporation for HEADW ORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-11, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-11 is hereby awarded to J. PUTNAM HENCK, a corporation in the total amount of $2,495,961.00, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor on March 1, 1967; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 66-154 as amended, on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . Agenda Item #25 -Q- District #1 RESOLUTION NO.67-28-2 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENTS �./ A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANTS OF EASEMENTS FROM FULLERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Temporary Working Easement dated February 23, 1967, wherein FULLERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 a temporary working ease- ment for the purpose of placing dirt, machinery, refuse and other materials and equipment relating to the construction of Rolling Hills Drive Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-1, is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the certain real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the certain permanent Grant of Easement and right of way dated February 23, 1967, wherein FULLERTON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT grants to County Sanitation District No. 2 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con- struction of Rolling Hills Drive Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-1, is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the certain real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. Agenda Item #32 -R- District #2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-29-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 OR ORANGE ... COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and concurred in by the District' s Chief Engineer, that award of con- tract be made to INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, for construction of ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2, and the proposal sub- mitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 2-11-2 be awarded to INDUSTRIAL PIPELINE CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of $ 1614347.05 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 67-14-2 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That the written request of D. K. Moran Construction Company dated March 7, 1967 for rescission of Ito bid for said work in the amount of $128,293.74 be received and ordered filed, and that said request is hereby granted; and, Nft� Section 5. That all bids received for said work, except for the bid of Industrial Pipeline Construction Company, are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks sub- mitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. Agenda Item #33 -S- District #2 ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $154,801.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date March 7, 1967 Contract For: ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID *1. D. K. Moran Construction Co. $128,293.74 610 East Holt Ontario, California **2. Industrial Pipeline Construction Co. $16l,347.05 13801 So. Central Avenue Los Angeles,59, California 3. Far Western Pipeline, Inc. $165,282.4o 6611 Fee Ana Anaheim, California 4. Cook & Barletta, Inc. $170,867.10 542 East Centra' Park Avenue Anaheim, California 5. Lomar Corporation $171,720.00 700 Fifth Street Huntington Beach, California 6. Ecco Contractbrs, "Ind. $177,458.00 7931-Lampson Avenue Garden..Grove, ' California 7. Charles L. McLaughlin $177,468.00 3429 Ocean View Blvd. Glendale, California 8. J. M. Covington Corp. $186,201.00 10114 Shoemaker Avenue Santa Fe Springs, California 9. R. E. Ziebarth & S. B. Alper $187,800.00 21205 Bolsa Street Torrance, California Continued: Agenda Item #33 T-1 District #2 ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $154,801.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date March 7, 1967 Contract For: ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID *1. D. K. Moran Construction Co. $128,293.74 610 East Holt Ontario, California **2. Industrial Pipeline Construction Co. $161,347.05 13801 So. Central Avenue Los Angeles,59, California 3. Far `,,Festern Pipeline, Inc. $165,282.40 6611 Fee Ana Anaheim, California 4. Cook & Barletta , Inc . $170,867.10 542 East Central Park Avenue Anaheim, California 5. Lomar Corporation $171,720.00 700 Fifth Street Huntington Beach, California 6. Ecco Contractbre, -Ind. $177,458.00 7931-Lampson Avenue Garden•.Grove, ' California 7. Charles L. McLaughlin $177,468.00 3429 Ocean View Blvd. Glendale, California 8. J. M. Covington Corp. $186,201 .00 10114 Shoemaker Avenue Santa Fe Springs, California 9. R. E. 2iebarth & S. B. Alper $187,800.00 21205 Bolsa Street Torrance, California Continued. Agenda Item #33 T-1 District #2 10. Dateline Pipe Contracting, Inc. $187,817.00 1231 North Lemon Street Anaheim, California 11. Pascal & Ludwig, Inc . $199,455.00 1500 West Ninth Street Upland, California * See letter requesting that bid be rescinded Page T-3 ** See engineers ' recommendation of award Page T-4 Agenda Item #33 T-2 District-#2 CONCRETE PIPE 610 EAST HOL? EILVD. PIPE LINE CONSTRUCTION IRRIGATION SYSTEMS TRENCHING SEWERS AND STORM DRAINS TELEPHONE YUKON 6.4075 UNDERGROUND AIR DUCTS D. K. MORAN, PREG. D. F. CARAWAY, VICE PREG. R. W. CONNOR. EEC:TREAS. AREA CODE 714 /!��\�g�'p r/� {� rr� {�p p ,A���p p� �y g� 9 TELEPHONE 656 SN 4-7634 ��• d,• 1'V Y`V a 11 Y Co Ii5 i 4 l� 6 V G J Company 0�'LA i Y�Y �"'��'�C�+�•Qti:.'�r_'1'�'D•�:.rCJ�G,r"�...rr..n:.rr�'r�-C�' ..rGCf�rr..�.�-r�..r+.f1�{ GENET NAL Y 1?ZLUI�EZ CONTZACTOU ANYWHERE CONCRETE FOR PERMANENCE ONTARIO, Ott. I: RWIA 7 March 1967 County Sanitation #2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley , California. Re : Contract #2-11-2 Atten: fir . Paul Brown Gentlemen : Due to an error in extension of our bid on the concrete , which amounted to $29 ,600 .00 , we respectively request permission to withdraw our bid . Very Truly yours , D . K . Moran Construction Co . B Dr: xaway.__.._.._... �.._ DrC/br Agenda Item #33 T-3 District #2 J. R. LESTER mid SIDJ\ILY L. LOWLY Coiu:,liing Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE EiNGINEERING LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES 412 South Lyon Street P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana, Calif., 92702 Telephone 547.4471 March 7 , 1967 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Subject: Rolling Hills Pump Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract 2-11-2 Gentlemen: Eleven bids for the subject contract were opened on :larch 6, 1967. A tabulation of these bids is on file. On March 7, 1967 , D. K. Moran rescinded his bid because of an error in preparing it. Mr. Fred Harper, Mr. Paul Brown and I reviewed the work sheets used to compile the bid of D. K. Moran, and it appears an error in concrete extension of $29 ,600 was omitted in his tabulation. We therefore recommend approval of his action in rescinding his bid.' We further -recommend that the contract be awarded to Industrial Pipeline Construction •Co. in the amount of $161, 347. 05 . This bid is approximately 4% above the. Engineer's estimate of $154, 801. 00 . We make the above recommendations subject to concur- rence by the Administrative and Legal Staffs of the District. Very truly yours, J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry Consulting Engineers Milo K. Keith MKK:m I hereby concur in reabovyrecommevni'd at' n. �..✓ March 8, 1967 \., i Chief Engineer Agenda Item #33 T-4 District #2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: Far Western Pipeline, Inc. DATE: March 8. 1967 JOE: Trunk Sew_er�Back Bay Drive to Pacific Coast Highway, Contract 5-13 Amount of this change order (ADD) (R R2) $ 1,0219.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer' s letter of March 1, 1967 and Engineer' s final progress estimate ADD 1. Additional asphalt priming of sand base with 0.50 gallons per square yard of liquid asphalt as directed by engineer $ 400.00 2. Special rock bedding at established Contract price 195 C.Y. @ $4.20/C.Y. 819.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,219.00 Original Contract Price $ 2173370.35 Prev. Authorized Changes none This Change (AM) (DEEM) 1,219.00 Amended Contract Price $ 218,582.35 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF r.. March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY.9 CALIFORNIA By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC. By Agenda Item #42 -U- District ..n#5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Far Western Pipeline, Inc . DATE: March 8, 1967 Trunk Sewer, Back Bay Drive to Pacific JOB: Coast Highway, Contract No . 5-13 Amount of this change order ( ) (DEDUCT) $ 3,760.39 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT Item Change Est 'd. Quant. No. Unit From To 2. L.F. 725 724.66 .34 LF @ $ 23.70/LF $ 8.o6 5. L.F. 200 74 126 LF @ 12.00/LF 1,512.00 6. L.F. 200 0 200 LF @ 13.00/LF 2,600.00 7. Each 2 1 1 EA @ 150.00/EA 150.00 8. Each 1 0 1 EA @ 150.00/EA 150.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $3,760.39 ADD 1. L.F. 4021 4021.32 .32 LF @ $ 45.85/LF $ 14. 67 3. Each 15 16 1 EA @ 645.00/EA 645.00 TOTAL ADD $ 659.67 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $3,760•39 Original Contract Price $ 217,370. 35 Prev. Authorized Changes ADD 1,219.00 This Change ) (DEDUCT) 3,760•39 Amended Contract Price $ 214,828.96 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC. By Aa-enda+Item -V- District #5 RESOLUTION NO. 67-30-5 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-13 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS `a•► OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 5-13 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, FAR WESTERN PIPELINE, INC. , a California corporation has completed the construction in accord- ance with the terms of the contract for the TRUNK SEWER, BACK BAY DRIVE TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 5-13, on the 3rd day of March, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4 . That the construction of the TRUNK SEWER, BACK BAY DRIVE TO PACIFIC COAST HIGHWAY, CONTRACT NO. 5-133 is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 6th day of December 1966; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #44 -W- District #5 COUNTY SAaTITATTON DISTRICTS OF 0..AG2 COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. CONTRACTOR: Cook & Barletta, Inc. DATE: March 8, 1967 JOB: Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction - Job No. 6-6 ti...� Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ none In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor' s letter dated March 2, 1967 and Contract Revision No. 3 EXTENSION OF TIME Weather - Inclement Days November 2 December 7 January 5 Acts of the Districts Conflict with existing contractor constructing Balboa Bay Club apartments limiting access to pump station 1�_ TOTAL 29 Original Completion Date: January 4, 1967 Change Order No . 1 15 calendar days January 19, 1967 Change Order No. 2 7 calendar days January 26 1967 Change Order No. 3 29 calendar days February 24, 1967 Actual completion date: February 24, 1967 Original Contract Price $ 24,058.00 Prev. Authorized Changes ADD 300.00 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) none Amended Contract Price $ 24,358.00 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF March 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By_ ,1s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer COOK & BARLETTA, INC. By Agenda Item #48 -X- District #6 RESOLUTION NO. 67-31-6 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 6-6 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT N0, 6-6 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, COOK AND BARLETTA INC. , a California corporation has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the ROCKY POINT PUMPING STATION RECONSTRUCTION, CONTRACT NO. 6-6, on the 24th day of February, 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction, Contract No. 6-6, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 6th day of October, 1966; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item #49 -Y- District #6 RESOLUTION NO. 67-32-7 APPROVING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE ISTRIC Annexation 13 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Panorama Elemen- tary School Site - Annexation #13) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That application has heretofore been made to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of territory to County Sanitation District No. 7, by means of Resolution No. 67-12-7 filed with said Commission; and, Section 2. That the designation assigned by said Commission to the territory proposed to be annexed is "ANNEXATION NO. 13 - PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE ANNEXATION", the exterior boundaries of which are described on EXHIBIT "A" attached hereto and by reference made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the territory hereinbefore referred to is uninhabited; and, Section 4. That the reason for annexing said territory is to provide public sanitary sewer service to the property of the Orange Unified School District, known as the "Panorama Elementary School"; and, Section 5. That annexation fees in the amount of $1,325 have been received by County Sanitation District No. 7; and, Section 6. That, as authorized by resolution of the Local Agency Formation Commission pursuant to Division 1 (District �..✓ Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California, under the provisions of Government Code Section 56261, the territory hereinbefore referred to and described hereinabove, be and it is hereby ordered annexed to County Sanitation District No. 7. Agenda Item #54 -Z- District No. 7 BOYLE and LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE ENCINEE-11ING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES P. 0. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone 547-4471 February 23, 1967 County Sanitation District No. 7 Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper Gentlemen: County Sanitation District No. 7 Annexations to Seventh Sewer Maintenance District Enclosed are reproducible copies of the legal descriptions and the sketches to accompany the descriptions of the following proposed annexations to the Seventh Sewer Maintenance District. 1 . Prospect 2. El Modena 3. Hewes-Bond 4. Tustin-Fairhaven 5. Arroyo-La Loma Also enclosed are copies of letters from the Local Agency Formation Commission dated January 30, February 6 and February 10, stating that the boundaries of the proposed annexations are reasonably definite and certain. We have sent the legal description and sketch for the Yorba Annexation within the city limits of the city of Tustin to Ben Wheelock for processing by the city of Tustin. County Sanitation District No. 7 by letter from the general manager or by Resolu- tion of the Board of Directors, should now request annexation of the five proposed annexations within county territory. The communication to the Board of Super- visors should state that all of these areas now have operating sewers,and that the sewers cannot be cleaned and maintained by County Sanitation District No. 7 until these areas have been annexed to the Seventh Sewer Maintenance District. It is our understanding that the county of Orange in connection with these annex- ations and the hearing will mail a notice of the hearing to each inhabitant of the territory sought to be annexed. It is also our understanding that the county uses the registered voters address list for such mailings rather than the property owners address list. In connection with a property owners address list, we have already Agenda Item #55 AA-1 District No. T County Sanitation District No. 7 February 23, 1967 Page Two assembled ownership address lists for most of the area within these five annexa- tions utilizing the mailing list for Assessment District No. 6 and can furnish ownership address lists for the rest of the areas. However, since the county says the list is to go to the inhabitants, we will not do anymore work on com- piling a complete property owners address list. Very truly yours, BOYLE and LOWRY Carl A. Carlson, C.E. 6654 PP 41-7635-40-00 Enc. cc: Lowry and Associates \owl r n,7e AA-2 DJ.etrict; Nc�. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour y„r of 8:00 o'clock p.m. , March 8 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Lindsley Parsons (Chairman) , Paul J . Gruber, and David L. Baker Directors absent: None Present: Fred A . Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. _,5 Moved, seconded and duly carried : Adjournment That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 11:00 a .m. March 30 1967, in the Council Chambers , City Hall, Newport Beach, California . Whereupon the Chairman declared the meeting so adjourned at 8:56 p .m. , March 8, 1g67. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of March , 1967. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ^AWVI the official seal of County Sanitation District No- 5 , of Orange County, California, this 8th day of March �96 7• Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 5 Hut,n„ T '� TELEPHONES: �JN a Y SANITATION DISTRICTS . ,�{} � AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA � � 962-2411 " 10.o44 E*LLl9 AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 February 24, 1967 MANAGER' S REPORT TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE The following is an explanation of the various items of bu,liness propose(] to be considered at the March lst meet-ing of the Executive Committee and the Building Committee. Arta.ched to this Manager' s Report are the minutes of z:he ,jc,int; meeting of f.;he Executive Committee and Building Comma i.i;ee on Ja,nllary 18t;h. 1 . Alt('fIITECT]_IRAL WEATMI-,NT FOR PLANT NO. 2 STRUCTURES. Director Clifton Miller was instructed by the Committees to requesi; proposals from several well-known architects for developing an over-all plan for improving the appearance :,f Plant No. 2. D-irector Miller advises that he has con- i;acted three archif;ectural firms, and that representatives from each will be available for discussions with the Committees at the:, March lst meeting. 2. i I)i S'PRIC'.l'S 1 APHtEN`i'ICESHIP PROGRAM. In November, 1966, the ,W Lnt boards authorized the staff to develop an apprentice- ship program, which is scheduled to begin in July. The staff' s Training Committee has now developed what we consider to be a comprehensive program which we would like to outline in detail to the Executive Committee for their comments and suggestions . 3. RECOMMENDATIONS OF CHARLES L. ROBINSON INSURANCE CONSULTANT. The December, 1966 report of Charles L. Robinson, Insurance Consultant, was referred, at the January joint meeting of the Boards, to the Executive Committee for study and final recommendation as to changes to be made in the Districts ' insurance coverages . At the January 18th meeting of the Committee, sufficient information was not available for the Executive Committee to -2- ti.. take any action. The staff: has now prepared a report for the Committee' s consideration, a copy of which is attached. Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH:j b 'MLTATIpy COUNTY ° '` ��SANITATION DISTRICTS TELEPHONERS,. AREA CODE 714 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA o 9 6 2-2 41 1 11 1 IS44 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 9270E February 24, 1967 REPORT OF THE STAFF ON RECOMMENDATIONS OF CriA.RLES L. ROBINSON Insurance Consultant LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Pacific Indemnity Company Policy. Consultant ' s Recommendations 1. When services or purchased equipment are obtained from others, the Districts should continue to require that such must conform to any applicable California Code . In designing Specifications the Districts may addition- ally wish zo require its sources to carry a special form of coverage which could, in effect, protect such sources and '.:_e Districts from liability for some time in the future . That coverage has two names : a) "Products Liacilizy Coverage" when it applies to the design or fabrication of machinery or equipment, or b) "Completed Ope:^atio;,s Coverage" when it applies to construction work. Those coverages of such sources would be available for the Districts to claim against for damages in the event the ^articular piece of equipment fails or if a portion of the specific construction work fails , providing the failure is due -:;o negligence of the source . Some contractors carry such insurance. That will predictably add the cost of the premium of such coverage to each bid price in some cases . But in the event of failure of the property due to supplier' s or contractor' s negligence, the Districts would have an additional party (the insurance company) available to claim against for most, if not all, of the direct expense involved during the .1-mmediate future . Current coverage can be claimed against in future years even though the supplier 'or contractor has ceased operations for any reason . 1. Staffs Recommendation - Not to add the coverage . The contracts for purchase of equipment and construction of facilities include warranties for defective materials and unauthorized work. The materials and equipment called for in the -1- contracts are specified by the Districts ' engineers and, in most cases, are of a known standard or quality. Most of the Districts ' purchases are made from well-known, established companies and when defective equipment is discovered the suppliers readily :Hake the necessary adjust- ment . If this coverage is added to each equipment and construction bid, it will in- crease the bid prices to the Districts, as well as mate bidding more detailed and cum- bersone . Further, it could reduce the number of bidders , thereby decreasing compe- tition. Coverage like this on equipment could tend to let the suppliers "off the hook," in that they might feel t' at the responsibility has been transferred to the insurance company. 2. The "Family Protection" coverage should be deleted from the subject policy, if tha;, has not already been done . And, ideally, the entire $315 premium should be credited to the Districts on the theory that the existence and purpose of .the coverage should have been explained to the Districts by the insurance agent upon delivery, when it would have been declined. 3. In lieu of "Family Protection," , the Districts may wish to cons the purchase of "Medical Payments Coverage" for its seven passenger vehicles . That is a voluntary coverage tha;, t-:ould be available 'Go any non-employee in a Districts ' vehicle in zhe event of injury. The cost per car is reason- able and a limit of $1,000 per person should suffice for most accidents . Voluntary payment of such expense to an occupant frequently forestalls notions of lawsuits depending somewhat', of course , upon the injured occupant . The benefit is paid whether the Districts were liable for the accident or not . 2 and 3. Staff' s Recommendation - Provide $1,000 Medical Payment cbvera e on Class 1.70 Vehicles assen er automobiles at an annual -oremiura cost of $132, and delete uninsured motorist coverage at an annual premium cost of $315 .00. Tree have seven passenger cars at present, but one is being eliminated in March. See "attached letter from Jones-Gillespie In- surance Company, on page A 4. The existence of six monitoring devices utilizing small amounts of -radio-active material probably poses something of a potential problem with respect to the present exposure, -2- i if any, of employees to radiation poisoning, which would be outside of the knowledge of this -office . The duration and frequency of the exposure has been discussed. In spite of supposedly adequate shielding from radio-active material, the Districts may wish to have the present use and exposures of the monitors measured by a proper laboratory in order to establish an independent opinion about the margin or lack of safety which now exists and which could be tolerated by heretofore exposed individuals (employees) in the future ., The "state of the art" in this field does change and -can + easily justify periodic measures of the devices and receipt of new advices from an independent authority from time to time . 4. Staff' s Comment - We are ordering and install- (, rg -oe=.,.anent, devices in each area i of radioactive material usage to detect any 'oossible approach to a limit which might be I cause for a change in our 'Present monitoring "program i We are licensed by -che- State of California for the possess_on of the radioactive density meters . The Orange County Health Department is the local enforcer.ent agency. We. are required to make periodic tests on this equipment to check for any leakage . T:�e shielding on these devices is such that the levels are well below the standards set for a radiation area. 9 training course was conducted by the Orange County radiological personnel to qualify our key people . We have a training session scheduled for our ope-rationa'_ and maintenance personnel which will advise them of normal precautions and also of emergency procedures in event of a major accident involving this equipment . Moving, installation and repairs to the source holders are under the supervision of an out- side concern licensed to do this type of worn. In addition, we also conduct our own independ- ent monitoring at such times . ; . In discussing the customary emergency, repair, and clean- up steps followed by the Districts for ruptured lines , the reported degree of preparedness and relatively efficient procedures .were impressive . One point is suggested: Upon completion of tending or repairing an emergency involving a -rupturred line, alwa. s invite the local Public Health and Welfaxe Office to send a representative to the site for a final inspection and recommendations . This would -relieve the Districts of responsibility for not performing its work satisfacto-r__1y which, in most cases , would have to be -3- ; established if a claimant successfully claimed damages against the Districts . i r..� 5. Staff' s Comment - We have always maintained close liason with the public agencies in an emergency. This practice will be continued . On February 14th we experienced -another break in the Westside Force Main in District No. 3. The County Health Department, the Executive Officer of the Regional Water Pollution Con- ` trol Board, and the State Health officials were notified of the emergency. Since we planned to discharge into a Flood Control channel during the emergency, Orange County Flood Con- trol personnel were also alerted. Following this incident personnel from these same agencies were invited to meet with the staff to discuss the emergency and to visit the site. EXCESS LIABILITY INSURANCE - - Saint Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company Policy. Consultant ' s Recommendations 1. Malp-ractice should be added to conform to the underlying policy. 1. Staff' s Comment - The staff has directed the insurance carrier to add malpractice cover- age to conform to the underlying policy. 2.. Premiums for higher Limits of Liability should be obtained and may be considered by the Districts . The cost of one or more additional increments of $1,000,000 should be small and might justify some increase to the present Limit of Liability. 2. Staff' s Recommendation - In view of the slight additional increase in premium, the staff recommends that the Districts ' lia- bility coverage be increased to at least $2,000,000 . The staff has received the following quota- tions for higher limits of liability (present coverage is $1,000,000) : $2,000,000 - Annual premium increase of $450.00. $5,000,000 - Annual premium increase of $1,125 .00 . See letter on page B -4- PROPERTY INSURANCE (Fire, Extended Coverage and Vandalism) - - Empire Insurance Company Policy. Consultant ' s Recommendations 1. Insure all Districts ' properties at both plants, and else- where if above grade level, for Fire, Extended Coverage, and Vandalism & Malicious Mischief. 2. Amount of insurance should not exceed 90% of the combined gross values (not depreciated) of both plants and adjacent structures, and probably not in excess of $1,000,000. 3. Coverage to be on a $1,000 deductible, replacement cost, agreed amount, blanket basis without an average clause and Without. property being necessarily scheduled on the policy. New properties to be covered automatically and those exceed- ing �50,000 each to be -reported within 60 days . 4. Three or five year policy with equal, flat annual premiums . 5 . Difference of Conditions coverage, as a separate part of the foregoing, in effect for $100' 000 to apply as All-Risk Cover for all contents of Districts ' structures . Rate should be attractive . 6 . yi-re rate for items 1 thru 4 not to exceed $ .13 per $100 value . 1 through 6 . Staff Recommendation - That ,,..c- insurance Consultant be employed to prepare specifications and outline bidding procedures for acquisition of the neces- sary property insurance coverage . At the Insurance Consultant' s suggestion, the staff forwarded a copy of his recommenda- tions regarding this coverage to the Empire Insurance Company. That company advised us that they are unable to provide property insurance coverage as outlined in the Con- sultant' s recommendations . 3011JER AND MACHINERY INSURANCE - - The Travelers Indemnity Company Policy. Consultant' s Recommendations 1. The Districts might wish to consider the advisability of in- suring on a Replacement Cost basis . That would avoid contro- versy, in the event of a loss, in determining the amount for depreciation that must be deducted on an Actual Cash Value settlement basis for depreciation . Further it would avoid the need for the Districts " to find" money unexpectedly for the amount of the depreciation, once agreed to, that would be deducted from the insurance company payment of loss . That amount of depreciation on a costly piece of equipment over 5 years of age, or older, could be sizeable what with -5- inflation of values in recent years . l. ' Staff' s Recommendation - Amend the �.d Districts ' current Boiler & Machinery insurance policy to provide for pay- ment of loss on Replacement Cost basis . The increase in annual premium will be $209 .00, as shown in the attached letter. . See page C WORIUv N' S COMPENSATION INSURANCE - - State Compensation Insurance Fund Policy. Consultant' s Comment 1. Excepting for continuous improvement in Accident .Prevention., there is not too much the Districts can do about this form of coverage . 1. Staff' s Comment - The Districts have an active and aggressive Safety Program which is supervised by a competent Safety Committee of Districts Super- visory personnel. PUBLIC: EMPLOYEES BLANKET BOND - - Fidelity and Deposit- Company Policy. Consultant' s Comment 1. Coverage should suffice and is recommended. 1. Staff Recommendation - None . UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES Consultant ' s Comments Some exposures exist which have not been mentioned on the preceding pages, and they are cited for the purpose of in- formation even though their probabilities may vary consider- ably. Explosion of the by-product of gas may be a possibility about which the Districts ' engineers are knowledgeable . Operators of some sewage treatment plants have been encountered with this fear. It could be insured, although the constant cur- rents of winds at both plants might well make such coverage ostensibly unnecessary. Flood Damage is quite difficult to insure against, particu- larly in the wide-spread and varying terrain of the Districts . Its ,cost would probably be excessive in terms of the limited exposure of a submerged collection system up to this time . Use and Occupancy insurance was mentioned in my report as -6- having doubtful value in expediting restoration of property after a loss . Theoretically, after a plant is damaged the volume of material to be processed would continue at about �..d its usual rate, and could reportedly be disposed of currently if the plants were operating at 50% capacity except for a few hours per day. Additional insurance money could not alter either feature, nor could any process be contracted to another. Earthquake insurance is available at tolerable cost. How- ever, all surface structures of importance of the Districts have a favorable ratio of length-width vs . height which, in the past, have successfully withstood earthquake forces with only minor damage . UNINSURED PERILS AND EXPOSURES -- Staff' s Recommendation - That these items be in- cluded in the bid specifications for the property damage coverage . After the pre- mium charges are known, a determination can be made -'as to whether the Districts should insure against_ any one , or all,, of the perils listed . In the event the staff' s recommendation on property insurance is accepted, and the Insurance Consultant is employed to prepare bid specifications , we recommend that in- surance rates be obtained at the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by requesting them in our specifications . The staff contacted several insurance brokers to obtain, insurance rates on the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" as out- lined in the Insurance Consultant' s December report, and in each case we were asked for detailed information concerning our facilities and our present insurance coverages . When we encountered this situation, we contacted Mr. Robinson, the insurance Consultant, and he submitted the attached letter, commenting on the Districts ' uninsured perils and _exposures . See page D ;�a. e FREE) E. GOPPERT O, K. JONES y PREWDENT J O N E S - G I L L E S P I E. 1 N C VNOiRWRITINO MANAO[R A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE ' r H.VicE PREOIDENT YOy FIFTH STREET F. RAMPTON POST OFFICE BOX 271 :y..: man.IttALReunPxPT. i•` PRANCES L.JONES PHONe 530.2531 s ` t•� . . •. SECRETARY•TAKAOURER HUNTINGTON BEACH, CALIFORNIA 92640 January 27, 1967 Cou::ty Sanitation Districts of Orange. Co. 5 1O844 Ellis Avenue Fountaln Valley, California _ Attention: Mr. Fred Harper General Manager Dear Mr. Harper: in reply to your request for a quotation for medical payments on your automotive equipment in lieu of the uninsured motorists coverage now carried by the Districts, I am pleased to submit the following quota- tions. To provide $1,000.00 medical coverage on the Districts vehicles would be broken down into the following categories: Class 6 vehicles as shown on the present schedule -- $14.00 ' • ,:. .i ... ' per vehicle i Class CA5 vehicles -- $21.00 per vehicle ' Class 1.70 vehicles -- $22.00 per vehicle Our present schedule shows 23 Class 6 vehicles, 29 Class CA5 vehicles and 7 Class 1.70 vehicles, which is your private passenger automobiles. Proectin- this out, this would be a premium on the Class 6 vehicles of _322.00, or, the Class CA vehicles $609.009 and on the Class 1.70 private passenger vehicles' 154.00. The uninsured motorists coverage represents a premium of $315.00 per year. Perhaps the Sanitation Districts would only desire to place this medical coverage on certain types of vehicles and waive the uninsured motorists coverage. . I will be happy to meet with you and your co::::,I ttee for further explanation. , NOTE: Class 1.70 - Passenger automobiles Cass 6 - Pickup trucks Class CA - Large, 112 ton trucks _A_ �.. , . i h.• " ;cY ' this lnforaation is what .you require. and I am awaiting your << t T,usti..£� il.struations. ,� J . `!+_• , ' Yours very truly, 1 "x , „. I , , JONES GILLES +w T,'..:•1;1y,: ',' . 1 . ;'j: . .. ' i ... - } , �' . '•f ' !In I ,.. .l . I.•t r t : t t' f . .j f K.. _ * J J• f c . ..• ,. . t •1 i,. J. -•r- .'L iJ t .1 •i. at! •�f 1 ..: ^:�•••II - ..:�i. 1 -y .. { A ice. t ! ., 1 .rr • J l r` '{ 1 •} e t •J:.t •i 4 .1 E µ` j' . . . • :i .i, 1 1 r I, 4;t r • Y- , '1' . 1 r:..•, ° .t K ,: It i f n :' i 1 1 ` 5 ';:`i`;' t i :, :, . , . . {' n: ;'fit;.,..!. .' `. '7 t,J t. . . t �A_ . . ' PREGIOENT j 1 Y O N E S- G I L L E S P ' S, I N C• FAED E. GOPPEAT 1 !' N ,'�.!• •�' UNDEAWRITING MANAGER A. C. GILLESPIE INSURANCE AND REAL ESTATE r �' NT EOV FIFTH STREET •','�'::• •. H•its AAMPTON '+ • POST OFFICE 80X 271 PNDN4 d30.2d31 ' • - "� ','; •''t• MOR.REAL EYTATi DE!? Vicr rAEGIDE .• a ECR¢TART•TR FAGU NCR HUNTINGTON ULACH, CALIFORNIA 02040 i�' ' January , 7' County Sanitation Districts of Orange Co•,' 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, -California • '> .' ` ' Attention: Mr. Fred harper General Manager Dear ►:r. Harper: In answer to your request for a quotation to increase the ' limits under the Sanitation Districts umbrella policy, I am pleased to make the following quotation. To increase the limits of the 'St. Paul Fire and Marine policy ? 566XV718 from the present VA1,000,000 limit to a $2,000,000 z _ limit, the annual premium would be $19628.00, or an annual i increase of $450.00. To increase the present limit to ' 5,000,000, the annual premium would be $2,303.00, or an In- crease over the present policy of $1,125.00. St. Paul Fire and Marine has informed me that they do not { care to quote above the $5,000,000 limit and in order to get limits above 559 000,000 it would be necessary for me to go to' } another excess market for a quotation. If you or your board feel this is advisable please let me know and I kill pursue this further. +. Yours very truly9 JONF,S-GILLS PI , INC. Dave K o DXJ:sh- I . —B— insurance for I;verY Need f ge�C� 5B3 WEST 19TH sTREOR IA 92637'. • ,1 ' 9t�)t 366 ,'I;;FI 'r''' t;OBTA ME5Ar C�►1.If 3 _ pHaNg 5 f '"�r ` r ebrua�'Y 3 g 1967 . 7 t t •L t,4 •, , t t '� . .• ! .' + t,., ,r..I{tit••' ,y1 � ' .1 •. 1. • .7•if. • t tFred $arpexs General.a a of Orange Countfs ° Sanitatlon Distr9. t Co'un,Jy 51759 C� Box Val�eys Calif. .R.�.; 1 Four.gain Policy BM-2��anCe coo i Dear Fr ed g have"lets j ofpZ acement Cost Coverage �, your question ir, r 6piy ° roe above Po1i cY° ishea With Gn in 02' covexage can be 209�Q I �tu.s 4YIp Payment of w and the . the knnual prem�. ton the present PolicY 11967 ..:t i u1d b an endorsenen ate basis to Ju7Y finis wo uld be an a pro-r t first payment wo Ya,n's trulY9 + C. M. ( •• ` I�: ''i '.11 ••,• fill • • • . .. ,'t• '. '•'1'eft t .{ lit _ � ' '. F•sroevnre 1 CIIA.RLES L. R013INSON ' r xANAOF.MENT BERVIOEBI INSURANCE CONSULTANT. •: -% .�`i'.',•- INOVAAHCADarAnTmnxzYVN(mor .. Sr.LY IFOUnANOn RVALVASION Or DIDO STAYr IxOVAANcm Awnaon Ioa ADu:xleanArcox NATIONAL OIL DAILDINO ' AnD Aoc000vNrtxo • 8Arrr[PROGRAMS 000 SOUTH OnAND AVENtM LOS ANOELESI CALIFORNIA 90017 �✓ r (218) 625.1011 i February21 1967 } Mr. Fred A. Harper ' General Manager County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Dear. Mr. Harper: This will comment upon the "Uninsured Perils and Exposures" sec-. i tion of our Report . of Survey. Your Board quite properly wishes { to evaluate each item as to: 1) Estimated degree of risk; and 2) Cost to insure such risk. Since you tentatively are considering, inviting competitive bids on your property insurance, you could obtain insurance rates at the same time for the uninsured perils and exposures by request- ing them in your Specifications. The bidders would respond with quotations and the Board could then decide to insure some, all or .'. none of the latter. Many of" the coverages could be endorsed to your property insurance policy. St may be helpful to your Board if a capsule opinion was now ven- tured for each uninsured peril, bearing in mind that our crystal ball is apt to be as opaque as the next one about future perils and exposures: Exalosion - Estimated Maximum Loss could be extensive at any one loMlon; but probability will vary depending upon dissipation of gases by natural wind forces. Insurance cost should be toler- able with receptive markets. Flood: insurance probably not 'available at bearable cost. Use and Gccupan�: This can pay for loss of profit and continu- ing expense w �c could not be earned after a loss, for extra expense incurred for operations after a loss, for cost of sub- contracting your services to another, and for exceptional expe- diting expense ( such as shipping components by air instead of by surface) , etc. The need for such insurance may not be uncom- �o^table yet, but as your daily volume increases, some future ' insurance of this type may become indicated. Markets are recep- tive.. • Earthquake: Estimated Maximum Loss to plants, equipment and sys- tems could be severe if the force of the earthquake were intense. -D- . CHARLES I- ROBINSON •i INSURANCE CONSULTANT : Mr. Fred A. Harper Page two �• . February 21, 1967 However, as our Report stated: "All surface structures of the Districts of -importance have a favorable ratio of length-width vs. height which, in the past, has successfully withstood earth- quake forces (up to moderate) with only minor damage" . At least three uncertainly located faults are thought to penetrate or bisect the aggregate areas of your Districts. Coverage is writ ten on a percentage deductible ( 2 to 10%) of total va14� of all properties at the time of the loss. Insurance markets are mo- derately -receptive at this time, but tend to fluctutate. The I cost to insure against damage by Tidal Wave should probably be obtained at the same time with respect to Plant 2• Exposure is moderate or greater; probability is, of course, unknown. The epicenter of the Long Beach Earthquake of March 10, 1933 is reputed to be located about 2 3/4 mites offshore of Newport Beach and about 32 miles south of the mouth of the Santa Ana River. •� 1 shall be pleased to be available to you or to your Board - to. .. ...,. explore these points, . if desired. Respectfully submitted CLR:hwh ''� Charles L. Robinson Insurance Consultant ' -D- MILLER,NISSON & K,OGLER CLARK MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW TELEPHONE C.ARTHUR NISSON 2014 NORTH BROADWAY 542-0771 NELSON KOGLER SANTA ANA,CALIFOKNIA 92706 February 27 , 1967 Mr. Fred Harper County Sanitation Districts of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Dear Fred: I have reviewed your staff report relating to the report of the insurance consultant. I wish to state that in my opinion your staff report is correct in all respects and well prepared. It should be sufficient to proceed on as .recommended without further delay. I know of no insurance risks which are not considered and I would recommend no additional or other action other than that set forth in the staff report. Yours very truly, C. Arthur Nisson CAN:mi j BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. 1 7 IIAGENDA (1) Roll Call (2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to open bids received for Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11 (�) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion referring bids for Job No. P2-11 to the staff and engineers for tabulation and recommendation (7) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-25-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Site Improvements - Phase II at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2 to R. J. Noble Company in the total amount of $7,680.30. See page "A" (See page "B" for bid 'tabulation) . (8) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received for Job No. P1-12-3 (Fence and Entrance Revisions at Plant No. 1) , as recommended by the staff. See page "C" for bid tabulation 19) D1 STRI CT 7 ,(. Consideration of "Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers" ' Report prepared by Boyle and Lowry (If the report is approved as submitted, the Board s;lould *adopt a resolution setting date for public hearing) . (10) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and concurring in award of Contract No. 7-2C (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer) , to Far Western Pipeline, Inc . , in the total amount of $725184. 25. (Bid tabulation in folders) -� (11) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file written recommendation of the staff; and authorizing the Utaff to proceed with the discussions with Irvine Ranch Water District concerning development of a Master Plana for sewering the area, and the use of District 7 waste water for water reclamation purposes. See page "D" for staff recommendation. l j' (12) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Other business and communications, if any (13) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment �.d (14) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment RESOLUTION NO. 67-25-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-8-2 `mod A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB N0. P2-8-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Construction Engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY for SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-8-2 is hereby awarded to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY in the total amount of 7 680. 0, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor on February 28, 1967; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 67-9 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work ti..d are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid- ders . Agenda-Item N.o. .5 -A- District No. .1 ENGINEERV ESTIMATE $83500.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date February 28, 1967 Contract For: SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. R. J. Noble Company $. 7,680.30 P. 0. Box 620 Orange, California 2. Griffith Company 8,633. 60 P. 0. Box 395 Costa Mesa, California 3. R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc. 93155.92 151 Commercial Way Costa Mesa, California 4. Goode, Schroeder, Inc . %510.14 3036 Treadwell Street Los Angeles, California 5. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 103272.70 P. 0. Box 432 Orange, California 6. John W. Tiedemann Co . 105754•64 13827 East Tedemory Drive Whittier, California 7. Yoder & Sons 10,875. 66 7890' Alhambra Huntington Beach, California 8. Stanford Trunk & Paving Service 13,357.55 6761 Stanton Avenue Buena Park, California A _B_ District No . 1 Agenda Item No. 5 ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $2,006.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date February 28, 1967 Contract For: MISCELLANEOUS FENCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-12-3 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Crown Fence & Supply Co. , Ltd. $3,088.00 922 East 4th Street, Santa Santa Ana, California 2. Star D Iron Works, Inc. 4,638.00 16951 Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana, California 3. Brown' s Ornamental Iron, Inc. No Bid 3526 W. Westminster Avenue Santa Ana, California Azenda Item No. 8 -C- District No. 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS �; Fi , AREAECODE 714 $ S40-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA oa 9 6 2-241 1 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 \""' March 1, 1967 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California On February 17th, at•. the request of Irvine Ranch Water District personnel, I met with their representatives to discuss the sewering of the Irvine Ranch Area southeast . of the District' s boundary, from the San Diego Freeway to Irvine Boulevard. The Irvine interests wish to develop a Master Plan for sewering this area, which is in the Irvine Ranch Water District. They are also interested in acquiring suitable waste water for water reclamation purposes . Our discussion was very preliminary, as we were attempting to determine whether the two entities had any common areas of interest. The sewage flows in District No. 7 increased 45% last year, and at the present time the flows in District No. 7 exceed the flows in either Districts 5 or 6. All this has occurred since 1963. The District ' s Red Hill Trunk will soon be utilized to its designed capacity. We have made some preliminary samplings of the discharge in the Red Hill Trunk, in the vicinity of the Marine Corps Air Facility, and the quality of this waste water appears to be suitable for water reclamation. The Irvine Ranch Water District ' representatives would like to investigate, with us, the feasibility of utilizing facilities owned by both Districts in developing a Master Plan for sewering the above-mentioned area on the Irvine Ranch. It is the staff' s recommendation that further discussions be held with Irvine Ranch Water District representatives, as there appear to be far-reaching benefits possible for both entities . Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH:jb Agenda Item No . 11 -D- District No. 7 1 � III I ROLL CALL District r Regular Adjourned i Date - / (. Time JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey ✓ McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter � Bousman Davis Baker Featherly,/; Bowen Noe Crapo Shull DIST T 2 Culver Parks Hileman Forgit Gruber Crapo Shull Furman Bouma Culver Gruber Forgit Harvey McMichael Gummere Anderson Hock Michel Hock Michel Schutte Krein Long Brown Schwerdtfeger Harwood Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Baker Featherly Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Harwood Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bower, Noe Coen Crapo Shull Walters Herbst Culver Workman Furman Bouma Baker Featherly Gummerre Anderson Harvey McMichael Long Brown Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein OTHERS: Schwerdtfeger Fregeau Stewart Green Brown ✓ Walters Herbst Nisson Baker Featherly Galloway Tremblay �- DISTRICT 5 Lowry Parsons Carlson Gruber Forgit Rimel Baker Featherly Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter ✓rl� Gruber Forgit cJ, Baker Featherly DISTRICT 7 \/Miller, Clifton. Mack .� `- t Gruber LZ'arvey McMichael ,Parks Hileman Q Imo er - - ' korr ►���c ken � Featherly C o DISTRICT d ..r Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Baker Featherly Baker Featherly BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Change County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. IIAGENDA ow (1) Roll Call (2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (3) e General Mana r (4) RPnprt of th��e el (5) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to open bids received for Headworks "C" at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-11 (6) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion referring bids for Job No. P2-11 to the staff and engineers for tabulation rj- and recommendation (7) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-25-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Site Improvements - Phase III at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2 to R. J. Noble Comany in the total amount of `�7,680.30. See page "Al' ' Ale- (See page "B" for bid tabulation) . (8) DISTRICT l Consideration of motion rejecting all bids received for Job No. P1-12-3 (Fence and Entrance Revisions at Plant No. 1) , as recommended by the staff. See page "C" for bid tabulation 9) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of "Master Plan of Subtrunk Sewers" Report prepared by Boyle and Lowry %." ! Z (If the report is approved as submitted, the Board fo should 'adopt a resolution setting date for public hearing) . (10) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and concurring in award�� of Contract No. 7-2C (Lane Road Subtrunk Sewer) , to Far Western Pipeline., Inc . , in the total amount of $723184. 25. (Bid tabulation in folders) •.. (11) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to approve, receive and file (� ( written recommendation of the staff; and authorizing the staff to proceed with the discussions with Irvine 1 ' Ranch Water District concerning development of a Master Plan for sewering the area, and the use of District 7 waste water fox, water reclamation purposes. See page "D" for staff recommendation. (12) DISTRICTS 1 Ott siness and ' ommuni 'ozT�any (13) DISTRICT 1 d Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (14) DISTRICT 7 _ Consideration of motion re: Adjournment � � � RESOLUTION NO. 67-25-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-8-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 23 JOB NO. P2-8-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts ' Construction Engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY for SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 23 JOB NO. P2-8-2, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P2-8-2 is hereby awarded to R. J. NOBLE COMPANY in the total amount of $7 680.30, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor on February 28, 1967; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 67-9 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4 . That all other bids received for said work ti..t are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid- ders . Agenda Item No. 5 -A- District No. 1 ENGINEERS' ESTIMATE $8,500.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date February 28, 1967 Contract For: SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 21 JOB NO. P2-8-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. R. J. Noble Company $: 7,680.30 P. 0. Box 620 Orange, California 2. Griffith Company 8,633. 60 P. 0. Box 395 Costa Mesa, California 3. R. W. McClellan & Sons, Inc. 9,155. 92 151 Commercial Way Costa Mesa, California 4. Goode, Schroeder, Inc . 93510.14 3036 Treadwell Street Los Angeles, California 5. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. 10,272.70 P. 0. Box 432 Orange, California 6. John W. Tiedemann Co . 105754.64 13827 East Tedemory Drive Whittier, California 7. Yoder & Sons -, 10,875. 66 7890' Alhambra Huntington Beach, California 8. Stanford Trunk & Paving Service 13,357.55 6761 Stanton Avenue Buena Park, California �d _B_ District No. 1 P.genda Item No . 5 _ ENGINEERS ' ESTIMATE $2,000.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date February 28, 1967 Contract For: MISCELLANEOUS FENCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1 JOB NO. P1-12-3 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Crown Fence & Supply Co . , Ltd. $3,088.00 922 East 4th Street, Santa Santa Ana, California 2. Star D Iron Works, Inc . 4,638.00 16951 Harbor Blvd. Santa Ana, California 3. Brown' s Ornamental Iron, Inc . No Bid 3526 W. Westminster Avenue Santa Ana, California Agenda Item No. 8 -C- District No . 1 -0� COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS AREA CODE 714 a 540-291❑ Or ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-2 41 1 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P. O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92708 March 1, 1967 Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California On February 17th, at- the request of Irvine Ranch Water District personnel, I met with their representatives to discuss the sewering of the Irvine Ranch Area southeast of the District' s boundary, from the San Diego Freeway to Irvine Boulevard. The Irvine interests wish to develop a Master Plan for sewering this area, which is in the Irvine Ranch Water District. They are also interested in acquiring suitable waste water for water reclamation purposes . Our discussion was very preliminary, as we were attempting to determine whether the two entities had any common areas of interest. The sewage flows in District No. 7 increased 45% last year, and at the present time the flows in District No. 7 exceed ;,he flows in either Districts 5 or 6. All this has occurred since 1963. The District' s Red Hill Trunk will soon be utilized to its designed capacity. We have made some preliminary samplings of the discharge in the Red Hill Trunk, in the vicinity of the Marine Corps Air Facility, and the quality of this waste water appears to be suitable -or water reclamation. The Irvine Ranch Water District representatives would like to investigate, with us, the feasibility of utilizing facilities owned by both Districts in developing a Master Plan for sewering the above-mentioned area on the Irvine Ranch. It is the staff' s recommendation that further discussions be held with Irvine Ranch Water District representatives, as there appear to be far-reaching benefits possible for both entities . Q. Fred A. Harper General Manager FAH:jb Agenda Item No . 11 -D- District No . 7