Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1967-02 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS TE A CODN7 4 AREA DE 74 540-2910 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 9 6 2-241 10844 ELLIS AVENUE, P.O. BOX 5175, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA, 92706 February 17, 1967 NOTICE OF SPECIAL MEETING DISTRICT NO. 3 Thursday, February 23, 1967 - 7:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: I am calling a special meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 at the above hour and date. The purpose of this meeting is to consider the repair and/or replacement of the Westside Force Main Sewer. Ls/ Thomas 0. Speer Chairman I� MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaliF.,92708 DISTRICT No3 Phone 962-2411 . February 17, 1967 SPECIAL MEETING Thursday, February 23, 1967 7:00 P.M. The following is the only subject planned for consideration at this special meeting. REPORT OF ENGINEERS AND STAFF ON REPAIR AND/OR REPLACEMENT OF WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN SEWER: At the regular meeting on February 8, this matter was an agenda item under which a comprehensive report from the engineers concerning their investigation into the repair of this force main was received and filed. Since the February 8 meeting another rupture in the force main has occurred (February 14) resulting in another repair job. This last incident has changed to some extent our thinking and timing on this whole subject . Therefore, we have asked the engineers to present their recommendations in a complete verbal package at this special meeting in order than any course of action decided upon can be instituted without further delay. At this time we are unable to state with certainty what the recommendations of the engineers and staff will be, although it appears that there is a good possibility that the best ultimate solution to the recurring problems in this force main is the elimination of that portion of it east of Bolsa Chica Road by a parallel gravity sewer. This construction project would obviously cost considerably more than replacing the existing force main in this stretch but it does have definite advantages which will be brought out at the meeting. We anticipate that the formal agenda for the meeting will include several items embodying the recommendations of the engineers and ourselves towards a permanent solution to this problem. Fred A. Harper General Manager I February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY per✓ PLAN A General: Replace existing 20-inch Westside Force Main between 104+00+ and 114+50±, approximately 1150 feet. This is area of first rupture and is located on west side of Garden Grove-San Diego Freeway interchange complex. Construct new 39-inch gravity sewer from Garden Grove-San Diego Freeway interchange along Garden Grove Boulevard to Mi I ler-Holder Trunk , at Seneca Drive, approx- imately 5700 feet in length. Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 10.1 MGD Twenty-inch Westside Force Main Capacity = 10.1 MGD (7000 gpm) Thirty-nine-inch Gravity Sewer Capacity = 14.6 MGD Construction Costs: 1 . Replace existing 20-inch force main between 104+00± and 114+50± . $ 30,000 2. Construct 39-inch gravity sewer. 222,000 TOTAL $252,000 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 3.81 u February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY PLAN B General: Replace existing 20-inch Westside Force Main from Westside Pumping Station to Garden Grove-San Diego Freeway interchange area with new 24-inch force main, approximately 12,300 feet in length. Construct 39-inch gravity sewer from inter- change area along Garden Grove Boulevard to Miller-Holder Trunk at Seneca Drive, approximately 5700 feet in length. Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 14.0 MGD Twenty-Four-inch Westside Force Main Capacity = 14.0 MGD (9500 gpm) Thirty-nine-inch Gravity Sewer Capacity = 14.6 MGD Construction Costs: 1 . Construct new 24-inch force main. $314,000 2. Construct 39-inch gravity sewer. 222,000 TOTAL $536,000 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 8.0s� February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY PLAN C General: Replace existing 20-inch Westside Force Main between Westside Pumping Station and Miller-Holder Trunk at Seneca Drive with new 27-inch force main. New force main to parallel existing force main alignment, approximately 18,000 feet in length. ' Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 14.0 MGD Twenty-seven-inch Westside Force Main Capacity = 14.0 MGD (9500 gpm) Constructions Costs: 1 . Construct new 27-inch force main. $458,000 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 6.8� ��J February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY PLAN D General: Replace existing 20-inch Westside Force Main between Westside Pumping Station and Miller-Holder Trunk via Lampson Avenue with new 27-inch force main. Miller- Holder Trunk to operate under submerged conditions at maximum flow between Lampson Avenue and Garden Grove Boulevard. Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 14.0 MGD Twenty-seven-inch Westside Force Main Capacity = 14.0 MGD (9500 gpm) Construction Costs: 1 . • Construct new 27-inch force main. $391 ,300 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 5.8� February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY PLAN E General: Construct new 26-inch force main from Westside Pumping Station to Blackmer Street via Lampson Avenue, approximately 14,500 feet and 39-inch gravity sewer from Blackmer Street to Miller-Holder Trunk via Lampson Avenue, approximately 4700 feet in length. Mi I ler-Holder Trunk to flow submerged from Lampson to ' Garden Grove Boulevard. Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 14.0 MGD Twenty-six-inch Force Main Capacity = 14.0 MGD (9500 gpm) Thirty-nine-inch Gravity Sewer Capacity = 14.6 (MGD) Construction Costs: 1 . Twenty-six-inch force main. $292,000 2. Thirty-nine-inch gravity sewer. 189,000 TOTAL $481 ,000 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 7.21i / y7t. 7) February 23, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY ,../ PLAN F General: Make permanent repairs to existing 20-inch Westside Force Main between 104+00± and 114+50f (1150 feet), and between 136+00+ and 145+00± (900 feet). Install air release line at 127+40. Data: Westside Pumping Station Capacity = 8.7 MGD Westside Force Main Capacity = 8.7 MGD (6000 gpm) Construction Costs: 1 . Complete replacement between 104+00± and 114+50. $30,000 2. Installation of air release line at 127+40. 2,500 3. Complete replacement between 136+00+ and 145+00±. 15,000 TOTAL $47,500 Estimated increase in 1967-68 tax rate to raise this amount 0.71 � � If 9 - BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaliF., 92708 DISTRICT NO. 3 IIAGENDA February 23, 1967 at 6:00 p.m. (1) Roll Call ,2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager Report of the engineers on various possible alternate plans for repair and/or replacement of the existing Westside Force Main (5) Report of the staff on financial impact of various alternate plans proposed (o) • Consideration of actions necessary if a plan is selected and approved (7) Adjournment z•�3-G� 37 76 - / -7 F y 7 of 1 76v — 3o o -7 yz3-7 Ali 6-%"S -,i 1997-617 I� 1 —67 67 633�670 704-779017 At& 1 6 76 490 oo u I ' I i i $7 ROLL CALL District R4gg;rlar // Adjourned ! Dat e �� Time (O I JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 ! H. McMichael rvey Mc ichael M ller, Clifto Ma .3a Lie zt P ter Davis Ba er Fea herly EcU,en Noe Crapo Shull DI TRICT 2 Culver Pa ks Hil man �'oroit Gruber Cr o Shu 1 Fur:,,-,an Bouma Cul er Griner Forgit Har ey cM chael Gu:r:..ere Anderson Hoc 'cliel Michel Sch tte K e n Brown Schw rdt eger H od er, Clifton Mack Spee Cl r Harry Kohl Walt s He b t Hileman Workm "-Da-1-sons Baker Feat erly ?otter c utte Krein DISTRICT 3 Scrtiaerdtf eger Harwood Speer Clark Fregeau Amo ✓ S-0eer Clark Bousman ,/ Davis S�a:.art Green Bowen Noe Coen -Crapo ✓ Shull :alters Herbst Culver 4/ Furman ,✓ Bouma Ba:ti r Featherl Gummere ✓� Anderson Harvey McMichael Long Brown Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte ate- Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau / - Stewart Green _ ..::r ✓ ,, Walters ✓ Herbst �ViSSOn ✓ ' Baker ,l Featherly Gal10 "ay �- _ ------- -- �" Tremt lay �— DISTR - lo;:_•,r ✓ P rsons Ca o-n G uber Forgi ci.1�1 B ker Feath rly a-1dox e'3� „,�(�n Pter DIS ICT 6 Gruber Forgit BaKer Feathe ly r, 1 D STRICT 7 kw� Mi let, C1' ton Mack Fo git Gruber Ha vey McMicha 1 Pa ks ilema Po ter B e r athe ly DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne St wa t Coe Michell Ba t ett Ba::er Featherly Ba Feat rly 2-23-67 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 SUGGESTED ACTIONS IN THE EVENT PLAN 'Y' IS SELECTED 1. Motion authorizing engineers to prepare preliminary engineering report evaluating various alternates for ultimate sewerage of District 2. Motion authorizing staff to take informal bids on replacement pipe necessary, and to purchase said ipe as soon as possible, without regard to the 2,000 limitation in Resolution No. f386 3. Motion authorizing the General Manager to proceed with the repair of existing force main in accordance with Plan 'Y' by use of District ' s forces and rental equipment as expeditiously as possible and without regard to the $2,000 limitation in Resolution No . 286. 4. Motion authorizing establishment of reserve fund in 1967-68 Capital Outlay Budget for facilities shown by engineering studies to be needed in the next five years . 2-23-67 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 v.d SUGGESTED ACTIONS IN THE EVENT PLAN "F" IS SELECTED 1. Motion authorizing engineers to prepare preliminary engineering report evaluating various alternates for ultimate sewerage of District 2. Motion authorizing staff to take informal bids on replacement pipe necessary, and to purchase said ipe as soon as' possible, without regard to the 2,000 limitation in Resolution No. 86 3: otion authorizing the General Manager to proceed ith the repair of existing force main in accordance with Plan "F" by use of District ' s forces and rental equipment as expeditiously as possible and without regard to the $2,000 limitation in Resolution No . 286. �+. Motion authorizing establishment of reserve fund in 1967-68 Capital Outlay Budget for facilities shown by engineering studies to be needed in the next five years . �'r MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708 Phone 962-2411 JOINT BOARDS February 3, 1967 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday February 8, 1967 6: 00 P.M. Attached to this report are two items of general interest to the Directors: (1) a copy of the section of the 1966 Grand Jury Report relating to the Sanitation Districts, and (2) a copy of a letter dated January 17, 1957 from the League of Women Voters of Orange Coast . Roth are rather complimentary to the Districts ' operations in contrast to the somewhat derogatory report of the 1965 Grand Jury. The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 13 - REPORT OF GENERAL MANAGER: Under this item, for the past several months we have presented a speaker from our staff or con- sultants . However in view of the length of the agenda and the possibility that there may be considerable discussion on several of the items, we are planning to dispense with a speaker for this meeting. Nos . 14 through 16 - REPORT OF THE GENERAL COUNSEL: Mr. Nisson has advised us that he will have a report and recommendation on two matters: (1) Approval of final settlement in a recent condemnation suit to acquire an additional 20 acres adjacent to Plant No. 1, and (2) Recovery of price-fixing damages by the Districts for past chlorine purchases . A letter from the General Counsel containing his report and recommendations on the second matter (Item No . 16) is included with the accompanying agenda material. No . 17 - AWARD OF PLANT JOB NO. P1-12-2: This project was described in the January Manager ' s Report and involves miscellaneous additional paving at Plant No . 1. Bids were taken by the staff on February 1 and it will be recommended that the award be made to Sully Miller Company of Orange at its low bid of $17,873. A bid tabulation and the formal resolution of award is included with the accompanying agenda material. No . 18 _ APPROVAL OF ADDENDUM NO. 1, PLANT JOB NO. P2-11: This plant projeproject, now out for bid as authorized at the December meeting, is ct, "C" - Plant No . 2" . Bids will be received by the Board of District No . 1 on March 1. The project has been described in detail in former Manager ' s Reports and is attracting an unprecedented number of bidders (approximately 22) . As usual in a job of this size and complexity, involving extensive mechanical and specialty work, bidders reviewing the plans have called to our attention a number of items which should be clarified. Only one of these, involving a change in the specifications, at the manufacturer ' s request, of the plastic protective liner to be installed in areas exposed to corrosive gases, may affect the cost of the project in any appreciable amount . In fact, it is doubtful whether the change in liner specifications will result in any change in cost if state- ments of the manufacturer ' s representatives are accurate. The desirable changes in the plans and specifications should be formally approved by means of an addendum at this meeting and immediately forwarded to all prospective bidders . The actual addendum is not included in the accompanying agenda material at this time since it appears desirable to wait until February 8 to prepare the actual document in order that any further desirable changes coming to our attention can be incorporated. This addendum will appear in final form with the agenda material distributed at the time of the meeting. No . 19 - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FENCE AND WALL REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1 (JOB NO. P1-12-3) : This regularly scheduled project is formally entitled "Miscellaneous Fence Revisions at Plant No . 1" . Because of the imminent widening and improvement of Ellis Avenue, scheduled for this spring, it will be necessary to make minor changes in our chain link fence alignment and, in order to improve visibility for outgoing traffic from our main entrance, to remodel the existing ornamental brick wall. It is very desirable for safety reasons to have this work accomplished before the street widening begins . For this reason, we are recommending his project be approved for bidding at an estimated cost of 2,000,) with the award to be made at the March Joint Board meeting. order that the Directors may visualize the appearance of the front entrance after the wall remodeling, included with the agenda material under this item is a sketch of the entrance subsequent to completion of the work involved in this contract. No. 20 - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ADDITIONAL PAVING AT PLANT NO. 2 (JOB NO. P2-8-2) : Another of our regularly scheduled plant projects for this budget year is the addition of asphalt paving -2- in several areas at Plant No . 2 to improve drainage, general appearance and maintenance . This project is formally entitled "Site Improvements - Phase II at Plant No . 2" and is now ready for- bidding. The additional paving will consist of approximatel 33,000 square feet of asphaltic concrete and the estimated cost is $8,500. The resolution, attached to the accompanying agenda materia this item, establishes February 28 as the bid date (at the same time as bids for the above described fence project will be taken) , with bids to be opened by the staff and recommendation for award for both jobs to be made at the March Joint Board meeting. Nos. 21 and 22 - COMPLETION OF PLANT JOB NO. I-4-2: The completion of this plant project took place on February 2 after a considerable delay through no fault of the contractor. The project is known as "Installation of Additional Gas Compressors" and the contractor was Kemper Construction Company and W. W. Hoagland, who accomplished the work in a very satisfactory manner. Item No. 21 is recommended Change Order No . 2 to the contract granting an extension of time of 115 days for the delays mentioned and as further detailed in the formal change order accompanying the agenda material. Item No . 22 is the customary resolution accepting the work as complete and authorizing filing of a Notice of Completion. Nos . 23 and 24 - FINANCIAL AND BUDGET REVIEW REPORTS: On February 1, two reports on these subjects were mailed to all Directors under separate letter of transmittal. As mentioned in the transmittal, these matters will be gone into further at the Board meeting, particularly the mid-year budget review material. It should be noted, however, that the transmitted interim financial report of our inde- pendent auditors is in a different format than formerly and we believe, as a consequence, it presents more meaningful and under- standable financial information than heretofore . No . 25 - PROPOSED NEW WATER QUALITY STANDARDS FOR PACIFIC OCEAN ADJACENT TO ORANGE COUNTY: The Directors will remember the presenta- tion by our guest speaker, Mr. Richard Bueermann, at the October, 1966 meeting who described recent changes in the Federal Water Pollution Control Act and their impact on State regulations affecting our operations . Mr. Bueermann is Executive Officer of the State of California Regional Water Quality Control Board and has advised us, informally, that a hearing on the new proposed standards will be held by his Board in the early part of March, probably before our Joint Board meeting in that month . We have not, as yet, received an invitation to testify at this hearing but expect to receive formal notification in the very near future. Inasmuch as it is known that the new standards proposed with respect to bacterial concentrations will greatly influence the Districts ' operating costs, we are recommending the motion appearing -3- on the agenda under this item to authorize the staff to make representations in behalf of the Districts at the hearing. As a matter of interest, immediate compliance with the new coliform standards proposed would involve an additional expenditure for chlorine by the Districts of approximately $300-400,000 per year until our proposed new 20,000 foot outfall can be completed. Consequently, we are recommending that the Boards authorize the staff to petition for delay in imposing the new coliform standards until after completion of the new outfall in order that the additional expenditures for chlorine can be better utilized for expediting construction of the new outfall. The staff will be pre- pared to go into as much detail on this matter as desired by the Directors . No . 26 (District No . 3 only) - REQUEST OF CITY OF BREA FOR SEWER SERVICES FOR 17.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY: At the January meeting, this request was referred to the staff for report and recommendation. This report was mailed to all Directors of District No . 3 on January 27 and is, we believe, complete and self- explanatory. An additional copy of the report is included with the agenda material for all Directors (see Item No. 27 - all Districts) . If the Directors of District No . 3, after consideration of this report agree to the Brea request, adoption of the resolutin appearing with the accompanying agenda material under this item will be in order. No. 27 (All Districts) - REQUEST OF CITY OF BREA FOR SEWER SERVICES FOR 17.7 ACRES OF PROPERTY IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY: In accordance with the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958, the serving of any territory outside of a District by an individual District must be concurred in by all of the other six Districts. Accordingly, if District No . 3 acts favorably upon this request (a report thereon is included with the agenda material under this item) it will be necessary for the other Boards to take action also on this matter. No . 28 - STAFF AND ENGINEER' S REPORT ON PROPOSED SALE OF EXISTING 78-INCH OUTFALL TO RIVERSIDE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL AND WATER CONSERVATION DISTRICT: The two reports on this subject, as directed by the Boards in October, 1966 were mailed to all Directors on February 1. In the staff report will be found definite recom- mendations regarding the proposed sale which, we believe, it will be appropriate for the Boards to act upon either at this meeting or at the March meeting, at the latest, in order that the established time- table for our new outfall construction program can be maintained. The staff and engineers will be prepared to go into greater detail as to their findings and recommendations on the Riverside proposal, if desired. No . 31 - COMMUNICATION REGARDING GARFIELD AVENUE IMPROVEMENT: We have received a letter from an attorney representing a property owner in Fountain Valley asking the Districts ' support for the early con- struction of a bridge over the Santa Ana River at Garfield Avenue and -4- related improvements. This bridge and improvements would make Garfield a through street and is, we understand, a part of the County' s arterial master plan. A copy of the letter is included with the agenda material and has appended on it our comments on this subject . District No . 1 No . 32 - EXTENSION OF INDUSTRIAL WASTE AGREEMENT WITH HOLLY SUGAR COMPANY: In March of 1966, the District entered into an interim agreement with Holly Sugar Company establishing charges for the disposal of industrial waste to the Districts ' system. At that time, it was the understanding that an evaluation would be made during 1966 of the additional cost incurred by the Districts by reason of accepting this strong waste water. Although we have accumulated considerable data having a bearing on these additional costs, we are still not in a position to substantiate them exactly. For this reason, we are recommending that the terms of the 1966 agreement be extended for the 1967 season with the above described studies to continue . The present agreement sets up certain charges based on the quantity and quality of the waste water and as a matter of interest to the Directors, the total charges for 1966 were in excess of $25,000. Part of this sum went to District No . 1 for conveyance and regular gallonage charges and the balance to the Joint Operating Fund to defray the increased cost of treatment incurred. No . 35 - ADJOURNMENT TO MARCH 1 AT 4:00 P.M. : This is the hour and date established for receipt of bids on Plant Job No . P2-11 (see Item No . 18) . Accordingly, it will be necessary for the Board to so adjourn. An adjourned meeting of District No . 7 is also scheduled for the same time . District No . 5 No . 40 - DEMOLITION OF ABANDONED BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION: En- closed with the agenda material under this item, is a letter from the Irvine Company and a report of the District ' s engineer on this subject, which are self-explanatory. The staff recommends that Mr. Simpson be employed in accordance with the proposal contained in his report to draw up plans and specifications for the demolition work. The cost of this work has been included in the budget and is actually chargeable to the construction of the new Bay Bridge Pumping Station, since the work is being done in exchange for a new easement for the present pumping station. No . 41 - TRANSFER OF OPERATING BUDGET FUNDS: As shown on the mid- year budget material, previously forwarded, the cost of the manhole and force main replacement program, now under contract, is projected to exceed the budget figure by approximately $17,000. This matter was discussed at the time the contract for the repair work was awarded and it was concluded that this overexpenditure would present •.� no particular problem with regard to the future District tax rate. -5- In order to provide adequate funds to complete this project under this budget item, we are recommending the transfer of $20,000 from the Contingency Reserve to the Manhole and Force Main Replacement program. District No . 6 No. 45 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, JOB NO. 6-6: This project, the Recon- struction of the Rocky Point Pumping Station, is well on its way to completion. During the course of the work, it was determined by our maintenance personnel that desirable access to the dry well from above could easily be provided by a simple change in the roof slab and the moving of an existing cast iron frame and cover from the wet well to a new opening thus provided. Because of the modest cost of this change ($300) , we are recommending adoption of the formal change order included with the agenda material. No. 46 - PAYMENT FOR GROUT STABILIZATION - REPAIR OF DOVER DRIVE SUBSIDENCE: Approximately one year ago, the Board authorized the issuance of a purchase order to the City of Newport Beach to accomplish the repair of this street subsidence in a manner approved by our staff with all costs thereof to be reimbursed by the District . Various methods of repair have been under study since that time, both by the City' s Engineering staff and ourselves. Recently a decision was made, in the interest of considerable savings in over- all costs, to attempt to stabilize and raise the subsided soil by means of pressure grouting. Accordingly, Robert E. Lenihan of Long Beach was authorized to grout stabilize a test section of the subsidence . This experiment was so successful that it was agreed that Lenihan should undertake at the same time the pressure grouting of the entire stretch of the subsidence, which is approximately 1100 feet long. This work may be complete by the time of the Board meeting and since the charges for this work will undoubtedly exceed the $2,000 limitation in our purchasing regulations, we are recom- mending Board authorization to pay the pressure grouting charges in full at this time. The exact amount of the bill, if known by the time of the meeting, will be incorporated in the motion. The reason the City of Newport Beach is not paying Lenihan and charging the work to the above described purchase order is that the amount of the charges will exceed that which the City staff is allowed to authorize for outside services . District No. 7 No. 50 - COMPLETION OF THE SOUTH IRVINE SUBTRUNK SEWER: The Board previously authorized this work as a part of the District ' s Master Plan, and the construction was financed by Irvine Industrial Complex. The suggested action under this item is the approval of the Master Plan Reimbursement Agreement with Irvine Industrial Complex, for a maximum reimbursable amount of $120,147.23. This amount is to be paid over 3-plus years from connection charges received by the District. -6- No. 51 - ANNEXATION OF THE PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL SITE: The Orange Unified School District has requested annexation of the Panorama Elementary School property located on Newport Boulevard, and has paid tentative annexation fees of $215 per acre. It is the staff's recommendation that District No. 7 make application to the Local Agency Formation Commission for annexation of this property. The resolution included with the agenda initiates the necessary annexation proceedings . No. 54 - ADJOURNMENT TO 4: 00 P.M. , MARCH 1: Enclosed for the District No. 7 Directors ' study and review is a Master Plan Report prepared by Boyle and Lowry. Since the Board members may wish to discuss this report with the officials of their respective Cities or Sanitary Districts, the staff suggests that the Board adjourn to the above hour and date. At that time the report can be reviewed in detail. (There will be a meeting of District No . 1 at the same time, to open bids for Job No . P2-11. ) District No. 2 No . 55 - RECEIVE AND FILE MATERIAL FROM CITY OF GARDEN GROVE RE- LATING TO CONTRACT NO. 2-10-5: Last year, the Directors authorized an agreement with the City of Garden Grove whereby the City would install. a portion of the new Euclid Trunk Sewer concurrently with the widening and realignment of that street . Under this procedure, it was hoped that a considerable savings would accrue to the District as well as avoiding future sewer construction work in the new street. The City has now awarded the contract for the street work, including the sewer work to be done for the District, and has forwarded a bid tabulation showing the cost of the sewer work and an invoice for one half its cost as provided in the above described agreement. The hoped for savings were apparently realized in that the sewer portion of the job will cost $90,173.80 as opposed to the engineer' s original estimate of $110,000. Payment of the amount invoiced by the City will appear on the warrant register list. No . 56 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 2-11-1: This project, the Rolling Hills Drive Sub-Trunk Sewer, was described at the January meeting when bids were authorized to be taken. These bids will not be received until next Monday, February 6, and if in order, a recom- mendation for award and bid tabulation will appear with the final agenda for the meeting. No . 57 - APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2: This regularly budgeted District construction, the Rolling Hills Drive Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, has also previously been described and is a companion project of the contract to be awarded under Item No. 56. Plans and specifications will be ready for approval and authorization for bid by the time of the Board meeting. The resolution appearing with the agenda material under this item establishes March 6 as the date bids will be received and opened by the staff and engineers with award scheduled at the regular March meeting. The estimated construction cost of this project is $155,000. -7- -- District No . 3 No . 61 - NOTIFICATION OF DAMAGE BY CITY OF SEAL BEACH: Included with the agenda material is a letter from the attorneys for the City of Seal Beach putting the District on record as to damages incurred by the City and the Leisure World development by reason of the Westside Force Main incident last September. As stated in the letter, the total of these damages is approximately $3200. The action appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended. . No. 62 - REPORT OF ENGINEERS ON WESTSIDE FORCE MAIN INVESTIGATION AND REPAIR: As directed at the October meeting, the District ' s engineers and the staff have conducted an extensive investigational program as to the extent of the deterioration of this force main which led to the sewage overflow incident referred to under Item No . 61. Numerous conferences have been held between the engineers and staff and extensive interior and exterior inspections of the pipe have been made . A written report on this subject from the engineers is included with the agenda material for the Directors of District No . 3 and is believed to be self-explanatory. The staff and engineers will be prepared to go into further-'detail on this matter although it appears no formal action by the Board is necessary at this time, unless desired, since authorization has already been given to the engineers to proceed with final plans and specifications for permanent replacement of the defective sections of the pipe. No . 63 - TRANSFER OF OPERATING BUDGET FUNDS: As shown on the mid- year budget material, previously forwarded, the cost of the Westside Force Main emergency repair to date has caused our District Mainten- ance Expense Budget to be overexpended by approximately $38,000. In addition, there will be additional expenses for this project during the balance of the fiscal year if the permanent replacement program, described under Item No . 62, proceeds as planned. For this reason, we are recommending a budget transfer of $85,000 from the Contingency Reserve to the District Maintenance Expense account . Fred A. Harper General Manager -8- rII BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. o. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA February 8, 1967 at 8:00 p.m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpt from the Board of Supervisors showing appointment of Supervisor Featherly as alternate Director on the Districts ' Boards (5) DISTRICT 1 jJQ Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular ,11 meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January ll, 1967, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 7 �N.�" Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (11) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular ,2(-��--� meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman --Executive Committee Mtg. , 5 :00 p.m. (13) ALL DISTRICTS March lst (dinner meeting) Report of the General Manager (14) ALL DISTRICTS — Report of the General Counsel on Agenda Items 15 and 16 (15) Consideration of motion ratifying and approvingg payment I py\ made February 1, 1967, in the amount of $446, 261.48, on i the Judgment in the matter of County Sanitation District No. 1, et al, vs . Jack Toshiki Sakioka, et al, Action #143623; and consideration of motion authorizing the �J�6lr payment of Improvement Bond #432 ($2,448.40) , and Bond #433 ($29331. 37), as recommended by the General Counsel 1 (16) Consideration of motion to receive and file communication i from the General Counsel regarding possible recovery of a portion of the money spent by the Districts for the � Invh n" purchase of chlorine; and consideration of action on the V� General Counsel' s recommendation. See page "F" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Job No. P1-12-2 (Site Improvements - Phase III at Plant No. 1) to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $17,873.00. See page "GI' {Bid tabulation on page "H" ) (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Addendum #1 to the Rlans and specifications for Job No. P2-11 (Headworks C" - Plant No. 2) . See page "I" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Considers ion of Resolution No. 67-8, approving plans / and specifications for Miscellaneous Fence and Entrance 1/ / Revisions at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-12-� ; and authoriz- ing advertising for bids. See page "J ' (See page t K" for sketch of proposed revisions) _ (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-9, approving plans ` and specifications for Site Improvements - Phase II at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2; and authorizing advertisingY, . for bids . See page "L" (21) ALL DISTRICTS Considers ion of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-4-2 (Installation / of Additional Gas Compressors) , granting an extension of time of 115 days to Kemper Construction Company and W. W. Hoagland, Contractor. See page "M" (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-10, accepting Job No. I-4-2 as complete., g and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page "N"� (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly Financial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles Isand Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ending September 30, 1966 24) ALL DISTRICTS Report by the Districts ' Director of Finance on Mid-year budget review. (copies of budgets in folders) (25) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the staff on proposed new water quality standards for Pacific Ocean adjacent to Orange County; and considera- tion of motion authorizing the staff to represent the Districts at a hearing on this matter, and to petition for a five-year delay before the bacterial portion of the new standards are made effective -2- (26) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-15-3, to receive and - file report of the staff, and authorizing preparation of an agreement for furnishing sewer service for 17.7 acres of property in Los Angeles County as requested by 2- r the City of Brea; said agreement to be in accordance with the terms outlined in the staff' s report. See lJ" ``v ���ry"� page 11 0 ff -y Q.� (27) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing District No. 3 to provide sewer service for 17.7 acres of property in vJ./ Los Angeles County. See page "P" for staff report. �t (28) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written reports of the staff and engineers on proposed sale of 6N" 1 existing outfall to Riverside County Flood Control and ' Water Conservation District; and consideration of action, on the reports. (29) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (30) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A" , "B" and "C" (31) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications. See page a. Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Dannemeyer and Tuohey, attorneys, asking the Districts ' support regarding con- struction of a bridge across the Santa Ana River at Garfield Avenue Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to notify the attorneys that the Districts do not wish to take a position on this matter at this time (32) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion authorizing extension, of the 1966 Agreement with Holly Sugar Company to include the /7 year 1967 on the same terms and conditions (33) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page (31 ) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (35) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 4:00 p.m. , March lst C �o (36) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (37) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any (38) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment A � (39) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 Consideration of motion approving Suspense Fund warrants, ✓ if any. See page "E" (40) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from TheIrvine Company requesting demolition of the District's 7 Bay Bridge Pumping Station; and consideration of motion accepting proposal of Donald C. Simpson, District's engineer, for engineering services in connection with the Q demolition, in an amount not to exceed $500. See pages l� "R" and "S" (41) DISTRICT 5 1 Consideration of motion authorizing transfer (within the �. Operating Fund), of funds in the amount of $20,000 from the Contingency Reserve appropriation to the Manhole and f) Force Main Repair expense account 1 (42) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (43) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any a (44) DISTRICT 5 i ,�3, W% Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (: L (45) DISTRICT 6a� Consideration of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6 (Rocky Point6 Pumping Station Reconstruction), authorizing a time extension / of 7 days and an addition of $300 to the contract- with Cook & Barletta, Inc. , Contractor. See page T (46) DISTRICT 6 .�� Consi erati f motio authori 'n payment o Robert E. Leniha Long ch, fo rout st ilization�Dover Drive. ount o paymen $ ) (47) DISTRICT 6 CCoa mnside��E�� on of tion appr rra ts, if (48) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (49) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -4- (50) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion to receive and file recommendation of the engineers; and consideration of Resolution No. 67-11-7, approving Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement with Irvine Industrial Complex, relative to the South Irvine Sub- trunk joy trunk Sewer. See page 11U" (See page "V" for recommendation) . (51) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-12-7, initiating pro- Jiur ceedings for annexation of the Panorama Elementary School property on Newport Boulevard. See page "W" (52) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page n,Elt (53). DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (54) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 4:00 p.m. , March 1s t -Z� `7 (55) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to receive and file communication and bid tabulation from the City of Garden Grove relative "� l to Contract No. 2-10-5 (Euclid Trunk Sewer); and concurring in award of the contract to Orange County Pipeline (56) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-13-2, to receive and .. „ file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding Contract No. 2-11-1 (Rolling Hills Drive Subtrunk Seb►eir) , to M. P. MITROVICH in the total aBe a e "X" See page mount o 1 0 P g ( P g "Y" for bid tabulation) . �. (57) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-14-2, approving plans and specifications for the Rolling Hills Drive Sewage �w Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-25 and authorizing advertising for bids. See page "Z" (58) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See " page "D„ (59) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications if an (60) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (61) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Notification of Damages submitted by the attorneys for the City of Seal Beach, and refer the matter to the District' s liability insurance carrier. See page "AA'i (62) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file report of the CAWOJ engineers regarding Westside Force Main Replacement. See page "BB" -5- (63) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion authorizing transfer (within the Operating Fund) of funds in the amount of $85,000 from D the Contingency Reserve appropriation to the Maintenance �.,✓ expense account (64) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page nDir 6/V (65) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (66) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment v` r � -6- EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS, 1,2,3,5,6rr7 and 11 (ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA) A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sani- tation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 33 5, 6, 7 and 11(of Orange County, Ca�fornia) , was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m. February 8 , 19,, 10844 Ellis Ave. , Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 8:00 o' clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each of the Boards of Directors. ALL DISTRICTS Following a repprt by the General Approving and ratifying Counsel, it was moved, seconded and settlement in the matter duly carried: of County Sanitation D strict No. 1 vs . Jack That payment mAde February 1, 1967, Toshiki Sakioka, et al in the amount of $446,261.48, on the Judgment in the matter of County Sanitation District No. 1, et al, vs. Jack Toshiki Sakioka, et al, Action #143623, be approved and ratified; and, FURTHER MOVED: That payment of Improvement Bond #432 in the amount of $2,448.40, and Bond #433 in the amount of $2,331.37, is hereby authorized as recommended by the General Counsel: STATE OF CALIFORNIA)) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I. FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5 , 6, 7 and 11(of Orange County, California) , do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record in this office taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of February _196 i" IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of February , 196 7 . Secretary of each of the oards of Directors of County Sanitation Dis- tricts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 63 7 and 11 EXCERPTS FROM TIE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour ,-SAW, of 8:00 o'clock p.m. , February 8 , 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Clifton C . Miller (Chairman) , Al Forgit, Harry H. Harvey , Rex A . Parks, Ellis N. Porter and David L. Baker Directors absent: NONE Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. 7 Moved, seconded and duly ADJOURNTENT carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 be adjourned to 4:00 pp.m. , March 1, 1967, in the District' s office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:25 p.m. , February 8, 1967. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of February , 196 7. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal -of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, this 8th day of February , 1967 . Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour \TAT" of 8:00 o'clock p.m., February 8 , 196 7 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Harry H. Harvey (Chairman , Clifton C . Miller, Ellis N. Porter and David L. Baker Directors absent: None Present: Fred A . Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO. 1 Moved, seconded and duly ADJOURNMENT-- carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4:00 pp.m. , March 1, 1967, in the District' s office at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California . The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9 :21 p.m. , February 8, 1967. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I. FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. l , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 8th day of February , 196r - IN WITNESS-4IffRIEG�, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed �i the official seal :of CQunt-y Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, Calif-or-nia, this _8yh day of February , 1967 . Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 1 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 51'75 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS February 8, 1967 at 8:00 p.m. AGENDA (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3) Appointment of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file excerpt ^ from the Board of Supervisors showing appointment of Supervisor Featherly as alternate Director on the Districts ' Boards (5) DISTRICT 1 0"',vz� Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January ll, 1967, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular l meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 5 y�► Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular I" meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 7 I,,n Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (1.1) DISTRICT 11 �n Consideration of motion approving minutes of the regular meeting held January 11, 1967, as mailed (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (14) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel on Agenda Items 15 and 16 (15) Consideration of motion ratifying and ap V46,, 2 ovin payment made February 1, 1967, in the amount of 1.48, on the Judgment in the matter of County Sanitation District No. 1, et al, vs. Jack Toshiki Sakioka, et al, Action #143623; and consideration of motion authorizing the payment of Improvement Bond #432 ($2,448.40) , and Bond #433 ($29331.37), as recommended by the General Counsel r (16) Consideration of motion to receive and file communication � r from the General Counsel regarding possible recovery of a portion of the money spent by the Districts for the purchase of chlorine; and consideration of action on the General Counsel' s recommendation. See page "F" (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Job No. P1-12-2 (Site Improvements - Phase III at Plant No. 1) to Sully-Miller Contracting Company in the total amount of $17,873.00. See page "GIt (Bid tabulation on page "H" ) (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Addendum #1 to the I %r plans-and specifications for Job No. P2-11 (Headworks C" - Plant No. 2) . See page "I" (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 67-8, approving plans and specifications for Miscellaneous Fence and Entrance Revisions at Plant No. 1, Job No. P1-12-� ; and authoriz- ing advertising for bids. See page flit (See page K" for sketch of proposed revisions (20) ALL DISTRICTS y,✓ Consideration of Resolution No. 67-9, approving plans and specifications for Site Improvements - Phase II at Plant No. 2, Job No. P2-8-2; and authorizing advertisin for bids . See page "L" (21) ALL DISTRICTS Considers ion of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-4-2 (Installation of Additional Gas Compressors), granting an extension of time of 115 days to Kemper Construction Company and W. W. Hoagland, Contractor. See page "M" ( ) ALL DISTRICTS v Consideration of Resolution No. 67-10, accepting Job No. I-4-2 as complete, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Work. See page __N (23) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file Quarterly Financial Report submitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles Yn and Sylvester, Certified Public Accountants, for the period ending September 30, 1966 (24) ALL DISTRICTS Report by the Districts' Director of Finance on Mid-year V budget review. (copies of budgets in folders) (25) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the staff on proposed new water quality standards ' for Pacific Ocean adjacent to Orange County; and considera- tion of motion authorizing the staff to represent the Districts at a hearing on this matter, and to petition for a five-year delay before the bacterial portion of the new standards are made effective -2- (26) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-15-3, to receive and file report of the staff, and authorizing preparation of an agreement for furnishing sewer service for 17.7 J acres of property in Los Angeles County as requested by J the City of Brea; said agreement to be in accordance with the terms outlined in the staff' s report. See page "0" (27) ALL DISTRICTS ons era . on of motion authorizing District No. 3 to provide sewer service for 17.7 acres of property in y Los Angeles County. See page "P" for staff report. (28) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file writtenOJ'�J --7 L / reports of the staff and engineers on proposed sale of ►� �" �N existing outfall to Riverside County Flood Control and WateP, Conservation District; and consideration of action on the reports. (29) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file written certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (30) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books for signature of the Chairman of District No. 1. and authorizing payment of claims listed on p g s ll "B" and r'Cn s (31) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications. See page a. Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from Dannemeyer and Tuohey, attorneys, asking the Districts' support regarding con-M struction of a bridge across the Santa Ana River at Garfield Avenue Consideration of motion authorizing the staff to notify the attorneys that the Districts do not wish to take a position on this matter at thi time ` gl (32) DISTRICT 1, �oG``ns`ideration of motion authorizing extension of the 1966 Agreement with Holly Sugar Company to include the year 1967 on the same terms and conditions (33) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. see f page nDn / ! rani (34) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (35) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 4:00 p.m. , March lst �. Z -3- (36) DISTRICT 11 y Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" (37) DISTRICT 11 Other ess and Comm ca (38) DISTRICT 11 Cons deration of motion re: Adjournment r Z �� r (39) DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 S consideration of motion approving. Suspense Fund warrants, if any. See page "E" (40) DISTRICT 5/S- /Z- � Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from The Irvine Company requesting demolition of the District's 5' Bay Bridge Pumping Station; and consideration of motion e ' accepting proposal of Donald C. Simpson, District's engineer, for engineering services in connection with the demolition, in an amount not to exceed $500. See pages "R" and "S" (41) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion authorizing transfer (within the h^� Operating Fund), of funds in the amount of $20,000 from �rV the Contingency Reserve appropriation to the Manhole and Force Main Repair expense account (42) DISTRICT 5 �. ons deration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (43) DISTRICT they ss and communicati s, _if (44) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment L -K� • (45) DISTRICT 6 Cons deration of motion approving Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 6-6 (Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction), authorizing a time extension of 7 days and an addition of $300 to the contract with Cook & Barletta, Inc. , Contractor. See page "T" (46) DISTRICT 6 / r onsiderat' of mot n authoriz ym nt to Robe Leniha , ong Beach for stabili ti ver Dr (Amount of nt, $ ) (47) DISTRICT 6 ons derati o ion a rovin 11111Cee a (48) �0"�" uisine�ssan`dc v.�/ mmunication (49) DISTRICT 6 i Consideration of motion re: Adjournment -4- (50) DISTRICT 7 A Consideration of motion to receive and file recommendation ,I of the engineers; and consideration of Resolution No. 67-11-7, approving Sewerage Facility Reimbursement Agreement with )' Irvine Industrial Complex, relative to the South Irvine Sub- trunk Sewer. See page ItU" (See page "V" for recommendation) . (51) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-12-7, initiating pro- hnQ ceedings for annexation of the Panorama Elementary School property on Newport Boulevard. See page "W" (52) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion approving warrants . See page nV" (53) DISTRICT business and ications, if an (54) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 4:00 p.m. , March 1st (55) DISTRICT 2 onsideration of motion to receive and file communication _ and bid tabulation from the City of Garden Grove relative to Contract No. 2-10-5 (Euclid Trunk Sewer) ; and concurring in award of the contract to Orange County Pipeline (56) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-13-2, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding m C7 Contract No. 2-11-1 (Rolling Hills Drive Subtrunk Sewer) , to M. P. MITROVICH in the total amount o 1 O See page "X" (See page "Y" for bid tabulation) . (57) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 67-14-2, approving plans and specifications for the Rolling Hills Drive Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No. 2-11-2, , and authorizing advertising for bids . See page "Z" (58) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See � page "D" I (59) DISTRICT 2 e q Al Other business and communicatio s if an (60) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (61) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Notification C of Damages submitted by the attorneys for the City of Seal Beach, and refer the matter to the District' s liability insurance carrier. See page "AA" '(62) DISTRICT 3 / Consideration of motion to receive and file report of the engineers regarding Westside Force Main Replacement. See page "BB" -5- (63) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion authorizing transfer (within the Operating Fund) of funds in the amount of $85,000 from the Ccntingency Reserve appropriation to the Maintenance expense account (64) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" (65) DISTRICT 3 Othey::h�i-ness and communications, if any (66) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -6- O� C�� -w w w w r a.�%w �.+ w ��+ w �r w w r+ w w w yr w w w w w w �+ �.. +mod 1'! - . !/ - --- - - � - - - ---v - ----, - - - - 0- - -- J- -- -- - ) _- - - - -- -... -- -.. _ _ - - �- - - . --G���i----- _- ----- _ __ �i2��-- -- - -- - - - February 8th Meeting yr' Recognition was given two plant men, ney & Baldwin, and Certificates (find out what kind) were presented e men by Chairman Harvey. Harvey announced that he is re ring and that elections would be held next month for Chairman of 1 d Joint Chairman, etc . Leaving as of April 4th. E.C. dinner meeting at 5 :0 p.m. , March 1st #15 - Re: Sakioka $432,0 was previously offered.They wanted 500,000. Non-jury trial - Settled at V5,000 51,050. See motion for what we actually paid. 18.10 usable acre . earned interest. #16 - Outlined recommend tion in his letter. Possible gross recovery of $50,000 or more. Questions by the Directors. Next hearing 13th on this matter so we have to decide right now. #18 - &nd answered questions . #24 - Explained the mid- ear budget review. Explained invested funds earned quarter of a million from investment program in the first quarter. Mid-year budget review will give the staff some insight into the problems needs, etc. July Board m eting will approve tentative budgets . Also that we will review our p sition again sometime in April before our-final budget recommendations . 1. ,\1 #25 - PGB Met with the sta f of the Regional Board on this, etc . At the tearing we would petition d---ask far_ a delay of about five years . #20 - FAH Recommendation. Will not cause any additional pollution on the Orange County Beaches. Lengthy discussion. gree to offer to sell for $2,000,000? ,, #34 - Nissor�,reported on negotiation�,�. _aequiz,�-tj-o�f—�ght- �f -way-. $-,-000 will be spent`0 r- is_. Does not expectus to have to file suit . #59 - Nisson re: Anaheim Union Water District, and recommended that the matter be authorized (adoption of resolution) RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS February 8, 1267 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6573 Advance Electric, Generator & Motor Repair $ 397.70 6574 City of Anaheim, Power 35.62 6575 American Compressor Co ., Air Compressors 1,987.23 6576 The Anchor Packing Company, Pump Pack.& Gskts. 183.74 6577 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 98.01 6578 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 106.21 6579 Bales Office Equipment Co ., Office Equip. Mtce . 13.38 6580 Barnes Delaney Co ., Tires 105.43 6581 Bay City Bearing Co . , Inc. , Pump Parts, Tubing 247.79 6582 Bell Radiator, Truck Radiator Repair , 61.20 6583 Bell Pipe & Supply Co. , Piping Supplies 89.34 6584 Thomas Y. Bibleheimer, Employee Mileage 7 .40 6585 Blower Paper Company, Elect . & Masking Tape 162.74 6586 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. , Magneto Repairs 304.80 6587 Charles Bruning Co ., Reproduction Paper 442.77 6588 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Electrical Supplies 33.30 6589 Business Systems Inc . , Office Supplies, Warrants 490.62 6590 Ralph B. Carter Co ., Pump Parts 180.00 6591 John Cochran Co . , Grout Pumping 40.00 6592 Consolidated Electrical Dist. , Elect. Supplies 566.06 6593 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc ., Truck Parts 532.34 6594 E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co., Training Material 253.00 6595 Enchanter Inc. , Ocean Research & Monitoring 1,672.50 6596 Enterprise Printing Co ., Office Supplies 119 .81 6597 Estekote Co. , Chlorination Manifold 2,001.29 6593 Rimmon C . Fay, Ph.D., Ocean Research (2 Mos. ) 1,150.31 6599 Fischer & Porter Co. , Instrumentation Parts 192.25 660o Flair Drafting Service, Drafting Service 52i .50 6601 Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Mach. Shop Work 29.68 6602 Frey Industrial Supply Co ., Tools 18.19 6603 Friden, Inc. , Office Equipment Maintenance 18.00 6604 Robert N. Galloway, Misc. Expenses 25.49 6605 Garden Grove Printing, Office Supplies 41 .60 6606 General Telephone Co . 205.10 6607 Bob Gosche Co ., Elect. Supplies, Small Hardware 179 .85 6608 Harbor Clinic, Pre Employment Physical Exams 93.50 6609 Harrington Industrial Plastics, Sheet Plastic 37.61 6610 Fred A. Harper, Various Meeting Expenses 31.52 6611 Hertz Equipment Rental Corp., Equipment Rental 12.00 6612. Honeywell, Inc . , Instrumentation Mtce . , Charts 1,873.51 6613 Howard Supply Co. , Valves, Piping, Small Hdwre. 472.58 6614 City of Huntington Beach, Water 14.60 6615 IBM Corporation, Office Supplies 23.40 6616 International Harvester Co., Truck Parts 120.01 6617 Jones Chemicals, Inc. , Chlorine 7,987.20 6618 KAR Products, Inc. , Electrical Supplies 22.77 6619 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co ., Piping Supplies 115.11 6620 Kelly Pipe Co ., Valves 138.75 6621 Kittell Muffler & Engineering, Freight 3.65 6622 Kleen-Line Corp., Janitorial Supplies 28.76 6623 Knox Industrial Supplies, Piping, Tools 182.05 6624 William Kroeger, Employee Mileage 14.30 �...' 6625 Herbert H. Kyzer, Employee Mileage 25.20 6626 Anthony Lauricha, Employee Mileage 14.90 6627 J. Lausch Assoc . , Sealing Materials 59 .11 6628 LBWS, Inc., Tools, Gauges 858.30 6629 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 20.70 6630 Legal Book Store, Civil Procedure Code 9.04 6631 Donald J. Lord, Employee Mileage 19.50 -A- WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6632 McCalla Bros., Pump Parts $ 108.73 6633 R. W. McClellan & Sons, Plaster Sand 48.41 6634 Bill McDaniel Co ., Crane Rental 59.00 6635 McGraw-Hill Book Co. , Technical Publication 13.55 6636 3M Business Products Sales, Inc . , Office Supplies 1.14 6637 Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work 388.61 6638 M & 'S Maintenance Co . , Gas Pump Nozzle 34.91 6639 Mechanical Equip. Supply Co ., Suction Hose 697.91 6640 Metropolitan Supply Co., Piping Supplies 27.75 6641 Mission Lab. Supply, Inc ., Lab. Supplies 62.11 6642 Munselle Supply Co ., Inc . , Welding Supplies 54.34 6643 National Chemsearch Corp. , Weed Killer 100.88 6644 Lee M. Nelson, Consulting Services 320.00 6645 City of Newport Beach, Water 56.33 6646 Newport First Aid Supply Co ., First Aid Supplies 23.18 6647 C . Arthur Nisson, Jr. , General Counsel Retainer 700.00 6648 Noland Paper Co. , Inc. , Mimeo Paper 126.62 6649 Oakite Products Inc. , Cleaning Solvent 86.64 6650 Orange County Radiotelephone 420.20 6651 Pacific Boiler Corp. , Boiler Rental 630.00 6652 Pacific Telephone Co . 277.45 6653 Planchets Co., Lab Supplies 31 .84 6654 Postmaster, Postage 150.00 6655 R E A Express, Freight 5.86 6656 Red' s Frame, Wheel & Brake Serv. , Truck Repair 12.43 6657 Research Supplies Laboratory, Lab Supplies 61 .15 6658 Robbins & Myers, Inc . , Pump Parts 108.16 6659 Rodeffer Industries, Inc ., Rock Base 28.04 666o Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints 12.74 6661 Santa Ana Electric motors, Elect. Motor Repair 174.03 6662 Russell M. Scott, Sr. , Ei-jiployee Mileage 57.00 6663 Scott Refrigeration Serv. , Inc . , Air Cond. Mtce. 32.70 6664 Select Nurseries Inc. , Plants 31 .20 6665 The Sherwin-Williams Co ., Paint Supplies 151.84 6666 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 23.00 6667 Signal Oil Co., Gasoline 441.42 6668 Smith Engineering Co . , Thermocouples 142.80 6669 Snap-On Tools Corp. , Tools 34.01 6670 Southern California Edison Co ., Power 10J041 .02 6671 Southern California Water Co . 3.9g 6672 Southern Counties Gas Co. 218.1 6673 Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies 6.31 6674 Standard Oil Co . of Cali: '. , Tire Repair 3.00 6675 Star D Iron Works, Inc . , Clarifier Bracket 88.98 6676 Stilley' s, Equipment Rental 55.00 6677 Surveyors Service, Co. , Engr. Tapes 9 .98 6678 T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts 181.24 6679 Tardif Sheet Metal, Electrical Panels 171 .38 6680 C . 0. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene 91.47 6681 Tony' s Lock & Safe Service, Keys 20.07 6682 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. , Steel 99 .96 6633 Tucker & Son, Inc . , Line Clean Safety Equip. 52.42 6634 United Automotive Service, Truck Parts 23.09 6685 John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant 215.60 6686 Warnock-Bancroft Equipment Co . , Loader Parts 30.0 `..� 6687 Warren & Bailey Co., Inc ., Solenoid Valves, Tubing334.00 6688 Waukesha Motor Company, Freight 8.05 6689 Welch' s Coastal Concrete Co ., Concrete 181.35 6690 City of Westminster, Water 5.00 6691 Whelen Engineering Co., Inc . , Port. Emerg. Lights 57.39 6692 Winter & Co . , Photo Finishing & Supplies 121.72 -B- WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6693 American Airlines, Inc . , Air Freight $ 47 .74 6694 Continental Airlines, Inc . , Air Freight 27 .77 6695 Xerox: Corporation, Reproduction Service Chgs. 289 .21 *arll TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 43,087.85 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6696 Aladdin Litho & Art $ 7�7.90 6697 Bank of America NT&SA - Assignee-Vinnell Corp.145, 3 0.00 6698 Enterprise Printing Co. 48.78 6699 *City of Fountain Valley 4,779.77 6700 - J. Putnam Henck 9, 588.70 6701 Kemper Construction Co., & W. W. Hoagland 1,484.00 6702 *Miller, Nisson & Kogler 2,242.10 6703 *Pacific Air Industries 312.00 6704 -The Register 90.00 6705 Twining Laboratories 20.00 6706 *Cedric A. White, Jr., M.A.I. 1,145.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 1651,788.25 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 208,876.10 Total cost of Plant No . l land acquisition including incidental expenses is $455,000.35. _C- DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 6707 Aladdin Litho & Art Y 43.06 6708 Boyle Engineerin; 1,417.50 6709 City of Santa Ana 45,000.00 $ 46,460.56 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6710 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry 15,201.00 6711 Enterprise Printing Company 70.61 6712 City of Fullerton 46,426.97 6713 City of Garden Grove 45,086.90 6714 The Orange Daily News 47.96 106,833.44 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6715 City of Fullerton 14,676.98 DISTRICT NO.5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6716 AAA Construction Company ti? 19,467.00 6717 City of Newport Beach MOO 6718 Donald C. Simpson 421.60 19,976.60 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6719 Far Western Pipeline, Inc. 77,064.52 6720 Donald C. Simpson 2,161. 13 79,225.65 $ 99,202.25 WD- DISTRICT NO. 5 & 6 SUSPENSE FUND V..ARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 0721 Cook & Barletta, Inc . 4i 5,53;. ;4 DISTRICT NO_ 7 OPERATING FUND V,ARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6722 Boyle and Lowry(AD;'`643,669.25;Other $455. ) $ 4,124.25 6723 County of Orange (AD ;;`-6) 34. 20 6724 Southern California Edison Company 365.39 4,523.84 CONSTRUCTION FUND YTARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 676 Boyle and Lowry 183.07 6726 biller, Nisson, &: Ko-ler 1,109.60 1,292.67 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND 4:ARgf.NTS IN FAVOR OF 6727 Boyle and Lowry $ 1,533.58 6728 Enterprise Printing Company 134.57 1,668.15 7,484.66 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 6729 Lomar Corp. & Orange County Pipeline, Inc. $ 17,662.50 6730 Lowry and Associates 2,193.00 $ 19j855.50 -E_ MILLER,NISSON IS KOGLER CLARK MILLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW C.ARTNUR NISSON 2014 NORTH BROADWAY TELEPHONE NELSON KOGLEq t;at-enl SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA 92706 January 31, 1967• Fred A. Harper, General Manager, and Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2 , 3, 5, 6 , 7 and 11 Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Several months ago I received informal notice that price fixing suits involving the sale and purchase of chlorine were underway in the San Francisco area. I received a copy of a letter from Joseph L. Alioto directed to Winthrop 0. Gordon concerning this matter and indicating that his office would be willing to assist any public agency who had purchased substantial amounts of chlorine in the past. The suit he referred to was one filed by him on behalf of the East Bay Municipal Utility District against the nine manufacturers of liquid chlorine used by cities and water districts in water and sewage purification. The complaint was patterned after one pending' by the Antitrust Division of the office of the Attorney General of the United States in Philadelphia. Subsequent investigation has disclosed that the period of purchases involved might begin with October 1, 1955 , and end on December 24 , 1964. During this period the Districts have purchased chlorine and paid in excess of $500 ,000 for the purchases . The suit appears to be going rapidly; and it is possible to anticipate a settlement recovery of 10% or better, that is , 10% of the total monies paid for the purchase of chlorine during this period. Upon contacting the office of Mr. Alioto, I found that they make two fee arrangements : (a) A fee retainer of $5 ,0M plus the time of the princi- pal at $40 an hour and the time of associates at $20 an hour and plus all costs involved; or (b) A fee retainer of $5, 000 plus all costs of suit and 20% of the recovery of any money obtained by way of settlement or trial. By reason of the prior cases filed and suits pending regard- ing price firing with reference to the purchase of concrete pipe, the local law firm. of Rutan & Tucker has gained experience in this type of litigation; and I have. contacted them with -reference to their interest in representing the Districts in the chlorine cases. They nave indicated that they would be most willing to represent the Districts and that they would work on the following basis : J Agenda Item # 16 F-1 All Districts Fred A. Harper, General Manager, and Directors of County Sanitation .Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 January 31, 1967 Page 2 The Districts would underwrite costs to a total amount of not more than $500; that is to say, this total would include the costs of all Districts. In the event of costs in excess of $500 , authorization from, the Districts would be obtained before any further costs would be expanded. From the recoveries obtained by settlement or suit, the Districts would first be -reimbursed their costs, and thereafter,, the fee would be one-third of the first $60 ,000 of monies recovered. On any recovery in excess of $60 ,000 and costs , the fees would be 256 of such excess amount. The Attorney General of the State of California is not engaging in this price fixing matter in that the State of California is not known to have made any substantial purchases. in either event, I, as your General Counsel, would work with -whichever group of attorneys you might select with reference to compiling the information required and direct contact with Districts ' personnel in preparation and presentation of evidence information. In this regard, it is not expected that much time would be required from Districts ' personnel, in that the chlorine purchases were direct and not nearly as involved as the purchase and acquisition of cement pi_oe. There would be no fees payable by the Districts to me arising out of this matter other than for my participation .with the law firm you may authorize to represent you. In view of the foregoing, I recommend that you authorize i:=.ediate representation of the Districts in the pending suit in San Francisco or the filing of a separate suit if it appears to be in the best interests of the Districts. The next hearing on this matter is on February 13, 1967; and it would be important, as to a possible speedy determination of the :natter, to be represented at L'.hat t.-Lme before the court. I further recommend the em-olo_:.ent of the local attorneys Rutan & Tucker upon the terms hereinabove out- lined. It appears that the Districts have a duty and obligation to the public they represent to pursue such rights and remedies as they may have arising out of the violation of the statutes prohibiting price fixing by t :e suppliers of products and materials . Res,pectfully submitted C. Arthur Nisson, General Counsel for County Sanitation Districts can hw of Orange County, California ' J Agenda Item 16 F-2 All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-7 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P1-12-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 11 2, 35 5, 65 75 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 13 JOB NO. P1-12-2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 23 35 55 63 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Boards of Directors by the Districts ' Construction Engineer, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY for SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-12-2, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That contract for said Job No. P1-12-2 is hereby awarded to SULLY-MILLER CONTRACTING COMPANY in the total amount of $ 17,873.00 , in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor on February 1, 1967; and, Section 3. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, 3, 51 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, be authorized to enter into and sign a contract for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . Agenda Item No. 17 -G- All Districts Engineers ' Est. $25,000 B I D T A B U LA T I ON S H E E T Date: February 1, 1967 Contract: SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE III AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-12-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Sully-Miller Contracting Co. P. o. Box 432 $17,873.00 Orange, California 2. R. W. Mc Clellan and Sons 151 Commercial Way $19,540.87 Costa Mesa, California 3. C. E. Hurley Contracting Corp. 11541 Westminster Blvd. $20,869 .40 Garden Grove, California 4. John W. Tiedemann Co. 13827 E. Tedemary Drive $22,573.4o P. 0. Box 4o69 Whittier, California 90607 5. Copp Paving Co. , Inc . Box 458 $235992.00 Artesia, California 6 . Griffith Company P. O. Box 395 $24,002.20 Costa Mesa, California 92627 7. R. J. Noble Company P. o. Box 620 $24,582.6o Orange, California 8. Western Paving Co. 6842 Live Oak $25,445.4o Bell Gardens, California 9 . Yoder and Sons 7890 Alhambra $27,016 .00 Huntington Beach, California Agenda Item No. 17 -H- All Districts February 8, 1967 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 ADDENDUM NO. 1 to Plans and Specifications for HEADWORKS "C" - PLANT NO. 2 JOB NO. P2-11 PROPOSAL Page 5 - LIST OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS Delete the first paragraph and substitute the following: "The name of the manufacturer of each piece of equipment that will be installed in this project is set forth below. Only one manufacturer of each item shall be listed and all blanks shall be completed. Bidder agrees that in the event any so listed manufacturer is not specifically named in the Specifications, he will, prior to award, submit complete information satisfactory to the Engineer that such manufacturer' s equipment complies with all requirements of the Specifications. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, the so listed manufacturer' s equipment does not comply with the Specifications, the bid may be rejected unless, prior to award, the Bidder, in writing, agrees to supply approved equipment without a change in the bid price. " NOTE: For the Bidder' s convenience, two copies of Page 5 as revised by this addendum are attached hereto. It is suggested that the Bidder sustitute this revised Page 5 in the Proposal Form previously furnished. Agenda Item No. 18 I-1 All Districts SPECIFICATIONS 1. Page SP-39, Section 14-24, PVC LINER PLATE Delete Nob-Lock liner plate. All liner plate shall be T-Lock. 2. Page SP-115, Section 30-10, CAST IRON PIPE (g)l� Flanges. Add to the first paragraph after the word nuts. If the flanges are not full faced flanges, the edges of both flanges shall be covered around the periphery for the full width of both flanges with a vinyl tape. The tape shall be the same color as the color code of the piping as specified under PAINTING. The vinyl tape shall be as manufactured by 3-M, Easy- Coat, or Brady, or approved equal. Tape ends shall be lapped not less than 3 inches. " 3. Page SP-123, Section 30-16, STEEL PIPE (d) Flanges. Add to the first paragraph after the word iron: "If the flanges are not full faced flanges, the edges of both flanges shall be covered around the periphery for the full width of both flanges with a vinyl tape. The tape shall be the same color as the color code of piping as specified under PAINTING. The vinyl tape shall be as manufactured by 3-M, Easy-Coat, Brady, or approved equal. Tape ends shall be lapped not less than 3 inches. " 4. Page SP-131, Section 31-2, BACK PRESSURE CONTROL VALVES (b) Chlorine Solution System. Add to the fourth paragraph after the word Hastelloy-C: "The tubing between the diaphragm seal and the controller shall be annealed 316 stainless steel tubing with stainless steel "Swagelok" fittings. " 5. Page SP-155, Section 33-18, HYDROGEN SULFIDE ANALYZER (b) Analyzer. Add to the second to the last paragraph on the page:+`The pump shall be a Model K-202 rotary integral oil- less pump as manufactured by Leiman Bros . , Inc. , or approved equal. Pump shall have a 316 stainless steel body and shall have all parts exposed to process media made of 316 stainless steel. " 5. Page SP-179, Section 39-2, NEW RAW SEWAGE PUMPS, GEAR REDUCERS AND ENGINE DRIVE (e) Engine Drive (4) Power Take-Off - Change the first sentence to read as follows: "Power shall be transmitted . . . . Style No . 430, the driving element being stub shaft mounted. " Agenda Item No. 18 I-2 All Districts 7. Page SP-193, Section 39-5, DRAINAGE PUMPS (a) General. Add the following name to the list of pump manufacturers in the second paragraph: "Cascade Pump Company" . 8. Page SP-228, Section 42-6, CONDUIT (a) General. Add a new paragraph after the third paragraph as follows:xpansion ,joints shall be installed in all conduit runs which cross building and structure expansion joints within the headworks complex. Expansion joints shall be O.Z. Type EX with bonding jumper as manufactured by 0. Z. Electrical Mfg. Co. , or approved equal. " 9. Page SP-238, Section 42-22, LIGHTING FIXTURES Fixture D - Change the last sentence to read as follows: "Fixture shall be Stonco Electric Products Co. 05602-E, or approved equal. " PLANS 1. Dwg. No. Y-1, PROFILE - 78-INCH RCP WETWELL OUTLET "C" Delete the note "PVC liner full circumference of pipe" in two places. Delete the 5-foot dimension where the pipe enters the structure at each end of the pipe. 2. Dwg. No. S-6, SECTION "G" . Change the dimension at the left side of the section from 27' -2" to 28'-2" . Change the elevation of the bottom of the floor from -20. 15 to elevation -21. 15. 3. Dwg. No. M-11 Add two fabricated steel supports under the horizontal run of each 10-inch engine exhaust pipe. Supports shall be anchored to the adjacent concrete discharge launder with flush shells. Pipe supports shall be Grinnell Fig. 195 welded steel brackets with Figure 186 pipe saddles, or approved equal. 4. Dwg. No . M-31, NATURAL GAS SCHEMATIC "A" Add, a 1-inch natural gas pipe from the 4" blind flange near the surge tank within the headworks structure to the relocated incinerators. The new 1-inch natural gas pipe shall parallel the new 4-inch L.P. Digester gas which runs from near the surge tank to the relocated incinerators. The new 1-inch natural gas pipe shall branch at the relocated incinerators with one 3/4-inch pipe going to the pilot of each of the four burners on each of the two relocate-d incinerators. Each 3/4-inch line to the pilots a.� Agenda Item No. 18 I-3 All Districts shall be valved near the entrance to the incinerator with a 3/4-inch plug valve. DIGESTER GAS SCHEMATIC "B" Delete the 3/4-inch pipes and valves which connect to the burner pilots. Dwg. No. M-3;4, ISOMETRIC-NATURAL GAS SYSTEM "A" and ISOMETRIC DIGESTER GAS SYSTEM "B" Same changes as specified above for Dwg. No. M-31. Dwg. No . M-21, GRIT TUNNEL PIPING PLAN "M" Add a 1-inch natural gas pipe beside the 4-inch digester gas pipe. Dwg. No. M-22, Sections "G" and "A" Add a 1-inch natural gas pipe beside the 4-inch digester gas pipe. Dwg. No. M-9, SECTIONAL PLAN - PUMP STATION PIPING GALLERY - ELEV. -1. 50 "All Add a 1-inch natural gas pipe parallel to the 4-inch digester gas pipe from the 4-inch blind flange near the surge tanks to the relocated incinerators. Dwg. No. M-11, Sections "R" and "P" Add a 1-inch natural gas pipe beside the new 4-inch digester gas pipe. 5. Dwg. No. MS-7, SECTION "E" Add a cutoff wall on the right side of the new concrete outlet box. The cutoff wall shall go from Elev. 0.67 down to elev. minus 1. 50, shall be across the full 3' -0" width of the box and shall be 6-inches thick. The cutoff wall shall be reinforced with #4 bars at 12-inch centers each way. JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS ,..r, Agenda Item No. 18 I-4 All Districts LIST OF EQUIPMENT MANUFACTURERS The name of the manufacturer of each piece of equipment that will be installed in this project is set forth below. Only one manufactur- er of each item shall be listed and all blanks shall be completed. Bidder agrees that in the event any so listed manufacturer is not specifically named in the Specifications, he will, prior to award, submit complete information satisfactory to the Engineer that such manufacturer' s equipment complies with all requirements of the Specifications. If, in the opinion of the Engineer, the so .listed manufacturer's equipment does not comply with the Specifications, the bid may be rejected unless, prior to award, the Bidder, in writing agrees to supply approved equipment without a change in the bid price. Sluice Gates and Slide Gates Prime Manufacturer of Raw Sewage Pump System Raw Sewage Pumps Right Angle Gear Reducer Engine Drive Ebullient Engine Cooling Sump Pumps Plant Water Pumps Drainage Pumps Right Angle Gear Reducer for Existing Pump Ventilation Fans Grit Washing Screw Conveyor Grit Hopper Gates Bar Screens and Conveyor Aeration Blowers Bridge Crane Hydrogen Sulfide Analyzer Electric Control Centers Fiberglass Ducts (Revised Dy Addendum No. 1) Agenda Item No . 18 I-5 All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-8 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB 0. P - 2-- A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 51 63 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR FENCE AND ENTRANCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-12-3 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 13 2, 32 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for FENCE AND ENTRANCE REVISIONS AT PLANT NO. 1, JOB NO. P1-12-3, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed with the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be directed to advertise for bids for said work in the manner prescribed by law; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 Vim., February 28, 196:7, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Districts ' staff be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 63 7, and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to award contract for said work. Agenda Item No. 19 -J- All Districts C• Y �� r!'f � _� e '` gilt'"<"r,•+'"71At` Y i i Mat i , 4 _ JLL :. �.. ►•� M A I IV E. fl T 2 A N G OUTWACT P 1 - 12 - 3 M ISCELLAMF-OUS FF-1IC-IMCa R-EV IS IOV4 ESTItjiATED C05T 1=07- F- .4T►2E PIZ03V--CT 2000. TAL PLAMT F-WTlZAkMCE AND TRF- FENCING AT TKE WELL SITES ARE SE-% I" MA2CN l9GT. THE 2EMOV1►.1G OF THE. UPPETZ PORTMO4 OF THE EQI .� WILL IMPROVE. TRAFFIC VISISl$--1'Ty WHEM LEAVING THE PLAt�l-r i 1 � L >� ATE 2F- S10 �.1 G REVISED 11.1 PRE.PARAT'10AS FOR OF ELLIS AV. K Wild& wAI.L-S Aul=) IWSTALLIWG THE ARC»ITECTUQAt_ STEEL RAl�.1�1G RESOLUTION NO. 67-9 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR J6D ffO P - -2 �.d A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 23 3, 5, 63 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 13 23 33 53 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for SITE IMPROVEMENTS - PHASE II AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-8-2, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed with the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be directed to advertise for bids for said work in the manner prescribed by law; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 2.m. 3February 28,1267 , at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Districts ' staff be authorized to open said bids on behalf of the Boards of Directors; and, Section 5. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and Districts Nos . 2, 3, 5, 63 7, and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to award contract for said work. Agenda Item No. 20 -L- All Districts COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Kemper Const. & W. W. Hoagland DATE: Feb. 8, 1967 JOB: Installation of Additional Gas Compressors, Job No. I-4-2 Amount of this change order $ none In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor' s letters dated July 25, September 29, October 4, October 26, 1966 and January 25, 1967 and Construction Engineer' s Memorandum dated January 313 1967 EXTENSION OF TIME Acts of the District Days 1. Postponed access to Boiler Bldg. thus delaying the relocation of a gas engine 15 2. Revision of gas control valves and critical material shortage . 45 3. Suspension of work due to Westside Force Main emergency work. 20 4. Various postponements in making connections to the existing gas system. 15 Weather 1. Cast iron fittings supplier delayed due to unsuitable weather conditions for pouring molten iron 20 TOTAL CALENDAR DAYS 115 Original Contract date: April 28, 1966 Change Order No. 1 (15 calendar days) May 13, 1966 New completion date with this extension of time (115 calendar days) February 2, 1967 Original Contract Price $ 148,400.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 1,,425.60 This Change none Amended Contract Price $ 1492825.60 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF February 8, 1967 ORANGE COUNTY By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer KEMPER CONST. & W. W. HOAGLAND By Agenda Item No. 21 -M- All Districts RESOLUTION N0. 67-10 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-4-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS . 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING INSTALLA- TION OF ADDITIONAL GAS COMPRESSORS, JOB NO. I-4-23 AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 3, 53 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Contractor, KEMPER CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and W. W. HOAGLAND, a joint venture, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL GAS COMPRESSORS, JOB NO. I-4-2, on the 1st day of February , 1967; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL GAS COMPRESSORS, JOB NO. I-4-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 28th day of April, 1966; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 1 be authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. Agenda Item No. 22 -N- All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 67-15-3 APPROVING AGREEMENT TO PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING PREPARATION OF AN AGREE- MENT TO PROVIDE SEWER SERVICE TO CERTAIN PROPERTY IN LOS ANGELES COUNTY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, resolves as follows: WHEREAS, by means of a letter dated January 4, 1967, the City of Brea, California has requested that County Sanitation District No. 3 provide sewer service, on a contractual basis, for 17.7 acres of property in Los Angeles County, located at the northerly terminus of Puente Street in Brea; and, WHEREAS, the staff has prepared a report containing its recommendations relative to providing sewer service for the above- mentioned property; and, WHEREAS, County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11 have, by Minute Order adopted February 8, 1967, given their approval and consent to the District' s providing such sewer service, as required under the terms of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement dated 1958. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. That the report of the staff, dated January 27, 1967, be approved, received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That preparation of an agreement to provide sewer service, on a contractual basis, to the property referred to hereinabove and more particularly described and shown on Exhibits "A" and "B" attached hereto, is hereby authorized between County Sanitation District No. 3, the City of Brea, and a Los Angeles County local sewering agency. Said Agreement shall be based upon the terms and conditions outlined in the staffs report. Agenda Item No. 26 0-1 District No. 3 Section 3. It is hereby understood and agreed that the District' s providing sewer service to this area in no way estab- lishes policy in this connection, and the District will not extend the territory to be served beyond that described hereinabove. jgenda Item No. 26 0-2 District No. 3 January 27, 1967 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Subject: Staff report on request from City of Brea for sewer service for approximately 17.7 acres of property in Los Angeles County at the northerly terminus of Puente Street INTRODUCTION At the January 11, 1967 meeting of the Board a letter from the Mayor of the City of Brea, dated January 4, was received and filed and referred to the staff for study and report . The Brea letter basically requests the Board to consider providing sewer service on a contractual basis for the property described below. The following is a report on the study of this matter made by the staff as directed by the Board. LOCATION AND EXTENT OF PROPERTY AND STATEMENT OF PROBLEM The property in question is undeveloped land in two parcels and located adjacent to the County boundary at the northerly terminus of Puente Street in Brea (sketch attached) . The larger parcel is owned by the Ryness-Smith Company and the smaller by the Union Oil Company of California. Because of the location of the Rancho line and the boundary between Los Angeles and Orange counties, these two parcels are isolated from other property in the area and naturally drain towards Orange County. As stated above, the total extent of the two parcels is 17.7 acres. Since there is no sewering agency in Los Angeles County at any feasible distance from the property and since the owners are desirous of development in the very near future, they have proposed to the City of Brea that the latter provide sewer service for the property through the City' s facilities which connect to the District ' s trunk in Imperial Highway. They have further proposed that a sewer maintenance district be formed in Los Angeles County which would provide a legal and continuing entity to enter into a Agenda Item No. 27 P-1 All Districts contractual arrangement with Brea and the District and to collect taxes to defray the charges imposed by the City and the District for this service. FINDINGS The staff finds that: 1. The sewerage problem of the property in question is basically as stated above. 2. The volume of sewage generated in this small acreage would be insignificant with respect to the capacity of existing District facilities. 3. Sewer service to the area, as proposed, is entirely feasible from a physical standpoint. 4. The entering into of a contractual arrangement as described above is feasible. 5. It is not desirable nor feasible at the present time for the District to consider serving other property similarly situated in Los Angeles County because of the large area involved draining naturally to Orange County and the approach, within approximately five years, of the limit of capacity in the District ' s facilities (see the report on Waste Water Disposal and Reclamation for the County of Orange, California, 1966-2000") . 6. Charges to be imposed by the District for this service should be at least equal to that which would be paid by a similar development in Orange County seeking annexation to the District. 7. Consent of the other six Sanitation Districts will be necessary before District No. 3 can enter into the described contractual arrangement. This consent is obligatory under the terms of the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement entered into by the seven Sanitation Districts in 1958. RECOMMENDATIONS 1. If the Board of Directors of District No. 3 indicates a willingness to serve this property and the other six Sanitation Districts consent to the arrangement, the Board should clearly stipulate that because of the peculiar situation of the property it is willing to provide such service but is not creating a precedent and will not extend the area to be served beyond the requested 17.7 acres. �d Agenda Item No. 27 P-2 All Districts 2. That if the area in question is to be served as proposed, a contractual arrangement should be entered into between the District, the City of Brea and a future sewer maintenance district in Los Angeles County, containing the above recommended limitation in area to be served. 3. That such a contractual arrangement include the following provisions: a. A lump sum payment of $250 per acre ($4425) by the sewer maintenance district to District No . 3 at, or before, the time service commences. This charge would be in lieu of an annexation fee to be paid if the property were located in Orange County. b. An annual service charge of $37.50 per residential lot be paid by the sewer maintenance district to District No. 3. This charge is based on taxes now paid to the District on similar homes in the District. In the event of any future commercial development, an annual service charge of $250 per acre be established. c. That the annual service charges established be reviewed at five year intervals and adjusted upward by District No. 3 if it appears that the property in question is paying less in service charge than equivalent property in the District is paying by ad valorem taxes or otherwise. d. The term of the agreement to be at the pleasure of the sewer maintenance district. Respectfully submitted, Fred A. Harper General Manager FM PGB:gg Enclosure Agenda Item No. 27 P-3 All Districts .. ,.: .,. i/� _>• I:^�I^ h "IYra:n[hsi•6o`,.I�e•.U'�_susi LCrua � Ti:� 'J 1 11 t+no�_ I� _ RIR •pq ��• c� l�:•• I+ ! '�f41r?I-,y':M1Ia ST til�. RI4�t+11 rICH1 LA ST A 4c /AWUT `'i �: [ al ST i °o .... t �L' �'' W4LNUr •.r,:fi•I III100 w wo OI+^ ✓,r �• MCI7 r ~ v 1 ' •Rau;ao d ', Ia�I�?I _r r 1,ATEL�e 1 S7 .� ?RI ��qq.. IR Sl a ` 90 TMy Cr�an'0 ,1•i/RC7 ST�� ST s'I CAIIrOAw ST f AILLSIO[ S/7�1'i,N• HILLSI - ;� + p•> v •) X �I � �! r-.ST�� �pUHI/AM I^IT LOI!S 1ST NI+ I1ulpp 1 +' ti' !�• �. ^)^�`•::p'riywlC^157 OSCtrtn1AIL ACF. PA UN PLE" S7 �� �fGS 0J CA �L � u U.j p it CNGINITA$lST �O C>,T �,Y .1 •' chl I �_ r ;o� 1311 •,. ST �,• o ,CT a EA yp � �. <1, f• �I tS •'� I n hO,i. a 1 cl.nr a e fA- coon nuaunn at 4= U A p c L„Ctlri N Sr �+ ^w b ^o e F ab o lw >r� 1,; In f;•^, �a A MAiN ,nln i" p �S A LIB C I Z uni z. I 9p • AAL �OgdT C} v O J!• C I� (,-. .•. .� C. �s ALDISId14 ST it Ga G_ IGF �•T 1 pnANCL�G[r "e v �tr, OgOT I ("' t ----- iirof CYPRESS i"' n, - ` V JLU C Tr 1' ir = LENS.. It�l 1I w ;$T< .!1 r•n 701 , CY RC1�•II• :'0 fd ua ••T f.LLr wrJ -t3 I _t�a �GfE5T lA1 �7Tw — —�- •� 4s '�mit L Z 1 •z MAPLE I „ z��?__- a •yC Yti {-� tll l71 f p [ Q t MCPwER60Na.i.. G G ST Ze • O ,~ 8CN1 �i �Ir.�n7 1. • I P la1 •. T =• .� WALKER z i :COL�iCE ST I RE. ' Y. j�� ST�vEw N TEAR lY I c, k _r COLLEGE' L rsTA.. �0 � I f AS a Z F ! O bG"S z ST < r I tl -J`�" COl d a G• SUN CT m e p x 3 I s it z°oo' sr g IM �.� b 1 m1�v�aRDSTo i ,.,Fr RpaNN[ OR I F >o Kw I GOe�25 a D z'Nf1RtJE ST z riARSORI_ �o~` a Ifs ,col v :r: I�� ©LVD`t ( r' \ -ba'�� y� Af PrI.E I St s } rf00 if rM6F nlC ROCaIN '��• I� N f DEDCOFD •- C7 L ST{ iS In s? I ST r• d 1 I 8 i/tnCOLFAx Z�`- ST I+c }+ s L �ci F 4 vfj OE aR , C, rr �D DExTER �eA SY ya i T te!'IK, : �P = `,,� d' r i c 1 •� //•A ... 0 ...z I^ IN r �L '•� N „' i FONDA 1 D = o �RRI;,IroN r sE< r• ,C/P i AR . .'-�..�va>-� Jt7"';, GER .ST t� , N t`� O �l r'ri �� ,a s<• ;� Ro ,A,� c ;LA .. o. •.a C r U NITAVa < ST o n ..T r•� Z I I``.� j I SON RA PLC LAURA $T I� cj s', C C s •••j .•• i 1 j I.i��. ter•. f r 1 r' �- •.� v soo� PALM 5T A $nj.1•Ip,r�,�PnIN�� ST �'. O.j. �, � I '�"a�, 1. r I Z500/'�:6W 1+1 I ZOOir, WILS 00CN$ {: j�.v L'V•CLlr1)ST 1... 4 ♦•••••a ..� /:� 1 �r.......... _,• I ' ; I i I WADE' T K = ^ e1L-} ` --D- I •( `� 1 I �+ ip I �•=�.. 3 1 04GATE 'gat rl Aeun WY 1�-•T -- 1 it I I = p F LT VE AONn 090 KW 000 OR , I,n 1 p ROSCOE ST c F�r'1'FRON 5T S CPnLERMO w n -TW)PICANA WY `I r =46Y'T_ OR .dry •Y� ( I'�� ST l'oC JUR ST �. , Ti,A a$n opA `►r d +, ,.�? i < r i..1! f < <1y R►t g I � �ai+�. `� _ __ _ C LOCRIIAvE CA S $ it LO GG TOS OR � 6 1 OC 10o O yZ 11 p ! �YARDM I '^-."` 1 t ••' r ^+�^� C4•u i �L•!'13315 Q, ' a,. on 1 G of A 'a•��G:!AV I^ 1200 •L Va;+fpt,`�� I ' �i/�A_ ��j��167 I I ;. ?^'.:;c;A• �I i 1.,1 STEELS v DR AV T,eERRY 1 15T \ I 970 \ + ... is v1.%A M I^. N s I I p 1 I V i 11.1.a<► „ I I _ �N4 t} i I � 1 Et ;•,-r`,�I ARFO �,''.%\ ��'„ � it ~ I •I `��-- `'� EvERCo C�V\S` `•+-,7;`1T•,i � I'"••. -') 0 �.. I >Al fid � � II GELPHr rr•. `! m I, 4 I r ,• / Ij a ..1 \q'w p,�:Sn 1 r3r 0 TAMARACK .�. �, r I, •l�r F 411 V.F rp0 t r�•V ,. �C�a' s' i 1`-r` C'� _• II 1� \I A•+ ^ A',n�W Or '�:•> n � ,vl I u `r', � 'Oty3�'�p°q� "e•�� �� �Y -SKI! ' �' I •••a I �:J+•JV.� u'i V .���n V J I �J 4 `^!' I ,'1/ -�'1,,,_ I I• I ,AUREL :.V� o e V �OPltap' y'�+?, o^� vi $i a J I I,9Q j/ �'�{^:.:� r ,•SI', 1 ..,� i I °ihE ST I vl �' I r •'` ~ I I'� I ' 1 • Ram i< y L�AN:r1 RL I ' - � 1 I tom'` ). ' no. +♦i avl � j 1 ; 'I c! Oax Pl C it I r E►STa^JE WY 11 ` I lrf Co •., 41111111100, 'Z enca Ite%a ti0. �r P-4 All Districts DANNEMEYER TUGHEY • WILLIAM E.DANNEM EYER ATTORNEYS AT LAW CONRAO O.TUGHEY 1105 EAST COMMONWEALTH FULLERTON,CALIFORNIA 926131 TELEPHONE e71-1046 January 23, 1967 Orange County Sanitation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: This office represents the owners of real property located at the northeast corner of the intersection of Garfield and Brookhurst. The owners of this property are desirous of having a bridge built across the Santa Ana River at Garfield as early as possible in order to better serve the real property which they own. At the present time, a 60 ft. right of way exists in this area directly to the north of the Ellis substation. Ultimate widening plans would necessitate the taking of 20 ft. from the Sanitation : District and 20 ft. from the Edison Co. property in order to widen the right of way to the 100 ft. desired width. Annually the County of Orange in cooperation with the cities of the County appropriates approximately $300,000 for the construc- tion of bridges. A bridge costs about $10.00/sq. ft. to construct. It is estimated that a bridge on Garfield Avenue at the point of the Santa Ana River crossing would cost approximately $300,000. Our clients are interested in establishing a priority for this particular bridge and are interested in obtaining your support in this endeavor. If the position of the County Sanita- tion Districts of Orange County is to favor the construction of this bridge as soon as possible, I would appreciate a letter from your company attesting to such fact so that we may utilize such information along with any other information which we are able to develop in order to establish as good a priority for this bridge as is possible under the circumstances. fiery truly yours, WltEflAM E. A NEMEYER WED: ly Staff Report: We have contacted the Cities of Huntington Beach, Fountain Valley, and Costa Mesa, and at the present time the project proposed in this letter is not being considered by these cities. Staff Recommendation: Receive and file the letter, .and direct the staff to notify the attorneys that the Districts do not desire to take a position on this matter at this time . Agenda Item No . 31 -Q- All Districts rr.ilE: ARV N COMI AINT"Y 13042 MYFORD ROAD, IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 • TELEPHONE (714) 544-0120 January 25, 1967 llr. Fred A. Harper, Secretary Board of Directors of County Sanitation District 'o. 5 of Orange County P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Subject: Bay Bridge Pump Station Demolition and Removal Dear Mr. Harper: This letter is to officially request demolition and removal of the abandoned Bay Bridge Pump Station on the southerly side of the Bay Bridge in Newport Beach. An easement for this pump station was granted originally to the City of Newport Beach by The Irvine Company in 1937 . The grant- ino of this is filed in the County Recorders Office of Official Records 867/440 . On December 12, 1951 the City of Newport Beach conveyed the pump station and its rights in the easement to Sanitation District No. 5. The original grant of easement provided the site would revert to The Irvine Company if it ceased to be used for a period of one (1) year. With this in mind, we would appreciate scheduling of the demolition work at your earliest convenience. Very truly yours, David A. Kaylor Project Engineer. DAK/mz Agenda Item No. 40 -R- District No. _5 ,J DO,NALD C. SIN?SON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER 3343 NEWPORT BLVD. • NEWPORT BEACH. CALIFORNIA • OR B-1431 INVESTIGATIONS & REPORTS WATER • SEWERAGE DRAINAGE • STREETS STAFF ENGINEERING January 31, 1967 Board of Directors Cl to Sa nitutio�l D,-S L. U No . 5 10844 `Cllis Avenue ountair� Valley, Calif ' is Gentlemen: 1' e have reviewed the letter from Yr. Kaylo-r of the Irvine CGay any, dated January 25, 1967, recuesting demolition of the abandoned Bay Bridge x umping Station. The s;,atenentus in the let ter -regarding the ,'ranting and ever s:ion of the easement ure; accurate as 'pest we have been able to aete .nine . = negotf-at-ing ,rith 1:Tr. a`Gsoi'i of Irvine Co �Gany for thn, �-,rantf n E Ci an easement or t�_e new QL'u"1'yJi".'Lg StatiGil, a Co :.i Umsnt ras Taa to d molis t'r_ old station. Zy y de e h e is �heleio-re recG:=ended that you authorize the ae':a01-•tiori -requested in �T air 0r I S .eater. -e de::olition will involve the re�10val G� any salvageable SC`, ;pjmcnv, the. d-om-L0lition and removal of the COrLcre��e StruCtlAre t0 a ;J G'i:1t belG•r., grade, - iista.11ing a l..n the inconLing 2111 limn, cL CO::�y�aCtPCi .ill ii1 the re is L-L void, and or actin aLid laysl:ing the Sur 7*ace . u ,"1ai'S b!?-n our thou, ;h -ha t-ho -x: S—i:1v 2l li1.f3 S=G 2-ld �!? COn _:,i^C: �G th^ 1)1 t0 irovide �?�l?'i`�f? CST OV!?I�lOt'r. 'i'^ ;, r- ra .L rµ r' 'CIO, a an J.�_—•.+ Ir 1.i1 ..VG.-V ,� u• �iG 1..7 J.�e+.ai.elle aV-G ul'aV Gl ��L G.+.11. G•.cJ ....iy 4wJ G.Li :._t,_.Oa,C :.1( re�..•�V 1i0.: �:�� D1ViSi0i1 Or. I..L�,11;ayw • ... r..0 not ti'lillic V.Oi-LCL b? t0 Construct this OVe--i,, ow r'. conjunction ti.•.r U.- l,i �la ..•G 1...V 1 G•1 wG1La •lot :1 2,•CCkxa'u`!� �?St:,.i:::avn 0:� ��:? cost 0:. tl:-? CiOi^__ has S?:a Dar ei �:O%+eV-or, Z C:0 i�Ot �f?E31 t'.-I at 1t 'Jill e:iCeeC. 15 y 000 . you CigS:i^'�y j"JC �'7ill b!? wvaila'Olo U re-_pa a ti10 -.L u LVL,- and biadln^. dOCLLin1 t3 . V1e t'v0i�� C �rO70Se t0 CLG the ors an nou-rly basis at the sane rates St_aulaced -L Ol�.6 CLl:ir'?:1t Agenda Item No. 40 S-1 District No. 5 agreement for engineering services : The cost of these services should not exceed {S500 . I will be available at your next meeting, February 8th, to answer any questions you may have . Respectfully'sub.:itted, Donald 0 . Simpson DCS: c Agenda Item No. 40 S-2 District No. 5 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 2 CONTRACTOR: Cook & Barletta , Inc. DATE: Feb. 8, 1967 JOB: Rocky Point Pumping Station Reconstruction, Job No. 6-6 Amount of this change order (ADD) (ZEMI" $ 300.00 In accordance with contract provisons, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor' s letter dated January 5, 1967 and Contract Revision dated January 30, 1967 ADD Install salvaged hatch covers in Dry Well Roof $300.00 Due to the above work, the contract time is extended a total of seven (7) calendar days. Original completion date: January 4, 1967 Completion date with this, and previous extension of time (12 calendar days) January 26, 1967 Original Contract Price $ 24,05,8.00 Prev. Auth. Changes none This Change (ADD) ( =) 300.00 Amended Contract Price $ 24,358.00 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of February 8, 1967 Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer COOK & BARLETTA, INC. By Agenda Item No. 45 -T- District No. 6 RESOLUTION NO. 67-11-7 APPROVING MASTER PLAN REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWERAGE FACILITY REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT (MASTER PLAN) WITH IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Sewerage Facility Reimburse- ment Agreement (Master Plan) , between County Sanitation District No. 7 and IRVINE INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX, providing for reimbursement by the District for the SOUTH IRVINE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agree- ment on behalf of the District, in form acceptable to the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That reimbursement in the total amount of $120,147.23 is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in said agreement, from the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. Agenda Item No. 50 -U- District No. 7 ' BOVLE and LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES P. O. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone 547-447I January 26 , 1967 Fred A. Harper, General Manager County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California' 92708 Dear Sir: Please refer to my letter of January 5 , 1967 re: South Irvine Sub-trunk Sewer. The final quantities submitted with this letter covered only that portion of the sub-trunk shown on the plans prepared by this office, Boyle and Lowry, District Engineers. That portion of the South Irvine Sub-trunk extending in Michelson Drive, from MacArthur Blvd. to Von Karman Dr. , was constructed from plans prepared by Williamson 6 Schmid for the Irvine Industrial Complex. The final quantities and cost of this portion of the sub- trunk are attached to a letter to you dated November 7, 1966 from Irvine Industrial Complex, signed by E. M. Secord. We have secured a set of sepia prints of these plans to be filed with the District. We note in checking the quantities that. the actual length of 18-inch pipe installed was 2280 feet rather than 2216 feet, as shown on Mr. Secord's estimate. However, since the contract has been paid in full we recommend the accept- ance of the Sully-Miller contract amount of $33 , 832. 40. j Attached is a revised statement of final quantities and cost for both the Rogers 6 Davies contract and the Sully-Miller Co. contract. Also attached are six copies of a map showing the location and extent of the South Irvine Sub-trunk. Very truly yours , Boyle and Lowry Consulting Engineers . i( ' Sidney L.-Lowry SLL:m Encl. cc - Boyle Engineering Irvine Industrial Complex Agenda Item No . 50 V-1 District No. 7 SOUTH IRVINE SUB-TRUNK FINAL QUANTITIES Rogers 8 Davies Contract: Item Unit ' I No. Description Quantity Price Amount 1. 24" V. C.P. 811. 0 L. F. $18 . 20 $14, 760 . 20 2 . 18" V. C.P. 3413 . 0 L. F. 12 . 60 • 43 ,003. 80 3. 48" Manholes 39 . 5 V.F. 32 . 00 1,264. 00 4. 60" Manholes 16. 33 V. F. 44 . 00 718. 52 5 . V.C.P. Conc. Encasement 14. 0 C.Y. 30 . 00 420 . 00 6 . Type I . Bedding 4224. 0 L.F. 1.10 4,646 . 40 7. 33" Bore Casing 50. 0 L.F. 75 . 00 35750 . 00 Subtotal ---------- $68 ,562 . 92 C.O. No. 1 - Remove 6 replace pvmt. across taxiways • - 3 ,652 .00 C.O. No. 2 - Attain 90% relative comp. 2707 L. F. 125860 . 00 I C.O. No. 3 - Rock Base under pavement - 150 . 00 . C.O. No. 4 - Oil Airport Field (412 . 55 + 10%) - 453 . 80 C.O. No. 5 - Rock 8 extra work required for tie-in 636 . 11 TOTAL CONTRACT ---- $86 , 314. 83 Sully-Miller Co. Contract (Michelson Dr. portion) Item Unit No. Description Quantity Price Amount 1. 18" V. C.P. 2216 L. F. $ 12 .40 $27 ,478 . 40 2 . 48" Manholes 6 Each 345 . 00 2 ,070 . 00 3 . Rock Bedding 680 Tons 6 . 30 4 ,284. 00 TOTAL CONTRACT --- $33 ,832 . 40 TOTAL CONSTRUCTION COST, SOUTH IRVINE SUB-TRUNK FOR REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT Rogers 6 Davies Contract --------- $ 865314 . 83 Sully-Miller Co. Contract --------- 33 , 832 . 40 TOTAL -- $120 , 147 . 23 i i Agenda Item No. 50 V-2 District No . 7 .- ;J�.,• - !' -fryer - - if •G.,j . 11, J ' 4-3 .5co% -Soo' MAP /./,457 TRlJ/YX u� =.';.'WK.. OiPANC•E COUNTY ,4/RPORT / COf/N7-3 L4AXIM7--ONO/ST. N97 Q� / H 61 / ,�� RESOLUTION NO. 67-12-7 ANNEXATION #13 - PANORAMA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FOR APPLICATION TO ANNEX TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: That an application for annexation of territory to itself be made to the Local Agency Formation Commission as follows : Section 1. This proposal is made pursuant to Division 1 (District Reorganization Act of 1965) of Title 6 of the Government Code of the State of California. Section 2. This application is for the purpose of annexing a 6 .17 acre parcel of real property improved by a public school (Panorama Elementary School) and owned by the Orange Unified School District so that said school may be served by public sanitary sewers . Section 3. The districts affected other than this district are as follows : Orange Unified School District County of Orange County Structural Fire Protection County Library District Orange County Cemetery District No. 1 Orange County Flood Control District Orange County Harbor District Orange County Mosquito Abatement District County Service Area No. 5 East Orange County Water District Road District No. 4 Metropolitan Water District Orange County Municipal Water District Orange County Waterworks No. 8 Orange County Water District Section 4. The territory to be annexed is uninhabited and its description is as follows: Agenda Item No. 51 W-1 District No. 7 That portion of Lot 8 of E1 Modena Citrus Lands as shown on a map thereof recorded in Book 6, Page 32 Of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Newport Avenue, 60.00 feet wide, and Greenwald Lane, 50.00 feet wide, as said intersection is shown in Book 53, Page 25 of Records of Survey Records of Orange County, California; thence along the centerline of Newport Avenue, South 730 12' 30" East 195.18 feet; thence North 350 22' 30" East 31.65 feet to the true point of beginning; said point being also a point in the existing boundary of the County Sani- tation District No. 7 established by Exclusion Resolution No. 61-984 dated September 27, 1961; thence leaving said District boundary and con- tinuing North 350 22' 30" East 541.65 feet; thence South 640 41' 00" East 27.42 feet; thence North 350 22' 30" East 215.31 feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 8; thence along said Northerly line South 640 41' 00" East 345.85 feet; thence leaving said Northerly line South 350 23' 35" West 779.73 feet to a point in the said District boundary; thence North 50° 47' 00" West along said District boundary 201.44 feet to an angle point in said District boundary; thence continuing along said District boundary North 730 12' 30" West 175.44 feet to the true point of beginning. Section 5. That all annexation fees are to be paid to County Sanitation District No. 7 prior to completion of the annexation proceedings . Section 6. Request is hereby made that such proceedings as are required by law be taken to complete this annexation as soon as possible. Agenda Item No. 51 W-2 District No. 7 RESOLUTION NO. 67-13-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-11-1 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-1 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and concurred in by the Chief Engineer, that award of contract be made to M. P. MITROVICH , Contractor, for construction of the ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-1, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and Section 2. That the contract for said Contract No. 2-11-1 be awarded to M. P. MITROVICH , Contractor, in the total amount of $ 169 , 89.70 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 67-6-2 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . -Agenda Item No. 56- -X- - Dis iric t ,No;,'_2 Engineers' Est. $248,865.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date: February 6, 1967 Contract: ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-1 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. M. P. Mitrovich 622 Sunset Blvd. $1693589 .70 Arcadia, Calif. 2. Dateline Pipe Contracting, Inc . 1231 North Lemon $1733150.00 Anaheim, California 3. Far Western Pipeline, Inc . 6611 Fee Ana $1933787.45 Anaheim, California 4. Edmond J. Vadnais, General Contractor P. 0. Box 68 $194,963.95 7257 Etiwanda Avenue Etiwanda, California 5 . Colich Construction Co. 8320 Isis Ave . $1973923.00 Los Angeles, California 6 . Steve Bubalo Construction Co. 10616 Fair Oaks Blvd., Apt. 7 $205,164.50 Fair Oaks, California 7. Mark Dakovich 1305 North Padonia $218,772.00 Whittier, California 8. Wal-Con Construction Co. and John M. Artukovich Equipment Co. $2213343.00 14044 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, California 9 . Anro Construction Company 1304 N. Tyler Ave. $224,296 .80 So. El Monte, California 10. Famco Construction Co. 842.60 2840 West First Street $229� v Santa Ana, California 11. The Beecher Construction Co. $230�910.00 10258 E. Randwick Drive Temple City, California Agenda Item No. 56 Y-1 District No. 2 BID TABULATION S H E E T (Continued) �.d CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 12. Henson Construction Inc . 7608 So. Garfield Ave. $231,805.00 Bell Gardens, California 13. Rossi Construction Co. 15236 Burbank Blvd. $236,770.00 Suite 204-206 Van Nuys, California 14. City Construction Co. 17840 E. Verness Street $247,571.00 Corvina, California 15. Ralph DeLeon Construction Inc. 207 Cottman Ave. $247,661.92 Anaheim, California 16. G. R. McKervey 23882 Estancia Ave. $258,341.10 South Laguna, California 17. George Dakovich Co. 715 Anoakia Lane $259,070.75 Arcadia, California 18. M.G.R. Construction Co. 149 N. Puente Ave. $293,886•63 Brea, California 19. John J. Bilich 71 Eastfield Drive $2973171.00 Rolling Hills, California Agenda Item No. 56 Y-2 District No. 2 RESOLUTION NO. 67-14-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR `,, CONT N0. 2-11-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, District' s engineers, for construction of the ROLLING HILLS DRIVE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-11-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said Contract No. 2-11-2 in the manner prescribed by law; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , March 6, 1967 , at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the staff and the engineers be authorized to open said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. Agenda Item No. 57 -Z- District No. 2 } Rooisns .wn CAnw s i ATTORNEYS ,AT LAW ORVILLE A.ROOERS 0001-1957) 15730 SOUTH PARAMOUNT BOULEVARD METCALF 4.162s JAMES R.CARNES JAMEs E.PLoosreR PARAMOUNTt.CALIFORNIA 90723 NEVADA 6•e326 , January 17 , 1967 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 Orange County 19844 Ellis Avenue ' P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 ' Gentlemen: j As attorneys for the city of Seal Beach, we have been directed by the City Council to put you on Notice of damage resulting from breaks in the main trunk sewer line going to County Sanitation District No . 3 of Orange County which occurred on September 23, 1966 and September 29, 1966. We are also advised that the Golden ' Rain Foundation , by their agent, J. L. Moyer Company, had suffered considerable damage as the result of the aforementioned breaks , and hereby put you on notice thereof, i The preliminary estimate of cost incurred by the City is $1,282.29; . the Moyer Company as agent for Golden Rain Foundation, reports their cost at $1,921.12. It is to be noted that these figures may be adjusted as further invoices come to our attention. We have been advised by your financial director, Mr. Sylvester, that there is no formal claims procecure and that a letter at this time will suffice . The city of Seal Beach would, of course , like to resolve this matter in a spirit of cooperation , and will keep you ' advised of further developments. Very truly yours , ROGERS and CARNES Attorneys for City of Seal Beach a es R. Carnes JRC/ls cc: City Manager City. Hall Seal Beach, California �..d Agenda Item No. 61 -AA- District No. 3 ). R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY Consulfirrg Engineers, A Jr-;)it Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY Ai ND ASSOCIATES 412 South Lyon Street P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana, Calif., 92702 Telephone 547-4471 r February 2, 1967 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County Post Office Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager Gentlemen: Westside Force Main Corrosion Investigation and Recommendations for Repair After the second rupture of the Westside Force Main, it was decided by the district staff and the engineers to conduct a complete investigation of the force main from beginning to end in an effort to find any other sections of the pipeline which might be corroded. Review of the force main plans indicated that certain locations should be investi- gated because of flat grades and the possibility of stationary air pockets which could contribute to a corrosive environment. Also, other locations should be inspected because of their location in respect to freeway facilities and the need for some assurance that the pipeline in these areas was not damaged which possibly might cause problems to the freeway facilities if rupture should occur. Other areas should also be investigated because of position, in respect to projection of information obtained, to adjacent sections of the pipeline as a result of similarity of grade and location to the two previous ruptures. At the time temporary repairs were made on the two ruptured sections, observations at each end of each rupture were made and informa- tion as to the condition of the pipeline in specific areas was obtained. To complement this information and inspect the force main from beginning to end, ten exploratory holes were dug and the pipeline examined externally and internally for evidence of corrosion. In the case of the first two explora- tory holes, it was not possible to inspect the force main internally because Agenda Item No. 62 BB-1 District No. 3 Board of Directors February 2, 1967.' County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County the time required to drain the force main exceeded the time limit that the pumping station could be shut down before serious consequences of back water flooding would occur in the gravity sewer systems emptying into the pumping station. In the remaining eight holes, only one other location was not examined internally. The external investigation work consisted of exposing the force main for one full pipe length, thereby permitting the examination of one section and the joints on each end of the section. The section was exposed for approximately two-thirds of the outside periphery of the pipe with the dirt underneath the pipe remaining in place to support it. The external examination (approximately 40 feet in length) served two purposes. First it gave a good indication of the condition of the protective mortar coating over the steel shell of the pipeline. Secondly, we had learned from previous examinations of the two ruptured areas that severe corrosion could take place internally and progress far enough to be serious but not rupture, and indications of this situation would usually be rust stains appearing on the exterior mortar coating due to the sewage seeping out of the pipeline under pressure through the corroded areas. To examine the inside of the force main, a semielliptical hand hole approximately six inches in size was cut into the pipe. The hand hole permitted inspection of the particular joint by direct eye examination as well as reflected views from mirrors placed inside the pipeline which also gave a longer line of sight. To cut the hand holes in the steel shell, the exterior mortar had to be removed from the force main which gave the opportunity to examine the steel shell and determine its condition as well as the bond between the steel and the outside protective mortar. All 'hand holes had to be cut in the early morning hours between 12:30 a.m. and 4:00 a.m., depending upon the particular location, because of the limited shutdown period of the pumping station. It would have been pref- erable to examine the inside of the force main during daylight hours because of the lighting situation, but obviously this was not possible. On the next page is a chart which lists the results of the exploratory observations at the ten different locations. _ - _ .....�.__.. •..........�.....�_..!_...r.. ....4.��.....uw. .....I.n..4�.y1..1..Jv.w:L..J w«.....a.....l...y..y..... ....,..Jl.... .i..n.. .... ... ... .. .- .. ... Agenda Item No. 62 BB-2 District No. 3 Westside Force Main Exploratory Observation Summary _, Cond. of Stl. Location Cond. of Exter. Removed Cond. of Stl . Cylinder and (Stationing Exposed Cem.Mor.Coat. Exterior Cylinder on Cut Explor. Inter. Cement Remarks Approx.) Pipe 1 and Joint Coating Outside Surf. Hole in Pipe Mortar Lining q 3+77 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent No _ Intended to cut exploratory hole, but could not drain pipe in time during period of station shut-down. 28+54 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent No - See above. Slight coating of grease on bottom half of pipe - interior 35+71 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes Excellent of pipeline appears to be in excellent shape. Mortar coatings hard and clean. 43+57 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Paper-thin coating of grease bottom two-thirds of pipe. Interior of pipeline appears to be in excellent shape. 58+69 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes Excellent See above - also several small grease stalactites about one-inch in length in pipe. can 83+65 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent No - pq This position just west of siphon break and corroded section. Looking east and upstream, large grease 103+30 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes Excellent stalactites four or five inches long in pipeline. Believe corroded section of pipeline begins one joint east of exploratory hole. Grease scum all around interior of pipe. This area has definitely undergone severe corrosion - large 107+50 Yes Good Yes Poor Yes Poor amount of grease deposited interior surface. Many grease stalactites both up and downstream of exploratory hole (rust stains). N Steel cylinder in excellent shape but interior mortar 12 Steel-Excellent lining has been under corrosive attack, approximately 30 141+50 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes to 40 percent of lining thickness lost. Large grease z Mortar - Poor stalactites pipe joint east. From this joint,east about 350 feet to second break force main will have to be replaced. N 173+50 Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Yes Excellent Interior of pipe coated with grease, otherwise line in H Cd excellent shape. Some grease stalactites. hn a� 1 In each location except 173+50, one full pipe length of 32 feet plus the joints at both ends was exposed for two-thirds of the top periphery of pipe and examined for evidence of corrosion. U, )ly when pipe has corroded through but not ruptured, rust stains will appear on the extu,for mortar coating. i Board of Directors February 2, 1967 County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County From the results of the investigation and the information gained during the temporary repair of the two ruptures, it is reasonable to conclude that the force main is in excellent condition except for the two ruptured areas. The force main is approximately 18,000 feet in length. About 1,400 feet has sustained damage in the two ruptured areas. Permanent repairs will have to be made in these two areas and should not be delayed too long. It is recommended that the force main be replaced in its entirety between 104+00± and 114+50;�. This is the area where the first rupture occurred last September 27, 1966. This section also contains the siphon under the Balsa Chico flood control channel, which we previously recommended be eliminated in our letter of October 7, 1966. The siphon can be eliminated by carrying the force main on a straight grade through the flood control channel or taking it over the top of the flood control channel, whichever is feasible, taking into consideration the requirements of the Orange County Flood Control District. The section between 141+OOr and 144+50s should also be replaced. This is where the second rupture occurred last October 18, 1966. In this case it is felt the replacement can be made in such a manner that the physical factors which contributed to the corrosion problem can be eliminated. It is further recom- mended that an air release line be installed at 127+40 which is the upstream side of a small siphon in the force main under a freeway drainage channel on the Garden Grove-San Diego interchange area. This siphon was constructed by the State Division of Highways in 1964 when the freeway was bui It. For the record it should be noted that when the siphon was constructed, the force main in this area was observed to be in excellent shape. Estimated construc- tion costs for permanent repairs to the force main are as follows: 1 . Complete replacement between 104+00± and 114+50f = $30,000 2. Installation of air release line at 127+40 = 21500 3. Complete replacement between 141+00± and 144+50 = 7,500 Total = $40,000 Repair work on the force main will be an extremely sensitive task. Coordination and cooperation between the district and the contractor will have to be perfect. When the final connection of the replacement sections are made to the existing pipeline, the work wi II have to progress exactly as planned. There is no margin for error due to the short time limit that the force main and pumping station can be taken out of service. Since the repair work will be so demanding, it is the engineer's opinion that only a Agenda Item No. 62 BB-4 District No. 3 Board of Directors February 2, 1967 • County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County highly reputable contractor experienced in the construction and/or repair of sewage pipelines flowing under pressure should be employed. We do not believe that this work should be advertised for competitive bidding as is normally done. Selection of the contractor(s) should be based on mutual recommendation of the district staff and engineer. Bids can then be taken on an informal basis. The type of contract to be let is also important. There are several avenues of approach in this regard. Recommendations as to the phasing of the work and type of contract wi II be forthcoming as the plans and specifications are drawn up. We are available at your convenience to discuss the investigation !.: or an other details concerning the repair of the Westside Force Main. I Y g p Very truly yours, J.R. LESTER BOYLE an/d/ SI D NEY L._LOWRY Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E.-10951 41-8017-00-00 cc: Lowry and Associates Attention Mr.. Sidney L. Lowry i` i • ' i Agenda Item No. 62 BB-5 District No .