Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-08 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Boy. 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS -- - -- - --- AGENDA -- -- August loth, 1966 - 8:00 p.m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance - #� (2) Roll Call (3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary 0 (4) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the /ryj adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (5) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the I1 5 adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 135 1966, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the L adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed �1 J (9) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meetings held July 13th, and July 20th,dp9 S 1966, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motions re : Approval of minutes of the ,., S adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman `y, , X �12,� ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager-11", (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resol tion No. 66-106, accepting proposal m t>" of John Carollo Engineers for an Engineer' s Report relative to Ocean outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10; and directing the (� engineers to proceed with preparation of said report. See . pages "F" and "G111 (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from C the City of Fountain Valley, dated July 21, 1966, request- 41 / ing construction of improvements to Ellis Avenue; and take the matter under submi�ion for study. See page "H" i (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving, in principle, execution of an agreement with Talbert Drainage District :whereby said District will quitclaim all pipeline and road ease- A ments and parcel owned in fee at Plant No. 2 site, in exchange for construction, by the Districts, of a new pump station for the Drainage District in an easement to be granted on Districts ' property; and authorizing preparation of said agreement. (17 ALL DISTRICTS ` Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Fischer-Porter F!' Company, dated July 26, 1966, for a magnetic meter for Aq S Ocean Outfall No. 1, for the total amount of $6,455 plus freight and tax, with refund of said sum if the meter doesV not perform satisfactorily. See page "I" /+I (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of moti n authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff m mber to attend the 39th Annual Con- ference of the Water ollution Control Federation in Kansas City, Missour , September 25th through 30th; and authorizing payment or travel, meals, lodging, registra- tion fees and incidental expenses (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to Job Ij No. P2-12 (Clarifier "H") , authorizing a total addition of $1,276 .68 to the contract with J. Putnam Henck, Con- tractor. See page "J" i1 l (20) ALL DISTRICTS II Consideration of Resolution No. 66-107 re : Determining `� 7 prevailing wage rates within the Districts, and repealing Resolution No. 65-184 adopted November 10, 1965. See page "Krr (21) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file the certifica- tion of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (22) ALL DISTRICTS (� Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant books and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A" 9 "B" and C" � (23) ALL DISTRICTS Other business c a io (24) DI-TRICT 1 (_ Consideration of motion authorizing advance payments to ) the City of Santa Ana, upon demand, based on the City' s requirement estimates, in accordance with the agreement dated December, 1965. -2- (25 ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-108-1, to receive and file Modification Report of the engineers; anc' ordering Modification No. 1 to the Engineers Report datF�d Jt:?_y, 1965, to provide for the extension of the Grand Ave:-.ue Sub-Trunk Sewer and for a change in size of said facility. See pages "L" and "M" (26) DISTRICT 1 Lj Consideration of motion acceptinG proposal of Boyle Engineering, dated August 2, 196b, for engineering services in connection with the extension of the Grand Avenue Sub- Trunk (Warner Avenue Sub-Trunk) , and for re-design of a siphon at Warner and Grand Avenues. See page "L" (27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if anyJV y See page "D" (28) DISTRICTJI� Qthe-r" business and Comm ions (29) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment .� (30) DISTRICT 5 t!W Consideration of motion to receive and file two letters from Irvine Ranch Water District regarding sewerage of , the northerly portion of Tract No. 5018• and take under submission. See pages "N" and "0�' (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. See page "D" (32) DISTRICT 5 _ _ 0� �-busine s a ommunications, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 10: 00 a.m. ,.r 5 August 22nd, Newport Beach City Hall (34) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-log-6, approving plans and specifications for Rocky Point Pumping Station Re- construction; authorizing advertising for bids; and authorizing the staff and engineers to open said bids. See page "P" (35) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. See page "E" (36) DISTRIC _0�her business an commu ons, if any �� ��. / (37) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (38) DISTRICT 7 S Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants . See page "E" -3- (39) DISTRICT 7.�— business and c nications, if any (40) DISTRICT 7 nj Consideration of motion re: Adjournment �� Z' 3 (41-S) DISTRICT 11 Report of the engineers on acquisition _of easement for ,vow pump station, Contract No . 11-1-0-2 '/� �� �' .v ' •O1/� (41) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-110-11, approving plans and specifications for the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Slater Avenue Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No . 11-10-2; and authorizing advertising for bids . See page "Q" (42) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the y plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-10-1 (Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nichols Street Gravity Sewer) , authorizing a deduction of $25.50 from the Contract with Orange County Pipeline, Inc . , Contractor. See page "R" (43) DISTRICT 1_1 Consideration of Resolution No . 66-111-11, accepting the construction of Contract No. 11-10-1 as complete; and VJ\ authorizing execution and recordation of a Notice of n Completion of Work. See page "S" (44) DISTRICT 11 / Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants , if any.M J See page "E" (45) DISTRICT 11 Othe "iness and co unica , if any (46) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 4: 00 p .m. ,S September 12th (47) DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-112, approving and authorizing execution of an amendment to the Agreement m y for Purchase and Sale of Magnolia Trunk and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewers, dated May 1, 1966, to provide for a change in the method of payment . (See pages "T" and "U (48) DISTRICT 2 c Consideration of motion amending the District' s Accumulated( Capital Outlay budget requirements,,/,. to $4,693,638, for the ' 1966-67 fiscal yearAll ��=' (49 ) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion amending the District' s Accumulated{ Capital Outlay budget requirements to $4,395,901, for the 1966-67 fiscal year (50) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. See page "D" / (51) DISTRICT-,3 Ohgr b s i comet , any (52) DISTRICT 3 / Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -4- (53) DISTRICT 2 j Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept ; proposal from the engineers for engineering design services in connection with Contracts Nos. 2-10-5 and 2-10-6, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the existing agreement with said engineers. See page "V" (54) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to Contract No. 2-10-4 (Euclid Trunk Sewer) , granting an ^ / extension of time of 45 days, and authorizing an additi V of $6,161.00 to the contract with A & P Pipeline, Con- tractor. See page "W" (55) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. / See page "D" (56) DISTRICT_- 2 Other business d co in ations, if any (57) DISTRICT 2 �< ' Consideration of motion re : Adjournment -5- RESOLUTIONS AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS August 10, 1966 1 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 5071 Abbey Rents, Equipment Rental $ 32.20 l..✓ 5072 Acore Drilling Service 123.30 5073 Advance Electric, Motor Rewind 148.47 5074 Airkem Sales, Odor Control Chemicals 438-87 5075 Aladdin Litho & Art, Forms 42.81 5076 Alemite Company, Tool Repairs 25.42 5077 All Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings 56.91 5078 Allis Chalmers, Compressor Parts 288.65 5079 Almquist Tool & Equipment Co., Tools 15.29 5080 City of Anaheim, Power 32.02 5081 Anaheim Dodge, Truck Parts 8.40 5082 The Anchor Packing Company, Packing & Gaskets 212.54 5083 Apco Supply, Electric Motor & Controls 139.78 5084 Appliance Refinishing Co., Equipment Maintenance 70.00 5085 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water 120.25 5086 Atlas Machine Works, Engine Repairs 12.00 5087 Automatic Electric Company, Cable ID Decals 23.70 5088 Barnes Delaney, Tires 200.96 5089 Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Belts & Couplings 198.20 5090 Beach Fabricating Co., Machine Shop Work 310.22 5091 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 41.50 5092 Benz Engineering, Inc., Compressor Parts 103.75 5093 Thomas Bibleheimer, Employee Mileage 30..80 5094 Blower Paper Co., Janitor Supplies & Tape 237.73 5095 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc., Magneto Repairs 96.31 5096 Buehler Tank & Welding Works, Air Tank 159.40 5097 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies & Tools 196.93 5098 Business Systems Inc., Office Supplies 39.62 5099 Century Fiberglass, Inc ., Overflow Tank 139.36 5100 Certified Building Materials,Co., Sealer 55.89 5101 Chemical Rubber Company, Technical Books 56.80 5102 Chicago Pneumatic Tool Co., Engine Parts 1,118.03 5103 Chrome Crankshaft Co., Inc., Engine Parts & Reprs. 991.84 5104 R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls 397.35 5105 College Lumber Co., Inc., Folding Door, Lumber 403.61 5106 Compressor Service Co., Blower 1,325.38 5107 Cords Piston Ring Mfg. Co., Engine Parts 16.88 5108 Costa Mesa Lumber Co., Framing Material 14.04 5109 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 480.27 5110 John M. Deck Co., Equipment Parts 7.49 5111 De Guelle & Son' s Glass Co., Plate Glass 8.96 5112 Del Chemical Corp., Paint Supplies 40.56 5113 A. B. Dick Company, Reproduction Supplies 88.09 5114 Diesel Control Corp., Pump Parts 14.56 5115 Digiacinto Mfg. Co., Survey Equipment 25.40 5116 Dow Corning Corp., Insulating Compound 60.84 5117 Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electric Supplies 624.60 5118 Enchanter Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring .2j075.00 5119 Ensign Products Co., Lubricant 16.73 5120 Chas. A. Estey, Inc., Adapters 53.46 5121 Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation Parts 1,303.77 5122 Flair Drafting Service 444.61 5123 Foster-Barker Co., Equipment Rental 6.00 5124 Fowler Equipment Inc., Crane Rental 284.25 5125 Freeborn Equipment Co., Inc., Equipment Rental 156.00 5126 Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Mach. Shop Work 388.04 5127 Robert N. Galloway, Misc. Expense 33.11 5128 General Electric Supply Company 2,627.78 5129 General Telephone Co. 913.20 -A- i WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 5130 Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware $ 253.26 5131 Graybar Electric Company, Inc., Supplies & Tools 96.70 5132 George T. Hall, Controls 82.73 5133 Harbor Clinic, Medical Exams 55.00 5134 Fred A. Harper, Dinner Meeting Expense 6.60 5135 Heathkit Electronic Center, Walkie Talkie Repair 24.30 5136 Hill Crane Service, Inc., Crane Rental 50.50 5137 Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation Supplies 564.34 5138 Howard Supply Co., Fittings & Pipe, Filter Unit 440.54 5139 Edward L. Houchins, Carpentry Services 204.00 5140 City of Huntington Beach, Water 7.90 5141 IBM Corporation, Office Supplies 35.10 5142 International Harvester Co., Truck Parts 289 .77 5143 B. R. Jones &' Company, Inc., Gas Regulator Parts 51.25 5144 Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine 25,417.60 5145 Kelly Pipe Company, Fittings 68.45 5146 Roy L. Kirk' s Nursery, Tools 10.14 5147 Kleen-Line Corporation, Janitor Supplies 90.48 5148 Knipper's Rentals, Equipment Rental 1.50 5149 Knox Industrial Supplies, Tools, Fittings, Conduit 63.05 5150 L & N Uniform Supply Co.,Uniform Rental (2 Mos.) 1,620.20 5151 LBWS Inc., Tools, Cabinets 490.94 5152 Lawless GM Diesel, Engine Parts 45.52 5153 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 20.90 5154 Los Angeles Times, Employment Ad 78.40 5155 Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work 184.80 5156 Manufacturers Service, Inc., Turbine Mtce. 15.60 5157 R. W. McClellan & Sons, Sand 98.16 5158 McCoy Motor Co., Truck Parts 140.71 5159 Ronald C. Mueller, Employee Mileage 15.60 5160 Munselle Supply Co., Inc ., Welding Supplies 87.84 5161 National Academy of Sciences, Technical Book 8.00 5162 National Chemsearch Corp., Steam Cleaner Supplies 180.18 5163 National Lead Company, Paint Supplies 23.81 5164 Nelson-Dunn Inc., Carburetor Parts 122.84 5165 Lee M. Nelson, Consultant 320.00 5166 City of Newport Beach, Water 201.17 5167 Oakite Products Inc., Cleaning Solvent 86.65 5168- Orange County Radiotelephone Service 279.70 5169 Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamp & Supplies 21.27• 5170 Pacific Telephone 238.45 '. 5171 Packaging Specialties Corp., Drafting Supplies 14.93 5172 Postmaster, Postage 150.00 5173 RAM Chemicals, Inc., Paint Supplies 122.36 5174 The Register, Employment Ad 64.96 5175 Requarth Engines, Engine Parts 19.97 5176 Rhodia Inc., Odor Control Chemicals 353.60 5177 Robbins & Meyers, Inc., Pump Parts 1,407.12 5178 Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints 33.38 5179 Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motor Repairs & Parts 51.26 5180 Scott Refrigeration Service Inc ., Air Cond. Repair 46 .95 5181 Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage 27.80 5182 The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies & Tools 74.27 5183 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 28.40 5184 Signal Oil Co., Gasoline 529.18 5185 Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power 10, 511.90 5186 Southern Calif. Water Co., Water 3.90 5187 Southern Counties Gas Co., Natural Gas 2,137.87 5188 Southwest Processors, Pumping Truck 60.00 5189 Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies 7.58 5190 Speed-E-Auto Parts, Vehicle Warning Lights 677.82 -B- WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 5191 Standard Brands Paint Co., ID Number Decals $ 10.30 5192 Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Oil, Gas, Grease 875.01 5193 Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Street Paving 125.00 5194 T & H Equipment Co., Inc ., Belts 8.26 5195 Tardif Sheet Metal, Electric Gear Cover 10.74 5196 C. 0. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil 119.93 5197 Tony's Lock & Safe Service, Keys 12.32 5198 Trans World Airlines Inc., Freight 17.41 5199 Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Small Hdwre, Steel 51.17 5200 Tube Sales, Aluminum Tubing 16.24 5201 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc ., Tools 51.58 5202 Union Oil Co., Gasoline 8.85 5203 Union Sign Co., Signs 22.46 5204 John R. Waples R.S., Odor Consultant 228.20 5205 Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Fittings & Valve 55.42 5206 Water Pollution Control Federation, Training Mat. 31.00 5207 Waukesha Motor Company, Engine Parts & Repairs 975.68 5208 Welch's Concrete Company, Concrete 34.34 5209 Western Surgical Westlab Scientific, Lab Supplies 429.41 5210 City of Westminster, Water 5.00 5211 W. D. Wilson Company, Fittings 66.68 5212 Wimberly' s Petroleum Dist., Diesel Fuel 49.04 5213 Xerox Corporation, Reproduction Costs & Supplies 257.73 5214 Anaheim Sewer Construction, Sewer Repair 75.00 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 69, 531 .90 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5215 American Compressor Company $ 13,922.48 5216 Bank of America NT & SA, Assignee-Vinnell Corp. 10,062.00 5217 J. Putnam Henck 56,374.3.9 5218 Kemper Construction Co ., & W. W. Hoagland 17,362.80 5219 Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Inc . 779 .0 0 5220 Cedric A . White, Jr., M.A .I. 200.000 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 98,700.67 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 168,232.57 Ord -C- DISTRICT NO. 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 5221 Boyle Engineering $ 5,718.75 5222 Goode & Goode 250.00 5223 City of Santa Ana 65,000.00 $ 71,028.75 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5224 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 30.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5225 A & P Pipeline, Inc. $ 19,664.82 5226 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry 1,027.00 5227 Enterprise Printing Company 39.59 $ 20,731.141 $ 20,761.L41 DISTRICT NO. 3 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5228 J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ 1,600.00 DISTRICT NO. 5 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5229 Donald C. Simpson $ 1,500.00 5230 Simpson & Stevlingson 3,948.00 $ 5,z448.oo -D-- 1 DISTRICT NO, 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT N0, IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT . 5231 Boyle and Lowry 2,'424.90 5232 . Southern California Edison Co . 19 .83 $ 2,444-73 CONSTRUCTION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5233 Enterprise Printing Company $ 39 .59 5234 The' Tustin News 49 ;64 $ 39 .23 FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5235 ' City of Anaheim $ 93.98 5236 City of Fullerton 93.98 5237 ..City of Orange 93.98 5238 - City of Santa Ana 93.98 $ 375.92 FACILITIES REVOLVING. FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5239 Jennings-Halderman-Hood Sewer Account $ 2,332.46 5240 Boyle and Lowry 59 .99 5241 E. :L. Sellers Company 2,16l.95 $ 4, 554.40 7,464 .28 DISTRICT NO , 11 { ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 5242 Lowry and Associates 1,286.00 5243 orange -County Pipeline, Inc. 1,530.00 $ 2,816 .00 d ;rE- JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS'' PHOENIX 13ERKELEY EL PASO JOHN A.CAROLLO July 1 2, 1966 . ROOERT M. ORERETON LEON W.JACKSON ' CHARLCO A. ROLLING _ Reply to: H. HARVEY HUNT 2166 SHATTUCK AVENUE HOWARD M. WAY f BERKELEY. CALIF. 04704 ROBERT O.WILLIAMS DONALD R.PREIOLBR TELEPHONES 1346-7578 `..r' Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 Gentlemen: Subject: Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job J-10 This letter constitutes our proposal to prepare 100 copies of a report on your new outfall in compliance with Health and Safety Code Section 4748. This report is to be submitted to you 120 days after your order to proceed, and will include the following: .(a) A. general description of existing-facilities for sewage collection, treatment, and disposal. (b) A general description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objects of the Districts. (c)� A general plan and general specifications of the work. (d) A general description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in carrying-out the work. (e) A map showing the boundaries of the Districts and in general the location of the work proposed to be done, .property taken or damaged, and any other information useful to an understanding of the proposed work. (f) .An estimate of the cost of the proposed work. Our fee for preparing the above report is $1, 000 due and payable upon presentation of the report. Very truly yours, JOH CA LLO ENGUD RS. HHH:gl Accepted: H rvey un County Sanitation Districts of Orange County By Fred A. Harper, General Manager -Secretary Date: _ (All Districts RESOLUTION NO. 66-106 EMPLOYING ENGINEERS A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 23 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EMPLOYING SANITATION ENGINEERS AND DIRECTING SAID ENGINEERS TO PREPARE A REPORT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Boards of Directors do hereby employ JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS, to make a survey and report, pursuant to the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 4748, showing the present and future sewerage requirements for the Districts. Section 2. That the engineers be directed to prepare and file a report with the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts setting forth: (a) A general description of existing facilities for sewage collection, treatment and disposal, or a general descrip- tion of existing facilities for refuse transfer or disposal, or both. (b) A general description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objects of the Districts. (c ) A general plan and general specifications of the work. (d) A general description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in carrying out the work. (e) A map showing the boundaries of the Districts and in general the location of the work proposed to be done, property taken or damaged, and any other information useful to an under- standing of the proposed work. (f) An estimate of the cost of the proposed work. G-1 (All Districts) Section 3. That said engineers are hereby employed to do the work hereinabove set forth in accordance with the proposal of said engineers dated July 12, 1966, for a fee of $1,000.00, payable upon presentation of said reports G-2 (All Districts) y ' g7�✓ r1 •�i Y1 ,� '�. 7 t - .. .t(\ti i A •� r V /''-��`Y Y't�•�,''T4'y /� .ry _~f� V .:)/•r�� C{ •�YlM ,v ., by /"�t ' � .�•�../„1,.J.i.V• .L.C3. , }t .• :• ••. ,,.ti;.;•,. •3,:.;•;i 'r ,•:-^1�. '•d G ���1�I' (�� � �►i'fYr. ,L�"f t,`�f:F �' ��iili..�.CrFr`,.���J, i'ra !7 ,.r, . •+•.b11, ���.{..�.L..i.L�,.L„='"•� ����j b;; : �� _ "I:Y..iri' ' '.lt�i,`S:1ieLiu..aS��. .;,ct :t•} ^L J' 'Ai.,,•.J�.: t'•(ytJ`a'1C�'{.t��k.^a t�+..% Q � •.5. u.a�- ti.lulidyac ..'r ..S ':`• >.•::; 10200 SLATER AVENUE, FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORNIA ' 962-2424 TELEPHONE 649-0361 July 21, 1966 Board of Directors County Sanitation Districts of Orange County P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Subject: Improvements on Ellis Avenue at Treatment Plan No. •1 Gentlemen: . The City requests that the Board of Directors for the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County consider constructing the ultimate improve- ments to center line for Ellis Avenue along the north side of Treatment Plan No. 1. The poli6y of the City has been that each developer improve the portion of the street from their property line to the centerline of the adjacent. street along the frontage of their property. In September of 1963, at the time building permits were obtained from the City of Fountain Valley• for construction of your Administration Offices, a request was made to the City by. the. General Manager of your District, Mr. Lee Nelson, to defer the-improvements of Ellis Avenue until development occurred along -the property on the north side of Ellis Avenue. At the time- of deferment the traffic volume along Ellis Avenue was nomi- nal; therefore, the request for deferment was granted. The San Diego Freeway is presently under construction and will be completed in November of 1966 with major on and off ramps at the intersection of Euclid Street and'Ellis Avenue. The City anticipates a rapid increase in the traffic load of Ellis Avenue upon the completion of the freeway. The present structural section of Ellis Avenue will not be able to handle large traffic volumes; therefore, the City requests that the Board of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County authorize 'the construction of the aforementioned .improvements. The improvements will provide safer ingress and egress to the Administration Office. At the present time the improvements should include curb and gutters along the south side of Ellis Avenue and a new street section from the curb to the centerline of the• street. The side- walk can be deferred at this time if you so desire. 1 • , H-1 (A11 Districts) Board-of Directors ` County Sanitation Districts of Orange. Countq � . July 21, 1966 . �..✓ Page -2- The City will attempt'to have the Orange County Water District improve Ellis Avenue for the frontage of their property from your westerly property line to Ward•Street. Ultimate improvements have been constructed from Brookhurst Street to 1320 feet westerly of Ward Street. The balance of the improvements between Brookhurst and Ward should be constructed within ' the next six mon'ths' by the adjacent developers. Completion of your improvements along wi:th'those by the Water District will supply a structurally sound street that. will provide maximum safety to the traveling public. Thank you'.for your time and consideration in this matter. Yours very truly, f CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY h arvin C.Haglun Director of Public Works WSO:ct H-2 (All Districts) 5722 East Union Pacific Avo, Los Angolos,California 90022 C: TRE1,1BLAY 7/27-fhh Phono: (213) 685-6304 Mr. Harper 7/29/66 rolo><: Ob-74741 Cv 'G' F_ R C ® . COMPLETE PROCESS WRUMENTATION a CHL041HATIOH EQUIPMENT DATA REDUCTION&WTOMADON SYSTEMS • INDUSIRK CIAS PRODUCTS DATE, 26 July 1966 *. .County Sanitation. Districts sus, Metering for Ocean Outfall of Orange County, California #•1 10844 Ellis. Avenue aEf, P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention Norman R. Tremblay Construction Engineer Gentlemen: Reference is made to the pitot type Fischer and Porter Magnetic Meter System that- is being supplied for installation at your Ocean Outfall #1. This system will consist of a 12" Fischer and Porter Pitot type Magnetic Meter, a Magnetic Signal to current converter, a Fischer and Porter Electronic Strip Chart Recorder with 30 day strip chart and a manual reset type counter for flow totalization. The Magnetic Meter will be suspended from a cover plate for a 20" diameter access hole that is to be cut in a larger manhole plate, . also supplied,'.that will measure 3/4" thick by 51 in diameter and be suitable for the 701 head which you experience at the meter lo- cation. The Meter and other equipment will be furnished with the usual Fischer and Porter guarantee that warrants the equipment to be free from defects in material and workmanship for a period of one year following installation. In addition, this Meter System is -to be suitable in its performance as a treated sewage effluent meter, metering flow ranging from 50 to 250 CFS under the conditions out- lined above and to have an overall accuracy of plus or minus 2% of range at the point in which the flow is sampled. As in any pitot type installation it is necessary that the meter be positioned at a point representing the average flow through the conduit. In the event that any part is found to be defective within the warranty period, Fischer and Porter Company will repair or replace the part . The performance of the Meter as being suitable for- the operation outlined above is subject to your approval. It is con- sidered that a year will be sufficient time to evaluate the success- ful performance of the Meter. In the event that you may feel the 'Meter. does not perform satisfactorily after a reasonable period of evaluation, the Fischer and Porter Company will accept a return of the Meter and refund the purchase price of the equipment. MANUFACTURING PUNTS AT WARNJNSTER, PENNSYLVANIA; MELBOURNE, AUSTRAUA4 TORONTO, CANADA4 WORKWGTON, ENGLAND; CLFRMONT.FERRAND,FRANCE;GOETTINGEN,GERMANYi MILAN,ITALY,TOKYO,JAPAN)MEKICO CITY,ARNHEM,NETHERLANDS,MADRID,SPAIN T-1 (All Districts) i= I '$ .0 H Ci 'R w G9 O R T M R C O . PAGE OF_.. County Sanitation.'District of Orange ••County, .California Mr. Norman R..:•'Tremblay 26 July 1966 The cost of the• above .described equipment will be $6,455.00, . r.O.B. the .factory •Warminster, Pennsylvania . We have entered the order form for this equipment and anticipate shipping it to you in 120 days. ' Yours very truly, FISCHER & PORTER COMPANY Ri hard M` Day ' Area Market Ma riz Water & Waste Division*.- RMD:ab • ';,, ,'• fit. ,..• � ..• :.. ;. . ' . .. _. 1-2 (All Districts) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: J. Putnam Henck DATE: Aug. 10, 1966 JOB: Clarifier "H", Job No. P2-12 Amount of this change order (ADD) E $ 1,276.68 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor' s letter dated August 2, 1966 and Contract Drawing Sheets Nos. 4 (Rev. #1), 5 (Rev. #2), 9 (Rev. #4) , 10 (Rev. #2) and 12 (Rev. #2) of 16 ADD 1. Revise raw sludge piping as indicated on Sheet 9 (Rev. #4) of 16 No Charge 2. Revise sump pump discharge piping as indicated on Sheets Nos. Rev. #1 , 5 (Rev. #2), 9 (Rev. #4) and 10 (Rev . #2) of 1� $ 622.88 3. Revise water line in tunnel and add hose bibs as indicated on Sheets Nos. 4 (Rev. #1) and 12 (Rev. #2) of 16 446.69 4. Add water line to center bridge with hose bibs as indicated on Sheets Nos. 4 Rev. #1 , 5 (Rev. #2), 9 (Rev. #4) and 10 (Rev. 9) of 1 207.11 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $1,276.68 Original Contract Price $ 2473518.00 Prev. Auth. Changes None This Change (ADD) (MDR'" ) 1.,276.68 Amended Contract Price $ 248 y94.68 Doard authorization date: Approved: COUN'.P7 SAN-TATION DISTRICTS Of August 10, 1966 Orange County, California ByLsI P;jul G. Brot•rn Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer J. PUTNAM HENCK By -J- (All Districts) RESOLUTION NO. 66-107 DETERMINING PREVAILING WAGE RATES A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 53 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DETERMINING PREVAILING WAGE RATES WITHIN SAID DISTRICTS; AND REPEALING RESOLUTION NO. 65-184 ADOPTED NOVEMBER 10, 1965 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 1, 2, 33 53 65 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the general prevailing wage rate and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work within the territory of the Districts/for each of the crafts, classifi- cations or types of workmen as set forth on Schedule "A" , attached hereto and made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein, is hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That Resolution No. 65-184, adopted by the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation Districts on November 10, 1965, establishing the general hourly prevailing wage rate and the general prevailing rate for holiday and overtime work, is hereby repealed and rescinded and made of no further effect; and, Section 3. That all other resolutions or motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith, are hereby rescinded. K-1 (All Districts) SCHEDULE "A" - RESOLUTION NO. 66-107 The wage rates listed in this Schedule are in accordance with the terms of the Southern California Master Labor Agreement for the Construction Industry and cover the following counties : LOS ANGELES, ORANGE, RIVERSIDE, SAN BERNADINO, IMPERIAL, VENTURA, SANTA BARBARA, SAN LUIS OBISPO, KERN, INYO and MONO. ADDITIONAL COST ITEMS: For Subsistence Allowance, Transportation and Travel Time Allowance, Apprentice Program Contribu- C) tions, Industry Promotion Funds, etc . , contact the Local Union or its District Council having jurisdiction. � RIGGERS and WELDERS FOR THE SIX BASIC TRADES: Same wage scales as crafts to which rigging and welding are incidental . A CARPENTERS FOREMAN: Receives not less than 500 per hour more than the hourly rate of the highest Carpenter Classification over which he has responsibility, except "Pneumatic Nailer" . 1 May 66 HEALTH AND WELFARE: 230 per hour PENSION: 300 per hour VACATION: 150 per hour N 1 Classification: Carpenter------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- $4 83 Shingler-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.96 Hardwood Floor Worker------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.03 Millwright------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5 .03 SawFiler------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.91 Table Power Saw Operator---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.93 PneumaticNailer------------------------------------------------------------------------------ .0 PileDriver Foreman--------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.46 Pile Driver Man - Bridge or Dock Carpenter and Cable Splicer---------------------------------- 4.96 Pile Driver Man - Derrick Bargeman------------------------------------------------------------ 4.96 HeadRockslinger------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 5.06 Rockslinger------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.86 ---------------- Rock Bargeman or Scowman---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.76 Men working from a swinging scaffold, or suspended from a rope or cable, shall receive 250 per hour above the appli- cable Journeyman or Apprentice rate. (1) 290 increase. The Union may elect, at its option, upon sixty days written notice, prior to May 1, 1967, to allocate up to- a maximum of 100 per hour of above amounts to Health & Walfare & Vacation Funds. CEMENT MASONS FOREMAN: When three or more Cement Masons are employed on a job, one shall be employed as a Foreman and shall receive not less than 500 per hour more than the highest classification over which he has leadership. OVERTIME: Time and one-half for the first three hours after the regularly constituted straight-time shift; double a' time for all other overtime . 1 May 66 1 May 67 A HEALTH AND WELFARE : 250 per hour 250 per hour PENSION: 300 per hour 300 per hour VACATION: 200 per hour 250 per hour Classification: Cement Mason Journeyman; including but not restricted to the following: Chipping; patching; setting curb form and plank, setting of lines, stakes and grades; setting screeds, which includes screed pins; cutting, scoring and sawing new concrete; plugging, filling She-Bolt holes; dry can packing concrete and Embco; tending material hose on slabs, floors and decks; tending mixer-truck chute, slabs floors and decks; bush hammer- ing; patching and sacking; rodding, tamping, bit well rodding, machine and similar types, bull floating---------------------------------------- $4.60 $4.84 Cement Mason (magnesite, magnesite-terrazo and mastic composition, Epoxy, Dex-O-Tex)------------------------------------------------------ 4.72 4.96 Cement Mason Floating & Troweling Machine Operator---------------------- 4.85 5.09 Curb & Gutter Machine Operator (cement only)---------------------------- 4.60 4.84 Clary & Similar Type of Screed Operator--------------------------------- 4.60 4 .84 Grinding Machine Operator (all types)----------------------------------- 4.60 4.84 Jackson Vibratory & Similar Type Screed Operator------------------------ 4.60 4.84 Scoring Machine Operator------------------------------------------------ 4.60 4.84 LABORERS FOREMAN: Not less than 300 per hour more than the hourly wage rate of the highest classification over which he has leadership. 1 May 66 1 May 67 1 May 68 1 May 69 U HEALTH AND WELFARE: .215 .215 .245 .25 PENSION: .22 .27 .32 .35 VACATION: .15 .20 .25 .25 .,a A Classification: Laborer - General or Construction--------------- $3.70 $3.85 $3.97 $4.145 Demolition Laborer, The Cleaning of Brick and Lumber------------------------------ 3.70 3.85 3.97 4.145 Dry Packing of Concrete------------------------- 3.70 3.85 3.97 4.145 Operator of Pneumatic and Electric Tools, Vibrating Machines and sim- ilar mechanical tools not separ- ately 3.91 4.06 4.18 4 .355 x atel classified herein Saw Man, excluding Tractor Type------------------------------------------ 3.91 4.06 4.18 4.355 Roto-Scraper------------------------------------ 3.91 4.06 4 .18 4 .355 Concrete Core Cutter---------------------------- 3.91 4.06 4 .18 4.355 Asphalt Raker and Ironer------------------------ 3 .91 4.06 4.18 4.355 Asphalt Shoveler-------------------------------- 3.80 3.95 4 07 4.245 Buggymobile Man--------------------------------- 3.91 4.06 4 .18 4.355 Cement Dumper (on 1 yd. or large mixer and handling bulk cement)--------------- 3.91 4 .06 4.18 4.355 Cesspool Digger and Installer------------------- 3.88 4.03 4.15 4.325 Chucktender------------------------------------- 3.85 4.00 4.12 4.295 Concrete Curer--Impervious Membrane and Form Oiler-------------------------------- 3.89 4.04 4.16 4.335 Cribber or Shorer------------------------------- 4.06 4.21 4.33 4.505 LABORERS (Continued) 1 May 66 1 May 67 1 May 68 1 May 69 Cutting Torch Operator (Demolition)------------------------- $3.75 $3.90 $4.02 $4.195 Driller (Core, Diamond or Wagon), Joy Driller Model TW M-2A, Gardner Denver Model DH 143 and similar type drills (in co accordance with memorandum of understanding between 0 Laborers and Operating Engineers dated at Miami, Florida, 3 February 1 954)------------------------------------------ 4.15 4.30 4.42 4.595 � +' Driller, Jackhammer 22 ft. drill steel or longer------------ 3.99 4.14 4.26 4.435 ;a Fine Grader, Highway and Street Paving, Airports, runways A and similar type heavy construction----------------------- 3.8o 3.95 4.07 4.245 Flagman--------- 3 3.85 3.97 4.145 Gas and Oil Pipeline Laborer----------- 3.70 3.85 3.97 4.145 --------------------- Gas and Oil Pipeline Wrapper--Pot Tender and Form Man------- 3.91 4.06 4.18 4.355 Gas and Oil Pipeline Wrapper--6 inch pipe and over---------- 4.04 4.19 4.31 4.485 Guinea Chaser----------------------------------------------- 3.78 3.93 4.05 4.225 Laborer Packing Rod Steel and Pans-------------------------- 3 .825 3.975 4.095 4.27 Landscape Gardener and Nursery Man*------------------------- 3.8o 3.95 4.07 4.245 Laying of all non-metallic pipe, including Sewer Pipe, Drain Pipe and Underground Tile--------------------------------- 4.ol 4.16 4.28 4.455 x Making and Caulking of all non-metallic Pipe Joints--------- 3.89 4.o4 4.16 4.335 Powderman--------------------------------------------------- 4.o6 4.21 4.33 4.505 Riprap Stonepaver------------------------------------------- 3.89 4.04 4.16 4.335 Rock Slinger------------------------------------------------ 3.96 4.11 4.23 4 .405 Head Rock Slinger------------------------------------------- 4.22 4.37 4.49 4.665 Sandblaster Nozzleman)------------------------------------- 4.15 4.30 4.42 4.595 Sandblaster (Pot Tender)------------------------------------ 3.89 4.o4 4.16 4.335 Scaler------------------------------------------------------ 3.75 3.90 4.02 4.195 Scaler (Using Bos 'n' s Chair or Safety Belt or Pwr. Tools)--- 3.96 4 .11 4.23 4.405 Septic Tank Digger and Installer (Lead Man)----------------- 3.85 4.o0 4.12 4.295 Steel Headerboard Man--------------------------------------- 4.125 4.275 4.395 4.57 Tank Scaler and Cleaner------------------------------------- 3.825 3.975 4.095 4.27 Tarman and Mortarman---------------------------------------- 3.75 3.90 4.02 4.195 Tree Climber, Faller, Chain Saw Operator, Pittsburgh Chipper and similar type Brush Shredders-------------------------- 3.91 4.o6 4.18 4.355 Underground Laborer, including Caisson Bellower------------- 3.83 3.98 4.10 4.275 Watchman---------------------------------------------------- 3.o4 3.19 3.31 3.485 LABORERS (continued) 1 May 66 1 May 67 1 May 68 1 May 69 Window Cleaner $3.70 $3.85 $3.97 $4.145 *Has knowledge of plant materials and how to plant them. Lays out plant arrangements to follow the landscape plan. EO TUNNEL CLASSIFICATIONS 1 May 66 1 May 67 HEALTH AND WELFARE 2110 per hour -� ca PENSION 220 per hour 270 per hour VACATION 150 per hour 200 per hour A NOTE: Seven consecutive hours, excluding meal period, to begin at 7:00, 7:30 or 8:00 a.m. shall constitute a regular day' s d work for which eight times the straight-time hourly rate shall be paid on all shifts . Single shift premiums shall not apply on tunnels less than 200 feet. The classification "Shifter" receives a 350 per hour differential over the highest classification over which he has leadership. 1 May 66 1 May 67 Shaft and Raise Miner------------------------------------ $4.845 $5.095 ko i Miner-Tunnel (hand or machine)--------------------------- 4.595 4 .845 x Timberman, Retimberman-wood or steel--------------------- 4.595 4•845 Blaster, Driller, Powderman------------------------------ 4.595 4.845 Cherry Pickerman----------------------------------------- 4.595 4.845 Nipper--------------------------------------------------- 4.445 4.695 Chucktender, Cabletender--------------------------------- 4.445 4.695 Swamper (Brakeman and Switchman on Tunnel Work)---------- 4.345 4 .595 Powderman-Primer House----------------------------------- 4 5 5 4.845 Bull Gang Foreman---------------------------------------- 5 5 4.845 Bull Gang Mucker, Trackman------------------------------- 4.3 5 4.595 Dumpman-------------------------------------------------- 4.345 4.5 5 Steel Form Raiser & Setter------------------------------- 4.595 4.8 5 Helper for Steel Form Raiser & Setter-------------------- 4.445 4.695 (Note: Helper for Steel Form Raiser & Setter may be used on a one-for-one basis with the Steel Form Raiser or Setter) Vibratorman, Jack Hammer, Pneumatic Tools (except driller) 4.445 4.695 Concrete Crew, includes Rodders & Spreaders-------------- 4.345 4.595 Grout Crew----------------------------------------------- 4.345 4.595 j TUNNEL CLASSIFICATIONS (continued) 1 May 1966 1 May 1g67 Grout Gunman--------------------------------------------- $4.545 $4.795 Kemper & other Pneumatic Concrete Placer Operator--=_____ 4.5 5 4.845 3 3.�9 Watchman------------------------------------------- .0 N IRON WORKERS Qrl Feb. 16, Aug. 16, Aug. 16, Aug. 16, Aug. 16, � 4-3 Classification 1966 1966 1967 1968 1969 Reinforcing Iron Worker A $5.20 $5.54 $5 .83 $6 .10 $6 .37 Structural & Ornamental 5.41 5.71 5 .98 6 .23 6 .48 Fence Erector 5.21 5 .51 5 .78 6 .03 6 .28 Foremen shall be paid not less than 450 per hour more than the hourly rate of the highest class- ification over which they have supervision. When two or more Iron Workers are employed, one shall be selected by the Employer to act as ti Foreman . � x WELFARE .255 .28 .305 •33 VACATION .18 .23 .25 PENSION .20 .25 .30 .325 TEAMSTERS Foreman: When a Contractor employs on his payroll, 9 or more Teamsters operating equipment under the jurisdiction of the Teamsters, excluding any equipment less than six tons and maintenance equipment, the Contractor shall designate one Teamster as a Craft Foreman and he shall receive 250 per hour more than the highest Teamster classifi- cation over which he is foreman. +­1 U Classification May 1, May 1, k 1966 1967 A Driver of Dump Truck of less than: 4 yds . water level $4.35 $4.50 4 yds . but less than 8 yds , water level 4 .38 4 .53 8 yds . but less than 12 yds . water level 4.43 4.58 12 yds . but less than 16 yds . water level 4.51 4.66 16 yds . but less than 25 yds . water level 4.73 4.88 25 yds. or more water level (single unit or combination of vehicles) 5.19 5.34 Driver of Truck Legal Payload Capacity: Less than 6 tons (includes all vehicles less than six tons) 4 .35 4.50 6 tons to 10 tons 4.38 3.53 10 tons to 15 tons 4.43 4.58 00 15 tons to 20 tons 4.51 4.66 x 20 tons or more 4 .73 4.88 Driver of Dumpster Truck 4.73 4.88 Driver of Transit-Mix Truck - under 3 yds. 4.59 4.74 Driver of Transit-Mix Truck - 3 yds . or more 4.73 4.88 Pipeline and Utility Working Truck Driver including Winch Truck, but limited to trucks applicable to pipeline and utility work, where a composite crew is used 4 .53 4.68 Driver of Road Oil Spreader Truck 4.53 4.68 Bootman 4 .53 4.68 Cement Distributor Truck 4.53 4.68 Dumperete Truck less than 62 yds . water level 4•59 4.74 Dumperete Truck, 61 yds . water level and over 4.73 4.88 Ross Carrier Driver - Highway 5.035 5•i85 Water or Tank-Type Truck Driver - under 2500 gals . 4.41 4.56 Water or Tank-Type Truck Driver - 2500 gals . to 4000 gals . 4.53 4.68 TEAMSTERS ( . . .continued) May 1, May 1, Classification 1966 1967 Water or Tank-Type Truck Driver - 4000 gals . and over $4.65 $4.80 Fork Lift Driver 5•035 5.185 Traffic-Control Pilot Car, excluding moving heavy equipment, permit loads 4 .35 4.50 Truck Mounted Power Broom 4.41 4.56 Truck Greaser and Tireman 4.68 4 .83 Truck Repairman 5.315 5.465 .� Truck Repairman Helper 4.585 4.735 A Warehouseman and Teamster 4.27 4.42 Warehouseman - Clerk 4.41 4.56 ¢ A-Frame or Swedish Crane Driver 5.035 5•i85 DW 10 and DW 20 Euclid-type Equipment, Le Tourneau Pulls, Terra Cobras and similar types of equipment; also PB and similar type trucks when performing work within the Teamster jurisdiction, regardless of types of attachment and when pulling Aqua/Pak and water tank trailer 5.315 5 .465 Winch Truck Driver - 1220 per hour additional when operating power winch, or similar special attachments HEALTH AND WELFARE 300 per hour 350 per hour PENSION 200 per hour 200 per hour VACATION AND HOLIDAY FUND 150 per hour 250 per hour OPERATING ENGINEERS FOREMAN: Receives not less than 350 per hour over the hourly rate of the highest Operating Engineer Classification under his direction, excluding premium pay or differential pay. July 1 July 1 July 1 1966 1967 1968 � U HEALTH AND WELFARE 300 300 300 $4 PENSION: 30¢ 450 600 W VACATION - HOLIDAY SAVINGS FUND 300 300 300 A GROUP 1 -------------------------------------------------------- $4.38 4.53 $4.68 H Air Compressor, Pump or Generator Operator Q Engineer-Oiler and Signalman Heavy Duty Repairman's Helper Switchman or Brakeman GROUP2 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.62 4.77 4.92 Concrete Mixer Operator, Skip Type Conveyor Operator and Beltman Fireman x Generator, Pump or Compressor Operator (2-5 inclusive, portable units) over 5 units - 10¢ per hour for each additional unit up to ten Generator, Pump or Compressor Plant Operator Hydrostatic Pump Rotary Drill Helper (oilfield type) Skiploader-Wheeltype-Ford Ferguson, Jeep or Similar Type 3/4 yard of less (without dragtype attachments) Temporary Heating Plant Operator Truck Crane Oiler GROUP 3 ---------------------------------------------------------------------- 4.86 5.01 5.16 A-Frame or Winch Truck Operator Dinkey Locomotive or Tunnel Motor Operator Elevator Hoist Operator Equipment Greaser Ford, Ferguson or Similar Type (with dragtype attachments) Hydra-Hammer or Similar Type Equipment Power Concrete Curing Machine Power Concrete Saw Operator -Power-driven Jumbo Form Setter Operator OPERATING ENGINEERS GROUP 3 ( . . .continued) July 1 July 1 July 11966 1967 1968 Rodman and Chainman $4.86 $5.01 $5.16 Ross Carrier (job-site) Self-Propelled Tar Pipelining Machine Operator Stationary Pipe Wrapping and Cleaning Machine Operator Towblade Operator 4.3 GROUP 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------- $4.97 $5.12 $5.27 (aa Asphalt Plant Fireman ra Boring Machine Operator ,� Boxman or Mixer Box Operator (Concrete or Asphalt Plant) Concrete Pump Operator (small portable) Derrick Man (oilfield type) Drilling Machine Operator (including water wells) Highline Cableway Signalman Instrumentman Locomotive Engineer Power Sweeper Operator Roller Operator, Compacting Screed Operator Trenching Machine Operator (up to 6 foot depth capacity, Manufacturer' s rating) GROUP 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------- 5.16 5.31 5.46 Asphalt or Concrete Spreading, Mechanical Tamping or Finishing Machine Operator, Roller (all types and sizes) , Soil, Cement, Asphalt-Finish Asphalt Plant Engineer Deck Engine Operator Grade Checker Heavy Duty Repairman Heavy Duty Welder Machine Tool Operator Pavement-Breaker Operator Pneumatic Heading Shield - Tunnel Road Oil Mixing Machine Operator Fork Lift, under five ton Rubber-tired, Heavy Duty Equipment Operator-Oshkosh, DW, Euclid, LeTourneau, LaPlant-Choate, or similar type equipment with any type attachments Skip Loader Wheel Type over 3/4 yard, up to and including 12 yards Slip Form Pump Operator (power driven hydraulic lifting device for concrete forms) Tractor Operator-Dragtype Shovel, Bulldozer, Tamper, Scraper and Push Tractor OPERATING ENGINEERS ( . . .continued) July 1 July l Jul 1 1966 1967 196 GROUP6 --------------------------------------------------------------------- $5.26 $5.41 $5.56 Combination Heavy Duty Repairman and Welder Motor Patrol Operator (any type or size) 3 Concrete Mixer Operator-Paving Multiple Engine-Earth Moving Machinery Operator ,0 Concrete Mobile Mixer Operator Party Chief Concrete Pump or Pumperete Gun Operator Pneumatic Concrete Placing Machine Operator M Crushing Plant Engineer Hackley-Presswell or similar type Elevating Grader Operator Rotary Drill Operator, excluding Caisson type A Grade-All Operator Skiploader-Wheeltype over 12 yards ,.i Highline Cableway Operator Surface Heater and Planer Operator y Hoist Operator (Chicago Boom and Mine) Tractor Loader Operator, Crawler Type--all types & sizes Kolman Belt Loader and Similar Type Tractor Operator--with boom attachments Lift Slab Machine Operator Traveling Pipe Wrapping, Cleaning and Bending Loader Operator Athey, Euclid, Machine Operator Hancock, Sierra or similar type Trenching Machine Operator (over 6 foot depth capacity, Fork Lift, over five ton manufacturer' s rating) Universal Equipment Operator (Shovel, Back Hoe, Dragline, CQ Clamshell, Derrick, Derrick Barge, Crane, Pile Driver, and Mucking Machine) 1. All operators and oilers on equipment with booms of 80 to 100 feet, including jib and pile driving rigs with hammer leads of 80 to 100 feet, shall receive fifteen cents (150) per hour premium pay additional to the regular rate of pay. Thereafter they shall receive an additional ten cents (100) per hour premium pay additional to the regular rate of pay for each additional 20 feet of boom, including jib. 2. It is agreed that two or more Engineer Operators will constitute a complete operating crew on all Tower Crane Equipment (American Pecco, Bucyrus Erie, Mayco-Weitz, Linden and similar types) , and they shall receive forty-five cents (450) per hour premium pay in addition to the applicable Universal Equipment Operator' s rate of pay (Long Boom premium shall not apply to this equipment . 3. Operators on all hoisting equipment with three drums or more, shall receive fifteen cents (150) per hour premium pay additional to the regular rate of pay. 4. Combination Mixer and Compressor Operators on Gunite work shall be classified as Concrete Mobile Mixer Operators . 10-15 E ENGINERING - o - ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS 412 SOUTH LYON STREET SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92702 TELEPHONE (714) 547.4471 ADDRESS REPLY TO P. O. BOX 170 August 2, 1966 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California' -Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager-Secretary Gentlemen: In accordance with the action taken at your regular meeting on July 13, 1966, and the subsequent letter-request of July 14, 1966, by Mr. Fred A. Harper, we are pleased to submit herewith the, recommended Modification No. 1 to the Engineer's Report for Count Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County dated July, 1965. This modification provides for the change in size of the Grand Avenue Trunk and the addition of the Warner Avenue Subtrunk in order to serve an area within County Sanitation District No. 1 of Orange County presently under development northeasterly of the intersection of Maywood Avenue and Ritchie Street. The modification which is attached hereto is recommended for adoption by the Board of Directors in accordance with the terms and conditions specified in the County Sanitation District Act. In accordance with your request, we herein propose to prepare plans and specifications for the Warner Avenue Subtrunk in accordance with our basic engineering agreement dated November 10, 1965, for a fixed fee of $3,400. Included in this fee is the preparation of the modification report as well as the siphon design which was prepared for the Grand Avenue Trunk, Contract 6-1, in order to physically effect change orders approved at the July 13, 1966, meeting. Final plans and specifications for the Warner Avenue Subtrunk will be completed within six weeks after authorization to proceed is received at your regular August, 19661 meeting. Very truly yours, BOYLE ENGINEERING Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951 CH/vld F,,O F E S S 1 O N A L E N G I N E' E R I N G A N D ARCH ITECTU RAL S E R V I C E S -L- (District 1) RESOLUTION NO. 66-1o8-1 AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION #1 TO REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND MODIFYING ENGINEER' S REPORT DATED JULY, 1965 (Modification #1) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Boyle Engineering, Consulting Engineers, have prepared a modification of the Engineer' s Report dated July, 1965, to provide for a change in size of the Grand Avenue Trunk and the addition of the Warner Avenue Sub-Trunk; and, Section 2. That the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 does hereby find and determine that the public interest requires a modification or departure from the plans and specifications as contained in the Engineer' s Report dated July, 1965, in the manner set forth on the attached sheet which is hereby made a part of this resolution as though fully set forth herein, all in accordance with Section 4758 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. ,moo M-1 (District 1) MODIFICATION NO. 1 to ENGINEER'S REPORT for �..✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1 OF ORANGE COUNTY dated July, 1965 Modify Section 11 Page 3 Portion of paragraph modified to read as follows: "Group A Improvements, consisting of approximately 21,650 feet of trunk sewers, are recommended for present construction; " Page 4 Group A Improvements - Present Construction Program Item 4 - modified to read as follows: "Grand Avenue Trunk" extending along Grand Avenue from Warner Avenue on the north to Dyer Road on the south. Construction of the Grand Avenue Trunk would consist of approximately 780 feet of 27-inch V.C.P. , 1,770 feet of 24-inch V.C.P. , and 50 feet of 21-inch V.C.P. together with required manholes and appurtenant work. " Add Item 5 read as follows: "Warner Avenue Subtrunk extending easterly along Warner Avenue from Grand Avenue to Wright Street; thence northerly to Maywood Avenue; thence lft� easterly to Lyon Street. Construction of the Warner Avenue Subtrunk would consist of approximately 1,600 feet of 21-inch V.C.P. together with required manholes and appurtenant work. " M-2 (District 1) Modification No. 1 to Engineer' s Report Plate 11 is hereby modified to indicate the general location of the Warner Avenue Subtrunk and the modification of the Grand Avenue Trunk. Group A Improvements in Table 1, page 11 entitled "Estimated Cost of Proposed Improvement is revised as follows: Group A Improvements 1. Upper Main and Broadway Trunk $398,000 2. Seventeenth Street Subtrunk 32,000 3. Washington Avenue Subtrunk 20,000 4. Grand Avenue Trunk 86,000 5. Warner Avenue Subtrunk 42,000 $578,000 Contingencies at 10% 58,000 636,000 Engineering, surveying and inspection at 10% 64, 0o0 $700,000 Administration and Miscellaneous 35,000 Costs at 5% Grand Total - Group A Improvements $735,000 Prepared by, BOYLE ENGINEERING Edwin H. Finster, C.E. 8624 M-3 (District 1) ;'t�� t1Z ili:n 1)q�llk RAWI� WAIER EMU " POST OFFICE BOX D I IRVINE , CALIFORNIA 92664 July 18, 1966 Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley; California Attention: Mr. Paul Brown Gentlemen: Reference is made to prior discussions relative to the problem existing in providing sewage service to fifty-five lots in Tract 5018 lying without Sanitation District No. 5 but within Irvine Ranch Water District. In order to provide temporary relief to District No. 5 to receive payment for services rendered to the subject properties it is possible for both named Districts to make contractual arrange- ments for payment and disposal. The Irvine Ranch Water District can collect fees from the property owners in the District and can in turn reimburse Sanitation District No. 5 for this service. . ;he area in which the subject lots are located is to be further .'eveloped in the next few years and adjoining lots will require additional disposal facilities. It is therefore recommended that pending development of a master plan a contract be made betwea: the two Districts providing for annual payments for disposal of sewage from the fifty-five lots in question, such contract to be limited to five years. It would be appreciated if you could prepare a draft of such a contract embodying the terms as outlined and proposing the amount to be charged annually for service to the fifty-five lots. If further discussion appears to be necessary we will contact you, otherwise a final contract can be prepared and executed. Very truly yours, ' William H. Eppingerj � General Manager WHE:dt Copy to Irvine Co. '.d o -N- (District 5) J'Ai �7 1 �• IO•� IRK R " D WHIR EMU* POST OFFICE BOX D I IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 92664 August 2, 1966 Orange County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Paul Brown Gentlemen: Reference is made to your letter of July 20th, 1966, responding to our July 18th letter concerning provision of temporary sewerage service for that portion of Tract 5018 lying within our District and outside of District No. 5. Subsequent discussion with The Irvine Company has resulted in the recommendation that the area in question be annexed to Sanitation District No. 5, thereby allowing for a more realistic approach to the problem at hand. Accordingly this District will take no further action in this regard unless requested by you. Construction of our water reclamation plant has been started and the plant should be in operation the latter part of 1967. If it appears that a connection to our existing faci- lities would be in order in the near future please let us know so that we can discuss same. Very truly yours, William H. Eppinger General Manager WHE:dt -0- (District 5) RESOLUTION N0. 66-109-6 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROCKY POINT PUMPING STATION RECON TRUCTION �..d A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 6, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROCKY POINT PUMPING STATION RECONSTRUCTION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 6, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, for ROCKY POINT PUMPING STATION RECON- STRUCTION, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , September 19th, 1966, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the staff and the engineers be authorized and directed to receive and open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors . t..' -P- (District 6) RESOLUTION NO. 66-110-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS �..✓ OR CONT ACT 0. 1-10-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 11-10-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Lowry and Associates, Engineers, for construction of the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND SLATER AVENUE SEWAGE PUMPING STATION AND FORCE MAIN SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-2, are hereby approved, re- ceived and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said Contract No. 11-10-2 pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , Sept. 12, 1966 , at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read . -Q- (District 11) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR: Orange County Pipeline , Inc. DATE: August 5, 1966 Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and JOB: Nichols Street Gravity Sewer, Contract No 11-10-1 Amount of this change order (M) (DEDUCT) $ 25.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer' s Report No. 3 ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S QUANTITIES DEDUCT Item Change Est ' d. Quant . No. Unit From To 2 L.F. 2621 2620 1 L.F. @ $25. 50/LF $25.50 Original Contract Price $ 116,594.30 Prev. Auth. Changes None This Change (J „ (DEDUCT) 25.50 Amended Contract Price $ 116,568.80 Board authorization date : Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of August 10, 1966 Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Chief Engineer ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. By -R- (District 11) RESOLUTION NO. 66-111-11 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 115 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. , has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER and NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1, on the 25th day of July, 1966; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the Chief Engineer of the District has concurred in said engineers ' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER and NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 26th day of May, 1966; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work �vr✓ therefor. -S- (District 11) FIRST AMENDMENT (To Agreement for Purchase and Sale - Districts Nos. 2 and 3 - Magnolia Trunk Sewer and Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer) �...� THIS AGREEMENT, made and entered into this loth day of August, 1966, by and between COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, of Orange County, hereinafter referred to as "Seller", and COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, of Orange County, hereinafter referred to as "Buyer", W I T N E S S E T H: That for and in consideration of the promises and agree- ments hereinafter made and exchanged, the Buyer and the Seller agree as follows: Section 1. That Section 3 of that certain agreement entered into on May 1, 1966, between the parties hereto, is hereby amended to read as follows : "Section 3. Buyer will pay to Seller the total principal sum of $1,086,980.89 for said sewerage facilities described in Sections 1 and 2 hereof, said sum with interest at 4.0 percent per annum on the unpaid balance, to be payable in install- ments as follows : $300,000 on January 1, 1967, $200,000 on January 1, 1968, $200,000 on January 1, 1969, $200,000 on January 1, 1970, and $186,980.89 on January 1, 1971. Said interest will be computed as beginning January 1, 1967, and payment thereof will be made at the time said in- stallment payments are made beginning with the installment payable on January 1, 1968. Buyer re- serves the right to increase said installment pay- ments at any time or to retire the total principal amount remaining at any time. " T-1 (Districts 2 and 3) Section 2. That all other terms and conditions set forth in the agreement dated May 1, 1966, shall remain in full force and effect; and, Section 3. That this Amendment shall take effect retro- actively and be in effect from the 31st day of July, 1966. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, this agreement has been executed in duplicate in the names of the Buyer and Seller, by their officers thereunto duly authorized, as the day and year first above written. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, SELLER: of Orange County, California, a public corporation By: Chairman, Board of DirecE-ors By: Secretary, Board of Directors COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, BUYER: of Orange County, California, a public corporation By: Chairman, Board of Directors By: Secretary, Board of Directors `„v T-2 (Districts 2 and 3) RESOLUTION NO, 66-112 APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT ,'..' FOR PURCHASE AND SALE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 2, AND 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE, DATED MAY 1, 1966 The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, and 3 , of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Amendment dated August 10, 1966, to the Agreement for Purchase and Sale of the MAGNOLIA TRUNK SEWER and MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, dated May 1, 1966, by and between County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, and 3, is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairmen and the Secretary of County Sanitation Districts Nos . 2, and 3 be authorized and directed to execute said Amendment on behalf of the Districts. -U- (Districts 2 and 3) R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY;: J• L. LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A joint Ventura of - BOYLE ENGINEERING 6 IAWRY AND ASSOCIATES ? J r'� I ;`,, ' - t �. .r', , i.r .rr; r t•. ..,' .412 South Lyon St reet P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana,. Calif., 92702 t I ' .;. .:...� �;i 1' ;,•r c• Telephone S47.4471 ' .•, � },' 1 •, '•rl..' h�'';�•��:; +! ,fl IF .. e,'9U8t ar -` . 1 :• 1 •. .('. '� •,• ! , , /r .I I!t , i 11 1 ' I'N/ 2 41 1.• ' 1 +. ��•.• 1 •,•a .'fir 1 I .j1 a 1`'•tJ t. 1_t� 1 , ,,.. .. Ir .4. .• J ti i, .,.:•i Board of Directors ^ i q r, �'�..� ??;r` t;, , t ' y ,` 1.'• � •� ' ' '` ' ' •`= County Sanitation Distric ` ' ' , ,;• , , ';,r , c e '} J tl t No. ;t, , ; t1 Y HI , ,,. :,. of OrangeCounty. k >.Y . .�.� i., 4 ,•.; r:• P.O. Box 5175 •a r.,.:. - • .` „ t:x Fountain Valley, California Attention Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager-Secretary `I Gentlemen: ' :u Pursuant to your request of July 14, 1966, regarding engineering services in connection with the preparation of plans and specifications for the reconstruction :-f;°•�� ' "'~ of two sections of the Euclid Trunk as outlined in the Engineer's Report of March, 1965, .r we are pleased to submit the following proposal for your consideration: We will pre are plans and specifications for Contract 2-10-5 (Lampson to Chapman Avenues) anTContract 2-10-6 (Ball Road to La Palma Avenue) as two se P orate contracts in accordance with the conditions as set forth in our basic agreement of {• September 15, 1965. It is presently contemplated that plans and specifications for Contract 2-10-5 '<;: •. be incorporated with plans and specifications that are being prepared by the city of Garden Grove for the improvement of Euclid Avenue in the same area. Past discussions between ourselves, the district, and the city have indicated that this approach can '.:,'.. minimize congestion and greatly reduce the length of time that the street would be torn up for the different types of construction projects. This approach is in keeping with previous requests for the city of Garden Grove for an advance construction period of this section so that the new street pavements would not have to be torn up in the future. �We will prepare specifications and bid proposals in such a manner that separate bid items for the, sewer work can be set apart from those for roadway work thus reflecting true costs for the sewer project as if it had been bid by itself. We will .coordinate as required with the city .'`,c_.:.�'.? k: . so that our plans and specifications from a format standpoint will be compatible with the :.'.,,.: city's plans and specifications. We will also provide all of the other associated services ;•::<_`. :';,:: .:5 C.: as outlined in our basic agreement for this contract. We propose that the engineer's fee for the design services be $7,750. We have included in this fee our costs for preparing i' plans and specifications for a siphon on the existing Euclid Trunk at Pine Street and Stanford:..r • 'to accommodate.a'new storm drain to be built by the.city of Garden Grove, 1 , '• •' ' ' ,'•'1::• } ti•-rJ t •' �'r t ` r fJt 1 r �.....-�«.. --.«.-._�_.- • .•. ... ..... � ....:'.•.• •1wr•.•.wJ�«L�. �•.• w. . rJ,•,w:.r..-,rW J.,rr.r�.''' �r • �.,.......«ter-.rrV•Y•rry..t••«• ;.,., -V-l. .` . (District 2) t Air Board of Directors -2- August 2, 1966 County Sanitation. District No. 2 If we are authorized to proceed with this work at the August, 1966, Board of Directors! meeting, the plans and specifications for Contract 2-10-5 will be ready by : . . �• _' February, 1967, at which time the city of Garden Grove wishes to advertise for its • ' improvement of Euclid Avenue. For Contract 2-10-6, we will prepare plans and specifications so that the district may advertise for bids in accordance with the standard procedure of the district. • We will provide engineering services for the preparation of plans and specifications in accordance with the basic agreement of September 15, 1965. It is proposed that our fixed fee for this project will be $27,500. If we ore authorized to proceed on this project at the August meeting of the „; ' . •'-; Board of Directors,. plans and specifications for Contract 2-10-6 will be ready for approval by the board and advertising of bids at the January, 1967, meeting with bids to 6e received in February, 19670 , Very truly yours, ; • '. 1 J. R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY , /AAA . , :?.• ';. Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951 .J _ t 1 cH/vid , cc: Mr. Sidney L. Lowry . ;: 1 1, ,;, ► ,. Lr....r........�r..�..•�w- ....�..-�....•r r...«a:r«..trr •rr......• �� ..1...r.1a.rv.►1� r.aarv+l.rrri? Y• 1..� b-'- _ _ _ ;'1 •V-2 (District 2) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 1 CONTRACTOR:_ A & P Pipeline, Inc. DATE: Aug. 10, 1966 JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-4 Amount of this change order (ADD) (MM=) $ 6,161.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor' s claim dated July 28, 1966 and Engineer' s letter dated August 3, 1966 ADD A. Extra work occasioned by presence of unknown 27" concrete pipeline adjacent to and in trench prism 1. Extra pavement replacement from Sta. 274+50 to 266+16 (contractor-Is claim Item No. 1) $15210. 2. Curb and gutter replacement (Contractor' s claim Item No. 2) 435. 3. Extra paving replacement from Sta. 277+63 to 274+50 (Contractor' s claim Item No. 3) 244. 4. Removal and disposal of abandoned pipe from trench from Sta. 277+62.49 to 282+03 (Contractor' s claim Item No. 4, 5 and 6) 2,422. 5. Provide shoring to protect existing 30-inch trunk sewer and adjacent utilities at Stanford and Pine Streets (Contractor's claim Item No. 11) 300. SUBTOTAL $4,611. (Continued on next page) ORIGINAL CONTRACT PRICE $ 215,843.20 PREY. AUTH. CHANGES None THIS CHANGE (ADD) (ZMDVLM0 6,161._00 AMENDED CONTRACT PRICE $ 222.004.20 Board authorization date: Approved: COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of August 10, 1966 Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer A & P PIPELINE, INC. By -W-1- (District No. 2) • ti n Change Order No. 1 - Contract No. 2-10-4 - A & P Pipeline, Inc. (Brought forward) SUBTOTAL $4,611. B. Extra work occasioned by additional traffic control in connection with lowering telephone duct at Euclid Avenue and Garden Grove Boulevard 1. Temporary removal of traffic signal (Contractor' s claim item No. 8) $ 650. 2. Provide traffic barricades for 30 days (Contractor's claim Item No. 9) 550. SUBTOTAL 13200. C. Extra work occasioned by encountering unknown steel pipeline at Walnut and new Euclid and at Stanford and Pine (Contractor' s claim Items No. 12 and 13) 150. D. Extra work occasioned by lowering of manhole at Sta. 284+37 per request of City of Garden Grove (Contractor' s claim Item No. 7) 200. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $6,161. An extension of time of 45 days is hereby granted because of the above extra work. -W-2- (District No. 2) EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No 11 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m. , August 10 1966 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Directors Jake Stewart (Chairman), Ted Bartlett, and Alton E. Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Bo d. DISTRICT NO, 11 Moved, seconded an duly AD70URMT carriedt That this meeting of the Boar of Directors of County Sanitation District N 11 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m. , Betember 12, 1C 6, in the District' s office at 1094 Ellis Ave e, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman declared he meeting so adjourned at 8:28 p.m. , August 10, 1966. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.11 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the loth day of August , 1966 • IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation Di-strict No. ll , of Orange County, California, this loth day of xt:gui =; 9 , 1965 Secretary, Board:Of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 F ! EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO ll�� , t OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o' clock p.m. , t 10 196 Fountain Valley, Calif 6 at 10844 Ellis Avenue, M� . The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Jake R. Stewart (Chairman), Ted Bartlett, and Alton E. Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT 11 Mr. Milo Keith, of Lowry and Report of the engineers Associates,;`reported on regarding acquisition of negotiations with the General easement needed for Con- Telephone!Company for an ease- tract No. 11-10-2 ment neeed in the construction of the District' s Contract No. 11-10-2 (Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer arjd Slater Avenue Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer) . Mr. K ith recommended that the General Counsel and the engineers be authorized to prepare the final documents for acquisition of a easement, and that the engineers be authorized to nego iate with General Telephone Company for right of immediate posAession of the easement. r It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel and the engineers be authorized to prepare the necessary documents for acquisition of al�/ easement from General Telephone Company; and, FURTHER MOVED: That the engineers be authorized to negotiate with General Telephone Company for right of immediate possession of the easement so that construction can begin after receipt of bids. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) i SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) �i I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District o. 1 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the abov and Foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute en ries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of s d Board on the loth day of August ' 196 6' IN WITNESS WHERE , I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of Co ty Sanitation District No. , of Orange County, California, t . s 18th day of ku st ' 1916 . Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 #12 - The General Manager announced that. Clarke Miller, of Miller, Nisson & Kogler, was in attend ce to serve as General Counsel in Mr. Nisson' s absence The General Manager also report on the employees' Newsletter which had been mailed t the Directors and employees; and on the new method of handli the agenda material. The Directors will receive only e material affecting the Districts represented. Mr. Harper also ad v sed that the Orange County Survey Report had been accepted by e Board of Supervisors, ah copies of the report � e--t�r�-�. ;V 1-S Mr. Milo Keith o Lowry and Associates reported goon negotiations with the Gene al Telephone Company for an easement needed in the construction o the District' s Contract No. 11-10-2. Mr. Keith recommended that the eneral Counsel and the engineers be authorized to prepare the fina documents for acquisition of the easement, and that the engineers be uthorized to negotiate with General Telephone Company for right o immediate possession of the easement. It was then MS&DC: That the General ounsel and the engineers I be authorized to prepare the necessary docum nts for acquisition of an easement from General Telephone Company tT c-z—' nr.nr7 i i i Ana - - o Yi�trP TIYe O Vfd�k2��O�kt and, FURTHER MOVED: That the engineers be authorize to negotiate with General Telephone Company for right of immediate ossessinn of .� 90- easement so that construction can begin -ss after eceipt of bids., (-in- of the Tele ho e omp-any'-s Low, *4000 ..................................... //000'� 6-0-o-- -�7 4Z2 .0-'�� '--7L7' Coo—o� lt ROLL CALL District jz _S-Z, 7 Regular Adjourned Date � i' �' l , Time JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 H. ✓ McMichael y McMichael Amo 11 Miller, Clifton i Mack Bartlett Porter -7- Bousman Davis Allen -� Hirstein Bowen ---77- Noe Brown Long DISTRICT 2 Crapo -�" Shull Parks ✓ Hileman Culver �L Crapo r/ Shull Forgit -� Gruber Culver Furman �� Bouma y �- McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock - Michel Gummere — Anderson Schutte Krein Hock — Michel Schwerdtfeger �- Kanno Miller, Clifton -� Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry -� Kohl Wars Herbst Parks - Hileman Workman �- Parsons Allen �- Hirstein Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer ,/ Clark Fregeau Amo ✓ Speer Clark Bousman ✓ Davis Stewart Green Bowen �� Noe Coen Brown Long Wer xrs -�� Herbst Crapo ✓ Shull Workman Culver ✓ Allen Hirstein Furman �- Bouma Gummere ✓ Anderson H �- McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger �- Fregeau OTHERS; Stewart �� Green s �^ Herbst Brown ✓ Allen ✓ Hirstein N±s&m - ✓ Galloway —� DISTRICT 5 Tremblay Y Parsons 7- -Low,ry Gruber �- Forgit CaT-JZ4Dn Allen �- Hirstein R-ime-1 DISTRICT 6 ��� Porter Gruber Forgit Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton I., Mack Forgit Gruber . • ' " y -�- McMichael c _ Parks Hileman Porter / Allen -17' Hirstein DIST RICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Bartlett ett Allen Hirstein Allen -� Hirstein ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time wr- l JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 McMichael .fey McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman - - Davis Allen Hirstein Bowen -�� Noe Brown Long DISTRICT 2 Crapo Shull Parks L1111 Hileman Culver �- Crapo -�`- Shull Forgit -�` Gruber Culver t/ Furman �� Bouma _ McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel Gummere Anderson Schutte -� Krein Hock Michel Schwerdtfeger - Kanno Miller, Clifton Mack Speer -�� Clark Miller, Harry �L Kohl s Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons -7/ Allen Hirstein Porter Schutte �� Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger —� Kanno Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer -�� Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bowen Noe Coen Brown Long -�� Herbst Crapo Shull Workman Culver Allen Hirstein Furman Bouma Gummere Anderson H"EE&� McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau OTHERS; Stewart Green We E49"I'e- Herbst Brown Allen Hirstein Nisson Galloway DISTRICT 5 Tremblay Parsons Lowry Gruber Forgit Carlson Allen Hirstein Rimel Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter Gruber Forgit Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton Mack Forgit Gruber �'' U=;M-y McMichael Parks Hileman Porter Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time IwAw JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 McMichael Hammy ✓�✓ McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman Davis Allen Hirstein Bowen Noe Brown Long DISTRICT Crapo Shull Parks Hileman Culver Crapo Shull Forgit Gruber Culver Furman Bouma Harmvz McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel Gummere Anderson Schutte Krein Hock Michel Schwerdtfeger Kanno Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Wks— Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Allen Hirstein Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bowen Noe Coen Brown OCi Long Herbst Crapo Shull Workman Culver Allen Hirstein Furman Bouma Gummere Anderson - y McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau OTHERS: Stewart Green -ems He rb s t Brown Allen Hirstein Nisson Galloway DISTRICT 5 Tremblay Parsons Lowry Gruber Forgit Carlson Allen Hirstein Rime 1 Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter Forgit Allen r Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton Mack Forgit Gruber McMichael Parks Hileman Porter Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 1 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT N0. 5 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m. , August 10 1966 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Directors Lindsley Parsons (Chairman), Paul Gruber, and Alton E. Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of t Board. DISTRICT NO. 5 Moved, seconded and duly ADJOLTRNMENT carried: That this meeting of the and of Directors of County Sanitation Distri No. 5 be adjourned to 10:00 a.m. . August 22, 66, in the Council Chambers at Newport Be ch City Hall, Newport Beach, California. The Chairman deolar d the meeting so adjourned at 8:22 p.m. , Aug t 10, 1966. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District NO- 5 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken, from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on ttle­ipth -day of August 3 1966 �►` IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District 'No. 5 , of Orange County, California, this 10thday August -- !! =1966 Secretary,-.$aard-of Direc rs of County- Sancta--ion District No. 5 JEAN----MR. HARPER ASKED ME TO GIVE YOU THIS FOR YOUR CONVENIENCE IN ROUGHING UP THE MINUTES. HE ASKED ME TO JUST PUT IN HIS BOOK A "CLEAN" ONE AS HE THOT HE WOULD NOT BE REFERRING TO IT AND IF NECESSARY HE COULD GET THIS COPY FROM YOU. ALSO COPIES OF DIST. 2 & 3 BUDGETS AS REVISED. HE HAS A COPY OF EACH FOR HIS BUDGET FILE FHH 9. That the Contractor- shall carry wox insurance and require all subcontractors to compensation insurance as required -by the Le State of -California. - 10. That any person performing labor j BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA = _� August loth, 1966 - 8:00 p.m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) Roll Call (3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (5) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (9) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the (I adjourned regular meetings held July 13th, and July 20th, f� 1966, as mailed (10) DISTRICT 11 . Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held July 13, 1966, as mailed (11) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman (12) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (13) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel (14) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 66-106, accepting proposal of John Carollo Engineers for an Engineer' s Report relative to Ocean Outfall No. 2, Job No. J-10; and directing the engineers to proceed with preparation of said report. See pages "F" and "G" (15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file letter from the City of Fountain Valley, dated July 21, 1966, request- ing construction of improvements to Ellis Avenue; and take the matter under submission for study. See page Hrr (16) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving, in principle, execution of an agreement with Talbert Drainage District whereby said District will quitclaim all pipeline and road ease- ments and parcel owned in fee at Plant No. 2 site, in exchange for construction, by the Districts, of a new pump station for the Drainage District in an easement to be granted on Districts' property; and authorizing preparation of said agreement. (17) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Fischer-Porter Company, dated July 26, 1966, for a magnetic meter for Ocean Outfall No. 1, for the total amount of $6,455 plus freight and tax, with refund of said sum if the meter do's not perform satisfactorily. See page 'rill �/�C��6� (18) ALL DISTRICTS �-�X Consideration of motion authorizing the General Manager to designate one staff member to attend the 39th Annual Con- ference of the Water Pollution Control Federation in Kansas City, Missouri, September 25th through 30th; and authorizing payment for travel, meals, lodging, registra- tion fees and incidental expenses (19) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to Job ✓�� No. P2-12 (Clarifier "H"), authorizing a total addition of $1,276 .68 to the contract with J. Putnam Henck Con- tra oC'�r'.—�'ee page rr Jrr (20) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 66-107 re: Determining prevailing wage rates within the Districts, and repealing Resolution No. 65-184 adopted November 10, 1965. See page rrKrr (21) ALL DISTRICTS ll ,, Consideration of motion to receive and file the certifica- tion of the General Manager that he has checked all bills 12 appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment 11-4 (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion approving Joint r Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant �fU" books and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "All n B r' and C r' (23) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (24) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion authorizing advance payments to the City of Santa Ana, upon demand, based on the City's requirement estimates, in accordance with the agreement dated December, 1965. Pop -2- (25) DISTRICT 1 n Consideration of Resolution No. 66-108-1, to receive and file Modification Report of the engineers; and ordering Modification No. 1 to the Engineers Report dated July, 1965, to provide for the extension of the Grand Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer and for a change in size of said facility. See pages "L" and "M" (26) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion accepting proposal of Boyle Engineering, dated August 2, 1966, for engineering services in connection with the extension of the Grand Avenue Sub- Trunk (Warner Avenue Sub-Trunk), and for re-design of a siphon at Warner and Grand Avenues. See page "L" (27) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any. See page "D" (28) DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any (29) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ��, � D V L-L'l (30) DISTRICT 5 Q Consideration of motion to receive and file two letters from Irvine Ranch Water District regarding sewerage of the northerly portion of Tract No. 5018• and take under submission. See pages 'IN" and "0�' (31) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any. See page "D" (32) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any (33) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 10:00 a.m. , August 22nd, Newport Beach City Hall (34) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-log-6, approving plans and specifications for Rocky Point Pumping Station Re- construction; authorizing advertising for bids; and authorizing the staff and engineers to open said bids. See page "P" (35) DISTRICT 6 Cons tion of otion al of s, any. page "E" (36) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any (37) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (38) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants. See page "E" -3- (39) DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications , if any (40) DISTRICT 7 ,,� V1 Consideration of motion. re : Adjournment . (41-5) DISTRICT 11 Report of the engineers on acquisition of easement for pump station, Contract No. 11-1_0-2 (41) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-110-11, approving plans and specifications for the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer anda Slater Avenue Sewage Pumping Station and Force Main Sewer, Contract No . 11 10 2; and authorizing advertising for �,c bids . See page "Q" (42) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 11-10-1 (Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nichols Street Gravity Sewer) , authorizing a deduction of $25 .50 from the Contract with Orange County Pipeline, Inc . , Contractor. See page "R" (43) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No . 66-111-11, accepting the construction of Contract No. 11-10-1 as complete; and authorizing execution and recordation of a Notice of .� Completion of Work. See page "S" C7�v (44) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. See "E" page (45) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications , if any (46 ) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 4: 00 p .m. , September 12th �i� `� �� .� ✓� (47) DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-112, approving and authorizing execution of an amendment to the Agreement ►� for Purchase and Sale of Magnolia Trunk and Miller-Holder " Trunk Sewers, dated May 1, 1966, to provide for a chan5e in the method of payment . (See pages "T" and "U (48) DISTRICT 2 t� Consideration of motion amending the District' s Accumulated9 Capital Outlay budget requirements to $4,693,638, for the ,LI 1966-67 fiscal year JI (49 ) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion amending the District' s Accumulated Capital Outlay budget requirements to $4,395,901, for the �- 1966-67 fiscal year T)'y � (50) DISTRICT 3 � Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants , if any. See page "D" (51) DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any (52) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment 41 .1" CC" (53) DISTRICT 2 t Consideration of motion to receive, file, and accept t proposal from the engineers for Engineering design services in connection with Contracts Nos. 2-10-5 and `.✓ 2-10-6, in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the existing agreement with said engineers. V See page "V" (54) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to Contract No. 2-10-4 (Euclid Trunk Sewer), granting an extension of time of 45 days, and authorizing an addition of $6,161.00 to the contract with A & P Pipeline, Con- tractor. See page "W" �2'0U e_tr_'C( (55) DISTRICT 2 onsideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any. See page "D" (56) DISTRICT 2 ther business and communications, if any (57) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: AdjournmentQ� -5- o ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time C 0 JOINT BOARDS �' r Cn t DISTRICT 1 Harty. ✓ McMichael Iikivey ` McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman Davis Allen �*- Hirstein v Bowen ,i Noe ,�v_Brown 01— Long `DISTRICT 2 Crapo �_ Shull Parks Hileman /Culver � Crapo ✓ Shull Forgit ✓ Gruber ✓ Culver ✓ Furman Bouma Hr McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel ,i Gummere Anderson Schutte Krein Hock _� Michel Schwerdtffeger ✓ ✓ Kanno Miller, Clifton ✓ Mack Speer ,✓ ` Clark ,,Miller, Harry ,i Kohl t/ Wtgagrs ✓ .. ciHerbst ✓Parks _� Hileman Workman,/ .41� ✓ ,Parsons ✓ Allen Hirstein ✓Porter ✓ Schutte �/ Krein DISTRICT 3 ,/Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer ✓ Clark Fregeau Amo L-1 Speer ✓ Clark `� Bousman ✓ Davis +� Stewart Green ✓ Bowen Noe Coen Brown Long a, wa31te-rs Herbst Crapo ✓ Shull Workman ✓ Culver v-�A llen �— Hirstein 4­" Furman v Bouma r Gummere ✓ Anderson � L-- McMichael ✓ Miller, Harry ti Kohl Schutte _ Krein Schwerdtfeger / Fregeau OTHERS: Stewart Green / UaAlte s �_ Herbst ✓ Brown ✓ Allen _ Hirstein Galloway U DISTRICT 5 Tremblay ✓ Parsons , Lowry Gruber ,✓ Forgit Carlson Allen Hirstein Rimel Maddox DISTRICT 6 ��� (�,wLec Porter ✓ _T� � � Allen ✓ Hirsit tein DISTRICT 7 � -- Miller, Clifton c— Mack Forgit Gruber Hax-vey ✓ McMichael .C�IParks Hileman Porter Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne Stewart rl Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein CPO June 30, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT No. 2 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR . 1966-1967 FISCAL YEAR Fiscal Year Fiscal Year GENERAL SMIARY 65-66 66-67 Total Requirements: Operating Fund $ 867,472. $ 830, 359. .Bonds 1958 Fund . 15025,050. 1,07 ,650. Bonds 1951 Fund 125,281. 12 ,764. Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 3,521,513. ; 6�$.�,6g3�3g Fixed Obligation Fund 21,782. 423. Total Requirements $ 55563,098. $ Vie, .6,7z4)�3q Funds Available July 1, 1966 and Anticipated Revenue from Sources Other Than Taxes $ 2,961,227. $ 4;,ioa:,a-34.41,40,T31 DISTRICT' S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 2,601,871. $ --c ^,"^^.2Pq)1D3 Tax Rate Tax Rate 1966-67 65-66 Estimated* Tax Rate : Operating Fund $ .0580 $ .-9�+ .OSot Bonds '1958 Fund .1049 . ► °`�Z Bonds 1951 Fund .0118 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund ..3055 :5165 . 1001 Fixed Obligation Fund .0018 -0- Total $ .4820 $ .482& •`���� �..✓ *The estimated tax rate was com uted using an estimated Assessed Valuation of $63.6,eee^^^,VVV: ($ 5/ Delinquency Factor) 583) G5-1,2-10, �4��,3�0, -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRIC^1 N0. 2 Approved Proposed `ftol� Budget Bud,et 65-66 1 60-9-7 1 Operating Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures : $40g,442.) Salaries and Wales $ 5,500. $ 4, 00. Maintenance and Operation 526,148. 502,�06. unappropriated Reserve 70,000. 70,000. Total $ 601,648. $ 576,g06. Authorized General Reserve 265,824. 253,E-53. Total Requirements $ 867,472. $ 830,359. Bess: Cash and Revenue Casa. & inve st:rent s, July 1 $ 517,945• $ 56�,80 Delinquent Taxes 10,000. -3-5.,5(56 Interest & Mi.sc.. Receipts 15,000. 22,,000. Total $ 542,945. $ -53 1 AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 324,527. $ Jam'o'g-. 1958 Bond -~hind Samrary: (65-66 Expenditures: $587,250.) Principal on 1958 Bonds $ 250,000. $ 3003000. Interest 337,250. 322,250. Total $ 587,250 $ 622,250. Authorized General Reserve 437,80o. 453,400. Total Requirements.. $1,025,050. $1,075,650. Bess: Cash and Revenue Cash & lave str:ient s, July 1 $ 424.)619. $ 455�,564-. 14'A 0,0 3 Delinquent Taxes � 15,000. 22-,-623-. SO) S .. Interest Receivable 19,000. 7,000. Total $ 449,o19• $ 462,5-64 4 -11-780 . : ^R1OU`i;T TO BE RAISED BY TAXES '> 575,E+31. $ ; (l) Qae ?a-e 5 -orc e ctual 65-66 0.,De-rati no Fatal Expenditures and O'cerating _fund detail for66-07. -2- 9 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Approved Proposed �✓ Budget Budget 65-b6 66-67 Accurrralated Capital Outlay Fund: (65-66 Expenditures: $1.,321,191.) Treatment Plant Expansion $2,749,655. $3,191,727, Reconstruction of Upper Euclid Trunk 210,000. -0- Payrient Due Co. Sari. Dist.. yr3 865484. 863484. Construction of Rolling Hills Pump Station & Force Main (2-11-1) 155,000. ' Construction of Rolling Hills Sub-Trunk (2-11-2) . 2705000. Reconstruction of Euclid Ave. Trunk--Larapson to Chapman (2-10-5) 130,000. Reconstruction of Euclid Ave. Trunk--Ball to La Palma (2-10-6) 5205000. Purchase of Fullerton-Brea Trunk Sewer •62,615 -0- Purchase of Bolsa Ave. Trunk Sewer 19,359• -0- Purchase of Orangethorpe Trunk 46,400. 461427. Reconstruction of Euclid Trunk in City of Garden Grove (2-10-4) 255,000. 140,000. Sewerage Facilities Improvements 905000. �'�86: 190,000. Tax Collection Expense - ACO Fund 42000. 4,000. To ms $352353•t rt 4,669,654. Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investments, July 1 15757,337. Cn VWW7 Delinquent Taxes 50,000. Received from Dist.. #3 -0- -7VQ'__'U1=. 300,000 Interest 30,000. 40,000. Sale of Equity in Joint Works 20,000. 284,286. Total $1,8572 337. . 3,oiG,2b1 � , AAMOUNTAMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES t1,666,176. $�fi_ns_-�,57,. ' 66-1 1 -� -3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 Approved Proposed �.✓ Budget fidget 1951 Bond Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures: $69,357.) Principal on 19.51 Bonds $ 45,000. $ 452000. interest 24,357. 23 345. Total $ 69,357. $ 68,345. Authorized General Reserve 56.,925. 56,419. Total Requirements $ 126,282. $ 1242764. Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investments 58,34o. 56,671.' Delinquent Taxes 2,000. interest 700. 600. Transfer from Fixed Obligation Fund -0- 423. Total $ 61,040. $ AN:OUITT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 65,242. Fixed Obligation Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures: $21,722.) Acquisition Section I, J.O.S. $ 215722. $ -0- Tax Collection Expense - Fixed Obligation Funa I 60. -0- Authorized General Reserve -0- -0- Transfer to Bond Fund (1951) -0- 423. Total Requirements $ 21,782. $ - 423. Uess.- Cash and Revenue Cash & Invest-ments, July-1 9,908. 423. Interest & visc. income 200. -0- Total $-, 10,108. $ 423. A16OUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 115 674. $ -0- • 4 "4- C0UNITY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES 65-60 66-67 Actual (1) Estimated Salaries and Wages : Directors $ 3,175. $ 4,Ooo. Right of ?,Tay Agent 20. 500. Total $ 3,195. $ 4,500. Maih tenance and operation: District Share of Joint Operating $ 371,185. $ 443,206. Directors' Mileage 243. 400. Bond Collection Expense •1,316. 1,500. Supplies., Blueprints, Legal Ads 351. 800. interest Expense 17,296. 18,000. Professional Services 641. 10,000. Maintenance Expense i4,36o. 20,000. Odor Control- Expense 22. 7,500. Tax Collection Expense - Operating Fund 833. 1LOOo. Total $ 406,247. $ 502,4o6. d Total S & W, M & 0 $- 4o9,442. $ 506,qo6. Unappropriated Reserve -0- 70 000. TOTAL OPERATING $ 4o93442. $ 576,906. (1) June Estimated -5- June 30, 1966 COUZTTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 PROPOSED BUDGET FOR 1966 - 1967 FISCAL YEAR Fiscal Year Fiscal Year 65-66 66-67 G.EtiRAL SU� ,.ARY: Total Requirements : Operating Fund $ 958,757. $1,077,41o. Bonds 1,589, 167. 1,645,125. Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 3,3�+6,320. - ;�. Construction Fund 697,800. 890,64o: Total $6,592,o44. $8,a:64,ey 6.. 8 0 09,o-t6. Funds Available July 1, 1966 and Anticipated Revenue from Sources Other Than Taxes 42019,758. 5330,16Z9, DISTRICT'S REQUIREMENTS TO BE RAISED. BY TAXES $215722 286. $2 fr6,o662-. Z,(18,4q 1, Estimated* Tax Rate Tax Rate 65-66 66-67 Tax Rate : Operating Fund $ .0778 $ E)$3± ,0262- Bonds .1393 =8080— ooay Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund .2002 .3272.2— .320a Construction Fund -0- -0- To tal $ .4173 $ :4'1-33— . 41C4 *The esti-Mated tax rate was computed using an estimated Assessed Valuation of 6e-:— ($6793eee3eee. 5% Delinquency Factor) L-I.Z? (9 1 q90. Wq) 7Z() 041 . -1- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Approved Proposed Budget Budget 65-66 1 66-67 1 Operating Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures: $529,861.) Salaries and Wages $ 6,500. $ 5,500. Maintenance and Operation 556,413. 646,107. . Capital Outlay i4,387. -0- Unappropriated Reserve 100,000. lOO,OQO. Total $ 677,300. $ 7513607. Authorized .General Reserve $ .281,457. $ 3252803. Total Requirements $ 958,757. $1,077,41,0. Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investments, July 1 459,939. 473, 379 Delinquent Taxes 20,000. -28jeee. 2-$104,1. Interest & Misc. . Receipts 20,000. 20,000. Total $ 499,939. $ 515,3T9. 520 .4'LG. AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 458,818. $ 54e-i- Bond Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures: $9373481.) Principal on Bonds $ 4353000. $ 435,000. Interest 502,481. 477,694. Total $ 937,481. $ 912.,694. Authorized General Reserve 6512688. 732,431. Total Requirements $1358%169. $1,645,125. Less: Cash and Revenue Cash '& Investments 676,2o4. 656,998. Delinquent Taxes 30,000. 35,000. Interest 8,000. 8,o00. Transfer from Construction Fund 890,640. Total $ 714,204. $1,590,638. AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ 874,965. $ 54,487. (1) See Page 4 for Actual 65-66Onerating Fund Expenditures and Operating rand detail for 66-167. -2- I i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 Approved Proposed ! Budget Budget 67 i Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund: (65-66 Expenditures: $1,202,200. ) Treatment. Plant Expansion $ 2,670,330. $3,421,224. Purchase of Additional Equity in Jointly Owned Facilities 225,000. 6686-. 300,000. Reconstruction of the La Habra Section of Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer 286;000. -0- Purchase Equity in Joint Works 145,000. 430,000. Garden Grove Sanitary District 14,990. -0- Tax Collection Expense 5,000. 5,000. Purchase of Orangethorpe Trunk Sewer. 14,677, Payment to Dist. #11 190;000. Westside Pump Station Improvement 355000. Total Requirements: $ 3,346,320. $ , , Less: Cash and Revenue Cash & Investments, July 1 2,016,332. 2;�95�. 2,203 ZzS. Delinquent Taxes , uUSecuet D 30.,000. - 5.,008. Interest.. :' 30,000. 502000. Total $ 2�,076,332• AMOUNT TO BE' RAISED BY TAXES $ 1,269,988. $e;=m om._2,ov i,9-1 Construction Fund Summary: (65-66 Expenditures: $ • -0-) Transfer to District No. 3 $ -0- $ 890,64o Bond Fund Sewage Facilities Construction 697,800. -0- Total Requirements $ 697,800. $ 890,64o. Funds Presently Available 697.800, 890,64o. AMOUNT TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $ -0- $ -0- -3- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND EXPENDITURES `"! 1965-66 1966-67 Actual (1) Estimated Salaries and Wages: Directors $ 4,225. $ 5,000. Right of Way Agent 40. 500. Total $ 41265. $ 5,500. Maintenance and Operation: District Share of Joint Operating 464,408. 575,307. Directors ' Mileage Expense 354. 500. Bond Collection Expense 1,534. 1,800. Supplies, Blueprints, Legal Ads 28. 500. Interest Expense 45079. 12,900. Maintenance Expense 27,953. 305000. Professional Services 621. 5,000. Utilities Expense 93292. 10,000. Odor Control Expense 129. 6,000. Inter-District Sewer Use Charge 1,615. 2,100. Tax Collection Expense - Operating Fund 1,196. 2,000. Total $ 511,209 $ 646,107. Capital Outlay: Purchase Sec. #1 Joint Outfall Sewer $ 14 387. $ -0- Total $ 14,387. $ Total S & W, M & 0, C. 0. $ 529,861. $ 651,607. Unappropriated Reserve -0- 100,000. TOTAL OPERATING $ 529,861. $ 751,607. (1) June Estimated -4- R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned Meeting Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Harvey McMichael Miller, Clifton Mack Porter Allen Hirstein Rt�� G (o — lo �: -7 DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton Mack V/ acmwl-ti _ Gruber Harvey V' McMichael Parks 1/ Hileman V-/ Porter Allen _ Hirstein OTHERS: Brown Nisson Rimel Hohene r Lowry Fins to r Galloway Carlson ,.." BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaliF., 92708 DISTRICT NO. 7 AGENDA AuF,ust 4, 1966 - 4:00 p.m. (1) Roll 11 (2) Appointm t of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of t2� General Manager (4) Re rt off e eral oun 1 (5) Consideration of solution No. 66-103-7, awarding contract for construction o the Tustin Avenue Sewer, Contract No. 7-5A-2, to M. P. Mi rovich in the amount of $23, 303.00. (� See page "A" ( id tabulation in folders) (6) Consideration of let dL er from Henry T. Segerstrom requesting construction of the rtherly extension of the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewe See page "B" (7) Consideration of mot* n to receive and file recommendation of the engineers, and declaring intent to include in the District' s Master Pla of Sewers, the South Coast Plaza Sub- Trunk Sewer from Anto Boulevard to Sunflower Avenue. See page "Ell (8) Consideration of moti directing the engineers to prepare plans and specificatio s for the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer; authorizing pa ent for inspection costs; and approv- ing,reimbursement agre ment with the developer upon completion of the f— (9) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-104-7, authorizing accept- ance of an easement, at no cost to the District, as recommended by the General Counsel See page "C" (10) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-105-7, authorizing accept- ance of an easement frm Broadmoor Homes, Inc. , at no cost to the District, relat ve to Tract #5576. See page "D" (11.) Consideration of motio to receive and file Assignment of Funds from Crowell, We don & Co. , to Bank of America, relative to Assessment District #6 (12) Other nd , (13) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment District No. SOLUTION AND SUPPORTING DOCUMENTS , ` 19�6 AuVst.:� I 1 RESOLUTION NO. 66-103-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to M. P. MITROVICH, Contractor, for construction of the TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 7-5A-2 awarded to M. P. MITROVICH, Contractor, in the total amount of $23,303.00 in accordance with the terms of his bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 66-101-7 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s �..e checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid- ders . -A- : . .: South Cast'aza July 27, 1966 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #7 P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper Gentlemen: This letter is to request that your Board authorize the preparation of engineering plans and specifications for construction of the northerly extension of the South.Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk from Anton Boulevard to Sunflower Avenue. This line is part of the Master Plan Sub-Trunk System of Sanitation District V. Your approval of this request for prompt completion of the necessary plans will be greatly appreciated so that construction may be comple- ted prior to the period of heavy rainfall this winter. Sincerely, SOUTH COAST PLAZA JPra Henry Segerst m HTS:BWS 3315 FAIRVIEW ROAD COSTA MESA,CALIFORNIA 92626 TELEPHONE:(714) 546-o1Io RESOLUTION NO. 66-lo4-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FOR PARCEL NO. 7-5-19b (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein REDHILL REALTY, INC. , grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con- struction in Assessment District No. 5-A, is hereby approved and accepted, at no cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. -C- RESOLUTION NO. 66-105-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE CO'MY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM BROADMOOR HOMES, INC . The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein BROADMOOR HOMES, INC. , grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with Tract No. 5576, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described as follows : The Easterly ten (10.00) feet of Lot 16 Tract 5576, per map recorded in Book 224, pages 4 through 6, inclusive, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. -D- 'Agenda Item Mo.--/`-� BOYLE and LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING b LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES P. O. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone S47-447I August 3 , 1966 Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley,' California Gentlemen.: We have made a study of the service area for the South Coast Plaza Sub-trunk, extending from a connection with the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer northerly to Anton Blvd. , and its recommended northerly extension to Sunflower Ave. , during the next 90 days , with a probable northerly extension along the east bank of the Santa Ana Gardens Storm Drain Channel, all as shown on the attached study map. The service area of this Sub-trunk is composed of 54 acres in District No. 1 and 227 acres in District No. 7 for a total of 281 acres . Since the peak capacity of this Sub-trunk is 1. 05 MGD this represents an average capacity of 3740 gpapd or a density of 21 people per acre. If we consider District No. 7 area alone, the average capacity would be equal to 4620 gpapd or a density of 25. 5 people/acre. . . Based upon the above analysis we recommend that your honorable body approve the extension of the South Coast Plaza, ` Sub-trunk as shown on the attached map to a point 1320 ft. Sly. of the -District No. 7 boundary line, with immediate — authorization for construction between Anton Blvd. and Sunflower Ave. We further recommend that the Board authorize the staff and Engineers to consider .and recommend to the Board the terms under which District No. 7 would furnish service to the 54 acre area . in .District No. 1. Very truly yours , Boyle and Lowry Co sultin ngineers It h- �Sidne L. Lowr 1 ' SLL:m ti BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box sus Orange California 10844 Ellis Avenue of C rang¢ County, CaliFo n Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. AGENDA August 4, 1966 - 4:0o p.m. (1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-103-7, awarding contract for construction of the Tustin Avenue Sewer, Contract No. 7-5A-2, to M. P. Mitrovich in the amount of $23, 303.00. See page "A" (Bid tabulation in folders) (6) Consideration of letter from Henry T. Segerstrom requesting construction of the northerly extension of the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer. See page "B" (7) Consideration of motion to receive and file recommendation of the engineers, and declaring intent to include in the District' s Master Plan of Sewers, the South Coast Plaza Sub- Trunk Sewer from Anton Boulevard to Sunflower Avenue. See page "�'" (8) Consideration of motion directing the engineers to prepare plans and specifications for the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer; authorizing payment for inspection costs; and approv- ing reimbursement agreement with the developer upon completion of the facility (9) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-104-7, authorizing accept- ance of an easement, at no cost to the District, as recommended by the General Counsel. See page "C" (10) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-105-7, authorizing accept- ance of an easement from Broadmoor Homes, Inc. , at no cost to the District, relative to Tract #5576. See page "D" (11) Consideration of motion to receive and file Assignment of Finds from Crowell, :deedon & Co. , to Bank of America, relative to Assessment District #6 4AI., (12) Other business and communications, if any AWAI (13) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ILbt' .—, 1 i o• � p4og2�.�G aka^ 1966 �t tyi\i4 1 RESOLUTION NO. 66-103-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to M. P. MITROVICH, Contractor, for construction of the TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 7-5A-2 awarded to M. P. MITROVICH, Contractor, in the total amount of $23,303 .00 in accordance with the terms of his bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 66-101-7 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4 . That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid- ders . -A- 12 South Cast 71a$a `..� July 27, 1966 Board of Directors Orange County Sanitation District #7 P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 Attention: Mr. Fred Harper Gentlemen: This letter is to request that your Board authorize the preparation of engineering plans and specifications for construction of the northerly extension of the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk from Anton Boulevard to Sunflower Avenue. This line is part of the Master Plan Sub-Trunk System of Sanitation District V. Your approval of this request for prompt completion of the necessary plans will be greatly appreciated so that construction may be comple- ted prior to the period of heavy rainfall this winter. Sincerely, SOUTH COAST PLAZA 1 Henry . Segerst m HTS:BWS 3315 FAIRVIEW ROAD COSTA MESA,CALIFORNIA 92626 TELEPHONE: (]I¢) 546-0110 RESOLUTION NO. 66-104-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 73 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FOR PARCEL NO. 7-5-19b (ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein REDHILL REALTY, INC . , grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con- struction in Assessment District No. 5-A, is hereby approved and accepted, at no cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the real property over which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. '..., -C- RESOLUTION NO. 66-105-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM BROADMOOR HOMES, INC . The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein BROADMOOR HOMES, INC. , grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection- with Tract No. 5576, is- hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the real property over- which said ease- ment is granted is more particularly described as follows : The Easterly ten (10.00) feet of Lot 16 Tract 5576, per map recorded in Book 224, pages 4 through 6, inclusive, Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County. Section 3. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of .Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. -D- 'Agenda Item MO 7 — �' BOYLE and LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A joint Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING b LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES P. O. Box 178 Santa Ana, California 92702 Telephone 547-4471 August 3 , 1966 �.d Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 7 P. 0. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: We have made a study of the service area for the South Coast Plaza Sub-trunk, extending from a connection with the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer northerly to Anton Blvd. , and its recommended northerly extension to Sunflower Ave. , during the next 90 days , with a probable northerly extension along the east bank of the Santa Ana Gardens Storm Drain Channel, all as shown on the attached study map. The service area of this Sub-trunk is composed of 54 acres in District No. 1 and 227 acres in District No. 7 for a total of 281 acres . Since the peak capacity of this Sub-trunk is 1. 05 MGD this represents an average capacity of 3740 gpapd or a density of 21 people per acre. If we consider District No. 7 area alone, the average capacity would be equal to 4620 gpapd or a density of 25 . 5 people/acre. Based upon the above analysis we recommend that your honorable body approve the extension of the South Coast Plaza Sub-trunk as shown on the attached map to a point 1320 ft. Sly. of the District No. 7 boundary line, with immediate . authorization for construction between Anton Blvd. and Sunflower Ave. We further recommend that the Board authorize the staff and Engineers to consider and recommend to the Board the terms under which District No. 7 would furnish service to the 54 acre area in District No. 1. Very truly yours , Boyle and Lowry Cojisultin ngineers Sidne L. Lowr SLL:m ��J BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. O. Box 5175 of Grange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT NO. # 7 I1 -- -- - — -- --- - AGENDA _ July 20th, 1966 - 4:00 p .m. (1) Roll all (2) Appoin ent of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Appointment of Secretary pro tem (4) Consideration of Resolution No. 66-101-7, approving plans and specifications for the Tustin Avenue Sewer, Contract No. 7-5A-2, and\authorizing the engineers and the General Manager to open bids . See page "A" (5) Receive and file letter from A. H> Famularo, Contractor, requesting reimbursement for a sewer line constructed in Cowan Heights Drive. (Copy of letter in folders) (6) Consideration of motion referring letter from A. H. Famularo to the staff and engineers for report at a later meeting (7) Other business and communications, if any (8) Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 4:00 p.m. , August 4th RESOLUTION NO. 66-101-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle and Lowry, District' s engineers, for construction of the TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-5A-2, are hereby approved and adopted; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said Contract No. 7-5A-2 pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m. , August 3, 1966, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the engineers and the General Manager be authorized and directed to receive and open said bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. llft ' -A- ROLL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date �,, , - Time c> JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman Davis Allen Hirstein Bowen Noe Brown Long DISTRICT 2 Crapo Shull Parks Hileman Culver Crapo Shull Forgit Gruber Culver Furman Bouma Harvey McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel Gummere Anderson Schutte Krein Hock Michel Schwerdtfeger Kanno Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Allen Hirstein Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bowen Noe Coen Brown Long Walters Herbst Crapo Shull Workman Culver Allen Hirstein Furman Bouma Gummere Anderson Harvey McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau OTHERS: Stewart Green Walters Herbst Brown ✓ ��`�' ' Allen Hirstein Nisson Galloway DISTRICT 5 Tremblay Parsons Lowry Gruber Forgit Carlson Allen Hirstein Rimel Maddox DISTRICT 6 .�- Porter Gruber Forgit Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 7 iller, Clifton Mack .., Forgit Gruber /Harvey McMichael ,/Parks Hileman v/Porter Allen —7-11"Hirstein DISTRICT 8 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein ROLL CALL District --4 7 Regular Adjourned Date Time JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman Davis Allen Hirstein Bowen Noe Brown Long DISTRICT 2 Crapo Shull Parks Hileman Culver Crapo Shull Forgit Gruber Culver Furman Bouma Harvey McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel Gummere Anderson Schutte Krein Hock Michel Schwerdtfeger Kanno Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Allen Hirstein Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bowen Noe Coen Brown Long Walters Herbst Crapo Shull Workman Culver Allen Hirstein Furman Bouma Gummere Anderson Harvey McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau OTHERS; Stewart Green Walters Herbst Brown Allen Hirstein Nisson Galloway DISTRICT 5 Tremblay Parsons Lowry Gruber Forgit Carlson Allen Hirstein Rimel Maddox DISTRICT 6 Porter Gruber Forgit Allen DISTRICT 7 14iller, Clifton Mack ..t Forgit Gruber rvey McMichael rks Hileman Porter / Allen Hirstein ✓ DISTRICT 8 ^� DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein Discussion items from July 20th meeting of District No. 7 #3 - Paul G. Brown appointed Secretary pro tem #4 - Following an explanation by Mr. Lowry of the scope of this contract and necessity for immediate construction in order to serve a parochial school near Fairhaven and Tustin Avenues, it was MS&DC: (adoption of resolution approving plans on 7-5A-2) #7-A - 1966-67 Assessed Valuation and Tax Rate. The Secretary pro tem reported that a more def\mee sessed valuation figure than was available at the July 13ng has just been received. The revised figure, with utialuations still estimated, is approximately $143,000,0r than the 137,000,000 originally estimated. With thebuddirements adopted on Jly h 1966-67 tax rate r " approximately 2 ¢ that of 1965-66. There ensued a discussion\as to future financial and construction problems facing the Dist I t It was the consensus of the Board that financing t fut�re/�construction out of ad valorem taxes was entirely impracticable and`that alternate methods of 1 financing, probably a general obligat`on bond issue, must be sought. It was also the consensus of the Board that the budget requirements already adopted should not be increase tPis �year although 1t�as agreed that the General Manager should , esent n urtherJz►ecbmmendationy in this regard at the next meeting of t e Board. Adjournment at 4: 37 p.m. BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, CaliF.,92708 DISTRICT No. 5_ August 22rd, 1956 - 10:00 a.m. AGENDA (1) Roll�all (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Consideration of report submitted by Donald C. Simpson, dated August, 1966, entitled "Study of Alternative Sewerage Facilities Easterly of Upper Newport Bay" , as mailed out (4) Considera ion of motion to receive, file, and approve the report (5) Considerati of motion approving recommended construction ; Plan "A" as escribed in the report; and authorizing the engineers to omplete plans and specifications for Welch Park Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 5-13, as soon as possible, in accordance with Plan "A" (6) Consideration of report of the staff on financing and con- struction. of Welch Park Sewer Replacement, Contract No. 5-13 (Copy attached) (7) Consideration of motion approving report of the staff on financing and construction of Welch Park Sewer Replacement; and directing the General Manager to proceed as recommended therein (8 ;' Report of the staff on negotiations regarding sewerage of the northerly portion of Tract #5018 (Eastbluff) in the City of Newport Beach (9) Other business and communications, if any (1u) consideration of motion re: Adjournment a August 22, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Report and Recommendations on Financing and Construction of Welch Park Sewer Replacement Report The total estimated cost of this project is $308,500, assuming that Plan A as outlined in the engineer' s report of August 10 is approved by the Directors . This sum has been hereinafter rounded to $310,000 for convenience. In past discussions of financing this project, it was antici- ated that The Irvine Company would lend the District approximately 150,000 on the same basis as the previous loan of $290,000 for the Bay Bridge Pumping Station project. In view of the present financial situation of the District it now appears that this estimate is still valid. The current Accumulated Capital Outlay budget for the District contains the sum of $70,000 for this project. The Facilities Re- volving Fund (accumulated connection charges) now contains approxi- mately $68,000 and it is anticipated that by the time this project is under way, this fund will have reached at least $90,000. Con- sequently, the difference between 310,000 and $160,000 (the total of District' s funds available) is V50,000 which is the sum recom- mended to be committed by loan from The Irvine Company. Recommendations If this project is approved (Agenda Item No. 5) , it is recommended that: 1. The Irvine Compan be requested to commit, as soon as possible, a maximum of 150,000 as a loan to the District for this project. The actual amount of the loan to be reduced to less than this sum if bids received indicate the total cost to be substantially less than $310,000. The requested loan to be on the same basis as the present outstanding loan of $290,000, i.e. (a) to carry five percent interest until commencement of repayment (b) repayment to be deferred until connection charges from the area benefited by the project reach the sum of $300,000. This is the amount of District' s tax funds to be spent on this project ($70,000) plus the amount already spent on the Bay Bridge Pumping Station project ($230,000), (c) repayment to be made out of Facilities Revolv- ing Fund from 75% of connection charges collected each year after the sum of $300,000 has been accumulated in the fund as specified. 2. The project be advertised for bids as soon as possible in order that the contract can be awarded and the job completed during the winter season. 3. After bids are received and prior to awarding con- tract, the exact amount of the loan from The Irvine Company be determined and a new agreement for a loan in aid of construction be executed on the above-recommended basis. Fred A. Harper General Manager-Secretary -2- August 22, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 Report and Recommendations on Financing and Construction of Welch Park Sewer Replacement Report The total estimated cost of this project is $308,500, assuming that Plan A as outlined in the engineer' s report of August 10 is approved by the Directors. This sum has been hereinafter rounded to $310,000 for convenience. In past discussions of financing this project, it was antici- pated that the Irvine Company would lend the District approximately $150,000 on the same basis as the previous loan of $290,000 for the Bay Bridge Fuming Station project. In view of the present financial situation of the District it now appears that this estimate is still Valid. The current Accumulated Capital Outlay budget for the District contains the sum of $70,000 for this project. The Facilities Revolving Fund (accumulated connection charges) now contains approximately $68,000 and it is anticipated that by the time this project is under way, this fund will have reached at least $90,000. Consequently, the difference between $310,000 and $160,000 (the total of District ' s funds available) is $150,000 which is the sum recommended to be committed by loan from the Irvine Company NNW Recommendations If this project is approved (Agenda Item No. 5) , it is recommended that: 1. The Irvine Company be requested to commit, as soon as possible, a maximum of $150,000 as a loan to the District for this 2. project . The actual amount of the loan to be reduced to less than this sum if bids received indicate the total cost to be substantially less than $310,000. The requested loan to be on the same basis as the present outstanding loan of $290,000, i.e. (a) to carry five percent interest until commencement of repayment ma-d - L - - - - - - + ' (b) repayment to be deferred until connection charges from the area benefited by the project reach the sum of $300,000. This is the amount of District ' s tax funds to be spent on this project ($70,000) plus the amount already spent on the Bay Bridge Pumping Station project ($230,000) , (c) repayment to be made out of Facilities Revolving Fund from 75% of connection charges collected each year after the sum of $300,000 has been accumulated in the fund as specified. 2. The project be advertised for bids as soon as possible in order that the contract can be awarded and the job completed during the winter season. 3. After bids are received and prior to awarding contract, the exact amount of the loan from the Irvine Company be determined and a new agreement for.loan in aid of construction be executed on the above recommended basis. Fred A. Harper General Manager-Secretary I' MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708 Phone 847-2511 DISTRICT No. i August 17, 1966 ADJOURNED MEETING Monday, August 22, 1966 10:00 a.m. Newport Beach City Hall The principal matters to be taken up at this meeting relate to the construction of the new trunk sewer through the Newport Dunes area which has been tentatively scheduled for this coming fall and winter. It will be recalled that at a meeting last March, the District ' s engineer, Donald C. Simpson, was directed to make a supplemental study to determine more precisely the exact size of the proposed sewer and to examine in detail any possible alternatives which should be considered in light of developments since his 1964 study. It will also be recalled that representatives of the Irvine Company, which is expected to lend to the District a portion of the funds for this new construction, requested this additional study in order to estimate more exactly the probable amount of the loan. In compliance with this direction, the engineer has submitted a supplemental report dated August 10, a copy of which is enclosed for the Directors ' study. A copy is also being transmitted to the Irvine Company. It is anticipated that the agenda for this meeting will include actions leading to a definite scheduling of the construction of this sewer which the engineer' s studies show should be in service by next spring in order to accommodate the development not: taking place in the southeasterly part of the District . Fred A. Harper General Manager-Secretary Enclosure copy to : The Irvine Company Donald C . Simpson 4 I i J Dist. 5 meeting 8-22-66 Item #8 - Report of the Staff. The staff repo ed that they met with representatives of The Irvine Co any, ee property owners of - Uu the no therly portion of, Tract #5018 ox (Eastbluff),# V o z�h, -- �-- ,-- Irvinetn s to annex this area to - , and ' t .t/it�� �,i,v"�-ti._.�� _a�.,E•-»-..-t.7c awn �=>�:-rr�•-F�-�.1-.�i.-vs�E�-n-� � "+ 3c+-zc-� a�''� The Chair then recog�n�ized Mr. Frank Hughes, representing The Irvine Company, who stated his firm desires to annex the area in question Gbu C- plus additional property westerly of Jamboree Road. The tota1AOf the annexation is approximately 66 acres . tto view of the fact that this area is inhabited, and the of an election be/"required to annex this area, Mr. Hughes requested that aW annexation fees be w �� i tzon Dlx-aGto i s area e wi raw —from--the_Irvine Ranch -Watex-- D'' . Following a lengthy discussion by the Directors, staff members and representatives of the City of Newport Beach, it was MS&DC: That 8d. 94 J'Z 7•-t.:i-LG- C-0., a proposal.1concerning annexation of the northerly portion of Tract #5018 (Eastbluff) and adjacent properties , be referred to the staff for study and recommendation fo the Board. ROLL CALL s District Regular Adjourned Date ` Time, Q' � JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Harvey McMichael Amo Miller, Clifton Mack Bartlett Porter Bousman Davis Allen Hirstein Bowen Noe Brown Long DISTRICT 2 Crapo Shull Parks Hileman Culver Crapo Shull Forgit Gruber Culver Furman Bouma Harvey McMichael Gruber Forgit Hock Michel Gummere Anderson Schutte Krein Hock Michel Schwerdtfeger Kanno Miller, Clifton Mack Speer Clark Miller, Harry Kohl Walters Herbst Parks Hileman Workman Parsons Allen Hirstein Porter Schutte Krein DISTRICT 3 Schwerdtfeger Kanno Speer Clark Fregeau Amo Speer Clark Bousman Davis Stewart Green Bowen Noe Coen Brown Long Walters Herbst Crapo Shull Workman Culver Allen Hirstein Furman Bouma Gummere Anderson Harvey McMichael Miller, Harry Kohl Schutte Krein Schwerdtfeger Fregeau OTHERS: Stewart Green Walters Herbst Brown Allen Hirstein Nison ✓ DISTRICT 5 Galloway ✓ � Tremblay Parsons Lowry ,/ Gruber Forgit ✓ Carlson ✓ �/ Allen Hirstein 1�' Rimel Maddox DISTRICT Porter Gruber Forgit Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller, Clifton Mack c_ �itl-C Forgit Gruber Harvey McMichael Parks Hileman Porter Allen Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambourne Stewart Coen Mitchell Bartlett Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Phone 962-2411 i .JOINT BOARDS August 5, 1966 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, August 10, 1966 8:00 P.M. The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting. BUDGETS AND TAX RATES: Although not a matter for official Board action (except in Districts No. 2 and 3 - see Items No. 48 and 49) we would like to call to the Directors ' attention the following best estimates of tax rates for the current fiscal year. It aill be re- called that at the July meeting the staff reported that assessed valuation figures were quite incomplete and in view of this, the Boards could either (1) adopt budgets and revise them if necessary at the August meeting because of less than anticipated assessed valuation or (2) postpone adoption of any budgets until the August meeting. The Boards chose the former course and it now appears that in order to maintain the policy of a stable or lower tax rate, it will be necessary to make budget revisions only in Districts No. 2 and 3. Tax Rate District Tax Rate 1966-67 No. 1965-66 Revised Estimate 1 .4622 .4533 2 .4820 .4661* 3 .4173 .4154* 6 . 27o4 . 27o4 11 .4795 .474o - *With proposed budget revisions Joint Boards No. 14 - FORMAL ENGINEER' S REPORT FOR NEW OUTFALL: Approximately a year ago the Boards authorized our consulting engineers for Joint Treatment and Disposal works, John Carollo Engineers, to commence design studies for a new submarine effluent outfall which will be needed by 1970. The engineers have advised us that they have proceeded far enough with these studies that a formal engineer' s report as required by Section 4748 of the County Sanitation District Act, can now be prepared in order that the public hearing and other formalities required can be held prior to final engineering design. The current formal Engineer' s Report under which our plant expansion program is proceeding does not include construction of this outfall and hence it appears that in order to comply with the law and to give the public an opportunity to be heard on this subject, such a report should be prepared immediately and made the basis of a public hearing. For this reason we have asked the engineers to submit a pro- posal for the preparation of this report. A copy of this proposal is included with the formal agenda. It is our recommendation that the proposal be accepted and the engineers directed to proceed with the report. It should also be called to the Direc-�ors attention that, as mentioned in a previous Manager ' s Report, we believe it appropriate that the engineers should be directed within the next few months to proceed also with a comprehensive long-range report for expansion of Plant facilities which report would, after approval, revise and extend the existing approved plan which was adopted in June, 1962. Further recommendations on this subject will be forth- coming at a later meeting. No. 15 - REQUEST OF CITY OF FOUNTAIN VALLEY FOR IMPROVEMENTS TO ELLIS AVENUE: Included with the attachments to the formal agenda is a letter from the City of Fountain Valley on this subject which is self-explanatory. As will be noted in the letter, the Orange County Water District which owns a 660 foot frontage also on Ellis Avenue, west of our Plant No. 1, will be asked to improve its stretch on a voluntary basis. The improvements to the street in front of our Districts ' property has been approved as a budget item for this year. However, it is recommended that the Boards take the request of the City under submission at this time in order to give the staff opportunity to prepare the final recommendation for the September meeting. We have tentatively scheduled a meeting on this, and other subjects, with representatives of the City and after this meeting and further discussions with the Water District, we should have a firm recommendation by the time of the September meeting. No. 16 - PROPOSED AGREEMENT WITH TALBERT DRAINAGE DISTRICT: This District, which provides land drainage in the lower part of the Talbert Valley, owns a parcel of land near the center of our Plant No. 2 property where a pumping station is operated. The Drainage District also owns extensive pipeline and road easements on the same ..r property which were acquired prior to our condemnation of this plant -2- site. Both the pumping station site, as presently located, and the pipeline easements will interfere seriously with construction to be undertaken in the near future and for some time we have held dis- cussions with the Drainage District regarding moving its pumping station to a more convenient location and the simultaneous deeding of the pump station site and easements to the Sanitation Districts. We believe we are now in basic agreement with the Drainage District and the motion appearing on the agenda under this item is recommended. We are anxious to conclude this matter as soon as possible since the next unit of construction at Plant No. 2 (Headworks "C" - Contract No. P2-11) will be located adjacent to the Drainage District parcel to be deeded to the Sanitation Districts under the agreement. No. 17 - PROPOSAL FOR EXPERIMENTAL OUTFALL METER: A continuing problem for a number of years has been the accurate metering of our effluent discharged to the ocean. Quantities of flow are needed for three reasons: (1) to check the accuracy of influent meters (2) to control effluent chlorination efficiently and (3) to determine the actual field capacity of our outfall. The present metering setup consists of a propeller type meter installed in 1961 which, even after many modifications, has proved unsatisfactory. The Fischer- Porter Company which manufactures magnetic meters of the type extensively used in our Plants, is developing an experimental "Pitot" type internal magnetic meter for large pipelines. Our staff feels that the new type meter shows sufficient promise that the Districts would be justified in purchasing one on a money-back basis if not satisfactory. It should also be mentioned that this Company is, at the same time, proposing the same sort of an arrangement with the Metropolitan Water District . Since the Fischer-Porter Company is now the only vendor capable of fabricating such a meter within a reasonable length of time, we asked them to submit a proposal for such a meter for the Districts on a guaranteed refund basis if not satisfactory. A copy of their proposal is included with the formal agenda and it is our recommendation that it be accepted on the basis set forth therein. No. 18 - AUTHORIZATION FOR ATTENDANCE OF STAFF MT-4BER AT MEETING OF WATER POLLUTION CONTROL FEDERATION: The 39th annual meeting of the Water Pollution Control Federation will be held in Kansas City, Missouri, on September 25 through 30. The Federation is the only national association of persons and firms specializing in the design and construction of waste treatment and disposal facilities and in water pollution control activities. This meeting brings together all of these people at one time for the exchange of information and the presentation of technical papers. It has been customary, in the past, to authorize attendance at these national meetings by one or more of our personnel. It is recommended that the General Manager be authorized to designate one staff member to attend. No. 19 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. P2-12: This is a recom- mended change order involving piping revisions to the contract with J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino for the construction of Clarifier "H" at Plant No. 2. The piping changes proposed are explained in -3- detail on the formal change order attached to the agenda. The total agreed on cost of the changes is $1,276. 88. No. 20 - ESTABLISHMENT OF PREVAILING WAGE RATES: This is the customary resolution adopted by each District after changes in the construction industry wage rates have been negotiated between the unions and the contractors. By adopting this resolution, the prevailing wage rates established are formally placed on file in the Secretary' s office for reference in advertising for bids for construction work. District No. 1 No. 24 - REIMBURSEMENT TO CITY OF SANTA ANA FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION: The District ' s agreement with the City for the current sewer con- struction program provides that funds will be advanced to the City from time to time as construction progresses. Since the Board meets infrequently, we are recommending the motion appearing on the agenda under this item which would allow immediate payment to the City upon demand in order to prevent the situation whereby the City would be out-of-pocket for construction expenses until such a time as the Board could meet and authorize payment. No. 25 - MODIFICATION TO JUNE, 1965 ENGINEER'S REPORT: At the July meeting the Board approved, in principle, a request of the City of Santa Ana for extension of the Grand Avenue Sub-Trunk easterly along Warner Avenue, etc. and at the same time ordered a modification to the current Engineer' s Report to cover this construction. This modification has been submitted by the District ' s engineers and will be found as an attachment to the agenda. It is recommended that the modification be adopted in order that the design of the requested extension can proceed. No. 26 - ENGINEERING FOR WARNER AVENUE TRUNK EXTENSION: If the modification described under the preceding item is approved, it will be in order to accept the proposal of the engineers for design services in connection with this extension. The fee appearing in the engineer' s proposal includes necessary design work for the re- location of an inverted siphon which relocation was made necessary by approval of the extension of the sewer easterly along Warner Avenue. District No. 5 No. 30 - LETTERS FROM IRVINE RANCH WATER DISTRICT REGARDING SEWERAGE OF THE NORTHERLY PORTION OF TRACT NO. 5018 (EASTBLUFF) : This matter has been discussed in previous Board meetings. Since the July meeting, we have received two communications from the Water District, one dated July 18 and the second August 2. Copies of these letters are enclosed with the agenda. It will be noted that the second letter in effect supersedes the first. Since there is still con- siderable doubt as to how this matter will be resolved, we recommend that the letters be received and filed and the staff directed to work -4- with the City of Newport Beach, the Irvine Company and the Irvine " Ranch Water District for a solution to this problem. It is possible that a further report on this subject will be available at the proposed adjourned meeting on August 22 (Item No. 33) • No. 33 - ADJOURNMENT TO AUGUST 22: We are tentatively scheduling this date for an adjourned meeting for further discussion and action on the above matter and to hear a report from the District ' s engineer regarding possible alternates to the immediate construction of a new trunk sewer through the Welch Park area. The Directors will recall that the engineer was instructed at a meeting last spring to look into such alternates. District No. 6 No. 34 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ROCKY POINT PUMPING STATION RECONSTRUCTION: Southworth & Stevens advise that they will have plans and specifications and contract documents for this job, for which District No. 6 is the contracting agent, ready for adoption by the time of the meeting. We have tentatively scheduled bids to be taken for this work on September lg with award planned for September 21. An estimate of the cost of this work will also be available at the meeting. District No. 11 No. 41 - PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW SLATER AVENUE PUMPING STATION AND GRAVITY SEWER: The District ' s engineers advise that this project will be ready for approval and to go to bid at this meeting. The job will include a new pumping station to replace the existing Golden West Pump Station with a short force main to connect the new pump station to the recently constructed sewer in Slater Avenue and Nichols Street (Items No. 42 and 43) , and a gravity sewer between the intersection of Slater and Golden West Avenues and the new pump station. Upon approval of plans and specifications, we plan to take bids for this project on September 12 and award at the regular Board meeting on September 14. A final estimate of the cost of this project has not yet been received but will be available at the Board meeting. Nos. 42 and 43 - COMPLETION AND CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1: This recently completed project is the gravity sewer mentioned above in Slater Avenue and Nichols Street and connecting to the existing District No. 3 Miller-Holder Trunk at Nichols Street and Warner Avenue. The contractor, Orange County Pipeline, Inc. , has completed his work satisfactorily and well ahead of time. During construction the contractor, by means of a letter to the engineers, requested extra payment for additional costs allegedly incurred by relocation of a City water line and the maintenance of a detour at Warner and Nichols. However, no formal claim has yet been filed with the District for either reason. The engineers advise that they believe the District has no obligation for either claim and, accordingly, no -5- recommendation is made by the staff for any additional payment . The only change order to this job is a small deduction of $25. 50 (Change Order No. 1, Item No. 42) to account for one foot less of pipe being installed than was originally estimated. Item No. 43 is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete as of July 25 and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. No. 46 - ADJOURNMENT TO SEPTEMBER 12 AT 4:00 P.M. : This is the hour and date set up by Item No. 41 for receipt of bids for project 11-10-2. If this date is unsatisfactory to the Directors, it can, of course, be changed. Districts No. 2 and 3 Nos. 47, 48 and 49 - INTER-DISTRICT PAYMENTS AND BURET REVISIONS: As reported at the July Board meeting, the tentative tax rates presented at that time were predicated on a substantial increase in assessed valuations in both Districts . After much difficulty, the final figures from the Assessor have now been received and show only a seven percent increase in District No. 2 and six percent in District No. 3 as against the ten percent increase estimated in July for each District . Since the final assessed valuations as received, and with the budget requirements adopted in July, would result in an increase in the tax rate in both Districts, we are recommending two actions : (1) that the Accumulated Capital Outlay requirements be reduced in both Districts and (2) that the recent agreement between the Districts providing for a time payment by District No. 3 for purchase of capacity in the Miller-Holder and Magnolia Trunks be amended to extend these payments one more year and reduce the payment for the current year from $500,000 to $300,000. The recommended motions appearing on the agenda under these items will accomplish these purposes and result in the approximate tax rate as shown at the beginning of this report . Since it has been the expressed wish of the Directors in the past to maintain a stable or decreasing tax rate, we are recom- mending this course of action. The recommended change in the inter- District agreement is basically a bookeeping transaction and will not seriously hamper the scheduling of capital outlay work by either District . District No. 2 No. 53 - ENGINEERING WORK FOR 1966-67 NEW PROJECTS: As directed at the July Board meeting, the District ' s design engineers, Boyle & Lowry, have submitted proposals for the two new projects known as Contracts No. 2-10-5 and 2-10-6 and as described in the July Agenda Report. The staff has analyzed these proposals and we are recom- mending their acceptance and authorization to proceed with the design of the work. -6- No. 54 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-4: This project for the reconstruction of the Euclid Trunk Sewer through the downtown section of Garden Grove in conjunction with the realignment and improvements of Euclid Avenue, is now nearing completion. During the course of construction, several items of additional work not contemplated by the contract have occured which in the opinion of the engineers and staff constitute valid and justified claims for additional compensation. These additional items of work are set forth in the formal change order attached to the agenda but it should be pointed out that the bulk of the additional cost was due to the encountering of an unknown 27-inch concrete pipeline immedi- ately adjacent to the new sewer and to a four-way controversy between the City of Garden Grove, the Pacific Telephone Company, the District and the contractor regarding lowering of a telephone duct under Garden Grove Boulevard. During the delay caused by negotiations to resolve the matter, the contractor was put to considerable expense in maintaining barricades. In order to keep the job moving he was also asked to pay for the relocation of a traffic signal, which cost we believe should be reimbursed. These two major difficulties plus the encountering of some unknown steel lines and the altering of a manhole at the request of the City of Garden Grove bring the total of the recommended change order up to $6161. The change order will also grant the contractor an extension of time of 5 days because of the additional described work and delays. Fred A . Harper General Manager-Secretary -7-