Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-05BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. # l~ P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Aven ue Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708 II AGENDA May 25th, 1966 -4:00 p.m. ( 1) Roll Call (2) Appointment o Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3) Report of the G~l Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Consideration of report of Boyle Engineering re~arding possible realignment of the Alton Avenue Trunk {deferred h-t ~~ from the May 11th meeting). Copy of report in folders . Ji,,j dfJ ~ ~,~-~ ~ ... ~ C-111 ~ ~ •. 7'-... ~~"<.,.,. ,f _ I "l.. Other business and communications, if any (7) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (6) ~~t~ :; ~-"'f 4-.1 ~ f:,,-.9'-~ ,._;(--- DISTRICT NO. 1 Harvey V" Meyers~ 1;11""' Miller ~ Allen ?" McMichael Mack Hirstein 4:00 -May 25, 1966 -;...;-, 4:00 -May 25, 1966 ~ DISTRICT NO. 1 Harvey Mc Michael Meyers,, ___ _ Miller Mack Allen Hirstein \._) II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation D istricts of Orange County, California JO INT BOARDS MAY 11th, 1966 -8:00 p .m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance ( 2) Rol l Call \1'{3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4) ALL DISTRICTS P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fo untain Valley, Cal i f., 92708 AGENDA Consideration of motion re: Receive and file minute excerpts from meetings of t he various cities regarding appointments of Directors and Al te r nates to th~ Districts' Boards. See listing on page 11 F 11 -~ ~~ (5) ALL DISTRICTS S.!>. 64ir---S--._ )~ Introduction of Directors (6) DISTRICT 1 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (7) DISTRICT 2 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (8) DISTRICT 3 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (9) DISTRICT 5 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (10 ) DISTRICT 6 Annual e l ection of Chairman of the Board (11) DISTRICT 7 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (12) DISTRICT 8 I" Annual election of Chairman of the Board (13) DISTRICT 11 Annual election of Chairman of the Board (14) ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization (15) ALL DISTR I CTS Annual election of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization (16) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held April 6, 1966, and the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed {17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof held April 26, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager {Preliminary Budget Discussion) ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Counsel 'r/-..----.. ALL DISTRICTS '~-~ Consideration of resolution expressing appreciation ~f/Jl~8 ~ for the services of retiring Directors r·V' Q ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-8-l, and authorizing an addition of $4o6.21 to the contract with J. Putnam Henck, Contractor. See page "G" ~~ ALL DISTRICTS 4 Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $30,000 .l ~--... from the Effluent Chlorination Fund to the Odor Controlf\~ Account; and authorizing transfer of $30,000 from the . Salary, Wages and Employee Benefits Account to the Utilities Account. ALL DISTRICTS V---- Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial ~vrr'° Report submitted by Hanson & Peterson, Certified Public V Accountants, for the period ending March 31, 1966 DISTRICT 8 · Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial _ ~ Report for the period ending December 31, 1965 ~ -2- (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion to receive and file certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills _ M~ appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that ~~j-,.._... he recommends authorization for payment n~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call Operating Fund and Capital books for signature of the and authorizing payment of "B" , and "C" vote motion approving Joint Outlay Revolving Fund warrant Chairman of District No. 1, claims listed on pages "A" ~ ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-56-1 re: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Clarifier H, Job No. P2-12, to J. Putnam Henck in the total amount of $247,518.00. See page "H 11 See page 11 I 11 for bid tabulation DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-57-1 re: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section, Job No. J-9. See page "J" . ~ DISTRICT l Consideration of Resolution No. 66-58-1 re: Approving plans and specifications for Jobs No. 1-6, 1-7 and 1-8; ~ and ordering them submitted to the City of Santa Ana t6 for construction in accordance with the agreement with --, -/J the City dated November, 1965. See page "K" ~~ • DISTRICT 1 ~ Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" -J () ~~ DISTRICT 5 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any \ -3- (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) (52) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58) (59) (60) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 8 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-59-11, awarding contract for Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nichols Street Gravity Sewer, Contract No. 11-10-1, to orange C~unty Pipeline ~ in the amount of $ 116,594.30 • Bid opening May 9) See page "L" (See page "M" for tabulation) ~ -,&J;f DISTRICT 11 ~ ~;;I-. Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment 'f ', l-1 DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Report of the Special Committee on the request of the City of Westminster Engineering Department DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Consideration of action on the request of the City of Westminster, Engineering Department (C~py in folders) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion declaring public hearing open f'µ----~ on Engineer's Report submitted by J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, dated April, 1966 DISTRICT 3 A ~~ Consideration of motion declaring public hearing closed (.;.,/~,- DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-60-3 re: Overruling ~~~ protests in connection with Engineer•s Report, and adoptingll · said report as made. See page "N" 5(~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-61-3 re: Approving specifications for Sewage Pumps, Shafting and Motors.for Westside Pumping Station; and authorizing the Secretary and engineers to receive and open bids for said equipment. See page "O" -4- {61) (62) (63) (64) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Assignment of Funds from H. E. Johnson Construction Company to The National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company, relative to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10, granting"2~~ an extension of time and authorizing a P.ayment to the "".;:;;-Ii-- Contractor of $5,070.00. See page "P' ,d~ Consideration of motion denying all claims not covered in ~~ the above change order. (~ -~ DISTRICT 3 ~~ Consideration of motion approving Change Order #4 to the plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10 (adjustment,;.-~ · of quantities). See page "Q" ~~ ~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-62-3 re: Accepting Contract No. 3-10 as complete and authorizing execution ":.::> ~ and recordation of a Notice of Completion of Work. See z;;>~ - page "R" ~ ~~ (65) DISTRICT 3 (66) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "D" DISTRICT 3 A A Other business and communications, if any ~. (67) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ? '. '{ of~ , (68) DISTRICT 7 (69) Consideration of letter from C. J. Segerstrom & Sons, dated April 26, 1966, requesting construction of the College Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer line extension to Huntzinger Avenue (Copy in folders) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of letter from F. B. Mears, M.D., and " roSi>~ , ).. ~ verbal report of the engineers. {Copy of letter in folders) (70) (71) (72) "' °3f ) I(, ) 7• DISTRICT 7 Consideration of letter from the Tustin Elementary School District requesting reduction of the direct sewer connection charges for the Loma Vista School and Red Hill School. • (Copy of letter in folders) ~ ~ DISTRICT 7 /J (,,l' Report of the engineers and staff re: Acquisition of /vvl facilities and capacity rights in sewers owned by the City of Orange, required in conjunction with Assessment District #6 DISTRICT 7 Report of the General Counsel re: County Sanitation District No. 7 vs. City of Santa Ana, for acquisition of the City's ~ Tustin Avenue Sewer north of Seventeenth Street 7~ -5- .o ,-: ~ v '-:) (73) DISTRICT 7 (74) Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See page "E" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any (75) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., June 8th ) () ~. 3 ? OJ ""' -6- II BOARDS OF DIR ECTORS County Sanitat ion Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 ~ll is Avenue Fo untain Va ll ey, Calif., 9 2708 JO INT BOARDS AGENDA MAY 11th, 1966 -8:00 p .m. (1) Pledge of Al legiance (2) Roll Call (3 ) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (4) ALL DISTRICTS (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) (14) (15 ) (16) Consideration of motion re : Receive and file minute excerpts from meetings of the various cities regarding appointments of Directors and Alternates to the Districts' Boards . See listing on page 11 F 11 ALL DISTRICTS Introduction of Directors DISTRICT 1 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 2 Annual ele c tion of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 3 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 5 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 6 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 7 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 8 Annual election of Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 11 Annual election of Chairman of the Board ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of Chairman of the Joint Organization ALL DI STRICTS /IJfa//(4 > h )~ >~ #Jjjjf7 ) l fo~¥ ~ ... :.~ . ._.. ~- > ~F --~~~c~ "'>~~~-~~ , >~-~~ t~~u Administrative; ~'j) ~..v Annual e l ection of Vice Cha i rman of t h e Joint Organization '~ Admin i strative ..::.:._/ DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held Ap ril 6, 1966, and the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed (17) D ISTR~T 2 Consid~ration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed (18) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes o f the regular eeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed (19) DISTRICT 5 Considerati0n of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meet ng held April 13, 1966, as mailed (20) DISTRICT 6 Consideration 0f motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed (21) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the r egular meeting he\d April 13, 1966, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof held April 26, 1 966 , as mailed (22) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of mot ·on re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 12, 1 966, as mailed (23) DISTRICT 11 (26) (27) (28) (29) (30) Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairma ~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (Preliminary Budget Discussion) ALL DISTRICTS !' Report of the General ounsel ~ ALL DISTRICTS . Consideration of resolution expressing ~preciation C,./\IM'-'.v) for the services of retiring Directors A ~~ f'--f I /...,-.or • I ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-8-l, and authorizing f{\ an addition of $4o6.21 to the contract with J . Putnam Henck, Contractor. See page 11 G11 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $30,000 \ I from the Effluent Ch t orination Fund to the Odor Control I"\ S t... Account; and authori ~ing transfer of $30,000 from the Salary, Wages and Em loyee Benefits Account to the Utilities Account. ALL DISTRICTS \ ) Cons ideration of moti p n to receive and file Financial fV\ f> c._ Report submitted by Hi~son & Peterson, Certified Public ''' Accountants, for the p_\iod ending March 31, 1966 Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial c__ DISTRICT 8 I I Report for the period ding December 31, 1965 ('(\ 5 -2- (31) (32) ALL DISTRICTS \ \ \ Consideration of motio~to receive and file certifi cation 5 ~ of the General Manager ~~~t he has checked all bills \'(\ appearing on the agenda ,.'.\_O und them in order, and that he re commends authorizatio ~or payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call v te motion approving Joint f Operating Fund and Capital Ou lay Revolving Fund warrant ~ C- books for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1, and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A" "B" , and II c" (3 LL DISTRICTS I ;13~ A O"fo-ih5e 5 ~siness and communic ~· ons, if any 0 /c (37) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Resolution No . 66-56-1 re: Receive and f(\ '.5 C,. file bid tabulation and re ~ommendation, and awarding · contract for Clarifier H, Job No. P2-12, to J. Putnam Henck in the total amount of $24'7,518.oo. See page "H" See page "I" for bid t abulation D~~~:t~~r!tion of Resolution No. 66-57-1 re: Receive and ~~f,} file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding 1, 1 l contract for Ocean Outfal l No. 2, Land Section, Job No. J-9. See page "J" ~ t0"'""--~v1'n~ ..... /,.~ ,,,,J,.,,Ld~~r DISTRICT 1 ""{f' --. plans and specifications for Jobs No. 1-6 , 1-7 and 1-; Yi! ~ and ordering them subm"tted to the City of Santa Ana 1·1 for construction in ac ordance with the agreement with the City dated November, 1965. See page "K" Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page 11 D" See ~1~1C, DISTRICT 1 (38) DISTRICT 1 -f) ~ > ~ r-._ !.JJl/\,' -tR. rvi ,<'1 C) ~ ·J I/ I ' ( (i ¥--' f>'Y~ I (39) DIST ICT 1 I . . ~ Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ~/';-?~ ? ) U\. lf} N (40) (41) (42) (43) (44) DISTRICT 5 ~:2"1 frn . V Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. page "D" ~. ~ ous ine Q.§_.ana-cc;;; uni c t~gn s-,-rrany-- DISTRICT 5 I J See 0)sj~ Consideration of moti n re: Adjournment fri /Sf<:--- DISTRICT 6 ~y Consideration of on approving warrants, if any. f'vl .5 ~ See page "E" -3- (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) (53) (54) (55) (56) (57) (58 ) (59) (60) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 8 D~~~~i~~r~tion of motion re Adjournment m).s/ (_ q :11-fl" DISTRICT 11 A Consideration of Resolution No. 66 -59 -llJ awarding contract ~ ~vi for Slater Avenue Gravity r,ewer and Nichol s Street Gravi ty ''I L- SewerJ Contract No. 11-lO!lJ to orange C~unty Pipe l ine · in the amo unt of $ 116 ,59~.30 . Bid opening May 9) See page "L" (See p 'ge 11 M 11 for tabulation) See l>JM DISTRICT 11 J Consideration of motio approving wa rrantsJ if any. page uE" I DISTRICT 1 ~siness d co unLc.a..thms, if any DISTR I CT 11 J I I / Consideration of motion re: Adjournment IYl.(5 ( C CJ,~¥~ DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Report of the Special Committee on the requej7t of the ;-/ City of Westminster Engineering Departm ent ;"~ --p-/ '<f::;?J ~ DISTRICTS 2 Cons i d tion of action( o the request of the c· o We inster, Engineering epartment (c~ fo l ders~ DISTRICT 2 ( ~ Consideration of motio approving warrantsJ if any.Jui,;~ See page 11 D11 '" ~j ~ DISTRICT ~us ines Fri."'C:---a'."Cicme' . if any e: Adjournment I?) /5 / <!_ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion declaring pub l ic hearing open p on Engineer 's Report subm~tted by J. ~·,Lester Boyle and N) ~ Sidney L. Lowry, dated Ap il, 1960 ~ ~ / / ~ / ~ DISTRICT 3 } Consideration of motion d e laring public hearing closed /fl/S~c_ DISTRICT 3 I Consideration of Resolution No . 66-60-3 re: Overruling ) protests in connection with Engineer's Report, and adopting rY\ S c_ said report as made. See p ge 11 N11 DI STRICT 3 Consideration of Resolution specifications for Sewage Westside Pumping Station; a and engineers to r ec eive an See page 11 0 11 -4- mps, Shafting and Motors for No. 66 -6 1-3 re: Approving /~ d authorizing the Secre tary (V\ Sc_, open bids for said equipment . ~61) (62) (63) (64) (65) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to ~eceive and file Assignment of Funds from H. E. Johnsonf Construction Company to The National Automobile a~d Casualty Insurance Company, relative to the Miller-r der Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 3-10 I DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the fo(c plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10, granting /YI '£ C..... an extension of time antl authorizing a riayment to the Contractor of $5,070.00. See page "P' Consideration of motion denying all claims not covered in {f\/$/c_ the above change order, { 1' DISTRICT 3 //) Consideration of motion ~pproving Change Order #4 to the vYIF, ~ plans and specifications for Cont ract No . 3-10 (adjustment of quantities). See pa "Q" DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resoluti on No . 66-62-3 re : Accepting I I Contract No. 3-10 as com~let e and authorizing executi on M .S C and recordation of a Not ce of Co mpletion of Work . See page "R" DISTRICT 3 I /. Consideration of motion proving warrants, if any. See ffl 5 page "D" s;-rr any of Adjournment DISTRICT 7 Consideration of letter f 9m C. J. Segerstrom & Sons,~ ~ dated April 26, 1966, req esting construction of the . v ,.,Jri~~ College Avenue Sub-Trunk ~we r line extension to l)_,<,,v -!-, Huntzinger Av;lJ.lC~py · folders) ':J-11 rf {_2-1 ~. t.-f:.-:-;;;;;.tl· 4') IL; DISTRICT 7 , ., ~~+i.n 'r· ~ ~ /' _,f..t.,. . ~ t/1"' Consideration of letter fr m F . B. Mears, M.D., and ~ 6_!_..,, 1 verbal report of the engin ers. :C~py of le~~.:J folders) 1 DISTRICT 7 · ~ Consideration of letter fro the Tustin Elementary School District requesting reducti n of the direct sewer connecti on charges for the Loma Vista ool and Red Hill School. / 111 Ir//' (Copy of letter in folders) \ C , '1J 1 ~ ____-o ( ':>/ L- DISTRICT 7 Report of the engineers and s aff re: Acquisition of f~cilities and capacity rig t in sewers owned by the City of Orange, required in onjunction with As sessment District #6 co.)_... !J'f!t' .I I' ,.,; ~ J_ .. ~/ I I i1 r (72) ISTRICT 7 r ~ d-if ~ JI '-' Report of the General Counsel re: County Sanitation District ..__,1~1 ?---' No. 7 vs . City of Santa Ana, f r acquisition of the Cityts ~ Tustin Ave n ue Sewer north of Se enteenth J treet , r ,1\\~ll--/<-f <r, ycrc:-&> L if v ~ ~ ~,,_;L; ,( l -5-?" b v U 7 / ~ (J J~- (73) DISTRICT 7 ~ ) 0~ Consideration of mo ion approving warrants, if any . yY) 5J <...- See page 11 E 11 (74) DISTRICT 7 __ ;H--~1+!'-7~~-ness ~)nd c' ~~) DISTRICT 7 ~__t:3- -C""onsideration of moti June 8th JD r' .J f f Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., M ~/c unications, if any I __ ,;'A J __ /~~A:;~~ ~ If \ ; 7{17 ~f'A;~ ~ fh/si~ \._ -6- PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ON 1966-67 JOINT CAPITAL OUTLAY AND JOINT OPERATING BUDGETS Introduction May 6, 1966 The following information is supplementary to the attached print·ed information on our budget procedures and is intended to give the Directors a preliminary idea of what the staff's thinking and recommendations on budgets f'or the coming fiscal year are at this time. By submitting this information to the Directors at the May meeting, there will be approximately a one month period for review and suggestions to the Executive Committee or staff prior to final adoption of our Joint Capital Outlay and Operating Budgets at the June meeting. In this connection., it is suggested that those· Directors who are serving for the first time at the May meeting carefully review the attached printed material concurrently with the following information. The older Directors will possibly also find a brief perusal of the printed material helpful in connection with the following. Joint Capital Out~ay Budget (Joint Works Requirements) Our planned Joint Works expansion program f~r 1966-67 will follow closely plans made and adopted by the Directors approximate~y five years ago. This pla.nning included an accelerated plant con- struction program to meet the Districts' increasing wast.e wa.ter flows through the 1969-70 fiscal year. The plans also contemplated continuing to 'raise necessary plant expansion funds through ad valorem taxes in a manner which would allow tax rates to remain essentially constant through 1970, i.e. the level of expenditures tor this purpose would progressively increase with increased ass·es,sed valuation. It should be pointed out also in connection with ~advance planning that at the end of the next fiscal year our present ma·ster' plan, evolved from a report of our consulting engin.eers,, John A. Carollo, adopted in 1962, will soon require a formal extension, presumably for another five year period. Consequently, we are · planning to recommend to the Boards in the next few month~ that a new formal engineering report for the ensuing five year period be authorized. Our program, after July, 1967, will consequently be based .on this n~w report, when approved, although obviously our thinking at the present time must extend into this new five ~ear period as will be apparent l~t.er. Our proposed program for 1966-67, the last year covered by our present formal plan, will include projects under study and planned for several years and will be based, as customary, on five criteria of priority: (1) Necessary structures and equip- ment for hydraulic capacity (in other words to enable us to treat and dispose of the incre_asing flows at the present level of treat~ ment) {2) Necessary structures and ·equipment for improvement or· treatment' (3) Necessary Capital Outlay for odor control (4) Neces--- -sary• Capital .outlay for increasing efficiency and reducing operating c.o.sts and (5} Outlay necessary for :lmprovttig; treatmen!b plant - appearance. Fortunately, -some of our outlays for pJa~t expansion meet as many as four of the above criteria. Naturally, those expenditures which have such a. multiple purpose receive priority in our planning. For the coming fiscal year all of the projects being planned wi11 meet one or more of criteria 1, 3, 4, and-5 with emphasis being placed, this year, on odor control and improvements of treatment plant appearance, particularly when these improvements ean be related t·o an increase in hydraulic capacity. Table I., attached, sets forth our present tentative list of 1966-67 construction projects plus- smns for land purchase, professionai services and a l~rge reserve for Ocean Outf.all No. 2 construction, beginning in.1961~68. It will be noted that this reserve sum will have reached almost $5 million by the end of the next fiscal year which, together with funds to -be raised in the following fiscal year, shoql.d be adequate to construct the marine section o:f' our new ocean outfall to a <iistance of better than 10,000 feet. Past and present flow projections indicate that this outfall should be in service by the summer of 1970. Accordingly, we ~:re happy to announcethat the financial picture will, barring unforeseen c~rcumstances, allow it to be constructed and-in service by that time. We also hope that upon its completion, our expendi- ture for chlQrtne (see discussion of Joint Operating Budget, below) can be sharply reduced. · It will also be noted that in spite --of the impressive list of pr __ oJect·s·and the sharp increase in reserve funQ._s (from $2.7-mi-llion to $4.9 million) the net amount to be raised by taxes proposed for the coming fiscal year will be only $45,000 (1.14;) more than the corresponding sum in the current fiscal ye_ar. With nom$1 expected increases in assessed valuation in all of the Districts, the tax rate levied for plant expansion and improvements shouid therefore be significantly less than this year. - As stat.ed in the accompanying _printed material, these projects will be carefully reviewed with the Executive ·Committee in meetings during May. However, we will be prepared at the May 11 Board meet-ing to discuss any or all of these improvements and expenditures if so desired. It should be remembered also that the attached list of projects and eJq>enditures is tentative at this time and is subject to a change in recommendation by the staff and, of course, by action of the -Executive Committee and Joint.Boards. Relating any of the individual projects to the criteria enumerated is necessarily a matter-of going into consid~rable detail and would disproportionately lengthen this preliminary report. Accordingly, the staff would p~efer to-discuss these details verball~ with the individual Dire~tors, the Executive Connnittee and the Joint Boards as a whole. -2- Joint Operating Budget Review of 1965-66 Joint Operating Costs Our.total budgeted joint-operating expense for the current year is $1:._459,627 for the treatment and disposal of an estimated total of .36,975 million gallons. (114,ooo acre feet) of waste water. The gallonage charge (see.attached printed material) was estimated at $38.65 per million gallons. This budget figure would have _resulted in an average district-wide. tax rate of 7. 3¢ per _$100 assessed valuation if there had not .been a substantial carry over from the previ~us year. As it was, the actual average tax rate was approximately 6.0¢ for joint operating expense. · . Actual expenditures from our Joint Operating Fund tor the first nine months of this year ·indicate that total annual cost will be approximately $1,310,000 with a projected total waste water flow of 36,800 million gallons. Allowing for cre.dit :for misJ:ellaneous - revenue of approximately $40,000, the net gallonage charge will be in the order of $34.50 per million gallons. These figures indicate that the~e will again be a substantial surplus remaining in the Fund on July l to apply to next year's buqget. These surpluses occur mainly because our ex.penditures for effluent disinfection chemicals (chlorine) are budgeted on the basis of adverse ocean conditions upon which we are largely at the mercy of' the elements and.which, to a large extent, determine the amount of chlorine which must be applied to our effluent. Fortunately, by very careful control and some measure of luck, we have been able to minimize the amount of chlQrine necessary to meet public health requirements and thus carry over a surplus each year. The total flow estimated for the current fiscal year-is nine percent above 196f-61'~ which is about the average annual rate of increase-for the past several years. This increase in flow follows ve~y closely the population increase in the County with the per capita contribution remaining nearly constant at about 95 gallons . per day. Except for the Phoenix area, it is doubtful whether .any metropolitan sewerage system has ever been called on before to handle such a sustained increase in flow. ..i'hat the Distripts 1 _ system has been able to do so without major difficulty and burden- some cost is a credit to our Directors, past-and present, and to our staff. Of the above estimated 1966-67 joint operating cost of $1,,310,.00,0, approximately 47% or $615,000 will go for salar;l.es and employee benefits for an average of 109 employees. Another major item of expense is the purchase of materials, supplies and-services {exclusive o:r chlorine) • Thes.e pure. base. s will amount to n.early $200,000 with most of them being made in the local-market. Procure- ment of chlorine {which, unfortunately, it is necessary to have shipped from Los Angeles) an_d odor control chemicals will amount to about $285,000 or nearly 22% of our total operating expenditures. This cost is -.largely unavoidable with our present plants and outfall -3- \,:~ ·'' since it is necessary for the protection of public health and the avoidance o:f nuisance to our neighbors. With completion.in 1969 or 1970 of our second marine outfall (see preceding discussion of our Joint Capital· Outlay Budget) we hope to effect a sharp reduction in this expense. In the regular Manager's Agenda Report, included herewith, it will be noted that there is a recommended action for transferring additional funds to our operating sub-account for odor control chemicals. We have (or will have by the end of the year) over expended in this category because our original estimate was too low by a considerable margin. The reasons for this low estimate, as well as in the purchased utilities sub-account., are explained in the Agenda Report. Anticipated 1966-67 Operating Costs I. Over-all Outlook In view of the recent decrease in immigration to Orange County of new permanent population, the general outlook at the present time is for a corresponding decline in the previously des~ribed annual increase in our rate of flow. Forecasting of this type, however, is extremely hazardous since changes in the economy can occur practically overnight. Nevertheless a forecast must be made which will be reasonably valid over the next fourteen months and we are therefor assum- ing that the 1966-67 flow will be approximately 5% over 1965-66. . Over the past several years, our unit cost (gallonage charge) for treating and disposing of sewage and industrial waste has been relatively constant with inflationary trends, salary increases, etc., essentially being offset by increased efficiency as our operation grows larger. We hope to continue to maintain in the future a similar basically constant unit cost and in order to do so for next year, we are tentatively setting a target of no more than a 5% increase in our Joint Operating Budget for 1966-67. II. Areas of Increases in Costs A. Additional Positions At the present time, we have a total of 100 authorized operational personnel positions and fifteen administrative positions {District No. 7 personnel not included). Even with the increased mechanization we are utilizing, the growing complexity of our treatment plant and pumping station operations will require some additional personnel as the flows increase. We are, at the time of this I -4- writing, in a series of discussions with our supervisors ~s to ways and means of holding.down our personnel require- ments for the coming year. However, the outlook at the present time is that our recommendation to the Executive Committee and Joint Boards will be for the establishment of a maximum of four new operational positions, mainly in the skilled labor category (mechanics, laboratory personnel, etc.). In addition, because of the recent shift in management, we will obviously need at least one new office position in the accounting category. Firm recommendations as to additional positions will be f~nalized in the next two weeks and will be presented to the Executive Committee for revj.ew, along with other budget recommendations, as soon as possible thereafter. B. Salary Increases As all.the Directors ere aware, for tpe past several years every public agency, including our own, has anriually·adjusted salaries upward, usually in a blanket fashion. Recent information indicates that most public agencies will follow this pattern again during the next fiscal year. It has also been our custom to hold off actual determination of salary increases until later in the fiscal year in order that the Directors, most of whom are faced with the same problem in their own communities, can make an equitable determination as far as our employees are concerned. In other words, we have usually been followers instead of leaders in this area. Assuming that this same pattern will prevail again and that over- all increases will approximate 3%, we expect to recommend to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards that a reserve amount sufficient to cover this incrase from the date it is granted until the end of the fiscal year be included in the Joint Operating Budget. In addition to the salary adjustments discussed above, there will be minor increases in our salary and wage figure fo~ periodic merit increases to those employees so entitled under our step plan. C. Standby Pay and Overtime Pay At the present time we do not, as most utilities do, provide additional compensation for those employees required or expected to be available during off hours for emergency work. Since there is now very little incentive for an employee to so make himself available, our supervisors are finding it an increasing problem to obtain adequate employee coverage during emergencies. We therefor expect to propose that a limited number of men be placed on standby status and that they be compen- sated for the inconvenience and disr~ption of their -5- ·..,_,.1 family life for being on call. The final details of this recommendation have not yet been worked out but, as visualized, its cost will be very minor and will result in the benefit of increased employee morale. It will also postpone the time when we will be obliged to have mainte- nance mechanics on duty at night and weekends. Our present regulations also provide for a 10% limitation on overtime pay for any. employee. Any overtime performed over 10~ must be taken off in compensatory time. This limitation is awkward but workable most of the time. However, during vacation periods, times of frequent emergencies and unusual absenteeism because of illness, it becomes a severe handicap. Rather than remove the limits on cash overtime completely-, however, we anticipate recommending that it be limited to 24 hours per month or approximately 15%. The question of overtime pay is always a problem and in common with all organizations we have kept, and will continue to attempt to keep it to a minimum consistent with performing our primary function of protecting the public health. As is obvious, the only other alternative to overtime pay is an increase in the number of personnel which we believe is a less efficient answer to manpower requirements than a limited overtime policy. D. Supplies, Utilities, etc. With the flow increase anticipated, it is apparent that we will be faced with increases in purchase of supplies in general, chlorine and odor control chemicals and increased costs for utilities. Careful study of our current expenditures in these cat.egories will lJlldoubtedly disclose some areas of expenditures where increases will not be necessary or appropriate and our final recommendations to the Executive Committee and Joint Boards will reflect the results of this study. -6- BUDGET PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION This section is intended as a general summary of the Sanitation Districts' budget procedures and has been prepared primarily for new Directors being called upon at the June meeting of each year to pass on budget matters for the ensuing fiscal year. It should also be of value to others who may be interested in or concerned with our fiscal procedures. The County Auditor-Controller, who is ex-officio Auditor of each District, requires that our official District budgets and those of other special districts be submitted in the latter part of July at the latest. This does not allow postponing final passage of our budgets past the regular July Joint meeting since the Directors ordinarily do not meet but once a month, on the second Wednesday. These requirements necessitate final action on our budgets earlier than in the case of the various cities, whose procedures the Directors are usually more familiar with than ours. It is hoped that the following outline will clarify our procedures and will assist new Directors in understanding budget material which is submitted at the June meeting. It also should be useful as a review for the older Directors. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT'S BUDGETS As stated above, these budgets must be finally passed upon in early July. They are actually our only official budgets, as far as the Auditor is concerned, and serve as a basis for establishing the tax rate for each District, which varies from year to year depending on each individual District's total requirements and assessed valuation. The individual District's budgets are composed of a minimum of three separate funds and as many as eight. These separate funds reflect the various classifications of expenditures of the individual Dis- tricts and always include (1) BOND INTEREST AND REDEMPTION FUND, (2) OPERATING FUND and (3) ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND. Some Districts may have more than one bond fund for different bond issues and may also have other fixed obligation funds. The expendi- tures out of the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds are, of course, fixed and thus are not subject to Board of Directors control and, therefore, will not be discussed further in this report. The balance of this report will instead be focused on controllable expenditures. It should be emphasized, particularly for new Directors, that these controllable expenditures are carefully reviewed by the Executive Committee of the Directors, as described in more detail below, before submission to the Boards as a whole. OPERATING AND ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS In contrast to the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds, expenditures in the Operating and Ac- cumulated Capital Outlay classifications are controllable and the decisions, which to a large measure affect these expenditures, are reached at the June meeting of each year. The reason decisions must be reached at the June meeting is that prior to the adoption of the formal District's budgets in July, firm figures must be approved for operation and capital outlay for the Joint Treatment Works. These latter expenditures comprise a large portion of the formal Dis- trict's budgets and, as stated above, are controllable. The seven Sanitation Districts, which jointly own and operate the treatment and disposal facilities, are required by the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958 to contribute to the operation of the Joint Works and to the construction of new works or the expansion of old works by formulas set forth in this Agreement. Consequently, it is necessary to arrive at a total figure for both operating expense and construction expense for all the Districts involved in the Joint Works in order that this formula may be applied to determine the contribution of each District to this total which contribution is then fed into the official individual District's budgets. -1- Procedures for developing and adopting the total projected operating and construction expendi- tures for the Joint Works are explained below under these respective captions. JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE All but a small portion of this expense is raised by ad valorem tax in the individual Districts. The total requirements for each fiscal year, together with the breakdown of the individual items of expenditures and the individual District's contribution to the total, are submitted to the Directors for approval at the June meeting. This budget is prepared during May. As is the case with all public agencies, a large proportion of our operating expense is for salaries and wages-approximately 50%. However, this includes considerable labor not chargeable to joint operations. In addition to operation and maintenance of the Joint Treatment Works, our staff is responsible for operation and maintenance of the individual District's trunk sewers and pumping plants as well as incidental construction work in the Districts and at the plants. In effect then, we operate a service organization supplying labor and services to the individual Districts (including Sewer Maintenance Districts) as well as the Joint Works. For convenience this labor, not charge- able to joint operations, is included with our Joint Operating Budget and charged out as needed during the year. In the preparation of the total figure for joint operating expense, the staff, as is true in any bud- get, must estimate expenditures in the various classifications for next year and, in addition, must estimate the sewage ftow to be expected from each District during the coming year. The necessity of the latter estimate is the provision in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Con- struction Agreement that each District is required to contribute to the total joint operating expense in proportion to its sewage flow. Since the latter, of course, will not be known exactly until 13 months later, it must be estimated ahead of time in order that sufficient funds will be included in the individual District's budgets to provide for the eventual individual contributions. Therefore, the total of estimated joint operating expense is divided by the estimated total of all flow reaching the treatment plants to arrive at an estimated cost of treating and disposing of a unit quantity of sew- age. This unit cost (in our case, dollars per one million gallons) which we refer to as "Gallonage Charge" is then multiplied by the estimated sewage flow of each District in million gallons to arirve at the total expected District's contribution in dollars to joint operating expenses. Budget review of our joint operating expense by the Executive Committee of the Directors is provided for in our regulations. This Committee is composed of the Chairman of each individual District and will meet between the May and June regular Board meetings to review the staff's recom- mendations as to operating expenses prior to submission to all Directors prior to the June meeting. The figures thus distributed to the Joint Boards in June will have been reviewed by the Executive Committee and any changes in the staff's recommendations desired by the Committee will be incor- porated in the figures submitted to the Joint Boards. Since the sewage ftow and the assessed valuation of each District will vary, the tax rate neces- sary for raising funds for JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE will correspondingly vary from District to District but, usually, it is in the neighborhood of $0.07 per $100 assessed valuation. JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION EXPENSE The other major classification of significant District expense is for contribution to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, which we refer to as CO RF, from which the necessary joint construction work is provided to keep abreast of the tremendous growth in population in the Districts. Over the past few years, this type of expense for all seven Districts has been in the neighborhood of $3.5 million per year, necessitating a tax rate in the neighborhood of $0.24 per $100 assessed valuation which, again, is an average figure depending on the individual District's needs and ability as explained below. Initial capital outlay funds for treatment plants and ocean outfall were provided by the individual Districts by means of a bond issue passed in 1948. This issue, in all Districts,· totalled approximately $8.3 million of which only a portion was for plant and outfall construction, the rest being for work inside the individual Districts. The construction work provided by this bond issue was completed in -2- u 1954 and only two years later it became obvious that the explosive growth of the population in the Districts would soon require additional construction. At that time a firm policy was adopted by all Districts that in the forseeable future all joint construction work would be paid for out of ad valorem taxes on a step by step, long-range construction plan. In 1962 such a plan was formally approved by the Boards, setting forth needed construction in detaU for five years and guidelines through 1976. This plan provides for a gradually accelerating construction program for a number of years until the Districts reach their ultimate growth or until other methods of financing are arrived at by the Directors. This program correlates increasing expenditiires ·with growth of assessed valuation, so that a rather stable tax rate for each year for joint construction can be anticipated. As mentioned pre- viously, this rate is in the neighborhood of $0~24. ·This program is working out very satisfactorily and, in our opinion, should be continued. The 1962 plan adopted contemplates a major expense in the neighborhood of 1970 for the construc- tion of a new ocean outfall, which will be necessary because our existing 78-inch diameter outfall will, by then, have reached its maximum hydraulic capacity. Consequently in addition to the normal con- struction expense for expansion of Joint Treatment Works, a reserve for meeting this large item of expense was also approved by the Directors in 1962. Funds to augment this reserve will be recom- mended to be included in the next fiscal year's budget. In contrast to pro-rating operating expense among the Districts in accordance with current sew- age flow as explained above, contributions of the individual Districts to joint construction and reserve funds are computed on a different basis, which is also set forth in the 1958 Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Prior to the time this agreement was adopted, each District owned a fixed capacity in one or both of the existing treatment plants and outfall and contributed to con- struction expense on the basis of this capacity. Owing to a number of reasons, this method of con- tribution by the Districts proved to be so complicated as to be practically unworkable and resulted in the renting of capacity by those Districts which had an unused capacity to those Districts not owning enough capacity. Also complicating the picture, the fixed capacity method was extremely difficult to apply to new units of treatment works which, ordinarily, have a different capacity than other related units. For these reasons the above agreement provides for a simpler and more equitable basis of contri- bution and employs what we term the "Use and Needs" method. The individual District's annual con- tribution is obtained by averaging the average assessed valuation for the three most recent years and likewise averaging the annual District's sewage flow contribution for the past three years and ap- plying these averages to the total Districts' average flow and assessed valuation to arrive at a percent- age figure which each District should own in all treatment and disposal works at both plants. This percentage so calculated is called the "equity percentage'' and, as can be seen, takes into account use (sewage flow) and needs (assessed value). It is used to compute the contribution for each fiscal year of each District to joint construction expense as well as the credit or debit adjustment of each District for existing plant. Prior to arriving at the above percentage of each District's contribution and credit or debit, the staff and our design engineers estimate the construction needs for the next fiscal year for plant expan- sion purposes as well as the above-described reserve fund. The percentage contribution of each District is then estimated on the basis of metered flow from each District for the past ten months period together with a firm figure for the two years preceding and the firm figure for the three years past assessed valuation. This percentage for each District is then applied to the total construction and re- serve needs to arrive at a figure which, when approved, is placed in the individual District's budgets. This budget, although fairly definitely established by the 1962 long-range plan, is also subject to review by the Executive Committee at the same time as the joint operating budget as explained above. Figures for joint construction and reserve expenses for the next fiscal year, as reviewed and recommended by the Executive Committe, are submitted to the individual District's Directors for study prior to the June regular Board meeting. IN-DISTRICT EXPENSE Most of the foregoing has been a discussion of the Districts' expenditures as related to the jointly owned treatment works. However, as mentioned previously, each District has controllable expense for -3- operation and maintenance within the District, as well as necessary capital outlay. Consequently in each District's official budget, the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds must provide for In-District expense, unique to the individual District. Therefore, after the Joint Works requirements for operation and construction have been determined and fixed at the June meeting, the staff estimates the In-District expense for each District and includes this in the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds for each District. The sum of these two controllable items, i.e., joint expense and In-District expense constitutes the requirements for each District plus the fixed expenditures (Bond Interest and Retirement, etc.). Unexpended funds from the previous year in each category are used to reduce the requirement figures-the difference represent- ing the amount to be raised by taxes for each fund. Prior to mailing the complete budget recommendations for each District to each Director early in July, the figures are gone over in detail with the individual Board Chairman and with any other Director wishing an early review. --1- u \. JOINT WORKS REQUIREMENTS (Preliminary) 1966-67 Regular Construction (1962 Engineer's Report) (1) Headworks 11 c11 at Plant No. 2 (P2-ll) (2) Additional Pre-chlorination Facilities at Plant No. 1 (Pl-14) (3) Ellis Avenue Improvements (Pl-12) (4) Additions to Administrative Office Building (J-7-1) (5) Replacement of Interplant Gas Transmission Line (I-4-4) (6) Site Improvements and Enclosures at Plant No. 2 {P2-8-2) (7) Miscellaneous Smell Contracts and Force Account Subtotal Reserve for Future Ocean Outfall Land Purchase 20 acres adjacent to Plant No. 1 Professional Services {l) (2) Planning and Design Engineering on 1967-68 construction Legal and Survey Services $1.,650.,ooo(a) 270,000 100,000 95,ooo(a) 185,000 195,000 1222000 TOTAL REQUIREMENTS Unpaid or Encumbered from 1965-66 May 11, 1966 $2,620,ooo(b) 4,900,000 440,ooo(a) 300,000 20,000 $8,280,000 128302000 Cash Requirements for 1966-67 10.,110,000 Less: Balance available from 1965-66 6 2 120,oooCc) TOTAL TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $3,990,000(d) ·-~ NOTES: (a} {b) (c) Rebudgeted from 1965-66 Includes engineering not heretofore paid Includes $2.7 million reserve heretofore accumulated (d) For comparison, amount raised in 1965-66 $3,945,000 0m•d 00:9 -996! 'tt A"ew: flNI~~!!IW HO~ S~N:BWHOVili~V CTNV SNOiilifl~OS:?rd WARRANT NO. 4413 4414 4415 4416 4417 4418 4419 4420 4421 4422 4423· 4424 4425 4426 4427 4428 4429 4430 4431 4432 4433 4434 4435 4436 4437 4438 4439 4440 4441 4442 4443 4444 4445 4446 4447 4448 4449 4450 4451 4452 4453 4454 4455 4456 4457 4458 4459 4460 4461 4462 4463 4464 4465 4466 4467 4468 4469 4470 4471 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT A-1 Tool Rebuilders Inc., Power Tools ~ 236.25 A Door Window & Screen Co., Screen Door 28.50 Acore Drilling Service 75.00 Advance Electric, Electrical Supplies 110.29 Jan Alabaster, Employee Mileage 16.oo Aladdin Litho & Art, Forms 12.32 All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts 163.05 Almquist Tool & Equip. Co., Parts for Power Tools 20.77 Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chem. 555.98 American Compressor Cb., Comp. Parts 72.80 American Institute of Chemical Engrs., Manuals 39.80 American Lock & Supply Co., Padlocks 85.61 City of Anaheim, Power 26.98 Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc., Blasting Sand 174.72 Anaheim Truck & Transfer Co., Freight 12.88 Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets, Pump Parts 483.60 Arcade Stationers, Forms 1.77 Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water for Lab. 109.61 Astra Glas Inc., Fabricate Chlorination Manifold 692.85 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 105.67 Bank of America, Bond and Coup. Coll. Expense 145.23 Barnes Delaney Tires 118.27 Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings t Belts 167.23 Beach Fabricating Co., Welding Services 8.50 Beckman Instruments Inc., Instrumentation 100.11 Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump Parts 32.24 Benz Engineering Inc., Gaskets 109.86 Blake, Moffitt & Towne Paper, Janitor Supplies 21.88 Blower Paper Co., Janitor Supplies 32.01 Blystone Equipment Co., Repair Power Tool 105.18 The Davis Brown Co., Office Supplies 10.57 Brulin & Co., Inc., Solvents & Cleaners 232.17 Charles Bruning Co., Drafting & Rep. Supplies 476.15 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies 49.45 Business Equipment Co., Reproduction Supplies 42.30 Cal-Pac Chemicals Co., Inc., Pump Parts 50.66 Cal-State Seal Co., Engine Parts 58.92 Paul Calvo, Surveyor 644.50 Certified Building Materials Co., Cement 33.15 William N. Clarke, CWPCA Conference 124.20 College Lumber Co., Inc., Hdwr, Lumber, Rock 272.47 Consolidated Electric Dists., Electric Supplies 211.47 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 168.56 Costa Mesa Co. Water Dist., Water 4.40 Crane Packing Co., Crane Parts 60.94 Customline, Inc., Gate Gear 83.71 Daniels Tire Service, Repairs, Tires 213.14 DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Auto Interior Repairs 30.64 DeZurik Corp., Line Plugs 149.56 John M. Deck, Co., Rewind Starters 6.19 A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies 74.57 T. A. Dunn, CWPCA Conference 60.86 E. & F. Vacuum Pump Repair Service, Blower Repair 137.37 Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Elect. Supplies 981.91 Electrophysics Corp., Instrumentation Repairs 37.05 Empire Insurance Co., Insurance 22.70 Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring 1,025.00 Enterprise Electric Supply Co., Supplies 13.27 Filter Supply & Serv. Co., 011 Filters 55.03 ~- WARRANT NO. 4472 4473 4474 4475 4476 4477 4478 4479 4480 4481 4482 4483 4484 4485 4486 4487 4488 4489 4490 4491 4492 4493 4494 4495 4496 4497 4498 4499 4500 4501 4502 4503 4504 4505 4506 4507 4508 4509 4510 4511 4512 4513 4514 4515 4516 4517 4518 4519 4520 4521 4522 4523 4524 4525 4526 4527 4528 4529 4530 4531 4532 4533 IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation Flair Drafting Service $ 1,341.83 413.88 The Foxboro Co., Charts Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Engine Repairs R. N. Galloway, Misc. Expense, CWPCA Conf. General Electric Supply Co., Controls General Telephone Co. Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware Gough Industries Inc., Electric Supplies Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Tools George T. Hall Co., Controls Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physical Exams. Hercules Engine & Parts Co., Engine Parts Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation Howard Supply Co., Hardware, Valves, Tools City of Huntington Beach, Water Huntington Beach Blueprint, Blueprints International Harvester Co., Truck Repa~rs Jensen Instrument Co., Controls Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine Jordana Air Supplies, Inc., Air Comp. Parts Charles W. Justice, CWPCA Conference 21.00 67.80 85.14 274.56 988.20 94.99 1,697.50 66.46 232.38 55.00 58.21 390.00 371.32 7.30 4.68 47.01 349 .17 27,372.80 32.44 Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Sandblasting Mach. Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe Fittings 83.30 401.96 252.80 66.51 355.75 684.95 380.25 124.00 Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware LBWS, Inc., Welding Supp., Hdwr., Tools L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Robert E. Lenihan Co., Grouting R. W. McClellan & Sons, Equipment Rental Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Miller, Nissen & Kogler, Pipe Anti-Trust Suit Morrison Co., Pipe Packing 382.62 1,567.90 11.16 22.50 120.60 Municipal Finance Officers Assoc., Conf. Reg. Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Welding Supplies Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Tools 48.66 7.80 86.64 67.37 Parts 10.60 O. c. Suppliers, Inc., Gasket Material Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaning Solvent City of Orange, water Orange County Farm Supply Co., Sprinklers & Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc. Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Pacific Telephone Elmer L. Parker, CWPCA Conference Paul-Munroe Hydraulics, Inc., Fittings Roy Pendergraft, CWPCA Conference Postmaster, Postage REA Express, Freight 294.86 9.61 149.00 68.14 103.01. 66.84 200.00 44.23 Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electronic Tubes Red's Frame, Wheel & Brake Service, Truck Repairs Resinwood Mfg. Co., Digester Dome Repair 82.85 28.92 692.25 143.05 16.07 75.48 78.27 32.30 16.65 60.21 Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Repairs Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motors E. H. Sargent & Co., Lab Supplies Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage Sears, Roebuck & Co., Repair Film Editor The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Oil Co., Gasoline Lee Smith Insurance & Co., Empl. Blanket Bond Snow Gates & Valves, Inc., Hydrant Valve -B- 73.37 29.60 791.39 92.00 87.99 WARRANT NO. 4534 4535 4536 4537 4538 4539 4540 4541 4542 4543 4544 4545 4546 4547 4548 4549 4550 4551 4552 4553 . 4554 4555 4556 4557 4558 4559 4560 4561 4562 4563 4564 4565 4566 4567 4568 4569 4570 4571 IN FAVOR OF Southern California Edison Co., Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies Speed-E-Auto Parts, Parts, Batteries Stake & Bldg. Supplies Co., Survey Stakes Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline, 011, Stonehouse Signs, Inc., Signs T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts Tardif Sheet Metal, ToGl Boxes for Trucks Tell Steel, Inc., Steel Stock C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil Tony's Building Materials, Blasting Sand Norm R. Tremblay, CWPCA Conference J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment Tustin Water Works, Water for Dist. :/f7 Utilities Supply Co., Tools, Hardware Valvate Associates, Valves. John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Guy L. Warden & Sons, Boiler Parts AMOUNT $ 8,692.68 3.90 933.99 10.62 60.43 12.o6 Grease 303.29 27.66 53.77 224.54 101.41 120.54 37.71 138.85 44.93 250.00 69.04 84.24 218.00 Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing Warnock-Bancroft Equipment Co., Truck Parts Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts, Repairs Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete 24.47 70.78 16.22 128.43 24.21 81.04 140.03 782.80 85.24 John V. A. Williams, CWPCA Conference w. D. Wilson Co., Fittings Wimberly's Petroleum Dists., Diesel Fuel Winter & Co., Photo Supplies & Finishing John M. Wright; CWPCA Conference George Yardley Company, Controls, Valves TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Lithe & Art American Compressor Co. John Carollo Engineers Freedom Newspapers, Inc. J. Putnam Henck, A Corp. Schurr & Finlay, Inc. Twining Labs Wallace Trade Bindery Co. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- 76.78 489.69 $ 64,386.35 160.22 55,689 ._92 2,867.39 74.47 11,059.30 5,018.48 105.50 149. 76 $ 75,125.04 $ 139, 511.39 DISTRICT NO . 1 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARR ANTS WARRANT NO . ~N FAVOR OF AMOUNT 4572 ~ ngineering $ 5,737 .50 DISTRIC T NO . 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARi~ANTS IN FAVOR OF 4573 J . R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lo wry $ 596.50 4574 A & p Pipeline , Inc . 22 ,828.86 $ 23,425 .36 DI STRIC T NO . 3 ACCUMULA TED h APITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS I I N FAVOR OF 4575 J . R. 1ester Boyle & Si dney L . Lowry $ 3,554.00 4576 The Br a Progress 16 .13 4577 Natio al Auto & Casual ty Insurance Co . nee of H.E . Johnson Const. Co . 7,921.00 $ 11, 1.J-91. 13 DISTRICT NO . 5 4578 City of $ 72 .00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL I N FAVOR 0 45~9 James I. Gallacher $ 34,328.17 45 0 The I rvine Company 30,666 .44 4581 Simpson & Stevlingson 751 .40 4582 Small Craft, Inc. 90 .00 $ 65,836 .01 $ 65,908 .01 -D- WARRANT NO. 4583 4584 4585 4586 4587 4588 4589 4590 4591 4592 4593 4594 DISTRlCT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS I N FA OR OF Boyle & Lowry AD No. 6 Plan Check & Inspection Amount $ 4,677,98 \ 288 .00 I $l j,965 . 98 Southern Californ a Edison Company Title Insurance & Trust Company (A D#6) The Tustin News (A 6) FACILITIES REVOLVIN FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR 0 Boyle & Lowry The Tustin News Wallace Trade Binde William Weinzierl DI STRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS INlF AVOR OF Huntingt n Beach News Lowry & Associates Orange County Pi peline, Inc. Walla e Trade Bindery Co . -E- $ AMOUN T 310 .53 10 .00 71.24 1,243.15 44.17 20.52 50.00 $ 1,357 .84 $ 16,715.59 $ 34 .65 2,815 .00 14,223.47 20 .52 $ 17,093 .64 CITY Anaheim Buena Park Brea Cypress Fountain Valley MAYOR Fred T. Krein Jesse M. Davis Robert A. Clark Frank P. Noe Robert Schwerdtfeger Robert Schwerdtfeger Fullerton Glen G. Walters La Habra Leonard Crapo La Palma Peter Bouma Los Alamitos William S. Brown Huntington Beach Jake R. Stewart Jake R. Stewart (Council Member) Newport Beach (Council Member) Orange Placentia Seal Beach Stanton Tustin Santa Ana Villa Park /~~ Ted Bartlett Paul J. Gruber Lindsley Parsons Jack c. Hileman Victor Michel John Nescher Harry L. Miller Gerald Mack Harry Harvey James Workman w/Yh.-m~ SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER FILED In the Office of the S~cretary N~ounty M~t1on District !MAY 1/,1966 ~---=$;_"".u.11_.../IA~k~-,,,. ·~' . .. .. ALTERNATE DISTRICT A. J. Schutte 2,3 Harold Bousman 3 Thomas Speer 2,3 Richard Bowen 3 Jim Kanno 2 Donald Fregeau 3 Burton Herbst 2,3 Dean Shull 2~3 Paul Furman 3 Charles Long 3 Alvin Coen 11 Jack Green 3 None 11 Al Forgit 5,6,7 None 5 Rex A. Parks 2,7 James Hock 2 None appointed 3 Frank Kohl 3 Clifton Miller 1,7 'Ihomas McMichael 1,2,3,7 None appointed 2 g> DISTRICT Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver 1,6,7 2,3 ;t:;Ylt~~~~lr;~ COUNTY AREAS MEMBER ALTERNATE Chairman of Board of Supervisors Alton E. Allen -F- Supv. Wm. Hirstein 3 g DISTRICT All COUNl'Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COtml'Y P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. __ l ___ _ CONTRACTOR: J. Pu.tnam Henck DATE: May 11, 1966 En:Closures -outfall Booster No. 1, Switching Center, JOB: Service Center Job No. P2-8-l . Amount of this change order (ADD) (~) $ 406.21 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated December 29, 1965 and April 20, 1966 ADD 1. The contractor shall revise the ceram~c tile detail as indicated on sheet 15 of 41 2. The contractor shall z·emove a concrete block obstruction in the new tunnel under Clarifiers A, B & C as directed and dispose of the broken concrete off the plant site. TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 66.21 340.00 $ 406.21 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes $ 301.203.00 None This Change (ADD)(lll:RI~) 406.21 Amended Contract Price $ 307,609.21 Board authorization date: Approved: May 11, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer J. PUTNAM HENCK By------------~--~~----------- ... Q- RESOLUTION NO. 66-56-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA., AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CUiRIFIER n H11 , J'OB NO. P2-12, TO J. PUTNAM BENCK, A CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATION, Contractor, for CIARIFIER "H", JOB NO. P2-12, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. P2-12 is hereby awarded to J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATION, in the total amount of $247,518.oo, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 66-27 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks "-1 submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -H- Engineer's Est. $328,ooo. BID TABULATION SHEET "-' Contract: CLARIFIER 11 H11 , Job No. P2-12 CONTRACTOR 1. J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation 374 W. 40th St. San Bernardino, California 2. Kemper Construction Co. & W. W. Hoagland (a Joint-Venture) 3254 Cherry Avenue Long Beach, California 3. Weardco Construction Corp. P. O. Box 2458 Santa Fe Springs, California 4. R. E. Ziebarth and S. B. Alper 21205 Bolsa Street Torrance, California 5. Lemar Corporation 700 Fifth Street Huntington Beach, California 6. Cardiff Construction Corp. P. o. Box 5436 Riverside, California 7. Ecco Contractors Inc. 7931 Lampson Avenue Garden Grove, California Date May 4, 1966 CLARIFIER "H 11 GRAVEL FILL Lump Sum Price Add or Deduct $247,518.00 $279,170.00 $306,417.00 $312,800.00 $321,861.00 $338,,685.00 $339,735.00 $ 7.00 $ 6.50 $ 6.oo $ 6.oo $ 3.50 Add -$6.50/T Deduct -4.50/T $ 4.50 8. Willson-Hutcheson, General Contractors 7810 4th Place Downey, California $385,872.00 $ 4.50 9. W. A. Nesbitt 2250 California Avenue Long Beach 6, California -I- $393,400.00 $ 5.60 RESOLUTION NO. 66 -57 -1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. J -9 A RESOLU TION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DI STR I CT NO . 1 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CAL I FORNIA, AWARD I NG CONTRACT FOR OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -IAND SEC TI ON, JOB NO . J -9 ~he Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendat i on this day sub - mitted to the Board of Directors by the Distr i cts ' engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to 7~~~ , Contractor, for OC FAN OUT - FALL NO. 2 -IAND SECTION, JOB NO . J -9, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Secti~_:fJ~t said contract for Job No . J-9 is hereby awarded to ~ ~/71~ , in the total amount of $ 4 ~ rr-l-~ in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3 . That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are here by authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Reso l u - tion No . 66-28 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4 . That a ll other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cas hier 's checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders . -J- RESOLUTION NO. 66-58-1 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOBS 1-6, 1-7 and 1-8 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOBS NOS. 1-6, 1-7, and 1-8 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the plans and specifications this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's Engineers, for the Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-6; the Broadway Trunk Sewer and the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-7; and the 17th Street and Washington Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-8, be approved, received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the plans and specifications for said Jobs Nos. 1-6, 1-7, and 1-8, are hereby ordered transmitted to the City of Santa Ana for construction, in accordance with the certain agreement between the District and the City dated November, -K- RESOLUTION NO. 66-59-11 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-JO-l A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANI'rATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE SLATER AV&,-ruE GRAVITY SEWER AND NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to ORANGE COUNTY PIP~LINEA INC. , Contractor, for con- struction of the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1, and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 11-10-1 be awarded to ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. , Contractor, in the total amount of ~ in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby de- termined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Seci!£rl-.l:.. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 66-39-11 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4, That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid- d ers. (Engineer's Est. $158,240.) BID TABULATION SHEET Date May 9 2 1966 Contract: SIATER AVE. GRAVITY SEWER and NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1 Contractor Total Bid 1. Orange County Pipeline, Inc. 1506 N. Clinton $116,594.30 Santa Ana, California 2. Edmond J. Vadnais, Gen. Contr. P. O. Box 68 $137,252.00 Etiwanda, California 3. Far Western Pipeline, Inc. 6611 Fee Ana $143,650.44 Anaheim, California 4. Wal-Con Construction Co. 14044 Ventura Blvd. $154,260.00 Sherman Oaks, California 5. William R. Shriver, Jr. P. O. Box 1258 $166,525.00 Costa Mesa, California 6. Lomar Corporation 700 Fifth Street $176,215.15 Huntington Beach, California 7. Bachan Brothers Construction Co. 2520 Berkeley Avenue $176,924.oo Los Angeles, California 8. R. M. Vukanovich Constr. Co. 732 So. Garfield $191,906.30 Alhambra, California 9. Charles T. Brown Co. P. O. Box 311 $219,565.25 1955 Glenoaks Blvd. San Fernando, California -M- RESOLUTION NO. 66-60-3 OVERRULING PROTESTS TO ENGINEER'S REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS MADE OR FILED IN CONNECTION WITH THE REPORT OF J. R. LESTER BOYLE AND SIDNEY L. LOWRY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS; AND APPROVING AND ADOPTING SAID REPORT AS MADE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. This being the time and place set by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, for the hearing on any objections to the report of J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, Consulting Engineers, Sanitation Engineers for said District dated April, 1966, or to doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report, pur- suant to legal notices of said hearing published for the time and in the manner prescribed by law, the matter was called up. Section 2. There were verbal protests or objections --- made by those present at the hearing. Section 3. The Secretary reported that there had been ____ written protests filed in the office of the Secretary of the Board. Section 4. All protests and objections, both oral and written, made or filed in connection with the report of J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, Consulting Engineers, dated April, 1966, filed with this Board on April 13, 1966, be and the same are hereby overruled and denied, and said report is hereby adopted as made. -N- RESOLUTION NO. 66-61-3 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND MOTORS -WEST- SIDE PUMPING STATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed specifications this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, District's engineers, for SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND MOTORS -WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said equipment in the manner prescribed by. law; and, Section 3. That bids for SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND MOTORS- WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION, will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m., June 1, 1966, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the Dis- trict's engineers be authorized to receive and open bids for said equipment on behalf of the Board of Directors. -0- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER Co 0. NO ._---:3=:;.,-... __ _ CONTRACTOR: H. E. Johnson Const. Co.1 Inc. DATE: May 11) 1966 JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 Amount of this change order (ADD) (mEEHE~) $ 5,070.00 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are heregy authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's invoices as listed on attachment and Engineer's report dated May 2, 1966 Contractor's Invoice No. 454 450 449 447 452 .451 453 Extra Work Item Invoiced Expose MWD water line at direction of Engineer to determine exact elevation and for error in grade stakes at bore pit Delay caused by encountering three unknown oil lines at Sta. 1286+25 Delay caused by encountering unknown lines at Sta. 1285+75 Delay caused by encountering unknown pipes at Stations 1302+25, 1311+4o and 1316+ Delay caused by sewer line being encased and not so shown at Sta. 1339+60 Delay caused by setting elevation of manhole at Sta. 1338+20.37 Delay caused by 10" line at bottom of trench at Sta. 1339+60 Add $ 423.20 257.89 -o- 774.72 288.25 -0- -o- (continued on next page) Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change {ADD){EE~) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: Approved: 5,070.00 $ 271,,209.25 May 11, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO. By ____ ~--~------------~---- -P- Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 C. O. No. 3 Contractor's Invoice No. Extra Work Item Invoiced Add 448 Removal of 400 feet of 18" thick sub- surface asphalt paving not shown beginning at Sta. 1340+25 $1,637.03 455 Extra work in bore pit crossing Imperial Highway -o- 435 Extra work for cutting metal casing around 8" sewer line not shown at Sta. 1345+32.22 34.67 436 Removal of concrete paving not shown at Sta. 1346+20 135.02 429 Delay caused by encountering two pipeline culverts at lower elevation than shown on plans at siphon constructed under Change Order No. 2 at Sta. 1289+61.68 231.22 430 Extra work in maintaining 21 feet of open trench at said siphon location -0- 445 Claim for delay caused by restriction in working hours imposed by State Division of Highways during period October 28, 1965 through December 19, 1965 -o- Construct 4" house connection for Standard Oil Service Station SE corner of Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway 150.00 Construct 6" building connection for Standard Oil Company Research Building. 164 L.F. of 6" VCP at $7. 00/LF 1, 148. 00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $5,070.00 * * * * * * * * * * * * EXTENSION OF TIME: An extension of time of 16 days is hereby granted in accordance with Section 5-10 of the Specifications because of the additional work described under the above allowed claims. Original specified completion date: March 14, 1966 Completion date with Change Orders 14, 1966 Nos. 1 and 2 April Completion date with this extension of time (16 days) April 30, 1966 Actual completion date April 30, 1966 -P-2- . J. R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L, LOWRY Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES Mr. Fred A. Harper General Manager and Secretary County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California Attention: Mr. Paul G. Brown Assistant General Manager Gentlemen: 412 South Lyon Street P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana, Calif .4 92702 Telephone 5 7-4471 May 2, 1966 We have analy.zed the extra work presented by the contractor. Our summary report is attached. The report covers the various invoices which the contractor has sent to this office. We have had several meetings with the contractor's representatives wherein district personnel and Boyle Engineering personnel were present to consider the claims. Also a meeting was held between ourselves and the contractor to consider the same claims. We feel for the most part the amounts requested by the contractor are excessive and consequently a meeting of the minds with the contractor has not been possible. Our analysis of the recommended payment figures are based on the records kept by the inspector of the project. The recommended payment figures reflect what the records state from the standpoint of providing an equitable payment for extra work in conformance with the plans and specifi- cations. Contractor's invoice 445 is also enclosed and has not been acted upon by this office. This invoice pertains to the restricted working day as imposed on the contractor by the State work permit and as such does not reflect an extra in the sense of an unknown utility. Conferences with the contractor by the staff and the engineers have been held on this matter and no agreement has been reached. The house connection for the Standard Oil Service Station at Imperial Highway and Beach Boulevard and the Standard Oil Research Building 6-inch sewer lateral which are included in the summary report have not been formally invoiced by the contractor. The amounts as shown were agreed upon by the contractor, the district, and engineer in our j.oint meeting on April 28, 1966. P-3 -2-May 2, 1966 All of the inspection records are available for the district's perusal. We are available at the district's conveninece to discuss any and all claims. CH/vld cc: Sidney L. Lowry 41-8691-00-00 Very truly yours, J. R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY /s/ Conrad Hohener, Jr. Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951 P-4 Contractor's Invoice No. 454 450 449 447 Total Amount of Claim $ 895.33 1,031.55 773.59 2,062.96 ) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 of Orange County MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10 Recommended Payment $ 423.20 257.89 774.72 EXTRA WORK REMARKS Contractor 11/2/65 contractor claims error in grade stakes at bore pit (Jack at beginning of project) 4 hrs. delay claimed because of encountering 3 unknown oil lines at Station 1286+25 3 hrs. delay claimed for unknown lines in trench at Station 1285+75 2 hrs. delay claimed for encountering unknown pipe at Station 1302+25 3 hrs. delay claimed for encountering unknown lines at Station 1311+40 May 2, 1966 Engineer Claim denied -contractor made mistake of using cut figures for west side of bore on east side and east figures on west side. Allowed claim for exposing MWD line. 4 hrs. denied, 1 hr. allowed. Records show delay in trenching opera- tions very minimal. Lines identified as dead Standard Oil lines and ripped out within 1 hr's. time Claim denied. Lines referred to in the claim are same lines as in Claim 450. Lines lay skewed across trench for about 50 feet. 1 hr. allowed, Trencher ripped pipe out. Delay very minimal. 1 hr. allowed. Trencher ripped pipe out. Delay very minimal. ) Contractor's Invoice No. 447(Cont.) 452 451 453 448 455 Total Amount of Claim $ 391.74 261.16 391.74 2,082.19 745.49 ) Recommended Payment $ 288.25 REMARKS Contractor 3 hrs. delay claimed due to encountering 6 11 line a"t Sta·cion 1316 Delay in trenching due to sewer line being encased 3 hrs. claimed Claim for delay in setting manhole elevation Claim 3 hr. delay due to line in bottom of trench Claim for encountering 18" of asphalt roadway 2' below ground surface for distance of 400 feet beginning at Station 1340+25 Claims for work in bore pit to jack across Imperial Highway Page 2 Engineer 1 hr. allowed. Trencher down 1 hr • only. Deducted approximately 45 minutes from claim. Remainder allowed. Claim denied. State and District inspector gave manhole elevation to con- tractor's foreman. Believe foreman did not know how to establish manhole elevation in practice. Line below pipe, no con- flict or delay. Claim not allowed. Claim allowed. Adjustments made in number of hours unit crane and stamper worked. None of these claims are valid from standpoint of extra work. Utility lines referred to are shown on plans and do not conflict with sewer. It is con- tractor' a responsibility to provide suitable bore pit for jacking operation. ) Page 3 REMARKS Contractor's Total Amount Recommended Contractor Engineer Invoice No. of Claim Pa~ent 435 $ 34.67 $ 34.67 Claim for cutting metal Claim allowed. casing around 8" sewer line which had to be tied into new trunk 436 212.30 125.02 Claim for encountering Amount of equipment and underground concrete in number of men claimed on roadbed at Station 1346+20 invoice does not agree with inspection records. Claim adjusted to reflect actual men and equipment used to remove concrete. 429 448.50 231.22 Claim for encountering Claim adjusted according two standard oil pipe to inspector's records. t- line culverts at lower I elevation than shown p., on plans 430 2,,208.90 Claim to maintain 21 feet Siphon installed in this of open trench location due to utility culverts in invoice 429. Claim for maintenance of trench not valid. 150.00 150.00 4" house connection for Price mutually agreed Standard Oil Service upon Station at SE corner Beach Boulevard & Imperial Hwy. 1,,148.oo 1,148.oo 6" connection to Standard Price mutually s.greed Oil Company Research upon. 164 1. f. @ $7. 00 Building $ 12,838.12 $ 5,,070.00 ) ) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. 4 ------ CONTRACTOR: H. E. Johnson Const • Co. , Inc • DATE: May 11, 1966 JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 Amount of this change order (Jlt)I)) (DEDUCT) $ 891.50 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's Report No. 6 ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S gUANTITIES DEDUCT Item Change Est' d. Quant. No. Unit From To -- 3 L.F. 2270 2246 24 L.F. @ $28/LF $ 672.00 6 V.F. 8.5 8.2 .3 V.F. @ l25/VF 37.50 7 V.F. 56 54.9 1.1 V.F. @ 60/VF 66.oo 14 C.Y. 10 0 10 C.Y. @ 30/CY 300.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 1,075.50 ADD - 8 V.F. 200 204.6 4.6 V.F. @ $40/VF 184.oo TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $ 891.50 Original Contract Price $ 263,119.50 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 8,089.75 This Change ~(DEDUCT) 891.50 Amended Contract Price $ 270,317.75 Board authorization date: Approved: May 11, 1966 -Q- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. . . RESOLUTION NO. 66-62-3 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-10 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-10 AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC., has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10, on the 30th day of April, 1966; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 14th day of October, 1965; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. -R- I' @ii -. ROLL CALL District ------------~--~-Regular -----~--~---------Adjourned ----------------- Time ------- Item --------------------~ JOINT BOARDS Amo Bartlett Bouma Bowen ~Brown Clark Crapo Culver Davis Forgit Gruber Harvey Krein Meyers Michel Miller, C. Miller, H. Nescher Parks Furman Noe Long Speer Shull Bousman Gruber Forgit M:.;Michael Schutte Hock Mack Kohl Hileman Parsons Schwerdtfeger __ Kanno Fregeau Green Coen Herbst Queyrel Hirstein Stewart Walters Workman Allen OTHERS: Brown ---Nisson ---Galloway Tremblay-- Lowry -- Carlson Rimel -- Maddox --- DISTRICT 8 Martin ~--Mitchell ---Allen Lambourne Hirstein DISTRICT 1 Harvey ,,,,,., McMichael i Meyers ""' Miller ~ Mack Allen &;?' ' Hirstein DISTRICT 2 Parks ,/ Hileman ~~ k ~ Speer Crapo Shull Culver .,.,.- Harvey ~ McMichael KF@~R o.,._ Schutte ~slid. ~ Hock Schwerdtfeger Kanno V"'"Walters Workman Allen Amo Bouma _,...Bowen Brown , e1a1 tc= Crapo Culver ~919..s Harvey ~ei'ft Miller v- ~ "1.....- DISTRICT 3 ~ 7 r5' Herbst Hirstein Furman Noe Long Speer Shull ............-Bousman ~ McMichael 9 .... Schutte Kohl ,,,.,.---Gummer e ---Nescher Schwerdtfeger Stewart Walters ~ Fregeau Green Herbst Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 5 Parsons 7 Gruber v Forgit Allen ~ Hirstein DISTRICT 6 Meyers ./' Gruber .,......, Forgit Allen C'-· Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller ~ Mack Forgit v Gruber Harvey """" Mc Michael Meyers v Parks v Hileman Allen ~ Hirstein DISTRICT 11 Stewart ._......... Coen "Bartlett ._/" Allen ().:. Hirstein (33-A) (66-A) (74-A) (74-B) ALL DISTRICTS Supplemental Agenda May 11th, 1966 Consideration of motion authorizing acceptance of a permit from Orange County Flood Control District relative to construction of Job No. J-9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section); and authorizing execution of the permit by District No. 1 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice to Withhold against H. E. Johnson Construction Company (Contract No. 3-10), in the amount of $10,656. Notice filed by Patrick Boring Company, Inc. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement prepared by the General Counsel, for payment of $200 to John J. Hill for removal of trees in Parcel 7-5-lOE, Assess- ment District No. 5-A DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving proposed annexation of territory to the District (Liljeblad annexation; approved in principle on March 9, 1966) .. OATH OF OFFICE Will the new Directors please stand, and raise your right hands? Do you solemnly swear that you will support the Constitution of the United States of America and the Constitution of the State of California, and that you will faithfully discharge the duties of Director of the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, according to the best of your ability? II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, May 11, 1966 8:00 p.m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708 Phone 962-2411 May 6, 1966 DIRECTORS OF DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 5 PLEASE NOTE: Immediately preceding the regular meeting at 8:00 p.m., there will be a special called meeting of District No. 5 at 7:00 p .m. and an adjourned meeting of District No. 1 at 7:30 p.m., both in the Districts' offices . A separate agenda for the District No. 1 meeting is enclosed, the main item of business o f which is the opening of bids on the Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section (Job No. J-9). The enclosed Special Call notice for t he Directors of District No. 5 lists the matters to be c onsidered at this special meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * * As a result of the municipal elections in April, there will be new Directors in most of the Districts. Since some of these new Directors may not be familiar with our organization, it should be explained that it is a rule of the County Sanitation Districts' Boards that, at least five days prior to each meeting, the General Manager submit a report, together with a formal agenda, in which the Directors are provided the background information necessary to a concise understanding of the principal items of business to be taken up. This report accordingly is for the next joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of Districts No .. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 which regularly meet i n joint session ~every month on the second Wednesday at 8 :00 p.m. in the Districts' office at the above address. At these joint meetings, the Districts' Boards transact business relating to joint operations of all the Districts and also take up items, if any, relating to the respective individual Districts. It also covers District No . 8 which ordinarily meets only quarterly but whi ch post - poned for one month its scheduled meeting in April. Attention is also called to the accompanying report on our Sa nitation Districts ' Budget Procedures . The matter is timely since budget matters wi ll be taken up at the next monthly meeting in June (s ee Item No. 25). * * * * * * * * * * * * * -1 - ,. ..... • • .. n I I I ..... Ill. I ~..; .• · / .,~ • • • The following is a brief description of the more important agenda items which are known, at the time of this writing, to be coming before the Boards at this joint meeting. The numbers refer " to the item numbers on the enclosed formal agenda for the meeting wh ich has attached, insofar as possible, a copy of each formal action to be considered. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting and will be included with the complete agenda available at the meeting. The listing of bills for payment is not done until the actual meeting date because of the fact that Board approval of such payments is possible only once each month and if the listing were made up five days before the monthly meeting, payment on some bills would be delayed as much as six weeks. Some vendors from whom we get excellent prices and service would obviously be discouraged from doing business with the Distri cts if payment were so de layed . Joint Boards - Nos. 4 and 5 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: Attached to the agenda is a listing of the representatives, as far as is known at the time of this writing, of the · various cities, sanitary districts and of the Board of Supervisors, who comprise the Boards of Directors. We do not have, at this time, a complete listing since in some instances we have not received formal notification of the representatives to s it on the Boards. Representatives of those cities which have not yet formally notified us by mail should ask their Clerks to do so prior to the meeting or should bring a certified copy of the app ropriat e~ action of his City Council to the meeting . The attention of the new Directors is also called to the first agenda attachment which gives directions for finding our office and also sources of information in the event there are any questions to be answered before the meeting. Nos. 6 through 15 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN: In accordance with the Districts' standing procedures, a Chairman for each District Board and the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman of the Joint Admini - strative Or ganization are elected annually at the regular May meeting. The Chairmen for the past year were as follows: --.. • I • ·~·I I -.. District No. 1 District No . 2 .... District No. 3 District No . 5 District No. 6 District No . 7 District No . 11 Joint Chairman r -• •.,I • Vice Joint Chairman ... • ':1 , , *No longer a Director -. -. -.L •. I • • • - -2- Harry H. Harvey Rex A. Parks Howard M. Cornwell* Lindsley Parsons Arthur H. Meyers Clifton C. Miller Robert M. Lambert* Howard M. Cornwell* Harry H. Harvey r '· I I • " • • • ...... \ .II i"I ... I I,,, I .J • I .... It should be pointed out to the new Directors ~hat the District ~"'!' Chairmen automaticaily become members of the Executive Committee which meets, as required, to study and make recommendations to the Joint Boards on · all important matters concerning joint operations such as budgets, salaries, personnel, uniform policies, etc. ·--~. , No. 25 -1966-67 JOIN'I"CAPITAL OUTLAY AND JOINT OPERATING BUDGETS: Under this agenda item, if the Directors desire, there will be an opportunity for review and discussion of the preliminary budget information in the enclosed separate report. No. 28 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, JOB NO. P2~8-l: This plant construction project (Enclosures--Outfall Booster No. 1, Switching Center, Service Center) with J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino is progressing very well and so far with a minimum of extra work orders. However, we have asked and received quotations for two small additional items of work totalling $406.21 as detailed in the formal change order attached to the agenda. In view of the discussion at the April Board meeting concerning change orders, we would like to point out that this is one example of obtaining approval of the Boards before the extra work is done. We recommend the adoption of the formal change order by means of the motion appearing on the agenda. No. 29 -TRANSF'ER OF BUDGETED ALLOTMENTS: This recommended motion, as appearing on the agenda, is to transfer in our Joint Operating budg et the sum of $30,000 from our sub-account for Effluent Disin- fection Chemicals· to the sub-account for Odor Control Chemicals and also the sum of $30,000 from our Salaries and Wages and Employee Benefits account to the Utilities account. Our expenditure records to date for the current fiscal year indicate that we substantially underestimated the expenditures in both the Odor Control Chemicals and Utilities accounts~ The original estimates of ttie amount of oClor control chemicals, principally chlorine, to be used during 1965-66 were based on actual expenditure figures for the past several years. As it turned out, there were considerably more odor problems encountered at Plant No. 1 last fall and this spring than in the past. Also in view of the rapidly encroaching subdivision develop- ment on both sides of the Plant, we found it necessary to use a great deal more influent chlorination than anticipated. The over expenditure in the Utilities account was caused primarily from much higher power bills than anticipated. When the current year's budget was prepared, it was not expected that there would be a significant interruption, due to the construction of our new 84-inch effluent line along the river right of way, in use of our interplant transmission line by means of which we take power at • Plant No.· 2 through one meter and transmit it to Plant No. 1. At that time, we relied on a proposed agreement with the Edisoi; Company which would have provided for moving our interplant power line to a proposed adjacent Edison Company pole line. Such ai; arrangemen~ would have necessitated only a brief shutdown of the interplant line. However, because of easement problems, this agreement was not • 1• • ;J-~ ~.·. --~ .. • • .. -3-I - ... ---_,) - ~ • • ... . • ..,/ consummated and during the above described pipeline construction it was necessary to take our transmission line out of service to clear the right of way for the contractor. Hence, for approximately nine months it was necessary to buy power through a separate meter at each plant. Because of the block rate being applied to two separate meters, the total power bill was obviously much higher than would · ·:: ha.ve been · the case with one meter . Also we underestimated the use, this year, of our new ocean outfall booster station which uses a great deal of power and creates a high demand rate. No . 30 -·QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: The Districts' independent a-uditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, have submitted the quarterly financial report for the individual and Joint Districts for the third quarter of the 1965-66 fiscal year as required by the terms of their contract with the Districts . This report is being mailed to those Directors who have, in the past, requested a copy in advance and will also be mailed, upon request, to any other Director wishing to see it before the Board meeting. Copies will also be ava ilable at the Board meet ing for examination. This agenda item also includes action by District No. 8 to receive and file the consolidated financial report for the first half of the current fiscal year which report was previously received and filed by the other Boards. Nos. 31 and 32 -PAYMENT OF BILLS: The s e are two routine items as called for in our regulations, but for the benefit of the new Directors it should be pointed out that the General Manager must certify to certain facts concerning invoices and claims submitted prior to forma l roll call action by the Boards authorizing payment of the listed bills. As explained above, a listing of these bills will not be available until the final agenda submitted at the Board meeting. The listing will include a brief explanation of the purpose of the payment, if not obvious from the name of the vendor. District No. 1 I • Nos . 34 and 35 -AWARDS OF PLANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS NOS. P2-12 AND J-9: Bids for a new primary clarifier at Plant No. 2 (P2-12) were taken by the Board on May 4 and bids on the Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section (J-9) wi ll be taken at the adjourned meeting of the District at 7:30 p.m . preceding the Board meeting. At the time of this writing, we do not yet have a recommendation for award of the former contract. However, at the time of the meeting this recom- mendat ion will be forthcoming. In the case of Job No. J-9 we hope that the bids will be in order and that a recommendation for award can there for be made at the meeting since an early commencement of this job, which involves crossing of a Flo?d Control Channel in the dry seasen, can be started as soon as possible. For the benefit of the new Directors, under our Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958, District No. 1 is designated to act as contracting agent for all of the Districts in • .._ • 1i f9 .. -4-,~ ~ ·~ • ----.L • • r I - order to simplify paper work and to minimize additional board meetings . -~ However, for each construction project, specific authorization to so act in their behalf must be granted by the J o int Boards to Distr ict No. 1. Such authorization is granted at the t i me plans and specifi- cations are approved and advertising for b i ds authorized . No . 36 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DI STRICT SEWER JOBS NOS . 1 -6, 1-7 AND 1 -8: The Di strict 's engineers, Boyle Engineering, are comp l eting work on t h e p l ans a n d specifications fo r these contracts which are respective l y the Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer, the Broadway Trunk Sewer and the Ma i n Street Trunk Sewer, 17th Street and Washington Avenue Sub -T runk Sewers. Si nce i t is the desire of the City of Santa Ana to expedite this work as much as possib l e in order to complete the downtown portions before the Christmas holiday shopping season, we · are recommending approva l , by means of the attached resolution, of the plans and specifications for these jobs and to authorize submittal of the same to the City of Santa Ana for construction in accordance with the November, 1965 agreement between the District and the City . District No. 11 No . 48 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 1 1 -10-1 : Bids for this contract, the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nicho l s Str eet Gravi ty Sewer, were authorized at the April meeting and wil l be opened by the Engineer and Secretary next Monday, May 9 . If the bids are in order, the final agenda will contain a recommendation for award by the Engineer and myself. Districts Nos . 2 and 3 • No . 52 -REQUEST OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER FOR REMOVAL OF BOLSA AVENUE TRUNK SEWER FROM STORM DRAIN CULVERT: This matter was taken up at the April Board meeting and following discussion a committee composed of Directors Amo, Culver and Parks was appointed to analyze the request and to determine the Districts • degree of responsibility for the cost of correcting the problem. The Committee has met twice, on April 20 and May 3 . A separate written report on this subje~t is included with the formal agenda for the Directors of Districts Nos . 2 and 3. District No. 3 Nos. 57 through 59 ,_ PUBLIC HEARING ON ENGINEER 'S REPORT: At the Apri l Board meeting, a formal engineer 's report, ·as required by the County Sanitation District Act, was approved as to form and, as also required by law, a public ·hearing thereon was set for the time of this meeting. The report, basically, recommends the purchase by District No. 3 of ca~acity in certain of Distr~ct No. ~l's facil~ties at a total price of $190,000 . This pu rchase will provide convenient and permanent sewer service to an area of District No . 3 which is remote from the existing District No . 3 trunk sewers . Also by consummating the purchase, an existing inter-district agreement, I :f ~ ~ 1 r. I .. --5- r .. --• I I • - L .. I which accomplishes this purpose on a temporary rental basis, can be terminated. The older Directors are thoroughly familiar with the subject, since this transaction has been discussed for some time previously, but if any of the new Directors have any questions there- on, it will be appropriate to bring them up under these items. No. 60 -SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW PUMPING EQUIPMENT AT WESTSIDE PUMP STATION: Additional pumps, motors and appurtenant electrical gear are urgently needed in the near future at this pump station, which serves the northern Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, La Palma and western Cypress areas. The District's design engineers have been previously authorized to prepare specifications for these rather major items of equipment needed to increase the capacity of this station to meet the growing needs of this area. These specifications are now ready for approval. The recommended resolution, attached to the formal agenda, approves the specifications and authorized advertising for bids to· be received and opened on June 1. If the bids are satis- factory, a recommendation for award will be made at the regular June meeting. As many of the Directors are probably aware, there is a seller's market for equipment of this type and we are anxious to proceed with this contract as soon as possible in order to obtain delivery at the earliest possible date. Any delay in obtaining this equipment could possibly result in a serious problem at this · station. The engineer's estimate of the cost of this equipment is $27,040. Nos. 61 through 64 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 3-10: This contract with the H. E. Johnson Construction Company of Torrance was success- fully completed on April 30. The job involved the construction of a relief trunk sewer in Beach Boulevard between Imperial Highway and Rosecrans Avenue. During the course of construction, the contractor made numerous claims for extra payment for encountering of unknown utilities and obstructions in the trench area and also a rather major claim ($10,539.74) for delay caused by restricted working hours imposed by the State Division of Highw~ys. A number of meetings between the engineer and contractor were held to discuss these claims and on April 2e another meeting was held between the engineer, our General Counsel and staff to attempt to work out a reasonable settle- ment of these claims. However, no such agreement could be reached and we are therefor recommending paying a total of $5,070 for the extra work items listed in Change Order No. 3 attached to the agenda under Item No. 62. The amounts recommended to be paid are in accordance with the Engineer's analysis of the value of extra work actually performed (see attachments to Change Order No. 3). This change order also grants an extension · of time of 16 days to the contractor for the extra work performed, which extension of time, together with extensions previously granted, is sufficient to provide compliance with the time of completion called for in the Contract. Also under these items is an approval of an assignment of monies due the contractor (Item No. 61) to his surety, the National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company, and Change Order No. 4 (Item No. 63) which is the c~stomary_d?llar adjustment of t~e contract price to reflect unit quantities of work actually installed I .. , •• • Ill -6- .--- • l"I I,., ... . -iii • r I"' • as against the original estimates of quanti.ties. In the ca.se of this job, the adjustment results in a net deduction of $1,071.50 from the c ~i g inal contract price. Item No. 64 is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete as of April 30 and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. • District No. ,7 I No. 68 -REQUEST OF C. J, SEGERSTROM & SONS FOR THE DISTRICT TO CONSTRUCT AN EXTENSION OF THE COLLEGE AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER TO HUNTZINGER AVENUE: At the February 9th meeting of the Board, action was taken declaring intent to include this facility in the District's master plan of sewers; the engineers were authorized to prepare the plans and specifications; and the District agreed to provide in- spection services during the construction. It was understood by the Board at that time that the developer would construct the facility, and following its completion, execute a standard reimbursement agree- ment with the District, which provides for reimbursement over a period of not less than three years. The engineers' plans were accepted as complete at the District's meeting of April 13th. The construction estimate is $21,800 and sufficient funds are avaiiable in the District's revolving fund to pay for the facility. However, the District has entered into numerous reimbursement agreements with developers for the construction of master plan sewers and the Board's policy has been to treat everyone on an equal basis. If the existing reimbursement agreements for master plan sewers can be amended to authorize immediate payment of all remaining balances, the Board may desire to construct the extension of the College Avenue Sewer as requested. In addition to the current agreements, a master plan sewer facility is being planned to serve the District southerly of the p roposed San Dieg o Freeway and easterly of the Orange County Airport, and the Irvine Industrial Complex developers are prepared to enter · into a reimbursement agreement for the construction costs. Furtbe ~ information will be available at the meeting. 'Ro. 69 .. LETTER FROM FREDERICK B. MEARS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FOR Annr~lONAL COSTS INVOLVED IN CONNECTING TO DISTRICT'S SEWER FACILITIES: The engineers will be prepared to go into detail concerning the problems encountered by Dr. Mears in connecting his hillside home to the District's La Loma trunk sewer. No. 70 -REQUEST OF TUSTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR REDUCTION OF DIRECT CONNECTION CHARGES: A. letter has been addressed to the Board by the Assistant Superintendent of the Tustin Elementary School District requesting that the District's direct connection charges b e adjusted for two schools, since the state funds available to the school district are based on 75% of the District's direct connect i on charges. This request has been reviewed by the District's Legal Counsel and his opinion is that the District's connection charge • • • ~ t: • . :. .J.: --7- • • .. .._ ---II -~: -.. -· -r---- "I • _a • - "I .. • " :: -· loo .... -• ~ - Ordinance No . 709 does not specifically provide a means by whi ch the ,·"-.( Board could permit the reduction of established dharges. The District's Counsel will be prepared to go into this matter in more detail at the meeting. .. .. I~ No. 71 -ACQUISITION OF CITY OF ORANGE FACILITIES AND CAPACITY RIGHTS IN CONJUNCTIO:f WITH CONSTRUCTION IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICrr #6: At the Board's April 26th meeting, the Engineer of Work briefly described the facilities which must be acquired by the District to permit the use of the sewers to be constructed in Assessment District #6 . The staff and engineers would like to discuss with the Direi:tors the costs involved and the means by which the facilities can be acquired from the City of Orange. ~ • I I w • • I ., .;. -r • • • •• r I ll" I Ill • .. • .. •• • r r ... \ • I I Ir 1• • ... • I • -1 • • • I I I .. I ' • • ._ • • • • •• •l-11 .. • I - • .. t I Fred A. • General • "I L"' I • ~ ,., I I I "I • '• -r ·-• r • .s: • 41 I. I ... ' ---, .. I .. -• " .... -• .&.-: I ... -·--8·- Harper Manager -Sec~:-etary .. I • (33-A) (66-A) (74-A) (74-B) ALL DISTRICTS Supplemental Agenda May 11th, 1966 Consideration of motion authorizing acceptance of a permit from Orange County Flood Control District relative to construction of Job No. J-9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section); and authorizing execution of the permit by District No. 1 DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice to Withhold against H. E. Johnson Construction Company (Contract No. 3-10), in the amount of $10,656. Notice filed by Patrick Boring Company, Inc. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing the General Manager to execute an agreement prepared by the General Counsel, for payment of $200 to John J. Hill for removal of trees in Parcel 7-5-lOE, Assess- ment District No. 5-A DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving proposed annexation of territory to the District {Liljeblad annexation; approved in principle on March 9, 1966). \ ~LL_ --------.~ ?ff ----· ~ 5-;r ·------·-----· (J -----------~, ~------ DRAFT RE: May 11th, 1966 Joint Meeting Thip being the regular meeting at which annual elections of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization and Chairman of each District's Board were to be held pursuant to meeting procedure previously established by resolution, the Secretary called the meeting to order at 8:00 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance, the roll was called, and a quorum was reported present for each District. (Show receipt and filing of excerpts and the administering of Oaths of Office to new members, as prescribed in the State Constitution). With the Secretary of the Boards presiding, nominations were opened for Chairman of the Board of Directors of District No. 1. (Show customary election for Districts 1 through 11, EXCEPT District 3. District #3 will show two nominations and voting by written ballot). Election of Chairman of the Joint Adminis- trative Organization \ Moved and seconded: That Directo r Parks be nominated as a candidate for the office of Chairman declined of the Joint Administrative Organization. Director Parks the nomination and requested that his name be withdrawn. It was then moved and seconded: That Director Harvey be nominated as a candidate for the office of Joint Chairman. Director Speer was also nominated. , The vote was taken by written ballot and polled by the Districts ' General Counsel, who announced that Director Harvey had been elected ~~tN.txgkxixmxNx~fxtkex~~Kxax Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization. Director Harvey, newly elected Joint Chairman then assumed the gavel and declared nominations open for the office of Vice Joint Chairman. (Show standard election of Pa~s ) / Chairman harvey welcomed the new membe..Ys of the Boards and ,,, discussed tentative plans for an educational meeting to acquaint the new Directors with the activities of the Di s tricts. Chairman Harvey also expressed confidence in the ability of the staff and commended them for their efforts. #25 a.en~~l.-d'J!lan~~ the General Mana er -F1 e d A. Ha1pe1, the Dist:ricts' introduced the staff members in attendance; and announced that pla~ were being formulated for a Directors' tour of the Districts ' sewage trea~ent facilities to familiarize the new Directo rs with the Districts' oper /,,. Mr. Harper also expl ned the basic functions of the organization and discussed, briefly, the iminary budgets for 1966-67.~ Executive Committee meeting is scheduled fo May 25th to discu:s the bud~e~s f~ #35 -Mr. H. Harvey Hunt, of John rollo Engineers, gave the verbal recommendation of the engineers tha ~ J o b No. J-9 be awarded to Vinnell Corporation, the low bidder. (Then show award ). (J ~rr #3, -(Show Boyle Engineering item deferred to 4:00 p.m., May 25th) #52 -Director Parks presented th written report of the Special Committee on the request of the City of Wes{tminster Engineering Department, and I I advised that the Committee had met on two occasions, as outlined in .the written report; and a determination was made that the information gathered by the staff and Committee be presente~ to the Boards for their consideration. Yw-.._ ~av"'-'' ~l\'V\~J -fJ.4 'l 'tJv~cR; L1~ t:t;" ~~--, -t;;° ~ ~ 'r;o-d"~ .r{ r:;f.._ D/1-:)t~~~~ Following a brief discussion~ a\tiring wnich 1:h2 General Manager expanded upon the written report and recommended that the Districts offer -t:;t .-<l.£,t~\.IU~ttu-ZT~ ~ ~ to :b1.s:~2 furnish;\ inspection serv ,ces for the relocation work, it was moved, seconded and duly carried: ~ID!:txi;NJ!'.XXRX~mm1ut.Rxtx~NX@~x.t.Fuf xGHNRXKXXMx.mt:gKXXEEXR~~X@XH~ ~·· That the Districts deny any responsibility for obstruction of the ......si.poo~ and that the staff be directed to notify the City ll§.:fX.tNe that if the City wishes to utilize the previously abandoned storm drain culvert, the 24" VCP Balsa Avenue Sewer obstr;ucting the culvert must be relocated at the City's expense. FURTHER MOVED : That in accordanc~ with the recommendation of the General Manager, the staff be dire ~ted to make available to the . City of Westmins ter, the sewer reloc¢'tion construction drawings prepared ' in accordance with the Districts' ~~ecificati ons; and to provide inspection I services for the proposed reloca on work at no cost to the City. #68 -A let prese and considered by & Sons, dated Apr 26, 1966, was s ~J #68 -A letter from C. J. Segerstrom & Sons, dated April 26, 1966, requesting construction of an extension of the College Avenue Sub -Trunk Sewer to Huntzinger Avenue, was presented and considered b~ the Board. lJ-~_y After a !lai:.ei brief discussion, it was MS&DC: /1 That said request be denied since the District has entered into numerous reimbursement I agreements with developers for construc~ion of Master Plan Sewers, and the Board 's policy has been to treat ~11 requests on an equal basis. FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to notify C. J. Segerstrom & Sons that, upon completion truction of the line by the developer, the District will enter into agreement to acquire the facility. #69 -Mr. Carl Carlson of Boyle Engineering reported upon the communication dated April 14, B. Mears, M.D ., requesting reimbursement in th amount of $250 for additional expenseK incurred in the installation a sewer line on his property at 1672 La Loma Drive Santa Ana. additional e i-or-to..een&tructton oT the faci1ity. ~~-G1~~~-B-'1~~H:;tn~1tG!h1Eens31t~ai!ff of Boyle-·Engi-naering ..had _ se , visited_ the site of construct on on several occasions, and had provided -Dr. Mears with accurate infor tion; and that the re-trenching operation was necessitated by a miscalcu ation -on the part of Dr. Mears and/or his - Districts• responsibility~~ n -1.-• Fo~lowing ~ ?iscussion ~~~ ~J~. _.djl.s.i:..i-t=1:gt8::..s.lie.d_f.I:r.QID..-t:b.;;L.t.....:tlllt~,.f--tttv""-errg:t:nerer~, it was MS&D C: ~ ct-UJ:-~ J ~~ ,t..,,_d,..Q/_,JJ-,.;..,_, '-Yr---<--,. That the $250 sought by Dr. MearsAbe refunded, and th~t the staff -and tne engiRoors be directe~ to effect this refund,~ the meehoe \ ·f'onnd .:to... he the .most-aqui-.t.a:bl.e-to.. a.1.1.....concern.ed. . ... . - #70 -A letter from the Tustin Elementary Schoo l District, dated M~y 3, 1966, was presented and considered. Tl1e communication contained a request that the Sanitation District's c~nnection charges for the I Lorna Vista and Red Hill Schoo ls be adjusted to the amount available in (7f1J/., »{-lu MS-,~J)~ cJ-~ .. , the schools' funds !fRtkexxtNiH inste~rl of the complete charges. I In view of the fact that similar request have been received from the School District in the /..st, and have been denied by the Board upon recommendation of yfe General Counsel, it was MS&DC: That the request be that the staff be directed to inform the School Distric action taken by the Board ~Nx:tluf /t:t;~~;--l~t:f&EH::--:B~~~s=+=official~ that the Board cannot, under t e provisions of the existing connection charge ordinance, reduce th charges . ~ ltrl -Following a diiussion regarding acqu:s1t1on of certain facilities and capacity rights iri. facilit;jes owned by the City of Orange, required I in connection with the ,..:onstruction in Assessment Di.strict ~' it was MS&DC : That the staff tl~ directed to negotiate with the City of Orange . (!..(V,,:t-~ ...... to effect an agreement lr acquisition of ~. capacity rights and facilities 1R qs 1 '"°· ·• ~ u-.. 1, fi'~ ~~ "~ ~--"aati '-Jf-~'-<> -o t'\....{ ~~~ ~ c'~"?~--7~ -'")> ~ ~ :It= b #72 -The General Counsel the progress of the lawsuit filed on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, for acquisition of the Sewer north of Seventeenth Street . The General Coun s el recommended that ~ I 4-.. \· . . . ~ ::: ~.; -·~·· . -· -.. '. . (33-A) (66-A) (74-A) (74-B) Supplemental Agenda May 11th, ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion thorizing acceptance of a permit from Orange C~u Fl ood Control District relative to construct · n of Job No. J -9 (Ocean Outfall No . 2, Land Section)· and authorizing execution of the permit by District ~ . 1 DISTRICT 3 ~, Consideration of JI!0tion to rece i ve and file Notice to Withhold agai rlst H. E . Johnson Construction Company (Contrac No . 3-10), in the amount of $10,656 . Notice filed by atrick Boring Company, Inc. DISTRICT 7 Consideration o Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing the General Mana er to execute an agreement prepared by the General C unsel, for payment of $200 to John J . Hill for removal f trees in Parcel 7-5 -lOE, Assess- ment District No. 5-A DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving proposed annexat on of territory to the District (Liljeblad annex tion; approved in principle on March 9, 1966). ROLL CALL Di str ic t / 2 -...., ~ Reg ular__,,------'"'--~--~ A djo urned~~-~---~-- S ;/ .... i, i-Time _~g'---, _o-_J_ I tem x/J ' <! .t:_,( Date .Amo Bartlet t Ee llffia Bo we n Brown 7 J OINT BO ARDS 1/ S i P;: Crapo Culver Furman No e Long Spee r Shull Ill! ,. * Bo u sman Fo r g i t i/""' Gruber Gruber \...-"" F o rgi t Ha rvey i;;;;"' Mc Mi chael Harve:t Meyers Mil le r C., I DIS TRICT 1 7 Mc Mi chael +Mac k V::-Hi r stei n DI ST RI CT 2 Pa r k ~ ,/ Hile man ca::ail.c _ __.,a,/'"'-Spee r Crapo ~ S hull Cu l v er Harvey Mc Mi cha e l Krein CL--,., Schutte M.i ~l ? Ho c k S c hw e r d tfeger e>-Kanno Wa l ters --\/?':--;...Her b s~ Workma n 7 A.il.-1~ Z Hirste i n -Krein-~ S c hutte V' Meyers v :21 ~ehe-1 7 . Hock ' Mille r, Ci .. t · 7 Mack Mille r, H.•· 0\....--',,. Kohl Ne s c h er 7 ,,. Parks 7 ....-Hileman Parso ns v S chwer dtfege r~Kanno ~ Stewart ,.,Frege a u --7_,, Gre e n Walters Workman Co e n ~H e rb st ~Qu e yre l 7"Hi r s t e i n -;:::::;;-:-~---I _12:: OTHER S : Brown ~ Nisso n 7 Gallow a ? Trembl ay Lowry Car 1 s o n__:__,....:-- Rimel v Maddo_x _ _:.__ -jkr;:/ ~ I ~J\.1.,-..t l r/ ~y';·~ 0 JJJ DISTRI CT 8 Martin Mitchell ---~ Lamb o urne Hi rstein Am o Bo wen · Brown DISTRICT 3 LG':: Furman V7 Noe V""' ~ .Cd.fit:!"k 7 ~ Cr apo V?' Shull Culver C?' J Dw:: i s &Z' Bou s man "'-•'" -Ha rvey v McMichael K r ~i n Schutte Mil l e r,)/ ~ Kohl lj_e .s c_h~ r Gwnme re S c h werdtfege r ~,,,........Fregeau Stewart \/' Green Wa lte r s ;z: Herb s t AJ.,.1.-ei;i ~ Hi rstein J'9 rsons Grub e r Aiitlen tle y e µ Gruber ~ .Mi ller Forgi t Harvey Meyer s Parks AiPlMl" ~ew a rt 'Ba r tlett J\Jd!e n DISTRI CT:? ~ Forgit Hirstein DISTRIC~6 ?. F o rgit 7 Hi rste i n -~- ~~~~er ~ McMichael v ... L........-Hi leman 17 Hirste in --- DISTRICT/11 --¥-Co e n ==:::z: Hi rstein ROLL CALL District -------------------Regular --::~-----------------Adjourned ________________ __ Date Time ------------------------------~ ------- Item ----------~--------- JOINT BOARDS Amo Bartlett p 8 Bowen Brown ?7& k Crapo Culver DQ it Forgit Gruber Harvey Krein Meyers Michel Miller, C. Miller, H. Nescher Parks Parsons Furman Noe Long Speer Shull Bousman Gruber Forgit Mc Michael Schutte Hock Mack Kohl Hileman Schwerdtfeger __ _ Kanno Fregeau Green Coen Herbst Queyrel Hirstein Stewart Walters Work.man OTHERS: Brown ---Nisson ---Galloway Tremblay-- Lowry -- Carlson Rimel -- Maddox --- DISTRICT 8 Martin ----Mitchell ---Allen --- d tf//lnJ/-'12-~u~'Y\....L-- Lambourne Hirstein DISTRICT 1 Harvey McMichael Meyers Miller Mack Mien. Hirstein DISTRICT 2 Parks Hileman .!iP k Speer Crapo Shull Culver Harvey McMichael Krein Schutte Michel Hock Schwerdtfeger Kanno Walters Herbst Workman All rm Hirstein DISTRICT 3 Amo Ye~Bta Furman Bowen Noe Brown Long QiM_k Speer Crapo Shull Culver :Q& i.s Bousman Harvey McMichael Krein Schutte Mille:r;;J. Kohl Nescher Gummere Schwerdtfeger Fregeau Stewart Green Walters Herbst Ail en Hirstein DISTRICT 2 Parsons Gruber Forgit ~ l:l! z:D Hirstein DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Forgit 1~[1 Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Miller Mack Forgit Gruber Harvey McMichael Meyers Parks Hileman ftllCit-_ Hirstein DISTRICT 11 Stewart Coen Bartlett ~,,DR Hirstein ~/" .11' II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) DISTRICT No. #1 AGENDA May 11th, 1966 -7:30 p.m. Appointmen~ of Cha irman pro tern, if necessary Report of the General Manager Report of the G\1eral Counsel Consideration of motion approving and adopting Addendum #1 and Addendum #~to the plans and specifications for Ocean Outfall No. 2 Land Section, Job No. J-9. (Copy attached) \ fl() ·l./"- t he Secretary to open ~ Consideration of motio directing and read sealed bids r ceived for No. 2, Lan d Section, Jo No. J-9 the Ocean Outfall 'v~ ' Consideration of motion eferring bids for Job No . J-9 'N ~. to the engineers and staf\f for tabulation and recommendation ~~ II~"' I Other business and commun·cations, if any Consideration of motion r : Adjournmen t ~. ;/ PLANS ADDENDUM NO. l to Plans and Specifications for OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION JOB NO. J-9 (1) Sheet 11 of 18 1 Section B DELETE the notation which reads "2-1/2-inch thick standard flange". SPECIFICATIONS (2) Page D-20, Section 27-7 TUNNEL EXCAVATION AND LINER PLATE (a) RE.VISE the following sentence in Subsection (b) Tunnel Liner Plate: Third sentence of first paragraph in sub- section should read: "The tunnel liner plates may be a 2-flange lap type or a 4-flanged type, Armco Commercial Liner Plate Company, or approved equal." (b) ADD a paragraph to sub-section (b) Tunnel Liner Plate: "The 4-flanged liner plate shall be made of one piece of metal, provided with flanges and with bolt holes at both sides and both ends for attaching to adjacent plates. Corners shall be practically square so when plates are bolted together no openings shall exist large enough to permit inflow of · granular material. Design and shape of the liner plate shall be such that erection and assembly of the liner plate structure can be made from inside of the tunnel." (3) Page D-26, Section 29-2, PIPE SCHEDULE Change the fourth entry to read as follows: "36-inch pipe in tunnel" in lieu of 30-inch pipe in tunnel. JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS May 5, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. Box 5175, Fountain Valley, Calif. May 6, 1966 ADDENDUM NO. 2 to Specifications and Plans for OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION JOB NO. J-9 SPECIFICATIONS (1) Page D-19, Section 27-5, PIPE EXCAVATION ( 2) PLANS CHANGE the section to read as follows: "The maximum clear width of trench anywhere below a plane of one foot a~ove the top of the pipe shall not exceed the width of trench used for design of the pipe.11 Page D-28, Section 29-3, CONCRETE PIPE, PRESSURE, Subsection (g) Design: CHANGE the last item for the design criteria for external loading as follows: 11 Trench width at top of pipe Not less than actual field conditions 11 (3) Sheet 17 of 18, Sections B, Hand J. CH.ANGE maximum trench width notation in these three sections to conform with the above change in specified trench width. JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS BID TABULATION SHEET Est. $1,075,000. Date May 11 2 1966 Contract: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION, JOB NOo J-9 Contractor Total Bid 1. 2. 3. 4. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. -----__. Adjourned meeting --7:30 p.m., May 11, 1966 DISTRICT NO. 1 Harvey ,/' McMichael Meyers -V;-- Miller lZ Mack Allen a_.. Hirstein Harvey ___ McMichael Meyers Miller Mack ---Allen Hirstein Harvey ____ McMichael Meyers Miller Allen ------ Mack Hirstein .... r •• ii "I I I J #4 -- Report of the engineers re : Rep l acement of existing force main f rom Jamboree Pump Station #5 Meeting May 11, 1966 • l I • Donald C. Simpson, Consulting Engi neer , read his report r dated May 6, 1966 , on the subject , and answered questions from the Board members in this regard . Mr . Simpson discussed the methods of accomp lishing the proposed wor1S..i._ ~ ,.. r" ~-U\.. and reiterated, verbally , his recommendation thay{t be done~~ the forthcoming Jamboree Road Improvements unde r the auspices of the City of Newport Beach . Mr . Hunter Cook of the staff of the City of lfewP.ort Beac!}_J _ -/-(\ . ~~ N. <-C"1.lv\~ ""'-NJ tlmi..~~ concurred in this recommendation of Mr . Simpson, and( tated that he ~· J )"'- would advise the Ci ty Attorney 's office to prepare an a g reement between the City and the Di strict, whereby the Di strict construction would be included in the City 's contract for improvements to Jamboree Road . .. ... UI #5 -~ Acceptance of proposal from Donald C. Simpson for engineering se r vices in connection with re- placement of force main from Jamboree Pump Sta- tion ; and authorizing an agreement with the City of Newport Beach to accomplish the work \ • MS&DC : That the report of Donald C. Simpson , dated May 6, 1 9 66 , regarding replacement o f existing force main from Jamboree Pump Station be re c ~·ved and ordered ~ ± ~ ~ ~"VI.>-(. ,...:;, ;___ .J ~ ''-- filed ; and that the proposal of Dciiald C. Simpson, dat May 6, 1 96 6 ,Abe accepted; and that the General Manager be authorized to dire c t Dona~d C. ) Simpson to proceed with furnishing said services in accordance with /l~~ ~ -er-(.,/, h 15 1 9 66 . t5"' Parag raph F of the agreement with the engineer d a ted Marc , ' --........ • • r-.. FURTH ER MOVED : That an agreement with the Ci ty of Newport Beach be authorized , whereby the Ci ty will construct said force main under its forthcoming contract for improvements to Jamboree Road , with reimbur se - ment fo r a ll c o s t s the reof by the Di str i ct up o n completion of said work . #6 - Verbal rep ort of the engineers concerning status of Cont r act No . 5-12 Mr . Simpson briefly reviewed this project and stated that the de l ay beyond the complet i on dat e for fina l comp l eti on is due to wet 3:ther during November and December , x ~ 1 965 , and to failur e of the pump ma nu cturer t o supp l y equipment on schedul e . #9 - Verbal re p ort of staff o n f i nancial statu s of the Districts 1966 -67 tax rate . Show adjourmm ent at 7 :55 p .nf'. M . Br own verbally reported on the f i nancial picture of the Di strict , r t i cul a rly as re l ated to the requested~hat t~e _sta~f 1;..~7-(; -.cl., ~uCVi..S ~ · v e ibal~ r e pGJ:t.ed Agenud .lc1n No. _r; DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER aa411 NltWPOlllT •LVD. • NEW,.OlllT •EACH, DALIP'OlllNIA • 0111 •-t4at Boa.rd of Directors County Sanitation District No. 5 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Gentlemen: s-//-c.. £. INVIE•TllJATIDN• • REPORTa WATER • •IEWElllAIJI: DRAINAlllE • •TlllEET• •TAP'P' IENlllNl:l:llllNll May 6, 1966 In accordance with your staff's request, we hereby submit this proposal for furnishing !ngineering Services in connection with the replacement of the existing force main .from the Jamboree Pumping Station. The Public Works Department of the City of Newport Beach has informed us that the City's proposed widening and realignment of Jamboree Road will interfere with a portion of the 8" force main from the Jamboree Pumping Station. The plans for the road work are nearly complete and, because of financial participation by the County of Orange, the project must be advertised for bids prior to July 1, 1966. The present 8" force main is not large enough for ultimate needs. In ou.r opinion, either a 14" or 16" line will be required when the area is fully developed. The enlargement of the force main will result in a decreased pumping head and therefore, a modification of the pumps will be required. It should also be recognized that sometime in the future the Jamboree Station may be eliminated or relocated if it ever becomes feasible to construct a gravity line along Back Bay Drive to the mouth of Big Canyon. The force main in Jamboree Road would not then be needed. The information necessary to make this determination will probably not be available for some time. The estimated cost of installing the ultimate size force main is Sl4,000. The cost differential between con- structing this size line and a new 8" line is about S4,000. !ven though the line may be abandoned in the future, it is recommended that the ultimate size line be installed. The work can be done under a separate contract ~ -2 - simultaneously with the street project; or, by agreement, the work could be included as a separate bid item in the City• s contract. There are advantages and disadvantages to both methods. We suggest including the work in the City's contract, although the direct construction cost may be slightly higher. In accordance with the tenns of the .Agreement dated March 15, 1966, we will prepare the necessary draw- ings and supplementary specifications for the lump sum of 11500. Our services would also include recommendations on neoeasary pump modifications. rhe work will be compla~e4 within 30 d&J"B after anthorization to proceed. Very truly yours, ... --..-v a~~ Donald C. Simpson DCS:c A--......, • COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA 10844 ELLI S AVEN U E, P . 0 . Box 517 5 , F OU N TAIN VAL L EY, C ALIFORNIA, 92708 Gen t l e men: May 6 , 1966 NOT ICE OF SPEC I AL MEETI NG DI STRICT NO . 5 7:00 p .m., May 11 , 1 966 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Administra tive Offic• 962-24 11 , Aree Code 7 Treatment Plant Off 545 -7147, Aree Code : I am calling a specia l mee ting of t h e Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 at the above hour and date . Th e p urpos e of this meeting is to consider the following items: 1) Repor t of Engineer and engineering p r oposa l for replacement of Jamboree Forc e Main 2) Status report of Eng i neer re: Contract No. 5 -12 3 ) Change Orders , Contract No . 5-12 4) Staff report on financial condition of District /s/ Li ndsley Parsons Chairman ... ~'"'May 11, 1966 -7:00 p.m. -----.:.. -----Special Meeting \ OTHERS PRESENT: DISTRICT NO. 5 Parsons / Gruber ---y;....,.._· ---Forgit Allen ---,4--------Hirstein A Parsons / -....,,..._-Gruber ../ Forgi t Allen -A~-Hirstein Parsons Gruber Allen / ,../ Forgit ---A---Hirstein ;; · ~-May 11,, 1966 -7:00 p.m. -----------Special Meeting OTHERS PRESENT: Brown Harper Simpson DISTRICT NO. 5 / Parsons < Gruber -:;;.,..--Forgi t Allen A: Hirstein ~ Parsons Gruber Allen ~ 7 Forgit -A--Hirstein Parsons (. Gruber :; Forgit Allen ---14:~-Hirstein /) . • II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ~c of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708 / (1) /(2) /(3) /(4) / (5) v (J-~) v (6) v (1) /(9) /(10) DISTRICT No. _# _5 _ AGENDA \ May ~lfut::-7:00 p.m. ~~ I\ Appointmenf:. of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Roll Calli Appointment of Bec retary pro tern Consideration of report of Donald C. Simpson, Consulting Engineer, dated May 6, 1966, regarding replacement of existing force main from Jamboree Pump Station Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept report and proposal of Dona~d C. Simpson, dated May 6, 1966, for furnishing engineering services in connection with replace- ment of existing force main from Jamboree Pump Station; and authorizing the Genera~ Manager to direct said engineer to proceed w ~th furnishing said services in accordance with Paragraph F of the agreement with the engineer dated Ma rch 15, 1966. (Copy of profosal in f <J1s~ ~)' 1 7 !i 111 L ~ . r; .,~ ..... -+-;-e.:::c;-v e rba1 report of the eng neers ~ncerning status of Contract No. 5-12 Consideration of motion apr roving Change Order #3 to Contract No. 5-12, authori ing a total addition of $1,662 .99 to the contract. See page 11 A11 Consideration of motion ap roving Change Order #4 to Contract No. 5-12, grantin an extension of time of 20 days. See page "B"· Verbal report of staff on the financial status of the District Consideration of motion re: Adjournment COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175-10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER C .O. NO • __ 3~-- CONTRACTOR: James I. Gallacher DATE: May 11, 19~6 Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping JOB: Station Contract No. 5-12 ~___;. ___ _...;_.;....._::.. _______________ _ Amount of this change order {ADD) (~) In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's invoices dated May 6 and Engineer's letter dated May 11, 1966 1. Alterations in work at manholes No. 11 and 12 for commercial sewer connection on south side of Pacific Coast· Highway, east of Newport Bay per instructions from Engineer $ 2. Construct cleanout on 4-inch force main for commercial connection south side of Pacific Coast Highway, east of Newport Bay per instructions from Engineer 3. Re-connect existing 10-inch force main at Rocky Point Pump Station per instructions from Engineer 4. Alter bolt detail on 27-inch manifola in new pump station per instructions from Engineer 5. Increase size of dome lights in new pump station per instructions from Engineer 200.00 644.18 398.12 295.89 124.80 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 1,662.99 Original Contract Price $ 698,569.55 Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 205,761.75 This Change (ADD)(EEE~) 1,662.99 Amended Contract Price $ 494,470.79 Board authorization date: Approved: May 11, 1966 -A- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS or Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer JAMES I. GALLACHER By ______________________________ ___ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175-10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER c.o. N0. __ 4..._ __ _ CONTRACTOR: · James I. Gallacher DATE:_l!~y 11~ 1966 Coast Highway TrunK Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping Station JOB: Contract No. 5-12 Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ None __ ___;:.~..;;.._.-----~~-- In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated April 6, 1966 EXTENSION OF TIME: Inclement Weather Days November & December, 1965 20 Original specified completion date: April 10, 1966 Completion date with this extension of time (20 days) April 30, 1966 Original Contract Price $ 698,569.55 Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 204 1 098.76 This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) _ _....;;;N.;..;;o..;.;;n...;;..e _____ _ Amended Contract Price $ 494,470.79 Board authorization date: Approved: May 11, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of Orange County, California By /s/ Paul G. Brown Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer JAMES I. GALLACHER By ______ ~------------------------ -B- "--~·--- Agenda Items #9 throu~h)~2 can be referred to the special attorney for the assessment district: if desired. II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenu e Fountain Valley, CaliF., 92708 DISTRICT No. # 1-7 AGENDA May 4th, 1966 -4:00 p .~ ( 1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairmen p r o tern, if necessary ( 3) ISTRICT 1 ~-"~ on sideration of motion r e: Receive and f ile minute excerpts ,fTJll"f fr om the Cities of Orange and Tustin , relative to electi ons 5 (5) of mayors and appointments of alternates to serve on the District's Board DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 ./l. ~ Report of the General Manager /IV° . DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 -..-eport of the General Counse l ~' ISTRICT 1 ~~ Consideration of mot i on re: Directing the Secretary to open ...;yr~1 nd read sealed bids received for Clarifier H, Job No . P2-12, pursuant to legal notice pub lished as required by law DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Referring bids for Job No . P2 -12 to the engineers and the General Manager for tabulation and recommendation to the Board GSTRICTS 1 AND 7 0 /l Report of the engineers and General Counsel on acquisition ~ ·1· of easements between Ma in and Bristol Streets adjacent to { ~ he exi~:~,nfo District No . 1 easement ~ ~ ~ ~ h (9J •) ISTRICT 7 / r~ r ~ /U.' ~ v7 ~ '11 J ~( g~~~;~~~ ~a~ ~~ei;,o~utl'.::l I ntention in AssessmenJ ~ /' (10 ) (11) (12 ) (..,V ~ [//V DISTRICT 7 Considera tion of action regarding protests DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Reso l ution No. 66 -5 1-7 re : Ordering modification relative to Assessment District #6 DISTRICT 7 ~~ Considerat i on of Reso lution No. 66 -52-7 re: Ordering work in Assessment District #6 STRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -53-7 re: Authorizing condemnation of property needed in the construction in Ass e ssment District No . 6 . See page 11 A11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -54-7 re: Ap p lication for annexation of territory to the District (Hall-Conway ~ ~n~xa~n)"J-%, ~ (15) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: warrant, as follows: Approval of Operating Fund #2950 Southern California Edison Co. (16) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Other business and communications, if any (17) .I:. ~V'~ Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., ~ DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: May 11, 1966 (18) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment -2- RESOLUTION NO. 66-53-7 AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and determined and hereby does find and determine, that the public interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor. Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein. Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease- ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however, that: (a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; (b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con- structed upon, over, or along said easements and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located with- in the lines of said easements or rights of way; (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines of said easements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be constructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. '!hat the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include: {a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service con- nection structures appurtenant to said line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend above the surface of the ground; (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from the work, together with the right, upon completion of the construe- -2- tion of the pipeline or pipelines or other works, to construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along such permanent easements and rights of way as may be in the public interest from time to time. Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller, Nisson, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing the a.mount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized, upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District. -3- II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 ( 1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) DISTRICT No. #1-7 AGENDA ~ay 4th, 1966 -4:00 P·!!!..:... of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary DISTRIC Conside ation of motion re:<H' Receive and file minute excerpts from th Cit~~f 0 1~e~ Tustin , relative to elections of mayor arrci appointments of alternates to serve on the Distric t' Board DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 ~eport of e General Manager I DISTRICTS 1 A j • 1.-'-/' I'"'"\ . C ... -Report of the Counse l !~ ~ '' ' ~" DISTRICT 1 tt)J Consideration motion re: Directing the Secretary to open ,}'\,...., I . J and read sealed bids received for Clarifier H, Job No . P2-12, ~~v \ pursuant to lega notice published as required by law ~v "- (7) (8) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of ~tion re: Referring bids for Job No . P2 -12 to the engineers a d the General Manager for tabulation and recommendation to t e Board DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Report of the engineers and General Counsel on acquisition of easements between Main and Bristol Streets adjacent to the existing District No . 1 easement \? J ... /_._...,,, (9) DISTRICT 7 l ;l. I\ ?. I,_ Continue hearing on Resolution of In tention in Assessment (10) (11) (12) (13) ( 14) Di strict #6 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of action regarding protests DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -51-7 re: Ordering modification relative to Assessment District #6 DISTRICT 7 Cons ideration of Resolut i on 'INo. 66-52-7 re: Ordering work in Assessment District #6 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution condemnation of property nee Assessment District No . 6 . DISTRICT 7 . 66 -5 3-7 re: Authorizing d in the construction in e page 11 A11 ')). ,, Consideration of Resolution o . 66 -54-7 re: Application for annexation of ~erritOJY A t?-r!'.f~ ~ist ri9~ (Hall-Conway ~ an_nexation). ~ ~~ ~ _'1.~ 7Y'ft-.-'l ~~~ tyvv'~~ 0 /9~~--- 1 (15) (16} (17) (18) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion warrant, as follows: #2950 Southern re: '~ RPylva1 of Opera ting Fund (\. ~v1 / \~ (y .\r.>- rnia Edison Co. $63 .. 53 ~ 1v~ ' Vy u DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Other business and communic tions, if any fa:'·, \ .\_, ~ DISTRICT 1 -Consideration of motion re: May 11, 1966 \[\,, ' I .lJ Adjournment to 7: 30 P .m., I\ \ yJA\ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment -2- RESOLUTION NO. 66-53-7 AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and determined and hereby does find and determine, that the public interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor. Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein. Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease- ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however, that: {a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; (b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con- structed upon, over, or along said easements and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located with- in the lines of said easements or rights of way; (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines of said easements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be constructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include: (a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service con- nection structures appurtenant to said line or lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend above the surface of the ground; (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from the work, together with the right, upon completion of the construe- -2- tion of the pipeline or pipelines or other works, to construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along such permanent easements and rights of way as may be in the public interest from time to time. Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller, Nissen, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to make application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized, upon receipt of a Court order and demand from c. Arthur Nissen, General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District. -3- Mr . E . H. Fi nster , of Boy l e Engineering , engineers for the District , reported verbally on the acquisition of sewer easements between Main and Bristol Streets, ~e:je:eent bo ehs 81EiB1'ing D:hii;riei; 8PS€"t0 ent . ' Following a d iscuss i on by the engineers, Gene r al Counsel , and the Directors concerning negotiations for the acquisition of easements adjacent t o the exi sting Di strict No . 1 easement , it was moved , seconde d and dul y c arr i ed : £~~~ t!!?J~~ ~~ That the engineers be directed to submit a written e v aluati on o f the costs of acqu isition of the additional construction expense i f ri g ht of way . easemen ts, as /)~~~ thex' '"sewer is 1 compared with the ~~~ Perouted in public ·-· R G L L C A L L Dat24ky ,~ ;~/(, Time /,,. It~m ~ t.dL :;> Adj o urnea--#= /d H7M eet~~ 7 DISTRICT 1 Harvey I/"' McMicha 0 1 Meye rs v Miller v Mack AllLn 7 Hirste:.in -:.~ DISTRICT 7. ll-~S-J-] v ~ -'7 v v -=-Mill ~r v Mack i---v v v ~·r 1 8 tt i--GrubE.r i..---L./ i.-Harvey -McMichaeJ. v l- y v !.--Meyers i--~ "' ~ Parks ,__. Hileman v (_--- [,,,.. / Allen Hirstein y I.. v t,r;,,_ ~-y. 7 , THER...>: Nelson {j{cL(, l & ( r--_,~yr-) Brown .......-- Nisson 1.---v Rimel .... ftt: I Hohener ( , I rl v ~ Lowry L-- Finster ~ < Galloway t..-- ;/ .' Ca,rlson t.... .J....., ' ,__,... v / I 1• r / '--V ~ CLr.' .. - R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned ./ ~ 7 Meeting '-' Date S-1-..~ (,, ' . Time <i ( ~ Item .A« C d1 t:> Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway ;;on . ~R&a, I ~ Harvey Meyers Miller Allt:n Miller DISTRICT 1 DISTRICT 7 I Citm:arl!cForgi t __ _ Harvey Meyers Parks Allen V' McMichael Mack Hirstein Mack Gruber McMichael Hileman Hirstein \_.I Est. ~328,000.00 B I D TABULAT,ION SHEET Date May 4, 1966 -------------------- CLARIFIER H -Job No. P2-12 Contract: Contractor Total Bid 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. ~ 9. 10. IL. ~J ~-/ft7~ fT~~I ' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 l i 2 4 5 6 71 al 91 I 101 ll 12 l3il 14 15, 16 l? 18! 19 ~ml 211 22 23 241 251 ?61 :• 27i i 2ai 291 '-'. 30 I 311 I 32! LAW OFf'ICES OIP' l.1 RIMEL. HARVEY 8t HELSING ji P'OURTH FLOOR j 1 1 1010 NORTH MAIN SIT. SANTA ANA. 11 CAL.IFORNIA 92701 I i MINU'lJES FOR CONTINUED HEARING ON RESOllUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7 ASSES~MENT DISTRICT NO. 6 I i I May 4, 1966 4: 00 o'clock p. m. The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the hearin~ on protests or objections against the work or the district as described I I in Reso,ution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of i sanitarY\sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 I has been\continued. The Engineer of Work and the Attorney for the assessment, \ I district p~ceedings thereupon advised the Board that they had prepared a I resolution of modification for consideration by the Board and the contents of I \ I ' I said resolut\~n for modification were thereupon discussed at length. It was ) then moved by Director.~ , seconded by Director ~I that RESOLUTION NO. 66-51-7, entitled: I "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY I SANITATiON DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI- FORNIA, . .ADOPTED UNDER AND PURSUANT TO THE AUTH- ORITY GRANTED BY SECTION 5231.1 OF THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS GODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING CHANGES AT\HEARING ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION, CHANGING, MODIFYING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO.' 66-19-7 OF SAID DISTRICT, AND THE PLANS OF THE DISTRICT HERETOFORE APPROVED FOR AND PER- TAINING TO 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6,' WHICH SAID PLANS ARE REFERi\ED TO AND INCORPORATED IN SAID RESOLUTION OF INT~NTION, AND MODIFYING THE WORK TO BE DONE AS DESCB_,IBED AND SHOWN ON SAID PLANS AND IN SAID RESOLUTION 0~ INTENTION," . \ I be adopted and said motion and said ~ESOLUTION NO. I 66-51-7 were thereupon! adopted by the following roll call vote: \ \ \ A YES: Directors NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors It now appearing that changes and modifications in the Resolution of Intention, the Plans, and the work have been made in th~ manner provided by law and all protestants having been heard and an opportunity\having been given -1- I I I I I II / I! --'l -11, 1! ll I I I 11 to all persons desiring to be heard,-and a full, fa~r and impartial hearing ~ 2 3 4 5 61 7 '.8 91 iPI ·: ... I 1 ,1. ti1 J.2 • I 131 u!I 15 161 171 . I 181 .,: ::• i +Et ~·: , ~pl ~~I 2~ ~ . .. 23 .•- 24 251 ?611 211' I 2a! 29! ~· 3011 :;1 II 11 3211 LAW Ol"P'ICEB OP' I' RIMEL. HARVEY& ,I HELSING I: FOURTH FLOOR ii 1010 NORTH MAIN 8To SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 02701 I! haviJ?.g been granted, the Board of Directors ha-V:ing before it a diagram of / the assessment district and being familiaI_"/With the assessment district and / . / also having considered all protests fi~7d, and having considered the m:~ 1 as to the area ,of property represe16d by the protestants, Director ~ presented the ~Pllowing resolutiJ' and moved its adoption: I . WHEREAS, cerlain protests have been filed by Dr. Robert I E. ~all, M. D., J/a others, protesting against the doing of the j work and impr7ement described in Resolution of Intention No. j 66-19-7, or ainst the Assessment District therein described; and WHE EA S, the Board of Directors has carefully considered all prote s or objections and having considered the area of the Distric represented by said protests; and HEREAS, this Board of Directors has made certain ges and modifications in said Resolution of Intention, the ns, and the work therein described; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of ctors that it does hereby find and determine that the said prot sts or objections have been made by the owners of less than of the area of the property to be assessed for said work as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No. FURTHER RESOLVED that each and all of the said protests or o · ections be and they hereby are overruled and denied. Said motion was duly sec nded by Director ~4 ~ and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors Director A~ J the offered and moved the adoption of I I i I I ! l I I I ! I I RESOLUTION ORDERING WORK NO. in the matter of the constructio1 l -2- I I .---~ ·- , 1 ~r . ! " l :I 4 5 6 7 :,aj ~I I 10 11 12 13 1 141 I I I 151 I 161 171 181 191 20 1 211 22 23 241 I 251 I I ?6! 271 1 I 281 29! ' I '..!' 30 i I I :;111 32! I' LAW OP'P'ICE& OP' ! I RIMEL. HARVEY 8c i I HELSING !I FOURTH FLOOR 11 1010 NORTH MAIN &To • SANTA ANA. ll !I CA&.ll"ORNIA 9270J ! I of ·sanitary sewers and appurt~ri~nces and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," which motion was seconded by Director ~~ u and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: \ ) AYES: Directors ~ NOES: :Oirectors ~ ~ ABSENT: ;f)irectors ~ I { f .:' I t I -3- l i I l I I ·I I I ! FORM 21• ATLAS STATIONERS\L A -Jf f M.EMO ·RANDUM TO ___ _ DATE - FROM .A SUBJECT ______________ _ > ~ /J.D. ~ _47?aq ~ ~~?4,r . ORAL messages waste your time and the time of the other person; they often cause annoying interruptions and are apt to be misunderstood or forgotten. Put it in writing. JACK J. RIMEL JOHN A. HARVEY, Ill DUFFERN H. HELSING :RICHARD N. RIMEL GEORGE G. LOGAN LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL, H A RVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1 010 NORTH MAIN STREET SANTA .ANA, CALIFORNIA 9 2701 April 20, 1966 Fred A. Harper, Secretary County Sanitation District No . 7 P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 927 0 8 D ear Mr. Harper: Re ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 547-7395 MADISON 5 -7 579 We e n close h erewith the follo w ing for you r use at you r meeting n ext Tuesday, April 26th, when the h earing on t h e Reso- lution of Int ention is held in the above matter : (1) Form of minutes . (2 ) Resolution Ordering Work. After the hearing, if you will furnish us with a conformed copy of the resol ution ord ering work, a n estimated amount of incidentals to date (including acquisition cost), and a date for the opening of bids, we will then complete and send you a notice inviting bids to be posted. We w ill have it published. jc encl cc : Boyle & Lowry-Eng. Yours very truly, C . THUR NISSON and J ACK 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 2 MINUTES FOR HEARING ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7 3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 4 5, I 61 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 221 23 24 25 26 27 28 ".-! 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY Be HELSING FOURTH FLOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALll"ORNIA 92701 II April 26, 1966 7:00 o'clock p. m. The Secretary reported that this was the time and place fixed for the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District, as described in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 as described in said resolution. The Secretary also reported that affidavits in support of the publication of the Resolution of Intention, the mailing of printed notices of the adoption of said resolution, and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as required by law, had been made and are on file in the office of the Secretary. The Chair- man then inquired of the Secretary if any written protests or objections against the work or the District had been filed with him in said matter. The Secretary reported that written protests had been filed with him prior to the ------ time set for the hearing by the following: The Chairman then announced that this was the time and place set for the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, each as set forth in the Resolution of Intention hereinbefore mentioned, and asked if anyone present desired to be heard in said matter. -1- l The Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assessment 2 District and being familiar with the Assessment District and there being no pro- 3 tests filed, Director ________ presented tl~e following resolution and 4 51 6, 7! I 8 9 10 I ll 12 13 14 moved its adoption: WHEREAS, it appearing that no protests, either written or oral, protesting against the doing of the work and improvement described in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, or against the Assessment District therein described, have been filed; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors having considered the area of the District represented; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of Directors that it does hereby find and determine that no protests or objections have been made by any owners of the area of the property to be assessed for said work and improvement, as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said resolution be approved and the proceedings be approved. Said motion was seconded by Director and carried by ------- 15 the following roll call vote: 16 17 18 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Directors - Directors - Directors - Director then offered and moved the adoption of Reso--------------- 19 lution Ordering Work No. , in the matter of the construction of sani------ tary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in County Sanitation District No. 7, which motion was seconded by Director ---- , and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: ----- 23 AYES: NOES: 24 ABSENT: Directors - Directors - Directors - 25 Director _________ then offered and moved the adoption of 26 Resolution No. _____ , ascertaining and determining the prevailing rate of 27 wages to be paid for the public work described in Resolution of Intention No. 28 66-19-7, for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in 29 "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," which motion was seconded by Director 30 and carried by the following roll call vote: 31 "32 AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Directors - Directors - Directors - ___ , LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. -2- CAa.u·un1w .. 1>a701 (IF NO PROTESTS) --- l 2 3 41 sl sl I 7' 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 24 25 26 27 . 28 ~ 29 30 31 ·32 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. --~ .- After all protests and objections had been made, it was moved by Director and seconded by Director and unanimous! --------------------------- carried by the roll call vote of all Board members present, that all protests be referred to the Engineer of Work for checking and report as to the percentag of the area represented thereby. (And that this hearing be continued until , 1966, at o'clock p. m., for the purpose of receiving the ------------------ report of the Engineer of Work and for further action in the matter.) (The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, as described in said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 was continued for the purpose of hearing the report of the Engineer of Work as to percentage of protests, and for further action.) The Engineer of Work reported that the protests represented less than % of the total area of the assessment district. All protestants having been heard and an opportunity having been give to all persons desiring to be heard, and a full, fair and impartial hearing having been granted, the Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assess- ment District and being familiar with the assessment dis~rict and also having considered all protests filed,, and having considered the matter as to the area of property represented by said protestants,, Director presented -----------....: the following resolution and moved its adoption: WHEREAS, certain protests have been filed by ---------- and others,, protesting against the doing of the work ---------- and improvement described in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, or against the Assessment District therein described; and WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has carefully considered all protests or objections and having considered the area of the District r~presented by said protests; . -.2- CAUf'ORNIA 927~1 ~ I_ (if there ARE nrotP~t~) 7· 6 7 11 a' I 91 10 I 11 I 12 13 14 NOW,, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of Directors that it does hereby find and determine that the said protests or objections have been made by the owners of less than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for said work and improvement, as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each and all of the said protests or objections be and they are hereby overruled and denied. Said motion was du~y seconded by Director and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Directors - Directors - Directors - 15 Director then offered and moved the adoption of ------------------------ 16 Resolution Ordering Work No. ,, in the matter of the construction of ---- 17 sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT 18 DISTRICT NO. 6,," which motion was seconded by Director ---------------------- 19 and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: 20 21 22 .23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' I RIMEL. HARVEY Be I HELSING I FOURTH FLOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. 1 SANTA ANA. 1' CALIFORNIA 92701 I AYES: NOES: ABSENT: Directors - Directors - Directors - -3- (if there ARE nrotests) l 2 3 4 5 i' \ '\ \ I I \ \ RESOLUTION NO. A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. 6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter ll mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District No. 7, to-wit: 14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 66-19 -7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Maz:ch, 1966. 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and·the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district 32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES 01' RIMEL. HARVEY 81 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN 8To SANTA ANA. CAl.lf'ORNIA 92.701 -1- 'wJ l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani- tation District No. 7, to-wit: The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu- tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the offices of the Secretary and·the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more. than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district "32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 81 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. -1- CALIP'~RN!A 9~701 l 2 3 4 51 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. 6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter ll mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements tO be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District ~o. 7, to-wit: 14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 ! of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary.public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district ~2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES 01' RIMEL. HARVEY 8c HELSING f'OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA. CALIP'ORNIA ea70I 1 2 3 4 5 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. 6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter 11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District No. 7, to-wit: 14 . The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district I "32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 81 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN BT. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 -1- \._/ i' l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,, CALIFORNIA,, pursuant to the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911,," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California,, does RESOLVE as follows: That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter mentioned to be done and,, therefore,, the said Board of Directors hereby orders the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani- tation District No. 7, to-wit: The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. For further particulars,, reference is hereby made to said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7,, and to the plans,, profiles and drawings on file in the offices of the Secretary and-the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,, and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work for said district,, and all of said plans, profiles,, drawings and specifications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors,, of more than local or ordinary public benefit,, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district °'22 I v For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES 01' RIMEL, HARVEY Be HELSING FOURTH FLOOR toro NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA, -CALIP'ORNIA 92701 "-" l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 q I ll I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: That the publ~c interest and convenience require the work hereinafter mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders the following work to be done and improvements fo be made in said County Sani- tation District No. 7, to-wit: The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 in said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board ~f Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district ~2 For the particular description of said district6 reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 8c HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN OT. -1-SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 ...._,; l 2 3 4 5j 6 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter 11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District No. 7, to-wit: 14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. . 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 I of Directors and on file.in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district 32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR SOJO NORTH MAIN BT. SANTA ANA. -1- CAUFORNIA 92701 ~- i' l 2 3 4 51 6 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 9 of the State of California, .does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter 11 I mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District No. 7, to-wit: 14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of March, 1966. 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 I of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by' the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district I S2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFP'ICES 01' RIMEL. HARVEY &I HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 \._! l 2 3 4 51 6 RESOLUTION NO. ------- A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES- CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7, IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT. THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the 8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code 7 NO. 9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows: 10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter 11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders 12 the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani- 13 tation District No. 7, to-wit: 14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all 15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 in said County Sanitation 16 District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu- 17 tion of Intention No. 6 6-19 -7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of 18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. 19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution 20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the 21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said. sanitation district, 22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board 23 I of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work 24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications 25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more 27 particular description of said work. 28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem- 29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said 30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said 31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district ~2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 8& HELSING f'OUATH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. -1-SANTA ANA. CALIP'ORNIA 92.701 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 1 2 13 14 1 5 16 17 18 1 9 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ·3 2 LAW OFFICES 01' RIM EL. HARVEY 81 H ELS ING P'OURTH FLOOR ,, Ii II 11 11 'I 11 I 1010 N O RTH MAIN ST, ii' SANTA ANA. CAi.ll'O RNIA 92701 \ \ \; \ ' \ Resolution of Intention No . 66 -19-7 . Said Board of Directors h as determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six p e r cent (6%) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9 ) years from the second day of January next succeeding the n ext September 1st following their date, will b e issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improveme nt Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of C alifornia, to represent each ass essment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at the expira - tion of t he last date fixed for p ayme nt of assessment in· t he notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors h as e l ected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) of the unmatured principal in accordan ce w i t h the provisions of Section 6464 of the Str eets and Highways Code of the St ate of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the L egisla ture of the St ate of California , designated the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code . All of t h e said work s h a ll be done unde r the dir ection of a nd to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials us ed shall comply with the specifications a nd be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Wor k. The Secretary of s a id County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, a nd the Secretary i s hereby directed to publish twic e in THE TUSTIN NEWS, a weekly n e wspa p er published and circulated in said county and district a nd h ereby designated by the said Board o f Directors for that purpose, a N otice inviting such proposa l s or bids for doing the said work and referring to specifications on file. ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this d ay of 1966. ATTEST: S'e cretary -2- ----------~--~~- Cha irman l 2 \_,,) 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ·32 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 81 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTA ANA, CAUP'ORNIA 92701 i' Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the mann·er provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and d~termined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the ''Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district,, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS; a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and ref erring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of -----------~---~---- Chairman s'e·cretary -2- l 2 \_,I 3 4 5 6 7 8 .9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL.. HARVEY & HELSING P'OURTH FLOOR t010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIP'ORNIA 92701 j' Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next su~ceeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caluornia, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caluornia. Said Board of Directors has elected and d~termined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911," being .Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specuications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered,, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and .hereby desigi;iated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and ref erring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of --~------~------- Chairman S'ecretary -2- l 2 \.,,! 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES Of' RIMEL.. HARVEY & HELSING l'OURTH FLOOR tOIO NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIJPORNIA 92701 .. 11 I 11 11 Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeecli~g the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 <?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall com~ly with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and referring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~----------- Chairman s'ecretary -2- l 2 \._I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 lO 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 S2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 8& HELSING P'OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CAL.IPORNIA 92701 11 'I I I 'I Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement .Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911,," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and .hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and ref erring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of --------------------- Chairman S'ecretary -2- l 2 \.._I 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEi.. HARVEY 81 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. : SANTAANA. I CAL.ll'ORNIA 92701 I II I 'I II Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 ?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and referring to sp·ecifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~----------~ Chairman S'ecretary -2- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 '..I 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES Of' RIMEL. HARVEY II HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN BT. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 11 I Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00} or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o} of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and ref erring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED# SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------------------- Chairman S'ecretary -2- l 2 ·~ 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL. HARVEY 81 HELSING P'OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIP'ORNIA 92701 II I Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond , bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6%) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 <?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall com~ly with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and referring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------------------- Chairman -2- l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL.. HARVEY a HELSING P'OURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. I -CA~~f!N_IA 92701 -I II I I I Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7. Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond 1 bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira- tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 3 90 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o) of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California. · All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code. All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work. The Sec.retary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS; a weekly newspaper published and circulated in said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said work and referring to specifications on file. 1966. ATTEST: ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~----------~ Chairman S'ecretary -2- 11 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ 29 30 31 32 LAW OP'P'ICS8 OP' RIMEL 8i HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I IAHTA AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI I ., •, t C ERTIFIC AT ION I I ·I I I I I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITi TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. _____ was duly adopted ~ta regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ------------------~ the following vote of the members of the Board: AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ----------------------------- ABSENT: Directors ------------------------------ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and --------------~ ------ , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ----------~ ----- resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. ------------------ Secretary , County Sanitation D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. County of Orange ) I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA------------------- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1966. ---- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ------__________ ___,; Secretary , County Samtation b1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County 2 3 I I ·i I I c ERTIFIC AT ION I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT i TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I 4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- ' 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. ·7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ~------------------------ 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors ------------------------- NOES: Directors --------------------------- ABSENT: Directors ~--------~------------------ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ----------------------------· , as Secretary , signed and approved the said -------------------------- resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. -------------------- Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OP'P'IC&lil OP' I RIMEL 8i HARVEY FOURTH P'LOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN 81'. I ~ ... AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA--------------------- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, .true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District . I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the I day of , 1966. ----------· I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ------------------ Secretary , County Samtat1on D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County I I 'i CER.TIFICATION I I I 2 3 4 I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANI'l;' Aj- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ~------------------~ 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors ~------------------------------ NOES: Directors ~------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors ~------------------------------ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and __________________ --.; ~~--~ , as Secretary , signed and approved the said --------------------· ~------- resolution on the day of , 196 6. --------------------~ Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 23 24 25 I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify! that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. ll passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27 day of , 1966. 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFP'ICE9 OP' ,, RIMEL lie HARVEY FOURTH P&.OOR I' 1010 NORTH MAIN &T. ! SANTA AHA. CA&.IP'ORNIAI I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------------· Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County l I I CERTIFICATION I I ·1 I I 2 3 I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANI~ Aj- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I 4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by ---------------------~ 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors ------------------------~------ NOES: Directors --------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors -------------------------------- and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ~-------------------..; -------- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said --------------------~--~ resolution on the day of , 1966. ----------------------· (Seal) Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 231 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OP'P'ICP OP' I RIMEL & HARVEY FOURTH l'LOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I ~A AHA. CALIFORNIA I I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA---------------------------- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District . I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1966. -------------------- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ____; Secretary , County Samtation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County l 2 3 4 CERTIFICATION I I ·1 I I I I,------------' Secretary ____ of COUNTY SANI'l;' Aj- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ------~-----------~ 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors ~------------------------ NOES: Directors -----------------~ ABSENT: Directors ---------------------- and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ----------------------- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said -------------------------~ resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. ------------------- (Seal) Secretary , County Samtahon District No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 23. 24 25 I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify! that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1' passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27 day of , 1966. 28 29 30 31 32 I.AW OP'P'ICESI OP' RIMEL 8c HARVEY FOURTH P'LOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I' ~NTA AHA. CALIFORNIA' IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------------· Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County l 2 3 4 C ERTIFIC AT ION I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT1 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify j that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ----------------~ 6 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors ----------------------------~ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and --------------- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ----------------~----- resolution on the day of , 1966. ----------------- (Seal) Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OP'P'IClt8 OP RIMEL & HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN UT. I lANTA AHA, CALIFORNIA' I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify! that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. I passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District I , I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1966. ------------------ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------- Secretary , County Samtat1on D1str1ct No. 1 of Oi:ange County 2 3 I I ·1 I CERTIFICATION I I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANir:J;' Al- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I 4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- ' 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by ~---------~-- 'l the following vote of th~ members of the Board: 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors -----~-~-------~- and I further certify that , as Chairman , and -------------- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ----------· ---- resolution on the day of , 1966. ------------- Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 23. 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFl'IClll:ll OIP I RIMEL 81 HARVEY FOURTH l'LOOR I' 1010 NORTH MAIN llT. I :IAHTA AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA---------------- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District . I No. 7 of Orange County at ~ regular meeting thereof held on the I day of , 1966. ------------· I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------- Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County I I I l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 24 25 26 27 28 ''--11 29 30 31 32 LAW OFl"IC:l£8 OP' RIMEL tis HARVEY FOURTH l"l.OOR I' 1010 HORTH MAIN &T. t iANTA AHA, CA&.ll'ORNIAI l I I ·I I ' CERTIFICATION 1 I I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT Aj- TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. do hereby certify I that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a I ------~- regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ~-------------------- the following vote of the members of the Board: AYES: Directors -------------------------------- NOES: Directors ---------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors --------------------------------~ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ___________________ ___,; ----~-- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ---------------------' -------- resolution on the day of , 196 6. ---------------------- Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. County of Orange ) I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA---------------------------~ TION DISTRICT NO. 7· OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District . I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the I ___ day of • 1966. I IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ___,; I ~~........----------r--"7"l'---..,-"T"W-_._..... ____ I Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct J No. 7 of Oz:ange County I l 2 3 CERTIFICATION I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT 1 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I 4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District 6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ~----~-----~----- 7 the following vote of the members of the Board: 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 AYES: Directors ~------------~---------------- NOES: Directors ~-------------------------------- and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ---------~----~ ----~ , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ---------------------.; ~------~ resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. -----------------· (Seal) Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct No. 7 of Orange County 20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. 21 County of Orange ) 22 I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA--------------------~----- 23 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify 24 that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. ~ 25 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District I 26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the 27 day of , 1966. 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICEll OP' RIMEL 8c HARVEY FOURTH J'L.OOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I IANTA ANA. CAL.IP'ORNIAl IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ___.; Secretary , County Sarutation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County 1 f I I I l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 ll 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ~ 29 30 31 32 LAW OF..-ICE8 OP' RIMEL Sc HARVEY FOURTH ..-1.00R 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. :i.ANTA AHA. CA&.IFORNIAI C ER.TIFIC AT ION I I ·i I I I I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT.Aj- TION DISTR.ICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify j that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a ----- regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by ~--------------~ the following vote of the members of the Board: AYES: Directors NOES: Directors -----~---------~----~-- ABSENT: Directors ------------------------~ and I further certify that , as Chairman , and -------------- , as Secretary , signed and approved the said ------------------- resolution on the day ~f , 19 6 6. ---------------- Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct (Seal) No. 7 of Orange County STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) ) ss. County of Orange ) I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-t TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify! I that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1' passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District . I No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the day of , 1966. ----------- IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ----------------- Secretary , County Samtation D1str1ct No. 7 of Oz:ange County