HomeMy WebLinkAbout1966-05BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
DISTRICT No. # l~
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Aven ue
Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708
II AGENDA
May 25th, 1966 -4:00 p.m.
( 1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment o Chairman pro tem, if necessary
(3) Report of the G~l Manager
(4) Report of the General Counsel
(5) Consideration of report of Boyle Engineering re~arding
possible realignment of the Alton Avenue Trunk {deferred h-t ~~
from the May 11th meeting). Copy of report in folders . Ji,,j dfJ ~
~,~-~
~ ... ~
C-111 ~ ~ •. 7'-... ~~"<.,.,. ,f _ I "l..
Other business and communications, if any
(7) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(6)
~~t~
:; ~-"'f 4-.1 ~ f:,,-.9'-~ ,._;(---
DISTRICT NO. 1
Harvey V"
Meyers~ 1;11""'
Miller ~
Allen ?"
McMichael
Mack
Hirstein
4:00 -May 25, 1966
-;...;-, 4:00 -May 25, 1966
~ DISTRICT NO. 1
Harvey Mc Michael
Meyers,, ___ _
Miller Mack
Allen Hirstein
\._)
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation D istricts
of Orange County, California
JO INT BOARDS
MAY 11th, 1966 -8:00 p .m.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
( 2) Rol l Call
\1'{3) Appointments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary
(4) ALL DISTRICTS
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fo untain Valley, Cal i f., 92708
AGENDA
Consideration of motion re: Receive and file minute
excerpts from meetings of t he various cities regarding
appointments of Directors and Al te r nates to th~ Districts'
Boards. See listing on page 11 F 11
-~ ~~
(5) ALL DISTRICTS S.!>. 64ir---S--._ )~
Introduction of Directors
(6) DISTRICT 1
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(7) DISTRICT 2
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(8) DISTRICT 3
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(9) DISTRICT 5
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(10 ) DISTRICT 6
Annual e l ection of Chairman of the Board
(11) DISTRICT 7
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(12) DISTRICT 8 I"
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(13) DISTRICT 11
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
(14) ALL DISTRICTS
Annual election of Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization
(15) ALL DISTR I CTS
Annual election of Vice Chairman of the Joint Administrative
Organization
(16) DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held April 6, 1966, and the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
{17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, and the adjourned
regular meeting thereof held April 26, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held January 12, 1966, as mailed
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager {Preliminary Budget Discussion)
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Counsel 'r/-..----..
ALL DISTRICTS '~-~ Consideration of resolution expressing appreciation ~f/Jl~8 ~
for the services of retiring Directors r·V' Q
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the
plans and specifications for Job No. P2-8-l, and authorizing
an addition of $4o6.21 to the contract with J. Putnam Henck,
Contractor. See page "G" ~~
ALL DISTRICTS 4
Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $30,000 .l ~--...
from the Effluent Chlorination Fund to the Odor Controlf\~
Account; and authorizing transfer of $30,000 from the .
Salary, Wages and Employee Benefits Account to the
Utilities Account.
ALL DISTRICTS V----
Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial ~vrr'°
Report submitted by Hanson & Peterson, Certified Public V
Accountants, for the period ending March 31, 1966
DISTRICT 8 ·
Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial _ ~
Report for the period ending December 31, 1965 ~
-2-
(31)
(32)
(33)
(34)
(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion to receive and file certification
of the General Manager that he has checked all bills _ M~
appearing on the agenda, found them in order, and that ~~j-,.._...
he recommends authorization for payment n~
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call
Operating Fund and Capital
books for signature of the
and authorizing payment of
"B" , and "C"
vote motion approving Joint
Outlay Revolving Fund warrant
Chairman of District No. 1,
claims listed on pages "A"
~ ALL DISTRICTS
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-56-1 re: Receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding
contract for Clarifier H, Job No. P2-12, to J. Putnam Henck
in the total amount of $247,518.00. See page "H 11
See page 11 I 11 for bid tabulation
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-57-1 re: Receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding
contract for Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section, Job No.
J-9. See page "J" . ~
DISTRICT l
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-58-1 re: Approving
plans and specifications for Jobs No. 1-6, 1-7 and 1-8; ~
and ordering them submitted to the City of Santa Ana t6
for construction in accordance with the agreement with --, -/J
the City dated November, 1965. See page "K" ~~
• DISTRICT 1 ~
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D" -J ()
~~ DISTRICT 5
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any \
-3-
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(52)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58)
(59)
(60)
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 8
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 8
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-59-11, awarding contract
for Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nichols Street Gravity
Sewer, Contract No. 11-10-1, to orange C~unty Pipeline ~
in the amount of $ 116,594.30 • Bid opening May 9)
See page "L" (See page "M" for tabulation) ~ -,&J;f
DISTRICT 11 ~ ~;;I-.
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "E"
DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment 'f ', l-1
DISTRICTS 2 AND 3
Report of the Special Committee on the request of the
City of Westminster Engineering Department
DISTRICTS 2 AND 3
Consideration of action on the request of the City of
Westminster, Engineering Department (C~py in folders)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "D"
DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion declaring public hearing open f'µ----~
on Engineer's Report submitted by J. R. Lester Boyle and
Sidney L. Lowry, dated April, 1966
DISTRICT 3 A ~~
Consideration of motion declaring public hearing closed (.;.,/~,-
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-60-3 re: Overruling ~~~
protests in connection with Engineer•s Report, and adoptingll ·
said report as made. See page "N" 5(~
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-61-3 re: Approving
specifications for Sewage Pumps, Shafting and Motors.for
Westside Pumping Station; and authorizing the Secretary
and engineers to receive and open bids for said equipment.
See page "O"
-4-
{61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file Assignment
of Funds from H. E. Johnson Construction Company to
The National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company,
relative to the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No.
3-10
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the
plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10, granting"2~~
an extension of time and authorizing a P.ayment to the "".;:;;-Ii--
Contractor of $5,070.00. See page "P' ,d~
Consideration of motion denying all claims not covered in ~~
the above change order. (~ -~
DISTRICT 3 ~~
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #4 to the
plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10 (adjustment,;.-~ ·
of quantities). See page "Q" ~~ ~
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-62-3 re: Accepting
Contract No. 3-10 as complete and authorizing execution ":.::> ~
and recordation of a Notice of Completion of Work. See z;;>~ -
page "R" ~ ~~
(65) DISTRICT 3
(66)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any. See
page "D"
DISTRICT 3 A A
Other business and communications, if any ~.
(67) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ? '. '{ of~ ,
(68) DISTRICT 7
(69)
Consideration of letter from C. J. Segerstrom & Sons,
dated April 26, 1966, requesting construction of the
College Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer line extension to
Huntzinger Avenue (Copy in folders)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of letter from F. B. Mears, M.D., and " roSi>~ , ).. ~ verbal report of the engineers. {Copy of letter in folders)
(70)
(71)
(72)
"' °3f ) I(,
)
7•
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of letter from the Tustin Elementary School
District requesting reduction of the direct sewer connection
charges for the Loma Vista School and Red Hill School. •
(Copy of letter in folders) ~ ~
DISTRICT 7 /J (,,l'
Report of the engineers and staff re: Acquisition of /vvl
facilities and capacity rights in sewers owned by the
City of Orange, required in conjunction with Assessment
District #6
DISTRICT 7
Report of the General Counsel re: County Sanitation District
No. 7 vs. City of Santa Ana, for acquisition of the City's
~ Tustin Avenue Sewer north of Seventeenth Street
7~
-5-
.o ,-: ~
v
'-:)
(73) DISTRICT 7
(74)
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
See page "E"
DISTRICT 7
Other business and communications, if any
(75) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 7:30 p.m.,
June 8th
) () ~. 3 ? OJ ""'
-6-
II
BOARDS OF DIR ECTORS
County Sanitat ion Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 ~ll is Avenue
Fo untain Va ll ey, Calif., 9 2708
JO INT BOARDS
AGENDA
MAY 11th, 1966 -8:00 p .m.
(1) Pledge of Al legiance
(2) Roll Call
(3 ) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
(4) ALL DISTRICTS
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15 )
(16)
Consideration of motion re : Receive and file minute
excerpts from meetings of the various cities regarding
appointments of Directors and Alternates to the Districts'
Boards . See listing on page 11 F 11
ALL DISTRICTS
Introduction of Directors
DISTRICT 1
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 2
Annual ele c tion of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 3
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 5
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 6
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 7
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 8
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 11
Annual election of Chairman of the Board
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual election of Chairman of the Joint
Organization
ALL DI STRICTS
/IJfa//(4 > h
)~ >~ #Jjjjf7
) l fo~¥ ~ ... :.~ . ._.. ~-
> ~F --~~~c~
"'>~~~-~~
,
>~-~~
t~~u
Administrative; ~'j)
~..v
Annual e l ection of Vice Cha i rman of t h e Joint
Organization
'~ Admin i strative ..::.:._/
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the
adjourned regular meeting held Ap ril 6, 1966, and the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
(17) D ISTR~T 2
Consid~ration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
(18) DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes o f the
regular eeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
(19) DISTRICT 5
Considerati0n of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meet ng held April 13, 1966, as mailed
(20) DISTRICT 6
Consideration 0f motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
(21) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
r egular meeting he\d April 13, 1966, and the adjourned
regular meeting thereof held April 26, 1 966 , as mailed
(22) DISTRICT 8
Consideration of mot ·on re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held January 12, 1 966, as mailed
(23) DISTRICT 11
(26)
(27)
(28)
(29)
(30)
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 13, 1966, as mailed
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairma ~
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager (Preliminary Budget Discussion)
ALL DISTRICTS !'
Report of the General ounsel ~
ALL DISTRICTS .
Consideration of resolution expressing ~preciation C,./\IM'-'.v)
for the services of retiring Directors A ~~ f'--f
I /...,-.or • I
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #1 to the
plans and specifications for Job No. P2-8-l, and authorizing f{\
an addition of $4o6.21 to the contract with J . Putnam Henck,
Contractor. See page 11 G11
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion authorizing transfer of $30,000 \ I
from the Effluent Ch t orination Fund to the Odor Control I"\ S t...
Account; and authori ~ing transfer of $30,000 from the
Salary, Wages and Em loyee Benefits Account to the
Utilities Account.
ALL DISTRICTS \ ) Cons ideration of moti p n to receive and file Financial fV\ f> c._
Report submitted by Hi~son & Peterson, Certified Public '''
Accountants, for the p_\iod ending March 31, 1966
Consideration of motion to receive and file Financial c__ DISTRICT 8 I I
Report for the period ding December 31, 1965 ('(\ 5
-2-
(31)
(32)
ALL DISTRICTS \ \ \ Consideration of motio~to receive and file certifi cation 5 ~
of the General Manager ~~~t he has checked all bills \'(\
appearing on the agenda ,.'.\_O und them in order, and that
he re commends authorizatio ~or payment
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call v te motion approving Joint f
Operating Fund and Capital Ou lay Revolving Fund warrant ~ C-
books for signature of the Chairman of District No . 1,
and authorizing payment of claims listed on pages "A"
"B" , and II c"
(3 LL DISTRICTS I
;13~ A O"fo-ih5e 5 ~siness and communic ~· ons, if any
0
/c
(37)
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of Resolution No . 66-56-1 re: Receive and f(\ '.5 C,.
file bid tabulation and re ~ommendation, and awarding ·
contract for Clarifier H, Job No. P2-12, to J. Putnam Henck
in the total amount of $24'7,518.oo. See page "H"
See page "I" for bid t abulation
D~~~:t~~r!tion of Resolution No. 66-57-1 re: Receive and ~~f,}
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding 1, 1 l
contract for Ocean Outfal l No. 2, Land Section, Job No.
J-9. See page "J" ~ t0"'""--~v1'n~ ..... /,.~ ,,,,J,.,,Ld~~r
DISTRICT 1 ""{f' --.
plans and specifications for Jobs No. 1-6 , 1-7 and 1-; Yi! ~
and ordering them subm"tted to the City of Santa Ana 1·1
for construction in ac ordance with the agreement with
the City dated November, 1965. See page "K"
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page 11 D"
See ~1~1C, DISTRICT 1
(38) DISTRICT 1
-f) ~ > ~ r-._ !.JJl/\,' -tR. rvi ,<'1 C) ~ ·J I/ I ' ( (i ¥--' f>'Y~ I
(39) DIST ICT 1 I . . ~
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ~/';-?~ ? ) U\. lf} N
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
(44)
DISTRICT 5
~:2"1 frn . V
Consideration of motion approving warrants, if any.
page "D"
~. ~ ous ine Q.§_.ana-cc;;; uni c t~gn s-,-rrany--
DISTRICT 5 I J
See 0)sj~
Consideration of moti n re: Adjournment fri /Sf<:---
DISTRICT 6 ~y Consideration of on approving warrants, if any. f'vl .5 ~
See page "E"
-3-
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
(49)
(50)
(51)
(53)
(54)
(55)
(56)
(57)
(58 )
(59)
(60)
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 8
D~~~~i~~r~tion of motion re Adjournment m).s/ (_ q :11-fl"
DISTRICT 11 A
Consideration of Resolution No. 66 -59 -llJ awarding contract ~ ~vi
for Slater Avenue Gravity r,ewer and Nichol s Street Gravi ty ''I L-
SewerJ Contract No. 11-lO!lJ to orange C~unty Pipe l ine ·
in the amo unt of $ 116 ,59~.30 . Bid opening May 9)
See page "L" (See p 'ge
11
M
11
for tabulation) See l>JM
DISTRICT 11 J
Consideration of motio approving wa rrantsJ if any.
page uE" I
DISTRICT 1
~siness d co unLc.a..thms, if any
DISTR I CT 11 J I I /
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment IYl.(5 ( C CJ,~¥~
DISTRICTS 2 AND 3
Report of the Special Committee on the requej7t of the ;-/
City of Westminster Engineering Departm ent ;"~ --p-/ '<f::;?J ~
DISTRICTS 2
Cons i d tion of action( o the request of the c· o
We inster, Engineering epartment (c~ fo l ders~
DISTRICT 2 ( ~
Consideration of motio approving warrantsJ if any.Jui,;~
See page 11 D11
'" ~j ~
DISTRICT
~us ines Fri."'C:---a'."Cicme' . if any
e: Adjournment I?) /5 / <!_
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion declaring pub l ic hearing open p
on Engineer 's Report subm~tted by J. ~·,Lester Boyle and N) ~
Sidney L. Lowry, dated Ap il, 1960 ~ ~ / / ~ / ~
DISTRICT 3 }
Consideration of motion d e laring public hearing closed /fl/S~c_
DISTRICT 3 I Consideration of Resolution No . 66-60-3 re: Overruling )
protests in connection with Engineer's Report, and adopting rY\ S c_
said report as made. See p ge 11 N11
DI STRICT 3
Consideration of Resolution
specifications for Sewage
Westside Pumping Station; a
and engineers to r ec eive an
See page 11 0 11
-4-
mps, Shafting and Motors for No. 66 -6 1-3 re: Approving /~
d authorizing the Secre tary (V\ Sc_,
open bids for said equipment .
~61)
(62)
(63)
(64)
(65)
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to ~eceive and file Assignment
of Funds from H. E. Johnsonf Construction Company to
The National Automobile a~d Casualty Insurance Company,
relative to the Miller-r der Trunk Sewer, Contract No .
3-10
I DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion approving Change Order #3 to the fo(c
plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10, granting /YI '£ C.....
an extension of time antl authorizing a riayment to the
Contractor of $5,070.00. See page "P'
Consideration of motion denying all claims not covered in {f\/$/c_
the above change order, { 1'
DISTRICT 3 //)
Consideration of motion ~pproving Change Order #4 to the vYIF, ~
plans and specifications for Cont ract No . 3-10 (adjustment
of quantities). See pa "Q"
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of Resoluti on No . 66-62-3 re : Accepting I I
Contract No. 3-10 as com~let e and authorizing executi on M .S C
and recordation of a Not ce of Co mpletion of Work . See
page "R"
DISTRICT 3 I /.
Consideration of motion proving warrants, if any. See ffl 5
page "D"
s;-rr any
of Adjournment
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of letter f 9m C. J. Segerstrom & Sons,~ ~
dated April 26, 1966, req esting construction of the . v ,.,Jri~~
College Avenue Sub-Trunk ~we r line extension to l)_,<,,v -!-,
Huntzinger Av;lJ.lC~py · folders) ':J-11 rf {_2-1 ~. t.-f:.-:-;;;;;.tl· 4') IL;
DISTRICT 7 , ., ~~+i.n 'r· ~ ~ /' _,f..t.,. . ~ t/1"'
Consideration of letter fr m F . B. Mears, M.D., and ~ 6_!_..,, 1 verbal report of the engin ers. :C~py of le~~.:J folders)
1
DISTRICT 7 · ~
Consideration of letter fro the Tustin Elementary School
District requesting reducti n of the direct sewer connecti on
charges for the Loma Vista ool and Red Hill School. /
111
Ir//'
(Copy of letter in folders) \ C , '1J
1
~ ____-o ( ':>/ L-
DISTRICT 7
Report of the engineers and s aff re: Acquisition of
f~cilities and capacity rig t in sewers owned by the
City of Orange, required in onjunction with As sessment
District #6 co.)_... !J'f!t' .I I' ,.,; ~ J_ .. ~/ I I
i1 r (72) ISTRICT 7 r ~ d-if ~
JI '-' Report of the General Counsel re: County Sanitation District ..__,1~1 ?---' No. 7 vs . City of Santa Ana, f r acquisition of the Cityts
~ Tustin Ave n ue Sewer north of Se enteenth J treet , r ,1\\~ll--/<-f <r, ycrc:-&>
L if v ~ ~ ~,,_;L; ,( l -5-?" b v U 7 / ~ (J
J~-
(73) DISTRICT 7 ~ ) 0~ Consideration of mo ion approving warrants, if any . yY) 5J <...-
See page 11 E 11
(74) DISTRICT 7 __
;H--~1+!'-7~~-ness ~)nd c' ~~) DISTRICT 7 ~__t:3-
-C""onsideration of moti
June 8th JD r' .J f f Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., M ~/c
unications, if any
I
__ ,;'A J __ /~~A:;~~ ~ If \ ;
7{17 ~f'A;~ ~ fh/si~
\._
-6-
PRELIMINARY INFORMATION ON 1966-67
JOINT CAPITAL OUTLAY AND JOINT
OPERATING BUDGETS
Introduction
May 6, 1966
The following information is supplementary to the attached
print·ed information on our budget procedures and is intended to
give the Directors a preliminary idea of what the staff's thinking
and recommendations on budgets f'or the coming fiscal year are at
this time. By submitting this information to the Directors at the
May meeting, there will be approximately a one month period for
review and suggestions to the Executive Committee or staff prior to
final adoption of our Joint Capital Outlay and Operating Budgets
at the June meeting. In this connection., it is suggested that those·
Directors who are serving for the first time at the May meeting
carefully review the attached printed material concurrently with
the following information. The older Directors will possibly also
find a brief perusal of the printed material helpful in connection
with the following.
Joint Capital Out~ay Budget
(Joint Works Requirements)
Our planned Joint Works expansion program f~r 1966-67 will
follow closely plans made and adopted by the Directors approximate~y
five years ago. This pla.nning included an accelerated plant con-
struction program to meet the Districts' increasing wast.e wa.ter
flows through the 1969-70 fiscal year. The plans also contemplated
continuing to 'raise necessary plant expansion funds through ad
valorem taxes in a manner which would allow tax rates to remain
essentially constant through 1970, i.e. the level of expenditures
tor this purpose would progressively increase with increased
ass·es,sed valuation.
It should be pointed out also in connection with ~advance
planning that at the end of the next fiscal year our present ma·ster'
plan, evolved from a report of our consulting engin.eers,, John A.
Carollo, adopted in 1962, will soon require a formal extension,
presumably for another five year period. Consequently, we are
· planning to recommend to the Boards in the next few month~ that a
new formal engineering report for the ensuing five year period be
authorized.
Our program, after July, 1967, will consequently be based .on
this n~w report, when approved, although obviously our thinking at
the present time must extend into this new five ~ear period as will
be apparent l~t.er. Our proposed program for 1966-67, the last year
covered by our present formal plan, will include projects under
study and planned for several years and will be based, as customary,
on five criteria of priority: (1) Necessary structures and equip-
ment for hydraulic capacity (in other words to enable us to treat
and dispose of the incre_asing flows at the present level of treat~
ment) {2) Necessary structures and ·equipment for improvement or·
treatment' (3) Necessary Capital Outlay for odor control (4) Neces---
-sary• Capital .outlay for increasing efficiency and reducing operating
c.o.sts and (5} Outlay necessary for :lmprovttig; treatmen!b plant -
appearance.
Fortunately, -some of our outlays for pJa~t expansion meet as
many as four of the above criteria. Naturally, those expenditures
which have such a. multiple purpose receive priority in our planning.
For the coming fiscal year all of the projects being planned wi11
meet one or more of criteria 1, 3, 4, and-5 with emphasis being
placed, this year, on odor control and improvements of treatment
plant appearance, particularly when these improvements ean be related
t·o an increase in hydraulic capacity. Table I., attached, sets forth
our present tentative list of 1966-67 construction projects plus-
smns for land purchase, professionai services and a l~rge reserve
for Ocean Outf.all No. 2 construction, beginning in.1961~68. It will
be noted that this reserve sum will have reached almost $5 million
by the end of the next fiscal year which, together with funds to -be
raised in the following fiscal year, shoql.d be adequate to construct
the marine section o:f' our new ocean outfall to a <iistance of better
than 10,000 feet. Past and present flow projections indicate that
this outfall should be in service by the summer of 1970. Accordingly,
we ~:re happy to announcethat the financial picture will, barring
unforeseen c~rcumstances, allow it to be constructed and-in service
by that time. We also hope that upon its completion, our expendi-
ture for chlQrtne (see discussion of Joint Operating Budget, below)
can be sharply reduced. ·
It will also be noted that in spite --of the impressive list of
pr __ oJect·s·and the sharp increase in reserve funQ._s (from $2.7-mi-llion
to $4.9 million) the net amount to be raised by taxes proposed for
the coming fiscal year will be only $45,000 (1.14;) more than the
corresponding sum in the current fiscal ye_ar. With nom$1 expected
increases in assessed valuation in all of the Districts, the tax
rate levied for plant expansion and improvements shouid therefore
be significantly less than this year. -
As stat.ed in the accompanying _printed material, these projects
will be carefully reviewed with the Executive ·Committee in meetings
during May. However, we will be prepared at the May 11 Board meet-ing
to discuss any or all of these improvements and expenditures if so
desired. It should be remembered also that the attached list of
projects and eJq>enditures is tentative at this time and is subject
to a change in recommendation by the staff and, of course, by action
of the -Executive Committee and Joint.Boards. Relating any of the
individual projects to the criteria enumerated is necessarily a
matter-of going into consid~rable detail and would disproportionately
lengthen this preliminary report. Accordingly, the staff would
p~efer to-discuss these details verball~ with the individual
Dire~tors, the Executive Connnittee and the Joint Boards as a whole.
-2-
Joint Operating Budget
Review of 1965-66 Joint Operating Costs
Our.total budgeted joint-operating expense for the current
year is $1:._459,627 for the treatment and disposal of an estimated
total of .36,975 million gallons. (114,ooo acre feet) of waste water.
The gallonage charge (see.attached printed material) was estimated
at $38.65 per million gallons. This budget figure would have
_resulted in an average district-wide. tax rate of 7. 3¢ per _$100
assessed valuation if there had not .been a substantial carry over
from the previ~us year. As it was, the actual average tax rate was
approximately 6.0¢ for joint operating expense. · .
Actual expenditures from our Joint Operating Fund tor the
first nine months of this year ·indicate that total annual cost will
be approximately $1,310,000 with a projected total waste water flow
of 36,800 million gallons. Allowing for cre.dit :for misJ:ellaneous -
revenue of approximately $40,000, the net gallonage charge will be
in the order of $34.50 per million gallons. These figures indicate
that the~e will again be a substantial surplus remaining in the
Fund on July l to apply to next year's buqget. These surpluses
occur mainly because our ex.penditures for effluent disinfection
chemicals (chlorine) are budgeted on the basis of adverse ocean
conditions upon which we are largely at the mercy of' the elements
and.which, to a large extent, determine the amount of chlorine
which must be applied to our effluent. Fortunately, by very careful
control and some measure of luck, we have been able to minimize the
amount of chlQrine necessary to meet public health requirements and
thus carry over a surplus each year.
The total flow estimated for the current fiscal year-is nine
percent above 196f-61'~ which is about the average annual rate of
increase-for the past several years. This increase in flow follows
ve~y closely the population increase in the County with the per
capita contribution remaining nearly constant at about 95 gallons
. per day. Except for the Phoenix area, it is doubtful whether .any
metropolitan sewerage system has ever been called on before to
handle such a sustained increase in flow. ..i'hat the Distripts 1 _
system has been able to do so without major difficulty and burden-
some cost is a credit to our Directors, past-and present, and to
our staff.
Of the above estimated 1966-67 joint operating cost of
$1,,310,.00,0, approximately 47% or $615,000 will go for salar;l.es and
employee benefits for an average of 109 employees. Another major
item of expense is the purchase of materials, supplies and-services
{exclusive o:r chlorine) • Thes.e pure. base. s will amount to n.early
$200,000 with most of them being made in the local-market. Procure-
ment of chlorine {which, unfortunately, it is necessary to have
shipped from Los Angeles) an_d odor control chemicals will amount to
about $285,000 or nearly 22% of our total operating expenditures.
This cost is -.largely unavoidable with our present plants and outfall
-3-
\,:~
·''
since it is necessary for the protection of public health and the
avoidance o:f nuisance to our neighbors. With completion.in 1969 or
1970 of our second marine outfall (see preceding discussion of our
Joint Capital· Outlay Budget) we hope to effect a sharp reduction in
this expense.
In the regular Manager's Agenda Report, included herewith, it
will be noted that there is a recommended action for transferring
additional funds to our operating sub-account for odor control
chemicals. We have (or will have by the end of the year) over
expended in this category because our original estimate was too low
by a considerable margin. The reasons for this low estimate, as well
as in the purchased utilities sub-account., are explained in the
Agenda Report.
Anticipated 1966-67 Operating Costs
I. Over-all Outlook
In view of the recent decrease in immigration to Orange
County of new permanent population, the general outlook at
the present time is for a corresponding decline in the
previously des~ribed annual increase in our rate of flow.
Forecasting of this type, however, is extremely hazardous
since changes in the economy can occur practically overnight.
Nevertheless a forecast must be made which will be reasonably
valid over the next fourteen months and we are therefor assum-
ing that the 1966-67 flow will be approximately 5% over
1965-66. .
Over the past several years, our unit cost (gallonage
charge) for treating and disposing of sewage and industrial
waste has been relatively constant with inflationary trends,
salary increases, etc., essentially being offset by increased
efficiency as our operation grows larger. We hope to continue
to maintain in the future a similar basically constant unit
cost and in order to do so for next year, we are tentatively
setting a target of no more than a 5% increase in our Joint
Operating Budget for 1966-67.
II. Areas of Increases in Costs
A. Additional Positions
At the present time, we have a total of 100 authorized
operational personnel positions and fifteen administrative
positions {District No. 7 personnel not included). Even
with the increased mechanization we are utilizing, the
growing complexity of our treatment plant and pumping
station operations will require some additional personnel
as the flows increase. We are, at the time of this
I -4-
writing, in a series of discussions with our supervisors
~s to ways and means of holding.down our personnel require-
ments for the coming year. However, the outlook at the
present time is that our recommendation to the Executive
Committee and Joint Boards will be for the establishment
of a maximum of four new operational positions, mainly
in the skilled labor category (mechanics, laboratory
personnel, etc.). In addition, because of the recent
shift in management, we will obviously need at least one
new office position in the accounting category. Firm
recommendations as to additional positions will be
f~nalized in the next two weeks and will be presented to
the Executive Committee for revj.ew, along with other
budget recommendations, as soon as possible thereafter.
B. Salary Increases
As all.the Directors ere aware, for tpe past
several years every public agency, including our own, has
anriually·adjusted salaries upward, usually in a blanket
fashion. Recent information indicates that most public
agencies will follow this pattern again during the next
fiscal year. It has also been our custom to hold off
actual determination of salary increases until later in
the fiscal year in order that the Directors, most of whom
are faced with the same problem in their own communities,
can make an equitable determination as far as our
employees are concerned. In other words, we have usually
been followers instead of leaders in this area. Assuming
that this same pattern will prevail again and that over-
all increases will approximate 3%, we expect to recommend
to the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards that a
reserve amount sufficient to cover this incrase from the
date it is granted until the end of the fiscal year be
included in the Joint Operating Budget.
In addition to the salary adjustments discussed
above, there will be minor increases in our salary and
wage figure fo~ periodic merit increases to those
employees so entitled under our step plan.
C. Standby Pay and Overtime Pay
At the present time we do not, as most utilities do,
provide additional compensation for those employees
required or expected to be available during off hours
for emergency work. Since there is now very little
incentive for an employee to so make himself available,
our supervisors are finding it an increasing problem to
obtain adequate employee coverage during emergencies.
We therefor expect to propose that a limited number of
men be placed on standby status and that they be compen-
sated for the inconvenience and disr~ption of their
-5-
·..,_,.1
family life for being on call. The final details of this
recommendation have not yet been worked out but, as
visualized, its cost will be very minor and will result
in the benefit of increased employee morale. It will also
postpone the time when we will be obliged to have mainte-
nance mechanics on duty at night and weekends.
Our present regulations also provide for a 10%
limitation on overtime pay for any. employee. Any overtime
performed over 10~ must be taken off in compensatory time.
This limitation is awkward but workable most of the time.
However, during vacation periods, times of frequent
emergencies and unusual absenteeism because of illness,
it becomes a severe handicap. Rather than remove the
limits on cash overtime completely-, however, we anticipate
recommending that it be limited to 24 hours per month or
approximately 15%. The question of overtime pay is
always a problem and in common with all organizations
we have kept, and will continue to attempt to keep it to
a minimum consistent with performing our primary function
of protecting the public health. As is obvious, the only
other alternative to overtime pay is an increase in the
number of personnel which we believe is a less efficient
answer to manpower requirements than a limited overtime
policy.
D. Supplies, Utilities, etc.
With the flow increase anticipated, it is apparent
that we will be faced with increases in purchase of
supplies in general, chlorine and odor control chemicals
and increased costs for utilities. Careful study of our
current expenditures in these cat.egories will lJlldoubtedly
disclose some areas of expenditures where increases will
not be necessary or appropriate and our final
recommendations to the Executive Committee and Joint
Boards will reflect the results of this study.
-6-
BUDGET PROCEDURES
INTRODUCTION
This section is intended as a general summary of the Sanitation Districts' budget procedures
and has been prepared primarily for new Directors being called upon at the June meeting of each
year to pass on budget matters for the ensuing fiscal year. It should also be of value to others who
may be interested in or concerned with our fiscal procedures.
The County Auditor-Controller, who is ex-officio Auditor of each District, requires that our
official District budgets and those of other special districts be submitted in the latter part of July
at the latest. This does not allow postponing final passage of our budgets past the regular July Joint
meeting since the Directors ordinarily do not meet but once a month, on the second Wednesday.
These requirements necessitate final action on our budgets earlier than in the case of the various
cities, whose procedures the Directors are usually more familiar with than ours.
It is hoped that the following outline will clarify our procedures and will assist new Directors
in understanding budget material which is submitted at the June meeting. It also should be useful as
a review for the older Directors.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT'S BUDGETS
As stated above, these budgets must be finally passed upon in early July. They are actually our
only official budgets, as far as the Auditor is concerned, and serve as a basis for establishing the
tax rate for each District, which varies from year to year depending on each individual District's
total requirements and assessed valuation.
The individual District's budgets are composed of a minimum of three separate funds and as many
as eight. These separate funds reflect the various classifications of expenditures of the individual Dis-
tricts and always include (1) BOND INTEREST AND REDEMPTION FUND, (2) OPERATING
FUND and (3) ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND. Some Districts may have more than
one bond fund for different bond issues and may also have other fixed obligation funds. The expendi-
tures out of the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds are, of course, fixed and thus are not subject to
Board of Directors control and, therefore, will not be discussed further in this report.
The balance of this report will instead be focused on controllable expenditures. It should be
emphasized, particularly for new Directors, that these controllable expenditures are carefully reviewed
by the Executive Committee of the Directors, as described in more detail below, before submission
to the Boards as a whole.
OPERATING AND ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS
In contrast to the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds, expenditures in the Operating and Ac-
cumulated Capital Outlay classifications are controllable and the decisions, which to a large measure
affect these expenditures, are reached at the June meeting of each year.
The reason decisions must be reached at the June meeting is that prior to the adoption of the
formal District's budgets in July, firm figures must be approved for operation and capital outlay for
the Joint Treatment Works. These latter expenditures comprise a large portion of the formal Dis-
trict's budgets and, as stated above, are controllable.
The seven Sanitation Districts, which jointly own and operate the treatment and disposal facilities,
are required by the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958 to contribute
to the operation of the Joint Works and to the construction of new works or the expansion of old
works by formulas set forth in this Agreement. Consequently, it is necessary to arrive at a total
figure for both operating expense and construction expense for all the Districts involved in the
Joint Works in order that this formula may be applied to determine the contribution of each District
to this total which contribution is then fed into the official individual District's budgets.
-1-
Procedures for developing and adopting the total projected operating and construction expendi-
tures for the Joint Works are explained below under these respective captions.
JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
All but a small portion of this expense is raised by ad valorem tax in the individual Districts.
The total requirements for each fiscal year, together with the breakdown of the individual items of
expenditures and the individual District's contribution to the total, are submitted to the Directors for
approval at the June meeting. This budget is prepared during May.
As is the case with all public agencies, a large proportion of our operating expense is for salaries
and wages-approximately 50%. However, this includes considerable labor not chargeable to joint
operations. In addition to operation and maintenance of the Joint Treatment Works, our staff is
responsible for operation and maintenance of the individual District's trunk sewers and pumping
plants as well as incidental construction work in the Districts and at the plants. In effect then, we
operate a service organization supplying labor and services to the individual Districts (including
Sewer Maintenance Districts) as well as the Joint Works. For convenience this labor, not charge-
able to joint operations, is included with our Joint Operating Budget and charged out as needed
during the year.
In the preparation of the total figure for joint operating expense, the staff, as is true in any bud-
get, must estimate expenditures in the various classifications for next year and, in addition, must
estimate the sewage ftow to be expected from each District during the coming year.
The necessity of the latter estimate is the provision in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Con-
struction Agreement that each District is required to contribute to the total joint operating expense
in proportion to its sewage flow. Since the latter, of course, will not be known exactly until 13
months later, it must be estimated ahead of time in order that sufficient funds will be included in
the individual District's budgets to provide for the eventual individual contributions. Therefore, the
total of estimated joint operating expense is divided by the estimated total of all flow reaching the
treatment plants to arrive at an estimated cost of treating and disposing of a unit quantity of sew-
age. This unit cost (in our case, dollars per one million gallons) which we refer to as "Gallonage
Charge" is then multiplied by the estimated sewage flow of each District in million gallons to arirve
at the total expected District's contribution in dollars to joint operating expenses.
Budget review of our joint operating expense by the Executive Committee of the Directors is
provided for in our regulations. This Committee is composed of the Chairman of each individual
District and will meet between the May and June regular Board meetings to review the staff's recom-
mendations as to operating expenses prior to submission to all Directors prior to the June meeting.
The figures thus distributed to the Joint Boards in June will have been reviewed by the Executive
Committee and any changes in the staff's recommendations desired by the Committee will be incor-
porated in the figures submitted to the Joint Boards.
Since the sewage ftow and the assessed valuation of each District will vary, the tax rate neces-
sary for raising funds for JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE will correspondingly vary from District
to District but, usually, it is in the neighborhood of $0.07 per $100 assessed valuation.
JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION EXPENSE
The other major classification of significant District expense is for contribution to the Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund, which we refer to as CO RF, from which the necessary joint construction
work is provided to keep abreast of the tremendous growth in population in the Districts. Over the
past few years, this type of expense for all seven Districts has been in the neighborhood of $3.5 million
per year, necessitating a tax rate in the neighborhood of $0.24 per $100 assessed valuation which, again,
is an average figure depending on the individual District's needs and ability as explained below.
Initial capital outlay funds for treatment plants and ocean outfall were provided by the individual
Districts by means of a bond issue passed in 1948. This issue, in all Districts,· totalled approximately
$8.3 million of which only a portion was for plant and outfall construction, the rest being for work
inside the individual Districts. The construction work provided by this bond issue was completed in
-2-
u
1954 and only two years later it became obvious that the explosive growth of the population in the
Districts would soon require additional construction. At that time a firm policy was adopted by all
Districts that in the forseeable future all joint construction work would be paid for out of ad valorem
taxes on a step by step, long-range construction plan. In 1962 such a plan was formally approved by
the Boards, setting forth needed construction in detaU for five years and guidelines through 1976.
This plan provides for a gradually accelerating construction program for a number of years until the
Districts reach their ultimate growth or until other methods of financing are arrived at by the
Directors. This program correlates increasing expenditiires ·with growth of assessed valuation, so
that a rather stable tax rate for each year for joint construction can be anticipated. As mentioned pre-
viously, this rate is in the neighborhood of $0~24. ·This program is working out very satisfactorily
and, in our opinion, should be continued.
The 1962 plan adopted contemplates a major expense in the neighborhood of 1970 for the construc-
tion of a new ocean outfall, which will be necessary because our existing 78-inch diameter outfall will,
by then, have reached its maximum hydraulic capacity. Consequently in addition to the normal con-
struction expense for expansion of Joint Treatment Works, a reserve for meeting this large item of
expense was also approved by the Directors in 1962. Funds to augment this reserve will be recom-
mended to be included in the next fiscal year's budget.
In contrast to pro-rating operating expense among the Districts in accordance with current sew-
age flow as explained above, contributions of the individual Districts to joint construction and reserve
funds are computed on a different basis, which is also set forth in the 1958 Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement. Prior to the time this agreement was adopted, each District owned a
fixed capacity in one or both of the existing treatment plants and outfall and contributed to con-
struction expense on the basis of this capacity. Owing to a number of reasons, this method of con-
tribution by the Districts proved to be so complicated as to be practically unworkable and resulted in
the renting of capacity by those Districts which had an unused capacity to those Districts not owning
enough capacity. Also complicating the picture, the fixed capacity method was extremely difficult to
apply to new units of treatment works which, ordinarily, have a different capacity than other related
units.
For these reasons the above agreement provides for a simpler and more equitable basis of contri-
bution and employs what we term the "Use and Needs" method. The individual District's annual con-
tribution is obtained by averaging the average assessed valuation for the three most recent years and
likewise averaging the annual District's sewage flow contribution for the past three years and ap-
plying these averages to the total Districts' average flow and assessed valuation to arrive at a percent-
age figure which each District should own in all treatment and disposal works at both plants. This
percentage so calculated is called the "equity percentage'' and, as can be seen, takes into account use
(sewage flow) and needs (assessed value). It is used to compute the contribution for each fiscal year
of each District to joint construction expense as well as the credit or debit adjustment of each District
for existing plant.
Prior to arriving at the above percentage of each District's contribution and credit or debit, the
staff and our design engineers estimate the construction needs for the next fiscal year for plant expan-
sion purposes as well as the above-described reserve fund. The percentage contribution of each District
is then estimated on the basis of metered flow from each District for the past ten months period
together with a firm figure for the two years preceding and the firm figure for the three years past
assessed valuation. This percentage for each District is then applied to the total construction and re-
serve needs to arrive at a figure which, when approved, is placed in the individual District's budgets.
This budget, although fairly definitely established by the 1962 long-range plan, is also subject to
review by the Executive Committee at the same time as the joint operating budget as explained
above. Figures for joint construction and reserve expenses for the next fiscal year, as reviewed and
recommended by the Executive Committe, are submitted to the individual District's Directors for
study prior to the June regular Board meeting.
IN-DISTRICT EXPENSE
Most of the foregoing has been a discussion of the Districts' expenditures as related to the jointly
owned treatment works. However, as mentioned previously, each District has controllable expense for
-3-
operation and maintenance within the District, as well as necessary capital outlay. Consequently in
each District's official budget, the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds must provide for
In-District expense, unique to the individual District.
Therefore, after the Joint Works requirements for operation and construction have been determined
and fixed at the June meeting, the staff estimates the In-District expense for each District and includes
this in the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds for each District. The sum of these two
controllable items, i.e., joint expense and In-District expense constitutes the requirements for each
District plus the fixed expenditures (Bond Interest and Retirement, etc.). Unexpended funds from the
previous year in each category are used to reduce the requirement figures-the difference represent-
ing the amount to be raised by taxes for each fund.
Prior to mailing the complete budget recommendations for each District to each Director early
in July, the figures are gone over in detail with the individual Board Chairman and with any other
Director wishing an early review.
--1-
u
\.
JOINT WORKS REQUIREMENTS (Preliminary)
1966-67
Regular Construction (1962 Engineer's Report)
(1) Headworks 11 c11 at Plant No. 2
(P2-ll)
(2) Additional Pre-chlorination
Facilities at Plant No. 1 (Pl-14)
(3) Ellis Avenue Improvements (Pl-12)
(4) Additions to Administrative Office
Building (J-7-1)
(5) Replacement of Interplant Gas
Transmission Line (I-4-4)
(6) Site Improvements and Enclosures
at Plant No. 2 {P2-8-2)
(7) Miscellaneous Smell Contracts
and Force Account
Subtotal
Reserve for Future Ocean Outfall
Land Purchase
20 acres adjacent to Plant No. 1
Professional Services
{l)
(2)
Planning and Design Engineering on
1967-68 construction
Legal and Survey Services
$1.,650.,ooo(a)
270,000
100,000
95,ooo(a)
185,000
195,000
1222000
TOTAL REQUIREMENTS
Unpaid or Encumbered from 1965-66
May 11, 1966
$2,620,ooo(b)
4,900,000
440,ooo(a)
300,000
20,000
$8,280,000
128302000
Cash Requirements for 1966-67 10.,110,000
Less: Balance available from 1965-66 6 2 120,oooCc)
TOTAL TO BE RAISED BY TAXES $3,990,000(d)
·-~ NOTES:
(a}
{b)
(c)
Rebudgeted from 1965-66
Includes engineering not heretofore paid
Includes $2.7 million reserve heretofore
accumulated
(d) For comparison, amount raised in 1965-66 $3,945,000
0m•d 00:9 -996! 'tt A"ew:
flNI~~!!IW HO~ S~N:BWHOVili~V CTNV SNOiilifl~OS:?rd
WARRANT NO.
4413
4414
4415
4416
4417
4418
4419
4420
4421
4422
4423·
4424
4425
4426
4427
4428
4429
4430
4431
4432
4433
4434
4435
4436
4437
4438
4439
4440
4441
4442
4443
4444
4445
4446
4447
4448
4449
4450
4451
4452
4453
4454
4455
4456
4457
4458
4459
4460
4461
4462
4463
4464
4465
4466
4467
4468
4469
4470
4471
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
A-1 Tool Rebuilders Inc., Power Tools ~ 236.25
A Door Window & Screen Co., Screen Door 28.50
Acore Drilling Service 75.00
Advance Electric, Electrical Supplies 110.29
Jan Alabaster, Employee Mileage 16.oo
Aladdin Litho & Art, Forms 12.32
All Bearing Service, Inc., Pump Parts 163.05
Almquist Tool & Equip. Co., Parts for Power Tools 20.77
Alpine Aromatics, Inc., Odor Control Chem. 555.98
American Compressor Cb., Comp. Parts 72.80
American Institute of Chemical Engrs., Manuals 39.80
American Lock & Supply Co., Padlocks 85.61
City of Anaheim, Power 26.98
Anaheim Builders Supply, Inc., Blasting Sand 174.72
Anaheim Truck & Transfer Co., Freight 12.88
Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets, Pump Parts 483.60
Arcade Stationers, Forms 1.77
Arrowhead Puritas Waters, Bottled Water for Lab. 109.61
Astra Glas Inc., Fabricate Chlorination Manifold 692.85
Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 105.67
Bank of America, Bond and Coup. Coll. Expense 145.23
Barnes Delaney Tires 118.27
Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Bearings t Belts 167.23
Beach Fabricating Co., Welding Services 8.50
Beckman Instruments Inc., Instrumentation 100.11
Bell Pipe & Supply Co., Pump Parts 32.24
Benz Engineering Inc., Gaskets 109.86
Blake, Moffitt & Towne Paper, Janitor Supplies 21.88
Blower Paper Co., Janitor Supplies 32.01
Blystone Equipment Co., Repair Power Tool 105.18
The Davis Brown Co., Office Supplies 10.57
Brulin & Co., Inc., Solvents & Cleaners 232.17
Charles Bruning Co., Drafting & Rep. Supplies 476.15
Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies 49.45
Business Equipment Co., Reproduction Supplies 42.30
Cal-Pac Chemicals Co., Inc., Pump Parts 50.66
Cal-State Seal Co., Engine Parts 58.92
Paul Calvo, Surveyor 644.50
Certified Building Materials Co., Cement 33.15
William N. Clarke, CWPCA Conference 124.20
College Lumber Co., Inc., Hdwr, Lumber, Rock 272.47
Consolidated Electric Dists., Electric Supplies 211.47
Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Truck Parts 168.56
Costa Mesa Co. Water Dist., Water 4.40
Crane Packing Co., Crane Parts 60.94
Customline, Inc., Gate Gear 83.71
Daniels Tire Service, Repairs, Tires 213.14
DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Auto Interior Repairs 30.64
DeZurik Corp., Line Plugs 149.56
John M. Deck, Co., Rewind Starters 6.19
A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies 74.57
T. A. Dunn, CWPCA Conference 60.86
E. & F. Vacuum Pump Repair Service, Blower Repair 137.37
Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Elect. Supplies 981.91
Electrophysics Corp., Instrumentation Repairs 37.05
Empire Insurance Co., Insurance 22.70
Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Research & Monitoring 1,025.00
Enterprise Electric Supply Co., Supplies 13.27
Filter Supply & Serv. Co., 011 Filters 55.03
~-
WARRANT NO.
4472
4473
4474
4475
4476
4477
4478
4479
4480
4481
4482
4483
4484
4485
4486
4487
4488
4489
4490
4491
4492
4493
4494
4495
4496
4497
4498
4499
4500
4501
4502
4503
4504
4505
4506
4507
4508
4509
4510
4511
4512
4513
4514
4515
4516
4517
4518
4519
4520
4521
4522
4523
4524
4525
4526
4527
4528
4529
4530
4531
4532
4533
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation
Flair Drafting Service
$ 1,341.83
413.88
The Foxboro Co., Charts
Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Engine Repairs
R. N. Galloway, Misc. Expense, CWPCA Conf.
General Electric Supply Co., Controls
General Telephone Co.
Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware
Gough Industries Inc., Electric Supplies
Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Tools
George T. Hall Co., Controls
Harbor Clinic, Pre-employment Physical Exams.
Hercules Engine & Parts Co., Engine Parts
Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation
Howard Supply Co., Hardware, Valves, Tools
City of Huntington Beach, Water
Huntington Beach Blueprint, Blueprints
International Harvester Co., Truck Repa~rs
Jensen Instrument Co., Controls
Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine
Jordana Air Supplies, Inc., Air Comp. Parts
Charles W. Justice, CWPCA Conference
21.00
67.80
85.14
274.56
988.20
94.99
1,697.50
66.46
232.38
55.00
58.21
390.00
371.32
7.30
4.68
47.01
349 .17
27,372.80
32.44
Kelco Sales & Engineering Co., Sandblasting Mach.
Kelly Pipe Co., Pipe Fittings
83.30
401.96
252.80
66.51
355.75
684.95
380.25
124.00
Knox Industrial Supplies, Small Hardware
LBWS, Inc., Welding Supp., Hdwr., Tools
L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental
Robert E. Lenihan Co., Grouting
R. W. McClellan & Sons, Equipment Rental
Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work
Miller, Nissen & Kogler, Pipe Anti-Trust Suit
Morrison Co., Pipe Packing
382.62
1,567.90
11.16
22.50
120.60
Municipal Finance Officers Assoc., Conf. Reg.
Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Welding Supplies
Nelson-Dunn, Inc., Tools 48.66
7.80
86.64
67.37
Parts 10.60
O. c. Suppliers, Inc., Gasket Material
Oakite Products, Inc., Cleaning Solvent
City of Orange, water
Orange County Farm Supply Co., Sprinklers &
Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc.
Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies
Pacific Telephone
Elmer L. Parker, CWPCA Conference
Paul-Munroe Hydraulics, Inc., Fittings
Roy Pendergraft, CWPCA Conference
Postmaster, Postage
REA Express, Freight
294.86
9.61
149.00
68.14
103.01.
66.84
200.00
44.23
Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electronic Tubes
Red's Frame, Wheel & Brake Service, Truck Repairs
Resinwood Mfg. Co., Digester Dome Repair
82.85
28.92
692.25
143.05
16.07
75.48
78.27
32.30
16.65
60.21
Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Repairs
Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Blueprints
Santa Ana Electric Motors, Motors
E. H. Sargent & Co., Lab Supplies
Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage
Sears, Roebuck & Co., Repair Film Editor
The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies
A. H. Shipkey, Inc., Tires
John Sigler, Employee Mileage
Signal Oil Co., Gasoline
Lee Smith Insurance & Co., Empl. Blanket Bond
Snow Gates & Valves, Inc., Hydrant Valve
-B-
73.37
29.60
791.39
92.00
87.99
WARRANT NO.
4534
4535
4536
4537
4538
4539
4540
4541
4542
4543
4544
4545
4546
4547
4548
4549
4550
4551
4552
4553
. 4554
4555
4556
4557
4558
4559
4560
4561
4562
4563
4564
4565
4566
4567
4568
4569
4570
4571
IN FAVOR OF
Southern California Edison Co.,
Southern California Water Co.
Southern Counties Gas Co.
Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies
Speed-E-Auto Parts, Parts, Batteries
Stake & Bldg. Supplies Co., Survey Stakes
Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Gasoline, 011,
Stonehouse Signs, Inc., Signs
T & H Equipment Co., Inc., Truck Parts
Tardif Sheet Metal, ToGl Boxes for Trucks
Tell Steel, Inc., Steel Stock
C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil
Tony's Building Materials, Blasting Sand
Norm R. Tremblay, CWPCA Conference
J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Equipment
Tustin Water Works, Water for Dist. :/f7
Utilities Supply Co., Tools, Hardware
Valvate Associates, Valves.
John R. Waples, Odor Consultant
Guy L. Warden & Sons, Boiler Parts
AMOUNT
$ 8,692.68
3.90
933.99
10.62
60.43
12.o6
Grease 303.29
27.66
53.77
224.54
101.41
120.54
37.71
138.85
44.93
250.00
69.04
84.24
218.00
Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing
Warnock-Bancroft Equipment Co., Truck Parts
Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts, Repairs
Welch's Coastal Concrete Co., Concrete
24.47
70.78
16.22
128.43
24.21
81.04
140.03
782.80
85.24
John V. A. Williams, CWPCA Conference w. D. Wilson Co., Fittings
Wimberly's Petroleum Dists., Diesel Fuel
Winter & Co., Photo Supplies & Finishing
John M. Wright; CWPCA Conference
George Yardley Company, Controls, Valves
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Aladdin Lithe & Art
American Compressor Co.
John Carollo Engineers
Freedom Newspapers, Inc.
J. Putnam Henck, A Corp.
Schurr & Finlay, Inc.
Twining Labs
Wallace Trade Bindery Co.
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
-c-
76.78
489.69
$ 64,386.35
160.22
55,689 ._92
2,867.39
74.47
11,059.30
5,018.48
105.50
149. 76
$ 75,125.04
$ 139, 511.39
DISTRICT NO . 1
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARR ANTS
WARRANT NO . ~N FAVOR OF AMOUNT
4572 ~ ngineering $ 5,737 .50
DISTRIC T NO . 2
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARi~ANTS
IN FAVOR OF
4573 J . R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lo wry $ 596.50
4574 A & p Pipeline , Inc . 22 ,828.86
$ 23,425 .36
DI STRIC T NO . 3
ACCUMULA TED h APITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
I I N FAVOR OF
4575 J . R. 1ester Boyle & Si dney L . Lowry $ 3,554.00
4576 The Br a Progress 16 .13
4577 Natio al Auto & Casual ty Insurance Co .
nee of H.E . Johnson Const. Co . 7,921.00
$ 11, 1.J-91. 13
DISTRICT NO . 5
4578 City of $ 72 .00
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL
I N FAVOR 0
45~9 James I. Gallacher $ 34,328.17
45 0 The I rvine Company 30,666 .44
4581 Simpson & Stevlingson 751 .40
4582 Small Craft, Inc. 90 .00
$ 65,836 .01
$ 65,908 .01
-D-
WARRANT NO.
4583
4584
4585
4586
4587
4588
4589
4590
4591
4592
4593
4594
DISTRlCT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
I N FA OR OF
Boyle & Lowry
AD No.
6
Plan Check &
Inspection
Amount
$ 4,677,98
\ 288 .00
I
$l j,965 . 98
Southern Californ a Edison Company
Title Insurance & Trust Company (A D#6)
The Tustin News (A 6)
FACILITIES REVOLVIN FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR 0
Boyle & Lowry
The Tustin News
Wallace Trade Binde
William Weinzierl
DI STRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
INlF AVOR OF
Huntingt n Beach News
Lowry & Associates
Orange County Pi peline, Inc.
Walla e Trade Bindery Co .
-E-
$
AMOUN T
310 .53
10 .00
71.24
1,243.15
44.17
20.52
50.00
$ 1,357 .84
$ 16,715.59
$ 34 .65
2,815 .00
14,223.47
20 .52
$ 17,093 .64
CITY
Anaheim
Buena Park
Brea
Cypress
Fountain Valley
MAYOR
Fred T. Krein
Jesse M. Davis
Robert A. Clark
Frank P. Noe
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Fullerton Glen G. Walters
La Habra Leonard Crapo
La Palma Peter Bouma
Los Alamitos William S. Brown
Huntington Beach Jake R. Stewart
Jake R. Stewart
(Council Member)
Newport Beach
(Council Member)
Orange
Placentia
Seal Beach
Stanton
Tustin
Santa Ana
Villa Park
/~~
Ted Bartlett
Paul J. Gruber
Lindsley Parsons
Jack c. Hileman
Victor Michel
John Nescher
Harry L. Miller
Gerald Mack
Harry Harvey
James Workman w/Yh.-m~
SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER
FILED
In the Office of the S~cretary N~ounty M~t1on District
!MAY 1/,1966
~---=$;_"".u.11_.../IA~k~-,,,. ·~' . .. .. ALTERNATE DISTRICT
A. J. Schutte 2,3
Harold Bousman 3
Thomas Speer 2,3
Richard Bowen 3
Jim Kanno 2
Donald Fregeau 3
Burton Herbst 2,3
Dean Shull 2~3
Paul Furman 3
Charles Long 3
Alvin Coen 11
Jack Green 3
None 11
Al Forgit 5,6,7
None 5
Rex A. Parks 2,7
James Hock 2
None appointed 3
Frank Kohl 3
Clifton Miller 1,7
'Ihomas McMichael 1,2,3,7
None appointed 2
g>
DISTRICT
Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers
Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver
1,6,7
2,3
;t:;Ylt~~~~lr;~
COUNTY AREAS MEMBER ALTERNATE
Chairman of Board
of Supervisors
Alton E. Allen
-F-
Supv. Wm. Hirstein
3 g
DISTRICT
All
COUNl'Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COtml'Y
P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO. __ l ___ _
CONTRACTOR: J. Pu.tnam Henck DATE: May 11, 1966
En:Closures -outfall Booster No. 1, Switching Center,
JOB: Service Center Job No. P2-8-l .
Amount of this change order (ADD) (~) $ 406.21
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's letters dated December 29, 1965 and
April 20, 1966
ADD
1. The contractor shall revise the ceram~c tile
detail as indicated on sheet 15 of 41
2. The contractor shall z·emove a concrete block
obstruction in the new tunnel under Clarifiers
A, B & C as directed and dispose of the broken
concrete off the plant site.
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD
$ 66.21
340.00
$ 406.21
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes
$ 301.203.00
None
This Change (ADD)(lll:RI~) 406.21
Amended Contract Price $ 307,609.21
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 11, 1966
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer
J. PUTNAM HENCK
By------------~--~~-----------
... Q-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-56-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA., AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
CUiRIFIER n H11
, J'OB NO. P2-12, TO J. PUTNAM
BENCK, A CORPORATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' engineers, and
concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made
to J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATION, Contractor, for CIARIFIER "H",
JOB NO. P2-12, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said
work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Job No. P2-12 is hereby
awarded to J. PUTNAM HENCK, A CORPORATION, in the total amount of
$247,518.oo, in accordance with the terms of their bid and the
prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the
lowest and best bid received therefor; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu-
tion No. 66-27 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks
"-1 submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
-H-
Engineer's Est. $328,ooo.
BID TABULATION SHEET
"-' Contract: CLARIFIER 11 H11
, Job No. P2-12
CONTRACTOR
1. J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation
374 W. 40th St.
San Bernardino, California
2. Kemper Construction Co. &
W. W. Hoagland (a Joint-Venture)
3254 Cherry Avenue
Long Beach, California
3. Weardco Construction Corp.
P. O. Box 2458
Santa Fe Springs, California
4. R. E. Ziebarth and S. B. Alper
21205 Bolsa Street
Torrance, California
5. Lemar Corporation
700 Fifth Street
Huntington Beach, California
6. Cardiff Construction Corp.
P. o. Box 5436
Riverside, California
7. Ecco Contractors Inc.
7931 Lampson Avenue
Garden Grove, California
Date May 4, 1966
CLARIFIER "H 11 GRAVEL FILL
Lump Sum Price Add or Deduct
$247,518.00
$279,170.00
$306,417.00
$312,800.00
$321,861.00
$338,,685.00
$339,735.00
$ 7.00
$ 6.50
$ 6.oo
$ 6.oo
$ 3.50
Add -$6.50/T
Deduct -4.50/T
$ 4.50
8. Willson-Hutcheson, General Contractors
7810 4th Place
Downey, California $385,872.00 $ 4.50
9. W. A. Nesbitt
2250 California Avenue
Long Beach 6, California
-I-
$393,400.00 $ 5.60
RESOLUTION NO. 66 -57 -1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. J -9
A RESOLU TION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DI STR I CT NO . 1 , OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CAL I FORNIA, AWARD I NG CONTRACT FOR
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -IAND SEC TI ON, JOB
NO . J -9
~he Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendat i on this day sub -
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Distr i cts ' engineers, and
concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made
to 7~~~ , Contractor, for OC FAN OUT -
FALL NO. 2 -IAND SECTION, JOB NO . J -9, and the tabulation of bids
and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered
filed; and,
Secti~_:fJ~t said contract for Job No . J-9 is hereby
awarded to ~ ~/71~ , in the total amount
of $ 4 ~ rr-l-~ in accordance with the terms of their bid and
the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be
the lowest and best bid received therefor; and,
Section 3 . That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are here by authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Reso l u -
tion No . 66-28 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4 . That a ll other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cas hier 's checks
submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders .
-J-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-58-1
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOBS
1-6, 1-7 and 1-8
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOBS NOS. 1-6,
1-7, and 1-8
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the plans and specifications this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle Engineering, District's
Engineers, for the Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 1-6;
the Broadway Trunk Sewer and the Main Street Trunk Sewer, Contract
No. 1-7; and the 17th Street and Washington Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 1-8, be approved, received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the plans and specifications for said
Jobs Nos. 1-6, 1-7, and 1-8, are hereby ordered transmitted
to the City of Santa Ana for construction, in accordance with the
certain agreement between the District and the City dated November,
-K-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-59-11
AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-JO-l
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANI'rATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
THE SLATER AV&,-ruE GRAVITY SEWER AND NICHOLS
STREET GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, and
concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made
to ORANGE COUNTY PIP~LINEA INC. , Contractor, for con-
struction of the SLATER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND NICHOLS STREET
GRAVITY SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1, and the proposal submitted
for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Contract No. 11-10-1 be
awarded to ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. , Contractor, in the
total amount of ~ in accordance with the terms of
their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby de-
termined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and,
Seci!£rl-.l:.. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci-
fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution
No. 66-39-11 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4, That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's
checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bid-
d ers.
(Engineer's Est. $158,240.)
BID TABULATION SHEET
Date May 9 2 1966
Contract: SIATER AVE. GRAVITY SEWER and NICHOLS STREET GRAVITY
SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 11-10-1
Contractor Total Bid
1. Orange County Pipeline, Inc.
1506 N. Clinton $116,594.30
Santa Ana, California
2. Edmond J. Vadnais, Gen. Contr.
P. O. Box 68 $137,252.00
Etiwanda, California
3. Far Western Pipeline, Inc.
6611 Fee Ana $143,650.44
Anaheim, California
4. Wal-Con Construction Co.
14044 Ventura Blvd. $154,260.00
Sherman Oaks, California
5. William R. Shriver, Jr.
P. O. Box 1258 $166,525.00
Costa Mesa, California
6. Lomar Corporation
700 Fifth Street $176,215.15
Huntington Beach, California
7. Bachan Brothers Construction Co.
2520 Berkeley Avenue $176,924.oo
Los Angeles, California
8. R. M. Vukanovich Constr. Co.
732 So. Garfield $191,906.30
Alhambra, California
9. Charles T. Brown Co.
P. O. Box 311 $219,565.25
1955 Glenoaks Blvd.
San Fernando, California
-M-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-60-3
OVERRULING PROTESTS TO ENGINEER'S REPORT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING ALL PROTESTS
AND OBJECTIONS MADE OR FILED IN CONNECTION
WITH THE REPORT OF J. R. LESTER BOYLE AND
SIDNEY L. LOWRY, CONSULTING ENGINEERS; AND
APPROVING AND ADOPTING SAID REPORT AS MADE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. This being the time and place set by the
Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange
County, California, for the hearing on any objections to the report
of J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, Consulting Engineers,
Sanitation Engineers for said District dated April, 1966, or to
doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report, pur-
suant to legal notices of said hearing published for the time and
in the manner prescribed by law, the matter was called up.
Section 2. There were verbal protests or objections ---
made by those present at the hearing.
Section 3. The Secretary reported that there had been
____ written protests filed in the office of the Secretary of the
Board.
Section 4. All protests and objections, both oral and
written, made or filed in connection with the report of J. R.
Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, Consulting Engineers, dated April,
1966, filed with this Board on April 13, 1966, be and the same are
hereby overruled and denied, and said report is hereby adopted as
made.
-N-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-61-3
APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS
FOR SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND MOTORS -WEST-
SIDE PUMPING STATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed specifications this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney
L. Lowry, District's engineers, for SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND
MOTORS -WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION, are hereby approved, adopted and
ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said equipment in the manner prescribed
by. law; and,
Section 3. That bids for SEWAGE PUMPS, SHAFTING AND MOTORS-
WESTSIDE PUMPING STATION, will be received in the office of the
Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m., June 1, 1966, at which
time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board and the Dis-
trict's engineers be authorized to receive and open bids for said
equipment on behalf of the Board of Directors.
-0-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
Co 0. NO ._---:3=:;.,-... __ _
CONTRACTOR: H. E. Johnson Const. Co.1 Inc. DATE: May 11) 1966
JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10
Amount of this change order (ADD) (mEEHE~) $ 5,070.00
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are heregy authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's invoices as listed on attachment and
Engineer's report dated May 2, 1966
Contractor's
Invoice No.
454
450
449
447
452
.451
453
Extra Work Item Invoiced
Expose MWD water line at direction of
Engineer to determine exact elevation
and for error in grade stakes at bore pit
Delay caused by encountering three
unknown oil lines at Sta. 1286+25
Delay caused by encountering unknown
lines at Sta. 1285+75
Delay caused by encountering unknown
pipes at Stations 1302+25, 1311+4o
and 1316+
Delay caused by sewer line being
encased and not so shown at Sta. 1339+60
Delay caused by setting elevation of
manhole at Sta. 1338+20.37
Delay caused by 10" line at bottom of
trench at Sta. 1339+60
Add
$
423.20
257.89
-o-
774.72
288.25
-0-
-o-
(continued on next page)
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD
This Change {ADD){EE~)
Amended Contract Price
Board authorization date: Approved:
5,070.00
$ 271,,209.25
May 11, 1966
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer
H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO.
By ____ ~--~------------~----
-P-
Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 C. O. No. 3
Contractor's
Invoice No. Extra Work Item Invoiced Add
448 Removal of 400 feet of 18" thick sub-
surface asphalt paving not shown
beginning at Sta. 1340+25 $1,637.03
455 Extra work in bore pit crossing
Imperial Highway -o-
435 Extra work for cutting metal casing
around 8" sewer line not shown at
Sta. 1345+32.22 34.67
436 Removal of concrete paving not shown
at Sta. 1346+20 135.02
429 Delay caused by encountering two pipeline
culverts at lower elevation than shown
on plans at siphon constructed under
Change Order No. 2 at Sta. 1289+61.68 231.22
430 Extra work in maintaining 21 feet of
open trench at said siphon location -0-
445 Claim for delay caused by restriction in
working hours imposed by State Division
of Highways during period October 28, 1965
through December 19, 1965 -o-
Construct 4" house connection for Standard
Oil Service Station SE corner of Beach
Boulevard and Imperial Highway 150.00
Construct 6" building connection for
Standard Oil Company Research Building.
164 L.F. of 6" VCP at $7. 00/LF 1, 148. 00
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $5,070.00
* * * * * * * * * * * *
EXTENSION OF TIME:
An extension of time of 16 days is hereby granted in accordance
with Section 5-10 of the Specifications because of the additional
work described under the above allowed claims.
Original specified completion date: March 14, 1966
Completion date with Change Orders
14, 1966 Nos. 1 and 2 April
Completion date with this extension
of time (16 days) April 30, 1966
Actual completion date April 30, 1966
-P-2-
.
J. R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L, LOWRY
Consulting Engineers, A Joint Venture of
BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES
Mr. Fred A. Harper
General Manager and Secretary
County Sanitation District No. 3
of Orange County
P.O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California
Attention: Mr. Paul G. Brown
Assistant General Manager
Gentlemen:
412 South Lyon Street
P.O. Box 178
Santa Ana, Calif .4 92702
Telephone 5 7-4471
May 2, 1966
We have analy.zed the extra work presented by the contractor.
Our summary report is attached. The report covers the various
invoices which the contractor has sent to this office. We have had
several meetings with the contractor's representatives wherein
district personnel and Boyle Engineering personnel were present to
consider the claims. Also a meeting was held between ourselves
and the contractor to consider the same claims.
We feel for the most part the amounts requested by the
contractor are excessive and consequently a meeting of the minds
with the contractor has not been possible. Our analysis of the
recommended payment figures are based on the records kept by the
inspector of the project. The recommended payment figures reflect
what the records state from the standpoint of providing an equitable
payment for extra work in conformance with the plans and specifi-
cations.
Contractor's invoice 445 is also enclosed and has not been
acted upon by this office. This invoice pertains to the restricted
working day as imposed on the contractor by the State work permit
and as such does not reflect an extra in the sense of an unknown
utility. Conferences with the contractor by the staff and the
engineers have been held on this matter and no agreement has been
reached.
The house connection for the Standard Oil Service Station at
Imperial Highway and Beach Boulevard and the Standard Oil Research
Building 6-inch sewer lateral which are included in the summary
report have not been formally invoiced by the contractor. The
amounts as shown were agreed upon by the contractor, the district,
and engineer in our j.oint meeting on April 28, 1966.
P-3
-2-May 2, 1966
All of the inspection records are available for the district's
perusal. We are available at the district's conveninece to discuss
any and all claims.
CH/vld
cc: Sidney L. Lowry
41-8691-00-00
Very truly yours,
J. R. LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY
/s/ Conrad Hohener, Jr.
Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951
P-4
Contractor's
Invoice No.
454
450
449
447
Total Amount
of Claim
$ 895.33
1,031.55
773.59
2,062.96
)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3
of Orange County
MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10
Recommended
Payment
$ 423.20
257.89
774.72
EXTRA WORK
REMARKS
Contractor
11/2/65 contractor claims
error in grade stakes at
bore pit (Jack at
beginning of project)
4 hrs. delay claimed
because of encountering
3 unknown oil lines at
Station 1286+25
3 hrs. delay claimed for
unknown lines in trench
at Station 1285+75
2 hrs. delay claimed for
encountering unknown pipe
at Station 1302+25
3 hrs. delay claimed for
encountering unknown lines
at Station 1311+40
May 2, 1966
Engineer
Claim denied -contractor
made mistake of using cut
figures for west side of
bore on east side and east
figures on west side.
Allowed claim for exposing
MWD line.
4 hrs. denied, 1 hr.
allowed. Records show
delay in trenching opera-
tions very minimal. Lines
identified as dead
Standard Oil lines and
ripped out within 1 hr's.
time
Claim denied. Lines
referred to in the claim
are same lines as in
Claim 450. Lines lay
skewed across trench for
about 50 feet.
1 hr. allowed, Trencher
ripped pipe out. Delay
very minimal.
1 hr. allowed. Trencher
ripped pipe out. Delay
very minimal.
)
Contractor's
Invoice No.
447(Cont.)
452
451
453
448
455
Total Amount
of Claim
$
391.74
261.16
391.74
2,082.19
745.49
)
Recommended
Payment
$
288.25
REMARKS
Contractor
3 hrs. delay claimed due
to encountering 6 11 line
a"t Sta·cion 1316
Delay in trenching due to
sewer line being encased
3 hrs. claimed
Claim for delay in
setting manhole elevation
Claim 3 hr. delay due to
line in bottom of trench
Claim for encountering
18" of asphalt roadway
2' below ground surface
for distance of 400 feet
beginning at Station
1340+25
Claims for work in bore
pit to jack across
Imperial Highway
Page 2
Engineer
1 hr. allowed. Trencher
down 1 hr • only.
Deducted approximately
45 minutes from claim.
Remainder allowed.
Claim denied. State and
District inspector gave
manhole elevation to con-
tractor's foreman.
Believe foreman did not
know how to establish
manhole elevation in
practice.
Line below pipe, no con-
flict or delay. Claim
not allowed.
Claim allowed.
Adjustments made in number
of hours unit crane and
stamper worked.
None of these claims are
valid from standpoint of
extra work. Utility lines
referred to are shown on
plans and do not conflict
with sewer. It is con-
tractor' a responsibility
to provide suitable bore
pit for jacking operation.
)
Page 3
REMARKS
Contractor's Total Amount Recommended Contractor Engineer
Invoice No. of Claim Pa~ent
435 $ 34.67 $ 34.67 Claim for cutting metal Claim allowed.
casing around 8" sewer
line which had to be tied
into new trunk
436 212.30 125.02 Claim for encountering Amount of equipment and
underground concrete in number of men claimed on
roadbed at Station 1346+20 invoice does not agree
with inspection records.
Claim adjusted to reflect
actual men and equipment
used to remove concrete.
429 448.50 231.22 Claim for encountering Claim adjusted according
two standard oil pipe to inspector's records. t-
line culverts at lower I
elevation than shown p., on
plans
430 2,,208.90 Claim to maintain 21 feet Siphon installed in this
of open trench location due to utility
culverts in invoice 429.
Claim for maintenance of
trench not valid.
150.00 150.00 4" house connection for Price mutually agreed
Standard Oil Service upon
Station at SE corner Beach
Boulevard & Imperial Hwy.
1,,148.oo 1,148.oo 6" connection to Standard Price mutually s.greed
Oil Company Research upon. 164 1. f. @ $7. 00
Building
$ 12,838.12 $ 5,,070.00
) )
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO. 4 ------
CONTRACTOR: H. E. Johnson Const • Co. , Inc • DATE: May 11, 1966
JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10
Amount of this change order (Jlt)I)) (DEDUCT) $ 891.50
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's Report No. 6
ADJUSTMENT OF ENGINEER'S gUANTITIES
DEDUCT
Item Change Est' d. Quant.
No. Unit From To --
3 L.F. 2270 2246 24 L.F. @ $28/LF $ 672.00 6 V.F. 8.5 8.2 .3 V.F. @ l25/VF 37.50
7 V.F. 56 54.9 1.1 V.F. @ 60/VF 66.oo
14 C.Y. 10 0 10 C.Y. @ 30/CY 300.00
TOTAL DEDUCT $ 1,075.50
ADD -
8 V.F. 200 204.6 4.6 V.F. @ $40/VF 184.oo
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $ 891.50
Original Contract Price $ 263,119.50
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 8,089.75
This Change ~(DEDUCT) 891.50
Amended Contract Price $ 270,317.75
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 11, 1966
-Q-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer
H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC.
. .
RESOLUTION NO. 66-62-3
ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 3-10 AS COMPLETE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO.
3-10 AS COMPLETE
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the contractor, H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION
CO., INC., has completed the construction in accordance with the
terms of the contract for the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT
NO. 3-10, on the 30th day of April, 1966; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager of the District has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the construction of the MILLER-HOLDER
TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 14th
day of October, 1965; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work
therefor.
-R-
I' @ii
-.
ROLL CALL
District
------------~--~-Regular
-----~--~---------Adjourned -----------------
Time -------
Item
--------------------~
JOINT BOARDS
Amo
Bartlett
Bouma
Bowen
~Brown
Clark
Crapo
Culver
Davis
Forgit
Gruber
Harvey
Krein
Meyers
Michel
Miller, C.
Miller, H.
Nescher
Parks
Furman
Noe
Long
Speer
Shull
Bousman
Gruber
Forgit
M:.;Michael
Schutte
Hock
Mack
Kohl
Hileman
Parsons
Schwerdtfeger __ Kanno
Fregeau
Green
Coen
Herbst
Queyrel
Hirstein
Stewart
Walters
Workman
Allen
OTHERS:
Brown ---Nisson ---Galloway
Tremblay--
Lowry --
Carlson
Rimel --
Maddox ---
DISTRICT 8
Martin
~--Mitchell ---Allen
Lambourne
Hirstein
DISTRICT 1
Harvey ,,,,,., McMichael
i Meyers ""' Miller ~ Mack
Allen &;?' ' Hirstein
DISTRICT 2
Parks ,/ Hileman
~~ k ~ Speer
Crapo Shull
Culver .,.,.-
Harvey ~ McMichael
KF@~R o.,._ Schutte
~slid. ~ Hock
Schwerdtfeger Kanno
V"'"Walters
Workman
Allen
Amo
Bouma
_,...Bowen
Brown
, e1a1 tc=
Crapo
Culver
~919..s
Harvey
~ei'ft
Miller
v-
~
"1.....-
DISTRICT 3
~
7
r5'
Herbst
Hirstein
Furman
Noe
Long
Speer
Shull
............-Bousman
~ McMichael
9 .... Schutte
Kohl
,,,.,.---Gummer e ---Nescher
Schwerdtfeger
Stewart
Walters
~ Fregeau
Green
Herbst
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 5
Parsons 7
Gruber v Forgit
Allen ~ Hirstein
DISTRICT 6
Meyers ./'
Gruber .,......, Forgit
Allen C'-· Hirstein
DISTRICT 7
Miller ~ Mack
Forgit v Gruber
Harvey
""""
Mc Michael
Meyers v
Parks v Hileman
Allen ~ Hirstein
DISTRICT 11
Stewart ._......... Coen
"Bartlett ._/"
Allen ().:. Hirstein
(33-A)
(66-A)
(74-A)
(74-B)
ALL DISTRICTS
Supplemental Agenda
May 11th, 1966
Consideration of motion authorizing acceptance of a
permit from Orange County Flood Control District
relative to construction of Job No. J-9 (Ocean Outfall
No. 2, Land Section); and authorizing execution of the
permit by District No. 1
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice
to Withhold against H. E. Johnson Construction
Company (Contract No. 3-10), in the amount of $10,656.
Notice filed by Patrick Boring Company, Inc.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing
the General Manager to execute an agreement prepared
by the General Counsel, for payment of $200 to John J.
Hill for removal of trees in Parcel 7-5-lOE, Assess-
ment District No. 5-A
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving
proposed annexation of territory to the District
(Liljeblad annexation; approved in principle on
March 9, 1966) ..
OATH OF OFFICE
Will the new Directors please stand, and raise your right
hands?
Do you solemnly swear that you will support the Constitution
of the United States of America and the Constitution of the
State of California, and that you will faithfully discharge
the duties of Director of the County Sanitation Districts of
Orange County, according to the best of your ability?
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, May 11, 1966
8:00 p.m.
P. 0. Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Volley, Cal if., 92708
Phone 962-2411
May 6, 1966
DIRECTORS OF DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 5 PLEASE NOTE: Immediately
preceding the regular meeting at 8:00 p.m., there will be a special
called meeting of District No. 5 at 7:00 p .m. and an adjourned
meeting of District No. 1 at 7:30 p.m., both in the Districts' offices .
A separate agenda for the District No. 1 meeting is enclosed, the
main item of business o f which is the opening of bids on the Ocean
Outfall No. 2, Land Section (Job No. J-9). The enclosed Special Call
notice for t he Directors of District No. 5 lists the matters to be
c onsidered at this special meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
As a result of the municipal elections in April, there will be
new Directors in most of the Districts. Since some of these new
Directors may not be familiar with our organization, it should be
explained that it is a rule of the County Sanitation Districts'
Boards that, at least five days prior to each meeting, the General
Manager submit a report, together with a formal agenda, in which the
Directors are provided the background information necessary to a
concise understanding of the principal items of business to be taken
up.
This report accordingly is for the next joint meeting of the
Boards of Directors of Districts No .. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 which
regularly meet i n joint session ~every month on the second Wednesday
at 8 :00 p.m. in the Districts' office at the above address. At
these joint meetings, the Districts' Boards transact business relating
to joint operations of all the Districts and also take up items, if
any, relating to the respective individual Districts. It also covers
District No . 8 which ordinarily meets only quarterly but whi ch post -
poned for one month its scheduled meeting in April.
Attention is also called to the accompanying report on our
Sa nitation Districts ' Budget Procedures . The matter is timely since
budget matters wi ll be taken up at the next monthly meeting in June
(s ee Item No. 25).
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
-1 -
,. .....
• •
..
n
I
I I .....
Ill.
I ~..; .• · / .,~ •
• •
The following is a brief description of the more important
agenda items which are known, at the time of this writing, to be
coming before the Boards at this joint meeting. The numbers refer
"
to the item numbers on the enclosed formal agenda for the meeting
wh ich has attached, insofar as possible, a copy of each formal action
to be considered. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda
since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting and will be
included with the complete agenda available at the meeting. The
listing of bills for payment is not done until the actual meeting
date because of the fact that Board approval of such payments is
possible only once each month and if the listing were made up five
days before the monthly meeting, payment on some bills would be
delayed as much as six weeks. Some vendors from whom we get
excellent prices and service would obviously be discouraged from
doing business with the Distri cts if payment were so de layed .
Joint Boards -
Nos. 4 and 5 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: Attached to the agenda is
a listing of the representatives, as far as is known at the time of
this writing, of the · various cities, sanitary districts and of the
Board of Supervisors, who comprise the Boards of Directors. We do
not have, at this time, a complete listing since in some instances
we have not received formal notification of the representatives to
s it on the Boards. Representatives of those cities which have not
yet formally notified us by mail should ask their Clerks to do so
prior to the meeting or should bring a certified copy of the
app ropriat e~ action of his City Council to the meeting .
The attention of the new Directors is also called to the first
agenda attachment which gives directions for finding our office and
also sources of information in the event there are any questions to
be answered before the meeting.
Nos. 6 through 15 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN: In accordance with the
Districts' standing procedures, a Chairman for each District Board
and the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman of the Joint Admini -
strative Or ganization are elected annually at the regular May meeting.
The Chairmen for the past year were as follows:
--..
•
I
• ·~·I
I -..
District No. 1
District No . 2 ....
District No. 3
District No . 5
District No. 6
District No . 7
District No . 11
Joint Chairman
r -• •.,I
•
Vice Joint Chairman
...
•
':1 ,
, *No longer a Director
-. -. -.L •.
I
• • • -
-2-
Harry H. Harvey
Rex A. Parks
Howard M. Cornwell*
Lindsley Parsons
Arthur H. Meyers
Clifton C. Miller
Robert M. Lambert*
Howard M. Cornwell*
Harry H. Harvey
r
'·
I
I
•
"
• • • ...... \ .II
i"I ...
I I,,, I .J • I ....
It should be pointed out to the new Directors ~hat the District
~"'!' Chairmen automaticaily become members of the Executive Committee
which meets, as required, to study and make recommendations to the
Joint Boards on · all important matters concerning joint operations
such as budgets, salaries, personnel, uniform policies, etc.
·--~. ,
No. 25 -1966-67 JOIN'I"CAPITAL OUTLAY AND JOINT OPERATING BUDGETS:
Under this agenda item, if the Directors desire, there will be an
opportunity for review and discussion of the preliminary budget
information in the enclosed separate report.
No. 28 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, JOB NO. P2~8-l: This plant construction
project (Enclosures--Outfall Booster No. 1, Switching Center, Service
Center) with J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino is progressing very
well and so far with a minimum of extra work orders. However, we
have asked and received quotations for two small additional items
of work totalling $406.21 as detailed in the formal change order
attached to the agenda. In view of the discussion at the April
Board meeting concerning change orders, we would like to point out
that this is one example of obtaining approval of the Boards before
the extra work is done. We recommend the adoption of the formal
change order by means of the motion appearing on the agenda.
No. 29 -TRANSF'ER OF BUDGETED ALLOTMENTS: This recommended motion,
as appearing on the agenda, is to transfer in our Joint Operating
budg et the sum of $30,000 from our sub-account for Effluent Disin-
fection Chemicals· to the sub-account for Odor Control Chemicals and
also the sum of $30,000 from our Salaries and Wages and Employee
Benefits account to the Utilities account. Our expenditure records
to date for the current fiscal year indicate that we substantially
underestimated the expenditures in both the Odor Control Chemicals
and Utilities accounts~ The original estimates of ttie amount of
oClor control chemicals, principally chlorine, to be used during
1965-66 were based on actual expenditure figures for the past several
years. As it turned out, there were considerably more odor problems
encountered at Plant No. 1 last fall and this spring than in the
past. Also in view of the rapidly encroaching subdivision develop-
ment on both sides of the Plant, we found it necessary to use a great
deal more influent chlorination than anticipated.
The over expenditure in the Utilities account was caused
primarily from much higher power bills than anticipated. When the
current year's budget was prepared, it was not expected that there
would be a significant interruption, due to the construction of our
new 84-inch effluent line along the river right of way, in use of
our interplant transmission line by means of which we take power at •
Plant No.· 2 through one meter and transmit it to Plant No. 1. At
that time, we relied on a proposed agreement with the Edisoi; Company
which would have provided for moving our interplant power line to
a proposed adjacent Edison Company pole line. Such ai; arrangemen~
would have necessitated only a brief shutdown of the interplant line.
However, because of easement problems, this agreement was not
• 1• •
;J-~ ~.·. --~ .. •
• .. -3-I -
...
---_,) -
~
•
• ... . •
..,/
consummated and during the above described pipeline construction it
was necessary to take our transmission line out of service to clear
the right of way for the contractor. Hence, for approximately nine
months it was necessary to buy power through a separate meter at
each plant. Because of the block rate being applied to two separate
meters, the total power bill was obviously much higher than would · ·::
ha.ve been · the case with one meter . Also we underestimated the use,
this year, of our new ocean outfall booster station which uses a
great deal of power and creates a high demand rate.
No . 30 -·QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: The Districts' independent
a-uditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, have submitted the
quarterly financial report for the individual and Joint Districts
for the third quarter of the 1965-66 fiscal year as required by the
terms of their contract with the Districts . This report is being
mailed to those Directors who have, in the past, requested a copy in
advance and will also be mailed, upon request, to any other Director
wishing to see it before the Board meeting. Copies will also be
ava ilable at the Board meet ing for examination. This agenda item
also includes action by District No. 8 to receive and file the
consolidated financial report for the first half of the current
fiscal year which report was previously received and filed by the
other Boards.
Nos. 31 and 32 -PAYMENT OF BILLS: The s e are two routine items as
called for in our regulations, but for the benefit of the new
Directors it should be pointed out that the General Manager must
certify to certain facts concerning invoices and claims submitted
prior to forma l roll call action by the Boards authorizing payment
of the listed bills. As explained above, a listing of these bills
will not be available until the final agenda submitted at the Board
meeting. The listing will include a brief explanation of the purpose
of the payment, if not obvious from the name of the vendor.
District No. 1 I •
Nos . 34 and 35 -AWARDS OF PLANT CONSTRUCTION PROJECTS NOS. P2-12
AND J-9: Bids for a new primary clarifier at Plant No. 2 (P2-12)
were taken by the Board on May 4 and bids on the Ocean Outfall No. 2,
Land Section (J-9) wi ll be taken at the adjourned meeting of the
District at 7:30 p.m . preceding the Board meeting. At the time of
this writing, we do not yet have a recommendation for award of the
former contract. However, at the time of the meeting this recom-
mendat ion will be forthcoming. In the case of Job No. J-9 we hope
that the bids will be in order and that a recommendation for award
can there for be made at the meeting since an early commencement of
this job, which involves crossing of a Flo?d Control Channel in the
dry seasen, can be started as soon as possible.
For the benefit of the new Directors, under our Joint Ownership,
Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958, District No. 1 is
designated to act as contracting agent for all of the Districts in
• .._ •
1i f9 .. -4-,~ ~ ·~ • ----.L
• •
r
I -
order to simplify paper work and to minimize additional board meetings .
-~ However, for each construction project, specific authorization to
so act in their behalf must be granted by the J o int Boards to Distr ict
No. 1. Such authorization is granted at the t i me plans and specifi-
cations are approved and advertising for b i ds authorized .
No . 36 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR DI STRICT SEWER
JOBS NOS . 1 -6, 1-7 AND 1 -8: The Di strict 's engineers, Boyle
Engineering, are comp l eting work on t h e p l ans a n d specifications fo r
these contracts which are respective l y the Grand Avenue Trunk Sewer,
the Broadway Trunk Sewer and the Ma i n Street Trunk Sewer, 17th Street
and Washington Avenue Sub -T runk Sewers. Si nce i t is the desire of
the City of Santa Ana to expedite this work as much as possib l e in
order to complete the downtown portions before the Christmas holiday
shopping season, we · are recommending approva l , by means of the
attached resolution, of the plans and specifications for these jobs
and to authorize submittal of the same to the City of Santa Ana for
construction in accordance with the November, 1965 agreement between
the District and the City .
District No. 11
No . 48 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 1 1 -10-1 : Bids for this contract, the
Slater Avenue Gravity Sewer and Nicho l s Str eet Gravi ty Sewer, were
authorized at the April meeting and wil l be opened by the Engineer
and Secretary next Monday, May 9 . If the bids are in order, the
final agenda will contain a recommendation for award by the Engineer
and myself.
Districts Nos . 2 and 3 •
No . 52 -REQUEST OF THE CITY OF WESTMINSTER FOR REMOVAL OF BOLSA
AVENUE TRUNK SEWER FROM STORM DRAIN CULVERT: This matter was taken
up at the April Board meeting and following discussion a committee
composed of Directors Amo, Culver and Parks was appointed to analyze
the request and to determine the Districts • degree of responsibility
for the cost of correcting the problem. The Committee has met twice,
on April 20 and May 3 . A separate written report on this subje~t is
included with the formal agenda for the Directors of Districts Nos .
2 and 3.
District No. 3
Nos. 57 through 59 ,_ PUBLIC HEARING ON ENGINEER 'S REPORT: At the
Apri l Board meeting, a formal engineer 's report, ·as required by the
County Sanitation District Act, was approved as to form and, as also
required by law, a public ·hearing thereon was set for the time of
this meeting. The report, basically, recommends the purchase by
District No. 3 of ca~acity in certain of Distr~ct No. ~l's facil~ties
at a total price of $190,000 . This pu rchase will provide convenient
and permanent sewer service to an area of District No . 3 which is
remote from the existing District No . 3 trunk sewers . Also by
consummating the purchase, an existing inter-district agreement,
I :f ~ ~ 1 r. I .. --5-
r .. --• I I
• -
L
..
I
which accomplishes this purpose on a temporary rental basis, can be
terminated. The older Directors are thoroughly familiar with the
subject, since this transaction has been discussed for some time
previously, but if any of the new Directors have any questions there-
on, it will be appropriate to bring them up under these items.
No. 60 -SPECIFICATIONS FOR NEW PUMPING EQUIPMENT AT WESTSIDE PUMP
STATION: Additional pumps, motors and appurtenant electrical gear
are urgently needed in the near future at this pump station, which
serves the northern Seal Beach, Los Alamitos, La Palma and western
Cypress areas. The District's design engineers have been previously
authorized to prepare specifications for these rather major items of
equipment needed to increase the capacity of this station to meet
the growing needs of this area. These specifications are now ready
for approval. The recommended resolution, attached to the formal
agenda, approves the specifications and authorized advertising for
bids to· be received and opened on June 1. If the bids are satis-
factory, a recommendation for award will be made at the regular June
meeting. As many of the Directors are probably aware, there is a
seller's market for equipment of this type and we are anxious to
proceed with this contract as soon as possible in order to obtain
delivery at the earliest possible date. Any delay in obtaining this
equipment could possibly result in a serious problem at this · station.
The engineer's estimate of the cost of this equipment is $27,040.
Nos. 61 through 64 -CLOSEOUT OF CONTRACT NO. 3-10: This contract
with the H. E. Johnson Construction Company of Torrance was success-
fully completed on April 30. The job involved the construction of
a relief trunk sewer in Beach Boulevard between Imperial Highway and
Rosecrans Avenue. During the course of construction, the contractor
made numerous claims for extra payment for encountering of unknown
utilities and obstructions in the trench area and also a rather major
claim ($10,539.74) for delay caused by restricted working hours
imposed by the State Division of Highw~ys. A number of meetings
between the engineer and contractor were held to discuss these claims
and on April 2e another meeting was held between the engineer, our
General Counsel and staff to attempt to work out a reasonable settle-
ment of these claims. However, no such agreement could be reached and
we are therefor recommending paying a total of $5,070 for the extra
work items listed in Change Order No. 3 attached to the agenda under
Item No. 62. The amounts recommended to be paid are in accordance
with the Engineer's analysis of the value of extra work actually
performed (see attachments to Change Order No. 3). This change order
also grants an extension · of time of 16 days to the contractor for
the extra work performed, which extension of time, together with
extensions previously granted, is sufficient to provide compliance
with the time of completion called for in the Contract.
Also under these items is an approval of an assignment of monies
due the contractor (Item No. 61) to his surety, the National
Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company, and Change Order No. 4
(Item No. 63) which is the c~stomary_d?llar adjustment of t~e
contract price to reflect unit quantities of work actually installed
I .. ,
••
•
Ill -6-
.---
•
l"I I,., ... . -iii •
r I"' •
as against the original estimates of quanti.ties. In the ca.se of this
job, the adjustment results in a net deduction of $1,071.50 from the
c ~i g inal contract price. Item No. 64 is the customary resolution
accepting the job as complete as of April 30 and authorizing filing
of Notice of Completion.
• District No. ,7 I
No. 68 -REQUEST OF C. J, SEGERSTROM & SONS FOR THE DISTRICT TO
CONSTRUCT AN EXTENSION OF THE COLLEGE AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER TO
HUNTZINGER AVENUE: At the February 9th meeting of the Board, action
was taken declaring intent to include this facility in the District's
master plan of sewers; the engineers were authorized to prepare the
plans and specifications; and the District agreed to provide in-
spection services during the construction. It was understood by the
Board at that time that the developer would construct the facility,
and following its completion, execute a standard reimbursement agree-
ment with the District, which provides for reimbursement over a
period of not less than three years. The engineers' plans were
accepted as complete at the District's meeting of April 13th. The
construction estimate is $21,800 and sufficient funds are avaiiable
in the District's revolving fund to pay for the facility.
However, the District has entered into numerous reimbursement
agreements with developers for the construction of master plan sewers
and the Board's policy has been to treat everyone on an equal basis.
If the existing reimbursement agreements for master plan sewers can
be amended to authorize immediate payment of all remaining balances,
the Board may desire to construct the extension of the College
Avenue Sewer as requested.
In addition to the current agreements, a master plan sewer
facility is being planned to serve the District southerly of the
p roposed San Dieg o Freeway and easterly of the Orange County Airport,
and the Irvine Industrial Complex developers are prepared to enter ·
into a reimbursement agreement for the construction costs. Furtbe ~
information will be available at the meeting.
'Ro. 69 .. LETTER FROM FREDERICK B. MEARS REQUESTING REIMBURSEMENT FOR Annr~lONAL COSTS INVOLVED IN CONNECTING TO DISTRICT'S SEWER FACILITIES:
The engineers will be prepared to go into detail concerning the
problems encountered by Dr. Mears in connecting his hillside home to
the District's La Loma trunk sewer.
No. 70 -REQUEST OF TUSTIN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR REDUCTION
OF DIRECT CONNECTION CHARGES: A. letter has been addressed to the
Board by the Assistant Superintendent of the Tustin Elementary School
District requesting that the District's direct connection charges
b e adjusted for two schools, since the state funds available to the
school district are based on 75% of the District's direct connect i on
charges. This request has been reviewed by the District's Legal
Counsel and his opinion is that the District's connection charge
• •
•
~ t: • . :.
.J.: --7-
•
•
..
.._ ---II
-~: -.. -· -r----
"I
•
_a
•
-
"I .. • " :: -·
loo .... -•
~ -
Ordinance No . 709 does not specifically provide a means by whi ch the
,·"-.( Board could permit the reduction of established dharges. The
District's Counsel will be prepared to go into this matter in more
detail at the meeting.
..
..
I~
No. 71 -ACQUISITION OF CITY OF ORANGE FACILITIES AND CAPACITY RIGHTS
IN CONJUNCTIO:f WITH CONSTRUCTION IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICrr #6: At the
Board's April 26th meeting, the Engineer of Work briefly described
the facilities which must be acquired by the District to permit the
use of the sewers to be constructed in Assessment District #6 . The
staff and engineers would like to discuss with the Direi:tors the
costs involved and the means by which the facilities can be acquired
from the City of Orange.
~ • I
I
w
• • I
.,
.;.
-r
• •
• ••
r I
ll"
I
Ill
• ..
• ..
•• •
r r
...
\
•
I
I Ir 1•
• ...
• I
•
-1 •
•
•
I I
I
..
I '
• • ._
•
•
• • •• •l-11 .. •
I -
• .. t I
Fred A. • General
•
"I
L"'
I
• ~
,.,
I I
I
"I • '• -r
·-• r •
.s: • 41 I. I ... ' ---, .. I
.. -•
" .... -• .&.-:
I
... -·--8·-
Harper
Manager -Sec~:-etary
..
I
•
(33-A)
(66-A)
(74-A)
(74-B)
ALL DISTRICTS
Supplemental Agenda
May 11th, 1966
Consideration of motion authorizing acceptance of a
permit from Orange County Flood Control District
relative to construction of Job No. J-9 (Ocean Outfall
No. 2, Land Section); and authorizing execution of the
permit by District No. 1
DISTRICT 3
Consideration of motion to receive and file Notice
to Withhold against H. E. Johnson Construction
Company (Contract No. 3-10), in the amount of $10,656.
Notice filed by Patrick Boring Company, Inc.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing
the General Manager to execute an agreement prepared
by the General Counsel, for payment of $200 to John J.
Hill for removal of trees in Parcel 7-5-lOE, Assess-
ment District No. 5-A
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving
proposed annexation of territory to the District
{Liljeblad annexation; approved in principle on
March 9, 1966).
\
~LL_
--------.~ ?ff
----· ~ 5-;r
·------·-----·
(J -----------~,
~------
DRAFT RE: May 11th, 1966
Joint Meeting
Thip being the regular meeting at which annual elections
of Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization and Chairman
of each District's Board were to be held pursuant to meeting procedure
previously established by resolution, the Secretary called the meeting
to order at 8:00 p.m. Following the Pledge of Allegiance, the roll
was called, and a quorum was reported present for each District.
(Show receipt and filing of excerpts and the administering
of Oaths of Office to new members, as prescribed in the State Constitution).
With the Secretary of the Boards presiding, nominations were
opened for Chairman of the Board of Directors of District No. 1.
(Show customary election for Districts 1 through 11, EXCEPT
District 3. District #3 will show two nominations and voting by written
ballot).
Election of Chairman
of the Joint Adminis-
trative Organization
\ Moved and seconded:
That Directo r Parks be nominated
as a candidate for the office of
Chairman
declined
of the Joint Administrative Organization. Director Parks
the nomination and requested that his name be withdrawn.
It was then moved and seconded: That Director Harvey be nominated
as a candidate for the office of Joint Chairman. Director Speer
was also nominated. ,
The vote was taken by written ballot and polled by the Districts '
General Counsel, who announced that Director Harvey had been
elected ~~tN.txgkxixmxNx~fxtkex~~Kxax Chairman of the Joint
Administrative Organization.
Director Harvey, newly elected Joint Chairman then assumed the
gavel and declared nominations open for the office of Vice Joint
Chairman. (Show standard election of Pa~s )
/
Chairman harvey welcomed the new membe..Ys of the Boards and ,,,
discussed tentative plans for an educational meeting to acquaint the
new Directors with the activities of the Di s tricts.
Chairman Harvey also expressed confidence in the ability of the
staff and commended them for their efforts.
#25
a.en~~l.-d'J!lan~~
the General Mana er -F1 e d A. Ha1pe1, the Dist:ricts'
introduced the staff members in attendance; and
announced that pla~ were being formulated for a Directors' tour of the
Districts ' sewage trea~ent facilities to familiarize the new Directo rs
with the Districts' oper
/,,.
Mr. Harper also expl ned the basic functions of the organization
and discussed, briefly, the iminary budgets for 1966-67.~ Executive
Committee meeting is scheduled fo May 25th to discu:s the bud~e~s f~
#35 -Mr. H. Harvey Hunt, of John rollo Engineers, gave the verbal
recommendation of the engineers tha ~ J o b No. J-9 be awarded to Vinnell
Corporation, the low bidder. (Then show award ).
(J ~rr
#3, -(Show Boyle Engineering item deferred to 4:00 p.m., May 25th)
#52 -Director Parks presented th written report of the Special Committee
on the request of the City of Wes{tminster Engineering Department, and
I
I advised that the Committee had met on two occasions, as outlined in .the
written report; and a determination was made that the information gathered
by the staff and Committee be presente~ to the Boards for their consideration.
Yw-.._ ~av"'-'' ~l\'V\~J -fJ.4 'l 'tJv~cR; L1~ t:t;" ~~--, -t;;° ~ ~ 'r;o-d"~ .r{ r:;f.._
D/1-:)t~~~~ Following a brief discussion~ a\tiring wnich 1:h2 General Manager
expanded upon the written report and recommended that the Districts offer
-t:;t .-<l.£,t~\.IU~ttu-ZT~ ~ ~
to :b1.s:~2 furnish;\ inspection serv ,ces for the relocation work, it was
moved, seconded and duly carried:
~ID!:txi;NJ!'.XXRX~mm1ut.Rxtx~NX@~x.t.Fuf xGHNRXKXXMx.mt:gKXXEEXR~~X@XH~
~·· That the Districts deny any responsibility for obstruction of the
......si.poo~ and that the staff be directed to notify the City ll§.:fX.tNe that
if the City wishes to utilize the previously abandoned storm drain
culvert, the 24" VCP Balsa Avenue Sewer obstr;ucting the culvert
must be relocated at the City's expense.
FURTHER MOVED : That in accordanc~ with the recommendation of
the General Manager, the staff be dire ~ted to make available to the .
City of Westmins ter, the sewer reloc¢'tion construction drawings prepared
' in accordance with the Districts' ~~ecificati ons; and to provide inspection
I services for the proposed reloca on work at no cost to the City.
#68 -A let
prese and considered by
& Sons, dated Apr 26, 1966, was
s
~J
#68 -A letter from C. J. Segerstrom & Sons, dated April 26, 1966,
requesting construction of an extension of the College Avenue Sub -Trunk
Sewer to Huntzinger Avenue, was presented and considered b~ the Board. lJ-~_y
After a !lai:.ei brief discussion, it was MS&DC: /1 That said request
be denied since the District has entered into numerous reimbursement
I
agreements with developers for construc~ion of Master Plan Sewers, and
the Board 's policy has been to treat ~11 requests on an equal basis.
FURTHER MOVED: That the staff be directed to notify C. J. Segerstrom
& Sons that, upon completion truction of the line by the developer,
the District will enter into agreement to acquire the
facility.
#69 -Mr. Carl Carlson of Boyle Engineering reported upon the
communication dated April 14, B. Mears, M.D .,
requesting reimbursement in th amount of $250 for additional expenseK
incurred in the installation a sewer line on his property at 1672 La
Loma Drive Santa Ana. additional e
i-or-to..een&tructton oT the faci1ity.
~~-G1~~~-B-'1~~H:;tn~1tG!h1Eens31t~ai!ff of Boyle-·Engi-naering ..had _
se
, visited_ the site of construct on on several occasions, and had provided
-Dr. Mears with accurate infor tion; and that the re-trenching operation
was necessitated by a miscalcu ation -on the part of Dr. Mears and/or his -
Districts• responsibility~~ n -1.-• Fo~lowing ~ ?iscussion
~~~ ~J~.
_.djl.s.i:..i-t=1:gt8::..s.lie.d_f.I:r.QID..-t:b.;;L.t.....:tlllt~,.f--tttv""-errg:t:nerer~, it was MS&D C: ~ ct-UJ:-~ J ~~ ,t..,,_d,..Q/_,JJ-,.;..,_, '-Yr---<--,.
That the $250 sought by Dr. MearsAbe refunded, and th~t the
staff -and tne engiRoors be directe~ to effect this refund,~ the meehoe
\
·f'onnd .:to... he the .most-aqui-.t.a:bl.e-to.. a.1.1.....concern.ed.
. ... . -
#70 -A letter from the Tustin Elementary Schoo l District, dated
M~y 3, 1966, was presented and considered. Tl1e communication contained
a request that the Sanitation District's c~nnection charges for the
I
Lorna Vista and Red Hill Schoo ls be adjusted to the amount available in
(7f1J/., »{-lu MS-,~J)~ cJ-~ .. ,
the schools' funds !fRtkexxtNiH inste~rl of the complete charges.
I
In view of the fact that similar request have been received
from the School District in the /..st, and have been denied by the
Board upon recommendation of yfe General Counsel, it was MS&DC:
That the request be that the staff be directed to
inform the School Distric action taken by the Board ~Nx:tluf
/t:t;~~;--l~t:f&EH::--:B~~~s=+=official~ that the
Board cannot, under t e provisions of the existing connection charge
ordinance, reduce th charges . ~
ltrl -Following a diiussion regarding acqu:s1t1on of certain facilities
and capacity rights iri. facilit;jes owned by the City of Orange, required
I
in connection with the ,..:onstruction in Assessment Di.strict ~' it was
MS&DC : That the staff tl~ directed to negotiate with the City of Orange
. (!..(V,,:t-~ ......
to effect an agreement lr acquisition of ~. capacity rights and
facilities 1R qs 1 '"°· ·• ~ u-.. 1, fi'~ ~~ "~
~--"aati '-Jf-~'-<> -o t'\....{ ~~~ ~ c'~"?~--7~
-'")> ~ ~ :It= b
#72 -The General Counsel the progress of the lawsuit
filed on behalf of the City of Santa Ana, for
acquisition of the Sewer north of Seventeenth
Street . The General Coun s el recommended that ~
I 4-..
\·
. . . ~ ::: ~.; -·~·· . -· -.. '. .
(33-A)
(66-A)
(74-A)
(74-B)
Supplemental Agenda
May 11th,
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion thorizing acceptance of a
permit from Orange C~u Fl ood Control District
relative to construct · n of Job No. J -9 (Ocean Outfall
No . 2, Land Section)· and authorizing execution of the
permit by District ~ . 1
DISTRICT 3 ~,
Consideration of JI!0tion to rece i ve and file Notice
to Withhold agai rlst H. E . Johnson Construction
Company (Contrac No . 3-10), in the amount of $10,656 .
Notice filed by atrick Boring Company, Inc.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration o Resolution No. 66-63-7, authorizing
the General Mana er to execute an agreement prepared
by the General C unsel, for payment of $200 to John J .
Hill for removal f trees in Parcel 7-5 -lOE, Assess-
ment District No. 5-A
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 66-64-7 approving
proposed annexat on of territory to the District
(Liljeblad annex tion; approved in principle on
March 9, 1966).
ROLL CALL
Di str ic t / 2 -...., ~
Reg ular__,,------'"'--~--~
A djo urned~~-~---~--
S ;/ .... i, i-Time _~g'---, _o-_J_
I tem x/J ' <! .t:_,(
Date
.Amo
Bartlet t
Ee llffia
Bo we n
Brown
7
J OINT BO ARDS
1/
S i P;:
Crapo
Culver
Furman
No e
Long
Spee r
Shull
Ill! ,. * Bo u sman
Fo r g i t i/""' Gruber
Gruber \...-"" F o rgi t
Ha rvey i;;;;"' Mc Mi chael
Harve:t
Meyers
Mil le r C.,
I
DIS TRICT 1
7 Mc Mi chael
+Mac k
V::-Hi r stei n
DI ST RI CT 2
Pa r k ~ ,/ Hile man
ca::ail.c _ __.,a,/'"'-Spee r
Crapo ~ S hull
Cu l v er
Harvey Mc Mi cha e l
Krein CL--,., Schutte
M.i ~l ? Ho c k
S c hw e r d tfeger e>-Kanno
Wa l ters --\/?':--;...Her b s~
Workma n 7
A.il.-1~ Z Hirste i n
-Krein-~ S c hutte V'
Meyers v
:21 ~ehe-1 7 . Hock
' Mille r, Ci .. t · 7 Mack
Mille r, H.•· 0\....--',,. Kohl
Ne s c h er 7 ,,.
Parks 7 ....-Hileman
Parso ns v
S chwer dtfege r~Kanno ~
Stewart
,.,Frege a u --7_,, Gre e n
Walters
Workman
Co e n
~H e rb st
~Qu e yre l
7"Hi r s t e i n
-;:::::;;-:-~---I
_12::
OTHER S :
Brown ~
Nisso n 7
Gallow a ? Trembl ay
Lowry
Car 1 s o n__:__,....:--
Rimel v Maddo_x _ _:.__
-jkr;:/ ~
I ~J\.1.,-..t l r/
~y';·~
0 JJJ
DISTRI CT 8
Martin
Mitchell ---~
Lamb o urne
Hi rstein
Am o
Bo wen ·
Brown
DISTRICT 3
LG':: Furman
V7 Noe
V""' ~
.Cd.fit:!"k 7 ~
Cr apo V?' Shull
Culver C?' J
Dw:: i s &Z' Bou s man "'-•'" -Ha rvey v McMichael
K r ~i n Schutte
Mil l e r,)/ ~ Kohl
lj_e .s c_h~ r Gwnme re
S c h werdtfege r ~,,,........Fregeau
Stewart \/' Green
Wa lte r s ;z: Herb s t
AJ.,.1.-ei;i ~ Hi rstein
J'9 rsons
Grub e r
Aiitlen
tle y e µ
Gruber
~
.Mi ller
Forgi t
Harvey
Meyer s
Parks
AiPlMl"
~ew a rt
'Ba r tlett
J\Jd!e n
DISTRI CT:? ~ Forgit
Hirstein
DISTRIC~6 ?. F o rgit
7 Hi rste i n -~-
~~~~er ~ McMichael
v ...
L........-Hi leman
17 Hirste in ---
DISTRICT/11
--¥-Co e n ==:::z: Hi rstein
ROLL CALL
District -------------------Regular
--::~-----------------Adjourned ________________ __
Date Time
------------------------------~ -------
Item
----------~---------
JOINT BOARDS
Amo
Bartlett
p 8
Bowen
Brown
?7& k
Crapo
Culver
DQ it
Forgit
Gruber
Harvey
Krein
Meyers
Michel
Miller, C.
Miller, H.
Nescher
Parks
Parsons
Furman
Noe
Long
Speer
Shull
Bousman
Gruber
Forgit
Mc Michael
Schutte
Hock
Mack
Kohl
Hileman
Schwerdtfeger __ _ Kanno
Fregeau
Green
Coen
Herbst
Queyrel
Hirstein
Stewart
Walters
Work.man
OTHERS:
Brown ---Nisson ---Galloway
Tremblay--
Lowry --
Carlson
Rimel --
Maddox ---
DISTRICT 8
Martin ----Mitchell ---Allen ---
d tf//lnJ/-'12-~u~'Y\....L--
Lambourne
Hirstein
DISTRICT 1
Harvey McMichael
Meyers
Miller Mack
Mien. Hirstein
DISTRICT 2
Parks Hileman
.!iP k Speer
Crapo Shull
Culver
Harvey McMichael
Krein Schutte
Michel Hock
Schwerdtfeger Kanno
Walters Herbst
Workman
All rm Hirstein
DISTRICT 3 Amo
Ye~Bta Furman
Bowen Noe
Brown Long
QiM_k Speer
Crapo Shull
Culver
:Q& i.s Bousman
Harvey McMichael
Krein Schutte
Mille:r;;J. Kohl
Nescher Gummere
Schwerdtfeger Fregeau
Stewart Green
Walters Herbst
Ail en Hirstein
DISTRICT 2 Parsons
Gruber Forgit
~ l:l! z:D Hirstein
DISTRICT 6
Meyers
Gruber Forgit
1~[1 Hirstein
DISTRICT 7
Miller Mack
Forgit Gruber
Harvey McMichael
Meyers
Parks Hileman
ftllCit-_ Hirstein
DISTRICT 11
Stewart Coen
Bartlett
~,,DR Hirstein
~/"
.11'
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
DISTRICT No. #1
AGENDA
May 11th, 1966 -7:30 p.m.
Appointmen~ of Cha irman pro tern, if necessary
Report of the General Manager
Report of the G\1eral Counsel
Consideration of motion approving and adopting Addendum
#1 and Addendum #~to the plans and specifications for
Ocean Outfall No. 2 Land Section, Job No. J-9. (Copy
attached) \ fl() ·l./"-
t he Secretary to open ~ Consideration of motio directing
and read sealed bids r ceived for
No. 2, Lan d Section, Jo No. J-9
the Ocean Outfall 'v~ '
Consideration of motion eferring bids for Job No . J-9 'N ~.
to the engineers and staf\f for tabulation and recommendation ~~
II~"' I
Other business and commun·cations, if any
Consideration of motion r : Adjournmen t
~.
;/
PLANS
ADDENDUM NO. l
to
Plans and Specifications
for
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION
JOB NO. J-9
(1) Sheet 11 of 18 1 Section B
DELETE the notation which reads "2-1/2-inch thick
standard flange".
SPECIFICATIONS
(2) Page D-20, Section 27-7 TUNNEL EXCAVATION AND LINER
PLATE
(a) RE.VISE the following sentence in Subsection (b)
Tunnel Liner Plate:
Third sentence of first paragraph in sub-
section should read:
"The tunnel liner plates may be a
2-flange lap type or a 4-flanged type,
Armco Commercial Liner Plate Company,
or approved equal."
(b) ADD a paragraph to sub-section (b) Tunnel
Liner Plate:
"The 4-flanged liner plate shall be made
of one piece of metal, provided with flanges
and with bolt holes at both sides and both
ends for attaching to adjacent plates.
Corners shall be practically square so when
plates are bolted together no openings shall
exist large enough to permit inflow of ·
granular material. Design and shape of the
liner plate shall be such that erection and
assembly of the liner plate structure can
be made from inside of the tunnel."
(3) Page D-26, Section 29-2, PIPE SCHEDULE
Change the fourth entry to read as follows: "36-inch
pipe in tunnel" in lieu of 30-inch pipe in tunnel.
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
May 5, 1966
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. Box 5175, Fountain Valley, Calif.
May 6, 1966
ADDENDUM NO. 2
to
Specifications and Plans
for
OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION
JOB NO. J-9
SPECIFICATIONS
(1) Page D-19, Section 27-5, PIPE EXCAVATION
( 2)
PLANS
CHANGE the section to read as follows:
"The maximum clear width of trench anywhere below a
plane of one foot a~ove the top of the pipe shall not
exceed the width of trench used for design of the
pipe.11
Page D-28, Section 29-3, CONCRETE PIPE, PRESSURE,
Subsection (g) Design:
CHANGE the last item for the design criteria for external
loading as follows:
11 Trench width at top
of pipe
Not less than actual
field conditions 11
(3) Sheet 17 of 18, Sections B, Hand J.
CH.ANGE maximum trench width notation in these three
sections to conform with the above change in specified
trench width.
JOHN CAROLLO ENGINEERS
BID TABULATION
SHEET
Est. $1,075,000.
Date May 11 2 1966
Contract: OCEAN OUTFALL NO. 2 -LAND SECTION, JOB NOo J-9
Contractor Total Bid
1.
2.
3.
4.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
-----__. Adjourned meeting --7:30 p.m., May 11, 1966
DISTRICT NO. 1
Harvey ,/' McMichael
Meyers -V;--
Miller lZ Mack
Allen a_.. Hirstein
Harvey ___ McMichael
Meyers
Miller Mack ---Allen Hirstein
Harvey ____ McMichael
Meyers
Miller
Allen ------
Mack
Hirstein
....
r
••
ii
"I I
I
J
#4 --
Report of the engineers
re : Rep l acement of
existing force main f rom
Jamboree Pump Station
#5 Meeting May 11, 1966
• l I
• Donald C. Simpson, Consulting
Engi neer , read his report
r dated May 6, 1966 , on the
subject , and answered questions from the Board members in this regard .
Mr . Simpson discussed the methods of accomp lishing the proposed wor1S..i._
~ ,.. r" ~-U\..
and reiterated, verbally , his recommendation thay{t be done~~ the
forthcoming Jamboree Road Improvements unde r the auspices of the City
of Newport Beach .
Mr . Hunter Cook of the staff of the City of lfewP.ort Beac!}_J _ -/-(\
. ~~ N. <-C"1.lv\~ ""'-NJ tlmi..~~
concurred in this recommendation of Mr . Simpson, and( tated that he ~· J
)"'-
would advise the Ci ty Attorney 's office to prepare an a g reement between
the City and the Di strict, whereby the Di strict construction would be
included in the City 's contract for improvements to Jamboree Road .
.. ...
UI
#5 -~
Acceptance of proposal
from Donald C. Simpson
for engineering se r vices
in connection with re-
placement of force main
from Jamboree Pump Sta-
tion ; and authorizing
an agreement with the
City of Newport Beach
to accomplish the work
\
• MS&DC :
That the report of Donald C.
Simpson , dated May 6, 1 9 66 ,
regarding replacement o f existing
force main from Jamboree Pump
Station be re c ~·ved and ordered ~ ± ~ ~ ~"VI.>-(. ,...:;, ;___ .J ~ ''--
filed ; and that the proposal of Dciiald C. Simpson, dat May 6, 1 96 6 ,Abe
accepted; and that the General Manager be authorized to dire c t Dona~d C. )
Simpson to proceed with furnishing said services in accordance with /l~~ ~
-er-(.,/,
h 15 1 9 66 . t5"' Parag raph F of the agreement with the engineer d a ted Marc , '
--........
• • r-..
FURTH ER MOVED : That an agreement with the Ci ty of Newport Beach be
authorized , whereby the Ci ty will construct said force main under its
forthcoming contract for improvements to Jamboree Road , with reimbur se -
ment fo r a ll c o s t s the reof by the Di str i ct up o n completion of said work .
#6 -
Verbal rep ort of the
engineers concerning
status of Cont r act
No . 5-12
Mr . Simpson briefly reviewed
this project and stated that the
de l ay beyond the complet i on dat e
for fina l comp l eti on is due to wet 3:ther during November and December ,
x ~
1 965 , and to failur e of the pump ma nu cturer t o supp l y equipment on
schedul e .
#9 -
Verbal re p ort of staff
o n f i nancial statu s of
the Districts
1966 -67 tax rate .
Show adjourmm ent at 7 :55 p .nf'.
M . Br own verbally reported on the
f i nancial picture of the Di strict ,
r t i cul a rly as re l ated to the
requested~hat t~e _sta~f 1;..~7-(; -.cl., ~uCVi..S ~
· v e ibal~ r e pGJ:t.ed
Agenud .lc1n No. _r;
DONALD C. SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER
aa411 NltWPOlllT •LVD. • NEW,.OlllT •EACH, DALIP'OlllNIA • 0111 •-t4at
Boa.rd of Directors
County Sanitation District No. 5
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Gentlemen:
s-//-c.. £.
INVIE•TllJATIDN• • REPORTa
WATER • •IEWElllAIJI:
DRAINAlllE • •TlllEET•
•TAP'P' IENlllNl:l:llllNll
May 6, 1966
In accordance with your staff's request, we hereby
submit this proposal for furnishing !ngineering Services in
connection with the replacement of the existing force main
.from the Jamboree Pumping Station.
The Public Works Department of the City of Newport
Beach has informed us that the City's proposed widening and
realignment of Jamboree Road will interfere with a portion
of the 8" force main from the Jamboree Pumping Station. The
plans for the road work are nearly complete and, because of
financial participation by the County of Orange, the project
must be advertised for bids prior to July 1, 1966.
The present 8" force main is not large enough for
ultimate needs. In ou.r opinion, either a 14" or 16" line
will be required when the area is fully developed.
The enlargement of the force main will result in a
decreased pumping head and therefore, a modification of the
pumps will be required. It should also be recognized that
sometime in the future the Jamboree Station may be eliminated
or relocated if it ever becomes feasible to construct a
gravity line along Back Bay Drive to the mouth of Big Canyon.
The force main in Jamboree Road would not then be needed.
The information necessary to make this determination will
probably not be available for some time.
The estimated cost of installing the ultimate size
force main is Sl4,000. The cost differential between con-
structing this size line and a new 8" line is about S4,000.
!ven though the line may be abandoned in the future, it is
recommended that the ultimate size line be installed.
The work can be done under a separate contract
~
-2 -
simultaneously with the street project; or, by agreement,
the work could be included as a separate bid item in the
City• s contract. There are advantages and disadvantages
to both methods. We suggest including the work in the
City's contract, although the direct construction cost
may be slightly higher.
In accordance with the tenns of the .Agreement
dated March 15, 1966, we will prepare the necessary draw-
ings and supplementary specifications for the lump sum
of 11500. Our services would also include recommendations
on neoeasary pump modifications. rhe work will be
compla~e4 within 30 d&J"B after anthorization to proceed.
Very truly yours,
... --..-v
a~~
Donald C. Simpson
DCS:c
A--......, •
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS
of ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
10844 ELLI S AVEN U E, P . 0 . Box 517 5 , F OU N TAIN VAL L EY, C ALIFORNIA, 92708
Gen t l e men:
May 6 , 1966
NOT ICE OF SPEC I AL MEETI NG
DI STRICT NO . 5
7:00 p .m., May 11 , 1 966
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
Administra tive Offic•
962-24 11 , Aree Code 7
Treatment Plant Off
545 -7147, Aree Code :
I am calling a specia l mee ting of t h e Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 5 at the above hour and date .
Th e p urpos e of this meeting is to consider the following
items:
1) Repor t of Engineer and engineering p r oposa l
for replacement of Jamboree Forc e Main
2) Status report of Eng i neer re: Contract No. 5 -12
3 ) Change Orders , Contract No . 5-12
4) Staff report on financial condition of District
/s/ Li ndsley Parsons
Chairman
... ~'"'May 11, 1966 -7:00 p.m. -----.:.. -----Special Meeting
\
OTHERS PRESENT:
DISTRICT NO. 5
Parsons /
Gruber ---y;....,.._· ---Forgit
Allen ---,4--------Hirstein A
Parsons / -....,,..._-Gruber ../ Forgi t
Allen -A~-Hirstein
Parsons
Gruber
Allen
/
,../ Forgit ---A---Hirstein
;; · ~-May 11,, 1966 -7:00 p.m. -----------Special Meeting
OTHERS PRESENT:
Brown
Harper
Simpson
DISTRICT NO. 5
/ Parsons <
Gruber -:;;.,..--Forgi t
Allen A: Hirstein ~
Parsons
Gruber
Allen
~ 7 Forgit -A--Hirstein
Parsons (.
Gruber :; Forgit
Allen ---14:~-Hirstein /)
. •
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts ~c
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenu e
Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708
/ (1)
/(2)
/(3)
/(4)
/ (5)
v (J-~)
v (6)
v (1)
/(9)
/(10)
DISTRICT No. _# _5 _
AGENDA
\ May ~lfut::-7:00 p.m.
~~
I\
Appointmenf:. of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Roll Calli
Appointment of Bec retary pro tern
Consideration of report of Donald C. Simpson, Consulting
Engineer, dated May 6, 1966, regarding replacement of
existing force main from Jamboree Pump Station
Consideration of motion to receive, file and accept report
and proposal of Dona~d C. Simpson, dated May 6, 1966, for
furnishing engineering services in connection with replace-
ment of existing force main from Jamboree Pump Station;
and authorizing the Genera~ Manager to direct said
engineer to proceed w ~th furnishing said services in
accordance with Paragraph F of the agreement with the
engineer dated Ma rch 15, 1966. (Copy of profosal in
f <J1s~ ~)' 1 7 !i 111 L ~ . r; .,~ ..... -+-;-e.:::c;-v e rba1 report of the eng neers ~ncerning status of
Contract No. 5-12
Consideration of motion apr roving Change Order #3 to
Contract No. 5-12, authori ing a total addition of
$1,662 .99 to the contract. See page 11 A11
Consideration of motion ap roving Change Order #4 to
Contract No. 5-12, grantin an extension of time of
20 days. See page "B"·
Verbal report of staff on the financial status of the
District
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175-10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER
C .O. NO • __ 3~--
CONTRACTOR: James I. Gallacher DATE: May 11, 19~6
Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping
JOB: Station Contract No. 5-12 ~___;. ___ _...;_.;....._::.. _______________ _
Amount of this change order {ADD) (~)
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contractor's invoices dated May 6 and Engineer's letter
dated May 11, 1966
1. Alterations in work at manholes No. 11 and 12 for
commercial sewer connection on south side of Pacific
Coast· Highway, east of Newport Bay per instructions
from Engineer $
2. Construct cleanout on 4-inch force main for
commercial connection south side of Pacific Coast
Highway, east of Newport Bay per instructions
from Engineer
3. Re-connect existing 10-inch force main at Rocky
Point Pump Station per instructions from Engineer
4. Alter bolt detail on 27-inch manifola in new pump
station per instructions from Engineer
5. Increase size of dome lights in new pump station
per instructions from Engineer
200.00
644.18
398.12
295.89
124.80
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 1,662.99
Original Contract Price $ 698,569.55
Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 205,761.75
This Change (ADD)(EEE~) 1,662.99
Amended Contract Price $ 494,470.79
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 11, 1966
-A-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS or
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer
JAMES I. GALLACHER
By ______________________________ ___
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P.O. BOX 5175-10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
CHANGE ORDER c.o. N0. __ 4..._ __ _
CONTRACTOR: · James I. Gallacher DATE:_l!~y 11~ 1966
Coast Highway TrunK Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping Station
JOB: Contract No. 5-12
Amount of this change order (ADD) (DEDUCT) $ None __ ___;:.~..;;.._.-----~~--
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Engineer's letter dated April 6, 1966
EXTENSION OF TIME:
Inclement Weather Days
November & December, 1965 20
Original specified completion date: April 10, 1966
Completion date with this extension
of time (20 days) April 30, 1966
Original Contract Price $ 698,569.55
Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 204 1 098.76
This Change (ADD) (DEDUCT) _ _....;;;N.;..;;o..;.;;n...;;..e _____ _
Amended Contract Price $ 494,470.79
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 11, 1966
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS of
Orange County, California
By /s/ Paul G. Brown
Asst. Gen. Mgr. & Chief Engineer
JAMES I. GALLACHER
By ______ ~------------------------
-B-
"--~·---
Agenda Items #9 throu~h)~2 can be referred to
the special attorney for the assessment district:
if desired.
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenu e
Fountain Valley, CaliF., 92708
DISTRICT No. # 1-7
AGENDA
May 4th, 1966 -4:00 p .~
( 1) Roll Call
(2) Appointment of Chairmen p r o tern, if necessary
( 3) ISTRICT 1 ~-"~
on sideration of motion r e: Receive and f ile minute excerpts ,fTJll"f
fr om the Cities of Orange and Tustin , relative to electi ons 5
(5)
of mayors and appointments of alternates to serve on the
District's Board
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 ./l. ~
Report of the General Manager /IV° .
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
-..-eport of the General Counse l ~'
ISTRICT 1 ~~
Consideration of mot i on re: Directing the Secretary to open ...;yr~1
nd read sealed bids received for Clarifier H, Job No . P2-12,
pursuant to legal notice pub lished as required by law
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Referring bids for Job No . P2 -12
to the engineers and the General Manager for tabulation and
recommendation to the Board
GSTRICTS 1 AND 7 0 /l
Report of the engineers and General Counsel on acquisition ~ ·1· of easements between Ma in and Bristol Streets adjacent to {
~ he exi~:~,nfo District No . 1 easement ~ ~ ~ ~ h
(9J •) ISTRICT 7 / r~ r ~ /U.' ~ v7 ~ '11 J ~( g~~~;~~~ ~a~ ~~ei;,o~utl'.::l I ntention in AssessmenJ ~ /'
(10 )
(11)
(12 )
(..,V
~
[//V
DISTRICT 7
Considera tion of action regarding protests
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Reso l ution No. 66 -5 1-7 re : Ordering
modification relative to Assessment District #6
DISTRICT 7
~~
Considerat i on of Reso lution No. 66 -52-7 re: Ordering work
in Assessment District #6
STRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -53-7 re: Authorizing
condemnation of property needed in the construction in
Ass e ssment District No . 6 . See page 11 A11
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -54-7 re: Ap p lication for
annexation of territory to the District (Hall-Conway ~
~n~xa~n)"J-%, ~
(15) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re:
warrant, as follows:
Approval of Operating Fund
#2950 Southern California Edison Co.
(16) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Other business and communications, if any
(17) .I:. ~V'~
Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., ~
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re:
May 11, 1966
(18) DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-53-7
AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN
CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and
determined and hereby does find and determine, that the public
interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition,
construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County
Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A
sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or
incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping
stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of
sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation,
treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising
within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such
other territories as said District may have contracted to serve
pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor.
Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of
which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses
and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly
described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full
herein.
Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of
way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired
subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to
use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease-
ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and
free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however,
that:
(a) No building or structure of any kind shall be
placed, erected or maintained thereon;
(b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con-
structed upon, over, or along said easements
and rights of way to a grade less than four feet
above the top of any pipe or pipes located with-
in the lines of said easements or rights of way;
(c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the
surface of the ground as it shall exist within
the lines of said easements and rights of way
upon the completion of the improvements to be
constructed therein greater than six feet in
depth.
Section 4. '!hat the permanent easements and rights of way
to be acquired shall include:
{a) The right to construct manholes, air valves,
blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations,
metering stations, standpipe and service con-
nection structures appurtenant to said line or
lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall
not extend above the surface of the ground;
(b) The right during construction to use all existing
private roads within the properties of the owners
for ingress to and egress from the work, together
with the right, upon completion of the construe-
-2-
tion of the pipeline or pipelines or other
works, to construct and maintain an access
road upon, over and along such permanent
easements and rights of way as may be in
the public interest from time to time.
Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares
its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof
by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller,
Nisson, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California,
be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners
and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose
of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said
County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be
prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable
thereto. That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to
make application to said Court for an order fixing the a.mount of
security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for
an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange
County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said
real property for the uses and purposes herein described.
Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized,
upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nissen,
General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the
County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as
may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the
Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way
to the District.
-3-
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
( 1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
DISTRICT No. #1-7
AGENDA
~ay 4th, 1966 -4:00 P·!!!..:...
of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
DISTRIC
Conside ation of motion re:<H' Receive and file minute excerpts
from th Cit~~f 0 1~e~ Tustin , relative to elections
of mayor arrci appointments of alternates to serve on the
Distric t' Board
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
~eport of e General Manager
I
DISTRICTS 1 A j • 1.-'-/' I'"'"\ . C ...
-Report of the Counse l !~ ~ '' ' ~"
DISTRICT 1 tt)J
Consideration motion re: Directing the Secretary to open ,}'\,....,
I . J
and read sealed bids received for Clarifier H, Job No . P2-12, ~~v \
pursuant to lega notice published as required by law
~v "-
(7)
(8)
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of ~tion re: Referring bids for Job No . P2 -12
to the engineers a d the General Manager for tabulation and
recommendation to t e Board
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Report of the engineers and General Counsel on acquisition
of easements between Main and Bristol Streets adjacent to
the existing District No . 1 easement \? J ... /_._...,,,
(9) DISTRICT 7 l ;l. I\ ?. I,_
Continue hearing on Resolution of In tention in Assessment
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
( 14)
Di strict #6
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of action regarding protests
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No . 66 -51-7 re: Ordering
modification relative to Assessment District #6
DISTRICT 7
Cons ideration of Resolut i on 'INo. 66-52-7 re: Ordering work
in Assessment District #6
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution
condemnation of property nee
Assessment District No . 6 .
DISTRICT 7
. 66 -5 3-7 re: Authorizing
d in the construction in
e page 11 A11
')). ,,
Consideration of Resolution o . 66 -54-7 re: Application for
annexation of ~erritOJY A t?-r!'.f~ ~ist ri9~ (Hall-Conway ~
an_nexation). ~ ~~ ~ _'1.~ 7Y'ft-.-'l ~~~ tyvv'~~ 0 /9~~---
1
(15)
(16}
(17)
(18)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion
warrant, as follows:
#2950 Southern
re: '~ RPylva1 of Opera ting Fund (\. ~v1
/ \~ (y .\r.>-
rnia Edison Co. $63 .. 53 ~ 1v~
'
Vy
u DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Other business and communic tions, if any
fa:'·, \ .\_, ~
DISTRICT 1
-Consideration of motion re:
May 11, 1966
\[\,, ' I .lJ
Adjournment to 7: 30 P .m., I\ \ yJA\
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 66-53-7
AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN
CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and
determined and hereby does find and determine, that the public
interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition,
construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County
Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: A
sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or
incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping
stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of
sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation,
treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising
within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such
other territories as said District may have contracted to serve
pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor.
Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of
which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses
and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly
described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit "A"
attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full
herein.
Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of
way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired
subject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to
use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease-
ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and
free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however,
that:
{a) No building or structure of any kind shall be
placed, erected or maintained thereon;
(b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con-
structed upon, over, or along said easements
and rights of way to a grade less than four feet
above the top of any pipe or pipes located with-
in the lines of said easements or rights of way;
(c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the
surface of the ground as it shall exist within
the lines of said easements and rights of way
upon the completion of the improvements to be
constructed therein greater than six feet in
depth.
Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way
to be acquired shall include:
(a) The right to construct manholes, air valves,
blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations,
metering stations, standpipe and service con-
nection structures appurtenant to said line or
lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall
not extend above the surface of the ground;
(b) The right during construction to use all existing
private roads within the properties of the owners
for ingress to and egress from the work, together
with the right, upon completion of the construe-
-2-
tion of the pipeline or pipelines or other
works, to construct and maintain an access
road upon, over and along such permanent
easements and rights of way as may be in
the public interest from time to time.
Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares
its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof
by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller,
Nissen, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California,
be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners
and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose
of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said
County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be
prosecuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable
thereto. That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to
make application to said Court for an order fixing the amount of
security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for
an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange
County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said
real property for the uses and purposes herein described.
Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized,
upon receipt of a Court order and demand from c. Arthur Nissen,
General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the
County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as
may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the
Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way
to the District.
-3-
Mr . E . H. Fi nster , of Boy l e Engineering , engineers for
the District , reported verbally on the acquisition of sewer easements
between Main and Bristol Streets, ~e:je:eent bo ehs 81EiB1'ing D:hii;riei;
8PS€"t0 ent . '
Following a d iscuss i on by the engineers, Gene r al Counsel , and
the Directors concerning negotiations for the acquisition of
easements adjacent t o the exi sting Di strict No . 1 easement , it
was moved , seconde d and dul y c arr i ed :
£~~~ t!!?J~~
~~
That the engineers be directed to submit a written e v aluati on
o f the costs of acqu isition of the
additional construction expense i f
ri g ht of way .
easemen ts, as
/)~~~
thex' '"sewer is
1
compared with the
~~~ Perouted in public
·-·
R G L L C A L L
Dat24ky ,~ ;~/(, Time /,,.
It~m ~ t.dL :;>
Adj o urnea--#= /d H7M eet~~
7
DISTRICT 1
Harvey I/"' McMicha 0 1
Meye rs v
Miller v Mack
AllLn 7 Hirste:.in
-:.~ DISTRICT 7. ll-~S-J-]
v ~ -'7 v v
-=-Mill ~r v Mack
i---v v v ~·r 1 8 tt i--GrubE.r i..---L./ i.-Harvey -McMichaeJ. v l-
y v
!.--Meyers i--~
"' ~ Parks ,__. Hileman v (_---
[,,,.. / Allen Hirstein y I.. v
t,r;,,_ ~-y. 7
, THER...>:
Nelson {j{cL(, l & ( r--_,~yr-)
Brown .......--
Nisson 1.---v
Rimel .... ftt: I
Hohener ( , I rl v ~
Lowry L--
Finster ~
< Galloway t..--
;/ .'
Ca,rlson t....
.J....., ' ,__,... v
/
I 1• r / '--V ~ CLr.'
..
-
R 0 L L C A L L
Adjourned ./ ~ 7 Meeting
'-' Date S-1-..~ (,, ' . Time <i ( ~
Item .A« C d1
t:>
Nelson
Brown
Niss on
Rimel
Hohener
Lowry
Finster
Galloway ;;on . ~R&a,
I ~
Harvey
Meyers
Miller
Allt:n
Miller
DISTRICT 1
DISTRICT 7 I
Citm:arl!cForgi t __ _
Harvey
Meyers
Parks
Allen
V'
McMichael
Mack
Hirstein
Mack
Gruber
McMichael
Hileman
Hirstein
\_.I
Est. ~328,000.00
B I D TABULAT,ION
SHEET
Date
May 4, 1966
--------------------
CLARIFIER H -Job No. P2-12 Contract:
Contractor Total Bid
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
~
9.
10.
IL. ~J ~-/ft7~ fT~~I
' COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
l i
2
4
5
6
71
al
91
I 101
ll
12
l3il
14
15,
16
l?
18!
19
~ml
211
22
23
241
251
?61
:•
27i
i
2ai
291
'-'. 30 I
311
I
32!
LAW OFf'ICES OIP' l.1
RIMEL. HARVEY 8t
HELSING ji
P'OURTH FLOOR j
1
1
1010 NORTH MAIN SIT.
SANTA ANA. 11
CAL.IFORNIA 92701 I
i MINU'lJES FOR CONTINUED HEARING ON
RESOllUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7
ASSES~MENT DISTRICT NO. 6
I
i
I
May 4, 1966
4: 00 o'clock p. m.
The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the hearin~ on protests or objections against the work or the district as described I
I
in Reso,ution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of i
sanitarY\sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 I
has been\continued. The Engineer of Work and the Attorney for the assessment,
\ I
district p~ceedings thereupon advised the Board that they had prepared a I
resolution of modification for consideration by the Board and the contents of I
\ I
' I said resolut\~n for modification were thereupon discussed at length. It was )
then moved by Director.~ , seconded by Director ~I
that RESOLUTION NO. 66-51-7, entitled: I
"A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY I
SANITATiON DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI-
FORNIA, . .ADOPTED UNDER AND PURSUANT TO THE AUTH-
ORITY GRANTED BY SECTION 5231.1 OF THE STREETS AND
HIGHWAYS GODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING
CHANGES AT\HEARING ON RESOLUTION OF INTENTION,
CHANGING, MODIFYING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION OF
INTENTION NO.' 66-19-7 OF SAID DISTRICT, AND THE PLANS
OF THE DISTRICT HERETOFORE APPROVED FOR AND PER-
TAINING TO 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6,' WHICH SAID
PLANS ARE REFERi\ED TO AND INCORPORATED IN SAID
RESOLUTION OF INT~NTION, AND MODIFYING THE WORK
TO BE DONE AS DESCB_,IBED AND SHOWN ON SAID PLANS AND
IN SAID RESOLUTION 0~ INTENTION," .
\ I
be adopted and said motion and said ~ESOLUTION NO. I 66-51-7 were thereupon!
adopted by the following roll call vote: \
\
\
A YES: Directors
NOES: Directors
ABSENT: Directors
It now appearing that changes and modifications in the Resolution of
Intention, the Plans, and the work have been made in th~ manner provided by
law and all protestants having been heard and an opportunity\having been given
-1-
I
I
I
I
I
II / I! --'l -11,
1!
ll
I
I
I
11 to all persons desiring to be heard,-and a full, fa~r and impartial hearing
~
2
3
4
5
61
7
'.8
91
iPI ·: ... I
1 ,1.
ti1
J.2 •
I
131
u!I
15
161
171 . I
181
.,: ::• i
+Et
~·: ,
~pl
~~I
2~
~ . ..
23
.•-
24
251
?611
211'
I 2a!
29!
~· 3011
:;1 II
11
3211
LAW Ol"P'ICEB OP' I'
RIMEL. HARVEY& ,I
HELSING I:
FOURTH FLOOR ii
1010 NORTH MAIN 8To
SANTA ANA,
CALIFORNIA 02701 I!
haviJ?.g been granted, the Board of Directors ha-V:ing before it a diagram of
/
the assessment district and being familiaI_"/With the assessment district and
/ . /
also having considered all protests fi~7d, and having considered the m:~
1
as to the area ,of property represe16d by the protestants, Director ~
presented the ~Pllowing resolutiJ' and moved its adoption: I
. WHEREAS, cerlain protests have been filed by Dr. Robert I
E. ~all, M. D., J/a others, protesting against the doing of the j
work and impr7ement described in Resolution of Intention No. j
66-19-7, or ainst the Assessment District therein described; and
WHE EA S, the Board of Directors has carefully considered
all prote s or objections and having considered the area of the
Distric represented by said protests; and
HEREAS, this Board of Directors has made certain
ges and modifications in said Resolution of Intention, the
ns, and the work therein described;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of
ctors that it does hereby find and determine that the said
prot sts or objections have been made by the owners of less than
of the area of the property to be assessed for said work
as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No.
FURTHER RESOLVED that each and all of the said
protests or o · ections be and they hereby are overruled and denied.
Said motion was duly sec nded by Director ~4 ~ and carried by the
following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES: Directors
ABSENT: Directors
Director A~
J
the offered and moved the adoption of
I
I
i
I
I
!
l
I
I
I
!
I
I
RESOLUTION ORDERING WORK NO. in the matter of the constructio1
l
-2-
I
I .---~ ·-
, 1
~r . !
"
l
:I
4
5
6
7
:,aj
~I
I
10
11
12
13 1
141 I
I
I
151
I
161
171
181
191
20 1
211
22
23
241
I
251 I
I ?6!
271 1
I
281
29!
' I
'..!' 30 i I
I
:;111
32!
I'
LAW OP'P'ICE& OP' ! I
RIMEL. HARVEY 8c i I
HELSING !I
FOURTH FLOOR 11
1010 NORTH MAIN &To •
SANTA ANA. ll !I
CA&.ll"ORNIA 9270J ! I
of ·sanitary sewers and appurt~ri~nces and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT NO. 6," which motion was seconded by Director ~~
u
and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote:
\
)
AYES: Directors ~
NOES: :Oirectors ~
~
ABSENT: ;f)irectors ~
I
{
f
.:'
I
t
I
-3-
l
i
I
l
I
I
·I I
I
!
FORM 21• ATLAS STATIONERS\L A
-Jf f M.EMO ·RANDUM
TO ___ _ DATE -
FROM .A SUBJECT ______________ _
>
~
/J.D. ~ _47?aq ~ ~~?4,r .
ORAL messages waste your time and the time of the other person; they often cause
annoying interruptions and are apt to be misunderstood or forgotten. Put it in writing.
JACK J. RIMEL
JOHN A. HARVEY, Ill
DUFFERN H. HELSING
:RICHARD N. RIMEL
GEORGE G. LOGAN
LAW OFFICES OF
RIMEL, H A RVEY & HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1 010 NORTH MAIN STREET
SANTA .ANA, CALIFORNIA 9 2701
April 20, 1966
Fred A. Harper, Secretary
County Sanitation District No . 7
P. O. Box 5175
Fountain Valley, California 927 0 8
D ear Mr. Harper:
Re ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
547-7395
MADISON 5 -7 579
We e n close h erewith the follo w ing for you r use at you r
meeting n ext Tuesday, April 26th, when the h earing on t h e Reso-
lution of Int ention is held in the above matter :
(1) Form of minutes .
(2 ) Resolution Ordering Work.
After the hearing, if you will furnish us with a conformed copy of
the resol ution ord ering work, a n estimated amount of incidentals
to date (including acquisition cost), and a date for the opening of
bids, we will then complete and send you a notice inviting bids to
be posted. We w ill have it published.
jc
encl
cc : Boyle & Lowry-Eng.
Yours very truly,
C . THUR NISSON and
J ACK
1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7
2 MINUTES FOR HEARING ON
RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7
3 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6
4
5,
I
61
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
221
23
24
25
26
27
28
".-!
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY Be
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALll"ORNIA 92701 II
April 26, 1966
7:00 o'clock p. m.
The Secretary reported that this was the time and place fixed for the
hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District, as described
in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of
sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611
as described in said resolution.
The Secretary also reported that affidavits in support of the publication
of the Resolution of Intention, the mailing of printed notices of the adoption of
said resolution, and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as required by
law, had been made and are on file in the office of the Secretary. The Chair-
man then inquired of the Secretary if any written protests or objections against
the work or the District had been filed with him in said matter. The Secretary
reported that written protests had been filed with him prior to the ------
time set for the hearing by the following:
The Chairman then announced that this was the time and place set for
the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, each as
set forth in the Resolution of Intention hereinbefore mentioned, and asked if
anyone present desired to be heard in said matter.
-1-
l The Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assessment
2 District and being familiar with the Assessment District and there being no pro-
3 tests filed, Director ________ presented tl~e following resolution and
4
51
6,
7!
I
8
9
10 I
ll
12
13
14
moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, it appearing that no protests, either written or
oral, protesting against the doing of the work and improvement
described in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, or against the
Assessment District therein described, have been filed; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors having considered the
area of the District represented;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of
Directors that it does hereby find and determine that no protests
or objections have been made by any owners of the area of the
property to be assessed for said work and improvement, as set
forth in said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said resolution be
approved and the proceedings be approved.
Said motion was seconded by Director and carried by -------
15 the following roll call vote:
16
17
18
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors -
Directors -
Directors -
Director then offered and moved the adoption of Reso---------------
19 lution Ordering Work No. , in the matter of the construction of sani------
tary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 in
County Sanitation District No. 7, which motion was seconded by Director ----
, and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: -----
23 AYES:
NOES:
24 ABSENT:
Directors -
Directors -
Directors -
25 Director _________ then offered and moved the adoption of
26 Resolution No. _____ , ascertaining and determining the prevailing rate of
27 wages to be paid for the public work described in Resolution of Intention No.
28 66-19-7, for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in
29 "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," which motion was seconded by Director
30 and carried by the following roll call vote:
31
"32
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors -
Directors -
Directors -
___ ,
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY &
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA. -2-
CAa.u·un1w .. 1>a701 (IF NO PROTESTS)
---
l
2
3
41
sl
sl
I
7'
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23 I
24
25
26
27
. 28
~
29
30
31
·32
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY &
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
--~ .-
After all protests and objections had been made, it was moved by
Director and seconded by Director and unanimous! ---------------------------
carried by the roll call vote of all Board members present, that all protests
be referred to the Engineer of Work for checking and report as to the percentag
of the area represented thereby. (And that this hearing be continued until
, 1966, at o'clock p. m., for the purpose of receiving the ------------------
report of the Engineer of Work and for further action in the matter.)
(The Secretary reported that this was the time and place to which the
hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, as described
in said Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7, in the matter of the construction of
sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 was
continued for the purpose of hearing the report of the Engineer of Work as to
percentage of protests, and for further action.)
The Engineer of Work reported that the protests represented less
than % of the total area of the assessment district.
All protestants having been heard and an opportunity having been give
to all persons desiring to be heard, and a full, fair and impartial hearing having
been granted, the Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assess-
ment District and being familiar with the assessment dis~rict and also having
considered all protests filed,, and having considered the matter as to the area
of property represented by said protestants,, Director presented -----------....:
the following resolution and moved its adoption:
WHEREAS, certain protests have been filed by ----------
and others,, protesting against the doing of the work ----------
and improvement described in Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7,
or against the Assessment District therein described; and
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors has carefully considered
all protests or objections and having considered the area of the
District r~presented by said protests;
. -.2-
CAUf'ORNIA 927~1 ~ I_ (if there ARE nrotP~t~)
7·
6
7
11
a' I
91
10 I
11 I
12
13
14
NOW,, THEREFORE,, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of
Directors that it does hereby find and determine that the said
protests or objections have been made by the owners of less
than one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for said
work and improvement, as set forth in said Resolution of Intention
No. 66-19-7; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each and all of the said
protests or objections be and they are hereby overruled and
denied.
Said motion was du~y seconded by Director and
carried by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors -
Directors -
Directors -
15 Director then offered and moved the adoption of ------------------------
16 Resolution Ordering Work No. ,, in the matter of the construction of ----
17 sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT
18 DISTRICT NO. 6,," which motion was seconded by Director ----------------------
19 and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote:
20
21
22
.23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP' I
RIMEL. HARVEY Be I
HELSING I
FOURTH FLOOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. 1
SANTA ANA. 1'
CALIFORNIA 92701 I
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
Directors -
Directors -
Directors -
-3-
(if there ARE nrotests)
l
2
3
4
5
i'
\ '\
\ I
I \
\
RESOLUTION NO.
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
ll mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District No. 7, to-wit:
14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 66-19 -7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Maz:ch, 1966.
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and·the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES 01'
RIMEL. HARVEY 81
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN 8To
SANTA ANA.
CAl.lf'ORNIA 92.701
-1-
'wJ
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
"Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani-
tation District No. 7, to-wit:
The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
offices of the Secretary and·the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more. than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
"32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 81
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA. -1-
CALIP'~RN!A 9~701
l
2
3
4
51
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
ll mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements tO be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District ~o. 7, to-wit:
14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 ! of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary.public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
~2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES 01'
RIMEL. HARVEY 8c
HELSING
f'OURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA.
CALIP'ORNIA ea70I
1
2
3
4
5
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
6 THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District No. 7, to-wit:
14 . The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
I
"32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 81
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN BT.
SANTA ANA,
CALIFORNIA 92701
-1-
\._/
i'
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY,, CALIFORNIA,, pursuant to the provisions of the
"Improvement Act of 1911,," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California,, does RESOLVE as follows:
That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
mentioned to be done and,, therefore,, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani-
tation District No. 7, to-wit:
The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
For further particulars,, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
of Intention No. 66-19-7,, and to the plans,, profiles and drawings on file in the
offices of the Secretary and-the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,,
and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
for said district,, and all of said plans, profiles,, drawings and specifications
heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors,, of more than local or ordinary public benefit,, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
°'22 I v For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES 01'
RIMEL, HARVEY Be
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
toro NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA,
-CALIP'ORNIA 92701
"-"
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
q
I
ll I
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
"Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
That the publ~c interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
the following work to be done and improvements fo be made in said County Sani-
tation District No. 7, to-wit:
The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 in said County Sanitation
District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board ~f Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
~2 For the particular description of said district6 reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 8c
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN OT. -1-SANTA ANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
...._,;
l
2
3
4
5j
6
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District No. 7, to-wit:
14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966. .
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 I of Directors and on file.in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
32 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY &
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
SOJO NORTH MAIN BT.
SANTA ANA. -1-
CAUFORNIA 92701
~-
i'
l
2
3
4
51
6
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
9 of the State of California, .does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
11 I mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements to be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District No. 7, to-wit:
14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6" in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 66-19-7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of March, 1966.
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 I of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by' the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
I
S2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFP'ICES 01'
RIMEL. HARVEY &I
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. -1-SANTA ANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
\._!
l
2
3
4
51
6
RESOLUTION NO. -------
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE WORK DES-
CRIBED IN RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 66-19-7,
IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 OF SAID DISTRICT.
THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT
7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, pursuant to the provisions of the
8 "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code
7 NO.
9 of the State of California, does RESOLVE as follows:
10 That the public interest and convenience require the work hereinafter
11 mentioned to be done and, therefore, the said Board of Directors hereby orders
12 the following work to be done and improvements tb be made in said County Sani-
13 tation District No. 7, to-wit:
14 The construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and all
15 appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 in said County Sanitation
16 District No. 7 of Orange County,, all as more particularly described in Resolu-
17 tion of Intention No. 6 6-19 -7, passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of
18 said sanitation district on the 9th day of Ma~ch, 1966.
19 For further particulars, reference is hereby made to said Resolution
20 of Intention No. 66-19-7, and to the plans, profiles and drawings on file in the
21 offices of the Secretary and.the Engineer of Work of said. sanitation district,
22 and to the specifications for the said work heretofore adopted by the said Board
23 I of Directors and on file in the offices of the Secretary and the Engineer of Work
24 for said district, and all of said plans, profiles, drawings and specifications
25 heretofore approved by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 are incorporated herein and reference is hereby made thereto for a more
27 particular description of said work.
28 Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that the contem-
29 plated work and improvement heretofore mentioned was, in the opinion of said
30 Board of Directors, of more than local or ordinary public benefit, and the said
31 Board of Directors has made the expense of said work chargeable upon a district
~2 For the particular description of said district, reference is hereby made to said
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 8&
HELSING
f'OUATH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. -1-SANTA ANA.
CALIP'ORNIA 92.701
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
1 2
13
14
1 5
16
17
18
1 9
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
·3 2
LAW OFFICES 01'
RIM EL. HARVEY 81
H ELS ING
P'OURTH FLOOR
,, Ii II
11
11
'I
11
I
1010 N O RTH MAIN ST, ii'
SANTA ANA.
CAi.ll'O RNIA 92701
\ \
\; \ ' \
Resolution of Intention No . 66 -19-7 .
Said Board of Directors h as determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six p e r cent (6%) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9 ) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the n ext September 1st following their date, will b e issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improveme nt Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of C alifornia, to represent each
ass essment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at the expira -
tion of t he last date fixed for p ayme nt of assessment in· t he notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors h as e l ected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%)
of the unmatured principal in accordan ce w i t h the provisions of Section 6464
of the Str eets and Highways Code of the St ate of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the L egisla ture of the St ate of California , designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code .
All of t h e said work s h a ll be done unde r the dir ection of a nd to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials us ed shall comply
with the specifications a nd be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Wor k.
The Secretary of s a id County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, a nd the Secretary i s hereby directed to publish
twic e in THE TUSTIN NEWS, a weekly n e wspa p er published and circulated in
said county and district a nd h ereby designated by the said Board o f Directors
for that purpose, a N otice inviting such proposa l s or bids for doing the said
work and referring to specifications on file.
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this d ay of
1966.
ATTEST:
S'e cretary
-2-
----------~--~~-
Cha irman
l
2
\_,,) 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
·32
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 81
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST,
SANTA ANA,
CAUP'ORNIA 92701
i'
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
mann·er provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911, " being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and d~termined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
''Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district,, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS; a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and ref erring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of -----------~---~----
Chairman
s'e·cretary
-2-
l
2
\_,I 3
4
5
6
7
8
.9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL.. HARVEY &
HELSING
P'OURTH FLOOR
t010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALIP'ORNIA 92701
j'
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next su~ceeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of Caluornia, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of Caluornia.
Said Board of Directors has elected and d~termined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911," being .Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specuications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered,, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and .hereby desigi;iated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and ref erring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of
--~------~-------
Chairman
S'ecretary
-2-
l
2
\.,,! 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES Of'
RIMEL.. HARVEY &
HELSING
l'OURTH FLOOR
tOIO NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALIJPORNIA 92701
..
11
I
11
11
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeecli~g
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
<?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall com~ly
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and referring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~-----------
Chairman
s'ecretary
-2-
l
2
\._I 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
lO
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
S2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 8&
HELSING
P'OURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CAL.IPORNIA 92701
11
'I
I
I
'I
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement .Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911,," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and .hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and ref erring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ---------------------
Chairman
S'ecretary
-2-
l
2
\.._I 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEi.. HARVEY 81
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. :
SANTAANA. I
CAL.ll'ORNIA 92701 I
II I
'I II
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and referring to sp·ecifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~----------~
Chairman
S'ecretary
-2-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
'..I
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES Of'
RIMEL. HARVEY II
HELSING
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN BT.
SANTA ANA.
CALIFORNIA 92701
11
I
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00} or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o}
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
9f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911, 11 being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and ref erring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED# SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of -------------------
Chairman
S'ecretary
-2-
l
2
·~ 3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL. HARVEY 81
HELSING
P'OURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA.
CALIP'ORNIA 92701
II I
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond ,
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6%) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5390 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5%)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
<?f the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall com~ly
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Secretary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS~ a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and referring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of -------------------
Chairman
-2-
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
~2
LAW OFFICES OP'
RIMEL.. HARVEY a
HELSING
P'OURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
SANTA ANA. I
-CA~~f!N_IA 92701 -I
II
I
I
I
Resolution of Intention No. 66-19-7.
Said Board of Directors has determined and declared that serial bond 1
bearing interest at the rate of six per cent (6o/o) per annum and extending over a
period ending nine (9) years from the second day of January next succeeding
the next September 1st following their date, will be issued hereunder in the
manner provided by the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Part 5, Division 7
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, to represent each
assessment of Fifty Dollars ($50. 00) or more remaining unpaid at. the expira-
tion of the last date fixed for payment of assessment in the notice to property
owners mailed pursuant to the provisions of Section 5 3 90 of the Streets and
Highways Code of the State of California.
Said Board of Directors has elected and determined to have the
redemption provisions of said bonds provide a premium of five per cent (5o/o)
of the unmatured principal in accordance with the provisions of Section 6464
of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California.
· All of the work herein ordered shall be done and carried through in
pursuance of an Act of the Legislature of the State of California, designated the
"Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code.
All of the said work shall be done under the direction of and to the
satisfaction of the Engineer of Work and all of the materials used shall comply
with the specifications and be to the satisfaction of the Engineer of Work.
The Sec.retary of said County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby
directed to post conspicuously for five (5) days on or near the Chamber door of
the Board of Directors of said county sanitation district, in the manner and
form required by said Code, a Notice Inviting Sealed Proposals or Bids for
doing the work herein ordered, and the Secretary is hereby directed to publish
twice in THE TUSTIN NEWS; a weekly newspaper published and circulated in
said county and district and.hereby designated by the said Board of Directors
for that purpose, a Notice inviting such proposals or bids for doing the said
work and referring to specifications on file.
1966.
ATTEST:
ADOPTED, SIGNED AND APPROVED this day of ------~----------~
Chairman
S'ecretary
-2-
11
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ 29
30
31
32
LAW OP'P'ICS8 OP'
RIMEL 8i HARVEY
FOURTH FLOOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I
IAHTA AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI I
., •, t
C ERTIFIC AT ION
I
I
·I
I
I
I
I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITi
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing Resolution No. _____ was duly adopted ~ta
regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ------------------~
the following vote of the members of the Board:
AYES: Directors
NOES: Directors -----------------------------
ABSENT: Directors ------------------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and
--------------~ ------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said
----------~ -----
resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. ------------------
Secretary , County Sanitation D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
County of Orange )
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-------------------
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of , 1966. ----
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ------__________ ___,;
Secretary , County Samtation b1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
2
3
I
I
·i
I
I c ERTIFIC AT ION I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT i
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
' 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. ·7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by
~------------------------
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors -------------------------
NOES: Directors ---------------------------
ABSENT: Directors
~--------~------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ----------------------------·
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said --------------------------
resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. --------------------
Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OP'P'IC&lil OP' I
RIMEL 8i HARVEY
FOURTH P'LOOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN 81'. I
~ ... AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA---------------------
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, .true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
. I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the I
day of , 1966. ----------· I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ------------------
Secretary , County Samtat1on D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
I
I
'i
CER.TIFICATION I
I
I
2
3
4
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANI'l;' Aj-
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by
~------------------~
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
~------------------------------
NOES: Directors
~-------------------------------
ABSENT: Directors
~------------------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and __________________ --.; ~~--~
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said --------------------· ~-------
resolution on the day of , 196 6. --------------------~
Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22
23
24
25
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify!
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. ll
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
27 day of , 1966.
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFP'ICE9 OP' ,,
RIMEL lie HARVEY
FOURTH P&.OOR I'
1010 NORTH MAIN &T. !
SANTA AHA. CA&.IP'ORNIAI I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------------·
Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
l
I
I CERTIFICATION
I
I
·1
I
I
2
3
I I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANI~ Aj-
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by ---------------------~
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
------------------------~------
NOES: Directors ---------------------------------
ABSENT: Directors --------------------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ~-------------------..; --------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said --------------------~--~
resolution on the day of , 1966. ----------------------·
(Seal)
Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct
No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22
231
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OP'P'ICP OP' I
RIMEL & HARVEY
FOURTH l'LOOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I
~A AHA. CALIFORNIA I I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA----------------------------
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
. I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of , 1966. --------------------
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ____;
Secretary , County Samtation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
l
2
3
4
CERTIFICATION
I
I
·1
I
I
I
I,------------' Secretary ____ of COUNTY SANI'l;' Aj-
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF. ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ------~-----------~
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
~------------------------
NOES: Directors
-----------------~
ABSENT: Directors ----------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and -----------------------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said -------------------------~
resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. -------------------
(Seal)
Secretary , County Samtahon District
No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22
23.
24
25
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify!
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1'
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
27 day of , 1966.
28
29
30
31
32
I.AW OP'P'ICESI OP'
RIMEL 8c HARVEY
FOURTH P'LOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I'
~NTA AHA. CALIFORNIA'
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ---------------------·
Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
l
2
3
4
C ERTIFIC AT ION
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT1
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify j
that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by ----------------~
6
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
NOES: Directors -------------------------------
ABSENT: Directors
----------------------------~
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ---------------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said ----------------~-----
resolution on the day of , 1966. -----------------
(Seal)
Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct
No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OP'P'IClt8 OP
RIMEL & HARVEY
FOURTH FLOOR
1010 NORTH MAIN UT. I
lANTA AHA, CALIFORNIA'
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-1
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify!
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. I
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District I
, I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of , 1966. ------------------
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ----------------
Secretary , County Samtat1on D1str1ct
No. 1 of Oi:ange County
2
3
I
I
·1
I
CERTIFICATION I
I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANir:J;' Al-
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
' 5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by
~---------~--
'l the following vote of th~ members of the Board:
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
NOES: Directors
ABSENT: Directors
-----~-~-------~-
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and --------------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said ----------· ----
resolution on the day of , 1966. -------------
Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22
23.
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFl'IClll:ll OIP I
RIMEL 81 HARVEY
FOURTH l'LOOR I'
1010 NORTH MAIN llT. I
:IAHTA AHA. CALIP'ORNIAI
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA----------------
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
. I
No. 7 of Orange County at ~ regular meeting thereof held on the I
day of , 1966. ------------· I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. ----------------
Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
I
I
I
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
231
24
25
26
27
28
''--11 29
30
31
32
LAW OFl"IC:l£8 OP'
RIMEL tis HARVEY
FOURTH l"l.OOR I'
1010 HORTH MAIN &T. t
iANTA AHA, CA&.ll'ORNIAI l
I
I
·I
I
' CERTIFICATION 1 I
I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT Aj-
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. do hereby certify I
that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a
I ------~-
regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by
~--------------------
the following vote of the members of the Board:
AYES: Directors --------------------------------
NOES: Directors ----------------------------------
ABSENT: Directors
--------------------------------~
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and ___________________ ___,; ----~--
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said ---------------------' --------
resolution on the day of , 196 6. ----------------------
Secretary , County Samtafaon D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
County of Orange )
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA---------------------------~
TION DISTRICT NO. 7· OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
. I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the I
___ day of • 1966. I
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ___,; I
~~........----------r--"7"l'---..,-"T"W-_._..... ____ I Secretary , Counfy Samtation D1str1ct J
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
I
l
2
3
CERTIFICATION
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT 1
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify I
4 that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
5 regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
6 No. 7 of Orange County, held on the day of , 1966, by
~----~-----~-----
7 the following vote of the members of the Board:
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AYES: Directors
~------------~----------------
NOES: Directors
~--------------------------------
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and
---------~----~ ----~
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said ---------------------.; ~------~
resolution on the day of , 19 6 6. -----------------·
(Seal)
Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct
No. 7 of Orange County
20 ST ATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
21 County of Orange )
22 I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA--------------------~-----
23 TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify
24 that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. ~
25 passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District I
26 No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
27 day of , 1966.
28
29
30
31
32
LAW OFFICEll OP'
RIMEL 8c HARVEY
FOURTH J'L.OOR I
1010 NORTH MAIN 8T. I
IANTA ANA. CAL.IP'ORNIAl
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -------_____________ ___.;
Secretary , County Sarutation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County
1
f
I
I
I
l
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ll
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
~ 29
30
31
32
LAW OF..-ICE8 OP'
RIMEL Sc HARVEY
FOURTH ..-1.00R
1010 NORTH MAIN ST.
:i.ANTA AHA. CA&.IFORNIAI
C ER.TIFIC AT ION
I
I
·i
I
I
I
I
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANIT.Aj-
TION DISTR.ICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify j
that the foregoing Resolution No. was duly adopted at a -----
regular meeting of the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
No. 7 of Orange County, held on .the day of , 1966, by
~--------------~
the following vote of the members of the Board:
AYES: Directors
NOES: Directors
-----~---------~----~--
ABSENT: Directors
------------------------~
and I further certify that , as Chairman , and --------------
, as Secretary , signed and approved the said -------------------
resolution on the day ~f , 19 6 6. ----------------
Secretary , County Samtahon D1str1ct
(Seal) No. 7 of Orange County
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
) ss.
County of Orange )
I, , Secretary of COUNTY SANITA-t
TION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, do hereby certify!
I
that the foregoing is a full, true and correct copy of Resolution No. 1'
passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District
. I
No. 7 of Orange County at a regular meeting thereof held on the
day of , 1966. -----------
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the
official Seal of said District this day of , 1966. -----------------
Secretary , County Samtation D1str1ct
No. 7 of Oz:ange County