The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1966-03• • ~ BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II Coun ty Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 E:ll is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9 ) (10) (11) (12) DISTRICT No. # 11 AGENDA March 28th, 1966 -5:00 p.m. Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Consideration of motion re: Declaring public hearing open Jfl' ( '-{\ on Engineer 's Report submitted by Lowry and Associates, pursuant to legal notice published in the manner prescribed by l aw Report of the engineers re: Engineer 's Report Consideration at-motion re: Declaring public hearing closed . Consideration of \Res olution No. 66 -23-11 re: Overruling protests in connection with Engineer's Report, and adopting said report as mad\ See page "A" Consideration of mo~\on re: Accepting proposal of Lowry and Associates, Distr~·ct's Engineers, for engineering services in connection with Contracts 11-10-1 and 11-10-2, in accordance with the erms of the existing agreement . (Copy of proposal in fol ers). Report of the engineers on progress of design and scheduling of construction of Contracts 11-10-1 and 11-10-2 ~ -t:J "-ti }I-.._· 3> ~ r <.. Consideration of request 7af the City of Huntington Beach (held over from March 9th meeting) for deferring annexation fees on a proposed annexation of 14.63 acres of dairy property located at the intersection of Bolsa Chica Road and Heil Avenue; and , Consideration of the recommendation of the staff, as follows : (a) That annexation of the l ij 63 acres be favorably ac ted upon by the Board, and that annexation fees be established in accordance with Section 1, Subsection A of Resolution No. 64-136-11 (attached ), setting forth the District's annexation policy (b) That annexation fees be collected from time to time as portions of the annexed area requi re sewer service Report of the engineers on completion of Contract No . 11-9 (Edinger Avenue Gravity Sewer and Ea· Avenue Sewerage Lift Station) Other business and communications, · J ,, ' Consideration of motion re: ent S '. ,( 0 J > RESOLUTION NO. 66-23-11 OVERRULING PROTESTS IN CONNECTION WITH ENGINEERS' REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, OVERRULING PROTESTS AND OBJECTIONS MADE IN CONNECTION WITH ENGINEERS REPORT; AND ADOPTING SAID REPORT AS MADE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section l. This being the time and place set by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 for the hearing on any objections to the report of Lowry and Associates, Consulting Civil Engineers, Sanitation Engineers of said District, dated March, 1966, or to doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report, pursuant to legal notices of said hearing pub- lished for the time and in the manner prescribed by law, the matter was called up. Section 2. There were () verbal protests or objections ---- made by those present at the hearing. Section 3. The Secretary reported that there had been C> written protests filed in the office of the Secretary of the Board. Section 4. All protests and objections, both oral and written, made or filed in connection with the report of Lowry and Associates, dated March, 1966, filed with this Board on the 9th day of March, 1966, be and the same are hereby overruled and denied, and said report is hereby adopted as made. -A- ~. . RESOLUTION NO . 64-136-11 AMENDED ANNEXATION POLICY RESOLUTION OF COUNTY SANI TA TION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY ESTABLISH I NG AN AMENDED POLICY CONCERNING ANNEXATIONS OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT WHEREAS, it is in the public interest to establish certain requ:i.rements for territory seeking annexation to this District : NOW) THEREFORE , BE IT HESOLVED THr\T: Section l. The proponents of any application for annexation of any territory t o the D:!..strict, shall, n.s a condition to se ~uring approval of the Directors of the District to such annexation. com- ply with the following r~quirements; A. Pay or make secure arrangemt:nts to pay to the D5strict a sum of money computed by the following formula: For each parcel of land of le::..:: than 1/4 acre included in the proposed annexation, $75.00; for each parcel of lanJ of more than 1/4 acre included in said proposed annexation, $66.00 per 1/4 acre or portion thereof. In lieu of lump sum ca.sh payment of the aforsesaid sum of money > romplete or partia l payments may be deferred until all or any portion of the area in an annexation requires sewerage service. The Chairma11 and Secretary ar~ hereby authorized td exe~utc an agreement with the City of Huntington Beach whereby said City will, before sewerage service is supplied by the District, collect and transmit to the District such complete or partial payments. B. Dissolve and terzrinate any public agen the terri- tory proposed to be annexed which exists for the primary purpose of providing sewage and refuse colle~- tion and/er treatment for the territory proposed to be annexed. Section 2. The hereinabove stated condition~ shall apply to any application for annexation of territory to the District filed with the Boundary Commission, County of Orange, on or after Oc;tober 1, 1963. Section 3. Resolution No. 63-138-11 previously adopted by the Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 is hereby re- scinded and made of no further effect. PASSED AND ADOPrED at a regular meeting on September 10, 1964 . -2- .. ~ . "-' ----------------. ---------------·-~--..,.- STATE OF CALIFORNIAl SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 , of Orange County, Cali- fornia, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 6'.·l,.36.ll was regularly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said Board on the 10th day of ........,.,. , 196 't. , by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Di: t,cn ~ Stnart &n4 ftdll1M~ NOES: Done ABSENT: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, this lOtJ• day of Septenlaer, 196 h . Fred A.-Harper, Secretary, Board of Directors of County"" Sani ta t.:'..oi: District No. 11, of Orange County, California # 1 meeting March 28th #8 -Mr. Milo Keith, of Lowry and Associ tes, District's Engineers, -:;z/lL ~ CP '<I ~~~ /~ v informed the Directors that Xke.(Contfact No. '11-10-1, which will be known as the Slater Avenue Gravity Sewe and Nichols Street Sewer/ Board 's ~~eeifiea~ioR& w 11 be presented for the consideration at the April 13th meeting. !£he plans and specs for Kei:t:b::l#uJ::::th&Fza!ep""O~ed.::it~ ~fcontract No. 11-10-2; (Slater Avenue Sewage Pumping Statio:n, Force Main Sewer and Graviey Sewer, and Goldenwest Street Trunk $ewer ) will be presented to the Board at its meeting on July 13th. The engineers estimate the total cost of both contracts at $397,500.00. Fo±low~Rg-a -aise~ss~oR-ef 'fhe ~equest of the City of Huntington was considered, regarding t~e deferment of Beach/21&Xxa222xxt:otgxannexation fees for a proposed annexation of 14.63 acres of dairy property located at the intersection of Bolsa Chica Road and Heil Avenue. The staff recommended that the proposed annexation be favorably considered by the Board,and that annexation fees be established in accordance with Resolution No. 64-136-11, adopted ~~~Vf'.___-_/~U~'-~~~--~-' which outlines the District 's annexation policy. The staff also recommended that the annexation fees be collected from time to time as portions of the annexed area require XlfXNK sewer service. It was lvLS&DC: That the letter from the City of Huntington Beach be received and ordered filed; and, That the recommendation of the staff be approved and a«~e~te« adopted. \ #10 -The Chair recognized Mr. Milo Keith, representing Lowry and Associates, District's engineers, who reported on the progress of constructio n of Contract No . 11-9 (Edinger Avenue Gravity Sewer and -~ , Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift Station ) project is nearing completion and it can be •«;tp«M accepted by Mr. Keith distribut ed Contract No. 11-9, and a more detailed ana sis can be made. Mr. Keith advised that the anticipated that ~ as complete on April 13th. a memorandum regarding R 0 LL C A L L District :=::#-~/ -------Regular < Adjourned ______ i?" ______ __ Date ~auL,~~~ Time S: d FfoflJ. ----- I::=-~-~ JOINT BOARDS Cornwell Amo Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Nescher Parks Parsons Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Workman Wright Allen OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson YlvD~l~tL ~(LM. ' v v DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Allen Farnsworth Thompson Kanno Gruber Shull De Vries Elder McMichael Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Gumm ere Hileman Krein Welch Harvey, C. Queyrel Noe Hirstein Hirstein DISTRICT 1 Harvey,H. Meyers Miller Allen DISTRICT 2 Parks Callens Cornwell Crapo Culver Harvey,H. Hock Schutte Speer Worlanan Allen DISTRICT 3 Cornwell Amo Bousman Crapo Culver Furman Harvey,H. Johnson Kanno Long Nescher Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Allen DISTRICT 5 Parsons Gruber Allen Meyers Gruber Allen DISTRICT 6 DISTRICT 7 Miller Cook Harvey,H. Meyers Parks Allen DISTRICT 11 McMichael Mack Hirstein Hileman Kanno Farnswortn Shull McMichael Michel Krein Harvey,C. Queyrel Hirstein Farnsworth Thompson Shull De Vries McMichael Antich Callens Bell Gumm ere Krein Welch Harvey,C. Noe Hirstein Elder Hirstein Elder Hirstein Mack Gruber McMichael Hileman Hirstein Lambert o-Shipley Stewart ..............- Allen ;::;; Hirste~n ( , BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ~LC ~lZtii \_1 P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ell is Av enue Fountain Valley, Ca li f., 92708 II IY(1) ~P-(2 ) ;µ.. (3) (4) I (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) DISTRICT No. #5 AGENDA March 15th, 1 966 -7:30 p.m. Roll Call / App J intment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary I J j Consideration of motion re: Receive and file report ~~ of Donald C. Simpson, District Consulting Engineer, :AO i ~ dated March 14, 1966, re l ative to construction of the ~ · WelcQ Park Sewer. (Copy in fo lders) ~ Report of the staff re: Financing of the Welch Park \~'\\(\' ~~ Sewer ~' V' Consideration of motion re: Authorizing terminati on of agreement with Simpson and Stevlingson, Consulting Engineers, dated January 13, 1965, as provided in said agreement . ~ Consideration of motion re : Accepting proposal of hy'L,, Donald C. Simps~n, Consulting Civil Engineer, dated ~'' March 14, 1960, for engineering services in connection with the We lch Park Sewer project . (Copy of proposal in,,.f olders) Consideration of Reso lution No. 66 -20 -5 re: Approving and authoriz i ng execution p f agreement employing Dona l d C. Simpson, Consulting Civ~l Engineer, ln accordance with the proposal, unde-r the same general terms and c onditions as the exi~ting eng ineers ' agreement. See page "A" I' Cons i deration of request of City of Newport Beach, and report of the staff relative to revi sion of agreement with the City of Newport Beach for collec t i o n of the District 's connection cha rges. Consideration of motion re: ~eceive and file letters from the City of Newport Beach dated February 2 3, and March 10, 1966. (Copies in fo l ders) Consideration of Resolution!. No . 66 -21-5 re: Approving and a uthori z i ng exec utio n 9T revised agreement with the City of Newport Beach ~or collection of connectio n charges . See pag e 11 B11 /·(Copy of ag reement in folders) Consideration of Resolutioh No. 6 6 -17-5 re: Au t horizing di (. acceptance of a Grant of sement from Th e Irvine Company, f pl · .... "' in exchange for the quitcl iming by the District o f an /~~~~ existing eas ement, in conn ction with c o ~structio~ of ~""- the Coast Highway Trunk Se er and Ba y Brid*e Pumping Station, Contract No . 5 -1 2 . See pag e "c 1 (12) (13) {14) Consideration of motio Adjournment ~·.<q~ RESOLUTION NO. 66-20-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT EMPLOYING ENGINEER A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT EMPLOY- ING DONALD Co SIMPSON, CONSULTING CIVIL ENGINEER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the proposal of Donald c. Simpson, Consulting Civil Engineer, dated March 14, 1966, be approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the certain agreement, wherein said engineer is employed for engineering services including the design of the Welch Park Sewer, is hereby approved; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District; and, Section 4. That payment for said services is hereby authorized to be made in accordance with the terms of the proposal. -A- j RESOLUTION NO. 66-21-5 APPROVING REVISED AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING REVISED AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, FOR COLLECTION OF CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain revised agreement with the City of Newport Beach, dated March 15, 1966, providing for the collection of sewer connection charges established by Ordinance No. 502, as amended, be approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. -B- ! RESOLUTION NO. 66-17-5 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF A GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM THE IRVINE COMPANY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 3rd, 1966, wherein The Irvine Company, a West Virginia corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 5 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping Station, Contract No. 5-12, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said Grant of Easement is accepted in exchange for the quitclaiming by the District of its interest in real property described as Parcel 2 in an easement recorded September 10, 1965, Book 7661, Pages 741-746 of Official Records of Orange County; and, Section 3. That the quitclaiming of interest in said Parcel 2, in exchange for which this easement is granted, has heretofore been authorized by this Board of Directors by Resolution No. 65-211-5 adopted December 8, 1965; and, Section 4. That said Grant of Easement is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County, California. -C- Age,,1fa -lfn;;., Mn. I 0 .... AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES FILED In the Office of the Secreta County Sanitation District ry No 5 MAR 15 1966 ~~ THIS AGREEMENT, made in the City of Newport Beach, California, by and between the City of Newport Beach, a municipal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, hereinafter called "District", WHEREAS, District has by the enactment of Ordinance No. 502, as amended, established a schedule of sewer connection charges; and WHEREAS, City is entirely contained within the territorial limits of District; and WHEREAS, all of the improved territory of the District is also within the city limits of City; and WHEREAS, the City by and through its building department regulates all new construction within the City; and WHEREAS, it is for the mutual benefit of City and District that the sewer connection charges provided for in said Ordinance No. 502, as amended, of the District be collected in a manner most expedient and least burdensome on the owners of property within the City; and WHEREAS, the City will benefit by the construction and maintenance of sewerage facilities of the District within the city limits of City by District from the funds to be collected from said sewer connection charges. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. City as agent will and does hereby agree to issue permits and collect the charges established by District under said Ordinance No. 502, as amended. 2. City will account for the charges collected and remit to District on a regular basis not less frequently than ~uarterly the monies so collected. --..... ' 3. District does hereby appoint and nominate City and its agents and employees as the same may be designated by City as agents of the District for the purpose of issuing permits and determining and collecting the sewer connection charges established under Ordinance No. 502, as amended. This does not authorize City to act as agent for the General Manager or to perform the duties of the General Manager of the District as set forth and established in said Ordinance No. 502, as amended, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. 4. City agrees to act as agent for District as herein provided for a fee equal to four dollars ($4.00) for each District connection permit issued by City under the provisions of said Ordinance No. 502, as amended, irrespective of whether a District connection charge is payable for any such permit issued, and District agrees to pay said fee. Said fee may be deducted from the monies so collected.by City. 5. That certain agreement effective May 24, 1965 between the parties hereto is hereby terminated as of the effective date of this agreement. 6. This agreement may be terminated by either party giving ninety (90) days written notice to the other party designating a termination date, which date shall be the first day of a calendar month. 7. This Agreement shall become effective on the 1st day of April, 1966. (SEAL) {SEAL) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH a municipal corporation By----------~~------~----:-~----May or By ____________________ ~~~~--:----- C it y Clerk CITY COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, of Orange County, California, a public corporation By ______________ ~-:-~:-----:--------- Ch airman, Board of Directors By----------~------:-=oo:---~~~--S e c re ta ry, Board of Directors -2- 150 I \ ~ ~· /-·--·---( DISTRICT NO. 5 Parsons Gruber Allen v" ..-v Elder k!""' Hirstein Parsons ~ Gruber \7 Elder Allen vi' Hirstein Parsons Gruber Allen -JJ; 3"' v' V7. Elder ? Hirstein #5 -7:30 p.m., March 15th /I G ff)/ (-)7 ~I The1s:;t;aff r eviewed ~ ~oss ible mean s of financing the 7Ju__ c.vd lJ recommended construction project4which has been estimated by the ~ engineers1te eost-a~1n1111~ $320 ,,000 . The District, during the next fis cal yea~ will have $85,,000 in accumul ated tax f und s , and an / J;(o estimated $1 00 ,,000 in 1~~ connection charge fund .1P'I'he staff has conferred with official s of The Irvine Company, who have indicated Cl~ ' "'' .. that Lltey wot:tl~ l3e uil3::~to l oan the District $150 ,, 000 to assist in · ~ ~ c.1'-4''-y .4-e <!t<-JK ~loan would be repaidfon the same basis as financing the project . f ?-,t:j O oc-O the existing l o~n from ,.1 ~ I + The Irvine Company ~~e . In the event No l oan is rllllt negotiated , the District,5tax rate will fia:;!..£'$;tzo be increased ~approximately 10¢ for the 1966-67 fiscal year to provide the necessary funds . Following the verbal report of the staff it was MS&DC : That the staff be instructed to continue n e gotiating with The Irvine T t>c#ARC , Company concerning a possibl e l oan of $1 50 ,0001to ~el~ financ~he con - structi on of the facilit ie s recommended by the District 's engineers . -f-Should we mention what the basis o f repayment is on the existing l oan? -~· . - I. 0~tj.._ I --c;.v. ,."- The Assistant General Manag e r reviewed,\ the ~XR.S.R.Rt e xi sting agreement between the Dis trict and the City o f Newport Beach, f or colle~tion by t~e City of the District's c onnectio n charges . The agreeme n t provides for retention by the City of l ~ of the connection charges co llec ted, a s reimbursement to the City for its e xp enses. ~ A recent by the City 's s t aff reveale d that it the costs f or collecting t he connecti on charges were approximately $4 .oo per p ermit ; therefore, they rec o mmend~d that the City Counc il request recon s ideration o f t he ag reemen t, and t hP t negotiations be e ntere d into with the District t o revi se the existing agreeme nt to increase the City 's fee to $4.oo p e~~~e d. It was MS&DC: That the letters dated F ebrua r y 23, and Mar ch 10, 1966 , from the City of Newport Beac h, requesting a review of the agreemen t betwe en the Dis trict and t h e City, be received and ordered f ile d; and, FURTHER MOVED : That, as rec ommended b y t he District 's staff, the Board o f Direc tor s adopt Res olution No. 66 -21-5 , approving and authorizing e x ecution of a revised agreement wi th the City of Newp ort ~4 ~~·t.l Beach to provide f o r a f ee o f ~ .0 0 per p ermit issued to be Fe~a irie.d .-to-~ ~ tbe Cit~f or c ollecting the Dis trict 's c o nne ctio n chArges . 10-A -Th e Chair recognized Mr . Gordon Jones, representative o f The I .,,..---__,, ~ ~ ~ Irvi ne Comp any, wh o p o inted o ut to the Board and the s t aff that the procedure of the City in d e ducting its f ees fro m the c o nnection charges c ollected, befo r e transmissio n to the sani ta tion distric t, reduced the amount of funds in the District 's Facilities Revo lving Fund whi ch '· "I!'~ z • I I .. ~.· I ~") I fl ... ~ ... ' ~·~··'···"r/t: .. -· ... • .. . .. w • t ·- -· t;_ • .I •-,.-n S . • ., • ti.l. .. will be payable to The Irvine Company on a $290 ,000 loan. .... After a discussion of the matter, and upon recommendation of the staff, it was ?~S&DC: 1 r •. , " "'"&~-11,,I r - I ! l~ That the fees c~arged for collecting the District 's connection charges~ are to be pa ~d out of-~he O~erating Fund of the District. Ill • I f I ~ I l_~'t! 'I "'l;;I ., i I ' . . I •1 rM .J ' • J. .... -• I... -.,. .. ~ "Iii F .· ~~,. ,.~· . ~ I' ~ 1. • ;.,_ & • "r L r •,,. \. • __. 311 • . .,::, [~ -.i ... ~, .-' I ..: ~~I L .. , ~-~'=I. .. ·.- 11,l, I' "ja' ' .. · • :~. ~! • ~-., "i. ,1 I ~· r.. • -•I ;ii..,. ,!!'-, ... -...., ,., . • ... • . . ., .. I... 'r. I \ • l • .. ~ r '• -:-~ ~--~ -·· ....... ·-. • • J •• ~ • • • <~ v . l,-. . ,. ...... ~ .,,:. .. .. "I • • ~· . t-~ --.. ...L!. . .,._ .,'/"'-~ I i. • • L .....,~ --r ~ fl' _ _. ~· .... ; -, ·r ~ 'I.. .I' II 'I • -~-...... • • I .. • J ~ .. ....,. ... I .C.. · "" I • ,...._.t • I ~D . • • • '•r-..r • .11111.i I • l • ·~· ;. .. ....-.• .ir.Jt ~ • I I I _;p '"• 'fj -~~ . .... . .. . ...-'· . • ' .. NP• .~lo I ~ I · • ~ -• :-' ··r t I .i:.: -Jt.· • --.... • _.I/Ii . .-::.."' ;'-a:• I "i _,.. ~ -.... .:.II :-ii I · ... ri ·. ' • .~ -. r •r1 -··-. ...ie,,. -• • 1.. P'.i. • ... ~ _Ir"-.:~~-• -• .. lii ·-' •• · .I .J."-I [ • _;..~ •... -. . . . . ~"--<. • :... -It' .I • -. • ... J •., • " ., -.e I " ~ • ,.. •, =~· ~ r_ . . ~ -• ~ ... . . . , .... • • ~ I p a .. I., '"-'I iE r I .,"\ • '. l ~ . -l • .r.. 1.r--I -il. [ff 1111 • • •r ~· I • ~w" "',i;'"t: .. '.. "' ,; ,, •,,. ' .. _ . .£ !fr)_ --t. I r-1 I. r ,)ii.l .· ~ i:,. I f' ' • ~::!fllw-'tr M'-' l'-f'W ~ r~ I r"'~-. . .. -.. I rl"'. [L. .... I .... I · " I J · r 1 • .. --~ ....... --'4 .II! lt-a~s., ~~-.· -'-io.d· .···· .. -. .. := ... q.,uj -• ' I!' lnli -• .,.... • "1 • •. -:,.·-rl J ~ L • -.. i!:a--'j'• -~.;.. ~ . .: -. ~ it:11 ~ •1 I r .. , . ,, . I' ~ ~ --:: ... -:..----- " l • -- • ... Iii - -~ ORDINANCE NO. 502 (as amended by Ordinance No •. 503 effective March 1, 1966) AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND RE- PEALING ORDINANCE NO. 501. 3-1-66 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 Ordinance No. 501 entitled "An Ordinance Providing Rules and Regulations Relating to Connections to District Trunk Sewers" is hereby repealed. ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this ordinance, certain words and terms are defined as follows: (a) Connection Manhole. Shall mean a manhole constructed in the main line of a District trunk or sub-trunk sewer not as a part of the original construction, or a manhole built adjacent thereto, for the purpose of permitting sewage to flow into a District sewer. (b) District Connection Charge. Is a connection charge imposed by District No. 5 as a charge for the use of District 1 s sewerage facilities whether such connection is made directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately dis- charges into a District sewerage facility. (c) District Sewerage Facility. Shall mean any property belonging to County Sanitation District No. 5 used in the treat- ment, transportation or disposal of sewage or industrial wastes. (d) Domestic Sewage. Shall mean the waterborne wastes derived from the ordinary living processes which are of such volume and character as to permit satisfactory disposal into a public sewer. (e) Industrial Waste. Shall mean any and all liquid or solid waste substance, not sewage, from any producing, manufactur- o ing or processing operation of whatever nature. {f) Industrial Waste Treatment Plant or Facility. Shall mean any works or device for the treatment of industrial waste prior to its discharge into the District sewerage facilities. (g) Plumbing Fixture Unit. A plumbing fixture unit as used in this Ordinance is defined as being the same as set forth in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach, on March 24, 1965, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the District. (h) Pretreatment. Shall mean treatment prior to dis- charge into a District sewerage facility by means of an industrial waste treatment plant or facility. (i) Public Corporation. Shall mean any city, district or public agency (other than County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County), duly authorized and existing under the laws of the State of California. (j) Sewerage Facilities. Are any facilities used in the collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage and industrial wastes. (k) Single Family Dwelling. A single family dwelling is defined as a building containing only one kitchen designed for or used to house not more than one family including all necessary employees of such family. (1) Trunk Sewer Manholes. Shall mean those manholes constructed as a part of the District's sewer system. ARTICLE 3 -PERMIT REGULATIONS (a) Requirements. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use or maintain a connection to the -2- sewerage facilities of the District without a valid permit. This shall mean that all new construction occurring within the bounda- ries of the District from and after the effective date of this ordinance shall be required to have a valid permit from County Sanitation District No. 5 before it can connect to a sewerage facility or discharge sewage or industrial waste into a sewerage facility within the District. {b) Condition Precedent. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be sewered by use of the permit shall be in- cluded within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 5 and within the boundaries of a public corporation authorized to maintain public sewerage works. (c) Permit. (1) The permit shall be in two parts: First a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District sewerage facility or sewerage facility subject to a District connection charge as hereinabove defined under conditions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for dis- charging sewage and industrial wastes into District sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances of the District as to characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage. (2) The use permit may prescribe requirements as to a connection manhole, an industrial waste treatment plant or facility, or pretreatment, all to insure compliance with the District regulations as to characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage and industrial wastes. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit by the General Manager. -3- (3) Surcharges for Use Permit. The District hereby establishes the quantity of 7,500 cubic feet of non-residential sewage or industrial waste per month per acre of territory served as the maximum allowable effluent to be discharged into the District's sewerage facilities without the payment of surcharges. Each user discharging more than 7,500 cubic feet of non-residential sewage or industrial wastes per month per acre shall be charged $0.50 per 1,000 cubic feet or any portion of 1,000 cubic feet in excess of the 7,500 cubic feet maximum. Measure- ments may be required by the permittee, or permittee's effluent may be considered equivalent to the water or some portion of the water (excepting irrigation water) purchased or used by the permittee. Per- mittee shall upon demand provide District with his or its water usage records. (4) All existing permits shall be modified or amended to comply with the provisions of this ordi- nance. (d) Suspension of Use Permit. The second part of the permit may be suspended if a permittee is acting in violation of any provision of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regu- lations of the District thirty (30) days after receiving a formal written notice of such violation and a demand for correc- tion thereof from the District. Such formal written notice shall be given only upon recommendation of the General Manager and approval of the Directors of the District. No formal written notice of violation shall be authorized unless the General Manager of the District has first given an informal written notice of violation to the subject -4- permittee at least fifteen (15) days in advance of action by the Board of Directors. (e) Violation. For each day or part of a day a permittee whose permit has been suspended continues to discharge sewage or industrial wastes into a District sewerage facility in violation of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regulations of the District, he or it shall be charged the sum of ten percent {10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit. The same noticing procedure set forth hereinabove shall apply for intermittent or sporadic violators; and in lieu of a suspension of permit, the District Directors may impose a fine of not less than ten percent {10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit per day or any part of a day for intermittent violations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the violation of a permittee causes damage to the sewerage facilities of the Dis- trict, the District shall have the right to charge and collect for the damages to its facilities caused by such violations by an action of law. In all cases a formal notice of violation as herein- above provided for shall set forth the fine or other charges to be imposed for violations after the thirty (30) day correction period. (f) Procedure to Acquire Permit. An applicant for a permit or his agent shall make application on a form furnished by the District or an agent designated to act for the District. The permit application shall be supplemented by such plans, speci- fications or other information considered pertinent in the judgment of the General Manager of the District. The permit fees and charges as hereinafter described shall be paid to the District or an agent designated to act for the District. -5- {g) Disposition of Charges. All surcharges and penal- ties under this Article, when collected, shall be deposited in the District's Operating Fund. ARTICLE 4 -CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the appli- cant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. (a) Connection Charge for New Construction, Single :Qwelling Buildings. For each new single dwelling building con- structed, the connection charge shall be $120.00. (b) Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings. For each new multiple dwelling building con- structed, the connection charge shall be $120.00 for each dwelling unit or $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. (c) Connection Charges for New Construction, Other than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not limited to commercial, industrial and public building con- struction, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $60.00. (d) Connection Charges for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (a}, (b), and (c) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or -6- destruction of the former building, and such demolition or de- struction occurs after July 1, 1965, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $120.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. {e) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. For additions to or alterations of exist- ing buildings, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit added, provided that no charge shall be made for the first twelve (12) fixture units added. In the event that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a credit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alter- ations or additions. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtain- ing a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Cha~ges. A schedule of charges specified here- in will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as de- fined and specified in Sections 402 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. -7- ARTICLE 5 -FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND There is hereby established the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. All charges as established by Article 4 hereof, when collected, shall be deposited in said Fund. Said Fund may have one or more accounts within itself to be used for the purposes of accounting for the sewer connection fees originating in various territorial areas of the District. Said Fund shall be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other purposes described in Section 5474.9 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. ARTICLE 6 -INTERPRETATION OF PERMIT REGULATIONS If the factual situations presented do not follow pre- cisely within the rules herein promulgated in this Article, the General Manager shall interpret them in a reasonable manner. In making such interpretations, the General Manager shall be guided by the policy of the District, which is hereby stated as follows: It is the policy of the Directors of the District to base fees and charges in accordance with the benefits and uses supplied by the District. Those receiving the greatest benefits and most use of the facilities provided by the District shall proportionately bear more of the costs and expenses of the District. ARTICLE 7 -APPEAL If an applicant disagrees with the requirements directed by the General Manager in Article 5, he or it may appeal.by written notice stating his or its grievance. The Board of Direc- tors shall hear such appeal at its regular meeting next occurring fourteen (14) days after the filing of such written appeal or sooner at the plea.sure of' the Di.rectors. The decision of the Directors shall be final. -8- ARTICLE 8 -PENALTIES AND VIOLATIONS For each day or part of a day that any person, govern- mental agency or public corporation is without a valid permit and is connected directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewerage facility which discharges into a sewerage facility, he or it shall be liable to the District in a sum equal to ten per- cent (10%) of the permit charge applicable to the property so connected. ARTICLE 9 -ENFORCEMENT The provisions of this ordinance may be enforced by civil action at law and/or by injunction. In this connection, these regulations shall be construed as a contract by County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, and each permittee. ARTICLE 10 -VALIDITY If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be held to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the remaining provisions or portions of this ordinance; and to this end the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each and every article, section, sub- section, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more other articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be declared invalid. ARTICLE 11 -EFFECTIVE DATE The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary of the District shall attest thereto -9- and certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the DAILY PILOT, a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date of the passage of this Ordinance by said Board of Directors, and said Ordinance shall take effect July 1 1 1965. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, at an adjourned regular meeting held on the 24th day of May, 1965. /s/ James B. Stoddard Chairman of the Board of Directors ATTEST: /s/ Fred A. Harper Secretary of the Board of Directors -10- I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that ORDINANCE NO. 503, amending Ordinance No. 502, was passed and adopted by the Board of Directors of said District at a special meeting held January 24~ 1966; and that said Ordinance No. 503 shall take effect March 1, 1966. /s/ Fred A. Harper Secretary of the Board of Directors March 1, 1966 INTE RPRETA TIO N NO. 1 to Ord inance No . 502 , as amended With reference to Paragraph (e ), Article 4, Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings: If any additi on or alteration to a n existing bui l ding creates a comp l ete new dwelling unit, Paragraph (e) does not apply and charges will be co llected in accordance with Paragraph (c) "Connection Cha rge for New Constructi on, Mu l tip l e Dwelling Bui l dings .11 /s/Lee M. Ne lson General Manager ----- ------------ ---·------ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ei\,:f/1.-~. i~ f /}~ ·. ~' v l-K--C. C-. ~'"" b ,c-,.;(' , .,. · P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS ( AGENDA MARCH 9, 1966 -8 :00 p .m. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2 ) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (1 2) 6 (14) Roll Call Appointment of Chairmen pro tern , if necessary DISTR[CT 1 Cons~deration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 196 6 , and the spe9 ial meeting held February 23 , 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting h e l d February 9, 1 966, as mailed DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regul ar meeting held February 9, 1966, as mailed DISTRICT 5 Constderation of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1966, as mailed DISTR I CT 6 Cons i deration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1966, as mailed DI STR I CT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 196 6 , as mai l ed DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held February 9, 1966, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof held February 16, 1966, as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DI STRICTS Report of the Manager ALL DISTRICTS Couns el-c;tah vt1f ~?"24 J.5 ad/t:-. Report of the ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Comrni ttee (15) ALL DI STRICTS Consideration of motio re: Receive and file recommendation of the eneral Counsel relative to f antitrust suits initiat d by the State Attorney General. See page 11 G (16) (17) (18) (19) (20) (21) (22) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of resol tion authorizing the Attorney General of California t conduct legal proceedings on behalf of the Distri ts, against certain pipe manufacturers who have a legedlr, acted in violation of antitrust laws. See p ge 'F" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolutio No. 66-11 re: Approving plans and specifications fo Job No. I-4-2 (Installation of Additional Gas Compresso s), authorizing advertising for bids, and authorizing Di trict No. l to award contract for said work. See page "H" ' ~ ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of motion re: pproval of Change Order #3 to the plans and specifica ions for Job No. I-6-2 authorizing an addition of $1 220. 22 to the r-;~trac·t with Vinnell Corporation, Contract r. See page 'I' ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No 66-12 re: Accepting Job No. I-6-2 as complete, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of W rk. See page "J" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Report submitted by Hanson & Accountants, for the six-month 31, 1965. ceive and file Financial A'. terson, Certified Public eriod ending December ALL DISTRICTS ~ Consideration of motion re: Re eive and file written certification of the General Ma ager that he has checked all bills appearing on the age da, found them to be in order, and that he recommends thorization for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vot Joint Operating Fund and Capit warrant books for signature of No. 1, and authorizing pa~ent "A 11 "B" and "c" -------' ' . motion re: Approval of 1 Outlay Revolving Fund he Chairman of District f claims. See pages (23) ALL DISTRICTS (24) (25) (26) (27) Other business and communications if any DISTRICT l J Consideration of motion re: any. See page "D" DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, DISTRICT l Consideration of motion re: April 6th DISTRICT 2 of warrants, if 4:00 p.m., *' I Consideration of motion any. See page "D" re: Approval \pf warrants, if \\ \ -2- \ \_ \ \ 1./-1) ~1)v- • B (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) DISTRICT 2 '--1J-,, tJ!;r r Other business and commun1\cations, if any 'T · ~~ DISTRICT 2 , £'" 'ffi) Consideration of motion r : Adjournment ~ '1'· DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 \ Consideratia o ~·on e: warra:n-f bo an utho1 izing Se~page t/ 11 E" \ ~ DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: any. See page 11 D" DISTRICT 5 Approval of warrants, if ~q~ Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to a date convenient to the Board (preferably on or after March 21st) DISTRICTS 6 AND 7 Consideration of motion re: warrants, if any. See page (35) DISTRICT 6 (36) (37) (38) (39) c~~~ra-~ony.£-W~~io~~ Apprg__v~l oJ:.--w~ra~ a/• See page~ / i/ ~ ., DISTRICT 6 1 Other business and communic J tions, if any \ DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: \A djournment q '· ~ '- DISTRICT 11 \ Consideration of Resolution N~. 66-13-11 re: Fixing ~~ time and place for public hear~ng on Engineers Rep,ort r--_r ~ submitted by Lowry and Associates . See page 11 K' ~ DISTRICT 11 \ ~"(~~,~~-r Considera ti on of motion re : Ap\proval of warrants, if / J~"' -~~._,,. J any. See page 11 E 11 I" 1 J.}-,(.,;t.· ~ (40) DISTRICT 11 and communicatio~ns, if any(Le tter from City o f (41) ( 4 2 ) *** Other business DISTRICT 11 Consideration convenient to 2 1st) DISTRICT 3 Q <\. ~ I t:, , flµn tington Beach) • \~ t 'ti:t0'-4 ~~ J._Ot> \ of motion re: Adjournment to ~ date the Board (preferably on or after March Consideration of motion re: Receive and file Notices to Withhold against H. E. Johnson Cons t ruction Company, Contractor on the Mil l er-Holde r Trunk Sewer, Con t ract No. 3-10. (Notices to Withhold will be shown on Page 11 L11 of the final agenda). -3- ,_ i j (43) (44) (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) (52) DISTRICT 3 f Consideration of motion re: Approval of C~ange Order #2 (Revised), to the plans and specificati!'~ns for the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3±10, authori~-_ ing an addition of $ 3,019.75 to the conttact with H. E. Johnson Construction Company, Contr;actor. See page 11 M11 I x ' I "\~ DISTRICT 3 I Consideration of motion re: Receive and/file written ~ report of the Special Committee on Negotiations with "12.. ~ District No. 11. (Copy of report in ~6lders) v / DISTRICT 3 I Consideration of action on the reconun'endations in the report of the Committee, as follpws: I (1) That the District's engineers be directed ~ to prepare a formal Engine~rs Report re-~ ~//I lating to the purchase of permanent v~v capacity by the District in the existing facilities of District Nol 11, I I (2) That the District enter :ifnto an agree- ment with District No. li, whereby District No. 11 would rent from District No. 3 capacity in the M:illler-Holder Trunk Sewer below Nichols Str~et, on a temporary basis at a charge of approximately $15.00 per million gallons of sewage discharged. I J DISTRICT 3 1 Consideration of Resolution NoJ 66-14-3 re: Accepting proposal of the engineers, and/ordering preparation of an Engineers Report. See page 11 N11 (Proposal, Page "O") ' - DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion any. See page "D" re: ! I A:Pproval of warrants, if [ DISTRICT 3 f Other business and communications, if any I I I DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: /Adjournment i DISTRICT 7 J Consideration of Resolution No. 66-15-7 re: Authorizing acceptance of two easements from Howard T. Renshaw, et ux, in connection with Tract #48/46, at no cost to the District. See page npH ' DISTRICT 7 I Consideration of motion re: Receive and file letter from the City of Santa Ana ~equesting immediate con- struction of the Fourth Str~et Bypass Sewer. {Copy of letter in folders). ! ; i DISTRICT 7 ! Consideration of motion re:I Authorizing the engineers~ tvt. to prepare plans and specifications for the Fourth {) ~ · Street Bypass Sewer. ~ -4- (53) (54) (55) (57) (58) (59) (60) (61) (63) (64) (65) rli u\ DISTRICT 7 \~~ Consideration of motion re: Authoriz'ng the staff and 7'J(J.)/-· General Counsel to negotiate for acquisition of easements \ needed in the construction of the Fourth Street Bypass Sewer I DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Authorizing payment in the amount of $120. 00 to R. P . Buclmer, as settlement for removal of three trees from his property during construction in Assessment District #5-A, in accordance with the recom- mendation of the General Counsel. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Directing the staff to collect connection charges based upon schedule of charges prior to January 1, 1966, from the W. R. Nelson Elementary School DISTRICT 7 Consideration of letter from H. G. Liljeblad and E . Wessinger .JA requesting an expression from the Board concerning proposed ~r annexation of approximately one acre in the Cowan Heights yv area, which is not contiguous to the ~resent District - boundary. (Copy of letter in folders). DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Receive and file letter from the County Health Officer recommending immediate construction of local sewers in proposed Assessment Distr·ict No. 6; and adoption of Resolution No. 66-18-7 DISTRICT 7 Report of E. H. Finster of Boyle & Lowry, of construction plans for sanitary sewers District No. 6 and presentation ~ for Assessment \~oL,...-' ·yz ~,~ ~ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approving, receiving and filing plans and specifications for proposed Assessment District No. 6 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approving, receiving and filing ...r" diagram of proposed Assessment Distri ct #6 \'t--'~)ty~ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion estimate of costs re : Approving, receiving and filing L ,,1,., )./ , ,., DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution of Intention consideration of motion re : Authorizing Work to do all work necessary to prepare and posting ~~ A,~ DISTRICT 7 \lV" l'' y\V I No. 66 -19 -7; and the Engineer of notices for m~iling 7 ',O o \l~ Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants. See page "E" DISTRICT 7 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: IAdjournment \O'.)J~~ -5- WARRANT NO. 3996 3997 3998 3999 4000 4001 4002 4003 4004 4oo5 4006 4007 4008 4009 4010 4011 4012 4013 4ol4 4015 4016 4017 4018 4o19 4020 4021 4o22 4o23 4024 4o25 4o26 4027 4028 4o~ 4030 4031 4032 4033 4034 4035 4036 4037 4o38 4o39 4040 4041 4042 4o43 4044 4045 40~ 4o47 4048 4049 4050 ~~ 4052 4053 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS AMOUNT A-1 Tool Rebuilders Inc., Tools $ 12.81 Acore Drilling Service 132.17 Advance Electric, Motor Rewind, Supplies 244.85 Advance Supply, Valve 147.46 All Bearing Service Inc. 46.09 American Compressor Co., Parts 346.56 City of Anaheim, Power 31.21 Anchor Packing Co., Gaskets, Pump Parts 690.14 Arrowhead Puritas Waters 92.92 Arthur's Equipment Rental Inc., Grade R/W 731.25 Associated Concrete Products Inc., Grade Rin1s 66.20 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 106.05 Bank of America, Dist. 2 & 3 Bond & Coup Coll. 1,439.35 Bay City Bearing Co., Repairs, Seals, Belts 425.73 Beach Fabricating Co., Welding Service 27.47 Bell's Radiator Service, Repairs, Radiator Recore 54.32 Blower Paper Co., Janitor Supplies 109.75 Blystone Equipment Co., Valve 12.48 Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies 76.52 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies 485.36 Business Equipment Co., Reproduction Supplies 192.37 Calif. Wholesale Electric Co., Supplies 239.78 Cascade Pump Co., Pump Parts 728.oo Certified Building Materials Co., Cement 40.00 Chelsea Publishing Co., Engineering Book 19.10 R. B. Clapp Co., Inc., Controls 54.41 College Lumber Co., Inc. 142.72 Consolidated Electric Dist., Electric Supplies 37.91 Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc., Parts, Tools 316.25 DeGuelle & Sons Glass Co., Auto Seat Repairs 36.10 John M. Deck Co., Engine Repairs 29.93 Denny's Refrigeration & Heating, Air Cond. Repairl39.00 A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies 114.61 Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repairs 54.67 Don's Lawn Mower Shop, Power Mower 330.72 Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Electric Supplies 65.42 Enchanter, Inc. Ocean Research and Monitoring 1,000.00 Engineers Sales-Service Co., Inc., Comp. Parts 98.88 Enterprise Printing Co., Forms 43.84 Rimmon c. Fay, Ph.D., Bacteriological Research 370.00 Firestone Stores, Tire Repairs 6.oo Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation Repairs 267.24 Flair Drafting Service 403.38 Edward R. Francis, Employee Mileage 49.80 Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Engine Repairs 443.20 Garden Grove Camera Center, Film Processing 19.66 General Electric Supply Co., Supplies 741.31 General Telephone Co. 211.40 Goodall Rubber Co., Polyethylene Sheeting 25.99 Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware 134.67 George T. Hall Co., Incinerator Parts 448.10 Heathkit Electronic Center, Transcievers 447.72 Bernard Heying, Employee Mileage 27.60 Honeywell, Inc., Instrumentation Repairs 223.92 Howard Supply Co., Gauges, Valves, Hardware 914.98 City of Huntington Beach, Water 48.30 Hydraulic Institute, Technical Manuals 9.00 International Harvester Co., Auto Parts & Repairsl90.88 -A- WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 4054 Jones Chemicals, Inc., Chlorine $ 9,776.00 4055 Jones-Gillespie, Inc., Insurance 390.00 4056 Kleen-Line Corp., Janitor Supplies 106.81 4057 LBWS, Inc., Tools, Repairs 556.90 4o58 L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental 678. 35 4059 Judy Lee, Employee Mileage 20.60 4o6o Lewis Bros., Batteries 221.62 4061 D. J. Lord, Employee Mileage 15.20 4o62 3M Business Products Sales, Inc., Equip. Mtce. 40.00 4063 Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work 337.95 4064 Meredith Separator Co., Heating Panel 20.75 4o65 John E. Middleton, Employee Mileage 30.10 4066 Mine Safety Applieances Co., Chlor. Safety Equi~ 127.50 4067 Mission Laboratory Supply Inc., Lab Supplies 423.35 4068 Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Welding Supplies 142.89 4069 Nelson-Dunn Inc., Engine Parts 398.22 4o70 Newark Electronics Co., Inc., Supplies 61.15 4071 City of Newport Beach, Water 2.25 4o72 O. C. Suppliers, Fittings 736.18 4o73 Calif. Office of Procurement, Gov•t. Code 65.00 4074 Crance Supply Co., Pipe & Fittings 307.44 4075 Orange County Film Service, Photograph Manholes 85.80 4076 Orange County Muffler Service, Auto Repairs 19.12 4077 Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc. 329.11 4o78 Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps 12.19 4079 Orange County Wholesale Electric Co., Supplies 617.99 4o8o Pacific Telephone 277.45 4081 Postmaster, Postage 100.00 4082 Quality Electric Co., Instrument Repairs 31.59 4083 Robbins & Myers Inc., Pump Parts 270.48 4o84 San/Bar Electronics Co., Intercom Repai~s 29.78 4085 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 2.71 4o86 Santa Ana Book Stores, Office Supplies 2.86 4087 Santa Ana Electronics Co., Supplies 52.52 4088 E. H. Sargent & Co., Lab Supplies 448.61 4089 Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage 96.90 4090 John Sigler, Employee Mileage 24.80 4o91 Signal 011 Co., Gasoline 565.81 4092 Smith Bros. co., Roof Guard 124.80 4o93 Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses 21.84 4094 Southern Calif. Edison Co., Power & Light 4,097.86 4095 So. Calif. Water Co. 7 .80 4og6 So. Counties Gas Co. 1,263.28 4097 Southwest Flexible Co., Line Clean Equipment 243.89 4098 Sparks Stationers, Office Supplies 51.89 4099 Speed-E-Auto Parts 27.42 4100 Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Grease 54.29 4101 Sully-Miller Contracting Co., Street Repairs 455.00 4102 J. Wayne Sylvester, Notary Filing Fee 6.oo 4103 Tardif Sheet Metal, Truck Tool Boxes 659.70 4104 Triangle Steel & Supply Co., Steel Stock 134.39 4105 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Tools 117.10 4106 Utilities Supply Co., Tools 73.38 4107 Van Dien-Young Co., Cement 58.47 4108 Walker-Holmes, Notary Bond 9.00 4109 Walker Hardware Co., Shelf Holder 22.46 4110 John R. Waples, Odor Consultant 224.90 4111 Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts 11.73 4112 Western Electromotive Inc., Instrumentation Supp. 85.12 4113 Wimberly 1 s Petroleum Dist., Diesel Fuel 55.02 4114 Worthington Corp., Freight 72.18 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 39,249.05 -B- CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 4115 John Carollo Engineers $ 17,907.00 4116 J. Putnam Henck, A Corporation 27,648.27 4117 Schurr & Finlay, Inc. 19,899.09 i 4118 Twining I,aboratories 32.00 4119 Vinnell Corporation 13,316.22 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $ 78,802.58 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 118,051.63 -c- ~I WARRANT NO. 412 4121 4122 4123 4124 4125 4126 4127 4128 4129 4130 4131 4132 4133 4134 4135 4136 4137 4138 4139 4140 4141 4142 4143 4144 4145 DISTRICT NO. 1 Boyle Engin ng DISTRICT NO. 2 ANTS AMOUNT $ 14,615.50 J. R. Lester Boyle & idney L. Lowry $ 30.00 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUT ~y FUND WARRANTS J. R. Lester B le & Sidney L. Lowry Charles T. B wn Co. City of Ful erton FIXED OBL ATION FUND WARRANTS City Anaheim City f Fullerton Gar en Grove Sanitary District C / of Placentia ty of Santa Ana 1 ty of Buena Park µ ity of La Habra City of Orange DISTRICT NO. 3 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS 1 City of Anaheim \J. R. Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry City of Buena Park (\ity or Fullerton G~rden Grove Sanitary District C1\tY of La Habra CixY of Orange Cit~ of Placentia City of Santa Ana \ ACCUMULATk CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS ---- $15,902.:34 18,604.40 46,426.97 $ 80,933.71 $ 3,,136.07 ~r' 3,136. 23 / 574.12 / 574. i.2 ~/ 9,957.01 / 229.59 / 918.64 ./ 2,929.42 $ 21,455.20 $102,418.91 $ 2,243.26 ~ 45.00 / 139.52 / 2,243.10 /, 348.87 558.2i f 2,117.43 /' 348.87 j/ 6,387.82 $ 14,432.08 J. R.\Lester Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry $ City o Fullerton 1,994.00 14,676.98 13,187.75 H. E. ohnson Construction Co., Inc. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WA $ 29,858.73 $ 44,290.81 $ $ 645.59 350.00 995.59 James I. Gallacher Simpson & Stevlingson Small Craft, Inc. $ 75,099.73 ''----,_ 859. 00 1,081.00 $. ·77_, 039. 73 $ 78,035.32 \ -D- ; ./ ,. DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 4146 Boyle & Lowry 155.56 4147 R. P. Buckner {AD #5A) 120.00 4148 Southern California Edison Co. 227.08 $ 502.64 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS 4149 Boje & Lowry $ 400.00 FIXED OBLIGATION FUND WARRANTS 1,561.80~ 4150 City or Anaheim $ 4151 City of Buena Park 96.70 4152 City of Fullerton 1,561.80 /· 4153 Garden Grove Sanitary District 241.80 / 4154 City of Orange 1,474.70 4155 City or Placentia 241.80 / 4156 City of Santa Ana 4,434.50 / City of La Habra 386.90/ $ 10,000.00 $ 10,902.64 DISTRICT NOS. 6&7 SU~PENSE FUND WARRANTS 4157 Boyle & Lowry $ 40.90 4158 Orange County Pipeline Inc. 3,356.32 4159 Southworth & Stevens, Inc. 1,538.60 ( $ 4,935.82 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS 4160 Lowry & Associates $ 1,200.60 4161 Orange County Pipeline Inc. 16,197.75 $ 17,397.75 ..... ,,,/ -E- : State of California Office of· the Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE State Building, San Francisco 94102 February 7, 1966 "Fred Harper, Secretary Santa Ana Sanitation District Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 "Dear Sir: "Re: Concrete and Steel Water Pipe Antitrust Cases "This office, on March 17, 1965, filed in the United States District Court in San Francisco, on behalf of the State of California, five civil antitrust actions against certain manufacturers of concrete and steel pipe of the type used in water supply systems, irrigation systems, sewage systems, flood control, and other similar installa- tions built to handle large quantities of water. "The complaints, in general, charged that between 1946 and 1964, certain pipe manufacturers named therein as defendants engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to allocate territories and to submit collusive and rigged bids to the State, its political subdivisions and special districts (hereinafter called California Public End Users), with the result that the Public End Users paid more for pipe or projects containing pipe than they would have paid if law- ful competitive conditions would have prevailed. The alleged conspiracy affected virtually all substantial sales of pipe in California. l/ "The defendants named in our five suits are:- "American Pipe and Construction Company Kaiser Steel Corporation Martin-Marietta Co. (formerly American Marietta Co. or Concrete Conduit Co.) Smith-Scott, Inc. United Concrete Pipe Corporation United States Industries, Inc. United States Steel Corporation "The products involved are: "Concrete pipe, reinforced and non- reinforced, pressure and non-pressure, including fittings and appurtenances. "Welded steel, pressure pipe, including fittings and appurtenances, thin walled dis.meter of four inches to 48 inches, and heavy walled diameter of over 24 inches." 1. Various defendants are named in more than one action. F-(1) State of California Office oft the Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE State Building, San Francisco 94102 February 7, 1966 "Fred Harper, Secretary Santa Ana Sanitation District Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 "Dear Sir: "Re: Concrete and Steel Water Pipe Antitrust Cases "This office, on March 17, 1965, filed in the United States District Court in San Francisco, on behalf of the State of California, five civil antitrust actions against certain manufacturers of concrete and steel pipe of the type used in water supply systems, irrigation systems, sewage systems, flood control, and other similar installa- tions built to handle large quantities of water. "The complaints, in general,, charged that between 1946 and 1964, certain pipe manufacturers named therein as defendants engaged in an unlawful conspiracy to allocate territories and to submit collusive and rigged bids to the State, its political subdivisions and special districts (hereinafter called California Public End Users), with the result that the Public End Users paid more for pipe or projects containing pipe than they would have paid if law- ful competitive conditions would have prevailed. The alleged conspiracy affected virtually all substantial sales of pipe in California. 1/ "The defendants named in our five suits are:- "American Pipe and Construction Company Kaiser Steel Corporation Martin-Marietta Co. (formerly American Marietta Co. or Concrete Conduit Co.) Smith-Scott, Inc. United Concrete Pipe Corporation United States Industries, Inc. United States Steel Corporation "The products involved are: "Concre~e pipe, reinforced and non- reinforced, pressure and non-pressure, including fittings and appurtenances. "Welded steel, pressure pipe, including fittings and appurtenances, thin walled diameter of four inches to 48 inches, and heavy walled diameter of over 24 inches." 1. Various defendants are named in more than one action. F-(1) i "Under the antitrust laws, persons who have been damaged by defendants• conspiracy to unlawfully rig bids and allocate territories are entitled to sue for the recovery of three times the damage actually suffered, plus reasonable attorneys' fees and their costs of suit. Recovery may be made regardless of whether the damages are suffered directly or indirectly (i.e., regardless of whether the pipe acquired was actually purchased by the Public End User, itself, or by a general contractor per- forming a construction project). "Each of the five suits is in the form of a class action. The State sued on behalf of itself, its political subdivisions and special districts similarly situated. "One of the purposes of filing a class action was to permit this office in a representative capacity to establish uniform procedures for discovery and pleading in the initial stages of this litigation. This has been sub- stantially achieved under the numerous pretrial orders entered to date. Moreover, the assignment of all "pipe" cases in the Western United States to one judge has assisted in this result. "The class actions were challenged by the defendants. On January 14, 1966, the Court announced it was upholding the class actions. At the same time, it set March 31, 1966, as the time within which California Public End Users must intervene or be foreclosed from thereafter joining the actions filed by the State. "An advantage of a class action is that members of the class who join the action have the benefit of the class representative's filing date for the determination of questions relating to the statute of limitations. The statute of limitations is of importance with respect to those transactions for which damages may be claimed. "Information presently available to us indicates that during the period of the alleged conspiracies you acquired substantial quantities of concrete and/or steel pipe, either by direct purchase or as part of a general construction project. Although the discovery of additional facts may affect the validity of your claim, it is our opinion that from the amount of pipe you apparently acquired, your interest and that of the State of California require your prompt action. "While you may elect to employ private counsel, this office stands ready to represent you and to associate your legal representatives as co-counsel and to promptly file a petition to intervene on your behalf in the five class actions. Our representation envisions that your legal representative will assist us with your claim for damages. His assistance will involve accwnulation of data and prepara- tion of materials identifying the transactions for which you will claim damages. Our antitrust unit is prepared to establish the existence of the conspiracy and its effect upon your transactions (i.e., the measure of damages that you suffered). We will be prepared to handle all common questions of fact and law along with trial preparations, settlement negotiations, and trial." F-(2) ·:...,,.! "It will be necessary for your governing board to pass the attached resolution in order for this office to represent you. Since there are specific time limits imposed upon your intervention in the class actions, if we are to represent you, it is absolutely necessary that a properly executed co~~ of this resolution be in our hands prior to March 1, 1955. The resolution sets forth the terms upon which this office would represent you. "Inquiries concerning this matter may be made of Deputy Attorneys General Mervin R. Samuel, Otto J. Hetzel, or Michael I. Spiegel; Area Code 415-557-1918.11 "WH : dlns 11 "Enc." 11 Very truly yours, "THOMAS c. LYNCH "Attorney General "By /s/ Wallace Howland WALLACE HOWLAND "Assistant Attorney General" F-(3) .• RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA TO CONDUCT LEGAL PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, (type your legal name here) (called Public End User herein) has acquired certain concrete and steel pipe from certain manufacturers thereof, either directly or indirectly; and WHEREAS, it appears that the manufacturers of said pipe and other persons have acted in violation of the antitrust laws of the United States and of the State of California and that Public End User in the acquisition of said pipe may have paid more for said pipe or projects containing pipe than would have been paid if lawful competitive conditions had prevailed; and WHEREAS, the Attorney General of California, acting in his official capacity to protect and further the legal interests of the State, its political subdivisions and agencies, has offered to act as the legal representative of Public End User in connection with these matters; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED THAT THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF CALIFORNIA, IS HEREBY AUTHORIZED BY PUBLIC END USER, acting through its duly constituted governing body, to take any and all legal action and proceedings that he may deem appropriate to recover for Public End User such monetary damages and other compensation to which it may be entitled under applicable law, federal or state, by reason of legal injuries received in the course of acquiring said pipe. In so acting as attorney on behalf of Public End User, the Attorney General may, among other things: F-(4) 1. Determine in his discretion what pipe acquisition transactions by Public End User, if any, would be brought to suit. 2. Join all or any part of the claims of Public End User in legal proceedings with all or any part of similar claims by the State or any political subdivision or public agency thereof, in any manner he may deem appropriate. 3. Settle, compromise, or dismiss all or any part of any claim of Publi~ End User involved~~ 1 ~ ~ w-'J::. ~ ~~ ~--t:p~ in such proceedings in aRey' llla:RRQP :Re ma:; deem \ €l:l?Pr 0 pr.iate. ~ ~ 4. Distribute in such manner as may be determined or approved by the Court any money or other recoveries received from the defendants in such proceedings, whether by settlement, suit or otherwise, to the State, its ~olitical subdivisions and public agencies, including Public End User, which are parties to said proceedings, excepting the amount of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses determined or approved by the Court; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, Public End User will, on request, advance such sums and amounts for costs and expenses of carrying on the litigation herein, other than attorneys 1 fees, as may be determined to be Public End User's fair share. ~ t1\\ '-f caJ.-S" f) 0 • I.? -0 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that such amount of attorneys' fees, costs and expenses incurred by the State in connection with said proceedings as may be determined or approved by the Court, less amounts paid in advance by Public End User, shall be paid into the State Treasury for services rendered and F-(5) \.,.,) \,..,) costs and expenses incurred by the Office of the Attorney General. DATED: __ ~~--------------- Public End User, above named, by: (Signatures of members of governing board .• ) F-(6) "RE: REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 11 CONCRETE AND STEEL PRICE-FIXING AND ANTITRUST SUITS" "On or about September 1, 1962, certain defendant steel companies entered a plea of nolo ,contendre in one or more federal criminal actions relating to violations of the anti-trust laws regarding price-fixing in the steel and concrete pipe industry serving the western area of the United States. This plea appar- ently had the effect of admitting that certain price-fixing had gone on up to that time. "Subsequently the Attorney General of the State of Cali- fornia filed a "class action", which could include all cities and special districts, as well as the State of California, for the purpose of seeking recovery of the damages those joining as plain- tiffs had suffered by reason of said price-fixing. The applicable statutes allow treble damages plus an award for attorney's fees. "The Attorney General's office has offered to include the County Sanitation Districts as plaintiffs and has forwarded a resolution authorizing that office to represent the Districts and to associate me as your general counsel on the case. My duties would be to gather information at this local level for use in the pending lawsuit. The pro•s and con•s of such action seem to be as follows: "PRO: (1) The action is underway; and the principal work to be done is to determine damages and to either settle or litigate the amount thereof. (2) Each plaintiff would probably be treated equally as to method of settlement and costs involved. G-(1) "CON: (1) You would have no control over the amount or basis of settlement. (2) The exact amount of costs you would bear are unknown, but, after a telephone call to the Attorney General's office, are be- lieved to be quite small. (3) You would have to pay my fees as local counsel in addition to other costs. The amount of these fees would depend upon how much work I was required to do and cannot at this time be estimated. (4) There may be a protracted delay in re- ceiving money damages by reason of the involvement with many similar claimants in one lawsuit. "As an alternate course of action--and this is being adopted by some local agencies (e.g., Coastal Municipal Water District)--staff counsel is retained to enter into a stipulation with the defendant steel and pipe companies to waive the running of the statute of limitations, and thereafter, negotiations for settlement of the damage claims are begun. If a settlement can- not be reached, a lawsuit is filed to litigate the claims. It is my understanding that the Metropolitan Water District will follow this course of procedure. If this course of action is followed, the matter could be handled on a contingent fee basis; and I, as your legal counsel, would expect to associate an attorney experienced in this type of litigation and settlement negotiation. The usual contingent fee for this type of matter is one-third of the amount recovered plus any attorney 1 s fees which the court might award in the event of litigation. The pro's and con's of such action seem to be as follows: G-(2) " PRO ·. ( 1 ) Y 1 ou wou d determine in the event of a settlement what the amount of and basis for settlement would be. (2) A settlement of the claims is probable in that the defendants have already indicated a willingness to make some monetary settlement according to the best information I have received. (3) You would probably receive your money sooner. (4) You would not be involved with numerous other districts and cities and would control at the local level the course of the proceedings. (5) If you recovered nothing, you would not be out any monetary costs. "CON: The ultimate fees might be greater in the event of a substantial recovery than they would be if the matter were turned over to the Attorney General. "A third procedure is being advocated by a local firm of attorneys, that is, to join as many cities and districts in the Orange County area as possible and to file a suit directly. Fees would probably be on a contingent basis. "It is apparent that you have a duty to take some action in the matter because there were substantial amounts of reinforced concrete pipe purchased and used in construction by the Districts during the period 1951 to September 1, 2962. I would be pleased to represent the Districts under the second alternative plan under the terms suggested; however, if you choose to turn the matter over to the Attorney General, I will cooperate in every way as local counsel to obtain the best recovery possible for you. "Dated: March 3, 1966 "Respectfully submitted "Is/ c. Arthur Nissan c. Arthur Nissan General Counsel for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California G-(3) RESOLUTION NO. 66-11 APPROVING PLANS FOR JOB NO. I-4-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPT- ING PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NO. I-4-2, AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO RECEIVE BIDS AND TO AWARD CONTRACT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by John Carollo, Engineers, for INSTALLATION OF ADDITIONAL GAS COMPRESSORS, JOB NO. I-4-2, are hereby approved, received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said Job No. I-4-2 pursuant to the pro- visions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 1~:00 p.m., April 6 2 1966, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to open bids and to award contract for said work. -H- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER c.o. N0. _ _,_.3 ___ _ CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation Addition to Plant No. l Effluent JOB: Discharge Facilities -Structures DATE: Mar. 9. 1966 Job No. I-6-2 Amount of this change order (ADD) •oru) $ 1,220.22 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated March 2, 1966 and Contract Revision No. 3 previously furnished contractor ADD 1. Relocation of Orange County Water District water line to avoid conflict with Effluent Structure $ 126.98 2. Repair and reinstall 78-inch gate, Secondary Effluent Box (gate was damaged due to unavoidable high water through Treatment Plant) 560.62 3. Additional concrete and labor to partially fill Effluent Junction Box at Unit #1 Outfall Booster Station (Districts unable to maintain sufficient low water within the pump station) 532.62 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 1,220.22 EXTENSION OF TIME Inclement Weather Calendar days Rain and muddy conditions 44 Strike Operating Engineers 30 TOTAL EXTENSION OF TIME 74 (continued) Original Contract Price $ 172,800.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 678.00 This Change (ADD) (EEE>HH) 1,220.22 Amended Contract Price $ 174,698.22 Board authorization date: Approved: March 9, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By ____________________________ __ I-(1) Job No. I-6-2 Vinnell Corporation Change Order No. 3 Original specified completion date: Completion date with this extension of time (74 days) Actual final completion date: I-(2) December 16, 1965 February 28, 1966 February 28, 1966 RESOLUTION NO. 66-12 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-6-2 AS COMPLETE A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-6-2 AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, VINNELL CORPORATION, a California corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for ADDITIONS TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2, on the 28th day of February, 1966; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' reconnnendation, which said recom- mendation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of ADDITIONS TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 19th day of June, 1965; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. l is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. -J- RESOLUTION NO. 66-13-11 FIXING TIME AND PLACE FOR PUBLIC HEARING ON ENGINEER'S REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, TO RECEIVE AND FILE ENGINEER 1 S REPORT SUBMITTED BY LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES, AND DIRECTING THE SECRETARY TO PUBLISH NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING ON SAID REPORT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: WHEREAS, the report of Lowry and Associates, engineers, sanitation engineers for the District, dated ------Ma~rc~h_._,_1~9~6~6 ____ __ was presented and considered by the Board. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED: Section 1. That the Engineer's Report for County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, prepared and submitted by Lowry and Associates, engineers, is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That this Board finds and it does hereby find that said report complies with the provisions of the County Sanita- tion District Act (Chapter 3, Part 3, Division 5 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California) and that it is satisfactory to this Board. Section 3. That this Board fix and it does hereby fix the <.'i day of ~ • 1266. at the hour of ~() l"i, at the regular meeting place of said Board as the time and place for hearing objections to said report and to doing all or any part of the work referred to in said report. Section 4. That the Secretary be and is hereby·ordered to publish notice of said hearing in the DAILY PILOT, Huntington Beach, California, for the time and in the manner prescribed by law. -K- MOTION .... ,_. ___ _ DISTRICT NO. 3 MOVED: That the following Notices to Withhold, filed against funds due H. E. Johnson Construction Company for con- struction of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10, be received and ordered filed: COMPANY AMOUNT Water Works Supply Co., Inc. $ 7,931.89 Associated Concrete Products, Inc. $ 2,531.20 Kennedy Ready Mixed Concrete Co., Inc. $ 1,625.76 Joe J. Peria $ 1,725.00 $13,813.85 -L- COUNTY SANITATION DISTrtICTS OF ORAllGE COUHTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: H. E. Johnson Construction Co. c.o. NO. 2(Revised) DATE: Mar. 9, 1966 JOB: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 Amount of this change order (ADD) ~) $ 3,019.75 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's proposal of January 11, 1966 (rejected), Engineer's letter of instruction dated January 14, 1966 and Engineer's letter of actual construction costs dated March 4, 1966. Construct siphon between Station 1289+61.68 and Station 1289+86 to avoid conflict with Standard Oil Company of California culvert carrying pipeline under highway. Extra compensation as described below was determined on a "Force Account" basis as specified in Section 8-4 EXTRA WORK of the General Provisions of the Contract documents. The work for which extra compensation is provided herein is as described in referenced Engineer's letter. ADD 1. Direct labor cost (including payroll taxes, insurance, etc.) 15% profit and overhead $709.92 106.49 SUB-TOTAL $816.41 2. Equipment rental 15% profit and overhead 601.69 90.25 3. SUB-TOTAL Material Sales Tax, 15% profit and overhead SUB-TOTAL Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes This Change (ADD)~ Amended Contract Price $ $ 762.04 149.36 691.94 911.40 (continued) 263,119.50 none 3,019.75 266,139.25 Board authorization date: Approved: March 9, 1966 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO., INC. By~~~--~~----~--~~~~----- -M - Contract No. 3-10 H. E. Johnson Const. Co. Change Order No. 2 (Revised) 4. Two siphon manholes per Bid Item No. 8 15 VF @ $40.00/VF TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD * * * * * * * * * * * * $ .600.00 $ 3,019.75 An extension of time of seven calendar days is hereby granted for the extra work hereinabove ordered. Original specified completion date: March 14, 1966 Com41etion date with Change Order No. 1 (2 days) April 7, 1966 Completion date with this extension of time (7 days) April 14, 1966 -M-(2) RESOLUTION NO. 66-14-3 EMPLOYING ENGINEERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EMPLOYING SANITATION ENGINEERS AND DIRECTING SAID ENGINEERS TO PREPARE REPORT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That this Board of Directors does hereby employ J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry, a joint venture, Consulting Engineers, to make a· survey and report, pursuant to the provisions of the State Health and Safety Code, Section 4748, show- ing the present and future sewerage requirements for the District; and, Section 2. That said engineers are employed to prepare said report in accordance with the proposal dated March 3, 1966, which said proposal is hereby approved, received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That the engineers be directed to prepare and file a report with the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 setting forth: (a) A general description of existing facilities for sewage collection, treatment and disposal, or a general description of existing facilities for refuse transfer or disposal, or both. {b) A general description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objects of the District. (c) A general plan and general specifications of the work. (d) A general description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in carrying out the work. N-{l) (e) A map showing the boundaries of the District and in general the location of the work proposed to be done, property taken or damaged, and any other information useful to an understanding of the proposed work. (f) An estimate of the cost of the proposed work. Section 4. That said engineers are employed to do the work hereinabove set forth, in accordance with their proposal, for a total fee of $750.00. N-(2) J.R.LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY Lo LOWRY Consulting Engineers, a joint venture of BOYLE ENGINEERING & LOWRY AND ASSOCIATES 412 South Lyon Street P.O. Box 178 Santa Ana, California March 3, 1966 "Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 3 of Orange County P.O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California "Gentlemen: "In accordance with the action taken by the special District No. 3 committee on February 16, 1966 authorizing preparation of an Engineer's Report for purchase of capacity by District No. 3 of facilities in District No. 11, and re- questing a proposal for preparing the report, we are pleased to submit the following: "We will :Qrepare an Engineer's Report in accordance with Section 4748 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California for a fee of $750.00. "The District No. 3 area, bounded on the east by Beach Boulevard, on the north by Slater Avenue, and on the west by the common boundary of District No. 3 and 11, and on the south by Garfield Avenue, has been served by District No. 11 trunk facilities in accordance with the basic accommodation agreement between District No. 3 and District No. 11 for the past five years. It was the intention of the original agreement that by the expiration date of January 1, 1966 that District No. 3 would make permanent arrangements for disposing of sewage originating in the area. At the present time, the area is continuing to be served by District No. 11 trunk facilities on a six-month carry-over basis to permit District No. 3 to make permanent arrangements. "District No. 11 has reported to the District No. 3 committee that in the very near future they will have excess capacity in the Newland-Delaware Trunk Sewer which is the trunk presently serving the area in question and they would be receptive to selling this excess capacity right!. to District No. 3 in order to provide a permanent method of disposal of sewage from the area. "The Engineer's Report will examine the District No. 11 proposal and it will also study other alternatives that may be available to District No. 3, and subsequently set forth recom- mendations for district ac1iion." 0-(1) Page 2. "We are prepared to proceed immediately with the preparation of the Engineer's Report and can have it in final form for presentation to the Board of Directors at its regular April meetingo "It is our understanding that all plates and copy for the report will be prepared by the engineers and all costs of reproducing and binding the required copies will be billed at cost to the district." "CH/vld 61-2050-00-00 cc: Mr. Sidney L. Lowry" "Very truly yours, "J.R.LESTER BOYLE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY "Is/ Conrad Hohener 1 Jr. "Conrad Hohener, Jr., C.E. 10951 11 0-(2) .- RESOLUTION NO. 66-15-7 ACCEPTING GRANTS OF EASEMENTS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANTS OF EASEMENTS RE: TRACT #4846 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grants of Easements dated February 16, 1966, wherein HOWARD T. RENSHAW and STELLA A. RENSHAW, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 two permanent easemen1sfor sewer purposes in connection with Tract #4846, are hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said permanent easements, which are accepted at no cost to the District, are more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easements in the Official Records of Orange County. -P- ~~~nd4/ item No .• zi ,t&.t..-&~ -11 FILED In the Office of the Secretary County Sani~!/on District .~ . ......_,,,. ~ l 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 $2 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTA ANA. ii I MINUTES RE "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA No ---------------------i- MAR 9 1966 • 6" 'I:_ ~ The Secretary advised the Board that he had received a letter from Edw. Lee Russell, M. D., Health Officer :lbr the County of Orange, dated March 2, 1966, pertaining to the need to construct sewers in proposed "Assessment District No. 6." Said letter dated March 2, 1966, was then read. It was thereupon moved, seconded and regularly carried that said letter be filed. There was then presented to the Board for its consideration a resolu- tion numbered RESOLUTION NO. &(, .. /£-7, entitled: "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIRORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF SECTION 2808 OF THE 'SPECIAL .ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROT,EST ACT OF 1931," BEING DIVI- SION 4 E>F THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF C'.f..LIFORNIA. II It was moved by Director ~~/<..~ that said resolution be adopted and said ~~~·was secondJ.d by Director /a.A}<t.-.~:,,._, and carried by the following roll call vote: A YES: Directors ~. "·ltv-~t_,.p2.. ~/l./P--V.:"'--;.. '7!Jl.A-rt> 0 ;>'·· A.Ct/t, . ./t2? ...; ti~-·~ .• L ti .I tJ NOES: Directors <--fvt;-»'"-~~-- ABSENT: Directors '-j--t-·~·Jvv(.,. •••••••••••••si:-q~ ~noq~ s~eAew ·~ o~ ~~eds . (:nf Item No . .5i ~ &;~ FILED In the Office of the Secretary County Sanlt~on District .. No------~~------. MAR 9 1966 1 MINUTES RE "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 11 er 2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT 3 4 5 I 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 '32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR SOIO NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA The Secretary advised the Board that he had received a letter from Edw. Lee Russell., M. D. , Health Officer :lbr the County of Orange, dated March 2, 196 6, pertaining to the need to construct sewers in proposed "Assessment District No. 6." Said letter dated March 2, 1966, was then read. It was thereupon moved., seconded and regularly carried that said letter be filed. There was then presented to the Board for its consideration a resolu- tion numbered RESOLUTION NO. f.t,'-1/f-7, entitled: 11 A RESOLUTIO].'f OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIJ:i;ORNIA, ADOPTED PURSUANT TO PROVISIONS OF aECTION 2808 OF THE 'SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND MAJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1931," BEING DIVI- SION 4 E>F THE STREETS AND HIGHWAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF C~LIFORNIA." It was moved by Director ~/1.__ that said resolution be adopted -7-;:f~1: (_._-_,;. ~ / /', and said .PeSOlution was seconde,d by Director / &L..-t.J/r,t.~"J .. --and carried by \, the following roll call vote: , .._ __ \~~·-a C (;. ~ t· ~ '71~~:> .. -· A YES: Directors -'Ji~';;. ,,_;_2,,.2 L Wl-4 "7-/ · If NOES: Directors ~~vz.--· ABSENT: Directors <..-1--t,··~---1/'•.A..,. :! •l r ; __ ,_. I ~. I . 11 l 2 ~ 3 4 5 I 61 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OP' I RIMEL. HARVEY & 1' HELSING 11 FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. I, SANTA ANA, II CALIFORNIA 92701 FILEO In the Office of the Secreta111 County Sanitation District No 7 MAR 9 1966 MINUTES RE ".ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 611 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT -~ NO. 7 OF OR.ANGE COUNTY Edwin H. Finster, of Boyle & Lowry, the E~~: of Work for proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," presente'd to the Board of Director .// for its consideration and approval the Plans for ~aid proposed work and i improvement, entitled "Construction Plans fm;~/Sanitary Districts in Assess- / ment District No. 6, County Sanitation Dis~,:vfots of Orange County, California, District No. 7, 11 dated March, 1966, con~{~ting. of 29 sheets, numbered 1 to I 29, inclusive. Director ~QA.A t,.J.~ moved that said Plans be approved,, received and filed, and sai~o~~~s seconded by Director_..Ji:::::.LA~:::5a:~~~ /. and carried by the following roll.call vote: A YES: Director{ '--rv\ i 0 0 o~ ~ ~, ~..t~f!.(i.I j ~~y·~er I -, ,- NOES: Direqt'ors __ J__._ ..... k_~ ___ . _ ... ____________ _ ,/ ABSENT: Dir¢ctors ~· / -----------------------------11 Mr. Finste/ next submitted to the Board of Directors,, for its con- / sideration and appr/val,, the Specifications for said proposed "ASSESSMENT :" DISTRICT NO. 6 1 }'. consisting of "General Provisions," "Standard Specifica- tions," and "Det'~iled Specifications:" Director ?~moved that / . said Specifica~ions be approved,, received and filed,, and said motion was .. seconded by,t:Jirector ~<!A tf3 / and carried by the following roll call vote: Directorsy~LHJ? ~~ U ,· Directors ~~- ~~··· ·n Mr. Finster then 'submitted to the Board of Directors for its con- sideration and approval the D~am or Plat of the proposed "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6," entitled "Diag~ Exhibiting the Property Affected or ·~.,_ Benefited by and to be assessed to pay:"tl'}e Costs and Expenses of the ..... '~ "IMPROVEMENT OF SANITARY SEWERS.'I~ ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6,, .. ,,_,, ......... ·""· -1- 'I . . . I :,;.-...,-• I " 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 231 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ·32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY Sc 1· HE:;LSING FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 'I 11 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, Calif.,, Distriet No. 7, 11 consist ing of 10 sheets, numbered 1to10, inclusive. Direct~r · ~~ moved that said Diagram or Plat b~ecehred and filed, and said motion was seconded by Director ~ and carried by the following ; / roll call vote: Directors~ ... ~.~ l/JuafAo ~ AYES: NOES: Directors~--./ ABSENT: Directors ~ ~--------/~-~--------~~ // // Mr. Finster then off er71to the Board of Directors for its considera tion and approval the proposed ~~timate of Cost for all acquisition,, work and improvement, including incid~tal expenses there ,, for said proposed J "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT Ne/ 6." Director moved that /J said Estimate of Cost be a received and filed,, and said motion was seconded by Director_----!o:-:...-=.=.;....~~-··_~·~'°and carried by the following roll .I call vote: / I 7 r l c--~ ./!1 A YES: Directors _,.~ .. z?··t.e. ct:,:::.') ~e~-;V""tj..__ __ .. I -"'-"'"-~-,.-_;-=---=-------=-:;..._~------ NOES: /Directors ________________ _ ABSENT· Directors posed Resolution of tention to be numbered "RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. ctr' I?'-z,, II en :tied as follows: "A ~ESOLU~ON OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION !STRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI- FORNIA,, DEC .ARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE CON- STRUCTION 0 SANITARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTE NT WORK IN 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6 1 IN SAID SANITA ON DISTRICT; DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO ORDER THE A RUISITION OF CERTAIN LANDS, RIGHTS- OF-WA Y AND EASE ENTS NECESSARY IN CONNECTION WITH SAID WORK AND IMP OVEMENT AND TO ASSESS THE COSTS OF SAID ACQUISITION,, I LUDING THE INCIDENTAL COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF, SPART OF THE COST OF SAID WORK AND IMPROVEMENT; D CLARING THE ACQUISITION OF SAID LANDS, RIGHTS-OF-WA ND EASEMENTS AND THE WORK AND IMPROVEMENT TO B OF MORE THAN LOCAL OR ORDI- NARY PUBLIC BENEFIT ANrriESCRIBING THE DISTRICT TO BE BENEFITED BY SAID ACQ SITION AND WORK AND IM- PROVEMENT AND TO PAY TH COSTS AND EXPENSES THEREOF FIXING THE TIME AND PLACE FOR HEARING OF OBJECTIONS TO SAID ACQUISITION,, WORK AND IMPROVEMENT. 11 \ -2- ' l l 2 3 4 5 6 7 al I 91 10 i1 I 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 '"-" 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OF I RIMEL, HARVEY Sc j HELSING I FOURTH FLOOR 11 1010 NORTH MAIN ST, SANTA ANA, CALIFORNIA 92701 11 .! }t I ii l t f' j r Said Resolution of Inten+_on fixed the time and place for the date of hearing as •,. .'j ~ a~ ;t j -11966, at the hour of 1: n o'clock p. ~- # It was thereupon moved by Director ~ that said RESOLUTION OF INTErTION NO. let._ -1 f -7 tie adopted, and said motion was seconded by Directr ~J..A,,,,6..-•·'" and carried by the following roll call vote: i AYES: Jirectors ~· I ~....,.c:~--------------~ NOES: rl>irectors ABSENT: Jirectors----------------- \ \ \ -3- .---..t.._r; ~ -_ r; I --{I i-JJ ~ ~ l!!UJOJ!Jl!J '1!53W l!lSOJ laaJlS 4l6t l51!3 91>£ SH3A31N ·H HnH.1.HV ·-• !.,.. ....... · . ~ ,· \ I. '"'t l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Director's Compensation and Mileage Fc)r Qun.rter Ending Februrry 28, 1966 DirE:f~ r.or.' c Name: Address:. Mr. Arthu1"' H. Me;rers 13G41 N. Fairview Garrlnn Grove 1 C~lif;.)rnia *********************************~***********************************************~****~************ For: Attendir;g meetings of County Sb.r:itation Di.stricts as listed beloi.:: Ml LEA GE 'i10TAL DISTRIC~(S) COMPEH-FROM COMPENSA'I'ICN DATE NUMBER MEETINti PLACE Sf.i TI.OH RESJDEFCf AT • 1(1 AND MILEAGE ----·------·-····--- 12-1-65 1 i ·Jr~ tt~ Ell13, Fountn.1:; V~lley 2s.on i:·_ J..20 $ ?6.80 12-8-65 1, 6, 7 75.00 , •) (. 76.80 I Same ...._1 J .l.oO 12-15-65 1 & '1 Srune ~~5. 00 L~-, . , .. 26. s.:) ..&.. • .•._J 1-12-65 l, .. i..)' 7 Semc 75.00 lf~ l.f.O r(o. 80 2-9-GG l, /"" 7 SP~!e 75 .. )Q 1q l .(~0 ?6 .. fo ·_j ' 2-?3-66 1 Sc:1~r1e '.H· "') i ~:. 1)\) 2~. ~~.(, -'-· )._ .. _ ........ ---- 300.00 10.80 $310. ~~\) Char~eable tc:.. THstrict No. l -~_31.3~ District No. ,,. ~ 6 Q '.) -7 • i_,O Distrlct ?k:. 7 -$102.70 I certify that the :1bove is ·'3. col'.TE:ct rercr~. anci that ps.ymet1+ theref°\ .. lr ha:.: not b 1:?E'r1 receivt·:-id. SIGNATURE OF DIRECTOR --------·--·------------ ) J\rrp . "'7 ,,.... flO""l•\iiw • ..,,,_, .. •nl • VJ .('/ -.: 1 t ', In en"' Ott1..:"' ,~ •· County Senlttstlon •rf U1:6't11ot No ----------- MAR 9 1966 By >LI ,.,, ..... ' -.. COUNTY SAN ITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY AUDIT REPORT December 31, 1965 HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES & SYL VESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS TUSTIN. CALIFORNIA HANSON, PETERS ON, C OWLES & SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PU BLIC A CCOUNTANTS 653 SOUTH B STREET, P .O. BOX 658 MEMBERS OF: H . LOUIS HANSON, C .P .A . ARTHUR PETERSON, J R., C .P .A . HAROLD L . C OWLES, C .P.A. D E LMER L . SYLVESTER, C.P.A . AMERICAN INSTIT UTE OF JAMES D . KILE, C.P .A . TUSTIN. CALI FORNIA 9Z660 PHONE 544 . 7 6 60 CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS ANO CALIFORNIA SOCIETY OF CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Feb rua ry 25, 1966 Board o f Di r e ctors County Sa nit ation Districts of Orange County 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley , California Gentlemen : We submi t herewith unaudited financia l statements of the Co unty Sanitation Districts of Orange County for the six month s ended Decembe r 31, 1 965. Under the terms of our engagement, c ertain phases of our annual examination are co ndu cted on an inte rim basis t hr ough o u t the year , but it is only at the close of the fiscal ye ar , June 30 , that o ur exa minat ion is sufficient in scope to permit us to express a n opinion on the financia l sta tements o f the districts. We are therefore unable t o exp r ess an opinion on the a ccompany ing financ i a l state ments . Yo urs very truly, HPC&S : l mh COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY COMMENTS ON OPERATIONS Joint Operating Fund During the six months from July 1, 1965 to December 31, 1965, the district sewage flows were based upon meter readings with estimates for cross-over flows between districts. The following schedule contains comparative figures for the same periods of 1964 and 1965: District No. 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Total (in million gallons) Capital Outlay Revolving Fund -Plant Expansion First six 1964-65 2,245 5,783 5,651 854 844 566 961 16,904 months 1965-66 2,347 5,281 6,461 1,231 886 891 1,155 18,252 The final payment was made on one contract during the second quarter of the 1965-66 year. Retention is still held on one contract which has been completed. Construction in·Progress New contracts were signed by District # 2, #5, and #6 and #7 (Suspense) during the period October 1 to December 31, 1965. Construction has commenced under each of the contracts. HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES a SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY CASH AND INVESTMENT BALANCES* December 31, 1965 Fund District Operating Fund Joint Operations l• 2 3 5 6 7 8 11 Bond Interest and Sinking Fund -1951 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Bond Interest and Sinking Fund -1958 2 11 Bond Interest and Sinking Fund -1962 7 Construction Fund 3 7 Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund 1 2 3 5 6 7 11 Fixed Obligation Fund 2 7 Facilities Revolving Fund 5 * The attached letter is an integral part of this report. 7 Cash in County Treasury $ 61,949.14 63,476.31 126,607.47 164,249.33 46,548.41 36,126.58 120,888.12 478.25 54,723.01 34,533.15 17' 751.62 877'151.12 8,254.34 18, 117. 76 10,892.93 9,954.54 578,070.08 94,427.71 47,837.76 23,724.74 11,006.45 166,485.60 443,648.08 363,849.10 79,246.31 75,363.30 106,385.53 122,602.56 16,694.13 9,322.07 4,960.78 73,623.30 HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES a SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Schedule 1 Investment in U.S. Treasury Bills $ 103 ,741. 71 386,082.04 322,480.97 99,037.82 54,579.95 19,809.33 6,830.63 44,599.99 24,883.13 19,904.13 -0- 9,952.07 4,979.00 -0- -0- -0- -0- 73,975.75 685,667.88 58,937.68 1,188,815.60 1,595,863.45 1,825,491.58 411,010.90 2~8,529.71 229,685.53 469,869.41 -0- -0- 19,545.11 245,924.57 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY JOINT OPERATING FUND* COMPARATIVE OPERATING.STATEMENT Revenues Gallonage Charges Other Income Total Revenue Expenditures Salaries Administrative Operational Indirect Employee Benefits Total Salaries Maintenance and Operations Administrative Insurance Supplies Utilities Materials Research and Pollution Control Control Laboratory Total Maintenance and Operation Capital Outlay Administration Operational * Control Laboratories Total Capital Outlay Total Expenditures Excess of Revenues or (Expenditures) The attached letter is an integral part of this report. 7/1/64 to 12/31/64 $531,748.86 17,175.87 $548,924.73 $ 49,499.98 179' 221. 01 33 2 655.69 $262 2 376.68 $ 17,748.97 23' 801. 37 119,284.59 36,379.11 46,622.01 8,374.73 2 2 263.03 $2542473.81 $ 5:056.42 26,679.82 338.00 $ 32,074.24 $548,924.73 $ -0- 7/1/65 to 12/31/65 $634,963.20 29,022.06 $663,985.26 $ 52,992.00 213,354.82 39 2 518.15 $305 2 864.97 $ 11,973.26 37,213.18 160,538.10 52,287.46 62,803.45 18,934.50 2 2709.66 $346 2 459.61 $ 694.08 9,645.80 1 2 320.80 $ 11,660.68 $663 2 985.26 $ -0- HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES a SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Schedule 2 Ipcrease (Decrease) $103,214.34 11,846.19 $115, 06{). 53 $ 3,492.02 34,133.81 5 2 862.46 $ 43 2 488.29 $( 5,775.71) 13 ,411. 81 41,253.51 15,908.35 16' 181.44 10,559.77 446.63 $ 91,985.80 $( 4,362.34) (17,034.02) 982.80 $(20 2 413.56) $1152060.53 $ -0- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT ON PLANT EXPANSION* December 31, 1965 Number Adjusted Payments Payments of Description Date of Amount of Prior to 7/1/65 to Contract Contract Contract 7/1/65 12/31/65 Capital OutlaI Revolving Fund General Remodel Ellis Ave. Pump Station P-1 Site Plant f} l Site Land Plant # l Land Total of Plant # l Disbursements P-2 Site Plant fJ 2 Site $ $ $ 2-A Headworks -250 HP Motor 12/23/64 5,699 4,559 1,140 5•E Headworks Pump, Etc. 3/4/65 37,797 30,238 7-A Turbine Generator ll/14/63 230,373 184,298 7-B Steam Turbine Generator 6/25/64 16,943 16,943 7-1 Steam Turbine Generator Installation 10/14/64 30,170 28,232 1,938 8-1 Site Improvement ll/25/65 307,203 ll Headworks #3 @ Plant fJ 2 Total of Plant fJ 2 Contracts and Disbursements $ 628 1185 §2341032 § 33 1316 Pl-13 & P2-10 Grit Hoppers at Plants l and 2 I-4-2, I-4-3 Install Addn'l. Gas Storage and Compressors 4-2A Digester Gas Compressor and Starters 5-1 Relocation of 12KV and Control Line 5-2 Control Cable 6-1 Effluent Discharge Facility Pipeline 6-2 Effluent Discharge Facility Addition Total of Interplant Contracts and Disbursements J-2-1 Ocean Outfall Diffuser 5-Dl Redesign Original Control Equipment 5-E Instrumentation -1965 7-1 Administration Building Addition -9 Ocean Outfall No. 2 Land Section -10 Ocean Outfall No. 3 Marine Section Total of Joint Contracts and Disbursements Total "All Plant" Ex2ansion * 'l'be attached letter is an integral part of this report. 3/25/65 $ 74 1549 $ 2 1 196 $ $ 12/6/65 69,612 12/9/64 52, 778 44,682 9/23/65 44,021 2/27/65 1,493,189 291,202 6/19/65 173.478 §1 1 833 1 078 $3351884 8/12/64 $ 333,573 $209,818 7/29/65 58,554 § 392.127 $209.818 ~2 1 927 1 939 ~781 1 930 HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES a SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS § 721353 $ 1,061,979 104.253 §1.166.232 $ 103,839 ~ 103.839 §1.375.740 7/1/65 -12/31/65 Retention Other Total Paid and Cash on Contract Incomplete Paid Out and Other $ 9 1 450 $ 9 1 450 $ 16,950 $ 16,950 40 40 $ 16 1 990 $ 16 1 990 $ $ 8,986 $ 8,986 3,352 4,492 7,559 519 30,757 46,075 8,270 8,270 686 686 467 2,405 307,203 27,188 27,188 65 65 ~3601837 ~ 49.533 $ 82 1849 $ $ 2 1 325 $ 74 1 678 $ $ 975 $ 975 69,612 3,523 3,523 8,096 475 475 44,021 3,049 3,049 140,008 21,768 l,083,747 69.225 7 1 962 1121215 ~330.962 $ 37.752 §1.203.984 $ 19,916 $ 17,346 $ 121,185 4,623 4,623 58,554 4,177 4,177 527 527 14,691 14,691 6 6 $ 78.470 § 41.370 $ 1451209 ~110.269 ~157.420 ~1 1 533 1 160 No. of Contract District No. 1 District No. 2 2-10-3 2-10-4 District No. 3 3-10 District No. 5 5-12 . .. ' ' Description General Euclid Trunk Sewer Reconstruction Euclid Trunk Sewer Reconstruction -Engineering General. -Northerly Portion of District Totals District No. 2 Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer Coast Hwy. Trunk and Bay Bridge Station General Totals District No. 5 Districts No. 5 and No. 6 Suspense District No. 7 7-2-B 7-4-2A 7-5-3 Rock Point Pump Station Remodel Walnut Street & So. Coast Plaza Sub-trunks Panorama Hts. Trunk Sewer West Trunk Bypass Sewer Newport Ave. Sub-trunk Sewer Miscellaneous Totals District No. 7 Districts No. 6 and No. 7 Suspense 7-1-F Greenville Banning Trunk Sewer College Ave. Sub-Trunk Sewer Totals Districts No. 6 and No. 7 Suspense .. .. . , COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY REPORT ON CONSTRUCTION IN PROGRESS* December 31, 1965 Date of Contract 7/29/65 10/14/65 10/12/65 6/24/65 7/23/64 7/23/64 ) 10/22/65 ) Adjusted Amount of Contract $200,027 $200.027 $492,808 $492.808 $ 69,644 33,014 20,931 $123,589 $ 34,270 $ 34,270 ( ( Payments Prior to 7/1/65 $33,014 20,931 $53.945 District No. 11 11-9 Edinger Ave. Sewer and Lift Station 6/18/65 $1481649 * The attached letter is an integral part of this report. HANSON, PETERSON, COWLES 8: SYLVESTER CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS Payments 7/1/65 to 12/31/65 $148,008 $148,008 $ 28,431 $ 28,431 $ 62,680 $ 62,680 $ 16,942 ) 12,997 ) $ 29,939 $102,177 Retention and $ 52,019 $ 52.019 $221.361 $464,377 $464.377 $ 6,964 $ 6,964 $ 4,331 ( ( • 0 l to 12/31/65 Total paid Other Cash on Contract Paid Out 1 520 $ 19,360 1,195 18 1355 $ 38,910 $ 23,038 $ 33,574 1 1 510 $ 41.084 $ 195 $ 8,210 17,997 9,107 7,025 263 $ 42,602 $ 359 1,403 $ 1,762 and Other 1 520 $167,368 1,195 18.355 $186.918 $ 64.797 $ 62,005 7 510 $ 69:515 $ 195 $ 70,890 51,011 30,038 7,025 263 $159.227 $ 17,301 14,400 $ 31,701 $122,193 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., March 9th , 1966 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Miller, Cook, Meyers, Harvey, Parks and Allen Directors absent: NONE Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT 7 Authorizinf payment for remova of trees A.D. #5-A Moved, seconded and duly carried: That payment in the total amount of $120.00 is hereby authorized to be made to R. P. Buckner, as settlement for removal of three trees from his property during constructio~ in Assessment District #5-A, in accordance with the recommendation of the General Counsel. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • ************ I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County S~nitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of March , 196 6 IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed ·....,,; the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, this 14thiay of March , 196 6 • Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 . . EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. f , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., March 9th , 196 6, at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Harvey, Meyers, Miller, and Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. Ad,1ournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 be adjourned to 4:00 p.m., April 6th, 1966 in the Districts• office at the above address. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:45 p.m., March 9, 1966. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Dire7tors of County Sanitation District No.l , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of March , 19~ · IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 1 , of Orange County, California, this 9th day of March , 1966 • Se~a~ .?£¥cftr1 of County Sanitation District No. 1 EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour "--'. of 8: 00 o'clock p .m. , March 9 , 196 6 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Parsons, Gruber, Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 be adjourned to 9;80 p.m., 7 .' >·-'1 March 15, 1966, City Hall, Newport Beach, California. The Chai:mian then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:55 p.m., March 9, 1966. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • I FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County S~nitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, tru7 and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of March , 196 6. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.5 , of Orange County, California, this 9th day of March , 1966 · EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.11, of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8: 00 o'clock p .m. , March 9th , 196 6 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Lambert, Stewart, Allen Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 be adjourned to 5:00 p.mo, March 88th, 1966. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at 9:56 p.m., March 9, 1966. Secretary, Board of Dire~ -Ors of , , County Sanitation District No. II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOIN T BOARDS REG ULAR MEE'TING Wednesday , March 9, 1966 8 :00 p .m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fou ntain Valley, Calif., 92708 Phone 9 62-24 11 March 4, 1966 The following is an explanation of the more i mportant non - routine i tems which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up imme d iately preceding the meeting but will .appear in the comp l ete agenda a vai l able at the meeting . Joint Boards No . 14 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMM ITTEE : We have been attempting to arrange a meeting of the Committee t o consider matters coming under its jurisdiction . However because of difficulty in establ ishing a date convenient to all Committee members , the meeting has not been held at the time of this writing . It is expected that between now and the time of the Joint meeting , a Committee meeting can be arr anged and, if so, any recommendations arrived at by the Committee will be presented to the Joint Boards under this item. Nos . 15 and 16 -CONSIDERATION OF RECOVERY OF DAMAGES FROM PIPE MANUFAC'TURERS : The staff and General Counsel has been aware for som e time that the State Attorney General has been proceeding against certain defendants alleg ed to have sold to public agencies and their contractors concrete and stee l pipe in violation of anti-trust statutes. We are also aware that the Districts could recover damages if the alle ged violations are proved but that u p unti l now, no recommendation has been made to the Boards on this matter pending a determination as to the c ourse of act ion of the Attorney General . This matter has now been brought to a head by receipt from the Attorney General's office of a letter transmitting a suggested resolution (copy of both enclosed ) for the Boards' consideration which would, in effe ct, authorize the Attorney General to proceed for recovery of damages in behalf of the Districts . On February 16 , The Board of District No. 11 considered this resolution and decided to defer action until this Joint Board meeting . In view of the March 1 deadline established by the Attorney General 's office, on February 23 the Board of District No . 1 also considered a similar l resolution wh ich wou ld, in District No . l's capacity as contracting a gent for the other Districts, authorize the Attorney General to proceed in beha lf of all Districts. After discussion, the Directors of District No . 1 also decided to defer action on t his matter until all the Boards could joint ly consider a c ourse of action at thi s meeting . Since this is basically a l ega l problem, we have asked th e Gen eral ~ Counsel to p repare a memorandum on the rami fica tion s of joining the action of the Attorney Gen era l and on possible a l ternat e courses of action . A copy of this l egal mem orandum i s also enclosed fo r c onsideration under thi s item. Item No . 16 is consideration of the actual resolution prepared by the Attorney Genera l if some or all of the Di stricts wish to proceed with this course of action . No . 17 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANT J OB NO . I-4 -2 : The next regular ly scheduled plant construction project consists of the installation of additional gas compressors a nd major piping at both Plants needed to cope with our increasing digester gas production and to operate our new gas turbine at maximum effectiveness . Completion of this project is also expected to eliminate the e .s cape of digester gas which has become a major s ource of Plant odors . A contract ha s already been awarded for the purchase of the compressors themselves and the job under c onsideration is basically a piping contract to install these compressors and to make major piping revisions and additions . Bids for this job are scheduled to be opened by the Board of District No. 1 on April 6 and if satisfactory, the contract will be awarded at the Joint Board meeting on April 13. Th e engineers have estimated the cost of this contract to be approximate l y $175,000 . Nos . 18 and 19 -CLOSEOUT OF PLANT JOB NO . I -6 -2 : This Plant con- struction contract with the Vinnell Corporation of Alhambra was satisfactor i l y completed on February 28. In o rder to c lose out this job, which was for the construction of t h e necessary structures at b oth Plants to tie both Plants into our new 84 -inch RCP efflu ent l ine between the Plants, Board action on th ese two items is necessary. Item No . 1 8 is recommended Change Order No . 3 granting a total o f $1,220 .22 to the contract amount for the three minor items of additiona l work described in the formal change order attached to the agenda. This change order a l so grants the contractor an extension of time of 74 calendar days because of the Operating Engineers strike l ast summer and because of rain and wet grounds during the period of the contract. Item No . 19 is the customary r esolution accepting this contract as complete as of February 28 and authori zing filing of a Notice of Completion. • ' • -2-• -· -... Ill r "' "· ~ .. -• "~,.._ -1 I ·~·- • I • - No. 20 -RECEIVE AND FILE FINANC I AL REPORT FOR SIX MONTHS END I NG DECEMBER 31, 1965 : The Districts' auditors, Hanson , Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have submitted their customary report on the Districts' financial affairs covering the first two quarters of the present fisca l year. A copy of this report is enc l osed for the Chairman of each Board and will, of course, be forwarded before the meeting to any other Director upon request . District No. 1 I No. 26 -CONSIDERATION OF ADJOURNMENT TO 4:00 P.M ., APRIL 6 : This is the hour and date scheduled for opening bids on Plant Job No . I-4 -2 (see Item No . 17). -District No. 5 •• • ~ .. No. 33 -ADJOURNMENT TO DATE LATER IN THE MONTH OF MARCH : We are r e commending that the Directors adjourn the meeting to a mutually agreeable date on, or after, March 21 in orde r to consider a pre - liminary report by the engineers and staff on construction projects for the next fiscal year and the financing thereof. Also possibly to be considered at the adjourned meeting is a revision of the e xisting agreement with the City of Newport Beach for coll ection of the District's connection charges. • District No. 11 • No . 38 -CONSIDERATION OF ENGINEERS REPORT REGARDING NEW PUMP STAT I ON, ETC ., ON SLATER AVENUE: As direct ed at the January 27 meeting, Lowry & Associates are currently preparing this report which is scheduled to be submitted for consideration at this meeting in order tbat the rweded· construction . project can proceed without delay. Since State l aw requires public hea ring on this r~po rt a fter acceptance by the Boar d, the· res.elution at t ached to the agenda under this . item establishes such a hearing after which the report and plan therein may be formall y approve. No . 41 -ADJOURNMENT TO DATE LATER IN THE MONTH: We are reco~nding that the Directors adjourn the meeting to a mutually agreeab l e time and place on, or after, March 21 in order that the public hearing, described in Item No. 38, may be he l d and other related items of business taken up . • District No. 3 -. .. . ""· - No . 42 -RECEIVE AND FI LE NOTICES TO WI THHOLD, CONTRACT NO . 3 -10: The Direc t ors will recall that this contract with the H. E . Johnson Company, of Torrance, is for a relief section of the Miller -Ho l der Trunk sewer in Highway 39 between Imperial and Rosecrans Bbulevards. Most of the contract is now complete and has been paid for under progress payments with the exception of the normal retained per - centage. It is becoming obvi ous that the contractor is having credit -3- ... --"'-' -. . -, ' . .. I I -~ I .~ ; , • r " I ) problems as evidenced by the receipt, from his creditors, of Formal Notices to Withhold which will be listed on the final agenda. The only action required by the Board is to receive and file these Notices for the record. No . 43 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 (REVISED), CONTRACT NO. 3-10: At a previous meeting of the Board, the contractor on the job described under Item No . 42 was directed to install a. siphon in the sewer line with compensation to be on a cost plus basis. Now that the work is complete, a dollar value ($3,019 .75) can be assigned to this extra work as computed in the recommended formal change order attached to the agenda . Nos. 44, 45 and 46 -NEGOTIATIONS WITH DISTRICT NO. 11: As proposed at the February Joint meeting, a committee of Directors composed of Messrs. Cornwell, Culver and Kanno met with the Directors of District No. 11 on February 16 for the purpose of carrying on further negotiations regarding sewerage of a portion of District No. 3 through the facilities of District No . 11 and to consider related joint problems. A report on this Committee meeting is enclosed for the Directors and we believe it to be self-explanatory. If the report and recommendation of the Committee is acceptable to the full Board of Directors, adoption of the recommended actions as appearing on the formal agenda will be in order. In connection with Item No. 46, the proposal of the District's engineers for preparation of the recommended report is attached to the agenda. -I District No . 7 --- No. 50 -RESOLUTION NO . 66-15-7: Accepts easements, at no cost to the District, relative to sewer construction within a newly developed subdivision, Tract #4846 . 1 Nos. 51 through 53 -AUTHORIZING THE STAFF AND ENGINEERS TO PROCEED WITH THE CONSTRUCTION OF THE FOURTH STREET BYPASS SEWER: At the regu lar meeting in November, the Board declared its intent to include this sewer in its Master Plan and authorized the City of Santa Ana to use the connection charges collected by them to finance the project. Orig inally, only one segment of the bypass was planned for construction this year, but the City has now requested that the Di s trict plan construction of the entire project to coincide with a street widening contract scheduled for June. The staff and eng ineers have discussed the matter with the City 's staff, and recommend that the District construct the facility at this time. The preliminary cost estimate is $45,538.00, of which the City will contribute approximately $30,000 from its connection charge fund . No. 54 -SETTLEMENT OF DAMAGES: This action authorizes payment to a property owner for removal of three trees during construction of sewers in Assessment District #5 -A. The settlement was negotiated .... -.,. J -4- 3 , "I - "I • , .... ~ '. -~l· -'. -: • I • _J by the General Counsel, and the $120 contingency was included in the Assessment District 's incidenta l expenses. The General Counsel recommends payment of this amount . No. 55 -CONNECTION CHARGES FOR THE W. R. NELSON ELEMENTARY SCHOOL : During 1965, the Tustin Elementary School District constructed a school on 8.9 acres located at the northeast corner of Browning and Walnut Avenues. We advised the Schoo l District that this property was outside our District and must be annexed to District No. 7 . Appli cation for annexation was made to the Board of Supervisors and was approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission in March, 1965. The annexation should have been comp l eted no later than May, but, due to a misunderstanding or clerical error, the documents were not processed. New annexation proceedings were instituted late in 1965 and the annexation became official in February, 1966 . The school opened in September, 1965, and, since it began using District No. 7 's facilities at that time, the staff wou l d like direction from the Board concerning the collection of the applicable connection charges. No. 56 -CONSIDERATION OF LETTER CONCERNING POSSIBLE ANNEXATION: A letter has been received from Messrs . Liljeblad and Wessinger requesting an expression from the Board as to its views concerning a petition for annexation to the District of approximately one acre, which is not contiguous to the District boundary . A copy of the letter is enclosed with the agenda. This type of annexation is legal but may not be satisfactory to the Board . The proponents of the annexation plan to attend the meeting to explain their position more fully . Nos . 57 through 62 -INITIATION OF PROCEEDING FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 6: The next improvement district for which the installation of street sewers is proposed is Assessment District No . 6. This will provide for local sewers in the El Modena area and scattered developed areas in District No. 7 which are not now sewered. • • . • . ~"· .. I... • I -I . -J-.. 1 •f Lee M. Nelson _. ~ General Ma nage r • j :.-. I - ... j • ·- ' " .. I r r • tJ .... " , I --~ • R 0 L L C A L L District ?':;;.., .5' ..( b, / J/ Reg ul ar ' ~ :;; / Adjourned~~~~~~~ JO I NT BOARDS Farnsworth A o DISTRICT 1 Harvey,H. Meyers Mi ller Allen DISTRICT 2 McMichae l Mack Hirstein Bo s man Ca l en s 1 Coo Crap Cu lv r Fu rm a Thompson Kanno Gruber Shull Parks Callens Cornwe ll Crapo Culver Harvey,H. Hock Schutte Speer Workman Allen ;;ir ..?-Hil eman Ka nno Farns wortr~ Shull \ Gruber \ Harvey , Hock Johnson f .. Kanno , Lambert \ Long l Meyers l Mi ller -Nescher Parks Parsons Schutte ' Shipl ey I Speer I Stewart -Workman l Wright I Allen De Vries Elder McMichael Miche l Antich Ca ll ens Shipley Bell Gumm ere Hi l eman Krein We l ch c . DISTRICT 3 Cornwe 11 ....-- Amo ~ Bousman /" Crapo ,/ Culver ~ Furman .,,...-- Harvey, H. ,/ =on ~i/. Long Nescher Schutte Shipley Speer ..__,...., OTHERS: l " _fl Wr i ght .-----\/\) . .4<-f ~.<:A-Allen v=: Nelson ~ 1~ ,() •I ~.,:....1 DISTRICT 5 Brown c,...cc'" Y~K-u~ Nisson . _,., ~ Parsons v ~ ~ ./A-JI.--. Gruber ~ Galloway ye,:·\."" ·---~ Dunn V '\3~ ~ Allen '/ Tremblay .--1 \ 1 1 . ,-IJ-DISTRICT 6 Lowry ~ (-\'--, ~ Meyers ~ Carlson ,_-.f +-~ · Grub er ../" ·1.:J~ \A~L.."" Y~ Allen ,/ -G~~'-, \~~ DISTRICT 7 ~ -tJ., .r .. ~ --· /1 Mi l ler v-~~~""-L l~ c k ~ jA-H~~vey,H . ~ Mey ers i./ Parks i,/" Allen ,/ DISTRICT 11 Lambert ~ Stewart j._../ Al l en ·DISTRICT 8 Martin / / Mi t che1 1 I _)_,.1 _/_,,.J /'] (Aller! '-'I~ I L Jhr(tein McMichael Michel Krein Harvey,C. Qu eyr el Hirstein Farnswort' Thompson Shull De Vries McMichael Anticll Callens Bell Gummer e Krein We l ch Harvey ,C. No e Hirst ein Eld e r Hirst ein Elder Hirstein Mack Gruber McMichae l Hileman Hirstein Shipley R 0 LL C A L L District -------Regular ____________ __ Adjourned ____________ __ Dat~ Time '-"' Item DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Harvey,H. McMichael Meyers Cornwell Farnsworth Miller Mack Amo Allen Hirstein Bousman Thompson DISTRICT 2 Callens Kanno Parks Hileman Cook Gruber Callens Kanno Crapo Shull Cornwell Farnswortn Culver Crapo Shull Fu1.,man De Vries Culver Gruber Elder Harvey,H. McMichael Harvey,H. McMichael Hock Michel Hock Michel Schutte Krein Johnson Antich Speer Harvey,C. Kanno Callens Workman Queyrel Lambert Shipley Allen Hirstein Long Bell Meyers DISTRICT 3 Miller Cornwell Farnsworth Nescher Gummere Amo Parks Hileman Bousman Thompson Parsons Crapo Shull Schutte Krein Culver Shipley Welch Furman De Vries Speer Harvey, c. Harvey,H. McMichael Stewart Johnson Antich Workman Queyrel Kanno Callens Wright Noe Long Bell Allen Hirstein Nescher Gumm ere Schutte Krein Shipley Welch Speer Harvey,C. OTHERS: Wright Noe Allen Hirstein Nelson DISTRICT 5 Brown Parsons Nissen Gruber Elder Galloway Allen Hirstein Dunn Tremblay DISTRICT 6 Lowry Meyers Carlson Gruber Elder Allen Hirstein DISTRICT A Miller Mack Cook Gruber }it\ Harvey, H. McMichael ~ Meyers ~-~ Parks Hileman Allen 1/ Hirstein DISTRICT 11 DISTRICT 8 Lambert Shipley Martin Stewart Mitchell Allen Hirstein Allen Hirstein March 9, 1966 OU TLI NE OF SUGGESTED ACTIONS TO CARRY OUT PERSONNEL RECOMMENDATIONS CONSIDERED BY EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING OF MARCH 9, 1966 1. Adoption of Resolution No . a men ding Resolut i on No. 63 -10 (Positions and Salaries) containing t he following provisions: 2 . 3 . (a) Add the following positions to the Joint Adm inistrati ve Organization at the sala ries indicated: Salary or Position Range SoQ ~et1u;< General Manager-~ :::(:s te!C"l") 4 J y1 ~00 Ass istant General Ma n ager .j and Chief Engineer ·:6:E-(3tcp:e=) 18 1 ~ 1e l '=&f.u ... ~ .. ~~ -P3anning AQd Sp9oial Pre;te=e"tS ~ulte:n t --=!~ not to annua lly (b) Delete the following p ositions from the Joint Adminis- trative Organization : ( ) ~ Genera l Manager Assistant General Manager Director of Finance and Secretary of the Boa rds (~) Effective Resolution o · tricts appointing Fred A . Harper to the # position of Secretar y -enera l Ma na ge at Step 1 of Range 62, l\~o-o effective -A-pI tt 1, 1966. Motion app~ng appointment of Paul G . Brown .tf'afjl~i on of ff Ass is tant Genera l Manager and Chief Enginfrera:E B tep~cbf Ra nge l~,oo«>1 J"" ·.&i=a a11d :b ee Ha NelsGn te posi t ion of Plarrning a:11 d Specia l Pro jee t s -Cons al tan t . ;a:a:ta: 4 :;:::::J:s 1¢ 1::.... ' ...._ ~~1rMiicdt .. March 9th Jo i nt Meet i ng The recognized Director Miller, who advised the Boards that the Committee ma t at 4 :00 p .m., March 9th, to ~~~~ the General Manager.51concerning pe r sonne l consider ~t::::~ti:: :::s:o:~~;~ha::::nt::e:0 ::::u::e:i::c::::ea:~ourn attendance that the B~rds wou l d return to regular session ~~~} ~(k.u ... \. o:i \ a:f:±::eJ: 1=oi•si dar:i6J.g personri\l matters . \ p .m., ~he Boards r eturned to regular sess i on , \ at which time Director Mi l ler\reported the actions taken by the Boards i n Execut i ve session, and annoupced that the Boards had adopted effecti ve May 1 , 1 966 , Resolution No . (/e / jl, 1 amending Reso l ution No . 63 -10, as amended , adding the fol l owing positions to the Joint Administrative Organization : General Manager-Sec r etary Assistant Gene r a~ Manager-Chief Engineer and de l eting the fo l lowing positi ons; ' \ \ General Manager \ \ Ass i stant General Manager Director of F i nance a~d Secretary of the Boards reported \ Director Mi l le r a l so ArNN0HN~HN the adopt~on of Resolution No . ~~,~ 'r-' / appointing Fred A. Harper to the positi o n of G~eral Manager-Secretary, eff ective May 1 , 1 966 , and announced that a -met~e R -fi aa -s ee n the Boards had , by motion , approved the appointment of Paul G Brown to the new positi on of Assistant General Manager-Ch i ef May 1, 1966. Engineer \lso ' \ effective .. t , R & F Report e General Counsel explained more fully his report to the s, which was included with the agenda, relative to the pending kRXR~ initiated by the State Attorney General certain pipe manufacturers. a lengthy discussion during which the General Counsel answered quest ons and explained the various procedures available to for recovery of damage~ it was MS&DC: 3, Page 2, of the resolution prepared by the State Attorney Gen al authorizing him to conduct these proceedings be changed to read: "3. le, compromise, or dismiss all or any art of any claim of Public End User involved in such proceedings with the c sent of the Public End User" FURTHER MOVED: That P ge 2 of said resolution be amended to limit the amount advanced by ~a \h District for costs and expensesJ of litigation, other than att ~neys' fees, to $500.00. It was then MS&DC: That said Resolution No. ------' authorizing the State Attorney Gen S{al to conduct legal proceedings on behalf of the Districts, against certain pipe ~a~f~cturers 1 alleged ' ~ ~puq tV cJa,?fo/-4'1 to have acted in violation of antitrust laws1 with the District's own General Counsel serving as associate« c nsel, ~g on the local level. Certified copy of attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. #12 -Report of the G.M. -The General Manage jiisplayed an elabozate ~ ~?u, ~. ;; {humorous) (amusing) (whimsical ) ~which ad been prepared for retired Directo r James Stoddard as a token of esteem and appreciation for his many services to the In Mr. . ~- .f'.,.• "$ ~ ~ ~ ~ . " ..::. \~ ~ Stoddard's absence, presentation s made to Director Lindsley Parsons, Chairman of 5, who accepted for Mr. Stoddard. #28 -The Secretary read a letter dated March 9, 1966, from the ~ City of Brea, requesting a modification of the~July, 1965, Engineer 's Report for Gotii:nty Sa:nit-at;lon Diotr:i:ct No, 2 (Rolling Hills Drive Pump Station, Rolling Hil l s Drive Force Main and Sub-Trunk Sewer) which, presumably, will result in a reduction of pumping head requirements for the proposed Rolling Hills Drive Pumping Plant, and will also result in an advantage for the Cities of Fullerton and Brea in the planning of their own future sewerage facilities. It was then MS&DC: THat the General Manager be ~xa authorized to direct the engineers to\prepare a modification report for con- sideration by the Board at its next regul a r meeting; and that the engineers be instructed to submit a proposal for the engineering design work for the project ._\ #56 -Following the reading of a etter from H. G. Liljebla d and E. Wessinger, requesting an expre s ion from the Board concerning a proposed annexation to the Dist ict of approximately one acre of property in the Cowan Hei g hts are , which is not contiguous to the District's present boundary, the cpair recognized Mr. Liljeblad, who distributed to the Directors supporting l .etters from the County Health and Building Departments, ~f~ that sanitary sewers will be required prior to their approval of residential construction on t;~:ty in question. a lengthy discussion of the staff 's recommendation that the property owners be requested to a nnex the;~'I'e€ilw.bi9'Fl: wili be xxxxxxxxxxxxx to be served by the sew e r age facilities requi d t re o serve the proponents • p~ope ~ .. , ~· it was MS&DC: That the recommendation of the staff be accepted, t 1J j '{[;_./j and that the property owners be requested,/ to tav:t annex the total area to b.s~rv~d ~_Y t.c.he '-sewerage facil2~es ~eqniied te ser¥e--thei.r_prop.er.ty. '{l.i _......,~---:~ .. 7 jt r"/6»-<-" .J If ~ unsuccessful, e Board will consider favorably the ·~-;: ... (., •L annexation of the ~rQ~oocn~ pr. perty. ,.-. , .. REPORT TO THE DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, S, 6 AND 11 RE: CONCRETE AND STEEL PRICE-PIXING AND ANTI-TRUST SUITS On or about September 1, 1962, certain defendant steel companies entered a plea of nolo contendre in one or more federal criminal actions relating to violations of the anti-trust laws regarding price-fixing in the steel and concrete pipe industry servinq the western area of the United States. This plea appar- ently had the effect of admitting that certain price-fixing had gone on up to that time. Subsequently the Attorney General of the State of Cali- fornia filed a "class action", which could include all cities and special districts, as well as the State of California, for the purpose of seeking recovery of the damages those joining as plain- tiffs had suffered by reason of said price-fixing. The applicable statutes allow treble damages plus an award for attorney's fees. The Attorney General's office has offered to include the County Sanitation Districts as plaintiffs and has forwarded a resolution authorizing that office to represent the Districts and to associate me as your general counsel on the case. My duti~s would be to qather information at this local level for use in the pending lawsuit. The pro's and con's of such action seem to be as follows: PRO: (1) The action is underway; and the principal work to be done is to determine damages and to either settle or litigate the amount thereof. (2) Each plaintiff would probably be treated equally as to method of settlement and costs involved. -1- ~·· CON: (1) You would have no control over the amount or basis of settlement. (2) The exact amount of costs you would bear are unknown, but, after a telephone call to the Attorney General's office, are believed to be quite small. (3) You would have to pay my fees as local counsel in addition to other costs. The amount of these fees would depend upon how much work I was required to do and cannot at this time be estimated. (4) There may be a protracted delay in receiving money damages by reason of the involvement with many similar claimants in one lawsuit. As an alternate course of action--and this is being adopted by some local agencies (e.g., Coastal Municipal Water District)-- staff counsel is retained to enter into a stipulation with the defendant steel and pipe companies to waive the running of the statute of limitations, and thereafter, negotiations for settlement of the damage claims are begun. If a settlement cannot be reached, a lawsuit is filed to litigate the claims. It is my understanding that the Metropolitan Water District will follow this course of procedure. If this course of action is followed, the matter could be handled on a contingent fee basis; and I, as your legal counsel, would expect to associate an attorney experienced in this type of litigation and settlement negotiation. The usual contingent fee for this type of matter is one-third of the amount recovered plus any attorney's fees which the court might award in the event of litigation. The pro's and con's of such action seem to be as follows: PRO: .. (1) You would determine in the event of a settle- m~nt what the amount of and basis for settle- tnent would be. -2- ~·· (2) A settlement of the claims is probable in that the defendants have already indicated a willing- ness to make some monetary settlement according to the best information I have received. (3) You would probably receive your money sooner. (4) You would not be involved with numerous other districts and cities and would control at the local level the course of the proceedings. (5) If you recovered nothing, you would not be out any monetary costs. CON: The ultimate fees might be greater in the event of a substantial recovery than they would be if the matter were turned over to the Attorney General. A third procedure is being advocated by a local firm of attorneys, that is, to join as many.cities and districts in the Orange County area as possible and to file a suit directly. Fees would probably be on a contingent basis. It is apparent that you have a duty to take some action in the matter because there were substantial amounts of reinforced concrete pipe purchased and used in construction by the Districts during the period 1951 to September 1, 1962. I would be pleased to represent the Districts under the second alternative plan under the terms suggested; however, if you choose to turn the matter over to the Attorney General, I will cooperate in every way as local counsel to obtain the best recovery possible for you. Dated: March 3, 1966 -3- Respectfully submitted c-~~ c. Arthur Nissan General Counsel for County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California f:. .. ,.. RESOLUTION NO. 63-57-7 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY APPOINTING JACK J. RIMEL AND C. ARTHUR ~6~¥g~sT2N~~~~ ~I~E~§PINt1 ~R~~i~~¥jJ~N~fill TO PERFORM ALL LEGAL WORK REQUIRED FOR ANY WORK AUTHORIZED BY THE "IMPROVEMENT ACT OF 1911 1 " BEING DIVISION 7 OF THE STREETS AND HIGlfwAYS CODE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, .AND/OR "THE SPECIAL ASSESSMENT INVESTIGATION, LIMITATION AND fJORITY PROTEST ACT OF 1~1," ~~fg1~Ir 1 ¥~~0VE~N~AfgTcg~Ei9f~D~O~EiiG DIVISION 12 OF SAID CODE~ IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF SANITARY SEWERS AND A~PURTENANT WORK WITHIN SAID DISTRICT. WHEREAS, it is contemplated and it is the intention of COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE 90UNTY, under the provisions of the "Improvement Act of 1911," being Division 7 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of C~lifornia, and/or "The Municipal ~mprovement Act of 1913," being Division 12 of said Code, to carry through one or more separate proceedings for the acquisition of \ necessary easements and rights-of-way and for the construc- tion of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in one or mo~e special assessment districts in County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County; and WHEREAS, it is necessary that some competent, qualified persons be appointed for the purpose of preparing and typing the resolutions, notices and other papers and proceedings and performing all other required legal work and services for any work authorized by the above mentioned "Improvement Act of 1911" and/or "The Municipal Improvement Act of 1913," together with the proceedings made necessary under the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investiga- tion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931," being Division 4 of the aforementioned Streets and Highways Oode of the State of California; and 1. . ...._, WHEREAS, JACK J. RIMEL and C. ARTHUR NISSON, herein- after referred to as Attorneys, are attorneys duly author- ized to practice law before all of the courts of the State of California and members of the State Bar of said state and are competent and qualified persons to perform said work and services; NOW, THEREFORE, THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1: That JACK J. RIMEL and C. ARTHUR NISSON be and they are hereby employed and appointed for the pur- pose of typing and preparing the resolutions, notices and other papers and proceedings for all work contemplated by this Board of Directors under the provisions of the herein- above mentioned Acts in the matter of the proposed acquisi- tion of necessary easements and rights-of-way and construc- tion of public improvements consisting of the construction of sanitary sewers and all appurtenances and appurtenant work in one or more assessment districts within this sani- tation district. The services to be furnished by the said attorneys shall not include the figuring and/or estimating of the amounts of estimated costs to each parcel of property under the provisions of the "Special Assessment Investiga- tion, Limitation and Majority Protest Act of 1931" or the preparation of the final assessment for any work done under the "Improvement Act of 1911" or for the issuance of bonds thereunder. Section 2: For all of the services of the attorneys, as aforesaid, in each one of the above mentioned projects (which said services shal 1 be known as "ordinary services''), save and except for the extraordinary services hereinafter mentioned and provided for, the compensation which the Sanitation District agrees to pay and which the said 2. '• attorneys agree to accept as payment in full is hereby fixed at an amount of money equal to two and one-half per- cent (2-1/2%) of the total construction costs of the pro- ject as finally determined by the bid of the successful bidder, with a minimum fee of not less than One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00) for the ordinary services. Items of cost known and designated by the "Improvement Act of 1911," and more particularly by Section 5024 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California, as "Incidental Expenses" shall not be included in the cost of construction for the purpose of determining the percentage fees and compensation of the said attorneys for their work called for under this resolution. Section 3: For all extraordinary services of said attorneys in each such project and assessment district pro- ceeding, which extraordinary services shall consist of any or all of the following services, to-wit: (a) All work of acquisition of lands, easements and rights-of-way required for said improve- ment; and (b) The preparation of the report and the resolu- tion papers and proceedings required when a report is made, filed and considered under the "Special Assessment Investigation, Limita- tion and Majority Protest Act of 1931," being Division 4 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and {c) All court work in both trial and appellate courts, including condemnation actions and in rem actions to determine the validity of· proceedings; the compensation of said attorneys is hereby fixed at the rate of Thirty-five Dollars ($J5.00) per hour, except ). \...,I '"'-' ·£or court work where the compensation is hereby fixed at the rate of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) per day for each full day in court and to be pro-rated for portions of a court day. Whenever and wherever permitted by the provi- sions of the said "Improvement Act of 1911" and/or the said "Municipal Improvement Act of 1913'' and/or by the said "Special Assessment Investigation, Limitation and Majority Protest .Act of 1931," as aforesaid, all such compensation paid for said extra-ordinary services, as well as the compensation paid on the percentage and minimum basis as hereinabove provided, shall be included as "Incidental Expenses" in the particular assessment district proceeding for which the services were rendered and shall become a charge against the district for said improvement. Section 4: In the event that any of said proposed assessment district proceedings shall cease or be abandoned before the award of the contract to the successful bidder, the Sanitation District shall be liable.to and obligated to and agrees to pay to the said attorneys, and they agree to accept as payment in full for all of their services, the following compensations only: The sum of Thirty-five Dollars ($35.00) per hour for the actual time of each of the said attorneys, provided, however, that where trial or appellate court work is involved, the rate of pay shall be at the rate of Two Hundred Dollars ($200.00) for each full day in court and pro-rated for portions of a court day. All such amounts charged to the Sanitation District as a result of any terminated or ~bandoned proceedings as afore- said shall be submitted to the Board of Directors by an itemized sworn statement of such services, provided, that it is mutually agreed that in no event shall said amount to be paid by the Sanitation District upon any such termi- nation or abandonment proceeding in any one of said proposed 4. assessment districts exceed an amount equal to One Thousand Dollars ($1,000.00). Section 5: The said compensation and fees to be paid under this Resolution shall be payable in the follow- ing manner and at the following times, to-wit: (a) An 3.mount equal to three-four·ths (J/4) of the estimated amount of the t;o·cal compensation to be paid to the said attorneys for their ordi- nary services, as aforesaid, to be based upon the bid of the successful bidder to whom the contract was awarded, plus E.11 compensation for extraordinary services incurred to the date of the award of the contract and which are properly includable as "Incidental Expenses:' sha11 ·be· collected from the su.ccassful con- tractor as Incidental Expens~s •. -All of the portion of the said ordinary and extraordinary fees and compensation above described shal.l be paid to the said attorneys within fifteen (15) days after the date of signing and enter- ing into the contract with the successful bidder. (b) The balance of the ordinary fee, to-wit: The remaining one-fourth (1/4) thereof, plus all compensation for extraordinary services in- curred after the date of award of contract and which are properly includable as "Incidental Expenses,u shall be collected from·the con- tractor as Incidental Expenses. All of said fees and compensation shall be due.and payable and shall be paid to the said attorneys within fifteen (15) days after the assessments for the said improvements and the assessment diagram, as confirmed by the Sanitation District, are recorded as required by law. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE } SS. I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the above and foregoing Resolution No. 63-57-7 was regularly passed and adopted at an adjourned regular meeting of said Board on the 16th day of April, 1963, by the following vote, to wit: AYES: Directors Doney, Hall, Meyers, Parks and Featherly NOES: None A~ENT:_ ~ -Di_rector Cook --~ --_- -__ ~ --rN Wil'NESs-=-wHER.EOF, I have hereunto set rrry hand and affixed ~----------: -:: ~ -----=-the-, O.fficial sear_ of County Sanitation District No. 7 of Orange ~, --. count.Y.-~~·gartior~ia, this 16th day of April, 1963. • Harper, ecre a y o e Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7 of Orange County, California 6. ORDINANCE NO. 709 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REPEAL- ING ORDINANCES NOS. 705, 706 AND 708. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE l -DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this ordinance, certain words and terms are defined as follows: (a) Assessment Charses. Are those charges paid directly by the property owner for the construction of street sewers. (b) Assessment District Sewers. Shall mean those sewerage facilities owned or controlled and maintained by County Sanitation District No. 7 which were constructed or acquired by means of special assessment district proceedings in accordance with the provisions of Health and Safety Code Section 4771. (c) Connection Manhole. Shall mean a manhole constructed in the main line of a District trunk or subtrunk sewer not as a part of the original construction, or a manhole built adjacent thereto, for the purpose of permitting sewage to flow into a District sew~r. {d) District Connection Charge. Is a connection charge imposed directly by County Sanitation District No. 7 as a charge for the use of the District's sewerage system and falls into the follow- ing categories: (1) Regular Connection Charge. Is the charge imposed on all property owners for connection to a sewer owned by the District or a sewer discharging into a District sewerage facility. {2) Trunk Connection Charge. Is the charge im- posed on the owner of real property for a direct con- -1- nection of that real property to a trunk sewer owned or maintained by the District. (3) Assessment District Connection Charge. Is the charge imposed on real property not assessed within an assessment district that connects to an assessment district sewer. {e) District Sewerage Facility. Shall mean any property belonging to County Sanitation District No. 7 used in the treatment, transportation or disposal of sewage or industrial wastes. (f) Domestic Sewage:-Shall mean the water-borne wastes derived from the ordinary living processes which are of such volume and character as to permit satisfactory disposal into a public sewer. (g) Industrial Waste. Shall mean any and all liquid or solid waste substance, not sewage, from any producing, manufacturing or processing operation of whatever nature. (h) Industrial Waste Treatment Plant or Facility... Shall mean any works or device for the treatment of industrial waste prior to its discharge into the District sewerage facilities. (i) Pretreatment. Shall mean treatment prior to discharge into a District sewerage facility by means of an industrial waste treatment plant or facility. (j) Public Corporation. Shall mean any city, district or other public agency duly authorized under the laws of the State of California. (k) Sewerage Facilities. Are any facilities used 1n the collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage and industrial wastes. (1) Street Sewers. Are those constructed as a result of local initiative and financing in tracts, subdivisions, commercial and industrial developments or other built-up areas by developers or real property owners excepting those constructed by special assessment districts. -2- (m) Trunk Sewers. Are trunk and subtrunk sewer lines owned or maintained by the District as distinguished from street sewers and assessment district sewers. (n) Trunk Sewer Manholes. Shall mean those manholes con- structed as a part of the District's sewerage system. ARTICLE 2 -PERMIT REGULATIONS {a) Requirements. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use or maintain a connection to the sewerage facilities of the District without a valid permit. {b) Condition Precedent. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be sewered by use of the permit shall be in- cluded within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 7 and within the boundaries of a public corporation (other than County Sanitation District No. 7) authorized to maintain public sewerage works. (c) Permit. (1) The permit shall be in two parts: First, a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing con- nection to a District sewerage facility under condi- tions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for discharging sewage and industrial wastes into District sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances of the District as to characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage. (2) The use permit may prescribe requirements as to a connection manhole, industrial waste treatment plant or facility, or pretreatment, all to insure compliance with the District regulations as to charac- teristics, quality and quantity of sewage and industrial wastes. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit by the General Manager. -3- (3) Surcharges for Use Permit. The District hereby establishes the quantity of 7,500 cubic feet of sewage or industrial wastes per month per acre of real property served and subject to District's ad valorem tax as the maximum allowable effluent to be discharged into the District's sewerage facilities without the payment of surcharges. Each user subject to District's ad valorem tax and discharging more than 7,500 cubic feet of sewage or industrial wastes per month per acre shall be charged $0.50 per 1,000 cubic feet or any portion of 1,000 cubic feet in excess of the 7,500 cubic foot maximum. Each user not subject to District's ad valorem tax and dis- charging more than 10,000 cubic feet of sewage and industrial wastes per month from any one premise shall be charged $0.50 per 1,000 cubic feet or any portion of 1,000 cubic feet discharged from such premise. Public school districts and agencies of the County of Orange shall be exempt from payment of any surcharge herein established. Measurements may be required by the permittee, or permittee's effluent may be considered equivalent to the water (excepting irrigation water) purchased by the per- mittee. Permittee shall upon demand provide District with his or its water usage records. (4) All existing permits shall be modified or amended to comply with the provisions of this ordi- nance. (d) Suspension of Use Permit. The second part of the permit may be suspended if a permittee is acting in violation of any provision of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regula- tions of the District thirty (30) days after receiving a formal -4- written notice of such violation and a demand for correction thereof from the District. Such formal written notice shall be given only upon recommendation of the General Manager and approval of the Directors of the District. No formal written notice of violation shall be authorized unless the General Manager of the District has first given an in- formal written notice of violation to the subject permittee at least fifteen (15) days in advance of action by the Board of Directors of the District. (e) Violation. For each day or part of a day a permittee whose permit has been suspended continues to discharge sewage or industrial wastes into a. District sewerage facility in violation of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regulations of the Dis- trict, he or it shall be charged the sum of ten percent {10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit. The same noticing procedure set forth hereinabove shall apply for intermittent or sporadic violators; and in lieu of a sus- pension of permit, the District Directors may impose a fine of not less than ten percent (10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit per day or any part of a day for intermittent violations. Notwithstanding the foregoing~ if the violation of a per- mittee causes damage to the sewerage facilities of the District~ the District shall have the right to charge and collect for the damages to its facilities caused by such violations by an action of law. In all cases, a formal notice of violation as hereinabove provided for shall set forth the fine or other charges to be imposed for violations after the thirty-(30-) day correction period. (f) Procedure to Acquire Permit. An applicant for a per- mit or his agent shall make application on a form furnished by the District. The permit application shall be supplemented by such -5- plans, specifications or other information considered pertinent in the judgment of the General Manager of the District. The permit fees and charges as hereinafter described shall be paid to the District or an agent designated to act for the District at the time the permit application is filed. (g) Disposition of Charges. All charges established under this Article, when collected, shall be deposited in the District's Operating Fund. ARTICLE 3 -PERMIT CHARGES (a) The regular connection charges for each single family dwelling connected to a sewer discharging into a District sewerage facility, excepting those so connected prior to March 1, 1962, shall be $50.00. (b) The regular connection charge for each multiple unit dwelling connected to a sewer discharging into a District sewerage facility, excepting those so connected prior to March 1, 1962, shall be $25.00 plus $25.00 per dwelling unit contained therein. {c) The regular connection charge for each commercial or industrial establishment connected to a sewer discharging into a District sewerage facility, excepting those so connected prior to March 1, 1962, shall be $25.00 plus $30.00 per one-fourth acre of area or major portion thereof. "Area" as herein used shall mean the entire property served by such connection. "Commercial or industrial establishment" as used herein shall include property owned or occupied by governmental agencies and nonprofit corpora- tions and organizations. (d) The trunk connection charge shall be $5.00 per front foot for the real property fronting on and connecting to a trunk sewer, provided that no trunk connection charge shall be less than $250.00. Any such real property with a depth in excess of 150 lineal feet shall be charged an additional charge equal to $200.00 per acre for that portion of the real property having a depth -6- greater than 150 lineal feet from the front property line, which shall be measured from the street easement, if any. The trunk con- nection charge, where applicable, shall be in addition to the regular connection charges provided for in Subsections (a), {b) and (c) of this ARTICLE 3. {e) The assessment district connection charge for the connection of improvements on real property to assessment district sewers shall be, in addition to the regular connection charges provided for in subsections (a), (b) and (c) of this ARTICLE 3, a sum of money equal to the assessment charge without interest or Treasurer's charges that would have been made against the real property on which such improvements are located had said real property been assessed within the assessment district which con- structed or acquired the assessment district sewer to which con- nection is proposed to be made. ARTICLE 4 -INTERPRETATION OF PERMIT REGULATIONS If the factual situations presented do not follow precisely within the rules herein promulgated in this Article, the General Manager shall interpret them in a reasonable manner. In making such interpretations, the General Manager shall be guided by the policy of the District, which is hereby stated as follows: It is the policy of the Directors of the District to base fees and charges in accordance with the benefits and uses supplied by the District. Those receiving the greatest benefits and most use of the facilities provided by the District shall proportionately bear more of the costs and expenses of the District. ARTICLE 5 -APPEAL If an applicant disagrees with the requirements directed by the General Manager in this Article, he or it may appeal by written notice stating his or its grievance. The Board of Directors shall hear such appeal at its regular meeting next occurring fourteen (14) -7- days after the filing of such written appeal or sooner at the pleasure of the Directors. The decision of the Directors shall be final. ARTICLE 6 -PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS For each day or part of a day that any person, governmental agency or public corporation is without a valid permit and is connected directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewerage facility which discharges into a District sewerage facility, he or it shall be liable to the District in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the permit charge applicable to the property so connected. ARTICLE 7. ~ FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND·. There is here~y established the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. All charges as established by ARTICLE 3 and ARTICLE 6 hereof, when collected, shall be deposited in said fund. Said fund shall be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other purposes described in Section 5474.9 of the California Health and Safety Code. ARTICLE 8 -ENFORCEMENT The provisions of this ordinance may be enforced by civil action at law and/or by injunction. In this connection these regu- lations shall b~ construed as a contract by the County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange CountyJ California, and each permittee. ARTICLE 9 -REPEALS Ordinances Nos. 705, 706 and 708 heretofore adopted and in force in the District are hereby repealed on the effective date of December 31, 1965, at 11:59 p.m. ARTICLE 10 -VALIDITY If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the application of any thereof to any -8- • I:. pers~n, entity, public corporation or circumstance, be held to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the valid- ity of any other provision or application of any of the remaining provisions or portions of this ordinance; and to this end the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordi- nance and each and every article, section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more other articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance, be declared invalid. ARTICLE 11 -EFFECTIVE DATE The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this ordinance and the Secretary of the District shall attest thereto and certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be published once in The Tustin News, a weekly news- paper of general circulation printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15} days after the date of the passage of this ordinance by said Board of Directors; and said ordinance shall take effect January 1, 1966. PASSED AND ADOPl'ED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, at a regular meeting held on the 14th day of July, 1965. Chairman of the Board of Directors ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors -9- STATE OF CALIFORNIA~ SS. COUNTY OF ORANGE I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 709 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 on the 14th day of July, 1965, by tne following roll call vote, to wit: AYES: Directors William Hirstein, Dee Cook, Harry H. Harvey, A. H. Meyers, Clifton c. Miller and Rex A. Parks NOES: NONE ABSENT: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, this 14th day of July, 1965. Fred A. Harper, secretary ot t~ Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California . -~ ~.> ~~: .. · ~ :.,'. . /#r. ,•ILC.11.1 In the Off•~ of the Secretary NC:7l !"S"t"~'~(t JAi 81964 JAN 8 -1964 RULES OF PROCEDURE F'O:<t.:': . . . - RESOLUTION NO. 64-3 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FIXING AND ESTABLISHING RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE CONDUCT OF BUSINESS OF THE DISTRICTS, AND REPEALING ALL RESOLUTIONS PREVIOUSLY ADOPl'ED WITH REGARD TO SAID PROCEEDINGS WHEREAS, it is necessary to establish rules of procedure to facilitate the orderly handling of business to come before the Joint Adm1nist1'8.tive Organization of County Sanitation Districts Nos: l, 2J 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 of Orange County, California, and WHEREAS, these Boards from time to time, conunencing in 1949, have established rules of procedure ·and from time to time have amended said rules so that different aspects of said procedures are to be round in a number of resolutions and motions, and WHEREAS, it is desirable and appropriate to consolidate, simplify and clarify the existing rules of procedure into one docu- ment readily accessible to the Directors, staff and general public, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED: Section A. That any procedures set forth in the Joint Owner- ship, Operation and Construction Agreement dated October 8, 1958, as amended, in conflict with the procedures set forth herein, take precedence. Section B. That the following rules of procedure be adopted for the conduct of business or the Joint Administrative Organization and or each County Sanitation District of Orange County, party thereto: 1. RE:GULAR MEETINGS -There shall be a regular monthly meeting or the Boards of Directors of the County Sanitation DJ.stricts of Orange County, parties to the Joint OWnership~ Operation and Construction Agreement dated October 8, 1958, as amended, on the second Wednesday or every month at 8:00 p.m., -H- • -.. ~~-· ~ ... .. in the Joint Administrative offices of the Districts at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California, provided however, if the second Wednesday of the month falls upon a legal holiday, said monthly meeting shall be held on the next day thereafter, at the same time and place. The Secretary shall mail to each Director a notice of such regula~ meetings, together with a proposed agenda, not later than the Friday immediately preceding such regular meetings. Said agenda, insofar as possible, shall include copies or resolutions and motions to be considered, together with any pertinent supporting documents. The Board or Directors may adjourn any regular, special or adjourned special meeting to a time and place speci- fied in the order or adjournment. 2. MEETINGS ADJOURNED BY SECRETARY -If all Directors are absent from any regular or adjourned regular meeting the Secretary of the District may declare the meeting adjourned to a stated time and place and he shall cause written notice of the adjournment to be given in the same manner as for a special meeting unless such notice is waived as provided for special meetings. A copy of the order or notice of adjournment shall be conspicuously posted on or near the door of the place where the regular, adjourned regular, special, or adjourned special meeting was held within twenty-four (24) hours after the time of the adjournment. 3. SPECIAL MEETINGS -A special meeting of the Board of Directors or any County Sanitation District may be called in any one;·ot' the following ways: (a) By the Chainnan or the Board of Directors of said District (b) By the written request of the majority ot the Directors ot the District delivered to the Secretary ot the District H-2 ~ _., ·( \ A special meeting of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization may be called by the Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization or by a majority of the Executive Committee. The call for special meeting shall be in writing and delivered personally or by mail at least 24 hours before the time of such meeting as specified in the notice. Any notice deposited in the regular mail addressed to a Director at the address he has on file with the Secretary or the District, postage prepaid, sixty (60) hours in advance of any such. meeting as specified in the notice shall be presumed to have been delivered. The call or notice shall specify the time and place of the special meeting and the business to be transacted. Such written notice may be dispensed with as to any Director or alternate Director who, at or prior to the time the meeting convenes, files with the Secretary of the District, a written waiver of notice. Such waiver may be given by telegram. Such written notice may also be dispensed with as to any member who is actually present at the meeting at the time it convenes. The Secretary of the District shall diligently attempt to notify each Director personally of the time, place and purpose of said meeting not less than twenty-four (24) hours before the time or said meeting. 4. NOTICES TO NEWS MEDIA -When any local newspaper of general circulation, radio or television station requests, in writing, notices of meetings of the Board of Directors of any "-"' District or of the Joint Administrative Organization, the Secretary shall thereafter, until receipt of a notice terminating said request, deliver notices of .special and adjourned regular meetings to such newspaper, radio or television stations. Delivery shall be made in the same manner as delivery is made to the Directors. H-3 . . ;,. ... ; -, '-" ....._, --- 5. RULES OF ORDER -The business to come before each individual District, and before the Districts as part of the business of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be carried on and conducted in accordance with the provisions of the 75th Anniversary Edition of "Robert's Rules of Order Revised", a copy of which is on file in the office of the Secretary'of the Joint Administrative Organization, except where the special provisions hereinafter set forth conflict therewith. 6. QUORUM -A majority of the Directors in five of the seven County Sanitation Districts of Orange County constituting the members of the Joint Administrative Organization shall constitute a quorum of the Joint Administrative Organization. 7. CHAIRMAN OF THE DISTRICT -A Chairman shall be elected -by majority vote as the first order of business by the members ot each District Board·or Directors at the first meeting ~n May of each year, and said Chairman shall serve at the pleasure Qf the majority of said members. 8. CHAIRMAN AND VICE CHAIRMAN OF THE JOINT A··~-~'. ORGANIZATION -A Chairman and a Vice Chairman of th~ ·-·~ .l.·1 ~ Administrative Organization shall be elected by a majority vote of the Districts at the first meeting in May of each year. The Chairman and the Vice Chairman shall serve at the pleasure the majority of the Districts. 9. PRESIDING OFFICER -The Chairman of the Joint Admini- strative Organization shall preside during meetings of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization and in addition, when the Directors of a District are sltting with the Directors of the other County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, any business to come before the District will be acted upon under the Chairmanship of the Chairman or the Joint Administrative Organization unless any Director requests that H-4 .. Directors, the General Manager and General Counsel and all formal communications. "--1 At the discretion of the General Manager, urgent items ot business not lalown at the time the regular agenda is mailed as herein provided, may be included in a supplemental agenda to be made available at the time or the meeting. ~ -- No business, except with consent or a majority of the Districts present, not appearing on the regular or supplemental agendas may be brought before the Directors or the Joint Adm1nistrat1ve Organization. 12. HANDLING OF BUSINESS AND VOTING -During the course of a Board meeting routine matters listed on the agenda for consideration will be referred to by Agenda Item Number only. Voting on all resolutions shall be by roll call. When a roll call vote is required on joint business or the Districts, and except as provided hereinafter, the name or each Director shall be called only once and his vote regarded the same for each District he represents, unless a Director expresses his desire to vote differently for any District he represents, or unless a member of the Board or Directors asks that each District be individually polled. Notwithstanding the foregoing, when voting on reso- lutions or motions of a routine nature in"the absence of an objection thereto by any Director, the Chairman may order a unanimous ballot cast in favor of the motion or resolution under consideration. On matters of considerable interest or on which there· -..,_; appears to be a controversy, the motion or resolution shall be read by title or repeated by the Chairman or the Joint Admini- strative Organization. The Chairman shall thereafter call tor discussion on the motion or resolution at which time any mem~er may discuss the matter pending. Any person other than a Director H-6 -· '\- '-"' present at the meeting may speak on the motion if the Chairman recognizes him or her. Sole discretion as to the extent of discussion outside of the membership of the Joint Administrative Organization shall rest with the Chairman. At the close of discussion the Chairman may, in his discretion, repeat the motion or resolution pending, and thereafter call for vote. The Secretary shall determine and state whether or not a motion or resolution is carried by roll call vote. On all other matters the Chairman shall determine the outcome of the voting. 13. PJ'\YI•illiYI' OP CL~IMS -The Secretary shall cause to be prepared for each regular meeting a list of all valid outstanding claims and invoices against the Joint Administrative Organization and each District; said list to set forth the warrant number, payee and amount of each such claim. The payment of claims shall not be made by the County Auditor unless approved by roll call vote of a majority of the Districts' Boards of Directors. Such roll call shall not be waived as provided for routine matters hereinabove and said vote shall not be taken until there has been received and filed a certification by the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order and that he recommends authorization for payment. All claims for damages or other claims deemed by the General Manager to be of questionable validity shall be taken up and acted upon separately and apart from claims for authorized ~ purchases, services and formal contract payments. 14. EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -There shall be a permanent Committee designated as the Executive Conunittee which shall consist of the Chairman of the Board of Directors or each District, parties to the Joint Ownership, Operation and Con- struction Agreement dated October 8, 1958. The General Manager u_7 .. '-"' ~ ";--. ... ''"'ii .... : .• ,. ·· . .,. of Joint Administrative Organization may attend meetings of said Committee in an advisory capacity. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization shall be the Chairman of the Executive Committee. The Committee may fix a regular meeting time and place or may meet at the call of the Chairman. The Committee may consider any matters related to the Joint ownership, operation and construction of all the Districts and make recommendations thereon to the Joint Boards of Directors of the Districts. Members of the Committee shall be entitled to mileage for attendance at committee meetings or for other D1str1cts 1 business. 15. MOTION TO REFER TO EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE -Any Director at a Joint Administrative meeting may move to have any matter of poli~y, or other activity affecting the members of the Joint Administrative Organization, or any one of the member Districts, referred to the Executive Committee for study and report. This motion shall be a privileged motion and when duly seconded, discussion thereof shall be limited to Directors only, and for a period of not to exceed two minutes per person. It shall be passed by an affirmative vote of a majority of the Districts. 16. SPECIAL COMMITTEES -Except for the Executive Committee, there shall be no permanent conunittees of the Directors of the Joint Administrative Organization. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization may, upon his own motion or upon motion of a majority of the Districts affected, appoint from time to time special or ad hoc committees to study and report on special matters affecting more than one District. The individual District chairman may appoint similar committees on matters affecting only one District; provided that where such committees are to be authorized to act in the name of the Board H-8 .. ~4:'"t~~T .. -· ;4: .$:~~'. March 8, 1966 MEMORANDUM TO: LEE M. NELSON SUBJECT: EVALUATION OF TRAINING SESSIONS The Training Committee, with the help of 23 members of the staff and 2 specialists from the outside, conducted a series of classes for the Districts' personnel. Thirty-five papers were presented in seven sessions. Attendance ran between 57 to 71 persons present each session. All phases of the Districts' operations were covered. The subjects were covered in a general manner to familiarize each employee with how his work fit into the overall operation of the Districts. The greatest advantage was accrued to the instructors who found they had to make themselves experts in their phase of instruction. At the end of the last session, a review session was held to evaluate our training methods. The training committee was pleased with the overall results and now have a basis for starting the next series of instruction seminars which will be specific and detailed instruction of small specialized groups of employees. JS:rw Copies to: LMN PGB FAH Training Committee Tremblay Dunn Clarke Wayne Sigler JOHN SIGLER February 3, 1966 COUNTY SAN ITATION DISTRICTS TRAINING SESSION EVALUATION your area of employment from one of the following : Operations Mechanica l Maintenance El ectrical Maintenan ce Plant Maintenance i l Laboratory Line Cleaning Other B. Read each question carefully and cir cle the one best answer. C. DO NOT GUESS . If you do not know the answer, or are not sure, leave it blank . * * * * * 1 . Each sanitation district is governed by the Orange County Board of Supervisors . TRUE FALSE 2 . Public Relations is only the job of management . TRUE FALSE 3 . At what level should purchasing dollar savings start? Purchasing Agent Al l employees Supervisors Management 4 . As l abor, material , supplies, and equipment are used on a job, they must be charged to that job by r eferenc e to: il An account number An equipment number A work order number A pu:r·c has c-order number 5 . The turbine generators at Plant No . 2 are capable of producing a maximum of: a b c d e 6 . Why do we 300 KW 1 300 KW 910 KW 1700 KW 500 KW use stationary gas engines? To provide variab l e speed and alternate power source. To provide a lower maintenance cost and improve pump efficiency . To provide more facilities to train new mechanics. None of these. Page -2- 7. The primary function of a grit chamber is to remove organic material. TRUE FALSE 8. What is considered a satisfactory percent removal of settleable solids in a primary sedimentation basin? a 60-70% b 90-100% c 70-80~~ d 30-40% e 50-60% 9. If a gas mixer blower fails on a digester, can a nearby high pressure air line be substituted for a few days? YES NO 10. Does a centrifuge separate solids and liquids by any method other than settling? YES NO 11. A trickling filter reduces dissolved solids. YES NO 12. To reduce BOD, an activated sludge tank utilizes: ii Pathogenic organisms Anaerobic organisms Aerobic organisms Coliform 13. Sludge digestion is accomplished by: Bacteria swallowing organic material. Carbon dioxide extracting methane from dissolved solids. Enzymes breaking down organic material. None of these. 14. In a room with a chlorine leak, purer air may be found close to the floor. TRUE FALSE 15. A representative sample for grease in a sewer should be taken in an area of turbulant flow. TRUE FALSE Page -3- 16. A BOD sample analysis of Thursday's composite sewage will be posted on: Monday Tuesday Wednesday Thursday Friday Saturday Sunday 17. Dollar savings are more likely to be accomplished through which of the follwoing lab activities? 1. Ocean bacteriological monitoring 2. Plant research activity 3. Raw sewage analysis 4. Radiological monitoring 18. A sterile sample may be touched with anything that has been thoroughly washed. TRUE FALSE 19. Our treatment is finally judged by the effect of our effluent on the beach. TRUE FALSE 20. To increase the total discharge head capability of a one-pump station: Add another pump in parallel. Add another pump in series. Increase the motor horsepower only. All of these. 21. Two gears in a gear train will change the direction of rotation. TRUE FALSE 22. To keep the digesters from popping -what parts of the gas system must be kept operating properly? a Low stage compressors b Flame arrestors c Condensate traps d Pressure regulators e All of these 23. A good fuse on a 220 volt 3 phase line should have about what voltage drop'? a) o b) 220 220 c) rr-d) 220 x (j '-'/ 24. A circuit breaker is primarily to protect against: ii Overload Short circuit Open circuit None of these Page -4- 25. A totally enclosed motor may be hosed down without fear of damage. TRUE FALSE 26. Telemetry in instrumentation refers only to signals brought in through commercial telephone circuits. TRUE FALSE 27. A 1 inch diameter wire at 120 volts will carry more power than a 1/8 inch diameter wire at 12,000 volts. TRUE FALSE 28. Net suction head refers to waters ability to flow up hill. TRUE FALSE 29. Pipe friction head loss from a pumping station can be greater than static head. TRUE FALSE 30. What is the hazard in line cleaning operations? a Traffic b Slimes c Fumes d Exposed structural metal e All of these 31. If you were to make an isometric drawing of the surge tower and #4 clarifier and the area in-between on an 18" x 24" sheet-- what scale would you use? ii 1" = 5' 1" = 50' 1" = 500' l" = 5,000 1 32. A schematic drawing is a true, 3 dimensional picture of a system. TRUE FALSE 33. The most important phase of coating application is: a Surface preparation b Prime coating c Method of applying d Finish coat e None of these Page 34. In general the promotional scale of men is based on the ability to: i! Avoid problems Create problems Solve problems Recognize problems 35. The best form for buildinB a scaffold is keeping the angles between all members at 90 • TRUE FALSE 36. A 30 weight motor oil and a 10-30 weight motor oil have identica+ lubricating characteristics at a specific: i! Pressure Speed Temperature Load ~--~',(,~<--f D~ ])~ / '/17 h\ ~~7llvi _ ~ f cl D i..-~ ~~-(..-~ /'-/oo~ ) - --J~~.?}oo ~ _ fsoo,o" -+ ~- -------- J - d7~_h~ 7; 0 0 fL~ ------------- ---~ --1- ------~---------------- ------------------ ------------------- -------