The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1966-01.J II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sa nitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. / #11 January 27th, 1966 -7 :30 p .1n . City Ha l l , Hunti ngton Beach, Ca l ifornia (1) Roll Ca ll 1 \ P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 ~llis Avenu e Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 AGENDA ( ·~~) Appointment o f Chairman pro tern, if neces&ar:1 (3 ) Re po r t of t h e engi ne e r s o n "Special Enginee r s Report for I n c r ease! in Cap aci ty of t h e Go l den West Street Pumping Stati on" I . (4) Consideratio n of' recommenda.tion of the eng i neer ~ on t h e Special Rep ort ·~ (7) (8 ) Consideration o~ motion re : Re~eive and file Special Engineers Report, a n d requesting a p r oposal f r om the engineers for a formal engineers repor t , in accordanc e with the findings of t h e Board u nder I tem 4, above . Report of the eng~nee r s on constructi on progress of Contract No . 11-9 (Ed i nger Avenu e Gravi ty Sewer and Edinger Avenue Sewe r age Li ft Station ) Other business and commu nications , if any ~ '~ Co nsideration of motion re : ' > Adjournment b · ~r· f- rf? 11/V(,(_ ~ if~' +.-. ('<'<> rf, \ :_ ,,,.. :l.. c. ~ ~~ e~_(_ /~ d~~ ~~ , .. ""-I -._.J \~vf. //[, 1. ~ -· ~ The Chair recognized Mr . Milo Keith, of Lowry and Associates, District 's Engineers, who presented to the Directors the Special Engineers Report for increasing the capacity of the Golden West Street Pumping Station . ...,,<..<' "\-•~ .<.. ,f"_,_..,___, Mr . Keith briefly reviewed the engineers as l contained in the report and suggested that the Directors consider thi:-& 7t....i ts.w,..,ul< ~construction tmmed;b<a.te:Ey of that portion of Plan C as described in said Special Engineers Report which includes a new pumping facility and force main which would discharge into a to -be -built 24 11 capacity sewer in Nichols Street between Slater and Warner Ave~ues . Said facility would /~ J ~?... / discharge the District 1s flow intd th.~Miller -Holder Trunk Sewer at l-V ~ • C--'I--'J( "-,.._..._ r • the intersection of Nichols and Warner Avenues ti ..;.-Mr . Keith suggested ~l---l-.., < that the construction of these facilities would relieve the present District 's facilities until such time as financing was available {.,, 1-.. ~ for construction of, . ..District 3 and 11 jointly owned f-aseHity to Plant No . 1 . '<.- Mr . Keith mt also recommended the sale of capacity rights in the District 's facilities to Di strict No . 3 as outlined in the Special Report . Following a lengthy discussion by the Directors, staff and engineers it was ms&dc : That the District (show adoption of resolution) ......... formal engineers report in accordance with the recommendation I 'I: providing for the construction of that p~ri_ion of Plan C ~s described in ~> the Special Report , to Nichols Avenu:: a~~e sale of c ~;.;:i; c:p:~i;~ (...!- rights in the District 's system to District No . 3 as described in the / Special Engineers Report dated Jan1a1. ry, 1966 . I •\,.'" ... I .f ~..._......,._._ ::tf--I) #6 -The Chai r r eeegRise a recognized the engineers who reported ,<.<. on progress of Contrac t No . 11-9 (title ). The engineers reported that the work is proceeding slowly at the present time the Contractor is approxi mately 90 days over the time allowed for completion of the work . The engineers recommended that the Contractor be ·~ied~i ·the Di stri ct , ::i5:zt24i!9 1 ""'e;~ that he ts suhject to the enforcement of the r'r ., . p r ovisions of Secti on 5 -10 of the spec;i fica.tions of ·the c..on.tJ;'.a.C...t.. -\J It was. then MS&D C: That the General Manager be directed to n o tify the Contractor , in writing , that he is subject to the enforcement -//. :i-. • ~ ·•Cir<.. of the provisions of Section 5 -1 0 of t he specifications . C--\-"":J~ ·.~·-t.-;;_~=~-/. "/{ (/ ()'. _,,,..,..._,, / .. - \ tJ I R 0 L L C A L L ?-4.~' District '/ -~-----Regular Adjourned-----2-------- Dat~· /-cz?7-C:~ Time Item ZL/ (A ,,-/....--- :? ~ JOINT BOARDS Cornwell Amo Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Nescher Parks Parsons Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Workman Wright Allen OTHERS: Nelson Brown Nisson Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Allen Farnsworth Thompson Kanno Gruber Shull De Vries Elder McMichael Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Gumm ere Hileman Krein Welch Harvey, C. Queyrel Noe Hirstein Hirstein DISTRICT 1 Harvey,H. Meyers iller llen DISTRICT 2 P rks C llens C rnwell Cr po Cu ver Ha vey,H. Hoc Sch .tte Spee Workn\an Allen\ Cornwell Amo Bousman Crapo Culver Furman Harvey,H. Johnson Kanno Long Nescher Schutte ! Shipley Speer Wright Allen DISTRICT 5 DISTRICT 11 Farnsworth Thompson Shull De Vries McMichael Antich Callens Bell Gummere Krein Welch Harvey,C. Noe Hirstein Elder Hirstein Elder Hirstein ack Gfuber M~Michael Hi\, eman Hf~stein Lambert Shipley Stewart Allen Hirstein January 19, 1966 -4:00 p.m. Newport Beach City Hall Parsons Gruber Allen Parsons Gruber Allen Parsons Gruber Allen DISTRICT NO. 5 Elder Hirstein Elder ~~-----~ Hirstein Elder ---------------Hirstein \ - #3 -The staff presented for the Board 's consideration a suggested revision of Articl e 4 of Ordinance No . 502 , which sets forth the connection permit charges within the Distri ct. The Board reviewed each suggested change, and following a lengthy discussion the Directors tookx the fo llowing act ions with regar d to the suggested revisions : Moved, seconded and duly carrie d : That the following paragraph be stricken from the proposed revision of Article 4 : (copy ) '-µ..A .. It was MS&DC : Tha ~the paragraP.h entitl ed "Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations to Existing Buildings 11 t he sentence providing that no charge be made for the first t en fixture uni~1 added , be changed to provide that no charge be made for the fj-a!st.-tw:J;· ve fixmur units added . ___:. / I A-vyJ_ ( I v, I It was then MS&DC : That t he s u ggested rev ision of Art icle 4 of Ordinance No . 502 be approved as amended; and , FURTHER MOVED : That the General Counsel be directed t o prepare a fo~mal ordinance for the Board 's consideration, providing for the revis i on of Arti cle 4 of Ordi nance No . 502. ~ #6 -The Cha i r recognized Mr . Harve y Hur l burt , Newport Beach City Manager , who advct.sed the Board that the fees charged by the City of Newport Beach for coll ecting the Di strict 's connection charges under Ordinance No . 502 were not sufficient to cover the expenses incurred by the Ci ty and that conside rati on shoul d be given to . T" ~ )<. ~c.-~--.-.v-•• --<--"-1 increasi ng ~ fees ~ellec±:iii:g-~t~r rc t+s=com1e c t~s . st 1 The Chai rman advised Mr . Hurlbu rt that , in view of the existing t;r it..,, 0 .~ ,c_ agr eement between t h e City and the Di strict, any request for increasing I fees should be initiated by the City Council . .. . -, II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Aven ue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. _# 5_ AGENDA J anuary 19th -1966 -4:00 p .m. City Ha ll, New po rt Be ach, Californ i a (1) Ro ll Call (2 ) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) I Consideration of staff recommendations for amen d ing "-... ~ Ord i nance No . 502 (revising ARTI CLE L~ -I NSPECTION A~ ( CONNECTION CHARGES) · · / (4)/ Consideration of mot ion re: Receive and file letter from to proposed amendment to The I rvine Comp any relative Ordinance No. 502 t //d" / & ~ (5 ) Considerati on of motion re : Directing the General Counsel to prepare Ordinance No . 503 amending Ord inance No . 502 (6) (7) <(; r ~ '' Other business and commun ications, i f any i) ~.., ,. ~ ... I< 1) Considerati on of motion re: Adjournment to a time and place agreeable to the Directors January 19, 1966 Suggested Revision of Article 4, Ordinance No. 502. ARTICLE 4 -INSPECTION AND CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. {a)-Inspection Charge for Direct Connection. An inspection addition thereto. This charge is for new building Connection Charge for New Construction, Single Dwelling For each new single dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $120.00. {~) Ci51" Connection Charge for New Construction, MultiEle Dwelling Building§_. For each new multiple dwelling building con- structed, the connection charge shall be $120.00 for each dwelling unit or $6.00 for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. (c) (~ Connection Charges for New Construction, Other than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not limited to commercial, industrial and public building construction, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $60.00. ( ol) ~ Connection Charges for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall Gt. LY be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (.e-), (-EP) . l!. and (~) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, and such demolition or destruction occurs after July 1, 1965, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $120.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. (-ij (f) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Building~. For additions to or alterations of existing .IJl"1l~ buildings, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing rJK~ fixture unit added, provided that no charge shall be made for the 7~ r~~O,.,.,.. first il>elr fixture units added. In the event that such alterations [tV" or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a c~edit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of inspection and connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the require- ment of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein · will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections 402 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. -2- rt :-··-..,-,,,.""'·• • r .. . . ~ ARTICLE 4 -PERMIT CHARGES The Dist r ict connect 4 on cha~ge >hall be determined as follows: (a) A charge of $ 2 0.r) p er unit for all new single family dwellings within t he District. (b) All other construction including but not limited to multiple family dwellings, commercial, industrial and public building construction shall be charged a connection fee in accord- ance with the number of plumbing fixture units contained within such construction. The connection f ee shall be calculated to be a sum totalling $6.00 per plumbing fix ture unit, provided that the minimum sewer connection fee shall be $120.00 for all new construction as differ i ng from the remodeling of or additions to a structure already connected to an existing sewer. A schedule of such charges will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. (c) Payment of a sewer connection fee shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all con- struction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection fee for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construe- tion within the territorial limits of the District. -6- Jan. 24th -1966 ~- DISTRICT NO. 5 ~~arsons ~ -~ v/ Elder · Gruber Hirstein Allen a__ Parsons ~- Gruber v Elder (I)") Allen 0-Hirstein J) j, Parsons Gruber Elder Allen Hirstein ~ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. #5 January 24th, 1966 -7:15 p.m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fou ntain Val ley, Calif., 92708 AGENDA City Hall, Newport Beach, California ( 1) Roll Call (2) Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) < (5) Report of the General Counsel Consideration of the adoption of Ordinance No. 503 amending Ordinance No. 502 (Article 4). Copy of proposed ordinance attached. (6) Other business and communications, if any (7) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment <'l o f t-v\ 7 ', ,r.. ORDINANCE NO. 503 AN ORDINANCE AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 502 PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REPEALING ORDINANCE NO. 501. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 ARTICLE 4 -INSPECTION AND CONNECTION CHARGES, under Ordinance No. 502 is hereby amended to read as follows: "ARTICLE 4 -CONNECTION CHARGES "Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. "(a) Connection Charge for New Construction, Single Dwelling Buildings. For each new single dwelling building constructed~ the connection charge shall be $120.00. "(b) Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings. For each new multiple dwellin~ building constructed, the connection charge shall be $120.00 for each dwelling unit or $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. "(c) Connection Charges for New Construction 1 Other than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not limited to commercial, industrial and public buildlng construction, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, pro·- vided that the minimum connection charge for such new con- struction shall be ~60.00. "(d) Connection Charges for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (a), (b), and (c) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, and such demolition or destruction occurs after July 1, 1965, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $120.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. "(e) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. For additions to or alterations of existing buildings, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit added, provided that no charge shall be made for the first twelve (12) fixture units added. In the event that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a credit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. "When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, ex- cepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of ,Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any con- struction within the territorial limits of the District. "Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secre- tary of the District and in the office of the Building Depart- ment of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections 402 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumb- ing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965." -2- ARTICLE 2 -VALIDITY If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be held to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the ....,J validity of any other provision or application of any of the remaining provisions or portions of this ordinance; and to this end the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each and every article, section, sub- section, sentence, clause or phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more other articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be declared invalid. ARTICLE 3 -EFFECTIVE DATE The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this ordinance and the Secretary of the District shall attest thereto and certify to the passage of this ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the ___ D_~_I_L_~ __ P_I_LO __ T _______ , a daily newspaper of general circulation, printed, published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date of the passage of this ordinance by said Board of Directors, and said ordinance shall take effect March 1, 1966. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, at a ____ s_p_e_c~i~a_l_______ meeting held the 24th day of --~J~a~n~u~a~r~Y--------- 1966. ATTEST: Chairman, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 -3- 11 ' •BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 ~llis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2 ) (3) (4) (5) ( 6) (7) DISTRICT No. #5 AGENDA January 19th -1966 --4 :00 p .m. City Ha ll, New port Beach, Ca l ifornia Rol l Ca ll Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Consideration of staff re commendations for amending Ordinance No . 502 (revising ARTICLE 4 -INSPECTION AND CONNECTION CHARGES) Consideration of motion re: Receive and fi le letter from The Irvine Company re l ative to proposed amendment to Ordinance No . 502 Consideration of motion re: Directing the General Counsel to prepare Ordinance No . 503 amending Ordinance No . 502 Other business and communication s, if any Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to a time and place agre eable tc the Di rectors January 19, 1966 Suggested Revision of Article 4, Ordinance No. 502. ARTICLE 4 -INSPECTION AND CONNECTION CHARGES Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. (a) Inspection Charge for Direct Connection. An inspection fee of $25.00 per connection shall be paid by a public corporation for all direct connections to District's facilities. This charge is separate and distinct from connection charges for new building construction, remodeling or alteration of buildings as provided hereinafter, and is in addition thereto. (b) Connection Charge for New Construction, Single Dwelling Buildings. For each new single dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $120.00. (c) Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings. For each new multiple dwelling building con- structed, the connection charge shall be $120.00 for each dwelling unit or $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. (d) Connection Charges for New Construction, Other than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not limited to commercial, industrial and public building construction, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $60.00. (e) Connection Charges for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (b}, (c) and (d) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, and such demolition or destruction occurs after July 1, 1965, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at $120.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. (f) Connection Charges for Additions. to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. For additions to or alterations of existing buildings, the connection charge shall be $6.00 for each plumbing fixture unit added, provided that no charge shall be made for the first ten fixture units added. In the event that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a c~edit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of inspection and connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the require- ment of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein · will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections 402 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. -2- tf -·~ 4 4 QUWUB ,•~ ---~"'----- _,,,.. ARTICLE 4 -PERMIT CHARGES The District connection charge shall be determined as follows: (a) A charge of $120.00 per unit for all new single family dwellings within the District . .,,.;;/ (b) All other construction including but not limited to multiple family dwellings, commercial, industrial and public building construction shall be charged a connection fee in accord- ance with the number of plumbing fixture units contained within such construction. The connection fee shall be calculated to be a sum totalling $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit, provided that the minimum sewer connection fee shall be $120.00 for all new construction as differing from the remodeling of or additions to a structure already connected to an existing sewer. A s~hedule of such charges will be on file in the office of the Secretary of t he District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. (c) Payment of a sewer connection fee shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all c on- struction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection fee for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construc- tion within the territorial limits of the District. -6- -------~ ~ ----~ --- - ~~~~~ ~~~~ ~~~-~ ~?~Lr Jb~¥-- BO ARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ju:N~,_ P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, C alif., 9 2708 II (1) (2) (3) (4) (5 ) .. ~ c\~ (6) '"J}: -(6 -a ) 1' .~ '1 ( 7) ~v cF (8) (9) (10) (11) (12 ) (13) JOINT BOARDS JANUA RY 12, 1966 -8:00 P.,k. Pledge of Al legiance Roll Call Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, /if necessary AGENDA DISTRICT 5 I Conside r ation of motion re: Reqeive and file excerpt from the City of Newp o rt Beach showing appointment of Lindsley Parsons to se r ve on t iy B,oard of District No . 5 AL L DISTRICTS I Conside r ation of motion re : ~eceive and file excerpt from minutes of the Board of $u pervisor s showing e l ecti on ~.,µ.v 0 of Al ton E. Allen as Cha i rman / and appointment of Wi lliam vr ~ fvt.~ Hirstein as alternate (. ~ .,, ..,. ~ I c ~ , .vrf_1''\..,,-.J 1..,vV' DISTRICT 5 / ..--~ ·~ 1 ,(.1;µ0 Election of Cha i rman of the Pis trict .... :.r~,.n-. ..... DISTRICT 7 -Ele ction of Cha~rman of t he Di s t r i c t t.J.JV. ALL DISTRICTS Election of Vice Joint Chaitman of the Joint Administrative Ll.d~ Organization j ~ttr~ DISTRICT 1 I y\J-~t Consideration of mot i on re .: Approval o f minutes of the \ '"~ regular meeting held December 8, 1965, and the adjourned ....-1' regu l ar meeting thereof h 1 ld December 15, 1965 , as ma iled ~ DISTRICT 2 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting he l d December 8, 196 5 , as mailed I DISTRICT 3 Consideration of mo t ion re : Approval o f minutes of the regular meeting held December 8, 1965, as mailed .. I r DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of regular meeting held Di cember 8, 1965, as mailed DI STRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : Ap proval of minutes of the regu l ar meeting held December 8, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 7 I Consideration of mo t ion re : Approval of minutes of the ~ regular meeting held r December 8, 1965, and the adjourned <::'. v-" r e gular meeting thereof held December 15, 1965, as mailed ~ Jf~ \\ -• .. ' ~ (14) (15) CJ (!!!) (18 ) ( 19 ) (20) (21) (22) ( 23) @ (25 ) (26 ) (27) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the adjourned re ular meeting held November 10, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 11 Consideration of regular meeting otion re: Approval of minutes of the J ,_; ld December 8, 1965, as mailed ~~~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the ALL DISTRICTS Report of the ALL DISTRICTS Report of the DISTRICTS 1 2,3 5 6 t Chairman Manager Counsel Consideration of mo on re: Approval of Change Order #2 (Revised) to the pla s and specifications for Job No . I-6-1 (Addition to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities -Pipe-¥"'~ line), authorizing a otal addition of $12,229.92 to the ~rL \ contract with Vinnell Corporation, Contractor, for extra ~1-Ac/'~ bedding gravel . See age 11 F 11 ~- DISTRICTS 1,2 3 5,6 7 1 Consideration of motio re: Approval of Change Order #5 to the plans and speci ications for Job No . I-6-1, authorizing a total add.tion of $43,232 .88 to the contract with Vinnell Corporatio , Contractor . See page 11 G11 DISTRICTS l ,2,3,5,6,7,11 Consideration of Resolut·on No. 66-1, accepting the .~ construction of Job No. -6 -1 as complete, and authorizing AJl~~. execution and recordatio of a Notice of Completion of y • · )\' vlork. See page 11 H11 ,/::iP ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re Receive and file written certification of the Gener 1 Manager that he has checked al l bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommen s authori zation for payment. to ci~ v 11'l ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call Joint Operating Fund and C warrant books for signatur No. 1, and authorizing navIJ 9/j motion re: Approval of }. vf -~~l Outlay Revo l ving Fund ..V v the Ch airman of District · t of claims listed on pages 11 A 11 11 B11 and ncri' ----' ' ALL DISTRICTS r 1 Other business cat/ons, if DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motio any . See page "D 11 DISTRICT 1 Other business a nd co DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Approval ications, if any Adjournment ~ ". ~ ~ « \\'°\ 1 (28) (29) (30) (31) (33) (34) (35) (36) (37) (38 ) (39) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion r : Approval of warrants, if any . See page 11 E 11 I DISTRICT 11 Other business and commu(ications, if any ) ~II'\. DISTRICT 1 1 ·~'\)~ ~f Cons i deration of motion Adjournment )-~ 1 · ~ 'li' · ;-c r.....,.... ('" ......-r\ l \/.) -V' I , \_......- DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 ~l.-"c A. vu:\' -V ..... Co nsi de ration of motion Authori zing is suance of a <IT~!.-<'"' 'l purchase order for emer repair of force ma in crossing 1-J;l/'c Coast Highway near the Point Pump Stat i on ~~~~~ DISTRICT 5 ~~ Consideration of motion Au thorizing refund of _;hJ connection c h arges co ll under Ordinance No . 502 -v\ f or replacement struc t res (in accordance with Interpre ,O~ -A~ tation No . 2 of said o dinance ). r~cr ·. DISTRICT 5 C on sfcieration of any . See page ---- DISTRICT 5 Other business Approval of warrants, DISTRIC T 5 ftVI Conside r 8:t,.i gn of mot on re: Adjournment t::_1,oo fl, J 11 .• _)Lq DISTRICT 6 l r 11 ~t..'"I J/...Lt-<-' " -'-' '-• V ~' > j 0 \..\ \, .../... 'V l 'I ~ [._. ;q ~ I . t ~ 7 Consideration of mo tl·on re: Authorizind payment by · issuance of a purch e o r der to the City of Newport LJ Beach for repair ne ssary to correct soil subsidence ~t.\·t.-. over the Dover Dr i v Trunk between 16th and 17th Streets, r1 1 (~ Newport Beach /~ DISTRICT 6 Considerati on of pr p2sal of Southworth and Stevens, engineers, for engi ering services relative to the reconstructi on of e Rocky Point Pump Station . (Copy of proposal in fol ers ) DISTRICTS 6 AND 7 Consideration of m warrants, if any . Approval of 11E 11 (40) DI STRICT 6 (41) (42 ) Other business and ommunications, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of DISTRICT 8 re : Adjournment ' Consideration of m9 ion re : Receive and fi l e Quarterly Financial Report ~ubmitted by Hanson, Peterson, Cowles t and Sylvester, Ce[tified Public Accountants, for the quarter ending September 30th, 1965 6})/.--. { -3-\{\~-- (43) (44) (45) (46) (47) (48) (49) (50) (51) (52) (53) (54) (55) DISTRICT 8 Other business and DISTRICT 8 Consideration of DISTRICT 2 Report of the cial Finance Committee DISTRICT 2 Consideration o any. See page -41r----- re: DISTRICT 2 Other business communications, if any DISTRICT 2 Consideration of DISTRICT 3 Report of the Gener 1 Counsel on lawsuit -Contract 3-5; and consideration o motion re: Receive and file written recommendat n of the General Counsel, and authorizing payment ·n the amount of $3,240 to Valley Engineers, Inc., as ttlement of lawsuit on Contract No. 3-5. (Copy of r ommendation in folders) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motio re: Denying claim of H. E •. Johnson Construction Company f r extra compensation for restricted working hours on Contr t No. 3-10 {restriction imposed ~~\ by State Di vision of Hi hways), without prejudice to A ,(' the Contractor to renew said claim upon completion of the 0 ,/l.;r- contract. 1)&" DIS TRI CU Receive and file report o the engineers concerning additional pumping equipm nt and electrical appurtenances needed for the West Side ping Station; and, Consideration of motion re: engineers for preparation purchase of said equipment. DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: any. See page "D" DISTRICT 3 Other business and communic Accepting proposal of the plans and specifications for _(Copy of proposal in folders) ions, if any DISTRICT 3 1 ~vi' . /_,... Consideration of motion re: Adjournment l O> ~'-.;, -.. _,j..,r l\' . v /'--" /A~ DISTRICT 7 . ./ l~. , '- Consideration of motion re: Ratifying action of the ~'1Y General Manager in accepti g connection charges through January 3, 1966, (instead f December 31, 1965), due to . ~ the fact that many cities' offices were closed December\ , rJl 31st. ~ -4- (58) (59) (60) DISTRICT 7 Report of the staff on for sewer service / petit i on ~property owners ,I // DI STRICT 7 l Report of the staff, engine"ers , and General Counsel re: Acquisiti on of the ~~ti n Avenue Sewer (north of 17th Street ) from theft ·ty of Santa Ana DISTRICT 7 ~!/ Consideration of mot i on /· e : Approval of warrants , if any . See page "E" I DISTRICT 7 Other business and co DISTRICT 7 Consideration of moti r ications , if any Ad j ournment -5 - WARRANT NO. 3629 3630 3631 3632 3633 3634 3635 3636 3637 3638 3639 364o 3641 3642 3643 3644 3645 3646 3647 3648 3649 3650 3651 3652 3653 3654 3655 3656 3657 3658 3659 3660 3661 3662 3663 3664 3665 3666 3667 3668 3669 3670 3671 3672 3673 3674 3675 3676 3677 3678 3679 3680 3681 3682 3683 3684 3685 3686 3687 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF A-1 Tool Rebuilders, Inc., Tools $ Advance Electric, Motor Repairs, Supplies Jan Alabaster, Employee Mileage All-Bearing Service, Inc., Bearings AMOUNT 12.65 414.60 17.60 590.10 American Chemical Society, Subscription American Water Works Assn., Inc., Subscription City of Anaheim, Power 5.00 25.00 11.67 409.70 17.08 Anchor Packing Co., Gasket, Pump Packing Apco Supply, Heating Supplies Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc. Astra Glas, Inc., Flanges Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies Balboa Marine Hardware Co., Auto Parts Bank of America, Bond & Coup. Collect. Exp. Barksdale Valves, Valve Parts Bay City Bearing Co., Inc., Conveyor, Bearings Beach Fabricating Co., Welding & Machine Work Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. Bird Machine Co., Centrifuge Parts Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies Business Equipment Co., Office Equip. Repairs Paul Calvo, Survey Chemical Exchange Co., Chlorine College Lumber Co., Inc., Paint, Tools, Hdwre Consolidated Freightways, Freight Costa Mesa Auto Parts, Inc. Costa Mesa County Water District The Davis Brown Co., Office Supplies John M. Deck Co., Engine Repairs Diesel & Gas Engine Progress, Subscription Diesel Control Corp., Governor Repairs Dunton Ford, Auto Parts Electric Marketeer Mfg. Co., Elect. Car Parts Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring & Research Ensign Products Co., Oil Enterprise Electric Supply Co., Supplies Enterprise Printing Co., Forms, Supplies Chas. A. Estey, Inc., Fittings Daniel Estrada Co., Sewer Mtce. Rimmon c. Fay, Ph.D., Oceanographic Research Filter Supply & Service Co., Filters 109.62 27.46 72.48 22.88 16.15 130.06 304.10 314.50 224.87 88.64 64.32 530.60 17.34 464.00 12,861.52 281.14 3.05 290.18 4.40 4.43 23.21 7 .50 152.03 5.89 145.17 1,375.00 207.19 486.83 249.96 3.22 18.00 330.00 263.55 1,546.13 Fischer & Porter Co., Instrumentation & Rep~·;.;. Fisher Governor Co., Valves 1,453.10 429.63 41.10 Lines 581 . 44 280.89 59.80 655.20 1, 595 .95 46.82 18.72 1,458.08 Flair Drafting Service Edward R. Francis, Employee Mileage Freeway Machine & Welding Shop, Rebuild Dr. Frey Industrial Supply Co., Tools Larry Fricker Co., l!eod Killer General Compressor & Machinery Co., Pump General Telephone Co. Goodall Rubber Co., Plastic Tubing Grants Surplus, Dye Markers Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Supplies Guaranty Chevrolet Motors, Auto Parts George T. Hall, Co., Controls Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester, Audit Hellyer Steel Parts Co., Engine Repairs Honeywell, Inc., Instrument Repairs -A- 49.10 180.27 211.00 210.40 869.96 WARRANT NO. 3688 3689 3690 3691 3692 3693 3694 3695 3696 3697 3698 3699 3700 3701 3702 3703 3704 3705 3706 3707 3708 3709 3710 3711 3712 3713 3714 3715 3716 3717 3718 3719 3720 3721 3722 3723 3724 3725 3726 3727 3728 3729 3730 3731 3732 3733 3734 3735 3736 3737 3738 3739 3740 3741 3742 3743 3744 3745 3746 3747 IN FAVOR OF Howard Supply Co., Fittings, Valves City of Huntington Beach, Water Johns-Manville, Pipe B. R. Jones & Co., Inc., Regulator Repairs Kleen-Line Corp., Janitor Supplies Knox Industrial Supplies, Hardware LBWS, Inc., Tools, Hdwre, Supplies, Repairs L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Lambert Truck Equip. Div., Auto Parts Mccalla Bros., Pump R. W. McClellan & Sons, Fill Dirt Jack Edward McKee, Consultant Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Metropolitan Supply Co., Gauges Mission Lab Supply Inc. Mon~oe International Inc., Equip. Mtce. Agrmt. E. B. Moritz Foundry, Manhole Rings & Covers Municipal Finance Officers Assn., Subscription Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Welding Supplies Doris Murphey, Employee Mileage City of Newport Beach, Water Nickles Machine Corp., Engine Parts O. c. Suppliers, Inc., Fittings, Tools, Hdwre. Oranco Supply Co., Pipe & Fittings Orange County Film Service, Manhole Insp. Orange County Radiotelephone Orange County Stamp Co., Rubber Stamps Orange County Water Dist., Semi-annual Pmp. Tax Pacific Pumping Co., Pump Parts Pacific Telephone Parker Publishing Co., Inc., Handbooks Postmaster AMOUNT 352.76 11.80 115.43 12.10 13.94 42.85 941.00 833.62 29.57 227.76 21.84 450.00 237.63 13.14 93.60 15.33 118.56 12.00 82.10 16.oo 132.77 319.32 246.44 131.38 101.84 297 .56 Red's Frame, Wheel & Brake Service, Auto Repairs Reynolds Camera Supply, Finishing & Supplies 13.45 434.90 94.59 277.45 26.31 100.00 6.83 42.91 50.31 Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Rohm & Haas Co., Chemicals Santa Ana Blue Print Co., Drafting Supplies Santa Ana Electronics Co., Elect. Supplies E. H. Sargent & Co., Lab Supplies Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint Supplies John Sigler, Employee Mileage Signal Flash Co., Barricade Rental Signal 011 Co., Gasoline Logan Smith & Assoc., Aerial Photography So. Calif. Edison Co., So. Calif. Water Co. So. Counties Gas Co. Speed-E-Auto Parts 39 Stake & Bldg. Supply Co., survey Supplies Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Paint Thinner, Oil Steel Structures Painting Council, Tech. Book 1,323.66 19.71 19.78 65.00 43.60 179.02 26.70 6.75 620.08 250.00 9 ,948. 39 3.90 455.97 219.69 11.23 C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Weed Oil, Kerosene Truck & Auto Supply, Couplings 288.23 15.50 206.24 17.24 13.36 156. 50 224.20 15.20 U. s. Divers Co., Chlor. Safety Mask Adapter Wallace & Tiernan Inc., Chlor. Parts John R. Waples R. S., Odor Consultant Warnock-Bancroft Equip. Co., Auto Parts Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Valve, Tools; Tubing Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Parts -B- 291.57 201.80 WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 3748 Western Salt Co. $ 26.00 3749 The Whitlock Mfg. Co., Hot Water Converter 772.37 3750 Wimberly's Petroleum Dists., Diesel Fuel 385.10 3751 Worthington Corp., Pump Parts 1,664.19 3752 Raymond Zehnpfennig, Employee Mileage 34.95 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 57,713.30 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 3753 Bank of America, Assignee Vinnell Corp. $ 78,314.94 3754 Paul Calvo 1,317.93 3755 John Carollo Engineers 3,180.82 3756 J. Putnam Henck 16,588.96 3757 Raymond G. Osborne Labs 190.00 3758 Vinnell Corp. 20,736.00 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $ 120,328.65 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 178,041.95 -c- 3769 3770 3771 3772 3773 3774 3775 3776 3777 3778 $ 159,870.76 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS John Conley & Assoc. $ 24.00 120.00 240.00 120.00 120.00 120.00 240.00 120.00 240.00 Guaranteed Homes & o. J. Moorhouse Win Barkmeyer Inc. & w. G. Barkmeyer Patrick O'Connor & William Dilliard Henry E. Brooks Don Lenk Frank H. Blackner and Dr. & Mrs. W.T. Whitney C. Ed Soule & Donald K. Sloper Riley U.Bissell & Eric Johnson Consolidated Const. Co. & B.K. & Norma Stoneman -n- 558.00 $ 1,902.00 $ 161,772.76 WARRANT NO. 3779 3780 3781 3782 3783 3784 3785 3786 3787 3788 3789 3790 3791 3792 3793 3794 3795 DISTRICT NO, 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle & Lowry $ AD No. Amount 5A $ 71. 70 Plan Check & Inspection _2.22.75 $671. 45 Bill Kroeger FACILITIES RE\TOLVING FUND WARRANTS *Allo Construction Corp. $ Boyle & Lowry *Cowan Heights Ranch *Henry c. cox Famco Construction Co. *Ted Fish *Fredericks Development Corp. *The Irvine Co. *Irvine Industrial Complex *William c. Matz *Orange Empire Area Council Exec. Board,BSA *The Roman Catholic Archbishop of L.A. *Security First National Bank *Mike Segal *Sycamore Developers AMOUNT 671.45 21.80 1,809.71 204.20 6,034.33 2,660.25 6,964. 39 596.40 684.70 9,069.83 26,118.80 1,006.20 . 7 ,416. 29 1,809.72 2,744.72 178.84 3,619.43 *Annual payment of Master Plan Reimbursement Agmt. $ 70,927.81 $ 71,621.06 3796 3797 3798 ACCUMUL & Associates e County Pipeline, Inc. · -E- $ 126.00 $ 976.00 207.90 $ 1,183.90 --- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER c.o. NO. 2 (Revised) CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation DATE: Jan. 7, 1966 Additions to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge JOB: Facilities -Pipe::.5-ne Job No. I-6-1 Amount of this change order (ADD) (ml~) $ 12, 229. 92 In accordance with contract provistons, the :rollowing changes in the contract a.nd/or contrac..c~ work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation the::refor, the follnl'ting additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. ADD Additional gravel fill as ordered by En*ineer over amount shown on Plans at Bid Price of $0.00 per cubic yard 1528.74 cubic yards@ $8.00/c.y. $12,229.92 Original Contract Price $ 1,455,850.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 2,339.09 This Change (ADD)(~~) 12,229.92 Amended Contract Price $ l,470,419.01 Board authorization date: Apprcved: January 12, 1966 -F- CotmJ'Y S/~NITATION DISTRICTS OF ORAI~<JE CUUNI'Y, CAL:n;ORNIA By /s/ L~e M. Nelaon General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By ______ ~--~~--------------- D COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER c.o. N0. ___ 5 ___ _ CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Coruoration DATE: Jan. 7 1 1966 Additions to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge JOB: Facilities -Pipeline Job No. I-6-1 Amount of this change order (ADD)(1ifRmDI«1K) $ 43,232.88 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's invoice No. 2-117, dated November 18, 1965 and December 31, 1965 Extra work caused by unknown utilities disclosed during contract work (Section 10-5 of Specifications). "Force Account" basis as provided in Section 8-4 of Specifications. 1. Extra equipment and labor time caused by encountering unknown 24-inch VCP abandoned sewer at the edge of trench prism bet•een Plant No. 2 and Hamilton Avenue and between Adams Avenue and Plant No. 1 ADD $ 34,123.27 2. Extra equipment and labor time for removal of said 24-inch sewer together with one manhole, support of a utility pole encroaching in work area and soil stabilization necessary because of seepage from said unknown sewer encountered at tunneling operation through earth filled ramp to Adams Avenue bridge ADD TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD 9,109.61 $ 43,232.88 Original Contract Price $ 1,455,850.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 14,569.01 This Change {ADD) {lmmtft) 43,232.88 Amended Contract Price $ 1,513,651.89 Board authorization date: Approved: January 12, 1966 -G- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By-------------~~---------~----- RESOLUTION NO. 66-1 ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-6-1 AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF D!RECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING JOB NO. I-6-1 AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the contractor, VINNELL CORPORATION, a California corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for ADDITION TO PIANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES PIPELINE, JOB NO. I-6-1, on the 7th day of January, 1966; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommen- dation is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of the ADDITION TO PIANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES PIPELINE, JOB NO. I-6-1, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor dated the 27th day of February, 1965; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 1 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. -H- R 0 L L CA LL District _ __._~...=...:.....,..=----- Regular ~ -------Adj ourned ------- Date /-/;2 -~ C: Ti me &J: d7 I t:nl~g &t/'L JOINT BOARD S Coo Crapo Culver Furman Grube l\ Harvey,H . Hock \ Johnson Kanno Lambe rt Lon g Meye rs Miller Nescher Parks Schutte Shipley Spe er Stewart Stoddard' Workman Wright Hirstein OTHERS : Nelson Brovm Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremb lay Lowry Carlson ;J,L.~~~ ll~,1' h-\4../ A..y (f <?~ Martin Mitc hell ..uir,...."~--·· \ \ Farnsworth Thompson Kanno Gr ube r Shull De Vries Elder Mc Michael Michel Antich Callens Shipley Be l l Gu mmere Hileman Krein Welch Harvey, C . ueyrel ~e A\len Allen DISTRICT 1 Ha rvey, H . _i:::::::. Mc Michae l Meye rs l _,./ Miller t _.,......,-,,Mack ,Jijrstein 7 Allen DI STRICT 2 Parks v-Hileman Ca llens v--Kanno Co rnwell L...--Fa rnsworth Crapo i..-Shul l Culver ~ Harvey, H. t..---Mc Michael Hock k ... Miche l Schutte Kre i n Speer ~ Harvey, C. Workman "' Qu eyre l Hii..l'S °i8~ ~-Allen DISTRICT 3 Corn well v"' Farnswor th Amo v Bo usman ~ Thompson Cra po v-Shull Culver y--- Furman v--De Vri es Harvey,H . y---McM ichael Johnson ,,.,,--Antich ~ Ca llens Lon g ~ Bell Nesc h er ~ Gummere Schutte /..-"' Krein Shipley a-We l ch Speer v' Harvey, C. Wright .... Noe n .,,,,.--Allen DISTR I CT 5 ~ v"' p ~rl'\,V'\ Gruber &.---Elder i/ Allen DISTRICT 6 v--Mey ers Gruber H<i. ns t e iR- V"' Elder v-" Allen DISTRICT 7 lli nwtn v Allen Co ok f"' Gruber Harvey, H. ~ McM ichael Meyers V--- Mill er v Mack Parks ~ Hi l ema n DISTRICT Lambert i/' Stewar t et_ ~ ~ 11 Shipley All en ROLL CALL Date Item j)~BOARDS Cornwell Amo Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson K kif Lambert Long Meyers Miller Nescher Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stec!eal'. d Workman Wright ~aea!f:ed:n OTHERS: Nelson Brovm Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson ~ Farnsworth ~- 1L Thompson ± Kanno Gruber ,.:::::::::: Shull ~ v De Vries &/"' Elder V' McMichael ._,./ Michel 1L Antich v Callens 2 Shipley IL Bell v-- ~ ~ Gummere ~ Hileman ~ Krein & Welch ~ Harvey, C. ~ er~ .....,......., .......---Queyrel V"-Noe .......-Allen DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Hirstein Allen District -------Regular -------Adjourned ------- Time ---- DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. Mc Michael Meyers Miller Mack Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 2 Parks Hileman Callens Kanno Cornwell Farnsworth Crapo Shull Culver Harvey; H. McMichael Hock Michel Schutte Krein Speer Harvey, C. Workman Queyrel Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 3 Cornwell Farnsworth Amo Bousman Thompson Crapo Shull Culver Furman De Vries Harvey,H. Mc Michael Johnson Antich Kanno Callens Long :Bell Nescher Gummere Schutte Krein Shipley Welch Speer Harvey, C. Wright Noe Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Allen Cook Gruber Harvey,H. McMichael Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lambert Shipley Stewart Hirstein Allen ROLL CALL District -------Regular Adjourned ____________ __ Date Time ---- Item DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Harvey,H. McMichael Cornwell Amo Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Nescher Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Hirstein OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson Farnsworth Thompson Kanno Gruber Shull De Vries Elder McMichael Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Gummere Hileman Krein Welch Harvey, C. Queyrel Noe Allen Meyers Miller Mack Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 2 Parks Callens Cornwell Crapo Culver Harvey, H. Hock Schutte Speer Workman Hirstein Hileman Kanno Farnsworth Shull McMichael Michel Krein Harvey, C. Queyrel Allen DISTRICT 3 Cornwell Amo Bousman Crapo Culver Furman Harvey,H. Johnson Kanno Long Nescher Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Hirstein Farnsworth Thompson Shull De Vries McMichael Antich Callens Bell Gummere Krein Welch Harvey, c. Noe Allen DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Hirstein Elder Allen ~rO ~ i ,_ 7 -~ DISTRICT Hi i's ts e i11 CL 7 Allen Gruber McMichael ~J-, Cook LL ~ Harvey, H. l/ Meyers p...... Miller Parks Mack Hileman DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Mitchell Hirstein Allen Lambert Shipley Stewart Hirstein Allen DRAFT -125 -66 #16 -Report of the Joint Chairman -The Joint Chairman commented on the investment program administered by the Districts ' staff whereby ) funds not needed immediately are invested in government securities . ~ These funds include bond redemption reserves , ~on ~funds, capital improvement reserves and unapp{opriated reserve funds . From February, tt:iiM:C.. 1959 -ta January, 1966, the earnings from the investment of these funds ' <..!(... }.;vl:~ axe approximately $1 ,,,000 for all Districts . \ \ #17 -Report of ~he General Manager -The General Manager reviewed for the Directors the~employee training program . He announced that during the past two months the operating personnel have attended four training sessions which are four hours each. The sessions are con- .4Z:~ ducted by the employee~ and all phases of the operations are ~d . ~ This training program has been very successful as evidenced by the interest of the employees . The General Manager discussed briefly the numerous facets o f odor control and the prob1ems facing the Di stricts concerning ,\)(.J. . ~Jt M the plantc operations, bee-au~e e-f the encroachment of a residential..aiea in the immediate vicinity of\ the two treatment facilities . #24 -Following a discussion by the Directors concerning the rm"-c '11 need-to empl-e-y1 an insurance consultant to review the Districts ' insurance coverages, it was MS&DC: That the matter be referred to the Executive Committee for study and reco~ndation to the Board,.:y, -· #56 -At the December 8 meeting of the Board1 a petition from property owners outside the District was presented for inclusion of their properties in an assessment district to provide sewer service . The matter was referred to the staff for a report and recommendation . The -s-taff,-including ,the--eng-ine~-s-and t h~ Di s.trict 1 s counsele:;. ~/ f.~-ct-<-.-<i <:r~ ~~~ s .~· ~"-,.-Y~ ..-r~ that t he'p eti t ieR-ee peti tioners be required to annex to the sanitation d i strict prior to the consideration of a petition for the constr ucti on of l ocal s e wers . 1 Foll owing a furthe r discussion as to the means of annexing (/ll\ l ~I.=-~V'/ ps.p&J.:.at.sa areas ~~ -ann~'"ffil to the Di st±ict , i t was MS&D C : That the Board accep t and approve the recorrnnendations of the staff, and that ~~ p e titioners be r equi r ed to annex to the sani tation d i strict prior to cons i d eration of a peti t ion for the construction of local sewers . FU RTHER MOVED : Th at all costs pertaining to annexation,sto the District , such as admin i strati~, legal , and engineering expenses , be I ' '° \0-{.. :l' I -' paid by the1 ~tit:i::E*1~ ·seeking ~i.--e~-&--~. #57 -The Ch air recogni zed Mr . C. Arthur Nisson, the District 's l egal cou~el , wh o repo rted to the Board tha~ as directed at the District 's December 5 th adjourned meeting , the staff, engineers , and ~~ General Coun s e l ~ in contact with the City of Santa Ana 's adminis - f u rther trative staff i n~ attempt to neg otiate/for the purchase of the City 's sewe r age facilit i es in Tustin Avenue north of 17th Street .1PMr . Ni sson advised the Board that the District 's representatives offered to buy I - "Cl Santa Ana 's fac ilities at the end of one year1 provide<}ithe City~ . -t/J,I make connections to.,~ta l\na 's facilities to permit the District to serve the deve l oped county area at the intersec tion o f Fairhaven and /rW ~ ~L. Tustin Avenue . Mr . Ni sson s aid that he had no± recei v ed ~~ly to this offer . Following an extensive discussion b y the members of the Board , it was MS&DC : (by the fo l lowing roll cal l vote ) .. -.- - ~~~~. That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 66 -2-7 i~ng ~he General Counsel to proceed with a condemnation action to acquire the facilities owned by the City of Santa, which are needed by the District .to serve-t-he ..ar.ea_at Fairhaven _and .Tustin Avenue-;~; Further moved : That t he General Counsel be instructed that, (.i.A:"~~ C:,~ \>~'.... in the event a~ aee~-SaOJ.~ proposa71 is offered by the City of Santa Ana concerning the1 ~qili.si tion of the necessary facilities , the condemnation actioTu is to be dismissed . ( ANNUAL PREMIUM $ 35.00 $ 1,382.00 $ 1,045.00 $10,429.00 120.00 $15,413.00 J AljJJARY 10, 1966 Fr(__ A. Harper COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA INSURANCE COVERAGE INSURANCE COMPANY Hartford Fire Ins. Company POLICY NO. PF 260625 Empire Insurance Co. CF 1487 The Travelers Indemnity Co. Pacific Indemnity Company Fidelity & Deposit Co. of Maryland State Compensation Ins. Fund Blanket Policy BM 2061040 Blanket Policy ~c 142387 56-58-108 180694 DATE OF EXPIRATION 3-28-66 9-15-66 7-12-68 5-1-67 COVERAGE Fire & Extended Coverage on Office Equipment AMOUNT $ 26,000.00 Fi1,e, Extended Coverage & $680, 000. 00 Vandalism on Bldgs & Equip. + coverage for Equip. de- livered but not installed $1,000 deductible Explosion $ 1,000.000.0C Coverage for all pressure vessels (air tanks) turbine, Gas Spheres, etc. Comprehensive Bodily Bodily Injury Injury, Liability and 5oow1,ooo 1\1\ Property Damage Property D. $200,000.00 Honesty Bond $10,000 on each employee $10,000.00 Workmens' Compensation ~Insured: County Sanitation Districts of Orange County and/or the 7th and 70th Sewer Maintenance Districts, members of Boards or Commissions, and appointive officers and employees 01· the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County. II MANAGER'S AGEN DA REPO RT Cou nty Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California JOIN T BOARDS January 7 , 1966 REGULAR MEET I NG WednesdayA J anuary 12, 196 6 ~:00 p .m. P. 0. Box 5175 10844lEllis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca lif., 92708 Phone 962-241 1 The fol l owing is an explanation of the more important non - routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediat ely preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting . Joint Boards Nos . 4 and 5 -SEA TING OF NEW DIREC TORS : We have been notified by the City of Newport Beach that Councilman Lindsley Parsons has been appointed by the City Council t o replace retiring Councilman Stoddard as a member of the Board of Dir ectors of District No . 5 . By the time of the meeting, we expect also to receive formal notification from the Board of Supervisors that Supervisor Allen has been e l ected as Chairman of the Board of Supervisors and hence ex officio member of the Boards of Directors of all Districts with Supervisor Hirste i n as his alternate on our Boards . No. 6 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMAN, DISTRICT NO . 5 : Since Director Stoddard has r etired from the Board of Directo rs, it will be necessary to elect a new Chairma n to f i ll his u nexpired term as Chairman of District No . 5 . No . 7 -ELECT I ON OF J OI NT VI CE CHA I RMAN : Mr . Stoddard 's retirement has also created a vacancy in the office of Joint Vice Chairman of the Joint Boards of Directors. Consequently, it will be necessary to elect a new Director to this office for the ba l ance of Mr . Stoddard 's term . Nos. 19, 20 and 21 -CLOSEOUT AND ACCEPI'ANCE OF PLANT JOB NO . I -6 -1: This contract with the Vinne l l Co r poration of Alhambra has been satisfactorily completed and well within the contract time speci - fied. We consider ourselves fortunate in several respects on this job, which involved the installation of a new 84-inch diameter reinforced concrete pipe between the Plants designed to carry, to - g ether with existing pipelines, the u l timate f l ow of effluent from , Plant No. 1 to the ocean outfall pumping stations. The total contract price, including extra work payments rec omm ended under Items Nos. 19 and 20, amounts to sli~htly over $1 .5 million as against our original budget figure of $1 .8 million. A portion of this savings of $300,000 was due to the cooperation of the Orange County Flood Control District in permitting instal- lation of the pipeline in the Santa Ana River levee, thus eliminating purcnase of additional expensive right of way. The balance of the saving is due to the unexpectedly low bid received from Vinnell Corporation. Also, the contractor did an excellent job with a minimum of controversy and demands which can normally be expected in a job of this magnitude. In spite of formidable difficulties the c~ntractor also met the desired objective of completion of levee work during the dry weather months of 1965, thus avoiding holding over fina l completion of the job until the summer of 1966, which delay, if it had occurred, would have caused us a great deal of inconvenience and overloading of existing pipe- lines. Item No. 19 is approval of recommended Change Order No . 2 (revised) and is basically a bookkeeping document to adjust the final contract price to allow for placing extra gravel fill ordered by the Engineer where unstable soil conditions were encountered, at the unit price bid of $8 .oo per cubic yard. Item No . 20 is approval of recommended Change Order No . 5 adding the sum of $43,232.88 to the contract price for the encounter- ing of an unknown abandoned 24-inch vit rified clay pipe line in a large stretch of the trench area, which, because of its location, seriously interfered with the progress of the work where encountered. The existence of thi s abandoned pipeline during the preparation of plans and specifications for this job was completely unknown to the Flood Control District or us. By coincidence, about the time it was f irst encountered, in an entirely unrelated investigation we turned up an old map showing this pipeline to be a joint venture of the City of Santa Ana and the Southern California Sugar Company constructed in 1912 (and abandoned in 1923) to carry domestic sewage and sugar plant effluent to the ocean. By this time the work was under way and the discovery of the old map mere ly confirmed our suspicions that the abandoned pipe would be encountered throughout most of the work area. Unfortunately , its alignment could not have been worse with respect to this job since for long stretches it lay at the bottom edge of the trench where the contractor's shield rested thus requiring hand renoval, replacement of the soil it occupied and also presented a water problem in certain areas where it was carrying a considerable flow of seepage. The new 84-inch line could not be moved except in one 700 foot stretch because of the proximity of our 66-inch pipeline now carrying most of the Plant No. 1 effluent . The existence of this old pipeline and the seepage water it carried also caused considerable difficuity and extra expense in the -2- tunneling operation at Ad ams Avenue, as stated in the formal change order attached to the agenda. Our sta ff h as been negotiating with the contractor re garding the additional c ost imposed on him by this old pipe line and we be lieve the final settlement reached to be fa ir and reasonable to both parties. We are also r easonably sure that had the existence of this old pipe line been known at the time of bidding and s hovm on the plans, the low bid could have been higher by an amount considerably greater than the amount called for under this r ecommended change order . Item No . 21 is the customary r esolution accepting the contract as complete and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. Districts Nos . 5 and 6 No . 31 -REPA IR OF VOID UNDER HIGHWAY AT ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION : During the course of construction of Contract No . 5-12, a. serious hazard to the Pa c ific Coast Hi g hway has been discovered. I n 1 952 a new fo rc e main from the Rocky Point Pump Station wa s installed and either duri ng its construction, or later, a void in the soil under the highway, of unknown extent, was created. The State Divi sion of' Hlghways is quite conce r ned over the possib ility of a future cave-in and it is obvious that it is an obligation of the two Di s tricts to repair this void as soon as possib le. District No . 5 's engineer, Mr ·. Simpson, has dis cussed thi s matter with the staff and we feel that this r epair can be most economically and expeditiously ac complished by i ssuing a. purchase order to a suitable contractor (presumably the sub-contractor installing the neN force ma.in under Contract No . 5 -12 ). We are, according ly, rec omm ending that the Boards authorize this work and the issuance of a purchase order therefor . By this procedur e our accounting records will be simplifie d in t hat th e repe.ir job is a maintenance and opcre.tion expense and should not be confused with the capital outlay work being done unde r Contra.ct No. 5 -12. District No. 5 No . 32 -REFUNDS OF CONNECTION CHARGES: The Bo ard , at its Novembe r meeting, authori zed an interpretation of Ordinance No . 502 to provide for a credit on sewer connection charges when a new build- ing replaces an existing structure . We h ave asked the Newport Beach Building Departmen t to submit a list of those persons who pa.i d the f ull connection charge prior to this interpretation and the refunds to which they are entitled under the interpretation . The motion, under this item, is to authori z e these refunds, the amounts and payees of which will appea r under the approval of warrant demands secti on of the final agenda distributed at the mee ting . District No. 6 No . 36 -REPAIR OF SUBSIDENCE ON DOVER DRIVE : Following the recent heavy rains, a serious street subsidence over the Dov e r Dr ive Trunk -3- between 16th and 17th Streets in Newport Beach has been reported to us by the City of Newport Beach. Preliminary investigation shows that a stretch of at least 100 yards of sewer is involved. We feel that the most expeditious method of repairing this defect, which is obviously a District obligation, is to authorize the City of Newport Beach to undertake the necessary repairs and later bill the District on completion. We are in the process of proposing this procedure to the City Public Works Department and we hope it will be agreeable with them. It is possible that the job will be of considerable magnitude if further investigation shows it is ne cessary to remove unstable fill and replace it with adequately compacted soil. No. 37 -ENGINEERING SERVICES FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF ROCKY POINT PUMP STATION: We have asked the District's engineers, Southworth & Stevens, to submit a proposal for providing engineering services for this job which has been discussed at several previous meetings. Action was also taken some time ago by Districts Nos. 5 and 6 to authorize District No . 6 to act as the contracting agent for the work. The engineering firm is in the process of preparing this proposal at the present time and we anticipate that it will be available for consideration at the Board meeting. District No. 8 No. 42 -RECEIVE AND FILE QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: This is a routine item already acted upon by the other Boards at the December meeting . Since District No. 8 Board meets only quarterly, it is usual;l-y necessary for it to act on this type of matter after the other Boards . At this particular meeting, this is the only action of this type required. District No. 2 No. 45 -REPORT OF SPECIAL FINANCE COMMITTEE: As authorized at the December meeting, the Committee has met to consider the recent letter of the City of Anaheim concerning trunk sewer construction in the Santa Ana Canyon area and a.lso the other financial problems facing the District . The meeting was held on January 5 at the Orange City Hall and was attended by the full Committee, Mayor K:rein of Anaheim, and several members of the City's staff . After a lengthy discussion it was the concensus of the Committee, with Anaheim's representa.tives concurring, that the City should submit for further consideration a more concrete proposal for ultimate financing of the facility under consideration. It was believed that the new proposal should spell out a definite deferred payment program whereby the District would ultimately reimburse the City for a portion or all of the construction cost. If this new proposal is received before the Board meeting, it would appear appropriate to refer it back to the Committee for further study. However, in the event it is not received in time, the Committee felt that the Board should authorize it to consider the proposal prior t o formal receipt by the full Board at the following Joint Board meeting. This matter will be elaborated on in greater detail by the Committee and/or staff and engineers, if desired . -4- : District No. 3 No. 49 -SETTLEMENT OF LAWSUIT WITH VALLEY ENG I NEERS, INC.: This firm, which was the contractor in 1960 for the construction of the Hoover-Western Subtrunk, filed suit some time ago against District No. 3 alleging that the District wrongful ly withheld $4800 from the contract amount for liquidated damages . Trial was scheduled to commence on January 5, immediately prior to which the General Counsel was successful in negotiating with the firm's attorneys a settlement representing one -half of t h e above sum plus accrued interest. This matter will be reported on further by the General Counsel at the meeting, if desired, prior to the recommended formal action shovm on the agenda under this item. No . 50 -TEMPORARY DENIAL OF CLAIMS FOR EXTRA COMPENSATION, CONTRACT NO. 3-10: At the December Board meeting this matter was discussed by the Engineers and staff and the Board subsequently authorized further -negotiations with the contractor over his claim for extra compensation due him because of restricted working hours imposed by the State Division of Highways. Such negotiations were under- taken but the contractor's opinion of his damages is so far apart from ours that we believe the formal action appearing on the agenda, recommended by the General Counsel and concurred in by me, should be taken to deny these claims for the time being without precluding re -opening the matter at the time of closeout of the contract . No. 51 -PURCHASE OF REPLACEMENT PUMP I NG EQUIPMENT AND APPURTENANCES FOR WESTSIDE PUMP STATION : This pump station, which was constructed by the Los Alamitos County Water District and subsequently sold to District No . 3, was designed structurally to handle all future flows tributary to it as determined at the time of the eng ineer's report for the 1958 bond issue . It was recognized, at that time, that when flows reached a certain point the original pum p s and motors would have to be replaced to cope with the increased volume of water and pumping head. This point is rapidly approaching and in view of slow de l ivery of equipment in recent months, we are recommending that immediate steps be taken to initiate the purch ase of the required larger pumps and motors and related electrical g ear . Accordingly, we have requested the District's engine ers, Boyle & Lowry, to submit a brief letter report and proposal for engineering services in connection with purchase of this equipment . This report and proposal will be available at the time of the meeting . The preliminary estimate for this equipment is $36,000 . Our present planning calls for the major portion of installation to be done b y District's crews as the most economical and expeditious route for g etting the job completed. The formal action as shown on the agenda is to receive and file the engineer's report and to accept their proposal for eng ineering services in connection with this project. District No . 7 No. 55 -RATIFYING ACTION OF THE GENERAL MANAGER IN ACCEPrING CONNECTION CHARGES: Ordinance No . 709 adopted July, 1965, and -5- effective January 1, 1966 , provides for an increase in the District's direct connection permit charges on any permit issued after Decembe r 31, 196 5. Because the offices of the participating cities observed a legal holiday on December 31st, thus denying applicants an opportunity to obtaih connection permits at the old connection charge fee on that date, your General Manager authorized acceptance of permit application fees on January 3rd. The motion appearing on the agenda for this item ratifies the action of the General Manager in accepting these fees and issuing connection permits at the old rate. No. 56 -PETITIONS BY PROPERTY OWNERS FOR SEWER SERVICE: At the December 8th meeting of the Board, the engineers presented a petition from property owners outside of the District for inclusion of their properties in an assessment district to provide sewer service . The matter was referred to the staff for a report and rec ommendation . A recommendation will be made to the Board at this meeting . No. 57 -REPORT ON AC QUISITION OF THE TUSTIN AVE:N1JE SEWER: As directed at the December 15th adjourned meeting of the Board, the staff, engineers and the General Counsel have been in contact with the City of Santa Ana administrative staff in an attempt to negotiate further for the purchase of the City's facility in Tustin Avenue north of 17th Street. A report on these negotiations will be made to the Di rectors at the meeting. -6 - Lee M. Nelson General Mana g er EXCERPl'S FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUJ.AR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO.£ , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., January 12 , 19Eb , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors present: Lindsley Parsons (Chairman), Paul J. Gruber, and Alton Allen Directors absent: ?fo~1e Present: Fred A. Harper,./Secretary of the Board. I / DISTRICT 5 Authorizing refund of connection charges collected under Ordinance 50~~ ---; l~v~~~ ,~econded and duly I carrieo.: Thnt funds collected for replacement structures under the provisions of Ordinance Ho. 5 2, are hereby authorized to be refunded in ace rdance with Interpretation No. 2 of said ordina ce. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • *********** I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No.5 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 12th day of January , 1966. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of County Sanitation District No.5~L' of Orange County, California, this 13th day of Januo.ry , 19~ • Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 lj I I C \ J~f, I 7 J ~ h\"y'-· (~Lu (<~)I r~ 7) \ -.l ' ' 1'1..-t'<--• ....... -j /21.}A-~ -/ vc---Lf _ : tC-+-' ' ; ' ':\: ' ' \ I /'LR. '·"-'-. ' <-<-P / i J.., ./ } ~ 1 h.,.tc (' ~1,v<--7 ;1 -IG....vo I Suggested Revision of Article 4 2 Ordinance No. 502. ARTICLE 4 -IMSPECTION AND CONNECTION CHARGES DRAFr 1-7-66 Before any connection permit shall be issued, the applicant shall pay to the District or its agent the charges specified herein. {a) Inspection Charge for Direct Connection. An inspection fee of $25.00 per connection shall be paid by a public corporation for all direct connections to District's facilities. This charge is separate and distinct from connection charges for new building construction, remodeling or alteration of buildings as provided hereinafter, and is in addition thereto. (b) Connection Charge for New Construction 2 Single Dwelling Buildings. For each new single dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $120.00. (c) Connection Charge for New Construction, Multiple Dwelling Buildings. For each new multiple dwelling building constructed, the connection charge shall be $120.00 for each dwelling unit or $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, whichever sum is less. (d) Connection Charges for New Construction, Other than Dwelling Units. For all other new construction including but not limited to commercial, industrial and public building construction, the connection charge shall be $6.oo for each plumbing fixture unit contained within such construction, provided that the minimum connection charge for such new construction shall be $60.00. (e) Connection Charges for Replacement Buildings. For new construction replacing former buildings, the connection charge shall be calculated on the same basis as provided in paragraphs (b), (c) and (d) hereinabove. If such replacement construction is commenced within two years after demolition or destruction of the former building, and such demolition or destruction occurs after July 1, 1965, a credit against such charges shall be allowed calculated at • . --... , -... ...._;· $120.00 per dwelling unit replaced or $6.oo per plumbing fixture unit replaced, whichever sum is more. (f) Connection Charges for Additions to or Alterations of Existing Buildings. For additions to or alterations of existing buildings, the connection charge shall be $6.00 for each plumbing fixture unit added, provided that no charge shall be made for the first ten fixture units added. In the event that such alterations or additions include the elimination of existing fixture units, a credit, calculated on the same basis, shall be allowed against the connection charge for such alterations or additions. When Charge is to be Paid. Payment of inspection and connection charges shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all construction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the require- ment of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The·payment of the sewer connection charge for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. Schedule of Charges. A schedule of charges specified herein will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in Sections 402 and 403 of the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. Waiver of Charges. Upon petition by an applicant showing sufficient cause therefor, the Board of Directors of the District may, by recorded action, waive any or all connection charges as hereinabove provided when the facts presented by applicant are sufficient for a determination that serious inequity will result from the payment of such charges. -2- !ll!lr•q;:e~~,,. ..... ___________ ------- .,....,.,. .. . -ARTICLE 4 -PERMIT CHARGES The District connection charge shall be determined as follows: (a) A charge of $120.00 per unit for all new single family dwellings within the District. (b) All other construction including but not limited to multiple family dwellings, commercial, industrial and public building construction shall be charged a connection fee in accord- ance with the number of plumbing fixture units contained within such construction. The connection fee shall be calculated to be a sum totalling $6.00 per plumbing fixture unit, provided that the minimum sewer connection fee shall be $120.00 for all new construction as differing from the remodeling of or additions to a structure already connected to an existing sewer. A schedule of such charges will be on file in the office of the Secretal"y of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the · City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture units as defined and specified in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. (c) Payment of a sewer connection fee shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all con- struction within the District, excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach. The payment of the sewer connection fee for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construc- tion within the territorial limits of the District. -6-