Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-12II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts ~ di P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange Co unty, California 10844 Ellis Ave nu e Fountain Valley, Cal i f., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) DISTR ICT No. #1-7 AGENDA December 15th, 1965 -4:00 p.m . Appoint of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Report e General Manager Report of Counsel DISTRICT 1 Consideration of mo ion re : Receive and file letter from the City of Santa An requesting permission to purchase two of the District' easements; and, Consideration of Reso tion No . 65 -214-1 re : sale of easements'-to e City of Santa Ana. (Copy of letter info d rs ). Authorizing See page "A 11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of neg fo r purchase of the Street (held over fr tiations with the City of Santa Ana ustin Avenue Sewer north of 17 th the December 8th regular meeting). (7) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of mo ti n re: Receive and file letter from iv? John J . Hill relative to alleged damage to eucalyptus ~y~I" · trees in Easement #10 Assessment District #5-A; and , FURTHER MOVED: That no other action be taken as the matte r has previously been re erred to the General Counsel. ~ t>"' (8) DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Other business and ~ ~ 1--~ ~""' ( 9 ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment I . u ) ""' (10 ) DISTRICT 7 f 'Yl\ ~ Consideration of motion re: Adjournment '.J RESOLUTION NO. 65-214-1 QUITCIAIMING EASEMENTS TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING QUITCLAIM OF REAL PROPERTY TO THE CITY OF SANTA ANA, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA --~ ------ The Board of Directors of County Sanitatio~ District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER THAT: Section 1. The real property hereinafter described is no longer required for the purposes of the District; and, Section 2. The City of Santa Ana, by means of letters dated December 6, and December 15, 1965, has requested that the District quitclaim to said City said real property for the purpose of obtain- ing future street easements; and, Section 3. The said real property and improvements thereto was valued at $5,000 per acre, more or less, at the time said real property was conveyed to District by the City of Santa Ana in Decem- ber, 1951; and, Section 4. The best interests of the District and the public will be served by reconveying said real property by the District to the City of Santa Ana for a consideration of $5,000 per acre; and, Section 5. Upon payment of the sum of $4,650 the Chairman and Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 1 are hereby author- ized and directed to execute and deliver to the City of Santa Ana a quitclaim deed to the real property described in Schedule "A" attached hereto. Parcel 1 as described in Schedule "A" comprises an area of 0.69 acres, more or less, and is hereby valued at the sum of $3,450. Parcel 2 as described in Schedule 11 A11 comprises an area of 0.24 acres, more or less, and is hereby valued at the sum of $1,200. -A- SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 65-214-1 PARCEL 1: That portion of Lot 8 and Lot 9 of the Williams Tract, as ~ shown on a map recorded in Book 30, page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California, lying West of the West line and its Southerly prolongation of the Easterly 45.86 acres of said Lot 9, said portion being described as follows: A strip of land 14.oo feet wide, being 7.00 feet wide on each side of and measured at right angles to a line which is described as: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Greeville Road which bears North oo 20' West and 1901.13 feet distant from the point of intersection of the centerline of Greenville Road with the center- line of Talbert Road, said point being designated as Engineer's Sta- tion 103 + 40.68 of the surveyed centerline of the Outfall Sewer of the City of Santa Ana; thence North 62° 33' East along said surveyed centerline to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 9. PARCEL 2·: That portion of the North one-half of Lot 4 of the Williams Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 30, page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: A strip of land 14.00 feet wide, being 7.00 feet wide on each side of and measured at right angles to a line which is the center- line of said strip of land, and which centerline is described as: Commencing at the common corner of Sections 27, 28, 33 and 34, Township 5 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, thence South 89° 21' East a distance of 577.03 feet to a point in the surveyed centerline of the outfall sewer of the City of Santa Ana, said point being designated at Engineer's Station 151 + 47; thence North 580 59' East along said centerline to its intersection with the West line of Lot 4 of the Williams Tract, as shown on a map recorded SCHEDULE "A" -PAGE 1 in Book 30~ page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, Cali- fornia, to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 58° 59' East along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 4, containing .236 acre of land, more or less. Excepting the Westerly 75.00 feet dedicated to the Orange County Flood Control District. SCHEDULE "A" -PA GE 2 .gf'W1 " lte"'J No._1 --- The Bosrd of Directors s an it a t io n .,· is t c le t I/ 7 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain V~lley, Calif. Dear Sirs: John J. H 111 1412 Mardick Road Santa Ana, Calif. 11 Oec 19 65 Thank you for your letter of 9 December and for the jetailed information contained therein. I am, of course, sorry to learn that the protests Nere overruled; from the be;i:in!"'i~ they were suomitted in good faith enc based upon realist le qrguments, as subsequent events have demonstrated. 'lheee protests were solicited by the 0 ietr ic t, 'nd every e ff'o rt hsa been made to comply with the requirements of the Distric t in t'1is connection 0 nd to RVoid cqprlcioue, insubstantial or unsuooortable e. r-p:ume nt. In contrast to this, I h~ve listened with patience to such remarkable contrs.d let lone by a representative of the Engineer of Work as the following: that sewers, being intended for use over very long periods of time, are placed "without regg.rd for present use of the lam." Followed by the counter-argument that the sewer had to be placed exactly where it ie because of the present .ise of the lam. That the trees d led because they formerly obtalned their w~ter from the then existing lemon grove -al"d t~at water is not no~ available because the echool ground a (which re'°"la.C'e the grove ) are "probably" not watered very much. A?ii .•.. that cutting the roots does not hurt the tree because the farmers regularly cut the roots to keep them from gett 1ng the water.··· ·t i-, is is preaumaoly the same water originally credited wlth keeping the trees alive. In fact, 1t ~as always a long way from the trees to any of the grove's irrigation water; where the trees suffered the most damq~e, there were never sny lemon trees near them; the lanu being used for a house, a barn ar.d the parking of farm equipment. It is even more d iaapoo int ini:z: to learn of The Board' a dee ls lo n baaed upon the ooinions of Mr. Hohener and Yr. Hollan:i that "the trees have teen deteriorBting for a number of years due to lack of euft'ic ient wster." I daresay, at the outset, that we are each of ue deteriorating -Rnd hq_ve been for a number of yeqrs -but that such jeter1oration in no way implies our immine nt demise. ~lor is the killing of an old man a. lesser crime cecB.uae he can be demonstrllted ~o have been senile. Ajaltlonally, lt ls a certainty th3t a man with a~rlcultural trJ.:? ining could not, in consc ie nee, have lntE:-n:ied to state or 1mply that &11 the tree a showed s ii;i:ns of deter iorat ion. The cond ltion ol'"the trees even at this moment -ana for weeks and months to come -will contrad let 9ny such assert 1on. It eeeme only reasonable to ask -inasmuch as the Board's decision December 15, 1965 Board of Directors THf CITY Of SHnTH HnH CALIFORNIA 92701 County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, District ONE P. O. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 OID CITY OUTFALL SEWER, I.JM: NO. ONE P/11aH aJJr11Sa r11pli11a io: . 217 North Main Street Phone : · 54 7-0511 The staff of the City of Santa Ana, and the staff of District ONE have met·.for the pur;ose of negotiating the sale to City of certain rights of way as authorized by the Board of Directors at their meet- ing of December 8, 1965. As a result of these negotiations, the City of Santa Ana offers to pay $4,650 for 0.93 acre of easements. This is based on a value of $5,000 per acre which is more than the value of land was in this area when the easements were transferred to the District by the City in 1951. This value is close to, and probably more than, the amount paid by the District if the assumption is made that the pipe has no value but considering land only. The parcel east of Greenville Street (on the Borchard property) is approximately 2,130 feet long and 14 feet wide with an area of 0.69 acre. At$5,000 per acre, its value is established as $3,450. This is Parcel 10, excepting Flood Control right of way, as shown on "Right of Way Map of City Outfall Sewer of the City of Santa Ana, 1950" • . ,, ·The parcel west of Greenville Street {on the Heffernan property) is approximately 750 feet long and 14 feet wide with an area of 0.24 acre. At $5,000 per acre, its value is established as $1,200. This is Parcel 12, and a portion of Parcel ·13 on the 1950 map. It is requested that the two easements be conveyed to the City of Santa Ana for the total consideration of $4,650. legal descriptions ~i),.a ed show·ng the_ two parcels. CARLJ.'1.~ City Manager Descriptions, Maps ·..._J East of Greenville--Borchard) That portion of Lot 8 and the South one-half of Lot 9 of the Williams Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 30, page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California, lying West of the West line and its Southerly prolongation of the Easterly 45.86 acres of said Lot 9, said portion being described as follows: A strip of land 14.00 feet wide, being 7.00 feet wide on each side of and measured at right angles to a line which is described as: Beginning at a point in the centerline of Greenville Road which bears North 0 . 0 20' West and 1901.13 feet distant from the point of intersection of the centerline of Greenville Road with the centerline of Talbert Road, said point being designated as Engineer's Station 103 + 40.68 of the surveyed centerline of the Outfall Sewer of the City of Santa Ana; thence North 62° 33' Eest along said surveyed centerline to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 9. Excepting the East 42.00 feet. c. ,, ... \ ,,,. .. .. \ ' C" 0-:. \ \ \ -P •¥•o :: .... \ \ \ \ \ \ ==[:::>Z \ . \ \ \ \ \ \ ---.--PF.RCEL 1-1. A A .!:.£. T. UAl!D.=.qscHEJD,.. <· REC .OR . co. OD . BK.51 9 ,P..,. •" '.) . ",,.. ; r .• , ~- C.~.3!..~~:.'. R~c .o.-;:.c:::. -·· -···-~':.__.'-'----·--·-------------··· ··--··-----··----·--------------------------- .~~;·;_·:'.".'.".'.'.".". ". 4: ~ West of Greenville --(Heffernan) Tnat portion o:f the North one-half of Lot 4 of the Williams Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 30, page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, California, described as follows: A strip of land 14.00 feet wide, being 7.00 feet wide on each side of and measured at right angles to a· line which is the centerline of said strip of land, and which centerline is described as: Commencing at the cow-~on corner of Sections 27, 28, 33 and 34, Township 5 South, I I Range 10 West, San Bernardino Base and Meridian, thence South 89° 21' East a distance of 577.03 feet to a point in the surveyed centerline of the. outfall sewer of the City of Santa Ana, said point being designated at Engineer's Station 151 + 47; thence North 58° 59' East along said centerline to its inter- section with the West line of Lot 4 of the Williains Tract, as shown on a map recorded in Book 30, page 14 of Deeds, records of Los Angeles County, Calif- ornia, to the true point of beginning; thence continuing North 58° 59' East along said centerline to its intersection with the North line of said Lot 4, containing ~236 acre of land, more or less. Excepting the Westerly 75.00 feet dedicated to the Orange County Flood Control District. .. \ -... : ' " ... . : ... ;:: , .. .' -.-f~ r· .. "' ... , // / ...... ·- \ ····· ···:· .. . ··-· ~ \ -..... \ "\ \ \ \ \ r.;./.·~,..-.~· .,,., \ \ \ \ \ ~ .. : ~··'-c..· ... .;: -' • ,/,·:.CC .. '( 1''r . .-.• /' ·-r ( -.L. .. -r: ...-.. r .. ~;: ~,--'. •' ~:; -~ ,.. . ,.. -,. '' -'--< -['~·-~ ·-· .. -~·.f./',l.1--:.i .• ·~. [·~, .. "': .......... -, ..... t,,. .;. '. \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ --·--;::,----==-··-----:..------- , .. J~~ 0 0 · .. \\ \ •.\ \ \ ' -· ' _,,.:.._~ '-.:::,: I ./ ,, 12-15-65 FAH BACKGROUND INFORMATION ON THE ACQUISITION OF THE TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER FROM THE CITY OF SANTA ANA The 3.7 million dollar bond issue which was passed in the early part of 1962 provided, among other facilities, for the con- struction of a District sewer north on Tustin Avenue beginning at First Street, Santa Ana, to La Veta Street just southerly of Santiago Creek. At the time of the bond election Santa Ana had constructed a 1211 sewer in Tustin Avenue from First Street to Seventeenth Street. Later the City extended another existing sewer in Seventeenth Street north in old Tustin Road, and at the present time this sewer extends above Santa Clara in Tustin Avenue. .A couple of years ago the District's engineers were advised by the State Division of Highways that construction of the proposed Garden Grove Freeway across Tustin Avenue would prohibit the installation of a sewer to La Veta Avenue, in that, one section of the freeway was to be depressed while another portion was to be elevated. At this same time a tract was being developed west of Cambridge Street, which is the first through street east of Tustin Avenue. The engineers received permission from the Santa Ana Public Works Department to make a connection to this tract. The District issued a purchase order to Orange County Pipeline, the sewer contractor for the tract developer, to extend approximately sixty feet of sewer to the tract boundary. Later, as a part of Contract No. 7-4-2A (Vadnais, Contractor), an Encroachment Permit to cross the proposed Garden Grove Freeway was issued by the State Division of Highways to the District, and a physical connection was made between the stub-out from the Santa Ana tract to Fairway Drive in Orange. This connection serves the District No. 7 area north of the Garden Grove Freeway and west of the Newport Freeway. The sewage discharged into the Santa Ana system at this point does not return to the District's facilities until it reaches First Street, Santa Ana, east of the Santa Ana Freeway. It has been proposed by the engineers that Santa Ana's facilities handling this sewage be purchased as part of the Master Plan System of the District. ~ . -.~·"' . --~ -. I'·:~-~ ~~ .. :~ i:-~ ::. :.~~.1: . i ~1~':·: ;~=~(: ~f: L.i · .. !:-.. ~(; ~:..)(/ :J ~ (;. .Sf·;:,'.~~ .f~ . ·.::·~? ·;.'..-:~ ,:;.,; -;~ ·, ,:: .... 1: µ,;:: t-~::.•c::.~· :·:~~..;_:·:: ~~~ ~·:;.J::<:-:. :.:: ·::H _r : · ·• .'::..: ~ ... ; 2 ~ ... : \~·T!-~~ #:!;: ,r; (=: = .. ~ ~.;-·:·;. ·vu·.:· ~. ~~; .._..,. ;:= __ ;:. c: }~. 4: ~ ;·;:; .-\_· r ~. ~' .;,;;~; ·'' '" :~~.~;~ ~.;~:'.1 ,,:~ :~ : Dt~~ tr22; 2 f ~Y; <-.. ~ ~,/ :~;~,~ ;; ;',i: ~·~ :'. ... ~·-t ,,: . ~ .. .. .• ~ ! u:~:::;~:_fp <JT. ..~, p·;.3. :~}G ~ .• :j 0.) :·~:_:-_,,;,;! ::~. LI-~_; .::1'-r~f/!,.'. ~0 :.;:~-~. ;,~ G ~~ .;"' -:. : .~> r·r_: :~~ i1!Ci-Q.:::".; ·:~. . . :>: ,. :'.:" l ·~:::r'.\ .. . ·.n.c~(YS._·T~.T (~·1: ... _::r:~:;:~~,~-~ ·J;;,;l:~· G~_;;;c,;::<~·.::.:n. ss.::J.i.~~· :\}'K; PT~-;~:· c.i: _r~:· ·· __ .,. ~-r,cs·: . ~~;~~-'i.j'(:. P'H~f.';,G•.'..:~TJ '/'1.i:~ .<; .;..· .. -!}} <·If.(> ~.J .. U' _.r:I:J.::~! ·~;-:.·:y :',~-j" '\' ;~:r. !:·:L::rr: ~~ re· -~':~,!'."~ J.cf,\ .. -.r/t/~t ~.: -r{·-'.~:.i ~~-~:~: _ . .t-~~: f:?.f...J}.~·. ~ ~·~\ :~}~·~:~-.. ·.:.; f~I1f~ · s:· ·~ i:;_:;· x~~-~·c ·.~_-··,-.::.-_.·.-_ .... _:,·~~---;.~_-.'-~----~· -.... ·\· _~:l.,,..,!~.~.~t.~.-.?~ Br c: ~n-· c ,~;: ) u l:.· c ~:-.{o;.1: 1'.~ ~.:i·;i.·· .. f:(';--c~~;n-.::s -.rv:; .I:.;;:,oi:.,_;i:::'.~~{::··.:./.::'·;~q..:-~t 1:-~ ... ~,r:_i,·lv _ -_-. ·-=-·-~~s~:u·:~·.-·; fi:: ... nt-t:; ~.t:::i'._::·!;-· .~ ::.-~<:·_j))_-~·::.:(f(j ~~·-_---j,~_(/"' ~.\, q ',_·(" -~·,:_;.. J!::;.":-Tq;}~~'} ,~ .. ~ ,.·~1n'•:•'i'/'. ..... ?~Y· ., ::, ';Ji: '[)LG .. "' .. U!) : .. r·.~:..r.~:.: ; .. r ~' I:G:;·~,;.:rr.;:· ":·:/;,,. ~:}." {. :~.· -;~f: . :JT, ·~(~_.-.:~:::F, .[:Ci'-J p?; -;;·j~_.:·, ~;;::;~--J; :~;~f;.-: ·.:~ =-~·i·::K .~ -~··.::·_,/(-.: ; ·-.~· s :) ··.-. :-!'.L ;°-' r) +. :.::t";~1:~ s ~~-/: .-)s.-LrX;:·rt,: -!~t') ..:. ~ :c r.:. .::~JG .;: .'..:;::r·= ,_. .q f3J~!.;?J°<•:\:, ::-: . .:. -;, .t :o ,:,·;{;_!:.:: 'i·~r ::: .L:T: .::. -:.: ~'~~t::J·~=r ;: ;~ _r':-. D;:: :;.: .f.:T,~.r --;_) _ ~-·~--\~·.rs'_ .. --_~,.~,;_· __ :.:_ ..... :'_:_::~.-.... ·.· .... ~ .. :.:~.:_'_•.J,~.:·.·~~-:. ~.,·"'-~£· -:.:: ~.i .r:;: :: .... Jc.-:;-,,_ .:_:-n . e;.c.':;·t..: ~:\~. f:-.. •.; :-:·;_; i~·L r_:(c"<C-'.' _: : .. :: ·: c }.Tb -~ }~/J"J.(ffG ·:_no.;~~1~· ~, · -. -r.".ZJ .-m~;··;::~·. •::J· \.: )~;~_:,::'.~ ~::f :_-.;.r ·f<,' . .:._·p:;::i '.r.:;::··::; .f." .T_:~::~: \f lL ~ °£j i:;:~~., ·. ~:-,j.~_r(~. ::; t •\i .f. ~.r~~: ~; ~:: ~= ·~ ~~;: ,-:_s ~~.:_:, ·:.:~.1 _t:;{; i~i . .;· ~.-~~·;_:: J.· :) :· .~ ~-, ; .. t _':.·.'.; :· ,~ .' j .. :; 1; ·: ;:;-l ~~· .~~. ·~:r · \,; JJ •:.·:- ', ... c;·~ .. ~tr;~.-: /.:T~<= ;·r.~ q. · ~·:·.~:·I.·:.~ e·r ~ -rlr1:r_ -~-;·~· · -~~ 2 ~r~J,r {~ _·. :~~. ~t ;_. ~: J: . :~· 1J:: .. c~f; ;~· :.·: -:·.: .t: .!~ :: i·~~ .r: ~:,? ··:::· : i·~.f:':.~~~-(:(J: ~)0 · G]_.(;.,-l·.~1~._;Gij •. :·~!:;.-c.-i~-:r,~~·<: ·:J·~~ .t:r.-;~ .. :~~.-·~·~·-(,;...:~£ .. :.~!·?~-/,z.~-;-;-~3 .. p.f-:.~-G·. ~~~7~:; :):::·-r~·( ·.:;·.r.·l c.·_iJ (;_~~--:: · -_T) ~.:rJ~~~ '.:; ·:\ ~.:;:. {~ :·::.'· ·:.i x. ~J ~· ~.:: .~.r :· ~ :\._.(j r.., :~~- -~-; .. : .... i r~'r (• · .. ·r-i• ·~ .. - . L •J :-: .. ;~ ·.1 :_.:. · ·~' .. i_I :_~. "/;.'~~/::.l-.~~E:,J· ;.::/·:._ ;7_-~-;_:::(1°::·'.:. _\_r_.: :'t".:. S_JJ '-:)\i'.:;:Jt.; .:-~ .1.'<l('fi} Cj Ol,. •-J.TF~~;.:•~::-:; ',\ :-. ': \.:"·.~ _;·· ,._:;:. :.! {'" ( -~·~:"J·~:·.: .. = C::.J O~:.: \J' G•)D-.hj'(; .... -· ~ .-~ :.. --... : .-~.:: ··:·: -· ~ ~?.~ J .. !-:.:.; .., f:;):;·~)::)~;:~J::·· ·--.;:-r•~.'.·-:, .FPTt; ~~:-.:=I-1.~:?} .. : r.::·= ... :·~f~;l_: .. ··:--~-; ·:~j'}.J: .. ).i:.~~ !'::·,·~~'-~;~~··~::-_!· ~!.-.:;;. .. '£_-! ~!'.f,! ·Ir~~:.~~·:ytJ ~-·: ;: .;~ ~.::.~.; --~· ··:--·:·_:·~_:_.~_:,:'. ... : 1:_:-r •. _:_-,:.-~-~~-.~-·~--"'.~<'~·.·::r • ·O~\-f -xn .. ;; f :[ l-: -~:(t. :-~-r(·; " ·;·~.\'. ::: .f.: ..... ~:· f-· ,-: .. }.'1-tJ\r(~:.: ·;-. .0.:·--.. ~:~,j~;.::~:0r./ .-t;'~~5) f:_;..::-~~ c~~:.: ~-~.~r ;·~~::.: :·.~~·-;_ .. }~!;:.: .. ~_:\Sf(,.:::~.~:._: . ·er -l~--.~ . -~~ ·~;F .. l~ ::·, :/k~· .J/~·; ~~ r·.;r ~j. ·~i-_:'::_ ~;)_;fJ. E .:..,·.:.,~ .. ~ ... :j \tL.".f .::.:;1 J:· ·~:· .-.. ~.; ~<-! ~: : ·-· .: • '· ;!· -'""' . ~?.~:;;~r.:r.:'r~.rf·:~L. _c,;:· .. ~:;l:.·· .\r~.-.:.::_;.p.2; fTiHG rTi..G .f/;1::~r ~:~-:;,:;_i:;4\:ro~-.: ·:?:Yr::.ps" -.1r.;·:~\ ·;·:~·:<r -t~·.:·>"·;;·~!-'. ~~.r;:~;_~~:·1.~ :": c:~<:J:::t'.f-·::.'1 v::yy ~-'::) 1 ":•· i\~-C:;~· .3.;:~,:.E·:,~·-.'.'. ~pf'.;:.(: ::. o:r+·~:r~·~~·'··~: "..:-. 1Y( . . _ .. ~.~;-.:·.-., ;·r-;·-~:::~~ri'-,r:·r ····, r ~:.:. -i}~~f~.;~·-Y~.f·~:;.:~~ ~~~;.~·~v;_.t. ?_f(:.~:lr+J .. : .. :~.:J ·rrj-~;., ;·~.~-.. "~{;\~~.·~J.:'.:F.~_: .P(;;~~~~-f-j')J~!· .. ~)~r. :-l"'"ra --.. ~;~:}\]~ ~·r:"£.r: --·.~~. · Y:;\:-".i ·_.}-u;.'"'.'\.>:":-::q:'.-~:::·~_;Jc.:~)'~{ .-,_:·~~~;c~!::~--r·~;:>".::r ;·: p-·:;;8·~· c~:.: ... ;~--;Js·. ,;::~!;J~-~ · __ .. ~t~.r~:,: ".~; ,~-.l ·-£;~:~~-T~r:.;~/:~: i_J::..:·~~·~--·~:T~~.-;·:·ri·::_r ~r.;:~~Lor; ~\-~; .. ~··.-;-(?·::: ;,,.~'~ !)~~--~-=~;~:~··:f __ .... r:·~Jl~ · .. ~_'?/.:£:~~;£~: .. j~ . .' L~Cii·J ::T~FC.i· ..... :: :·c;_c~t!Li ,.· '-·~· ~:~-·. .~~ ~= JJiiS!~~\f ~t.ti~F .L~~~'l i4~~c~t;J( ·:?ti:~(<~/:· . (.=f..1' .I:BI.~ ~r{(~\~~fl{;C:: J::;·, J>-):."! ,,. ~ r-\ --:-1.-"':r (;./ _. _) i' __. -,.-.'<.,-----fl) __. 1,. '::,-) -JI )J ~'Ti -Ve\ ~ -77~7-- ' , ) . ""r f / , '). -. I ) ,-T[ ~;:--. -. - ----------r--,-.y ..._ . -~ ,. • -:Y ~ ) -('T-~.,-;rv-rrv i: ~---vi:y-----tt------- ~.,~~r-;1) ---.; ---;-J ~) y~ '-~ !, :'l? ~~-)r--v~ r-J ~--..... ------ -=--1" --;: . :>r -__,_ ---v--, ' :;;, --y-? i. 7 iY -.,-,,-,-_,,,-, ~-;; ,,----. ,/' l/, ;-: /'£ ./ if • ---=-i.J --/ ). .. , <--. J ' '-5 l _--\-ri:Y-v-}/-c:::_~~~.r-~ (~ )1-7 ---------.1 ,,f', ,..-> ---": ~(---y--r+:,---y'y-- v J • -,. t: -, ·-"' .f T -,~-t-7]~ ------- ---':""-'~+~--~ .,, " ')~ -.:.z, ~ ~-"~ ft. ~ ---,_.,_,.,-;..~ ~~ -L . .;., -c:.')-;;,--·r h\..(/'\,~ . -• / --· >-) ; . ' ~ 'l.. ./,_ "T ----r ---------- ' "' 11~11 ~{L:-V·~5----- ------.;...+- J-= (~ ~l'\~'\\~ --- Y"'J)-+-p~~1-:L ~ ~ ~ ~' j-y-J ·-n~~-- 7"r.-;l ~ J ~ ) ~,,yr--)-;·dv.,/\1 ---~ --~~,,, d----~/-r?Y('p· --- ___ ---l</\"f rP ----------------....;~~'l T_,_ 1,,1 -;;z:5 - ) 7 7-y\? r1:i )~-h-'<> (1'1 ~ g ~f ~"1~;/~ r~;;-- ,. t------------------~---,~~ f • II /:JI:# ). .~ (;_ ---- --------------- ,_ ----------------------- ------- >------------------ -":-;;---:-r f >-i, ~ .. --J v ~ ~Y'7 ~;z, ~;._;.,·-~~ ------ ~ ·--· ROLL CALL Adjourned ft-/ Date .&. /~ /'J_i{,5 Time rj,· dQ Item ~ ~ 7 OTHERS : Nelson Brown Niss on Rim el Hohener Lowry Finster Gall oway Carl son ~~ A.....tJ ~ ~~ ;i:=- DISTRICT 1 Harvey Mey er s Miller Hirstein ~ Mc Mi c hae l V' V' Mack ~ Allen DI STRICT 7 Hirstein ~ Allen Cook ~ Gruber Harvey !/ Mc Michael Meyers / Mil l er ~ Mack Parks ~ Hi l eman ~ (.,/" ../"" ~ <....-- ~ i....--- .:f/ . Y 7 Mee t ing v ROLL CALL Adjourned Date Time __________________ ..._.___ ---------- Item --~------------------------------ OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson DISTRICT 1 Harvey Meyers Miller Hirstein McMichael Mack Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein ~ Allen Cook ~ Gruber Harvey ti McMichael Meyers ~ Miller ~ Mack Parks lll Hileman ----Meeting II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. #7 December 2, 1965 -7:00 p.m. (1) Roll Call (2 ) Appointment of Ch a irman pro tem, if necessary P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 Ellis Avenue Founta in Valley, Calif., 92708 AGENDA (3 ) Consideration of motion re: Granting an extension of time to Steve Cappello & Sons Construction Company, Contractor, to December 2, 1965, for completion of construction i n Assessment District No. 5-A (4) Secretary reports time and place for public hearing on assessments in Assessment District No. 5-A (5) Secretary reports upon receipt of Affidavits of Posting, Mailing, and Publication, and upon written objections received (6) Declaring public hearing open (7) Declaring hearing closed; and consideration of actions regarding assessments (8) Consideration of motion re: Approval of Operating Fund warrant book for signature of the Chairman; and authorizing payment of warrants, as follows: #3396 #3397 Operating Fund C.. Arthur Nissen & Jaclt J. Rimel Ivan Swanger, County Treasurer (9) Other business and communications, if any (10) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment $ 5"o87. T7 $18,324.oo $23,411.77 ROLL CALL Adjourned Da te_..._L~~..____.-d~_-....... ? ...... ~-=----Time ;z: lo Item~~~-L~if~ _ _....(!_......-41~L£_-------....-_ OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson DISTRICT 1 Harvey hael DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Allen Cook Gruber Harvey McMichael Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman ':}t-7 Mee ting II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 ~llis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca l if., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (7) (8) DISTRICT No. #1 AGENDA December 1st, 1 965 -4:00 p.m. of Chairman pro tern, if necessary f the General Manager Considera\ion of mot ion re: Approving Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-4-2A (Digester Gas Compre~ors and Starters). Copy of each addendum in folders. \ Consideratio ~f Resolution No, 65-202-1 re: Awarding purchases of e~uipment under Specifications #E-048 and #A -027 . See pa~r "A" (S ee pages "B" and 11 c11 for bid tabulati ~s ). Consideration of R~so lution No. 65-203-1 re: Awarding contract for Digestrr Gas Compressors and Starters, Job No. I-4-2A to Ameri \Compressor Company in the amount of $69,612.40. See age 11 D11 (Copy of bid tabulation in folders). Other business and comm ications, if any Consideration of mot ion Adjournment ,/ V'l ~-~:J. 3 O" ""lo'' - \ ~ .... ~---- \ RESOLUTION NO. 65-202-1 AWARDING PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT UNDER SPECIFICA- TIONS #E-048 AND #A-027 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the recommendation of the General Manager and the Purchasing Officer, and the proposals submitted for Specifi- cations #E-048 and #A-027, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That purchase of the equipment described in Specifications #E-048 and #A-027 is hereby awarded as follows: Spec. No. #E-048 #A-027 Item Bar Screens and Appur- tenances for Plant 2 Headworks One, Four-Door Passen- ger Sedan Vendor Jeffrey Mfg. Co. Al Roberts Plymouth Alnount $11,023.00 $ 2,230.00 Section 3. That issuance of purchase orders for said equipment is hereby authorized to be made in the amounts shown above; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said equipment are hereby rejected. -A- '\ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sa nita tion Districts P. 0 . Box 5175 of O range Cou nty, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca lif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) DIST RICT No. #1 AGENDA December 1 s t , 1 9l?5 ~ 4:QO p .m. of Chairman p r o tern , if necessary Report of e General Manager ~ ~or · Consideration o mot i on re : Approvi ng Addenda Nos . 1 and 2 to t h e p l ans and pecifications for J ob No . I -4-2A (Di gester Gas Compressors an Starters). Copy of each addendum in folders . Consideration of Resol tion No. 65 -202-1 re : Awarding ~­ ~urc hases of equipment under Specifications #E -048 and #A -027 . See page 11 A11 (See pages 11 B11 and 11 c'' for bid tabulations • (6) Consideration of Resol utio No. 65 -203--1 re: Awarding / ___ ~ - contract for Digester Gas C pressors and Starters, Job tJVV"""- No . I-4 -2A to Americah Comp essor Company in the amount of $69,61 2 .40 . See page 11 0 1 (Copy of bid tabulati on in fo l ders). (7) Other business and commuhicat ons , if any (8 ) Consideration of motion re: - I RESOLUTION NO. 65-203-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-4-2A A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-4-2A The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' Construction Engineer, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to ____ A~m~e~r~i~c_a~n __ c_o~m~n-r~e~s~s~o~r._.C~o~m~p~a~n~Y-------------- for DIGESTER GAS COMPRESSORS AND STARTERS, JOB NO. I-4-2A, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said equipment are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-4-2A is hereby awarded to ___ A_m_e_r_i_c_a_n_c_o_m_p_re_s_s_o_r_c_o._m_p_a_n .... y ___ in the total amount of $_6 __ 9 __ ,_6_1_2_.4_o ______ , in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said company for said equipment pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 65-182 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said equipment are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -D- ROLL CALL Adjourned Date ilJ:c, lyj /q(o ~ Time$ cJlJ Item.,&L ~ l ~,,....,... )_()J -I ))~-:tr f ~ v ~ V""' DISTRICT Harvey ~ Meyers v --Miller ~ Hirstein V" 1 McMichael Mack Allen DISTRICT 7 OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway L 1 Carlson vv~~- ~37' 4-..~l---~­ Twd :Dt!' < __,~ ------ Allen di: J Meeting ~ {pJ"'~~o).. ... \ }) ;,;;( -d:-t ~ v ~ v R 0 LL CALL Adjourned Date ____________ Time~---- Item ------------------------------------ OTHERS: Nelson Brown Nissan Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson DISTRICT , Harvey Meyers Miller Hirstein McMichs.el Mack Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Cook Harvey Meyers Miller Parks Allen Gruber McMichael Mack Hileman ----Meeting - 'i.:,.,. BOARDS OF DIR ECTO RS II County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5 175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Ave nue Fou ntain Va ll ey, C al if., 9 2708 (1) (2) (3 ) JOI NT BOA RDS December 8, 1965 -8 :00 p.m. Pledge of Al legiance I Roll Call Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary AGENDA (4) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of t h e adjourned regular meetin gs held November 3, 1965, and December 1 , 1965, and the regular meeting held November 10, 1965 (5 ) (6) (7) (8) (9 ) (10) (11) (12) (13 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 3 Consid e ration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regul ar meeting held November 10, 1965, as mai l ed DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1965, as mai l ed DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 11 consideration of motion r e : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held November 10, 1965, and the adjourned regular meeting held November 17, 1965 vr ... ~"vrr fJJ'~~ ~· ~~~/)~~~~ I / ~ Report of the Joi nt Chairman Report of the Genera l Manager Report of the Genera l Counse l (14) Report of the Executive Committee concerning personne l revisions I ( 15) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Approving and accepting the report of the Executive Committee; and consideration of Resolution No. 65-201 re: Amending Resolution No. 63-10 establishing employee positions and fixing salaries therefor; and authorizing employment of personnel. See page "F'' I -- .1 - i (16) (17) (18) (19) (20} ALL DISTRICTS l Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-2 (Addition {: ~l·\ to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities -Structures); ~,.\. and authorizing a total addition df $105 to the contract C,.v ),. ,)"""1 with Vinnell Corporation, Contractor. See page "G" l ~ I j ~ DISTRICTS j Consideration of motion re: App~oval of Change Order #1 to the plans and specifications for Job No. J-5E {Instrumentation -1965); and a ~horizing a total deduction of $892.20 from the contract wi Honeywell, Inc., Con- tractor. See page "H" ALL DISTRICTS -Consideration of motion re: Financial Report submitted by Public Accountants, for the qu 1965 ceive and file Quarter~y-1 . ,..,,X anson & ~eterson, Certified rJC.f./"..r I '( rter ending September 30th, if' 1 . l._..1 /l ,, \t ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: and file written certification of the General nager that he has checked all bills appearing on the age da, fowid them to be in order, and that he recommends uthor~zation for payment ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vot Joint Operating Fund and Capit warrant books for signature of No. 1, and authorizing pa~ent "A" , "B" , and "ci' mo ion re: Approval of tlay Revolving Fund e Chairman of District warrants. See pages .. ,..:....+" u .. (23) D1~TRICU ;J·IJ-~SS (24) DISTRICT 1 if any Consideration of ( 25} DISTRICT 5 Consideration of See page "D" (26) :Jt~A (27) DIS ICT 5 Consideration of motio (28) Adjournment v "~~\} \\\ ~ ~ I i, Approval of warrants, if any. I ; <L''-_ Adjournment ':: , < 'i\ 'll \" \ \ '__.. l) ~ Anproval of Suspense 't'E" Fund vJ /'-" !.': I I._, • ~ iti,1Y v DISTRICTS 6 AND 7 -Consideration of motio re: warrants, if any. See page ----\\\ Jl\ k'. \) /L. lJ l' t. -2- / (29) (30) DISTRIC 6 .. Consi er~~iort!of ~tion any. Se~/ /. DIST T 6 Other business c if any (31) DISTRICT 6 ' ~ \)\..\"-.. (32) Consideration of motion DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion to the Euclid Trunk Sew granting an extension o Brown Company, Contrac Adjournment l\ ,~ x e: Approval of Change Order #1 \ I I) '--1· , Contract No. 2-10-3; and 1-\0~ t time of 36 days to Charles T. , t v .... a--' ----·· See page 11 I" fl / (33) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of reque t of the City Management Corporation for permission to rel cate the Orange Sub-Trunk Sewer through its property; and consideration of motion approving the request subject t the engineers' review, and authoriz- ing preparation of an agreement with the City Management Corporation setting f rth the terms and conditions under which the request is anted. Copy of letter on page "J" (34) DISTRICT 2 (35) (36) (37) (39) ~ \/\... .)/ \}" \J\ .'·dJ . ; ' ' (40) Consideration of mo~io Receive and file letter from the City of Anaheim 1 re uesting sewer service south of the Santa Ana River and eas : of Placentia-Yorba Road,; and authorizing appoint nt bf a Special Finance Committee to consider the City's eq est and other financial problems of the District. (Co letter in f-olders.} i ; \ \_.,· DISTRICT 2 Consideration of See page "D" Approval of warrants, if. any. \,j1 1..:·-..,/v \ v \ \. ~·V ,; DISTRICT 2 Other business DISTRICT 2 a.tions, if any '\ d:: .. Lt v \ /) \ \1,, \ l ~ t : ' \ ."f.l-~ .. \ Consideration of motion djourrunent \ ~ .. v \ ~-\·· \ v DISTRICT 3 \ (';0' Consideration of motion re: Approve, receive and file l written report of the commi tee recommending an amendment l to the existing Basic Acco odation Agreement between I ~· Districts 3 and 11 for the purpose of extending the agreemen~ \ · for a two-year period(, or until such time as ot)her arrange-I '*~ , ments can be made. Copy of report in folders /-'( : . DISTRICT 3 Consideration of Resolut·on No. 65-205-3 re: Approving and authorizing executio of an amendment to the Basic Accommodation Agreement etween 11 D1.-stricts 3 and 11 dated December 14, 1960. See age K ~ ... ~ .. \'-~~ .. _ Jv~\V·-· ·- re: Declaring intent to lend to or construction of sewerage ' ...., ........... · I :' \} "' ~ ... DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motio District No. 11 funds J .Y< facilities which ulti , \y-~v'-subject to a formal E . JY·' \:·J/ tween the Districts. ately will benefit both Districts, gineer's Report and agreement be- ' I I;~ L y,.Vv -3- (41) (42) (44) (45) (46) (47) DISTRICT 3 I Consideration of Resolution No. 65 206-3 re: Approving i.}· and authorizing execution of an a reement with Standard l .:'v"~ Oil Company of California wherei the District is granted l .\ L" l right of way for sewer purposes at the southeast corner ,1) . i·) ~i of Beach Boulevard and Imperia Highway; and authorizing ..-}· execution of a letter agreeme for temfrorary righ~ of ( way during construction. See p "L' ,~~,~--~ ~~~''""'~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: H. E. Johnson Construction claiming additional 3-10 (Miller-Holder "M" DISTRICT 3 eceive and file letter from mpany, dated November 15, 1965, connection with Con tract No. l,,· ewer) • Copy of letter on page J.;\./ Report of the engineers Construction Company; a the claim n the claim of H. E. Johnson ; \ __ ._. consideration of action on r, D-v),\...-~-1 (}'\ f~~ ~l.\, : . "..\ 1) .. :\ • !;/v·C\'-;\, \ --;--'-' f ~ • 'e ·~ (_,,h\}J.... I DISTRICT ,...., . < 'i ' . \. ,J: ..: .:.. r: ' : ..... ·~ . ~f . I --(; • Ir-'· 1 "-( ,. I ' __.,,. ___ -o:m.3 \... ~ . . '-; . 0 !... ~ ~ j \ .. -' 2 <'~ ,·L ~--V. ,?.._-~1 ''-•. Vl"-'-~-• ; . Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any. ..-:· , .. . . See page u D" 7 .. ~; ,_ · · ' DISTRICT 3 ~ 1.1.~ . ...r--/ C:, .. 1w,f./""~~c~·L. ' Other business ications, if any 73 p.· ~~ ~ttt ~ r. ~-<~J ~ • J cA1v· I . ( -/' , .-;..i.,---; '-··!~ . ..,. -.,_./ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion r DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Resolut and authorizing executio Accommodation Agreement December 14, 1960. See Adjournment /\,.J;C', "I'.)-')... ~H\ /}'··~~\ .... L · ~ on No. 65-207-11 re: Approving of an amendment to the Basic etween Districts 3 and 11 dated ge "N" ' \J-)·~~'-· '-'-· -----~ ..... (48) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion See page "E" Approval of warrants, if any. (49) (50) (51) (52) (53) DISTRICT 11 Other business and commun·c~tions, if any DISTRICT 11 Consideration of J ~· ~ ~ .... J-J at') f DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion r to Steve Cap~ello & Sons to December 8, 1965, for Assessment District No. DISTRICT 7 ''cl ,.//... I )/'l /l' I Adjournment : Granting an extension of time onstruction Company, Contractor, ompletion of construction in A Secretary reports time a d place for public hearing on assessments in Assessme District No. 5-A DISTRICT 7 Secretary reports upon receipt of Affidavits of Posting, Mailing, and Publicati n, and upon written objections received -4- ' . \ \ , /..._,._; )( /'- (54) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of e: Declaring public hearing open (55) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of consideration of e: Declaring hearing closed; and regarding assessments (56) (57) (58) (59) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of to the plans and specif. granting a time extensi deduction in the amount Famco Construction Comp e: Approval of Change Order #3 ations for Contract No. 7-2B, of 7 days and authorizing a of $976.60 from the contract with y, Contractor. See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 7 w.1. Consideration of Resol tion No. 65-209-7 re: Accepting ~, Contract No. 7-2B as c mplete, and authorizing execution " .1··-- and recorda tion of a N tice of Completion of Work therefor. ) ,vv" See page "P" 1 · DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resol tion No. 65-210-7 re: Authorizing acceptance of an easem nt from Great Western Savings and Loan Association relat ve to Assessment District #5-A; and authorizing paym n for said easement in the amount of $1.00. See page 'Q" DISTRICT 7 f'. Consideration of Resol No. 65-208-7 re: Establishing "l~"-' employee positions and fixing salaries therefor; authorizing\f\J,1.J l', the e~lOYJ!lent of :pers nnel; and rescinding Resoluti0f1S ~ · \.i\)·\' Nos. 64-188-7 and 65-9 -7. See page "R" \'\ I ~ DISTRICT I ..r~"'-'""'·' /~ Report of the General Counsel re: Negotiations with the City of Santa Ana for purchase of the Tustin Avenue Sewer, north of Seventeenth treet {61) DISTRICT 7 Consideration ~~,....--""lliil age "E" DISTRICT 7 Consideration re: Approval of warrants. See communications, if any \ re: Adjournment \ ro\ -5- WARRANT NO. JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 3396 Advance Electric, Motor Rewind $ 215.33 3397 Jan Alabaster, Employee Mileage 12.00 3398 Aladdin Litho & Art, Printing 27.56 3399 Anaheim Dodge, Auto Parts 104.03 3400 Arrowhead & Puritas Water~, Inc. 107.65 3401 Atlas Stationers, Office Supplies 27.58 3402 Audrey & Co., Car Desks 52.56 3403 Bank of America, Bond & Coupon Collection Exp. 34.62 34o4 Barnes Delaney, Conveyor Belt, Tires 432.37 3405 Bay City Bearing co.,Chain Links, Bear1ngs~ Belts 643.64 3406 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 170. 75 3407 Blake, Moffitt, & Towne, Janitor Supplies 21.66 34o8 Charles Bruning Co., Drafting Supplies 37.23 3409 Buena Park Wholesale Electric, Supplies 678.56 3410 Burke & Co., Air Condition Maintenance 66.oo 3411 Business Equipment Co., Reproduction Supplies 120.78 3412 Chemical Exchange Co., Chlorine 14,619.58 3413 Coast Electric Service Dept., Parts 17.78 3414 Coast Office Equipment Co. 63.93 3415 College Lumber Co., Inc., Lumber, Tools 87.47 3416 Control Switches, Inc., Control Motor 80.28 3417 Crane Packing Co., Seal 30.47 3418 A. B. Dick Co., Reproduction Supplies 50.13 3419 Diesel Control Corp., Governor, Filters 1,361.69 3420 E & F Vacuum Pump Repair Serv., Blower Repairs 160.78 3421 Electric Supplies Dist. Co., Supplies 200.51 3422 Enchanter, Inc., Ocean Monitoring ... 1, 100 .oo 3423 Engineers Sales-Service Co., Compressor Parts 156.98 3424 Ensign Products Co., Paint Supplies 147.26 3425 Enterprise Electric Supply Co., Supplies 217.06 3426 Enterprise Printing Co., Office Supplies 136.45 3427 Essick Machinery Co.~ Compressor Parts 53.04 3428 Filter Supply & Service Co., Air Dryer 126.12 3429 Fisaher & Porter Co., Lab Supplies, Chlor Parts 771.27 3430 Flair Drafting Service 406.oo 3431 City of Fountain Valley, Water 20.00 3432 Fowler Equipment Inc., Crane Rental 56.00 3433 Edward R. Francis, Employee Mileage 55.50 3434 Freedom Newspapers, Inc., Legal Ad 18.51 3435 General Electric, Supplies 143.25 3436 General Telephone Co. 207.40 3437 Goodall Rubber Co., Rain Gear 360.39 3438 Bob Gosche Co., Small Hardware 186.17 3439 Graybar Electric Co., Inc., Motor Control Cntr. 4,201.60 3440 Harbor Clinic, Medical Exams 28.50 3441 Bernard Heying, Employee Mileage 22.80 3442 Honeywell, Inc., Charts 170.17 3443 Horton Camera Repair Service 22.00 3444 Edward L. Houchins, Carpentry Work 44.00 3445 Howard Supply Co., Valves, Fittings, Hardware 340.94 3446 City of Huntington Beach, Repave Street 33.80 3447 Industrial Wire Products Corp., Wire 19.53 3448 International Harvester Co., Auto Parts 137.34 3449 H. R. Jenks, Construction Trailer 990.00 3450 Jones-Gillespie, Inc., Insurance 529.00 3451 Keenan Pipe & Supply Co., Valves 65.56 3452 Kleen-Line Corp., Janitor Supplies 87.62 3453 Knox Industrial Supplies, Tools, Rope 121.36 -A- WARRANT NOs 3454 3455 3456 3457 3458 3459 3460 3461 3462 3463 3464 3465 3466 3467 3468 3469 3470 3471 3472 3473 3474 3475 3476 3477 3478 3479 3480 ~481 3482 3483 3484 3485 3486 3487 3488 3489 3490 3491 3492 3493 3494 3495 3496 3497 3498 3499 3500 3501 3502 3503 3504 3505 3506 3507 3508 3509 3510 3511 3512 3513 3514 IN FAVOR OF Bill Kroeger, Employee Mileage $ LBWS Inc., Tools, Supplies L & N Uniform Supply Co., Uniform Rental Lewis Bros.~ Batteries Jay G. Lissner, Drafting Supplies Lord-Babcock Inc., Fittings McCoy Motor Co., Auto Parts McGraw-Hill Book Co., Technical Manual Mahaffey Machine Co., Machine Shop Work Main Photo Service, Supplies & Finishing Matheson Scientific, Lab Supplies Metropolitan Supply Co., Tools John Middleton, Employee Mileage Mobil Oil Co., Oil Munselle Supply Co., Inc., Welding Supplies National Chemsearch Corp., Chemicals Lee M. Nelson, Atlantic City, Chicago Exp. Nelson-Dunn Inc., Carburetors City of Newport Beach, Water Oranco Supply Co., Fittings, Solvent O. c. Suppliers, Inc., Fittings Orange County Radiotelephone Service Orange County Stamp Co., Office Supplies Pacific Air Industries Inc., Photos Pacific Telephone L. B. Penhall Co • , Inc., Equipment Rental Postmaster, Postage REA Express, Freight Radio Products Sales, Inc., Electric Supplies RAM Chemicals, Inc., Paint Supplies Reynolds & Taylor, Plastic Washers Reynolds Camera Supply, Supplies & Processing Rhodia Inc., Odor Control Chemicals Robbins & Myers, Inc., Pump Parts Howard Ryan, Tires SantaAna Blue Print Co., Printing & Blueprints Santa Ana Paint Co., Drafting Supplies E. H. Sargent & Co., Lab Supplies R. L. Scherer Co., Equipment Rental Russell M. Scott, Sr., Employee Mileage The Sherwin-Williams Co., Paint & Supplies Signal Oil Co., Gasoline Smith Optical Service, Safety Glasses So. Calif. Edison Co. So. Calif. Water Co. So. Counties Gas Co. Spectrol Electronics Corp., Instruments Speed-E-Auto Parts Standard Oil Co. of Calif., Oil State of Calif. Dept. of Motor Vehicles, Use Tax Surveyors Service Co., Supplies J. Wayne Sylvester, Employee Mileage C. o. Thompson Petroleum Co., Kerosene, Weed Oil Tardif Sheet Metal, Fabricate Panels Thomas Bros. Maps, Street Atlas Thompson Construction Co., Repair Sewer J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc., Safety Markers Twining Labs, Tests Valvate-Associates, Valve Parts John R. Waples, Odor Consultant Warren & Bailey Co., Inc., Tubing -B- AMOUNT 30.40 625.57 659.59 169.24 26.85 201.88 10.98 9.65 48.72 39.39 9.57 28.28 29.60 66.70 25.47 650.35 345.67 339.77 6.26 142.23 62.28 290.96 2.78 11.70 277.45 65.00 200.00 8.56 137.45 122.36 57.98 86.51 803.09 134.84 384.71 38.95 14.58 104.11 4.68 87.60 236.18 459.27 9.83 8,445.08 3.90 127.51 15.81 70.20 33.03 6.oo 31.20 20.60 145.98 132.54 45.86 128.74 82.37 30.00 8.18 218.80 84.94 WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 3515 Waukesha Motor Co., Engine Repairs $ 744.51 3516 Western Carloading Co., Freight 9.43 3517 City of Westminster, Water 5.00 3518 Wimberly 1 s Petroleum Distributors, Diesel Fuel 641.67 3519 Everett H. York Co., Engine Parts 146.47 3520 John E. Sigler, Consultant 763.80 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 49,409.22 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 3521 John Carollo Engineers $ 2,637.19 3522 LeRoy Crandall & Associates 890.75 352~ Freedom Newspapers~ Inc. 13.02 352 Orange County Title Co. i,200·.oo 3525 Raymond G. Osborne 152.00 3526 Twining Labs 16.oo 352~ Vinnell Corp. 9,213.00 352 West & Wiggs, Inc. 5,924.16 3529 A. H. Wilson Development Co. 9,450.00 3530 Worthington Corp. 30,237.60 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING $ 59,733.72 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $ 109,142.94 -c- WARRANT NO. 3531 3532 3533 3534 3535 3536 3537 3538 3539 3540 ster Boyle & Sidney L. Lowry T. Brown Co. of Orange ACCUMULATED CA TAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN AVOR OF J. R. Lester yle & Sidney L. Lowry H. E. Johnson C nstruction Co. Raymond G. Osbo e Laboratories James I Gallacher Simpso & Stevlingson Sma~ raft, Inc. -D- WARRANTS AMOUNT $ 1,512.00 18,996.75 114.20 $ 20,622.95 $ 2,540.00 41,759.10 422.75 $ 44,721.85 $ 1,878.75 $ 15,533.20 1,066.25 350.00 $ 16,949.45 $ 18,828.20 WARRANT NO. 3541 3542 3543 3544 3545 3546 3547 3548 3549 3550 3551 3552 3553 3554 3555 3556 3557 3558 3559 Q!..STRICT_l!~~ SUSPENSE FUND WARR"J\NTS AMOUNT tQnt~l-G-..-E~~s~offin~~~.~~~---~-~.-~~------.-~.oo -~·- _!!L_FAVOR OF ~~CT NO&J m_RATING F'U!\ID W~RANT~ IN FAVOR OF Boyle & Lowry AD No. -5A-- Plan Check & Inspection Amount $11,852.68 969.75 -$1-2-,-822. 4 3 $ 12,822.43 Great Western sav1ngs--p\;)#5A} c. Arthur Nisson & Jack J. Rimel(AD#5A) Southern California Edison Co. 1.00 5,087.77 17.48 18,324.oo 38.08 Ivan H. Swanger (AD#5A) The Tustin News (AD#5A) .ffi~STRUQ_~IOiic:fl1ID \A[~~S IN FAVOR OF Goode & Goode FAGILITI~S REVOLV.1,NG FTnID WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF John M. Bowman Boyle & Lowry Clarence L. Conzelman Famco Construction Company William N. Harsha Richard B. Smith Val Verde Corporation IN FAVO OF Boyle & Lowry Orange County Pipel -E- $ 36,290.76 $ 350.00 232.99 304.50 232.99 748.71 50.00 232.99 264.27 $ 2,066.45 $ 38,707.21 $ 616.62 10,428.03 $ 11,044.65 $ i,184.oo 19,390.32 $ 20,574.32 ~,..~ 1, 2, that: POSITIONS AND SAIARIES -1965 RESOLUTION NO. 65-201 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1,2,3,5,6,7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63-10 ESTABLISHING E~.PLOYEE POSITIONS AND FIXING SAIARIES THEREFOR; AND AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, hereby resolve Section l. Section l of Resolution No. 63-10 is amended to read as follows: "Section 1. There are hereby established in the Joint Administrative Organization the following Ba.sic Salary Ranges: Ranse No. Monthl~ Five-SteE Rates Range No. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ~~-5 346 365 385 406 428 33.5 355 375 395 417 440 34 34.5 365 385 406 428 l.j.52 34.5 35 375 395 417 440 464 35 35.5 385 406 428 452 476 35.5 36 395 417 440 464 489 36 36.5 406 428 452 476 502 36.5 37 417 440 464 489 516 37 37.5 428 452 476 502 530 37.5 38 440 464 489 516 545 38 38.5 452 476 502 530 560 38.5 39 464 489 516 545 575 39 39.5 476 502 530 560 591 39.5 40 489 516 545 575 608 40 40.5 502 530 560 591 624 40.5 41 516 545 575 608 641 41 41.5 530 560 591 624 659 41.5 42 545 575 608 641 677 42 42.5 560 591 624 659 696 42.5 43 575 608 641 677 715 43 43.5 591 624 659 696 735 43.5 44 608 641 677 715 755 44 44.5 624 659 696 735 776 44.5 45 641 677 715 755 797 45 45.5 659 696 735 776 819 45.5 46 677 715 755 797 842 46 46.5 696 735 776 819 865 46.5 47 715 755 797 842 889 47 47.5 735 776 819 865 914 47.5 48 755 797 842 889 940 48 48.5 776 819 865 914 966 48.5 49 797 842 889 940 992 49 49.5 819 865 914 966 1020 49.5 50 842 889 940 992 1048 50 50.5 865 914 966 1020 1077 50.5 51 889 940 992 1048 1107 51 51.5 914 966 1020 1077 1138 51.5 52 940 992 1048 1107 1170 52 52.5 966 1020 1077 1138 1203 52.5 53 992 1048 1107 1170 1236 53 53.5 1020 1077 1138 1203 1271 53.5 54 1048 1107 1170 1236 1306 54 " F-1- Section 2. Section 2 of Resolution No. 63-10 is amended to read as follows: "Section 2. There are hereby established in the Joint Adminstrative Organization the following positions of employment by the County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, by and through the Joint Adminstrative Organization, at salaries indicated by the range number or hourly rates as set forth opposite the respective positions, said range numbers being descriptive of monthly salaries as set forth in Section 1: Number of Positions 1 1 1 1 1 1 l 1 1 1 1 1 l 5 l l 1 3 1 1 OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Range Number Classification or Salarf: Superintendent of Operations 52.5 Construction Engineer 52.5 Operations Engineer 49.5 Maintenance Superintendent 48 Plant Maintenance Supervisor 47 Research Chemist 46.5 Construction Engineer Assistant 46 Assistant Plant Maintenance Supervisor 45 Construction Inspector 44 Trunk Maintenance Supervisor 44 Shop Foreman 43.5 Electrical Foreman 43.5 Chief Laboratory Analyst 42.5 Control Center Operator 42.5 Chlorination Supervisor 42.5 Assistant Construction Inspector 42 Flowmeter Technician 41.5 Mechanic II 41.5 Engineering Aide 41 Associate Laboratory Analyst 40.5 F-2- Number of Positions 5 3 8 4 2 5 14 2 2 23 2 4 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 1 OPERATIONAL PERSONNEL Classification Mechanic I Trunk Maintenance Foreman Plant Operator Chlorinator Operator Operator Trainee Maintenance Man II Maintenance Man I Assistant Laboratory Analyst Draftsman Laborer Laboratory Aide Student Assistant, Part-time ADMINISTRATIVE PERSONNEL Range Number or Salary 40.5 40.5 39.5 38.5 38.5 38.5 37.5 36.5 35.5 35.5 35.5 $1.75/hr to 2.30/hr. Adminstrative & Purchasing Officer 50 47 42.5 37.5 35.5 35.5 Assistant Director of Finance Assistant Purchasing Officer Secretary Senior Stenographer Clerk Account Clerk Stenographer, Part-time Office Aide $2.30/hr. $1.90/hr." Section 3. The fourth paragraph of Section 13A of Resolution No. 63-10 is hereby amended to read as follows: "Provided, however, that no employee who occupies a position for which a salary exceeding that of Range 46, as herein- above established, is provided, shall be paid either before or after separation for overtime services; and further provided that the General Manager shall cause to be kept a record of the accumulated overtime service of such employees and may grant equi- valent time off with full pay at any time during employment to such employees upon application and for sufficient reason." F-3·- Section 4. Each employee employed before the effective date of this resolution and assigned to a full time monthly position established in Section 2 hereof shall be assigned the salary pro- vided for by the step rate to which such employee is entitled on ''wl the effective date of this resolution, under the provisions of, and the salary assignments authorized by prior resolutions, as amended. Section 5. All resolutions and motions or portions there- of in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. Section 6. This resolution shall become effective December 1, 1965. F-4- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C.O. N0. ___ 2 ________ _ CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation DATE: :pecember 8, 1965 Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent JOB: Discharge Facilities -Structures Job No. I-6-2 Amount of this change order {ADD) (~) $ __ 10:.0:0~5'-!J,·~o.o:..o _____ _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter dated November 8, Contract Revision No. 2 and Sheet 5-A of 12 of Contract drawings, previously furnished contractor. ADD 21-inch x 12-inch Tee into the corrugated metal vent pipe South of the Recirculation Pump Station, as indicated on Sheet 5-A of 12 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $105.00 Original Contract Price $ 172,800.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 573.00 THIS CHANGE (ADD)(mt:llE~) 105.00 Amended Contract Price $ 173,478.oo Board authorization date: Approved: December 8, 1965 -G- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By--------------------------~- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C.O •. NO. 1 ------ CONTRACTOR: ____ H_o_n_e_yw __ e_l_l_3 __ I_n_c~·----------------DATE: Dec. 8, 1965 JOB: ____ I_n_s_t~r_um-=-e~n~t_a~t1~·o~n~-__.;;1~9~6~5 ____ J~o~b~N~o~·~J_-~5~E----~---------~---- Amount of this change order (XEE) (DEDUCT) $ 892.20 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Districts' letter requesting change dated November 15, 1965 and Honeywell's letter dated November 23, 1965. ADD 1. For the turbine generator, provide current transformers for annneter -Bid Item No. 1, paragraph 2 2. For the steam turbine generator, change the current transformer so upper limit of kilo- watt hour meter is 391 kilowatts; Bid Item No. 2, System 3 3. For the gas turbine bypass valve, change from pneumatic to slide wire-current trans- mitter; Bid Item No. 2, System 7 4. Furnish one complete system for testing Radio Frequency Laboratories tone trans- mitting and receiving equipment 5. For digester gas metering system, furnish one dual pen and two single pen indicator recorders; Bid Item No. 2, System 15 6. For digester gas flow indication, provide ten {10) General Electric vertical scale indicators; Bid Item No. 2, System 15 7. For Chicago Pneumatic engine generator, provide current to pressure ratio relay system on gas-fuel oil mixture; Bid Item No. 2, System 16(b) 8. For turbine generator natural gas flow, provide one single pen indicator recorder; Bid Item No. 2, System 16 9. Engineering cost for above items TOTAL ADD $ 32.40 20.40 145.00 420.00 1,150.00 630.00 375.00 315.00 450.00 $ 3,537.80 {Continued on next page) H-1 Change Order No. 1 Honeywell, Inc. DEDUCT 1. Fo~ the gas turbihe generator, provide a dual pen instrument in lieu of two single pen instruments to record kilowatt hours and frequencies; Bid Item No. 2, Systems 1 & 4 2. Delete the six audiotone transmitters indicated in Bid Item No. 2, System 14 $ 110.00 4,320.00 TOTAL DEDUCT $ 4,430.00 TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT $ 892.20 ************* An extension of time of 35 calendar days for contract completion is hereby granted for above changes. ----- Original Contract Price-$ 59,446.oo Prev. Auth. Changes None This Change (DlD) (DEDUCT) 892.20 Amended Contract Price $ 58~553.80 Board authorization date: Approved: December 8, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By ____ ~/_s~/_Le __ e ___ M_._N_e_l_s_o_n ________ _ General Manager HONEYWELL., INC. By---------------------~~----- H-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P.O. BOX 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: Charles T. Brown Company JOB: Euclid Trunk Sewer -Contract No. 2-10-3 Amount of this change order fmolll) (JXllDUX.(U{) C.O. NO. 1 ------ DATE: Dec. 8, 1965 $ none In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's letter of November 16 and Engineer's letter of December 2, 1965 The following extension of time to Contract is hereby granted. A. Acts of Other Agencies Delay caused by City of Anaheim change in requirements for pedestal control box for lift station B. Rain and Inclement Weather 21 November, 1965 15 TOTAL 36 Original specified completion date: November 26, 1965 January 1, 1966 Completion date with this extension of time (36 calendar days) Original Contract Price $ 200,021.00 Prev. Auth. Changes none __ _... ......... ~----------- This Change (DB) (mtltm'X) __ n_...o_n ..... e _____ _ Amended Contract Price $ 200,027.00 Board authorization date: Approved: December 8, 1965 -I- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager CHARLES T. BROWN COMPANY By --------------- 11 THE CITY MANAGEMENT CORP. 4000 West Chapman Avenue Orange, California 92666 "The Board of Directors Ora~ge County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California "Subject: Relocation of Sewer "Gentlemen: "Telephone (714) 633-7111 "We, the City Management Corporation, hereby request that we be permitted to relocate the Orange Sub-Trunk Sewer through our property between Engineers Stations 8+55 and 28+94. "We propose to do all the work to the standards and specifications of the Orange County Sanitary District and to pay all costs of engineering, construction, inspection, plan checking and other fees associated with such relocation. "We shall furnish, without cost to the District, a new easement of 30-foot width over the full length of the relocation in exchange for the abandonment of the existing easement where not needed. "We submit the attached Exhibit "A" as the plan and profile of the proposed realignment and request that your consideration be given our proposal. ''Very Truly yours, S/ J. M. Moore "J. M. Moore "JMM:gcf "cc: Yamasaki Guthard Schrier Ku Glazer Bone Dietrich Sikand Johanson "Encl.: Exhibit "A" " -J- RESOLUTION NO. 65-206-3 ACCEPTING AGREEMENT FOR RIGHTS OF WAY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZ- ING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR RIGHTS OF WAY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement with the STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, wherein said company grants to the District rights of way needed in the construction of the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10, is hereby accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 2. That the certain letter agreement with the STANDARD OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, wherein said company grants to the District permission to use a 15-foot strip of land adjacent to the right of way referred to in Section 1 above until October 1, 1966, is hereby approved and accepted at no cost to the District; and, Section 3. That the rights of way referred to in Sections 1 and 2 of this resolution are more particularly described on Schedules "A" and "B" attached hereto and made a part of this resolu- tion; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized to execute and have recorded the documents necessary to acquire said rights of way for Contract No. 3-10. -L- "H. E. JOHNSON CONSTRUCTION CO. 1601 West Redondo Beach Blvd. Gardena, California 90247 "November 15, 1965 "Mr. Howard M. Cornwell Chairman, Board of Directors County Sanitation District of Orange County P. o. Box 5175 Fountain Valley, California 92708 "DA 3-7670 FA 1-9222 "Reference: Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-10 "Dear Sir: "In reference to the above-mentioned project, we wish to advise you of the following information. "On November 10, 1965, as per letter dated the same day, we re- quested a change in working time from 9:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. to 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m •• On the same day, a rider was issued by the Division of Highways for a starting time of 8:00 a.m •• In- asmuch as the job was bid on a starting time of 7:00 a.m. to 3:30 p.m., we feel we are justified in asking for extra compen- sation as described on the enclosed statement. "We would appreciate your early consideration and approval of this matter. "SRC:pk "Respectfully, S/Stewart R. Coiner "Stewart R. Coiner, Office Manager "cc: Mr. Conrad Hohener, Jr., Boyle Engineering" M-1 "STATEMENT "For period, October 28, 1965 thru November 10, 1965, 2t hrs. delay per day: 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. 3:00 p.m. to 3:30 p.m. "From November 12, 1965 until condition ceases, l~ hrs. delay per day. "LABOR AND EQUIPMENT PER HOUR: l Foreman 2 Operators l Oiler 5 Teamsters l Pipela.yer 4 Laborers "Payroll, Taxes, Insurance, Union Ben. 1 Water Truck l Linkbelt 1 Hough Loader Bare 4 Dump Trucks Bare l Unit Crane Bare 2 Flatbed Trucks 1 Pickup "Plus 15% Ant. Profit "Total M-2 $63.94 14.06 $117.00 $78.oo $117.00 $195.00 29.25 $224.25" RESOLUTION NO. 65-207-11 AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A1t'.1ENDMENT TO BASIC ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NQ,,11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AMENDMENT TO THE BASIC ACCOM- MODATION AGREEMENT BETWEEN COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 3 AND 11 FOR DISCHARGE OF SEWAGE TO TRUNK SEWERS OF SAID DISTRICT NO. 11 FROM TERRITORY OF DISTRICT NO. 3 {AMENDMENT #1) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Amendment No. 1 to the certain Basic Aecom- modation Agreement between County Sanitation Districts Nos. 3 and 11 dated December 14, 1960 is hereby approved; and, Section 2. That the purpose of Amendment No. 1 is to provide for an extension of said Basic Accommodation Agreement for a two-year period beginning January 1, 1966, or until such time as other arrange- ments can be made to the mutual benefit of Districts Nos. 3 and 11; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Dis-- trict are hereby authorized and directed to execute said Amendment No. 1 to the Basic Accommodation Agreement, in form acceptable to the District's General Counsel. -N- 1. COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER JOB:Contract No. 7-2-B, South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk and Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk C. 0. No. __ .... 3io...---- Da te: 12-8-65 CONTRACTOR: Famco Construction Co. Amount of this change order (DEDUCT) $ _ ___...9::;;;m7.._6_. 6_o __ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. Final ADD 'Item No. 1 4 7 DEDUCT 2 ~ 9 Adjustment of Engineer's Quantities Unit - L.F. L.F. V.F. L.F. L.F. V.F. C.Y. Adjust From 850 1100 15 2650 645 130 230 Engr•s Quant•s To 855 1103 15.5 2616 644 113 216 S LF @ 18. 75/LF 3 LF@ 9.75/LF .5 VF @ 40.00/VF TOTAL ADD 34 LF @ 10.90/LF 1 LF @ 8.00/LF 17 VF@ 37.00/YF 14 CY @ 8.00/CY TOTAL DEDUCT TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT TOTAL $ 93.75 29.25 20.00 $ 143.00 $ 370.60 8.oo 629.00 112.00 $1,119.60 $ 976.60 2. Extension of Time Reference: Letter of recommendation from Engineers dated November 12, 1965. A Time extension of seven (7) days is hereby granted the contractor for delay caused by the action of the District{conflict of Metro- politan District water line on Bristol Street during the construction of the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer.) No additional funds to be allowed contractor because of this time extension. Date of Contract: June 24, 1965 Date of Completion: November 11, 1965 Days of Completion allowed by Contract 90 Days extended by Change Orders #1 and #3 ~ Total Days for Completion 141 Days elapsed 140 Days remaining 1 - 0-1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California (Continued from Page 1 ••• ) JOB: Contract No. 7-2-B Date: 12-8-65 This contract has been completed within the Provisions of Time Limitations as set forth in the Specifications. Original Contract Price $ 69,260.50 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 1,360.00 This Change DEDUCT 976.60 Amended Contract Price $ 69,643.90 Board Authorization Date: Approved: December 8, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 of Orange County, California Isl Lee M. Nelson General Manager Approved: FAMCO CONSTRUCTION CO. By 0-2 -~ RESOLUTION NO. 65-209-7 ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-2-B AS COMPLETE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPTING CONTRACT NO. 7-2-B AS COMPLETE The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section lG That the contractor, FAMCO CONSTRUCTION CO., a California corporation, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK AND WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 7-2-B, on the 11th day of November, 1965; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the District have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager of the District has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the construction of the SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK AND WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 7-2-B, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 24th day of June, 1965; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. 7 is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. -P- RESOLUTION NO. 65-210-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTigCT #5-A (PARCEL 7-5-lbb) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT FROM GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, A CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated Novem- ber 9, 1965, wherein GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a Corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #5-A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said permanent easement, which is described as Parcel No. 7-5-16b in that certain action in eminent domain #133933, is more particularly described as follows: Easement for underground sewer purposes in and under the Northeasterly 12.50 feet of that por- tion of Lot 5 of Lemon Heights, in the County of Orange, State of California, shown as a 0.494-acre parcel on a map filed in Book 50, Page 1, Record of Surveys, in the office of the County Recorder of said Orange County. Section 3. That payment for said permanent easement is hereby authorized to be made to Great Western Savings and Loan Association, 4401 Crenshaw Boulevard, Los Angeles 2 California 9oo43, in the total amount of $1.00; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -Q- RESOLUTION NO. 65-208-7 POSITIONS AND SALARIES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING EMPLOYEE POSITIONS AND FIXING SAIARIES THEREFOR; AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF PERSONNEL; AND RESCINDING RESOLUTIONS NOS. 64-188-7 AND 65-91-7 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. There are hereby established the following posi- tions of employment by County Sanitation District No. 7, at the salaries indicated by the Range Number or monthly rate as set forth opposite the respective positions, said range numbers being descrip- tive of monthly salaries as set forth in Resolution No. 63-10, as amended: Number of Positions 1 1 1 Range Number Classification or Salary Rights of Way Agent {Part Time Basis) $875.00/Mo. Field Supervisor 46 Stenographer Clerk 34.5 Section 2. That the General Manager is hereby authorized to employ and assign persons as needed to occupy the positions established in Section 1 hereof at the salary rates set forth above, all in accordance with the applicable provisions of Resolution No. 63-10, as amended, previously adopted by this Board; and, Section 3. That the persons employed to fill the positions outlined above shall be subject to all regulations and shall be '.,,,,i. entitled to all the rights, privileges and benefits provided for permanent, full time employees of the Districts. -R- .. ~--- v c. Section 4. That Resolutions Nos. 64-188-7 and 65-91-7, previously adopted by this Board, are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. R-2 (21-A} (23-A) (26-A) (26-B) (62-A) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA December 8, 1965 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Au orizing reimbursement to the General Manager for me s, lodging and incidental / / ·I-- expenses incurred during st over in Chic~qo, Illinois, '&-·-·f-· ... ,-. ._,. for conference with of~ici s of Orenda, n\c., relative -:!fl, . .f_j to Job No. P2-7A, and in ection of the Chicago Sanitary ; ~-4 '-'· District facilities,~h· e en route to Water Pollution Control Federation con erence in Atlantic City, New Jersey, as authorized Septemb r 9, 1965 DISTRICT 1 Consideration of from the City of certain existing I ~~~; ~ r\ . : , 7 /. '. ·'" • • v i . -< "' \.;' '"' Letter dated December 6th, (JJ~' .-1 ' ;\:. anta Ana, requesting transfer of 1j\J'f· \., ',/('. asements from the District to the City . ~ ~ n folders) ~ (Copy of letters DISTRICT 5 / Consideration of es lution No. 65~211-5 re: Authorizing Quitclaim of ease e to The Irvine Company in exchange for an additional e sement needed in the construction of Contract No. 5-12 ( oast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping Sta ion). See page S-A of this .agenda DISTRICTS 5 AND 6 Consideration of tion re: Approval of Suspense Fund warrant book as fo lows: #3541 C .• Simpson $195.00 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Re elution No. 65-212-7 re: Resolution of application regarding the annexation of the W. R. Nelson Elementary School oh Browning Avenue. (The General ·counsel will present the resolution at the meeting). -~ tJ ,,.....,. ...,,....; ~ RESOLUTION NO. 65-211-5 AUTHORIZING QUITCIAIM OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING QUITCIAIM OF EASEMENT TO THE IRVINE COMPAiN The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the real property hereinafter described is no longer required for the purposes of the District in constructing the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Bay Bridge Pumping Station, Con- tract No. 5-12; and, Section 2. That said real property was acquired in connection . with the Bay Crossing portion of said Contract No. 5-12; and, Sectioll.J.:. That the best interests of the District and the public will be served by quitclaiming interest in said real property to The Irvine Company in exchange for an easement (Parcel No. 4), as recommended by the engineers and the General Counsel; and, Section 4. That the easement for Parcel No. 4, in exchange for which the Quitclaim is approved, is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute and deliver to The Irvine Company, upon receipt of easement, a Quitclaim Deed to the real property described as Parcel 2 in an easement recorded September 10, 1965, in Book 7661, pages 741-746 of Official Records of Orange County, California, and more particularly described on Schedule "B" attached hereto. S-A- .. • II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Coun ty San itatio n Di st ricts o f O range Co unty, Californi a JOINT BOARDS P. 0. Box 5175 10844 El l is Aven ue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Ph one 962-2411 December 1 , 196 5 MANAGER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR EMPLOYEE SALARY ADJUSTMENTS AND PERSONNEL CHANGEB Transmit tal 'rhis report has been prepared for study by the Executive Committee and other Directors as an expl anat i on of our recommenda- tions for actions on personne l changes to be taken at the December 8th Joint Board meeting . Recommendations herein have been gone over in detail with the Executive Committee at its meeting Decembe r 1st and the report of the committee on this subject is enclosed herewi th . Suggested Resolution No . 65.201 attached to the formal agenda will put into effect these recommendations . As the Directors are aware, no salary or personnel changes we re made f or the current fiscal year at the time our Operating Budget wa s prepared. However, t he Boards, by including a reserve sum in the salary and wages budget , acknowledged that salary adjus t - me nts during the year would be necessary. The reason for delaying act ion on thes e mat te rs at budge t t ime wa s to avoid complications for the individual Directors be- c aus e of their similar duties in their respective Cities, Sanitary Districts and the Coun ty Government . The cause of these complica- tions is the fact that our budget, owing to the system of joint operation which we have, must be prepared well ahead of the other g overnmental agencies. As a matter of fact our Join t Operating Budget, including salaries and wages, is adopted in June of each year whereas most of the Cities and Counties do not adopt final personnel revisions and official budgets until the early part of August . The f ollowing recommendations for changes in our personnel setup ha ve been deve l oped as a joint staff effort after several months of considerable study and analysis . We have analyzed the salary schedules of the County Government and all of the major cities in the County and have attempted to bring our salaries to a comparable level with these other governmental agencies, wherever possible. We have accumulated a considerable volume of background data and information which, while summarized below , will be avail- able for inspection at the December 8th Board meeting . In connec- tion with our study of sal.a..ries of other governmental agencies we have employed the common procedure of established bench mark posi- tions for comparison. In our case these key positions are La.borer , Engineering Aide, and Secretary (office). A table of comparative salaries for these jobs is attached. Also attached is a four-page tabulation summarizing the recommended changes in our personnel setup. It will be noted that our positions have been, as in the past, grouped into two major categories , Operational Employees and Administrative Employees, with the former group being sub-classified as to function. Our studies show that practically every city and the County government have already granted a general salary increase for this year . On the other hand, the Sanitation Districts' last salary adjustment was made in December of 1964. In our analysis of these increases, it was noted that there was a distinct trend toward a blanket increase for most employees. It is important to note from this tabulation that although two new positions have been added and certain changes of titles and duties recommended, because of deletion of two posi - tions, there will be no over-all increase in the total number of positions (115). Summary of Recommendations Our recommendations fall into three separate categories and can be summarized as follows: (1) (2) (3) An over-all uniform one-range increase (5.5%) for all positions except one, with two positions recom- mended for a two-range increase with no change in title and four positions for a one and one-half range increase with also no change in title. A change in title and salary for four positions, as explained below, chiefly to re f lect the increasing responsibilities of these positions. No change for the three top positions of General Manager, Assistant General Manager and Secretary- Director of Finance. We expect to have prepared within the next ninety days recommendations affecting these positions and possibly on other personnel matters for the consideration of the Executive Committee and the Joint Boards. Explanation of Recommendations 1. General Adjustments in Salaries. Our anaylsis of our salary setup as compared with other local public agencies shows that at the present time our schedules are generally one range (5 .5%) or -2- more below the others in most categories, particularly in the labor - ing and secretarial (office) categories . Attached he ret o, as pointed out in t he foregoing is a tabulation showing our recommendations for adjustments in salary which basically are a one-range increase for all positions except one , the greater increases recommended for six positions with no change in title and three for varying increases with change in title, all as explained in the fol lowing section. 2. Positions Recommended for More than One Range Increases but No Change in Title . (a) Construction En ginee r. Th e salary range proposed for the Construction Engineer (52.5) is still somewhat less than paid b y state, county, and local agencies for Senior Engineer , which is a direct l y comparable titl e . As most of the Directors are aware, there is keen competition in re cruiting for engineering positions and an agency which does not pay at least as well as other agencies in the a rea, is chronically handic a pped by a s ho rtage of competent help . (b) Engineering Aide. Our analysis of the Engineering Aid e position as shown on the attached bench mark tabulation shows that this increase is definitely warranted and necessary to retain a qualified employee. The salary range propos ed for Engineering Aide (41) brings this position abreast of similar jobs in other agencies . (c) Administrative and Purchasing Officer . A one and one -half range increase is proposed for this position to reflect the increasing responsibilities of the job with the growth of the orgainization and the vo lume of purchasing and administrative matters to b e handled. (d) Secretary (office ) (3). These three positions are also recommended for a one and one-half range increase to bring their salaries to a somewhat comparable level with similar jobs e lsewhere as shown on the attached bench mark tabulation . 3 . Positions Recommended for More than One Range Increase and Change in Title. (a) Electrical and Mec hanical Supervisor. We are rec ommending that the title of this position be changed to Mainten - ance Superintendent with a salary range increase from 46 to 4H. Both the title change and the salary change are recommended to reflec t more accurately the increasing responsibilities of the j ob. See attached job description . (b) Accountant. We are recommending that the title of this position be changed to Assistant Director of Finance, and the -3- salary range increased from 43 to 47. (The immediate effect of this recommended change is only a two-range salary increase for the employee, in that it will require at least two years before the 5th step of this range can be attained.) The reason for this recommen- dation is that the duties and responsibilities of the job as they have developed in the past two years are much greater than originally conceived . The new title and salary range more nearly reflects the a lready assumed responsibilities of the job and the salary proposed is comparable to other agencies for similar work. See attached job description. (c) Purchasing Clerk. We are recommending that this position title be changed to Assistant Purchasing Officer and salary range increased from 40.5 to 42.5. Again, the reason for this recom- mendation is to more accurately reflect the existing duties of the job as it has developed in our organization. See attached job description. 4. New Positions. Only two altogether new positions are being recommended and they are both in the lower categories. Our stepped up volume of engineering detail requires the addition of one Draftsman position at range 35.5 and the increases in routine office work such as reproduction machine work requires the position of Office Aide which is proposed at $1.90 per hour. Actually, since two positions are being recommended for deletion (see attached tabu- lations), the addition of these two jobs will not result in a net increase in the number of our employees. 5. Miscellaneous Changes. (a) Consolidation of existing positions of Chief Control Center Operator and Chief Plant Operator to one position of Operations Engineer. Our careful study of our plant operating setup shows definitely that these two jobs can be consolidated into one with a net reduction of one position. We are proposing that the new position of Operations Engineer be therefore established at a salary range of 49,5, as opposed to range 44 and 47.5 of the two existing positions. See attached job description. (b) Change in title with no change in duty or salary other than the over-all proposed one range increase. We are pro- posing that the existing job of Maintenance Supervisor at range 44 be changed in title to Assistant Plant Maintenance Supervisor to more accurately reflect the existing duties of the job. See attached job description. Financing of Above Recommendations As previously stated, the Joint Boards budgeted funds ($23,500) for adjustment of salaries for the current fiscal year. -4- This s um , together with salary sav ings accumula t ed f r om un f illed positions, will be more than adequate to cover the abov e described proposed increases in salaries. The total cost of these changes will u e approximately $19,200 for the balance of' the fiscal year . Hence, it can be seen that there are sufficient funds available to provid e for the increased cost to the Districts of the recommended changes . ... 5 - Lee M. Nels on General Manager COUNTY SANITATION DI STRI CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY FILr.D I th-. C' ~"'Cretary Cou r » ;. ( ) strict Dec e'ml1> ~ 3.,--J;-9G§- Boards of Directors County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 Subject: By·~~~~~~~~--- Executive Committee meeting December 1 to con sider employee salary adjustments and personnel changes ' . Your Executive Committee met in the Wedne sday, December 1, 1965 at 3:00 p.m. Cornwell, Chairman, Harvey, Parks, Gruber Hirstein and Lambert. Districts' office on Present were Directors (for Stoddard), Meyers, Others present were Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, Paul G. Brown, Assistant General Manager and Fred A. Harper, Secretary and Director of Finance. Chairman Cornwell presided . The only item of business taken up was the December 1 Manager's Report entitled "Manager's Recommendations for Employee Salary Adjustments and Personnel Changes". A copy of this report is atta ched hereto. The report and each recommendation therein was read and considered item by item . Numerous questions were raised by the Committee members and discussed with the General Manager. It was noted by the Committee that the salary increases recommended in the Manager's Report fall into three general categories: 1 . An over all increase of one salary range for most employee positions. This increase was shown in the Mana g er's report to be justified on the basis of comparable data presented for the benchmark positions of Laborer, Engineering Aide and Secretary (office) and data on other positions. It was agreed this over all type of increase is necessary at this time to mainta in a competi - tLve recruitment position by the Districts. It was recogni z ed that since the staff of t h e Districts is quite small, the loss of any well trained employee, regardless of his position, can be of serious consequence and result in sev ere hampering of operations as well as actual monetary loss through training of new personnel. For these r e asons the Committee recommends this type of salary increase not altogether to maintain a cost of living parity, although this is important, but principally to maintain the existing excellent personnel efficiency b y remaining in a competitive position with other a g encies . 2. Increases of more than one range for six positions. In addition to the one range increase described under No. 1, the Manager's recommendations for additional salary increases for six existing positions were gone over in detail. On the basis of comparative salary data presented, it was agreed that the increases proposed are justified again on the basis of maintaining a competitive position by the Districts in the existing labor market. 3. Changes in title and increases of more than one range. As noted above, the Committee carefully studied all of the changes in this category and agrees that over and above the one range increase described under (1), certain positions, as noted in the attached report, have grown in responsibility and thus are entitled to reclassification and additional salary. After reviewing with the General Manager the duties of the employees in these positions and their qualifications, the Committee agreed that these changes proposed are thoroughly justified. The Committee also noted and agreed with the General Manager's recommendation that consideration of the salaries of the General Manager, Assistant General Manager and Secretary & Director of Finance be postponed until a later meeting. After the above discussions and conclusions, the following formal action was taken: Action It was moved by Director Harvey, seconded by Director Hirstein and unanimously carried that the personnel recom- mendat i ons · contained in the Manager's Report thereon dated December .!, 1965 be approved and that the Committee recommends to the Joint Boards that these recommendations be put into effect at the December-ff, 1965 Joint Board meeting .2x_ means of an amendment to the Districts' Positions and Salaries ResOlution. ----- After further discussion it was moved by Director Hirstein, seconded by Director Parks and unanimously carried that Director Harvey be designated to present the Committee's report on this meeting to the Joint Boards at their December 8, 1965 meeting. The Committee adjourned at 4:15 p.m. -2- Howard Cornwell Chairman 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 1 4 10 OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES -Pa e 1 Existing Positions 11-30-65 Title ·Range I Supt. of Operations Chief Plant Operator ·Elect. & Mech. Supv. Plant Maint. Supv. Maintenance Supv. Trunk Maint. Supv. Chlorination Supv. Construction Engineer Construction Eng. Asst. Construction Inspector Asst. Const. Inspector Engineering Aide Draftsman 51.5 47.5 46 46 44 43 41.5 50.5 45 44 41 39 34.5 I I I I I I I I I I I 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 7 1 1 1 1 1 2 Student Assistant Part Time 1.70-2.00/hrl 4 11 ) Pro osed Positions Title Range Supervisory Group Supt. of Operations 52.5 Operations Engineer 49.5 Maintenance Superin-48 tendent Plant Maint •. Supv. 47 Asst. Plant Maint. Supv. 45 Trunk Maint. Supv. 44 Chlorination Supv. 42.5 Construction Inspection Group Construction Engineer Construction Eng. Asst. Construction Inspector Asst. Const. Inspector Engineering Aide .Draftsman Student Assistant 52.5 46 44 42 41 35.5 Part Time 1.75-2.30/hr Summary of Changes One Range Increase Two Range Increase & Change Title Two Range Increase & Change Title _One Range Increase One Range Increase & Change Title ·one Range Increase One Range Increase Two Range Increase One Range Increase None One Range Increase Two Range Increase Add (l); One Range Increase 30¢/hr Increase (Max.) ~ Rang~_l'l_C> • Monthll Five-SteE Rates Range :No. (1) (2)' {)) (4) (5) 33.5 346 365 385 406 428 33.5 34 355 375 395 417 440 34 ' 34.5 365 385 406 428 452 34.5 35 375 395 417 446· 464 35 35.5 385 406 428 452 476 35.5 36 395 417 ~ 440 '464 489. 36 36.5 406 428 . ; 452 476 502 36.5 37 417 440 : 464 489 516 37 37.5 428 452 476 502 530 '37 .5. ·38 440 464 489 516 545 38 38.5 452 476 ' 502-530 '560· :38.5 39 464 489 . 516 545 575 39 : 39.5 476 502 . 530 560 591 39.5. 40 489 516 : 545 575 608 ~ 40 40.5 502 530 i 560 -591 624 40.5 41 516 545 : 575 608 641 41 '. 41.5 530 560 591 624 659 41.5 .. 42. 545 575 608 641 . 677 42 42.5 560 591 624 659 696 42.5 43 575 608 641 677 715 43 43.5 591 624 659 696 735 43.5 44 608 641 677· 715 755 44 . 44.5 624 659 696 735 776. 44.5 45 641 677 715 755 797 45 45.5 659 696 735 776 819 45.5 46 .· 677 715 755 797 842 46 ,, 46.5 696 735 776 819 865 46.5 47 715 755 797 842 889 47 47.5 735 776 819 865 914 47.5 48 755 797 842 889 940 48 ' . 48.5 776 819 865 914 966 48.5. 49 797 842 889 940 992 49 ~ 49.5 819 865 914 966 1020 49.5 50 842 889 940 ·, 992 1048 50 50.5 865 914 966 1020 1077 50.5 51 889 940 992_ 1048 1107 51 51.5 914 966 1020 1077 1138 51.5 52 940 992 1048 .. 1107' 1170 52 52.5· 966. 1020 •. 1077 .. '1138 .. 1203 52.5_ 53 992 1048 1107 1170 1236 53 53.5 1020 1077 1138 1203 1271 53 5 54 1048 1107 1170 1236 1306' 54 i •, .J~- _,,. l 1 5 8 4 _g 20 1 3 5 5 14 OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES -Page 2 Existing Positions (11-30-65) Proposed Positions Title Range I No. Title Shop Foreman Trunk Maint. Foreman Chief Control Center Operator Control Center Oper. Plant Operator Chlorinator Oper. Operator Trainee Flowmeter Technician Mechanic II Mechanic I ~aintenance. Man II Maintenance Man I ) 42.5 I l 39 .51 3 4 44 I 41.51 38.5 37,51 37,51 40.51 40.5 I 39.51 37.5 5 8 4 2 19 l 3 5 5 36,51 14 Foreman Group Shop Foreman Trunk Maint. Foreman Operators Group Control Center Oper. Plant Operator Chlorinator Oper. Operator Trainee Ma~ntenance Group Flowmeter Technician Mechanic II Mechanic I Maintenance M~n II Maintenance Man I Range 43.5 40.5 42.5 39.5 38.5 38.5 41.5 41.5 40.5 .. 38.5 37.5 Summary of CQ.anges One Range Increase One Range Increase Abolish and combine duties with Opera- tions Engineer One Rang~ Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase Range No. Monthl~ Five-SteE Rates Ran_ge No. (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) 33~5 346 365 385 406 428 33.5 34 355 375 395 417 440 34 34.5 365 385 406 428 452 34.5 35 375 395 417 440 464 35 35.5 385 406 428 452 476 35.5 .;· 36 395 417 440 464 489 36 36.5 406 428 452 476 502 36.5 37 417 440 464 489 516 37 37.5 428 452 476 502 530 37 -38 440 464 489': 516 545 38 38.5 452 476 502 530 560 38.5 39 464 489 516 545 575 39· 39.5 476 502 530 560 591 39.5 40 489 516 545 575 608 40 40.5 502 530 560 591 624 40.5 41 516 545 575 608 641 41 41.5 530 560 591 624 659 41.5 '42 545 575 608· 641 677 42 42.5 560 591 624 659 696 42.5 43 575 608 641 677 715 43 43.5 591 624 659 696 735 43.5 44 608 641 677 715 755 44 44.5 624 659 696 735 776 44.5 45 641 677 715 755 797 45 45.5 659 696 735 776 819 45.5 46 677 715 755 797 842 46 • 46.5 696 735 776 819 865 46.5 47 715 755 797 842 889 47 47.5 735 776 819 865 914 47.5· 48 755 797 842 884 940 48 48.5 776 819 865 91 966 48.5 49 797 842 889 940 992 49 ~ 49.5 819 865 914 966 1020 49.5 50 842 889 940 992 1048 50 ::, 50.5 865 914 966 1020 1077 50.5 51 889 940 992· 1048 1107 51 : : 51.5 914 966 1020 1077 1138 51.5 : 52 940 992 1048 1107 1170 52 52.5 966 1020' 1077 1138 1203 52.5 53 992 1048 1107 1170 1236 53 .. ! .. 53.5 1020 1077 1138 1203 '· 1271 ::. 53 5 ! 54 ' 1048 ,'· 1107 . ·. 1170 1236 . 1306 54' -j ~ ! : : _,.~ . . ~-- ,,, "' ... OPERATIONAL EMPLOYEES -Page 3 Existin Positions 11-30-65 Pro osed Positions No. Title Range No. Title Ran~e :summarl of Changes 23 Laborer 34.s I 23 Laborer 35.5 One Range Increase 1 Janitor -Part Time 1.80/hr Delete Position 52 I 51 I Laboratory Group 1 Research Chemist 45.5 I l Research Chemist 46.5. One Range Increase 1 Chief Lab. Analyst 41.5 1 Chief Lab. Analyst 42.5 One Range Increase 1 Assoc. Lab. Analyst 39.5 I 1 Assoc. Lab. Analyst 40.5 One Range Increase 2 Asst. Lab~ Analyst 35.5 I 2 Asst. Lab. Analyst 36.5 .. One Range Increase 2 Laboratory Aide 34.5 2 Laboratory Aide 35.5 One Range Increase 7 7 100 ---Total Operating Employees 99 ) Range No. Monthll Five-SteE Rates Range No. · (1) .(2) {)) (4) (5) 33.5 346 365 385 406 . 428 33.5 34 355 375 395 417 440 34 34.5 365 385 406 428 452 34.5 35 375 395 417 440 464 35 35.5 385 406 428 452, 476 35.5 . 36 395 417 440 464 489 36 36.5 406 428 452 476 502 36.5 37 417 440 464 489 516 J7 37.5 428 452 476 502 530 37.5 38 440 464 489 516 545 38 38.5 452 476 502 530 560 38.5 39 464 489 516 545 575 39 39.5 476 502 530 560 591 39.5 40 489 516 545 575 608 ,. 40 40.5 502 530 560 591 624 ::. 40.5 41 516 545 575 608 641 ;· 41 41.5 530 560 591 624 659 41.5 42 545 575 608 641 677 42 42.5 560 591 624 659 696 : .42.5 43 575 608 641 677 715 43 43.5 591 624 659 696 735 43.5 44 608 641 677 715 755 : 44 44.5 624 659 696 735 776 44.5 45 641 677 715 755 797 45 45.5 659 696 . 735 776 819 45.5 . . .. 46 677 715 755 797 842 46 " 46.5 696 735 776 819 865 46.5 47 715 755 797 842 889 47 47.5 735 776 819 865 914 47.5 48 755 797 842 889 940. 48 48.5 776 819 865 914 966 48.5 49 797 842 889 940 992 49 49.5 819 865 914 966 1020 49.5 ' ~ 50 842 889 940 992 1048 50 - l~ 50.5 865 914 966 1020 1077 50.5 51 889 940 992 1048 1107 51 51.5 914 966 1020 1077. 1138 51.5 52 940 992 1048 1107 1170 52 52.5 966 1020 1077 .1138 1203 52.5 53 992 1048 1107 1170 1236 53 53.5 1020 1077 1138 1203 1271 53.5 54 1048 1107 1170 1236 1306 54 .. ·' . :~ r~ . i .. ADMINISTRATIVE EMPLOYEES No. 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 2 2 2 15 Existing Positions (11-30-65). Title General Manager Asst. Gen. Manager Range $20,500/yr $18,000/yr Secretary of Dists. & . Director of ·Finance $15,500/yr Administrative & Purchasing Officer Accountant Purchasing Clerk Secretary Senior Steno-Clerk Account Clerk 48.5 43 40.5 36 34.5 34.5 I I I I I I I I I I No. 1 .1 1 1 1 l· 3 2 2 1 Stenographer (Part Time) 2.30/hrf 2 Totals, Administrative Employees--16 115 ---Totals, All Employees ----------115 ) Proposed Positions Title General Manager Asst. Gen. Manager Secretary of Dists. & Director of Finance · Adminis tra ti ve & Purchasing Officer Asst. Director of Finance Asst. Purchasing Officer Secretary. Senior Steno-Clerk Account Clerk Office Aide Range Summary of Change See Text of Report See Text of Report See Text of Report 50 47 42.5 37~5 35.5 35.5 1.90/hr One and one-half Range Increase Four Range Increase & Change Title Two Range Increase & Change Title One and one-half · Range Increase One Range Increase One Range Increase New Position Stenographer {Part Time) 2.30/hr None R~ng_e_ ~o. Monthll Five-SteE Rates (1) (2) {)) . {4) : 33 .. 5 346 365 385 406 ··~ 34 355 375 395 417 34.5 365 385 406 428 35 375 395 417 440 35.5 385 406 428 452 ... 36 395 417 440 464 36.5 406 428 452 476 37 417 .. 440 .464 489 37 .5 . 428 452 476 502 38 440 464 489 516 .. 38.5 452 476 502 530 39 464 489 516. 545 39.5 476 502. 530 560 46 489 516 545 575 40.5 502 530 560 591 41 516 545 575 608 41.5 530 560 591 624 42 545 575 608 641 42.5 560 591 624 659 43 ... 575 608 641 677 43.5 591 624 659 696 44 ~ 608 641 677 715 44.5 624 659 696 735 45 641 677 715 755 45.5 659 696 735 776 46 677 715 755 797 "46.5 696 735 776 819 47 715 755 797 842 47.5 735 776 819 .. 865 48 755 797 842 889 48.5 776 819 :·· 865 .. ·· 914 49 797 842 ..... 889. ·. 940 49.5·. 819 -· 865 914·-966 ~ 50 842 889. :940. ' 992 50.5 865 914· .:966 ·. 1Q20 51 . 8~9 ; 940. , .... ~992 .. :--1948 51.5. 914 966. ·.·1020 . 107-7. 52 940 992 . 1048' . 1107 52.5 966 ~. 1020 . 2077·· . li38 53 992 ; 1048·· 1107 :, 1170 53.5 1020 1077 1138 1203 54 1048 .1107 1170 1236 ::.-:C5) 428 440 452 464 476:-. 489.:· 502 516 530 545 . 560 . 575 591. 608 624 . 641 . 659 677 696 715 .735 755 .776 797 819 842 865 889 914 940 96P 9Q~ ,, 1020 1048 lOt7 : >1107 I ; 1138 . .1170 : 1203 12~6 1271 13Q6 ., '~· I Ran_ge No. "33.5 ,34 34.5 35 35.5 36 ·36.5 37 . '37 .5 38 38.5 39 39.5 40 40.5 41 .41.5 42 42.5 43 43.5 44 :44.5 45 45.5 46 ·46.5 47 47.5 48 48.5 49 49.5 50 . 50.5 51 51.5 52 52.5 53 53.5 54 { ,~ ' November 30, 1965 COMPARISON OF BENCH MARK POSITIONS OF VARIOUS PUBLIC AGENCIES IN ORANGE COUNTY Engineering Laborer Aide County of Orange 428/502 530/659 (2) Santa Ana 420/502 527/635 (3) Anaheim 425/517 556/676 (4) Fullerton 395/481 (1) 517/628 Newport Beach 381/463 510/620 Garden Grove 402/488 537/651 (4) Costa Mesa 336/475 509/717 Huntington Beach 400/505 (1) 554/697 (4) Average 398/491 530/660 SANITATION DISTRICTS Existing 365/452 464/575 Proposed 385/476 516/641 (1) Maintenance Man (2) Engineering Aide III (3) Draftsman (4) Senior Eng. Aide (5) Secretary I (6) Senior Clerk Secretary 476/591 460/552 469/543 405/493 420/510 433/525 386/545 (5) 400/505 (6) 431/533 395/489 428/530 Definition: Duties: Qualifications: OPERATIONS ENGINEER Range 49.5 819 -992 December 1, 1965 Under direction of the Superintendent of Operations, to supervise sewage disposal plant operations, including coordination of chemical and bacteriological control and industrial waste and pollution investigations with operations; and to do related work as required. (1) Schedule, assign and supervise the work of control center operators, plant operators, chlorination supervisor and other plant employeee. (2) To assign and supervise plant control and industrial waste and pollution investigation. (3) To review plant control reports and direct adjustment in processes as necessary. (4) To recommend improvements in mechanical and electrical equipment in plant processes. (5) To consult with Design Engineers and Construc·tion Engineers with respect to future plant expansion. (6) To requisition equipment, materials and supplies required for plant operation and for repair and maintanance as required. (7) Inspect operations to insure adherence to standards and schedules. (8) To keep records and prepare reports. (1) Combination of training and experience equivalent to graduation from college, preferably with specialization in chemical or civil engineering .• (2) Registration, or eligibility fdr regis- tration, with application pending, as a professional engineer in California. OPERATIONS ENGINEER Qualifications: Page 2 (3) Ability to qualify for certification as a Grade I Operator by the California Water Pollution Control Association. (4) Two years of responsible experience in a sewage treatment plant practicing laboratory process control. (5) Thorough knowledge of the principles, practices, equipment and processes of sewage treatment. (6) Knowledge of and ability to interpret and apply information transmitted by automatic controls and measuring devices. (7) Ability to plan and direct work of others and to maintain effective working relations with others. (8) Ability to prepare concise written and verbal reports. Definition: Duties: Qualifications: MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT Range 48 755 -940 December 1, 1965 Under direction of the Superintendent of Operations~ to be responsible for the mainte- nance and repair of all Districts' owned facilities. (1) To supervise the maintenance and repair of all mechanical and electrical equipment and physical structures and all maintenance personnel. (2) To supervise the installation of or altera- tions to the electrical system of the sewage treatment plants and sewage pumping plants. (3) To requisition equipment, materials and supplies for all maintenance operations. (4) To recommend improv.ements in mechanical and electrical equipment in plant and pumping station processes. (5) To consult with Design Engineers and staff with respect to plant and district facilities expansion as to maintenance and operation of new and existing facilities. (6) To keep records and prepare reports. (7) Other related duties as assigned. (1) Graduation from high school. (2) At least five years' experience in a maintenance capacity in a large sewerage installation, at least two years of which must have been in a supervisory capacity. Range 45 641 -797 December 1, 1965 ASSISTANT PLANT MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR Definition: Duties: Qualifications: Under direction of the Plant Maintenance Supervisor, to supervise crews doing mechanical and maintenance work in the treat- ment plants • (1) To plan and lay out plant maintenance jobs and to recommend job plans therefor to Plant Maintenance Supervisor. (2) To assist Plant Maintenance Supervisor 1n routine operations and to act in his place in his absence. (3) To supervise crews assigned to carry out job plans and work orders at the plants. (4) Other related duties as assigned. (1) Equivalent to graduation from high school. {2) At least five years' experience in maintenance work in a large sewage treatment plant or similar installation, at least two years of which must have been in a supervisory capacity. Definition: Duties: Qualifications: Range 47 715 -889 December 1, 1965 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Under direction of the Director of Finance to plan, supervise and perform extensive and complex professional accounting work in the compilation and maintenance of the Districts• accounting records and systems, and related personnel records; and to do other work as required. (1) Supervise and prepare a variety of detailed and factual analytical accounting, statistical, and narrative reports including supporting schedules for integration adjustments and budget preparation. (2) Develops, supervises, and performs mainte- nance of the accounting system for the indi- vidual Sanitation Districts and the Joint Administrative Organization including journals, ledgers, cost and budget systems, and reconciles fund balances with County records. (3) Supervises preparation of all payrolls and related reports and reviews wofk performed by clerical assistants in connection with payroll, personnel records, labor and material coding, original fiscal entries, and claims processing. (4) Supervises sub-professional accounting personnel. (5) Performs other duties as assigned. (1) Any combination of training and experience equivalent to graduation from an accredited college or university with specialization in accounting. (2) Completion of requirements for the Certified Public Accountant's examination. (3) Five years of professional accounting experience. \..,,,1 ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF FINANCE Page 2 Qualifications: (4) Advanced knowledge of general cost, and governmental accounting principles, theories, procedures and systems and local government fiscal operations. (5) Knowledge of advanced accounting and office machines and office methods. (6) Ability to prepare comprehensive financial and statistical reports. Definition: Duties: Qualifications: Range 42.5 560 -696 December 1, 1965 ASSISTANT PURCHASING OFFICER Under direction of the Purchasing Officer and general supervision of the Superintendent of Operations, to be responsible for day to day purchases, keep records thereof and to be responsible for warehouse inventory. (1) To issue, upon requisition, purchase orders for smaller items of warehouse inventory not covered by group purchase orders. (2) To assist the Purchasing Officer in procedures for larger purchases and to do the necessary routine work involved. (3) To recommend to the Purchasing Officer changes in routine procedures for purchasing and to keep current accurate bidder's lists. (1) Equivalent to graduation from high school. (2) Clerical ability, including legible writing and simple arithmetic. Ability to do typing is desirable. (3) At least three years' experience in purchasing work or similar responsibilities. Definition: \._/ Duties: Qualifications: OFFICE AIDE $1.90/hr. maximum December 1, 1965 Under direct supervision to do routine office and housekeeping duties. {l) Operate office reproduction equipment including mimeograph, blueprint and photocopy machines. {2) Ga·ther reproduced material into required form for filing or distribution, which involves use of collating equipment. (3) Prepares and sorts materials for mailing or filing. (4) Perform general housekeeping duties in the Administrative office. (5) Other related duties as assigned. (1) Equivalent to high school education. (2) Knowledge of basic reproduction equipment and filing procedure. (3) Good housekeeping routines. (4) Ability to understand and follow oral and written directions. #6 -The Chair recognized Mr . Harper of the Districts ' staff , !N"'t'~ who reviewed for the Dir ectors the~sewer~ofa ci l ities pro~gsee to be acqui red or constructed by the District under the 1962 bond program in the Tust i n Avenue area~·f-rJ,_, ~ 7-~ c..r-rt..7"' The Chair then recognized Mr. Ca rl Thornton, City Manager , Ci ty of Santa Ana , who distributed to the Directors copies+ ~ rvv.._ I_,{,.....,,.._.. , ""'"' of a letter dated November 1 , 1 965 , which was submitted to t h e A City of Santa Ana Ci ty Co u nci l recommending te tha L b ody that the I ~~ City ~~d:-d reta in ownership of that4f acility in Tustin Aven Ve north of 17th Street . Mr . Thornton verb a lly addressed the Boaid arui--ela:b<?r"ited on the points stressed in his letter of Novem.Pe'i 1 st ~ / ( \J~ ·<{' ~ '<?) \.....-e>l-/J ,.J Ld C... c I t, () ~ cL/-" The Chair the n r ec6gnized Mr . C. Arthur Nisson, the District 's General Co unsel, who advis ed the Board that from I a lega l standpoint ~ facilities must be either buil t or I ~cquired to s erve this portion of the Di strict ~s was a part of the bond program . IJ!he Chair the n I ecogrr!zea Mr . Sidney L . Lowry , of Boyle ~~/ a nd Lowry , Districts ' Engineers , wifm answerecLtques tions of the I8.?ccto~s conc erning tae alternate methods of serving the area in Di strict No . ~w se rved ~ly o f the Ne~ Fr~ Fo llowing a l eng thy d i scussion it was moved, seconded a nd duly carried by the following roll call vote : (show) That the staff ,XRrucxlillf1';engi neers , an~ ~e~eral Counsel / ) ~ -. b e i nstructed to .make aifl: attemptnegot~&~x-:futther with the City of Santa Ana f or the purchase of its sewerage facilities in Tustin Avenue north of 17th Street . J J•J EURTHER MOVED : That , if a firm contract for the purchase of said facility is not negotiated prior to the next regul ar meeting of the Board , the General Counsel is hereby d irected to prepare a ·- Fii .-D In th<' 0 ... J ,i 1• •• cou• • -----No---- Agenda Item No._J§_ Nove~, 1965 RECORD OF MEETING OF SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON NEGOTIATIONS WITH DISTRICT NO. 11 Wednesday, November 17, 1965 -5:00 P.M. ,PJ .s tric t No. 3 Com£!.11.~~ PRESENT: Dj .r e ctor s He wa rd Cornwell (Chairm<'.n), Jim Kanno and No r·man E . Cu.J.ver ABSENT: None Distrtct No. 11 Board of Directors PRESENT: Directors Robert M. Lambert (Chairman) and William Hirstein ABSENT: Director Jake R. Stewart OTHERS: Lee M. Nelson, Paul G. Brown, C. Arthur Nisson, Milo Keith, Sidney L. Lowry, Don Martinson, Conrad Hohener, R. N. Galloway, and Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Boards A meeting of the Special Committee on Negotiations with District No. 11 was held in the Districts' office at the above hour and date for the purpose of discussing with the District No. 11 Board of Directors a possible amendment to the Basic Accommoda- tion Agreement between the Districts expiring January 1, 1966. Beport of the General Man'!_g er. The General Manager reviewed for those in attendance, the Basic Accommodation Agreement dated December 14, 1960, between Districts Nos. 3 and 11 which was entered into to provide temporary s e werage service for a portion of District No. 3 by using District No. 11 facilities. At the time the agree- ment was executed, it was anticipated that within a period of five years, District No. 3 would have constructed its own facilities to serve this area of the District. This portion of the District has been developing rapidly and all the local sewerage facilities are designed to connect into the existing facilities of District No. 11. Verbal Report of District No. 11 Enz1._neers. At the October 27th meeting of District No. 11, the engineers were directed to pre- pare an Engineer's Report outlining the immediate needs of District No. 11, with recommendations as to required facilities. Mr. Milo Keith of Lowry and Associates, engineers for Dis- trict No. 11, reviewed for the Committee members and the Directors of District No. 11 the suppl e mental s e werag e fac i lities n e eded in the immediate future to serve the northe rn p orti on of District No . 11 and the southwestern area of District No . 3 b eing s e rve d thr ough the District No. 11 sewer system. Mr. Keith sugg ested that since it is no t now e conomically feasible for District No. 3 to build facilit ies to serve the a r ea now being served by District No. 11, District No . 3 should consider the acquisition of permanent capacity rights in that p o rtion o f the District No. 11 system. Concurrently with this, to relieve the overloaded conditions in the northerly portio n of District No. 11, that District should: 1. Acquire capacity rights in District No. 3 1 s Mille r-Holder Trunk Sewer from approximately Slater Street south to Treatment Plant No . 2. 2. Construct a n e w pumping station in the vicinity of Go lden- west and Slater and other facilities necessary to discharge into the Miller-Holder Trunk Sew e r. Mr. Keith said that the e ng inee r's report now being pre - pared will includ e some alternate methods of relieving the District No. 11 system. However, he said it is quite apparent that District No. 3 should acquire permane nt capacity rights in the present Dis- trict No. 11 facilities and that District No . 11 should acquire in the very near future, at least t e mporary capacity rig h ts in the Mill e r-Holder Trunk Sewer from Slater south. Th e Engineer's Re port will develop cost figures wh ich will e nable the Directors of both Bo a rds to arrive at definite conclusions. Committee Action Recomme n ding Ext e nsion o f Ba sic Ac commoda- tion Agreement. Following a lengthy discussion by the Di strict No. 11 Board members and the Committee, it was moved by Director Kanno and seconded by Director Culver a n d· carried: Tha t t h e Co mm itt ee rec ommend to the Di s tri c t No . 3 Board , t ha t t h e e xis ting Ba s i c Ac comm odat ion Ag r eeme nt b e tw ee n Distri c ts Nos . 3 a nd 11 be e xtended by · an am e n dm e nt unt i l s u c h .time as a f or mal a g r eeme nt can be wo r ke d ou t to e x c hange o r p ur c has e p e rmane nt capacity rights in e ach other's facilities to the mutual bene fit of both Dis t ricts. Mr. Keith p o inte d out that District No. 11 doe s not have ade quate financing available to construct the facilities neces sary to relieve the overtax ed facilities in the nor t h e rn portion o f District No. 11, and that it will be n e cessary to borrow funds to accomplish the construction required at this time. -2- -- Committee Action Recommending Construction Loan to District No. 11. Following a discussion concerning the financing of the facilities needed immediately in the northern portion of District No. 11 and the future requirements in the southwesterly portion of District No. 3, it was moved by Director Culver and seconded by Director Kanno and carried: That the Committee recommend to its Board of Directors that District No. 3 lend sufficient funds to District No. 11 toward construction of facilities which will ulti- mately b e nefit both Districts. -3- Howard Cornwell Chairman "\.w,I EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR JOINT MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. l,2,3,5,6l7 and 11 (ORANGE COUNTY• CALIFORNIAJ A regular joint meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sani- tation Districts Nos. 1 1 2 0 3 1 5, 6 0 7 and ll(of Orange County, California)'-was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m. DecembQr 8th, 19.§2.., 1084q Ellis Ave., Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each of the Boards or Directors. .. ---.. --- ALL DISTRICTS Authorizing reimburse- ment to the General Manager tor expenses Moved, seconded and duly carried: Th.at reimbursement to the General Manager for meals, lodging and incidental expenses incurred during a stopover in C cago, Illinois, for a conference with the officials of Orend , Inc., relative to Job No. P2-7A, and an inspection of the C cago Sanitary District facilities, while en route to the ater Pollution Control Federation conference in Atlantic City, New Jersey as authorized Septem- ber 9, 1965, is hereby approved; and, That reimbursement to t e General Manager in the total amount of $103.45 is hereby au horized. \ STATE OF CALIFORNIA) ) ss. COUNTY OF ORANGE ) Ia FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of each of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6 1 7 and ll(of Orange County, California)~ do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record in this office taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Boards of Directors on the 8th day of December, 196~ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 13th day of December a 1962..._. ~O. ~§iu~ Secretary or each of theards of Directors of County Sanitation Dis- tricts Nos. 1 1 2, 3, 51 6, 7 and 11 ~ Just mail the !lti:N discussion to me tonight! I wouldn't start the minutes before Monday anyhow. Jean. Q A~c i-.J~~u / / 1J,7 ~ ~ _0..._~ ~ IJ MEMO FROM THE OFFICE OF FRED A. HARPER SECRETARY OF DISTRICTS & DIRECTOR OF FINANCE PHONE 962-2411 OF THE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS P .O . BOX 5175 -10844 ELLIS AVENUE FOUNTAIN VALLEY, CALIFORN I A 92708 .. . Decem r 8th Jt . Mt g . ~,.... Gruber --Chairman pro tern °} ..::J #11 -Report of the Joint Ch airman -Direc tor Gruber o f ~wp ort Beach inf ormed the Boards of M the retirement of Director Jamep Steddard accordingly, from the Newport Beach City Council, and saese~aeBt±y, i s retirement from the Sanitation Districts ' Boards . Fo llow ing a brief discussion by the ~ire tors rela tive t ~ the many services rendered the Di~tr i cts by Directo~ Stoddard, it un ~··' ' was moved, s econded and N~ carried : .'firaxx:hlie -GeBer l-GeaBse± That the Board s of Directors HN~N adopt Reso lution o . 65-213 as retiring a resolution of comme n dation t o/Director Stoddard1 the Genera l Counsel b e direc t ed to prepa re an appropri a te resolu #1 4 -The Chair r ec o gni zed Dire ctor Harvey who repo for the ~ Execu tive Committee on ~heir recommendations fo r sa adjus tments and personnel reclassifications of the Joint Administra ive Or g ani zation . Di rector Harvey advi sed the Boards that a t the Execbtive Co mmittee meeting held December 1st, the Committe e approved a nd reco~ended for adoption the personnel reclassification5and ;alary a dju s tme ts recommended in the rc:7 Manag er 's Re port to the Di re c tors zf December 3rd, 1965. Foll owing a f urther discussion of t he recommendations, it was moved seconded a nd duly carried : Th at the rep prt of the Committ ee be approved , received and ordered f iled;l a n d , That th e Bo a r ds of Direc tor s adopt R solution etc ., e tc. \ ~xe cutive No . 65 -20 1, #21-B MS&DC : That the Ge nera l Manager b e di rected to have the Sani tation ,..fd Districts1 vehicles a;is s i gne d~~n a ppropriat e designation, indicating that the vehicl es are the property o f the Sanitation Di stricts . ;/. ,: ;' ,." #34 -The Chairman of ~k.K Dis~ ,"Ct No. 2 announced the appointment to the I ;, , I Special Finance Committee o / ·rectors Cornwell, Speer, Hock, Schutte and Parks, and called a m ~1ng of the Committee to be held at 7:30 p.m., /;' 1965,A at the ,f~ge City Hall Engineering Department. l January 5, #38 -The Chair ;tfu.. discussions and I District No. 11,, (~torJ'lllr'!WV as follo'Qs: Director Culver who reviewed ~~--D:ficG-tm::s of the Special Cammi ttee on Jl.egotiations ~th outlined the Committee's recommendations, 1. That the xisting Basic Accommodation Agreement between Df stricts 3 and 11 be extended by an amendment til such time as a formal agreement can be wor ed out to exchange or purchase permanent capacity ri hts in each other's facilities to the mutual bene it of both Districts. 2. That Distric No. 3 lend to District No. 11 sufficient f ds toward construction of facilities which will ul ·mately benefit both Districts It was then MS&DC: the Special Committee be approved, received and the recommendations contained in said report be adop, (Then sh@w adoption of resolution authorizing amendment, etco (Item 39) ----- #43 MS&DC: That the Construction Company, one-half hours per day the restricted working (Contract No~ 3-10), be dated November 15, 1965, from H. E. Johnson ~ ai&r':!-: uesting extra compensation for~delay of two and m October 28, through Nevember 10, 1965, due to by the State Division of Highways permit ordered fiJfil. The Chair then recognized the District~s Assistant General Manager, and Mr. Conrad Hohen r, representing the District's engineers, \ who reviewed for the Directors\the conditions set forth in the State \ Di vision of Highways .woaaJs i ~ pel.,mi t which was issued .te the Contractor. Following a discussion by the member Board, it was MS&DC: That the staff and the engineers to negotiate the adjustment of stand-by time claimed by Contractor because of the restrictions imposed ~ by the State \ Highways. Said .At<' \.-1 adjustments/) subject to ratification by Board. #60 -Following the written report of the~~ General Counsel concerning his ne tiations with the @ity~ Santa Ana~for purchase of the r north of Seventeenth Street, and a lengthy discussion by the Direct"rs, it was MS&DC: That this matter be carried over to 4:00 and that representatives of the City be invited to a full discu the Board concerning the acquisition of the City's Tusti Avenue Sewer by the District. #7 Other Business --The engin er for Assessment District No. 6 presented to the B©ard a petition from e even property owners requesting that their properties be included in Asse sment District No. 6 to provide local ·) ~ sewers,.:in bheir area.. It was .b>t ~~~-~ tVJ-- {/ i::s not now in the sanitatien d ointed out by the engineer that ~~ strict as 1~~Jile¥tie>1 · ;i,A q>~es~ were withdrawn from the District in 1961 (Crawford Canyon -Exclusion #6). Following a brie discussion by the Directors it was moved, seconded and duly carri d: That the matter be referred to the staff f®r study and recommendation t the Boardo ... 11 11 l 2 3 4 5 61 7i sl gl 10 ll 121 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 (~' 22 • ! /, ) ' 23 \ 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ·32 LAW OFFICES OP' I RIMEl.. HARVEY 8c 11 HELSING FOURTH FLOOR fOIO NORTH MAIN ST. II SANTA ANA, ,, ...... ~,.;•1111 9'3701 A~enda Item No. 52"" JI ~. .i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A ·~ MINUTES FOR CONTINUED HEARING ON ASSESSMENT December 8, 1965 8: 30 o'clock p. m. I The Secretary advised the Board of Dir~,ctors that this is the time i and place to which the original hearing schedulec;l for 7: 00 o'clock p. m. on December 2, 19~5, was continued because of aJ;?sence of quorum at the time set for the original hearing. The Secretary further advised the Board that the notice of original hearing was given in th~· manner and form required by law and that the continuance of said hearing 1to this date was noticed in the manner and form required by law. The hearing mentioned above is tJi e hearing in the matter of the construction of certain sanitary sewers a,hd appurtenances and appurtenant I work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. f{-A" in this sanitation district, as I contemplated by Resolution of Intention,1No. 64-114-7, adopted by this Board of Directors on August 12, 1964, as arp.ended by Resolution No. 64-179-7, adopted by this Board of Directors on December 3, 1964. The Secretary also informed the said Board of Directors that affi- davits of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assess- ment were on file in his office, and that written appeals or objections ---- had been filed in his office prior to the date set for the hearing by: The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered filed. The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons present desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following persons then addressed the Board of Directors: -1- -&· l 2 3 4 ii I' q 1. !j Ii 11 1, 5j I 6' 7 8 9 io 1-1 12 ..t'i :r--..., 01 • ~ 13 All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show 14 cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections pre- g.s j sented having been heard and fully co6sidered, it was thereupon moved ;l6 ; +1 t,a 19 ~~I 22 ~·:' : >_.; ~5 2sj I 27 28 31 "32 I 1' LAW OFFICES OP' 1'' ti MEL. HARVEY & !i HELSING FOURTH FLOOR >10 NORTH MAIN ST. Ii' SANTA ANA. . r'ORHIA G.2.701 by Director th~t all objections, appeals and protests, -------------------- both oral and written, be overruled and denied. Said motion was seconded / by Director / and carried by the following roll call vote: ------------~----- AYES: Directors NOES: Dire<fors _______________________________ _ ABSENT: Direbtors -2- !I ,, q ... II "',; 11 .. Ii I! II 11 2 The Board of Directors now being sati ied with the correctness of ' ( h : I . '-·-'~ --\ ... c · that --------------~ the assessment and diagram, it was moved 31 said assessment and diagram, together w· h the proceedings, be confirmed 4 and approved and that the Engineer of ork shall forthwith attach a warrant 5 to said assessment bearing the date this order of the Board of Directors, \ .... 6 and carried by the ------------------which motion was seconded by Dire 7 following roll call vote: 8 ~9 10 I 111 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21jl 221 231 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 321 I UW OFP'IC:ES OP' Ill UMEL.. HARVEY & I HEL.SING I: FOURTH P'LOOR )10 NORTH MAIN GT. SANTA ANA. I' · ...... ,..OhHIA 02701 'I AYES: Directors ..._ ____________________________ __ NOES: ABSENT: -3-(if no changes) ~ :; :1 •' lj I ~ If . ,i ,; II 'I l I 21 31 411 sll I i 61 I I I 711 I 8 91 10 I I ll i 12 131 141 151 16 17 18 I • I 19 20 21 22 I I 23 I 24' 251 26 27 28 29 I 30 31 I I I s2 !I 11 LAW OFFICES OP' I RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSiNG FOURTH FLOOR 010 NORTH MAIN &T. SANTA ANA, .# . . . A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No. , " entitled ----- as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI- FORNIA, CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT ON THE lOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 1965, TO COVER THE STTMS DUE FOR THE WORK AND IMPROVE- MENT CONSISTING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANI- TARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN riASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A" IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 64-114-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 64-179-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE FACE THEREON IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH, 11 was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director that said Resolution No. ---~~-b-e_a_d_o_p_t_e_d_, ....;and the same was adopt~ the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors ------------------------------~--- NOES: Directors ----------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors -----------~------------------------ The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for ____ minutes to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. ----- The Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as cor-, rected and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set forth in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors ---- now being satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as I corrected and modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director 1 that said assessment and diagram, as corrected and modifie ~--------~--I together with the proceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Enginee . of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant to said assessment bearing· the date of this order of the Board of Directors, w~ch motion was seconded by Director ________ ,. and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ABSENT:· Directors -3a-(to be used if corrected) ii r ~· I r .. ' I I I II l 2 3 4 51 61 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OP RIMEL. HARVEY & HELSING FOURTH FLOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. 11 , SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 , I COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 MINUTES IN RE HEARING ON ASSESSMENT ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A The Secretary advised the Board of Directors that this is the time and place fixed, pursuant to statute and notice given, for the hearing in the matter of the assessment for the work and improvement consisting of the construction of certain sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A" in this sanitation district, as contemplated by Resolution of Intention No. 64-114-7, adopted by this Board of Directors on August 12, 1964, as amended by Resolution No. 64-179-7, adopted by this Board of Directors on December 3, 1964. The Secretary also informed the said Board of Directors that affi- davits of the mailing, posting and publication of the Notice of Filing Assess - ment were on file in his office, and that written appeals or ------ objections had been filed in his office prior to the date set for the hearing by: The said written appeals or objections were then read and ordered filed. The Chairman then asked if there were any interested persons pre- sent desiring to be heard in the above mentioned matter. The following per- sons then addressed the Board of Directors: -1- 'i 11 ~ I' ·I Ii r I I l 2 3 4 51 61 7 8 ·9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 ~2 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL. HARVEY & I HELSING I II FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA. CALIFORNIA 92701 .... -- All persons interested having been given full opportunity to show cause why said assessment should not be confirmed and all objections pre- sented having been heard and fully considered, it was thereupon moved by Director that all objections, appeals and protests, ~----~------~----- both oral and written, be overruled and denied. Said motion was seconded by Director and carried by the following roll call vote: -----------~~-----~ AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors -2- ,-... The Board of Directors now being satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, it was moved by Director that ~---~~~~~~ said assessment and diagram, together with the proceedings, be confirmed 4 and approved and that the Engineer of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant 5 to said assessment bearing the date of this order of the Board of Directors, 6 which motion was seconded by Director and carried by the ~--~--~~------- 7 following roll call vote: al' 911 q io I 111 121 131' 14 15 16 17 I 18 19 20 2111 221 231 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 °32 LAW OFFICES OF II, RIMEL. HARVEY & 'I HELSING FOURTH FLOOR SOSO NORTH MAIN GT. I SANTA ANA, ! CALIP'OnNIA 92.701 ,I AYES: Directors ~--~~~--~--~~----------~~ NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors -3-(if no changes) I I J -I I I I I I 11 l 2 31 4 5 6! I I 71 I 81 91 10 I 11 i 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 I 24' 2s I I 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OP' RIMEL, HARVEY & HEL.SING FOURTH FLOOR I 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. II SANTA ANA, CALtrorir-z•A P2701 .. A resolution to be numbered "Resolution No. '' entitled as follows: "A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALI- FORNIA, CORRECTING AND MODIFYING THE ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM MADE AND FILED BY THE ENGINEER OF WORK OF SAID DISTRICT ON THE lOTH DAY OF NOVEMBER , 1965, TO COVER THE STTMS DUE FOR 'l'HE WORK AND IMPROVE- MENT CONSISTING OF THE CONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN SANI- TARY SEWERS AND APPURTENANCES AND APPURTENANT WORK IN "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 5-A" IN SAID SANITATION DISTRICT, AS CONTEMPLATED BY RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 64-114-7, AS AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NO. 64-179-7 OF SAID DISTRICT; AND ORDERING AND DIRECTING THE ENGINEER OF WORK TO AMEND AND MODIFY THE SAID ASSESSMENT AND DIAGRAM ON THE FACE THEREON IN ACCORDANCE HEREWITH," was thereupon presented to the Board of Directors for its consideration, after which it was moved by Director , seconded by Director ___ -i that said Resolution No. be adopted, and the same was adopted by the .following roll call vote: AYES: Directors ---~--------~------~--------------- NOES: Directors -------------------------------------- ABSENT: Directors ------------------------------~----- The hearing upon said assessment was thereupon recessed for minutes --- to permit the Engineer of Work to make the corrections and modifications in the assessment and diagram as directed by said Resolution No. ----- The Engineer of Work thereafter returned the assessment and diagram as cor- rected and modified under the order and direction of the Board of Directors as set forth in said Resolution No. , and the said Board of Directors ---- now being satisfied with the correctness of the assessment and diagram, as corrected and modified by their instructions, it was moved by Director that said assessment and diagram, as corrected and modifie -------- together with the proceedings, be confirmed and approved and that the Enginee of Work shall forthwith attach a warrant to said assessment bearing· the date of this order of the Board of Directors, wh~ch motion was seconded by Director _______ ~, and carried by the following roll call vote: AYES: Directors NOES: Directors ABSENT: Directors -3a-(to be used if corrected) /_ ) '... ) .._:, >~ ~"11\ '4~:~ r -r: \.. -v...., -r-J T( \ \_. -r-~ t. "1 "'J?' l<i '? I -.f'_, }~'-' ,L...,, I-., .-'If . j+ ..... ... I , + t-"t" +- + + + t + + + + t + + + + .. + t t + + + t , ,.:_:, J 1, I >.p) tl !.?#. ? l;' -a 1?J'i .~5 ,·~"":.; . I'~ ., .. -i:'.) 4 i-A'-??<1??2' ~ '~,i·!..i;1;? .~ .... ,1 ... ,1.,~~t 2;11 ~1::1 l)~·.1 .\ ! J ~)/'A.; I I , I + + + + + + + + I t I + + I f f + + + t t I + + + r + + r + + + + + + t .. + I t + + t [ t t + + t r + . 0 MILLER;NISSON 8 KOGLER CLARK MILLER · TELEPHONE C. ARTHUR NISSON NELSON KOGLER ATTORNEYS AT LAW 2014 NORTH BROADWAY SANT~ ANA, CALIFORNIA 92706 FILE'D st2-:-f!l771 In· the Office of the Secre ary County S<rnitation District MEMORANDUM TO: Directors of county sanitation District No. 7 of Orange County FROM: c. Arthur ·Nisson. BACKGROUND 0 No--------- December 8, 1965 SUBJECT: Acquisition of Existing sewer Line in Tustin Avenue North of 17th Street from the City of Santa Ana The only remaining work to be done that was described in the engineering report .. of November, 1961, as modified,. · is the construction or acquisition of a sewer line extending northerly from a point below 17th Street in Tustin Avenue approximately 300 feet northerly to its intersection with Fairhaven Avenue. The City of Santa Ana has a 12 inch sewer line in Tustin Avenue in the area described extending about 600 feet northerly of Santa Clara Avenue. This sewer was constructed.by the City of Santa Ana subsequent to the adoption of the engineering report and substantially after the passing of the bond issue approving the engineering report. Various requests to.the City of Santa Ana regarding ac- quisition of this sewer by the District have been made since it was constructed beginning back as .far as 1962. Each time the city manager asked for more time to consider the matter. 'Finally, at your direction, I wrote the City Council of the City of Santa Ana on October 5, 1965, formally requesting acquisition of the sewer line. After considerable delibera- tion and after I had appeared before the Council on November 15 and explained the matter at length, the City, upon recommendation of its manager, refused to sell this sewer line to· the District. LEGAL DUTIES OF THE DISTRICT By reason of the existing engineering report which became binding upon the District when the bonds were passed by the voters of the District,· it is the legal responsibility of the District to either acquire this line or build another line substantially paralleling this already existing facility. I haye discussed with the District engineers whether some modification could be made to the report which would provide substantially the same service to this area of the District. I was informed that nothing short of building a duplicate line in this area would be a reasonable modification of · the report. RECOMMENDATION In that it seems wasteful to build a new sewer paralleling an already existing sewer which sewer would be designed to serve that area which the existing sewer is now capable of serving, I believe an attempt should be made to acquire this sewer by eminent ·domain proceedings against the City of Santa Ana. While the law is not entirely clear on this subject, the basic premise ·of the power of a public agency to acquire property from another public agency is that the condemning agency must show that their use is a more necessary public use than that to which the property is already devoted. I believe that such a showing can be made · in this situation because the sewer as owned by the City of Santa Ana can be used only by that territory that is within the City's limits of the City of Santa Ana. If the sewer is acquired by the District, .those users of it new within the City of Santa Ana will not have any change in their existing service and additionally those people within the District not now in the City of Santa Ana may use the sewer without being required to annex to the City of Santa Ana. It is c~ear that if, for example, the City of Orange were seeking to acquire thi. s line for the purpose c£. serving its inhabitants it could not acquire it from the City of Santa Ana for this purpose because these would be essentially competing services and if Orange were allowed to acquire the line then it could exclude those portions of the City of Santa Ana now being serv·ea by the line. In the case of the Sanitation District acquiring the line, the existing properties served by the line will continue to be served and additional properties not now capable of using the line can acquire the right to use the line. 2. -~ ACTION REQUIRED If the Board desires to follow my recommendation, a resolution authorizing condemnation of the line as needed to comply with the engineering report will have to be passed by 2/3 of all of the members on the District's Board. Respectfully submitted, General Counsel 3. ·.....,_; ~·: ROLL CALL Time/(,' V District __ ~~~:;;;;.::;;-~__,-----­ Regular ~ Adjourned _____________ __ DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS Harvey, H. ~ Mc Michael Meyers v c Farnsworth Miller v Mack Am Hirstein v:::: Allen Bou man Thompson Call ns Kanno DISTRICT 2 Cook Gruber Parks v Hileman Crapo Shull Callens v-Kanno Culve Cornwell ~, Farnsworth Furman De Vries Crapo ~ Shull Gruber Elder Culver ~ Harvey, • McMichael Harvey, H. v Mc Michael Hock Michel Hock ,__./ Michel Johnson Antich Schutte v-' Krein Kanno Callens Speer ~ Harvey, C. Lambert Shipley Workman zQueyrel Long Bell Hirstein Allen Meyers DISTRICT 3 Miller Cornwell Farnsworth Nescher Gumm.ere ,,_ Parks Hileman Amo v"' Schutte Krein Bousman v Thompson Shipley Welch Crapo ~ Shull Speer Harvey, C. Culver .....-- Stewart Furman ~· De Vries Stoddard Harvey,H. 1L McMichael Workman Johnson ~ Antich Wright Kanno ~ Callens Hirstein Long ,,.......-Bell Nescher v" Gwnmere Schutte ~ Krein Shipley ,_,,,,,--Welch OTHERS: Speer ...........-Harvey, c • Wright V' Noe ...,../ Nelson flL'Pc£1.{ Hirstein .~/ Allen Brown ~ {.L-, ~-~~ n '-Nisson .._../ DISTRICT 5 Galloway a__ \, ' ,.· ....... \....,. Stoddard ~ j)p' .. } . , c_i.,,\. Dunn .............. r~i:~ Gruber ~ Elder Tremblay v: Hirstein ~ Allen Lowry 7 Carlson ._.._...... 0'.'-).v DISTRICT 6 ~"~~/ Meyers , ...... / ,,. Gruber ~ Elder "' , I~ ..,.£ ci.~ Hirstein ............... Allen w~.~ DISTRICT T .lv~"" () U :~e._ U 7 ~ Hirstein v/ Allen ~ -I+ J .__.....-Cook ,,............-Gruber ' '"o/ i~'-V~ Harvey,H. ..._....--McMichael ~~~ w~ c..---Meyers 7 Miller Mack Parks ~-Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lambert ~ Shipley Stewart v Hirstein ;:;:/ Allen Ji R 0 LL CALL District -------Regular ------- Date---fii{J~OL~...;....(. _i:::::.....-a_d:_-___ _ Adjourned ------- Time ---- Item ----------------------------------~ ~--~---1-o \ JOINT BOARDS Cornwell Amo Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Nescher Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Hirstein OTHERS: Nelson Brmm Nisson Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson v Farnsworth ...........- .,.........., Thompson .........---Kanno t:::: Gruber ~ ; Shull t::::::' ~ De Vries ;;; -Elder McMichael 7 Michel c;i_... Antich v Callens V"' Shipley ~ Bell ._../" v" ?' Gummere 7 Hileman v Krein t:::::" Welch bl. Harvey, C. a/ ~ru•-' .,., ~ Queyrel v ,,,.Noe 7 Allen DISTRICT 8 Martin Mitchell Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 1 Harvey, H. McMichael Meyers Miller Mack Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 2 Parks Hileman Callens Kanno Cornwell Farnsworth Crapo Shull Culver Harvey, H. McMichael Hock Michel Schutte Krein Speer Harvey, C. Workman Queyrel Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 3 Cornwell Farnsworth Amo Bousman Thompson Crapo Shull Culver Furman De Vries Harvey,H. McMichael Johnson Antich Kanno Callens Long Bell Nescher Gwnmere Schutte Krein Shipley Welch Speer Harvey, c. Wright Noe Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Allen Cook Gruber Harvey,H. McMichael Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lambert Shipley Stewart Hirstein Allen _,.""\.. , -:'lo R 0 L L CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time Ite~ DISTRICT 1 ffe~ ~V\)--x ;\.:,J 1,;.... JOINT BOARDS Harvey, H. McMichael Meyers Cornwell v Farnsworth Miller Mack Amo v:: Hirstein Allen Bousman ~~ Thompson Callens ~,; Kanno DISTRICT 2 Cook v _. Gruber Parks Hileman Crapo "' .... ....-Shull Callens Kanno Culver V-Cornwell Farnsworth Furman v-De Vries Crapo Shull Gruber ~, Elder Culver Harvey,H. V"' McMichael Harvey, H. McMichael Hock ~ Michel Hock Michel Johnson c~ Antich Schutte Krein Kanno V' Callens Speer Harvey, C. Lambert ~ ..... Shipley Workman Queyrel Long ~-Bell Hirstein Allen Meyers v DISTRICT 3 Miller -=:::::::/ Cornwell Nescher v Gummere Farnsworth Parks v ...... Hileman Amo Schutte V' Krein Bousman Thompson Shipley ~ Welch Crapo Shull Speer v Harvey, C. Culver Stewart v / Furman De Vries Stoddard c.-,_ Harvey,H. McMichael Workman ~ Queyrel Johnson Antich Wright _.,., Noe Kanno Callens Hirstein v~ Allen Long Bell Nescher Gummere Schutte Krein Shipley Welch OTHERS: Speer Harvey, c. Wright Noe Nelson Hirstein Allen Brown Niss on DISTRICT 5 Galloway Stoddard Dunn Gruber Elder Tremblay Hirstein Allen Lowry Carlson DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen ,, , I . , c'/-/,,) ' .......... #__.....:--·-'--·~, DISTRICT 7 V'' Hirstein ~~ Allen v- v-Cook ~-Gruber ..............- v Harvey,H. ~ McMichael v .,,--Meyers ~ ~· ----Miller ~ Mack v/' V"' Parks Hileman ~ DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambert Shipley Mitchell Stewart Hirstein Allen Hirstein Allen