Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-06j I II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Co unt y Sanitati o n Districts P. 0. Box 5175 o f Ora nge Co unty , Ca liforn ia 10844 El lis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA JUNE 9, 1965 AT 8:00 P.M. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11 ) (12) Roll C 11 Appoin ~ment s of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary DISTRick 3 Consid€ration of motion re: Receive and file excerpt from the City of Buena Park, showing election of mayor and ap ointment of an alternate 1 Conside ation of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held May 12th, 1965, as mailed, and the adjourn d regular meeting held June 2nd, 1965 ~· tA ,., ~ ) , \..;.;:- DISTRICT 2 ,. Consider~tion of motion re: App r oval of minutes of the 6 \ .. \~ regular eeting he l d May 12th, 19 5, as mai l ed 'VV DI STRICT 3 ' ~~ Consider ~t ion of motion re: Approval of minutes of the -:f.rlY ~ regular mret ing held May 12th, 1965, as mailed Cl' ~u DI STRICT 5 , l~~~ Consideratiion of motion re: Approval of minutes of the ;Y'~u~ regular meeting held May 12th, and the adjourned regular J;Jv meeting he ~d May 24th, 1965, as mailed ~ DISTRICT 6 \ of the ~ J\ .. µJ Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes "N{; regular meet~ng held May 12th, 1965, as mailed \~A DISTRICT 7 _e'\v' Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the "4t.h 1 , v ,}./ regular meeti~g held May 1 2th, 1965, as mailed, and the /"{~ adjourned regular meeting he l d June 2nd, 1965 DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of regular meeting held May 12th, 1965, as mailed , and adjourned regular meeting held June 3rd, 1965 ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Re po rt of the ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Manager the 1 .. >V the r~/ • ' ( 15) ( 16) ALL DISTRICTS ittee on Joint Operating and (Written report attached to Report of the Executive Co Joint Construction Budget . budgets, in folders) ALL DISTRICTS \L.r- Consideration of roll c vote motion re: Approval of ~ MJ'-l~yh Joint Operating Budget 1965 -66. (Copy of budget in ~ j.JV,\ folders) 1 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote motion r~: Approval of A~~~ ~oint Construction Budget for 1965-66. (Copy of~ budget O~\tyV ~-§,,:b~~o-lde~s) ~ ~~V-X\ (18) ALL DISTRICT S (19) (20) (21) (22) (23) (24) Consideration of Resolution No . 65-86 r e : Approving and \ ) ~ adopting plans and specifications for Job No. J-5-E ~,,J"" ~,V (Instrumentation -1965).; and authorizing advertising ;. .. ,t<~~' for bids. See page 11 F I -r' tr ALL DISTRICTS \.J~ Consideration of motion re: Authorizing increase in the I y· vv1- maximum amount payable to Osborne Testing Laboratories / J~~. ,.>{ to $8,000.00, for pipe testing for Contract No. I-6-1 O \._:y \ (Addition to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline) ALL DISTRICTS ) Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order #3 \_ to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-7-l \ .,.f!\~~ (Installation of Steam Trubine at Plant No. 2), authorizing 1 ,,., ~i'\}'"' an addition of $842 .17 to the contract with John Ward (a· Company, Contractor. See page 11 G11 ~ ALL DISTRICTS \ J, ~ Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order #4 l~,Jf~j:r· to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-7-l ~~ (Installation of Steam Trubine at Plant No. 2), authorizing an extension of time of 115 day s to John Ward Company , Contractor. See page 11 H11 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No . 65-87 re: Accepting Job No . P2-7-l as completed,, and authorizing execution of a Notice of Completion of Work (John Ward Company, Contractor). See page "I" ').; ~ .......... v.,:,...,... > ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-1 (Addition to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge Faciltties Pipeline), authorizing change in the method of payment to the contract with Vinnell Corporation, Contractor, for extra grave l fill. See page 11 J 11 ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Receive and file written certification of the General Manager that he has checked all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in order, and that he recommends authorization for payment -2- • (25) ( 26 ) (27) (28 ) ( 29) (30) (31) (32 ) (33) (34) (35 ) (36 ) (37 ) J ALL DISTRICTS I Consideration of roll call vote motion re: Approval of Joint Operating Fund and C ~ital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant re g is ters for sign ture of the Chairman of District No . lJ and author zing payment of claims . See pages "A , 11 B11 , and 'c" I Other business and communications , if any ALL DISTRICTS DISTRICT 1 ~. Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -88-1 re: Receive and ~N1 )(11~/ file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding ~\ contract fo r Addition to Plant No . 1 Effluent Dis c harge · v~ Facilities -Structures, Job No . I-6-2, to Vinnell ~~ Corporation in the total am ount of $172,800.00 . See ~, page "K" (See page K-2 for bid tabulation) DISTRICT 1 Cons id See DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Adjournment Thursday, July 1st (Bid opening for Job motio DISTRICT 3 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICT 3 Considerat ion DISTRICT 5 Conside ration See page "D" DISTRICT 5 Other bus iness of motion re: Adjournment of motion re: Approval of warra n ts, i f ./ / any ·--V ·x. '. j' f'l ~ (38 ) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: -3 - • .. (39) DISTRICT 6 Consi at ion Se age 11 E11 (40) DISTRICT 6 Other business and communications, if any 1 ( """'~ -~ (41) DISTRICT 6 /' ~ ~~ d~onside ;p-P/~o~ r ~: Adjou,rnmVnt / ~~~ (42) DIS;;zT 7 ~~~#..:5/-4 (43) (44) (47) (48) <€9 (51) Consideration of Resolution No. 65 -90-7 re: Receive and (.lA file bid tabulation and recommendation; and award ing ~'Lr" Contract No. 7-2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer ' 1 :.\-~ and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Fam co Construe -,\.µ!). tion Co. in the total amoun t of $69,260.5 0 . See page 11 M11 f\ (Bid tabulation in folders) ~. ---- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolutio Resolution No . 64 -188-7 re of Stenographer-Clerk . Se No . 65 -9 1-7 re : Amending .»-~.,.,,.. rding compensation for position ~,.\ ...; page "N11 . ~'"J.t' \'l DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Ordinance --"':::> ~ I L• ' ; \.-"\v \' '\' r.JV ,r/.'\ NQ . 709 \''v e,i ~ .. -~~ 15ISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: page 11 E11 DISTRICT 7 of warrants. See Other business unicati ns, if any Q\/A- ./ \ of motion re: DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No . plans and specificat ions for the Contract No. 2-10-3; and author·z See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 2 c ~;/q "' -9 2-2 re: App r oving \X<-1 \ .... - uclid Trunk Sewer, -,\, J...yt g advertising for bids . ll\\' Consideration of motion re: and file communication from the General Counsel dated M y 20 , 1965, regarding a g reement relative to the propos Nohl Annexation #3 to District No . 2. (See letter in DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 6 -93 -2 re: Approving and authorizing execution of an a reement relative to the proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of te ritory to the District . See page 11 P" (A g reement in fo de rs) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No . 65 proposed annexation of te rrito r y t rescinding Resolution No . 65 -49 -2 . -4- r e : App r oving ~ District, and .. page llQ" ~1 f' N ~c (53) (54) (55) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of written concerning costs and fin the City of Anaheim date of facilities . (Copy o DISTRICT 2 Consideration See page "D" DISTRICT 2 report of the staff and engineers ncial feasibility of request of April 27, 1965, for construction report in fo lders) Approval of warrants, Other business and co uni cations, if any j H,; t-t,. .rft. it .J~ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion See page 11 E 11 re: Adjournment . v"Ji' ~..,..\ ~~ Jr: I ., "<' ~ ,_-/ re : Approval of warrants, if any . I (57) ~ISTRICT 11 Other business and commun i cations, if an DISTRICT 1 1 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment I ),_,{ Ci\'.01 ~"'' H l~ {I tvlfi .-yo l'-a~ /\-"<-._/t.. h~---} ~ l. \ -5- WARRANT NO. 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Acore Drilling Service Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. Jan Alabaster Aladdin Litho & Art American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. American Optical City of Anaheim Anaheim Dodge Anchor Packing Company Apco Supply Associated Concrete Products Atlas Stationers Barnes & Delaney Bascom Rush Co. Bay City Bearing Co. Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. Bedford Freight Lines, Inc. Bell Pipe & Supply Co. Blower Paper Company Blue M Engineering Co. Charles Bruning Co. Bud's Equipment Rentals Buena Park Wholesale Electric California Cartage Co., Inc. California Wholesale Electric Cal-State Seal Co. Paul Calvo Surveying Carlton's Linoleum Shop Chemical Exchange Co. College Lumber Co., Inc. Consolidated Freightways Costa Mesa Lumber Co. Cummins-Chicago Corp. The Davis Brown Co, John M. Deck Co. Electric Products Co. Electric Supplies Distributing Co. Enchanter, Inc. Engineers Sales-Service Co. Enterprise Electric Supply Co. Enterprise Printing Co. Chas. A. Estey, Inc. Fairbanks, Morse & Co. Fairfax Electronics, Inc. Fischer & Porter Co. Flair Drafting Service H. R. Fox & Co. Larry Fricker Co. Garden Grove Camera Center General Telephone Co. Bob Gosche Co. A. P~ Green Refractories, Inc. George T. Hall Co. Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester Harlows Clocks Haws Drinking Faucet Co. Bernard Heying Hollisters Nursery -A- AMOUNT $ 35.00 13.35 17.20 45.24 49.39 15.58 25.00 57 .65 136.55 47.29 34.42 84.64 415.81 30.16 414.27 139 .65 6.15 13.26 121.64 466.66 184.71 91.00 571.56 59.00 35.03 17.14 1,140.00 9.26 18,,968.42 50.85 23.07 3.99 722.80 72.75 15.32 186.46 2,313.16 1,000.00 456.22 614.18 166.23 10.92 442.27 56.65 921.65 332.50 187e08 88.17 126.97 187.10 141.90 218.40 119.70 448.oo 7.07 26.15 18.oo 21.99 WARRANT NO. 2280 2281 2282 2283 2284 2285 2286 2287 2288 2289 2290 2291 2292 2293 2294 2295 2296 2297 2298 2299 2300 2301 2302 2303 2304 2305 2306 2307 2308 2309 2310 2311 2313 2313 2314 2315 2316 2317 2318 2319 2320 2321 2322 2323 2324 2325 2326 2327 2328 2329 2330 2331 2332 2333 2334 2335 2336 2337 2338 2339 IN FAVOR OF Honeywell,, Inc. Howard Supply Co. City of Huntington Beach International Harvester Co. J & M Service B. R. Jones & Co., Inc. Kelly Pipe Co. Bill Kroeger Herbert H. Kyzer Lambert Truck Equipment Div. Larson Equipment Co. LASCO Industries LBWS, Inc. Judy Lee L & N Uniform Supply Co. D. J. Lord Lord-Babcock, Inc. Mahaffey Machine Co. McGraw-Hill Book Co. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Morrison Co. Munselle Supply Co., Inc. City of Newport Beach Orange County Blueprint Orange County Film Cleaning Ser~ice Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Orange County Stamp Co. o. c. Suppliers, Inc. Pacific Bellows Pacific Telephone Powr-Flo Products N B Products The Register Reynolds Camera Supply Robbins & Myers, Inc. Howard Ryan Tire Service Santa Ana Blue Print Co. Santa Ana Electric Motors Santa Ana Postmaster E. H. Sargent & Co. Schurr & Finlay, Inc. Russell M. Soott Selman Chevrolet Co. The Sherwin-Williams Co. Shipkey & Pearson, Inc. John E. Sigler, Consultant Signal Oil Co. Smith Engineering Co. Southern California Chemical Co. Southern California Edison Co. Southern California Water Co. Southern Counties Gas Co. Southwest Flexible Co. Speed-E-Auto Parts Speedy Saw Service Standard Oil Co. Of Calif. Sully Miller Contracting Co. Tardif Sheet Metal Technical Book Co. Tell Steel, Inc. -B- AMOUNT $ 626.00 1,304.85 4.50 139 .94 66.70 2.62 224.64 23.40 15.00 49.92 3,889 .36 195.31 453.29 4.60 646.69 26.60 79.40 462.24 8.09 53.81 14.57 101.04 47.47 6.29 204.82 Inc. 300.36 7.16 45.50 18.34 253.45 7.80 317.43 12.00 2.56 40.75 134.94 67.91 321.70 100.00 107.08 120.00 40.40 7.99 78.04 42.90 816.10 388.00 52.32 1,089.38 4,562.53 3.90 196.21 51.45 44.44 5.00 758.09 278.30 480.31 14.76 86.63 WARRANT NO. 2340 2341 2342 2343 2344 2345 2346 2347 2348 2349 2350 2351 2352 2353 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 2361 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 IN FAVOR OF Terminal Testing Laboratories Thermo-Fax Sales Incorporated Norman R. Termblay c. o. Thompson Petroleum Co. Turville Studio Union Sign Co. Utilities Supply Co. John R. Waples, Consultant Guy L. Warden & Sons Warren & Bailey Co. Welch's Concrete Co. Westco Pump Sales Co. City of Westminster Worthington Corporation TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art Bank of America Paul Calvo Surveying John Carollo Engrs. Enchanter, Inc. Enterprise Printing Co. The Orange Daily News Raymond G. Osborne Schurr & Finley, Inc. J. T. Smith Co. & Wescon, Inc. Wallace Trade Bindery John Ward Co. West & Wiggs, Inc. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- AMOUNT $ 8.oo 235.15 18.30 222.03 113.62 228.80 56.37 225.30 210.57 7.24 134.83 175.85 5.00 63.96 $ 53,434.48 $ 57.82 173,278.13 304.oo 5,338.62 2,100.00 33.90 46.27 1,909.50 3,832.86 26,685.84 40.51 2,737.94 2, 195.42 $218,560.81 $271, 995. 29 ·TARRANT NO. 2367 2368 2370 2371 2372 I DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERAT~G FUND WARRA NT S IN FAVOR OF County Sanitation District #3 Construction ltind Tax Service of Orange County AMOUNT $ 20,756.16 15.00 $ 20, 771.16 ACCUMULATED CA ITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS I IN FAVOR OF County Sa9 itation District #3 $ 86,484.oo Constru tion Fund DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Daily Pilot Tax Service o f Orange Count~ Inc. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art -D- $ 107,255.16 $ 86.36 75.00 $ 161.36 208.42 DISTRICT NO. 'I. OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 2373 Boyle & Lowry $ 6,330.44 AD No. Amount '...,/ 1 $2,343.38 3A 64.40 3B 59.60 SA 2,462.75 $4.,930.13 Plan Check & Inspection 1 1 400.31 $6,330.4~ 2374 Jack A. & Patricia G. Chandler (AD #5A} 570.00 2375 Costa Mesa Sanitary District 1,950.00 2376 Goode & Goode Appraisers (AD #1} 750.00 2377 Paul 3. Hogan 10.10 2378 County of Orange 377.40 AD NO. Amount 1 $211.40 SA i66.oo $377.40 2379 Walter A. & Corrine L. Schminke (AD #1} 625.00 2380 Southern California Edison co. 8.52 $ l0,682.06 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 2381 Costa Mesa Sanitary District $ 16,250.00 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 2382 Boyle & ].,owry $ 5,224.03 2383 Enterprise Printing Co. 36.59 2384 Raymond G. Osborne Laboratories 52.25 2385 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 1.99 2386 Tustin News 48.83 2387 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 22.83 $ 5,386.52 $ 32,318.58 DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 2388 Huntington Beach News $ 35.00 2389 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 32.76 67.76 -E- RESOLUTION NO. 65-86 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS -J-5-E A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR JOB NO. J-5-E (INSTRUMENTATION-1965); AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the engineers, for INSTRUMENTATION-1965, JOB NO. J-5-E, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 p.m., July 1, 1965, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to receive bids and to award contract for said work. -F- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER CONTRACTOR: ___ J_o_h_n __ W_a_r~d __ Com __ p_a_n~y ______________ _ C. 0. NO • _ _.3...__ __ DATE: June 4, 1965 JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l Amount of this change order (ADD)(mE~) $ 842.17 \..,I In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized a.nd as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. 4, previously furnished contractor, and contractor's proposal dated June 1, 1965 ADD 1. Furnish and install two replacement expansion joints damaged by District personnel while testing waste heat boiler 2. For contractor's additional overhead expense caused by delay in completion of project {see Change Order No. 4) 4 months at $100 per month TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 442.17 400.00 $ 842.17 Original Contract Price $ 28,738.00 Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 590.15 This Change (ADD)(~) 842.17 Amended Contract Price $ 30,170.32 Board authorization date: Approved: June 9, 1965 -G- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By ____ ~/_s~/ __ Le __ e_M~._N_e_l_s_o_n ______ ~ General Manager JOHN WARD COMPANY By-----------------~----------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C.O. NO~ 4 ------ CONTRACTOR: John Ward Company DATE: June 4, 1965 JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l Amount of this change order (1'1!H)(HJKJ&01~) $ None ------ ~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF TIME The following extension of time is granted to the original completion time for the following reasons as specified in Section 5-10 of the Specifications. Acts of the District Delays outside the control of the contractor due to District forces being unable to complete, on time, the testing of equipment installed by the con- tractor but furnished by the Districts 115 Original specified completion date: Completion date with this extension of time (115 days) Actual final completion date February 10, 1965 June 4, 1965 June 4, 1965 Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD $ 28,738.00 1,432.32 This Change (i:am£) (Sl1Bltnr) ___ No_n_e ___ _ Amended Contract Price $ 30,170.32 Board authorization date: . Approved: June 9, 1965 -H- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager JOHN WARD COMPANY By~------~----------~------- RESOLUTION NO. 65-87 ACCEPI'ING JOB NO. P2-7-l AS COMPLETE JOH1~ WARD COMPANY, CON'"J.~RACTOR A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, ACCEPI'ING JOB NO. P2-7-l AS COMPLETE The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE~ DETERMINE AND 9RDER: Section l. That the contractor, JOHN WARD COMPANY, has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the contract for INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l, on the 4th day of June, 1965; and, Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed in accordance with the terms of the contract; and, Section 3. That the General Manager of the Districts has concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda- tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 4. That the INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBI:NE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l, is hereby accepted as completed in accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the 27th day of November, 1964; and, Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation District No. l is hereby authorized and directed to execute a Notice of Completion of Work therefor. -I:- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. O. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C.O. No. 2 ------ CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation DATE: June 4, 1965 __ ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE JOB: FACILITIES -PIPELINE Job No. I-6-1 Amount of this change order $ None The following chapge in the contract documents is hereby made: Section 12-5 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (Page D-2 of Detailed Specifications) Change third paragraph to read as follows: "Any addition or deduction to the contract price under .Proposal Item No. 2 in excess or less than quantities shown on the plans, may be made on any progress payment or on the final payment. Under Proposal Item No. 2, the price shall include, in addition· to the placement and compaction of gravel fill, the removal or addition o:r earth as required." Original Contract Price $ 1,455#850.00 Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 1,361.24 This Change (m) (EEEHH) __ _.N..;,..;.o_ne ______ _ Amended Contract Price $ 1,454 2 488.76 Board authorization date: Approved: June 9, 1965 -J- COUNTY.SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By--------------~------------- RESOLUTION NO. 65-88-l AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-6-2 TO VINNELL CORPORATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES-STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts• engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, for Job No. I-6-2, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-6-2 (ADDITION TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES-STRUCTURES), be awarded to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, in the total amount of $172,800.00 in accordance with the terms or their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 65-63 on record in the office of the Secretary. Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -K- BID TABULATION S H E E T Date June 2 1 1965 Contract: ADDITION TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES - STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2 Contractor 1. Vinnell Corporation 1145 Westminster Ave. Alhambra, California 2. Bovee Construction Co. 15134 So. Indiana Ave. Paramount, California 3. J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation 374 West 40th Street P. o. Box 2476 San Bernardino, California 4. ECCO Contractors, Inc. 7931 Lampson Avenue Garden Grove, California K-2 Total $172,800.00 $207,457.00 $218,343.00 $286,ooo.oo Add or Deduct for Gravel Fill $8.oo/c.y. $9.90/c.y. $6.50/c.y. $10.00/c.y. RESOLUTION NO. 65-89-3 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR em3 11'RAcT NO. 3-10 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That tne detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District at a time and date to be deter- mined by the General Manager; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board, and the District's engineers be authorized and directed to receive and open said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Directors. -L- RESOLUTION NO. 65-90-7 AWARDING CONTRACT 7-2B A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,. CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-2B, WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. ~hat the Written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to FAMCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, for construction of CPNTRACT NO. 7-2B, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said Contract No. 7-2B, is hereby awarded to FAMCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of $69,260.50 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 65-65-7 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -M- June 2, 1965 Mayor Harvey -out of town until Thursday, June 3rd. Mr. Meyers - Miller Hirstein Cook Parks Corwnell Stoddard Lambert will attend meetings today. {U"'l lf IV-cy,r-4 will attend meetings today will attend will attend will be here at 1:30 this afternoon was not previously notified of today's meeting, but will attend will attend. RESOLUTION NO. 65-91-7 AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64-188-7 REGARD- ING COMPENSATION FOR STENOGRAPHER-CLERK A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64-188-7 REIATIVE TO COMPENSATION FOR STENOGRAPHER-CLERK The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Section 1 of Resolution No. 64-188-7, adopted by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 on December 9, 1964, is hereby amended as follows: That compensation for said Stenographer-Clerk is hereby established at Range 33.5 as set forth in Section 2 of this resolution. Section 2. The following Basic Salary Range is hereby established: Range Number Monthly Five-Step Rates ~ _g_ i~?l .2- 33.5 365 385 406 428 Section 3. That any other resolutions or motions or portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and made of no further effect; and, Section 4. That the effective date of this resolution shall be June 1, 1965. -N- RESOLUTION NO. 65-92-2 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR ~NTRACT Nd. 2-10-3 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3, are hereby approve~, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until July 7, 1965, at 4:00 p.m., at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board., and the District's engineers be authorized and directed to receive and open said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Director:~. -0- RESOLUTION NO. 65-93-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES IN CONNECTION WITH NOHL ANTu'"EXATION #3 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement between the County of Orange Board of Supervisors, the petitioners, and the District, setting forth the terms and conditions for deferring payment of the annexation fees relative to Nohl Annexation #3, is hereby approved as prepared by the General Counsel;and 1 · Section 2. That execution of said agreement by the Chairman and the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the agreement hereinabove referred to shall be recorded in the Official Records of Orange County. -P- RESOLUTION NO. 65-94-2 APPROVING PROPOSED ANNEXATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROPOSED ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT (Nohl Annexation #3); AND RESCINDING RESOLU- TION NO. 65-49-2, ADOPTED APRIL 14, 1965 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2> of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, a proceeding seeking to annex certain territory to County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, entitled "Nohl Annexation No. 3 11 , is now pending before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange; and, WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District has caused an engineering study to be made concerning the said proposed annexation of territory to the District; and, WHEREAS, the District adopted the recommendations con- tained in the aforesaid report dated April 8, 1965 and in a letter from the engineers dated April 13, 1965, as and for its policy with reference to ·the territory seeking to annex to the District; and, WHEREAS, it has been determined by legal counsel that (µy;~ / l/. 1 q l, \- certain provisions of Resolution No. 65-49-2, adopted ~ 12, 1'65, are in conflict with Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code, State of California pertaining to the payment of annexation fees; NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, does resolve, deter- mine and order as follows: Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County will be benefited by the annexation thereto of that certain territory described as "Nohl Annexation No. 3" now pending before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange. -Q- • Section 2. That consent to the annexation of territory described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof, is hereby given upon, and subject to, the following terms and conditions: (a) (b) (c) Annexation fees are hereby established for the proposed annexation at $100 per acre or any portion of an acre of territory to be annexed {130 acres) That the petitioners enter into an agreement with the County of Orange Board of Supervisors and County Sanita- tion District No. 2 setting forth the terms and conditions for deferring payment of said annexation fees; and that said agreement be recorded in the Official Records of Orange County That the a~reement referred to in Sub- section {bJ above shall contain the following provision: "Owners hereby agree to pay the sum of $13,000.00 to District as an annexation fee, which obliga- tion they recognize as personal upon themselves both jointly and severa]J.y. Said payments shall i be in~~equal installments of 'F ;J,t.o 0 1.1.oc)~e-:'OQ each commencing with the date of July 1, 1965, and annually thereafter. Owners shall have the right to pay any balance due on said annexation fee at any time". Section 3. That the annexation fees set forth in Section 2 of this resolution have reference to this annexation only, and in no way do they set policy establishing a fixed charge for future annexations to the District. i '{, lo/6 l Section 4. That Resolution No. 65-49-2, adopted 1Aa-w-Pf,;_} ~' is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. Q-2- EXCERPTS FROM THE MI NUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8 :00 o'clock p.m., June 9th , 196 5 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m . The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present,. Directors present; Directors William Hirstein (Chairman), Dee Cook, II. H. Harvey, A. H. Meyers, Clifton c. Miller and Rex A. Parke Directors absent: None Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DISTRICT NO . 7 Approv ing assi~ents re : A • D • #3-A , seconded and du l y ed: T t the Assignment from Bank of America NT&SA to Ta lor and Co mpany , and the Assignment f rom Taylor and Company to Leo Goodman , of funds due i n connectio with the cons truction in Assessment District #3-A e approved;and, That the Secretary of record said Assigrunen Orange Co unty. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • e Board be authori z ed to in the Official Records of I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of June , 1965. IN WITNESS 1'1HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official_seal o t_County Sanitation District No . 7 , of Orange Coun~y, California, this 10th day of June , 1965 Secretary, Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 7 -- (46-A) (46-C) (57-A) SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA JUNE 9, 1965 at 8:00 p.m. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution . 65-96 -7 re: Accept- ing easement from Walter A. chminke, et ux, in connection with Assessment istrict #1; and authoriz- ing payment for said eas ent in the total amount of $625.00. See page S-A Consideration of Res lution No. 65-95-7 re: Accept-~ DISTRICT 7 -~v,~ ' ing easement from J ck A. Chandler, et ux, relative ' to Assessment Distr ct #5-A; and authorizing payment ~ for said easement ·n the total amount of $570.00. ~ See page S-B 4 u. t \. · ........ t .... t ' <:::. , " 1 1 "" -"-"""-' . ~ <' l)JZe-&- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of otion re: Approving assignment from Bank o f Ameri a to Taylor and Company; and approving assignme t from Taylor and Company to Leo Goodman, relati e to Assessment District #3-A; and authorizing re rdation of said assignments ( DISTRICT 7 -Consideration of a hearin date re: Confirmation assess~a~q in Assessment · 1trict #1. ( Ju1Yi28th,) 2~~tl.[SU~ ~ h1 ( \....1:0-<J riv\ DISTRICT 11 Cons idera t ion of Resolution Approving proposed exclusio the Distri c t (Portion o f An Harbour). See page S-D o. 6 5-9 7-11 re: o f t erritory from exation #5 -Hunting ton RESOLUTION NO. 65-96-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-28B) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPI'ANCE OF EASEMENT FROM WALTER A. SCHMINKE AND CORINNE L. SCHMINKE (#132568) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant of permanent easement dated May 31, 1965, wherein WALTER A. SCHMINKE and CORINNE L. SCHMINKE, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is described as Parcel No. 7-l-28B in that certain action in eminent domain #132568, and more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to Walter A. Schminke and Corinne L. Schminke, 12774 Barrett Lane, Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $625.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. S-A -. RESOLUTION NO. 65-95-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5-A (Parcel 7-5-lla) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM JACK A. CHANDLER AND PATRICIA G. CHANDLER (#133933) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement dated June 8, 1965, wherein JACK A. CHANDLER and PATRICIA G. CHANDLER, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #5-A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is described as Parcel No. 7-5-lla in that certain action in eminent domain #133933, and more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to ·Jack A. Chandler and Patricia G. Chandler,. 1156 La Colina Drive, Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $570.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. S-B .· -· RESOLUTION NO. 65-98-7 APPROVIl'lG PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE WITH THE CITY OF SANTA ANA COVERING PURCHASE OF A PORTION OF THE TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement dated June 9th, 1965, between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the City of Santa Ana, covering the purchase by the District of a portion of the TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER from said City, be approved as submitted by the General Counsel; and, Section 2. That purchase of a portion of said facility is authorized, based upon the written recommendation of the engineers heretofore received and ordered filed; and, Section 3. That payment in the total amount of $84,954.~o is hereby authorized to be made to the City of Santa Ana in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the agre~ ment ref erred to in Section l of this resolution; and, Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District in form acceptable to the General Counsel. s":"c RESOLUTION NO. 65-97-11 FIXING OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, FIXING AND DETERMINING THE OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT AS OF JUNE 9, 1965; AND DETERMINING THE EFFECT ON THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM OF THE DISTRICT OF PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF TERRITORY {PORTION OF ANNEXATION #5 -HUNTINGTON HARBOUR) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, does resolve as follows: WHEREAS, petitions to withdraw certain territories from County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, have been filed with the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California; and, WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the outstanding indebtedness of said District as of this date; and, WHEREAS, the Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, are required to report as to how said withdrawal from said District will affect the operations of the sewerage system of the District. NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanita, tion District No. 11 does hereby FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE as follows: Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 11 has, as of June 9, 1965, the following indebtedness against the funds of the District: Oper .. a ting Fund None OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 Accumula tea Capital Outlay Fund AS OF JUNE 9, 1965 1951 Bond Interest & Sinking Fund 1958 Bond Interest & Sinking Fund Total Fixed Indebtedness $66,544.08 $3o4,ooo.oo $1,315,000.00 $1,685,544.08 S-D-1 Section 2. That the total outstanding indebtedness for said County Sanitation District No. 11 as of June 9, 1965, is One Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand, Five Hundred Forty-Four Dollars and Eight Cents ($l,685,544.o8). Section 3. That the proposed withdrawal of territory described in the withdrawal petition filed with the Board of Supervisors of Orange County, California, on June 2, 1965, will not be materially detrimental to the operation of its sewerage system as now owned and operated by the District. Section 4. That the territory proposed to be withdrawn from the District is not benefited by any services performed by the District, and the territory referred to was annexed to the District after the bonded indebtedness was incurred. S-D-2- II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts of Orang e County, Califo rnia JOINT BOARDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, June 9 , 1965 8:00 p.m. P. 0. Box 5 175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 Pho ne 962-2 41 1 June 4, 1965 Th e following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up i mme diately preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting . Joint Boa rds No. 15 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONCERNING JOINT BUDGETS: A separate written report by the Executive Committee on this subject, together with the proposed J oint budgets, is enclosed for a ll active Directors. The Director s are also referred to the printed r eport on our budget procedures attached to the Manager's Report for the May J o int Board meeting. However, for the benefit of new Directors and others who read this report and are not familiar with the budget procedures, we customarily present budget estimates for the ensuing fisca l year at the June meeting of each year . These estimates relate to J oint Operating Expenses necessary for administration, maintenance and operation of the Districts' jointly owned p r operty and t o con - struction r equirements for expansion and improvements to the Districts' jointly owned Treatment Plants and d isposa l faciliti es. As soon as these budget estimates can be prepared by our staff, they are presented t o the Ex ecutive Comm ittee for review . After action by the Committee, they are presented to the Joint Boards for review and adopt ion. It is nece ssary that approval as submitted, or as amended, be given at the June meeting in order that the figures so establish ed may be pro-rated, by formulas established by our procedures, between the individual Districts in accordance with their individual sewage flows and assessed valuations. The figures so obtained for the individual Districts are then combined, together with strictl y District requirements, into the individual District 's formal budgets, which must be prepared, sub - mitt ed to t he Directors and approved at the r egular meeting in July. -1- • The Executive Committee met on June 2 and after thorough study of the material submitted by the staff relating to the above described budget estimates for 1965-66, approved both budgets as submitted (see separate written report of Committee). No. 16 -JOINT OPERATING BUDGET: A summary of the Joint Operating Budget for 19 65 -66, as mentioned above, is enclosed for the active Directors together with the report of the Executive Committee. It calls for a total estimated Joint Operating expense in the amount of $1 4459,627, an increase over the 19 64 -65 budget of approximately $7 ,000. It will be noted that this dollar increase is approximately 5.3% as contrasted with an anticipated increase of sewage flows to the Treatment Plants of 9 .6%. Accordingly, the cost of treating the unit quantity of sewage (in our case one mi llion gal lons) will be less under the proposed budget than in 1964-65. Also to b e noted is the fact that because of savings made during the fiscal year now ending in various budget categories, the sum of $258,551 will be available for re-budgeting, thus reducing to $1,170,533 the amount that must actually be raised by taxes in the various Districts to cover Joint Operating expenses. No. 17 -JOINT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: All of our capital ex- penditures for Plant expansion and improvements are paid out of what is called the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. The proposed requir e - ments for this fund during the coming fiscal year and as approved by the Executive Committee is, as stated previously, enclosed for the active Directors together with the report of the Committee. The list of capital requirements are entitled 11 Schedule of Joint Works Requirements -1965-66" and attached to this schedule is another table showing the net amounts which each District must raise by taxes during the forthcoming fiscal year to pay for these improvements. It will be noted from the Schedule that the requirement s fall into two principle parts -(1) Construction necessary to maintain the existing degree of treatment and adequate hydraulic capacity and (2) Reserve Funds as approved in 1962 for additional future secondary treatment and new outfall. If desired by the Directors , the staff will discuss these requirements in relation to our authorized Master Plan of Plant Expansion as adopted in 1962 by the Boards. The total amount to be raised by taxes under this proposed budget represents an increase of less than $200,000 over the corresponding amount for 19 64 -65. Since an increase in this amount will undoubtedly be more than offset by the normal increases in assessed valuation in the Districts, the budget as proposed should result in a reduction in the tax rate for J o int Construction for mo st of the Districts. No. 18 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANT INSTRUMEN- TATION EQUIPMENT: John Carollo, Consulting Engineers, have sub-. mitted specifications for the purchase of additional instrumentation -2- • budgeted for next year. The estimate for this equipment is approxi- mately $51,000 of which $22,000 is for remote pumping station instrumentation which will be later charged out of inventory to the individual Districts in whose pump stations this equipment will be installed. There are five of such units and four are scheduled to be installed in District No. 11 pump stations proposed to be acquired from the City of Huntington Beach in the near future. The balance of the equipment is to extend our supervisory control over recent additions to the Plant units, particularly the sludge gas turbine-generator equipment now being put into operat~on. The attached resolution, authorizing advertising for bids for this equipment, calls for such bids to be opened on July 1 by the Board of District No. 1. No. 19 -AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE TESTING: The Districts have an agreement with Osborne Testing Laboratories for factory pipe inspection of the 84-inch RCP now being installed under Job No. I-6-1. At the time this agreement was entered into it was the staff's recommendation that the total of such services not exceed $4,ooo. It now appears that we seriously underestimated the amount of pipe inspection time which would be required. To rectify this miscalculation we are recommending that the authorization be raised to a total of $8,ooo in order to allow the inspection work to proceed to completion. Nos. 20, 21 and 22 -COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANT JOB P2-7-l: This job was done under contract with the John Ward Company of Hunting ton Beach and is for the i nstalla tion of th e previously described steam turbine at Plant No. 2. The contractor's work will be completed today (June 4) and these items relate to closing out the job. Item No. 20 is Change Order No. 3 adding an additional $842.17 to the contract price for the additional work described in the formal change order attached to the agenda and for the contractor's extra overhead expense occasioned by a delay in completion of the project. This delay was due to our forces being unable to complete on time the testing of equipment installed by the contractor but furnished by the Districts. This delay amounted to 115 days and, accordingly, Item No. 21 is a recommended change order granting this much extension of time to the contract . Item No. 22 is the customary resolution accepting the job as complete and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion. No. 23 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO PLANT JOB NO. I-6-1: This job is be i ng done under contract with the Vinnell Corporation of Alhambra and is for the installation of the 84-inch Plant No. 1 effluent pipeline mentioned under Item No. 19. The original contract speci- fications called for an adjustment in the contract price at the end of the work depending on whether more or less gravel fill than sh~wn on the plans was actually installed on the Engineer's orders. This -3- is a standard procedure with the Districts in Plant construction work and normally it works well and is fair to the contractor. However, in this particul ar case practically a l l of the gravel used will be in the first 25% of the work. Since it is obvious now that ~ore grave l than originally called for will be needed, we believe it only equitable to al l ow the contractor to be paid for it on the progr ess estimate for the month in which it is used rather than waiting a number of months until the end of the contract. Accordingly, we are recommending a~proval of formal Change Order No . 2 appearing on the agenda which amends the Contract payment provisions to al l ow compensation for additional gravel on monthly progress payments. This change order will not resu l t in any change in the final contract amount . District No. 1 No. 27 -AWARD OF PLANT JOB I -6 -2: This contract was described in the Manager's Report for the May meeting when the job was authorized for bids. The Board of Directors of District No. 1 opened bids for this work on June 2 and the Vinnell Corpor ation{ now working on the related ~roject I -6 -1 (see Items Nos. 19 and 23J, was the low bidder at $172,800. Accordingly, it is recommended that the job be awarded to this company by means of the resolution attached to the agenda. No. 30 -ADJOURNMENT TO 4:00 P .M., JULY 1: This is the hour and date suggested for receipt of bids on Pl ant Job J -5 -E (Item No. 18). Accordingly, if satisfactory with the Directors, it will be recom- mended that the Board so adjourn. District No. 3 No. 32 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPEC I FICATIONS FOR CONTRACT 3 -10: The District 's design engineers, Boy l e and Lowry, are nearing completion on p l ans and specificat i ons for the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, Contract No . 3-10. Except for a few minor details, the job is ready for bid now but we are suggesting, by means of the resolution att ached to the agenda, that the actual bid date be left to the discretion of the General Manager pending fina l issuance of a permit for the project by the State Division of Highways . This procedure is recommended in order to expedite the project which is badly needed and which otherwise wi l l be de l ayed another month. The work proposed, and budgeted for, consists of a new 24 -inch and 27 -inch VCP sewer in Beach Bou l evard between Imperial Hi ghway and Rosecrans Avenue. The present Mill er-Ho l der Trunk system is deficient in capacity in this stretch and we hoped to have the work complete before the winter rains wh i ch, if severe, are likely to cause sewage overfl ows in the area. District No. 7 No. 42 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO . 7 -2B, WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB -TRUNK SEWER: Bids for this job were taken r--4- at the adjourned meeting of the Board on June 2. It is recommended that the contract be awarded to Famco Construction Company of Santa Ana at their low bid price of $69,260.50. No. 43 -COMPENSATION FOR STENOGRAPHER-CLERK: Resolution 65-91-7 authorizes a reduction of one range for the presently established stenographer-clerk position. This recommended salary adjustment is in line with the job responsibilities and still enables the District to employ qualified personnel for this position. No. 44 -CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 709: At the May 12 meeting of the Board, the General Counsel was directed to prepare Ordinance No. 709 for the Board's consideration, consolidating all current ordinances concerning the District 's connection charges and the staff's recent recommendations for increasing direct connection charges. If the proposed ordinance is available by meeting time, it is recommended that the Board take the ordinance under submission for study and if it is acceptable to the Board by the July meeting, the ordinance can be adopted at that time. District No. 2 No. 48 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF UPPER EUCLID TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3: After considerable delay, pending preparation of the comprehensive district-wide plan (see report under Item No. 52), the District's engineers have now com- pleted work on the budgeted reconstruction of the upper portion of the Euclid Trunk between Orangethorpe and La Palma Avenues. This work has been under consideration and discussion over the past two years and because of the deteriorated condition of the existing sewer it is urgently needed. The Engineer's estimate for this job is $188,000. The work contemplated will provide 2450 feet of new 27-inch VCP and 2670 feet of 30-inch VCP both at a lower and consequently more serviceable elevation than the old trunk. These sizes provide capacity conforming to the ultimate sewerage plan laid out in the March, 1965 preliminary engineer's report. In order to get this long delayed project under way, it is accordingly recommended that plans and specifications be approved and that the project be autho- rized for advertising for bids to be opened on July 7. Award of the contract , if the bids are satisfactory, will be an agenda item for the July Board meeting. Nos. 49, 50 and 51 -PROPOSED NOHL ANNEXATION #3: This matter was taken up at the April Board meeting and again consj.dered briefly at the May meeting. Subsequently, the General Counsel after researching the law connected with t he payment of annexation fees, has submitted a report to the Directors dated May 20, and mai led from this office May 21, pointing out that the procedure agreed on at the April meeting for payment of fees is not in accordance with law. Mr. Nisson's report also forwarded to the Directors a draft agreement -5- between the District and the annexation proponents providing for payment of the annexation fees in ten equal instalL~ents. This type of payment is legally permissible. Item No. 49 is to receive and file the General Counsel's report which, as stated above, was mailed to the Directors separately on May 21 and is consequently not included herewith. I tem No . 50 is a resolution for Board consideration approving the proposed new agreement . Item No. 51 is a suggested resol ution rescinding former Resolution No . 65-49-2 which set up the procedure now known to be legally questionable and approving the annexation on the basis of the type deferred payments legally permissible. No. 52 -REPORT OF ENG I NEERS AND STAFF CONCERNING REQUEST OF CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION: A fairly comprehensive written report on this subject is included separately with this agenda for the Directors of District No. 2. This report is submitted in conformance with a minute order of the Board at the May 12 meeting. -~ -6- Lee M. Nelson General Manager Age nda Item No . .'ti In the Offlc:'~f Pt,e secretary County Sanitation D i strict COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY No ------- J UN 9 1965 June 3, 1965 BY--------- BOARDS OF DIRECTORS, County Sa nitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 Your Executive Committee met in the Districts' office on Wednesday, June 2, 1965, at 4:30 p.m. Present were Directors Cornwell, Chairman, Harvey, Parks, Stoddard, Meyers and Hirstein. Director Lambert was absent. Others present were Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, Paul G. Brown, Assistant General Manager and Fred A. Harper, Secretary and Director of Finance. Chairman Cornwell presided. Items considered and recommen- dations made to the Joint Boards are as follows: 1. Joint Operating Budget a. The tentative budget summary of the Joint Operating fund for 1965-66, as submitted by the General Manager, was examined item by item. b. The staff was questioned as to the method of estimating increases in sewage flow for each District for the next fiscal year. The General Manager explained that these ~-!1 (' ..... estimates are based on examination of past data and that --~ the cash contribution of each District, as shown on the material submitted, is computed from this estimate. It was noted by Mr. Hirstein that the estimated total flow from all Districts will average more than 100 mi llion gallons per day next year, as contrasted with less than 15 million gallons per day in the early 1950's. c. The amounts tentatively budgeted for research and pollution control were questioned by Mr. Stoddard. The General Manager explained that these amounts include an accelerated program necessary for final design of the new ocean outfall. He also stated that the Districts have been somewhat deficient in research work because, until recently, manpower and funds have not been available to carry out an adequate program. However, with more time and manpower now available and with State and National water pollution control being tightened up and waste water reclamation becoming a definite possibility, the money expended now in this connection will undoubtedly be repaid many fold in the future. Mr . Stoddard brought out that as a member of the State Water Pollution Control Board he believes that the State's research program should include some of this work which the individua l waste dischargers are now forced to do themselves. However, since the State's program does not, the Districts are justified in and must be doing this type of work themselves . d. It was noted by the Committee that by far the largest single item of operating expense, other than salaries and wages, is for effluent disinfection chemicals (chlorine). During the fiscal year now ending, these expenditures have been held down to a minimum ($105,000 less than budgeted) by our successful current prediction program which is based on past and present oceanographic research. However, in view of the extreme uncertainty as to the exact amount of chlorine to be used in any one year it was agreed that this item should be left at a figure substantially over the past year's requirements with savings carried over from year to year. e. The request for salary, wages and employee benefits were examined in detail. It was explained by the staff that the estimates are based on total authorized positions and computed at the step and range to be attained during the year. It was pointed out by the General Manager that no additional positions or salary adjustments are being requested although a reserve in the amount of 3% ($23,750) is included for anticipated salary adjustments. No changes in salaries are being recommended at this time since it has been our experience that such changes are more appropriate a~ter the various Cities and the County governments have acted in this regard. Action It was brought out by Mr. Harper that legislation is now pending which would place all public agencies, such as the Districts, under the State Unemployment Insurance p-rogram . This legislatton, if enacted, would add an additional 3.5% to our total salaries and wages cost. However, because the fate of the legislation is questionable, no item has been included for unemployment insurance. If, in spite of practically unanimous opposition of the public agencies to this legj_slation, it is enacted, funds can be made available from unappropriated reserve amounts in the individual District budgets. It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Hirstein and unanimously carried that the Joint Operating Budget for 1965-66, as submitted, be approved by the Committee and recommended for favorable action by the Joint Boards of Directors at the regular meeting on June 9, 1965. (Copy of budget and explanatory material attached.) 2. Joint Construction Budget a. The Schedule of Joint Requirements for the coming fiscal year as prepared by the staff and submitted by the General Manager was e x amined. -2- b. It was pointed out by the General Manager that the Joint Works expansion program was largely fixed by the 1962 Engineer's Report and that all of the items included in the proposed work for 1965-66 conform to this long range plan. c. The Committee recalled that at the time the 1962 plan was adopted, it was agreed that the sum of $1 million over and above current requirements would be raised annually as a reserve fund for future large scale projects, such as secondary treatment works, a new ocean outfall, and for purchase of additional land. These additional funds have been so accumulated with approximately $2 million already spent for secondary treatment and $885,000 budgeted the coming year for the new outfall plus $440,000 for the purchase of additional land, thus leaving a net reserve at the end of the coming fiscal year of $2,700,000. This should be adequate for future needs, assuming that the additional $1 million reserve funds continue to accumulate each year. Th e se reserve funds r e main in the indiv idual District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds and are invested in Government securities at a substantial interest rate. d. The sum of $96,ooo has been tentatively budgeted for extensions to the Administrative office building recommended to be built for our growing personnel needs and activities over the next several years. Preliminary plans for this office extension are now under study by the Special Action Building Committee composed of Directors Cornwell, Kanno, Miller and Stewart. It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Parks and unanimously carried that the Schedule of Joint Works Require- ments for 1965-66, as submitted, be approved by the Committee and recommended for favorable action by the Joint Boards of Dire ctors at the re ular meetin on June 9 1 65. (Copy of budget and explanatory materia attached. -3- ( TENTATIVE BUDGET SUMMARY JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965-1966 REVENUE: REVENUE FROM INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS' OPERATING FUNDS (Allocated on Basis of Estimated Sewage Flow) 1964-1965 Estimated Estimated Estimated Dist. Flows (1) Estimated 1965-1966 Cost District No. (Past Year} Increase Flows Per MG Contribution 1 4,522 MG 6.0% 4,790 MG $38.65 $ 185,134. 2 11,321 5.0% 11,890 38.65 459,548. 3 11,269 12.0% 12,620 38.65 487,763. 5 1,629 5.0% 1,710 38.65 66,092. 6 1,669 8.0% 1,795 38.65 69,377. 7 1,279 30.0% 1,660 38.65 . 64,159. 11 2,044 22.5% 2,510 38.65 97,011. Subtotal: 33,733 MG 9.6% 36,975 MG $1,429,084. 8 -0--0-600. Miscellaneous Income -(Sale of Sludge, Irrigation water, Inspection, Equipment charge outs, etc.) 29,943. TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND REVENUE $1,,459,627. EXPENSE: TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND EXPENSE $1,459 ,627. ( 2) (1) May and June 1965 estimated. ( May 28, 1965 1964-1965 COMPARATIVE DATA Cash Budget Actual (1) Carry Over to Contribution Contributions 1965-1266 $ 181,032. $ 147' 709. $ 33,323. 492,976. 369,794. 123,182. 412,880. 368,096. 44,784. 80,988. 53,210. 27,778. 65,902. 54,517. 11,385. 50,816. 41,778. 9,038. 75,827. 66 '766. 9,061. $1,360,421. $1,101,870. $258,551. 600. 600. 25,000. 30,570. $1,386,021. $1,133,040. $1,,386,,021. $1,133,040. (2) See Page 2 for summary and 1964~65 Comparative figures. See Pages 3-8 for detailed· breakdown and explanatory notes. May 28, 1965 RECAP OF JOINT OPERATING BUDGETS & EXPENDITURES Expenditures 1964-1965 Budgeted ADMINISTRATION $ 36,100. MAINTENANCE & OPERATION: Supplies 392,500. Utilities 72,500. Maintenance Expense (Other than Districts' Labor) 94,500. Insurance Research and Pollution Control Control Laboratory TOTAL MAINTENANCE & OPER- ATION AND ADMINISTRATION SALARIES, WAGES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS CAPITAL OUTIAY: Administrative Operational TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY GRAND TOTAL -JOINT OPERATING FUND 13,500. 23,000. 82500. $640,600. $668,271. 12,500. 64,650. 77,150. $1,386,021. {*) May and June 1965 estimated. -2- Expenditures Expenditures 1964 -1965 1965 -1966 Actual (*} Estimated $ 35,977. $ 39,800. 270,117. 394,300. 78,873. 89,300. 97,352. 118,ooo. 10,035. 14,625. 20,660. 35,000. 4,789. 82500. $517,803. $699,525. $563,432. $693,332. 9,721. 12,500. 42,566. 54,270. 52,287. 66,770. May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965 -1966 ADMINISTRATION Off ice Improvements Maintenance of Equipment Office Supplies Printing and Reproduction Expense Professional Services Travel and Vehicle Expense Employees' Medical Examinations Employee Training Expense 64/65 Budget -$36,100. (*) May and June 1965 estimated. Expenditures 1964 -1965 Actual (*) -0- $ 1,365. 9,258. 7,020. 11,487. 2,250. 580. 4,017. $35,977. Expenditures 1965 -1966 Estimated $ 3,000. 1,600. 9,000. 7,500. 12,000. 2,000. 700. 4,000.(1) $39,800. (1) With the increasing complexity of the treatment plants facilities a continuing training program for employees will insure the Districts of qualified and competent operating personnel. -3- May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPER.\TING FUND 1965 -1966 MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION Supplies: Odor Control Chemicals Expenditures 1964 -1965 Actual (*) $ 5,850. Effluent Disinfection Chemicals 225,349. Repair Materials, Supplies and Small Tools 17,444. Gasoline, Oil & Grease ($13,795.Actual) 9,551.(2) Uniform Rental 5,800. Paints and Protective Coatings 2,270. Welding Supplies 1,429. Cleaning and Maintenance Supplies 2,424. 64/65 Budget -$392,500. $270,117. Utilities: Power and Light $ 52,293. Telephone 14,859. (3) Water -Purchased 1,879. Natural Gas 5,785. Diesel Fuel for Emergency Power 4,057. 64/65 Budget -$72,500. $ 78,873. --- (*) May and June 1965 estimated. Expenditures 1965 -1966 Estimated $ 20,000. 330,000.(1) 18,ooo. 10,500. 7,500. 3,500. 1,500. 3,300. $394,300. $ 50,000. 16,800. 2,500. 15,000. 5,000. $ 89,300. (1) Chlorine Budget 62/63 -$300M; 63/64 -$340M; 64/65 -$330M. Each year we have carried over to the next fiscal year a sizeable amount which,on the surface would indicate that this item is overbudgeted approximately $100M. However, the demand for chlor- ination of our effluent is the Districts' most variable expense. Only through a very intensive and comprehensive program have the Districts been able to meet the State Water Pollution requirements and avoid chlorinating 24 hours a day. (2) $4~244. charged to individual Districts for work performed. (3) Includes approximately $4,200. for mobile radio telephone expense. -4- May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965 -1966 V.IA.INTENANCE EXPENSE (Other than Districts' Labor) Expenditures 1964-1965 Actual (*) Auto and Truck $11,443. Other Mobile Equipment 3,765. Internal Combustion Engines, fixed 9,767. Electrical 14,713. Pumps 11,984. Mechanical Equipment, other 6,725. Chlorinator Equipment 4,430. Piping and Heating 14,335. Building and Grounds 2,881. Equipment Rental 2,331. Maintenance Repair Contracts 4,800. Meter and Instrument Repair 8,935. Misc. Maintenance Expense 1,243. 64/65 Budget -$94,500. $97,352. {*) May and June 1965 estimated. -5- Expenditures 1965-1966 Estimated $ 13,500. 4,ooo. 16,000. 16,000. 16,ooo. 7,500. 7,500. 15,000. 3,000. 3,000. 5,000. 10,000. 1,500. $1182000. .- May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965 -1966 INSURANCE General P.D. & P.L. including Vehicles ($10,429. Actual) Fire & Extended Coverage Employees' Fidelity Bond 64/65 Budget -$13,500. Expenditures 1964-1965 Actual (*) $ 7 ,459. ( 1) 2,576. -0-( 2) $10,035. (1) $2,970. charged to individual Districts. Expenditures 1965 -1966 Estimated $11,000. 3,500. 125. $14,625. (2) Previously charged directly in individual Districts. All employees are bonded in the amount of $10,000. each. RESEARCH AND POLLUTION CONTROL Ocean Monitoring and Oceanographic Research Industrial Wastes and Operational Research 64/65 Budget -$23,000. $15,899. 4, 761. $20,660. $20,000. 15,000. (3) $35,000. (3) Increased activity is planned in Industrial discharge investi- gations to improve quality of secondary treated waste water. CONTROL LABORATORY Chemicals and Supplies Outside Service & Miscellaneous Laboratory Expense 64/65 Budget -$8,500. (4) Rebudgeted from 64/65 (*) May and June 1965 estimated. -6- $ 4, 789. -0- $ 4,789. $ 6,500. 2,000. (4) $ 8,500. • • .-May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965 -1966 SALARIES,, WAGES & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS Expenditures 1964 -1965 Actual {*) Administrative Salaries $114,700. Operational Salaries & Wages 550,516. 64/65 Budget -$777,571. $665,216. Reserve for Salary Adjustments -3% Actual Less Retirement ($32,226. -6,918.) Group Medical ($ 9,205. -1, 727.) Insurance Workmen's Com- pensation ($15,413. -4,460.) TOTAL LABOR COST LESS: Labor not char~eable to Joint Operations: { 4) $ 25,308.(3) 7,478.(3) 10.!253.(3) $708,955. Joint Capital Outlay (CORF) $ 51,074. Districts• Accounts -including Maintenance Districts 94,449. 64/65 Budget -$165,000. $145,523. SALARIES, WAGES AND EMPLOYEE BENEFITS 64/65 Budget -$657,271. $563,432. (*) May and June 1965 estimated. (1) Authorized positions with step-plan adjustments. Expenditures 1965 -1966 Estimated $133,638. 657,844. $ 791, 482. ( l) 23, 750. (2) $ 35,800. 8,800. 13,500. $873,332. $ 75,000. 105,000. $180,000. $693,332. (2) Provides for a general t step salary increase which is in line with current actions of the cities and other public agencies within Orange County. (3) $13,105. charged to individual Districts for work performed. (4) Operation and maintenance of the individual Districts' trunk sewers and pumping plants,as well as incidental construction work in the Districts and at the plants, are performed by em- ployees of the Joint Administrative Organization. We operate a service organization supplying labor and services for, and chargeable to, the individual Districts (including sewer main- tenance Districts), and the Joint Works. -7- • -.. ... May 28, 1965 BUDGET JOINT OPERATING FUND 1965 -1966 CAPITAL OUTIAY Administrative: Office Equipment & Furniture 64/65 Budget -$12,500. Operational: Automotive & Mobile Equipment Communication Equipment Machine Equipment & Tools Trunk Maintenance Equipment Laboratory Equipment Engineering Instruments & Test Equipment 64/65 Budget -$64,650. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTIAY 64/65 Budget -$77,150. (*) May and June 1965 estimated. Expenditures 1964 -1965 Actual (*) $ 9,721. $ 9,721. $32,855. 241. 5,083. -0- 1,400. 2,987. $42,566. $52,287. Expenditures 1965 -1966 Estimated $12,500. $12,500. $25,930. ( 1) 10,440.(2) 10,100. 2,300. 3,000. 2,500. $54,270. $66,770. (1) Includes $4930. for oil centrifuge authorized for purchase from DeLaval Separator Co. (2-17-65), delivery scheduled for August, 1965. Also includes four replacement working vehicles. (2) Includes $10,000. rebudgeted for VHF communication system. ·~· (Program still under study). -8- ( Equity District Percent 1 11.98 2 32.93 3 31.98 5 6.28 6 6.18 7 4.68 11 5.97 TOTALS -100.00 ( May 28, 1965 DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS.AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION i965 -·1966 1265-1966 Reguirements 1264-1265 Com12arative Amounts Cash Less: Es·timated Net Amounts Cash · Amounts Reguirements* Balances to be Raised Reguirements RaiseQ. $1, 000' 330 •. $ 554,149. $ 446,181. $ 794,930. $ 459,058. 2,749,655. 1,447,923. 1,301,732. 2,077,055. 1,264,511. 2,670,330. 1,310,,395. 1,299,935. 1,965,841. 1,143,313. 524,380. 312,755. 211,625. 448,649. 271,753. 516,030. 273,551. 242,479. 392,410. 232,410. 390,780. 204,833. 185,947. 293,834. 173,258. 498,495. 2lt).,394. 257,101. 346,281. 214,697. $8,350,000.* $4,405,000. ~,oo:Y $6,319,000. $3,759,000. *See Schedule "Joint Works Requirements" May 28, 1965 SCHEDULE OF JOINT WORKS REQUIREMENTS 1965'"'11966 Regula:r Construction ( 1962 Engineers' Report) (1) Buildings at Plant No. 2 ~ Vehicle Storage, Housing for Ocean Outfall Boo~ter Station No. 1, Power Building (2) Centrate and Supernatant T-reatment, Plants No. 1 and 2 · (3) Ocean. Outfall No. 2 -Land Section (4) Instrumentation Additions (several individual purchases) (5) Interplant Electrical Duct (6) Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 2 (7) Additional Primary Treatment at $154,ooo(a) 165,000 885,000 90,000 85,000 1,330,000 Plant No. 2 (One 20 MGD Sedimenta- tion Basin and Digester) (8) Addition to Administrative Office Building 505,000 96,000 (3) (9) Miscellaneous Small Jobs and Contingencies (10) Miscellaneous Force Account Work Subtotal Reserve for Future Requirements {1962 Engineers* Report) (1) Reserve for extension of Outfall No. 2 and Secondary Treatment Land .Purchase (1) 20 acres adjacent to Plant No. 1 Professional Services (1) Engineering on 1966-67 construction (2) Legal and Survey Services 90,000 75,000 TOTAL OF REQUIREMENTS Unpaid or Encumbered from 1964-65 Cash Requirements for 1965-66 Less: Balance available from 1964-65 TOTAL TO BE RAISED NOTES: (a) Rebudgeted from 1964-65 • . (b) Includes engineering not heretofore paid. $3,475 ,ooo{b l 2,700,000 440,000 1,610, 8,350,000 4a405 ,oog_C c) $3,945,ooo(d) (c) Includes $2.3 million reserve heretofore accumulated. (d) For comparison, amount raised in 1964-65 ~3,759,000 l l ' • I .. • • f . ' . . t ' ' .. . .. . . I I.. ·- -· l I • ,_ I ' . . ' . ,. . . . I . . .• . ... '. . I •• . , . ' . ·. • I 'I I / ... <:>· Fiscal Year 1965-66 1966-67 1967-68 1968-69 1969-70 TOTALS (1) {2) (3) (4) (5) Table 1 District No. 2 Suggested Financing of District Facilities Outlined in March, 1965 Engineer's Report through June, 1970 and Showing Funds Available for Additional Work {Assuming Maintaining 5 cent Tax Rate) Existing & Estimated Proposed Remaining Assessed Tax Payments ff~~ Total ~!i~~~ions New Con- Valuation Revenue District 3 Revenue struction Total Funds on ExEense June 30 $560(4) $0.280(4) $0.131(4) $0.696(4,5) $0.124(4) $0.191(4) $0.315(4) $0.381(4) 610 0.305 0.131 o.436 0.047 o.403 o.450 0.367 660 0.330 0.131 o.461 0.047 0.707 -0.754 0.074 710 ! 0.355 0.131 o.486 0 0.256 0.256 0.304 760 0.380 0.131 0.511 0 0.257 0.256 0.559 $3300 $1.650 $0.655 $2.590 $0.318 $1.814 $2.031 See discussion in text of report See Table 3 See Page I -Engineer's Report of March, 1965 Millions Includes 0.285 carryover from 1964-65 ) Available for Ad- ditional Work $0.075(4) 0 0 0.225 0.250 $0.550 " .it/ /. • / DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion See page 11 E11 and communications, if any STRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ( DISTRICT 7 (49) (50) (51) Consideration of Resolution No. 65-90-7 re: Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding Contract No. 7-2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer a d South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Famco Construc- ion Co. in the total amount of $69,260.50. See page 11 M11 (Bid tabulation in folders) ---- DI ICT 7 o,sideration of Resolution No. 65-91-7 re: Amending solution No. 64-188-7 regarding compensation for position f Stenographer-Clerk. See page 11 N" of Ordinance No. 709 STRICT 7 /Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants. .§e.e- page "E 11 !STRICT 7 Oti\er business and communications, if any DIST$rcT 7 Con~ideration of motion re: Adjournment \ \ DISTICT 2 ConSUeration of Resolution No. 65-92-2 re: Approving plans and specifications for the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-3; and authorizing advertising for bids. See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Receive and file communication from the General Counsel dated May 20, 1965, regarding agreement relative to the proposed Nahl Annexation #3 to District No. 2. {See letter in folders) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 65-93-2 re: Approving and authorizing execution of an agreement relative to the proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of territory to the District. See page "pn (Agreement in folders) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 65-94-2 re: Approving proposed annexation of territory to the District~ and rescinding Resolution No. 65-49-2. See page "Q" -4- , ) Table 3 District No. 2 Present and Proposed Fixed Obligation Payments (Assuming Sale of ·Capacity to District 3 and Purchase of Orangethorpe Sewer from Fullerton) Fullerton-Brea Bolsa Orangethorpe Fiscal Year Trunk Trunk Trunk Totals 1965-66 $52,610 $24,400 $ 46,400 $123,410 1966-67 0 0 46,400 46,400 1967-68 0 0 46,500 46,500 1968-69 0 0 0 0 1969-70 0 0 0 0 TOTALS $52,610 $24,400 $139,300 $216,310 b. It was pointed out by the General Manager that the Joint Works expansion program was largely fixed by the 1962 Engineer's Report and that all of the items included in the proposed work for 1965-66 conform to this long range plan. c. Th e Committee recalled that at the time the 1962 plan was adopted, it was agreed that the sum of $1 million over and above current requirements would be raised annually as a reserve fund for future large scale projects, such as ~ secondary treatment works, a new ocean outfall, and for \~\ purchase of additional land. These additional funds have ~\ ~\been so accumulated with approximately $2 million already \ \ ~ spent for secondary treatment and $8854000 budgeted the I·~ • '\ coming year for the new outfall plus $ 40, 000 for the 9 ' ~L purchase of additional land, thus leaving a net reserve at ~1 \ the end of the coming fiscal year of $2,700,000. This t should be adequate for future needs, assuming that the ~ additional $1 million reserve funds continue to accumulate '\~ ~/ each year. These reserve funds remain in the individual y ~ District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds and are ./ ~ invested in Government securities at a substantial interest ~\Y ·,\~J rate. t.~ ~ · d. The sum of $96,000 has been tentatively budgeted for r ·~ . ~J(;/ extensions to the Administrative office building recommended to be built for our growing personnel needs and activities over the next several years. Preliminary plans for this ~ office extension are now under study by the Special '~ Building Committee composed of Directors Cornwell, Kanno, Miller and Stewart. Action It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Parks and unanimously carried that the Schedule of Joint Works Require- ments for 1965-66, as submitted, be approved by the Committee and recommended for favorable action by the J cint Boards of Directors at the re ular meetin on June 9 1 65 . (Copy of budget and exp lanatory material attached. -3- Howard M. Cornwell Chairman (39) DISTRICT 6 v (40) (41) (42) (43 ) (44) (45 ) (46) Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if a n y . See page 11 E11 DISTRICT 6 Other business and communic at ions, if any DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment DISTRICT 7 ,/' Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -90 -7 re: Receive and ~ file bid tabulation and re commendat i on; and awarding Contract No . 7 -2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub -Trunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Fam co Co ns truc - tion Co. in t h e total amount o f $69,260 .50 . See page 11 M11 (B id tabulation in fo lders) ----- DI STR ICT 7 Conside ration of Resolution No . 65 -9 1-7 r e : Amending V" Resolution No. 6 4-188 -7 regarding compensation for position of Stenographer-Clerk. See page 11 N11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Ordinan ce No . 709 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants . See ~ page 11 E 11 DISTRICT 7 Othe r bus iness and communications, if any ~ (47) DISTRICT 7 (48) Conside r ation of motion re: DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No . =~-Approving ~ plans and specifications fo r the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 2 -10-3; and authorizing advertising for bids . See page 11 0 11 DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Receive and file communication ~ from the Gene r a l Counsel dated May 20, 1965, regarding \/" agreement relative to the proposed Nohl Ann exat ion #3 to District No. 2. (See letter in fo ld ers ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. 65 -93 -2 re: Approving and a u thorizing execution of an agreement relative to the J proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of territory to the District • . ~~~~~ See page 11 P11 (A greement in folders ) ISTRICT 2 Con sideration of Resolution No . 65 -9 4-2 re: Approving r...-- proposed annexation of territory to the District0 and ._:rescinding Resolution No. 65 -49 -2 . See page 11 Q 1 -4- June 4, 1965 Board of Directors Co u n t y Sanit ation District No . 2 Su bject: Eng i neering Fe asibility of Immediate Construction of District Sewers along the Santa Ana River easterl y of Olive and Atwood. Introduction : The "Preliminary En gineer 's Report of Ultimate Sewerage Facility Requirements for County Sanitation District No . 2", dated March, 1965, included proposed trunk sewers alo n g the Santa Ana River extending easterly from the proposed water reclamation plant . The first uni t of construction of th ese sewers was proposed for 1975, and the completion of the s ewers was scheduled for 1 980 . However, the City of Anaheim h as requested that considerat i on be given to the possibility of i mmediate construction of these trunk sewers to facilitate the development of the Santa Ana Canyon area. The City has been requested to provide sewer se rvice for a number of proposed ~ s u bdivisions, and the subject sewers would be utilized for that p u rpose . The purpose of this report is to present the f easi - bili ty from an engineering viewpoin t and the cost of construct- ing at this time one reach of the South Santa Ana River Trunk that would serve the immediate needs of the City of Anaheim. Proposed Trunk Sewer A conference was held with the City Eng ineer of Anaheim and the locations of the proposed subdivisions in the Santa Ana Canyon were revi ewed . It was concluded that a reach of the South Santa Ana River Trunk extending from Imperial Hi ghway to a point approximately 9350 feet easterly (Range line R 9 W, R 8 W) is needed to provide the desired sewer service. This sewer would be substantially the same size and capac i ty as proposed in the Preliminary En g ineer's Report dated March, 1965 . This trunk sewer could temporarily tie into the existing City of Anaheim sewer that presently t erminates at ~~=i~!~rf!a~=~~~~.-Yo rba Road as shown in the Prelim~ ~~) ~v -1- . ,__,,_ .. rO (,,? ~ . f1/'t- (1 i17\ 'c "'" Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY ,/ -June 3, 1965 OF DIRECTORS, { I Sa nitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11 C::\~\ Your Executive Committee met in the Districts' office on \ Wednesday, June 2, 1965, at 4:30 p.m. Present were Directors Cornwell, Chairman, Harvey, Parks, Stoddard, Meyers and Hirstein. Director Lambert was absent. Others present were Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, Paul G. Brown, Assistant General Manager and Fred A. Harper, Secretary and Director of Finance. Chairman Cornwell presided. Items considered and recommen- dations made to the Joint Boards are as follows: 1. Joint Operating Budget a ~· The tentative budget summary of the Joint Operating fund or 1965-66, as submitted by the General Manager, was ~ examined item by item. . The staff was questioned as to the method of estimating increases in sewage flow for each District for the next fiscal year. The General Manager explained that these estimates are based on examination of past data and that the cash contribution of each District, as shown on the material submitted, is computed from this estimate. It was noted by Mr. Hirstein that the estimated total flow from all Districts will average more than 100 million gallons per ay next year, as contrasted with less than 15 million ----~ lons per day in the early 1950's. he amounts tentatively budgeted for research and pollution control were questioned by Mr. Stoddard. The General Manager explained that these amounts include an accelerated program necessary for final design of the new ocean outfall. He also stated that the Districts have been somewhat deficient in research work because, until recently, manpower and funds have not been available to carry out an adequate program. However, with more time and manpower now available and with State and National water pollution control being tightened up and waste water reclamation becoming a definite possibility, the money expended now in this connection will undoubtedly be repaid many fold in the future. Mr. Stoddard brought out that as a member of the State Water Pollution Control Board he believes that the State's research program should include some of this work which the individual waste dischargers are now force d to do themselves. However, since the State's program does not, the Districts are justified in and must be doing this type of work themselves. / .. . (52) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of written report of the staff and engineers concerning costs and financial feasibility of request of the City of Anaheim dated April 27, 1965, for construction of facilities. (Copy of report in folders) (53) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any. See page 11 D11 (54) DISTRICT 2 Other business and communications, if any (55) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment (56) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any . See page 11 E 11 (57) DISTRICT 11 Other business and communications, if any (58) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment -5- WARRANT NO. 2222 2223 2224 2225 2226 2227 2228 2229 2230 2231 2232 2233 2234 2235 2236 2237 2238 2239 2240 2241 2242 2243 2244 2245 2246 2247 2248 2249 2250 2251 2252 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Acore Drilling Service $ 35.00 ../ Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. d u....._:_r . I.... 13. 35 Jan Alabaster 17.20 Aladdin Litho & Art 45.24 American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. 49.39 American Optical 15.58 City of Anaheim 25.00 Anaheim Dodge 57.65 Anchor Packing Company 136.55 .___ Apco Supply C--<1\..-~~ 47.29 Associated Concrete Products 34.42 Atlas Stationers 84.64 -Barnes & Delaney f'~~t:" (~l._T\ 415.81 Bascom Rush Co. 30.16 Bay City Bearing Co. 414.27 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 139.65 Bedford Freight Lines, Inc. 6.15 Bell Pipe & Supply Co. 13.26 Blower Paper Company 121.64 -· Blue M Engineering Co • 7"'' .-f ··-> .. ..A" 466 . 66 -Charles Bruning Co. t"0'-1-{'"°t...,..... ,~Q~~1~,-bl.1\"1 _J84.71 Bud's Equipment Rentals 91.00 Buena Park Wholesale Electri c 571.56 California Cartage Co., Inc. 59.00 California Wholesale Electric 35.03 .-. Cal-State Seal Co. .z...., ~ -·, •'tt--~ 17 .14 Paul Calvo Surqeying 1,140.00 Carlton's Linoleum Shop 9.26 Chemical Exchange Co. ~-~ 18,968.42 College Lumber Co., Inc. 50.85 Consolidated Freightways 23.07 Costa Mesa Lumber Co. 3.99 2253 2254 2255 2256 2257 _ rt Cummins-Chicago Corp. -,·~".-~ .... c n . 722 .80 7 "'f-' '<.~ •• ~The Davis Brown Co. 1"'"~. 72.75 2258 2259 2260 2261 2262 2263 2264 2265 2266 2267 2268 2269 2270 2271 2272 2273 2274 2275 2276 2277 2278 2279 -John M. Deck Co. .J-~ .. -.. l e ~"'-1'-'"i)''L-(... ._, 15. 32 Electric Products Co. 186.46 ~ Electric Supplies Distributing Co. 2,313.16 ou.-n----i r-~ Enchanter, Inc. 1, 000 .oo Engineers Sales-Service Co. 456.22 Enterprise Electric Supply Co. 614.18 Enterprise Printing Co. ~ J ,, $ 166. 23 Chas. A. Estey, Inc. 10.92 Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 442.27 Fairfax Electronics, Inc. 56.65 Fischer & Porter Co. 921.65 Flair Drafting Service 332.50 H. R. Fox & Co. 187.08 Larry Fricker Co. 88.17 Garden Grove Camera Center 7 126.97 General Telephone Co. 187.10 Bob Gosche Co. 141.90 A. P. Green Refractories, Inc. 218.40 -George T. Hall Co • ' L .. I' C:: 119 • 70 Hanson , Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester 448.oo Harlows Clocks 7 .07 Haws Drinking Faucet Co . 26 .1 5 Bernard Heying 18.oo Hollisters Nurse ry 21 .99 -A- , . WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 2280 Honeywell, Inc. 2281 Howard Supply Co. 2282 City of Huntington Beach 2283 International Harvester Co. $ 2284 -J & M Service 1 .. • _ .... -v._ < \-"'"'· 2285 -B. R. Jones & Co., Inc. t:t ._c:. ~. ~t ... ....,,.1-;, t'~ 2286 Kelly Pipe Co. 2287 Bill Kroeger 2288 Herbert H. Kyzer 2289 Lambert Truck Equipment Div. 2290 Larson Equipment Co. 2291 LASCO Industries 2292 LBWS, Inc. 2293 Judy Lee 2294 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 2295 D. J. Lord 2296 Lord-Babcock, Inc. 2297 Mahaffey Machine Co. 2298 McGraw-Hill Book Co. 2299 Minnesota Mining & Mfg. 2300 Morrison Co. 2301 Munselle Supply Co., Inc. 2302 City of Newport Beach 2303 . , (\ Orange County Blueprint 2304 ~~ -Orange CoL~nty Film Cleaning Service 2305 ~ ~ .. Orang e County Radiotelephone Service, Inc. 2306 Orange County Stamp Co. 2307 o. C. Suppliers, Inc. 2308 t.:ra•c•.-..' C Pacific Bellows 2309 Pacific Telephone 2310 Powr-Flo Products 2311 N B Products 2313 The Register 2313 Reynolds Camera Supply 2314 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 2315 Howard Ryan Tire Service 2316 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 2317 Santa Ana Electric Motors 23 18 Santa Ana Postmaster 2319 E. H. Sargent & Co. 2320 Schurr & Finlay, Inc. 2321 Russell M. Scott 2322 Selman Chevrolet Co. 2323 The Sherwin-Williams Co. 2324 Shipkey & Pearson, Inc. 2325 John E. Sigler, Consultant 2326 Signal Oil Co . 2327 Smith Engineering Co. 2328 Southern California Chemical Co. 2329 Southern California Edison Co. 2330 Southern California Water Co. 2331 Southern Counties Gas Co. 2332 Southwest Flexible Co. 2333 Speed-E-Auto Parts 2334 Speedy Saw Service 2335 Standard Oil Co. Of Calif. 2336 Sully Miller Contracting Co. 2337 Tardif Sheet Metal 2338 Technical Book Co. 2339 Tell Steel, Inc. -B - AMOUNT 626 .oo 1 ,304 .85 4.50 139 .94 66.70 2.62 224.64 23.40 15.00 49 .92 3,889 .36 195. 31 453.29 4.60 646 .69 26.60 79.40 462.24 8.09 53.81 14.57 101.04 47 .47 6 .29 204.82 300.36 7.16 45.50 18.34 253.45 7.80 317 .43 12.00 2.56 40.75 134.94 67.91 321 .70 100.00 107.08 120.00 40.40 7.99 78.04 42.90 816 .10 388 .00 52.32 1,089.38 4,562.53 3.90 196.21 51 .45 44.44 5.00 758 .09 278.30 480.31 14. 76 86 .63 ~ . WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 2340 Terminal Testing Laboratories 2341 Thermo -Fax Sales Incorporated 2342 Norman R. Termblay 2343 c. O. Thompson Petroleum Co. 2344 \~~--Turville Studio 2345 Union Sign Co. 2346 Utilities Supply Co. 2347 'I::. t-John R. Waples, Consultant , 2348 ~~ ..:1-r" ~~ .._ ... Guy L. Warden & Sons fJa.:h .\G\ L .._,.,,.. -J( 2349 :) • -t.f.:.-j , -Warren & Bailey Co. 2350 We lch's Concrete Co. 2351 Westco Pump Sales Co. 2352 City of Westminster 2353 Worthington Corporatio.n 2354 2355 2356 2357 2358 2359 2360 236 1 2362 2363 2364 2365 2366 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art Bank of America Paul Calvo Surveying John Carollo Engrs. En chanter, Inc. Enterprise Printing Co. The Orang e Daily News Raymond G. Osborne Schurr & Finley, Inc. J. T. Smith Co. & Wescon, Inc. Wal l ace Trade Bindery John Ward Co. West & Wiggs, Inc. TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF -c- AMOUNT 8.oo 235.15 18 .30 222.03 11 3 .62 228.80 56 .37 225.30 210.57 7.24 134 .83 175 .85 5.00 63.96 $ 53,434.48 $ 57.82 173,278.13 304.oo 5,338.62 2,100.00 33.90 46 .27 1,909.50 3,832.86 26,685.84 40 .51 2,737.9 4 2,195.42 $2 18,560 .81 $27 1,995 .29 .; r'-.. ·TARRANT NO. 2367 2368 2369 2370 2371 2372 DISTRICT NO. 2 OPERA'l'DJG FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF County Sanitation District #3 ~ Construction Fund Tax Service of Orange County AMOUNT $ 20,756.16 15.00 $ 20,771.16 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS j IN FAVOR OF / f "\ # ,.~ (Y't ~ County Sanitation District 3 J • 'P 86,484.oo Construction Fund DISTRICT NO. 5 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Daily Pilot Tax Service of Orange Count~ Inc. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art -D- $ 107,255.16 $ 86.36 75.00 $ 161.36 208.42 WARRANT NO. 2373 2374 2375 2376 2377 2378 2379 2380 2381 2382 2383 2384 2385 2386 2387 2388 2389 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Boyle & Lowry $ AMOUNT 6,330.44 AD No. Amount 1 $2,343.38 3A 64.40 3B 59.60 5A 2,462.75 $4,930.13 Plan Check & Inspection 1,400.31 $6,330.44 Jack A. & Patricia G. Chandler (AD #5A) Costa Mesa Sanitary District ~ Goode & Goode Appraisers (AD #1) Paul J. Hogan County of Orange AD NO. Amount 1 $211.40 5A 166.oo $377.40 Walter A. & Corrine L. Schminke {AD #1) Southern California Edison Co. ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF r ~ Costa Mesa Sanitary District \~fr-,~ FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 570.00 1,950.0.0 750.00 70.70 377.40 625.00 8.52 $ l0,682.06 $ 16,250.00 IN FAVOR OF J.)-:f~ Boyle & Lowry 7_i. ~ 11\b.Jpd ~bi $ 5,224.03 36,59 52.25 1.99 48.83 22.83 Enterprise Printing co. Raymond G. Osborne Laboratories Santa Ana Blue Print Co. Tustin News Wallace Trade Bindery Co. DISTRICT NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Huntington Beach News Wallace Trade Bindery Co. -E- $ $ 32,318.58 35.00 32.76 . . Agenc:a Item No. U Lr FILED ]. R. LESTER BOY LE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY In the Office of the Secretary County Sanitation District /, No --~---.:z....~~~~~- Consulting Engineers, A l oint Venture of BOYLE ENG INEER I NG & LOWRY AND ASSOCI ATES APR 1 tl 1965 , , 412 So11th Lyon Street P.O. Box 178 Santa A11a, Calif., 92702 Tefepl1011e Kimberl)' 7-4-171 April 8, 1965 ~Board of Directors County Sanitati on District No . 2 P . 0 . Box 5175 Fountain Valley , California r Ge n tlemen : 'Pursuant to a request by Mr . Fred A . Harper, District 's Secretary , we have prepared an engineering study regarding the annexat i on to the District of "Noh l An nexation No . 3 " as described in Resol ut ion No . 65 -219 of t he Board of Super visors a dopted Ma r ch 2 , 1 965. It is our recommendation that the following requirements be estab l ished as conditions to the annexation of this territory to the District . 1 . Payment of ad valorym taxes toward the retirement of the existing authori zed bon ds of the District , plant expansion a n d ma inten a n ce a n d operation costs . 2 . That the territory be annexed to the City of Anaheim, within a reasonable period of time, in order that the sewerage developed in the territory may be con - veyed via the local sewer system to the District 's trunk sewer system . 3 . The local sewer system to be installed and connected to the District 's system without expense to the District . 4 . Payment of all costs incurred by the District per- taining to th e required a n nexation proceedings . 5 . Payment to the District the sum of $100 .00 per acre of the territory so annexed. Board of Directors Co u nty Sanitati on District No . 2 4 -8-65 Page 2 . In determining the value to the territory to be annexed to the sewage disposal facilities of the District, the following basic criteria was used : Firs t, that conditi ons under wh i ch outside areas are a n nexed to the existing District shal l not be detri mental to t h e interest of the lands presently within the District , and Second , that conditions to be imposed upon areas to be annexed shall not be unreasonable in regard to providing sanitary sewer service as compared with similar lands presently within the District . The specific benefi t the subject lands will receive by annexing to the District is the immediate use of the Placentia- Newhope trunk sewer system via City of Anaheim sewer system, and treatment plant facilities . It would appear that the lands requesting annexation wi l l be schedul ed for earl y developme nt and that sai d lands wi ll probably be equi valent in assessed value to the average of the assessed value of improved l ands within the District, and thus will immediately assume its share of the District 's annual costs . Several estimates were made as to the value of the Dis - trict 's facilities available to serve the area proposed for annexation . These estimates incl uded the following : 1 . Estimate of back taxes that would have been paid by the area proposed for annexation since the formation of District No . 2 . 2 . Estimate of the principal and interest payments made on all District Bond Issues. reduced to an average value per acre . 3 . Estimate based on the net worth of the District as of June 30 , 1964, reduced to an average value per acre . After a careful analysis of these data, it was deter- mined that by payment of an annexation fee of $100 .00 per acre, plus future ad-valorum tax payments , sufficient funds wou l d be provided to pay the costs of serving the lands to be annexed without detrimental effect upon the lands presently within the District. Board of Directors County Sanitation District No . 2 4 -8-65 Page 3. We therefore recommend that your honorable body approve the subject annexation subject to the five conditions described in this report . SLL :m •1 cc -Mr. Ted Finster Mr. Thornton E . Piers all '' v Respectfully submitted, J . R . Lester Boyle and Sidney L . Lowry Consulting Engineers ,J-t~~ .,f!f ~ Sidney L . Lowry JUN 1 9 l86b JUN 9 1965 ~e Nohl Reso lution 0 ,/ , j -~~~ 90~1 to ... w:~e J,.ette~ t,~ .... ..S~ Ana~i t~ Co9ci¥sking fo.r F--~.-e' of t_he4emai h.ing po rt\_i_on of t(l~..-'.Pustin Avenue S~wer_..... () ~ General Counsel authorized to offer Sakioka $2300 per acre (instead of the original $2100 per acre). ---#1 3 -Rego of th General Mana x---R~vi--ewea the up dati ng of the { ~ Orang~ounty Sewera eport #14 -Reported on the di sso luti¢n of CSD #1 4 effective June 1st . Al s@ reported on negotiations wikh Sakioka fer the Districts acquisit i on of 20 acres south;m of the Orange County Water Dist property on Ward St,.:J[n acco rda ce with an appraisal report the O(~ Gene r a l Counsel advi sed he had offered $21,000 per acre. Saki @ka counte red that he wo ul d accept $25 ,000 per acre . The General Counsel recommended to the Bo~rd that he be authorized to make an offer of $23 ,000 per acre; th~same price that was paid by the OCWD for the propert y immediat ly ad j ac e nt to the l and under consideration . This was c~n cu red in by the General Manage r . I t was then MS&D:E} -(Tha t the ,. C. b e authorized, etc .) . , #1 7 -Adoption of budget -show roll call by District . Also add , ~1.11.,[4 / .. Bi rec ting the Erl Speci a l Buildi ng Committee l:le --:i:nstruetcd to make note of the present us e of the storage space now available . Fo llowing I t em 4 1 -Then #11 bus i dess was taken up and they adopted the resolution on wi thdrawal. / I 07 .2-b i'~1 • Re : No hl Annexation -5 e qual payments ~ $2690,..00 each - there will be a security i n the form of either stocks or bonds in an amount accep table to the Gene r a l Counsel of the District (change r e sol ution to match agreement -change will come from Nissen?) #52 -R & F e n g ineers r e port re : Anaheim request for constructi9n of faci l ities -financial report (red one) r & F and staff directed not to consider an increas e in the tax r ate of the Di stri ct for the purpose of fina ncing projects out o f ~r iority schedule i n the engineer preliminary engineer s report d a t ed rn~ __ _ltq ft.>' until s uch time as the Board could decide on the f inancing arrangements necessary to imp l ement the constru ction as outlined i n the preliminary engi nee r s repo rt . #46-B -Subj ec t to the General Counsel 's approval ~f the deed . -#46 -DD MS&DC That the G. C. be a uthorized and directed te write on behalf of the Board to the s. A. City Council requesting acqui siti on of the sewer fac ilities in Tustin Avenu e as outlined in the engi neers report dated November , 1 96 1 (remaining portion of facilities?) .._ ·-... 46-DDD Upon recommendation of the G. C. it was MS&DC: Reso l ution -That the G. c . Be ~V_"thorized to acquire an certain real property owned by ~ Sakioka needed i n struction of the South Coast Plaza Sub -Trunk xmt Sewer, 7 -2B in the amount of $896 .00 (Nissen to sign warrant ). --" r;-2 -IJ easement for the con- Contrac t From Joint Meeting June 9th Nohl Resolution to be changed. JUN 9 \965 General Counsel to write letter to Santa Ana City Council asking for the sale of the remaining portion of the Tustin Avenue Sewer. (lst portion purchased by agreement June, 1965) JJ'N 9 1965 General_ Counsel authorized to offer Sakioka $2300,-:per acre (instead of the original $2100 per acre). JUN 9 1965 #14 -The General Counsel reported on the dissolution of CSD #14 effective June 1st. Mr. Nisson also reported on negotiations with Sakioka for the Districts' acquisition of 20 acres southerly of the Orange County Water District property on Ward Street in accordance with an appraisal reportx~he General Counsel advised that he had offered $21,000 per acre. Sakioka countered that he would accept $25,000 per acre. The General Counsel recommended to the Boards that he be authorized to make an offer of $23,000 per acre; the same price that was paid by the OCWD for the property immediately adjacent to the land under consideration. This was concurred in by the General Manager. It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General Counsel be authorized to make an offer of $23,000 per acre in negotiating for acquisition of/20 acres of property on Ward Street. the Adoption of budget -show roll call vote by District. Also, add that the Special Building Committee be instructed to make a note of the present use of the storage space now available. Following Item 41 -Show #11 business taken up including resolution on withdrawal. JUN 9 1965 Ordinance 709 taken under submission for study. EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour of 8:00 o'clock p.m., June 9th , 1965 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue, Fountain Valley, Californi a. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p .m. The roll was c alled and the Secretary reported a quorum of the Board present. Directors pres e nt: Director s William H. Hirs te i n (Chairman ), Dee Cook , H. H. Harvey, A . H. Meyers, Clifto n c. Miller and Re x A. Parks Directors absent: Non e Present : Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board. DI STR ICT NO. 7 Directing the General Co unse l to submit r eque s t for purchase o f facilities Following he adoption of a r e so ut ion approving an agr~7 ent with the City ov Santa Ana for purch~se b y the Distr ict of a ,1por t i on of the Tustin Avenue Sewer, it was moved , seco~ded and dul y carri ed : Tha t the General Counsel be dir,~ted t o s ubmit to the Santa Ana City Counci l , a f or~l reques t f o r p urchase by t he District o f t he r ema.lm1ng port ion o f the sewer faci lities in Tustin Avenue , as outli ned in the Enginee r's Report date d Nov mber, 196 1. STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS COUNTY OF ORANGE ) • I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of t h e Board of Directors of County Sanitation Di stric t No. 7 , of Orang e County, California, do hereby certify the above and fore g oing to be full, true and correct copy of minut e entries on rec ord taken from the minutes of the re g ular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of June , 196 5 . IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have h e reunto set my hand and affix ed the official seal of Count:y:_ Sanitation Distr ict No. 7 r-' of Orange County , California , this l'(t h day o f J une , 19 6 '.? • Secretary , Board of Directors o f County Sanitation Di s t ric t No. 7 or Moved, seconded and duly carriedt That the Boards of Directors adopt Resolution No. 65-86, approving and adopting pZ?5?FYS? specifications for Instrumentation-1965, Job No. J-5-E; and authorizing advertising for bids. Certi- fied copy of this resolution is attached bereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded and duly carried /<ALL DISTRICTS / Authorizing increase x in maximum amount pay- ab1e ~I'~ •(J~b No. I-6-1) That the maximum amount pa.yab~ ~ · Osborne Testing Laboratorie~1is hereby authorized to be increased to $8,ooo.oa.fror pipe testing for Addition to Plant l Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline, · ~~o. I-6-1. I ALL DISTRICTS Approval of Change Order #3 to Job No. P2·7-l Moved, seconded and duly carrieds That Change Order #3 to the plans and specifications for Job No, P2-7-l (Installation of Steam Turbine at Plant No. 2) be approved, authorizing an addition of $842.17 to the contract with John Ward Company, Contractor. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. Moved, seconded and duly carriedc That Change Order #4 to the plans \ ....... / / ALL DISTRICTS ApProval of Change Order #4 to Job No. P2-7-l and specifications for i:aBxHa¥ Installation of Steam 'l'urbine at Plant No. 2~ Job No. P2-7-l, be approved, authorizing an extension of time of ALL l>ISTRIOTS Moved, seconded and duly carrieda \,,,..,.~Accepting Job No. , 1'2·7•1 as complete /( _ _.yl. That the Boards of Directors adopt ~~V' Resolution No. 65-87, accepting . f\ jJ-JI" (}/!"~ . Job No. P2-7·1 as completed, and authorizing execution~of a Notice of Gompletion of Wo~k~~ Company, Contractor). Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a pert of these minutes. ALL DIS'l'RICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried1 Approval of Change Order #2 to Job No. I-6-l 'l'hat Change Order #2 to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-1 (Addition to Plant l Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline), be approved, authorizing change 1n the method of pa ent -for extra gravel fill~ntrac ·~th Vinnell Corporation, Contractor. Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. ALL DISTRICTS Certification of the General Manager, re- ceived and filed Moved, seconded and duly carrieda That the written certification of the General Manager that he has personnally checked all bills appear- ing on the agenda for this meeting, found them to be 1n order, and that he recommends a.uthorizd.11*on for payment, be received and ordered filed. ALL DISTRICTS Approval of warrants Moved, seconded and unanimously carried by roll call vote1 -· That the Districts• Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay Revolving Fund warrant book.a be approved tor signature d the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor be authorized and directed to pay the following: Joint Operating Fund $ Capital Outlay Revolving Fund .._$ _____ _ $ in accordance with the following warrantss DISTRICT l Moved, seconded and duly carried: Awarding contract for Job No. I-6-2 to That the Board of Directors adopt Vinnell Corporation Resolution No. 65-88-1, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommen-1..-- dation, and awarding contract for Addition to Plant No. l - Effluent Discharge Facilities -Structures, Job No. I-6-2, to Vinnell Corporation in the total amount of $172~800.00. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and l _.made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT l Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District~o. 1 be adjourned to 4100 p.m., Thursday, July let, 1965. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at a p.m., June 9, 1965. Moved, seconded and duly carried1 DISTRICT 3 Approving plans and specifications for Contract No. 3-10 That the Board of Directors adopt Resolimion No. 65-89-3, approving and adopted plans and specifications for the Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-loi and authorizing advertising for bids!'} Certified copy of this resolution is attaehea hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTBICT 3 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried1 That this meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned. The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at ;z,· a Z-- p .m., June 9, 1965. DISTR ICT 5 Moved , seconded and duly carried: Approval of wa rrants That the District 's Operating Fund and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved for signature of t he Chairman, a nd that the County Auditor be authorized and d irected t o pay the f oll owing warrants : OPERATI NG FUND Daily P ilot 2370 2371 Tax Service of Orange County, Inc . $ 86 .36 75 .00 $161 .36 2372 ACCUMUIA TED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND Aladdin Lithe & Art $208.42 $369 .78 DISTRICT 5 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried: That this meeting of t he Board of Directors of Coun ty Sanitation Dis t rict No . 5 be adjourned . The Chairman then d e c lared the meeting so adjourned at ---p .m., J une 9, 1965 . DISTRICT 6 Adjournment Moved, seconded and duly carried : Tha t this meeting of the Board of Direc tors o f Coun ty Sanitation Dis t rict No . 6 be adjourned . The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at P..:m_., June 9, 1965 . --- ---------~ DISTR ICT 11 Approval of warrants Moved, seconded andduly darried: That the Dis t rict~ Ac cumulated Capital Ou tlay Fund warrant book b e approved for signature o f the Chairman , ahd that the County Auditor be authori zed and directed to pay t h e fo llowing warrants : ACCUMULATED CA PITAL OUTLAY FUND $ 35 .00 32.76 $ 67 . 76 DISTRICT 11 Adjour nme nt Moved, seconded and duly carried : That this meeting of the Board of Directors o f County Sanit ation District No . 11 be adjourned. Th e Chairman then dec lared the meeting so ad journed at __ _ p.m., June 9, 1965 . DISTRIC'l' 7 Awarding contract 1Br No. 7-2-B to Famco Construction Co. Moved, seconded and duly carriedt That the Board of Directors adopt Resolution No. 65-90-7, to receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation., and awarding lontract :In No. 7-2-B tor the South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk and Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk to Famoo Construction Company in the total amount of $69,260.50. Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes. DISTRICT 7 -' -.I -( R 0 LL CA LL District ----.,..---Regular ___ ~---Adjourned ______ __ Time f ; (}(J ---~o r~ r ( DISTRICT ;2 V7 r DISTRICT 1 ~'V> ~µ<.-~]~ ~ Har·v,_;y-,-H-:=z-Gilmore ....... JOINT BOAR"JG f'J Jr.; tl\iinc-• l11eye:.s v7" --------tQ Ylyj'-1 •c..~c Miller ~ Macl<: Cornwell _i.. ___ Farnswor ~;-"'.J_,-f(;l.~ Hirs te in ~ Allen Amo ..,.... r;.J. And erson Gummere '?/J~ • .1).-\,~, c .,I Bousman Thompson 1<-<-L.ct::. Parlrn Ca llens ~ Kanno C al l e~s --Cook ~ Gruber Cornwe ll Hileman l<~Ae­ Farnsworth Shull Crapo i--Shull Crauo Culver ....,../ Culver Furman ~ De Vrj_es Harvey , H. Grube r v Elder Hock Harvey,H . t/ Gilmore Schutte Hock v Michel Speer Johnson _..,....-Ant i ch Workman Kanno v-:' Ca llens Hirstein Lambert .......... Shipley Long t-< Bell Gilmore Michel Krein Harvey,C . Queyrel Allen Meye rs ~ DISTRICT 3 Cornwell V' Farnsworth Miller ,.........-- Parks ~ Schutte 2 Shipley a_ Speer _!J ___ _ Stewart g__....- Stoddard L.--' Mack Hileman Krein Welch Harvey,C# Workma n t::::7 Qu eyrel Wright ~ ,, No e Hirste in ;;?"' All en OTHERS: Nelson Brown Nis s on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson __::::::-__ llen Amo ~ Anders on Bousman Crapo Culver Furman Harvey,H. Johnson Kanno Long Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Hirs tein a- I ~ V' ,,....-- k ,,, " ........ i.--v a_ ~ ..........- v DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Gruber Hirstein V7 v v DISTRICT 6 v I/" Meyers Gruber Hirstein 7 ' DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Cook Harve y,H. Meyers Miller Parks v: v 1/ !,./"' v 1/ Gummere 'rhompson Shull De Vries Gilmore Antich Callens Bell Krein We lch Harvey,C. No e Allen Elder Allen Elder Al l en Allen Gruber Gilmore Mack Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lamb ert Stewart Hirstein V Shipley a-/ 1C?' Allen • R 0 L L CA LL Di strict -------Re gular ______ ~ Adjourned. ______ _ Time ----- Item --------------------~ C o'R r= 'b ~ -·\:s .... t- ca\\ q JOINT BOAR"J.S Cornwell ~-Farnsworth Amo Anderson Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Grub Gr Harvey,H . Hock J ohnson Kanno Lambe rt Long Meye rs Miller Parks Schutte Ship ley Sp eer Stewart Stoddard Workma n Wr ight Hirstein OTHERS : Nelson Brown Ni s s on Ga lloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson 1./ 0.---Gummere v Thompson V'" Ka nno ---Gruber .t~l 6' Shull 'N ~ De Vrj_e s v Elde:r ~ Gi lmor e tf? Michel Antich V7 Callens ~ Shipley L---Bell v-- ~ Mack ~ Hileman ~ Kre i n c...-Welch ti Harvey,C . (,.,._ -~ b1 Queyre l L..--" Noe ,,,..... Allen DISTRICT 8 Martin Scott Hirstein Allen -:( } ~ \, t \) l ~ IJc:J 1' DISTRICT 1 Har-v ~y , H. ~-Gilmore i,1eye!'.'S 1/ .Miller v-Mack Hi rstein ~-Allen DI ST RICT 2 Parks ~ Hileman Call8i1S ...........-Kanno Cornw ell V"' Farnsworth Cr apo IV Shull Culv er "' Harvey,H. ~ Gilmore Hock t-1 Michel Schutte ....,...... Krein Spe er -4-Harvey,C . Workma n Queyre l Hi rs te in ~ Allen DISTRICT 3 Co:rnwell V--Farnsworth Amo t...--""" Anderson c-Gummere Bousman ~ 'Ehompson Crapo N Shul l Culver ~ Fu rman ~ De Vries Harvey,H . l.' Gilmore Johns on \/" Antich Kanno V' Callens Long ""' Bell Schu tte v Krein Sh ipley ~ Welch Speer N Harvey,C . Wright v Noe Hi rstein v Allen DISTRICT 5 Stoddard / Gr ube r ~/ Elder Hirstein / Allen DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein '--""' Allen Cook f'.( Gruber Harvey,H . ..--Gilmore Meyers v Miller .............. Ma cl<: Parks ~ Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lambe rt ../ Shipley Stewart ~"-- Hirstein \./ Allen '{ b(N \ \ '4 -y"' ROLL CALL District -------Regular ____________ __ Adjourned ____________ __ Date Time ------------------------------ Item ------------------------------------~- NT BOAR'JS Cornwell -~;arnsworth Amo ~ Anderson f:Z:· Gummere Bousman _ Thompson Callens v Kanno Cook t:?" Gruber Crapo ---V-Shull Culver ~ Furman Gruber Harvey,H. Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Hirstein OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson De Vries Elder Gilmore Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Mack Hileman Krein Welch Harvey,C. Queyrel Noe Allen DISTP..ICT 8 Martin Scott Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 1 ---Har·vey, H. Gilmore --Meyers Miller Mack Hirstein Allen ~{·f'J DISTRICT 2 Parks + Hileman Callens Kanno Cornwell ~ Farnsworth Crapo N Shull Culver * Harvey,H. Gilmore Hock Michel Schutte v Krein Speer ti Harvey,C. Workman 'v Queyrel Hirstein ............. Allen DISTRICT 3 Cornwell Amo Anderson Bousman Crapo Culver Furman Harvey,H. Johnson Kanno Long Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Hirstein Farnsworth --- DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Gruber Hirstein DISTRICT 6 Meyers Gruber Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Cook Harvey,H. Meyers Miller Parks Gummere Thompson Shull De Vries Gilmore Antich Callens Bell Krein Welch Harvey,C. Noe Allen Elder Allen Elder Allen Allen Gruber Gilmore Macl( Hileman DISTRICT 11 Lambert Shipley Stewart Hirstein Allen 71 '-f N -... ~ 7 :; R 0 LL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time Item DISTRICT l --Harvey, H. Gilmore JOINT BOAR1S Meyers Miller Mack Cornwell Farnsworth Hirstein --Allen --Amo Anderson Gummere DISTRICT 2 Bousman Thompson Parks V"' Hileman Callens Kanno Callens v" Kanno Cook Gruber Cornwell 7 Farnsworth Crapo Shull Crapo Al Shull Culver Culver ±_ r') y Furman De Vrj_es Harvey,H. Gilmore Gruber Elder Hock ~ Michel ~ /\/ Harvey,H. --Gilmore Schutte Krein Hock Michel Speer ll Harvey,C. Johnson Antich Workman V'_ Queyrel Kanno Callens Hirstein ~ Allen Lambert Shipley Long Bell DISTRICT 3 Meyers Cornwell Farnsworth Miller Mack Amo Parks Hileman Anderson Gummere Schutte Krein Bousman Thompson Shipley Welch Crapo Shull Speer Harvey,C. Culver Stewart Furman De Vries Stoddard --Harvey,H. Gilmore Workman Queyrel Johnson Antich Wright Noe Kanno Callens Hirstein Allen Long Bell Schutte Krein Shipley Welch OTHERS: Speer Harvey,C. Wright Noe Nelson Hirstein Allen Brown DISTRICT 5 Nissen Stoddard Galloway Gruber Elder Dunn Hirstein Allen Tremblay Lowry DISTRICT 6 Carlson Meyers Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Allen Cook Gruber Harvey,H. Gilmore Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambert Shipley Scott Stewart Hirstein Allen Hirstein Allen BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fou ntain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. # 11 II AGENDA (1) (2) (3 ) (4) (5) ( 6 ) (7) (8) June 3, 1965 at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call Appointmeri_t of' Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of the~neral Manager A Consideration o~ motion re: Approval of Addendum #1 to ~ 1 1rt,;r" the plans and s~ecifications for the Edinger Avenue ~~~ Gravity Sewer a~d Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift Station, / Contract No. 11 ~ (Copy of Addendum in folders) , ,/ Consideration of fesolution No. 65 -85 -11 re: Receive and ?~ file bid tabulati~n and recommendation, and awarding ¥,,_ contract for the mdinger Avenue Gravity Sewer and Edinger .A' Avenue Sewerage Lift Station, Contract No. 11-9, to fV Oran e Count Pi eline Inc., Contractor, in the total amount of 1 O 1 • 5 . See page 11 A11 • (Bid tabulation will be in folders Consideration of motion re: Authori z ing the General /1 Manager to direct Lowry and Associates to provide detailed construction inspection for Contract No . 11-9, in accord-~ ance with paragraph Hof the agreement for engineering \'y services dated November 12, 1964 ~\· Other business and communications, if any Consideration of motion J e: Adjournment w t7 / p'i-\ \\I .. f.> o~ '<\' f}P .- RESOLUTION NO. 65-85-11 .AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER and EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-9; AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts• engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to Orange County Pipeline, Ihc. , Contractor, for Contract No. 11-9, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are here- by received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said Contract No. 11-9 (EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER and EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION), be awarded to ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. , Contractor, in the total amount of $ 140,618.65 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci- fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 65-62-11 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -A- . . COUNTY SANITATION DI STR I CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P . 0 . Box 5 175 -10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Va l ley, California 92708 ADDENDUM NO . l County Sani tation District No . 11 Contract 1 1 -9 EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER and EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LI FT STAT I ON May 21, 1965 A. Plans Sheet 3 of 12 A 2 -inch galvanized water line is located in Edinger and Graham 38 feet east of the cente r line of Graham and runs north from the 12 -inch water main in Edinger Street and crosses Graham Street west to the west property l ine 140 feet north of the center line of Edinger Street . Sheet 5 of 12 The water service connection shall be 1-inch per City of Huntington Beach Std. 101 in l ieu of the 1-1/2-inch shown . Sheet 12 of 1 2 Rotary mud will not be all owed as fill and shall be deleted . (See specification change below ) B. Specifications 1 . Page DS -25 parag raph 5-5 B The word sand and the word mud shall be deleted and the words "selected materia l" having a sand equivalent of not less than 30 as determined by State of California Test Method No . 217. 2. The Contractor is referred to paragraph 1 -3, page DS-2 of the Standard Sp e cifications . Fo r i nformation only the soil report on file indicat es water levels on 1 -21-65 at the following: Boring No . 1 at El evation 0 .00 Boring No . 2 at Elevation 5 .00 Lowry & Associates ------__ _,.. R 0 LL CALL District ------- GD~/ (J I o Regular ____________ __ Adjourned ____________ __ Date Time ~------------------------------ Item --------------------------------------DISTRICT 1 Har·vey, H. Gilmore JOINT BOART)S Meyers -- Miller Mack Cornwell Farnsworth Hirstein Allen --Amo / Anderson Gummere DISTRICT 2 Bousman Thompson Parks Hileman Callens Kanno Callens Kanno Cook Gruber Cornwell Farnsworth Crapo Shull Crapo Shull Culver Culver Furman De Vrtes Harvey,H. Gilmore Gruber Elder Hock Michel Harvey,H. Gilmore Schutte Krein Hock Michel Speer Harvey,C. Johnson Antich Workman Queyrel Kanno Callens Hirstein Allen Lambert Shipley Long Bell DISTRICT 3 Meyers Cornwell Farnsworth Miller Mack Amo Parks Hileman Anderson Gummere Schutte Krein Bousman Thompson Shipley Welch Crapo Shull Speer Harvey,C. Culver Stewart Furni.an De Vries Stoddard ---Harvey,H. Gilmore Workman Queyrel Johnson Antich Wright Noe Kanno Callens Hirstein Allen Long Bell Schutte Krein Shipley Welch OTHERS: Speer Harvey,C. Wright Noe Nelson v / Hirstein Allen Brown ~ DISTRICT 5 Nissan Stoddard Galloway Gruber Elder Dunn Hirstein Allen Tremblay Lowry DISTRICT 6 Carlson Meyers ~K~tl Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Hirstein Allen Cook Gruber Harvey,H. Gilmore Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman DISTRICT 8 ~'° (,,!r-'J~-1( DISTRICT 11 Martin v Lambert ~ Shipley Scott ~ Stewart ~ Hirstein Allen V' Hirstein ,/ Allen II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) (10) (11) (12) (13) DISTRICT No. #1-7 June 2, 1965 at 4:00 p.m. Roll Call Appointments o~ Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Report of the General Manager AGENDA Report of the Gene~al Counsel ~-- DISTRICT 1 . · Consideration of motion re: Approval of Addendum #1 \t" 6 ..Y~ to the plans and speci£ications for Job No. I--2 (Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities -~ Structures). Copy of acldendum in folders. DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion to open and read sealed to Plant No. 1 Effluent Job No. I-6-2, pursuant required by law -Qyv re: Directing the Secretary ~ v p ~oposals received for Addition \\ ·JA Dfscharge Facilities -Structures , "'r to legal notice published as \ DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Referring bids opened for Job No. I-6-2 to the engineers and the General Manager for tabulation and recommendaltion to the Board DISTRICT 7 I Consideration of motion re: Directing the Secretary to open and read sealed propo als received for the Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2B, pursuant to legal notice published as required b law DISTRICT 7 _,l. Consideration of motion re: R bids opened for ~->Jl.,V" Contract No. 7-2B to the engin ers and the General ~- Manager for tabulation and reco endation to the Board 1 DISTRICT 1 ,\,.. ·:jr- Consideration of Resolution No. 65-84-1 re : Accepting t'\~\}.-~ proposal of the engineers, and directin~ the preparation ~ of an Engineer's Report. See ~age 11 A1 • (Proposal in f olders) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 65-81-7 re: acceptance of an easement relat[ve to Tract cost to the District. See page "B 11 Authorizing #939, at no Consideration of Resolution No . 65-82-7 re: Authorizing acceptance of an easement relat've to Tract #3914, at DISTRICT 7 ~ no cost to the District. See p ge "C" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 65-83-7 re: Authorizirl{S acceptance of an easement relative to Tract #1968, at no cost to the District. See page 11 D11 (14) DISPRICP 7 (15) (16) (17) Consideration of Ordinance No. 709 DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, as follows: #2194 Postmaster, City of Santa Ana $100 .00 $100.00 DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 Other business and communications, if any DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 I \ ~ Consideration o f motiof re: Adjournment ~· fovv ( v-\ "'' ' c.JL. ,... "). 'CX ,.... t'-1 .I L-f-'· r-""' y~) '"? ~1/'- y I,'}- -2 - RESOLUTION NO. 65-84-1 EMPLOYING ENGINEERS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EMPLOYING SANITATION ENGINEERS AND DIRECTING SAID ENGINEERS TO PREPARE REPORT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That this Board of Directors does hereby employ Boyle Engineering, engineers, to make a survey and report, pursuant to the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code, Section 4748, showing the present and future sewerage requirements for the District. Section 2. That the engineers be directed to prepare and file a report with the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1 setting forth: (a) A general description of existing facilities for sewage collection, treatment and disposal, or a general description of existing facilities for refuse transfer or disposal, or both. (b) A general description of the work proposed to be done to carry out the objects of the District. (c) A general plan and general specifications of the work. (d) A general description of the property proposed to be acquired or damaged in carrying out the work. (e) A map showing the boundaries of the District and in general the location of the work proposed to be done, property taken or damaged, and any other information useful to an understanding of the proposed work. (f) An estimate of the cost of the proposed work. A-1 Section 3. That s~id engineers are hereby employed to do the work hereinabove set forth for a total fee of $1,400.00, in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in their proposal dated June 1, 1965. A-2 RESOLUTION NO. 65-81-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM HAROLD E. SCHULZE, a married man The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated December 9, 1964, wherein Harold E. Schulze, a married man, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes in connection with Tract Nos. 939 and 922 is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said Grant of Easement, which is more particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, is accepted at no cost to the District in form approved by the General Counsel. Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -B- EXHIBIT "An TO RESOLUTION NO. 65-81-7 That portion of Lots 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 of Tract 939 as per map thereof recorded in Book 29, Pages 46 to 48, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, and portion of Lots 25, 26, 27, and 28 of Tract 922 as per map thereof recorded in Book 29, Pages 5 to 7, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California, described as follows: Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 60 and running thence South 89° 30' East 67.19 feet along the Northerly line of said Lot 60 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence South 24° 52' Ea.st 60.17 feet along the Easterly line of said Lot 60 to the Southeast corner thereof; thence South 89° 29' 20" West 33.00 feet along the Nortnerly line of said Lot 59; thence South 3° 33' 29" East 134.05 feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 57, said point being located 68.5 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 4° 11' 59" East 123.37 feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 25, said point being located 78.00 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 3° 15' 06 11 East 66.12 feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 26, said point being located 82.00 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 0° 13' 00 11 West 64.oo feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 27, said point being located 82.00 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 4° 32' 06 11 West 67.74 feet to a point in the North line of said Lot 28, said point being located 76.90 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 6° 35' 57" West 71.05 feet to a point in the Southerly line of said Lot 28, said point being located 69.00 feet from the Southwest corner there- of; thence North 89° 39' OO" West 69.00 feet along the Southerly line of said Lot 28 to the Southwest corner thereof; thence North O~ 13 1 East 580.00 feet along the Westerly line of said Lots 28, 27, 26, 25, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 to the point of beginning. EXHIBIT "A 11 RESOLUTION NO. 65-82-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM THE GALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 11, 1965, wherein the GALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes in connection with Tract No. 3914 is hereby approved and accepted; and, Sec~ion 2. That said Grant of Easement, which is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, is accepted at no cost to the District;and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -C- -. • SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 65-82-7 That portion of Lot 11 in Tract No. 3914, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 178, Pages 1 thru 4 inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, described as follows: Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Lot; thence, along the Southeasterly line of said lot, North 37° 40 1 OO" East 134.46 feet to the most Easterly Corner thereof; thence, along the Northeasterly line of said lot, North 27° 49' 25 11 West 5.49 feet to a point in a line parallel with and distant Northwesterly 5.00 feet, measured at right angles from said Southeasterly line; thence, along said parallel line, South 37° 40 1 OO" West 110.14 feet; thence South 49° 35' 31" West 23.75 feet to a point in the Southwesterly line of said lot, said point being on a curve concave Southwesterly and having a radius of 44.oo feet, said last mentioned course being the Northeasterly prolongation of the radial line of said curve to said ·point; thence Southeasterly 10.48 feet along said lot line and said curve thru a central angle of 13° 39' 28" to the point of beginning. Together with the right to enter upon and use adjoining lands of Granter as may be necessary for initial construction of said sewer pipe line. SCHEDULE 11 A11 RESOLUTION NO. 65-83-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated March 16, 1965, wherein GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an ease- ment for sewer purposes in connection with Tract No. 1968 is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no cost to the District, and is more particularly described as follows: ·"Those portions of Lot 24 in Tract No. 1968, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 122, Pages 1 thru 5 inclusive of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County, described as follows: 11 The Southeasterly 10.00 feet of said lot. "The Southwesterly 15.00 feet of the Southeasterly 82.00 feet of said lot. 11 Together with the right to enter upon and use adjoining lands of Grantor as may be necessary for initial construction of said sewer pipe line.11 Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -D- .,.. . • Agenda Item No. /0 A R \.. H I T r ( T <:. • E r I G N ~ l · R s 4 1 2 :.OU"! H -fON ;T~E E T • ,ANT A ANA t .r..L11 01 '\!IA 9.-'"l02 • ~I M3 t kl' .1 .l l 1 A t:; nr:." R l P L ' TC p (< /( 111 FILED In the Office of the Secre t ary County Sanitation District No---------- June 1, 1965 JUN 2 1965 BY------------------~ Boord of Direr-tors County Sanitation District t'-.o. of Orange County l 0844 El I is Avenue Fountain Volley, Col iforn10 92708 Gentlemen: In response to a request from your Genera l .Mcinoger we are pleased ,.. . -- to submit herein a proposal to prepare an Engineer's Report setting forth require- ments for principal san i t a ry sewerage foci I it I es to meet the present and rea5onable future requirements of C o u nty Son itotion District No. 1 of Orang<. County . Said report will be prepared in ac c ordance with Section 4748 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Ca li fornia. We propose to prepare the Engineer s Report for a fee of $1400 . We further propose that al I plates and copy for the report wi II be prepared by this office and that oll cos t s of reproducing and binding of the required copies of the report wi II be bi lied at cost to t he district. We are prepared to proceed immediatel y with the preparation of the Engineer's Report and said report will cover, but not be limited to , the following facilities: Grand Avenue Trunk from Dyer Rood to Warner Aven1;e Main Street Trunk from Dyer Rood to Santa Ario Freeway. Seventeenth Street Trunk from Main Street to Santo Aria Freeway. Washington Avenue Trunk from Main Street to French Street . Raitt Street Trunk from Alton Avenue to Myrtle Street. Outfol I from Orang County Sanitation Districts, Sewage froa~rnent Plant No I to Gn:~envi lie Street. Board of Directors County Sanitation District No . June 1, 1965 It is estimated that the report should be completed for presentation prior to your regular meeting in July . This proposal is submitted as a basis for negotiations for a contract for engineering services relating to the matter set forth herein. We are recidy to proceed with the report immediately upon receipt of authorization to do so. Respectfully submitted, Z/Z~ERING Edwin H. Finster Vice President -Santa Ana EHF:jm ·,~~-{!• .: .. ~~ -'' : .._ "' • -I _.., I i. A,~. " \ • r - --~-:.-!. ...... ,,~ ............ -..................... -! • ·~ --·' ~ R 0 L L CA L L ~ pl Adjourned / ef 7 Meeting D ate~ ~qt:S Time i/{ EJ f 4'l, Item &a1 (?UL OTHE RS : , DISTRICT Harvey v/' Meyers v Miller ......... Hirste i n v DIS TRICT Hirstein v Cook Harvey Meyers Mille r Parks Ne ls on V' Brown t./ Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster v-- Ga lloway Car l son v 1/ v I/ 1 Gilmo1~e Ma ck Allen 7 Allen Gruber Gilmore Mack Hileman Date ROLL CAT.JL Adjourned Meeting ---- Time ---------------- Item ---------------~---------------- t y-s'f-I DISTRICT 1 Harvey V Meyers v Miller __ v: __ _ Hirstein / DISTRICT Hirstein Cook Harvey Meyers Miller Parks Gilmore Mack Allen 7 Allen Gruber Gilmore Mack Hileman OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson