HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-06j
I
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
Co unt y Sanitati o n Districts P. 0. Box 5175
o f Ora nge Co unty , Ca liforn ia 10844 El lis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
JUNE 9, 1965 AT 8:00 P.M.
(1) Pledge of Allegiance
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11 )
(12)
Roll C 11 Appoin ~ment s of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
DISTRick 3
Consid€ration of motion re: Receive and file excerpt
from the City of Buena Park, showing election of mayor
and ap ointment of an alternate
1
Conside ation of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held May 12th, 1965, as mailed, and the
adjourn d regular meeting held June 2nd, 1965
~·
tA ,., ~ )
, \..;.;:-
DISTRICT 2 ,.
Consider~tion of motion re: App r oval of minutes of the
6 \ .. \~ regular eeting he l d May 12th, 19 5, as mai l ed 'VV
DI STRICT 3 ' ~~ Consider ~t ion of motion re: Approval of minutes of the -:f.rlY ~
regular mret ing held May 12th, 1965, as mailed Cl' ~u
DI STRICT 5 , l~~~
Consideratiion of motion re: Approval of minutes of the ;Y'~u~
regular meeting held May 12th, and the adjourned regular J;Jv
meeting he ~d May 24th, 1965, as mailed ~
DISTRICT 6 \ of the ~ J\ .. µJ Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes "N{;
regular meet~ng held May 12th, 1965, as mailed \~A
DISTRICT 7 _e'\v'
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the "4t.h
1
, v ,}./
regular meeti~g held May 1 2th, 1965, as mailed, and the /"{~
adjourned regular meeting he l d June 2nd, 1965
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of
regular meeting held May 12th, 1965, as mailed , and
adjourned regular meeting held June 3rd, 1965
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the Joint Chairman
ALL DISTRICTS
Re po rt of the
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the
Manager
the 1 .. >V
the r~/
•
'
( 15)
( 16)
ALL DISTRICTS
ittee on Joint Operating and
(Written report attached to
Report of the Executive Co
Joint Construction Budget .
budgets, in folders)
ALL DISTRICTS \L.r-
Consideration of roll c vote motion re: Approval of ~ MJ'-l~yh
Joint Operating Budget 1965 -66. (Copy of budget in ~ j.JV,\
folders)
1
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of roll call vote motion r~: Approval of A~~~ ~oint Construction Budget for 1965-66. (Copy of~ budget O~\tyV
~-§,,:b~~o-lde~s) ~ ~~V-X\
(18) ALL DISTRICT S
(19)
(20)
(21)
(22)
(23)
(24)
Consideration of Resolution No . 65-86 r e : Approving and \ ) ~
adopting plans and specifications for Job No. J-5-E ~,,J"" ~,V
(Instrumentation -1965).; and authorizing advertising ;. .. ,t<~~'
for bids. See page 11 F I -r' tr
ALL DISTRICTS \.J~
Consideration of motion re: Authorizing increase in the I y· vv1-
maximum amount payable to Osborne Testing Laboratories / J~~. ,.>{
to $8,000.00, for pipe testing for Contract No. I-6-1 O \._:y \
(Addition to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities
Pipeline)
ALL DISTRICTS )
Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order #3 \_
to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-7-l \ .,.f!\~~
(Installation of Steam Trubine at Plant No. 2), authorizing 1
,,., ~i'\}'"'
an addition of $842 .17 to the contract with John Ward (a·
Company, Contractor. See page 11 G11 ~
ALL DISTRICTS \ J, ~
Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order #4 l~,Jf~j:r·
to the plans and specifications for Job No. P2-7-l ~~
(Installation of Steam Trubine at Plant No. 2), authorizing
an extension of time of 115 day s to John Ward Company ,
Contractor. See page 11 H11
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No . 65-87 re: Accepting
Job No . P2-7-l as completed,, and authorizing execution
of a Notice of Completion of Work (John Ward Company,
Contractor). See page "I" ').; ~ .......... v.,:,...,... >
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion re: Approval of Change Order
to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-1
(Addition to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge Faciltties
Pipeline), authorizing change in the method of payment
to the contract with Vinnell Corporation, Contractor,
for extra grave l fill. See page 11 J 11
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion re: Receive and file written
certification of the General Manager that he has checked
all bills appearing on the agenda, found them to be in
order, and that he recommends authorization for payment
-2-
•
(25)
( 26 )
(27)
(28 )
( 29)
(30)
(31)
(32 )
(33)
(34)
(35 )
(36 )
(37 )
J
ALL DISTRICTS I
Consideration of roll call vote motion re: Approval of
Joint Operating Fund and C ~ital Outlay Revolving Fund
warrant re g is ters for sign ture of the Chairman of
District No . lJ and author zing payment of claims . See
pages "A , 11 B11
, and 'c"
I Other business and communications , if any
ALL DISTRICTS
DISTRICT 1 ~.
Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -88-1 re: Receive and ~N1 )(11~/
file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding ~\
contract fo r Addition to Plant No . 1 Effluent Dis c harge · v~
Facilities -Structures, Job No . I-6-2, to Vinnell ~~
Corporation in the total am ount of $172,800.00 . See ~,
page "K" (See page K-2 for bid tabulation)
DISTRICT 1
Cons id
See
DISTRICT 1
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re : Adjournment
Thursday, July 1st (Bid opening for Job
motio
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICT 3
Considerat ion
DISTRICT 5
Conside ration
See page "D"
DISTRICT 5
Other bus iness
of motion re: Adjournment
of motion re: Approval of warra n ts, i f ./ /
any ·--V ·x.
'. j'
f'l ~
(38 ) DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion re:
-3 -
•
..
(39) DISTRICT 6
Consi at ion
Se age 11 E11
(40) DISTRICT 6
Other business and communications, if any
1
( """'~ -~
(41) DISTRICT 6 /' ~ ~~ d~onside ;p-P/~o~ r ~: Adjou,rnmVnt / ~~~
(42) DIS;;zT 7 ~~~#..:5/-4
(43)
(44)
(47)
(48)
<€9
(51)
Consideration of Resolution No. 65 -90-7 re: Receive and (.lA
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and award ing ~'Lr"
Contract No. 7-2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer ' 1 :.\-~
and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Fam co Construe -,\.µ!).
tion Co. in the total amoun t of $69,260.5 0 . See page 11 M11 f\
(Bid tabulation in folders) ~. ----
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolutio
Resolution No . 64 -188-7 re
of Stenographer-Clerk . Se
No . 65 -9 1-7 re : Amending .»-~.,.,,..
rding compensation for position ~,.\ ...;
page "N11 . ~'"J.t' \'l
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Ordinance
--"':::> ~ I L• ' ;
\.-"\v \'
'\' r.JV ,r/.'\
NQ . 709 \''v e,i ~ .. -~~ 15ISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re:
page 11 E11
DISTRICT 7
of warrants. See
Other business unicati ns, if any Q\/A-
./ \
of motion re:
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No .
plans and specificat ions for the
Contract No. 2-10-3; and author·z
See page 11 0 11
DISTRICT 2
c ~;/q "'
-9 2-2 re: App r oving \X<-1 \ .... -
uclid Trunk Sewer, -,\, J...yt
g advertising for bids . ll\\'
Consideration of motion re: and file communication
from the General Counsel dated M y 20 , 1965, regarding
a g reement relative to the propos Nohl Annexation #3 to
District No . 2. (See letter in
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 6 -93 -2 re: Approving
and authorizing execution of an a reement relative to the
proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of te ritory to the District .
See page 11 P" (A g reement in fo de rs)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No . 65
proposed annexation of te rrito r y t
rescinding Resolution No . 65 -49 -2 .
-4-
r e : App r oving ~
District, and ..
page llQ" ~1 f'
N
~c
(53)
(54)
(55)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of written
concerning costs and fin
the City of Anaheim date
of facilities . (Copy o
DISTRICT 2
Consideration
See page "D"
DISTRICT 2
report of the staff and engineers
ncial feasibility of request of
April 27, 1965, for construction
report in fo lders)
Approval of warrants,
Other business and co uni cations, if any j
H,; t-t,. .rft. it .J~ DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion
See page 11 E 11
re: Adjournment . v"Ji' ~..,..\ ~~ Jr:
I ., "<' ~ ,_-/
re : Approval of warrants, if any .
I (57) ~ISTRICT 11
Other business and commun i cations, if an
DISTRICT 1 1
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment I ),_,{
Ci\'.01 ~"'' H l~
{I tvlfi
.-yo
l'-a~ /\-"<-._/t..
h~---} ~ l.
\
-5-
WARRANT NO.
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Acore Drilling Service
Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Jan Alabaster
Aladdin Litho & Art
American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co.
American Optical
City of Anaheim
Anaheim Dodge
Anchor Packing Company
Apco Supply
Associated Concrete Products
Atlas Stationers
Barnes & Delaney
Bascom Rush Co.
Bay City Bearing Co.
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc.
Bedford Freight Lines, Inc.
Bell Pipe & Supply Co.
Blower Paper Company
Blue M Engineering Co.
Charles Bruning Co.
Bud's Equipment Rentals
Buena Park Wholesale Electric
California Cartage Co., Inc.
California Wholesale Electric
Cal-State Seal Co.
Paul Calvo Surveying
Carlton's Linoleum Shop
Chemical Exchange Co.
College Lumber Co., Inc.
Consolidated Freightways
Costa Mesa Lumber Co.
Cummins-Chicago Corp.
The Davis Brown Co,
John M. Deck Co.
Electric Products Co.
Electric Supplies Distributing Co.
Enchanter, Inc.
Engineers Sales-Service Co.
Enterprise Electric Supply Co.
Enterprise Printing Co.
Chas. A. Estey, Inc.
Fairbanks, Morse & Co.
Fairfax Electronics, Inc.
Fischer & Porter Co.
Flair Drafting Service
H. R. Fox & Co.
Larry Fricker Co.
Garden Grove Camera Center
General Telephone Co.
Bob Gosche Co.
A. P~ Green Refractories, Inc.
George T. Hall Co.
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester
Harlows Clocks
Haws Drinking Faucet Co.
Bernard Heying
Hollisters Nursery
-A-
AMOUNT
$ 35.00
13.35
17.20
45.24
49.39
15.58
25.00
57 .65
136.55
47.29
34.42
84.64
415.81
30.16
414.27
139 .65
6.15
13.26
121.64
466.66
184.71
91.00
571.56
59.00
35.03
17.14
1,140.00
9.26
18,,968.42
50.85
23.07
3.99
722.80
72.75
15.32
186.46
2,313.16
1,000.00
456.22
614.18
166.23
10.92
442.27
56.65
921.65
332.50
187e08
88.17
126.97
187.10
141.90
218.40
119.70
448.oo
7.07
26.15
18.oo
21.99
WARRANT NO.
2280
2281
2282
2283
2284
2285
2286
2287
2288
2289
2290
2291
2292
2293
2294
2295
2296
2297
2298
2299
2300
2301
2302
2303
2304
2305
2306
2307
2308
2309
2310
2311
2313
2313
2314
2315
2316
2317
2318
2319
2320
2321
2322
2323
2324
2325
2326
2327
2328
2329
2330
2331
2332
2333
2334
2335
2336
2337
2338
2339
IN FAVOR OF
Honeywell,, Inc.
Howard Supply Co.
City of Huntington Beach
International Harvester Co.
J & M Service
B. R. Jones & Co., Inc.
Kelly Pipe Co.
Bill Kroeger
Herbert H. Kyzer
Lambert Truck Equipment Div.
Larson Equipment Co.
LASCO Industries
LBWS, Inc.
Judy Lee
L & N Uniform Supply Co.
D. J. Lord
Lord-Babcock, Inc.
Mahaffey Machine Co.
McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Minnesota Mining & Mfg.
Morrison Co.
Munselle Supply Co., Inc.
City of Newport Beach
Orange County Blueprint
Orange County Film Cleaning Ser~ice
Orange County Radiotelephone Service,
Orange County Stamp Co. o. c. Suppliers, Inc.
Pacific Bellows
Pacific Telephone
Powr-Flo Products
N B Products
The Register
Reynolds Camera Supply
Robbins & Myers, Inc.
Howard Ryan Tire Service
Santa Ana Blue Print Co.
Santa Ana Electric Motors
Santa Ana Postmaster
E. H. Sargent & Co.
Schurr & Finlay, Inc.
Russell M. Soott
Selman Chevrolet Co.
The Sherwin-Williams Co.
Shipkey & Pearson, Inc.
John E. Sigler, Consultant
Signal Oil Co.
Smith Engineering Co.
Southern California Chemical Co.
Southern California Edison Co.
Southern California Water Co.
Southern Counties Gas Co.
Southwest Flexible Co.
Speed-E-Auto Parts
Speedy Saw Service
Standard Oil Co. Of Calif.
Sully Miller Contracting Co.
Tardif Sheet Metal
Technical Book Co.
Tell Steel, Inc.
-B-
AMOUNT
$ 626.00
1,304.85
4.50
139 .94
66.70
2.62
224.64
23.40
15.00
49.92
3,889 .36
195.31
453.29
4.60
646.69
26.60
79.40
462.24
8.09
53.81
14.57
101.04
47.47
6.29
204.82
Inc. 300.36
7.16
45.50
18.34
253.45
7.80
317.43
12.00
2.56
40.75
134.94
67.91
321.70
100.00
107.08
120.00
40.40
7.99
78.04
42.90
816.10
388.00
52.32
1,089.38
4,562.53
3.90
196.21
51.45
44.44
5.00
758.09
278.30
480.31
14.76
86.63
WARRANT NO.
2340
2341
2342
2343
2344
2345
2346
2347
2348
2349
2350
2351
2352
2353
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
2361
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
IN FAVOR OF
Terminal Testing Laboratories
Thermo-Fax Sales Incorporated
Norman R. Termblay c. o. Thompson Petroleum Co.
Turville Studio
Union Sign Co.
Utilities Supply Co.
John R. Waples, Consultant
Guy L. Warden & Sons
Warren & Bailey Co.
Welch's Concrete Co.
Westco Pump Sales Co.
City of Westminster
Worthington Corporation
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Aladdin Litho & Art
Bank of America
Paul Calvo Surveying
John Carollo Engrs.
Enchanter, Inc.
Enterprise Printing Co.
The Orange Daily News
Raymond G. Osborne
Schurr & Finley, Inc.
J. T. Smith Co. & Wescon, Inc.
Wallace Trade Bindery
John Ward Co.
West & Wiggs, Inc.
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
-c-
AMOUNT
$ 8.oo
235.15
18.30
222.03
113.62
228.80
56.37
225.30
210.57
7.24
134.83
175.85
5.00
63.96
$ 53,434.48
$ 57.82
173,278.13
304.oo
5,338.62
2,100.00
33.90
46.27
1,909.50
3,832.86
26,685.84
40.51
2,737.94
2, 195.42
$218,560.81
$271, 995. 29
·TARRANT NO.
2367
2368
2370
2371
2372
I
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERAT~G FUND WARRA NT S
IN FAVOR OF
County Sanitation District #3
Construction ltind
Tax Service of Orange County
AMOUNT
$ 20,756.16
15.00
$ 20, 771.16
ACCUMULATED CA ITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS I IN FAVOR OF
County Sa9 itation District #3 $ 86,484.oo
Constru tion Fund
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Daily Pilot
Tax Service o f Orange Count~ Inc.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Aladdin Litho & Art
-D-
$ 107,255.16
$ 86.36
75.00
$ 161.36
208.42
DISTRICT NO. 'I.
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
2373 Boyle & Lowry $ 6,330.44
AD No. Amount
'...,/ 1 $2,343.38
3A 64.40
3B 59.60
SA 2,462.75
$4.,930.13
Plan Check &
Inspection 1 1 400.31
$6,330.4~
2374 Jack A. & Patricia G. Chandler (AD #5A} 570.00
2375 Costa Mesa Sanitary District 1,950.00
2376 Goode & Goode Appraisers (AD #1} 750.00
2377 Paul 3. Hogan 10.10
2378 County of Orange 377.40
AD NO. Amount
1 $211.40
SA i66.oo
$377.40
2379 Walter A. & Corrine L. Schminke (AD #1} 625.00
2380 Southern California Edison co. 8.52
$ l0,682.06
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
2381 Costa Mesa Sanitary District $ 16,250.00
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
2382 Boyle & ].,owry $ 5,224.03
2383 Enterprise Printing Co. 36.59
2384 Raymond G. Osborne Laboratories 52.25
2385 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 1.99
2386 Tustin News 48.83
2387 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 22.83
$ 5,386.52
$ 32,318.58
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
2388 Huntington Beach News $ 35.00
2389 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 32.76
67.76
-E-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-86
APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS -J-5-E
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR JOB NO. J-5-E (INSTRUMENTATION-1965);
AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by the engineers, for INSTRUMENTATION-1965, JOB NO. J-5-E, are
hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the
Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 p.m., July 1, 1965,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting
as agent for itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is
hereby authorized and directed to receive bids and to award contract
for said work.
-F-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
CHANGE ORDER
CONTRACTOR: ___ J_o_h_n __ W_a_r~d __ Com __ p_a_n~y ______________ _
C. 0. NO • _ _.3...__ __
DATE: June 4, 1965
JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l
Amount of this change order (ADD)(mE~) $ 842.17
\..,I In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized a.nd as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. 4, previously furnished contractor,
and contractor's proposal dated June 1, 1965
ADD
1. Furnish and install two replacement expansion
joints damaged by District personnel while
testing waste heat boiler
2. For contractor's additional overhead expense
caused by delay in completion of project
{see Change Order No. 4)
4 months at $100 per month
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD
$ 442.17
400.00
$ 842.17
Original Contract Price $ 28,738.00
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD 590.15
This Change (ADD)(~) 842.17
Amended Contract Price $ 30,170.32
Board authorization date: Approved:
June 9, 1965
-G-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By ____ ~/_s~/ __ Le __ e_M~._N_e_l_s_o_n ______ ~
General Manager
JOHN WARD COMPANY
By-----------------~-----------
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. NO~ 4 ------
CONTRACTOR: John Ward Company DATE: June 4, 1965
JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l
Amount of this change order (1'1!H)(HJKJ&01~) $ None ------
~ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
EXTENSION OF TIME
The following extension of time is granted to the original completion
time for the following reasons as specified in Section 5-10 of the
Specifications.
Acts of the District
Delays outside the control of the contractor due to
District forces being unable to complete, on time,
the testing of equipment installed by the con-
tractor but furnished by the Districts 115
Original specified completion date:
Completion date with this extension
of time (115 days)
Actual final completion date
February 10, 1965
June 4, 1965
June 4, 1965
Original Contract Price
Prev. Auth. Changes ADD
$ 28,738.00
1,432.32
This Change (i:am£) (Sl1Bltnr) ___ No_n_e ___ _
Amended Contract Price $ 30,170.32
Board authorization date: . Approved:
June 9, 1965
-H-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
JOHN WARD COMPANY
By~------~----------~-------
RESOLUTION NO. 65-87
ACCEPI'ING JOB NO. P2-7-l AS COMPLETE
JOH1~ WARD COMPANY, CON'"J.~RACTOR
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
ACCEPI'ING JOB NO. P2-7-l AS COMPLETE
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE~ DETERMINE AND 9RDER:
Section l. That the contractor, JOHN WARD COMPANY,
has completed the construction in accordance with the terms of the
contract for INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2, JOB
NO. P2-7-l, on the 4th day of June, 1965; and,
Section 2. That by letter the engineers for the Districts
have recommended acceptance of said work as having been completed
in accordance with the terms of the contract; and,
Section 3. That the General Manager of the Districts has
concurred in said engineers' recommendation, which said recommenda-
tion is hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 4. That the INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBI:NE AT
PLANT NO. 2, JOB NO. P2-7-l, is hereby accepted as completed in
accordance with the terms of the contract therefor, dated the
27th day of November, 1964; and,
Section 5. That the Chairman of County Sanitation
District No. l is hereby authorized and directed to execute a
Notice of Completion of Work therefor.
-I:-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. O. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
CHANGE ORDER
C.O. No. 2 ------
CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation DATE: June 4, 1965 __
ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
JOB: FACILITIES -PIPELINE Job No. I-6-1
Amount of this change order $ None
The following chapge in the contract documents is hereby made:
Section 12-5 MEASUREMENT AND PAYMENT (Page D-2 of Detailed
Specifications)
Change third paragraph to read as follows:
"Any addition or deduction to the contract price under
.Proposal Item No. 2 in excess or less than quantities
shown on the plans, may be made on any progress payment
or on the final payment. Under Proposal Item No. 2,
the price shall include, in addition· to the placement
and compaction of gravel fill, the removal or
addition o:r earth as required."
Original Contract Price $ 1,455#850.00
Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 1,361.24
This Change (m) (EEEHH) __ _.N..;,..;.o_ne ______ _
Amended Contract Price $ 1,454 2 488.76
Board authorization date: Approved:
June 9, 1965
-J-
COUNTY.SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
VINNELL CORPORATION
By--------------~-------------
RESOLUTION NO. 65-88-l
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-6-2 TO VINNELL CORPORATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
FACILITIES-STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day
submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts• engineers,
and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be
made to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, for Job No. I-6-2, and
the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby
received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-6-2 (ADDITION
TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES-STRUCTURES), be awarded
to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, in the total amount of
$172,800.00 in accordance with the terms or their bid and the
prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the
lowest and best bid received therefor; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu-
tion No. 65-63 on record in the office of the Secretary.
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the
unsuccessful bidders.
-K-
BID TABULATION
S H E E T
Date June 2 1 1965
Contract: ADDITION TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -
STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2
Contractor
1. Vinnell Corporation
1145 Westminster Ave.
Alhambra, California
2. Bovee Construction Co.
15134 So. Indiana Ave.
Paramount, California
3. J. Putnam Henck, a Corporation
374 West 40th Street
P. o. Box 2476
San Bernardino, California
4. ECCO Contractors, Inc.
7931 Lampson Avenue
Garden Grove, California
K-2
Total
$172,800.00
$207,457.00
$218,343.00
$286,ooo.oo
Add or
Deduct for
Gravel Fill
$8.oo/c.y.
$9.90/c.y.
$6.50/c.y.
$10.00/c.y.
RESOLUTION NO. 65-89-3
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
em3 11'RAcT NO. 3-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 3 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO.
3-10
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That tne detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for
the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 3-10, are hereby approved,
adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District at a time and date to be deter-
mined by the General Manager; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board, and the
District's engineers be authorized and directed to receive and open
said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Directors.
-L-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-90-7
AWARDING CONTRACT 7-2B
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7,
OF ORANGE COUNTY,. CALIFORNIA, AWARDING
CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT
NO. 7-2B, WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER
AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. ~hat the Written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the District's engineers, and
concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be
made to FAMCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, for construction of
CPNTRACT NO. 7-2B, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for
said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said Contract No. 7-2B, is hereby awarded
to FAMCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of
$69,260.50 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices
contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest
and best bid received therefor; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the
specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu-
tion No. 65-65-7 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are
hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's checks
submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders.
-M-
June 2, 1965
Mayor Harvey -out of town until Thursday, June 3rd.
Mr. Meyers -
Miller
Hirstein
Cook
Parks
Corwnell
Stoddard
Lambert
will attend meetings today.
{U"'l lf IV-cy,r-4
will attend meetings today
will attend
will attend
will be here at 1:30 this afternoon
was not previously notified of today's
meeting, but will attend
will attend.
RESOLUTION NO. 65-91-7
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 64-188-7 REGARD-
ING COMPENSATION FOR STENOGRAPHER-CLERK
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION
NO. 64-188-7 REIATIVE TO COMPENSATION FOR
STENOGRAPHER-CLERK
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That Section 1 of Resolution No. 64-188-7,
adopted by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7 on December 9, 1964, is hereby amended as follows: That
compensation for said Stenographer-Clerk is hereby established at
Range 33.5 as set forth in Section 2 of this resolution.
Section 2. The following Basic Salary Range is hereby
established:
Range
Number
Monthly Five-Step Rates
~
_g_ i~?l .2-
33.5 365 385 406 428
Section 3. That any other resolutions or motions or
portions thereof in conflict herewith are hereby rescinded and
made of no further effect; and,
Section 4. That the effective date of this resolution
shall be June 1, 1965.
-N-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-92-2
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
~NTRACT Nd. 2-10-3
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for
the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3, are hereby approve~,
adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District until July 7, 1965, at 4:00 p.m.,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That the Secretary of the Board., and the
District's engineers be authorized and directed to receive and open
said sealed bids on behalf of the Board of Director:~.
-0-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-93-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES IN
CONNECTION WITH NOHL ANTu'"EXATION #3
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 2, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement between the County
of Orange Board of Supervisors, the petitioners, and the District,
setting forth the terms and conditions for deferring payment of
the annexation fees relative to Nohl Annexation #3, is hereby
approved as prepared by the General Counsel;and 1 ·
Section 2. That execution of said agreement by the
Chairman and the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized;
and,
Section 3. That the agreement hereinabove referred to
shall be recorded in the Official Records of Orange County.
-P-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-94-2
APPROVING PROPOSED ANNEXATION
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING PROPOSED
ANNEXATION OF TERRITORY TO THE DISTRICT
(Nohl Annexation #3); AND RESCINDING RESOLU-
TION NO. 65-49-2, ADOPTED APRIL 14, 1965
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2>
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, a proceeding seeking to annex certain territory
to County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California,
entitled "Nohl Annexation No. 3 11 , is now pending before the Board
of Supervisors of the County of Orange; and,
WHEREAS, the Board of Directors of this District has
caused an engineering study to be made concerning the said proposed
annexation of territory to the District; and,
WHEREAS, the District adopted the recommendations con-
tained in the aforesaid report dated April 8, 1965 and in a letter
from the engineers dated April 13, 1965, as and for its policy with
reference to ·the territory seeking to annex to the District; and,
WHEREAS, it has been determined by legal counsel that
(µy;~ / l/. 1 q l, \-
certain provisions of Resolution No. 65-49-2, adopted ~ 12, 1'65,
are in conflict with Section 4834 of the Health and Safety Code,
State of California pertaining to the payment of annexation fees;
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 2, of Orange County, California, does resolve, deter-
mine and order as follows:
Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 2, of
Orange County will be benefited by the annexation thereto of that
certain territory described as "Nohl Annexation No. 3" now pending
before the Board of Supervisors of the County of Orange.
-Q-
•
Section 2. That consent to the annexation of territory
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a part hereof,
is hereby given upon, and subject to, the following terms and
conditions:
(a)
(b)
(c)
Annexation fees are hereby established
for the proposed annexation at $100
per acre or any portion of an acre of
territory to be annexed {130 acres)
That the petitioners enter into an
agreement with the County of Orange
Board of Supervisors and County Sanita-
tion District No. 2 setting forth the
terms and conditions for deferring
payment of said annexation fees; and
that said agreement be recorded in the
Official Records of Orange County
That the a~reement referred to in Sub-
section {bJ above shall contain the
following provision:
"Owners hereby agree to pay the
sum of $13,000.00 to District as
an annexation fee, which obliga-
tion they recognize as personal
upon themselves both jointly and
severa]J.y. Said payments shall
i be in~~equal installments of
'F ;J,t.o 0 1.1.oc)~e-:'OQ each commencing with
the date of July 1, 1965, and
annually thereafter. Owners
shall have the right to pay any
balance due on said annexation
fee at any time".
Section 3. That the annexation fees set forth in
Section 2 of this resolution have reference to this annexation only,
and in no way do they set policy establishing a fixed charge for
future annexations to the District.
i '{, lo/6 l Section 4. That Resolution No. 65-49-2, adopted 1Aa-w-Pf,;_}
~' is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect.
Q-2-
EXCERPTS FROM THE MI NUTES OF THE REGULAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO . 7 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 8 :00 o'clock p.m., June 9th , 196 5 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, California.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p.m .
The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present,.
Directors present; Directors William Hirstein (Chairman),
Dee Cook, II. H. Harvey, A. H. Meyers,
Clifton c. Miller and Rex A. Parke
Directors absent: None
Present: Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board.
DISTRICT NO . 7
Approv ing assi~ents
re : A • D • #3-A
, seconded and du l y
ed:
T t the Assignment from
Bank of America NT&SA to Ta lor and Co mpany , and the
Assignment f rom Taylor and Company to Leo Goodman ,
of funds due i n connectio with the cons truction in
Assessment District #3-A e approved;and,
That the Secretary of
record said Assigrunen
Orange Co unty.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •
e Board be authori z ed to
in the Official Records of
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of the Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No. 7 , of Orange County, California,
do hereby certify the above and foregoing to be full, true and
correct copy of minute entries on record taken from the minutes of
the regular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of June , 1965.
IN WITNESS 1'1HEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed
the official_seal o t_County Sanitation District No . 7 , of Orange Coun~y, California, this 10th day of June , 1965
Secretary, Board of Directors of
County Sanitation District No . 7
--
(46-A)
(46-C)
(57-A)
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
JUNE 9, 1965 at 8:00 p.m.
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution . 65-96 -7 re: Accept-
ing easement from Walter A. chminke, et ux, in
connection with Assessment istrict #1; and authoriz-
ing payment for said eas ent in the total amount of
$625.00. See page S-A
Consideration of Res lution No. 65-95-7 re: Accept-~ DISTRICT 7 -~v,~ '
ing easement from J ck A. Chandler, et ux, relative '
to Assessment Distr ct #5-A; and authorizing payment ~
for said easement ·n the total amount of $570.00. ~
See page S-B 4 u. t \. · ........ t .... t ' <:::. , " 1 1 "" -"-"""-' . ~
<' l)JZe-&-
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of otion re: Approving assignment
from Bank o f Ameri a to Taylor and Company; and
approving assignme t from Taylor and Company to
Leo Goodman, relati e to Assessment District #3-A;
and authorizing re rdation of said assignments
(
DISTRICT 7
-Consideration of a hearin date re: Confirmation assess~a~q in Assessment · 1trict #1.
( Ju1Yi28th,) 2~~tl.[SU~ ~ h1
( \....1:0-<J riv\
DISTRICT 11
Cons idera t ion of Resolution
Approving proposed exclusio
the Distri c t (Portion o f An
Harbour). See page S-D
o. 6 5-9 7-11 re:
o f t erritory from
exation #5 -Hunting ton
RESOLUTION NO. 65-96-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT RE:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-28B)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPI'ANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM WALTER A. SCHMINKE AND CORINNE L. SCHMINKE
(#132568)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain grant of permanent easement
dated May 31, 1965, wherein WALTER A. SCHMINKE and CORINNE L.
SCHMINKE, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District
No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with
the construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement,
which is described as Parcel No. 7-l-28B in that certain action in
eminent domain #132568, and more particularly described on Schedule
"A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to Walter A.
Schminke and Corinne L. Schminke, 12774 Barrett Lane, Santa Ana,
California, in the total amount of $625.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby authorized and
directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records
of Orange County.
S-A
-.
RESOLUTION NO. 65-95-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5-A (Parcel 7-5-lla)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM JACK A. CHANDLER AND PATRICIA G. CHANDLER
(#133933)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
dated June 8, 1965, wherein JACK A. CHANDLER and PATRICIA G.
CHANDLER, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District
No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with
the construction in Assessment District #5-A, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement,
which is described as Parcel No. 7-5-lla in that certain action
in eminent domain #133933, and more particularly described on
Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to
·Jack A. Chandler and Patricia G. Chandler,. 1156 La Colina Drive,
Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $570.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
S-B .·
-·
RESOLUTION NO. 65-98-7
APPROVIl'lG PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT OF SALE AND PURCHASE
WITH THE CITY OF SANTA ANA COVERING PURCHASE
OF A PORTION OF THE TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement dated June 9th,
1965, between County Sanitation District No. 7 and the City of
Santa Ana, covering the purchase by the District of a portion of
the TUSTIN AVENUE SEWER from said City, be approved as submitted
by the General Counsel; and,
Section 2. That purchase of a portion of said facility
is authorized, based upon the written recommendation of the
engineers heretofore received and ordered filed; and,
Section 3. That payment in the total amount of
$84,954.~o is hereby authorized to be made to the City of Santa Ana
in accordance with the terms and conditions set forth in the agre~
ment ref erred to in Section l of this resolution; and,
Section 4. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute said agreement on
behalf of the District in form acceptable to the General Counsel.
s":"c
RESOLUTION NO. 65-97-11
FIXING OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, FIXING AND DETERMINING THE OUTSTANDING
INDEBTEDNESS OF THE DISTRICT AS OF JUNE 9, 1965;
AND DETERMINING THE EFFECT ON THE SEWERAGE SYSTEM
OF THE DISTRICT OF PROPOSED WITHDRAWAL OF TERRITORY
{PORTION OF ANNEXATION #5 -HUNTINGTON HARBOUR)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11, of Orange County, California, does resolve as follows:
WHEREAS, petitions to withdraw certain territories from
County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California,
have been filed with the Board of Supervisors of Orange County,
California; and,
WHEREAS, it is necessary to determine the outstanding
indebtedness of said District as of this date; and,
WHEREAS, the Directors of County Sanitation District No.
11, of Orange County, California, are required to report as to how
said withdrawal from said District will affect the operations of
the sewerage system of the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Board of Directors of County Sanita,
tion District No. 11 does hereby FIND, DETERMINE AND RESOLVE as
follows:
Section 1. That County Sanitation District No. 11 has,
as of June 9, 1965, the following indebtedness against the funds
of the District:
Oper ..
a ting
Fund
None
OUTSTANDING INDEBTEDNESS OF COUNTY SANITATION
DISTRICT NO. 11
Accumula tea
Capital
Outlay Fund
AS OF JUNE 9, 1965
1951 Bond
Interest &
Sinking Fund
1958 Bond
Interest &
Sinking Fund
Total
Fixed
Indebtedness
$66,544.08 $3o4,ooo.oo $1,315,000.00 $1,685,544.08
S-D-1
Section 2. That the total outstanding indebtedness for
said County Sanitation District No. 11 as of June 9, 1965, is One
Million, Six Hundred Eighty-Five Thousand, Five Hundred Forty-Four
Dollars and Eight Cents ($l,685,544.o8).
Section 3. That the proposed withdrawal of territory
described in the withdrawal petition filed with the Board of
Supervisors of Orange County, California, on June 2, 1965, will
not be materially detrimental to the operation of its sewerage
system as now owned and operated by the District.
Section 4. That the territory proposed to be withdrawn
from the District is not benefited by any services performed by
the District, and the territory referred to was annexed to the
District after the bonded indebtedness was incurred.
S-D-2-
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanitation Districts
of Orang e County, Califo rnia
JOINT BOARDS
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, June 9 , 1965
8:00 p.m.
P. 0. Box 5 175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
Pho ne 962-2 41 1
June 4, 1965
Th e following is an explanation of the more important non-
routine items which appear on the enclosed agenda and which are not
otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant registers are not attached to
the agenda since they are made up i mme diately preceding the meeting
but wi ll appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting .
Joint Boa rds
No. 15 -REPORT OF EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE CONCERNING JOINT BUDGETS:
A separate written report by the Executive Committee on this subject,
together with the proposed J oint budgets, is enclosed for a ll active
Directors. The Director s are also referred to the printed r eport
on our budget procedures attached to the Manager's Report for the
May J o int Board meeting. However, for the benefit of new Directors
and others who read this report and are not familiar with the budget
procedures, we customarily present budget estimates for the ensuing
fisca l year at the June meeting of each year . These estimates relate
to J oint Operating Expenses necessary for administration, maintenance
and operation of the Districts' jointly owned p r operty and t o con -
struction r equirements for expansion and improvements to the
Districts' jointly owned Treatment Plants and d isposa l faciliti es.
As soon as these budget estimates can be prepared by our staff,
they are presented t o the Ex ecutive Comm ittee for review . After
action by the Committee, they are presented to the Joint Boards for
review and adopt ion. It is nece ssary that approval as submitted, or
as amended, be given at the June meeting in order that the figures
so establish ed may be pro-rated, by formulas established by our
procedures, between the individual Districts in accordance with
their individual sewage flows and assessed valuations.
The figures so obtained for the individual Districts are then
combined, together with strictl y District requirements, into the
individual District 's formal budgets, which must be prepared, sub -
mitt ed to t he Directors and approved at the r egular meeting in July.
-1-
•
The Executive Committee met on June 2 and after thorough study
of the material submitted by the staff relating to the above
described budget estimates for 1965-66, approved both budgets as
submitted (see separate written report of Committee).
No. 16 -JOINT OPERATING BUDGET: A summary of the Joint Operating
Budget for 19 65 -66, as mentioned above, is enclosed for the active
Directors together with the report of the Executive Committee. It
calls for a total estimated Joint Operating expense in the amount of
$1 4459,627, an increase over the 19 64 -65 budget of approximately
$7 ,000. It will be noted that this dollar increase is approximately
5.3% as contrasted with an anticipated increase of sewage flows to
the Treatment Plants of 9 .6%. Accordingly, the cost of treating
the unit quantity of sewage (in our case one mi llion gal lons) will be
less under the proposed budget than in 1964-65.
Also to b e noted is the fact that because of savings made
during the fiscal year now ending in various budget categories, the
sum of $258,551 will be available for re-budgeting, thus reducing
to $1,170,533 the amount that must actually be raised by taxes in the
various Districts to cover Joint Operating expenses.
No. 17 -JOINT CONSTRUCTION REQUIREMENTS: All of our capital ex-
penditures for Plant expansion and improvements are paid out of what
is called the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund. The proposed requir e -
ments for this fund during the coming fiscal year and as approved by
the Executive Committee is, as stated previously, enclosed for the
active Directors together with the report of the Committee. The
list of capital requirements are entitled 11 Schedule of Joint Works
Requirements -1965-66" and attached to this schedule is another
table showing the net amounts which each District must raise by taxes
during the forthcoming fiscal year to pay for these improvements.
It will be noted from the Schedule that the requirement s fall
into two principle parts -(1) Construction necessary to maintain the
existing degree of treatment and adequate hydraulic capacity and
(2) Reserve Funds as approved in 1962 for additional future secondary
treatment and new outfall. If desired by the Directors , the staff
will discuss these requirements in relation to our authorized Master
Plan of Plant Expansion as adopted in 1962 by the Boards.
The total amount to be raised by taxes under this proposed
budget represents an increase of less than $200,000 over the
corresponding amount for 19 64 -65. Since an increase in this amount
will undoubtedly be more than offset by the normal increases in
assessed valuation in the Districts, the budget as proposed should
result in a reduction in the tax rate for J o int Construction for
mo st of the Districts.
No. 18 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR PLANT INSTRUMEN-
TATION EQUIPMENT: John Carollo, Consulting Engineers, have sub-.
mitted specifications for the purchase of additional instrumentation
-2-
•
budgeted for next year. The estimate for this equipment is approxi-
mately $51,000 of which $22,000 is for remote pumping station
instrumentation which will be later charged out of inventory to the
individual Districts in whose pump stations this equipment will be
installed. There are five of such units and four are scheduled to
be installed in District No. 11 pump stations proposed to be
acquired from the City of Huntington Beach in the near future. The
balance of the equipment is to extend our supervisory control over
recent additions to the Plant units, particularly the sludge gas
turbine-generator equipment now being put into operat~on. The
attached resolution, authorizing advertising for bids for this
equipment, calls for such bids to be opened on July 1 by the Board
of District No. 1.
No. 19 -AUTHORIZATION FOR ADDITIONAL PIPE TESTING: The Districts
have an agreement with Osborne Testing Laboratories for factory pipe
inspection of the 84-inch RCP now being installed under Job No.
I-6-1. At the time this agreement was entered into it was the
staff's recommendation that the total of such services not exceed
$4,ooo. It now appears that we seriously underestimated the amount
of pipe inspection time which would be required. To rectify this
miscalculation we are recommending that the authorization be raised
to a total of $8,ooo in order to allow the inspection work to
proceed to completion.
Nos. 20, 21 and 22 -COMPLETION AND ACCEPTANCE OF PLANT JOB P2-7-l:
This job was done under contract with the John Ward Company of
Hunting ton Beach and is for the i nstalla tion of th e previously
described steam turbine at Plant No. 2. The contractor's work will
be completed today (June 4) and these items relate to closing out
the job.
Item No. 20 is Change Order No. 3 adding an additional $842.17
to the contract price for the additional work described in the
formal change order attached to the agenda and for the contractor's
extra overhead expense occasioned by a delay in completion of the
project. This delay was due to our forces being unable to complete
on time the testing of equipment installed by the contractor but
furnished by the Districts. This delay amounted to 115 days and,
accordingly, Item No. 21 is a recommended change order granting
this much extension of time to the contract .
Item No. 22 is the customary resolution accepting the job as
complete and authorizing filing of Notice of Completion.
No. 23 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2 TO PLANT JOB NO. I-6-1: This job is
be i ng done under contract with the Vinnell Corporation of Alhambra
and is for the installation of the 84-inch Plant No. 1 effluent
pipeline mentioned under Item No. 19. The original contract speci-
fications called for an adjustment in the contract price at the end
of the work depending on whether more or less gravel fill than sh~wn
on the plans was actually installed on the Engineer's orders. This
-3-
is a standard procedure with the Districts in Plant construction work
and normally it works well and is fair to the contractor. However,
in this particul ar case practically a l l of the gravel used will be
in the first 25% of the work. Since it is obvious now that ~ore
grave l than originally called for will be needed, we believe it only
equitable to al l ow the contractor to be paid for it on the progr ess
estimate for the month in which it is used rather than waiting a
number of months until the end of the contract. Accordingly, we
are recommending a~proval of formal Change Order No . 2 appearing on
the agenda which amends the Contract payment provisions to al l ow
compensation for additional gravel on monthly progress payments.
This change order will not resu l t in any change in the final contract
amount .
District No. 1
No. 27 -AWARD OF PLANT JOB I -6 -2: This contract was described in
the Manager's Report for the May meeting when the job was authorized
for bids. The Board of Directors of District No. 1 opened bids for
this work on June 2 and the Vinnell Corpor ation{ now working on the
related ~roject I -6 -1 (see Items Nos. 19 and 23J, was the low bidder
at $172,800. Accordingly, it is recommended that the job be awarded
to this company by means of the resolution attached to the agenda.
No. 30 -ADJOURNMENT TO 4:00 P .M., JULY 1: This is the hour and date
suggested for receipt of bids on Pl ant Job J -5 -E (Item No. 18).
Accordingly, if satisfactory with the Directors, it will be recom-
mended that the Board so adjourn.
District No. 3
No. 32 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPEC I FICATIONS FOR CONTRACT 3 -10:
The District 's design engineers, Boy l e and Lowry, are nearing
completion on p l ans and specificat i ons for the MILLER-HOLDER TRUNK
SEWER, Contract No . 3-10. Except for a few minor details, the job is
ready for bid now but we are suggesting, by means of the resolution
att ached to the agenda, that the actual bid date be left to the
discretion of the General Manager pending fina l issuance of a permit
for the project by the State Division of Highways . This procedure
is recommended in order to expedite the project which is badly
needed and which otherwise wi l l be de l ayed another month.
The work proposed, and budgeted for, consists of a new 24 -inch
and 27 -inch VCP sewer in Beach Bou l evard between Imperial Hi ghway and
Rosecrans Avenue. The present Mill er-Ho l der Trunk system is
deficient in capacity in this stretch and we hoped to have the work
complete before the winter rains wh i ch, if severe, are likely to
cause sewage overfl ows in the area.
District No. 7
No. 42 -AWARD OF CONTRACT NO . 7 -2B, WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER
AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB -TRUNK SEWER: Bids for this job were taken
r--4-
at the adjourned meeting of the Board on June 2. It is recommended
that the contract be awarded to Famco Construction Company of Santa
Ana at their low bid price of $69,260.50.
No. 43 -COMPENSATION FOR STENOGRAPHER-CLERK: Resolution 65-91-7
authorizes a reduction of one range for the presently established
stenographer-clerk position. This recommended salary adjustment
is in line with the job responsibilities and still enables the
District to employ qualified personnel for this position.
No. 44 -CONSIDERATION OF ORDINANCE NO. 709: At the May 12 meeting
of the Board, the General Counsel was directed to prepare Ordinance
No. 709 for the Board's consideration, consolidating all current
ordinances concerning the District 's connection charges and the
staff's recent recommendations for increasing direct connection
charges. If the proposed ordinance is available by meeting time,
it is recommended that the Board take the ordinance under submission
for study and if it is acceptable to the Board by the July meeting,
the ordinance can be adopted at that time.
District No. 2
No. 48 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR RECONSTRUCTION OF
UPPER EUCLID TRUNK, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-3: After considerable delay,
pending preparation of the comprehensive district-wide plan (see
report under Item No. 52), the District's engineers have now com-
pleted work on the budgeted reconstruction of the upper portion of
the Euclid Trunk between Orangethorpe and La Palma Avenues. This
work has been under consideration and discussion over the past two
years and because of the deteriorated condition of the existing
sewer it is urgently needed. The Engineer's estimate for this job
is $188,000.
The work contemplated will provide 2450 feet of new 27-inch VCP
and 2670 feet of 30-inch VCP both at a lower and consequently more
serviceable elevation than the old trunk. These sizes provide
capacity conforming to the ultimate sewerage plan laid out in the
March, 1965 preliminary engineer's report. In order to get this
long delayed project under way, it is accordingly recommended that
plans and specifications be approved and that the project be autho-
rized for advertising for bids to be opened on July 7. Award of the
contract , if the bids are satisfactory, will be an agenda item for
the July Board meeting.
Nos. 49, 50 and 51 -PROPOSED NOHL ANNEXATION #3: This matter was
taken up at the April Board meeting and again consj.dered briefly at
the May meeting. Subsequently, the General Counsel after researching
the law connected with t he payment of annexation fees, has submitted
a report to the Directors dated May 20, and mai led from this office
May 21, pointing out that the procedure agreed on at the April
meeting for payment of fees is not in accordance with law. Mr.
Nisson's report also forwarded to the Directors a draft agreement
-5-
between the District and the annexation proponents providing for
payment of the annexation fees in ten equal instalL~ents. This
type of payment is legally permissible.
Item No. 49 is to receive and file the General Counsel's report
which, as stated above, was mailed to the Directors separately on
May 21 and is consequently not included herewith.
I tem No . 50 is a resolution for Board consideration approving
the proposed new agreement .
Item No. 51 is a suggested resol ution rescinding former
Resolution No . 65-49-2 which set up the procedure now known to be
legally questionable and approving the annexation on the basis of
the type deferred payments legally permissible.
No. 52 -REPORT OF ENG I NEERS AND STAFF CONCERNING REQUEST OF CITY
OF ANAHEIM FOR SEWER CONSTRUCTION: A fairly comprehensive written
report on this subject is included separately with this agenda for
the Directors of District No. 2. This report is submitted in
conformance with a minute order of the Board at the May 12 meeting.
-~
-6-
Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
Age nda Item No . .'ti In the Offlc:'~f Pt,e secretary
County Sanitation D i strict
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY No -------
J UN 9 1965
June 3, 1965
BY---------
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS,
County Sa nitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
Your Executive Committee met in the Districts' office on
Wednesday, June 2, 1965, at 4:30 p.m.
Present were Directors Cornwell, Chairman, Harvey, Parks,
Stoddard, Meyers and Hirstein. Director Lambert was absent.
Others present were Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, Paul G.
Brown, Assistant General Manager and Fred A. Harper, Secretary and
Director of Finance.
Chairman Cornwell presided. Items considered and recommen-
dations made to the Joint Boards are as follows:
1. Joint Operating Budget
a. The tentative budget summary of the Joint Operating fund
for 1965-66, as submitted by the General Manager, was
examined item by item.
b. The staff was questioned as to the method of estimating
increases in sewage flow for each District for the next
fiscal year. The General Manager explained that these
~-!1 (' .....
estimates are based on examination of past data and that --~
the cash contribution of each District, as shown on the
material submitted, is computed from this estimate. It was
noted by Mr. Hirstein that the estimated total flow from
all Districts will average more than 100 mi llion gallons
per day next year, as contrasted with less than 15 million
gallons per day in the early 1950's.
c. The amounts tentatively budgeted for research and pollution
control were questioned by Mr. Stoddard. The General
Manager explained that these amounts include an accelerated
program necessary for final design of the new ocean outfall.
He also stated that the Districts have been somewhat
deficient in research work because, until recently, manpower
and funds have not been available to carry out an adequate
program. However, with more time and manpower now available
and with State and National water pollution control being
tightened up and waste water reclamation becoming a
definite possibility, the money expended now in this
connection will undoubtedly be repaid many fold in the
future. Mr . Stoddard brought out that as a member of the
State Water Pollution Control Board he believes that the
State's research program should include some of this work
which the individua l waste dischargers are now forced to do
themselves. However, since the State's program does not,
the Districts are justified in and must be doing this type
of work themselves .
d. It was noted by the Committee that by far the largest
single item of operating expense, other than salaries and
wages, is for effluent disinfection chemicals (chlorine).
During the fiscal year now ending, these expenditures have
been held down to a minimum ($105,000 less than budgeted)
by our successful current prediction program which is based
on past and present oceanographic research.
However, in view of the extreme uncertainty as to the exact
amount of chlorine to be used in any one year it was agreed
that this item should be left at a figure substantially
over the past year's requirements with savings carried over
from year to year.
e. The request for salary, wages and employee benefits were
examined in detail. It was explained by the staff that the
estimates are based on total authorized positions and
computed at the step and range to be attained during the
year. It was pointed out by the General Manager that no
additional positions or salary adjustments are being
requested although a reserve in the amount of 3% ($23,750)
is included for anticipated salary adjustments. No changes
in salaries are being recommended at this time since it has
been our experience that such changes are more appropriate
a~ter the various Cities and the County governments have
acted in this regard.
Action
It was brought out by Mr. Harper that legislation is now
pending which would place all public agencies, such as the
Districts, under the State Unemployment Insurance p-rogram .
This legislatton, if enacted, would add an additional 3.5%
to our total salaries and wages cost. However, because
the fate of the legislation is questionable, no item has
been included for unemployment insurance. If, in spite of
practically unanimous opposition of the public agencies to
this legj_slation, it is enacted, funds can be made available
from unappropriated reserve amounts in the individual
District budgets.
It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Hirstein
and unanimously carried that the Joint Operating Budget for 1965-66,
as submitted, be approved by the Committee and recommended for
favorable action by the Joint Boards of Directors at the regular
meeting on June 9, 1965. (Copy of budget and explanatory material
attached.)
2. Joint Construction Budget
a. The Schedule of Joint Requirements for the coming fiscal
year as prepared by the staff and submitted by the General
Manager was e x amined.
-2-
b. It was pointed out by the General Manager that the Joint
Works expansion program was largely fixed by the 1962
Engineer's Report and that all of the items included in
the proposed work for 1965-66 conform to this long range
plan.
c. The Committee recalled that at the time the 1962 plan was
adopted, it was agreed that the sum of $1 million over and
above current requirements would be raised annually as a
reserve fund for future large scale projects, such as
secondary treatment works, a new ocean outfall, and for
purchase of additional land. These additional funds have
been so accumulated with approximately $2 million already
spent for secondary treatment and $885,000 budgeted the
coming year for the new outfall plus $440,000 for the
purchase of additional land, thus leaving a net reserve at
the end of the coming fiscal year of $2,700,000. This
should be adequate for future needs, assuming that the
additional $1 million reserve funds continue to accumulate
each year. Th e se reserve funds r e main in the indiv idual
District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds and are
invested in Government securities at a substantial interest
rate.
d. The sum of $96,ooo has been tentatively budgeted for
extensions to the Administrative office building recommended
to be built for our growing personnel needs and activities
over the next several years. Preliminary plans for this
office extension are now under study by the Special
Action
Building Committee composed of Directors Cornwell, Kanno,
Miller and Stewart.
It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Parks
and unanimously carried that the Schedule of Joint Works Require-
ments for 1965-66, as submitted, be approved by the Committee and
recommended for favorable action by the Joint Boards of Dire ctors
at the re ular meetin on June 9 1 65. (Copy of budget and
explanatory materia attached.
-3-
(
TENTATIVE
BUDGET SUMMARY
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965-1966
REVENUE:
REVENUE FROM INDIVIDUAL DISTRICTS' OPERATING FUNDS
(Allocated on Basis of Estimated Sewage Flow)
1964-1965 Estimated Estimated Estimated
Dist. Flows (1) Estimated 1965-1966 Cost District
No. (Past Year} Increase Flows Per MG Contribution
1 4,522 MG 6.0% 4,790 MG $38.65 $ 185,134.
2 11,321 5.0% 11,890 38.65 459,548.
3 11,269 12.0% 12,620 38.65 487,763.
5 1,629 5.0% 1,710 38.65 66,092.
6 1,669 8.0% 1,795 38.65 69,377.
7 1,279 30.0% 1,660 38.65 . 64,159.
11 2,044 22.5% 2,510 38.65 97,011.
Subtotal: 33,733 MG 9.6% 36,975 MG $1,429,084.
8 -0--0-600.
Miscellaneous Income -(Sale of Sludge, Irrigation
water, Inspection, Equipment
charge outs, etc.) 29,943.
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND REVENUE $1,,459,627.
EXPENSE:
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND EXPENSE $1,459 ,627. ( 2)
(1) May and June 1965 estimated.
(
May 28, 1965
1964-1965 COMPARATIVE DATA
Cash
Budget Actual (1) Carry Over to
Contribution Contributions 1965-1266
$ 181,032. $ 147' 709. $ 33,323.
492,976. 369,794. 123,182.
412,880. 368,096. 44,784.
80,988. 53,210. 27,778.
65,902. 54,517. 11,385.
50,816. 41,778. 9,038.
75,827. 66 '766. 9,061.
$1,360,421. $1,101,870. $258,551.
600. 600.
25,000. 30,570.
$1,386,021. $1,133,040.
$1,,386,,021. $1,133,040.
(2) See Page 2 for summary and 1964~65 Comparative figures. See Pages 3-8 for detailed· breakdown and explanatory notes.
May 28, 1965
RECAP OF JOINT OPERATING BUDGETS & EXPENDITURES
Expenditures
1964-1965
Budgeted
ADMINISTRATION $ 36,100.
MAINTENANCE & OPERATION:
Supplies 392,500.
Utilities 72,500.
Maintenance Expense (Other
than Districts' Labor) 94,500.
Insurance
Research and Pollution
Control
Control Laboratory
TOTAL MAINTENANCE & OPER-
ATION AND ADMINISTRATION
SALARIES, WAGES AND
EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
CAPITAL OUTIAY:
Administrative
Operational
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY
GRAND TOTAL -JOINT
OPERATING FUND
13,500.
23,000.
82500.
$640,600.
$668,271.
12,500.
64,650.
77,150.
$1,386,021.
{*) May and June 1965 estimated.
-2-
Expenditures Expenditures
1964 -1965 1965 -1966
Actual (*} Estimated
$ 35,977. $ 39,800.
270,117. 394,300.
78,873. 89,300.
97,352. 118,ooo.
10,035. 14,625.
20,660. 35,000.
4,789. 82500.
$517,803. $699,525.
$563,432. $693,332.
9,721. 12,500.
42,566. 54,270.
52,287. 66,770.
May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965 -1966
ADMINISTRATION
Off ice Improvements
Maintenance of Equipment
Office Supplies
Printing and Reproduction Expense
Professional Services
Travel and Vehicle Expense
Employees' Medical Examinations
Employee Training Expense
64/65 Budget -$36,100.
(*) May and June 1965 estimated.
Expenditures
1964 -1965
Actual (*)
-0-
$ 1,365.
9,258.
7,020.
11,487.
2,250.
580.
4,017.
$35,977.
Expenditures
1965 -1966
Estimated
$ 3,000.
1,600.
9,000.
7,500.
12,000.
2,000.
700.
4,000.(1)
$39,800.
(1) With the increasing complexity of the treatment plants facilities
a continuing training program for employees will insure the
Districts of qualified and competent operating personnel.
-3-
May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPER.\TING FUND
1965 -1966
MAINTENANCE AND OPERATION
Supplies:
Odor Control Chemicals
Expenditures
1964 -1965
Actual (*)
$ 5,850.
Effluent Disinfection Chemicals 225,349.
Repair Materials, Supplies and
Small Tools 17,444.
Gasoline, Oil & Grease ($13,795.Actual) 9,551.(2)
Uniform Rental 5,800.
Paints and Protective Coatings 2,270.
Welding Supplies 1,429.
Cleaning and Maintenance
Supplies 2,424.
64/65 Budget -$392,500. $270,117.
Utilities:
Power and Light $ 52,293.
Telephone 14,859. (3)
Water -Purchased 1,879.
Natural Gas 5,785.
Diesel Fuel for Emergency Power 4,057.
64/65 Budget -$72,500. $ 78,873. ---
(*) May and June 1965 estimated.
Expenditures
1965 -1966
Estimated
$ 20,000.
330,000.(1)
18,ooo.
10,500.
7,500.
3,500.
1,500.
3,300.
$394,300.
$ 50,000.
16,800.
2,500.
15,000.
5,000.
$ 89,300.
(1) Chlorine Budget 62/63 -$300M; 63/64 -$340M; 64/65 -$330M.
Each year we have carried over to the next fiscal year a sizeable
amount which,on the surface would indicate that this item is
overbudgeted approximately $100M. However, the demand for chlor-
ination of our effluent is the Districts' most variable expense.
Only through a very intensive and comprehensive program have the
Districts been able to meet the State Water Pollution requirements
and avoid chlorinating 24 hours a day.
(2) $4~244. charged to individual Districts for work performed.
(3) Includes approximately $4,200. for mobile radio telephone expense.
-4-
May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965 -1966
V.IA.INTENANCE EXPENSE (Other than
Districts' Labor)
Expenditures
1964-1965
Actual (*)
Auto and Truck $11,443.
Other Mobile Equipment 3,765.
Internal Combustion Engines, fixed 9,767.
Electrical 14,713.
Pumps 11,984.
Mechanical Equipment, other 6,725.
Chlorinator Equipment 4,430.
Piping and Heating 14,335.
Building and Grounds 2,881.
Equipment Rental 2,331.
Maintenance Repair Contracts 4,800.
Meter and Instrument Repair 8,935.
Misc. Maintenance Expense 1,243.
64/65 Budget -$94,500. $97,352.
{*) May and June 1965 estimated.
-5-
Expenditures
1965-1966
Estimated
$ 13,500.
4,ooo.
16,000.
16,000.
16,ooo.
7,500.
7,500.
15,000.
3,000.
3,000.
5,000.
10,000.
1,500.
$1182000.
.-
May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965 -1966
INSURANCE
General P.D. & P.L. including
Vehicles ($10,429. Actual)
Fire & Extended Coverage
Employees' Fidelity Bond
64/65 Budget -$13,500.
Expenditures
1964-1965
Actual (*)
$ 7 ,459. ( 1)
2,576.
-0-( 2)
$10,035.
(1) $2,970. charged to individual Districts.
Expenditures
1965 -1966
Estimated
$11,000.
3,500.
125.
$14,625.
(2) Previously charged directly in individual Districts. All
employees are bonded in the amount of $10,000. each.
RESEARCH AND POLLUTION CONTROL
Ocean Monitoring and
Oceanographic Research
Industrial Wastes and
Operational Research
64/65 Budget -$23,000.
$15,899.
4, 761.
$20,660.
$20,000.
15,000. (3)
$35,000.
(3) Increased activity is planned in Industrial discharge investi-
gations to improve quality of secondary treated waste water.
CONTROL LABORATORY
Chemicals and Supplies
Outside Service & Miscellaneous
Laboratory Expense
64/65 Budget -$8,500.
(4) Rebudgeted from 64/65
(*) May and June 1965 estimated.
-6-
$ 4, 789.
-0-
$ 4,789.
$ 6,500.
2,000. (4)
$ 8,500.
• •
.-May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965 -1966
SALARIES,, WAGES & EMPLOYEE BENEFITS
Expenditures
1964 -1965
Actual {*)
Administrative Salaries $114,700.
Operational Salaries & Wages 550,516.
64/65 Budget -$777,571. $665,216.
Reserve for Salary Adjustments -3%
Actual Less
Retirement ($32,226. -6,918.)
Group Medical
($ 9,205. -1, 727.) Insurance
Workmen's Com-
pensation ($15,413. -4,460.)
TOTAL LABOR COST
LESS:
Labor not char~eable to Joint
Operations: { 4)
$ 25,308.(3)
7,478.(3)
10.!253.(3)
$708,955.
Joint Capital Outlay (CORF) $ 51,074.
Districts• Accounts -including
Maintenance Districts 94,449.
64/65 Budget -$165,000. $145,523.
SALARIES, WAGES AND EMPLOYEE
BENEFITS
64/65 Budget -$657,271. $563,432.
(*) May and June 1965 estimated.
(1) Authorized positions with step-plan adjustments.
Expenditures
1965 -1966
Estimated
$133,638.
657,844.
$ 791, 482. ( l)
23, 750. (2)
$ 35,800.
8,800.
13,500.
$873,332.
$ 75,000.
105,000.
$180,000.
$693,332.
(2) Provides for a general t step salary increase which is in line
with current actions of the cities and other public agencies
within Orange County.
(3) $13,105. charged to individual Districts for work performed.
(4) Operation and maintenance of the individual Districts' trunk
sewers and pumping plants,as well as incidental construction
work in the Districts and at the plants, are performed by em-
ployees of the Joint Administrative Organization. We operate
a service organization supplying labor and services for, and
chargeable to, the individual Districts (including sewer main-
tenance Districts), and the Joint Works.
-7-
• -..
...
May 28, 1965
BUDGET
JOINT OPERATING FUND
1965 -1966
CAPITAL OUTIAY
Administrative:
Office Equipment & Furniture
64/65 Budget -$12,500.
Operational:
Automotive & Mobile Equipment
Communication Equipment
Machine Equipment & Tools
Trunk Maintenance Equipment
Laboratory Equipment
Engineering Instruments & Test
Equipment
64/65 Budget -$64,650.
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTIAY
64/65 Budget -$77,150.
(*) May and June 1965 estimated.
Expenditures
1964 -1965
Actual (*)
$ 9,721.
$ 9,721.
$32,855.
241.
5,083.
-0-
1,400.
2,987.
$42,566.
$52,287.
Expenditures
1965 -1966
Estimated
$12,500.
$12,500.
$25,930. ( 1)
10,440.(2)
10,100.
2,300.
3,000.
2,500.
$54,270.
$66,770.
(1) Includes $4930. for oil centrifuge authorized for purchase from
DeLaval Separator Co. (2-17-65), delivery scheduled for August,
1965. Also includes four replacement working vehicles.
(2) Includes $10,000. rebudgeted for VHF communication system.
·~· (Program still under study).
-8-
(
Equity
District Percent
1 11.98
2 32.93
3 31.98
5 6.28
6 6.18
7 4.68
11 5.97
TOTALS -100.00
(
May 28, 1965
DISTRICTS' REQUIREMENTS.AND COMPARATIVE DATA FOR JOINT WORKS EXPANSION
i965 -·1966
1265-1966 Reguirements 1264-1265 Com12arative Amounts
Cash Less: Es·timated Net Amounts Cash · Amounts
Reguirements* Balances to be Raised Reguirements RaiseQ.
$1, 000' 330 •. $ 554,149. $ 446,181. $ 794,930. $ 459,058.
2,749,655. 1,447,923. 1,301,732. 2,077,055. 1,264,511.
2,670,330. 1,310,,395. 1,299,935. 1,965,841. 1,143,313.
524,380. 312,755. 211,625. 448,649. 271,753.
516,030. 273,551. 242,479. 392,410. 232,410.
390,780. 204,833. 185,947. 293,834. 173,258.
498,495. 2lt).,394. 257,101. 346,281. 214,697.
$8,350,000.* $4,405,000. ~,oo:Y $6,319,000. $3,759,000.
*See Schedule "Joint Works Requirements"
May 28, 1965
SCHEDULE OF JOINT WORKS REQUIREMENTS
1965'"'11966
Regula:r Construction ( 1962 Engineers' Report)
(1) Buildings at Plant No. 2 ~ Vehicle
Storage, Housing for Ocean Outfall
Boo~ter Station No. 1, Power Building
(2) Centrate and Supernatant T-reatment,
Plants No. 1 and 2 ·
(3) Ocean. Outfall No. 2 -Land Section
(4) Instrumentation Additions (several
individual purchases)
(5) Interplant Electrical Duct
(6) Headworks No. 2 at Plant No. 2
(7) Additional Primary Treatment at
$154,ooo(a)
165,000
885,000
90,000
85,000
1,330,000
Plant No. 2 (One 20 MGD Sedimenta-
tion Basin and Digester)
(8) Addition to Administrative Office
Building
505,000
96,000 (3)
(9) Miscellaneous Small Jobs and
Contingencies
(10) Miscellaneous Force Account Work
Subtotal
Reserve for Future Requirements
{1962 Engineers* Report)
(1) Reserve for extension of Outfall
No. 2 and Secondary Treatment
Land .Purchase
(1) 20 acres adjacent to Plant No. 1
Professional Services
(1) Engineering on 1966-67 construction
(2) Legal and Survey Services
90,000
75,000
TOTAL OF REQUIREMENTS
Unpaid or Encumbered from 1964-65
Cash Requirements for 1965-66
Less: Balance available from 1964-65
TOTAL TO BE RAISED
NOTES:
(a) Rebudgeted from 1964-65 •
. (b) Includes engineering not heretofore paid.
$3,475 ,ooo{b l
2,700,000
440,000
1,610,
8,350,000
4a405 ,oog_C c)
$3,945,ooo(d)
(c) Includes $2.3 million reserve heretofore accumulated.
(d) For comparison, amount raised in 1964-65 ~3,759,000
l
l
'
• I ..
• • f
. ' . .
t '
'
.. . .. . .
I I.. ·-
-·
l
I
• ,_ I
' .
. ' . ,.
. . . I
. .
.•
. ... '. .
I •• . , .
' .
·.
• I
'I
I / ...
<:>·
Fiscal
Year
1965-66
1966-67
1967-68
1968-69
1969-70
TOTALS
(1)
{2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Table 1
District No. 2
Suggested Financing of District Facilities Outlined in March, 1965
Engineer's Report through June, 1970 and Showing Funds Available for Additional Work
{Assuming Maintaining 5 cent Tax Rate)
Existing &
Estimated Proposed Remaining
Assessed Tax Payments ff~~ Total ~!i~~~ions New Con-
Valuation Revenue District 3 Revenue struction
Total Funds on
ExEense June 30
$560(4) $0.280(4) $0.131(4) $0.696(4,5) $0.124(4) $0.191(4) $0.315(4) $0.381(4)
610 0.305 0.131 o.436 0.047 o.403 o.450 0.367
660 0.330 0.131 o.461 0.047 0.707 -0.754 0.074
710 ! 0.355 0.131 o.486 0 0.256 0.256 0.304
760 0.380 0.131 0.511 0 0.257 0.256 0.559
$3300 $1.650 $0.655 $2.590 $0.318 $1.814 $2.031
See discussion in text of report
See Table 3
See Page I -Engineer's Report of March, 1965
Millions
Includes 0.285 carryover from 1964-65
)
Available
for Ad-
ditional Work
$0.075(4)
0
0
0.225
0.250
$0.550
"
.it/
/. •
/
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion
See page 11 E11
and communications, if any
STRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
( DISTRICT 7
(49)
(50)
(51)
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-90-7 re: Receive and
file bid tabulation and recommendation; and awarding
Contract No. 7-2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer
a d South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Famco Construc-
ion Co. in the total amount of $69,260.50. See page 11 M11
(Bid tabulation in folders) ----
DI ICT 7
o,sideration of Resolution No. 65-91-7 re: Amending
solution No. 64-188-7 regarding compensation for position
f Stenographer-Clerk. See page 11 N"
of Ordinance No. 709
STRICT 7
/Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants. .§e.e-
page "E 11
!STRICT 7
Oti\er business and communications, if any
DIST$rcT 7
Con~ideration of motion re: Adjournment
\ \
DISTICT 2
ConSUeration of Resolution No. 65-92-2 re: Approving
plans and specifications for the Euclid Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 2-10-3; and authorizing advertising for bids.
See page 11 0 11
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Receive and file communication
from the General Counsel dated May 20, 1965, regarding
agreement relative to the proposed Nahl Annexation #3 to
District No. 2. {See letter in folders)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-93-2 re: Approving
and authorizing execution of an agreement relative to the
proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of territory to the District.
See page "pn (Agreement in folders)
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-94-2 re: Approving
proposed annexation of territory to the District~ and
rescinding Resolution No. 65-49-2. See page "Q"
-4-
,
)
Table 3
District No. 2
Present and Proposed Fixed Obligation Payments
(Assuming Sale of ·Capacity to District 3 and Purchase of Orangethorpe Sewer from Fullerton)
Fullerton-Brea Bolsa Orangethorpe
Fiscal Year Trunk Trunk Trunk Totals
1965-66 $52,610 $24,400 $ 46,400 $123,410
1966-67 0 0 46,400 46,400
1967-68 0 0 46,500 46,500
1968-69 0 0 0 0
1969-70 0 0 0 0
TOTALS $52,610 $24,400 $139,300 $216,310
b. It was pointed out by the General Manager that the Joint
Works expansion program was largely fixed by the 1962
Engineer's Report and that all of the items included in
the proposed work for 1965-66 conform to this long range
plan.
c. Th e Committee recalled that at the time the 1962 plan was
adopted, it was agreed that the sum of $1 million over and
above current requirements would be raised annually as a
reserve fund for future large scale projects, such as
~ secondary treatment works, a new ocean outfall, and for \~\ purchase of additional land. These additional funds have ~\ ~\been so accumulated with approximately $2 million already
\ \ ~ spent for secondary treatment and $8854000 budgeted the I·~ • '\ coming year for the new outfall plus $ 40, 000 for the
9 ' ~L purchase of additional land, thus leaving a net reserve at ~1 \ the end of the coming fiscal year of $2,700,000. This t should be adequate for future needs, assuming that the
~ additional $1 million reserve funds continue to accumulate
'\~ ~/ each year. These reserve funds remain in the individual y ~ District's Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds and are
./ ~ invested in Government securities at a substantial interest
~\Y ·,\~J rate.
t.~ ~ · d. The sum of $96,000 has been tentatively budgeted for r ·~ . ~J(;/ extensions to the Administrative office building recommended
to be built for our growing personnel needs and activities
over the next several years. Preliminary plans for this
~ office extension are now under study by the Special
'~ Building Committee composed of Directors Cornwell, Kanno,
Miller and Stewart.
Action
It was moved by Director Stoddard, seconded by Director Parks
and unanimously carried that the Schedule of Joint Works Require-
ments for 1965-66, as submitted, be approved by the Committee and
recommended for favorable action by the J cint Boards of Directors
at the re ular meetin on June 9 1 65 . (Copy of budget and
exp lanatory material attached.
-3-
Howard M. Cornwell
Chairman
(39) DISTRICT 6 v
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43 )
(44)
(45 )
(46)
Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if a n y .
See page 11 E11
DISTRICT 6
Other business and communic at ions, if any
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
DISTRICT 7 ,/'
Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -90 -7 re: Receive and ~
file bid tabulation and re commendat i on; and awarding
Contract No . 7 -2B for the Walnut Avenue Sub -Trunk Sewer
and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer to Fam co Co ns truc -
tion Co. in t h e total amount o f $69,260 .50 . See page 11 M11
(B id tabulation in fo lders) -----
DI STR ICT 7
Conside ration of Resolution No . 65 -9 1-7 r e : Amending V"
Resolution No. 6 4-188 -7 regarding compensation for position
of Stenographer-Clerk. See page 11 N11
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Ordinan ce No . 709
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants . See ~
page 11 E 11
DISTRICT 7
Othe r bus iness and communications, if any ~
(47) DISTRICT 7
(48)
Conside r ation of motion re:
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No . =~-Approving ~
plans and specifications fo r the Euclid Trunk Sewer,
Contract No . 2 -10-3; and authorizing advertising for bids .
See page 11 0 11
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Receive and file communication ~
from the Gene r a l Counsel dated May 20, 1965, regarding \/"
agreement relative to the proposed Nohl Ann exat ion #3 to
District No. 2. (See letter in fo ld ers )
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolution No. 65 -93 -2 re: Approving
and a u thorizing execution of an agreement relative to the
J
proposed Nohl Annexation #3 of territory to the District •
. ~~~~~ See page 11 P11 (A greement in folders )
ISTRICT 2
Con sideration of Resolution No . 65 -9 4-2 re: Approving r...--
proposed annexation of territory to the District0 and
._:rescinding Resolution No. 65 -49 -2 . See page 11 Q 1
-4-
June 4, 1965
Board of Directors
Co u n t y Sanit ation District No . 2
Su bject: Eng i neering Fe asibility of Immediate Construction
of District Sewers along the Santa Ana River easterl y
of Olive and Atwood.
Introduction :
The "Preliminary En gineer 's Report of Ultimate
Sewerage Facility Requirements for County Sanitation District
No . 2", dated March, 1965, included proposed trunk sewers
alo n g the Santa Ana River extending easterly from the proposed
water reclamation plant . The first uni t of construction of
th ese sewers was proposed for 1975, and the completion of the
s ewers was scheduled for 1 980 . However, the City of Anaheim
h as requested that considerat i on be given to the possibility
of i mmediate construction of these trunk sewers to facilitate
the development of the Santa Ana Canyon area. The City has
been requested to provide sewer se rvice for a number of proposed ~
s u bdivisions, and the subject sewers would be utilized for that
p u rpose .
The purpose of this report is to present the f easi -
bili ty from an engineering viewpoin t and the cost of construct-
ing at this time one reach of the South Santa Ana River Trunk
that would serve the immediate needs of the City of Anaheim.
Proposed Trunk Sewer
A conference was held with the City Eng ineer of
Anaheim and the locations of the proposed subdivisions in the
Santa Ana Canyon were revi ewed . It was concluded that a reach
of the South Santa Ana River Trunk extending from Imperial
Hi ghway to a point approximately 9350 feet easterly (Range
line R 9 W, R 8 W) is needed to provide the desired sewer
service. This sewer would be substantially the same size and
capac i ty as proposed in the Preliminary En g ineer's Report dated
March, 1965 .
This trunk sewer could temporarily tie into the
existing City of Anaheim sewer that presently t erminates at
~~=i~!~rf!a~=~~~~.-Yo rba Road as shown in the Prelim~ ~~)
~v
-1-
. ,__,,_ .. rO (,,?
~ . f1/'t-
(1 i17\ 'c "'"
Y SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
,/ -June 3, 1965
OF DIRECTORS,
{ I Sa nitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11
C::\~\ Your Executive Committee met in the Districts' office on
\ Wednesday, June 2, 1965, at 4:30 p.m.
Present were Directors Cornwell, Chairman, Harvey, Parks,
Stoddard, Meyers and Hirstein. Director Lambert was absent.
Others present were Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, Paul G.
Brown, Assistant General Manager and Fred A. Harper, Secretary and
Director of Finance.
Chairman Cornwell presided. Items considered and recommen-
dations made to the Joint Boards are as follows:
1. Joint Operating Budget
a ~· The tentative budget summary of the Joint Operating fund
or 1965-66, as submitted by the General Manager, was
~ examined item by item.
. The staff was questioned as to the method of estimating
increases in sewage flow for each District for the next
fiscal year. The General Manager explained that these
estimates are based on examination of past data and that
the cash contribution of each District, as shown on the
material submitted, is computed from this estimate. It was
noted by Mr. Hirstein that the estimated total flow from
all Districts will average more than 100 million gallons
per ay next year, as contrasted with less than 15 million
----~ lons per day in the early 1950's.
he amounts tentatively budgeted for research and pollution
control were questioned by Mr. Stoddard. The General
Manager explained that these amounts include an accelerated
program necessary for final design of the new ocean outfall.
He also stated that the Districts have been somewhat
deficient in research work because, until recently, manpower
and funds have not been available to carry out an adequate
program. However, with more time and manpower now available
and with State and National water pollution control being
tightened up and waste water reclamation becoming a
definite possibility, the money expended now in this
connection will undoubtedly be repaid many fold in the
future. Mr. Stoddard brought out that as a member of the
State Water Pollution Control Board he believes that the
State's research program should include some of this work
which the individual waste dischargers are now force d to do
themselves. However, since the State's program does not,
the Districts are justified in and must be doing this type
of work themselves.
/ .. .
(52) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of written report of the staff and engineers
concerning costs and financial feasibility of request of
the City of Anaheim dated April 27, 1965, for construction
of facilities. (Copy of report in folders)
(53) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any.
See page 11 D11
(54) DISTRICT 2
Other business and communications, if any
(55) DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
(56) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, if any .
See page 11 E 11
(57) DISTRICT 11
Other business and communications, if any
(58) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Adjournment
-5-
WARRANT NO.
2222
2223
2224
2225
2226
2227
2228
2229
2230
2231
2232
2233
2234
2235
2236
2237
2238
2239
2240
2241
2242
2243
2244
2245
2246
2247
2248
2249
2250
2251
2252
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
Acore Drilling Service $ 35.00
../ Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. d u....._:_r . I.... 13. 35
Jan Alabaster 17.20
Aladdin Litho & Art 45.24
American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. 49.39
American Optical 15.58
City of Anaheim 25.00
Anaheim Dodge 57.65
Anchor Packing Company 136.55
.___ Apco Supply C--<1\..-~~ 47.29
Associated Concrete Products 34.42
Atlas Stationers 84.64
-Barnes & Delaney f'~~t:" (~l._T\ 415.81
Bascom Rush Co. 30.16
Bay City Bearing Co. 414.27
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 139.65
Bedford Freight Lines, Inc. 6.15
Bell Pipe & Supply Co. 13.26
Blower Paper Company 121.64
-· Blue M Engineering Co • 7"'' .-f ··-> .. ..A" 466 . 66
-Charles Bruning Co. t"0'-1-{'"°t...,..... ,~Q~~1~,-bl.1\"1 _J84.71
Bud's Equipment Rentals 91.00
Buena Park Wholesale Electri c 571.56
California Cartage Co., Inc. 59.00
California Wholesale Electric 35.03
.-. Cal-State Seal Co. .z...., ~ -·, •'tt--~ 17 .14
Paul Calvo Surqeying 1,140.00
Carlton's Linoleum Shop 9.26
Chemical Exchange Co. ~-~ 18,968.42
College Lumber Co., Inc. 50.85
Consolidated Freightways 23.07
Costa Mesa Lumber Co. 3.99 2253
2254
2255
2256
2257
_ rt Cummins-Chicago Corp. -,·~".-~ .... c n . 722 .80 7 "'f-' '<.~ •• ~The Davis Brown Co. 1"'"~. 72.75
2258
2259
2260
2261
2262
2263
2264
2265
2266
2267
2268
2269
2270
2271
2272
2273
2274
2275
2276
2277
2278
2279
-John M. Deck Co. .J-~ .. -.. l e ~"'-1'-'"i)''L-(... ._, 15. 32
Electric Products Co. 186.46
~ Electric Supplies Distributing Co. 2,313.16
ou.-n----i r-~ Enchanter, Inc. 1, 000 .oo
Engineers Sales-Service Co. 456.22
Enterprise Electric Supply Co. 614.18
Enterprise Printing Co. ~ J ,, $ 166. 23
Chas. A. Estey, Inc. 10.92
Fairbanks, Morse & Co. 442.27
Fairfax Electronics, Inc. 56.65
Fischer & Porter Co. 921.65
Flair Drafting Service 332.50
H. R. Fox & Co. 187.08
Larry Fricker Co. 88.17
Garden Grove Camera Center 7 126.97
General Telephone Co. 187.10
Bob Gosche Co. 141.90
A. P. Green Refractories, Inc. 218.40
-George T. Hall Co • ' L .. I' C:: 119 • 70
Hanson , Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester 448.oo
Harlows Clocks 7 .07
Haws Drinking Faucet Co . 26 .1 5
Bernard Heying 18.oo
Hollisters Nurse ry 21 .99
-A-
, .
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
2280 Honeywell, Inc.
2281 Howard Supply Co.
2282 City of Huntington Beach
2283 International Harvester Co.
$
2284 -J & M Service 1 .. • _ .... -v._ < \-"'"'·
2285 -B. R. Jones & Co., Inc. t:t ._c:. ~. ~t ... ....,,.1-;, t'~
2286 Kelly Pipe Co.
2287 Bill Kroeger
2288 Herbert H. Kyzer
2289 Lambert Truck Equipment Div.
2290 Larson Equipment Co.
2291 LASCO Industries
2292 LBWS, Inc.
2293 Judy Lee
2294 L & N Uniform Supply Co.
2295 D. J. Lord
2296 Lord-Babcock, Inc.
2297 Mahaffey Machine Co.
2298 McGraw-Hill Book Co.
2299 Minnesota Mining & Mfg.
2300 Morrison Co.
2301 Munselle Supply Co., Inc.
2302 City of Newport Beach
2303 . , (\ Orange County Blueprint
2304 ~~ -Orange CoL~nty Film Cleaning Service
2305 ~ ~ .. Orang e County Radiotelephone Service, Inc.
2306 Orange County Stamp Co.
2307 o. C. Suppliers, Inc.
2308 t.:ra•c•.-..' C Pacific Bellows
2309 Pacific Telephone
2310 Powr-Flo Products
2311 N B Products
2313 The Register
2313 Reynolds Camera Supply
2314 Robbins & Myers, Inc.
2315 Howard Ryan Tire Service
2316 Santa Ana Blue Print Co.
2317 Santa Ana Electric Motors
23 18 Santa Ana Postmaster
2319 E. H. Sargent & Co.
2320 Schurr & Finlay, Inc.
2321 Russell M. Scott
2322 Selman Chevrolet Co.
2323 The Sherwin-Williams Co.
2324 Shipkey & Pearson, Inc.
2325 John E. Sigler, Consultant
2326 Signal Oil Co .
2327 Smith Engineering Co.
2328 Southern California Chemical Co.
2329 Southern California Edison Co.
2330 Southern California Water Co.
2331 Southern Counties Gas Co.
2332 Southwest Flexible Co.
2333 Speed-E-Auto Parts
2334 Speedy Saw Service
2335 Standard Oil Co. Of Calif.
2336 Sully Miller Contracting Co.
2337 Tardif Sheet Metal
2338 Technical Book Co.
2339 Tell Steel, Inc.
-B -
AMOUNT
626 .oo
1 ,304 .85
4.50
139 .94
66.70
2.62
224.64
23.40
15.00
49 .92
3,889 .36
195. 31
453.29
4.60
646 .69
26.60
79.40
462.24
8.09
53.81
14.57
101.04
47 .47
6 .29
204.82
300.36
7.16
45.50
18.34
253.45
7.80
317 .43
12.00
2.56
40.75
134.94
67.91
321 .70
100.00
107.08
120.00
40.40
7.99
78.04
42.90
816 .10
388 .00
52.32
1,089.38
4,562.53
3.90
196.21
51 .45
44.44
5.00
758 .09
278.30
480.31
14. 76
86 .63
~ .
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF
2340 Terminal Testing Laboratories
2341 Thermo -Fax Sales Incorporated
2342 Norman R. Termblay
2343 c. O. Thompson Petroleum Co.
2344 \~~--Turville Studio
2345 Union Sign Co.
2346 Utilities Supply Co.
2347 'I::. t-John R. Waples, Consultant ,
2348 ~~ ..:1-r" ~~ .._ ... Guy L. Warden & Sons fJa.:h .\G\ L .._,.,,.. -J(
2349 :) • -t.f.:.-j , -Warren & Bailey Co.
2350 We lch's Concrete Co.
2351 Westco Pump Sales Co.
2352 City of Westminster
2353 Worthington Corporatio.n
2354
2355
2356
2357
2358
2359
2360
236 1
2362
2363
2364
2365
2366
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Aladdin Litho & Art
Bank of America
Paul Calvo Surveying
John Carollo Engrs.
En chanter, Inc.
Enterprise Printing Co.
The Orang e Daily News
Raymond G. Osborne
Schurr & Finley, Inc.
J. T. Smith Co. & Wescon, Inc.
Wal l ace Trade Bindery
John Ward Co.
West & Wiggs, Inc.
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF
-c-
AMOUNT
8.oo
235.15
18 .30
222.03
11 3 .62
228.80
56 .37
225.30
210.57
7.24
134 .83
175 .85
5.00
63.96
$ 53,434.48
$ 57.82
173,278.13
304.oo
5,338.62
2,100.00
33.90
46 .27
1,909.50
3,832.86
26,685.84
40 .51
2,737.9 4
2,195.42
$2 18,560 .81
$27 1,995 .29
.; r'-..
·TARRANT NO.
2367
2368
2369
2370
2371
2372
DISTRICT NO. 2
OPERA'l'DJG FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
County Sanitation District #3 ~
Construction Fund
Tax Service of Orange County
AMOUNT
$ 20,756.16
15.00
$ 20,771.16
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS j
IN FAVOR OF / f "\
# ,.~ (Y't ~ County Sanitation District 3 J • 'P 86,484.oo
Construction Fund
DISTRICT NO. 5
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Daily Pilot
Tax Service of Orange Count~ Inc.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Aladdin Litho & Art
-D-
$ 107,255.16
$ 86.36
75.00
$ 161.36
208.42
WARRANT NO.
2373
2374
2375
2376
2377
2378
2379
2380
2381
2382
2383
2384
2385
2386
2387
2388
2389
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Boyle & Lowry $
AMOUNT
6,330.44
AD No. Amount
1 $2,343.38
3A 64.40
3B 59.60
5A 2,462.75
$4,930.13
Plan Check &
Inspection 1,400.31
$6,330.44
Jack A. & Patricia G. Chandler (AD #5A)
Costa Mesa Sanitary District ~
Goode & Goode Appraisers (AD #1)
Paul J. Hogan
County of Orange
AD NO. Amount
1 $211.40
5A 166.oo
$377.40
Walter A. & Corrine L. Schminke {AD #1)
Southern California Edison Co.
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF r ~
Costa Mesa Sanitary District \~fr-,~
FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
570.00
1,950.0.0
750.00
70.70
377.40
625.00
8.52
$ l0,682.06
$ 16,250.00
IN FAVOR OF J.)-:f~
Boyle & Lowry 7_i. ~ 11\b.Jpd ~bi $ 5,224.03
36,59
52.25
1.99
48.83
22.83
Enterprise Printing co.
Raymond G. Osborne Laboratories
Santa Ana Blue Print Co.
Tustin News
Wallace Trade Bindery Co.
DISTRICT NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Huntington Beach News
Wallace Trade Bindery Co.
-E-
$
$ 32,318.58
35.00
32.76
. . Agenc:a Item No. U Lr
FILED
]. R. LESTER BOY LE and SIDNEY L. LOWRY
In the Office of the Secretary
County Sanitation District
/,
No --~---.:z....~~~~~-
Consulting Engineers, A l oint Venture of
BOYLE ENG INEER I NG & LOWRY AND ASSOCI ATES APR 1 tl 1965
, ,
412 So11th Lyon Street
P.O. Box 178
Santa A11a, Calif., 92702
Tefepl1011e Kimberl)' 7-4-171
April 8, 1965
~Board of Directors
County Sanitati on District No . 2
P . 0 . Box 5175
Fountain Valley , California
r Ge n tlemen :
'Pursuant to a request by Mr . Fred A . Harper, District 's
Secretary , we have prepared an engineering study regarding the
annexat i on to the District of "Noh l An nexation No . 3 " as described
in Resol ut ion No . 65 -219 of t he Board of Super visors a dopted
Ma r ch 2 , 1 965.
It is our recommendation that the following requirements
be estab l ished as conditions to the annexation of this territory
to the District .
1 . Payment of ad valorym taxes toward the retirement
of the existing authori zed bon ds of the District ,
plant expansion a n d ma inten a n ce a n d operation costs .
2 . That the territory be annexed to the City of Anaheim,
within a reasonable period of time, in order that
the sewerage developed in the territory may be con -
veyed via the local sewer system to the District 's
trunk sewer system .
3 . The local sewer system to be installed and connected
to the District 's system without expense to the
District .
4 . Payment of all costs incurred by the District per-
taining to th e required a n nexation proceedings .
5 . Payment to the District the sum of $100 .00 per acre
of the territory so annexed.
Board of Directors
Co u nty Sanitati on District No . 2 4 -8-65 Page 2 .
In determining the value to the territory to be annexed
to the sewage disposal facilities of the District, the following
basic criteria was used :
Firs t, that conditi ons under wh i ch outside areas are
a n nexed to the existing District shal l not be detri mental to t h e
interest of the lands presently within the District , and
Second , that conditions to be imposed upon areas to be
annexed shall not be unreasonable in regard to providing sanitary
sewer service as compared with similar lands presently within the
District .
The specific benefi t the subject lands will receive by
annexing to the District is the immediate use of the Placentia-
Newhope trunk sewer system via City of Anaheim sewer system, and
treatment plant facilities .
It would appear that the lands requesting annexation
wi l l be schedul ed for earl y developme nt and that sai d lands wi ll
probably be equi valent in assessed value to the average of the
assessed value of improved l ands within the District, and thus
will immediately assume its share of the District 's annual costs .
Several estimates were made as to the value of the Dis -
trict 's facilities available to serve the area proposed for
annexation . These estimates incl uded the following :
1 . Estimate of back taxes that would have been
paid by the area proposed for annexation since
the formation of District No . 2 .
2 . Estimate of the principal and interest payments
made on all District Bond Issues. reduced to an
average value per acre .
3 . Estimate based on the net worth of the District
as of June 30 , 1964, reduced to an average value
per acre .
After a careful analysis of these data, it was deter-
mined that by payment of an annexation fee of $100 .00 per acre,
plus future ad-valorum tax payments , sufficient funds wou l d be
provided to pay the costs of serving the lands to be annexed
without detrimental effect upon the lands presently within the
District.
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No . 2 4 -8-65 Page 3.
We therefore recommend that your honorable body approve
the subject annexation subject to the five conditions described
in this report .
SLL :m
•1 cc -Mr. Ted Finster
Mr. Thornton E . Piers all ''
v Respectfully submitted,
J . R . Lester Boyle
and Sidney L . Lowry
Consulting Engineers
,J-t~~ .,f!f ~
Sidney L . Lowry
JUN 1 9 l86b
JUN 9 1965
~e Nohl Reso lution
0
,/ , j -~~~ 90~1 to ... w:~e J,.ette~ t,~ .... ..S~ Ana~i t~ Co9ci¥sking fo.r
F--~.-e' of t_he4emai h.ing po rt\_i_on of t(l~..-'.Pustin Avenue S~wer_.....
() ~ General Counsel authorized to offer Sakioka $2300 per acre (instead
of the original $2100 per acre).
---#1 3 -Rego of th General Mana x---R~vi--ewea the up dati ng of the
{ ~ Orang~ounty Sewera eport
#14 -Reported on the di sso luti¢n of CSD #1 4 effective June 1st .
Al s@ reported on negotiations wikh Sakioka fer the Districts
acquisit i on of 20 acres south;m of the Orange County Water Dist
property on Ward St,.:J[n acco rda ce with an appraisal report the
O(~ Gene r a l Counsel advi sed he had offered $21,000 per acre. Saki @ka
counte red that he wo ul d accept $25 ,000 per acre . The General
Counsel recommended to the Bo~rd that he be authorized to make an
offer of $23 ,000 per acre; th~same price that was paid by the
OCWD for the propert y immediat ly ad j ac e nt to the l and under
consideration . This was c~n cu red in by the General Manage r .
I t was then MS&D:E} -(Tha t the ,. C. b e authorized, etc .)
. , #1 7 -Adoption of budget -show roll call by District . Also add , ~1.11.,[4 / .. Bi rec ting the Erl Speci a l Buildi ng Committee l:le --:i:nstruetcd to make
note of the present us e of the storage space now available .
Fo llowing I t em 4 1 -Then #11 bus i dess was taken up and they adopted
the resolution on wi thdrawal. /
I 07 .2-b i'~1 •
Re : No hl Annexation -5 e qual payments ~ $2690,..00 each -
there will be a security i n the form of either stocks or bonds in an
amount accep table to the Gene r a l Counsel of the District (change
r e sol ution to match agreement -change will come from Nissen?)
#52 -R & F e n g ineers r e port re : Anaheim request for constructi9n
of faci l ities -financial report (red one) r & F and staff directed
not to consider an increas e in the tax r ate of the Di stri ct for the
purpose of fina ncing projects out o f ~r iority schedule i n the engineer
preliminary engineer s report d a t ed rn~ __ _ltq ft.>' until s uch time as
the Board could decide on the f inancing arrangements necessary to
imp l ement the constru ction as outlined i n the preliminary engi nee r s
repo rt .
#46-B -Subj ec t to the General Counsel 's approval ~f the deed . -#46 -DD MS&DC That the G. C. be a uthorized and directed te write on
behalf of the Board to the s. A. City Council requesting acqui siti on
of the sewer fac ilities in Tustin Avenu e as outlined in the engi neers
report dated November , 1 96 1 (remaining portion of facilities?)
.._ ·-...
46-DDD Upon recommendation of the G. C. it was MS&DC:
Reso l ution -That the G. c . Be ~V_"thorized to acquire an
certain real property owned by ~ Sakioka needed i n
struction of the South Coast Plaza Sub -Trunk xmt Sewer,
7 -2B in the amount of $896 .00 (Nissen to sign warrant ). --" r;-2 -IJ
easement for
the con-
Contrac t
From Joint Meeting
June 9th
Nohl Resolution to be changed.
JUN 9 \965
General Counsel to write letter to Santa Ana City Council asking
for the sale of the remaining portion of the Tustin Avenue Sewer.
(lst portion purchased by agreement June, 1965)
JJ'N 9 1965
General_ Counsel authorized to offer Sakioka $2300,-:per acre (instead
of the original $2100 per acre).
JUN 9 1965
#14 -The General Counsel reported on the dissolution of CSD #14
effective June 1st. Mr. Nisson also reported on negotiations with
Sakioka for the Districts' acquisition of 20 acres southerly of the
Orange County Water District property on Ward Street in accordance
with an appraisal reportx~he General Counsel advised that he had
offered $21,000 per acre. Sakioka countered that he would accept
$25,000 per acre. The General Counsel recommended to the Boards
that he be authorized to make an offer of $23,000 per acre; the
same price that was paid by the OCWD for the property immediately
adjacent to the land under consideration. This was concurred in
by the General Manager.
It was then moved, seconded and duly carried: That the General
Counsel be authorized to make an offer of $23,000 per acre in
negotiating for acquisition of/20 acres of property on Ward Street.
the
Adoption of budget -show roll call vote by District. Also, add
that the Special Building Committee be instructed to make a note
of the present use of the storage space now available.
Following Item 41 -Show #11 business taken up including resolution
on withdrawal.
JUN 9 1965
Ordinance 709 taken under submission for study.
EXCERPTS FROM THE MINUTES OF THE REGUIAR
MEETING OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 ,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
A regular meeting of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 7 , of Orange County, California, was held at the hour
of 8:00 o'clock p.m., June 9th , 1965 , at 10844 Ellis Avenue,
Fountain Valley, Californi a.
The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:00 o'clock p .m.
The roll was c alled and the Secretary reported a quorum of the
Board present.
Directors pres e nt: Director s William H. Hirs te i n (Chairman ),
Dee Cook , H. H. Harvey, A . H. Meyers,
Clifto n c. Miller and Re x A. Parks
Directors absent: Non e
Present : Fred A. Harper, Secretary of the Board.
DI STR ICT NO. 7
Directing the General
Co unse l to submit
r eque s t for purchase
o f facilities
Following he adoption
of a r e so ut ion approving
an agr~7 ent with the
City ov Santa Ana for
purch~se b y the Distr ict
of a ,1por t i on of the Tustin
Avenue Sewer, it was moved , seco~ded and dul y carri ed :
Tha t the General Counsel be dir,~ted t o s ubmit to the
Santa Ana City Counci l , a f or~l reques t f o r p urchase
by t he District o f t he r ema.lm1ng port ion o f the sewer
faci lities in Tustin Avenue , as outli ned in the
Enginee r's Report date d Nov mber, 196 1.
STATE OF CALIFORNIA) SS
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) •
I, FRED A. HARPER, Secretary of t h e Board of Directors of
County Sanitation Di stric t No. 7 , of Orang e County, California,
do hereby certify the above and fore g oing to be full, true and
correct copy of minut e entries on rec ord taken from the minutes of
the re g ular meeting of said Board on the 9th day of June , 196 5 .
IN WITNESS WHERE OF, I have h e reunto set my hand and affix ed
the official seal of Count:y:_ Sanitation Distr ict No. 7 r-' of Orange
County , California , this l'(t h day o f J une , 19 6 '.? •
Secretary , Board of Directors o f
County Sanitation Di s t ric t No. 7
or
Moved, seconded and duly carriedt
That the Boards of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 65-86, approving and
adopting pZ?5?FYS? specifications for Instrumentation-1965,
Job No. J-5-E; and authorizing advertising for bids. Certi-
fied copy of this resolution is attached bereto and made a
part of these minutes.
Moved, seconded and duly carried /<ALL DISTRICTS
/ Authorizing increase x
in maximum amount pay-
ab1e ~I'~
•(J~b No. I-6-1)
That the maximum amount pa.yab~ ~ ·
Osborne Testing Laboratorie~1is
hereby authorized to be increased
to $8,ooo.oa.fror pipe testing for
Addition to Plant l Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline, ·
~~o. I-6-1. I
ALL DISTRICTS
Approval of Change
Order #3 to Job
No. P2·7-l
Moved, seconded and duly carrieds
That Change Order #3 to the plans
and specifications for Job No,
P2-7-l (Installation of Steam
Turbine at Plant No. 2) be approved, authorizing an addition
of $842.17 to the contract with John Ward Company, Contractor.
Copy of this change order is attached hereto and made a part
of these minutes.
Moved, seconded and duly carriedc
That Change Order #4 to the plans
\ ....... /
/ ALL DISTRICTS
ApProval of Change
Order #4 to Job No.
P2-7-l and specifications for i:aBxHa¥ Installation
of Steam 'l'urbine at Plant No. 2~ Job
No. P2-7-l, be approved, authorizing an extension of time of
ALL l>ISTRIOTS Moved, seconded and duly carrieda
\,,,..,.~Accepting Job No. ,
1'2·7•1 as complete
/( _ _.yl.
That the Boards of Directors adopt ~~V'
Resolution No. 65-87, accepting . f\ jJ-JI" (}/!"~ .
Job No. P2-7·1 as completed, and authorizing execution~of
a Notice of Gompletion of Wo~k~~ Company, Contractor).
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a pert of these minutes.
ALL DIS'l'RICTS Moved, seconded and duly carried1
Approval of Change
Order #2 to Job No. I-6-l 'l'hat Change Order #2 to the plans
and specifications for Job No. I-6-1
(Addition to Plant l Effluent Discharge Facilities Pipeline),
be approved, authorizing change 1n the method of pa ent
-for extra gravel fill~ntrac ·~th
Vinnell Corporation, Contractor. Copy of this change order
is attached hereto and made a part of these minutes.
ALL DISTRICTS
Certification of the
General Manager, re-
ceived and filed
Moved, seconded and duly carrieda
That the written certification of
the General Manager that he has
personnally checked all bills appear-
ing on the agenda for this meeting,
found them to be 1n order, and that he recommends a.uthorizd.11*on
for payment, be received and ordered filed.
ALL DISTRICTS
Approval of warrants
Moved, seconded and unanimously
carried by roll call vote1
-·
That the Districts• Joint Operating Fund and Capital Outlay
Revolving Fund warrant book.a be approved tor signature d
the Chairman of District No. 1, and that the County Auditor
be authorized and directed to pay the following:
Joint Operating Fund $
Capital Outlay Revolving Fund .._$ _____ _
$
in accordance with the following warrantss
DISTRICT l Moved, seconded and duly carried:
Awarding contract for
Job No. I-6-2 to That the Board of Directors adopt
Vinnell Corporation Resolution No. 65-88-1, to receive
and file bid tabulation and recommen-1..--
dation, and awarding contract for Addition to Plant No. l -
Effluent Discharge Facilities -Structures, Job No. I-6-2,
to Vinnell Corporation in the total amount of $172~800.00.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and l
_.made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT l
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District~o. 1 be adjourned
to 4100 p.m., Thursday, July let, 1965.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
a p.m., June 9, 1965.
Moved, seconded and duly carried1 DISTRICT 3
Approving plans and
specifications for
Contract No. 3-10 That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolimion No. 65-89-3, approving
and adopted plans and specifications for the Miller-Holder
Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-loi and authorizing advertising
for bids!'} Certified copy of this resolution is attaehea
hereto and made a part of these minutes.
DISTBICT 3
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried1
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors of County Sanitation District No. 3 be adjourned.
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at ;z,· a Z--
p .m., June 9, 1965.
DISTR ICT 5 Moved , seconded and duly carried:
Approval of wa rrants
That the District 's Operating Fund
and Accumulated Capital Outlay Fund warrant books be approved
for signature of t he Chairman, a nd that the County Auditor
be authorized and d irected t o pay the f oll owing warrants :
OPERATI NG FUND
Daily P ilot 2370
2371 Tax Service of Orange County, Inc .
$ 86 .36
75 .00
$161 .36
2372
ACCUMUIA TED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND
Aladdin Lithe & Art $208.42
$369 .78
DISTRICT 5
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried:
That this meeting of t he Board of
Directors of Coun ty Sanitation Dis t rict No . 5 be adjourned .
The Chairman then d e c lared the meeting so adjourned at ---p .m., J une 9, 1965 .
DISTRICT 6
Adjournment
Moved, seconded and duly carried :
Tha t this meeting of the Board of
Direc tors o f Coun ty Sanitation Dis t rict No . 6 be adjourned .
The Chairman then declared the meeting so adjourned at
P..:m_., June 9, 1965 . ---
---------~
DISTR ICT 11
Approval of warrants
Moved, seconded andduly darried:
That the Dis t rict~ Ac cumulated Capital
Ou tlay Fund warrant book b e approved for signature o f the
Chairman , ahd that the County Auditor be authori zed and
directed to pay t h e fo llowing warrants :
ACCUMULATED CA PITAL OUTLAY FUND
$ 35 .00
32.76
$ 67 . 76
DISTRICT 11
Adjour nme nt
Moved, seconded and duly carried :
That this meeting of the Board of
Directors o f County Sanit ation District No . 11 be adjourned.
Th e Chairman then dec lared the meeting so ad journed at __ _
p.m., June 9, 1965 .
DISTRIC'l' 7
Awarding contract 1Br
No. 7-2-B to Famco
Construction Co.
Moved, seconded and duly carriedt
That the Board of Directors adopt
Resolution No. 65-90-7, to receive
and file bid tabulation and
recommendation., and awarding lontract :In No. 7-2-B tor the
South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk and Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk
to Famoo Construction Company in the total amount of $69,260.50.
Certified copy of this resolution is attached hereto and
made a part of these minutes.
DISTRICT 7
-'
-.I -(
R 0 LL CA LL
District ----.,..---Regular ___ ~---Adjourned ______ __
Time f ; (}(J
---~o r~ r (
DISTRICT ;2
V7
r DISTRICT 1 ~'V> ~µ<.-~]~ ~ Har·v,_;y-,-H-:=z-Gilmore
....... JOINT BOAR"JG f'J Jr.; tl\iinc-• l11eye:.s v7"
--------tQ Ylyj'-1 •c..~c Miller ~ Macl<:
Cornwell _i.. ___ Farnswor ~;-"'.J_,-f(;l.~ Hirs te in ~ Allen Amo ..,.... r;.J.
And erson Gummere '?/J~ • .1).-\,~, c .,I
Bousman Thompson 1<-<-L.ct::. Parlrn
Ca llens ~ Kanno C al l e~s
--Cook ~ Gruber Cornwe ll
Hileman
l<~Ae
Farnsworth
Shull Crapo i--Shull Crauo
Culver ....,../ Culver
Furman ~ De Vrj_es Harvey , H.
Grube r v Elder Hock
Harvey,H . t/ Gilmore Schutte
Hock v Michel Speer
Johnson _..,....-Ant i ch Workman
Kanno v-:' Ca llens Hirstein
Lambert .......... Shipley
Long t-< Bell
Gilmore
Michel
Krein
Harvey,C .
Queyrel
Allen
Meye rs ~
DISTRICT 3
Cornwell V' Farnsworth
Miller ,.........--
Parks ~
Schutte 2
Shipley a_
Speer _!J ___ _
Stewart g__....-
Stoddard L.--'
Mack
Hileman
Krein
Welch
Harvey,C#
Workma n t::::7 Qu eyrel
Wright ~ ,, No e
Hirste in ;;?"' All en
OTHERS:
Nelson
Brown
Nis s on
Galloway
Dunn
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
__::::::-__
llen
Amo ~
Anders on
Bousman
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Harvey,H.
Johnson
Kanno
Long
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Wright
Hirs tein
a-
I ~
V' ,,....--
k ,,,
" ........
i.--v
a_
~
..........-
v
DISTRICT 5
Stoddard
Gruber
Hirstein
V7 v
v
DISTRICT 6
v
I/"
Meyers
Gruber
Hirstein 7 '
DISTRICT 7
Hirstein
Cook
Harve y,H.
Meyers
Miller
Parks
v: v
1/
!,./"'
v
1/
Gummere
'rhompson
Shull
De Vries
Gilmore
Antich
Callens
Bell
Krein
We lch
Harvey,C.
No e
Allen
Elder
Allen
Elder
Al l en
Allen
Gruber
Gilmore
Mack
Hileman
DISTRICT 11
Lamb ert
Stewart
Hirstein
V Shipley
a-/
1C?' Allen
•
R 0 L L CA LL
Di strict -------Re gular ______ ~
Adjourned. ______ _
Time -----
Item --------------------~
C o'R r= 'b ~ -·\:s .... t-
ca\\ q
JOINT BOAR"J.S
Cornwell ~-Farnsworth
Amo
Anderson
Bousman
Callens
Cook
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Grub Gr
Harvey,H .
Hock
J ohnson
Kanno
Lambe rt
Long
Meye rs
Miller
Parks
Schutte
Ship ley
Sp eer
Stewart
Stoddard
Workma n
Wr ight
Hirstein
OTHERS :
Nelson
Brown
Ni s s on
Ga lloway
Dunn
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
1./
0.---Gummere v Thompson
V'" Ka nno ---Gruber .t~l
6' Shull
'N
~ De Vrj_e s
v Elde:r
~ Gi lmor e
tf? Michel
Antich
V7 Callens
~ Shipley
L---Bell
v--
~ Mack
~ Hileman
~ Kre i n
c...-Welch
ti Harvey,C .
(,.,._
-~
b1 Queyre l
L..--" Noe
,,,..... Allen
DISTRICT 8
Martin
Scott
Hirstein Allen
-:( }
~ \, t \) l ~
IJc:J 1'
DISTRICT 1
Har-v ~y , H. ~-Gilmore
i,1eye!'.'S 1/
.Miller v-Mack
Hi rstein ~-Allen
DI ST RICT 2
Parks ~ Hileman
Call8i1S ...........-Kanno
Cornw ell V"' Farnsworth
Cr apo IV Shull
Culv er "' Harvey,H. ~ Gilmore
Hock t-1 Michel
Schutte ....,...... Krein
Spe er -4-Harvey,C .
Workma n Queyre l
Hi rs te in ~ Allen
DISTRICT 3
Co:rnwell V--Farnsworth
Amo t...--"""
Anderson c-Gummere
Bousman ~ 'Ehompson
Crapo N Shul l
Culver ~ Fu rman ~ De Vries
Harvey,H . l.' Gilmore
Johns on \/" Antich
Kanno V' Callens
Long ""' Bell
Schu tte v Krein
Sh ipley ~ Welch
Speer N Harvey,C .
Wright v Noe
Hi rstein v Allen
DISTRICT 5
Stoddard /
Gr ube r ~/ Elder
Hirstein / Allen
DISTRICT 6
Meyers
Gruber Elder
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 7
Hirstein '--""' Allen
Cook f'.( Gruber
Harvey,H . ..--Gilmore
Meyers v
Miller .............. Ma cl<:
Parks ~ Hileman
DISTRICT 11
Lambe rt ../ Shipley
Stewart ~"--
Hirstein \./ Allen
'{
b(N
\ \ '4
-y"'
ROLL CALL
District -------Regular ____________ __
Adjourned ____________ __
Date Time ------------------------------
Item
------------------------------------~-
NT BOAR'JS
Cornwell -~;arnsworth
Amo ~
Anderson f:Z:· Gummere
Bousman _ Thompson
Callens v Kanno
Cook t:?" Gruber
Crapo ---V-Shull
Culver ~
Furman
Gruber
Harvey,H.
Hock
Johnson
Kanno
Lambert
Long
Meyers
Miller
Parks
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Stewart
Stoddard
Workman
Wright
Hirstein
OTHERS:
Nelson
Brown
Niss on
Galloway
Dunn
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
De Vries
Elder
Gilmore
Michel
Antich
Callens
Shipley
Bell
Mack
Hileman
Krein
Welch
Harvey,C.
Queyrel
Noe
Allen
DISTP..ICT 8
Martin
Scott
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 1 ---Har·vey, H. Gilmore --Meyers
Miller Mack
Hirstein Allen
~{·f'J DISTRICT 2
Parks + Hileman
Callens Kanno
Cornwell ~ Farnsworth
Crapo N Shull
Culver * Harvey,H. Gilmore
Hock Michel
Schutte v Krein
Speer ti Harvey,C.
Workman 'v Queyrel
Hirstein ............. Allen
DISTRICT 3
Cornwell
Amo
Anderson
Bousman
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Harvey,H.
Johnson
Kanno
Long
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Wright
Hirstein
Farnsworth ---
DISTRICT 5
Stoddard
Gruber
Hirstein
DISTRICT 6
Meyers
Gruber
Hirstein
DISTRICT 7
Hirstein
Cook
Harvey,H.
Meyers
Miller
Parks
Gummere
Thompson
Shull
De Vries
Gilmore
Antich
Callens
Bell
Krein
Welch
Harvey,C.
Noe
Allen
Elder
Allen
Elder
Allen
Allen
Gruber
Gilmore
Macl(
Hileman
DISTRICT 11
Lambert Shipley
Stewart
Hirstein Allen
71
'-f N
-... ~
7
:;
R 0 LL CALL
District
Regular
Adjourned
Date Time
Item
DISTRICT l --Harvey, H. Gilmore
JOINT BOAR1S Meyers
Miller Mack Cornwell Farnsworth Hirstein --Allen --Amo
Anderson Gummere DISTRICT 2
Bousman Thompson Parks V"' Hileman
Callens Kanno Callens v" Kanno
Cook Gruber Cornwell 7 Farnsworth
Crapo Shull Crapo Al Shull
Culver Culver ±_ r') y Furman De Vrj_es Harvey,H. Gilmore
Gruber Elder Hock ~ Michel ~ /\/ Harvey,H. --Gilmore Schutte Krein
Hock Michel Speer ll Harvey,C.
Johnson Antich Workman V'_ Queyrel
Kanno Callens Hirstein ~ Allen
Lambert Shipley
Long Bell DISTRICT 3
Meyers Cornwell Farnsworth
Miller Mack Amo
Parks Hileman Anderson Gummere
Schutte Krein Bousman Thompson
Shipley Welch Crapo Shull
Speer Harvey,C. Culver
Stewart Furman De Vries
Stoddard --Harvey,H. Gilmore
Workman Queyrel Johnson Antich
Wright Noe Kanno Callens
Hirstein Allen Long Bell
Schutte Krein
Shipley Welch
OTHERS: Speer Harvey,C.
Wright Noe
Nelson Hirstein Allen
Brown DISTRICT 5 Nissen Stoddard Galloway Gruber Elder Dunn Hirstein Allen Tremblay
Lowry DISTRICT 6 Carlson Meyers
Gruber Elder
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 7
Hirstein Allen
Cook Gruber
Harvey,H. Gilmore
Meyers
Miller Mack
Parks Hileman
DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11
Martin Lambert Shipley
Scott Stewart
Hirstein Allen Hirstein Allen
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0 . Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fou ntain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No. # 11
II AGENDA
(1)
(2)
(3 )
(4)
(5)
( 6 )
(7)
(8)
June 3, 1965 at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Appointmeri_t of' Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Report of the~neral Manager A
Consideration o~ motion re: Approval of Addendum #1 to ~ 1 1rt,;r"
the plans and s~ecifications for the Edinger Avenue ~~~
Gravity Sewer a~d Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift Station, /
Contract No. 11 ~ (Copy of Addendum in folders) , ,/
Consideration of fesolution No. 65 -85 -11 re: Receive and ?~
file bid tabulati~n and recommendation, and awarding ¥,,_
contract for the mdinger Avenue Gravity Sewer and Edinger .A'
Avenue Sewerage Lift Station, Contract No. 11-9, to fV
Oran e Count Pi eline Inc., Contractor, in the total
amount of 1 O 1 • 5 . See page 11 A11
• (Bid tabulation
will be in folders
Consideration of motion re: Authori z ing the General /1
Manager to direct Lowry and Associates to provide detailed
construction inspection for Contract No . 11-9, in accord-~
ance with paragraph Hof the agreement for engineering \'y
services dated November 12, 1964 ~\·
Other business and communications, if any
Consideration of motion J e: Adjournment w t7
/ p'i-\ \\I ..
f.> o~ '<\' f}P
.-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-85-11
.AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 11-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR EDINGER AVENUE
GRAVITY SEWER and EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT
STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-9; AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF CONTRACT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts• engineers, and
concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made
to Orange County Pipeline, Ihc. , Contractor, for Contract No. 11-9,
and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are here-
by received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said Contract No. 11-9 (EDINGER AVENUE
GRAVITY SEWER and EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION), be awarded
to ORANGE COUNTY PIPELINE, INC. , Contractor, in the total amount
of $ 140,618.65 in accordance with the terms of their bid and
the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be
the lowest and best bid received therefor; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign
a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the speci-
fications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No.
65-62-11 on record in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received for said work
are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier's
checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful
bidders.
-A-
. .
COUNTY SANITATION DI STR I CTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P . 0 . Box 5 175 -10844 Ell is Avenue
Fountain Va l ley, California 92708
ADDENDUM NO . l
County Sani tation District No . 11
Contract 1 1 -9
EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER
and
EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LI FT STAT I ON
May 21, 1965
A. Plans
Sheet 3 of 12
A 2 -inch galvanized water line is located in Edinger and
Graham 38 feet east of the cente r line of Graham and runs north
from the 12 -inch water main in Edinger Street and crosses Graham
Street west to the west property l ine 140 feet north of the center
line of Edinger Street .
Sheet 5 of 12
The water service connection shall be 1-inch per City of
Huntington Beach Std. 101 in l ieu of the 1-1/2-inch shown .
Sheet 12 of 1 2
Rotary mud will not be all owed as fill and shall be deleted .
(See specification change below )
B. Specifications
1 . Page DS -25 parag raph 5-5 B
The word sand and the word mud shall be deleted and the
words "selected materia l" having a sand equivalent of not less
than 30 as determined by State of California Test Method No . 217.
2. The Contractor is referred to paragraph 1 -3, page DS-2 of
the Standard Sp e cifications . Fo r i nformation only the soil
report on file indicat es water levels on 1 -21-65 at the
following:
Boring No . 1 at El evation 0 .00
Boring No . 2 at Elevation 5 .00
Lowry & Associates
------__ _,..
R 0 LL CALL
District -------
GD~/
(J I o
Regular ____________ __
Adjourned ____________ __
Date Time
~------------------------------
Item --------------------------------------DISTRICT 1
Har·vey, H. Gilmore
JOINT BOART)S Meyers --
Miller Mack
Cornwell Farnsworth Hirstein Allen --Amo
/ Anderson Gummere DISTRICT 2
Bousman Thompson Parks Hileman
Callens Kanno Callens Kanno
Cook Gruber Cornwell Farnsworth
Crapo Shull Crapo Shull
Culver Culver
Furman De Vrtes Harvey,H. Gilmore
Gruber Elder Hock Michel
Harvey,H. Gilmore Schutte Krein
Hock Michel Speer Harvey,C.
Johnson Antich Workman Queyrel
Kanno Callens Hirstein Allen
Lambert Shipley
Long Bell DISTRICT 3
Meyers Cornwell Farnsworth
Miller Mack Amo
Parks Hileman Anderson Gummere
Schutte Krein Bousman Thompson
Shipley Welch Crapo Shull
Speer Harvey,C. Culver
Stewart Furni.an De Vries
Stoddard ---Harvey,H. Gilmore
Workman Queyrel Johnson Antich
Wright Noe Kanno Callens
Hirstein Allen Long Bell
Schutte Krein
Shipley Welch
OTHERS: Speer Harvey,C.
Wright Noe
Nelson v
/
Hirstein Allen
Brown ~ DISTRICT 5 Nissan Stoddard Galloway Gruber Elder Dunn Hirstein Allen Tremblay
Lowry DISTRICT 6 Carlson Meyers
~K~tl Gruber Elder
Hirstein Allen
DISTRICT 7
Hirstein Allen
Cook Gruber
Harvey,H. Gilmore
Meyers
Miller Mack
Parks Hileman
DISTRICT 8 ~'° (,,!r-'J~-1( DISTRICT 11
Martin v Lambert ~ Shipley
Scott ~ Stewart ~ Hirstein Allen V' Hirstein ,/ Allen
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
(10)
(11)
(12)
(13)
DISTRICT No. #1-7
June 2, 1965 at 4:00 p.m.
Roll Call
Appointments o~ Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Report of the General Manager
AGENDA
Report of the Gene~al Counsel ~--
DISTRICT 1 . ·
Consideration of motion re: Approval of Addendum #1 \t"
6 ..Y~ to the plans and speci£ications for Job No. I--2
(Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities -~
Structures). Copy of acldendum in folders.
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion
to open and read sealed
to Plant No. 1 Effluent
Job No. I-6-2, pursuant
required by law
-Qyv
re: Directing the Secretary ~ v p ~oposals received for Addition \\ ·JA
Dfscharge Facilities -Structures , "'r
to legal notice published as
\
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Referring bids opened for
Job No. I-6-2 to the engineers and the General Manager
for tabulation and recommendaltion to the Board
DISTRICT 7 I
Consideration of motion re: Directing the Secretary
to open and read sealed propo als received for the
Walnut Avenue Sub-Trunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza
Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7-2B, pursuant to legal
notice published as required b law
DISTRICT 7 _,l.
Consideration of motion re: R bids opened for ~->Jl.,V"
Contract No. 7-2B to the engin ers and the General ~-
Manager for tabulation and reco endation to the Board 1
DISTRICT 1 ,\,.. ·:jr-
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-84-1 re : Accepting t'\~\}.-~
proposal of the engineers, and directin~ the preparation ~
of an Engineer's Report. See ~age 11 A1
• (Proposal in f olders)
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-81-7 re:
acceptance of an easement relat[ve to Tract
cost to the District. See page "B 11
Authorizing
#939, at no
Consideration of Resolution No . 65-82-7 re: Authorizing
acceptance of an easement relat've to Tract #3914, at
DISTRICT 7 ~
no cost to the District. See p ge "C"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Resolution No . 65-83-7 re: Authorizirl{S
acceptance of an easement relative to Tract #1968, at
no cost to the District. See page 11 D11
(14) DISPRICP 7
(15)
(16)
(17)
Consideration of Ordinance No. 709
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, as
follows:
#2194 Postmaster, City of Santa Ana $100 .00
$100.00
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7
Other business and communications, if any
DISTRICTS 1 AND 7 I \ ~
Consideration o f motiof re: Adjournment ~· fovv
(
v-\ "'' ' c.JL.
,... "). 'CX ,.... t'-1 .I
L-f-'· r-""' y~)
'"? ~1/'-
y I,'}-
-2 -
RESOLUTION NO. 65-84-1
EMPLOYING ENGINEERS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, EMPLOYING SANITATION
ENGINEERS AND DIRECTING SAID ENGINEERS TO
PREPARE REPORT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 1, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That this Board of Directors does hereby
employ Boyle Engineering, engineers, to make a survey and report,
pursuant to the provisions of the California Health and Safety Code,
Section 4748, showing the present and future sewerage requirements
for the District.
Section 2. That the engineers be directed to prepare and
file a report with the Board of Directors of County Sanitation
District No. 1 setting forth:
(a) A general description of existing facilities for
sewage collection, treatment and disposal, or a general description
of existing facilities for refuse transfer or disposal, or both.
(b) A general description of the work proposed to be
done to carry out the objects of the District.
(c) A general plan and general specifications of the
work.
(d) A general description of the property proposed to be
acquired or damaged in carrying out the work.
(e) A map showing the boundaries of the District and in
general the location of the work proposed to be done, property taken
or damaged, and any other information useful to an understanding of
the proposed work.
(f) An estimate of the cost of the proposed work.
A-1
Section 3. That s~id engineers are hereby employed to
do the work hereinabove set forth for a total fee of $1,400.00,
in accordance with the terms and conditions outlined in their
proposal dated June 1, 1965.
A-2
RESOLUTION NO. 65-81-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT FROM HAROLD E. SCHULZE, a married
man
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
December 9, 1964, wherein Harold E. Schulze, a married man, grants
to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes
in connection with Tract Nos. 939 and 922 is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That said Grant of Easement, which is more
particularly described on Exhibit "A" attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution, is accepted at no cost to the District in
form approved by the General Counsel.
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-B-
EXHIBIT "An TO RESOLUTION NO. 65-81-7
That portion of Lots 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 of Tract 939 as
per map thereof recorded in Book 29, Pages 46 to 48, Miscellaneous
Maps, Records of Orange County, California, and portion of Lots
25, 26, 27, and 28 of Tract 922 as per map thereof recorded in
Book 29, Pages 5 to 7, Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County,
California, described as follows:
Beginning at the Northwest corner of said Lot 60 and running
thence South 89° 30' East 67.19 feet along the Northerly line of
said Lot 60 to the Northeast corner thereof; thence South 24° 52'
Ea.st 60.17 feet along the Easterly line of said Lot 60 to the
Southeast corner thereof; thence South 89° 29' 20" West 33.00 feet
along the Nortnerly line of said Lot 59; thence South 3° 33' 29"
East 134.05 feet to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 57,
said point being located 68.5 feet from the Northwest corner thereof;
thence South 4° 11' 59" East 123.37 feet to a point in the Northerly
line of said Lot 25, said point being located 78.00 feet from the
Northwest corner thereof; thence South 3° 15' 06 11 East 66.12 feet
to a point in the Northerly line of said Lot 26, said point being
located 82.00 feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South
0° 13' 00 11 West 64.oo feet to a point in the Northerly line of said
Lot 27, said point being located 82.00 feet from the Northwest
corner thereof; thence South 4° 32' 06 11 West 67.74 feet to a point
in the North line of said Lot 28, said point being located 76.90
feet from the Northwest corner thereof; thence South 6° 35' 57"
West 71.05 feet to a point in the Southerly line of said Lot 28,
said point being located 69.00 feet from the Southwest corner there-
of; thence North 89° 39' OO" West 69.00 feet along the Southerly
line of said Lot 28 to the Southwest corner thereof; thence North
O~ 13 1 East 580.00 feet along the Westerly line of said Lots 28, 27,
26, 25, 56, 57, 58, 59 and 60 to the point of beginning.
EXHIBIT "A 11
RESOLUTION NO. 65-82-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT FROM THE GALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
March 11, 1965, wherein the GALY CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, a
corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement
for sewer purposes in connection with Tract No. 3914 is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Sec~ion 2. That said Grant of Easement, which is more
particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a
part of this resolution, is accepted at no cost to the District;and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-C-
-.
•
SCHEDULE "A" TO RESOLUTION NO. 65-82-7
That portion of Lot 11 in Tract No. 3914, as shown on a
Map recorded in Book 178, Pages 1 thru 4 inclusive of Miscellaneous
Maps, records of said Orange County, described as follows:
Beginning at the most Southerly corner of said Lot; thence,
along the Southeasterly line of said lot, North 37° 40 1 OO" East
134.46 feet to the most Easterly Corner thereof; thence, along the
Northeasterly line of said lot, North 27° 49' 25 11 West 5.49 feet to
a point in a line parallel with and distant Northwesterly 5.00 feet,
measured at right angles from said Southeasterly line; thence, along
said parallel line, South 37° 40 1 OO" West 110.14 feet; thence
South 49° 35' 31" West 23.75 feet to a point in the Southwesterly
line of said lot, said point being on a curve concave Southwesterly
and having a radius of 44.oo feet, said last mentioned course being
the Northeasterly prolongation of the radial line of said curve to
said ·point; thence Southeasterly 10.48 feet along said lot line and
said curve thru a central angle of 13° 39' 28" to the point of
beginning.
Together with the right to enter upon and use adjoining
lands of Granter as may be necessary for initial construction of
said sewer pipe line.
SCHEDULE 11 A11
RESOLUTION NO. 65-83-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF EASEMENT FROM GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
March 16, 1965, wherein GREAT WESTERN SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION,
a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an ease-
ment for sewer purposes in connection with Tract No. 1968 is hereby
approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That said Grant of Easement is accepted at no
cost to the District, and is more particularly described as follows:
·"Those portions of Lot 24 in Tract No. 1968, as shown on a
Map recorded in Book 122, Pages 1 thru 5 inclusive of Miscellaneous
Maps, records of said Orange County, described as follows:
11 The Southeasterly 10.00 feet of said lot.
"The Southwesterly 15.00 feet of the Southeasterly 82.00
feet of said lot.
11 Together with the right to enter upon and use adjoining
lands of Grantor as may be necessary for initial construction of
said sewer pipe line.11
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-D-
.,.. . •
Agenda Item No. /0
A R \.. H I T r ( T <:. • E r I G N ~ l · R s
4 1 2 :.OU"! H -fON ;T~E E T • ,ANT A ANA t .r..L11 01 '\!IA 9.-'"l02 • ~I M3 t kl' .1 .l l 1
A t:; nr:." R l P L ' TC p (< /( 111
FILED
In the Office of the Secre t ary
County Sanitation District
No----------
June 1, 1965 JUN 2 1965
BY------------------~ Boord of Direr-tors
County Sanitation District t'-.o.
of Orange County
l 0844 El I is Avenue
Fountain Volley, Col iforn10 92708
Gentlemen:
In response to a request from your Genera l .Mcinoger we are pleased
,.. . --
to submit herein a proposal to prepare an Engineer's Report setting forth require-
ments for principal san i t a ry sewerage foci I it I es to meet the present and rea5onable
future requirements of C o u nty Son itotion District No. 1 of Orang<. County . Said
report will be prepared in ac c ordance with Section 4748 of the Health and Safety
Code of the State of Ca li fornia.
We propose to prepare the Engineer s Report for a fee of $1400 .
We further propose that al I plates and copy for the report wi II be
prepared by this office and that oll cos t s of reproducing and binding of the required
copies of the report wi II be bi lied at cost to t he district.
We are prepared to proceed immediatel y with the preparation of the
Engineer's Report and said report will cover, but not be limited to , the following
facilities:
Grand Avenue Trunk from Dyer Rood to Warner Aven1;e
Main Street Trunk from Dyer Rood to Santa Ario Freeway.
Seventeenth Street Trunk from Main Street to Santo Aria Freeway.
Washington Avenue Trunk from Main Street to French Street .
Raitt Street Trunk from Alton Avenue to Myrtle Street.
Outfol I from Orang County Sanitation Districts, Sewage froa~rnent
Plant No I to Gn:~envi lie Street.
Board of Directors
County Sanitation District No . June 1, 1965
It is estimated that the report should be completed for presentation prior to
your regular meeting in July .
This proposal is submitted as a basis for negotiations for a contract for
engineering services relating to the matter set forth herein. We are recidy to
proceed with the report immediately upon receipt of authorization to do so.
Respectfully submitted,
Z/Z~ERING
Edwin H. Finster
Vice President -Santa Ana
EHF:jm
·,~~-{!• .: .. ~~ -'' : .._ "' • -I
_.., I i. A,~. " \ • r -
--~-:.-!. ...... ,,~ ............ -..................... -! • ·~ --·' ~
R 0 L L CA L L
~ pl
Adjourned / ef 7 Meeting
D ate~ ~qt:S Time i/{ EJ f 4'l,
Item &a1 (?UL
OTHE RS :
,
DISTRICT
Harvey v/'
Meyers v
Miller .........
Hirste i n v
DIS TRICT
Hirstein v
Cook
Harvey
Meyers
Mille r
Parks
Ne ls on V'
Brown t./
Niss on
Rimel
Hohener
Lowry
Finster v--
Ga lloway
Car l son
v
1/
v
I/
1
Gilmo1~e
Ma ck
Allen
7
Allen
Gruber
Gilmore
Mack
Hileman
Date
ROLL CAT.JL
Adjourned Meeting ----
Time ----------------
Item
---------------~----------------
t y-s'f-I
DISTRICT 1
Harvey V
Meyers v
Miller __ v: __ _
Hirstein /
DISTRICT
Hirstein
Cook
Harvey
Meyers
Miller
Parks
Gilmore
Mack
Allen
7
Allen
Gruber
Gilmore
Mack
Hileman
OTHERS:
Nelson
Brown
Niss on
Rimel
Hohener
Lowry
Finster
Galloway
Carlson