HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-05BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
II
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California
P. 0 . Box 5175
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
( 6)
(7)
(8 )
DISTRICT No. #5
AGENDA
MAY 24TH, 1965, 10:00 A.M.
City Hall, Newport Beach, California
Roll
of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Report of General Manager
A · . ~ t ,f--'1J'.,P«" s · Report of Counsel !J,c-.·oI"" t.C. v·~ ~ f"' : ~~.j....,.
1
Q
.:J I'/ 1}:-i(.,._e-''-,
Consideration of esolution No . 65-79 -5 re: Approving r
plans and speciff ~ti ons for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer ~
and Bay Bridge Pumpi~g Stati0n, Contract No. 5-12.
See Page 11 A11
•
Consideration of motion r : Adoption of Ordinance *~·, V r"-No. 502 entitled, 11 An Or ·nance Providing Rules and ~\)
Regulations Relating to C nnections to District '~J. ~
Sewerage Facilities, Estab ishing Charges Therefor ~
and Providing Penalties fo Violations , and Repealing
Ordinance No. 501 11
• {Copy f Ordinance in folder).
Consideration of Resolution o. 65-80-5 re: Authoriz-
ing execution of agreement w·th City of Newport Beach
entitled, "Agreement for Col ection of Sewer Connection
Charges" • See Page "B" (Copy of Agreement in
folder).
Consideration of draft agreeme
Company entitled, "Agreement
for Connection Charges".
folder).
with The Irvine
ncerning Prepayment
of Agreement in
M,>
~!''\
(9) Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, as
follows:
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTIAY FUND
#2191
#2192
The Irvine Company
Simpson & Stevlingson
$17,435.10
1,623.90
$19,059.00
i I ~ .... ,_~
n , v'>' ~U'lt~110 ) Other business and communication$, if any d~\.L~ (11) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment {~\fa'\
\ \'.~
RESOLUTION NO. 65-79-5
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 5-12
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER AND BAY BRIDGE
PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and
contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by
Simpson & Stevlingson, District's Engineers, for the COAST HIGHWAY
TRUNK SEWER AND BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12, are
hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the
Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise fQr bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District at a time and date to be determined
by the General Manager.
-A-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-80-5
APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF
SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH
THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FOR COLLECTION
OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement with the City of
Newport Beach, providing for the collection of sewer connection
charges established by Ordinance No. 502, be approved; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute
said agreement on behalf of the District as prepared by the
General Counsel.
-B-
A~
'"
Agenda lterw No :Z
AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF
SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES
DRAFT
May 19, 1965
THIS AGREEMENT, made in the City of Newport Beach,
California, by and between the City of Newport Beach, a munici.pal
corporation, hereinafter called "City", and County Sanitation
District No. 5 of Orange County, hereinafter called "District",
W I T N E S S E T H: _ .... ___ .... _____ _
WHEREAS, District has by the enactment of Ordinance No.
502 established a schedule of sewer connection charges; and
WHEREAS, City is entirely contained within the territorial
limits of District; and
WHEREAS, all of the improved territory of the District
is also within the city limits of City; and
WHEREAS, the City by and through its building department
regulates all new construction within the City; and
WHEREAS, it is for the mutual benefit of City and Dis-
trict that the sewer connection charges provided for in said
Ordinance No. 502 of the District be collected in a manner most
expedient and least burdensome on the owners of property within
the City; and
WHEREAS, the City will benefit by the construction and
maintenance of sewerage facilities of the District within the
city limits of City by District from the funds to be collected
from said sewer connection charges.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. City as agent will and does hereby agree to issue
permits and collect the charges established by District under said
Ordinance No. 502.
2. City will account for the charges collected and remit
to District on a regular basis not less frequently than quarterly
the monies so collected.
3. District does hereby appoint and nominate City and
its agents and employees as the same may be designated by City as
agents of the District for the purpose of issuing permits and
determining the sewer connection charges established under Ordi-
nance No. 502 and collecting the same. This does not authorize
City to act as agent for the General Manager or to perform the
duties of the General Manager of the District as set forth and
established in said Ordinance No. 502, except as expressly set
forth in this Agreement.
~ ~ This Agreement may be terminated by either party
giving ninety (90) days written notice to the other party desig-
nating a tennination date, which date shall be the first day of a
calendar month.
This Agreement shall become effective on the ---
day of , 1965. ------
(SEAL)
(SEAL)
CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH,
a municipal corporation
By ______________________________ _
By~-----------------------------
CITY,
co~rrry SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5,
of Orange County, California,
a public corporation
By
~~----~~--~~~~--:o-------C hair man, Board of Directors
By-=-----------~----_,_~-----------Sec re tary, Board of Directors
DISTRICT.
-2-
Agenda Item Mo1_$ __ _
AGREEMENT CONCERNING PREPAYMENT
FOR CONNECTION CHARGES
DRAFT
May 19, 1965
THIS AGREEMENT, made in the City of Santa Ana, California,
by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County,
California, hereinafter called 11 District 11
, and The Irvine Company
whose business address is P. O. Box 37, Irvine, California,
hereinafter called 11 Irvine 11
,
W I T N E S S E T H:
WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 502 heretofore adopted, the
District has established a system of sewer connection charges to
be collected and used for the purposes of acquisition, construction,
reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities
and other purposes described in Section 5474.9 of the Health and
Safety Code of the State of California; and
WHEREAS, District does not have sufficient funds to
construct sewerage facilities required within certain a r eas of
the District at this time; and
WHEREAS, Irvine is desirous of developing certain of
its property within the areas of the District which are not
sufficiently served by sewerage faci lities at this time.
NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows:
1. Th at District will collect and keep in a separate
account sewer connection charges as established in its Ordinance
No. 502 arising and originating from t erritory with in the District
which is set forth by description and map as Exhibit "A" attached
here to and made a part hereof.
2. I rvine agrees to pay in advance and upon the
execution of this Ag reement a sum of money not to exceed
$310,000 .00 to District as a prepayment of sewer connection charge s
for the territory described in Exhibit "A". In this connection
Irvine undertakes to prepay an amount not less than $250,000.00
if requested by the District and does not obligate itself by this
Agreement to prepay more than $250,000.00 as a prepayment of such
charges. Irvine reserves the right to designate and advise the
District in writing from time to time of what construction projects
within the territory descri.bed in Exhibit "A" they desire to apply
for credit of said prepaid charges.
3. District agrees to accept said monies from Irvine
as a prepayment of connection charges to become due on construction
within the territory described in Exhibit "A" in accordance with
Section 2 above.
4. District agrees to maintain in a separate account
all connection charges collected or to become due within the
territory described in Exhibit "A" for the purpose of using up
the credit due Irvine by reason of its prepayment of charges as
hereinabove provided. This shall not be taken to mean District
does not have the right within its own discretion of repaying
to Irvine money advanced as prepaym_ent of charges in lieu of credit
for sewer connection charges.
5. It is acknowledged that District owes to Irvine the
sum of $61,703.45 under the provisions of that certain agreement
by and between the District and The Irvine Company dated February
11, 1959 (Jamboree Road Trunk Sewer) and it is agreed that said
agreement be and it is hereby terminated effective July 1, 1965,
and the monies due and owing to Irvine as aforesaid in the sum of
$61,703.45 are hereby added as a further credit on prepayment
of Irvine under the provisions of this Agreement and in addition
to any and all other monies hereinabove provided for. That said
monies may be used as a credit as prepaid sewer connection charges
or .repaid to Irvine in cash at the option of the District.
-2-
6. The effective date of this Agreement is June 1, 1965.
{SEAL)
(SEAL)
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
a public corporation
By __ --=--..------=---.------=-----.-------Ch airman, Board of Directors
By~-..---------=-----~~-----~~--S e c re ta ry, Board of Directors
DISTRICT
THE IRVINE COMPANY
a West Virginia corporation
By ______ ~-------------------------
By------------------~-------------
IRVINE
-3-
Agenda Item No._.,..ftz __ ._
DRAFT
May 19, 1965
ORDINANCE NO. 502
AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS
RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE
FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND
PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REPEAL-
ING ORDINANCE NO. 501.
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5,
of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows:
ARTICLE 1
Ordinance No. 501 entitled "An Ordinance Providing Rules
and Regulations Relating to Connections to District Trunk Sewers"
is hereby repealed.
ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONS
For the purposes of this ordinance, certain words and
terms are defined as follows:
(a) Connection Manhole. Shall mean a manhole constructed
in the main line of a District trunk or subtrunk sewer not as a part
of the original construction, or a manhole built adjacent thereto,
for the purpose of permitting sewage to flow into a District sewer.
(b) District Connection ChaFge. Is a connection charge
imposed by District No. 5 as a charge for the use of District's
sewerage facilities whether such connection is made directly to a
District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately discharges
into a District sewerage facility.
(c) District Sewerage Facility. Shall mean any property
belonging to County Sanitation District No. 5 used in the treatment,
transportation or disposal of sewage or industrial wastes.
(d) Domestic Sewage. Shall mean the waterborne wastes
derived from the ordinary living processes which are of such volume
and character as to permit satisfactory disposal into a public sewer.
,
(e) Industrial Waste. Shall mean any and all liquid or
solid waste substance, not sewage, from any producing, manufactur-
ing or processing operation of whatever nature.
(f) Industrial Waste Treatment Plant or Facility. Shall
mean any works or device for the treatment of industrial waste
prior to its discharge into the District sewerage facilities.
(g) Plumbing Fixture Unit. A plumbing fixture unit as
used in this Ordinance is defined as being the same as set forth
in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964
Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach, on March 24,
1965, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Secretary
of the District.
(h) Pretreatment. Shall mean treatment prior to dis-
charge into a District sewerage facility by means of an industrial
waste treatment plant or facility.
{i) Public Corporation. Shall mean any city, district
or public agency (other than County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County), duly authorized and existing under the laws of
the State of California.
(j) Sewerage Facilities. Are any facilities used in the
collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage and
industrial wastes.
(k) Single Family Dwelling. A single family dwelling is
defined as a building containing only one kitchen designed for or
used to house not more than one family including all necessary
employees of such family.
(1) Trunk Sewer Manholes. Shall mean those manholes
constructed as a part of the District's sewer system.
ARTICLE 3 -PERMIT REGUIATIONS
(a) Requirements. No person or public corporation shall
be permitted to connect to, use or maintain a connection to the
-2-
-p
sewerage facilities of the District without a valid permit. This
shall mean that all new construction occurring within the bounda-
ries of the District from and after the effective date of this
ordinance shall be required to have a valid permit from County
Sanitation District No. 5 before it can connect to a sewerage
facility or discharge sewage or industrial waste into a sewerage
facility within the District.
{b) Condition Precedent. No permit shall be valid unless
the real property to be sewered by use of the permit shall be in-
cluded within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 5
and within the boundaries of a public corporation authorized to
maintain public sewerage works.
( c) Permit.
(1) The permit shall be in two parts: First
a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing
connection to a District sewerage facility or sewerage
facility subject to a District connection charge as
hereinabove defined under conditions set forth in
said permit; and secondly, a use permit for dis-
charging sewage and industrial wastes into District
sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules,
regulations and ordinances of the District as to
characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage.
(2) The use permit may prescribe requirements
as to a connection manhole, an industrial waste
treatment plant or facility, or pretreatment, all
to insure compliance with the District regulations
as to characteristics, quality and quantity of
sewage and industrial wastes. Any such requirements
shall be set forth in the permit by the General
Manager.
-3-
-
.!
(3) Surcharges for Use Permit. The District
hereby establishes the quantity of 7,500 cubic feet
of non-residential sewage or industrial waste per
month per acre of territory served as the maximum
allowable effluent to be discharged into the District's
sewerage facilities without the payment of surcharges.
Each user discharging more than 7,500 cubic feet of
non-residential sewage or industrial wastes per
month per acre shall be charged $0.50 per 1,000
cubic feet or any portion of 1,000 cubic feet in
excess of the 7,500 cubic feet maximum. Measure-
ments may be required by the permittee, or permittee's
effluent may be considered equivalent to the water
or some portion of the water (excepting irrigation
water) purchased or used by the permittee. Per-
mittee shall upon demand provide District with his
or its water usage records.
(4) All existing permits shall be modified or
amended to comply with the provisions of this ordi-
nance.
(d) Suspension of Use Permit. The second part of the
permit may be suspended if a permittee is acting in violation of
any provision of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regu-
lations of the District thirty (30) days after receiving a
formal written notice of such violation and a demand for correc-
tion thereof from the District. Such formal written notice shall
be given only upon recommendation of the General Manager and
approval of the Directors of the District.
No formal written notice of violation shall be
authorized unless the General Manager of the District has first
given an informal written notice of violation to the subject
-4-
permittee at least fifteen (15) days in advance of action by the
Board of Directors.
(e) Violation. For each day or part of a day a permittee
whose permit has been suspended continues to discharge sewage or
industrial wastes into a District sewerage facility in violation
of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regulations of the
District, he or it shall be charged the sum of ten percent {10%)
of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit.
The same noticing procedure set forth hereinabove
shall apply for intermittent or sporadic violators; and in lieu
of a suspension of permit, the District Directors may impose a
fine of not less than ten percent (10%) of the District connection
charge applicable to his or its permit per day or any part of a
day for intermittent violations.
Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the violation of
a permittee causes damage to the sewerage facilities of the Dis-
trict, the District shall have the right to charge and collect
for the damages to its facilities caused by such violations by
an action of law.
In all cases a formal notice of violation as herein-
above provided for shall set forth the fine or other charges to
be imposed for violations after the thirty (30) day correction
period.
{f) Procedure to Acquire Permit. An applicant for a
permit or his agent shall make application on a form furnished
by the District or an agent designated to act for the District.
The permit application shall be supplemented by such plans, speci-
fications or other information considered pertinent in the.judgment
of the General Manager of the District. The permit fees and
charges as hereinafter described shall be paid to the District
or an agent designated to act for the District.
-5-
(g) Disposition of Charges. All surcharges and penalties
under this Article, when collected, shall be deposited in the
District 1 s Operating Fund.
ARTICLE 4 -PERMIT CHARGES
The District connection charge shall be determined as
follows:
(a) A charge of $120.00 per unit for all new single
family dwellings within the District.
{b) All other new construction including but not limited
to multiple family dwellings, commercial, industrial and public
building construction shall be charged a connection fee in accord-
ance with the number of plumbing fixture units contained within
such construction. The connection fee shall be calculated to be
equivalent to $7.00 per plumbing fixture unit with a minimum
established fee of $120.00 per connection permit. A schedule of
such charges will be on file in the office of the Secretary of
the District and in the office of the Building Department of the
City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture unit
equivalents as defined and specified in the Western Plumbing
Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the
City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965.
(c) Payment of a sewer connection fee shall be required
at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all con-
struction within the District excepting in the case of a building
legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit
in the City of Newport Beach (e. g. public schools). The payment
of the sewer connection fee for such buildings will be required
at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection
permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the
District.
-6-
ARTICLE 5 -FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND
There is hereby established the Facilities Revolving Fund
of the District. All charges as established by Article 4 hereof,
when collected, shall be deposited in said Fund. Said Fund may
have one or more accounts within itself to be used for the pur-
poses of accounting for the sewer connection fees originating in
various territorial areas of the District. Said Fund shall be
used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction,
maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other pur-
poses described in Section 5474.9 of the Health and Safety Code
of the State of California.
ARTICLE 6 -INTERPRETATION OF PERMIT REGUIATIONS
If the factual situations presented do not follow precisely
within the rules herein promulgated in this Article, the General
Manager shall interpret them in a reasonable manner. In making
such interpretations, the General Manager shall be guided by the
policy of the District, which is hereby stated as follows: It is
the policy of the Directors of the District to base fees and
charges in accordance with the benefits and uses supplied by the
District. Those receiving the greatest benefits and most use of
the facilities provided by the District shall proportionately bear
more of the costs and expenses of the District.
ARTICLE 7 -APPEAL
If an applicant disagrees with the requirements directed
by the General Manager in Article 5, he or it may appeal by written
notice stating his or its grievance. The Board of Directors shall
hear such appeal at its regular meeting next occurring fourteen
(14) days after the filing of such written appeal or sooner at
the pleasure of the Directors. The decision of the Directors
shall be final.
ARTICLE 8 -PENALTIES AND VIOIATIONS
For each day or part of a day that any person, governmental
agency or public corporation is without a valid permit and is con-
nected directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewerage
-7-
facility which discharges into a sewerage facility, he or it shall
be liable to the District in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the
permit charge applicable to the property so connected.
ARTICLE 9 -ENFORCEMENT
The provisions of this ordinance may be enforced by civil
action at law and/or by injunction. In this connection these
regulations shall be construed as a contract by County Sanitation
District No. 5 of Orange County, California, and each permittee~
ARTICLE 10 -VALIDITY
If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause or
phrase of this ordinance, or the application of any thereof to any
person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be held to be
invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the
validity of any other provision or application of any of the
remaining provisions or portions of this ordinance; and to this end
the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange
County, California hereby declares that it would have adopted this
ordinance and each and every article, section, subsection, sentence,
clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or
more other articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or
phrases, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity,
public corporation or circumstance be declared invalid.
ARTICLE 11 -EFFECTIVE DATE
The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this
Ordinance and the Secretary of the District shall attest thereto
and certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the
same to be published once in the ---------------------------------'
a newspaper of general circulation, printed, -------------------------
published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 5 of
Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date
of the passage of this ordinance by said Board of Directors, and
said ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption
-8-
by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District.
PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County
Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California at a
regular meeting held on the day of , 1965.
Chairman of the Board of Directors
ATTEST:
Secretary of the Board of Directors
-9-
#5 Mr . Donald Simpson f Si mpson & Stevlingson,
for t e Directors
engineers , reviewed/the lans ~or the Coast Highway Trunk
Sewer and Stati on . It was then MS&D C:
(adoption
#6 Counse~ draft of a proposed
ordinance to the Di re tors for considerat~ Following
a discussion, some change revisions were made in the
tA ~ ll'.~,,... •• c~
f,;JJXoft . (then show adoption o
~ ~ ll'c , .~)
ES&:OQ::
u.. , "f> a r1. (.,U ,, • 1.11.
-' I . ~ / .. l ,L : ~ 1 ~ L. (' • ')~"'l ,..c /~..... . n-f'""'" ' .. "') •
jl'hat the~eng in eer~be instru cted t o prepare #8
, ;. y ref erred
a g eneral description of the~area ±~xRN.RM in the agre ement
~ence~ing~T,~ayment
·'r t!
#8 -Fo llowing a discussion of the proposed agreement with The
Irvine Company , it was MS&DC :
That the District 's engineers , Si mpson & Stevlin gson,
be instructed to prepare an exhibit to the agre ement containi ng
a general des cription o f the prepayment area referred to in sai d
agreement . I
I
-
ROLL CALL
Adjourned ___ v _____ Meeting
Date.~--~----~~~~-·----~-~-----------Time ID·,"~ ~ ~
Item;__ ________________________ __
("'
r-~o,...':> OJ, /o L-i ~,... ~ l ~---/ c; -~ ,,----------DISTRICT 5
v-~ Stoddard .. v.: .. ~
v---v Gruber v Elder V' . . . . . . . v ~ Hirstein ~ Allen / .......
OTHERS:
~
CITY
Anaheim
Buena Park
Brea
Cypress
Fountain Valley
MAYOR
Fred T. Krein
Jesse M. Davis
Robert A. Clark
Frank P. Noe
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Fullerton Glen G. Walters
La Habra Leonard Crapo
La Palma Peter Bouma
Los Alamitos William S. Brown
Hun~ington Beach Jake R. Stewart
Jake R. Stewart
(Council Member) Ted Bartlett
Newport Beach Paul J. Gruber
(Council Member) Lindsley Parsons
Orange Jack C. Hileman
Placentia Victor Michel
Seal Beach John Nescher
Stanton Harry L. Miller
Tustin Gerald Mack
Santa Ana Harry Harvey
Villa Park James Workman
SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER
ALTERNATE DISTRICT
A. J. Schutte 2,3
Harold Bousman 3
Thomas Speer 2,3
Richard Bowen 3
Jim Kanno 2
Donald Fregeau
Burton Herbst
Dean Shull
Paul Furman
Charles Long
Alvin Coen
Jack Green
None
Al Forgit
None
Rex A. Parks
James Hock
None appointed
Frank Kohl
Clifton Miller
3
2,3
2.,3
3
3
11
3
11
5,6,7
5
2,7
2
3
3
1,7
Thomas McMichael 1,2,3,7
None appointed 2
DISTRICT
Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers 1,6,7
2,3 Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver
~ddway City Sanitary District Lowell Amo 3
COUNTY AREAS MEMBER ALTERNATE DISTRICT
Chairman of Board
of Supervisors
Alton E. Allen Supv. Wm. Hirstein All
-F-
CITY
Anaheim
Buena Park
Brea
Cypress
Fountain Valley
MAYOR
Fred T. Krein
Jesse M. Davis
Robert A. Clark
Frank P. Noe
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Robert Schwerdtfeger
Fullerton Glen G. Walters
La Habra Leonard Crapo
La Palma Peter Bouma
Los Alamitos William S. Brown
Huntington Beach Jake R. Stewart
Jake R. Stewart
(Council Member} Ted Bartlett
Newport Beach Paul J. Gruber
(Council Member) Lindsley Parsons
Orange Jack C. Hileman
Placentia Victor Michel
Seal Beach John Nescher
Stanton Harry L. Miller
Tustin Gerald Mack
Santa Ana Harry Harvey
Villa Park James Workman
SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER
ALTERNATE DISTRICT
A. J. Schutte 2,3
Harold Bousman 3
Thomas Speer 2,3
Richard Bowen 3
Jim Kanno 2
Donald Fregeau
Burton Herbst
Dean Shull
Paul Furman
Charles Long
Alvin Coen
Jack Green
None
Al Forgit
None
Rex A. Parks
James Hock
None appointed
Frank Kohl
Clifton Miller
3
2,3
2.,3
3
3
11
3
11
5,6,7
5
2,7
2
3
3
1,7
Thomas McMichael 1,2,3,7
None appointed 2
DISTRICT
Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers 1,6,7
2,3 Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver
Midway City Sanitary District Lowell Amo
COUNTY AREAS
Chairman of Board
of Supervisors
MEMBER
Alton E. Allen
-F-
ALTERNATE
Supv. Wm. Hirstein
3
DISTRICT
All
•
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 9 2708
JOINT BOARDS
AGENDA
MAY 1 2, 1965 AT 8 :00 P.M .
(1) Pledge of
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
cEV
(11)
(12)
(13)
(14)
(15)
(16)
Roll Call
Appointments f Chairmen pro tern, if necessary
Consideration f motion re: Receive and file minute
excerpts rega ding appointments of Directors and
Alternates to the Districts' Boards.
DISTRICT 1
Annual election Chai:\nan of the Board
DISTRICT 2
Annual election Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 3
Annual election o Chairman of the Board
DISTRICT 5 J
.I
Annual election of of the Board
DISTRICT 6 --~~ Annual election of of the Board
DISTR ICT 7 ";,.J.--: ~:9 Gc e-1
Annual election of of the Board C:;:e Q -e e::=
DISTRICT 11 I \ ~ Annual election of o:i!1~ t~ f'1-I ....~
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual election of the Joint Administrative
Organization I C..t~~{.{
ALL DISTRICTS
Annual election of Vice
Organization -' 1°"'1 .... ;--\
Chairman of the Joint Administrative
'\:,~
DISTRICT 1 I
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of
the regular meeting held Apr~·1 14, 1965, and the
adjourned regular meeting th reof held May 5, 1965, as
mailed
\
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April 14, q965, as mailed
DISTRICT 3
Cons ideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of
regular meeting hel n Apr·i 1 lh, 19(\~, as mailed
\
...
(17)
(18)
(19)
(20)
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of otion re: Approval of minutes of
the regular meetin held April 14, 1965, and the
adjourned regular m eting thereof held April 26, 1965,
as mailed
DISTRICT 6
Consideration of motio re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held A_ril 14, 1965, as mailed
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of motion Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held Apri 14, 1965, and the adjourned
regular meeting thereof he d April 15, 1965, as mailed
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the
regular meeting held April l~ 1965, and the adjourned
regular meeting thereof held ay 4, 1965, as mailed
L1.· , \_-1-~_j.<1.. ~ v.)/~1. '~vJ~ ... A.(
1 ALL DISTRICTS lllr ~ .,--· _fJ
Report of the Joint Chairman { tt--'-\') ~ C.,.\""vt. ~~
ALL DISTRICTS
Report of the General Manager
(23) ALL DISTRICTS
(24)
(25)
(26)
(27)
(28)
Report of the General Counsel
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of Resolution No. 65-63 re: Approving
and adopting plans and specifi ations for Job No. I-6-2
(Additions to Plant No . 1 Eff ent Discharge Facilities
Structures); and authorizing dvertising for bids. See
page 11 F'' · ~~
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion re: thorizing issuance of a JL-
purchase order to Fischer & Po ter Company in the total ~¥-'
amount of $6,991.00, plus appl~ able sales and use taxes, '
for an 8,000 PPD Chlorinator, porator, and appurtenances
ALL DISTRICTS
roval of Change Order #2
for Job No. P2-7-l (Ins tal-
No. 2), authorizing a
he contract with John Ward
II G"
Consideration of motion re: Ap
to the plans and specifications
lation of Steam Turbine at Plan
total addition of $1,32~.0l to
Company, Contractor. See page ----
ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion re: Ap of Change Order #1 ~ t~~
to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-1 (Addition CJ.Jf ,
to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge cili ties -Pipeline), ~ ci"'11 c.. .,
authorizing a total deduction o $1,361.24 from the contract
with Vinnell Corporation, Cont iactor. See page "H"
ALL DISTRICTS \ L
Consideration of motion re: R ceive and file Quarterly / { J
Report submitted by Hanson, Pe erson, Cowles & Sylvester, ;t.ri vt
Certified Public Accountants, or the period ending March ~·..,,,/ '-'-'
31st, 1 965 ~}JAP
-2-
•
(29) ALL DISTRICTS
Consideration of motion re: ceive and file certi fication
of the General Manager that he as checked all bills appear-
ing on the agenda, found them order, and that he recommends
authorization for payment
(30) ALL DISTRICTS J, 1J/t/~
Consideration of roll call vote m tion re: Approval of ~ ·
Joint Operating Fund and Capital utlay Revolving Fund i,J~·
warrant books for signature of th Chairman of District 1, J
and authorizing payment of claims. See pages "A" ,
"B" , and 11 C" •.
(31) ALL DISTRICTS -\ ~. __ /,,,..,--:/J ;?/-/9 _ ~t,,,11~~ .... bjt~J.n~s and c~· at·ons, if ~ny I ~'~ ~17 <./"r«--YV{--:Z:-~-/ ~(.r -A ,11,/f' ..Y\
(32) DISTRICT 1 ~r_'/1,.v~ ~;· \
Consideration of Reso u ion No. 6 -64-1 re: Receive and . V.J}"'
file bid tabulation and recommend tion, and awarding -~.~
(33)
(34) f-(35)
(36)
(37)
(38)
(39)
(40)
(41)
(42)
(43)
contract for Digester and Surge ower Sandblasting and f-
Epoxy Coating, Specification #Fw 020 to Walker Coating
Company in the total amount of $ ,676.00. See page 11 I 11
(See page "J" for tabulatio
DISTRICT 1
Conside s
DISTRICT 1
f ts
Other business and communica if any
DISTRICT 1
Consideration of motion re: { Adjournment to 4 :OO p .m.,
June 2nd 3: 'I& P~
DISTRICTS 2 AND 3
Consideration of motion re: A~proval of Suspense Fund
warrants, if any. See page 'D"
DISTRICT 3
Consi
page ___ _
DISTRICT 3
Other business and communic
DISTRICT 3
~ Consideration of motion
·,DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion re:
to prepare a reimbursement
providing for an advance i
facilities
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion re.
any. See page "D"
DISTRICT 5
tions, if any ~: -:"1
Adjournment ;J-~;r( , 1)
s ·. ,:' 0 ,....,. ~ (vR' \·-'· '-
Directing the General Counsel tY f1'-'-"
greement with The Irvine Company,
aid of cons truction of District's \
i pproval of warrants, i f '~'
Other business and commun'cations, if any
DISTRICT 5
Consideration of motion r Adjournment
May 24th ~\....r'"'t 1) (/~ ~.~
3-~ ~
(45)
(46)
(47)
(48)
any.
DISTRICT 6
Other business unications, if any
DISTRICT 6 'y\\Y"\~,Y:f)
Consideration of moti re: Adjournment ' Ir" L~ ,...._,v
'l:5S f-~ DISTRICT 11
Consideration of Res ution No: 65-73 -11 re: Authorizing A 1 ~;J ,
acceptance of Grant eed and Bill of Sale for the Lake ~ 'y--
Avenue and Ocean Ave ue Trunk Sewers r.ursuant to agreement !\~
dated August 10, 196 • See page "K 1 I\\
DISTRICT 11
Consideration of
See page "E"
re: Approval of warrants,
if a;; .. J-f-
(49ku,.v DISTRICT 11
~ Other business and comm
~50) DISTRICT 11
Consideration of motion
June 3rd
nications , if any c/~ ~ 0~ ¥
~~o~'~°_ p.m.i c/Y~ /
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of letter f
the early construction of
Santa Ana Canyon area. S
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resoluti
and authorizing execution
the proposed Nohl #3 anne
See page "M"
Adjournment
the City of
he District's
page i1L"
Anaheim requesting ~·
facilities in the
(f ~,~
n No. 65-75-2 re: Approving 1/ •
of an agreement relative w~\!) ¥ .
ation of territory to th ~~\~{.
. ~~
(53) DISTRICT 2
(54)
Consideration of motion r
See page 11 D11
Approval of war~~~,--:Jf... ::_ny.
DISTRICT 2 '*' Other busines s and communications, if any
( 55) DISTRICT 2 \ (} '\'\\ % ~si eratio of mo Adjournment (\·. .
(56 )1 DISTRICT /\ ... /'
Consideration of motion re: Receive and file letter from\/~ v)
A./ County Sanitation District No. 14 ; and approving payment >(\' ,,JJ \.e.; -~p )' 1 in the total amount of $27,070.00 from the Accumulated ~ U~ Capital Outlay Fund, in accd rdance with the terms of the ~
Ba s ic Accommodation Agreemertt between Districts 7 and 14.
(57) DISTRICT 7 I
Consideration o f Resolution No. 65-65-7 re: Approving and
adopting plans and specifications for the Walnut Av enue
Sub-Trunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer,
Contract No. 7 -2B ; and authorizing advertising for bids .
See page "N"
..
(58)
(59 )
(60)
(61)
(62 )
(63)
(64)
(65)
DISTR IC T 7
Consideration o f Resolution No. 65 o -7 re : Authorizing
the filing of condemnation proce ings for acquisit ion
of easements needed in Assessm t District #1 . See page
II Q II
DISTRICT 7 di Consideration of Resolution N • 65 -67 -7 re : Authorizing v
acceptance of easement from uis V. Basic; e t ux, in
connection with Assessment D·strict #1, and authorizing ~~
pavment therefor in the tota amount of $500 .00 . See page ~
Yr p11
DISTRICT 7 \t,
Cons i deration of Resolution No . 65-68-7 re: Authorizing c,1' ./'J\.,
acceptance of easement from Cec il J. lf.iarks, et ux , r e lative (/Y
to Assessment District #5 -A, and authorizin* payment therefor \..
in the total amount of $1.00 . See page "Q ------
DISTR ICT 7 f ~
Cons ideration of Resolution No. 65 -69-7 re: Authorizing 0 fl(~~
acceptanc e of easement frbm State Mutual Sa vings and Loan \
Associati on relative to 1ract #5840, at no cost to the
District. See pag e 11 R 1
DISTRICT 7 I \}...
Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -70-7 r e : Authorizing <'
acceptance of easement and an agreement for temporary use .) \.A
of land from Norman J . Groot, et ux; and authorizing payment ~..,.v
for said easement and agreement in the total amount of ~
$1,046 .10. (Re: Contract No . 7 -4-2A) See pag e 11 S 11
DISTRICT 7
Consideration of Re s olution No . 65-71-7 re : Authorizing
acceptance of eas e ment and agreement for temporary use of
land from Theodore C. Bidlingmaie r, et al; and authorizing
payment for said easement and agreement in the total amount
of $1,134 .66 . (Re : Contract No . 7-'+-2A) See page "T"
DISTRICT 7
Consideration o f Reso ution No . 65-72 -7 re: Au t horizing ~
acceptanc e of easemen from Skyli ne-Panorama , Inc ., in ;)~ ·
connection with const uction in Ass e ssment Di s trict #1; ~ -·~~
and aut horizing paym t therefor in the total a mo unt of
$150 .00 . Se e page 11 u11
DISTR I CT 7
Consideration
acceptance o f
in connection with As
payment for said
See page "V"
DISTRICT 7
ution No . 65 -74-7 re: Authorizing
from James K. Batchelor, e t ux,
essment District #1; and authori z ing
ent in the tota l amount of $5 7 6 .oo .
Consi d e r ation of ordir nee ~IBndi~~ Ordinance 705 , as
a inend ed (cop y i n f ol de s ) I\ • l n..t: ~~~Q,
-5 -
DISTRICT 7
Report and recommendation of the staff and the engineers
on the proposed acquisition of the Tustin Avenue Sewer;
Consideration of motion re: Receive and f ile written
recommendation of the engineers and staff to acquire +
Sections A, B, c, and D of the City of San~Jl-Ana 's 7 "/ _
Tustin Avenue Sewer in the amount of $84, 9~4 . 00; and 'i''t/f f 1
directing the Gene r a l Counsel to 'prepare a purchase
and sale agreement for the acquisition of said sewer p ·
in accordance with the recommendation, for th-\. Board 1 s () . ,..--
consideration . (See map enc l osed) ~
. ~
(68) DI STRICT 7
Consi deration of mot i on re: Approval of warrants. See
page 11 E"
/
(69) ..__"1' ,PISTRICT 7 /.
...:::rr'Other business and co unic~tions, if
(70) DISTR ICT 7
Consideration of mo
June 2nd
Adjournment to
-6 -
'.....__/
'11\RRAN'l' NO •
2048
2049
2050
ft -
WARRANT NO.
1989
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
2010
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
2026
2027
2028
2029
2030
2031
. 2032
2033
2034
2035
2036
2037
2038
2039
2040
2041
2042
2043
2044
2045
2046
2047
IN FAVOR OF
Larry Fricker Co.
Friden, Inc.
Robert N. Galloway
e ~ e n n 4
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
Ace Plastics
Acore Drilling Service
Jan Alabaster
Aladdin Litho & Art
Alpine Aromatics, Inc.
American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co.
American Chemical Society
American Optical
American Wholesale Hardware Co.
The Anchor Packing Co.
Angelus Paper & Excelsior Products
The Arcade Stationers
Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc.
Atlas Stationers
Gerald Baldwin
Bank of America
Barksdale Valves
Bay City Bearing Co.
Beacon Auto Parts, Inc.
Beckman Instruments, Inc.
James G. Biddle Co.
Blower Paper Co.
Blystone Machinery Rental Co.
Bomar Magneto Service, Inc.
Broolanart
Charles Bruning Co.
Buck's Welding Works
Bud's Equipment Rental
Buena Park Wholesale Electric
Burke Engineering Co.
Business Equipment Co.
C-L Chemical Products
Paul Calvo -Surveyor
Chemical Exchange Co.
William N. Clarke
College Lumber Co., Inc.
Compressors Incorporated
Costa Mesa County Water District
John M. Deck -Sales & Service
Diesel Control Corporation
Dieterich-Post Co.
Electric Supplies Distributing Co.
Electro Components Distributors, Inc •
Jack N. Ellis
Enchanter, Inc.
Engineering Products Company
Engineers Sales-Service Co., Inc.
Ensign Products Co.
Enterprise Electric Supply Co.
Chas. A. Estey, Inc.
Marshall Fairres
Rimmon C. Fay, Ph.D..
Federal Pacific Electric Co.
Fischer & Porter
Flair Drafting Service
Foster Sand & Gravel Co.
Fowler Equipment, Inc.
Freemon Newspapers, Inc.
French Equipment Rentals
-A-
$
AMOUNT
90.27
18.oo
96.14
c7 7?
AMOUNT
83.27
116.10
19.60
49.92
531.28
50.84
14.oo
8.89
1.02
232.80
67.15
6.41
76.82
37.07
74.35
34.29
216.60
147.83
277.87
23.09
126.33
136.91
9.00
49.79
49.78
36.88
739.87
66.oo
1,045.45
46.37
114.41
44.05
1,111.00
23,132.21
95.32
93.55
2,060.22
4.40
17.96
183.97
13.05
75.92
106.08
7.00
1,100.00
13.10
144.05
146.92
1,408~63
28.91
27.00
600.00
310.00
38.08
377 .13
25.15
323.00
16.69
74.25
JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
1989 Ace Plastics $ 83.27
1990 Acore Drilling Service 116.10
1991 Jan Alabaster 19.60
1992 Aladdin Litho & Art 49.92
\wt 1993 Alpine Aromatics, Inc. 531.28
1994 American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. 50.84
1995 American Chemical Society 14.oo
1996 American Optical 8.89
1997 American Wholesale Hardware Co. 1.02
1998 The Anchor Packing Co. 232.80
1999 Angelus Paper & Excelsior Products 67.15
2000 The Arcade Stationers 6.41
2001 Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc. 76.82
2002 Atlas Stationers 37.07
2003 Gerald Baldwin 74.35
2004 Bank of America 34.29
2005 Barksdale Valves 216.60
2006 Bay City Bearing Co. 147.83
2007 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 277.87
2008 Beckman Instruments, Inc. 23.09
2009 James G. Biddle Co. 126.33
2010 Blower Paper Co. 136.91
2011 Blystone Machinery Rental Co. 9.00
2012 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. 49.79
2013 Broolanart 49.78
2014 Charles Bruning Co. 36.88
2015 Buck's Welding Works 739.87
2016 Bud's Equipment Rental 66.oo
2017 Buena Park Wholesale Electric 1,045.45
2018 Burke Engineering Co. 46.37
2019 Business Equipment Co. 114.41
2020 C-L Chemical Products 44.05
2021 Paul Calvo -Surveyor 1,111.00
2022 Chemical Exchange Co. 23,132.21
2023 William N. Clarke 95.32
2024 College Lumber Co., Inc. 93.55
2025 Compressors Incorporated 2,060.22
2026 Costa Mesa County Water District 4.40
2027 John M. Deck -Sales & Service 17.96
2028 Diesel Control Corporation 183.97
2029 Dieterich-Post Co. 13.05
2030 Electric Supplies Distributing Co. 75.92
2031 Electro Components Distributors, Inc. 106.08
. 2032 Jack N. Ellis 7.00
2033 Enchanter, Inc. 1,100.00
2034 Engineering Products Company 13.10
2035 Engineers Sales-Service Co., Inc. 144.05
2036 Ensign Products Co. 146.92
2037 Enterprise Electric Supply Co. 1,408.63
2038 Chas. A. Estey, Inc. 28.91
2039 Marshall Fairres 27.00
204o Rimmon c. Fay, Ph.D.. 600.00
2041 Federal Pacific Electric Co. 310.00
2042 Fischer & Porter 38.08
2043 Flair Drafting Service 377.13
2044 Foster Sand & Gravel Co. 25.15
2045 Fowler Equipment, Inc. 323.00
2046 Freemon Newspapers, Inc. 16.69
2047 French Equipment Rentals 74.25
-A-
1TARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
2048 Larry Fricker Co. $ 90.27
2049 Friden, Inc. 18.oo
2050 Robert N. Galloway 96.14
2051 Garden Grove Camera Center 57.72
2052 General Electric Supply Co. 494.98
2053 General Telephone Co. 901.05
2054 Gilmore and Page Trucking Co. 84.32
2055 Goodall Rubber Co. 64.07
2056 Raymond E. Goodspeed, Distributor 16.oo
2057 Graybar Electric Co., Inc. 285.79
2058 Guaranty Chevrolet Motors 2.62
20~9 Hach Chemical Company Inc. 93.04 20 0 Hanson, Peterson, Cowies & Sylvester 250.00
2061 Fred A. Harper 68.10
2o62 Howard Supply Co. 324.38
2063 City of Huntington Beach 7 .30
2064 Imperial Glass Co. 9.86
2065 International Business Machine Corp. 356.85
2066 International Harvester Co. 7.17
2067 Jensen Instrument Co. 76.54
2068 Kingmann-Wlll.te, Inc. 126.05
2069 Kleen-Line Corp. 8.74
2070 Knox Industrial Supplies 70.20
2071 Bill Kroeger 28.50
2072 LB W S, Inc. 403.78
2@73 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 660.30
2074 Judy Lee 5.20
2075 Mac's Tire Shop 4.50
2076 Mccalla Bros. 122.21
2077 R. w. McClellan & Sons 43.26
2078 Mahaffey Machine Co. 592.86
20~9 Mine Safety Appliances Co. 155.94
20 0 Monroe International, Inc. 15.33
2081 Motorola Instrumentation & Control, Inc. 49.22
2082 Munselle Supply Co., Inc. 145.03
208~ Nalco Chemical Co. 637 .09
208 National Chemsearch Corp. 620.08
2085 Lee M. Nelson 83.75
20~6 Nelson-Dunn, Inc. 8.82
20 7 City of Newport Beach 59.33
2088 Nordson Pacific, Inc. 106.08
2o89 o. c. Suppliers, Inc. 59.78
2090 Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc. 299.91
2091 Pacific Telephone 253.45
2092 Gregg Pamson 79.60
2093 Paul-Mun ro.e Hydraulics, Inc • 10.77
2094 C.L. Pharris Trucking 24.96
2095 Radio Products Sales, Inc. 72.22
2096 Red's Frame Wheel & Brake Service 12.97
2097 Reproduction Equip & Supplies 25.29
2098 The Republic Supply Co. of Calif. 24.94
2099 Reynolds Camera Supply ~A.08 2100 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1 .16
2101 Howard Ryan Tire Service 207.87
2102 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 90.37
2103 Santa Ana Electric Motors 536.22
2104 E. H. Sargent & Co. 204.47
2105 Russell M. Scott, Sr. 60.80
2106 Select Nurseries, Inc. 90.10
2107 John E. Sigler -Consultant 906.20
2108 Signal-Flash Division 13.80
-B-
WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT
·2109 Signal Oil Co. $ 652.03
2110 Southern California Edison Co. 7,133.28
2111 Southern California Water Co. 5.08
2112 Southern Counties Gas Co. 596.83
2113 Southwest Flexible Co. 153.24
2114 Speed-E-Auto Parts 70.89
2115 Sta~dard Oil Co. of Calif. 738.61
2116 State of Calif.-Office of Procurement 4.16
2117 State Employees' Retirement System 185.50
2118 Steverson Bros. l~~-40 2119 Sweetland Co. 1 .46
2120 J. Wayne Sylvester 3.00
2121 Tardif Sheet Metal 320.63
2122 Norman R. Tremblay 93.75
2123 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. 317.01
2124 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. 193.88
2125 Tustin Water Works 49.00
2126 Union 011 Co. of Calif. 8.94
212~ Utilities Supply Co. 37.44
212 Van Dien-Young Co. 35.82
2129 J. P. Vormi ttag 9.40
2130 John R. Waples -Consultant 112.40
2131 Warm Air Products Co., Inc. 195.62
2132 Warren & Bailey Co. 455.87
2133 Donald c. Webster 343.87
2134 Western Fastner Co. 95.83
2135 Western Salt Co. 26.00
2136 Raymond Zehnpfennig 62.59
2136A Howard M. Cornwell 91.05
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 58,848.64
CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOR OF
2137 Paul Calvo $ 379.00
2138 Enchanter, Inc. 2,900.00
2139 Enterprise Printing Co. 41.95
2140 Graybar Electric Co., Inc. 4,559.36
2141 Raymond G. Osborne 1,168.50
2142 P. S. I. Engineering Co. 2,712.00
2143 John Ward Co. 1,72·4.28
2144 Vinnell Corp. 91,718.55
TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $105,203.64 ~-··
TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $164,052.28
-c-
~'I ARRANT NO •
' 2145
2146
2148
2149
2150
.. ..........
DISTRZC~O. 2
OPERATING FUND'\;LARRANTS
IN FAVO;-x; AMO'QNT
J. R. Lester Boyle & 1dney L. Lowry $ 260.00
'l'ax Service of Orang/ County Inc. =$==========
2
;=:=:==:==:
DISTRICT NO. /2,
SUSPENSE F
OPERATING WARRANTS
IN AVOR oF!
Bartle Wells ssociat s $ 3,150.00
I ACCUMULATED CAPIT L OUTLA FUND WARRANTS
Anderson H rborBlue Print
Enterpris Printing Co.
-D-
$ 47.37
41.95
89.32
3.,239.32
WARRANT NO.
2151
2152
2153
2154
2155
2156
2157
2158
2159
2160
2161
2162
2163
2164
2165
2166
2167
2168
2169
DISTRICT NO. 7
OPERATING FUND WARRANTS
IN, FAVOR OF
Louis v. & Mary Basic (AD#l)
James K. BaPchelor (AD#l)
Boyle & Lowry
AD NO.
1
5A
AMOUNT
$3,203~
2,704.38
$5,967.76
Plan Check
& Inspection 134.oo
$6,101.76
J. Wylie Carlyle (ADlf!)
Paul J. Hogan
Cecil J. &\Claire s. Marks (AD#5A)
County of 01range (AD#l)
Skyline-Pan·911 ama, Inc • ( AD#l)
Southern California Edison Co. ' .
\
\ ACCUMULATED CAPITA~ OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
IN\FAVOR OF
$
County Sanitat~on District No. 14 of $
Orange County\
\ FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS
IN FAVOk OF
Theodore C. & Anna Bidlingmaier
Boyle & Lowry \
Galy Construction cqrporation
Norman J. & Leselotije Groot
Ernst Leibacher /
Frank s. Mannetti Jr.
Red Hill Ridge Estajtes
/
/
i/
1
DISTRIC '· NO. 11
ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS
Enterprise
Lowry and
-E-
$
$
$
AMOUNT
500.00
576.00
6,101.76
1.50
45.50
1.00
259.80
150.00
142.06
7,777.62
27,070.00
1,134.66
525.00
50.00
1,046.10
698.97
50.00
393.75
3,898.48
38,746.10
41.95
7,604.10
7,646.05
RESOLUTION NO. 65-63
APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS -I-6-2
A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3,
5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA,
APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICA-
TIONS FOR JOB NO. I-6-2 (ADDITIONS TO PLANT
NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -
STRUCTURES}; AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR
BIDS
The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California,
DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors
by the engineers, for the ADDITIONS TO PIANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE
FACILITIES -STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2, are hereby approved, adopted
and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 p.m., June 2, 1965,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and,
Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting
as agent for itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is
hereby authorized and directed to receive bids and to award contract
for said work.
-F-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. No. 2 --------
CONTRACTOR: John Ward Company Date: May 7, 1965
JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2,, Job No. P2-7-l
Amount of this change order (ADD)~ $ 1321. 01
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. 3 previously furnished contractor
ADD
1. Provide miscellaneous minor revisions to steam
and condensate piping, as specified $
2. Provide additional steam pipe supports and
anchors, as specified
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 1,321.01
Original Contract Price $ 28,738.00
Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 730.86
This Change (AD~)(lJEil.YJC'ID.O _...b.. ... 3_21 ___ .0_l ___ _
Amended Contract Price $ 29,328.15
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 12, 1965
-G-
cm.ru•ry SAr·rI'i'A'i,J:ON DISTRICTS OF
ORAMG·E COUifl'Y, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Lee M. Nelsen ----GeDeral Manage_r ___ _
JOHN WARD COMP.ANY
By ____ ~-------------------------
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
P. 0, Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California
CHANGE ORDER
C. O. NO. l -----
CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation
Job No. I-6-1 DATE: May 7, 1965
JOB: ADDITION TO PLANT #1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -PIPELINE
Amount of this change order (J.AXEO (DEDUCT) $ 1361. 24
In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in
the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com-
pensation therefor, the following additions to or. deductions from the
contract price are hereby approved.
REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. l previously furnished contractor
and contractor's quotation dated May 4, 1965
DEDUCT
1. Substitute 36-inch diameter steel bore casing
as specified at Adams and Hamilton Avenues
in lieu of 24-inch diameter RCP as originally
specified $ 200.00
2. Delete 13.5 feet of 84-inch RCP and 32 feet of
pipe lining as specified
TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT$ 1,361. 24
Original Contract Price $ 1,455,850.00
Prev. Auth. Changes None
This Change (~(DEDUCT) 1,361.24
Amended Contract Price $ 1,454,488.76
Board authorization date: Approved:
May 12, 1965
-H-
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
By /s/ Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
VINNELL CORPORATION
By--------~~-----------------
RESOLUTION NO. 65-64-1
AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SPECIFICATION
#PW-020
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR
DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND
EPOXY COATING, SPECIFICATION #"PW-020
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub-
mitted by the Purchasing Officer and concurred in by the General
Manager, that award of contract be made to WALKER COATING COMPANY
Contractor, for DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND EPOXY
COATING, Specification #PW-020 of County Sanitation Districts Nos.
1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; and the tabulation of bids and the proposal
submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and,
Section 2. That said contract for Specification PW-020
is hereby awarded to WALKER COATING COMPANY , Contractor,
in the total amount of $ 3 2 676.00 in accordance with the terms of
their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby
determined to be the lowest and best bid therefor; and,
,
Section 3. That execution of a contract with the Contractor
'fo·r said work is hereby authorized in accordance with the specifica-
tions and contract documents therefor; and,
Section 4. That all other bids received £or said work are
hereby rejected, and the Secretary is directed to return any certified.
checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds, to the unsuccessful
bidders.
-I-
-/
BID TABUIATION AND RECOMMENDATION
Date May 5, 1965
Contract: DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBIASTING AND EPOXY
COATING, SPECIFICATION #PW-020
CONTRACTOR ITEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL BID
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
Walker Coating Co.
2425 East 118th St.
Los Angeles, Calif. 90059
Edward A. Wopschall, Inc.
11 North 5th Avenue
Arcadia, California
Wilson & Hampton,
Painting Contractors
250-F N. Manchester
Anaheim, California
Coast Contractors, Inc.
678 East 28th Street
Long Beach, California
Klaas Bros., Inc.
2012 Hyperion Ave.
Los Angeles 27, Calif.
Teco Painting Co.
5332 Alhambra Avenue
Los Angeles, Calif. 90032
Spence & Sullivan, Inc.
18004 South Broadway
P. o. Box 427
Gardena, California 90247
$1,395.00 $2,281.00 $ 3,676.00
1,980.00 1,730.00 3,710.00
2,202.00 2,083.00 4,285.00
2,370.00 2,880.00 5,250.00
5,384.oo 1,181.00 6,565.00
6,385.00 3,985.00 10,370.00
8,495.00 2,192.00 l0,687.00
It is recommended that award of contract be made to Walker Coating
Company, 2425 East 118th Street, Los Angeles, California, as the
lowest and best bid.
Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
T. A. Dunn
Purchasing Officer
-J-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-73-11
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS
CONVEYING TITLE
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF DOCUMENTS CONVEYING TITLE TO CERTAIN
SEWERAGE FACILITIES
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
WHEREAS, an agreement entitled "Agreement for Sale and
Purchase of Lake Avenue and Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewers", and dated
August 10, 1960, was entered into with the City of Huntington Beach;
and,
WHEREAS, said agreement provided, that upon payment of the
final amount due, the facilities referred to in said agreement would
be conveyed to the District.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. All the terms and conditions set forth in
said agreement having been met, and final payment having been made
by the District, the District does hereby accept the facilities
outlined in said agreement and upon the terms and conditions as
shown therein; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized to record the
Grant Deed, Bill of Sale and other documents necessary to effect
transfer of title to the District.
-K-
11 April 27, 1965
11 Board of Directors
City of
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
County Sanitation District No. 2
10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, California 92708
11 Gentlemen:
11 The County Sanitation District No. 2 Engineers' Report, dated
March 1965, has been reviewed by the City of Anaheim staff engineers
and a report has been ma.de to the City Council.
"With the present trend of development expanding into the Santa Ana
Canyon, Anaheim has a vital interest in the program for the sewering
of this area. Your consideration of an earlier construction date
for the outfall sewers on both the north and south sides of the
Santa Ana River is earnestly requested. It is anticipated that the
need for these outfall sewers will occur in 1966 as numerous requests
for sewer service to this area already have been ma.de to the City.
11 If the sewer treatment plant is to be located as proposed, certain
protective measures must be taken to control the emission of odors.
A further, more detailed study would be in order to assure maximum
odor control. An underground facility may possibly be required to
effectively prevent the escape of undesirable odors into the fine
residential districts now existing, as well as those proposed for
the Santa Ana River areas.
"The City of Anaheim is in basic agreement with the proposals set
forth in the report, if the above considerations can be given your
approval.
11 Very truly yours,
11 CITY COUNCIL
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
/s/ Keith A. Murdoch
"Keith A. Murdoch
City Manager
II KAM: ml"
-L-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-75-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2,
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING
AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT
FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES IN
CONNECTION WITH NOHL, ANNEXATION #3
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain agreement ordered by
Resolution No. 65-49-2, between the County of Orange Board of
Supervisors, the petitioners, and the District, setting forth the
terms and conditions for deferring payment of the annexation fees
relative to Nohl, Annexation #3, is hereby approved as prepared by
the General Counsel and the County Counsel; and,
Section 2. That execution of said agreement by the
Chairman and the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized;
and,
Section 3. That the agreement hereinabove referred to
shall be recorded in the Officiai Records of Orange County.
-M-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-65-7
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING
PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WALNUT AVENUE
SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-
TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-2B; AND AUTHORIZ-
ING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by
Boyle and Lowry, Engineers, for the WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER
and the SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-2B, are
hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the
Secretary; and,
Section 2. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work
pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the
State of California; and,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m., June 2, 1965,
at which time said bids will be publicly opened, examined apd read.
-N-
1 ~
RESOLUTION NO. 65-~7
AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH
~lS'.mIG'±' 1°. 1 ( COODEMNATIDN #"11 j
-7v1J ~ .--Z--.13
...
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSM&M'.!!' '.JJISTRJ:-&'f NG-.-:t
~ 7-.t--a,rJ!-8
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and
determined, and hereby does find and determine, that the public
interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition,
construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County
Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: a
sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or
incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping
stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of
sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation,
treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising
within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such
other territories as said District may have contracted to serve
pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor.
Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of
which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses
and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the
County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly
described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit 11 A11
attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full
herein.
0-1-·
Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way
above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired sub-
ject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to
use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease-
ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and
free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided,
however, that:
(a) No building or structure of any kind shall be
placed, erected or maintained thereon;
{b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con-
structed upon, over, or along said easements
and rights of way to a grade less than four feet
above the top of any pipe or pipes located with-
in the lines of said easements or rights of way;
(c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the
surface of the ground as it shall exist within
the lines of said easements and rights of way
upon the completion of the improvements to be
constructed therein greater than six feet in
depth.
Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way
to be acquired shall include:
(a) The right to construct manholes, air valves,
blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations,
metering stations, standpipe and service con-
nection structures appurtenant to said line or'
lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall
not extend above the surface of the ground;
(b) The right during construction to use all existing
private roads within the properties of the owners
for ingress to and egress from the work, together
with the right, upon completion of the construe-
0-2-
tion of the pipeline or pipelines orother works,
to construct and maintain an access road upon,
over and along such permanent easements and
rights of way as may be in the public interest
from time to time.
Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita-
tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares
its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof
by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller,
Nissan, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California,
be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action
in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the
County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation
District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners
and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of
condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County
Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be pro-
secuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto.
That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to make applica-
tion to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by
way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order
permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County,
California, to take immediate possession and use of said real
property for the uses and purposes herein described.
Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized,
upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nissen, Jr.,
General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the
County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as
may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of
the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of
way to the District.
0-3-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-67-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF AN EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT
DISTRICT #1, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREFOR
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
dated April 12, 1965, wherein LOUIS V. BASIC and MARY C. BASIC,
husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a
permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the
construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said Permanent Easement,
which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-1-lOa in
that certain action in eminent domain #128876 and described on
Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to
Louis V. Basic and Mary C. Basic, 13146 Foothill Blvd.~ Santa Ana,
California, in the total amount of $500.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors
is hereby authorized and directed to record said Permanent Easement
in the Official Records of Orange County.
-P-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-68-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5-A (Parcel 7-5-191)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPl'ANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM CECIL J. MARKS AND CIAIRE S. MARKS
{#133933)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
dated April 23, 1965, wherein CECIL J. MARKS AND CLAIRE S. MARKS,
husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a
permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the
construction in Assessment District #5-A, is hereby approved and
accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement,
which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-5-191 in
that certain action in eminent domain #133933 and described on
Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be ma.de to
Cecil J. Marks and Claire s. Marks, 11872 S.W. Arroyo, Santa Ana,
California, in the total amount of $1.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-Q-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-69-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE
OF AN EASEMENT FROM STATE MUrUAL SAVINGS AND
LOAN ASSOCIATION AT NO COST TO THE DISTRICT
(RE: TRACT #5840)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERt"\!IINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated
April 23, 1965, wherein STATE MUTWU. SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION,
a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an
easement for sewer purposes in connection with Tract #5840, at
no cost to the District, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the certain real property over which
said easement is granted is more particularly described as:
An easement for sanitary sewer purposes over a
portion of Lot 44 of Tract No. 5840, County of
Orange, State of California, as per map recorded
in Book 214, pages 1, 2 and 3 of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of
said County, described as follows:
The easterly 5.00 feet of Lot 44 of said Tract
No. 5840, together with the right to enter upon
and use adjoining lands of the granter as may be
necessary for the initial construction of said
sanitary sewer.pipe line.
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Of~icial Records of Orange County.
-R-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-70-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT
AND AN AGREEMENT F'OR TEMPORARY USE OF IAND
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT
AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF !AND REIA-
TIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-4-2A
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Temporary
Use of Land for Construction Purposes dated November 19, 1964,
wherein NORMAN J. GROOT and LISELOTTE GROOT agree to waive any
further claim to damages by reason of the use and occupancy of
Parcel No. T-2 as described in Action No. 125752, and related and
adjoining properties damaged or used during the process of con-
struction by the District and its contractors during 1964, is
hereby approved and accepted in consideration of the total sum
of $287.10; and,
Section 2. Th.at payment for said agreement is hereby
authorized to be made to Norman J. Groot and Liselotte Groot,
P. o. Box 2212, El Modena, California, in the total amount of
$287.10; and,
Section 3. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
dated November 19, 1964, wherein Norman J. Groot and Liselotte
Groot grant to the District a Permanent Easement for sewer pur-
poses in connection with the construction of Contract No. 7-4-2A,
is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 4. That payment for said Permanent Easement,
described as Parcel No. P-2 in Action #125752, and more particu-
larly described as follows:
-S-
The South 20 feet of the following described
property located in the Rancho Santiago de
Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California:
Beginnin~ at the Southeast corner of Lot 19 in
Block "B of the Land of Oge and Bond, as shown
on a map recorded in Book 3, at pages 430 and
431, of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles
County, California, running thence East 5 chains;
thence South 10 chains; thence West 5 chains and
thence North 10 chains to the point of beginning.
is hereby authorized to be made to Norman J. Groot and Liselotte
Groot, P. O. Box 2212, El Modena 2 California, in the total amount
of $759.00; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
S-2-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-71-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT
AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF LAND
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT
AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF LAND RELA-
TIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-4-2A FROM
THEODORE C. BIDLINGMAIER AND ANNA C. BIDLINGMAIER
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Temporary Use
of Land for Construction Purposes wherein THEODORE C. BIDLINGMAIER
and ANNA C. BIDLINGMAIER agree to waive any further claim to damages
by reason of the use and occupancy of Parcel No. T-2 as described
in Action No. 125752, and related and adjoining properties damaged
or used during the process of construction by the District and its
contractors during 1964, is hereby approved and accepted in consid-
eration of the total sum of $311.26; and,
Section 2. That payment for said agreement is hereby
authorized to be made to Theodore c. Bidlingmaier and Anna c.
Bidlingmaier, 192 North Waverly, Orange, California, in the total
amount of $311.26; and,
Section 3. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
wherein Theodore C. Bidlingmaier and Anna C. Bidlingmaier grant to
the District a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection
with the construction of Contract No. 7-4-2A, is hereby approved
and accepted; and,
Section 4. That payment for said Permanent Easement,
described as Parcel No. P-1 in Action #125752, and more particularly
described as follows:
The South 20 feet of the following described
-T-1
/
property located in the Rancho Santiago de
Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California:
Beginninff at the Southeast corner of Lot 19 in
Block 11 B of the Land of Oge and Bond, as shown
on a map recorded in Book 3, at pages 430 and
431, of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles
County, California, running thence South 10
chains; thence West 10 chains; thence North 10
chains; thence East 10 chains to the point of
beginning.
Except the West 302.00 feet thereof
is hereby authorized to be made to Theodore c. Bidlingmaier and
Anna C. Bidlingmaier, 192 North Waverly, Orange 2 California, in the
total amount of $823.40; and,
Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
T-2-
_ ..
·"'
RESOLUTION NO. 65-72-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-32d)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM SKYLINE-
PANORAMA, INC. (#132568)
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement
dated April 28, 1965, wherein SKYLINE-PANORAMA, INC., a corporation,
grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for
sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment
District #1, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement,
which is described as Parcel No. 7-l-32d in that certain action
in eminent domain #132568, and more particularly described as:
That portion of Lot 27 of Tract 916, in the County
of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded
in Book 29, pages 2 to 4, inclusive, of Miscellaneous
Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said
County, lying southerly of the following described
line:
Beginning at a point in the southerly line of said
Lot 27 distant easterly thereon 82.68 feet from
the westerly terminus thereof; thence North 83°
02 1 33" East to the east line of said lot.
EXCEPT the Easterly 10.00 feet thereof
is hereby authorized to be made to Skyline-Panorama, Inc., c/o
Powers, Himrod & Pepys, Suite 1016 First Western Bank Building,
548 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California, Attention: Robert
M. Himrod, in the total amount of $150.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-U-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-74-7
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE:
ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-34b)
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY
SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY,
CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT
FROM JAMES K. BATCHELOR AND JEANETTE L. BATCHELOR
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 7, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein
JAMES K. BATCHELOR and JEANETTE L. BATCHELOR, husband and wife,
grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer
purposes in connection with construction in Assessment District
No. 1, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That payment for said Grant of Easement,
which is described as Parcel 7-l-34b, and more particularly
described as:
That portion of Lot 31 of El Modena Citrus Lands,
per ma.p thereof recorded in Book 6, page 32 of
Miscellaneous Maps of Orange County, California,
described as follows:
The Northwesterly 15.00 feet of that parcel of
land described in a deed recorded in Book 6760,
page 615 of Official Records of Orange County,
California.
is hereby authorized to be made to James K. Batchelor and Jeanette
L. Batchelor, 1010 North Main Street, Santa Ana, California, in
the total amount of $576.00; and,
Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby
authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the
Official Records of Orange County.
-V-
Item No .
(31-A)
(55 -A)
(69-A)
Ji0~1!k
SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA
_!vlay 1 2 , 1 965
ALL DISTRICTS u'---,
Consideration of mo tion re: A p r o ving ass i gnment ~ . .4ft1 . I--
of proceeds in connection with Job No. I-6-1 from r /))/-. IJ\
Vinnell Corporation to Bank o-A Ame rica, NT&S A, / l ,J vlA l
(Addi t i o n s t o Plant No. 1 Eff uent Discharge Facili-l)lr ij
ties -Pip eline) l(
L-ALL DIST:CUCTS ~
Considerat:lon of motion re: \Accepting proposal of ,("-)-..
Le roy Cranda,11 and As sociatef for soils investigation .;)/~
work in connection with Job o. J-9 (Ocean Outfa ll ~ ~
No . 2 -La n d Section); and a t horizing the General tJ" 1 "!,_,.._
Man ager to emp loy sai d firm an acc ordanc e with the ~-1.v
terms a n d conditions of sa i ~ proposal. See page ~
S-A I
DISTRICT 2
Consideration of Resolut ion No. 65-76-2 re: Approving
and authorizi ng execution p f a Consent to Common Use ~I .~
Agreement with the State D:i!vi s i on of Hi ghways . See {1~v \
page S-B } ' . ~~
DI STRIC T 7 I
Con s ideration of Resolut:iion No. 65 -'77-7 re: Authori z -
ing t he Gen eral Counsel t o accept on behalf of the ~
District, a deed of easefent from Oliphant, et al, .
r e lat ive to Assessmen t District #1 ; said easement ~~
shall be i n form app rove a by the Gene ral Counsel ; -
and authorizing the Genef:'al Counse l to s'i gn warra nt
b ook and warrant fo r par· . ent in the total amount of
$888 .oo . (Parcel 7-1 -34 )
( \ ~....., Yt~<-/ltoj -~ "'~ (J_ 0--.J I
s. ._J_ c ~ ~,,_-~:L ,c, ~"' ~c.-... :.. ~ ,<.-~ .-..,,!_
t!l __ , h \ (~<..):_.{
M 0 T I 0 N ----.-.-
MOVED:
That the proposal of LeRoy Crandall and Associates for
foundation investigation work for Job No. ~-9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2,
Land Section), is hereby a~proved and accepted; and,
That the General Manager be authorized to direct
LeRoy Crandall and Associates to proceed with said services as
outlined in the proposal; and,
That payment for said services is hereby authorized to
be made upon presentation of invoices in a total amount not to
exceed $4,-ooo.oo, in accordance with the terms of their proposal,
as follows:
LeRoy Crandall
Principals
Office engineering
Laboratory
Drafting
Clerical
Field Engineering
Field Engineering (Overtime)
Field Asslstant
Field Assistant (Overtime)
Mileage @ 12¢ per mile
· 30.00/per hour
20.00
13.00
12.50 B.oo
1.00 i6.oo
18050
9.00
:Pll.00
Outside services performed by others, and direct
expenses will be reimbursable at cost plus 5%.
S-A
RESOLUTION NO, 65-76-2
APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH STATE DIVISION
OF HIGHWAYS
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING
EXECUTION OF A CO:MMON USE AGREEMENT WITH THE
STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Consent to Common Use
Agreement No. 7cu-2341, dated May 12, 1965, wherein the State of
California, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways and
the District, agree to the common use of the District 1 s easement
acquired by action in eminent domain #91562, which said easement
is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and
made a part of this resolution, is hereby approved and accepted;
and,
Section 2. That said agreement be approved and accepted
as negotiated by the General Counsel; and,
Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the
District be authorized and directed to execute said Consent to
Common Use Agreement on behalf of the District.
S-B
?l .
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY
Members, Boards of Directors
County Sanitation Di stric t s
Nos. 1,2,3,5,6 ,7,8 and 11
May 7, 196 5
Subject : Ocean Inspecti on Trip of Outfall Di ffuser
An ocean inspection trip of the outfall d i ffuser constructi on
site had been scheduled for Wednesday, Apr i l 14th, but due t o
unfavorable weather condi tions and the roughness of the ocean 1 the trip was postponed Ui~til Wednesday, May 12th.
We ar e sorry to advi se that a further postponement of this tri p
is necessary due to weath er condi tion s and construction di ffi -
culties which have plagued the contractor.
Suc h a tri p as had be e n planned would be very interesting and
as soon as the con struc t ion difficulties are resolved , an
inspection trip of the outfall diffuser construction s i te wi ll
be arranged. We apprec i ate your interest and will advi se you
of further plans.
LMN:fh
LEE M. NELSON
General Manager
II
MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT
County Sanit ati on Districts
of Orange County, California
P. 0. Box 51 75
10844 t:l lis Ave nue
Fountain Vall ey, Ca lif., 9 2708
Phone 962-241 1
JOINT BOARDS
May 7, 1965
REGULAR MEETING
Wednesday, May 12, 1965
8:00 p.m.
ALL DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE: Please refer to th e attached notice
r egarding t h e Ocean Outfall Diffuser inspect i on trip which we had
hoped t o schedule for the afternoon preceding this Board meeting.
It n ow appears that a da te later in the month will be more
appropriate for this tri p. A further announcement in this reg ard
will be made at the Board meeting.
* * * * * * * * * * * * *
The following is an e xplanation of the more important non -
r o utine items which appear on the enclosed Joint Boards' a g enda
and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant registers
are not attached to the a g e n da since they are made up immediately
preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda a-
vailable at the meet i n g .
Jo i nt Boards
No. 4 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: It is anticipated by the time
of the meeting there will be one or more formal communications
from the Cities regarding changes i n City Councils which affect
memberships on the Boards of Directo rs.
Nos . 5 through 13 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN AND BUDGET PROCEDURES: I n
accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure, a Chairman for
each District Board and the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman
of the Joint Administrative Organization must be elected annually
at the regular May meeting . The Chairmen for the past year were
as follows:
A. Allen Hall* ·;J~
Rex A. Parks I/"
Howard M. Cornwell (..,./
James B. Stoddard V
District No. 1
Di strict No. 2
Distri ct No. 3
District No . 5
District No. 6
Di stri ct No. 7
District No. 11
Joint Chainian
, Arthur H. Meyers v . ~ _
")'hJ..i.tN -• * &~ Y ~
Robert M. Lambert ~~.
Vice Joint Chairman
*No longer Directors
Howard M. Cornwell
James B. Stoddard
It is called to the attention of the newer Directors that the
District's Chairmen automatically become members of the Executive
Committee which meets, as required, to study and make recommen-
dations to the Joint Boards on all important matters concerning
joint operations such as budgets, salaries, personnel, uniform
policies, etc.
A meeting of the Executive Committee to consider our 1965-66
J o int Operating and Joint Construction Bud get s is being planned
for the afternoon of Wednesday, June 2, following a District No. 1
Bo ard meeting. In this connection, we are attaching a printed
explanation for the Districts• budget procedures to serve as a
review for the Directors on this important subject. This printed
explanation will eventually be a part of a complete package of
informa tion describing all phases of the Districts' operations. As
stated in the attachment, these two Joint Bud get s are scheduled for
consideration and adoption at the June meeting. Accordingly, a
careful review of the printed budget procedures before that meeting
is recommended.
No. 24 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO
RECEIVE BIDS FOR PLANT JOB I-6-2: Our design engineers are sub-
mitting plans and specifications for the last regularly scheduled
plant expansion job for this fiscal year. This consists of the
second phase of construction of our new effluent discharge
facilities from Plant No. 1 and is entitled "Addition to Plant No. 1
Effluent Discharge Faci.lities -Structures, Job No. I-6 -2 11
• The
first phase, now under way, consists solely of the pipeline work
involved and the present plans and specifications under consider-
ation will complete the work under a separate contract for the
necessary structures at both ends of the 84-inch pipeline. This
overall project was divided into two phases t o expedite construction
and also because pipeline contractors are usually not interested in
bidding on structural work and vice versa. The engineer's estimate
for this contract is $173,000.
We are scheduling bids for this job to be taken b y the Board
of Directors of District No. 1, in accordance with our re gular
procedure, at an adjourned meeting at 4:00 p.m. on June 2.
No. 25 -PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL CHLORINATOR AND APPURTENANCES: In
1961 the Districts constructed an effluent chlorination station at
Plant No. 2 to disinfect our effluent to the ocean in accordance
with State requirements. Under the contract for this work, eight
8,000 pound per day chlorinators and evaporators were purchased
and installed by the contractor. Prior to this, an identical
chlorinator was purchased separately for pre-chlorination at Plant
No. 1 for odor control All nine of these units are of one make
(Fischer & Porter Company of Anaheim) and fa c tory replacement parts
are carried in inventory.
Recent laboratory research work has shown definitely that by
chlorinating effluent from Plant No. 1, a considerable savings can
-2-
be effected in chlorine used fo r disinfection. In order to expedite
setting up this additional chlorination procedure (which can result
in savings of over $100 per day in chlorine costs) we need an
additional 8,000 pound chlorinator as soon as possible and it is
obvious that from the standpoint of maintenance cost and inter-
changeability the same make of machine should be purchased.
Accordingly, we are recommending Board authorization for the
immediate purchase of this equipment from the Fischer & Porter
Company at their quoted price of $6991.
No. 26 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, PLANT JOB P2-7-l: This contract with
the John Ward Company is for basically piping work for our steam
turbine equipment at our power building at Plant No . 2 which equip-
ment, purchased under separate contract, has been installed by the
contractor. During a recent testing of the waste heat boiler
piping it became obvious that the anchoring for the steam and
condensate piping originally called for was not adequate. Conse-
quently, the contractor was asked to quote a price for additional
anchoring to be performed as extra work. This total extra cost as
detailed in the accompanying formal change order is $1321.01 and
the motion appearing on the agenda approving this change order is
recommended for adoption .
No. 27 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, PLANT JOB I-6-1 : This contract with
the Vinnell Corporation is for the 84-inch Plant No. 1 effluent
pipeline as mentioned under Item No. 24. In connection with the
final design of Job I-6-2 (Item No. 24), the decision was made to
delete a small portion of the pipeline and to replace it with a
structure under the second contract. Thi s deletion is detailed in
the formal change order attached to the agenda and the contractor
has agreed to a total deduction of $1361 .24 for this change in the
work .
No. 28 -QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: The Districts' auditors,
Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have recently submitted a
quarterly financial report to the Districts as called for under
their agreement . A copy of this r eport, which covers the quarter
ending March 13, 1965, is enclosed for each active Director.
District No. 1
No . 32 -AWARD OF PAINTING CONTR~CT: Bids for this maintenance
painting job, which was explained in the April Manager's Report,
were taken at the adjourned meeting of the Board on May 5. Unless
unforeseen circumstances alter the situation between now and the
Board meeting, it will be recommended that the contract be awarded
to Walker Coating Company of Los Angeles at their low bid price of
$3676.
No. 35 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 2: As ment i oned under Item No . 24,
bids for our plant expansion contract will be received and opened
on June 2 at 4:00 p.m. Accordingly, it will be necessary for the
Board to adjourn to this hour and date.
-3-
District No. 5
No . 40 -PREPARATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE COMPANY:
The Directors are familiar with the necessity for this agreement .
However for the record, it will be necessary to direct the General
Counsel to proceed with its preparation.
No. 43 -ADJOURNMENT TO MAY 24: In accordance with the Directors '
previously indicated plans, it is planned to hold an adjourned
meeting on the above date to consider for adoption the proposed
new District connection ordinance. This date is not fixed however
and can be changed at the time of the Board meeting, if desired.
District No. 11
No . 47 -DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ACQUISITION OF LAKE AVENUE AND OCEAN
AVENUE SEWER: This is the routine action relating to the final
acquisition of these two sewers by the District from the City of
Huntington Beach.
No. 50 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 3: At the adjourned meeting of the
Board on May 4, it was agreed that bids for Contract No. 11-9
(Edinger Ave. Gravity Sewer and Edinger Ave . Sewerage Lift Station)
would be received and opened by the Secretary and Engineer on June
1, and that if possible, the contract will be awarded on June 3 ,
It will therefore be necessary for the Board to adjourn to this
date for this purpose and it is suggested that the hour be set at
4:00 p.m., subject to change at this meeting.
District No. 2
No. 51 -CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM: By means
of a letter dated April 27, Anaheim has requested the District to
consider the early construction of outfall sewers on either side of
the Santa Ana River as recommended in the March, 1965, Preiiminary
Engineer's Report by Boyle and Lowry. A copy of the letter from
Anaheim is attached to the agenda for the Directors of District No.
2 .
No. 52 -AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES (NOHL #3 ): At
the April 14 Board meeting, Resolution No. 65-49-2 approving this
annexation was adopted . The resolution gave consent to the annex-
ation subject to the following terms · and conditions:
II (a)
II (b)
Annexation fees are hereby established
for the proposed annexation at $100
per acre or any portion of an acre of
territory to be annexed
That the petitioners enter into an
agreement with the County of Orange
Board of Supervisors and County Sanitation
-4-
II ( C)
District No. 2 setting forth the terms
and conditions for deferring payment
of said annexation fees; and that said
agreement be recorded in the Official
Records of Orange County
That the a~reement referred to in Sub-
section (bJ above shall contain the
following conditions:
1. Payment of annexation fees of
$100 per acre or any portion
of an acre for any acreage
developed within the annexed
area shall be due District
No. 2 at the time any acreage
is subdivided for development.
2. All annexation fees for this
proposed annexation remaining
unpaid ten (10) years from date
of annexation shall be paid in
full by the property owners of
record.
1'(d) That no sewer connections be made within
the area to be annexed until the area to
be served has paid its proportionate share
of the established fees per acre."
The agreement specified under paragraph (b) above is now
being prepared by the County Counsel and our General Counsel and in
the event it is available at the time of the Board meeting,
consideration of authorization of execution of this agreement will
be taken up under this item.
District No. 7
No. 56 -AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF DISTRICT 7'S SHARE OF CON-
STRUCTION COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIC ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT:
District No. 7 entered into a Basic Accommodation Agreement on
April 13, 1963, with County Sanitation District No. 14 to provide
a temporary means of sewage disposal for District No. 14. Paragraph
5 of the agreement states: 11 That Seven will pay the construction
costs, except design engineering, of a sewer and force main from
its MacArthur Avenue pump station to the boundary of Fourteen 11 •
The construction work is now complete and District No. 14 has billed
the District for $27,070. It is the recommendation of the staff
that payment be authorized.
No. 57 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH COAST
PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, JOB NO.
7-2~B: The Engineers are submitting plans and specifications for
-5-
this job, and we are recommending approval and authorization for
b i ds to be received at 7:30 p.m., J une 9, immediately preceding
the Joint Boards' meeting.
No. 58 -CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1: Res o lution
No. 65-66-7 authorizes condemnation for rights-of-way within the
assessment distric t.
Nos. 59 t hrough 6 1 , 6 4 and 65 -ACCEPTS EASEMENTS AND AUTHORIZES
PAYMENTS FOR RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS
#1 AND #5-A: The General Coun sel recommends acceptance of and
payment for these easements.
Nos. 62 and 63 -ACCEPTS PERMANENT EASEMENTS AND AGREEMENTS FOR
TEMPORARY USE OF LAND, AND AUTHORIZES PAYMENTS THEREFOR IN
CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO . 7-4-2A: These are the final rights-of-
way settlements for the Panorama Heights sub-trunk sewer which wa s
constructed l ast year. The General Cou nsel recommends the accept-
ance of and payment for these easements.
No. 66 -AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 705 I NCREAS ING DIRECT CONNECTION
CHARGES: At the April 15 meeting of the Board, the staff and
General Counsel were d irected to prepare an amendment to the
current connection charge ordinance, increasing the direct
connection charges. The staff has discussed the matter with the
Engineers and Counsel and the proposed amendment will be available
at the meeting. We recomme nd that the Boa rd take the ordinance
under subm ission f o r study, as the Directors may want to r e view
this proposed chang e with their city officials prior to action by
the Board. If the ordinance is acceptable to the Boa rd by the June
meeting, it can be adopted at that time.
No. 67 -ACQUISITION OF THE TUSTIN AVE NUE SEWER FROM THE CITY OF
SANTA ANA: The staff will have a ve rba l report concerning the
acquisition of this sewe r from the City of Santa Ana. It will be
our recommendation that the Board adopt the motion appearing on the
agenda, which authorizes acquisition of Sections A, B. C and D of
the sewer, indicated on the map enclosed with the agenda.
-6-
Lee M. Nelson
General Manager
BUDGET PROCEDURES
INTRODUCTION
This section is intended as a general summary of the Sanitation Districts' budget procedures
and has been prepared primarily for new Directors being called upon at the June meeting of each
year to pass on budget matters for the ensuing fiscal year. It should also be of value to others who
may be interested in or concerned with our fiscal procedures.
The County Auditor-Controller, who is ex-officio Auditor of each District, requires that our
official District budgets and those of other special districts be submitted in the latter part of July
at the latest. This does not allow postponing final passage of our budgets past the regular July Joint
meeting since the Directors ordinarily do not meet but once a month, on the second Wednesday.
These requirements necessitate final action on our budgets earlier than in the case of the various
cities, whose procedures the Directors are usually more familiar with than ours.
It is hoped that the following outline will clarify our procedures and will assist new Directors
in understanding budget material which is submitted at the June meeting. It also should be useful as
a review for the older Directors.
INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT'S BUDGETS
As stated above, these budgets must be finally passed upon in early July. They are actually our
only official budgets, as far as the Auditor is concerned, and serve as a basis for establishing the
tax rate for each District, which varies from year to year depending on each individual District's
total requirements and assessed valuation.
The individual District's budgets are composed of a minimum of three separate funds and as many
as eight. These separate funds reflect the various classifications of expenditures of the individual Dis-
tricts and always include (1) BOND INTEREST AND REDEMPTION FUND, (2) OPERATING
FUND and (3) ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND. Some Districts may have more than
one bond fund for different bond issues and may also have other fixed obligation funds. The expendi-
tures out of the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds are, of course, fixed and thus are not subject to
Board of Directors control and, therefore, will not be discussed further in this report.
The balance of this report will instead be focused on controllable expenditures. It should be
emphasized, particularly for new Directors, that these controllable expenditures are carefully reviewed
by the Executive Committee of the Directors, as described in more detail below, before submission
to the Boards as a whole.·
OPERATING AND ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS
In contrast to the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds, expenditures in the Operating and Ac-
cumulated Capital Outlay classifications are controllable and the decisions, which to a large measure
affect these expenditures, are reached at the June meeting of each year.
The reason decisions must be reached at the June meeting is that prior to the adoption of the
formal District's budgets in July, firm figures must be approved for operation and capital outlay for
the Joint Treatment Works. These latter expenditures comprise a large portion of the formal Dis-
trict's budgets and, as stated above, are controllable.
The seven Sanitation Districts, which jointly own and operate the treatment and disposal facilities,
are required by the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958 to contribute
to the operation of the Joint Works and to the construction of new works or the expansion of old
works by formulas set forth in this Agreement. Consequently, it is necessary to arrive at a total
figure for both operating expense and construction expense for all the Districts involved in the
Joint Works in order that this formula may be applied to determine the contribution of each District
to this total which contribution is then fed into the official individual District's budgets.
-1-
Procedures for developing and adopting the total projected operating and construction expendi-
tures for the Joint Works are explained below under these respective captions.
JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE
All but a small portion of this expense is raised by ad valorem tax in the individual Districts.
The total requirements for each fiscal year, together with the breakdown of the individual items of
expenditures and the individual District's contribution to the total, are submitted to the Directors for
approval at the June meeting. This budget is prepared during May.
As is the case with all public agencies, a large proportion of our operating expense is for salaries
and wages-approximately 50%. However, this includes considerable labor not chargeable to joint
operations. In addition to operation and maintenance of the Joint Treatment Works, our staff is
responsible for operation and maintenance of the individual District's trunk sewers and pumping
plants as well as incidental construction work in the Districts and at the plants. In effect then, we
operate a service organization supplying labor and services to the individual Districts (including
Sewer Maintenance Districts) as well as the Joint Works. For convenience this labor, not charge-
able to joint operations, is included with our Joint Operating Budget and charged out as needed
during the year.
In the preparation of the total figure for joint operating expense, the staff, as is true in any bud-
get, must estimate expenditures in the various classifications for next year and, in addition, must
estimate the sewage flow to be expected from each District during the coming year.
The necessity of the latter estimate is the provision in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Con-
struction Agreement that each District is required to contribute to the total joint operating expense
in proportion to its sewage flow. Since the latter, of course, will not be known exactly until 13
months later, it must be estimated ahead of time in order that sufficient funds will be included in
the individual District's budgets to provide for the eventual individual contributions. Therefore, the
total of estimated joint operating expense is divided by the estimated total of all flow reaching the
treatment plants to arrive at an estimated cost of treating and disposing of a unit quantity of sew-
age. This unit cost (in our case, dollars per one million gallons) which we refer to as ''Gallonage
Charge" is then multiplied by the estimated sewage flow of each District in million gallons to arirve
at the total expected District's contribution in dollars to joint operating expenses.
Budget review of our joint operating expense by the Executive Committee of the Directors is
provided for in our regulations. This Committee is composed of the Chairman of each individual
District and will meet between the May and June regular Board meetings to review the staff's recom-
mendations as to operating expenses prior to submission to all Directors prior to the June meeting.
The figures thus distributed to the Joint Boards in June will have been reviewed by the Executive
Committee and any changes in the staff's recommendations desired by the Committee will be incor-
porated in the figures submitted to the Joint Boards.
Since the sewage flow and the assessed valuation of each District will vary, the tax rate neces-
sary for raising funds for JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE will correspondingly vary from District
to District but, usually, it is in the neighborhood of $0.07 per $100 assessed valuation.
JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION EXPENSE
The other major classification of significant District expense is for contribution to the Capital
Outlay Revolving Fund, which we refer to as CORF, from which the necessary joint construction
work is provided to keep abreast of the tremendous growth in population in the Districts. Over the
past few years, this type of expense for all seven Districts has been in the neighborhood of $3.5 million
per year, necessitating a tax rate in the neighborhood of $0.24 per $100 assessed valuation which, again,
is an average figure depending on the individual District's needs and ability as explained below.
Initial capital outlay funds for treatment plants and ocean outfall were provided by the individual
Districts by means of a bond issue passed in 1948. This issue, in all Districts, totalled approximately
$8.3 million of which only a portion was for plant and outfall construction, the rest being for work
inside the individual Districts. The construction work provided by this bond issue was completed in
-2-
1954 and only two years later it became obvious that the explosive growth of the population in the
Districts would soon require additional construction. At that time a firm policy was adopted by all
Districts that in the forseeable future all joint construction work would be paid for out of ad valorem
taxes on a step by step, long-range construction plan. In 1962 such a plan was formally approved by
the Boards, setting forth needed construction .. in detail for five years and guidelines through 1976.
This plan provides for a gradually accelerating construction program for a number of years until the
Districts reach their ultimate growth or cntil 'other methods ·of financing are arrived at by the
Directors. This program correlates increasing expenditttres with growth of assessed valuation, so
that a rather stable tax rate for each year for joint construction can be anticipated. As mentioned pre-
viously, this rate is in the neighborhood of $0.24. This program is working out very satisfactorily
and, in our opinion, should be continued. ·
The 1962 plan adopted contemplates a major expense in the neighborhood of 1970 for the construc-
tion of a new ocean outfall, which will be necessary because our existing 78-inch diameter outfall will,
by then, have reached its maximum hydraulic capacity. Consequently in addition to the normal con-
struction expense for expansion of Joint Treatment Works, a reserve for meeting this large item of
expense was also approved by the Directors in 1962. Funds to augment this reserve will be recom-
mended to be included in the next fiscal year's budget.
In contrast to pro-rating operating expense among the Districts in accordance with current sew-
age flow as explained above, contributions of the individual Districts to joint construction and reserve
funds are computed on a different basis, which is also set forth in the 1958 Joint Ownership, Operation
and Construction Agreement. Prior to the time this agreement was adopted, each District owned a
fixed capacity in one or both of the existing treatment plants and outfall and contributed to con-
struction expense on the basis of this capacity. Owing to a number of reasons, this method of con-
tribution by the Districts proved to be so complicated as to be practically unworkable and resulted in
the renting of capacity by those Districts which had an unused capacity to those Districts not owning
enough capacity. Also complicating the picture, the fixed capacity method was extremely difficult to
apply to new units of treatment works which, ordinarily, have a different capacity than other related
units.
For these reasons the above agreement provides for a simpler and more equitable basis of contri-
bution and employs what we term the "Use and Needs" method. The individual District's annual con-
tribution is obtained by averaging the average assessed valuation for the three most recent years and
likewise averaging the annual District's sewage flow contribution for the past three years and ap-
plying these averages to the total Districts' average flow and assessed valuation to arrive at a percent-
age figure which each District should own in all treatment and disposal works at both plants. This
percentage so calculated is called the "equity percentage" and, as can be seen, takes into account use
(sewage flow) and needs (assessed value). It is used to compute the contribution for each fiscal year
of each District to joint construction expense as well as the credit or debit adjustment of each District
for existing plant.
Prior to arriving at the above percentage of each District's contribution and credit or debit, the
staff and our design engineers estimate the construction needs for the next fiscal year for plant expan-
sion purposes as well as the above-described reserve fund. The percentage contribution of each District
is then estimated on the basis of metered flow from each District for the past ten months period
together with a firm figure for the two years preceding and the firm figure for the three years past
assessed valuation. This percentage for each District is then applied to the total construction and re-
serve needs to arrive at a figure which, when approved, is placed in the individual District's budgets.
This budget, although fairly definitely established by the 1962 long-range plan, is also subject to
review by the Executive Committee at the same time as the joint operating budget as explained
above. Figures for joint construction and reserve expenses for the next fiscal year, as reviewed and
recommended by the Executive Committe, are submitted to the individual District's Directors for
study prior to the June regular Board meeting.
IN-DISTRICT EXPENSE
Most of the foregoing has been a discussion of the Districts' expenditures as related to the jointly
owned treatment works. However, as mentioned previously, each District has controllable expense for
_3_,_
operation and maintenance within the District, as well as necessary capital outlay. Consequently in
each District's official budget, the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds must provide for
In-District expense, unique to the individual District.
Therefore, after the Joint Works requirements for operation and construction have been determined
and fixed at the June meeting, the staff estimates the In-District expense for each District and includes
this in the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds for each District. The sum of these two
controllable items, i.e., joint expense and In-District expense constitutes the requirements for each
District plus the fixed expenditures (Bond Interest and Retirement, etc.). Unexpended funds from the
previous year in each category are used to reduce the requirement figures-the difference represent-
ing the amount to be raised by taxes for each fund.
Prior to mailing the complete budget recommendations for each District to each Director early
in July, the figures are gone over in detail with the individual Board Chairman and with any other
Director wishing an early review.
-4-
....... ' ,_ .. ~---
u
u
May Joint Meeting
Re : Election of #7 Chairman ----Show nominations, written ballot,
t ie bote , dec l are nomin ations open agai n, then show Hi rstein 's election.
(Fred, I think t his i s clear to me -okay?) (I 'll go into it in detail
in the stencil)
#21 -Report o~ the Joint Chairman -The Joint Chairman reported ~
GeRtFe±-on the recent conference
of the Californi a Control Association, which he attended
Mr . Cornwell f urther explained that
San Diego April 28th through May 1 st , was aD.-
~:;i.·~~-r'tl;"t:ttat tlre=i.n'f'tn"'nfa"tWn cover.ed...oa~-tbe me'Bi>1Rg
at the suggestion
the Conference , he l d
had been an inval uab le expe ience, i n that the information obtained
£~M the meeting was very clo e l y related to the Districts ' interests,
-tJAer~-woul a the functions o f the
office of Chairman of the Joint
The Chairman calle d a meeting of t h e E ecutive Committee for 4 :30
p.m ., June 2nd, for the staff 's 1 965 -66
budget recommendations for the
merits. r
.:r ;)·r Ja.-k._
and ca-p-i:ta.;t. improve -
Report of the General Manager -The General Mana er expanded on the \~
\\ f y\ I
Chai rman 's review of the Water Po llution Control onference 0 ~ .al:~
announced that the i nspection trip to view the
.i[/x the Ocean Outfal l Diffuser , Job No . J -2-1 ,
x rescheduled for 9 :00 a .m., Saturday, June 5th .
structi on site
been tentatively
~,tr,5f-B --Ma er d e ferred -:;aJ.f'di ected to secure~e proposals ~a or f o r soi i nvestigati ons :µr'connecti n with Job l!t("J-9 (Ocean OUtfal l
No. -La n d Sec t i on-)~
#51 -Fo llowi ng the reading of a e tter f r om the Ci ty of Anahe i ~
r equesti ng the early c ons t ructio o f t h e proposed District fac i liti es
t o serve the Santa Ana Canyon Ar,a, the Ch air recognized Mr . James
Maddox , City Engi nee r, City of ~a he i m , wh o elaborated on t he com -
munication , and i ndicated the desi r e for the construction of
certai n f ac ilities to serve thi s a rea by 1 966 .
Fo l l owi ng a l engthy di c u ssion b y the Di rectors , i t was
moved , seconded and du l y carrie That the matter be deferred
t o the next regular meeti ng of h e Boards , and that the staff and
t he engineers be directed to su the Boards ' cons i deration,
af\~ on possible mean s of f the facil i t i es reques t ed
by t he City .
#52 -The General Counsel report agreement rel a tive to the
proposed Nohl #3 annexation of t rritory to the District had not been
p r epared ~e , and at s u ch ti e as the agreement was prepared, it
would be mai l ed to the Di rectors or their consideration and study.
#66 -Following the presentation the staff of the proposed ordinance
i ncreasing the connection charges w District , wt was moved,
seconded and duly carried : Counse l be fi i rected to
prepare~an ordinance c~nsolidating Ord ·nance No. 705 , as amended,
inc l uding the connec tion charge i n creas s recommended by the staff .
' • I
#67 -(a fter r e gul ar a ction) FURTHER MOVED : That the staff and
c
the ~ae~s;..be d irecte d,~ conti nue negot iations wi t h t he City
of Santa Ana t o acquire tz~exi st i ng facilit i es owned b y t he Citys
::v~:::: :;::~e , as ou l inedx in t he Engi neer s ' Report dat ed
,.
31 -B -Following consideration of the proposal of LeRoy Crandall
and Associates f or fo undation investigation ~~x services for Job
No . J -9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section).," it was moved, s econded
and duly carried:
~aat -tae -staff -aaa -tae -eagiaeers -ee -aireetea
/
That action on the proposal o f LeRoy Crandall and Associates
"
. ~-· .,/_ ::z.~ / ~ -:-:;7;
. 11 , ~ ~ ,.<,..<. 'A-' <. 1. ~· rn.J. . · · " .,;.c.., ~·-t-·1•..,,,.w...., ·· ·;r "" ;,'!' ;: ~·i .,. ' p
That the staff be .. C!;l'rected tolJobtain proposal s for 7 (~f<-,:..
;:;µ~ ~ founda tion~~'~ services for Job No . J -9 . < t' ,;r.
a,.-i. ~ .,,(_
be def erred; and,
/ . ' . .._ ,.
. (A:. . ~· t~ . J.. I
(
------------------i'---------
By..,-----1---
-+-------·
~-1---------------·--+------
1
--I --------
------t---------
--------~--· -----
.I
ENGINEERING
............ DAYS START-UP
R 0 L L CALL
Date YrJ!q..#--z-1,, L=f"Time £',n jd&
Item~ r?..t;~
District <.~/d/ C ~7~// Regular.~~-----v~~~~~
Adjou rne d~~~~~~~
DISTRICT 1
JOINT BOARDS
mo
E. derson
Bo
Ca l
Cook
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Gr ube r
'.-Iarvey
Hock
Johnson
Kanno
Lambert
Long
Meye rs
Mi ller
Parks
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Stewart
Stoddard
Workman
Wright
Hirste in
OTHERS :
Nelson
Brown
Nissen
Galloway
Dunn
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
-:)--~~
JJ "'-'-~~ -VOV\ d.
~r~ i~~
~ . \ \ \ (t.cA.-~
v
v
/ v
v"'
........-
V"'"
.....
v
\...-
\...
Farnsworth
Gummere
W:t:she-k '/Hemp~ o""
Kanno
Gruber
Shull
De Vries
Elder
G:!.lmore
Michel
Antich
Callens
Shipley
Bell
Mack
Hileman
Ha rvey
Meyers
Miller
Hirstein
Parks
Ca llen§
Co rnwell
Crapo
Culver
Sarvey
Hock
Schutte
Speer
Workman
Hirste i n
Cornwell
Amo
Anderson
Bousman
Crapo
Culver
Furman
a arv ey
Johnson
Ka nno
Long
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Wright
Hirs tein
Stoddard
Gruber
Hirs tein
Mey ers
Gruber
Hi rstein
Cook
aa :·v ey
Meyers
Miller
Parks
Hirs t ein
Lambert
Stewart
Hirste i n
±
V'
1/
Gilmore
Mack
Allen
DISTRICT 2
v Hileman
y" Kanno
1 / Farnsworth
,/ Shull •
b Gi l more , .......... Michel
le-Kreh1
~ Harvey
Quey r e l
Allen
DISTRICT 3 v Farnsworth
~
~ Gummere
v . ~-;~m.pe. ~/II
v Shull
v
,/ De Vri es v Gi l wore
a-Antich
v Ca llens
v Be ll v f(Rfil~ v.-We l ch
1/ Ha r vey
i ./ Noe v Allen
DISTRICT 5
v
v' Elder
v Allen
DISTRICT 6 v v Elde r
v Allen
DISTRICT 7 v Gruber v Gilmo r e
~ Mack
~ Hileman
Allen
DISTRICT 11 v Shipley
a-
\:?' Allen
R 0 L L CAL L
District --------Regular _______ _
Adjourned. _______ _
Date Time -------------------------
Item.~-------------------
JOINT BOARDS
Cornwell
Amo
Anderson
Bousman
Callens
Cook
Crapo
Culver
Furman
Gruber
~-farvey
Hock
Johnson
Kanno
Lambert
Long
Meyers
Miller
Parks
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Stewart
Stoddard
Workman
Wright
Hirste in
OTHERS:
Nelson
Brown
Niss on
Galloway
Dunn
Tremblay
Lowry
Carlson
~ Farnsworth
V'
CL Gummere
1./ ~0..?71'50;\/
../ Kanno
V" Gruber
1/ Shull
-G-De Vries v Elder
~ Gi lmor e v Michel
~ Antich
~ Callens
v Shipley
i/ Bell
i.-/ ,,............ Mack
1 / Hileman
1/ Krein
i--' Welch
./ Harvey
o._ .c v
~ Quey rel
........... Noe
1/ Allen
DISTRICT 8
Mar t in
Scott
Hi r ste in Allen
Harvey
Meyers
Miller
Hi1~stei n
Parks
Callens
Cornwell
Crapo
Culver
:-Iarvey
Hock
Schutte
Speer
Workman
Hirstein
Cornwell
Amo
Anderson
Bousman
Crapo
Culver
Furman
aarv ey
Johnson
Kanno
Long
Schutte
Shipley
Speer
Wright
Hirstein
Stoddard
Gruber
Hirstein
Meyers
Gruber
Hirstein
Cook
aa:·vey
Meyers
Mi lle r
Parks
Hirste in
Lambert
Stewart
Hirstein
DISTRICT 1
Gilmo n::
Mack
Allen
DISTRICT 2
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
DISTRICT
Hi l eman
Kanno
Farnsworth
Shull
Gi l more
Michel
Krein
Harvey
Queyrel
Allen
3
Farnsworth
Gummere
~/.llom)>So/V'
Shull
De Vries
Gi l i.i1ore
Antich
Callens
Bell
Welch
Harvey
Noe
Allen
5
Elder
Allen
6
Elder
Allen
DISTRICT 7
Gruber
Gilmore
Mack
Hileman
Allen
DISTRICT 11
Shipley
All en
II
BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
County Sani tation Districts P. 0. Box 5175
of Ora-nge Co unty, California 10844 Ellis Avenue
Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708
DISTRICT No. #1
AGENDA
~-Y.: 5, 1965 at 4:00 p.m.
(1)
(2) of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
(3) Report e General Manag e r
(4) Consideration of motion re : Di recting the Secretary to -~Q.LA
open and read sealed bids r e cei ved for Digester and ~~.a
(5)
(6)
(7)
(8)
(9)
Surge Tower Sa dblci,sting and Epoxy Coating, Specification \~
#PW -020, pursu nt to legal noti ces published as required
by law
Consideration of
Specification #F'W-
Purchas i ng Officer
the Board
to t he General Manager and the V~
re : Referring bids received for \~~i
tabulation and recommendation to
ConsideTation of
Highways that the Dis
Dyer Street Trunk .
Consideration of claim
1965, for da.rJages in the
of claim in folders)
from the State Division of
t abandon a porti on of the
i n fol ders) ~JI"
ovee and Cra.il1 dated April 20 , ~
amount of ~8,755 .49. (Copy ~~
~-(, "'f' • .-v t · t-fY'-x~
ations, if any
Consideration of motion re
IA.A
lt_.1 o! Adjournment 1 ./
#1 meeting
Harvey -pro tem
#6 R & F letter from Division of "ghways (explain request more fully).
Following a discus sion of
request contained in sai d letter,
(copy from Brown 's l e e ter ).
matter and consideration o f t he
was move d , seconded and duly carried :
#7 R & F Bovee & Crail letter from attorneys), contai ning
claim for damages (explain).
It was then moved , seconded and dul carried : That sai d letter
be received and ordered f iled ; that the claim
damages be denie d; and that the Secretary
to the Di strict 's Insurance carrier .
and Crail for
Date
R 0 L L CALL
Ad journed __ ~-~,-~--M eetin g
~/} c4 /"' I µ)' S !9&> Time$!}J._
Item ~ UL{
t> z::::::::
DI STR I CT 1
ao.rvey
Meyers
Miller
~ Gilmore
Ill"
"' Mack
Hi rs te in -"'""tt __
DI STRI CT 7
~~~(y
Mey t r
Mi l J.l
P a!f~
Hi ste i n ---
Allen
OTHERS :
Nelson
Brown
Nisson
Rimel
Hohener
Lowry
Finster
Gal l ow ay
Car l son
p BOARDS OF DIRECTORS
II
County Sanitation Districts
of Orange County, California 10844 fllis Aven ue
Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708
(1)
(2)
(3)
DISTRICT No. # 11
AGENDA
7:00 p.m., May 4, 1962
City Hall, Huntington Beac h, California
I
of Chairman pro tern, if necessary
Report of
Consideratio of motion re: Granting an extension of
time of 60 da s to the engineers for preparation of
plans and spe 'fications for Contract No. 11-9 (Edinger
Avenue Gravity ewer and Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift
Station), under c'\..ntract dated November 12, 1964.
Consideration of Reso ution No. 65-62-11 re: Approving
and adopting plans and specifications for the Edinger
Avenue Gravity Sewer an Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift
Station, Contract No. 11 ; and authorizing advertising
for bids to be received ... \ I '( {., f l i...., •
\ See page 11 A11
/ 14 :...-~
fr' 0 J -/7 r· , -:1-1 ·-c r-\:.. .:. , --t ( t ._.~ <-... L -s-<-t ._ ~ ~ , ~ r-._,0 .......-
( 6) Consideration of Resolution No. 65-61-11 re: Authorizing ~~ ~~
acceptance of a permit from tfie Orange County Flood Control f"\'~
District relative to constructd.~n of Contract No. 11-9 ?i ',[tt'( f
and authorizing execution of sai~ permit. See page 1B11
/; / _/. tt..4' I/ '71.~
Report of the staff on propose ~ withdrawal of territory
from the District.
(7)
\
(8) Other business and communicatio'l:is, if any
(9 ) Consideration of motion re:
\ ro ~ vt\
Adjournment fl:'\
>
RESOLUTION NO . 65-62-11
APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
CONTRACT NO. 11-9
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS
OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND
ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR
EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND EDINGER
AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION, CONTRACT
NO. 11-9
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 11,
of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER :
Secti on 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and
contract documents this day subm itted to the Boards of Directors for
the EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWE R AND EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT
STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-9, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered
filed in the office of the Secretary ; and ,
Se ction 2. That the Secretary be authori zed and directed
to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of
the Health and Safety Code of the State of Californi a; and ,
Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office
of the Secretary of the District until , -----------------------------
at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read. ~
Ct-..< cft-~ t-~t-·, ,l._OL{ t ~ 1< tv
-A-
RESOLUTION NO. 65-61-11
AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT FROM THE
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF
COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING
ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY
FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT
The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District
No. 11, of Orange County, California,
DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER:
Section 1. That the certain Permit #07665 from the
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, wherein that District grants
to County Sanitation District No. 11 permission to install and
maintain certain sewerage facilities (Contract No. 11-9) in Flood
Control right of way of the Westminster Channel easterly of Graham
Street, is hereby approved and accepted; and,
Section 2. That the Chairman of the Board of Directors
of County Sanitation District No. 11 is hereby authorized to
execute said permit on behalf of the District.
-B-
#11 Meeting
R & F Engineer 's Esti mate
#7 The Board discussed the propose withdrawal of territory
(Exclusion No . 1 ) from the
Hun ting Harbour Annexati on
d i scussion it was MS&DC :
That the Secretary
County Assessor , Cou nty of
District( which is a small portio n of the
#5 datel June 27 , 1962 . Following the
be authofized and d i rected to contact the
Orange , ~nd submit a r e quest t-ft~r
, I
DISTRICT NO . 11
Lambert
Stewart
Hirstein
-;"')
\:. " 2
Lambert
Stewart
Hirstein
~p
'f--L-z '-
Lambert
Stewart
Hirstein
v
17
ll..
t..'
"' I:.
,<._
Shipley
Allen
l J--l,, l -
Shipley
Allen
t\--l J-1/
k Shipley
Allen
I I