Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1965-05BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California P. 0 . Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) ( 6) (7) (8 ) DISTRICT No. #5 AGENDA MAY 24TH, 1965, 10:00 A.M. City Hall, Newport Beach, California Roll of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of General Manager A · . ~ t ,f--'1J'.,P«" s · Report of Counsel !J,c-.·oI"" t.C. v·~ ~ f"' : ~~.j....,. 1 Q .:J I'/ 1}:-i(.,._e-''-, Consideration of esolution No . 65-79 -5 re: Approving r plans and speciff ~ti ons for Coast Highway Trunk Sewer ~ and Bay Bridge Pumpi~g Stati0n, Contract No. 5-12. See Page 11 A11 • Consideration of motion r : Adoption of Ordinance *~·, V r"-No. 502 entitled, 11 An Or ·nance Providing Rules and ~\) Regulations Relating to C nnections to District '~J. ~ Sewerage Facilities, Estab ishing Charges Therefor ~ and Providing Penalties fo Violations , and Repealing Ordinance No. 501 11 • {Copy f Ordinance in folder). Consideration of Resolution o. 65-80-5 re: Authoriz- ing execution of agreement w·th City of Newport Beach entitled, "Agreement for Col ection of Sewer Connection Charges" • See Page "B" (Copy of Agreement in folder). Consideration of draft agreeme Company entitled, "Agreement for Connection Charges". folder). with The Irvine ncerning Prepayment of Agreement in M,> ~!''\ (9) Consideration of motion re: Approval of warrants, as follows: ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTIAY FUND #2191 #2192 The Irvine Company Simpson & Stevlingson $17,435.10 1,623.90 $19,059.00 i I ~ .... ,_~ n , v'>' ~U'lt~110 ) Other business and communication$, if any d~\.L~ (11) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment {~\fa'\ \ \'.~ RESOLUTION NO. 65-79-5 ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 5-12 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER AND BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications, and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Simpson & Stevlingson, District's Engineers, for the COAST HIGHWAY TRUNK SEWER AND BAY BRIDGE PUMPING STATION, CONTRACT NO. 5-12, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise fQr bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District at a time and date to be determined by the General Manager. -A- RESOLUTION NO. 65-80-5 APPROVING AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO, 5, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement with the City of Newport Beach, providing for the collection of sewer connection charges established by Ordinance No. 502, be approved; and, Section 2. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the Board of Directors are hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District as prepared by the General Counsel. -B- A~ '" Agenda lterw No :Z AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF SEWER CONNECTION CHARGES DRAFT May 19, 1965 THIS AGREEMENT, made in the City of Newport Beach, California, by and between the City of Newport Beach, a munici.pal corporation, hereinafter called "City", and County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, hereinafter called "District", W I T N E S S E T H: _ .... ___ .... _____ _ WHEREAS, District has by the enactment of Ordinance No. 502 established a schedule of sewer connection charges; and WHEREAS, City is entirely contained within the territorial limits of District; and WHEREAS, all of the improved territory of the District is also within the city limits of City; and WHEREAS, the City by and through its building department regulates all new construction within the City; and WHEREAS, it is for the mutual benefit of City and Dis- trict that the sewer connection charges provided for in said Ordinance No. 502 of the District be collected in a manner most expedient and least burdensome on the owners of property within the City; and WHEREAS, the City will benefit by the construction and maintenance of sewerage facilities of the District within the city limits of City by District from the funds to be collected from said sewer connection charges. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. City as agent will and does hereby agree to issue permits and collect the charges established by District under said Ordinance No. 502. 2. City will account for the charges collected and remit to District on a regular basis not less frequently than quarterly the monies so collected. 3. District does hereby appoint and nominate City and its agents and employees as the same may be designated by City as agents of the District for the purpose of issuing permits and determining the sewer connection charges established under Ordi- nance No. 502 and collecting the same. This does not authorize City to act as agent for the General Manager or to perform the duties of the General Manager of the District as set forth and established in said Ordinance No. 502, except as expressly set forth in this Agreement. ~ ~ This Agreement may be terminated by either party giving ninety (90) days written notice to the other party desig- nating a tennination date, which date shall be the first day of a calendar month. This Agreement shall become effective on the --- day of , 1965. ------ (SEAL) (SEAL) CITY OF NEWPORT BEACH, a municipal corporation By ______________________________ _ By~----------------------------- CITY, co~rrry SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5, of Orange County, California, a public corporation By ~~----~~--~~~~--:o-------C hair man, Board of Directors By-=-----------~----_,_~-----------Sec re tary, Board of Directors DISTRICT. -2- Agenda Item Mo1_$ __ _ AGREEMENT CONCERNING PREPAYMENT FOR CONNECTION CHARGES DRAFT May 19, 1965 THIS AGREEMENT, made in the City of Santa Ana, California, by and between County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, hereinafter called 11 District 11 , and The Irvine Company whose business address is P. O. Box 37, Irvine, California, hereinafter called 11 Irvine 11 , W I T N E S S E T H: WHEREAS, by Ordinance No. 502 heretofore adopted, the District has established a system of sewer connection charges to be collected and used for the purposes of acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other purposes described in Section 5474.9 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and WHEREAS, District does not have sufficient funds to construct sewerage facilities required within certain a r eas of the District at this time; and WHEREAS, Irvine is desirous of developing certain of its property within the areas of the District which are not sufficiently served by sewerage faci lities at this time. NOW, THEREFORE, it is mutually agreed as follows: 1. Th at District will collect and keep in a separate account sewer connection charges as established in its Ordinance No. 502 arising and originating from t erritory with in the District which is set forth by description and map as Exhibit "A" attached here to and made a part hereof. 2. I rvine agrees to pay in advance and upon the execution of this Ag reement a sum of money not to exceed $310,000 .00 to District as a prepayment of sewer connection charge s for the territory described in Exhibit "A". In this connection Irvine undertakes to prepay an amount not less than $250,000.00 if requested by the District and does not obligate itself by this Agreement to prepay more than $250,000.00 as a prepayment of such charges. Irvine reserves the right to designate and advise the District in writing from time to time of what construction projects within the territory descri.bed in Exhibit "A" they desire to apply for credit of said prepaid charges. 3. District agrees to accept said monies from Irvine as a prepayment of connection charges to become due on construction within the territory described in Exhibit "A" in accordance with Section 2 above. 4. District agrees to maintain in a separate account all connection charges collected or to become due within the territory described in Exhibit "A" for the purpose of using up the credit due Irvine by reason of its prepayment of charges as hereinabove provided. This shall not be taken to mean District does not have the right within its own discretion of repaying to Irvine money advanced as prepaym_ent of charges in lieu of credit for sewer connection charges. 5. It is acknowledged that District owes to Irvine the sum of $61,703.45 under the provisions of that certain agreement by and between the District and The Irvine Company dated February 11, 1959 (Jamboree Road Trunk Sewer) and it is agreed that said agreement be and it is hereby terminated effective July 1, 1965, and the monies due and owing to Irvine as aforesaid in the sum of $61,703.45 are hereby added as a further credit on prepayment of Irvine under the provisions of this Agreement and in addition to any and all other monies hereinabove provided for. That said monies may be used as a credit as prepaid sewer connection charges or .repaid to Irvine in cash at the option of the District. -2- 6. The effective date of this Agreement is June 1, 1965. {SEAL) (SEAL) COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 5 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA a public corporation By __ --=--..------=---.------=-----.-------Ch airman, Board of Directors By~-..---------=-----~~-----~~--S e c re ta ry, Board of Directors DISTRICT THE IRVINE COMPANY a West Virginia corporation By ______ ~------------------------- By------------------~------------- IRVINE -3- Agenda Item No._.,..ftz __ ._ DRAFT May 19, 1965 ORDINANCE NO. 502 AN ORDINANCE PROVIDING RULES AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO CONNECTIONS TO DISTRICT SEWERAGE FACILITIES, ESTABLISHING CHARGES THEREFOR AND PROVIDING PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS, AND REPEAL- ING ORDINANCE NO. 501. The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California, does ordain as follows: ARTICLE 1 Ordinance No. 501 entitled "An Ordinance Providing Rules and Regulations Relating to Connections to District Trunk Sewers" is hereby repealed. ARTICLE 2 -DEFINITIONS For the purposes of this ordinance, certain words and terms are defined as follows: (a) Connection Manhole. Shall mean a manhole constructed in the main line of a District trunk or subtrunk sewer not as a part of the original construction, or a manhole built adjacent thereto, for the purpose of permitting sewage to flow into a District sewer. (b) District Connection ChaFge. Is a connection charge imposed by District No. 5 as a charge for the use of District's sewerage facilities whether such connection is made directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewer which ultimately discharges into a District sewerage facility. (c) District Sewerage Facility. Shall mean any property belonging to County Sanitation District No. 5 used in the treatment, transportation or disposal of sewage or industrial wastes. (d) Domestic Sewage. Shall mean the waterborne wastes derived from the ordinary living processes which are of such volume and character as to permit satisfactory disposal into a public sewer. , (e) Industrial Waste. Shall mean any and all liquid or solid waste substance, not sewage, from any producing, manufactur- ing or processing operation of whatever nature. (f) Industrial Waste Treatment Plant or Facility. Shall mean any works or device for the treatment of industrial waste prior to its discharge into the District sewerage facilities. (g) Plumbing Fixture Unit. A plumbing fixture unit as used in this Ordinance is defined as being the same as set forth in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach, on March 24, 1965, a copy of which is on file in the office of the Secretary of the District. (h) Pretreatment. Shall mean treatment prior to dis- charge into a District sewerage facility by means of an industrial waste treatment plant or facility. {i) Public Corporation. Shall mean any city, district or public agency (other than County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County), duly authorized and existing under the laws of the State of California. (j) Sewerage Facilities. Are any facilities used in the collection, transportation, treatment or disposal of sewage and industrial wastes. (k) Single Family Dwelling. A single family dwelling is defined as a building containing only one kitchen designed for or used to house not more than one family including all necessary employees of such family. (1) Trunk Sewer Manholes. Shall mean those manholes constructed as a part of the District's sewer system. ARTICLE 3 -PERMIT REGUIATIONS (a) Requirements. No person or public corporation shall be permitted to connect to, use or maintain a connection to the -2- -p sewerage facilities of the District without a valid permit. This shall mean that all new construction occurring within the bounda- ries of the District from and after the effective date of this ordinance shall be required to have a valid permit from County Sanitation District No. 5 before it can connect to a sewerage facility or discharge sewage or industrial waste into a sewerage facility within the District. {b) Condition Precedent. No permit shall be valid unless the real property to be sewered by use of the permit shall be in- cluded within the boundaries of County Sanitation District No. 5 and within the boundaries of a public corporation authorized to maintain public sewerage works. ( c) Permit. (1) The permit shall be in two parts: First a connection permit for the purpose of authorizing connection to a District sewerage facility or sewerage facility subject to a District connection charge as hereinabove defined under conditions set forth in said permit; and secondly, a use permit for dis- charging sewage and industrial wastes into District sewerage facilities in accordance with the rules, regulations and ordinances of the District as to characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage. (2) The use permit may prescribe requirements as to a connection manhole, an industrial waste treatment plant or facility, or pretreatment, all to insure compliance with the District regulations as to characteristics, quality and quantity of sewage and industrial wastes. Any such requirements shall be set forth in the permit by the General Manager. -3- - .! (3) Surcharges for Use Permit. The District hereby establishes the quantity of 7,500 cubic feet of non-residential sewage or industrial waste per month per acre of territory served as the maximum allowable effluent to be discharged into the District's sewerage facilities without the payment of surcharges. Each user discharging more than 7,500 cubic feet of non-residential sewage or industrial wastes per month per acre shall be charged $0.50 per 1,000 cubic feet or any portion of 1,000 cubic feet in excess of the 7,500 cubic feet maximum. Measure- ments may be required by the permittee, or permittee's effluent may be considered equivalent to the water or some portion of the water (excepting irrigation water) purchased or used by the permittee. Per- mittee shall upon demand provide District with his or its water usage records. (4) All existing permits shall be modified or amended to comply with the provisions of this ordi- nance. (d) Suspension of Use Permit. The second part of the permit may be suspended if a permittee is acting in violation of any provision of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regu- lations of the District thirty (30) days after receiving a formal written notice of such violation and a demand for correc- tion thereof from the District. Such formal written notice shall be given only upon recommendation of the General Manager and approval of the Directors of the District. No formal written notice of violation shall be authorized unless the General Manager of the District has first given an informal written notice of violation to the subject -4- permittee at least fifteen (15) days in advance of action by the Board of Directors. (e) Violation. For each day or part of a day a permittee whose permit has been suspended continues to discharge sewage or industrial wastes into a District sewerage facility in violation of the permit or of the ordinances, rules or regulations of the District, he or it shall be charged the sum of ten percent {10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit. The same noticing procedure set forth hereinabove shall apply for intermittent or sporadic violators; and in lieu of a suspension of permit, the District Directors may impose a fine of not less than ten percent (10%) of the District connection charge applicable to his or its permit per day or any part of a day for intermittent violations. Notwithstanding the foregoing, if the violation of a permittee causes damage to the sewerage facilities of the Dis- trict, the District shall have the right to charge and collect for the damages to its facilities caused by such violations by an action of law. In all cases a formal notice of violation as herein- above provided for shall set forth the fine or other charges to be imposed for violations after the thirty (30) day correction period. {f) Procedure to Acquire Permit. An applicant for a permit or his agent shall make application on a form furnished by the District or an agent designated to act for the District. The permit application shall be supplemented by such plans, speci- fications or other information considered pertinent in the.judgment of the General Manager of the District. The permit fees and charges as hereinafter described shall be paid to the District or an agent designated to act for the District. -5- (g) Disposition of Charges. All surcharges and penalties under this Article, when collected, shall be deposited in the District 1 s Operating Fund. ARTICLE 4 -PERMIT CHARGES The District connection charge shall be determined as follows: (a) A charge of $120.00 per unit for all new single family dwellings within the District. {b) All other new construction including but not limited to multiple family dwellings, commercial, industrial and public building construction shall be charged a connection fee in accord- ance with the number of plumbing fixture units contained within such construction. The connection fee shall be calculated to be equivalent to $7.00 per plumbing fixture unit with a minimum established fee of $120.00 per connection permit. A schedule of such charges will be on file in the office of the Secretary of the District and in the office of the Building Department of the City of Newport Beach and will be based on plumbing fixture unit equivalents as defined and specified in the Western Plumbing Officials Uniform Plumbing Code, 1964 Edition, as adopted by the City of Newport Beach on March 24, 1965. (c) Payment of a sewer connection fee shall be required at the time of the issuance of the building permit for all con- struction within the District excepting in the case of a building legally exempt from the requirement of obtaining a building permit in the City of Newport Beach (e. g. public schools). The payment of the sewer connection fee for such buildings will be required at the time of and prior to the issuing of a plumbing connection permit for any construction within the territorial limits of the District. -6- ARTICLE 5 -FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND There is hereby established the Facilities Revolving Fund of the District. All charges as established by Article 4 hereof, when collected, shall be deposited in said Fund. Said Fund may have one or more accounts within itself to be used for the pur- poses of accounting for the sewer connection fees originating in various territorial areas of the District. Said Fund shall be used only for the acquisition, construction, reconstruction, maintenance and operation of sewerage facilities and other pur- poses described in Section 5474.9 of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California. ARTICLE 6 -INTERPRETATION OF PERMIT REGUIATIONS If the factual situations presented do not follow precisely within the rules herein promulgated in this Article, the General Manager shall interpret them in a reasonable manner. In making such interpretations, the General Manager shall be guided by the policy of the District, which is hereby stated as follows: It is the policy of the Directors of the District to base fees and charges in accordance with the benefits and uses supplied by the District. Those receiving the greatest benefits and most use of the facilities provided by the District shall proportionately bear more of the costs and expenses of the District. ARTICLE 7 -APPEAL If an applicant disagrees with the requirements directed by the General Manager in Article 5, he or it may appeal by written notice stating his or its grievance. The Board of Directors shall hear such appeal at its regular meeting next occurring fourteen (14) days after the filing of such written appeal or sooner at the pleasure of the Directors. The decision of the Directors shall be final. ARTICLE 8 -PENALTIES AND VIOIATIONS For each day or part of a day that any person, governmental agency or public corporation is without a valid permit and is con- nected directly to a District sewerage facility or to a sewerage -7- facility which discharges into a sewerage facility, he or it shall be liable to the District in a sum equal to ten percent (10%) of the permit charge applicable to the property so connected. ARTICLE 9 -ENFORCEMENT The provisions of this ordinance may be enforced by civil action at law and/or by injunction. In this connection these regulations shall be construed as a contract by County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, and each permittee~ ARTICLE 10 -VALIDITY If any article, section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this ordinance, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be held to be invalid for any reason, such invalidity shall not affect the validity of any other provision or application of any of the remaining provisions or portions of this ordinance; and to this end the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5, of Orange County, California hereby declares that it would have adopted this ordinance and each and every article, section, subsection, sentence, clause and phrase thereof irrespective of the fact that any one or more other articles, sections, subsections, sentences, clauses or phrases, or the application of any thereof to any person, entity, public corporation or circumstance be declared invalid. ARTICLE 11 -EFFECTIVE DATE The Chairman of the Board of Directors shall sign this Ordinance and the Secretary of the District shall attest thereto and certify to the passage of this Ordinance, and shall cause the same to be published once in the ---------------------------------' a newspaper of general circulation, printed, ------------------------- published and circulated in County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California, within fifteen (15) days after the date of the passage of this ordinance by said Board of Directors, and said ordinance shall take effect thirty (30) days after its adoption -8- by the Board of Directors of said County Sanitation District. PASSED AND ADOPTED by the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 5 of Orange County, California at a regular meeting held on the day of , 1965. Chairman of the Board of Directors ATTEST: Secretary of the Board of Directors -9- #5 Mr . Donald Simpson f Si mpson & Stevlingson, for t e Directors engineers , reviewed/the lans ~or the Coast Highway Trunk Sewer and Stati on . It was then MS&D C: (adoption #6 Counse~ draft of a proposed ordinance to the Di re tors for considerat~ Following a discussion, some change revisions were made in the tA ~ ll'.~,,... •• c~ f,;JJXoft . (then show adoption o ~ ~ ll'c , .~) ES&:OQ:: u.. , "f> a r1. (.,U ,, • 1.11. -' I . ~ / .. l ,L : ~ 1 ~ L. (' • ')~"'l ,..c /~..... . n-f'""'" ' .. "') • jl'hat the~eng in eer~be instru cted t o prepare #8 , ;. y ref erred a g eneral description of the~area ±~xRN.RM in the agre ement ~ence~ing~T,~ayment ·'r t! #8 -Fo llowing a discussion of the proposed agreement with The Irvine Company , it was MS&DC : That the District 's engineers , Si mpson & Stevlin gson, be instructed to prepare an exhibit to the agre ement containi ng a general des cription o f the prepayment area referred to in sai d agreement . I I - ROLL CALL Adjourned ___ v _____ Meeting Date.~--~----~~~~-·----~-~-----------Time ID·,"~ ~ ~ Item;__ ________________________ __ ("' r-~o,...':> OJ, /o L-i ~,... ~ l ~---/ c; -~ ,,----------DISTRICT 5 v-~ Stoddard .. v.: .. ~ v---v Gruber v Elder V' . . . . . . . v ~ Hirstein ~ Allen / ....... OTHERS: ~ CITY Anaheim Buena Park Brea Cypress Fountain Valley MAYOR Fred T. Krein Jesse M. Davis Robert A. Clark Frank P. Noe Robert Schwerdtfeger Robert Schwerdtfeger Fullerton Glen G. Walters La Habra Leonard Crapo La Palma Peter Bouma Los Alamitos William S. Brown Hun~ington Beach Jake R. Stewart Jake R. Stewart (Council Member) Ted Bartlett Newport Beach Paul J. Gruber (Council Member) Lindsley Parsons Orange Jack C. Hileman Placentia Victor Michel Seal Beach John Nescher Stanton Harry L. Miller Tustin Gerald Mack Santa Ana Harry Harvey Villa Park James Workman SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER ALTERNATE DISTRICT A. J. Schutte 2,3 Harold Bousman 3 Thomas Speer 2,3 Richard Bowen 3 Jim Kanno 2 Donald Fregeau Burton Herbst Dean Shull Paul Furman Charles Long Alvin Coen Jack Green None Al Forgit None Rex A. Parks James Hock None appointed Frank Kohl Clifton Miller 3 2,3 2.,3 3 3 11 3 11 5,6,7 5 2,7 2 3 3 1,7 Thomas McMichael 1,2,3,7 None appointed 2 DISTRICT Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers 1,6,7 2,3 Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver ~ddway City Sanitary District Lowell Amo 3 COUNTY AREAS MEMBER ALTERNATE DISTRICT Chairman of Board of Supervisors Alton E. Allen Supv. Wm. Hirstein All -F- CITY Anaheim Buena Park Brea Cypress Fountain Valley MAYOR Fred T. Krein Jesse M. Davis Robert A. Clark Frank P. Noe Robert Schwerdtfeger Robert Schwerdtfeger Fullerton Glen G. Walters La Habra Leonard Crapo La Palma Peter Bouma Los Alamitos William S. Brown Huntington Beach Jake R. Stewart Jake R. Stewart (Council Member} Ted Bartlett Newport Beach Paul J. Gruber (Council Member) Lindsley Parsons Orange Jack C. Hileman Placentia Victor Michel Seal Beach John Nescher Stanton Harry L. Miller Tustin Gerald Mack Santa Ana Harry Harvey Villa Park James Workman SANITARY DISTRICT MEMBER ALTERNATE DISTRICT A. J. Schutte 2,3 Harold Bousman 3 Thomas Speer 2,3 Richard Bowen 3 Jim Kanno 2 Donald Fregeau Burton Herbst Dean Shull Paul Furman Charles Long Alvin Coen Jack Green None Al Forgit None Rex A. Parks James Hock None appointed Frank Kohl Clifton Miller 3 2,3 2.,3 3 3 11 3 11 5,6,7 5 2,7 2 3 3 1,7 Thomas McMichael 1,2,3,7 None appointed 2 DISTRICT Costa Mesa Sanitary District Arthur H. Meyers 1,6,7 2,3 Garden Grove Sanitary District Norman Culver Midway City Sanitary District Lowell Amo COUNTY AREAS Chairman of Board of Supervisors MEMBER Alton E. Allen -F- ALTERNATE Supv. Wm. Hirstein 3 DISTRICT All • II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 9 2708 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA MAY 1 2, 1965 AT 8 :00 P.M . (1) Pledge of (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) cEV (11) (12) (13) (14) (15) (16) Roll Call Appointments f Chairmen pro tern, if necessary Consideration f motion re: Receive and file minute excerpts rega ding appointments of Directors and Alternates to the Districts' Boards. DISTRICT 1 Annual election Chai:\nan of the Board DISTRICT 2 Annual election Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 3 Annual election o Chairman of the Board DISTRICT 5 J .I Annual election of of the Board DISTRICT 6 --~~ Annual election of of the Board DISTR ICT 7 ";,.J.--: ~:9 Gc e-1 Annual election of of the Board C:;:e Q -e e::= DISTRICT 11 I \ ~ Annual election of o:i!1~ t~ f'1-I ....~ ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of the Joint Administrative Organization I C..t~~{.{ ALL DISTRICTS Annual election of Vice Organization -' 1°"'1 .... ;--\ Chairman of the Joint Administrative '\:,~ DISTRICT 1 I Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held Apr~·1 14, 1965, and the adjourned regular meeting th reof held May 5, 1965, as mailed \ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April 14, q965, as mailed DISTRICT 3 Cons ideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of regular meeting hel n Apr·i 1 lh, 19(\~, as mailed \ ... (17) (18) (19) (20) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of otion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meetin held April 14, 1965, and the adjourned regular m eting thereof held April 26, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motio re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held A_ril 14, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held Apri 14, 1965, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof he d April 15, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held April l~ 1965, and the adjourned regular meeting thereof held ay 4, 1965, as mailed L1.· , \_-1-~_j.<1.. ~ v.)/~1. '~vJ~ ... A.( 1 ALL DISTRICTS lllr ~ .,--· _fJ Report of the Joint Chairman { tt--'-\') ~ C.,.\""vt. ~~ ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager (23) ALL DISTRICTS (24) (25) (26) (27) (28) Report of the General Counsel ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolution No. 65-63 re: Approving and adopting plans and specifi ations for Job No. I-6-2 (Additions to Plant No . 1 Eff ent Discharge Facilities Structures); and authorizing dvertising for bids. See page 11 F'' · ~~ ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: thorizing issuance of a JL- purchase order to Fischer & Po ter Company in the total ~¥-' amount of $6,991.00, plus appl~ able sales and use taxes, ' for an 8,000 PPD Chlorinator, porator, and appurtenances ALL DISTRICTS roval of Change Order #2 for Job No. P2-7-l (Ins tal- No. 2), authorizing a he contract with John Ward II G" Consideration of motion re: Ap to the plans and specifications lation of Steam Turbine at Plan total addition of $1,32~.0l to Company, Contractor. See page ---- ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: Ap of Change Order #1 ~ t~~ to the plans and specifications for Job No. I-6-1 (Addition CJ.Jf , to Plant 1 Effluent Discharge cili ties -Pipeline), ~ ci"'11 c.. ., authorizing a total deduction o $1,361.24 from the contract with Vinnell Corporation, Cont iactor. See page "H" ALL DISTRICTS \ L Consideration of motion re: R ceive and file Quarterly / { J Report submitted by Hanson, Pe erson, Cowles & Sylvester, ;t.ri vt Certified Public Accountants, or the period ending March ~·..,,,/ '-'-' 31st, 1 965 ~}JAP -2- • (29) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: ceive and file certi fication of the General Manager that he as checked all bills appear- ing on the agenda, found them order, and that he recommends authorization for payment (30) ALL DISTRICTS J, 1J/t/~ Consideration of roll call vote m tion re: Approval of ~ · Joint Operating Fund and Capital utlay Revolving Fund i,J~· warrant books for signature of th Chairman of District 1, J and authorizing payment of claims. See pages "A" , "B" , and 11 C" •. (31) ALL DISTRICTS -\ ~. __ /,,,..,--:/J ;?/-/9 _ ~t,,,11~~ .... bjt~J.n~s and c~· at·ons, if ~ny I ~'~ ~17 <./"r«--YV{--:Z:-~-/ ~(.r -A ,11,/f' ..Y\ (32) DISTRICT 1 ~r_'/1,.v~ ~;· \ Consideration of Reso u ion No. 6 -64-1 re: Receive and . V.J}"' file bid tabulation and recommend tion, and awarding -~.~ (33) (34) f-(35) (36) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) (42) (43) contract for Digester and Surge ower Sandblasting and f- Epoxy Coating, Specification #Fw 020 to Walker Coating Company in the total amount of $ ,676.00. See page 11 I 11 (See page "J" for tabulatio DISTRICT 1 Conside s DISTRICT 1 f ts Other business and communica if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: { Adjournment to 4 :OO p .m., June 2nd 3: 'I& P~ DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 Consideration of motion re: A~proval of Suspense Fund warrants, if any. See page 'D" DISTRICT 3 Consi page ___ _ DISTRICT 3 Other business and communic DISTRICT 3 ~ Consideration of motion ·,DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: to prepare a reimbursement providing for an advance i facilities DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re. any. See page "D" DISTRICT 5 tions, if any ~: -:"1 Adjournment ;J-~;r( , 1) s ·. ,:' 0 ,....,. ~ (vR' \·-'· '- Directing the General Counsel tY f1'-'-" greement with The Irvine Company, aid of cons truction of District's \ i pproval of warrants, i f '~' Other business and commun'cations, if any DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion r Adjournment May 24th ~\....r'"'t 1) (/~ ~.~ 3-~ ~ (45) (46) (47) (48) any. DISTRICT 6 Other business unications, if any DISTRICT 6 'y\\Y"\~,Y:f) Consideration of moti re: Adjournment ' Ir" L~ ,...._,v 'l:5S f-~ DISTRICT 11 Consideration of Res ution No: 65-73 -11 re: Authorizing A 1 ~;J , acceptance of Grant eed and Bill of Sale for the Lake ~ 'y-- Avenue and Ocean Ave ue Trunk Sewers r.ursuant to agreement !\~ dated August 10, 196 • See page "K 1 I\\ DISTRICT 11 Consideration of See page "E" re: Approval of warrants, if a;; .. J-f- (49ku,.v DISTRICT 11 ~ Other business and comm ~50) DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion June 3rd nications , if any c/~ ~ 0~ ¥ ~~o~'~°_ p.m.i c/Y~ / DISTRICT 2 Consideration of letter f the early construction of Santa Ana Canyon area. S DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resoluti and authorizing execution the proposed Nohl #3 anne See page "M" Adjournment the City of he District's page i1L" Anaheim requesting ~· facilities in the (f ~,~ n No. 65-75-2 re: Approving 1/ • of an agreement relative w~\!) ¥ . ation of territory to th ~~\~{. . ~~ (53) DISTRICT 2 (54) Consideration of motion r See page 11 D11 Approval of war~~~,--:Jf... ::_ny. DISTRICT 2 '*' Other busines s and communications, if any ( 55) DISTRICT 2 \ (} '\'\\ % ~si eratio of mo Adjournment (\·. . (56 )1 DISTRICT /\ ... /' Consideration of motion re: Receive and file letter from\/~ v) A./ County Sanitation District No. 14 ; and approving payment >(\' ,,JJ \.e.; -~p )' 1 in the total amount of $27,070.00 from the Accumulated ~ U~ Capital Outlay Fund, in accd rdance with the terms of the ~ Ba s ic Accommodation Agreemertt between Districts 7 and 14. (57) DISTRICT 7 I Consideration o f Resolution No. 65-65-7 re: Approving and adopting plans and specifications for the Walnut Av enue Sub-Trunk Sewer and South Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 7 -2B ; and authorizing advertising for bids . See page "N" .. (58) (59 ) (60) (61) (62 ) (63) (64) (65) DISTR IC T 7 Consideration o f Resolution No. 65 o -7 re : Authorizing the filing of condemnation proce ings for acquisit ion of easements needed in Assessm t District #1 . See page II Q II DISTRICT 7 di Consideration of Resolution N • 65 -67 -7 re : Authorizing v acceptance of easement from uis V. Basic; e t ux, in connection with Assessment D·strict #1, and authorizing ~~ pavment therefor in the tota amount of $500 .00 . See page ~ Yr p11 DISTRICT 7 \t, Cons i deration of Resolution No . 65-68-7 re: Authorizing c,1' ./'J\., acceptance of easement from Cec il J. lf.iarks, et ux , r e lative (/Y to Assessment District #5 -A, and authorizin* payment therefor \.. in the total amount of $1.00 . See page "Q ------ DISTR ICT 7 f ~ Cons ideration of Resolution No. 65 -69-7 re: Authorizing 0 fl(~~ acceptanc e of easement frbm State Mutual Sa vings and Loan \ Associati on relative to 1ract #5840, at no cost to the District. See pag e 11 R 1 DISTRICT 7 I \}... Consideration of Resolution No . 65 -70-7 r e : Authorizing <' acceptance of easement and an agreement for temporary use .) \.A of land from Norman J . Groot, et ux; and authorizing payment ~..,.v for said easement and agreement in the total amount of ~ $1,046 .10. (Re: Contract No . 7 -4-2A) See pag e 11 S 11 DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Re s olution No . 65-71-7 re : Authorizing acceptance of eas e ment and agreement for temporary use of land from Theodore C. Bidlingmaie r, et al; and authorizing payment for said easement and agreement in the total amount of $1,134 .66 . (Re : Contract No . 7-'+-2A) See page "T" DISTRICT 7 Consideration o f Reso ution No . 65-72 -7 re: Au t horizing ~ acceptanc e of easemen from Skyli ne-Panorama , Inc ., in ;)~ · connection with const uction in Ass e ssment Di s trict #1; ~ -·~~ and aut horizing paym t therefor in the total a mo unt of $150 .00 . Se e page 11 u11 DISTR I CT 7 Consideration acceptance o f in connection with As payment for said See page "V" DISTRICT 7 ution No . 65 -74-7 re: Authorizing from James K. Batchelor, e t ux, essment District #1; and authori z ing ent in the tota l amount of $5 7 6 .oo . Consi d e r ation of ordir nee ~IBndi~~ Ordinance 705 , as a inend ed (cop y i n f ol de s ) I\ • l n..t: ~~~Q, -5 - DISTRICT 7 Report and recommendation of the staff and the engineers on the proposed acquisition of the Tustin Avenue Sewer; Consideration of motion re: Receive and f ile written recommendation of the engineers and staff to acquire + Sections A, B, c, and D of the City of San~Jl-Ana 's 7 "/ _ Tustin Avenue Sewer in the amount of $84, 9~4 . 00; and 'i''t/f f 1 directing the Gene r a l Counsel to 'prepare a purchase and sale agreement for the acquisition of said sewer p · in accordance with the recommendation, for th-\. Board 1 s () . ,..-- consideration . (See map enc l osed) ~ . ~ (68) DI STRICT 7 Consi deration of mot i on re: Approval of warrants. See page 11 E" / (69) ..__"1' ,PISTRICT 7 /. ...:::rr'Other business and co unic~tions, if (70) DISTR ICT 7 Consideration of mo June 2nd Adjournment to -6 - '.....__/ '11\RRAN'l' NO • 2048 2049 2050 ft - WARRANT NO. 1989 1990 1991 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 . 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 2043 2044 2045 2046 2047 IN FAVOR OF Larry Fricker Co. Friden, Inc. Robert N. Galloway e ~ e n n 4 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Ace Plastics Acore Drilling Service Jan Alabaster Aladdin Litho & Art Alpine Aromatics, Inc. American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. American Chemical Society American Optical American Wholesale Hardware Co. The Anchor Packing Co. Angelus Paper & Excelsior Products The Arcade Stationers Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc. Atlas Stationers Gerald Baldwin Bank of America Barksdale Valves Bay City Bearing Co. Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. Beckman Instruments, Inc. James G. Biddle Co. Blower Paper Co. Blystone Machinery Rental Co. Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. Broolanart Charles Bruning Co. Buck's Welding Works Bud's Equipment Rental Buena Park Wholesale Electric Burke Engineering Co. Business Equipment Co. C-L Chemical Products Paul Calvo -Surveyor Chemical Exchange Co. William N. Clarke College Lumber Co., Inc. Compressors Incorporated Costa Mesa County Water District John M. Deck -Sales & Service Diesel Control Corporation Dieterich-Post Co. Electric Supplies Distributing Co. Electro Components Distributors, Inc • Jack N. Ellis Enchanter, Inc. Engineering Products Company Engineers Sales-Service Co., Inc. Ensign Products Co. Enterprise Electric Supply Co. Chas. A. Estey, Inc. Marshall Fairres Rimmon C. Fay, Ph.D.. Federal Pacific Electric Co. Fischer & Porter Flair Drafting Service Foster Sand & Gravel Co. Fowler Equipment, Inc. Freemon Newspapers, Inc. French Equipment Rentals -A- $ AMOUNT 90.27 18.oo 96.14 c7 7? AMOUNT 83.27 116.10 19.60 49.92 531.28 50.84 14.oo 8.89 1.02 232.80 67.15 6.41 76.82 37.07 74.35 34.29 216.60 147.83 277.87 23.09 126.33 136.91 9.00 49.79 49.78 36.88 739.87 66.oo 1,045.45 46.37 114.41 44.05 1,111.00 23,132.21 95.32 93.55 2,060.22 4.40 17.96 183.97 13.05 75.92 106.08 7.00 1,100.00 13.10 144.05 146.92 1,408~63 28.91 27.00 600.00 310.00 38.08 377 .13 25.15 323.00 16.69 74.25 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 1989 Ace Plastics $ 83.27 1990 Acore Drilling Service 116.10 1991 Jan Alabaster 19.60 1992 Aladdin Litho & Art 49.92 \wt 1993 Alpine Aromatics, Inc. 531.28 1994 American Bitumuls & Asphalt Co. 50.84 1995 American Chemical Society 14.oo 1996 American Optical 8.89 1997 American Wholesale Hardware Co. 1.02 1998 The Anchor Packing Co. 232.80 1999 Angelus Paper & Excelsior Products 67.15 2000 The Arcade Stationers 6.41 2001 Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc. 76.82 2002 Atlas Stationers 37.07 2003 Gerald Baldwin 74.35 2004 Bank of America 34.29 2005 Barksdale Valves 216.60 2006 Bay City Bearing Co. 147.83 2007 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 277.87 2008 Beckman Instruments, Inc. 23.09 2009 James G. Biddle Co. 126.33 2010 Blower Paper Co. 136.91 2011 Blystone Machinery Rental Co. 9.00 2012 Bomar Magneto Service, Inc. 49.79 2013 Broolanart 49.78 2014 Charles Bruning Co. 36.88 2015 Buck's Welding Works 739.87 2016 Bud's Equipment Rental 66.oo 2017 Buena Park Wholesale Electric 1,045.45 2018 Burke Engineering Co. 46.37 2019 Business Equipment Co. 114.41 2020 C-L Chemical Products 44.05 2021 Paul Calvo -Surveyor 1,111.00 2022 Chemical Exchange Co. 23,132.21 2023 William N. Clarke 95.32 2024 College Lumber Co., Inc. 93.55 2025 Compressors Incorporated 2,060.22 2026 Costa Mesa County Water District 4.40 2027 John M. Deck -Sales & Service 17.96 2028 Diesel Control Corporation 183.97 2029 Dieterich-Post Co. 13.05 2030 Electric Supplies Distributing Co. 75.92 2031 Electro Components Distributors, Inc. 106.08 . 2032 Jack N. Ellis 7.00 2033 Enchanter, Inc. 1,100.00 2034 Engineering Products Company 13.10 2035 Engineers Sales-Service Co., Inc. 144.05 2036 Ensign Products Co. 146.92 2037 Enterprise Electric Supply Co. 1,408.63 2038 Chas. A. Estey, Inc. 28.91 2039 Marshall Fairres 27.00 204o Rimmon c. Fay, Ph.D.. 600.00 2041 Federal Pacific Electric Co. 310.00 2042 Fischer & Porter 38.08 2043 Flair Drafting Service 377.13 2044 Foster Sand & Gravel Co. 25.15 2045 Fowler Equipment, Inc. 323.00 2046 Freemon Newspapers, Inc. 16.69 2047 French Equipment Rentals 74.25 -A- 1TARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 2048 Larry Fricker Co. $ 90.27 2049 Friden, Inc. 18.oo 2050 Robert N. Galloway 96.14 2051 Garden Grove Camera Center 57.72 2052 General Electric Supply Co. 494.98 2053 General Telephone Co. 901.05 2054 Gilmore and Page Trucking Co. 84.32 2055 Goodall Rubber Co. 64.07 2056 Raymond E. Goodspeed, Distributor 16.oo 2057 Graybar Electric Co., Inc. 285.79 2058 Guaranty Chevrolet Motors 2.62 20~9 Hach Chemical Company Inc. 93.04 20 0 Hanson, Peterson, Cowies & Sylvester 250.00 2061 Fred A. Harper 68.10 2o62 Howard Supply Co. 324.38 2063 City of Huntington Beach 7 .30 2064 Imperial Glass Co. 9.86 2065 International Business Machine Corp. 356.85 2066 International Harvester Co. 7.17 2067 Jensen Instrument Co. 76.54 2068 Kingmann-Wlll.te, Inc. 126.05 2069 Kleen-Line Corp. 8.74 2070 Knox Industrial Supplies 70.20 2071 Bill Kroeger 28.50 2072 LB W S, Inc. 403.78 2@73 L & N Uniform Supply Co. 660.30 2074 Judy Lee 5.20 2075 Mac's Tire Shop 4.50 2076 Mccalla Bros. 122.21 2077 R. w. McClellan & Sons 43.26 2078 Mahaffey Machine Co. 592.86 20~9 Mine Safety Appliances Co. 155.94 20 0 Monroe International, Inc. 15.33 2081 Motorola Instrumentation & Control, Inc. 49.22 2082 Munselle Supply Co., Inc. 145.03 208~ Nalco Chemical Co. 637 .09 208 National Chemsearch Corp. 620.08 2085 Lee M. Nelson 83.75 20~6 Nelson-Dunn, Inc. 8.82 20 7 City of Newport Beach 59.33 2088 Nordson Pacific, Inc. 106.08 2o89 o. c. Suppliers, Inc. 59.78 2090 Orange County Radiotelephone Service, Inc. 299.91 2091 Pacific Telephone 253.45 2092 Gregg Pamson 79.60 2093 Paul-Mun ro.e Hydraulics, Inc • 10.77 2094 C.L. Pharris Trucking 24.96 2095 Radio Products Sales, Inc. 72.22 2096 Red's Frame Wheel & Brake Service 12.97 2097 Reproduction Equip & Supplies 25.29 2098 The Republic Supply Co. of Calif. 24.94 2099 Reynolds Camera Supply ~A.08 2100 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 1 .16 2101 Howard Ryan Tire Service 207.87 2102 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 90.37 2103 Santa Ana Electric Motors 536.22 2104 E. H. Sargent & Co. 204.47 2105 Russell M. Scott, Sr. 60.80 2106 Select Nurseries, Inc. 90.10 2107 John E. Sigler -Consultant 906.20 2108 Signal-Flash Division 13.80 -B- WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT ·2109 Signal Oil Co. $ 652.03 2110 Southern California Edison Co. 7,133.28 2111 Southern California Water Co. 5.08 2112 Southern Counties Gas Co. 596.83 2113 Southwest Flexible Co. 153.24 2114 Speed-E-Auto Parts 70.89 2115 Sta~dard Oil Co. of Calif. 738.61 2116 State of Calif.-Office of Procurement 4.16 2117 State Employees' Retirement System 185.50 2118 Steverson Bros. l~~-40 2119 Sweetland Co. 1 .46 2120 J. Wayne Sylvester 3.00 2121 Tardif Sheet Metal 320.63 2122 Norman R. Tremblay 93.75 2123 Triangle Steel & Supply Co. 317.01 2124 J. G. Tucker & Son, Inc. 193.88 2125 Tustin Water Works 49.00 2126 Union 011 Co. of Calif. 8.94 212~ Utilities Supply Co. 37.44 212 Van Dien-Young Co. 35.82 2129 J. P. Vormi ttag 9.40 2130 John R. Waples -Consultant 112.40 2131 Warm Air Products Co., Inc. 195.62 2132 Warren & Bailey Co. 455.87 2133 Donald c. Webster 343.87 2134 Western Fastner Co. 95.83 2135 Western Salt Co. 26.00 2136 Raymond Zehnpfennig 62.59 2136A Howard M. Cornwell 91.05 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 58,848.64 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF 2137 Paul Calvo $ 379.00 2138 Enchanter, Inc. 2,900.00 2139 Enterprise Printing Co. 41.95 2140 Graybar Electric Co., Inc. 4,559.36 2141 Raymond G. Osborne 1,168.50 2142 P. S. I. Engineering Co. 2,712.00 2143 John Ward Co. 1,72·4.28 2144 Vinnell Corp. 91,718.55 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $105,203.64 ~-·· TOTAL JOINT OPERATING AND CORF $164,052.28 -c- ~'I ARRANT NO • ' 2145 2146 2148 2149 2150 .. .......... DISTRZC~O. 2 OPERATING FUND'\;LARRANTS IN FAVO;-x; AMO'QNT J. R. Lester Boyle & 1dney L. Lowry $ 260.00 'l'ax Service of Orang/ County Inc. =$========== 2 ;=:=:==:==: DISTRICT NO. /2, SUSPENSE F OPERATING WARRANTS IN AVOR oF! Bartle Wells ssociat s $ 3,150.00 I ACCUMULATED CAPIT L OUTLA FUND WARRANTS Anderson H rborBlue Print Enterpris Printing Co. -D- $ 47.37 41.95 89.32 3.,239.32 WARRANT NO. 2151 2152 2153 2154 2155 2156 2157 2158 2159 2160 2161 2162 2163 2164 2165 2166 2167 2168 2169 DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN, FAVOR OF Louis v. & Mary Basic (AD#l) James K. BaPchelor (AD#l) Boyle & Lowry AD NO. 1 5A AMOUNT $3,203~ 2,704.38 $5,967.76 Plan Check & Inspection 134.oo $6,101.76 J. Wylie Carlyle (ADlf!) Paul J. Hogan Cecil J. &\Claire s. Marks (AD#5A) County of 01range (AD#l) Skyline-Pan·911 ama, Inc • ( AD#l) Southern California Edison Co. ' . \ \ ACCUMULATED CAPITA~ OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS IN\FAVOR OF $ County Sanitat~on District No. 14 of $ Orange County\ \ FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOk OF Theodore C. & Anna Bidlingmaier Boyle & Lowry \ Galy Construction cqrporation Norman J. & Leselotije Groot Ernst Leibacher / Frank s. Mannetti Jr. Red Hill Ridge Estajtes / / i/ 1 DISTRIC '· NO. 11 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS Enterprise Lowry and -E- $ $ $ AMOUNT 500.00 576.00 6,101.76 1.50 45.50 1.00 259.80 150.00 142.06 7,777.62 27,070.00 1,134.66 525.00 50.00 1,046.10 698.97 50.00 393.75 3,898.48 38,746.10 41.95 7,604.10 7,646.05 RESOLUTION NO. 65-63 APPROVING SPECIFICATIONS -I-6-2 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICA- TIONS FOR JOB NO. I-6-2 (ADDITIONS TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES - STRUCTURES}; AND AUTHORIZING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors by the engineers, for the ADDITIONS TO PIANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -STRUCTURES, JOB NO. I-6-2, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 4:00 p.m., June 2, 1965, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to receive bids and to award contract for said work. -F- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. o. Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C. O. No. 2 -------- CONTRACTOR: John Ward Company Date: May 7, 1965 JOB: INSTALLATION OF STEAM TURBINE AT PLANT NO. 2,, Job No. P2-7-l Amount of this change order (ADD)~ $ 1321. 01 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. 3 previously furnished contractor ADD 1. Provide miscellaneous minor revisions to steam and condensate piping, as specified $ 2. Provide additional steam pipe supports and anchors, as specified TOTAL CHANGE ORDER ADD $ 1,321.01 Original Contract Price $ 28,738.00 Prev. Auth. Changes DEDUCT 730.86 This Change (AD~)(lJEil.YJC'ID.O _...b.. ... 3_21 ___ .0_l ___ _ Amended Contract Price $ 29,328.15 Board authorization date: Approved: May 12, 1965 -G- cm.ru•ry SAr·rI'i'A'i,J:ON DISTRICTS OF ORAMG·E COUifl'Y, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelsen ----GeDeral Manage_r ___ _ JOHN WARD COMP.ANY By ____ ~------------------------- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0, Box 5175 -10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. l ----- CONTRACTOR: Vinnell Corporation Job No. I-6-1 DATE: May 7, 1965 JOB: ADDITION TO PLANT #1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES -PIPELINE Amount of this change order (J.AXEO (DEDUCT) $ 1361. 24 In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or. deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contract Revision No. l previously furnished contractor and contractor's quotation dated May 4, 1965 DEDUCT 1. Substitute 36-inch diameter steel bore casing as specified at Adams and Hamilton Avenues in lieu of 24-inch diameter RCP as originally specified $ 200.00 2. Delete 13.5 feet of 84-inch RCP and 32 feet of pipe lining as specified TOTAL CHANGE ORDER DEDUCT$ 1,361. 24 Original Contract Price $ 1,455,850.00 Prev. Auth. Changes None This Change (~(DEDUCT) 1,361.24 Amended Contract Price $ 1,454,488.76 Board authorization date: Approved: May 12, 1965 -H- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager VINNELL CORPORATION By--------~~----------------- RESOLUTION NO. 65-64-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR SPECIFICATION #PW-020 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND EPOXY COATING, SPECIFICATION #"PW-020 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day sub- mitted by the Purchasing Officer and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to WALKER COATING COMPANY Contractor, for DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBLASTING AND EPOXY COATING, Specification #PW-020 of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, and 11; and the tabulation of bids and the proposal submitted for said work are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Specification PW-020 is hereby awarded to WALKER COATING COMPANY , Contractor, in the total amount of $ 3 2 676.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid therefor; and, , Section 3. That execution of a contract with the Contractor 'fo·r said work is hereby authorized in accordance with the specifica- tions and contract documents therefor; and, Section 4. That all other bids received £or said work are hereby rejected, and the Secretary is directed to return any certified. checks or cashier's checks submitted as bid bonds, to the unsuccessful bidders. -I- -/ BID TABUIATION AND RECOMMENDATION Date May 5, 1965 Contract: DIGESTER AND SURGE TOWER SANDBIASTING AND EPOXY COATING, SPECIFICATION #PW-020 CONTRACTOR ITEM 1 ITEM 2 TOTAL BID 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Walker Coating Co. 2425 East 118th St. Los Angeles, Calif. 90059 Edward A. Wopschall, Inc. 11 North 5th Avenue Arcadia, California Wilson & Hampton, Painting Contractors 250-F N. Manchester Anaheim, California Coast Contractors, Inc. 678 East 28th Street Long Beach, California Klaas Bros., Inc. 2012 Hyperion Ave. Los Angeles 27, Calif. Teco Painting Co. 5332 Alhambra Avenue Los Angeles, Calif. 90032 Spence & Sullivan, Inc. 18004 South Broadway P. o. Box 427 Gardena, California 90247 $1,395.00 $2,281.00 $ 3,676.00 1,980.00 1,730.00 3,710.00 2,202.00 2,083.00 4,285.00 2,370.00 2,880.00 5,250.00 5,384.oo 1,181.00 6,565.00 6,385.00 3,985.00 10,370.00 8,495.00 2,192.00 l0,687.00 It is recommended that award of contract be made to Walker Coating Company, 2425 East 118th Street, Los Angeles, California, as the lowest and best bid. Lee M. Nelson General Manager T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer -J- RESOLUTION NO. 65-73-11 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS CONVEYING TITLE A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF DOCUMENTS CONVEYING TITLE TO CERTAIN SEWERAGE FACILITIES The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: WHEREAS, an agreement entitled "Agreement for Sale and Purchase of Lake Avenue and Ocean Avenue Trunk Sewers", and dated August 10, 1960, was entered into with the City of Huntington Beach; and, WHEREAS, said agreement provided, that upon payment of the final amount due, the facilities referred to in said agreement would be conveyed to the District. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. All the terms and conditions set forth in said agreement having been met, and final payment having been made by the District, the District does hereby accept the facilities outlined in said agreement and upon the terms and conditions as shown therein; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized to record the Grant Deed, Bill of Sale and other documents necessary to effect transfer of title to the District. -K- 11 April 27, 1965 11 Board of Directors City of ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA County Sanitation District No. 2 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California 92708 11 Gentlemen: 11 The County Sanitation District No. 2 Engineers' Report, dated March 1965, has been reviewed by the City of Anaheim staff engineers and a report has been ma.de to the City Council. "With the present trend of development expanding into the Santa Ana Canyon, Anaheim has a vital interest in the program for the sewering of this area. Your consideration of an earlier construction date for the outfall sewers on both the north and south sides of the Santa Ana River is earnestly requested. It is anticipated that the need for these outfall sewers will occur in 1966 as numerous requests for sewer service to this area already have been ma.de to the City. 11 If the sewer treatment plant is to be located as proposed, certain protective measures must be taken to control the emission of odors. A further, more detailed study would be in order to assure maximum odor control. An underground facility may possibly be required to effectively prevent the escape of undesirable odors into the fine residential districts now existing, as well as those proposed for the Santa Ana River areas. "The City of Anaheim is in basic agreement with the proposals set forth in the report, if the above considerations can be given your approval. 11 Very truly yours, 11 CITY COUNCIL CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA /s/ Keith A. Murdoch "Keith A. Murdoch City Manager II KAM: ml" -L- RESOLUTION NO. 65-75-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES IN CONNECTION WITH NOHL, ANNEXATION #3 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain agreement ordered by Resolution No. 65-49-2, between the County of Orange Board of Supervisors, the petitioners, and the District, setting forth the terms and conditions for deferring payment of the annexation fees relative to Nohl, Annexation #3, is hereby approved as prepared by the General Counsel and the County Counsel; and, Section 2. That execution of said agreement by the Chairman and the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized; and, Section 3. That the agreement hereinabove referred to shall be recorded in the Officiai Records of Orange County. -M- RESOLUTION NO. 65-65-7 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB- TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-2B; AND AUTHORIZ- ING ADVERTISING FOR BIDS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Board of Directors by Boyle and Lowry, Engineers, for the WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER and the SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 7-2B, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until 4:00 p.m., June 2, 1965, at which time said bids will be publicly opened, examined apd read. -N- 1 ~ RESOLUTION NO. 65-~7 AUTHORIZING CONDEMNATION IN CONNECTION WITH ~lS'.mIG'±' 1°. 1 ( COODEMNATIDN #"11 j -7v1J ~ .--Z--.13 ... A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CONDEMNATION OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY SITUATED IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RE: ASSESSM&M'.!!' '.JJISTRJ:-&'f NG-.-:t ~ 7-.t--a,rJ!-8 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, has found and determined, and hereby does find and determine, that the public interest and necessity require for public use the acquisition, construction, completion, operation and maintenance by said County Sanitation District of certain public improvements, to wit: a sanitary sewer and all facilities and appurtenances necessary or incidental thereto including manholes, measuring devices, pumping stations and other structures for the transporting and receipt of sewage and industrial wastes for the purpose of transportation, treating and disposing of said sewage and industrial wastes arising within the territories of said County Sanitation District and such other territories as said District may have contracted to serve pursuant to law; and that certain real property situated in the County of Orange, State of California, is necessary therefor. Section 2. That the real property, the acquisition of which is required by the public interest and necessity for the uses and purposes set forth in Section 1 hereof, is situated in the County of Orange, State of California, and is more particularly described on Schedule "A" and shown on maps marked Exhibit 11 A11 attached hereto and made a part hereof as though set out in full herein. 0-1-· Section 3. That the permanent easements and rights of way above described and necessary to be acquired shall be acquired sub- ject to the rights of the owners, their successors and assigns, to use the surface of the land within the boundary lines of such ease- ments and rights of way to the extent compatible with the full and free exercise of said easements and rights of way; provided, however, that: (a) No building or structure of any kind shall be placed, erected or maintained thereon; {b) No streets, alleys nor roadways shall be con- structed upon, over, or along said easements and rights of way to a grade less than four feet above the top of any pipe or pipes located with- in the lines of said easements or rights of way; (c) No fill shall be placed or maintained over the surface of the ground as it shall exist within the lines of said easements and rights of way upon the completion of the improvements to be constructed therein greater than six feet in depth. Section 4. That the permanent easements and rights of way to be acquired shall include: (a) The right to construct manholes, air valves, blowoffs, pumping wells, pumping stations, metering stations, standpipe and service con- nection structures appurtenant to said line or' lines of trunk sewer pipe, which structures shall not extend above the surface of the ground; (b) The right during construction to use all existing private roads within the properties of the owners for ingress to and egress from the work, together with the right, upon completion of the construe- 0-2- tion of the pipeline or pipelines orother works, to construct and maintain an access road upon, over and along such permanent easements and rights of way as may be in the public interest from time to time. Section 5. That the Board of Directors of County Sanita- tion District No. 7, of Orange County, California, hereby declares its intention to acquire the property described in Section 2 hereof by proceedings in eminent domain. That the law firm of Miller, Nissan, Kogler & Wenke, 2014 North Broadway, Santa Ana, California, be and it is hereby authorized and directed to commence an action in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the County of Orange in the name and on behalf of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, against all owners and claimants of the above-described properties for the purpose of condemning and acquiring said properties for the use of said County Sanitation District; that said condemnation action shall be pro- secuted in accordance with the provisions of law applicable thereto. That said attorneys are authorized and instructed to make applica- tion to said Court for an order fixing the amount of security by way of money deposits as said Court may direct and for an order permitting County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, to take immediate possession and use of said real property for the uses and purposes herein described. Section 6. That the Auditor of the District is authorized, upon receipt of a Court order and demand from C. Arthur Nissen, Jr., General Counsel of the District, to pay to the County Clerk of the County of Orange such sum or sums of money from District funds as may be required from time to time to be deposited upon order of the Court granting immediate possession of easements and rights of way to the District. 0-3- RESOLUTION NO. 65-67-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement dated April 12, 1965, wherein LOUIS V. BASIC and MARY C. BASIC, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said Permanent Easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-1-lOa in that certain action in eminent domain #128876 and described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to Louis V. Basic and Mary C. Basic, 13146 Foothill Blvd.~ Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $500.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to record said Permanent Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -P- RESOLUTION NO. 65-68-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #5-A (Parcel 7-5-191) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPl'ANCE OF EASEMENT FROM CECIL J. MARKS AND CIAIRE S. MARKS {#133933) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement dated April 23, 1965, wherein CECIL J. MARKS AND CLAIRE S. MARKS, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #5-A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-5-191 in that certain action in eminent domain #133933 and described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be ma.de to Cecil J. Marks and Claire s. Marks, 11872 S.W. Arroyo, Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $1.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -Q- RESOLUTION NO. 65-69-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT FROM STATE MUrUAL SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION AT NO COST TO THE DISTRICT (RE: TRACT #5840) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERt"\!IINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement dated April 23, 1965, wherein STATE MUTWU. SAVINGS AND LOAN ASSOCIATION, a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes in connection with Tract #5840, at no cost to the District, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the certain real property over which said easement is granted is more particularly described as: An easement for sanitary sewer purposes over a portion of Lot 44 of Tract No. 5840, County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 214, pages 1, 2 and 3 of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, described as follows: The easterly 5.00 feet of Lot 44 of said Tract No. 5840, together with the right to enter upon and use adjoining lands of the granter as may be necessary for the initial construction of said sanitary sewer.pipe line. Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Of~icial Records of Orange County. -R- RESOLUTION NO. 65-70-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AN AGREEMENT F'OR TEMPORARY USE OF IAND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF !AND REIA- TIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-4-2A The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Temporary Use of Land for Construction Purposes dated November 19, 1964, wherein NORMAN J. GROOT and LISELOTTE GROOT agree to waive any further claim to damages by reason of the use and occupancy of Parcel No. T-2 as described in Action No. 125752, and related and adjoining properties damaged or used during the process of con- struction by the District and its contractors during 1964, is hereby approved and accepted in consideration of the total sum of $287.10; and, Section 2. Th.at payment for said agreement is hereby authorized to be made to Norman J. Groot and Liselotte Groot, P. o. Box 2212, El Modena, California, in the total amount of $287.10; and, Section 3. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement dated November 19, 1964, wherein Norman J. Groot and Liselotte Groot grant to the District a Permanent Easement for sewer pur- poses in connection with the construction of Contract No. 7-4-2A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 4. That payment for said Permanent Easement, described as Parcel No. P-2 in Action #125752, and more particu- larly described as follows: -S- The South 20 feet of the following described property located in the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California: Beginnin~ at the Southeast corner of Lot 19 in Block "B of the Land of Oge and Bond, as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, at pages 430 and 431, of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, running thence East 5 chains; thence South 10 chains; thence West 5 chains and thence North 10 chains to the point of beginning. is hereby authorized to be made to Norman J. Groot and Liselotte Groot, P. O. Box 2212, El Modena 2 California, in the total amount of $759.00; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. S-2- RESOLUTION NO. 65-71-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF LAND A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT AND AN AGREEMENT FOR TEMPORARY USE OF LAND RELA- TIVE TO CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-4-2A FROM THEODORE C. BIDLINGMAIER AND ANNA C. BIDLINGMAIER The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Agreement for Temporary Use of Land for Construction Purposes wherein THEODORE C. BIDLINGMAIER and ANNA C. BIDLINGMAIER agree to waive any further claim to damages by reason of the use and occupancy of Parcel No. T-2 as described in Action No. 125752, and related and adjoining properties damaged or used during the process of construction by the District and its contractors during 1964, is hereby approved and accepted in consid- eration of the total sum of $311.26; and, Section 2. That payment for said agreement is hereby authorized to be made to Theodore c. Bidlingmaier and Anna c. Bidlingmaier, 192 North Waverly, Orange, California, in the total amount of $311.26; and, Section 3. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement wherein Theodore C. Bidlingmaier and Anna C. Bidlingmaier grant to the District a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction of Contract No. 7-4-2A, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 4. That payment for said Permanent Easement, described as Parcel No. P-1 in Action #125752, and more particularly described as follows: The South 20 feet of the following described -T-1 / property located in the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana, County of Orange, State of California: Beginninff at the Southeast corner of Lot 19 in Block 11 B of the Land of Oge and Bond, as shown on a map recorded in Book 3, at pages 430 and 431, of Miscellaneous Records of Los Angeles County, California, running thence South 10 chains; thence West 10 chains; thence North 10 chains; thence East 10 chains to the point of beginning. Except the West 302.00 feet thereof is hereby authorized to be made to Theodore c. Bidlingmaier and Anna C. Bidlingmaier, 192 North Waverly, Orange 2 California, in the total amount of $823.40; and, Section 5. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. T-2- _ .. ·"' RESOLUTION NO. 65-72-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-32d) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM SKYLINE- PANORAMA, INC. (#132568) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement dated April 28, 1965, wherein SKYLINE-PANORAMA, INC., a corporation, grants to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is described as Parcel No. 7-l-32d in that certain action in eminent domain #132568, and more particularly described as: That portion of Lot 27 of Tract 916, in the County of Orange, State of California, as per map recorded in Book 29, pages 2 to 4, inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, in the office of the County Recorder of said County, lying southerly of the following described line: Beginning at a point in the southerly line of said Lot 27 distant easterly thereon 82.68 feet from the westerly terminus thereof; thence North 83° 02 1 33" East to the east line of said lot. EXCEPT the Easterly 10.00 feet thereof is hereby authorized to be made to Skyline-Panorama, Inc., c/o Powers, Himrod & Pepys, Suite 1016 First Western Bank Building, 548 South Spring Street, Los Angeles, California, Attention: Robert M. Himrod, in the total amount of $150.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -U- RESOLUTION NO. 65-74-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1 (Parcel 7-l-34b) A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT FROM JAMES K. BATCHELOR AND JEANETTE L. BATCHELOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Easement wherein JAMES K. BATCHELOR and JEANETTE L. BATCHELOR, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes in connection with construction in Assessment District No. 1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said Grant of Easement, which is described as Parcel 7-l-34b, and more particularly described as: That portion of Lot 31 of El Modena Citrus Lands, per ma.p thereof recorded in Book 6, page 32 of Miscellaneous Maps of Orange County, California, described as follows: The Northwesterly 15.00 feet of that parcel of land described in a deed recorded in Book 6760, page 615 of Official Records of Orange County, California. is hereby authorized to be made to James K. Batchelor and Jeanette L. Batchelor, 1010 North Main Street, Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $576.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -V- Item No . (31-A) (55 -A) (69-A) Ji0~1!k SUPPLEMENTAL AGENDA _!vlay 1 2 , 1 965 ALL DISTRICTS u'---, Consideration of mo tion re: A p r o ving ass i gnment ~ . .4ft1 . I-- of proceeds in connection with Job No. I-6-1 from r /))/-. IJ\ Vinnell Corporation to Bank o-A Ame rica, NT&S A, / l ,J vlA l (Addi t i o n s t o Plant No. 1 Eff uent Discharge Facili-l)lr ij ties -Pip eline) l( L-ALL DIST:CUCTS ~ Considerat:lon of motion re: \Accepting proposal of ,("-)-.. Le roy Cranda,11 and As sociatef for soils investigation .;)/~ work in connection with Job o. J-9 (Ocean Outfa ll ~ ~ No . 2 -La n d Section); and a t horizing the General tJ" 1 "!,_,.._ Man ager to emp loy sai d firm an acc ordanc e with the ~-1.v terms a n d conditions of sa i ~ proposal. See page ~ S-A I DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolut ion No. 65-76-2 re: Approving and authorizi ng execution p f a Consent to Common Use ~I .~ Agreement with the State D:i!vi s i on of Hi ghways . See {1~v \ page S-B } ' . ~~ DI STRIC T 7 I Con s ideration of Resolut:iion No. 65 -'77-7 re: Authori z - ing t he Gen eral Counsel t o accept on behalf of the ~ District, a deed of easefent from Oliphant, et al, . r e lat ive to Assessmen t District #1 ; said easement ~~ shall be i n form app rove a by the Gene ral Counsel ; - and authorizing the Genef:'al Counse l to s'i gn warra nt b ook and warrant fo r par· . ent in the total amount of $888 .oo . (Parcel 7-1 -34 ) ( \ ~....., Yt~<-/ltoj -~ "'~ (J_ 0--.J I s. ._J_ c ~ ~,,_-~:L ,c, ~"' ~c.-... :.. ~ ,<.-~ .-..,,!_ t!l __ , h \ (~<..):_.{ M 0 T I 0 N ----.-.- MOVED: That the proposal of LeRoy Crandall and Associates for foundation investigation work for Job No. ~-9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section), is hereby a~proved and accepted; and, That the General Manager be authorized to direct LeRoy Crandall and Associates to proceed with said services as outlined in the proposal; and, That payment for said services is hereby authorized to be made upon presentation of invoices in a total amount not to exceed $4,-ooo.oo, in accordance with the terms of their proposal, as follows: LeRoy Crandall Principals Office engineering Laboratory Drafting Clerical Field Engineering Field Engineering (Overtime) Field Asslstant Field Assistant (Overtime) Mileage @ 12¢ per mile · 30.00/per hour 20.00 13.00 12.50 B.oo 1.00 i6.oo 18050 9.00 :Pll.00 Outside services performed by others, and direct expenses will be reimbursable at cost plus 5%. S-A RESOLUTION NO, 65-76-2 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 2, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A CO:MMON USE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE DIVISION OF HIGHWAYS The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Consent to Common Use Agreement No. 7cu-2341, dated May 12, 1965, wherein the State of California, Department of Public Works, Division of Highways and the District, agree to the common use of the District 1 s easement acquired by action in eminent domain #91562, which said easement is more particularly described on Schedule "A" attached hereto and made a part of this resolution, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That said agreement be approved and accepted as negotiated by the General Counsel; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District be authorized and directed to execute said Consent to Common Use Agreement on behalf of the District. S-B ?l . COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY Members, Boards of Directors County Sanitation Di stric t s Nos. 1,2,3,5,6 ,7,8 and 11 May 7, 196 5 Subject : Ocean Inspecti on Trip of Outfall Di ffuser An ocean inspection trip of the outfall d i ffuser constructi on site had been scheduled for Wednesday, Apr i l 14th, but due t o unfavorable weather condi tions and the roughness of the ocean 1 the trip was postponed Ui~til Wednesday, May 12th. We ar e sorry to advi se that a further postponement of this tri p is necessary due to weath er condi tion s and construction di ffi - culties which have plagued the contractor. Suc h a tri p as had be e n planned would be very interesting and as soon as the con struc t ion difficulties are resolved , an inspection trip of the outfall diffuser construction s i te wi ll be arranged. We apprec i ate your interest and will advi se you of further plans. LMN:fh LEE M. NELSON General Manager II MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanit ati on Districts of Orange County, California P. 0. Box 51 75 10844 t:l lis Ave nue Fountain Vall ey, Ca lif., 9 2708 Phone 962-241 1 JOINT BOARDS May 7, 1965 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, May 12, 1965 8:00 p.m. ALL DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE: Please refer to th e attached notice r egarding t h e Ocean Outfall Diffuser inspect i on trip which we had hoped t o schedule for the afternoon preceding this Board meeting. It n ow appears that a da te later in the month will be more appropriate for this tri p. A further announcement in this reg ard will be made at the Board meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * * The following is an e xplanation of the more important non - r o utine items which appear on the enclosed Joint Boards' a g enda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant registers are not attached to the a g e n da since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but wi ll appear in the complete agenda a- vailable at the meet i n g . Jo i nt Boards No. 4 -SEATING OF NEW DIRECTORS: It is anticipated by the time of the meeting there will be one or more formal communications from the Cities regarding changes i n City Councils which affect memberships on the Boards of Directo rs. Nos . 5 through 13 -ELECTION OF CHAIRMEN AND BUDGET PROCEDURES: I n accordance with the Districts' rules of procedure, a Chairman for each District Board and the Joint Chairman and Vice Joint Chairman of the Joint Administrative Organization must be elected annually at the regular May meeting . The Chairmen for the past year were as follows: A. Allen Hall* ·;J~ Rex A. Parks I/" Howard M. Cornwell (..,./ James B. Stoddard V District No. 1 Di strict No. 2 Distri ct No. 3 District No . 5 District No. 6 Di stri ct No. 7 District No. 11 Joint Chainian , Arthur H. Meyers v . ~ _ ")'hJ..i.tN -• * &~ Y ~ Robert M. Lambert ~~. Vice Joint Chairman *No longer Directors Howard M. Cornwell James B. Stoddard It is called to the attention of the newer Directors that the District's Chairmen automatically become members of the Executive Committee which meets, as required, to study and make recommen- dations to the Joint Boards on all important matters concerning joint operations such as budgets, salaries, personnel, uniform policies, etc. A meeting of the Executive Committee to consider our 1965-66 J o int Operating and Joint Construction Bud get s is being planned for the afternoon of Wednesday, June 2, following a District No. 1 Bo ard meeting. In this connection, we are attaching a printed explanation for the Districts• budget procedures to serve as a review for the Directors on this important subject. This printed explanation will eventually be a part of a complete package of informa tion describing all phases of the Districts' operations. As stated in the attachment, these two Joint Bud get s are scheduled for consideration and adoption at the June meeting. Accordingly, a careful review of the printed budget procedures before that meeting is recommended. No. 24 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS AND AUTHORIZATION TO RECEIVE BIDS FOR PLANT JOB I-6-2: Our design engineers are sub- mitting plans and specifications for the last regularly scheduled plant expansion job for this fiscal year. This consists of the second phase of construction of our new effluent discharge facilities from Plant No. 1 and is entitled "Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Discharge Faci.lities -Structures, Job No. I-6 -2 11 • The first phase, now under way, consists solely of the pipeline work involved and the present plans and specifications under consider- ation will complete the work under a separate contract for the necessary structures at both ends of the 84-inch pipeline. This overall project was divided into two phases t o expedite construction and also because pipeline contractors are usually not interested in bidding on structural work and vice versa. The engineer's estimate for this contract is $173,000. We are scheduling bids for this job to be taken b y the Board of Directors of District No. 1, in accordance with our re gular procedure, at an adjourned meeting at 4:00 p.m. on June 2. No. 25 -PURCHASE OF ADDITIONAL CHLORINATOR AND APPURTENANCES: In 1961 the Districts constructed an effluent chlorination station at Plant No. 2 to disinfect our effluent to the ocean in accordance with State requirements. Under the contract for this work, eight 8,000 pound per day chlorinators and evaporators were purchased and installed by the contractor. Prior to this, an identical chlorinator was purchased separately for pre-chlorination at Plant No. 1 for odor control All nine of these units are of one make (Fischer & Porter Company of Anaheim) and fa c tory replacement parts are carried in inventory. Recent laboratory research work has shown definitely that by chlorinating effluent from Plant No. 1, a considerable savings can -2- be effected in chlorine used fo r disinfection. In order to expedite setting up this additional chlorination procedure (which can result in savings of over $100 per day in chlorine costs) we need an additional 8,000 pound chlorinator as soon as possible and it is obvious that from the standpoint of maintenance cost and inter- changeability the same make of machine should be purchased. Accordingly, we are recommending Board authorization for the immediate purchase of this equipment from the Fischer & Porter Company at their quoted price of $6991. No. 26 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 2, PLANT JOB P2-7-l: This contract with the John Ward Company is for basically piping work for our steam turbine equipment at our power building at Plant No . 2 which equip- ment, purchased under separate contract, has been installed by the contractor. During a recent testing of the waste heat boiler piping it became obvious that the anchoring for the steam and condensate piping originally called for was not adequate. Conse- quently, the contractor was asked to quote a price for additional anchoring to be performed as extra work. This total extra cost as detailed in the accompanying formal change order is $1321.01 and the motion appearing on the agenda approving this change order is recommended for adoption . No. 27 -CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, PLANT JOB I-6-1 : This contract with the Vinnell Corporation is for the 84-inch Plant No. 1 effluent pipeline as mentioned under Item No. 24. In connection with the final design of Job I-6-2 (Item No. 24), the decision was made to delete a small portion of the pipeline and to replace it with a structure under the second contract. Thi s deletion is detailed in the formal change order attached to the agenda and the contractor has agreed to a total deduction of $1361 .24 for this change in the work . No. 28 -QUARTERLY FINANCIAL REPORT: The Districts' auditors, Hanson, Peterson, Cowles and Sylvester, have recently submitted a quarterly financial report to the Districts as called for under their agreement . A copy of this r eport, which covers the quarter ending March 13, 1965, is enclosed for each active Director. District No. 1 No . 32 -AWARD OF PAINTING CONTR~CT: Bids for this maintenance painting job, which was explained in the April Manager's Report, were taken at the adjourned meeting of the Board on May 5. Unless unforeseen circumstances alter the situation between now and the Board meeting, it will be recommended that the contract be awarded to Walker Coating Company of Los Angeles at their low bid price of $3676. No. 35 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 2: As ment i oned under Item No . 24, bids for our plant expansion contract will be received and opened on June 2 at 4:00 p.m. Accordingly, it will be necessary for the Board to adjourn to this hour and date. -3- District No. 5 No . 40 -PREPARATION OF REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT WITH IRVINE COMPANY: The Directors are familiar with the necessity for this agreement . However for the record, it will be necessary to direct the General Counsel to proceed with its preparation. No. 43 -ADJOURNMENT TO MAY 24: In accordance with the Directors ' previously indicated plans, it is planned to hold an adjourned meeting on the above date to consider for adoption the proposed new District connection ordinance. This date is not fixed however and can be changed at the time of the Board meeting, if desired. District No. 11 No . 47 -DOCUMENTS RELATING TO ACQUISITION OF LAKE AVENUE AND OCEAN AVENUE SEWER: This is the routine action relating to the final acquisition of these two sewers by the District from the City of Huntington Beach. No. 50 -ADJOURNMENT TO JUNE 3: At the adjourned meeting of the Board on May 4, it was agreed that bids for Contract No. 11-9 (Edinger Ave. Gravity Sewer and Edinger Ave . Sewerage Lift Station) would be received and opened by the Secretary and Engineer on June 1, and that if possible, the contract will be awarded on June 3 , It will therefore be necessary for the Board to adjourn to this date for this purpose and it is suggested that the hour be set at 4:00 p.m., subject to change at this meeting. District No. 2 No. 51 -CONSIDERATION OF REQUEST FROM CITY OF ANAHEIM: By means of a letter dated April 27, Anaheim has requested the District to consider the early construction of outfall sewers on either side of the Santa Ana River as recommended in the March, 1965, Preiiminary Engineer's Report by Boyle and Lowry. A copy of the letter from Anaheim is attached to the agenda for the Directors of District No. 2 . No. 52 -AGREEMENT FOR COLLECTION OF ANNEXATION FEES (NOHL #3 ): At the April 14 Board meeting, Resolution No. 65-49-2 approving this annexation was adopted . The resolution gave consent to the annex- ation subject to the following terms · and conditions: II (a) II (b) Annexation fees are hereby established for the proposed annexation at $100 per acre or any portion of an acre of territory to be annexed That the petitioners enter into an agreement with the County of Orange Board of Supervisors and County Sanitation -4- II ( C) District No. 2 setting forth the terms and conditions for deferring payment of said annexation fees; and that said agreement be recorded in the Official Records of Orange County That the a~reement referred to in Sub- section (bJ above shall contain the following conditions: 1. Payment of annexation fees of $100 per acre or any portion of an acre for any acreage developed within the annexed area shall be due District No. 2 at the time any acreage is subdivided for development. 2. All annexation fees for this proposed annexation remaining unpaid ten (10) years from date of annexation shall be paid in full by the property owners of record. 1'(d) That no sewer connections be made within the area to be annexed until the area to be served has paid its proportionate share of the established fees per acre." The agreement specified under paragraph (b) above is now being prepared by the County Counsel and our General Counsel and in the event it is available at the time of the Board meeting, consideration of authorization of execution of this agreement will be taken up under this item. District No. 7 No. 56 -AUTHORIZATION FOR PAYMENT OF DISTRICT 7'S SHARE OF CON- STRUCTION COSTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH BASIC ACCOMMODATION AGREEMENT: District No. 7 entered into a Basic Accommodation Agreement on April 13, 1963, with County Sanitation District No. 14 to provide a temporary means of sewage disposal for District No. 14. Paragraph 5 of the agreement states: 11 That Seven will pay the construction costs, except design engineering, of a sewer and force main from its MacArthur Avenue pump station to the boundary of Fourteen 11 • The construction work is now complete and District No. 14 has billed the District for $27,070. It is the recommendation of the staff that payment be authorized. No. 57 -APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR SOUTH COAST PLAZA SUB-TRUNK SEWER AND WALNUT AVENUE SUB-TRUNK SEWER, JOB NO. 7-2~B: The Engineers are submitting plans and specifications for -5- this job, and we are recommending approval and authorization for b i ds to be received at 7:30 p.m., J une 9, immediately preceding the Joint Boards' meeting. No. 58 -CONDEMNATION ACTION FOR ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1: Res o lution No. 65-66-7 authorizes condemnation for rights-of-way within the assessment distric t. Nos. 59 t hrough 6 1 , 6 4 and 65 -ACCEPTS EASEMENTS AND AUTHORIZES PAYMENTS FOR RIGHTS -OF -WAY IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS #1 AND #5-A: The General Coun sel recommends acceptance of and payment for these easements. Nos. 62 and 63 -ACCEPTS PERMANENT EASEMENTS AND AGREEMENTS FOR TEMPORARY USE OF LAND, AND AUTHORIZES PAYMENTS THEREFOR IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT NO . 7-4-2A: These are the final rights-of- way settlements for the Panorama Heights sub-trunk sewer which wa s constructed l ast year. The General Cou nsel recommends the accept- ance of and payment for these easements. No. 66 -AMENDMENT TO ORDINANCE 705 I NCREAS ING DIRECT CONNECTION CHARGES: At the April 15 meeting of the Board, the staff and General Counsel were d irected to prepare an amendment to the current connection charge ordinance, increasing the direct connection charges. The staff has discussed the matter with the Engineers and Counsel and the proposed amendment will be available at the meeting. We recomme nd that the Boa rd take the ordinance under subm ission f o r study, as the Directors may want to r e view this proposed chang e with their city officials prior to action by the Board. If the ordinance is acceptable to the Boa rd by the June meeting, it can be adopted at that time. No. 67 -ACQUISITION OF THE TUSTIN AVE NUE SEWER FROM THE CITY OF SANTA ANA: The staff will have a ve rba l report concerning the acquisition of this sewe r from the City of Santa Ana. It will be our recommendation that the Board adopt the motion appearing on the agenda, which authorizes acquisition of Sections A, B. C and D of the sewer, indicated on the map enclosed with the agenda. -6- Lee M. Nelson General Manager BUDGET PROCEDURES INTRODUCTION This section is intended as a general summary of the Sanitation Districts' budget procedures and has been prepared primarily for new Directors being called upon at the June meeting of each year to pass on budget matters for the ensuing fiscal year. It should also be of value to others who may be interested in or concerned with our fiscal procedures. The County Auditor-Controller, who is ex-officio Auditor of each District, requires that our official District budgets and those of other special districts be submitted in the latter part of July at the latest. This does not allow postponing final passage of our budgets past the regular July Joint meeting since the Directors ordinarily do not meet but once a month, on the second Wednesday. These requirements necessitate final action on our budgets earlier than in the case of the various cities, whose procedures the Directors are usually more familiar with than ours. It is hoped that the following outline will clarify our procedures and will assist new Directors in understanding budget material which is submitted at the June meeting. It also should be useful as a review for the older Directors. INDIVIDUAL DISTRICT'S BUDGETS As stated above, these budgets must be finally passed upon in early July. They are actually our only official budgets, as far as the Auditor is concerned, and serve as a basis for establishing the tax rate for each District, which varies from year to year depending on each individual District's total requirements and assessed valuation. The individual District's budgets are composed of a minimum of three separate funds and as many as eight. These separate funds reflect the various classifications of expenditures of the individual Dis- tricts and always include (1) BOND INTEREST AND REDEMPTION FUND, (2) OPERATING FUND and (3) ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND. Some Districts may have more than one bond fund for different bond issues and may also have other fixed obligation funds. The expendi- tures out of the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds are, of course, fixed and thus are not subject to Board of Directors control and, therefore, will not be discussed further in this report. The balance of this report will instead be focused on controllable expenditures. It should be emphasized, particularly for new Directors, that these controllable expenditures are carefully reviewed by the Executive Committee of the Directors, as described in more detail below, before submission to the Boards as a whole.· OPERATING AND ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUNDS In contrast to the Bond and Fixed Obligation Funds, expenditures in the Operating and Ac- cumulated Capital Outlay classifications are controllable and the decisions, which to a large measure affect these expenditures, are reached at the June meeting of each year. The reason decisions must be reached at the June meeting is that prior to the adoption of the formal District's budgets in July, firm figures must be approved for operation and capital outlay for the Joint Treatment Works. These latter expenditures comprise a large portion of the formal Dis- trict's budgets and, as stated above, are controllable. The seven Sanitation Districts, which jointly own and operate the treatment and disposal facilities, are required by the Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement of 1958 to contribute to the operation of the Joint Works and to the construction of new works or the expansion of old works by formulas set forth in this Agreement. Consequently, it is necessary to arrive at a total figure for both operating expense and construction expense for all the Districts involved in the Joint Works in order that this formula may be applied to determine the contribution of each District to this total which contribution is then fed into the official individual District's budgets. -1- Procedures for developing and adopting the total projected operating and construction expendi- tures for the Joint Works are explained below under these respective captions. JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE All but a small portion of this expense is raised by ad valorem tax in the individual Districts. The total requirements for each fiscal year, together with the breakdown of the individual items of expenditures and the individual District's contribution to the total, are submitted to the Directors for approval at the June meeting. This budget is prepared during May. As is the case with all public agencies, a large proportion of our operating expense is for salaries and wages-approximately 50%. However, this includes considerable labor not chargeable to joint operations. In addition to operation and maintenance of the Joint Treatment Works, our staff is responsible for operation and maintenance of the individual District's trunk sewers and pumping plants as well as incidental construction work in the Districts and at the plants. In effect then, we operate a service organization supplying labor and services to the individual Districts (including Sewer Maintenance Districts) as well as the Joint Works. For convenience this labor, not charge- able to joint operations, is included with our Joint Operating Budget and charged out as needed during the year. In the preparation of the total figure for joint operating expense, the staff, as is true in any bud- get, must estimate expenditures in the various classifications for next year and, in addition, must estimate the sewage flow to be expected from each District during the coming year. The necessity of the latter estimate is the provision in the Joint Ownership, Operation and Con- struction Agreement that each District is required to contribute to the total joint operating expense in proportion to its sewage flow. Since the latter, of course, will not be known exactly until 13 months later, it must be estimated ahead of time in order that sufficient funds will be included in the individual District's budgets to provide for the eventual individual contributions. Therefore, the total of estimated joint operating expense is divided by the estimated total of all flow reaching the treatment plants to arrive at an estimated cost of treating and disposing of a unit quantity of sew- age. This unit cost (in our case, dollars per one million gallons) which we refer to as ''Gallonage Charge" is then multiplied by the estimated sewage flow of each District in million gallons to arirve at the total expected District's contribution in dollars to joint operating expenses. Budget review of our joint operating expense by the Executive Committee of the Directors is provided for in our regulations. This Committee is composed of the Chairman of each individual District and will meet between the May and June regular Board meetings to review the staff's recom- mendations as to operating expenses prior to submission to all Directors prior to the June meeting. The figures thus distributed to the Joint Boards in June will have been reviewed by the Executive Committee and any changes in the staff's recommendations desired by the Committee will be incor- porated in the figures submitted to the Joint Boards. Since the sewage flow and the assessed valuation of each District will vary, the tax rate neces- sary for raising funds for JOINT OPERATING EXPENSE will correspondingly vary from District to District but, usually, it is in the neighborhood of $0.07 per $100 assessed valuation. JOINT CONSTRUCTION AND EXPANSION EXPENSE The other major classification of significant District expense is for contribution to the Capital Outlay Revolving Fund, which we refer to as CORF, from which the necessary joint construction work is provided to keep abreast of the tremendous growth in population in the Districts. Over the past few years, this type of expense for all seven Districts has been in the neighborhood of $3.5 million per year, necessitating a tax rate in the neighborhood of $0.24 per $100 assessed valuation which, again, is an average figure depending on the individual District's needs and ability as explained below. Initial capital outlay funds for treatment plants and ocean outfall were provided by the individual Districts by means of a bond issue passed in 1948. This issue, in all Districts, totalled approximately $8.3 million of which only a portion was for plant and outfall construction, the rest being for work inside the individual Districts. The construction work provided by this bond issue was completed in -2- 1954 and only two years later it became obvious that the explosive growth of the population in the Districts would soon require additional construction. At that time a firm policy was adopted by all Districts that in the forseeable future all joint construction work would be paid for out of ad valorem taxes on a step by step, long-range construction plan. In 1962 such a plan was formally approved by the Boards, setting forth needed construction .. in detail for five years and guidelines through 1976. This plan provides for a gradually accelerating construction program for a number of years until the Districts reach their ultimate growth or cntil 'other methods ·of financing are arrived at by the Directors. This program correlates increasing expenditttres with growth of assessed valuation, so that a rather stable tax rate for each year for joint construction can be anticipated. As mentioned pre- viously, this rate is in the neighborhood of $0.24. This program is working out very satisfactorily and, in our opinion, should be continued. · The 1962 plan adopted contemplates a major expense in the neighborhood of 1970 for the construc- tion of a new ocean outfall, which will be necessary because our existing 78-inch diameter outfall will, by then, have reached its maximum hydraulic capacity. Consequently in addition to the normal con- struction expense for expansion of Joint Treatment Works, a reserve for meeting this large item of expense was also approved by the Directors in 1962. Funds to augment this reserve will be recom- mended to be included in the next fiscal year's budget. In contrast to pro-rating operating expense among the Districts in accordance with current sew- age flow as explained above, contributions of the individual Districts to joint construction and reserve funds are computed on a different basis, which is also set forth in the 1958 Joint Ownership, Operation and Construction Agreement. Prior to the time this agreement was adopted, each District owned a fixed capacity in one or both of the existing treatment plants and outfall and contributed to con- struction expense on the basis of this capacity. Owing to a number of reasons, this method of con- tribution by the Districts proved to be so complicated as to be practically unworkable and resulted in the renting of capacity by those Districts which had an unused capacity to those Districts not owning enough capacity. Also complicating the picture, the fixed capacity method was extremely difficult to apply to new units of treatment works which, ordinarily, have a different capacity than other related units. For these reasons the above agreement provides for a simpler and more equitable basis of contri- bution and employs what we term the "Use and Needs" method. The individual District's annual con- tribution is obtained by averaging the average assessed valuation for the three most recent years and likewise averaging the annual District's sewage flow contribution for the past three years and ap- plying these averages to the total Districts' average flow and assessed valuation to arrive at a percent- age figure which each District should own in all treatment and disposal works at both plants. This percentage so calculated is called the "equity percentage" and, as can be seen, takes into account use (sewage flow) and needs (assessed value). It is used to compute the contribution for each fiscal year of each District to joint construction expense as well as the credit or debit adjustment of each District for existing plant. Prior to arriving at the above percentage of each District's contribution and credit or debit, the staff and our design engineers estimate the construction needs for the next fiscal year for plant expan- sion purposes as well as the above-described reserve fund. The percentage contribution of each District is then estimated on the basis of metered flow from each District for the past ten months period together with a firm figure for the two years preceding and the firm figure for the three years past assessed valuation. This percentage for each District is then applied to the total construction and re- serve needs to arrive at a figure which, when approved, is placed in the individual District's budgets. This budget, although fairly definitely established by the 1962 long-range plan, is also subject to review by the Executive Committee at the same time as the joint operating budget as explained above. Figures for joint construction and reserve expenses for the next fiscal year, as reviewed and recommended by the Executive Committe, are submitted to the individual District's Directors for study prior to the June regular Board meeting. IN-DISTRICT EXPENSE Most of the foregoing has been a discussion of the Districts' expenditures as related to the jointly owned treatment works. However, as mentioned previously, each District has controllable expense for _3_,_ operation and maintenance within the District, as well as necessary capital outlay. Consequently in each District's official budget, the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds must provide for In-District expense, unique to the individual District. Therefore, after the Joint Works requirements for operation and construction have been determined and fixed at the June meeting, the staff estimates the In-District expense for each District and includes this in the Operating and Accumulated Capital Outlay Funds for each District. The sum of these two controllable items, i.e., joint expense and In-District expense constitutes the requirements for each District plus the fixed expenditures (Bond Interest and Retirement, etc.). Unexpended funds from the previous year in each category are used to reduce the requirement figures-the difference represent- ing the amount to be raised by taxes for each fund. Prior to mailing the complete budget recommendations for each District to each Director early in July, the figures are gone over in detail with the individual Board Chairman and with any other Director wishing an early review. -4- ....... ' ,_ .. ~--- u u May Joint Meeting Re : Election of #7 Chairman ----Show nominations, written ballot, t ie bote , dec l are nomin ations open agai n, then show Hi rstein 's election. (Fred, I think t his i s clear to me -okay?) (I 'll go into it in detail in the stencil) #21 -Report o~ the Joint Chairman -The Joint Chairman reported ~ GeRtFe±-on the recent conference of the Californi a Control Association, which he attended Mr . Cornwell f urther explained that San Diego April 28th through May 1 st , was aD.- ~:;i.·~~-r'tl;"t:ttat tlre=i.n'f'tn"'nfa"tWn cover.ed...oa~-tbe me'Bi>1Rg at the suggestion the Conference , he l d had been an inval uab le expe ience, i n that the information obtained £~M the meeting was very clo e l y related to the Districts ' interests, -tJAer~-woul a the functions o f the office of Chairman of the Joint The Chairman calle d a meeting of t h e E ecutive Committee for 4 :30 p.m ., June 2nd, for the staff 's 1 965 -66 budget recommendations for the merits. r .:r ;)·r Ja.-k._ and ca-p-i:ta.;t. improve - Report of the General Manager -The General Mana er expanded on the \~ \\ f y\ I Chai rman 's review of the Water Po llution Control onference 0 ~ .al:~ announced that the i nspection trip to view the .i[/x the Ocean Outfal l Diffuser , Job No . J -2-1 , x rescheduled for 9 :00 a .m., Saturday, June 5th . structi on site been tentatively ~,tr,5f-B --Ma er d e ferred -:;aJ.f'di ected to secure~e proposals ~a or f o r soi i nvestigati ons :µr'connecti n with Job l!t("J-9 (Ocean OUtfal l No. -La n d Sec t i on-)~ #51 -Fo llowi ng the reading of a e tter f r om the Ci ty of Anahe i ~ r equesti ng the early c ons t ructio o f t h e proposed District fac i liti es t o serve the Santa Ana Canyon Ar,a, the Ch air recognized Mr . James Maddox , City Engi nee r, City of ~a he i m , wh o elaborated on t he com - munication , and i ndicated the desi r e for the construction of certai n f ac ilities to serve thi s a rea by 1 966 . Fo l l owi ng a l engthy di c u ssion b y the Di rectors , i t was moved , seconded and du l y carrie That the matter be deferred t o the next regular meeti ng of h e Boards , and that the staff and t he engineers be directed to su the Boards ' cons i deration, af\~ on possible mean s of f the facil i t i es reques t ed by t he City . #52 -The General Counsel report agreement rel a tive to the proposed Nohl #3 annexation of t rritory to the District had not been p r epared ~e , and at s u ch ti e as the agreement was prepared, it would be mai l ed to the Di rectors or their consideration and study. #66 -Following the presentation the staff of the proposed ordinance i ncreasing the connection charges w District , wt was moved, seconded and duly carried : Counse l be fi i rected to prepare~an ordinance c~nsolidating Ord ·nance No. 705 , as amended, inc l uding the connec tion charge i n creas s recommended by the staff . ' • I #67 -(a fter r e gul ar a ction) FURTHER MOVED : That the staff and c the ~ae~s;..be d irecte d,~ conti nue negot iations wi t h t he City of Santa Ana t o acquire tz~exi st i ng facilit i es owned b y t he Citys ::v~:::: :;::~e , as ou l inedx in t he Engi neer s ' Report dat ed ,. 31 -B -Following consideration of the proposal of LeRoy Crandall and Associates f or fo undation investigation ~~x services for Job No . J -9 (Ocean Outfall No. 2, Land Section).," it was moved, s econded and duly carried: ~aat -tae -staff -aaa -tae -eagiaeers -ee -aireetea / That action on the proposal o f LeRoy Crandall and Associates " . ~-· .,/_ ::z.~ / ~ -:-:;7; . 11 , ~ ~ ,.<,..<. 'A-' <. 1. ~· rn.J. . · · " .,;.c.., ~·-t-·1•..,,,.w...., ·· ·;r "" ;,'!' ;: ~·i .,. ' p That the staff be .. C!;l'rected tolJobtain proposal s for 7 (~f<-,:.. ;:;µ~ ~ founda tion~~'~ services for Job No . J -9 . < t' ,;r. a,.-i. ~ .,,(_ be def erred; and, / . ' . .._ ,. . (A:. . ~· t~ . J.. I ( ------------------i'--------- By..,-----1--- -+-------· ~-1---------------·--+------ 1 --I -------- ------t--------- --------~--· ----- .I ENGINEERING ............ DAYS START-UP R 0 L L CALL Date YrJ!q..#--z-1,, L=f"Time £',n jd& Item~ r?..t;~ District <.~/d/ C ~7~// Regular.~~-----v~~~~~ Adjou rne d~~~~~~~ DISTRICT 1 JOINT BOARDS mo E. derson Bo Ca l Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gr ube r '.-Iarvey Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meye rs Mi ller Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Hirste in OTHERS : Nelson Brown Nissen Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson -:)--~~ JJ "'-'-~~ -VOV\ d. ~r~ i~~ ~ . \ \ \ (t.cA.-~ v v / v v"' ........- V"'" ..... v \...- \... Farnsworth Gummere W:t:she-k '/Hemp~ o"" Kanno Gruber Shull De Vries Elder G:!.lmore Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Mack Hileman Ha rvey Meyers Miller Hirstein Parks Ca llen§ Co rnwell Crapo Culver Sarvey Hock Schutte Speer Workman Hirste i n Cornwell Amo Anderson Bousman Crapo Culver Furman a arv ey Johnson Ka nno Long Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Hirs tein Stoddard Gruber Hirs tein Mey ers Gruber Hi rstein Cook aa :·v ey Meyers Miller Parks Hirs t ein Lambert Stewart Hirste i n ± V' 1/ Gilmore Mack Allen DISTRICT 2 v Hileman y" Kanno 1 / Farnsworth ,/ Shull • b Gi l more , .......... Michel le-Kreh1 ~ Harvey Quey r e l Allen DISTRICT 3 v Farnsworth ~ ~ Gummere v . ~-;~m.pe. ~/II v Shull v ,/ De Vri es v Gi l wore a-Antich v Ca llens v Be ll v f(Rfil~ v.-We l ch 1/ Ha r vey i ./ Noe v Allen DISTRICT 5 v v' Elder v Allen DISTRICT 6 v v Elde r v Allen DISTRICT 7 v Gruber v Gilmo r e ~ Mack ~ Hileman Allen DISTRICT 11 v Shipley a- \:?' Allen R 0 L L CAL L District --------Regular _______ _ Adjourned. _______ _ Date Time ------------------------- Item.~------------------- JOINT BOARDS Cornwell Amo Anderson Bousman Callens Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber ~-farvey Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Hirste in OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson ~ Farnsworth V' CL Gummere 1./ ~0..?71'50;\/ ../ Kanno V" Gruber 1/ Shull -G-De Vries v Elder ~ Gi lmor e v Michel ~ Antich ~ Callens v Shipley i/ Bell i.-/ ,,............ Mack 1 / Hileman 1/ Krein i--' Welch ./ Harvey o._ .c v ~ Quey rel ........... Noe 1/ Allen DISTRICT 8 Mar t in Scott Hi r ste in Allen Harvey Meyers Miller Hi1~stei n Parks Callens Cornwell Crapo Culver :-Iarvey Hock Schutte Speer Workman Hirstein Cornwell Amo Anderson Bousman Crapo Culver Furman aarv ey Johnson Kanno Long Schutte Shipley Speer Wright Hirstein Stoddard Gruber Hirstein Meyers Gruber Hirstein Cook aa:·vey Meyers Mi lle r Parks Hirste in Lambert Stewart Hirstein DISTRICT 1 Gilmo n:: Mack Allen DISTRICT 2 DISTRICT DISTRICT DISTRICT Hi l eman Kanno Farnsworth Shull Gi l more Michel Krein Harvey Queyrel Allen 3 Farnsworth Gummere ~/.llom)>So/V' Shull De Vries Gi l i.i1ore Antich Callens Bell Welch Harvey Noe Allen 5 Elder Allen 6 Elder Allen DISTRICT 7 Gruber Gilmore Mack Hileman Allen DISTRICT 11 Shipley All en II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sani tation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Ora-nge Co unty, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. #1 AGENDA ~-Y.: 5, 1965 at 4:00 p.m. (1) (2) of Chairman pro tern, if necessary (3) Report e General Manag e r (4) Consideration of motion re : Di recting the Secretary to -~Q.LA open and read sealed bids r e cei ved for Digester and ~~.a (5) (6) (7) (8) (9) Surge Tower Sa dblci,sting and Epoxy Coating, Specification \~ #PW -020, pursu nt to legal noti ces published as required by law Consideration of Specification #F'W- Purchas i ng Officer the Board to t he General Manager and the V~ re : Referring bids received for \~~i tabulation and recommendation to ConsideTation of Highways that the Dis Dyer Street Trunk . Consideration of claim 1965, for da.rJages in the of claim in folders) from the State Division of t abandon a porti on of the i n fol ders) ~JI" ovee and Cra.il1 dated April 20 , ~ amount of ~8,755 .49. (Copy ~~ ~-(, "'f' • .-v t · t-fY'-x~ ations, if any Consideration of motion re IA.A lt_.1 o! Adjournment 1 ./ #1 meeting Harvey -pro tem #6 R & F letter from Division of "ghways (explain request more fully). Following a discus sion of request contained in sai d letter, (copy from Brown 's l e e ter ). matter and consideration o f t he was move d , seconded and duly carried : #7 R & F Bovee & Crail letter from attorneys), contai ning claim for damages (explain). It was then moved , seconded and dul carried : That sai d letter be received and ordered f iled ; that the claim damages be denie d; and that the Secretary to the Di strict 's Insurance carrier . and Crail for Date R 0 L L CALL Ad journed __ ~-~,-~--M eetin g ~/} c4 /"' I µ)' S !9&> Time$!}J._ Item ~ UL{ t> z:::::::: DI STR I CT 1 ao.rvey Meyers Miller ~ Gilmore Ill" "' Mack Hi rs te in -"'""tt __ DI STRI CT 7 ~~~(y Mey t r Mi l J.l P a!f~ Hi ste i n --- Allen OTHERS : Nelson Brown Nisson Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Gal l ow ay Car l son p BOARDS OF DIRECTORS II County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California 10844 fllis Aven ue Fountain Vall ey, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) DISTRICT No. # 11 AGENDA 7:00 p.m., May 4, 1962 City Hall, Huntington Beac h, California I of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of Consideratio of motion re: Granting an extension of time of 60 da s to the engineers for preparation of plans and spe 'fications for Contract No. 11-9 (Edinger Avenue Gravity ewer and Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift Station), under c'\..ntract dated November 12, 1964. Consideration of Reso ution No. 65-62-11 re: Approving and adopting plans and specifications for the Edinger Avenue Gravity Sewer an Edinger Avenue Sewerage Lift Station, Contract No. 11 ; and authorizing advertising for bids to be received ... \ I '( {., f l i...., • \ See page 11 A11 / 14 :...-~ fr' 0 J -/7 r· , -:1-1 ·-c r-\:.. .:. , --t ( t ._.~ <-... L -s-<-t ._ ~ ~ , ~ r-._,0 .......- ( 6) Consideration of Resolution No. 65-61-11 re: Authorizing ~~ ~~ acceptance of a permit from tfie Orange County Flood Control f"\'~ District relative to constructd.~n of Contract No. 11-9 ?i ',[tt'( f and authorizing execution of sai~ permit. See page 1B11 /; / _/. tt..4' I/ '71.~ Report of the staff on propose ~ withdrawal of territory from the District. (7) \ (8) Other business and communicatio'l:is, if any (9 ) Consideration of motion re: \ ro ~ vt\ Adjournment fl:'\ > RESOLUTION NO . 65-62-11 APPROVING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR CONTRACT NO. 11-9 A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWER AND EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-9 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No . 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER : Secti on 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day subm itted to the Boards of Directors for the EDINGER AVENUE GRAVITY SEWE R AND EDINGER AVENUE SEWERAGE LIFT STATION, CONTRACT NO. 11-9, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed in the office of the Secretary ; and , Se ction 2. That the Secretary be authori zed and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of Californi a; and , Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the District until , ----------------------------- at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read. ~ Ct-..< cft-~ t-~t-·, ,l._OL{ t ~ 1< tv -A- RESOLUTION NO. 65-61-11 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF PERMIT FROM THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Permit #07665 from the ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, wherein that District grants to County Sanitation District No. 11 permission to install and maintain certain sewerage facilities (Contract No. 11-9) in Flood Control right of way of the Westminster Channel easterly of Graham Street, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman of the Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 11 is hereby authorized to execute said permit on behalf of the District. -B- #11 Meeting R & F Engineer 's Esti mate #7 The Board discussed the propose withdrawal of territory (Exclusion No . 1 ) from the Hun ting Harbour Annexati on d i scussion it was MS&DC : That the Secretary County Assessor , Cou nty of District( which is a small portio n of the #5 datel June 27 , 1962 . Following the be authofized and d i rected to contact the Orange , ~nd submit a r e quest t-ft~r , I DISTRICT NO . 11 Lambert Stewart Hirstein -;"') \:. " 2 Lambert Stewart Hirstein ~p 'f--L-z '- Lambert Stewart Hirstein v 17 ll.. t..' "' I:. ,<._ Shipley Allen l J--l,, l - Shipley Allen t\--l J-1/ k Shipley Allen I I