The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1965-02II r BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts r-• '• P. 0. Box 5 175 of Orange Cou nty, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2 ) (3) (4) (5 ) (6 ) (7) (8) DI STRICT No. # 2-3 February 24, 196 5 at 7 :30 u.m . Conference Ro o m C -City Hall Orange , California AGENDA of Cha i rme n pro t e m, if necessary General Manager Report of Counsel Report and re endation of the Special Contract Committee re : 'tigati on on Mi ller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract o . 3-4A (Di s t r i cts 2 and 3 vs . George Dakovich, e t a l) Preliminary pres t ation by the engineers re: Studies on present and fu re sewerage re~uirenents in District No . 2 (Although t s is a report for Distri c t 2, there will be a discussi of Di strict 3 capaciti es and needs in jointly owned t n k sewer fac ilitie s). Other business and Consideration of moti n re : Adjournment q:~o~ki\ r~.,.,-Y; ~ -r ~ la/{Q~ ~ '""'~ C:0 ~3-VA ~ ---l ~~ .,...;__ -to-(..-t·~.J!.t i( • 1*.. ~ )._,:... ""?'~ ,,;;J ..... ?7 ~, -t;o" ...... J,...t W...._ v-n ~~ ~~ r-...J.. \ ~~ "-'-~..;h:-,J t ~ ( J..r-J ~vf,M-c..f' J ~~f~ ~ \1~~ ~""c:=[ .A-t.c_~f Y~·-· (/t__ A'--· '"'"r . ~_,_,J ~ ~-c £::....:t) -t::cJr W-:, I 0 0 """ ~.JI J JtO -{,...._. (J II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS Coun ty Sanitation D ist rict s ·- P. 0 . Box 5175 o f Orange Co unty, Ca liforn ia 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Ca l if., 92708 DISTRICT No. # 2-3 February 24, 1965 at 7:30 p.m. Conference Room C -City Hall Orange, California (1) Roll Call AG E NDA (2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Report and recommendation of the Special Contract Committee re: Litigation on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3 -4A (Districts 2 and 3 vs. George Dakovich, et al) (6) Preliminary presentation by the engineers re: Studies on present and future sewerage re~uireme nts in District No. 2 (Although this is a report for District 2, there will be a discussion of District 3 capacities and needs in jointly o~med trunk sewer facilities). (7) Other business and communications, if any (8) Consideration of motion re : Adjournment c a2.f2 c__ (l_ ~ T~,.__;;/ <?~4~ (j a,;&_- ~ -~~~~ f;JJ4 sF ~~, Yvn. VI ~ Cf !LU_ l ), , I ~ ·~_J_ '!~~~ '":"',..r r. ,;.__._.._,., k2 ,........,_"'IJ. ~ft~ l '6 ' ..;f ~-">' ~~ ~ d~ .or:./" Ott o IO a ICQ ~ 0 GIOl(?Ot_J . I' (~(VJ ~7P'~;> ~t"/ --r---.~ .~(11 ~r ~ ~~t -·~ 7 µ,., ... ~· ~-,.:,/:;__.)~4-_ ~~ · " iLJ/ ~o} ""~ ry·~ II ~ Y---rYVL t // ~~P ... -·~r-µ ~ ·~~ • .. -..... ............__.....,....~.., ..... 'L --, . ~ 8 I )06 "1 ~ J CG "("" ~ 'e> -r , -r o ~a.1£-711 /'t -~.Ao\ ,;g o ~ -''t..L ~8 L -:f /~~ r---y~ ,f ...,,.,,0 . 'V ~ & C '~fYD ( ""t' # . ~ ~--:"" )n~~ ~<:!'.. J ,...........,,J_ ~""""' ~11 I ~C?eJ JO ':::r:'r'7 ~ -T~-L 7'. 'P..,~ -~~:----~ t ~~~ II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 DISTRICT No. #2 -3 February 24~ 1965 at 7:30 p.m . Conference Room C -City Rall Orange, California (1) Roll Call AGENDA (2) Appointments of Chairmen pro tern, if necessary (3) Report of the General Manager (4) Report of the General Counsel (5) Report and recommendation of the Special Contract Committee re: Litigation on Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 3-4A (Districts 2 and 3 vs . George Dakovich, et al) (6) Preliminary presentati on by the er.gineers re: Studies on present and future sewerage re~uirements in District No. 2 (Although this is a report for District 2, there will be a discussion of District 3 capacities and needs in jointly owned trunk sewer facilities). (7) Other business and communications, if any (8) Consideration of mot ion re: Adjournment ,. ' 2-24-65 2&3 DISTRICTS NOS. ·2 AND 3 MINUTES OF THE ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING February 24 2 1965 2 at 7:30 p.m. Conference Room C -City Hall Orange, California Pursuant to adjournments of the regular meeting on February 10, 1965, the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2 and 3, of Orange County, California, met in an adjourned regular meeting at 7:30 p.m., February 24, 1965, City Hall, Orange, California. The Chairman called the meeting to order at 7:30 p.m. The roll was called and the Secretary reported a quorum present for each District's Board. DISTRICT NO. 2 Directors present: Directors absent: DISTRICT NO. 3 Directors present: Directors absent: Rex A. Parks (Chairman), Jim Kanno, Howard Cornwell, Leonard Crapo, . Norman Culver, James Hock, A. J. Schutte, Thomas o. Speer, an~~ William H. Hirstein --..:..... ~ James Workman Howard Cornwell {Chairman), Lowell Amo, Harold Bousman, Leonard Crapo, Norman Culver, A. A. Hall, Ernest Johnson, Jim Kanno, Charles Long, A. J. Schutte, Donald Shipley {arrived 8:00 p.m.), Thomas o. Speer, Mark L. Wright, and William Hirstein Stanley Anderson, Paul c. Furman OTHERS PRESENT: Lee M. Nelson, Paul G. Brown, C. Arthur Nissen, Sidney L. Lowry, Conrad Hohener, Nat H. Neff, Don Martinson, E. H. Fi~ster, J. R. Lester Boyle, Harry Billings, George Osborne, Mrs. Osborne, Bud Quist, Ralph Pease, William Devan, and Fred A. Harper, Secretary DISTRICTS 2 AND~3 Report of· Sp~~ aontract CoMmi£t'e'e *************** Chairman Cornwell reported for the Special Contract Committee. The Committee met with the staff and the legal counsel on February 10th and 24th, to review the progress and developments with respect to the lawsuit filed by Districts 2 and 3 against George Dakovich, et al. It wa13· ·the Committee's recommendation that the Districts proceed with the lawsuit against the Contractor. .-- cl~~ #5 Di!ecbor Cornwe l l reported for the Special Contract ·rJ_ -d .~ ,..-::( ,._, I -~ • ~ J,. >' Committee. The Committee met;on February 1 0th and 24th, t~~±reg-a-~~ to review the prog ress and developments with respect to the suit filed by Districts 2 and 3 vs . George Dak ovich , et al , in eonneei;ioH: wii;h~ioA... ~ a.f a portion -of the Miller H'older Trunk" 8-eweT, kno.w.n as Contract ,..,.. '3 11? 1vO ... •it . It i s the Commit ' ee 's recommendation that the Di stricts proceed with the suit again&t the Contractor, at al . ~ .~ .... ( f.-t-.-CI , .u..:v..f.-~ , I Ir The General Manage;r ~ aM:~wt4dliett'ioe<1dC"=s!SJ q:j }:):e.Q deficiencies which were Ct .....-t. U-4~ J. \I/) sewer.I\ by the Districts. discovered following the acceptance of the I t was then moved, ~econded and duly carried by roll call vote : ~ That the General Cou~$el for the Districts be d i rected to p~OG9~G-with the litigati on o Miller-Holder Trunk Sewer, Contract No . 3-4A . Maddox 's Assistant --RALPH PEASE _.,.,.,,..._ #6 -The Chai r recogni z e d Mr . Sidney L . Lowry , of J . R. Iie s ter Boy l e and Si dney L . Lowry , who made a verbal <f ;'"\.Al ) \,.(. ~ ~ ,,.._.c-J .....r Tt. <!' £ 1 ~•tabt ~ on prel)i:tilisi-y studies of present and future sewerage requirements in Distric t #2 . ~e a Pea und~tudy i s .p.:i::.i.mar i ly in the northeaster n p o r t ion of the District and t e rritory outside the Di s trict to the Orange County boundary l ine northe r l y and easte r l y o f Di strict No . 2 . Th e engi neers were emplo yed by the District April 8 , 1964 , f or p repa r a tio n of a Prelimina r y Engineers ' Report to det e rm i ne t h e ultima t e sewe r age requir ements for portions o f t he Di stri c t lying north erly o f t h e Anaheim-Olive Road and i nc luding possible a nnexa tions to the Di st r i ct e xtendi ng northerl y and easterly to the County bou ndary l i n e , and southerl y to the top of the s lop e drai n i ng to the Santa Ana River . On Nov e mber 9, 1964 , t h e Bo ard directed the engi neers to expand t h eir s tudy to i nclude the drain~e area se r ved by the District 's Euc lid Tr unk because of the inter-re l ationship of the ,, ..... t .. -:# 1 Euclid Trunk Sewer and the are~und e r s~~d¥· ~.l'~ ... 1 •-<" Fo l l owing Mr . Lowry 1 s ve¥&al ref>€Hl-t the Chair recognized Mr . Conrad Ho hene r of J . R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L . Lowry , who ~ repo r t e d on three possible p l ans involving the improvement of the Di st r i cts Eucli d Trunk Sewer . ~ ' A s~t j a ns cmm :e.x:r:i:tn g the ~ as they ho e "to .. I , • U ~ u l _._1 u. _.. g~;x,:mx u~ £0-~ .rep_orri .:nc.Ja:n.o;:i ng :r::e.c.o d o:t.hms for the~oard s ' cons i d eration ,in t ffe ne a r ~utur~ I ~Iv. i ~~~~-;1 ~~----A_ ?k f "'-~;y,J ~<11rd-°' 0 1 I (!"'"') .. ROLL CALL District __ ~J:--'(j--___ -3 __ __ Regular ____________ __ Adjourned _____ __.. ______ _ ~ R 0 LL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Meyers JOINT BOARDS Miller Mack Cornwell Farnsworth Hirstein Allen Amo DISTRICT 2 Anderson Gummere Parks ,_.....,-Hileman ~ Bousman Wishek Ca llc11s ~ Kanno Callens Kanno Cornwell ~ Farnsworth Cook Gruber Crapo .......-· Shull Crapo Shull Culver ~ Culver Hall ~ Hubbard Furman De Vries Hock ~ Michel Gruber Elder Schutte Chandler J~ Hall Hubbard Speer ~ Harvey ·~·. Hock Michel Workman 7-Queyrel Johnson Antich Hirstein Allen d~j Kanno Callens Lambert Shipley DISTRICT 3 Long Bell Cornwell ~ Farnsworth Meyers Amo ...,.........- / Miller Mack Anderson Gl--Gummere Parks Hileman Bousman ~ Wishek ~J Schutte Chandler Crapo ~ Shull Shipley Welch Culver ~ Speer Harvey Furman ~ De Vries / Stewart Hall .~ Hubbard Stoddard Johnson 1-=:::::: Antich Workman Queyrel Kanno ~ Callens Wright Noe Long ~ Bell Hirstein Allen Schutte ~ Chandler Shipley "--Welch Speer a/' Harvey Wright ~ Noe OTHERS: Hirstein v Allen Nelson DISTRICT 5 Brown Stoddard Niss on Gruber Elder Galloway Hirstein Allen Dunn Tremblay DISTRICT 6 Lowry Meyers Carlson Gruber Elder Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 7 Cook Gruber Hall Hubbard Meyers ·~ Miller Mack Parks Hileman Hirstein Allen DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Lambert Shipley Scott Stewart Hirstein Allen Hirstein Allen ' , BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts of Orange County, California DISTRICT No. 1 -7 ~~r P. 0. Box 5175 10844 El l is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 II AGENDA (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6) (7) {/ FEBRUARY 17TH, 1965 at 1~:00 p.m. Roll Report Report of DISTRICT 1 of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary General Manager Counsel -Consideration o Reso lution No . 65 -25-1 re: Awarding contract for Jo~ No. I-6-1 (Add ition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Dischar e Facilities Pipeline) to Vinnell Corporation in t total amount of $1,455 ,850.00. See page "A" (See 11 B11 for bid tabul ation ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of Res lution No . 65 -26-1 re : Awarding contract for Job No. 2-5E (Headworks Pump, Motor, Gear- head and Starter ) to rthingtun Corporation in the total amount of $ 37, 39 • 00. See page 11 C11 (See page "D 11 for bid tabulat on) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion r Awa rdin§ purchase of the following equipment: (s e pages "E 11 F 11 "G" 11 H11 11 I") _, _, _, _, ---- S ec. No. Item Vendor Amount #E-041 Oil Centrifuge De Laval Separator $4,930 .00 Co. #A-021 Passenger Sedan Al Roberts Plymouth $2,252.43 #A-022 Utility Pickup Truck Selma n Chev. $2 ,384 .38 #A-023 1/2 Ton Pickup $1 ,841.90 Truck cCoy Motor Co. #A-024 Rotary Air Xr~ ~ A •. rA Compressor $3 ,889.36 ~~-'~ Y"-' -/ -t... ' / r rl £,. -1~ ~0:... t-(..~ !1-\ L-, -.....-(8) DISTRICT 7 ,_ ~· " I-_:_<{_~~ tf-1 · ' i) ~- / J ~on s id~ration of Resoluti:on No . 65-2 -7 re : Dec larin g~ ~ ~ . intention to modify plans for Assessm \ District #1 · } ~ &._ ( 9) .!2illRI CT 7 c) C~n si der ation of motion re: Receive a~d f ile lette r from ~~ Wirun~r Development Comp any, Inc., re l a t ive to sewer '1.-. f \(iQ ~111 service for the South Coas t Plaza (co y in fold ~ 1 ~~ (12) (13) (14) (17) (18) (19) !STRICT 7 Report and recommendation o re: Request of Winmar Real the F-2 Storm Drain Channel Plaza Sub-Trunk) engineers and staff for the construction of ub-Trunk (South Coast DISTRICT 7 {) ~ Consideration of motion re: Declaring intent to include ~r ~if in the District's Master Pl a of Sewers, the F-2 Storm ~ Drain Channel Sub-Trunk (Sou h Coast Plaza Sub -Trunk ); and FURTHER MOVED: interes t of clarity, said ~~~Q,u'- F-2 Storm Drain Channel Sub-runk shall be designated ~ as the So uth Coast Plaza ub Trunk. DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Authorizing the General Manager to direct the engin ers to proceed with the preparation of plans and sp cifications for the So uth Coast Plaza Sub-Trunk I DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution ~o 65 -28-7 re: Authorizing acceptance of easement neede n connection with Assess- ment District No. 2; and aut o izing payment therefor in the total amount of $320.00. See page "J" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution acceptance of easement need ment District No. 2; and aut the total amount of $500.00 . DISTRICT 7 · Report of the staff re: $1,3 ~Department for repairs to Y r Contractor, Bosko Constructi DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: follows: • 65-29-7 re: Authorizing in connection with Assess- rizing payment therefor in See page "K" .17 claim of County Road a Street (Contract 7-4-1, ) ~~ of warrants, as 1539 1540 1541 Dean D. Johnson & Haze l I . Johnson James T. Muhic & B rbara Muhic $ 320.00 500.00 5,293.16 c. Arthur Nissan & Jack J. Rimel $6,113.16 DISTRICTS 1 & 7 Other_b~B~ne~s-an O-commun~cations, ny <---DISTRICT 1 .f 110 fl Considera tion Adjournment to 7:30 p.m., 4f:~1.'..rc.-... March 10th ~ 0 ) '"-r /'.,,-. DISTRICT 7 Consideration o f motion re: -2- Adjournment f, ';) "1 ~- Qv- ,, RESOLUTION NO. 65-25-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. I-6-1 TO VINNELL CORPORATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR ADDITION TO PLANT NO. l EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES PIPELINE, JOB NO. I-6-1 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, for Job No. I-6-1, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. I-6-1 {ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES PIPELINE), be awarded to VINNELL CORPORATION, Contractor, in the total amount of $1,455 2 850.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 65-2 on record in the office of the Secretary. Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all bid bonds be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -A- BID TABULATION SHEET Date February 102 1965 Contract: ADDITION TO PLANT NO. 1 EFFLUENT DISCHARGE FACILITIES PIPELINE -JOB NO. I-6-1 CONTRACTOR 1. Vinnell Corporation 1145 Westminster Ave. Alhambra, California 91802 2. John A. Artukovich Sons, Inc. 16200 So. Atlantic Avenue Paramount, California 3. Kordick & Son, Inc. 914 South Shamrock Monrovia, California 4. Hood Corporation 8201 S. Sorensen Whittier, California 5. Einer Brothers, Inc. P. o. Box 936 Escondido, California 6. Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. 2419 N. Chico Avenue El Monte, California 7. R. A. Wattson Co. Box 4575 Panorama City, California 8. M. J. Bevanda Co., Inc. 6950 Tujunga Ave., Box 439 North Hollywood, California 9. Steve P. Rados, Inc. 112 West Maple Avenue Monrovia, California 10. Vida Artukovich & Son, Inc. 11155 Rush Street El Monte, California -B- TOTAL BID Item 1 Item 2 $1,455,850.00 $ 8.oo $1,643,000.00 $ 7.50 $1,677,515.00 $ 5.50 $1,690,000.00 $10.00 $1,694,448.oo $ 8.50 $1,710,000.00 $ 4.50 $1,782,000.00 $ 8.oo $1,840,000.00 $10.00 $2,011,200.00 $ 7.50 $2,511,050.00 $10.00 RESOLUTION NO. 65-26-1 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR JOB NO. P2-5E TO THE WORTHINGTON CORPORATION A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR HEADWORKS PUMP, MOTOR, GEARHEAD AND STARTER, JOB NO. P2-5E, TO WORTHINGTON CORPORATION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 1, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districts' engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to WORTHINGTON CORPORATION, Contractor, for Job N9• P2-5E, and the tabulation of bids and the proposal for said work, are hereby re- ceived and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said contract for Job No. P2-5E (HEADWORKS PUMP, MOTOR, GEARHEAD AND STARTER), be awarded to the WORTHINGTON CORPORATION, Contractor, in the total amount of $37,797.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid received therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said equipment pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 65-3 on record in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That all other bids are hereby rejected. -C- BID TABULATION SHEET Date February 10, 1965 Contract: HEADWORKS PUMP, MOTOR, GEARHEAD AND STARTER, JOB NO. P2-5-E CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Worthington Corp. 1060 So. Vail Avenue $37,797.00 Montebello, California 2. Fairbanks Morse, Inc. 630 Third Street $37,986.oo San Francisco, California 3. Luscombe Engineering Agents for Allis-Chalmers Mfg. Co. $37,996.oo 190 E. Glenarm Pasadena, California 4. u. s. Pumps, Inc. 2324 East 49th Street No Bid Los Angeles 58, California -D- BID TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATION Date February 15, 1965 Item: One, Oil Centrifuge -Specification #E-041 and Filter VENDOR The Sharples Co. 1100 Carolan Ave. Burlingame, Calif. *The De Laval Separator Co. 1815 Rollins Road Burlingame, Calif. BID PRICE $ 4,450.00 $ 4,930.00 It is recommended that the bid submitted by The Sharples Company be rejected because of the deviations from specifications con- tained in the proposal of Sharples Company. Conditions partially listed were as follows: 1. Installation and test engineering service will be furnished at a charge of $90.00 per day, an additional charge for living expense, plus trans- portation to and from installation. 2. Purchase price shall be adjusted to prices in effect at time shipment of equipment is made. 3. There are no warranties of fitness for Buyer's purpose. *It is recommended that award be made to the De Laval Separator Company for the total amount of $4,930.00. Lee M. Nelson ·General Manager -E- T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer BID TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATION Date February 15 2 1965 Item: Passenger Sedan, Specification #A-021 VENDOR Al Roberts Plymouth 10080 Garden Grove Blvd. Garden Grove Smith Motor Co. 12801 Brook.hurst Garden Grove McCoy Motor Co. 320 N. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim Security Chevrolet 146 s. Brea Blvd. Brea Dunton Ford, Inc. 2240 S. Ma.in St. Santa Ana Mark Downing Ford 18575 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach BID PRICE $ 2,252.43 $ 2,301.16 $ 2,368.03 $ 2,508.83 $ 2,514.62 $ 2,703.35 It is recommended that the award be made to Al Roberts Plymouth, 10080 Garden Grove Boulevard, Garden Grove, California, as the lowest and best bid. Lee M. Nelson General Manager T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer -F- -.. BID TABULATION -AND RECO!Vf.:Mm'NDATION --_____ .._ __ ,_ Item: Utility Pickup Truck, Specification #A-022 VENDOR Selman Chevrolet 401 W. Chapman Orange Connell Chevrolet 2828 Harbor Blvd. Costa Mesa Guaranty Chevrolet 711 E. 17th St. Santa Ana BID PRICE $ 2,385.00 $ 2,390.97 It is recom..~ended that the award be made to Selman Chevrolet, 401 West Chapman Avenue, Orange, California, as the lowest and best bid. Lee M. Nelson General Manager T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer -G- BID TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATION Date February 15 1 1965 Item: 1/2 Ton Pickup Truck, Specification #A-023 VENDOR McCoy Motor Co. 320 N. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim International Harvester 1110 E. Katella Avenue Anaheim Dunton Ford, Inc. 2240 S. Main St. Santa Ana Mark Downing Ford 18575 Beach Blvd. Huntington Beach Smith Motor Co. 12801 Brookhurst Garden Grove BID PRICE $ 1,,841.90 $ 1,921.44 $ 1,978.33 $ 2,147.87 NO BID It is hereby recommended that the award be made to McCoy Motor Co., 320 N. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, as the lowest and best bid. Lee M. Nelson General Manager T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer -H- ·c BID TABULATION AND RECOMMENDATION -----··· - Date February 15 1 1965 Contract: ROTARY AIR COMPRESSOR, SPEC. A-024 BIDDER MAKE TOTAL BID 1. Larson Equipment Co. Davey $3,889.36 3000 Santa Fe Avenue Los Angeles, California 2. Engine & Equipment Co. Le Roi $4,219.97 11125 Palmer Avenue Southgate, California 3. Gardena Equipment, Inc. 14506 Crenshaw Blvd. Worthington $4,264.oo Gardena, California 4. Bl~stone Equipment Co. Ingersol-Rand $5,,148.oo 80 O East Slausen Avenue Montebello, California 5. Schramm, Inc. Schramm $3,975.66 846 East 6th Street "Not as Specified" Los Angeles, California (Reciprocating Compressor ) It is recommended that the award be made to Larson Equipment Co., 3000 Santa Fe Avenue, Los Angeles, California, as the lowest and best bid. -I- Lee M. Nelson General Manager T. A. Dunn Purchasing Officer RESOLUTION NO. 65-28-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COlJNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #2, AND AUTHORIZ- ING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant of Permanent Easement February 9, 1965, wherein DEAN D. JOHNSON and HAZEL I. JOHNSON, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con- struction in Assessment District #2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said Permanent Easement, which is more particularly described at Parcel No. 7-2-2b in that certain action in eminent domain #124140 and described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to Dean D. Johnson and Hazel I. Johnson, 3562 Valley View, Norco 1 California, in the total amount of $320.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to record said Permanent Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -J- RESOLUTION NO. 65-29-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF OH.ANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #2, A.J."'qD AUTHORIZ- ING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant of Permanent Easement dated February 11, 1965, wherein JAMES T. MUHIC and BARBARA MUHIC= grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said Permanent Easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-2-~c3 in that certain action in eminent domain #124140, and described on Schedule "A" attached hereto, is hereby authorized to be made to James T. Muhic and Ba.rbara Muhic,, 14572 Beeson Lane 2 Tustin 2 California, in the total amount of $500.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary of the Board of Directors is hereby authorized and directed to record said Permanent Easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -K- Mts . Fe b . 1 7th = 1 & 7 / 7 -A -The Ch air recogni zed Mr . Mar ray , attorney for Ho lly Sugar Corporation who requested taken January 13 , 1 965 , in view Corporat ion.{li:J :Eberl a to Ord i nance No . 101 di scussion by the Board , (copy from #10 -The Ch a i r e Board reconsider action ~·..}:;=,() -tl. ~-f ,.;;_ ;1 • • 0 f act tha~ the Ho l ly Sugar permit i n 1 955 , whic h was prior .:?.vV-~ /j q S' f . After considerable MS&DC: Mr . Jame s F . Brewer , Project Coordinator for t h e So th Coast Plaza, GGsta MeS"a , wh o briefl y reviewed for the Di rect rs the l arge commercial development contem- ~j).() p l a t ed in the vicinity o the proposed N:e:11~er~Freeway and Bristo1 • ...1..t'~~ Mr . Brewer requested the oard to take such action as was needed to construct the proposed Mas er Plan Su b -Trunk Sewer which would serve thi s development . #11 -Following bal recommendation of the staff it was MS&DC: (regul ar action ) #15 -The General Manager advised the Board that during t he mon t h of Nove mber , 1963 , a consid\rable amount of subsidence occurred in the main trench section of Cont~act No . 7 -4 -1 (Yorba Street n o rth of Santa Clara Avenue and south of Ranier Drive) making the street ~ i mp assable i n the t rench area . Th i s j ob had been accepted as comp l ete by Coun t y Sanitati on District No . 7 on March 8, 1963 . 'fh:c eont1act01' .(.Eeslico Const:i::.uGtj an} r...efuse-6--to m~ ~s . The County Road l 1~ ~ C-f'.c/M,._J~)\._) existed and when t he contractor failed to act , the County made t h e \ necessary repairs and billed the c ntractor $1 ,309 .17 . The b ill has remained unpaid and the County Ro 'M" Department has" made a demand upon the Sanitation Distr ict unt of the repairsx as the District cosi gned the County Excavation Per ·t with the contractor. Following a discussion of the matter by the Board, it was moved, seconded and duly carried : That the claim upon the District by the County Road Department in the amount of $1 ,309 .17 be denied . (Show roll cal l vote -Hi rstein voted 11 no 11 ) . . -~-I /,_(.\ DRAFT - That the motion adopted by the Board on March 9, 1955 relative to the connection to and use of District's Dyer Street Trunk by the Holly Sugar Company shall be construed to permit the use of said sewer by said Corporation without regard to the provisions of Ordinance No. 101 adopted c). -5 -,1958; provided, as stipulated in said motion, that a mutually satisfactory agreement between District and said Corpo - ration, setting forth terms and conditions of such use, shall be executed prior to such use; Further moved that this action shall in no way be construed as affecting the enforcement of said Ordinance relative to other connections to Districts ' faci lities after the effective date of said (}rdinance. ROLL CALL Adjourned 1/ f. #-f ~ting ~ ~; 2-&< Time~ Date OTHERS: Item difL~ ; Nelson Brown Niss on Rime·1 Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson DISTRICT 1 Hall ~ Hubbard Meyers V: Miller ~ Mack Hirstein~ Allen DISTRICT 7 Cook ~ Gruber Hall ~, Hubbard Meyers Miller ~ Mack Parks / H:i.leman Hirstein Allen 1 ROLL CALL Adjourned __________ Meeting Date Time ---------------- OTHERS: Item -------------------------------- " ~----)..b-' ~ ~ ~ Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson DISTRICT 1 Hall Meyers Miller Hirstein Cook Hall Meyers Miller Parks Hirstein v: 7 .........-~ z --- ~ Hubbard Mack Allen Gruber Hubbard Mack Hileman Allen ~__;---µ ' ROLL CALL AdJ·ourned Meeting ---- Date Time ---------------- OTHERS: Item -------------------------------- Nelson Brown Niss on Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson Ha.11 Meyers Miller DISTRICT l Hirstein __ _ DISTRICT 7 Cook / Hall V :r~~~ ~ Parks Hirstein Hubbard Mack Allen Gruber Hubbard Mack Hi.leman Allen II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P. 0. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 ~lli s Avenue Foun ta in Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BOARDS AGENDA r FEBRUARY 10TH 3 1965 3 AT 8:00 P.M. (1) Pledge of Allegiance (2) (3) (4) Roll Call Appintments of Chairmen pro tem, if necessary DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed (5) DISTRICT 2 Conside~ation of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regµlar meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed (6) DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed (7) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regulwr meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed (8) (9) (10) (12) ( 13) (14) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held January 13, 1965, and the regular meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion re: Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held January 13, 1965, as mailed ALL DISTRICTS Report of the Joint Chairman ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Manager ALL DISTRICTS Report of the General Gounsel ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resolut on No. 65-17 re: Approving plans and specifications or Job Nos. Pl-13 and P2-10 (G rit Hoppers at Plants No. 1 and 2 ); authori zing advertising for bids, and authorizing District No . 1 to receive bids and to awafd contract. See page 11 F 11 \ ( 16) (17) (18) ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re: horizing General Manager and General Counsel t0 make appropriate representations in oppositio to Senate Bill s.4, 89th Congress, (amending Fe eral Water Polution Control Act), and express·, the opposition of the Districts thereto. ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion from Jones Chemical Comp and authorizing executio agreement dated July 1, Exchange Company, Divisi extending said agreement same terms and condition : Receive and file letter ~ y dated February 2, 1965; 962, with the Chemical of an amendment to the ~ n of Jones Chemicals, Inc., to December 31, 1965 on the No. 65-18 re: Amending ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of Resoluti Resolution No. 762 provid relative to conditions of g for rules and regulations mployment. See page 11 G" ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of motion re No. 2 to the plans and spe Pl-12-1 (Site Improvements, granting a time extension a R. W. McC lellan and Sons. Approval fications Phase II, 100 days e page ~ of Change Order J! for Job No. v,t at Plant 1), ~~ to the contractor, ·11U II H" ,, ( 19) ALL DISTRICTS (20) (23) ( 24) - (25 ) Consideration of motion re: cation of the General Manage bills appearing on the agenda order, and that he recommends Receive and file certifi- that he has checked all found them to be in thorization for payment. ALL DISTRICTS Consideration of roll call vote of Joint Operating Fund and Capi Fund warrant registers for signat of District No. 1, and authorizin See pages 11 A11 , "B" , and "C ALL DISTRICTS ~ 1 .,, Approval 1 Outlay Revolv ing e of the Chairman ayment of claims. Other business and communications, ·f any DISTRICTS 1 AND 2 Staff report on sewerage of a por through District No . 1 facilities DISTRICT 1 Other business and communications if any DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re: February 17th Adj urnment to 4: 00 p .m. \ 0~~\ T -2- ( 26) (27) (28) (29) (30) (31) (32) (33) (34) (35) (37) (38) (39) (40) (41) ~ (42) DISTRICT 5 Consideration of motion re: any. See page fl D11 DISTRICT 5 Other business and communicati s, if any DISTRICT 5 ;j Consideration of motion re ~~djournrnent Approva ts if DISTRICT 6 D:::::c:u:iness and cornmun· ations , if any O•." d ~ -~tj( Consideration of motion r Adjournment ~ 7 ~· Jr DISTRICT 11 ~ ~ Consideration of motion e: Approval of warrants, if )~~~~~ any • See page fl E :r ?;P';;. ~ DISTRICT 11 Other business and comm DISTRICT 11 Consideration of motion DISTRICT 2 AND 3 Consideration of motion warrant register for sig District No . 3, and auth any. See page 11 D11 DISTRICTS 2 AND 3 ications, if any ~~ e : Adjournment ,~ S·.·p~"' e: Approval of Suspense Fund it' ture of the Chairman of .. I izing payment of claims, if 'N v J Other business and comrnuni tions, if an~ DISTRICT 2 I ~ O Consider a ti on of motion re: Ap---proval e arrants,, if y), ul..r'' Il:~x any. See page "D 11 ~ ¥~ lf,c.r DISTRICT 2 1 ~J~ +-~~ ~ 3 ... l/A-{ ~ / "~ J.~:j. ~ Other business and · ons, if any <Vtf ~l" if/ DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion r February ~' at Orange ),, ~ DISTRICT 3 Consideration of motion any. See page 11 D" /:304 .\ ~ • Adjournment to -9~0 ~ ,~("1 yv0 ity Hall g:Jt~.tn, ~t Approval of warrants, if c;:;~ (44) (47) (48) (49) (_4-q -ct) (50) DISTR ICT 7 \ ~ Consideration of Resol11 · n No. 65-19-7 r e : Authorizing ~~11 p-p.A and directing the conde ation of certain real property needed in the con strue n in Assessment District #1 . (Copy of resolution in olders ) v'°'1'A/VV~ DISTRICT 7 Consideration and direc t ing needed in the constr (Copy of resolution ion No. 65-20-7 re: Authorizing mnation of certain real pro~erty ion in Assessment District #5-A. fo l d e rs ) DISTRICT 7 ~-. ..J...\,\,f) Report and recommenda 'on of the Engineer of Work ~t-.t~ ~ f regarding Easement #2 in Assessment District #1 i\AA~ ,.,,~ . ·' rv' I. _,,,,. ,.....- A .v-' ~ ... / DISTRICT 7 A, IJVY ~ Consideration of Resol on No. 65-21-7 re: Accepting IT"~ an easement in connecti with Assessment District #2 ~ from the California Dep tment of Veterans Affairs and izing payment therefor i the total amount of $5 00 .00. Edward William Elstrom a; d Rene M. Elstrom, and author-~Vt See page "I" ~~ DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resoluti an easement in connection from the California Depart Millard G. Black and Dorot payment therefor in the tot page "J" DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: See page "E" No. 65-22-7 re: Accepting •th Assessment District #2 nt of Veterans Affairs and • Black, and authorizing mount of $500.00. See val of warrants. and communicati , if any of motion re: -4- ..• WARRANT NO. 1361 1362 1363 1364 1365 1366 1367 1368 1369 1370 1371 1372 1373 1374 1375 1376 1377 1378 1379 1380 1381 1382 1383 1384 1385 1386 1387 1388 1389 1390 1391 1392 1393 1394 1395 1396 1397 1398 1399 1400 14ol 14Q2 1403 1404 1405 1406 1407 14o8 1409 1410 1411 1412 1413 1414 1415 1416 1417 JOINT OPERATING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT _____ .. Ajax Rents ~ "~ ~ $ 24.oo Aladdin Litho & Art ~ r ~ 83.72 Alcorn Fence Co. ~~~ ~ 110.00 Am~ricaJ1 Airlines, Inc. ~ ~(U ~:,;,16.10 American Compressor Co. ~~~If~ 148.67 The American Society of Civil Engineers °'VV'~ 43.60 American Water Works Assn. ~~i...P~~A...l.25.00 Anaheim Dodge ~-7f~ 33 .. 78 Anchor Packing Co. ~....L:*; l ~""-a') 73.84 V. B. Anderson Co. ~ ~~ 4.32 Arcade Stationers ~ ---d~ 100.35 Arrowhead & Puritas Waters, Inc. ?>;:uLJ w~ 74.85 Associated Concrete Products ~--~ 66.15 Bay City Bearing Co. ~~~~_: IL • 655.05 Beach Fabricating Co. ~~--.. -~~ , _ _.-----. 91.84 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. ~ ~~ 196.61 Blake, Moffitt & Towne Paper ~~ ~ 21.88 L. H. Blatterman Co. v~ . 230.32 Blower Paper Co • J--~ ~?>~~ 31. 29 Blystone Equipment Co. v~ ~ ~-...,_ 23.40 Bragg Crane Service ~~ r'~ '° 1 270.75 Brookhurst Dodge ~ (\..L--~~ 213.52 Brulin & Co., Inc. ~~ 11--t~ • 161.39 Buena Park Wholesal·e Electric ~ ~ 788.72 Business Equipment Co. ~ &~ 86 .64 C & D Compressor Service ~-~.1 43.68 Chemical Exchange Co. ~ 12,954.04 Clark Dye Hardware ~~ ~·~.~~J~ 23.55 William N. Clarke ~~~~(fWA~) 30.77 Coast Office Equipment "=J-:.4 ~ 139.10 College Lumber Co., Inc. ~ 31.35 Concrete Coring Co. ~~ 180.00 Costa Mesa Lumber Co. _e.4.. .... i., ·... 83. 36 Dearth Machinery Co • ~~ ~ ~J_;_J ~ 620. 80 -P:::.t--rI ~ John M. Deck Co • ~ • ~ ;:...-.. .l.~~ 105. 32 Deckert Surgical Co. ;;::,-..::,.;r ~ !CJ:;. 76. 00 A. B. Dick Co. ~ ~~ 118.66 Diesel Control Corp. ~~ ~ 72.04 E & F Vacuum Pump Repair Service ~~F"',,_ 442.00 Electric Supplies Distributing Co~-~~~ 161.67 Enchanter, Inc. ~~ t., ~ ~ 1,200.00 Engineering Products Co .'"ik ~ ~ 372 .67 Engineers Sales Service Co., Inc. ~~\'~ 29.65 Enterprise Electric Supply Co.~.~ 334.83 Enterprise Printing Co. ~ 82.73 Finney Tire Service 1~ ~~ 16. 25 Fischer & Porter ~~ ~;_._;r~ 110.93 Flair Drafting Service '"D~+~ ~ 422.63 Four Seasons Nursery .£-....J~~ ~ 34. 79 Freedom Newspapers, Inc. h ~ ~ 30 .Bo Friden, Inc. ~ ~ T-:'-'-~ 18.oo General Hoist & Equipment Co. ~<f~ 94.12 General Telephone Co. fi~ • ~ ...... ~-r 824.85 Goodall Rubber Co. ~~ ~ 87·. 81 Bob Gosche Co. ~.__JJ_ ~..<~ 132.33 Hanson, Peterson, Cowles & Sylvester~~ 213.00 Harbor Clinic ~/\.A-~w:,_;;t~ 93.00 -A- -, WARRANT NO. 1418 1419 1420 1421 1422 1423 1424 1425 1426 1427 1428 1429 1430 1431 1432 1433 1434. 1435 1436 1437 1438 1439 1440 1441 1442 1443 1444 1445 1446 1447 1448 1449 1450 1451 1452 1453 1454 1455 1456 1457 1458 1459 1460 1461 1462 1463 1464 1465 1466 1467 1468 1469 1470 1471 1472 1473 1474 1475 1476 1477 1478 IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Fred A. Harper ~ ~~ $ 33.20 Glenn Harris ~ ~~J-A-37.20 Harrison, Zeppegno & Bri~tol ~ cr-'..,-a-L24.oo Paul Hogan ~~JA-44.70 Honeywell, Inc. ~~~~~ ~~ 366.80 Howard Supply Co • o ~ ......C.. 2, 125. 32 City of Huntington Beach ~.~~~""" 4.50 International Business Machines Corp.1~~461.45 International .Harvester Co. -r~ ~0 48 .61 J & M Service ~ ·~ , 150 .oo Kleen-Line Corp. ~.:..O ~ 98. 44 Knox Industrial Supplies~~~~ 1,089.74 LBW s, Inc. ~~ -·~-r'~ 489.51 L & N Uniform Supply Co.~ _.,.__,c:j 640.98 Judy Lee ~~c;..y. 18.oo Lewis Bros. ~~ 111.66 Jay G. Lissner Co. ~~+~ ~~ 10.04 Los Angeles Times .t..-~~ :.;.__ 51.46 Mahaffey Machine Co. ~ ~ ~ 230 .82 Mc Calla Bros. Pump & Drilling Co • ~ (', t ~ 76 • 54 Charles Meriam Co. ~ ~ ... -" , ·.., 57 • 41 E. B. Moritz Foundry ~~ e. ~ 88.40 Munselle Supply Co., Inc. ~ L-\ ~ 69. 58 National Chemsearch Corp. ~ ~:::x: ~ ~ 351.09 City of Newport Beach .....,.,t;._ ~ '1>..J-s:1~~~~~ 5.75 o. C. Suppliers, Inc. ~~ ~ ~ 102.52 County of Orange ~~~ ~ ~~... a..... 6 .90 Orange County Farm Supply Co • ~ ~,.( 22 .10 Orange County Radiotelephone Service~~. 261.13 Orange County Stamp Co. ~~'"C" .,.~ 22.88 Overhead Door Co. of Orange County~ ~400 .80 Pacific Telephone ~--~~~ l.r;to,,,11 253.45 Postmaster, City of Santa Ana ~~~~ 100.00 Reds Frame, Wheel & Brake Service~~ ~~6 .80 The Register ~~ A-L-8. 80 The Republic Supply Co. of California~~3.57 Rex Chainbel t, Inc. ~ ~ .. , . 772. 35 Howard Ryan Tire Service -r~ ~.~~ 102.12 San Bar Electronics Co. ~~ ~~~ 28.24 Sangamo Electric Co. ~,,..:__ ~~ 384.80 Santa Ana ·Chain & Gear Co • k~ • 816. 77 Santa Ana Electric Motors ~ A-L~ "~ 771.18 Santa Ana Electronics Co. ~......:__ ~~ 88. 40 Santa Ana Lumber Co. ~ 93.56 E. H. Sargent & Co. ~.,...... ft-"~·.: 278.25 Russell M. Scott, Sr. ~ o"~ ~~ ~ 83.90 Select Nurseries, Inc • .a-~+~~µ 140.92 Shipkey & Pearson, Inc • .,-~ 57.20 Signal Oil Co. t° ,., 4·' _. 337 .44 So. Calif. Edison Co. i.A..~ k; (~ 4,622.39 Southern Calif. Water Co. ~\1't~,.t, 20.99 Southern Counties Gas Co. ~ ~ 538.23 Sparks Stationers ~ ~rS 58.08 Speed-E-Auto Parts ~ ~~ 23.71 Standard Auto-Body Co.~ L '~' 272.18 Standard Oil Co. of Calif. )>~ ~~ u.:.A. 1, 114.18 J. Wayne Sylvester ~ ~~~ 22.80 Tell Steel, Inc. ~ ~ ~ ~~ 424.34 Thermo-Fax Sales, Inc. ~~ ~ 7 .Bo C. O. Thompson Petroleum Co.·~~ 122.71 Utilities Supply Co. ~ 24.91 -B- WARRANT NO. 1479 1480 1481 1482 1483 1484 1485 1486 1487 1488 1489 1490 1491 1492 1493 1494 1495 1496 IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT Van Waters & Rogers, Inc. J2..-..t. --~t~ $ 192.20 John R. Waples ~ ~~ 223.00 Westco Pump Sales Co. ~ ,~->··~·-'\-~ 72 .18 Western Salt Co. ~ 20.SO City of Westminster Water Dept. t\-~-?t" w~ 5. 50 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING FUND $ 42,351.80 CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS IN FAVOR OF Aladdin Litho & Art Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. John Carollo Engineers ~7-~ ~~u~ Fred J. Early, Jr. Co., Inc.\~~\ Enterprise Printing Co. Freedom Newspapers, Inc. R. W. Mc Clellan & Sons '~ Raymond G. Osborne Labs, Inc. Santa Ana Blue Print Co. Schurr & Finlay, Inc. J. T. Smith Co. & Wescon,, Inc. ~\LU\ Wallace Trade Bindery Co. ~ John Ward Co. 4~ ~ TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF -c- $ 79.4c; 1,005.60 31,969 .9~ 12,943.25 117.81 38.79 3,909.30 684.oo 13.90 5,950.22 60,,043.14 39.00 9,170.63 $125,964.63 $168,316.43 DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL orirLAY FUND WARRANTS I WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF 1497 1498 1499 1500 1501 ' City of re~ City of llerton Garden G e ve Sanitary District ACCUMULATED CAPITA OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS DIST'RICT NO. e &.:3 SUSPENSE .FUND WARRANTS IN FAVdR OF CGunty of OranJ e DISTRICT O. 5 ,-- ACCUMULATED CAPITAb OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS Iir).AVOR OF $ AMOUNT 30,609.00 26,391.00 19,358.86 $ 76,358.86 $ 14,989.J.c $ 34 .oo 1502 Simpson l Stevlingson $ 7,758 .67 -D- WARF.ANT NO • 1503 1504 . 1505 1506 1507 1508 1509 1510 1511 151 2 15 13 DISTRICT NO. 7 ~-----·--- OP E.EATING FUND WARP.ANTS :::::N FAVOR OF Boyle & Lowry AiJ No. Amouri.t $ 5,1og:-88 2,456.00 4,947r 7 0 1 2 5A $12,513.58 Plan che ck & Inspection 1,835 .~0 $14,349.!;8 Kenn e th R. Brandt & Hilda M. Brandt ( f.J) :/fl) Bill Kro ege r Coun t y of Orang e AD No. Amoun t l $ 3 69 ·.··00 2 151.CO $ 520.00 ... Southern Ca lifornia Ed ison Co . Title Insurance & Tru s t Co. (AD #1) Th e Tustin News Uni te d Title Guaranty Co. (A D fJ5A) De p artment of Veterans Af fair s (AD #2 ) FACILI TIE S REVOLVING.FUND WA RR ANTS IN FAVOR OF Lloy d A. Po llard ACC UM.UL C!.T:::'.J'i -E- AMO u'"N T $ 14, 349 .. 48 20 0 .CO 3 0 ,0(' 520 .00 7.35 97 6 .00 32 .11-2 2,493.55 1,000 .00 $ 19 ,608 .80 $ 300.00 $ 19 ,908.80 4,142 .9 0 RESOLUTION NO. 65-17 APPROVING PIANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR JOB NOS. Pl-13 AND P2-l0 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND ADOPTING PIA.NS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRIT HOPPERS AT PIANTS NO. 1 AND 2, JOB NOS. Pl-13 AND P2-10; AND AUTHORIZING DISTRICT NO. 1 TO RECEIVE BIDS AND TO AWARD CONTRACT FOR SAID WORK --~ -----~ -- The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, DO HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the detailed plans, specifications and contract documents this day submitted to the Boards of Directors for GRIT HOPPERS AT PL.~NTS NO. 1 AND 2, JOB NOS. Pl-13 AND P2-10, are hereby approved, adopted and ordered filed with the Secretary; and, Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized and directed to advertise for bids for said work pursuant to the provisions of the Health and Safety Code of the State of California; and, Section 3. That said bids will be received in the office of the Secretary of the Districts until 7:30 p.m., March 10, 1965, at which time said bids will be publicly opened and read; and, Section 4. That County Sanitation District No. 1, acting as agent for itself and County Sanitation Districts Nos. 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, is hereby authorized and directed to receive bids and to award contract for said work. -F- CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT 1965 RESOLUTION NO. 65-18 A JOINT RESOLUTION OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 AND 11, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 762 PROVIDING FOR RULES AND REGUIATIONS REIATIVE TO CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT The Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7 and 11, of Orange County, California, hereby resolve that: Section 1. Paragraph 11 of Resolution No. 762, as amended by Resolution No. 778, is hereby amended to read: 11. Any employee separating from the Districts' service who has not taken his earned vacation, if any, shall receive the hourly equivalent of his salary for each hour of earned vacation, based on the pay rate in effect for such person on the last day actually worked, or spent on authorized sick leave, or spent on authorized time off as compensation for overtime. When separation is caused by death of an employee, payment shall be made to the estate of such employee, or in applicable cases, as provided by Section 630 of the Probate Code. An employee receiving pay in lieu of unused vacation may not be reemployed by the County Sanitation Districts in any capacity until a number of working days equal to the number of days paid vacation has elapsed following the effective date of separation. Nothing in this Section shall be interpreted as preventing the General Manager from filling a position vacated by separation immediately following the effective date of such separation. Section 2. Paragraph 24 of Resolution No. 762, as amended, is hereby amended to read as follows: G-1- 24. The following paid holidays shall be granted to all employees holding duly established permanent, full time positions: January 1, February 12, February 22, May 30, July 4, Labor Day, November 11, Thanks- giving Day, December 25. Any employee eligible to receive paid holidays who is required to work on a holiday shall be entitled to equivalent time oft as provided in these rules. When a holiday falls on a Sunday, the following Monday will be observed as a holiday._ When a holiday falls on the regularly scheduled same day off of a work week for an employee who is eligible to receive paid holidays, the employee shall be entitled to an additional day as equivalent time off. Section 3. This resolution shall become effective February 1, 1965. G-2 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OP OR.ANGE COUN'lY P. O. Box 5175-10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C. O. NO. 2 -----Site Improvements, Phase II JOB: at Plant No. 1 Job No. Pl-12-1 DATE: Jan. 5, 1965 CONTRACTOR: __ __.R~·---W~·-::-.::M~c~Cl~e~l~l~an--..~an__...d:-:.S~on~s--... ______________ ___ .Amount of this change order (ADD)(DEDUCT) $ __ --:on~o_n_e __________ _ In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. EXTENSION OF TIME The following extension of time is granted to the original completion time for the following reasons as specified in Section 5-10 of the Specifications. Inclement Weather November & December, 1964 & January, 1965 Acts of the Districts Change Order No. 1 55 TOTAL 100 Original specified completion date: Completion date with this extension of time (100 days) Revised Contract completion date Original Contract Price Prev. Auth. Changes ADD This Change {ADD)(DEDUCT) Amended Contract Price Board authorization date: .Approved: December 12, 1964 March 22, 1965 March 22, 1965 $ 29, 726.60 2a331.00 none $ 32,057 .60 February 10, 1965 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF OR.ANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA By /s/ Lee M. Nelson General Manager R. W. McCLELLAN AND SONS By ----------------------------- -H- RESOLUTION NO. 65-21-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 1, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #2, AND AUTHORIZ- ING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board or Directors or County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant or permanent easement dated January 19, 1965, wherein the DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and EDWARD WILLIAM ELSTROM and RENE M. ELSTROM, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-2-lb in that certain action in eminent domain #124140, is hereby authorized to be made to the DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and EDWARD WILLIAM ELSTROM and RENE M. ELSTROM in the total amount of $500.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -I- RESOLUTION NO. 65-22-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZ- ING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #2, AND AUTHORIZ- ING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant of permanent easement dated January 20, 1965, wherein the DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and MILLARD G. BLACK and DOROTHY BLACK, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a permanent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the con- struction in Assessment District #2, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-2-la in that certain action in eminent domain #124140, is hereby authorized to be made to the DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA and MILLARD G. BLACK and DOROTHY BLACK in the total amount of $500.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed·to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. -J- (41 -A) ~ (49-A) DISTRICTS OFFICIAL COPY SUPPLEMENTA L AGENDA February 1 0, 1965 DISTRICT 3 /) -Consideration of moti on ~~~ Fe~ruary ~~, at re: Adj ourP..ment 0 ange City Hall ,,, v .....,_ l '2-'f '-- DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resol ion Noo 65 -23-7 re: Authorizi n g acceptanc of a penria n e nt easemen t in cor .... 11ection with As essmer.1.t District #1, a nd ~ a'J.thc.,rizing payme nt erefor in th~ amou.J.t of D $200.00 . Se~ p age 11 A11 of thi s agen da ~ .r-· ... RESOLUTION NO. 65-23-7 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF AN EASEMENT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF EASEMENT IN CONNECTION WITH ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #1, AND AUTHOR- IZING PAYMENT THEREFOR The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain grant of permanent easement dated February 9, 1965, wherein KENNETH R. BRANDT and HILDA M. BRANDT, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 a per- manent easement for sewer purposes in connection with the construction in Assessment District #1, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That payment for said permanent easement, which is more particularly described as Parcel No. 7-1-8 in that certain action in eminent domain #128876, is hereby authorized to be made to Kenneth R. Brandt and Hilda M. Brandt, 19282 East Barrett Lane~ Santa Ana, California, in the total amount of $200.00; and, Section 3. That the Secretary is hereby authorized and directed to record said permanent easement in the Official Records of Orange County. .. · S-A II DISTRICTS MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT Coun ty Sani tat ion Distr icts o f Oran ge Coun ty , Cal iforn ia Offl CIAL e· i V P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountai n Valley, Calif., 92708 JOINT BO A RDS REGULAR MEETING Wednesday~ February lO, 1965 ~:00 p.m. Phone 962-2411 February 5, 1965 DISTRICT NO. 1 DIRECTORS PLEASE NOTE: There i;rill be an adjourned meeting of the District No. 1 Board at 7:30 p .m. on this date to open bids on two Plant construction jobs. A separate agenda for this meeting is enclosed. The item (No. 7) relating to evaluation of bids to be o~ened for Job No. P2-5-E (Headworks Pump, Motor, Gearhead and Starter) will be explained verbally at the meeting. * * * * * * * * * * * * The f o l lowing is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed Joint Boards' agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory . Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting but will appear in the complete agenda available at the meeting . Joint Boards GENERAL INFORMATION: For those Directors who may not have had the opportunity of reading the 1964 Grand Jury report we quote verbatim, without comment, the section of this report relating to the Sanitation Districts: "There has been excellent cooperation between three departments which are closely allied, namely, Orange County Flood Control District, Orange County Water Distric t and the Sanitation District in the vital work of conservation of and the protection of our limited water supplies. This work will become increasing- ly urgent as the County expands . "We urge that this cooperation be continued . "There are many services vital to a pleasant living and livli - h ood that are provided by the cities and County for its many inhabitants which are taken as a matter of course . Behind many of these lie great fores ight by County leaders, excellent engineering, large physical facilities and a skilled staff of employees. This is true of work of the Sanitation District which is charged with the removal of domestic and industrial sewerage . "The Grand Jury was conducted on a tour of the new admini- strative buildings and of one of two sewage treatment plants a.nd were briefed on the present and future operations. "The members feel that a.n excellent job is being performed." No. 14--APPROVAL OF PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR GRIT HOPPERS, JOB NO. Pl-13 AND P2-10: Part of our planned construction for Plant improvements for this fiscal year include providing hoppers for storage of grit removed at the headworks at each Plant. The work also includes a new grit classifier at Plant No. 2. Our engineers are now submitting plans and specifications for this job and they will be recommended for approval and authorization for bids to be received by the Board of District No. 1. The provision of these hoppers will result in a better and more sanitary appearance at both Plant headworks and will also result in a.n increased efficiency since we will be able to release for other work the dump trucks now used for grit storage. The engineer's estimate for this work is $62,000. No. 15 -AUTHORITY TO OPPOSE FEDERAL SENATE BILL NO. 4 (Muskie): This Bill before the present Congress will, in our opinion, result eYentually in a practically complete usurpation of local control over water pollution and a transference of such authority to the Federal Government. We have been advised that this Bill has already passed the Senate and is now before the House Public Works Committee. We are recommending the motion appearing on the formal agenda in order that the staff and Legal Counsel can use every legitimate method of opposing passage of at least certain portions of this Bill by the House. If the Bill passes the House it will undoubtedly be approved by the President since he has included this matter in his urgent legislative program. The portion of this Bill, which is actually a.n amendment to the existing Federal Water Pollution Control Act, which we most object to and which we are sure most state governments and water pollution control organizations will oppose, is the setting of standards by the Federal Government for water quality for any actual or future beneficial use. This enactment will obviously result in one set of water standards throughout the country regardless of the wishes or needs of local interests. No. 16 -AUTHORITY TO EXTEND PRESENT CHLORINE PURCHASE CONTRACT: Our current contract with Jones Chemical, Inc., for purchase of chlorine at a very favorable price will terminate on June 30 of this year. We feel certain that soliciting new bids at this time will result, because of the present market, in a new contract with a higher unit cost. Also the installation of our outfall diffuser this spring may hopefully result in a decrease in chlorine use which will tend to cause suppliers to bid higher. For these reasons we believe that an extension of the existing contract at the same terms for a period of six months will result in a substantial savings to the Districts. The supplier has just submitted a letter agreeing to a six month extension of their agreement with us at the present terms. Accordingly, we are recommending acceptance of their proposal and -2- authorization to execute an amendment to the existing contract to extend the period to December 31, 1965. If the Directors do not concur in this recommendation, it will mean that we will be required to go out for new bids and for this reason we should like to clear up this matter at this seemingly early date. It may be recalled that delivery of chlorine in bulk quantities to our Chlorination Station was discussed at a previous Board meeting ·when funds for such storage were included in this year's budget. However, because of the imminent completion of the ocean outfall diffuser with its possible reduction of chlorine use, we are planning to defer action on providing chlorine storage until the next fiscal year. No. 17 -AMENDMENT TO Ru~S AND REGULATIONS RELATING TO EMPLOYMENT: Our present resolution (762) spelling out these regulations was adopted in 19 60. The terms were then practically identical with those of the County Government particularly as to payment of vacation time on termination, ete., mainly because our payroll is channeled through the County Auditor-Controller. The Cou.~ty rules in this connection have been changed since 1960 and it would therefore be a marked convenience to both our payroll people and the County Auditor to conform to the present C~unty r ules. We are consequently recormnena.ing the res:ilution, attached to the formal agenda, amend:t.ng Resol"t:tion No . 762, which will make two - changes in our rules: (1) Provide for cash payment of accrued vaca- tion time to a terminati~g employee and (2) Eliminate reference to Good Friday as a partial holiday. ~he matter of time off on Good Friday has also been extremely troublesome to our Accounting depart- ment because of shift work and we are therefore recommending that mention of time off with pay on Good Friday be deleted from the regulations. We propose to aliow employees who actually attend religious services ~·d thin the specified hours to take this time off with pay. No. 18 -CHANGE ORDBR NO. 2, PI.ANT JOB NO . Pl-12-1: This job is the rather extensive paving operation which has been going on the past several months at Plant No . 1 . This job was scheduled to be completed on the 12th of December last year but owing to untimely rains, mist and cold weather, tne slurry seal operation included in the contract could not be completed until this month. The formal change order .attached to the agenda therefore grants'the co ntractor an extension of time of 55 days for inclement weather. Also, as the Directors will recall, a change order was approved at the January meeting pro- viding for an extension of p~ving to our existing office parking lot. The contractor has partially completed this work a~ the present time but we have asked him to delay final placing of asphalt until such time as the ground dries out sufficiently to allow a firm bedding to be obtained . Weather being unpredictable, we are recommending that the contractor be allowed an additional 55 days to his contract to'"complete this change order work. The total recommended extension of time for the above two reas ons is thus 100 days. -3- ~. Districts Nos. 1 and 2 No. 22 -STAFF REPORT ON SEWERAGE OF A PORTION OF DISTRICT NO. 2 THROUGH DISTRICT NO. 1 FACILITIES: A report will be made by the staff on this subject which, basically, is a problem created when District No. 2 boundaries were originally drawn. These boundaries left two small portions of District No. 2 which will obviously have to drain through District No. 1 . These areas are now or will be in the City of Santa Ana and portions are now being developed . We have discussed this matter with City representatives and it is anticipated that the City Council will, in the near future, request the Directors of Districts Nos. 1 and 2 to provide permanent sewerage arrangements for these areas. District No. 1 No. 25 -ADJOURNMENT TO FEBRUARY 17: We are recommending that the Board adjourn to the hour of 4:00 p.m. on the above date to award construction contracts, bids for which will be taken at the 7:30 p.m. adjourned meeting prior to the Joint Board meeting and to award purchase of operating equipment, bids for which have been authorized to be taken by the staff. The Directors of District No. 7, most of' whom are also Directors of District No. 1, will be meeting in an adjourned session at the same time (Item No. 48 below). District No. 2 No. 39 -ADJOURNMENT TO FEBRUARY 27: The District's engineers, Boyle & Lowry, who are woikl.ng on the future sewerage facilities requirements report for District No. 2 and I feel that it is appropriate for the Board to review the progress of their studies which are being com- plicated by a number of matters on which the Directors should be in- formed. Consequently, if agreeable to the Directors, we are proposing that an adjourned meeting to review this subject be held on Saturday morning, February 27, at the Orange City Hall. One of the problems to be considered is financing of the proposed reclamation operation ·- and it may be that such financing may involve the Orange County Muni- cipal Water District and the Orange County Water District. For this reason, the Board may wish us to ask representatives of these two Districts to meet with the Directors on the above date . District No. 7 Nos. 43 and 44 -CONDEMNATION ACTION FeR ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS NOS. 1 AND 5A: Resolution s 65 -19-7 and 65 -20-7 authorize condemnation for rights of way within Assessment Districts Nos. 1 and 5A. No. 45 -REPORT OF THE ENGINEER OF WORK REGARDING EASEMENT NO. 24 IN A.D. NO. 1: Concerns possible rerouting of the presently planned sewer in this area (see enclosed letters from property owners). -4- J • Nos. 46 and 47 -ACCEPrING EASEMENTS FROM THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS ET AL: Authorizes payment of $500.00 for each easement for rights of way in connection with A.D. No. 2. No. 50 -ADJOURNMENT TO 4:00 P.M. FEBRUARY 17, 1965: This meeting will be held in conjunction with the District No. 1 meeting called for the same hour and date. A recommendation to proceed with the construction of a master plan sewer in the vicinity of Bristol Street and the proposed San Diego Freeway will be presented. -5- Lee M. Nelson General Manager Mtg . (JOINT) 2 -10 #11 -Report of the Joint Chairm -The Joint Chairman reported that the Santa Ana River Basin Region Water Pollution Control Board held a board meeting oh January 21st at t~e Sanitation Districts ' ~·~·r ,.,.... ( VI --d. r ~/ offices~d approved the use of the est wells for the injectRNion of treated waste water . #15 -Mr . Paul G. Brown, ssistant General Manager , reviewed briefly for the Directors the p posed Senate Bill S .4, 89th Congress, which proposes to amend the Fe Water Pollution Control Act . It was the recommendation of the taff to oppose certain provisions of the act which invol ved great~t federal control . It was then moved , seconded and duly carried : That the ger be a u thorized to make appropriate representations in opposi of Senate Bill S-4, 89th Contra ss which appe s to be objectionable to the interests of the Sanitation to all #21 - #22 - of Districts #1 a of ±kR Santa Ana Basic Accommodati l to the Boards for #36 -The copies of these objections be forwarded istant General Manager advised the Board members #2 that an area within #2 in the northerly portion being served by #1 facilities and in the near future a Agreement between the two Districts will be presente d heir consideration . neral Counsel reported on a meeting held February 4th in Los Angeles , w· h representatives of the Contractor and the bonding company and engine s relative to t?e sui~ fi~ed on Contract No . 3 -4A riv,~ .. J. .. ~ •" '-"'~ • (Miller-Holder Trun ewer). / At the recommendation of the General I\ Couns e l it was J / That the matter be referred to the Special Contract Committee / made up of Direc tor s Bousman, Crapo , Barks and Co r nwell to review the pending litigation and s u bmit a7e ,~endation to the Boards . #45 -R & F letter . ,. ,,_,_~. Following the readin~of a letter reeard~the rerouting of ~ Assessment Distri ct #1 sewer schedul ed to be built in Easement #24 , the writer, Mr . L . L . Sibe l, k verbally requested that his letter be withdrawn as he is onger objecting to the presently planned location of the sewer . It was then MS& That sai d request be granted, and that Mr . L . B . Si bel be a llowe4 to withdraw his objection . #45 -It was then $s&DC : That no change wi ll be made in the alignment of the sewer schedul ed i n Easement #24 in Assessment Di s trict #1 . I #45 -A -Show ado£~i..Qn _pf _~eJo luti on accepting easement G ~~~~ TJ:::f&-:~-tA.YJ "' -( _~P),.;> ~ ~<l_ "tJ-Y.,~.7"' '<:L-V n -~ ~ ~~0(L .Mm~ _ ·~'// .$\~ ~v'11~f1' ar>: ct.~ ~~ wN\l'l"". ,,(W\ ''11;:; ~·~ ·::vc~ "Yr R 0 LL JOINT BOARDS \ornwell A~ An erson Bou man Call ns Cook Crapo Culver Furman Gruber Hall Hock Johnson Kanno Lambert Long Meyers Miller Parks Schutte Shipley Speer Stewart Stoddard Workman Wright Phillips OTHERS: Nelson Brown Niss on Galloway Dunn Tremblay Lowry Carlson ~ ~~ )2 µ-~=-' - Farnsworth Gummere Wishek Kanno Gruber Shull De Vries Elder Hubbard Michel Antich Callens Shipley Bell Mack Hileman Chandler Welch Harvey Q.ueyrel Noe Hirs tein DISTRICT 8 Mantin ~~_____/'Ellerby Scpt £ /I:Z_j Ptti;}_lips Hi stein CALL District_..:../ ____ c __ / Regular ___ ~)'-------- Adjourned.~------ DISTRICT 1 Hall v--Hubbard Meyers v-- Miller /,/ Mack EJa:M--~ .~Hirstein DISTRICT 2 Parks / Hileman Callens v---Kanno Cornwell ---Farnsworth Crapo v:: Shull Culver i/ Hall ~ Hubbard Hock ,,,.... Michel Schutte i / Chandler Speer ,_.....,,. Harvey Workman ~ Queyre l ~i -H::i:ps e/ Hirs tein DISTRICT 3 Cornwell ,/ Farnsworth Amo ,,_....,.... Anderson ~ Gummere Bousman Wishek Crapo ,,,,..,.--Shull Culver ~ Furman ~ De Vries Hall Hubbard Johnson V" Antich Kanno ;;?" Callens Long ,z Bell Schutte ~ Chandler Shipley ~ Welch Speer i ~ Harv ey Wright ! .......... Noe ..ai>R:ilMtJS ....---Hirstein DISTR ICT 5 Stoddard 1/ Gruber ~ Elder ~-:l4$S Hirstein DISTRICT 6 Meyers v Gruber ~ Elder ~ ~ Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Cook ,/ Gruber Hall i/ Hubbard Mey ers 1Z ..... Mack Miller Parks V-Hileman ~s ~ Hirstein DISTRICT 11 Lambert ~ Shipley Stewart ~ iPJ?i ~s > ~ Hirstein R 0 LL CALL District Regular Adjourned Date Time Item ~~ DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Meyers JOINT BOARDS Miller Mack Cornwell Farnsworth Phillips Hirstein Amo DISTRICT 2 Anderson Gummere Parks Hileman Bousman Wishek Callens ·Kanno Callens Kanno Cornwell Farnsworth Cook + Gruber Crapo Shull Crapo Shull Culver Culver z Hall Hubbard Furman ~ De Vries Hock Michel Gruber Elder Schutte Chandler Hall Hubbard Speer Harvey Hock Michel Workman Queyrel Johnson Antich Phillips Hirstein Kanno ~ Callens Lambert Shipley DISTRICT 3 Long Bell Cornwell Farnsworth Meyers Amo Miller ~· Mack Anderson Gummere Parks Hileman Bousman Wishek Schutte Chandler Crapo Shull Shipley Welch Culver Speer Harvey Furman De Vries Stewart Hall Hubbard Stoddard Johnson Antich Workman Queyrel Kanno Callens Wright Noe Long Bell "@Ji I fDtps Hirstein Schutte Chandler Shipley Welch Speer Harvey Wright Noe OTHERS: Phillips Hirstein Nelson DISTRICT 5 Brown Stoddard Niss on Gruber Elder Galloway Phillips Hirstein Dunn Tremblay DISTRICT 6 Lowry Meyers Carlson Gruber Elder Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Cook Gruber Hall Hubbard Meyers Miller Mack Parks Hileman -~ Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Martin Ellerby Lambert Shipley Scott Stewart Phillips Hirstein Phillips Hirstein I II BOARDS OF DIRECTORS DISTRICTS County Sanitation District.s of Orange County, California O:·dC M[ P. 0. Box 5175 10844 Ell is Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif., 92708 (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) (6 ) (7) (8) (9) DISTRICT No. 1 AGENDA FEBRUARY 10TH 2 1965, at 7:30 p.m. Roll Call Appointment of Chairman pro tern, if necessary Report of the General Manager , ~\~ Consideration of motion re: Approving Addendum #1 to ~~~ the plans and specificiations for Addition to Plant No . 1 Effluent Discharge Facilities--Pipe Line , Job No. I-6-1 (Copy of Adde~dum #1 attached) Consideration of motion re: Directing the Secretary to open and rea~ bids received for Addition to Plant No. 1 Effluent Di~charge Facilities--Pipe Line, Job No . I-6-1. Consideration of motio No. I-6-1 to the engin for tabulation and reco re: Referring bids for Job rs and the General Manager endation to the Board Consideration of motion of recommendation from the Manager re: Method to be use Job No. P2-5-E Receive and file letter ineer and the General in evaluating bids for Consideration of motion re: Dir~cting the Secretary to open and read bids received f Headworks Pump , Motor, Gearhead and Starter, Job o. P2-5-E Consideration of motion re: Refer ·ng bids for Job No. P2-5-E to the engineers and th General Manager for tabulation and recommendation the Board (10) Other business and communications, if any (11) Consideration of motion re: Adjournment ~ ~ 1: '{ {' ROLL CALL <j_ ;J ~ Date :;fUL~ /~ Time 7 ,' 2 O Adjourned __ ~ ____ / ______ Meeting OTHERS: Item_,_~_vL/ __ , -~--- DISTRICT 1 Hall V" Hubbard Meyers ~ Miller Mack Hirstein Allen Nelson V Brown v: Niss on v· Rimel Hohener Lowry Finster Galloway Carlson