The URL can be used to link to this page

Home My WebLink About1964-04 BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis AvenueFountain Valley, CaliF.,92708 DISTRICT No. II - - ---- � AGENDA _— APRIL 20, 1964 AT 4 : 00 P.M. (1 ) Roll all (2 ) Appoi tment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3 ) Report of the <neal Manager (4 ) Consideration of Resolution No. 64-58-7 re : Receive and file bid tabulation and recommendation, and awarding contract for construction of Contract 7-1E, Revised, Sub- Trunks, to Anro Construction Company in the total amount of $119, 190. 00. See page "A'' (5 ) Other business and communications, if any (6 ) Consideration of motion re : Adjournment to 7 :30 p.m. , May 13, 1964 RESOLUTION N0. 64-58-7 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 7-1E, REVISED, SUB- TRUNKS A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CONTRACT NO. 7-1E, REVISED, SUB-TRUNKS TO ANRO CONSTRUCTION The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the Districtts engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to ANRO CONSTRUCTION, Contractor, for construction of CONTRACT NO. 7-1E, REVISED, SUB-TRUNKS; and the tabulation of bids and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said Contract No. 7-1E, Revised, is hereby awarded to ANRO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, Contractor, in the total amount of $119,190.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolu- tion No. 64-46-7 on record in the office of the Secretary. Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashier' s checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -A- R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned Meeting Date / ime d� Item 6"fL - DISTRICT 1 VMeers bbar H e n Ste n i DISTRICT 7 Doney ✓ Humeston Cook Hart UL Hall Hubbard t. Meyers Parks Reynolds Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener Lowry �— Billings Galloway R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned Meeting Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Doney v Humeston Cook Hart Hall .mac.._ Hubbard Meyers 7 Parks Reynolds Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener Lowry Billings Galloway BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708 DISTRICT No. # 7 IIAGENDA APRIL 15, 1964 AT 7:00 P.M. (1 ) Roll Cal (2 ) Appointmen of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3 ) Consideration of motion re : Directing the Secretary O to open and re d sealed bids received for Contract No. 7-1E Revise (4 ) Consideration of m tion re : Referring bids opened for Contract No. 7- E Revised, to the engineers and the General Manager or tabulation and recommendation to the Board (5 ) Report of the General Counsel re : Proposed agreement �) with the Navy Department ( eld ov tom 4 t8-64 ) 1 (6 ) Recess until 7:30 p.m. (7) At 7:30 p.m. Chairman asks or any further written protests -7 . t(e pk^ (8) Secretary reports time d place for hearing of protests, and reports upon rece t of Affidavits of Publication, and. Affidavits of Pos ing and Mailing (9 ) Chairman calls for y written protests filed with the Secretary (10) Secretary to repo t on written protests filed before 7:30 p.m. (time or hearing) (11 ) Chairman to ask audience if anyone wishes to be heard, i.e., public hearing (12 ) Consideration ,of motion re : Refer written protests to tt"r Engineer of Wrk for checking and report (13 ) Recess or adjournment until engineers can report on protests (14) Report ;of Engineer of Work on percentage of protests (15) ConsAeration of motion re : Adoption of resolution or ring the work to be done Rep rt of the engineers on service connections for co lots in Assessment Districts (17 ) Othe usiness and communications, if- any (18) Consi eration of motion ro: nd ioiu•nnx-nt to April 20th, 4: 00 .m. J -Re: Assessment District No. 2 - Co. San. Distr. No, 7 Mr. Harper - The date for opening bids must be at least 10 days after the first publication of notice inviting bids. We are going to publish on April 23rd and 30th. Therefore, you should not set the date for opening bids any earlier than May 6th at least. We are sending enough copies of the Notice Inviting Bids for you to post and to attach to the affidavit of posting. It should be posted for at least five days. We will take care of the publication, but would like to know the, number o the Resolution Ordering Work as soon as possible, 1 COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 2 MINUTES FOR HEARING ON 3 RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 64-3 5-7 4 ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2 April 15, 1964 5 7:30 o'clock P. m. 6 7 The Secretary reported that this was the time and place fixed for the 8 hearing of protests or objections against the work or the District, as described i 9 in Resolution of Intention No. 64-35-7, in the matter of the cghstruction of 10 sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT DI!�TRICT NO. 2, " 11 as described in said resolution. ' 12 The Secretary also reported that affidavits in support of the publication 13 of the Resolution of Intention, the mailing of printed Xiotices of the adoption of 14 said resolution, and the posting of the Notice of Improvement, as required by 15 law, had been made and are on file in the office of the Secretary. The Chair- 16 man then inquired of the Secretary if any written protests or objections against 17 the work or the District had been filed with him in said matter. The Secretary 18 reported that tY written protests had been filed with him prior to the 19 time set for the hearing by the following: 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 The Chairman then announced that this was the time and place set for 29 the hearing of protests or objections against the work or the district, each as 30 set forth in the Resolution of Intention hereinbefore mentioned, and asked if 31 anyone present desired to be heard in said matter. 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL&HARVEY i FOURTH FLOOR I! 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. 7ANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA I f s - n 1 The Boar of Directors having before it a diagram of the Assessment 2 District and being amiliar with the Assessment District and there being no 3 protests filed, Dir for presented the following resolution 4 and moved its adopti n: 5 WHERE , it appearing that no protests, either written or oral, 6 protesting agai st the doing of the work and improvement described 7 in Resolution of ntention No. 64-35-7, or against the Assessment 8 District therein d scribed, have been filed; and 9 WHEREAS, th Board of Directors having considered the area 10 of the District repre ented; 11 NOW, THEREFO E, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of Directors 12 that it does hereby fin and determine that no protests or objections 13 have been made by any ners of the area of the property to be 14 assessed for said work a. .A improvement, as set forth in said Reso- 15 lution of Intention No. 64-3,5-7; and 16 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said resolution be approved 17 and the proceedings be approed. 18 Said motion was duly seconded y Director and 19 carried by the following roll call vote: 20 AYES: Directors 21 22 NOES: Directors 23 ABSENT: Directors 24 25 Director then offered and moved the adoption of 26 Resolution Ordering Work No. i� the matter of the construction 27 of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in "A,'SESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 2" I. 28 in County Sanitation District No. 7, which moti'�n was seconded by Director a 29 and upon roll call vote w�s adopted by the following vote:l 30 AYES: Directors t 31 NOES: Directors 1 I 32 ABSENT: Directors 4 LAW OFFICES OF [ } RIMEL&HARVEY L t} FOURTH FLOOR { 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. } SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA' —2- f (if NO protests) i I After all protests and objections had been made, it was moved by 2 Director and seconded by Director 3 and unanimously carried by the roll call vote of-all Board members present, 4 that all protests be referred to the Engineer of Work for checking and report 5 as to the percentage of the area represented thereby. ( ar-Mg 6 .,at. Y "4 7 - u�rpose.,f r � ki repAat.,o #,Yee=E g rfa �r d^ft r"f Yf � Ion 9 10 (The Secretary reported that this was the # -rffd"'a4id place to whic the 11 hearing or protests"o"r` obje tions against .the.*ork or the�Districft- as desc 'bed . f _.i` 12 in said Resolution of Inten on No. 64-35 4, in the matte of floe constructiri of ,f 13 certain sanitary sewers d appurtep fit ,work in "ASSET, DISTRICT NO. 14 211, �,as continued for t e purpos *of hearing the report the Engineer o 15 rk as to percentage f ro Zsts and or further action W� P g Pt � . ) 16 17 The Engineer of Work reported that the protests represented less than 18 % of the total area of the assessment district. 19 All protestants having been heard and an opportunity having been given 20 to all persons desiring to be heard, and a full, fair and impartial hearing 21 having been granted, the Board of Directors having before it a diagram of the 22 Assessment District and beingtai miliar with the assessment district and also 23 having considered all protests filed,: and having considered the matter as to the 24 area of property represented by said protestants, Director 25 presented the following resolution and moved its adoption: 26 WHEREAS, certain protests have been filed by Aataa L�!4 27 and others, protesting against the doing of the 28 work and improvement described in the Resolution of Intention No. 29 64-35-7, or against the Assessment District therein described; and 30 WHEREAS, the Boai-d of Directors has carefully considered all 31 protests or objections and having considered the area of the District { r 32 represented by said protests; LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL IN HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR I I 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. A 1 SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA -2- (if there ARE protests) 1 1 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by this Board of 2 Directors, that it does hereby find and determine that the said 3 protests or objections have been made by the owners of less than 4 one-half of the area of the property to be assessed for said work 5 and improvement, as set forth in said Resolution of Intention No. 6 64-35-7; and 7 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that each and all of the said 8 protests or objections be and they hereby are overruled and denied. 10 Said motion was duly seconded by Director and 11 carried by the following roll call vote: 12 AYES: Directors '- - 13 14 NOES: Directors 15 ABSENT: Directors r 16 17 Director then offered and moved the adoption of 18 Resolution Ordering Work No. r - in the matter of the construction 19 of sanitary sewers and appurtenances and appurtenant work in "ASSESSMENT 20 DISTRICT NO. 2, " 'which motion was seconded by Director 21 and upon roll call vote was adopted by the following vote: 22 AYES: Directors 23 24 NOES: Directors ` �- - `t � .• 25 ABSENT: Directors �,,4. 26 1 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL 11 HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA -3- (if there ARE protests I t 1 #5 The General Counsel reported to the Board relative to the proposed agreement with the Navy Department providing sewerage facilities for the Marine Corps Air Facility Santa Ana. He advised that he was unable to f d any provision in Public Law 660 to require/ja credit ,ron any District connection 0 chargep , when a Fede al Grant has been given to the District. He recommended that the and continue the matter to the next regular meeting. It was then moved, seconded d duly carried: That consideration of the proposed agreement with the avy Department be continued to the next regular meeting of the Distr t Board. Mtg. of 4-15 #16 Mr. Finster, the Engineer of Work for the Assessment Districts, advised the and that xxxx a number of complaints have been received rela ive to the fact that some corner lots,, will be served by a sewer being constructed in the street \"Wp, along the side of the rather than in front of the propert'lt'. He also pointed out that umerous properties have the septic tanks and cesspools to therear f the peter, and in either case the property owner ig general y faced with mrspe expense th 4 . cv- cf,-- .w. V'- ect on e -a.. s f-PeR3-the ee��estie �te-the-h i he Following a discussion of t e matter by the Directors, during which it was pointed out b the Chairman that on the Board established the olicy that the property was deenled served when a sewer was av ilable on any one side of the property. It was thm then moved, s conded and duly carried.: That the District will bontinue t policy of serving properties with one sewer. Est. $137s690. B I D T A B U L AT I ON S H E E T Date _Rr{� IS- 1964 �.d Contract For; SUB-TRUNKS, Contract 7-1E (Revised) CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID I. Anro Construction Co. $1190190,00 (Corrected) 2480 Ramona Blvd. Los Angeles 33, Calif. 2,51 ,.0o._) 2. Soott Bras. Construction 2437 W. First St. 141#051.50 Santa AnBAlk Calif. 3. The aallacher Company P. 0. Box 813 142,372.40 Costa Mesa, Calif. 4. Orange County Pipeline, Ina. 1506 N. Clinton St. 1512244.00 Santa Ana, Calif. 5. Maroo Construction, Inc* 822 N. Los Angeles St. 1648420.00 Anaheim, Calif. 6. Wal—Con Construction Co. 1404 Ventura Blvd, 1690400.00 Sherman Oaks, Calif. 7. E. J. Vadnais P. 0. Box 68 1826260.00 Etiwanda, Calif. 8. N. A. Artukoviah, Inc. 723 Union St. 213*630.00 Montebello, Calif. 9. 10. R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned Meeting Date / Time - o Item DIS T 1 /al Hub and H eston Hi ein DISTRICT 7 Doney Humeston Cook —�`^ Hart Hall Hubbard Meyers Parks Reynolds Phillips Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener Lowry Billings �/� Galloway R 0 L L C A L L �.d Adjourned Meeting Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Doney ✓ Humeston Cook wy/_ Hart Hall e/ Hubbard Meyers Parks " v Reynolds Phillips Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener "�— Lowry Billings —" Galloway R 0 L L C A L L Adjourned Meeting Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Doney ✓ Humeston Cook Hart Hall Hubbard /n Meyers Parks Reynolds Phillips Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener Lowry Billings Galloway '+'- P�-`--� a P�G ¢�. T,�-� �J �� ti �� a,.� /� � ,i � 3 � IaP�w�-� � � G�l,� t � . V�,� �2k L:.� ,4G a � i �uv � /Jt�—� w � .. � A . R 0 L L C A L L AdJourned Meeting Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall Hubbard Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 7 Doney Humeston Cook Hart Hall Hubbard Meyers Parks Reynolds Phillips Hirstein OTHERS Nelson Chairmen pro tem. if any Brown Nisson Hohener Lowry Billings Galloway BOARDS OF DIRECTORS County Sanitation Districts P.O. Box 5175 of Change County, California 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif.,92708 JOINT BOARDS APRIL 8;, 1964 at 8:00 P.M. IIAGENDA (1 ) Pledge of llegiance (2 ) Roll Call (3 ) Appointments o Chairmen pro tem, if necessary (4 ) DISTRICT 1 Consideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the adjourned meeting on March 10th, and the regular meeting on March 11, 1964'i. as mailed (5 ) DISTRICT 2 ti yt�� Lons aeration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the � regular meeting held;. March 11, 1964, as mailed (6 ) DISTRICT 3 . C�onsideration of motion re : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1964, as mailed t (7) DISTRICT 5 cl ons eration of motion ripe : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held Marc 11, 1964, as mailed (8) DISTRICT 6 Consideration of motion re : ,Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March ll� 1964, as mailed (9 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : App�:' oval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 19,64, and the special meeting held March 26, 1964, as ml iled (10) DISTRICT 8 Consideration of motion re: Approva\of minutes of the adjourned regular meeting on Febrry 13, 1964, as mailed (11 ) DISTRICT 11 Co'nsidera ion of motion re : Approval of minutes of the regular meeting held March 11, 1964, as,:mailed (12 ) Report of the Joint Chairman (13 ) Report of the General Manager (14 ) Report of the General Counse (15 ) DISTRICTS 1,2,3,5,6, 7, 11 " `r rizi the General Consideration o mo ion re : Authorizing ngy.0 Manager to notify John Carol engineers, to proceed with the design of the Ocean tfall Diffuser as described in the engineers rep t dated September, 1962 (16 ) DISTRICTS 1, 2, 3,5,6, 7, 11 Cons eration o mo on re : Auth izing the General Manager to designate six employees� to attend the 36th A-VA Annual Conference of the Californid�_ Ldater Pollution Control Association in Fresno, Aprilt2lst through April 25th; and authorizing reimbursement f r transportation, lodging, meals, registration fees and-- ;ncidental expenses, from the Operating Fund of the Districts (17) Ak DISTRICTS on era ion of Resolution No. 64-48 re : A resolution / of co endation for retiring members of the Boards ,, (18) ALL DISTRIC c Cons i era ion f motion re : Receive and file written certification o he General Manager that he has checked V all bills appears on the agenda for this meeting, found them to be in der, and that he recommends autho- rization for payment (19) ALL DISTRICTS rl Cons era ion of roll call vote otion re : Approval of I Joint Operating Fund and Capital ay Revolving Fund warrant registers for signature of th airman, and authorizing payment of warrants . See pag "A" , I "B" and "C" 4 (20) ALL DISTRICTS Other business and communications, if any (21 ) DISTRICT 1 ��;P ation f motio 1+: val an See pag " C. (22) DISTRICT 1 Other usiness and communicatio if any (23 ) DISTRICT 1 %A Cons eration of motion re : djournment 0� (24 ) DISTRIC 3 Coq.sTder tion_,&t--�motiq a o an Idly. S e ge — - (25 ) DISTRICT 3 Other bUsiness and commun cat ons, if anyA,4 kd (26 ) DISTRICT 3 illy Consideration of motion r : djournment (27 ) DISTRICT 5 Consider of notion r >vat of war Se ge "D" 3 (28) DISTRICT 5 Other business and communi ations, if any (29) DISTRICT 5 N . � Consideration of motion re : Adjournment (30) DISTRICT .6 Consid"er`ation f mo re : Apr warrants, if . any. See pa e E" (31 ) DISTRICT 6 r 4 Other business and communications, if any (32 ) DISTRICT 6 Consideration oi' motion re: Adjournment (33 ) DISTR.ICT 8 ons-1 i - ion of tion re • 1p ova of wary an -2- w ' (34 ) DISTRICT 8 Other—'business and communica ions, if any (35 ) DISTRICT 8 I �' onsi eration of motionJre : djournment (36 ) DISTRICT 11 onsi era o£ motionppx�oval of warrants f any ee page ' (37) DISTRICT 11 � Other business and communicatibns, if any (38) DISTRICT 11 L..� ons eraTion of motion re ; Adjournment P V^1 /�,OL (39) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of Resolution No. ' 4-49-2 re: Awarding contract for the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-2, v to Bosko Construction in the tot 1 amount of $232, 256.00, and authorizing execution of sai contract. Seepage "F11 ; (40) DISTRICT 2 onsiceration of motion re : Approving Change Order #1 I to the plans and specifications f r Contract No. 2-10-1 (a portion of Euclid Trunk Sewer) with no dollar change in the contract with Kordick & So , Contractor. See page V` G (41 ) DISTRICT 2 onsi eration of motion re : Auth rizing the General Manager to employ Raymond G. Osbo ne Laboratories for factory pipe inspection cove ing Contracts 2-10-1 and 2-10-2, in accordance with t e terms of the existing i agreement with said firm coveri plant work. See page nHn (42 ) DISTRICT 2 Cons eration of proposal of J. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry for preparation of a preliminary engineers report on additional ewerage facility re- quirements (copy of proposal i folders ) (43 ) DISTRICT 2 \ ons eration of motion re : pproval of warrants, if any. See page "D" (44) DISTRICT 2_....._ e usiness and communes �tions,� (45 ) DISTRICT 2 Consideration of motion r Adjournment (46 ) DISTRICT 7 r Consideration of motion zee : Declaring public hearing _ • ; 4., open on proposed modification in Assessment District No. 3-A (47) DISTRICT 7 onsi eration of motion re : Declaring public hearing closed (48) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No . 64-53-7 re : Modifying plans and specifications for Assessment District`No. 3-A .ti' ,3- 9�/ (49) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Dec4ring public hearing open on proposed modification in Assessment District, ,,,w No. 3-B � '.� (50) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Declaring public hearing ' closed t � (51 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 64-54-7 re : Modifying plans and specifications for Ass ssment District No. 3-B � (52) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 64-50-7 re: Approving and authorizing execution of agreement with the Navy , L Department covering connection c arges and rates for IA .use of the District' s facilities, for sewering the family . housing project, Marine Corps Air Facility, Santa Ana, << and the Armed Services Reserve Center located at the air facility. (terms of agreeme t are in accordance with I/ District' s Ordinance 705, as am nded) . See page "I'' -61(_ l (53 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 64-51-7 re : Authorizing Modification #8 to engineer' s r port dated November, Pill/ 1961, re : Contract No. 7-1E (Re ised). See page "J" (54 ) DISTRICT 7 I Consideration of Resolution Noi 64-52-7 re: Authorizing acceptance of Easement in conn,bction with Assessment District No. 3-A, and authorizing payment therefor in the total amount of $700.00. 1See page "K" (55 ) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of Resolution No. 64-55-7 re: Approving n and authorizing execution of 'a Pipeline License with the Ya'.Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company in connection with Assessment District -4. ', See page "L" (56) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re : Approval of warrants, if any. See page "E" (57) DISTRICT 7 �104/''�0 OEher bUsiness and communications, if any (58) DISTRICT 7 Consideration of motion re: Adjournment to 7: 00 P.M., ` � April 15th -4- r JOINT OPERATING FUND .WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9131 Acore Drilling Service $ 154.24 9132 Jan Alabaster 18.80 9133 Aladdin Litho & Art 75.40 9134 Aloe 54.83 9135 Alpine Aromatics 477.74 9136 American Optical Co. 24.12 9137 American Wholesale Hardware Co. 20.63 9138 Anaconda Wire and Cable Co. 489.13 9139 Anaheim Dodge 9.82 9140 The Anchor Packing Co. 233,06 9141 The Arcade Stationers 66.39 9142 Associated Concrete Products 48.15 9143 Bales Office Equipment Co. 330.20 9144 Bank of America 1,730.86 9145 Bay City Bearing Co. 202.6o 9146 Beacon Auto Parts, Inc. 404.64 9147 Bell' s Radiator Service 10.00 9148 Blake, Moffit, & Towne Paper 75.66 9149 Buena Park Wholesale Electric 552.97 9150 Business Equipment Company 13.25 9151 Brown Bevis Industrial Equip, Co. 149.10 9152 Cadillac Plastic Co. 57.55 9153 Carey Truck Line Inc. 2.95 9154 John D. Chapman, Saws 2,050.00 9155 Chemical Exchange Co. 9156 Clark Dye Hardware 124.39 9157 Coast Office Equipment Co. 43.68 9158 College Lumber Co., Inc. 68.Oo 9159 Cgpeland Motors, Inc. 149,53 9160 Richard S. Dawson Co. 33.47 9161 Dezurik Corporation 47.16 9162 Diesel Control Corp. 69.14 9163 Electric Supplies Dist. Co. 462.20 9164 Emery's Paint and Wallpaper 735 9165 Enchanter, Inc, 1,050-00 9166 Engineers Sales Service Co.,, Inc. 145.82 9167 Roy W. Enright, M. D. 44.00 9168 Enterprise Electric Supply Co. 786.28 9169 Epco Engineering Products Co. 40,05 9170 City of Fullerton Water Dept. 2.25 9171 Finney Auto Glass 25.69 9172 The Flag Shop 38.79 9173 Foster & Gallagher, Inc. 23.00 9174 Friden, Inc. 18.00 9175 Robert N. Galloway 23.25 9176 General Telephone 9ol.14 9177 Glenmart Company, Inc. 96,17 917 Goodall Rubber Co. 114,51 9179 Bob Gosche Co. 318.92 9180 Graybar Electric Co Inc. 260.71 9181 A. P. Green Refractories Inc . 113.73 9182 City of Huntington Beach Water Dept . 4.50 9183 Fred A. Harper 31 .00 9184 Edward J. Houchins, Carpenter 572.00 9185 Howard Supply Co. 704.68 9186 1. B. M. 30.96 9187 Kelly Pipe Co. 28.78 9188 Signs by Kersh 314.60 -A- qk r i WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9189 Kirkwood Imports $ 9.63 9190 Kleen Line Corp. 79,29 9191 Knox Industrial Supplies 125.47 9192 L. B. W. S. Inc. 210.67 9193 Lewis Bros. 110.22 9194 Lietzau Pattern Co. 2,028.CO 9195 Jack Edward McKee, Sanitary Engineer 450.00 9196 R. M. Maddock Trucking 4.60 9197 Machinery Rental Co. 88,,00 9198 Mahaffey Machine Co. 134.25 9199 Metropolitan Supply Co. 46.89 9200 John Middleton 14.60 9201 E. B. Moritz Foundry 39 .00 9202 Munselle Supply Co., Inc. 173.97 9203 The National Cash Register Co. 19.08 9204 Lee M. Nelson 54.20 9205 City of Newport Beach 5.75 9206 Oakite Products Inc. 78.76 9207 Orange County Radiotelephone Serv. Inc. 217.1�0 920 Orange County Film Cleaning Serv. 91.31 9209 Orange County Stamp Co. 1.87 9210 Orco Steel & Supply Co. 39.42 9211 Pacific Telephone 169.45 9212 Roy Pendergraft 87.10 9k3 William T. Pinnix Sr. 33.90 9214 Postmaster, City of Santa Ana 200.00 9215 Ram Chemicals, Inc. 240.48 9216 The Register 6.00 9217 Reliable Delivery Service, Inc. 2.95 921 Reliable Sheet Metal Works 270.00 9219 James Requarth, Engine Service 146.69 9220 Reynolds Camera Supply 15.24 9221 Robbins & Myers, Inc. 25.29 9222 Howard Ryan Tire Service 95.41 9223 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 16.43 9224 Santa Ana Electric Motors 201.15 9225 Santa Ana Paint Co. Sato 9226 E. H. Sargent & Co. 28.43 9227 Russell M. Scott Sr. 91.40 922 Select Nurseries, Inc. 53.56 9229 The Sherwin Williams Co. 19.66 9230 Signal oil Co. 520.08 9231 Dorothy E. Smith, Drafting 402.75 9232 Smith Printers & Lithographers 53.56 9233 Southern California Edison Co. 4,146.25 9234 Southern California Water Co. 3.90 9235 Southern Counties Gas Co. 593.58 9236 Standard Oil Co. of California 862.44 9237 Steiner American Corp. 764.64 9238 John W. Sylvester 32.30 9239 Texas Water & Sewage Works Assn. 18.00 9240 Thermo,-Fax Sales Inc. 90.42 9241 C. 0. 'Thompson Petroleum Co , 980°9 9242 Norman R. Tremblay �5.53 7.209243 Turco Products Inc . 1 9244 Tustin Water Works 31. 5 9245 Union Sign Co. 6 2 9246 University Office Equipment 58.24 9924 Van Dien Young Co. 23.40 John R. Waples , Consultant 218.10 9249 Warren & Bailey Co. 19.73 WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9250 Water Works and Wastes Engineering $ 8.CC 9251 Waukesha Motor Co. 688.71 9252 Western Automation, Inc. 33.78 9253 Western Belting & Mechanicals, Inc . 67..90 9254 Western Salt Co. 21.b4 9255 John Claus, Bus Charter 57.00 9256 Fowler Equipment, Inc. 60.OJ TOTAL JOINT OPERATING $ _ 2 •--O,l x CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9257 Aladdin Litho & Art $ 111.E+9 925 Bart A. Ashby Co. 4.47 9259 Bird Machine Co. 8,570.20 9260 John Carollo Engineers 1,468.69 9261 Dunnell Construction Co., Inc. 617.13 9262 J. Putnam Henck 162,457.96 9263 J. Putnam Henck 6,574.43 9264 Kemper Const. Co. & W. W. Hoagland 45, 431.40 9265 R. W. McClellan & Sons 7,153.00 9266 Raymond G. Osborne Labs. 57.00 9267 Santa Ana Blue Print Co. 74.88 9268 Twining Laboratories 110.56 TOTAL CAPITAL OUTLAY REVOLVING FUND $ 232,631.21 TOTAL JOINT OPERATING & CORF $ 261,491.34 -C DISTRICT NO. 2 ACCUMULATED CAPITAL, OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF f AMOUNT 9269 Aladdin Litho & Art $ 485.68 9270 Bart A. Ashby 62.28 9271 J. Rj Lester Boyle & Sidney Lowry 5,605.86 9272 Enterprise Printing Co. 41.95 9273 The News and Independent 36.96 9274 Wallace Trade Bindery Co . 60 .00 9275 Yorba Linda County Water Dist . 10,000 .00 $ 16, 292.73 -D- i r DISTRICT NO. 7 OPERATING FUND WARRANTS WARRANT NO. IN FAVOR OF AMOUNT 9276 Boyle & Lowry $ 1,324.50 AD No. Survey Ins ection 3-A $36F.-50 $ - 6 00. 4 950.00 1,05 9277 Boyle & Lowry 80.00 9278 Billy Calvert & Flora H. Calvert 700.00 (AD No. 3-A Easement) 9279 Goode & Qoode 75.00 (AD No. 4 Easement Appraisal) 928o Paul J. Hogan 83.00 9281 William Kroeger 31.30 9282 The Tustin News 737.60 AD No. Amount 2 $4 2�".53 3-A 127.22 3-B 147.85 $ 5,031.4o ACCUMULATED CAPITAL OUTLAY FUND WARRANTS 9283 Aladdin Litho & Art $ 22.88 9284 Bart A. Ashby Inc. 54.91 9285 Wallace Trade Bindery Co. 37.17 $ 114.96 FACILITIES REVOLVING FUND WARRANTS 9286 County of Orange $ 5.00 $ 5,151.36 .r -E- RESOLUTION N0. 64-49-2 AWARDING CONTRACT NO. 2-10-2 (EUCLID TRUNK A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 21 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-2; AND AUTHORIZ- ING EXECUTION OF SAID CONTRACT The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 2, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the written recommendation this day submitted to the Board of Directors by the District' s engineers, and concurred in by the General Manager, that award of contract be made to BOSKO CONSTRUCTION, Contractor, for the EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-2; and the tabulation of bids and the proposal submitted for said work, are hereby received and ordered filed; and, Section 2. That said Contract No. 2-10-2 is hereby awarded to BOSKO CONSTRUCTION, Contractor, in the total amount of $232,256.00 in accordance with the terms of their bid and the prices contained therein, which bid is hereby determined to be the lowest and best bid therefor; and, Section 3. That the Chairman and the Secretary of the District are hereby authorized and directed to enter into and sign a contract with said Contractor for said work pursuant to the specifications and contract documents therefor, adopted by Resolution No. 64-34-2 on record in the office of the Secretary. Section 4. That all other bids received for said work are hereby rejected, and that all certified checks or cashierts checks submitted as bid bonds, be returned to the unsuccessful bidders. -F- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY P. 0. BOX 5175 - 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California CHANGE ORDER C. 0. NO. 1 JOB: EUCLID TRUNK SEWER - Contract No. 2-10-1 DATE: April 8, 1964 CONTRACTOR: Kordick & Son, Inc. Amount of this change order (m�(NMRX) None In accordance with contract provisions, the following changes in the contract and/or contract work are hereby authorized and as com- pensation therefor, the following additions to or deductions from the contract price are hereby approved. REFERENCE: Contractor's verbal proposal and Engineer's letter dated April 1, 1964 1. Substitute 2000 D strength reinforced concrete pipe throughout the project for 1400 D & 1500 D reinforced concrete pipe, including that portion of the project between Sta. 5+50 and Sta. 9+35 which is to be encased as originally specified. 2. Use Type V gravel bedding as shown on the Plans for 2000 D reinforced concrete pipe installation. 3. Trench excavation wider than originally specified will be permitted provided the contractor attempts to maintain a trapezoidal section. This permission is not to be construed to permit excavation in a haphazard or unworkman- like manner nor relieve the contractor of the responsibility for protecting all underground utilities, structures and sub- surface improvements as well as aboveground utilities, structures and surface improvements within the right-of-way and adjacent thereto as stipulated in the Specifications. Said permission for over-excavation in no way relieves the contractor from these responsibilities and the District will not be responsible for -any damage to the above enumerated improvements caused by said over-excavation. Original Contract Price 360,428.00 Prev. Authorized Changes None This Change (MI )(1 X) None Amended Contract Price $ 360,428.00 Board authorization date : Approved : CORMY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF April 8, 1964 ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR 41A BY s Lee M. Nelson General -114anager KORDICK & SON, INC. By -G- 1 The terms contained in the existing proposal of Raymond G. Osborne Laboratories: CONCRETE OR VITRIFIED CLAY PIPE ( ) Hydrostatic pressure, crushing strength ...,f "D" Load Test - Inspection & Witnessing Reg. Time Per hr. 9.50 Per day 68.00 Per wk. 1324.00 NO CHARGE FOR TRAVEL TIME OR MILEAGE PREMIUMS - SUBSISTENCE & COMPENSABLE EXPENSES 1. NO CHARGE WILL BE MADE FOR THE TRAVEL TIME, MILEAGE OR MISCELLANEOUS EXPENSES OF ANY PERSONNEL WITHIN A 50-MILE RADIUS OF THE LOS ANGELES CITY HALL. 2. Subsistence will be charged in conjunction with services rendered outside a 50-mile radius at the rate of $15.00 per diem. 3. Overtime will be charged at the rate of time and one-half for all hours worked in excess of eight in any one day on jobs billed by the hour or day, and for all hours in excess of forty in any one week on jobs billed by the week or month. Time and one-half for Saturdays; double time for Sundays and holidays. 4. No minimum charge will be made except on items of inspection marked ( ) SEE ABOVE FOR DETAILS. -N- RESOLUTION N0. 64-50-7 APPROVING AGREEMENT WITH U. S. NAVY A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF A SEWAGE SERVICE CONTRACT WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain contract dated July 1, 1964, between The United States of America (Department of the Navy), and County Sanitation District No. 7, covering connection charges and rates for use of the District' s facilities for sewering the family housing project, Marine Corps Air Facility, Santa Ana, and the Armed Services Reserve Center located at said air facility, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That the Chairman of the District is hereby authorized and directed to execute said agreement on behalf of the District. r.d -I- RESOLUTION N0. 64-51-7 AUTHORIZING MODIFICATION ##8 TO REPORT A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AMENDING AND MODIFYING ENGINEER'S REPORT DATED NOVEMBER, 1961, AS AMENDED (Modifica- tion #8) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That Hoyle and Lowry, Consulting Engineers, have prepared a mod1ficati-on of tlae. ,Eagineer's Report dated - Iqovemher, 19610- and adopted mc► mmber` 22#. 196L and .amended, to- prov_td.e.-for- alignmeat and extension of . the five ==sings of'the San D:Lega Freeway;. and, -Section 2.. That--the -Board of Directors of 4ounty Sancta-_, t1on District No. .7 -does hereby find and determine ..that the- _ pubai.c interest requires a modification -or -departure- from .the Plans: and specifications. as contained in the Engineer's Report .'.' dated-.November, 1961, as amended♦ in the manner set Forth. on - the attached sheet which is hereby mode a. part of this resolution, all in accordance with Section 4758 of the Health and Safety Code of-the State of California. -3_ MODIFICATION N0. 8 Engineer' s Report For County Sanitation District No. 7 Dated November, 1961, and amended, (as adopted by Resolution No. 64-51-7 on 4-8-64) SECTION II - WORK TO BE DONE Item 41 on page 19, is hereby modified to read as follows: 41. Construction of five crossings of the proposed San Diego Freeway, said crossings extending north of Section I of the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer to provide service for the area northerly of the freeway and to be constructed at Stations 81+78, 125+06, 152+94, 178+90 and 199+45, as shown on the plans for Section I of the Gisler-Red Hill Trunk Sewer, and consisting of approximately 1320 feet of 15-inch pipe, 1070 feet of 12-inch pipe and 250 feet of 8-inch pipe. SECTION IV - RIGHTS OF WAY TO BE ACQUIRED Add Section 13, as follows : 13. SAN DIEGO FREEWAY CROSSINGS: Strips of land 20 feet in width, lying 10 feet on each side of the crossings, at Stations 81+78, 152+94, 178+90 and 199+45, except as such crossing construction is within the Freeway right of way. J--2 RESOLUTION NO. 64-52-7 ACCEPTING GRANT OF EASEMENT ..' A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 73 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT FROM BILLY CALVERT AND FLORA H. CALVERT, AND AUTHORIZING PAYMENT THEREFOR (7-3A-3b) The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the certain Grant of Permanent Easement wherein BILLY CALVERT AND FLORA H. CALVERT, husband and wife, grant to County Sanitation District No. 7 an easement for sewer purposes in connection with construction in ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 3-A, is hereby approved and accepted; and Section 2. That the Secretary of the District is hereby authorized and directed to record said Grant of Easement in the Official Records of Orange County; and, Section 3. That the Auditor of the District is hereby authorized and directed to pay to Billy Calvert and Flora H. Calvert, husband and wife, 13111 Fairmont Way, Santa Ana, the sum of $700. 00 from the Operating Fund of the District, as payment for said easement . -K- RESOLUTION N0. 64-55-7 APPROVING PIPELINE LICENSE WITH ATCHISON, TOPEKA A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7, OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE AND EXECUTION OF A PIPELINE LICENSE WITH THE ATCHISON, TOPEKA & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY RE: ASSESSMENT DISTRICT #4 The Board of Directors of County Sanitation District No. 7, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Chairman and the Secretary of County Sanitation District No. 7 be authorized and directed to accept and sign that certain Pipe Line License from the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company dated December 4, 1963, identified by Engineer' s Drawing No. L-3-26185, required in connection with construction in Assessment District #4 (Condemna- tion #118569), and Section 2. That the Secretary be authorized to forward said License in duplicate to the Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company for execution and return; and, Section 3. That said License be accepted and approved by the District upon the filing of a duly executed copy thereof in the office of the Secretary; and, Section 4. That the motion adopted December 11, 19633 authorizing acceptance of Pipe Line License, is hereby rescinded and made of no further effect. -L- MANAGER'S AGENDA REPORT County Sanitation Districts 1104 West Eighth Street of Orange County, California Santa Ana, Calif., 92701 Phone 542-3583 JOINT BOARDS April 3, 1964 REGULAR MEETING Wednesday, April 8, 1964 8:00 p.m. Attached for the Directors' information are three items of interest: 1. A statement prepared by the Director of Finance showing recent investment income of the various Districts and the amounts of cash on hand and invested for each District. 2. A reprint of an article appearing in the January, 1964 issue of the JOURNAL of the Water Pollution Control Federation entitled Marine Outfall Cleaning and written by our Superintendent of Operations, Mr. Galloway. It may be recalled that some time ago the Directors of the Boards directed the staff to proceed with cleaning our marine outfall and included the sum of $12,500 in the budget for equipment necessary for this cleaning. As can be seen from the article the equipment used was very simple - its total cost did not exceed $2,500. 3. A reprint of an article appearing in the February 14, 1964 issue of the Southwest Builder and Contractor entitled Sewer Facilities Kept Abreast of Growth. This article describes in a rather concise form the present construction activities at the Districts ' Joint Works. The following is an explanation of the more important non- routine items which appear on the enclosed formal agenda and which are not otherwise self-explanatory. Warrant registers are not attached to the agenda since they are made up immediately preceding the meeting, but will appear in a complete agenda available at the meeting. Joint Boards No. 15 - AUTHORIZATION FOR OCEAN OUTFALL DIFFUSER DESIGN: Cne of the next projects to be undertaken under our planned program of improvements to our treatment and disposal facilities is a structure to be placed at the end of the existing 7,000 foot 78-inch diameter marine outfall to increase diffusion of our effluent into the ocean water. This project was originally scheduled for the present fiscal year but was postponed because of higher priority work. We are now in a position to design and finance this project for the next fis- cal year and under the terms of our contract with our design engineers, Board authorization is necessary before design can officially begin. The diffuser will consist of, basically, a junction box joining two legs of new concrete pipe to the end of the existing pipe and thus extending it in a wye fashion. These wye legs will contain ports to reduce the volume of effluent reaching the surface at any one point (our existing outfall dis- charges the whole quantity of effluent at one point resulting in an obvious discoloration of the ocean and a potentially high concentra- tion of contaminants at that point) . Although a firm estimate has not been prepared of the total cost of the project, it will probably not exceed $400,000. No. 16 - ATTENDANCE OF DISTRICTS ' PERSONNEL AT CWPCA ANNUAL CON- FERENCE: This item is a recommended motion authorizing me to designate six Districts ' employees to attend the 36th annual conference of the California Water Pollution Control Association in Fresno on April 22 through 25. It has been customary in the past to authorize at least this number of employees to attend these meetings and they always have been of benefit to the Districts in acquainting our personnel with practices and procedures of other sewering agencies and new developments in the sewerage field. The Association is quite active, its annual meeting being attended by more than 800 municipal and District personnel and consfflting,2 engineers active in the field of sewage collection, treatment and disposal. It is the only meeting during the year which more than one of our personnel regularly attend. No. 17 - RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION FOR RETIRING DIRECTORS : We have been advised that four regular Directors are not candidates for Council seats in their respective Cities . They are Messrs. Coons, Gemmill, Lorenz and Reese. In order that these gentlemen may be honored at their last meeting of the Boards, we are suggesting that a resolution of commendation for their services be adopted at this time . District No. 2 No. 39 - AWARD OF CONTRACT NO. 2-10-2 (LOWER EUCLID TRUNK) : Bids for this project, as authorized at the last meeting, were taken Thursday afternoon, April 2. The low bidder is Bosko Construction at a total price of $232,256. Attached to the agenda is a bid -2- tabulation and recommended Resolution No. 64-49-2 awarding the job to this firm. This project consists of essentially one mile of 36-inch trunk sewer in Euclid Avenue between Warner and Edinger Avenues and its completion will satisfy. our existing agreement with the City of Fountain Valley, by which the lower Euclid Avenue Trunk reconstruction is being jointly financed. No. 40 - CHANGE ORDER NO. 1, CONTRACT NO. 2-10-1 : The contractor on this job, Kordiek & Son, Inc . , is concerned with attempting to hold to the restricted trench width called out in the plans and specifications and has proposed that these restrictions be relaxed if he puts in stronger pipe. Our design engineers have thoroughly studied this proposal and by means of a letter dated April 1, 1964 have approved the change. This change does not affect the dollar amount of the contract but since it is a significant departure from the original plans and specifications, Change Order No. 1 spelling out the new requirements has been prepared for Board consideration and is attached to the agenda. No. 41 - FACTORY PIPE INSPECTION ON CONTRACTS NOS. 2-10-1 AND 2-10-2: The Joint Boards have an existing agreement with the Raymond G. Osborne Testing Laboratories for factory pipe inspection on large diameter pipe being installed at the treatment works. It is our recommendation that this firm be also employed to inspect and test the pipe at the factory for the above two jobs, now under construction or soon to be. Rather than to negotiate a new agree- ment with the Osborne Company, the latter has agreed to extend the terms of the existing agreement to cover this work in District No. 2. The recommended motion appearing on the agenda authorizes this extension. No. 42 - PROPOSAL FOR PRELIMINARY ENGINEER' S REPORT ON FUTURE FACILITIES: At the regular meeting in March and at the special meeting on Saturday, April 4, the Directors were acquainted in a general way with our future problems of providing adequate sewer service in the District, particularly in the undeveloped areas in the northeast portion and the areas adjacent thereto which may ultimately annex to the District. At the April 4 meeting, a proposal from J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry to prepare and submit a preliminary report on these problems will be distributed. For the benefit of those members not able to attend the April 4 meeting, another copy of the proposal will be placed in the agenda folders of the Board members at the time of the April 8 meeting. If the proposal is satisfactory to the Directors, it is our recommen- dation that it be accepted and Boyle and Lowry directed to proceed with this preliminary survey and report. District No. 7 Nos . 46 through 51 - PUBLIC HEARINGS ON MODIFICATIONS OF WORK IN ASSESSMENT DISTRICTS 3A AND 3B: At the regular meeting in March, the Directors adopted resolutions of intention to make modifications -3- to the plans for improvements in these two districts. These agenda items relate to the formalities necessary for the public hearings on these modifications and final formal adoption of the modifications. No . 52 - AUTHORIZATION OF AGREEMENT WITH NAVY BUREAU OF YARDS AND DOCKS : The Navy Department has furnished us with a proposed agree- ment covering connection charges and quantity rates for use of the Districtts facilities. The service proposed is for the Family Housing Project, Marine Corps Air Facility, Santa Ana, and the Armed Services Reserve Center at the same general location. The terms spelled out are in accordance with our Ordinance No. 705 (Amended) setting up connection and use charges . The resolution, appearing on the agenda, authorizes the execution of this agreement with the Navy. No. 53 - MODIFICATION OF ENGINEER' S REPORT IN CONNECTION WITH CONTRACT 7-1E : Any construction work deviating from the precise plan adopted for a bond issue election requires a resolution of modification concurred in by a four-fifths vote of the Directors . Contract 7-1E, now out for bid ( see Item No. 56) , contains changes from the original bond plan consisting of an increase in pipe size from 12-inch to 15-inch and a shift in alignment caused by changes in the San Diego Freeway plan. No. 56 - ADJOURNMENT TO APRIL 15 : The hour of 7 :00 p.m. on April 15 has been advertised for receipt of bids on Contract 7-1E and, consequently, it will be necessary for the Board to adjourn to this time and date . This contract is, basically, for the lateral crossings of the San Diego Freeway soon to be under construction. It also includes a line on Flower Street, projected, for serving portions of the Costa Mesa Sanitary District and the City of Santa Ana westerly of the intersection of Main Street and Newport Boulevard as well as an additional force main for the College Avenue Pumping Station. The Flower Street Sub-Trunk is not under bond issue financing but will be paid for out of other District funds with the assistance of a loan from the Costa Mesa Sanitary District . Also at the April meeting, a public hearing on Assessment District No. 2 will be held at 7:30 p.m. Lee M. Nelson General Manager attachments -4- April 1, 1964 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS INVESTMENT INTEREST EARNED FROM U. S. TREASURY BILLS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF THE 1963/64 FISCAL YEAR AND A COMPARISON OF CASH ON HAND AND INVESTMENTS AS OF APRIL 1, 1964. Investment Earnings Cash on Hand Investments Total District 7-1-63 thru 3-31-64 (4-1-64) (4-1-64) (4-1-64) 1 $ 12,225.33 $ 19,364.92 $ 680,448.80 $ 699,813.72 2 41,866.51 69,795.90 1,943,812.41 2,013,6o8. 31 3 48,825.56 46,436.05 2,569,358.71 2,615,794.76 5 9,415.26 28,99o.69 443,302.50 472,293.19 6 5,075. 10 31,872.88 245,439. 38 277,312. 26 7 20,953.46 118,939.47 835,791.25 954,730.72 8 241.78 458.34 7,793.44 8,251.78 11 7,078.09 19,127.05 400,198.93 419,325.98 TOTALS $145,681.og $334,985.30 $7,126,145.42 $7,461,130.72 ''n%i7ght as part of the January 1964 Joumm. \V ATFR Poux,rioN CONTROL PMERATION Washington, D. C. '1u016 Printed in U.S. \ MARINE OUTFALL CLEANING Robert N. Galloway The outfall for the County Sanita- outfall at Los Angeles' Hyperion tion Districts of Orange County, Cali- plant. This job was done by an or- fornia, carries effluent from two pri- ganization that specializes in water mary treatment plants to a point some main cleaning, and since the pipe was 7000 ft (2,040 m) offshore from the 7 miles (11.3 km) long an ingenious mouth of the Santa Ana River into 60 device was used to locate the cleaning ft (18 m) of water in the Pacific tool, which was free in the line, in Ocean. The pipe is 78 in. (198 cm) in case it became stuck. diameter and the total length of the Unlike Hyperion's line the Dis- land and marine sections is 9,000 ft tricts' outfall cannot be taken out of (2,740 m). There are manholes at 500- service, and neither is it possible to ft (150-m) intervals on both sections. force a tight fitting cleaning tool The two sections were installed by through it with water pressure. So it different contractors and a steel bulk- was decided to use a tool which would head separated the two jobs. This create enough of a restriction in the bulkhead was later cut out by a diver line that the velocity of the fluid rush- using a torch. ing around it would scour the pipe. Also, since it is imperative that the The Problem outfall be in service continuously, au- Periodically pieces of greyish sub- other condition had to be met that the stance have been found along the tool must pull 9,000 ft (2,740 m) of beaches which are suspiciously like the cable of sufficient strength to either grease cake that forms in sewers. It pull the tool upstream or tear it to was reasoned that this material could pieces in case it became stuck. be collecting in the line, particularly in the manholes, then being discharged Tool Construction by some means, perhaps by sheer With the above conditions in mind weight or temperature changes. It the first device constructed was a disc was felt that a method should be de- made of plywood 1.5-in. (3.8-cm) thick, vised for cleaning the line in order to 72 in. (183 cm) in diameter, and with remove any grease or other matter a 20-in. (51-cm) hole in the center. which could have any effect on the This was calculated to give 10 to 15 beaches or the n factor of the pipe ft (3 to 5 m) of head loss with 100- and, of course, the time for cleaning mgd (379,000-cu m/day) flow and should coincide with favorable ocean have enough thrust to pull the 9,000 conditions so the debris would be car- ft (2„740 m) of :}-in. (1.3-cm) cable. ried out to sea. Also at this rate of flow a scouring There is very little .information oil velocity of about 16 fps (5 m/sec) the subject of marine outfall cleaning could be obtained. in the literature. Cleaning has been In order to handle the quantity of done on the 20-in. (51-cm) sludge cable required and to have the neces- Robert N. Galloway is Superintendent, sary power to redraw it in case of County Sanitation Districts of Orange trouble, a used oil field draw works County, Santa Ana, Calif. was purchased. It has a brake drum 80 83 JOURNAL wPCF January 1904 back to the boil, the cleaning tool was caused by the remnant of the steel already at the end of the pipe. Since bulkhead, the tire was in good enough it required an hour for him to reach shape to use again. the boil, he found no floatables any- Due to the construction of an ex- where in the area. tension to the outfall surge tower, There are four 1-ft (0.3-m) square where the cleaning device is started ports in the last joint of the pipe and into the outfall, there have beeen no it is assumed that when the tool further attempts to use it. reached the first of these ports the head of water was lost, thereby stop- Conclusion ping the tool. The measuring device Plans are to close part of the center on the cable confirmed that it was only hole to help create a better scouring a few feet from the end of the pipe. velocity around the outer edge, and As it would have been impossible for a run it through as soon as conditions diver to disconnect the tool without are favorable. Next time, a deter- pulling it out of the pipe, it had been mination of the it factor before and decided earlier to pull it back through. after is desired; also an observer at When it was retrieved, outside of a the boil is necessary to evaluate the few scratches which were probably efficiency of the method. t D � i _ rr IN FOUNTAIN VALLEY is the site of Orange County Sanitation Districts for employees use, engineering and accounting offices for the new headquarters. Constructed of redwood and brick the 8900 sq. 8 Districts, and a large board of directors meeting room. Gen- ft. structure is completely air-conditioned, has small cafeteria eral contractor on the structure was J. Ray Construction Co. Sewer facilities gr o b akept reast fowth KEEPING ABREAST of growth appears cilities is the dilemma which all com- many new communities as theyspring to be one of the major problems con- munity planners face in the expanding up in that area, without having excess fronting present day planners. Whether areas of Southern California. investment tied up in facilities for the to plan and construct for the ultimate One example of the need for such distant future but presently surplus. growth in fast growing communities and planning is the Sanitation Districts of Recently the headquarters of the dis- to have the overcapacity plants sitting Orange County. This group consisting of tricts was moved to a new building at partially idle, or to construct as the eight districts has so far, been able to Fountain Valley, which is also the"site demand arises and take the chance of keep their construction far enough ahead of the District's Sewage Treatment having population growth outstrip fa- to provide adequate facilities for the Plant No. 1, and the scene of.much•con- struction work as the District's expan= DIGESTER tank being built as part of J. Putnam Henck's $1,784,500 contract is 90 sion program moves forward. ft. in diameter and has 30 ft. walls. It is being formed with Economy steel forms and The newly constructed administra- tion have a post tensioned collar at the top. Water capacity of tank is 1.3 million gal. building was constructed under a $135,000 contract with J. Ray Construc- tion Co., Corona Del Mar, as the general contractor. The building is.an 8900-sq. <� 1 ft. structure built of brick and redwood. It houses the offices of the Districts' manager, Lee M. Nelson, and his staff of about 14 people who work in the billing and engineering departments. A large board of directors meeting room and a small cafeteria for the employees are all included in the modern office building. An air conditioning and purifi- cation plant is set up in a zonal system _ •: so that the air in any one of the zones ' can be controlled independently of the other areas. This building, is are all of the works built for the Districts, is de- - = signed for future expansion. i Another of the large contracts at Plant No. 1 is one for the construction of a ' '' secondary treatment plant. This con- tract for $1,784,569 is with J. Putnam Henck of San Bernardino, and calls for the construction of a primary sedimen- tation basin, 3 trickling filters, two sec- .. ondary clarifiers, a digester tank, and a recirculation pump station. PRIMARY Clarifier, also being constructed of the Orange County plant, will increase ' primary treatment capacity of the plant to 75 M.G.D. Total construction at the two plants amounts to about $211 million. Planned for next fiscal year is another $4 million in construction work. Nc ith the completion of the first phases will result in another source of revenue for the Districts, the sale of the purified - 4 water for reinjection in wells to aid in stemming salt water intrusion. } Also at Plant No. 1 the Districts have . ' a contract for $216,340 with Kemper Construction and W. W. Hoagland to fe. ... wt •'ors IG' construct a 140-ft. Prinrairy Clarifier. v �i f' �s• ,.p • ,.;, The new unit is set on 105 Raymond step-taper pile and will increase the primary treatment capacity of Plant No. 1 to 75 \I.G.D., which is approximately 70% of the Treatment Plant No. 2 ca- t* t pacity. Treatment Plant No. 2, which is kxated 4 miles southwest of Plant No. I at the mouth of the Santa Ana '+ River, has a primary treatment capacity - .r, - - of 110 M.G.D. wJ Contracts have been recently awarded "Z7 to increase the sludge handling facilities at Plant No. I and to provide gas stor- �x , �`` ' rr�, age facilities at both plants. The Sec- ' and Phase of the Sludge Handling Fa- cilities will include the installation of storage hoppers, conveyor system, a f "c sludge centrifuge, and a control build- ing. The Gas Storage Facilities will in - elude a 32-ft. diameter sphere at each plant. Another new development being in- stalled is a 1500-hp. sewer gas operated turbine generator to provide 1200 lay. •� .. �, of electricity for use at the plant. { In addition to Henck s project at plant No. 1, contracts underway at both plants amount to another $1 million. These t _ include expansion and improvement of existing facilities as well as landscaping r and paving of the grounds at the two plants. The high %\titer table in the area calls Waterbearing walls have a polvvinyl Besides all of this work, the 1964-65 for all structures to be designed for not chloride dumbbell type waterstop at budget, starting July 1, 1984, calls for only bearing but also for uplift. construction and contraction joints. an additional expenditure of about �4 All structures, except the trickling After the digester dome has been cast million on construction at the plants. filters now underway are all set on and cured the post-tension-collar is pre- Engineering for the Districts' is per- Raymond step-piles with the average stressed prior to removing the dome formed by John Carollo, Engineers, in cut-off length being 49 feet. A total of forms using the Prescon system. The Phoenix. 720 piles have been driven to support collar serves to prevent side movement On Henck's contract, Henry Howell the Digester, Pump Station, Secondary clue to the dome weight after the forms is project manager, H. Harry Hunt is Clarifiers and miscellaneous small struc- have been removed. This system has been project engineer for Carrollo and Nor- tures. successful in previous tanks to prevent man Tremblay is construction engineer The new digester tank under con- cracks in the dome and separation at for County Sanitation Districts of Or- struction as part of this project is 90 feet the dome and wall intersection thereby ange County. in diameter and has 30-ft. walls. it is providing a gas tight structure. Soule' Steel is supplying and placing being formed with Economy steel forms This work which is being clone under the reinforcing steel for the new strue- and will have a water capacity of 1.3 Phase I of the planned development is tures, and Allied Steel is supplying mis- million gallons. It is being formed of the first of five phases which will keep cellaneous steel. Bovee and Crail are reinforced concrete with a post-tension- the facilities ahead of the growth of the doing the piping work, Consolidated ing collar in the top two feet of the community. It will bring the total plant Rock Products is supplying the ready walls. The tank has no vertical joints. investment to about $16,000,000 and mix concrete. Rock for the trickling filters is from Triangle Rock Products Reprinted from Southwest Builder and Contractor issue of Feb. 14, 1964 and Stanco is doing the dewatering. Y 1 FILED I In the Office of the Secretary County Sanitation District No I APR 8 1964 FOR COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7: By MOVED: That Miller, Nisson, Kogler & Wenke, as attorneys for the District in Case No. 107680 of the Superior Court of Orange `�►` County, be authorized to dismiss said action with reference to defendants William L. Gorzeman and Gertrude J. GDrzeman and particularly with reference to Parcel 5-P, and that said attorneys be authorized to apply to the court for a determination of the value of the temporary use of said property. FURTHER MOVED: That C. Arthur Nisson be authorized to sign a war- rant demand on the Construction Fund of the District to pay such judgment when it is made. "April 2, 1964 "Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 Orange County, California 10844 Ellis Ave, Fountain Valley, Calif. "Gentlemen: "In accordance with a request of Mr. Lee M. Nelson, General Manager, we submit herewith a proposal for the prepara- tion of a preliminary Engineers' Report to determine the ultimate sewerage requirements for portions of your District lying north- erly of Anaheim-Olive Road, and including possible annexations to the District extending northerly and easterly to the County boundary line and southerly to the top of the slope draining to the Santa Ana River. "The study of the subject area would include the follow- ing items: "Establish the general location of major sewage facilities worthy of consideration for servicing the subject area, including possible sewage treatment plants . "Determine the general size and capacity of required facilities based upon anticipated land use and development. This study to be coordinated with existing studies by Anaheim, Brea, Placentia and the Yorba Linda County Water District. "Prepare estimates of costs of the proposed facilities. "Estimate the financial requirements for such a system and investigate various means of financing the proposed system. "Board of Directors County Sanitation District No. 2 4-2-64 Page 2. "Evaluate the position of District No. 2 with reference to the various organizational concepts that may be used to finance, construct and operate the required facilities, such as the formation of an Improvement District within District No. 2, or the establishment of special conditions of annexation to District No. 2. "The engineering fees for this report will be based on the following hourly rates: "Principal engineer - $20.00 Civil Engineer - 15.00 Draftsman - 9.00 Secretary - 5.00 3-Man Survey Party - current hourly rate Printing and binding of the completed report in the number of copies required - at cost. "It is anticipated that the total engineering fees for such report will not exceed $12,000.00. This preliminary report will furnish most of the basic data from which a final Engineers' Report could be prepared on all, or portions of work described, as determined by the Board of Directors. "It is anticipated that the report, as outlined above, will require six months to prepare, however, a verbal progress report would be made in three months, or at such other times as the Board directs, from which the Board could determine to curtail or expand the proposed report. "Respectfully submitted, J. R. Lester Boyle and Sidney L. Lowry Consulting Engineers /s/ Sidney L. Lowry SLL:m Sidney L. Lowry" April 1, 1964 ORANGE COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS INVESTMENT INTEREST EARNED FROM U. S. TREASTJR,' BILLS FOR THE FIRST NINE MONTHS OF THE 1963/64 FISCAL YEAR AND A COMPARISON OF CASH ON HAND AND INVESTMENTS AS OF APRIL 1, 1964. Investment Earnings Cash on Hand Investments Total District 7-1-63 thru 3-31-64 (4--1-6� ) (4-1-64) (4-1-64) 1 $ 12,225. 33 $ 19,364.92 $ 68o,448.8o $ 699,813.72 2 41,866.51 69,795 .90 1,943,812.41 2,013,6o8.31 3 48,825.56 46,436.05 2,569,358.71 2,615,794.76 5 9,415.26 28,99o. 69 443,302.50 472,293. 19 6 5,075. 10 31,872.88 245,439. 38 277,312.26 7 20,953.46 118,939.47 835,791.25 954,730.72 8 241.78 458.34 7,793. 44 8,251.78 11 7,078.09 19,127.05 400, 198.93 419,325.98 TOTALS $145,681.o9 $334,985.30 $7,126,145.42 $7,461, 130.72 l COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 2 MINUTES OF HEARING ON MODIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. 64-44-7 3 April 8, 1964 4 8:00 o'clock P. m. 5 It appearing that the hour of 8:00 o'clock p. m. ;dad arrived, the Secre- 6 tart' advised the Board of Directors that this was nowAhe time, date and place 3 7 for the public hearing called for by Resolution No. 64-44-7 of this Board, 8 adopted March 11, 1964, being a resolution proposing to change, modify and 9 amend the Plans, Resolution of Intention No. 63-177-7, and the work therein 10 provided for, for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtenant work in 11 "ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 3-AI' of this District. 12 The Secretary advised the Board of Directors that said Resolution No. 13 64-44-7 had been published on March 26, 1964, in The Tustin News, in accord- 14 ance with the order of the Board and that #1e affidavit of publication had been 15 received and was on file with the Secretary. 16 Upon inquiry by the Chairman,:'the Secretary advised the Board of 17 Directors that written objections had been filed with him or the Board 18 concerning the proposed changes, modifications and amendments. The Chair- 19 man then inquired if there were any.' ersons present who wished to object to r 20 the proposed changes, modification's and/or amendments. There were 21 such objections from persons present. { 22 The Board of Directors as further advised by the Secretary that the 23 Contractor, Ralph DeLeon Construction, Inc. , a corporation, had consented in 24 writing to the making of the sai changes, modifications and amendments des- 25 cribed in said Resolution No. 4-44-7 and that said written consent was on file t 1 26 in the office of the Secretary.! 1j 27 The Board of Directors then indicated that it was ready to act, where- r 28 upon the Secretary presented to the Boardfor its consideration a resolution to r 29 be numbered RESOLUTION'NO. and entitled as follows: 30 "A RESOLUTION;OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFOR- 31 NIA, CHANGIN MODIFYING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION O. 63-177-7 OF SAID DISTRICT AND THE 32 I PLANS HERET FORE APPROVED FOR AND PERTAINING TO LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL IN HARVEY f FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA -1- l 'ASSESSMENT DISTRICT NO. 3-A, WHICH S D PLANS ARE REFERRED TO AND INCORPORATED SAID RESO- LUTION OF INTENTION, AND TO MODIF THE WORK TO BE DONE AS DESCRIBED AND SHOWN OD(SAID PLANS AND 3 IN SAID RESOLUTION OF INTENTION. 'f +i. 4 5 It was thereupon moved by Director seconded 6 by Director that sai Resolution No. (�. ..` - ', be 7 adopted and the same was thereupon a pted by the following roll call vote: 8 AYES: Directors— ' 9 10 NOES: Director 11 ABSENT: Direct s r 12 13 14 i 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 i I 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL&HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR 1 i 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. ! f SANTA ANA,CALIFORNIA i COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 1 MINUTES OF HEARING ON MODIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. 64-45-7 2 � 3 Aoril 8, 1964 8�t 05 o'clock p. m. 4 C 5 It appearing that the hour of 8:05 o'clock p, m, had arrived, the Secre- 6 tart' advised the Board of Directors that this was now the 1 me, date and place 7 for the public hearing called for by Resolution No. 64-4517 of this Board, adopte 8 March 11, 1964, being a resolution proposing to change modify and amend the 9 Plans, Resolution of Intention No. 63-178-7, and the whrk therein provided for, 10 for the construction of sanitary sewers and appurtena4t work in "ASSESSMENT 11 DISTRICT NO. 3-B" of this District. 12 The Secretary advised the Board of Directors that said Resolution No. r 13 64-45-7 had been published on March 26.,, 1964, in ''he Tustin News, in accord- ,. 14 ance with the order of the Board and that the affidavit of publication had been re- 15 ceived and was on file with the Secretary. iz 3.6 Upon inquiry by the Chairman, the Secretary advised the Board of ,r 17 Directors that written objections had been filed with him or the Board r' 18 concerning the proposed changes, modifications and amendments. The Chair- Yr 19 man then inquired if there were any persons present who wished to object to the E 20 proposed changes, modifications and/or amendments. There were IF 21 such objections from persons present/aid f 22 The Board of Directors was er advised by the Secretary that the 23 contractor, John R. Davies & Son, In corporation, had consented in writing 24 to the making of the said changes, mations and amendments described in 25 said Resolution No. 64-45-7 and tha� written consent was on file in the 26 office of the Secretary- 27 The Board of Directors en indicated that it was ready to act, where- 28 upon the Secretary presented to a Board for its consideration a resolution to 29 be numbered RESOLUTION NO 6 and entitled as follows: 30 "A RESOLUTIO�OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS OF `�✓ COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. 7 OF ORANGE � 31 COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, CHANGING, MODIFYING AND AMENDING RESOLUTION OF INTENTION NO. 63-178-7 32 OF SAID DISTRICT AND THE PLANS HERETOFORE 1 APPROVEI)�FOR AND PERTAINING TO "ASSESSMENT LAW OFFICES OF DISTRICT ENO. 3-B, " WHICH SAID PLANS ARE REFERRED RIMEL&HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANAL CALIFORNIA -1- r s r 1 TO AND INCORPORATED IN S RESOLUTION OF INTENTION, AND MODIFYIN HE WORK TO BE 2 DONE AS DESCRIBED AND S . OWN ON SAID PLANS AND IN SAID RESOLUTION SF INTENTION. " 3 4 It was t reupon moved by /rector ,/ seconded 5 by Director .w. hat said Resolution No. be 6 adopted and the same was there pon adopted by the following roll call vote: 7 AYES: Direct s ' 8 - 9 NOES: Di ectors ` 10 ABSENT: PirectorsOlt 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 LAW OFFICES OF RIMEL&HARVEY FOURTH FLOOR +� 1010 NORTH MAIN ST. SANTA ANA.CALIFORNIA� -2- COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS OF ORANGE COUNTY 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Telephone 847-2511 �d April 2, 1964 TO: MEMBERS OF THE BOARDS OF DIRECTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICTS NOS. 1, 2, 3, L 6, 7s 8 AND 11 Gentlemen: The next regular meeting of the Boards of Directors of County Sanitation Districts Nos. 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8 and 11, of Orange County, California, will be held : Wednesday evening, April 8, 1964 at 8:00 p.m. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, California Secretary FAH:rw Tentative adjournment dates in April: Dist. #7 Wednesday, April 15th at 7:00 p.m. Dist. N Monday, April 20th at 4:00 p.m. Est. $209,280.00 B I D T A B U L A T I O N S H E E T Date April 2. 1964 Contract For: EUCLID TRUNK SEWER, COPITRACT NO. 2-10-2 CONTRACTOR TOTAL BID 1. Bosko Construction $ 232, 256.00 8520 Fishman Road P Pico Rivera, Calif. 2. Orange County Pipeline 238,902.00 Santa Ana, Calif. 3. The Gallacher Co. 239,595.58 P. O. Box 813 Costa Mesa, Calif.. 4. Gantry Construction Co. , Inc. 2522844.00 13384 Foothill Blvd. Sylmar, Calif. 5 . Charles L. Burch & Sons, Inc. 272,369.00 2419 N. Chico Ave. E1 Monte, Calif. 6. Hydro Construction Co. 276,656.84 Santa Fe Springs, Calif. 7. Kordick & Son, Inc. 279,093.00 914 S. Shamrock Monrovia, Calif. 8. Wal-Con Construction Co. 279,635.00 14044 Ventura Blvd. Sherman Oaks, Calif. 9. Vukojevich & Kordich 2873212.10 6124 Ferguson Drive Los Angeles, Calif. 10. George Miller Constr. Co. 2913539. 50 3032 Bandini Blvd. Los Angeles, Calif. Item #25 - Other business and communications RESOLUTION NO. 64-56-3 AUTHORIZING ACCEPTANCE OF ABAND02 FACILITY \ftP, A RESOLUTION OF THE BOARD OF DI CTORS OF COUNTY SANITATION DISTRICT NO. , OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, AUTHORIZIN ACCEPTANCE OF GRANT OF EASEMENT AND CONVE ANCE OF ABANDONED SEWER FACILITIES FR MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT The Board of Directors of Count Sanitation District No. 3, of Orange County, California, DOES HEREBY RESOLVE, DETERMINE AND ORDER: Section 1. That the Grant of asement and Transfer of Sewer Facilities, dated April 2, 1 4, wherein the MIDWAY CITY SANITARY DISTRICT grants and conv ys to County Sanitation District No. 3, a sewer easement, togeth with an abandoned pump station and all other sewer facilities located within said easement area, at no cost to said District o. 3, is hereby approved and accepted; and, Section 2. That he Secretary be directed to record said Grant of Easement a Transfer of Sewer Facilities in the Official Records of Orang County. r � DRAFT 4-13-64 #12 Report of the Joint Chairman -- The Joint Chairma " as a Director on the Orange County Water District Boar , secured copys of the report entitled, "Prelim ary Review of Sea Water Barrier Program, Orange County C astline" by Paul Hennessy and John Toups, fay the--Direct s. This report contains recommendations for the con ruction of a pilot plant for the purpose of conditioning th Districts' secondary treated waste water,'for injectio into the underground am aeg to establish a sea water trusion barrier. The Joint Chairman also reviewed for the Directors the tour of the northerly portion of /the District, taken by the Board of District 2� and the staff a/nd engineers on April 4th, for the purpose of s-trrveyi'ng, first-4and, w=e pratIMR*- which are rapidly developing in the northevly portion of the District. #15 Following a - pertaining to her I an Ocean Outfall Diffu I er, as proposed in the Engineers Report dated September, 1962, Iit was moved; seconded and duly carried: That the General Ma�ager be authorized to notify John Carollo, engineers, to proceed r�rith the design of the Ocean Outfall Diffuser I as described in said engineers report. I Following the read' ng by the Secretary of a communication dated April 7th from Lowry nd Associates, engineers for the District, I relative to the Goldenwest Street Pumping Cation, recommending the purchase xf and installation of a ew pump for the station, it was moved, seconded duly carried: That the letter be received d filed, and that the recommendation of the engin ers be accepted and approved, and that the Magg e directed and authorized to purchase and install the nece ` ary equipment. C #52 Following a disc ssion relative to the connection charges proposed to be paid y the Navy Department for tkie 4eus- Zg L-- d elo a me ery ces a er `-Cent -resent_I-ySant ---- - 'may, Ca7�=ia, it was m ved, seconded and duly carriedt exe--_--_ -aK agre ent with the Navy Department A covering connection charges an rates for use of the Districts facilities for sewering the famil housing project, Marine Corps Air Facility, Santa Ana, and the Arm d Services Reserve Center located at the facility, be referr d to the General Counsel for a review and report on April 15th R 0 L L C A L L District Regular Adjourned Date �' C� Time ,m , Item ,l.d DISTRICT 1 Hall � u and Doney � Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein DINT BOARDS DISTRICT 2 Parks ✓ eynolds C rnwell Herbst Callens Kanno Be 1 Pool Schutte Bo man —` Crenshaw Cornwell Herbst Cal ens Kanno Culver --7 Coo Hart Hall Hubbard Coon Schutte Hock _�/ Michel Culve Shull ✓ Ward Doney Humeston Reese �� Newton Dunham Workman Craft Furman DeVries Phillips Hirstein Gemmill Leonard Hall Hubbard DISTRICT 3 Hock Michel Cornwell / Herbst Kanno Callens Bell ��✓ Pool Lambert Welch Bousman _J� Crenshaw Lorenz � Schutte McBratney McCarthy Culver Meyers Dunham ✓ Parks Reynolds Furman DeVries Reese Newton Gemmill Leonard Shull Ward Hall Hubbard Stewart -Alow �.. Callens Stoddard art Lambert _�. Welch Workman aft McBratney Z-- McCarthy Wright V n Dyke Reese ✓ Newton Phillips Hi stein Shull Ward Wright ✓ Van Dyke Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 5 Stoddard / _ art Lorenz OTHERS: �� -�``` �``� Phillips a-r Hirstein Nelson ✓ '®� DISTRICT 6 Brown �_ I ��a,,.:t�. -��`�� Meyers Nisson Stoddard �T Galloway �" Phillips = Hirstein Dunn cc-Q Tremblay DISTRICT Boettner (� Doney Humeston Yaberg Cook C' Hart Lowry Hall �Z Hubbard Billings Meyers �- Parks � Reynolds Phillips 0.- Hirstein DISTRICT 8 f DISTRICT 11 Scott Stewart Martin Lambert Welch Phillips _ Hirstein Phillips ,.. ... Hirstein R 0 L L C A L L District Regular Adjourne Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 1 �✓ Hall u and Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips _...�_ Hirstein JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 2 Parks eynolds Cornwell Herbst Callens Kanno Bell Pool Coons Schutte Bousman Crenshaw Cornwell Herbst Callens Kanno Culver Cook _ Hart Hall Hubbard CQQO& Schutte Hock Michel Culver Shull Ward Doney Humeston Reese Newton Dunham ✓ Workman Craft Furman _y/ DeVries Phillips Hirstein Gemmill ✓ Leonard Hall Hubbard DISTRICT 3 Hock �� Michel Cornwell Herbst #ire !� Callens Bell Pool Lambert Welch Bousman Crenshaw Lorenz Coons Schutte McBratney McCarthy Culver Meyers Dunham Parks ✓ Reynolds Furman DeVries Reese ✓ Newton Gemmill Leonard Shull Ward Hall Hubbard Stewart _�. Kanno Callens Stoddard Hart Lambert Welch Workman Craft McBratney McCarthy Wright y/ Van Dyke Reese Newton Phillips Hirstein Shull Ward Wright Van Dyke Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 5 Stoddard art a�✓ J Lorenz OTHERS: L� Ley Phillips Hirstein Nelson ' DISTRICT 6 Brown Meyers Nisson Stoddard Galloway �1 Phillips Hirstein Dunn Tremblay "� DISTRICT 7 Boettner �� Doney ✓ Humeston Yaberg Cook Hart �..1 Lowry Hall Hubbard Billings Meyers Parks ✓ Reynolds Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Scott Stewart Martin Lambert Welch Phillips Hirstein Phillips Hirstein R 0 L L C A L L District Regular Adjourned Date Time Item DISTRICT 1 Hall ` Hu"Fbard Doney Humeston Meyers Phillips Hirstein JOINT BOARDS DISTRICT 2 Parks eynolds Cornwell Herbst Callens Kanno Bell Pool Coons Schutte Housman Crenshaw Cornwell Herbst Callens Kanno Culver Cook Hart Hall Hubbard Coons Schutte Hock Michel Culver Shull Ward Doney Humeston Reese Newton Dunham Workman Craft Furman DeVries Phillips Hirstein Gemmill Leonard Hall Hubbard DISTRICT 3 Hock Michel Cornwell Herbst Kanno Callens Bell Pool Lambert Welch Bousman Crenshaw Lorenz Coons Schutte McBratney McCarthy Culver Meyers Dunham Parks Reynolds Furman DeVries Reese Newton Gemmill Leonard Shull Ward Hall Hubbard Stewart Kanno A Callens Stoddard Hart Lambert Welch Workman Craft McBratney McCarthy Wright Van Dyke Reese Newton Phillips Hirstein Shull Ward Wright Van Dyke Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 5 Stoddard Hart Lorenz OTHERS: Phillips Hirstein Nelson DISTRICT 6 Brown Meyers Nisson Stoddard Galloway Phillips Hirstein Dunn Tremblay �1 DISTRICT Boettner Doney Humeston Yaberg Cook Hart �..r Lowry � Hall Hubbard Billings Meyers ✓ Parks Reynolds Phillips Hirstein DISTRICT 8 DISTRICT 11 Scott Stewart Martin Lambert Welch Phillips Hirstein Phillips Hirstein April 2, 1964 RECORD OF MEETING OF COMMITTEE ON RECONSTRUCTION OF THE EUCLID TRUNK SMIER Thursday, April 2, 1964 - 4:00 p.m. s -r c s ce PRESENT: Directors Parks (Chairman), Cornwell, and Callens ABSENT: NONE OTHERS: Lee M. Nelson, Paul G. Brown, Conrad Hohener, and Fred A. Harper, Secretary A meeting of the Special Committee on Reconstruction of the Euclid Trunk Sewer was held in the Districtst offices at the above hour and date for the purpose of opening bids received for construction of a portion of the Euclid Trunk Sewer (Contract 2-10-2 ), as previously authorized by the Board of Directors of District No. 2. Bid Opening -- Follov.ing a motion by Director Parks, seconded an unan ously carried, the 10 bids received for con- struction of Contract 2-10-2 were publicly opened and read. Referral of Bids - The bids were referred to the General Manager and the engineers for tabulation and recommendation, by motion, duly seconded, and unanimously carried. Adjournment - The meeting was adjourned at 4113 P.M. Fred A. Harper Secretary /jb t J Meeting SPECIAL COMMITTEE ON EUCLID TRUNK APRIL 2 1964 at 4100 PoM. 10844 Ellis Avenue Fountain Valley, Calif. (1 ) Roll Call (2 ) Appointment of Chairman pro tem, if necessary (3 ) Report of the General Manager (4 ) Consideration of motion res Directing the Secretary to open sealed bids received for the Euclid Trunk Sewer, Contract No. 2-10-2 (5 ) Consideration of motion re: Referring bids opened for Euclid Trunk S=wer, Contract No . 2-10-2, to the engineers and General Manager for tabulation and recommendation (6 ) Other business and communications, if any (7 ) Consideration of motion re= AdJournment